WEBVTT - Tech Startups that Died in 2023

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? You know, tech startups are a risky thing.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>There are certainly unicorns out there, you know. There are

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>these companies that get incredible buzz and support and hit

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars valuation and it propels them monopath that

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>inevitably leads to either an IPO or an acquisition and

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>huge payouts for the folks who's stuck with it. But

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>those are actually the exceptions to the rule most startups.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>The vast majority of startups will fail, and a few

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>will fail in their first year. Somewhere around ten percent

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of all startups fail in the first year. According to

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>at least some sources, as many as ninety or even

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety one percent of startups fail in the long run,

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and it might take several years for that to happen,

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but it does happen. Maybe the business plan never worked out.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe whatever the company was providing people just weren't seeking.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe external factors beyond anyone's control were to blame. Maybe

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the only common factor among all the businesses that went

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>bust is that, you know, they all fizzled out. So

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would look back to last year, which

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was twenty twenty three for those of you listening from

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the future, and I thought i'd talk about some of

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the startups that failed that year. Now, these weren't companies

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that necessarily launched in twenty twenty three. In fact, none

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of the ones I'm talking about launched that year, but

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they did die in twenty twenty three. In one case,

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it only became mostly dead. So let's dive in. First up,

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about a business that actually was around longer

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>than a decade before it failed in twenty twenty three.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>This also makes you wonder at what point you stop

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>using the word startup to describe a business and then

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>instead use phrases like established business. I guess most folks

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>say a startup graduates after not after surviving a certain

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>amount of time. It's not like after X number of

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>years you're no longer a startup. Instead, the metric appears

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to be growing to a certain scale, like once you

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>hit a certain scale, you're no longer a startup. That

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>seems weird to me because sometimes unicorns scale up way

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>faster than others, but they don't manage to get established,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>and so I think startup would still be an applicable term.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But what do I know? All right? So the businesses

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention first off, because there's a pair

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of them that both were owned by the same company

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>were Cloud Nordic and A Zero, So these were two

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>cloud services companies, both of which were owned by a

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>holding company called Cerdica Holding. Certica Holding also owned a

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity company called netquestaps more on that in a second.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And all of these businesses were located out of Denmark,

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>so that means that there's going to be names that

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to butcher because I don't speak Danish and

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I have no familiarity with any Norwegian language. So that's

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just a precursor for what's about to happen. Anyway, the

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>various companies that were under Certica Holding had been operating

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>as successful businesses for several years, but all of that

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.839
<v Speaker 1>would change on Friday, August eighteenth, twenty twenty three. That's

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>when some ransomware hackers infiltrated systems belonging to A zero

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and Cloud Nordic and locked away essentially all of their

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>customer data, like made it impossible for Cloud Nordic or

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>A zero to access any of that customer information. And

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, I should say that that's not exactly

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>when the hackers necessarily infiltrated the systems, it's when they

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>executed their attack. They had probably actually exploited the systems

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a week earlier, but every single zero and every single

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>one belonging to the company's customers was removed from their access.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And as far as I can tell, the identity of

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the ransomware hackers has never been disclosed, which is a

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit strange. It's possible that the information can be

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>found on some Danish cybersecurity site and I simply couldn't

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>find it, maybe because Google's usefulness has arguably become less

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so over years. There are a lot of people who

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>say that Google is essentially ruined at this point, and

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should switch to other web search tools than Google.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>But I couldn't find a lot of sources, even in

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>Denmark that really went into detail about this. So I'm

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>not saying the ransomware hackers were never identified. I'm just

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>saying I couldn't fin the information about that. But apparently

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>they did strike it pretty much the perfect time. So

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Certica Holding was in this process of moving systems from

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>one data center to another. The hackers had apparently already

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>penetrated company systems leading up to this transition, and the

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>actual moving gave them access to pretty much all corporate

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>systems across the board, so it was a total nightmare.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>A zero and cloud Nordick admitted that they couldn't and

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't respond to ransomware demands. So apparently the hackers demanded

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>money that exceeded the company's access to funds. They could

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>not pay the ransom even if they wanted to, and

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they said they didn't want to, which is honestly the

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>right answer generally speaking, because paying off ransoms just encourages

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>more ransoms down the road. If you show that this

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is a viable way to make millions of dollars, of

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>course more attacks will follow because there's the incentive to

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. If nobody pays the ransom. Eventually, any hacker

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that's doing this for the money at the very least

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to stop doing ransomware attacks because it won't

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be effective. It'll be a waste of time for ransomware

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>hackers who are doing this for some sort of perceived cause.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It could be a different story, right if you're doing

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>something because you have a personal grudge against the company,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>or you believe in some philosophy that targets the company

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>as an enemy, then maybe you would go through the

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>trouble of attacking with ransomware even if you weren't going

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to get paid out at the end of the day.

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>There are some other factors in this story that make

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it sound at least a little shady to me, like

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it raises some red flags. But customers started to receive

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>notifications that their data was inaccessible. It was caput, it

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>was gone. Cloud Nordic began to restore servers like web

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>servers and email servers, so customers would have access to

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.239
<v Speaker 1>their domains and their email servers again. But then everything

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that had been on those servers was gone. It was

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>all blank slate, starting from square one. In the real world,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this would be kind of like you come home and

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you see that your house or apartment building or whatever

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is totally gone. You still have access rights to the

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>land where the building had stood, but you have nothing there.

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You would be forced to rebuild, and just imagine your

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>company and all of your web presence is wiped out.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So the two companies A zero and Cloud Nordick went

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to the rather extraordinary length of advising customers to actually

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>port their accounts to other providers, which signaled that these,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>these providers, these cloud companies A zero and Cloud Nordick,

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>were not long for this world. If you're telling your customers, hey,

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you need to go find a different provider, chances are

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not sticking around very long. One company that popped

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>up as an alternative to Cloud Nordic was called Rocky Nordic.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Rocky Nordic exists to this day, but you know what,

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it didn't exist, or at least, the website for Rocky

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Nordic didn't exist until August twenty second, twenty twenty three.

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So the attack happened August eighteenth, twenty twenty three. So

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>just a few days after this ransomware attack that Cloud

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Nordick was hit by Rocky Nordic, the website launches, which

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>seems a little strange right now. If I were the

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>fringe theory type, I might start to think that someone

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>over at Cloud Nordic had scrambled to create a new

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>company that also was not saddled with the reputation of

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>having lost every single scrap of customer data to hackers.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And here's a very weird coincidence, y'all. The owner of

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Rocky Nordic, according to various CVR registers, is Casper Tikiob

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>or Tikub. Again, I don't speak Danish, so I'm butchering

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the name, but he's the chairman of the board for

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Rocky Nordic. He was also a co founder of both

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>A zero and Cloud Nordic, and look at that. The

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Rocky Nordic website talks about how safe and secure their

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>service is, which is kind of interesting. Also, by the way,

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if you try to navigate to the old Cloud Nordic site,

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you get redirected to Rocky Nordic, which is also kind

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. Anyway, the damage was done to A zero

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and Cloud Nordic customers. The company claimed it wouldn't be

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>able to compensate customers for the loss of that data either.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>That essentially the customer agreement made with these companies essentially

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>said the companies would not be at fault for any

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>loss of data. So Cloud Nordic and A zero quickly disappeared. Also,

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>net questaps the information security company would disappear. That was

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the other one that was held by the same holding company.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Also interesting that an information security company wasn't able to

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>do more in the face of a ransomware attack that

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>affected its sister companies. How about that? Now, there are

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>other companies called Netquest out there. Just to be clear,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you were to like, oh, I want to

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>read up more about this, you need to make sure

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the right net Quest, because there are

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other companies called Netquest that are not

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this one. There's in fact a net Quest here in

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States that provides threat detection for stuff like

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>state backed hacker attacks and that kind of thing, like

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>really serious potential threats. So that's not the same company.

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I say that because at least one of the sources

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at while I was researching this made

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the mistake of equating the net Quest that was part

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>of this other holding company with that one. They are

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>not the same. That's a different organization entirely. So that

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is the sad tale of a family of companies that

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>were wiped out due to external forces. Honestly, I'm surprised

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't find more information about this When I was searching,

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I read a lot of translated articles because

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>again I can't write, read, or write in Danish. But

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have expected at least a few deeper to

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>investigate how the company's handled or failed to handle, the

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>fallout of this situation that led up to them just

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>shutting down, as well as the questionable origins of Rocky Nordic.

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like having that jump up so quickly as

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>an alternative, and it was founded by one of the

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>co founders of the companies that had been affected by

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the ransomware attacks, you know, that just seems like it's

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>something that needs to be investigated a little bit. Maybe

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>everything is just as it seems on the surface, everything's

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>on the up and up, and you know, there's nothing

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>really questionable here, But I feel like it almost feels

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>like an attempt to continue business as usual and shirking

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>off the reputation of a company that failed to protect

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>customer data to like the most extreme degree possible. It's

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like if you were running a game and you realize, oh, no,

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this game has totally gone off the rails. I'm just

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna quit. Now start a new game, call it something else,

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and hope that nobody questions me about it, like that's

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what it feels like to me, and it may not

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>be that. Again, this is my opinion. It's how I feel,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>how the red flags are popping up in my mind.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And there may even be perfect answers for all of this,

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just couldn't find it in my research. So

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to be totally fair here. Okay, let's take

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. When we come back, we'll talk about

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>some more flops in twenty twenty three. We're back, so

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 1>how about we focus on a failed startup in which

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>all the details of that failure are Fuzzy. That's my

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>cute way to introduce the sad story of Fuzzy, a

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>telehealth site for pets, really for pet owners. Pets are

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>notoriously bad at operating apps. Fuzzy introduced apps for pet

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>owners and on demand telemedicine appointments. Before that, though, Fuzzy

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>actually offered customers the chance to book physical vet visits,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>so they were working with actual veterinary offices and kind

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of serving as a booking agency for those. But that

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>particular business approach proved to be too difficult to scale,

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>so in twenty twenty and in twenty twenty one, the

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>company would change course to focus more on telemedicine. Customers

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>would pay a fee of fifteen dollars per month, and

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in return, they would have access to various like telehealth

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>appointments and a few other services. Zubin Bette, whose name

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'm also mispronouncing, founded Fuzzy back in twenty sixteen.

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>By twenty twenty three, the company had raised more than

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>eighty million dollars in various investment rounds. But on Thursday

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>June fifteenth, twenty twenty three, the company abruptly shut down.

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And when I say abruptly, I do mean it was fast. Now.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Employees reported that they had not been paid since the

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>end of May, so something was clearly up right, and

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>some employees might have already had an inkling that things

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>were going south in a hurry. There were also other

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>employees who reported that they encountered some difficulties when trying

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to use company provided medical insurance and to use the

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>various insurance benefits, that they were running into issues with processing.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So obviously there were problems that were already evident even

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>before the company officially shut down. But the shutdown was

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>so sudden that a lot of high ranking folks at

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the company had no idea that it was happening, and

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they were just as shocked as anyone else. So, according

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to the news site Coverager, Zubin Bette's LinkedIn and Twitter

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>profiles were both taken offline. Now they have since been restored,

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>because I saw both of them while I was researching

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this episode. So I don't want to suggest that he

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>just you know, ghosted the entire world and hid away

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>because this business that he founded had failed. Initially, that

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>might have been the case, because again that's what Coverager

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was saying, but when I did the search, they both

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>popped up, so you know, it could have been a

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>knee jerk reaction. I know that if I had a

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>business that failed pretty spectacularly, especially one that had raised

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like forty million dollars the year before, like a year

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half before, I would be tempted to just

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>go and hide too. I'm actually tempted to go and

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>hide most days, and I don't have something like that

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that happened to me. So I'm not blaming him at

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>all if that was his initial reaction, but I don't

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>know for a fact that that was his reaction at all.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I just know that it was reported that way, but

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>now it appears that all that information is back up online.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>It sounded like the company had owed a great deal

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of money to its creditors and it just hit a

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>point where money was going out faster than it could

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>come in, even with these large investments in on occasion.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But it had been like a year and a half

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>since the last round of investment funding, so I think

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it was just a critical case of a company running

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>out of all that investment money and not generating enough

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>revenue to sustain itself. The news site sf gate suggested

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a potential link between the failure of the Silicon Valley

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Bank with Fuzzy going off to the Rainbow Bridge. To

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>use a analogy as a reminder, the Silicon Valley Bank

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>collapsed due to a number of reasons, including inflation and

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>high interest rates, which then discouraged various companies and individuals

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>from taking out loans. There were a lot of other

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>factors that contributed to the bank's failure. To go into

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all of those would take a full episode by itself,

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, it probably would be best reserved for a

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>totally different type of podcast like a financial podcast. Silicon

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank was and now is again, although it's a

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>totally different entity than it was before. But it was very,

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>very important in the tech industry. Like it was a

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>bank that catered to startups and to venture catalysts and

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>other investors. So it was a big deal. And I

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>do remember when this failure actually happened, because the news

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>broke while I was waiting to board a flight to Austin,

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Texas for south By Southwest in twenty twenty three, and

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of tech executives were supposed to be well.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>They were on that flight, and I started seeing them

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>all look at their notifications on their phone and start

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to sweat really, really hard as the money that they

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>counted on was suddenly getting harder for them to get

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>access to. It was a really dramatic moment that I witnessed,

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just because I happened to be in the right place

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>at the right time to see it, at least on

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>a small scale of folks who were waiting for a

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>flight from Atlanta to Austin, Texas. Anyway, it's possible that

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley banks collapse exacerbated problems that already existed at Fuzzy.

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if SVB had remained solvent, Fuzzy would still be

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>around today, But it sounds to me as though the

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>scaling problems were a real issue and that the odds

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>were stacked against Fuzzy even before the failure of Silicon

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank. Now, not all startup failures are the end

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of the story entirely, so let me set the next scene.

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the spring of twenty fourteen, and you are Keith Alexander,

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the four star general and former director of the United

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>States National Security Agency, or NSA, and you've just had

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a couple of years after denying multiple

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>times that your agency was collecting information on American citizens,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the NSA is really supposed to be

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>focused on foreign intelligence threats. Then a contractor named Edward

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Snowden has revealed to the world that, whoopsie Daisy, the

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>NSA kind of was collecting data on Americans after all,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at least to the extent of, you know, who Americans

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>were calling and who was calling Americans and like a big,

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>massive record of all of those phone calls. So yeah,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you kind of were collecting information about American citizens, even

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>though you were saying you weren't. So then you go

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and you retire from that gig and you're looking to

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>launch something new. That knew something in twenty fourteen is

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a cybersecurity company, and you call it IronNet. It launches

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on May Well in May of twenty fourteen, and Keith

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Alexander's involvement and the company's reputation among investors encouraged a

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of initial enthusiasm, so over time the company would

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>raise more than four hundred million dollars in funding. In

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, the plan was to take the company public,

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but not through the traditional initial public offering or IPO route.

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So the IPO, as I said, is the traditional way

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to take a privately held company to become a publicly

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>traded one. You go through a whole bunch of different steps.

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You work with underwriters, you work with regulators, and you

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>come up with an initial stock price for your company

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as well as the number of shares that you're going

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to issue to a stock market, and the market kind

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of takes care of the rest. And if you're really lucky,

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>people are super jazzed about your company, and the stock

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>price goes up because demand is going up, and you

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>end up raising a huge amount of capital that you

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can then invest into the business and then scale things

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>because now you've got all this cash at your disposal.

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>But there's an alternative to the IPO, which I would

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>call the old standby. It's known as the special purpose

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>acquisition company or SPAC spack approach. This involves investors creating

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a shell company that doesn't do anything like it doesn't

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>produce anything, no products, no services, nothing. It just exists

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of going public and then being used

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to acquire some other company, like a private company. And

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>at that point the acquired private company becomes part of

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a public holding company and boom, you got yourself a

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded company now, which sounds a bit wild, right,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you're bypassing all the IPO stuff in order to

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to take this private company public. It's a

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>workaround which sounds like it shouldn't be allowed, but it

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>totally is allowed. Spacks have become really popular in recent years.

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>They sidestep a lot of tricky hurdles that you have

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 1>to overcome if you're taking a privately held company public

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the traditional way. Sometimes companies fail to go to a

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>full IPO. That's happened a few times, so a SPAC

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is one way to kind of sidestep all that. Now,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot of cynical opinions about SPACs, but

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I also have to admit that I am not at

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>all educated about this kind of stuff. My reticence could

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>only be based off my ignorance. It could be that

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just completely off base because I don't understand it properly.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>But it still does seem kind of questionable to me. However. Anyway,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one, iron Net would go public through

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a SPAC acquisition. Less than a year later, in June

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, iron Net would go through a reorganization

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and would downsize. It laid off around seventeen percent of

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>its workforce, which is kind of crazy, Like, you know,

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>here's a company that had raised hundreds of millions of

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>dollars in investments, then managed to go public through a

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>SPACK acquisition, and now just a year later, is downsizing.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Tech Crunch's Carly page included a quote from IronNet spokesperson

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Joseph P. Deppa the Third that said, quote, the workforce

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>reduction is part of a broader plan to streamline our operations.

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>For higher efficiency, to reduce overall expenses and preserve cash,

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and to set iron Net up for rationalized growth going forward.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>End quote. So it sounds like despite that influx of

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>cash from investments and from going public, iron Net was

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>hitting hard times, which is weird, right because we're also

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about a time when cybersecurity threats were definitely on

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the rise, like from twenty twenty to today, Like you've

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>seen just such a dramatic rise in cybersecurity threats, particularly

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>nation backed cybersecurity threats. You would think that a company

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>headed by a former director of the NSA would actually

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>be doing business like gangbusters, like they'd be able to

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>scale easily, you would think based upon just the reputation

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the people involved and the factors that were present

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>at that time. But that's not what was going on.

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Iron Net was not doing well. According to Zach Whittaker,

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>also of tech Crunch, iron Net had fewer than one

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred corporate customers in twenty twenty two. The company worded

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it a little differently in a statement from Alexander that

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>read quote, we encountered unexpected headwinds in our transactional business

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>this quarter. To contain costs, we are undertaking a further

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>restructuring of the company with the support of our new CFO,

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Cameron four. We have decided to forego a call with

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>management this quarter until we are better able to communicate

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on our progress end quote, which almost sounds like we

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to talk to you all till we can

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>get our story straight. In July twenty twenty three, Alexander

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>was shown the door. Now, this was all part of

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a larger strategy to take the company private again. Remember

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it had only been public for like less than a

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>year at this point. Linder Zicher who was chosen as

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the person who would step in from the investor. She

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was a big wig over at the main investor C five.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>She would become the new CEO of this beleaguered cybersecurity

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>company for day to day operations. By this point, Ironnet's

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>stock with down to a measly twenty one cents per share.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>When the SPAC first acquired iron Net in twenty twenty one,

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the stock was trading at more than thirteen dollars per share,

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>so down to twenty one cents was a huge decline.

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Iron Net would go through some serious slimming even at

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the board level. The strategy included a requirement that iron

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Net's board of directors would need to slim down to

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>just seven folks, three of whom would be determined by

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that venture capital firm C five. And a couple of

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>months after that, in October of twenty twenty three, iron

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Net went dark. All staff were let go. The company

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 1>filed for bankruptcy. However, it would end up being only

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly dead. In February twenty twenty four, iron Net would

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>sputter to life again, emerging from Chapter eleven bankruptcy and

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>restructured as a privately held company. Well, iron Net do

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>better the second time around? Beats me? But golly, I

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>bet folks who invested in the company before it went

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>into bankruptcy are really regretting that decision because that one

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>was a monumental failure leading up to the relaunch. Right, so,

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>rough times, I'm curious about other things that happened at

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that company. I saw kind of vague mentions of mismanagement,

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and it does sound like that would have had to

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have been part of it, right, Like, you know, how

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 1>do you have a company that's getting hundreds of millions

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in investment and then is going public end

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>up having that same issue where you have to reorganize

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>like twice in a year due to issues like that

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>does suggest there's some mismanagement going on, But I didn't

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>find a lot of details, so I'm going to keep

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>looking to see if I can learn more about what

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>actually happened to this cybersecurity company, because there's got to

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be more to the story than that. But in the meantime,

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take a quick break. When we come back,

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got one more failure I want to talk about

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>for this episode before we things up. I plan on

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>doing a second episode of failures from twenty twenty three

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>because there were a bunch of them and this is

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>just a small sample. But first, let's take another quick

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsors. Okay, so we're back. Get

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ready for stating the obvious moment, right, The pandemic really

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>did a big old whammy on businesses. Now, some businesses

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like Quibi stumbled really hard, and you could at least

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>partly blame the pandemic for that. Now, there are plenty

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of people who say that Quibi was doomed to fail,

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>whether the pandemic had happened or not. If you don't

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>remember Quibi that was a short form video streaming platform.

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>The original idea was that this would be something you

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>would watch on your mobile device, like your phone, and

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that it was designed so that you could watch videos

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>either in portrait or landscape mode, you would get a

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>slightly different experience depending on how you were holding your phone,

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and that all the content on Quibi would be designed

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to be digestible in short stents, so like even a

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>full length film would be divided into like ten minute chapters,

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>so that you could watch it whenever you had time.

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you wouldn't necessarily sit down to watch

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>full length films or television episodes in one sitting. It

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was more like, oh, throughout the day, you might watch

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit now and a little bit later, and

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. But Quibi famously blazed out of

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>control in its first year of existence, where it overspent.

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>It spent way too much on production and securing content.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And also you had the pandemic hit, so people weren't

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>out and about with their smartphones anymore, they were staying

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>at home. But again there were those who were saying

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that even if the pandemic hadn't happened, Quibi probably would

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not have succeeded. That it was just a bad idea

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning. But there were other companies, other services

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that would do quite well, largely due to the pandemic.

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Zoom saw a meteoric rise in importance because

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of the restrictions that the world was working under. And

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you have so much of the world

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>under lockdown and all meetings have to be virtual, a

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>tool like Zoom is obviously going to do very well well.

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>One company that initially did well under the circumstances of

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic was a live streaming service company called Mandolin.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it was the pandemic that inspired Mandolin's co

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>founders to create the company. Mandolin launched on June first,

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. Now, when I read that, I assumed that

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this was actually going to be the story about a

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>company that began as an idea that formed a year

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>or two in advance, right like maybe twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen,

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and that it kind of incubated for months and months

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>before it finally launched in the summer of twenty twenty.

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But I was wrong. Mandolin's earliest days are traced to

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>just a month before it launched in May twenty twenty.

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>That's incredible. That's an insane ramp up. Co founders Steve Caldwell,

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Mary Kay Hughes, and Robert Mitis saw opportunity where otherwise

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>things were really looking pretty bleak. Obviously, the pandemic would

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have an enormous impact on live performances. Venues had to

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>shut down, Artists had nowhere to go to play, Audiences

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>had nowhere to go to listen. So enormous companies that

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>had built empires on managing live events were suddenly shackled

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and in a holding pattern, and no one was sure

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>how long this was going to last. This created a

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>heck of an opportunity for entrepreneurs. A live streaming service

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>catering specifically to live music would have no better shot

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>at gaining mind share than in the early days of

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. I mean, they were already platforms out there

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that could do this, but they weren't necessarily dedicated for

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>live music. Right like you could do it on Twitch,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you could do it on YouTube. There were solutions out there,

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but one that was specifically built to cater to the

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>live music community. That was something that was seen as

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity. The business minds behind Mandolin secured partnerships with

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>venues like City Winery, so they even had venue sponsored

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>livestream events where you're virtually attending a City Winery show.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>They became the backbone for digital only online festivals, and

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the leaders of the business stressed that the company's success

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't only dependent upon the unfortunate lockdown situation, that the

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>music industry as a whole was ripe for disruption for

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.479
<v Speaker 1>a multitude of reasons, and to some extent I agree

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.479
<v Speaker 1>with them. I do think the live music industry in

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>general is ripe for disruption. We're certainly seeing a lot

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>more pushback against the traditional live music industry, especially here

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, with companies like ticket Master being

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>challenged by the US government saying that they're operating as

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly, essentially that they're using anti competitive practices to

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>lock down venues and artists into agreements where Ticketmaster has

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>control of all the different elements in that vertical stack.

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing that happen now. So I agree that the

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>live music industry as a whole is ripe for disruption. However,

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that Mandolin was doing as much as

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the creators of the company were boasting about Now, Mandolin's

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>operations received both financial investment and critical acclaim in those

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>few years where it existed. Investors poured several million dollars

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>into the company, and in twenty twenty one, Pollstar named

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Mandolin the best streaming platform fast Come. He would follow

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>suit and named Mandolin the most innovative music company in

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the world in twenty twenty two, and just a year later,

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Mandolin would cut its strings and shut down. Obviously, some

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>things changed in those years between the company's launch in

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty and shutting down in twenty twenty three. For

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing, the severity of the pandemic was in decline,

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and you had a lot more folks going out to

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>live venues, and live venues were opening back up again.

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Now there was a lot of shuffling going on in

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the live venue space. You had some folks and companies

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that were getting out of the business or had failed entirely,

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and other companies got into it, and Mandolin tried to

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>navigate those changes as well, but found it challenging to

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>do so so. For one thing, Mandolin introduced a feature

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>called Live Plus in twenty twenty one, as Variety would report.

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>This was really a suite of features that included quote

0:33:55.840 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a plethora of digital choices before, during, and after show,

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>from ticket sales to meet and greet or after party

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>add ons to the show, to ordering food and merch

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>online without waiting in line, to getting access at home

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to replays of shows that are filmed live end quote.

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I can totally dig on that. Like one thing I

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to do when I go to a live show

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>is I'm always tempted to scoop up an album by

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the artists I'm watching, particularly if the album happens to

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be Vinyl. But it can be a real hassle getting

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in line at the end of a show. And I

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>can definitely see the value proposition of a service like

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that where you've got essentially like a virtual line queue

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.959
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But for the business side of things, well

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit more opaque to me. So apparently the

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>idea was that venues would opt into supporting this feature.

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>So presumably there would be some sort of compensation for that, right,

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like the venue would pay a certain amount of money,

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe like a recurring fee on a yearly or monthly basis,

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to be part of this service. Whether that would actually

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.479
<v Speaker 1>generate enough revenue to sustain the company in the long run.

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't say, but at the time Mandolin had raised

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>nearly twenty million investments and then on top of that,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>had these revenue generation strategies. In twenty twenty two, the

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>company launched a couple of new products called fan Pages

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and Fan Navigator. These were not geared to live music audiences.

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>These were geared to the actual musicians. So Fan Navigator

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>would give musical acts access to aggregated data about fans.

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Fan Pages would include a tool that would collect data

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.959
<v Speaker 1>from fans in the first place, and presumably acts would

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>then be able to take this information and then make

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>something useful out of it. Perhaps they could use it

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to plan out new merch launches, or maybe make ideas

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for new tours, that kind of thing. But despite all

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>these efforts, Mandolin wasn't able to stick around once folks

0:35:56.560 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>started to go back to live venues again. Company's website

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>had a message that read quote, we are sad to

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>announce that, after three incredible years of connecting artists and

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>fans more authentically through digital experiences, we are officially closing

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>down our product and business operations end quote, and they

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>said that the final day of operations would be April

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty first, twenty twenty three, and another live streaming music

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>platform called Sessions also shut down, this one much earlier

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. Like Mandolins, Sessions launched in twenty twenty.

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it launched first. It launched in April twenty twenty,

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 1>right in the very beginning of the pandemic. The former

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Pandora was the founder for this company, and

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>rumors about its demise began to circulate in late twenty

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. So I didn't really think it quite made

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the cut for this episode for you know, startups that

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>failed in twenty twenty three. But you know, the fate

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of Sessions really did show that Mandolin was not unique

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in this issue. A lot of companies that had been

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>well positioned to provide products and services during the pandemic

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>failed to remain relevant once those conditions changed, right like

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>once people started to leave their homes again. And this

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was something that was bigger than just startups. Obviously, we

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>saw lots and lots of companies start to hold layoffs

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>in the months that followed lockdowns, opening up because these

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>companies had invested big time in ramping things up during

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, and then didn't need those larger staff bases

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>once the pandemic conditions changed. So we didn't just see

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>startups but affected by this. We saw massive companies like

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies obviously continued to hold massive layoffs year

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>over year. And that's just a taste of some of

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the tech startups that failed last year. I'll bring more

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of those to you later this week, but for now,

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I hope you are all well, and I'll talk to

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production.

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:15.879
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.