WEBVTT - Post-Presidents Cup Mailbag

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I miss the green.

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 2>For example, I'm already upset. When I find my ball

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 2>in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 3>And when I find my ball in a frid Egg,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg, Friday Frida Egg, Frida Egg,

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Bride Egg.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Lie, I'm about ready to run off of the course.

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Friday Egg Podcast. Today we have another mailbag episode with

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Nathan Draws and Face.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 2>Kyle welcomes up.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Andy.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks, excited to do it again.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, man, I talked to you yesterday. You said your

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>your grinding on your game for a member guest.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 3>It is a sad state of affairs.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 4>I wish I was grinding for the mid Am this weekend,

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 4>but unfortunately I didn't try to qualify it and hurt

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 4>all year. It's just kind of been a wasted year.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>But trying to grind for member guest is.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 4>A new low in my golf career and I just

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 4>have to accept that what are you doing to get ready?

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 2>How do you prepare for remember guests? I think that

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 2>people want to know.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, you have to go to the ATM and get

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 4>some cash, that's usually really good at member guests, and

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 4>that's about it. Unfortunately, since I haven't played very much

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 4>just somewmer, my handicap is still in the range where

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 4>I actually have to try to play decent or I'll

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 4>let my partner down. And it's actually down in Houston

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 4>with my buddy John Hunter and at Carlton Woods, which

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 4>is a very difficult course. So I could shoot in

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 4>the eighties there in a hurry if I'm not careful.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 4>So that's really what my preventative defense is about.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, the people.

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Are coming at golfers like you this week, you know,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of questions of regarding amateur status and the many

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>tour players former many tour players playing midim events now,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>so let's get you know, let's get right into it.

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I got two of them right off the bat. Thoughts

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on amateur status rules and former pros competing with lifetime

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ams in state and USGA events from Andy Roderick.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, obviously it's not ideal. I you know, myself,

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm a reinstated AM and I think I probably have,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, ten thousand dollars in career earning, so I

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 4>don't think maybe if that you know that might it's

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 4>not really geared toward me, and I get where a

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 4>lot of guys come from.

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>You get some bigger names.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I know Es Daily.

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.679
<v Speaker 3>Played well in the MIDAM a couple of years ago.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 4>And from what I understand, it's like thirty five forty

0:02:56.040 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 4>percent of the field, and the Midam is often reinstated.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Former professionals.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 4>So the question would be how to combat that, And

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's hard to do money.

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 3>That's it's money is.

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 4>The only logical thing to me that makes sense. But

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to do that because in the but you know,

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 4>pre Tiger, the persons were fairly low. So you know,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 4>if a guy's playing the Nike Tour, say and made

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, he could have been playing for three years

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 4>and made forty grand, which is a lot different than

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 4>a guy playing six tour events and making eighty.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 4>So it's just it's hard to put money into the

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 4>equation because the persons have gone up so dramatically.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>What if they did, like a cut of made cuts

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>on nationwide PGA tour.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 3>See that that would be something that's a good idea.

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 4>I would be all for that because I think that

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 4>you know a guy that at twenty two, goes and

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 4>plays the Mini Tours for a couple of years, and

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, then he's working for eleven years. I mean

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 4>that's that's an amateur really, and I think they should

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 4>be able to get their status back. But I agree,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 4>if someone makes eighteen cuts on the Nationwide Tour, should

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 4>they be allowed to get their amateur status back?

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean maybe, I think they know.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 4>I think they should, but there should be some restriction

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 4>in some events. Whether it's the US Mid Am or not,

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, but there should be some restriction because

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 4>otherwise it just gets out of hand. Because I mean,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 4>could Tiger get his amateur status back if he wanted?

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean technically, yeah, right.

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I think So that's the problem is, like you look

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>at the reps if you I mean, like Jess Daly's

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a great example. I mean he played professional golf on

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour, the then Nationwide Tour. I mean it

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>was what ten years, twelve years? Yeah, he played for

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>a long time, like me sitting in a desk chair

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:57.239
<v Speaker 1>for ten years versus him playing on Web and PGA

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Tour events for ten years. Like the reps, the PRAC

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>does the you know, I sound like Tiger with reps,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>but like that that stuff, like it's not we aren't

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the same, Like Mike. Mike Muir is another good example, right,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's he made it over. I think he

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>made over a million dollars on the PGA Tour in

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>his career and he put he plays midam stuff. I

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it just to me, there's got to be some

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of dividing line.

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing for a twenty two year old that

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>goes and tries and you know, might play a couple

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of seasons on the Canadian Tour and make you know,

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand dollars in their career and come back like that,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing.

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>But for guys that you know have made.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 1>You know a great deal of money on the on

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour to the point where like you know,

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you're you're getting your amateur stats back. But your job

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is hardly going to be that of a kid that

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know works for you know. I think one of

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the toughest things with Midham golf is like early in

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>your Midham careers, learning.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 2>Like you're a low level employee, you know, Right, That's.

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 3>The one thing a lot of people take for granted.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 3>I feel like there's a lot of guys.

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, they they get their status back, and we've

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 4>seen it in Illinois with some of the players, and

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 4>they automatically think they're gonna win every mid am or

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 4>am tournament they play, and it's not the case because

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to balance golf and work. It's I mean,

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 4>it's really hard, especially when you're starting a career like you.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Said, yeah, but when you've made a million dollars on

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the on the PGA tour, like.

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 2>You're not starting your career right right.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You're very You're probably doing quite well, and you you know,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you've you've met people in your career that can obviously

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>put you in a position where you're not, you know,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>grinding for for paychecks.

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 4>But I like the cuts made. That seems, you know,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 4>of all the options, that seems the best one.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, you know, we gotta get we gotta get

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you out of out of mid am events.

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>That's that's the goal. Had all the all the former

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>pros out, you know, I'd have it. I'd have a

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>fighting chance.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Here's a mid am question.

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 4>This is from Mike Wallace. He says, Okay, you're fred Ridley.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 4>You decide to give Jeff Knox an invite to the

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 4>next five Masters. He obviously plays as an am. He

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 4>plays from the same tease as the pros. How many

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 4>cuts does he make? How many times does he win

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 4>low am? How many top tens does he contend in?

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>All five? Does he win one?

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think, uh, I think Jeff Knox is like

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the most overblown story in golf. It's like just overhyped.

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>But he's really good. He's a really good midam. But

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is he as good as like say Stuart Hagastad or

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Scott Harvey, Like, No, he happens to play Augusta's his

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>home course, so that's a big advantage.

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 2>I honestly think he would make one cut out of

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 2>five I have.

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly what I think.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 4>To one cut, maybe two, But I mean at the

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 4>absolute maximum, I'd say makes two cuts and maybe wins

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 4>low am one time.

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, zero top tens doesn't contend?

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think he shoots a lot of like

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>seventy six.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Is I'm in agreement.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 4>It's much easier to play when you can just pick

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 4>your ball up, you know, once you're out of the hole.

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Very his you know, beating.

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>He also always plays with like the guy that just

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>shot like eighty on Saturday.

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Right is trying to get the hell out of there.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>So like that's the other thing. It's like, oh he

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 2>beat this guy, but like that guy didn't really care, Like.

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 3>They don't Birdy two and three. It's get me out

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>of here.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm in last place right now. So all right, let's see.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot of questions. So do you have

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>any good putting games that you like to play? And

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this is from Scott du Dick. He's got this game wide,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not going to explain everything involved in it.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll explain it. If you don't have any good putting games.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 3>What I do have is the card game. Have you

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 3>played the card game?

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I have not played the card game.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of fun. So, you know, if you have

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 4>a foursome. Sometimes it works better if you have a

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 4>couple of foursomes. But you know, say everybody puts twenty

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 4>dollars into the pot, and then and then after the round,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 4>you start with five cards, you know, out of a deck,

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 4>and every time you get a one putt throughout the day,

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 4>you get an extra card. Every time you three putt,

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 4>you put you know, say five dollars in the pot

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 4>and you subtract a card. So it's it's a little

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 4>finicky because you know if you're on the fringe and

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 4>you you know, that's a one putt if you just

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 4>get it up and down whatever, But you know, you

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 4>wind up some guy. You know, it's not it's not

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 4>skill based really, but you know, some guys will have

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 4>nine cards and they'll have you know, four of a kind.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Some guys will have four cards and they have no

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 4>chance to win. It's just kind of a nic, a

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 4>little side thing to do.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>You could end up with like a ton of card huh.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah, totally, and someone else is pumping the pot

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 3>for you too.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think about fringe and putting. I

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like it should count as putts.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>It should.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 4>I honestly usually do count it as putts. When I

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 4>think about my round and I say, you know, if

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 4>I put three putts from the fringe or get down

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 4>in three from the fringe, I always I just to myself,

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm thinking that's a three putt.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like if it's up against the collar and you

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>use putter, like I feel like that's a pass.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 2>It's more of a chip then. But if you're like,

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 2>if you're like a foot on the fringe, like that's

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>a pot.

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 3>I use my discretion.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean sometimes I'll get the chili dips go on

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>and I'll put from nine yards off the green.

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't count that as a putt.

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 2>But what uh do you do?

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>You always pull the pin when you when you've got

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the h when you're on the fringe.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Uh, yeah, I usually do, I mean almost always.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 4>I know they say, you know, there's no real research.

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 4>I guess Pell said, right, but if you're downhill, if anything,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 4>if you're down, he'll leave it in. Up he'll take

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 4>it out. I almost always just take it out.

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>My philosophy is like I make all my putts with

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a pin out, So why would I keep the pin

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in and like visually and psychologically have.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 2>A pin in there? Right? Yeah? All right?

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>With the youth movement on the PGA tour, This from

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Vitt, friend of the Witch.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 2>Should the President's.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Cup team reserve two spots for thirty five plus year

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>olds mid am or mid pros.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 3>The old mid pro. Yeah, it's not a bad idea.

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 4>We had some other questions about the President's Cup, and

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 4>I know we talked, we didn't. We didn't spend too

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 4>much time watching it. I really, in my whole life,

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure I've spent much time watching it.

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't really appeal to me.

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 4>It hasn't been competitive, you know, for what, you know,

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 4>whatever that reason may be, whether the internationals, you know,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 4>they have their little two somes and three somes of

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, countrymen, but other than that, they have no

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 4>greater you know, patriotism like we do, pull themselves together,

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 4>and obviously for something like that, motivation is important. But

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think they could make it a lot

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 4>more fun by making it co ed if you had

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, six and six or even eight, eight tour

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 4>guys and four women. You know, I don't watch much

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 4>women's golf, but I would be interested in watching that

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 4>way more than the current state. And plus it would

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 4>be a lot more competitive because I think the international

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 4>women would have the advantage over the American women. And

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 4>there's some contrived co ed events, you know, like the

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Templeton shootout and all that. But to me, that would

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 4>be I would watch that in a heartbeat, and I

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 4>currently don't watch it, so to me it would be appealing.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they need I think that.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Originally, the idea of like making Ryder Cup points two

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was a great one, but the execution and like the

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>results thus far have been pretty lackluster.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>So shake up something right, right, all right?

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>I want to get to our first overrated underrated.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah we got you got tons of them.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Joe Mayberry overrated underrated Opening and closing on opening or

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 4>closing around on a part three, So.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say opening overright. I hate it. Yeah, it

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>hitting like especially if.

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 2>It's a long iron, like so brutal.

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I had a Usam qualifier like last year, and I

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>was playing really good golf, but I I went into

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>it and I had to hit like a three iron

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to like a small green on the tenth hole, and

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>that was it was just the worst way to start

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>my round. I hit a bad shot and just got

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>off flustered.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I was like behind a tree.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm out on opening par threes and I just

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>like broke my cardinal rule of like using a personal.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Experience in a tournament. But closing part three is I

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>actually kind of like them.

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.599
<v Speaker 1>I think they're cool, especially if if it's got a

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's got a tough green like Glen Floor Country club.

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 3>That that green is jacked. That's a good hole.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like it's hard to make a it.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good test of golf because you know,

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>with today's day and age, like it's very rare for

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>people to hit mid.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>And long irons in the game.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I don't mind the closing part three because

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's like the final test, like, hey, you

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>got to hit you gotta hit a really good golf

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>shot here with a mid iron, and then you got

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in the right spot to make a putt,

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like if you make a birdie, you really earn earn

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it on.

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>You know. Part three's generally.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't I don't really prefer either. Opening is difficult,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 4>you know. I feel like whenever you're playing in a

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 4>shotgun event and you see your first hole as a

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 4>four iron, you're like, oh God, what a brutal break.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 4>And closing, I don't know, I think, you know, East

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Lake Greenbrier, there's some some out there on tour. I

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 4>think Congressional did the right thing by switching the finish.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, eighteen is kind of a whatever Part three,

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 4>and you know, now it's an awesome Part four, So

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm out on both.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 2>John Hunter, your partner, You've got a question for you.

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 2>What point should I go pro?

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>When my handicap finally gets to the zero or after

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I win my club championship.

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 4>I think you wait till after the club championship. You know,

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 4>once you can consistently beat two and three handicaps under pressure,

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 4>I think the game is sharp enough to turn pro.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 4>So as soon, maybe the Monday after the club championship,

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 4>you go out that night and have a good time

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 4>and start your next page as a professional. The next Monday, I.

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Have a press conference.

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure, at least a periscope is.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 2>A Friday will start to televised though.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 4>All right, Cody friend of the pod, Cody Sunberg wants

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 4>to know what is the average tour players handicap?

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you think plus six plus seven?

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I think about when I play with like Vince India

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>who's on the web, or like T. K. Kelly or

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Zach Blair, like the times I've played with him, and

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I need like five shots to make it competitive and

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times I still lose. Like so I

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>would say, like I play around like plus one plus

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>two when I'm playing good golf, and.

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I would say at least plus seven. What do you think,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>like A.

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like that.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean I think that's pretty pretty spot on six

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 4>to eight plus six to eight. Do you remember I'm

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 4>sure you know someone you guys can google this, but

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 4>there was someone wrote an article excuse me, on Tiger

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Woods's two thousand and one season if you just you

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 4>know the rounds he played.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Basically he equated like a plus eleven I think it

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 3>was or something that year. It was just insane golf.

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That's That's the other tough thing is like, you know,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you measure like because we have like the

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>slope and rating stuff is so crazy because like you can't.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't measure wind, It doesn't measure conditions like like

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I think about it like tournaments all the time, Like

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>what's a PGA Tour set up?

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Or like a US Open shooting sixty three in the

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 2>US Open? Right? I mean, is that is that? Like

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 2>what's the slope and rating of that event?

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 2>Is that like a plus twenty differential? Right?

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 3>I I agree.

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 4>I The weather has I mean there's some I hate.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't really like the handicap system. I don't know

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 4>if anyone has a good logical fix for it. But

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 4>you know, there's so many things. You play in a

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>thirty five mile hour wind on a course that's rated

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 4>seventy two and you shoot seventy four.

0:17:58.200 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's not that bad of a round, but.

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 4>Not good.

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, the course one of the courses I played

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, bally Neil, I loved it, doesn't even have

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>slope and rating. Can euners score from there in the handicap?

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Really? Yeah, I don't know that I've ever heard of that.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, they don't have T boxes, they don't have T markers.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They have T boxes, no T markers. You just pick

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>where you want to play every hole.

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like a fantasy land for you, Oh, spectacular

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 3>with for days.

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's like when we played this winner, like it

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was windy and with a couple holes, like you know,

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple holes we wanted to play par five's up,

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>so they were so they're gettable, Like play them up

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter, right, Like why why do we got to

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be constricted by by entering a score?

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 3>I like that approach. My dad to this day like

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 3>has never kept scores.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Played probably I don't know, six maybe a thousand rounds

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 4>and he just doesn't keep scores like I would have.

0:18:58.119 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, I would want to torture myself.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 2>That's amazing. I care less and less about a score.

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>It's been so much more enjoyable. I think score is overrated.

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Score overrated.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you here, here's one Benjamin McIntyre lunch at

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the Turn overrated, underrated.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm uh, I'm split on this. It depends on your

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 4>on your time. Sometimes I'm cool with literally stopping and

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 4>letting like four groups go through and having like a

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 4>nice luxurious lunch and a couple of beers and you know,

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 4>having a good time, maybe watching some TV and literally

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 4>like an hour long lunch, And I'm I love that sometimes.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 4>But sometimes you just want to get out of there.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 4>And so I think it's solely dependent on the time

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 4>you have.

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's all based on the time of tioff.

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>So like if you t off at ten o'clock on

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a day like, let's let's be real, you're not going

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to really do anything that day. You know your day's

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.719
<v Speaker 1>gone because you know, you tea off at ten. If

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you play a fast round, you're done it. You know,

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if assuming the course is busy, you're gonna be done

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>at like two or two thirty, so you're right by

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the time you get home it's like four. I mean

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the days over so on. At ten o'clock tea off time,

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, Jill, have lunch. You know you just are

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>getting home at dinner time, right, just just pushing back

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>when you get home.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna say underrated, underrated, next one, overrated underrated. General

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 4>thoughts on driving range versus just playing for practice and improvement.

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I have I've practiced like once this whole year, so

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go the driving range is overrated.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I just go out and hit shot.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you know where I stand. It's overrated

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 4>I think that, at least from my own personal experiences,

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 4>I've played the best golf when I'm barely hitting balls

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 4>on the range and just playing as much as I

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 4>humanly can, because I think that you know, that helps

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 4>you get sharp under pressure, and you know, you get

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 4>so many different shots you'd never hit on the range.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm a big fan of playing to improve.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. You know, one of my pet peeves is seeing

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>like twenty handicaps just beating balls on a range.

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like your swing is not.

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Like good, So you're just ingraining bad habits Dal, I

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's Duval, Yeah it.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Dovall used to say he never hit.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 4>A lot of balls because when he was hitting the

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 4>ball well, he knew he was swinging it well. He

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't need to keep hitting balls his swing was grooved.

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 4>If he was hitting it bad, he didn't want to keep,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, grinding the bad swing over and over again.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 4>So he just said he didn't hit very many balls.

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a lot of guys like that. I

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 4>know Rich Beam said he basically hit wedges and drivers

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 4>and that was about it.

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 3>On the range.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this, I think practicing your wedges is underrated and.

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 2>And hitting balls in general is way overrated. Free completely

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 2>with Duval.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think using like going out and playing with like

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>seven clubs is this way underrated too, because, like I agree,

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden you have to hit like seven

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>iron punch shots from one forty and like, you hit

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>those shots and then the next round you play, you

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>get into the trees and you have you see, you've

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>seen this low shot, you know, right, so then you

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>go out and you can hit that shot. So I

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>would say that's a better way to practice than going

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to the range.

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think Sam Snead had a quote. I think

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 4>he said, if he'd had to do it all over again,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 4>he would only hit.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Under one hundred yard shots and drivers. That's all he

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 3>would ever practice. And you could probably get pretty good,

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 3>especially in today's day and age, just doing that.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 2>So here's a question I really liked why it is

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 2>from Andrew Allen.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't there more focused on the rookie Reshuffle showcase

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that in the All in Spring instead of the FedEx

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Cup standings.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 3>I'll defer this thist to you because I want to

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 3>know why too.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 4>And I think that you know, your newsletter does such

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 4>a good job of, you know, previewing the younger guys

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 4>that for some reason, nobody talks about.

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>So I think so much of it has to do

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>with marketing. I mean, like FedEx Cup. FedEx pays for

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the FedEx Cup, but you know.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just like it's kind of like, oh, they paid

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for this, so we have to do it versus bringing

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>them an alternative option.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Be like, we know this is important, but we.

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Clearly see that it's it's pretty stupid to do here,

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And why don't we say, like this FedEx Cup up

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>like this FedEx update of the Rookie reshuffle and then

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, like you know, like the clear

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>reason why you just get FedEx cups shoved down your

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>throat is because FedEx pays the tour ginormous sum of money.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But why don't you just take some of the money

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they paid for that and say like, hey, like we

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>have gotten feedback that this is dumb, so we're going

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>to do something different, Like what do you think about this?

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Like cause, like I think rookie reshuffle in the priority

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ranking is like the most under MISSI like not understood

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>thing for for golf fans. Like a guy could be playing,

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>he could be in fiftieth place, but he could be

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on the eighteenth hole at a certain event based off

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of like the reshuffle when it happens and needs a

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>birdie to get into the next three events. Like that

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that is great drama that's in like at the you know,

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>like Xander Shaffle is a perfect example. He didn't have

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a good status coming in to last year, but he

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>finished t fifth at Sanderson and that got him into

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>all the events in the in the in early twenty seventeen,

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and it allowed him to play and everything.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 2>But like you see it so much, is that a rookie.

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't play well in the fall pretty much has

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>no chance of keeping his car because like the next

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>start he gets is at Sony. If he doesn't play

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.479
<v Speaker 1>well there, then the next start he's going to get

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is at Pebble Beach, and he might get a terrible

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>pro am partner, you know, and all of a sudden,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he's one hundred and eighty fifth and fedec Cup points

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>when he's making these starts and he's like, oh shit,

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I got to play well. Yeah.

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 3>To me, that's much more appealing to follow than you know,

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the event itself.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Basically, I think that's in every sport. We you know,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 4>obsess over rookies, like we are with Trubisky coming up

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 4>here in Chicago. But you know, there's a focus on

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 4>rookies where I think the tour kind of lacks that

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 4>a bit.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think one of the things that

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they got I think the Internet has allowed for, Like

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the tour is still stuck behind what the Internet is

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and what it can do. Like you know, like Xander

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Schoffley has become like an overnight star. Wes Bryan came

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in with like you know starting like, people know who

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys are more so they did fifteen years ago

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the Internet. Like so they're still stuck in like, oh,

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to hype Jim Furick because he sea.

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Like when you could you could make a name for.

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>These guys at a much earlier stage, absolutely because of

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. But they still think it takes ten years

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for somebody to become a big name.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 3>So you brought up Xander speak.

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 4>We got a cup, We got a couple of questions

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 4>on you know who from this President's Cup team won't

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 4>be on the Ryder Cup next year? Who you know

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 4>who will be on the Ryder Cup. He was the

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 4>first name that came to mind that could make the

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 4>jump to the Ryder Cup next year, you know, not

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 4>looking at the points, just going from the eye test,

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 4>But what do you think?

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 2>So I would say that.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>You got Chapel, Hoffman Kiszner are kind of three guys

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't think all three of those guys aren't

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the team. You know, like one

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of one or two of those guys isn't gonna be

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on the team next year.

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't you agree with that? Yes? I would?

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean I I we could throw Phil in there too, Phil,

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 4>I just.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Phil. I mean that's a that's a

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 2>great question.

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Is is Phil going to be on the team if

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>he has a year like he had this year next year?

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 4>I think probably, but you know I don't. It's by

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 4>no means a lock.

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, then you look at so like Xander Schaffle,

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see what he does this year.

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>You've got Ali Schneider jans.

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Had like I think he had like four or five

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 2>top tens.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was real, he was consistent.

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So like you look at a guy that's probably gonna

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>win this year, I think he's gonna Like I always

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>look at guys, is that if I'm gonna look for

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's gonna break out, is like find a guy

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that was in contention like four or five times the

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>year before but didn't win, and they'll probably win the

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>next year, right Like I Adam Hadwin was a perfect

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>example of that last year to this year. So like

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Ali Schneider Dance, I think is gonna win a tournament

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this year, So he's one that would be in there.

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got all these older guys like you know,

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Snyder Kerr has been injured, but like if he comes

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>back and wins an event or two, like he's probably

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be.

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 2>In mm hmm. Then you've got I mean, Jim Jimmy

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Walker's down forty seventh in the world.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Which is kind of crazy, but wow, you've got You've

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of young guys.

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Peter Euline. I don't think he'll get up there this year.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But I would say that Patrick Cantley's got a good

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>chance of getting on that team. And it's really you know,

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody's gonna get hot Tony final.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, if history's been in the indicator, there's gonna be

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 4>one out of left field that you know, wins two

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 4>or three events next year and gets a spot.

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 2>There's yeah, I mean, there's gonna be. There's gonna be.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I think there's two.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>There's three spots that are interchangeable, those three Kissner, Chapel,

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Phil and Hoffin. So there's probably eight guys that are

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on you. I mean like Dustin Johnson, Speeth,

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Ricky J. T. Brooks, Coocher read or locks. Right, So

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>how many players of that that's one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, seven,

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So you got seven locks and there's five spots up

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>for grabs, and you could put probably twenty five guys

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in those five spots and wouldn't be surprised if any

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of them made it right.

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 3>That should be fun to watch.

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It'll be interesting to see what the euro team. I

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's almost more interesting what the euro team will

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>look like. Like Westwood's getting old and you've got Fleetwood.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of young guys. Like everybody bags

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on the young talent in Europe, but like Paul Dunn

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>won a tournament. They got this Italian kid, Bernardo put

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>perr Tory who won. He's twenty years old last year.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 3>So Paul Dun is a player.

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>He is, He's really good. He that's uh, I mean,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty one to win is pretty good.

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 3>He's been in contention to a couple of times and

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 3>obviously played well in the open.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>You've got d Tree to the other Belgian kid that

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>went to Illinois, who's young.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of young talent over there.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, Let's say you just got back from you know,

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 3>sand Hills and bally Neil. How would you split ten

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 3>rounds between the two.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So I've thought about this a lot, and this is

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>like no, no, nothing on bally Neil. I think it's

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like a world class golf course and a spectacular golf course.

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>But sand Hills is like a whole nother lie level

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of golf that I've probably never experienced before playing there.

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>It would be either eight to two or nine to one.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Wow. So I really love bally Neil though it's really

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>really great.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's more of a testament to sand Hills

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. Like sand Hills is my my like

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of Nirvana. It's it's got a lot of width,

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:30.959
<v Speaker 1>it's all about angles, tons of strategy. Every hole, you know,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you can change the pin and that the whole drastically

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>changes you change.

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of holes, like I played sixty three

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>holes out there, and there's a lot of holes where

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not sure what the right play is, you know,

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And I've played it like six different ways, dropping balls

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>like in later rounds and trying different shots.

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's that place is a spectacular.

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Place that everybody should if they get the opportunity to

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>go out there.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Awesome all right, Overrated, underrated range balls, pre recreational round.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think overrated. I don't have a lot of range balls.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I usually just scrambling to get to the course on time.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 2>What about you, I'm.

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Gonna say underrated.

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 4>I actually play a ton of rounds without hitting range balls,

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 4>and I always get pissed off on like the third

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 4>hole when I'm two over, I'm like, why the hell

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 4>didn't I hit balls?

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna say underrated.

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care about my score and recreational rounds either,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's part of why I think it's overrated.

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 2>What do you think on overrated? Underrated? On trees in

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the fairway.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Way overrated?

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 4>I trees in the fairway are I mean, I know

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 4>how you feel about trees in general, but trees in

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 4>the fairway are terrible. There's a golf course. What's the

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 4>it's in, dear Briarwood. Is it Briarwood in Deerfield Green, Well,

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 4>briar Wood both of those Revene Green too, but Briarwood.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 4>It's like seventeen great holes, and then you get to

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 4>the eighteenth hole and it's a dog leg left with

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 4>a tree in the middle of the fairway, and you're like, Wow,

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 4>this is the worst wall I've ever played. This course sucks.

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Even though the seventeen holes were good. It just it's

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 4>frustrating to Uh, it's just it's not fair. I mean,

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 4>it's beyond domb.

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I you can occasionally pull off a tree in the

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>fairway like that. It's okay every once in a while,

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but it has to be the right spot.

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 3>But like where you got an example, I.

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Mean, like swings Cove has one that I don't mind.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like by the green and it's like a short

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>par five. So like if you're not going like if

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going for the green, it acts like you know,

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you're you're.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Probably coming in and the ball is gonna roll up there,

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 2>you know. But if you.

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't, then you have to hit to a certain side

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of the fairway that's like eighty five yards wide to

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>set up your angle into the green.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It just like emphasizes like they're kind of emphasizes like that, Okay,

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>this fairway is eighty yards wide. The worst place I

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can be is in the middle of the fairway because

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I have no chance to get around this tree.

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So it pushes people to play.

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>To the edges of the fairway where there are bunkers

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there's the property lines on the left.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense?

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but no, that's okay.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>But like it's eighty yards wide versus like something that's

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five yards wide and you have a tree

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in the middle.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 2>Like, that's not acceptable.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 3>Agreed, all right?

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Here, what's your most helpful putting tools or drills that

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 2>you use from Luke Smith?

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't have too many dramatic drills. I kind

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 4>of stick the two t's in the ground, you know,

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 4>put between them. I saw most of the guys do

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 4>that the last time I was the Masters, and I

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 4>was like, well, if they're doing it, I might as

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 4>well do it too, So I I do that quite

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 4>a bit. That's probably the only I guess drill I do.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 3>How about you?

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I carry a yard stick around with me. I have

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 2>like this. It's called the perfect putting aid.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>If it's not like a real yardstick, but you can

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just go to home depot and get like a metal

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>yard stick and I just put down a yard stick

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can put it, I think like a yard

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>without it rolling off either side. You're hitting, You're rolling

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball perfectly.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 4>It is amazing how hard it is to do that, right, Yeah,

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Like it's amazing. You're like, what the hell I can't

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.919
<v Speaker 4>hit a putt a foot, you know, without rolling.

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 3>It's it's crazy.

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>It's like when I'm putting really well, like I if

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I use it a lot, I start putting really well.

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 2>But I've used it.

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Like twice this whole year, so that's probably why I'm

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>putted well all year. But like I try and do

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>like ten or twenty in a row, and like it's

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>really hard. The last couple You're like, You're like, please, please,

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>just you know, and it puts a little pressure on it,

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>which is good.

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>And uh Luke Smith.

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Also, do you have any recks for Fort Myers or Naples?

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, not, not really, I'm not sure. What's uh

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 4>is a corkscrew?

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I think I think that's public.

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. There's not good golf there really that's public.

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm pretty sure corkscrew is public.

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Other than that, you know, someone else asked us what's

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the best way to get on private courses? And you know,

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 4>sometimes you can just call and say, you know, you're

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 4>in from out of town and you know, blah blah blah.

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean it probably works less than forty percent of

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 4>the time, but you can't hurt to try or have

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 4>your pro call at.

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Your local golf court. You know, I I think cork.

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:04.439
<v Speaker 2>Screws public a good way.

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 1>If you like you're if you're authentic, like I've I

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>know that a letter sometimes works.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm. So if you're very.

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Authentic and you like explain why you want to see

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the golf course, like it would help if like you

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>knew some stuff about the golf course that was why

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to see it, Like, you know, I love architecture, Like,

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>don't make it about your personal quest to play the

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred courses, but you know, I love architecture.

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I understand that this course is so

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and so, like I'd love to see it.

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes that's a good way to get out to some

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 2>of these places.

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And it probably won't work all the time and everywhere,

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>but if people people are looking to help you, if

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you if you do things the right way, and if

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>that happens, like sending a nice thank you note that

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, like.

0:37:55.560 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 2>It'll help you. Let's see.

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>God, Hey, so this is going back to like President's Cup,

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup. Which player that wasn't on the President's Cup

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>would you be most excited to see in the Ryder.

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Cup Xander going back to him, I just you know,

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 4>the way he played in in big events at Aaron

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Hills and then in Atlanta, was was pretty cool to see.

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I I'm I would be very excited to see him play.

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 4>You're in on ax I am x going and give

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 4>it to you.

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You've you've You've pushed all your chips and this is

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>why we need the stock market.

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 4>I think in the previous podcast I mentioned I would

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 4>buy I would be all in on uh Xander stay.

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>In Florida, and this is we could go, you know,

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>without public or private, so we could do private and

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>public here.

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 2>What are some of your favorite courses in Florida? Hersh

0:38:58.760 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 2>from Hers.

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I like lob Lolly.

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I like.

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.479
<v Speaker 3>The TPC Stadium course. It's so far north, it doesn't

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 3>seem like it's in Florida.

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 3>Public. I like World Woods. That's always a fun place

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 3>to play.

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 4>I think you can play thirty six holes for like

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 4>one hundred bucks and it's really it's really good. Trying

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 4>to think where else Jupiter Hills. I haven't played Seminole,

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 4>but obviously that would be at the top of any list.

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 2>John's Island, Oh.

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, John's Island's amazing. Forgot about that too, And then

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 4>there's another one there. There's a couple of courses in

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.359
<v Speaker 4>Zero Orchid Island is good.

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of good courses. There's a lot of

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 3>really good courses. Not a lot of great courses.

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a stream song. Courses are good. They're they're expensive,

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>but they're really good. Winter Park is super cool. You

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>played Winter Park?

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I did.

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 3>That was a lot of fun.

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not you know, it's not gonna be hard, like

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of hard though for how it's short.

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like twenty what twenty six or twenty four hundred

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>yard nine hall course.

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 2>It's just weird.

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 3>It's so it's it's one of a kind. You're not

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 3>used to hitting.

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, the greens are big and undulating or not,

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 4>you know, not so big, but they have big undulations

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 4>in them, and you know, the bunkers are well manicured,

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 4>and it looks like you're playing you know, you know,

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 4>major golf course and you know.

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 3>You're hit it's two sixty. You're like, wow, what a weird.

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's it's it's a lot of fun though.

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I love that place. I plan on playing there again too.

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that I that's like a it's such a cool spot.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I played.

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic Beach Country Club up in Jacksonville's cool, cool little spot.

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 2>They did the same kind of idea.

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 1>It's that you know nothing property and they and they

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>had the Web finals there last week.

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 2>But they made it wall the wall fairway. It was cool.

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>A place that I didn't get a check out was

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>which I turned Tron and DJ onto is called Hyde

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Park and it's a in Jacksonville. It's a originally a

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Thompson design that they think is a a they

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>say is Donald Ross, but like supposed to be really good.

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.919
<v Speaker 1>I go, I gotta see it next time I'm down there.

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Mountain Lake's awesome, awesome course. I played this place called

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Shingle Creek that just got redone by Arnold Palmer's guy,

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Thad Layton, and he did a really good job basically

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>just kind of redid all the greens and he had

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>budget to basically do everything inside one hundred yards, so

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you see, really cool green complex is really cool bunkering.

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure on the price.

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>The price kind of fluctuates there some times it is

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty pricey, which kind of turns it off. But you know,

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Orlando doesn't have a ton of great options. It's it's

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's decent and they did a really good job with

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what they had.

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 2>To work with there.

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Tampa lost that. Bellevue builtmore the Donald

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Ross course there. I guess some guy bought it from

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that happened. They bought it from

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the municipality, and.

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 3>He's Commisia and Tampa's really cool.

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And then of course I want to go see tim

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Iquana another one.

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 3>There's a there's not a ton of Maurial we left

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 3>off that list.

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all the Memorial is a good one too that

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen. Florida.

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good, good, not great. Lots of lots of courses though,

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>mm hmm.

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Let's see how.

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 3>About this one.

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Speeth was so wrong on the penalty he was given

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 4>on Saturday at twelve. He acted like a spoiled little millennial.

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Does this bother you? That's from Bill who is at

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 4>dj D Johnson Swag.

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:09.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think you just didn't under I mean it's

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>like the perfect example of like the the rule is

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the ruling was right, but the situation, like the ball

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going like picking up the ball in motion you

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't do, but like the given the circumstance, you.

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Know, right, Yeah, it's tricky. No, No, I've been a lot.

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I've been critical, as you know about on speech at

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 4>times for carrying on and this and that. But I

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 4>don't think he was in the wrong with his questioning

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 4>and you know, hands in the air, and I probably

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 4>would have been the same way because yeah, it didn't

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 4>affect the whole one bit whatsoever. I get that, you know,

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 4>it could hit a meteor and bounce back and.

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 3>Go on the hole.

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I guess I get why they called it. It's just

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 4>one of those things you have to deal with, I

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 4>guess sometimes in golf, just you know, it is what

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 4>it is.

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 3>It's it's a bizarre It was bizarre, and you know

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 3>that's why you saw kind of the exasperated looks of

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Tiger and Jordan, where you know they there's not much

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 3>you can do. It's just kind of a it's just

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:22.839
<v Speaker 3>up to.

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 4>The rules official and you know you got to play it,

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 4>call the rules the way they are, and just unfortunate,

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 4>you know what.

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like it's.

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Kind of like in the NBA when guys go for

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the intentional foul and the guy just like shucks up

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a shot.

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:38.879
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like that, like, you know, the guy

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to make that shot, but if like you

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:46.800
<v Speaker 1>just can't do it, you know, right, it's.

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Another interesting question we got was from Brendan Porath regarding

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Stymy's if they should be back into match Bay. I mean,

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a great, great question. I kind of I

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of am in on Steymy's.

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm When I first read the question, I

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 4>was like, absolutely not, and then I started thinking about

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 4>it more, and it would just be you'd have to

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 4>develop a whole new skill, right, because it would be

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 4>it wouldn't just be you wouldn't be playing the same

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 4>way and just being like, oh shit, there's a ball

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 4>in my way, you know, but you'd really you'd have

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 4>to really playing your way around and come up with

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:34.439
<v Speaker 4>some spinning putts and whatnot. But you know, I'm I'm

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 4>fine with maybe one one event a year if they

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 4>really wanted to do it, but no more than that.

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they you know, I'm cool with one event.

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 4>I'd like to see it. It doesn't even have to

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 4>be a sanctioned tour event, maybe one of the silly

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:50.720
<v Speaker 4>season events, but sure.

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things is, like you'd golf

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>like stroke play that's beaten down your throat. Is like

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not playing the field, you're playing the golf course.

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But match play, you aren't playing the golf course. You're

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>just playing the man. You know they're your opponent.

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 2>So the idea of you know, hey, I hit this out.

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Abounds and now I can kind of like I'm not

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>out of it because I could stymy this guy.

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess you'd still be kind of screwed.

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Can you imagine being like, I don't know, six inches

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 4>out of someone's line on a putt and just kind

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 4>of going up there and one handed tapping your ball

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 4>right in the middle of his line, Like what a

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:34.359
<v Speaker 4>disrespectful move.

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:36.840
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of amazing, though, Okay, it.

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Adds some drama. Now the more I think about it,

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:39.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm in.

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Then you could make the putt and they'd have to

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>play away from the hole, and maybe instead of having

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like a foot they have like three feet, Like it

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 1>would eliminate the ability to just like cozy the ball

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>down into the hole.

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 4>I just picture a golfer literally, you know, just going

0:46:56.719 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 4>through his pre shot routine, tapping it like a foot

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 4>and then taunting the other guy.

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I'm excited.

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I think Stimeys are. We might have

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to get Stems into something we just tested.

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Right mm yeah, I think one silly season event.

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>What's your favorite PGA Tour event that's not played in

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the States.

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I get is, do you count the British Open?

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Uh, let's go go No on that. I guess there's

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:36.359
<v Speaker 2>not that many. Yeah, I don't. I'm I don't know.

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really in on any of the Asian events.

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I haven't really watched much of them. I know

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Malaysia has has a lot of good golf courses, you know,

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 4>and obviously Shin's in, But yeah, I'm not I'm not

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 4>not not all in on them either.

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Remember last year the Hero when Tiger came back and

0:47:58.840 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>looked really good.

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he was like almost holding out, spinning the club

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 4>and everything.

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 2>He was back. That's like depressed.

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe that was not even a year ago.

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy, isn't it.

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>He looks so good that week, that damn flight, it

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 1>had to be that flight. But I guess you know

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>if if that was the case, it would never have

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>held up.

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 3>And right through the riggers of the season.

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you use the plumb bob? This was a question

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 2>from Jeff W.

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand it. I've never understood it.

0:48:33.480 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 3>I uh, yeah, I know.

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:37.839
<v Speaker 4>I guess I know how to do it, and I'm

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 4>not really sure. I guess if I'm really either putting

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 4>horribly or completely stumped.

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I've tried it, but I mean, I'm not going to

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 3>make a good stroke generally if I'm putting on a

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 3>plumb bob reed, because I have no idea what's going on.

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I's that's a great point. It's like, if you

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on, you're not going to hit

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a good putt. That happens to me a lots why

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I hit a lot of bad putts.

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Here's one for you.

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 4>You've been to La recently, favorite public course in LA

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 4>and overrated, underrated off season for golf in La.

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 2>So I lived in LA for a little bit, so

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I identify with this. I played a lot.

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Less golf than I play in Chicago. I completely agree

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:30.399
<v Speaker 1>with what sal Hutton said here. He said since living

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in La, I golf way less than in Canada. I

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is, like you all of a

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>sudden do more stuff. You're used to the weather being nice,

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so you kind of play it less.

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Favorite public course, Rustic Canyon, is really good.

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a course that Jeff Shackelford and Gil Hans designed together.

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's about an hour away. It's cheap.

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like I think it's like sixty bucks to walk

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>on the weekends. It's walkable, which is rare out there

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the city.

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I like, I have. I love Rancho Park. I used

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to live.

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Like like a four blocks from it, so I'd play

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>there all the time. It's slow, it takes forever to play.

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:20.839
<v Speaker 1>It's in bad condition, but it's cheap and it has

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>like a ton of potential. It's got like you have

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to hit really good golf shots there because.

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 2>It's got, you know, good land. It used to host

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 2>the LA Open. It's a really good If that that's

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 2>to be my one course.

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I think we had another question about what course you'd

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 1>want to Oh, that was in Chicago. That's a good

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 1>question too. We'll get to that one next. But Rancho

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Park I really love too. But I would say Rustic

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Canyon is the best one in the Greater LA area.

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So I I'm not a big fan of oak Meadow.

0:50:55.640 --> 0:51:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So just it's in Chicago that just went underwent a renovation. So, Kyle,

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of all the courses in Chicago public courses, which one

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:08.760
<v Speaker 1>would you like to see get a renovation done?

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 2>And then we can also expand it out to the country.

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 2>So two answers, Okay, Chicago.

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go a little far from Chicago and say

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the General at Eagle Ridge in Galina. I think the

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:31.280
<v Speaker 4>topography is pretty cool out there, and that golf course

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 4>is just bad, and I feel like it shouldn't be.

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 4>So they have the land, they have the you know,

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 4>rolling hills and all that, and water. I mean, they

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:45.720
<v Speaker 4>literally have everything you need to build a good golf course,

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 4>but not the golf course. So that would be my

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Chicago pick, even though it's probably what two and a

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 4>half hours outside of Chicago nationally, i'd have let me

0:51:57.800 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 4>think about that.

0:51:58.880 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you go?

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So I would say, in Chicago, there's a course called Big.

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Run that Oh yeah, I love Big Run.

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I like love playing there. It's so fun.

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Fun, it's a really fun layouts.

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:14.320
<v Speaker 1>It's on like a crazy piece of land for Chicago,

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and the course is always in just horrendous condition, but

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's so much fun to play. There's way too many trees,

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think you need to do that much

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:27.359
<v Speaker 1>there to make it really good.

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 2>And so i'd say Big Run.

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Would be my place that I would I would go

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:35.799
<v Speaker 1>in and take a knife too, if I had, you know,

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 1>five million bucks, and then or even ravslow. I just

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's done a renovation, but I just like chopped down

0:52:45.120 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of trees. I take down every tree and

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 1>make it really firm and fast, And I think that

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:54.240
<v Speaker 1>place would be crazy fun. But then across the country

0:52:54.360 --> 0:53:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it'd be between Sleepy Hollow in Cleveland and and and jeezus,

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting old. I can't believe I just Rancho Park

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:08.799
<v Speaker 1>in la I can't believe I almost just forgot that.

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 2>So those would be my two.

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that I really have one for the country.

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I guess you know somewhere in Florida, I'm sure are somewhere.

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.160
<v Speaker 4>What about the course that you live on, oh right,

0:53:29.239 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 4>right right, Hare and Bay, Yeah, that would actually be

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 4>a good one. It's a the lands flat, but you

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 4>know they used to have the Honda here, and it

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 4>is a huge golf course. I mean it's like seventy

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 4>three hundred or you know, I play as long, it

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 4>might even be seventy four hundred. And it's just in

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 4>the shittiest of shape, like I mean, real bad. And

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 4>it's a nice community. They just they stopped caring about

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:54.879
<v Speaker 4>the golf course. I think they're planning on getting rid

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 4>of it. But yeah, you could build I mean you

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 4>already have the course. I mean you could literally build

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 4>a tour event course out there. I just don't know

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:04.400
<v Speaker 4>if they're interested in doing that, but yeah, there you

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:05.919
<v Speaker 4>go right down the road.

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 2>What what do you think do you think? Here's from

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Neil Smith.

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Overrated Underrated at golf pencils with erasers.

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Underrated because when I'm when I'm keeping track of Scotch,

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I sometimes make mathematical errors and then you add it

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:29.600
<v Speaker 4>up and you realize it doesn't equal zero, and then

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 4>you have to go back and you know you're already

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:34.280
<v Speaker 4>keeping score and money.

0:54:34.360 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's you need an eraser in case you make

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:37.239
<v Speaker 3>an error.

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Which I'm I'm I'm pretty absent minded, and I like

0:54:45.320 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 1>forget I like keep score for three holes and then

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I forget to write down scores for five holes, and

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I need an eraser because then a lot of times

0:54:54.719 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 1>write my score in the wrong spot.

0:54:57.560 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I have flip flop scores with other players.

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:03.239
<v Speaker 1>You don't want me keeping score, Yeah Jesus not a

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>good scorekeeper, But so I need I need a pencil

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 1>with an eraser.

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Here's a.

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 4>How about this one? What's the best caddie you've ever heard?

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Who's the best, what's the best caddy.

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:20.240
<v Speaker 3>You've ever had? Or who.

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:55:22.520 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got my cousin caddies for me a lot, like

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in the summer, if I'm like in the stadium, and

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a high school baseball coach and he used to

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 1>be a he.

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Played like pro baseball for a lot while he's.

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 1>A pitcher, and I think pitchers like get golf because

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not like every other sport is reactionary for

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the most part. In golf is the only place where

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about it and a picture has

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:50.279
<v Speaker 1>to think about it too, and so he kind of

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>gets the mental process of it.

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 2>And he knows, you know, he's he's a coach, so.

0:55:55.080 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 1>He knows how to like talk to people, talk to

0:55:57.440 --> 0:56:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you in moments I think that is the and he doesn't.

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:04.719
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't try and tell me what to do. Like

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't like when caddies read putts for me unless

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I ask, because like, how do you know how hard

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to hit the ball?

0:56:12.480 --> 0:56:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 1>You know? Like so much of reading a putt is

0:56:15.840 --> 0:56:18.320
<v Speaker 1>dictated on how you're going to hit it in a situation.

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, there's three there's three different reads for every putt, right.

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 3>M hm.

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think like a caddies that, I think the

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:28.960
<v Speaker 1>best caddies are the ones that understand how to communicate

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:29.239
<v Speaker 1>with you.

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:33.680
<v Speaker 4>I agree with what you said? This made me think

0:56:33.719 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 4>of my worst caddy experience ever. So I was playing

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 4>in the Western Junior. I was probably seventeen years old,

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 4>maybe sixteen. It was a it was at Sea Island.

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:49.840
<v Speaker 4>I got randomly assigned a caddy and you know, I

0:56:49.960 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 4>meet him on the first t the first round and

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 4>he seems like an okay guy, you know, cool guy,

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 4>probably twenty five, enjoying the uh, enjoying the walk for

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:02.759
<v Speaker 4>the first holes we get to, Uh, I forget the hole.

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 4>It's the dog leg right with the marsh on the left.

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, I'm like hey, can you give me the

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:09.759
<v Speaker 4>five wood? And he's like, no, man, don't be a

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 4>pussy hit driver. And I was like, I was already

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 4>like two or three over and I was already flushed

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 4>in the face, and I was.

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Like, oh, okay, give me the driver.

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 4>So I hit driver, snap hook at in the marsh,

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 4>make double on the hole, and I'm like, Okay, that

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:28.040
<v Speaker 4>sucked with an asshole. And a few holes later he's like, oh,

0:57:28.080 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 4>so Chicago, huh. I'm like, yeah, Chicago. He's like, ah, man.

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 4>One of my best times I've ever had I was

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 4>on a bunch of acid at Wrigley Field.

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 3>It was awesome. I was like, oh god, I just

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:39.720
<v Speaker 3>fucking listened to this guy. Are you kidding me?

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 4>So be careful listening to Caddy's advice is what I

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:47.280
<v Speaker 4>would say, you make the final decision.

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I had a great Caddy in in the in the

0:57:49.960 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Radics Cup this year. He didn't say much. He was

0:57:55.280 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 1>he was quiet and he just delivered. Like the best

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>moment of maybe my gulf of the of the summer

0:58:02.720 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was you know, we were I think we were one

0:58:05.560 --> 0:58:07.400
<v Speaker 1>down in our match and we were on this or

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 1>two down. We were two down and we were on

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the fifteenth hole, and you know, I busted a drive

0:58:13.600 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and I knew I need it was a short part five.

0:58:16.120 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I knew I needed like a BIRDI er an eagle,

0:58:19.600 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 2>probably an eagle, you know.

0:58:21.080 --> 0:58:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So I turned to him and I go, all right,

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to make a big bird here. And he

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 1>looks back at me and he was real quiet, kid,

0:58:29.080 --> 0:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and he goes, not big bird, jumbo bird like albatross.

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I only made a regular bird. But it

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 2>was good enough to But it was I mean, like

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 2>I just burst out laughing.

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 3>It was like gave all the looseness you needed.

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, it's you know, a good cat. He

0:58:49.440 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 2>does it. It's like you got to pick your spots.

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:54.959
<v Speaker 1>You can't talk too much, but like when you talk,

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, make make sure it's worthwhile, don't you know,

0:58:58.000 --> 0:59:00.919
<v Speaker 1>don't talk my ear off. But you have some good

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>have some good clips, you know.

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, here's another question. Can you explain again why

0:59:11.080 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 3>par is just a number and how that may or

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 3>may not make a golf hole a bad long part

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:17.720
<v Speaker 3>of three versus a great short part four.

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is I mean, the perfect example of this

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>is like Riviera, where the first hole is five hundred

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 1>yards downhill par five, and the second one is like

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:35.040
<v Speaker 1>four eighty par four coming back up the hill.

0:59:35.600 --> 0:59:39.120
<v Speaker 2>It's like, okay, so like one of them is a

0:59:39.160 --> 0:59:40.920
<v Speaker 2>par five and one is a part four.

0:59:41.600 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>But like in reality, like a lot of the second

0:59:45.560 --> 0:59:48.439
<v Speaker 1>hole a lot of times plays tougher than the first hole,

0:59:49.280 --> 0:59:53.919
<v Speaker 1>so like it, you know, it goes part five, part four,

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but really in actuality it doesn't really like if you

0:59:56.920 --> 0:59:59.520
<v Speaker 1>get make nine on the two holes, like you haven't

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>lost anything on the field. Really, you know eight is

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a good score, but you think about it longer, like

1:00:05.880 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on certain days and conditions, like you know, a par

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>five could be playing like a par four or like

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the perfect example is like Sandhills where I played this

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>this week, Like there's this great short par five on

1:00:18.800 --> 1:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the back nine. It's like the fourteenth hole, and earlier

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with the wind we played it was hard off the left,

1:00:25.080 --> 1:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>so it played short. I hit like nine iron and

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a wedge into it the couple times I played it.

1:00:30.560 --> 1:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But then on the front nine there's a four hundred

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and eighty five yard par four the fourth hole that

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>played dead into the wind to like a tiny green,

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was hitting three iron and four wood into

1:00:41.680 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it like that, you know, like par doesn't matter, Like

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>if you make a four on both of them, like

1:00:49.000 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you've done well. But like if you make a five

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on the par four, it's not really a bogie.

1:00:54.240 --> 1:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's gonna be bogie in that hole. Does that make

1:00:57.920 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 2>sense to me? It does?

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I completely I follow and agree, I think.

1:01:02.840 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And also like when we look at like the US Open,

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like this is I think where most people were clapping

1:01:08.360 --> 1:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>at me when I said par doesn't matter, and everybody's

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like I don't get it, Like the game's fundamentally changed

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with like equipment, So like why are we holding on?

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Like why don't you just make the par sixty eight.

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, Like don't put associate pars to holes and just

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>say this is a par sixty eight. You know, like

1:01:25.920 --> 1:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this course of bally Neil has no has no slopan

1:01:29.080 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>rating and they unfortunate. I was kind of disappointed that

1:01:31.800 --> 1:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they had par, but like why not just take par

1:01:34.920 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>off golf courses?

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it literally means nothing. It means you don't need

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:44.280
<v Speaker 4>it to play in a handicap match. I mean you

1:01:44.360 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 4>just need a handicap for that or handicap poles, I

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:50.360
<v Speaker 4>should say, but I mean, it literally bears nothing on.

1:01:52.080 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>The day because you could play great and shoot even par,

1:01:55.920 --> 1:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and you could also play great and shoot four over par.

1:01:59.080 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But that day, clearly the par wasn't even par, right,

1:02:03.080 --> 1:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Like it wasn't seventy two, seventy six.

1:02:05.880 --> 1:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Like that's like the thing that I think is the

1:02:07.960 --> 1:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>problem with it.

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's you're you're associating a number that doesn't

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>tell the whole story, like that number doesn't apply every day.

1:02:16.440 --> 1:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of goes to this greens keeper revenge question.

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>We got what do you think about like hard course

1:02:22.360 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>days and days where you you know, the greenskeeper gets

1:02:26.400 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to put pins in crazy places.

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I think they're fun. I always enjoy playing in them.

1:02:33.440 --> 1:02:37.120
<v Speaker 3>It's amazing how hard they actually are. You think like, oh,

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 3>it shouldn't be that bad, you know, shamble or scramble,

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>whatever format you decide to play.

1:02:40.960 --> 1:02:42.680
<v Speaker 4>You're like, oh, it won't be that bad, and then

1:02:42.720 --> 1:02:44.360
<v Speaker 4>you get out there and you're like, holy shit, this

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>is impossibly hard. So I think it's cool to just

1:02:48.760 --> 1:02:51.600
<v Speaker 4>just to see how hard a golf course could play

1:02:51.600 --> 1:02:53.680
<v Speaker 4>if you could put the pin anywhere and you know,

1:02:53.760 --> 1:02:55.680
<v Speaker 4>tease back all that.

1:02:56.320 --> 1:03:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's I kind of like, I like a Big

1:03:00.480 --> 1:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Cup days with Crazy Pinned.

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 4>If you have you ever played the Big Cup at

1:03:05.240 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 4>glen Woody, I haven't. Oh god, that is the most

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:13.200
<v Speaker 4>insane thing. I mean literally, we you can.

1:03:13.320 --> 1:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a big cup which is the size of a sprinkler,

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:18.880
<v Speaker 3>and you know we had I've played with really good

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:20.760
<v Speaker 3>teams where we had four guys that were you know,

1:03:20.880 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 3>plus three plus four and you.

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Make doubles on holes. You put it right in the water,

1:03:26.520 --> 1:03:27.760
<v Speaker 4>right in the bunker, right in the water.

1:03:27.800 --> 1:03:28.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's insane.

1:03:29.960 --> 1:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Then scramble too, right, it's a four man scramble.

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's uh, it is crazy. It's it's cool experience

1:03:38.640 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 4>if you if you're around there. It's in October in Chicago,

1:03:41.320 --> 1:03:43.120
<v Speaker 4>glen Woodie, go play it, just to be like, what

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:43.640
<v Speaker 4>the hell?

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>How do we just make triple and a four man scramble?

1:03:50.160 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think the I think just alternative formats.

1:03:54.040 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm all, I know.

1:03:55.840 --> 1:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I think golf should just you know, you should do

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>different ship with it. I don't know. This is about

1:04:02.240 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>it for me.

1:04:03.960 --> 1:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Here.

1:04:04.600 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>You got any other questions you should do?

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:09.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm good.

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, uh you're gonna watch any of this? This

1:04:14.120 --> 1:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>tournament this week Silverado.

1:04:15.640 --> 1:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I actually probably will you know.

1:04:17.320 --> 1:04:19.760
<v Speaker 4>I've been to Silverado a bunch of my my parents

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:22.600
<v Speaker 4>are big NAPA fans, as they're big wine fans, and

1:04:23.120 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 4>we used to always go to Silverado.

1:04:24.840 --> 1:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>And I love the golf course.

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:28.120
<v Speaker 4>I was shocked a few years ago when it got

1:04:28.120 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 4>a tour event because I always thought of it as

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 4>a extremely fun golf course, but I didn't really realize

1:04:36.120 --> 1:04:37.600
<v Speaker 4>it was going to be a tour event golf course.

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>So it's cool.

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I like the golf course a lot.

1:04:39.960 --> 1:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I actually I get more excited about these fall

1:04:44.320 --> 1:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>events than I do about like the FedEx Cup playoffs.

1:04:47.440 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Which is yeah, I'm with you on that.

1:04:49.920 --> 1:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I like I like the I like the fresh blood.

1:04:52.880 --> 1:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like what we talked about earlier. I

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like seeing the new guys. I like seeing you know,

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a fresh slate, like a lot of guys that struggle,

1:05:01.000 --> 1:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>like you get you survive, you get the new season

1:05:03.840 --> 1:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, oh, if you're like new life. And

1:05:06.680 --> 1:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of the fall events and so

1:05:10.640 --> 1:05:13.919
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, well we'll talk in a week or two.

1:05:14.360 --> 1:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for all the questions, Yep, thank you guys.

1:05:17.200 --> 1:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>All Right, bye,