1 00:00:01,040 --> 00:00:03,720 Speaker 1: This is the Action Network podcast. 2 00:00:04,559 --> 00:00:05,800 Speaker 2: It's good to. 3 00:00:05,880 --> 00:00:09,040 Speaker 1: The winds without further ado. 4 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:11,480 Speaker 2: That's what the game's all about. 5 00:00:12,640 --> 00:00:16,919 Speaker 1: All of a sudden, you feel like you can't miss. 6 00:00:19,040 --> 00:00:23,079 Speaker 2: I could make if you try that to get absolutely 7 00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 2: trying to. 8 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:34,519 Speaker 3: Welcome to the Action Network Podcast NBA Draft Edition. I'm 9 00:00:34,560 --> 00:00:37,159 Speaker 3: Matt Morrison, your NBA writer, joined as always on our 10 00:00:37,240 --> 00:00:41,040 Speaker 3: NBA editions by Brandon Anderson and Raheem Palmer. We're gonna 11 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:44,919 Speaker 3: be taking you through the NBA Draft. All the props, 12 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:48,600 Speaker 3: everything available. Everything that we're talking about is however, available 13 00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:50,080 Speaker 3: on the Action Network. 14 00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:51,680 Speaker 1: App, which you should check out. We've got prop stuff. 15 00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:55,040 Speaker 3: I will have my final props board up later today. 16 00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 3: Recording this on Wednesday, I'll have that up for you 17 00:00:57,400 --> 00:00:59,440 Speaker 3: to get your bets in. I've already bet a lot 18 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:02,200 Speaker 3: I've been betting over the last month or so. Today's 19 00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:04,479 Speaker 3: odds are provided you by bet mgm, the official OS 20 00:01:04,480 --> 00:01:07,080 Speaker 3: provider of the Action Network podcast. Most of the odds 21 00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 3: we will talk about are available at bet mgm, unless 22 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:14,880 Speaker 3: otherwise noted. Before we do that, however, heads up, several 23 00:01:14,920 --> 00:01:18,000 Speaker 3: new podcasts are debuting next week from the Action Network, 24 00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:21,480 Speaker 3: including one dedicated just for NBA betting. 25 00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:23,040 Speaker 1: So to hear me and the rest. 26 00:01:22,800 --> 00:01:25,039 Speaker 3: Of our crew going forward, you need to subscribe to 27 00:01:25,080 --> 00:01:27,319 Speaker 3: a new podcast debuting next week. 28 00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:29,119 Speaker 1: It'll be called Buckets, but we'll. 29 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:31,760 Speaker 3: Announce and make that official announcement right here on the 30 00:01:31,760 --> 00:01:33,760 Speaker 3: Action Network podcast feed next week, and we'll get you 31 00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:36,040 Speaker 3: guys a link so you can subscribe and not miss 32 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:36,680 Speaker 3: an episode. 33 00:01:36,880 --> 00:01:40,080 Speaker 1: Stay tuned, you can hear the chatter from the crowd. 34 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:43,080 Speaker 3: Raheem does not pay attention to college basketball and is 35 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:46,680 Speaker 3: too busy prepping for NFL and having to sweat his 36 00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:51,280 Speaker 3: Broncos overticket as I tried to warn him off fervently 37 00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:53,280 Speaker 3: after he'd already done it, which doesn't really make any sense, 38 00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:55,160 Speaker 3: but I try to do that anyway. He's not really 39 00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:55,680 Speaker 3: worried about it. 40 00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 1: He feels confident their defense is going to be good. 41 00:01:57,800 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 1: They're not going to be there be trash Chiefs fans. 42 00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:02,880 Speaker 3: But anyway, Rahiem and I are gonna and Brandon and 43 00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:04,800 Speaker 3: I were gonna talk about the NBA season wrap up. 44 00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:06,200 Speaker 3: We never got a chance to kind of wrap up 45 00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:09,680 Speaker 3: after the finals. Milwaukee Bucks, Congratulations to the NBA champions. 46 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:14,000 Speaker 3: Congratulations to us for having uh properly managed our futures 47 00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:16,760 Speaker 3: bets to come out ahead in most cases, including Raheem, 48 00:02:16,760 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 3: who was on the Bucks after game two. 49 00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:23,280 Speaker 4: I wasn't on the mafter game two. I'm gonna I'm 50 00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:26,040 Speaker 4: not even gonna lie to you. I didn't figure it 51 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:28,360 Speaker 4: out until game four. Like I lost a lot of 52 00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 4: money on game. 53 00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 1: For the series. Yeah, it kind of actually ruined me. 54 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:36,519 Speaker 4: I had a lot of money on the Sons Game four, 55 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:39,359 Speaker 4: and then that's when it hit me like, Yo, this 56 00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:40,519 Speaker 4: is Raptors Bucks. 57 00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:44,079 Speaker 3: But you were you were up big from the conference semifinals. 58 00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 3: So you've done You've done well. 59 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:50,880 Speaker 1: Let's let's start here, all right. 60 00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:54,520 Speaker 3: So the final four teams from twenty twenty in the bubble, 61 00:02:55,360 --> 00:02:57,360 Speaker 3: all of them go out. 62 00:02:57,639 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 1: Three of them go out in the first round. The 63 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:02,520 Speaker 1: other one gets in the second, which. 64 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:04,919 Speaker 3: Has led to the idea of, like, you know, maybe 65 00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:07,040 Speaker 3: that was just like a fluke situation, and I think 66 00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 3: that there's like I personally think there's probably some validity 67 00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:13,200 Speaker 3: to that. I don't think there's it's entirely I don't 68 00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:17,320 Speaker 3: think it's like the Lakers aren't actually good. I think 69 00:03:17,639 --> 00:03:19,880 Speaker 3: the Lakers are actually good, but they were so dominant 70 00:03:19,880 --> 00:03:23,040 Speaker 3: because inside the bubble Anthony Davis one stayed healthy after 71 00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:26,880 Speaker 3: three months off and two shot the lights out from 72 00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:30,480 Speaker 3: on his jumper, which doesn't always happen. I think the 73 00:03:30,520 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 3: heat got hot, no pun intended. I think that they 74 00:03:34,040 --> 00:03:36,920 Speaker 3: had the right series and matchups and the Celtics kind 75 00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:39,760 Speaker 3: of imploded in that conference final series and that's how 76 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:41,600 Speaker 3: they made their run. And I think that they're not 77 00:03:41,680 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 3: as good, especially after they lost j Crowder. I think 78 00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:46,520 Speaker 3: that that really knocked them down. I think Crowder was 79 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:47,080 Speaker 3: a big part. 80 00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:47,440 Speaker 1: Of that run. 81 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:50,280 Speaker 3: The Nuggets are one I can't really I can't really 82 00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:52,400 Speaker 3: tell on they're in the I have not decided. I 83 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:55,160 Speaker 3: think the Celtics were good. I think the Celtics had 84 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,160 Speaker 3: a down year this season. It's kind of where I'm at. 85 00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:01,880 Speaker 3: But my question for you, Rahimla start with you if 86 00:04:01,880 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 3: you're gonna if we're gonna say you have to take 87 00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:06,160 Speaker 3: the last two seasons with a grain of salt because 88 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:07,520 Speaker 3: of the pandemic, which I think is fair. 89 00:04:08,040 --> 00:04:09,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, which one do you. 90 00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:12,240 Speaker 3: Think has the bigger or more grains of salt. Do 91 00:04:12,280 --> 00:04:14,880 Speaker 3: you think it's the bubble and all the weirdness that 92 00:04:14,920 --> 00:04:18,400 Speaker 3: occurred in there after a fairly normal start of the season, 93 00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:25,400 Speaker 3: or last year with COVID interruptions, exhaustion, a really terrible schedule, 94 00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:27,799 Speaker 3: injuries and everything else. 95 00:04:28,480 --> 00:04:30,880 Speaker 4: I definitely think it's last year. You have to take 96 00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:34,159 Speaker 4: that more with the granted salt, because you know, everybody 97 00:04:34,240 --> 00:04:37,440 Speaker 4: was hurt. I mean, if you look at James Harden, 98 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:40,800 Speaker 4: James Harden is one of the most durable players of 99 00:04:40,839 --> 00:04:43,960 Speaker 4: all time, him and Lebron James, and both of them 100 00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:48,960 Speaker 4: went down. The Celtics they never like the Celtics to me, 101 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 4: were never they never had a shot from I mean 102 00:04:52,279 --> 00:04:56,080 Speaker 4: Game one. You know, they were suffering injuries, COVID absences. 103 00:04:56,760 --> 00:05:00,400 Speaker 4: It's just everybody went down and this was this was 104 00:05:00,440 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 4: the ultimate war of attrition, you know, at least in 105 00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:05,320 Speaker 4: the bubble, you know. I think there were some mental 106 00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:08,760 Speaker 4: health aspects to you know, why teams slipped, But for 107 00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:11,760 Speaker 4: the most part, you know, everybody was on a level 108 00:05:11,800 --> 00:05:14,880 Speaker 4: playing field. You can't say the same about this year 109 00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:17,520 Speaker 4: as far as everybody being on a level playing field. 110 00:05:17,560 --> 00:05:19,000 Speaker 4: So I'm taking this year with the more of a 111 00:05:19,040 --> 00:05:22,839 Speaker 4: grain of salt. But I do think you know, a 112 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:24,920 Speaker 4: team like the Bucks, they earned it. So I don't 113 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:28,159 Speaker 4: want to you know, I don't I don't want to 114 00:05:28,160 --> 00:05:31,320 Speaker 4: disregard their championship because I feel like, you know, the 115 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:34,080 Speaker 4: Bucks were never the same once they entered the bubble, 116 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:36,640 Speaker 4: like they kind of lost that momentum, and this year 117 00:05:36,680 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 4: they didn't have that momentum taken away from Brandon. 118 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:47,040 Speaker 2: What do you thoughts, Yeah, I don't know. I I 119 00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:50,560 Speaker 2: agree that the injuries this year just piled up so 120 00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:54,719 Speaker 2: much that we ended up it felt like, you know, 121 00:05:54,839 --> 00:05:56,680 Speaker 2: it felt like we ended up with the two teams 122 00:05:56,680 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 2: in the finals that just outlasted everyone else in someone 123 00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:02,760 Speaker 2: And again that doesn't take away from it. You got 124 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:05,640 Speaker 2: to still win the games and credit both of them. 125 00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:08,720 Speaker 2: Phoenix survived a series in the first round with Chris 126 00:06:08,760 --> 00:06:12,640 Speaker 2: Paul hurt. The Bucks survived Yannis being hurt in the 127 00:06:12,680 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 2: conference finals and won two games to make the finals. 128 00:06:15,360 --> 00:06:18,640 Speaker 2: So you absolutely get credit for winning without your stars 129 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:21,040 Speaker 2: some of the most. None of the other teams won 130 00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:22,920 Speaker 2: without their stars. That's the whole point. That's why they're 131 00:06:22,920 --> 00:06:25,440 Speaker 2: in the finals. So you get credit for that. It 132 00:06:25,600 --> 00:06:28,119 Speaker 2: just that there were so many injuries. I think though 133 00:06:29,200 --> 00:06:33,080 Speaker 2: last year had had more grains of salt to me, 134 00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:37,359 Speaker 2: just because like this year, there were so many injuries. 135 00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:39,640 Speaker 2: But that could happen any year, and for sure it 136 00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:43,320 Speaker 2: seems like the injuries this year tied to the condemned schedule, 137 00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:45,760 Speaker 2: the pandemic, all of that. Like, it's hard to on 138 00:06:46,000 --> 00:06:49,160 Speaker 2: couple of those things. But any year we get enter 139 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:51,640 Speaker 2: the playoffs and see, you know, the ones you lose 140 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:53,440 Speaker 2: their star. You know, we can think of a lot 141 00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:56,800 Speaker 2: of examples where that's happened. Every playoff has its own 142 00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:59,760 Speaker 2: asterisk of the big injury or the luck or the 143 00:06:59,800 --> 00:07:04,479 Speaker 2: tip or whatever. This year, the asterisks or whatever you 144 00:07:04,480 --> 00:07:07,359 Speaker 2: want to call them, seem a little bigger. But I 145 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:12,200 Speaker 2: felt like last year had so many more big grains 146 00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:15,320 Speaker 2: of salt that were affecting things. Things like you said, 147 00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:17,720 Speaker 2: like like some of the mental health things in the bubble, 148 00:07:18,040 --> 00:07:21,200 Speaker 2: the social unrest that was happening. It was literally a 149 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:24,560 Speaker 2: strike or like a in the middle of the playoffs. 150 00:07:24,600 --> 00:07:26,640 Speaker 2: We stopped playing and then kept going again a couple 151 00:07:26,680 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 2: of days later. And I don't think we have any 152 00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:32,160 Speaker 2: idea to understand like how that affected some teams differently 153 00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:34,960 Speaker 2: than others, and how it affected the players and the coaches. 154 00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:38,200 Speaker 2: They're just there was so much more last year. I 155 00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:40,840 Speaker 2: don't think either one of them are an asterisk. Last 156 00:07:40,920 --> 00:07:43,000 Speaker 2: year is what it was this year is what it was. 157 00:07:43,440 --> 00:07:46,040 Speaker 2: We have two champs and they earned it. You know, 158 00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:49,400 Speaker 2: it's it. They played what was put before them and 159 00:07:49,400 --> 00:07:53,000 Speaker 2: they won the title. So I I guess to me, 160 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:56,480 Speaker 2: I feel like like I like to think of it 161 00:07:56,520 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 2: as Okay, it's the end of the playoffs and we 162 00:07:59,880 --> 00:08:01,880 Speaker 2: have there's no way to know what the injuries would 163 00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 2: have been or what might have been. Otherwise we can speculate, 164 00:08:04,520 --> 00:08:07,840 Speaker 2: we can kind of guess, but knowing what we know now, 165 00:08:08,280 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 2: if you look back, knowing everything you know now but 166 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:12,760 Speaker 2: not the injuries, it's the start of the playoffs, but 167 00:08:12,880 --> 00:08:17,000 Speaker 2: you've now seen this possible future timeline. It's the new 168 00:08:17,040 --> 00:08:20,560 Speaker 2: start of this year's playoffs. Would you still pick the 169 00:08:20,600 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 2: Bucks or the Suns to make the finals? Because I 170 00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:28,120 Speaker 2: think I still wouldn't And it doesn't mean that that 171 00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 2: takes away from what they did. I just don't think 172 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:33,000 Speaker 2: that even with the things I saw, they were better 173 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:34,560 Speaker 2: than I thought they would be. I just am not 174 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:36,800 Speaker 2: sure it's still to pick them. I think the injuries 175 00:08:36,880 --> 00:08:38,360 Speaker 2: played a huge role on both sides. 176 00:08:38,559 --> 00:08:39,400 Speaker 1: Here's the bigger question. 177 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:41,360 Speaker 3: It's not a redoing this when we can't make money 178 00:08:41,400 --> 00:08:42,120 Speaker 3: off what's already done. 179 00:08:42,160 --> 00:08:42,439 Speaker 1: Brandon. 180 00:08:43,320 --> 00:08:47,600 Speaker 3: The bigger question is does winning the title fundamentally shift 181 00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:50,080 Speaker 3: who they are because a lot of times the team 182 00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:53,800 Speaker 3: wins a title and that the confidence and what they 183 00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:57,960 Speaker 3: learned from that process opens up new stuff. Like I 184 00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:00,679 Speaker 3: had the Bucks on my top five props for now, 185 00:09:01,480 --> 00:09:04,079 Speaker 3: I've already bet the five that are on my list. 186 00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:11,120 Speaker 3: I bet Nuggets, I bet Warriors, I bet Mavericks, I 187 00:09:11,200 --> 00:09:14,120 Speaker 3: bet I bet Bucks a plus eight fifty. 188 00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:15,640 Speaker 1: I think there's value there, not a lot. 189 00:09:15,840 --> 00:09:18,000 Speaker 5: I think there's value there as well. 190 00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:21,440 Speaker 3: So that's kind of question, is like it's I do 191 00:09:21,640 --> 00:09:23,440 Speaker 3: I'm with you, Brandon in terms of coming back and 192 00:09:23,480 --> 00:09:27,160 Speaker 3: being like yeah, but but James Harden and Kyrie are 193 00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:30,040 Speaker 3: like they went seven with no Harden and no Kyrie 194 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:32,280 Speaker 3: like brand here. Here's here's a bigger question is like, 195 00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:36,400 Speaker 3: is there anybody we see free agency? There's always crazy 196 00:09:36,440 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 3: stuff that can happen, but right now, is there a 197 00:09:41,040 --> 00:09:44,160 Speaker 3: team outside of Brooklyn that you think beats the Bucks? 198 00:09:45,679 --> 00:09:49,000 Speaker 2: Yeah? I mean when you posted your futures column, and 199 00:09:49,120 --> 00:09:52,520 Speaker 2: I guess my takeaway from what I was saying is 200 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:54,520 Speaker 2: kind of I think the opposite a little bit of 201 00:09:54,559 --> 00:09:57,520 Speaker 2: your takeaway, which is my response to your Futures column, 202 00:09:57,480 --> 00:09:59,880 Speaker 2: I wrote you, I said, you know, just just let 203 00:09:59,880 --> 00:10:01,960 Speaker 2: me all my five units on the nets. I just 204 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:04,839 Speaker 2: feel like, like I feel like I'm looking at the nets. 205 00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:07,520 Speaker 2: We saw how it played out. The guys got hurt, 206 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 2: but it sure was looking inevitable right up until the 207 00:10:10,920 --> 00:10:14,040 Speaker 2: guys got hurt. It sure looked like we all sort 208 00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:16,160 Speaker 2: of had that feeling of like, oh man, how did 209 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:18,679 Speaker 2: we not just see that this was just going to happen. 210 00:10:18,760 --> 00:10:23,600 Speaker 2: There's so much it was literally, oh my god, I'm sorry. Yeah, true, 211 00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:27,880 Speaker 2: that's right. I feel like it's the Nets, and if 212 00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:30,360 Speaker 2: it's not the Nets, then it's the Lakers because of 213 00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:33,400 Speaker 2: the same thing. It's just it's overwhelming superstar talent, and 214 00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 2: that's what happens in the NBA unless the overwhelming superstar 215 00:10:36,840 --> 00:10:37,560 Speaker 2: talent gets hurt. 216 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:40,600 Speaker 3: I'll say this, I have liked the Bucks matchup versus 217 00:10:40,640 --> 00:10:43,120 Speaker 3: the Lakers the last two seasons. If the Bucks had 218 00:10:43,120 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 3: not gotten knocked off by the Heat, I would have 219 00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:48,960 Speaker 3: loved them in the finals matchup versus the Lakers. How 220 00:10:48,960 --> 00:10:51,240 Speaker 3: the Lakers want to beat you. They want to beat 221 00:10:51,240 --> 00:10:54,960 Speaker 3: you with size side and size and defense. The Bucks 222 00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 3: are basically okay. How about if we're just as big 223 00:10:57,559 --> 00:11:00,760 Speaker 3: as you, only we're not one hundred years old and 224 00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 3: we're not completely brittle. Like I don't like the idea 225 00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:07,439 Speaker 3: of Anthony Davis going up against that physicality. 226 00:11:07,640 --> 00:11:09,960 Speaker 1: Don't like it at all. I don't like the idea. 227 00:11:10,080 --> 00:11:12,200 Speaker 3: Like as bad as I talked about the buck Shooters, 228 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:14,240 Speaker 3: they finally came through. Like this is a lot of 229 00:11:14,240 --> 00:11:16,319 Speaker 3: it for me, is like the buck Shooters finally came 230 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:18,720 Speaker 3: through rahem, Like they finally made made shots that they 231 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:19,120 Speaker 3: needed to. 232 00:11:19,920 --> 00:11:21,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, it was so funny. 233 00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:25,719 Speaker 4: The I didn't mean to cut Brandon off, but that 234 00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:28,880 Speaker 4: NETS series was inevitable up until the time when Bruce 235 00:11:28,960 --> 00:11:32,839 Speaker 4: Brown Bruce Brown bowling based I mean not bowing. Bruce 236 00:11:32,880 --> 00:11:36,000 Speaker 4: Brown basically decided that he was going to close out 237 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:40,559 Speaker 4: the game with floaters, Like if Kevin Durant or Kyrie 238 00:11:40,600 --> 00:11:43,560 Speaker 4: Irvin takes those shots, I mean, we're looking at nets 239 00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:44,240 Speaker 4: in the finals. 240 00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:50,760 Speaker 3: So here's here's my one caveat and like, look, there 241 00:11:51,240 --> 00:11:54,120 Speaker 3: will be a time to bet the nets. I don't 242 00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:57,680 Speaker 3: think it's now, agree Like I think the numbers bad 243 00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:01,560 Speaker 3: now they're the lowest on the board, Like the nets 244 00:12:01,559 --> 00:12:04,760 Speaker 3: are plus two twenty five. We are a year away 245 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:07,760 Speaker 3: from the finals and they're plus two twenty five. Yeah, 246 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:11,400 Speaker 3: like that's a like they have I get it because 247 00:12:11,400 --> 00:12:13,959 Speaker 3: the books are basically like, we don't want your Nets 248 00:12:14,000 --> 00:12:17,760 Speaker 3: money now, like we don't want it now. We know 249 00:12:17,840 --> 00:12:20,120 Speaker 3: how favored they are, and I get that, but that 250 00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:23,520 Speaker 3: number is bad. We will build a Nets position over 251 00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:26,120 Speaker 3: the next year on our podcast. 252 00:12:26,320 --> 00:12:27,360 Speaker 1: That's the thing we will do. 253 00:12:27,480 --> 00:12:29,120 Speaker 4: I think that's something that you've always been good at, 254 00:12:29,200 --> 00:12:32,600 Speaker 4: Like you've been good at building positions and knowing when 255 00:12:32,679 --> 00:12:36,560 Speaker 4: to take you know, teams that you know our favorite 256 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:39,480 Speaker 4: and hitting them on the down spots. It's almost like, 257 00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:43,640 Speaker 4: you know, Rali Bob Volgaris, he was able to get 258 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:46,960 Speaker 4: the Shaq and kolbe Lakers at like like six to 259 00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:48,839 Speaker 4: six to one when they were. 260 00:12:48,800 --> 00:12:50,440 Speaker 1: In the middle of turmoil. So I think you have 261 00:12:50,480 --> 00:12:52,200 Speaker 1: to kind of wait for those spots. 262 00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:54,720 Speaker 3: Right, So you're just trying to build it up so 263 00:12:54,880 --> 00:12:56,839 Speaker 3: there'll be a time about the Nets. Here's my one 264 00:12:56,920 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 3: caveat with the Nets. Kyrie Irving has had one healthy 265 00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:02,720 Speaker 3: season over the last six years. 266 00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, Katie had a whole bunch of stuff last. 267 00:13:07,040 --> 00:13:11,199 Speaker 2: Year, and we know that guy's coming off the Olympics. 268 00:13:11,280 --> 00:13:13,200 Speaker 2: That it's it's not great, and we're on this like 269 00:13:13,280 --> 00:13:16,600 Speaker 2: extended long season and then no off season for him. 270 00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:21,160 Speaker 1: Like came good. 271 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:24,120 Speaker 4: The NBA just came out with some news saying that 272 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:28,120 Speaker 4: they're basically, you know, they're gonna stop calling all of 273 00:13:28,160 --> 00:13:31,760 Speaker 4: these fouls. So maybe Harten is a different player next year. 274 00:13:31,840 --> 00:13:35,559 Speaker 3: All right, So all of this I think combines where 275 00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:40,600 Speaker 3: I think we'll be on when the wind totals come out, 276 00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:43,560 Speaker 3: We're going to be on the Nets over. I think 277 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:46,040 Speaker 3: depending on what they do in free agent and free agency, 278 00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:48,040 Speaker 3: I think we'll probably be on the over. 279 00:13:48,360 --> 00:13:49,920 Speaker 2: I actually think that I will be on the under 280 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:52,319 Speaker 2: because I feel like I feel like I'm looking at 281 00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:54,720 Speaker 2: the Nets regular season as just a throwaway. 282 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:55,520 Speaker 1: Here's a problem. 283 00:13:55,720 --> 00:13:57,520 Speaker 2: The games out hard and sets them out. 284 00:13:57,840 --> 00:13:59,600 Speaker 3: They literally didn't have this year, Brandon, where they still 285 00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:00,600 Speaker 3: wind up with two seeds. 286 00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:03,520 Speaker 1: That's my problem is like they were so good this year. 287 00:14:03,760 --> 00:14:06,079 Speaker 3: No team cared less about the regular season than the 288 00:14:06,120 --> 00:14:08,440 Speaker 3: Brooklyn Nets, and they still wound up with the two seed. 289 00:14:08,760 --> 00:14:10,760 Speaker 3: So like, I think we got to take the over, 290 00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:13,680 Speaker 3: and I don't think that the title BET's gonna be bad. 291 00:14:14,080 --> 00:14:15,240 Speaker 1: We just got to wait for the number. 292 00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:18,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, all right, let's wrap this up and move 293 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 3: to some NBA draft props. Raheem's gonna bounce, Rahiem, you 294 00:14:21,040 --> 00:14:23,640 Speaker 3: just are. Raheem's great work on NFL coverage as well 295 00:14:23,680 --> 00:14:25,000 Speaker 3: as boxing, and I think. 296 00:14:24,920 --> 00:14:26,920 Speaker 5: Next year you guys have inspired me. 297 00:14:27,160 --> 00:14:29,880 Speaker 4: I'm gonna start doing some draft stuff because I see 298 00:14:29,920 --> 00:14:32,640 Speaker 4: I have to actually pay attention to college basketball. 299 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:35,400 Speaker 3: All right, you can catch Raheem on the Action Network. 300 00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:37,000 Speaker 3: You can follow his picks there as well as you 301 00:14:37,040 --> 00:14:39,480 Speaker 3: can catch him on Twitter as well. In the episode 302 00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:42,040 Speaker 3: of description. Thanks for joining us, Raheem, and we'll talk 303 00:14:42,040 --> 00:14:43,960 Speaker 3: to you guys again. We'll talk to you again soon 304 00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:46,560 Speaker 3: and we'll do some NFL NBA draft props. 305 00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:51,880 Speaker 5: This is Action Network podcast producer Matt Mitchell here to 306 00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:54,240 Speaker 5: tell you our friends at bet MGM have a great 307 00:14:54,280 --> 00:14:57,360 Speaker 5: news sign up offer for our listeners, a six hundred 308 00:14:57,440 --> 00:15:00,000 Speaker 5: dollars risk free first bet. Here's where. 309 00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:03,080 Speaker 6: If you don't already have an account at bet mgm, 310 00:15:03,520 --> 00:15:05,960 Speaker 6: just sign up, make your first deposit and place that 311 00:15:06,080 --> 00:15:09,280 Speaker 6: initial wager. If the bet wins, you get all the money. 312 00:15:09,560 --> 00:15:12,560 Speaker 6: If it doesn't win, bet mgm will refund you in 313 00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:15,720 Speaker 6: free bets up to six hundred dollars it's that simple. 314 00:15:16,200 --> 00:15:18,600 Speaker 6: Just click on the link in this episode description to 315 00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:21,800 Speaker 6: get started. Bet MGM has been a great podcast partner, 316 00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:24,600 Speaker 6: and they've got all the features gamblers like us love, 317 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:26,600 Speaker 6: like live betting and daily. 318 00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:29,239 Speaker 5: Odds boosts PLAST. They're compatible with Betsinc. 319 00:15:29,440 --> 00:15:32,160 Speaker 6: So when you place a wager at betmgm, that bet 320 00:15:32,200 --> 00:15:35,440 Speaker 6: can automatically be tracked in your action app. So open 321 00:15:35,480 --> 00:15:38,080 Speaker 6: an account today and make your first bet risk free 322 00:15:38,240 --> 00:15:40,560 Speaker 6: up to six hundred dollars. Just click on the link 323 00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:43,600 Speaker 6: in this episode description to Get Started. Must be twenty 324 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:47,040 Speaker 6: one or older and physically located in Michigan, New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana, 325 00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:50,560 Speaker 6: West Virginia, and Iowa, Virginia, Tennessee, Nevata of Pennsylvania. Please 326 00:15:50,560 --> 00:15:53,400 Speaker 6: gamble responsibly. Gambling problem called one eight hundred and two 327 00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:55,800 Speaker 6: two forty seven hundred in Colorado and Nevada. One eight 328 00:15:55,880 --> 00:15:58,480 Speaker 6: hundred gimbler in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, in West Virginia one 329 00:15:58,520 --> 00:16:00,680 Speaker 6: eight hundred and nine with it in Indiana, one eight 330 00:16:00,720 --> 00:16:02,640 Speaker 6: hundred and two seven zero seven to one one seven 331 00:16:02,640 --> 00:16:04,680 Speaker 6: in Michigan, one one hundred and eight nine nine seven 332 00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:06,480 Speaker 6: eight nine in Tennessee one e one hundred bets off 333 00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:08,320 Speaker 6: at Awa or one eight eight five three to two 334 00:16:08,440 --> 00:16:11,600 Speaker 6: thirty five hundred in Virginia. Betsink not available in the data. 335 00:16:11,960 --> 00:16:12,800 Speaker 6: Thanks for listening. 336 00:16:13,040 --> 00:16:14,040 Speaker 5: Now back to the show. 337 00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:19,760 Speaker 1: Brandon Anderson is the NBA Draft time. My head is spinning. 338 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 3: So last year I did really well on draft props. 339 00:16:23,200 --> 00:16:26,960 Speaker 3: I took Kelly and Hayes under ten. I took Cole 340 00:16:27,040 --> 00:16:31,400 Speaker 3: Anthony under twenty. My draft props we went I think 341 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:34,520 Speaker 3: four and one last year. Uh and it was great 342 00:16:34,560 --> 00:16:36,720 Speaker 3: and I felt very good about it. That inspired me 343 00:16:36,760 --> 00:16:38,560 Speaker 3: to go deeper. And now I'm concerned because I think 344 00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:40,440 Speaker 3: I've gone I think I'm in that. Oh no, I've 345 00:16:40,480 --> 00:16:42,600 Speaker 3: gone too far, Like I've I have a lot of 346 00:16:42,640 --> 00:16:45,320 Speaker 3: props out there that I've already bet. I will write 347 00:16:45,360 --> 00:16:47,760 Speaker 3: up the ones I like the most. On Action, I 348 00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:50,280 Speaker 3: have a lot of information based off of talking to 349 00:16:50,400 --> 00:16:53,040 Speaker 3: tele Intel. Before we get started, I want to kind 350 00:16:53,040 --> 00:16:56,760 Speaker 3: of explain my process. Brandon has done a series of 351 00:16:57,200 --> 00:16:59,400 Speaker 3: really great in depth profiles of the draft prospects. 352 00:16:59,400 --> 00:17:00,920 Speaker 1: If you want to know more by who these guys are, go. 353 00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:03,880 Speaker 3: To actionetwork dot com or the Action Network app and 354 00:17:04,119 --> 00:17:06,200 Speaker 3: just find they'll be all over the pages in terms 355 00:17:06,240 --> 00:17:08,560 Speaker 3: of they'll be profiles from Brandon on a lot of 356 00:17:08,560 --> 00:17:12,800 Speaker 3: the major prospects. Deep dives is really great information. We 357 00:17:12,840 --> 00:17:15,240 Speaker 3: want to talk about how to bet this NBA draft. 358 00:17:15,840 --> 00:17:23,200 Speaker 3: My intel, or my process rather is I'm trying to synthesize. 359 00:17:24,160 --> 00:17:25,080 Speaker 1: A couple of things. 360 00:17:25,440 --> 00:17:27,960 Speaker 3: One is what I've heard from the league, like from 361 00:17:27,960 --> 00:17:30,239 Speaker 3: people there around the league, and what they expect. A 362 00:17:30,280 --> 00:17:32,760 Speaker 3: lot of that is not this team told me that 363 00:17:32,840 --> 00:17:36,919 Speaker 3: they like X, because teams don't do that, like that 364 00:17:37,119 --> 00:17:39,040 Speaker 3: is not a thing because they want to keep it 365 00:17:39,080 --> 00:17:41,399 Speaker 3: as secret as possible. But what you will hear is 366 00:17:41,440 --> 00:17:45,680 Speaker 3: teams are like based off of whatever intel that they've gathered, 367 00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:48,600 Speaker 3: they have penciled in, you know, said team to go 368 00:17:48,760 --> 00:17:49,560 Speaker 3: here or wherever. 369 00:17:50,240 --> 00:17:51,719 Speaker 1: Some of this is generated by agents. 370 00:17:51,720 --> 00:17:53,680 Speaker 3: I'm not gonna lie that agents have a big part 371 00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:55,720 Speaker 3: of this process in terms of influencing. 372 00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:55,800 Speaker 1: What I hear. 373 00:17:56,200 --> 00:17:58,840 Speaker 3: Okay, not that I'm talking to agents, but like they 374 00:17:58,880 --> 00:18:01,760 Speaker 3: will say things and they get tod there is noise 375 00:18:01,760 --> 00:18:05,359 Speaker 3: and you're trying to sort out rumor from legit, and 376 00:18:05,400 --> 00:18:08,800 Speaker 3: that has risks. I try and synthesize that with what 377 00:18:08,960 --> 00:18:12,159 Speaker 3: mock drafts from guys that do actual draft consulting do. 378 00:18:12,640 --> 00:18:14,560 Speaker 3: For some of the teams, and there's a very select 379 00:18:14,560 --> 00:18:16,520 Speaker 3: few that I kind of rely on for that. 380 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:19,000 Speaker 1: Brandon and I are going to. 381 00:18:19,040 --> 00:18:22,439 Speaker 3: Talk about best fits, about the logic of all these. Brandon, 382 00:18:22,520 --> 00:18:29,200 Speaker 3: let's start the top. Okay at bet MGM right now, 383 00:18:30,400 --> 00:18:33,439 Speaker 3: Caid to go number one is minus five thousand, so 384 00:18:33,600 --> 00:18:36,919 Speaker 3: not great value to take the number one pick for 385 00:18:37,040 --> 00:18:40,040 Speaker 3: Kaid Cunningham based off of. 386 00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:41,840 Speaker 1: Anything that we have seen or heard. 387 00:18:42,600 --> 00:18:44,680 Speaker 3: Is there anyone else that you would want to bet 388 00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:46,720 Speaker 3: at number one because you like the long shots? 389 00:18:46,720 --> 00:18:50,240 Speaker 2: I know, yeah, there's definitely no one else I want 390 00:18:50,240 --> 00:18:54,280 Speaker 2: to bet at number one. I think Kid Cunningham is 391 00:18:54,280 --> 00:19:00,600 Speaker 2: going to go number one if it's possible. Maybe maybe 392 00:19:00,760 --> 00:19:04,840 Speaker 2: that Cunningham goes number one, not to Detroit. Maybe someone 393 00:19:04,920 --> 00:19:07,439 Speaker 2: else does make the trade up with Detroit, but if 394 00:19:07,480 --> 00:19:11,359 Speaker 2: they do, it's gonna be for Kid. So I don't 395 00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:14,760 Speaker 2: see a scenario where Detroit sticks at number one and 396 00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:18,240 Speaker 2: does not select Caid Cunningham. If they do choose, he's 397 00:19:18,320 --> 00:19:20,879 Speaker 2: not their guy, maybe I don't buy it, but if 398 00:19:20,920 --> 00:19:22,320 Speaker 2: they do, I think it has to be on a 399 00:19:22,440 --> 00:19:25,879 Speaker 2: move down. So I definitely want no part, not of 400 00:19:25,920 --> 00:19:28,840 Speaker 2: betting on anything except Cunningham, and I'm not betting on 401 00:19:28,880 --> 00:19:31,160 Speaker 2: him either five thousand, no, thank you. 402 00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:39,840 Speaker 1: He's plus thirty five hundred to go number two, right. 403 00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:41,960 Speaker 2: I mean, that's that's the flip side. If you want 404 00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:43,879 Speaker 2: to play it, that's the angle. If you want to 405 00:19:43,960 --> 00:19:47,600 Speaker 2: just play, play the possibility. If you're a Pistons fan 406 00:19:47,640 --> 00:19:50,320 Speaker 2: and you're a sports nihilist like me, and you're locked 407 00:19:50,320 --> 00:19:52,879 Speaker 2: in on Cunningham and just like worried it's not gonna happen, 408 00:19:53,560 --> 00:19:55,320 Speaker 2: that's your angle. Make a few bucks off of it 409 00:19:55,359 --> 00:19:59,720 Speaker 2: at least. So I don't mind that play just because, Okay, 410 00:19:59,760 --> 00:20:01,520 Speaker 2: what a is that like a three percent chance? Is 411 00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:04,480 Speaker 2: there a three percent chance of the Pistons just think 412 00:20:04,560 --> 00:20:07,719 Speaker 2: that they're the Celtics and they've evaluated and decided that 413 00:20:07,800 --> 00:20:11,080 Speaker 2: they found their tatum while everyone else has their faults. Yeah, sure, 414 00:20:11,119 --> 00:20:13,560 Speaker 2: there's a three percent chance of that. Son. I don't 415 00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:14,880 Speaker 2: mind that, but I think he'll be kid. 416 00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:17,000 Speaker 1: Okay, So here's my thought on it. 417 00:20:17,960 --> 00:20:21,840 Speaker 3: After the lottery, I said, I wrote this, and I 418 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:22,320 Speaker 3: tweeted it. 419 00:20:22,400 --> 00:20:23,480 Speaker 1: I said, I can't. 420 00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:27,399 Speaker 3: Wait for Kay Cunningham to be the number one pick 421 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:30,760 Speaker 3: every single week until the last week before the draft, 422 00:20:31,800 --> 00:20:35,960 Speaker 3: and then suddenly it's well, but maybe he's not number one, 423 00:20:36,160 --> 00:20:38,199 Speaker 3: and then he goes number one. So that's like the 424 00:20:38,240 --> 00:20:42,600 Speaker 3: big picture view, but then there's trapped in the moment 425 00:20:42,720 --> 00:20:47,240 Speaker 3: me that has heard that the Pistons have the here's 426 00:20:47,240 --> 00:20:50,680 Speaker 3: the biggest thing is just the well, there's two things here. 427 00:20:50,720 --> 00:20:52,840 Speaker 3: If it was that Kate Is is a number one lock, 428 00:20:52,880 --> 00:20:55,360 Speaker 3: He's going to be a franchise superstar, He's Luka Doncic, 429 00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:56,639 Speaker 3: it would be different. 430 00:20:57,840 --> 00:20:58,480 Speaker 1: I talked to. 431 00:21:00,840 --> 00:21:05,120 Speaker 3: Guys that work at analytics for teams and they both 432 00:21:05,119 --> 00:21:07,760 Speaker 3: told me that Kid does not grade out as well 433 00:21:08,040 --> 00:21:11,720 Speaker 3: as he's projected. That it's basically like, no, yeah, like, 434 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:15,000 Speaker 3: Kid's gonna be great, I mean a superstar. It's gonna 435 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:16,800 Speaker 3: be great, but not gonna be a superstar because the 436 00:21:16,800 --> 00:21:19,560 Speaker 3: production isn't there, even when you factor for his teammates 437 00:21:19,600 --> 00:21:24,600 Speaker 3: at okay stake. So it's like there are scouts that 438 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:26,679 Speaker 3: agree with that assessment. Not all of them, but there 439 00:21:26,720 --> 00:21:30,000 Speaker 3: are scouts that agree with that assessment that no, yeah, 440 00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:32,160 Speaker 3: Kid's gonna be a really good player that helps you win, 441 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:34,479 Speaker 3: but he's not going to be a give him the 442 00:21:34,520 --> 00:21:39,960 Speaker 3: ball yeah on hundred, like for eighty possessions a game, right, yeah? 443 00:21:40,280 --> 00:21:40,600 Speaker 2: Agree? 444 00:21:40,720 --> 00:21:43,879 Speaker 3: So or for you know, forty possessions a game. So 445 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:47,200 Speaker 3: if that's the thought process, that opens up enough of 446 00:21:47,240 --> 00:21:48,520 Speaker 3: the thing where. 447 00:21:50,119 --> 00:21:55,040 Speaker 1: I can see either them trading the pick. 448 00:21:55,640 --> 00:21:58,280 Speaker 3: But in that case, he still goes number one, right, 449 00:21:59,320 --> 00:22:01,639 Speaker 3: or they talk themselves into Jalen Green. 450 00:22:02,800 --> 00:22:05,160 Speaker 1: There's a lot. Look, there are a lot of people that. 451 00:22:05,080 --> 00:22:06,919 Speaker 3: Think Evan Mobley is the best player in the draft 452 00:22:07,800 --> 00:22:11,119 Speaker 3: like that. It is a yeah, it is a not 453 00:22:11,320 --> 00:22:15,440 Speaker 3: insignificant amount of people that think that Evan Mobley as 454 00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:19,840 Speaker 3: much as it's like really a big He's switchable, he's versatile, 455 00:22:19,920 --> 00:22:22,200 Speaker 3: like he checks all the boxes for a modern wing. 456 00:22:25,840 --> 00:22:27,920 Speaker 3: I will look, I'll just I'll go ahead and say 457 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:31,840 Speaker 3: I've bet Kate on a flyer at thirty five to one. 458 00:22:32,280 --> 00:22:36,080 Speaker 3: I haven't, Like, I'm not sitting here telling you I 459 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:36,800 Speaker 3: love this pic. 460 00:22:36,880 --> 00:22:38,679 Speaker 1: It's my lock of the day, Like we don't do 461 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:40,679 Speaker 1: that here at action. But I'm not. 462 00:22:41,080 --> 00:22:43,000 Speaker 3: I am not going to write Kate in my props 463 00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:47,480 Speaker 3: article I bet him number two because I don't see 464 00:22:47,520 --> 00:22:51,160 Speaker 3: any scenario, like there are two ways that this goes. 465 00:22:51,440 --> 00:22:57,520 Speaker 3: A team trades up and takes somebody else, which is unlikely, 466 00:22:58,040 --> 00:23:00,480 Speaker 3: or and then the pisson just take ca anyway, Like 467 00:23:00,520 --> 00:23:01,919 Speaker 3: if somebody says like, hey, we want to trade up 468 00:23:01,920 --> 00:23:03,320 Speaker 3: and we want to take you know, mobilely number one 469 00:23:03,359 --> 00:23:05,119 Speaker 3: for some reason. I don't know why, but if they 470 00:23:05,119 --> 00:23:09,240 Speaker 3: want to do that, right right, because like think of 471 00:23:09,280 --> 00:23:10,800 Speaker 3: it that way. If somebody told you. 472 00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:14,400 Speaker 1: That you could do that, you can. 473 00:23:14,600 --> 00:23:16,080 Speaker 3: Here's the thing is, if you could get assets and 474 00:23:16,119 --> 00:23:17,399 Speaker 3: you don't think the kid is a guy, then you 475 00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:20,320 Speaker 3: can do that deal. If he falls at two and 476 00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:21,879 Speaker 3: the Rockets are still there, the Rockets are going to 477 00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:22,720 Speaker 3: take him, that's it. 478 00:23:23,080 --> 00:23:25,080 Speaker 1: But there's there's no scenario. 479 00:23:24,760 --> 00:23:27,159 Speaker 3: That the Rockets do not take him at two, and 480 00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:29,200 Speaker 3: if he is there, the Rockets will not trade out 481 00:23:29,200 --> 00:23:31,400 Speaker 3: of the two spot, like they will wait to see 482 00:23:31,440 --> 00:23:33,480 Speaker 3: if Kid doesn't go number one and then take Kate 483 00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:36,560 Speaker 3: to two. That's how much they like Kid, right, So 484 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:38,760 Speaker 3: if I know Kate is going to go is going 485 00:23:38,800 --> 00:23:40,560 Speaker 3: to go top two, I don't have any risk of 486 00:23:40,640 --> 00:23:41,680 Speaker 3: him falling. 487 00:23:43,040 --> 00:23:44,080 Speaker 1: To me at thirty five to one. 488 00:23:44,119 --> 00:23:49,960 Speaker 3: It was worth it, the intel, Brandon says the order. 489 00:23:50,080 --> 00:23:51,440 Speaker 1: This is what the the. 490 00:23:51,160 --> 00:23:53,919 Speaker 3: Consensus is amongst people I have talked to him, and 491 00:23:54,240 --> 00:23:56,399 Speaker 3: this is this is reflected in the drafts, like the 492 00:23:56,440 --> 00:23:58,840 Speaker 3: mock drafts are all like this because that information at 493 00:23:58,880 --> 00:24:04,800 Speaker 3: the top is public enough. It's Cad Jalen Green, Evan 494 00:24:04,840 --> 00:24:09,320 Speaker 3: Mobley did the Calves, Jalen Suggs at the Raptors, Scottie Barnes. 495 00:24:09,480 --> 00:24:10,960 Speaker 1: To the Magic, that's the top five. 496 00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:15,920 Speaker 3: Kaminga is still listed in there, which I think is weird, 497 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:17,919 Speaker 3: Like he was number five on the initial boards and 498 00:24:17,960 --> 00:24:20,440 Speaker 3: that was you and I were just like we were 499 00:24:20,800 --> 00:24:23,120 Speaker 3: salivating trying to get a Kamenica prop on the board 500 00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:26,640 Speaker 3: so we could bet the over. Kaminga is not on 501 00:24:26,680 --> 00:24:29,720 Speaker 3: the board for props at that MGM, which is frustrating. 502 00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:34,520 Speaker 3: I have bet him at other places, however, at five 503 00:24:34,560 --> 00:24:39,639 Speaker 3: and a half and six and a half over Barnes. 504 00:24:40,280 --> 00:24:45,680 Speaker 3: On the other hand, you know he's he's plus two 505 00:24:45,760 --> 00:24:47,080 Speaker 3: twenty five to go fourth. 506 00:24:48,440 --> 00:24:50,199 Speaker 1: Yeah, what's your give me? 507 00:24:50,400 --> 00:24:51,840 Speaker 3: I want to hear your take. Yeah, I don't know 508 00:24:51,840 --> 00:24:53,800 Speaker 3: if you've done a profile on him. Give me your 509 00:24:53,920 --> 00:24:55,280 Speaker 3: your breakdown on Scotty Barnes. 510 00:24:56,520 --> 00:24:58,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, I did. I just had a profile on him 511 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:00,159 Speaker 2: just yesterday. He's the last one that I'm doing, I 512 00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:05,560 Speaker 2: think so I on the night that the lottery happened, 513 00:25:06,040 --> 00:25:08,080 Speaker 2: the Raptor is obviously one of the teams that moved up. 514 00:25:08,119 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 2: I think there was supposed to have been like seventh 515 00:25:09,880 --> 00:25:12,200 Speaker 2: or eighth. Then they moved up to fourth, and I 516 00:25:12,240 --> 00:25:15,679 Speaker 2: was bummed because my mock draft before that I have 517 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:18,439 Speaker 2: Scotty Barnes going to the Raptors. I really like that 518 00:25:18,560 --> 00:25:22,240 Speaker 2: specific fit for them. He feels like a very Raptors player. 519 00:25:22,720 --> 00:25:28,120 Speaker 2: So here's Scotty Barnes. Defensively awesome, just absolutely awesome. He's 520 00:25:28,640 --> 00:25:32,400 Speaker 2: he's super fluid, he's got fluid hips, he moves well laterally. 521 00:25:32,960 --> 00:25:35,760 Speaker 2: He's super long. He's got like a seven foot three wingspan. 522 00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:39,320 Speaker 2: Like think of it as he's basically kind of like 523 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:42,479 Speaker 2: the height of a wing with the length of a center. 524 00:25:42,920 --> 00:25:45,520 Speaker 2: And he played point guard this season. And if that 525 00:25:45,520 --> 00:25:47,320 Speaker 2: doesn't sound like a modern basketball player, I don't know 526 00:25:47,320 --> 00:25:50,160 Speaker 2: what does. Here's the problem. Like, the defense is gonna play. 527 00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:52,679 Speaker 2: The defense is very good. You know you're hearing like 528 00:25:52,720 --> 00:25:55,399 Speaker 2: the Draymond Green thing, which nobody is Draymond Green, but 529 00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:57,760 Speaker 2: just like the versatile, the switching thing, being able to 530 00:25:57,760 --> 00:26:00,960 Speaker 2: guard a lot of positions, all that's true. He's like 531 00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:03,840 Speaker 2: picking up opposing guards seventy five feet from the hoop, 532 00:26:04,000 --> 00:26:06,119 Speaker 2: and just because he can't just to pressure them. He 533 00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:09,360 Speaker 2: plays with high effort coaches love him, people rave about him. 534 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:12,560 Speaker 2: The problem is, I don't know if you can play 535 00:26:12,600 --> 00:26:16,320 Speaker 2: offense in the NBA. He can't shoot for anything right now. 536 00:26:16,520 --> 00:26:19,439 Speaker 2: The shot is not there. He's a really nice passer, 537 00:26:19,560 --> 00:26:22,800 Speaker 2: like a genuinely good not good for a big like, 538 00:26:22,920 --> 00:26:25,160 Speaker 2: just a good passer. That's why he played point guard. 539 00:26:25,600 --> 00:26:28,440 Speaker 2: But you can't be a good passer and not have 540 00:26:28,640 --> 00:26:32,840 Speaker 2: other offensive skills otherwise you're Ben Simmons. And we know 541 00:26:32,880 --> 00:26:34,520 Speaker 2: that this doesn't work in a lot of teams. You 542 00:26:34,560 --> 00:26:37,520 Speaker 2: need to have other stuff that goes with you. If 543 00:26:37,560 --> 00:26:39,840 Speaker 2: you don't have the ball in your hands enough, you 544 00:26:39,840 --> 00:26:42,920 Speaker 2: don't get to use all that passing. So my take 545 00:26:42,960 --> 00:26:45,639 Speaker 2: with Barnes is this, I think the high end Barnes 546 00:26:45,680 --> 00:26:50,159 Speaker 2: outcome is really good, like a championship caliber player, because 547 00:26:50,160 --> 00:26:52,919 Speaker 2: of the versatility of the defense. It's all great. The 548 00:26:53,000 --> 00:26:55,520 Speaker 2: problem is that the low end outcomes I think are 549 00:26:55,560 --> 00:26:58,640 Speaker 2: pretty bad and like not playable. And I think that 550 00:26:58,720 --> 00:27:02,720 Speaker 2: he's a higher variance guy. And I understand the fourth 551 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:05,400 Speaker 2: or fifth thing. I agree. I don't think there's value 552 00:27:05,440 --> 00:27:07,280 Speaker 2: in playing him to go five now that the odds 553 00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:10,120 Speaker 2: have juiced so high, I don't mind the value at four. 554 00:27:10,200 --> 00:27:12,320 Speaker 2: I actually wrote about that as a possible pick a 555 00:27:12,320 --> 00:27:15,160 Speaker 2: few weeks ago, but even that number is not super 556 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:19,480 Speaker 2: great at this point. It's weird too. I really don't 557 00:27:19,520 --> 00:27:21,720 Speaker 2: like him to Orlando. I don't understand why that's the 558 00:27:21,720 --> 00:27:25,080 Speaker 2: team that wants him. Of all teams, Orlando has length 559 00:27:25,160 --> 00:27:27,439 Speaker 2: and defense. What they need is someone to soak up 560 00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:31,000 Speaker 2: usage in possessions and shoot the ball while like Jonathan 561 00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:35,160 Speaker 2: Isaac and Chu Mulakike do their defensive complimentary stuff around him. 562 00:27:35,480 --> 00:27:38,440 Speaker 2: That's not where I want Scottie Barnes. I'd love him 563 00:27:38,480 --> 00:27:42,399 Speaker 2: to Golden State theoretically if the timeline fit better. I 564 00:27:42,480 --> 00:27:46,400 Speaker 2: like him in Toronto. I like him a lot. He's 565 00:27:46,440 --> 00:27:49,560 Speaker 2: going to be a fan favorite, but he definitely is 566 00:27:49,640 --> 00:27:52,840 Speaker 2: more of a swing or miss sort of guy. I think, well, 567 00:27:52,840 --> 00:27:53,360 Speaker 2: we don't. 568 00:27:54,040 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 1: I guess to think I don't care about fit in 569 00:27:56,880 --> 00:27:59,880 Speaker 1: top ten. I don't care. 570 00:28:00,160 --> 00:28:04,440 Speaker 3: Like it's irrelevant. Yeah, it's that no one drafts top ten. 571 00:28:04,560 --> 00:28:06,520 Speaker 3: You don't draft fit honestly until fifteen. 572 00:28:08,119 --> 00:28:10,439 Speaker 2: I think that that's I think that's fair. But I 573 00:28:10,440 --> 00:28:12,840 Speaker 2: think that part of part of that's part of my 574 00:28:12,920 --> 00:28:16,840 Speaker 2: concern with Scotty is that I think that, like I 575 00:28:17,320 --> 00:28:20,000 Speaker 2: consider team fit and team building a lot when I'm 576 00:28:20,000 --> 00:28:22,639 Speaker 2: thinking about players and player value, and I think that 577 00:28:22,720 --> 00:28:26,679 Speaker 2: he has a difficult team fet I think because of 578 00:28:26,720 --> 00:28:30,600 Speaker 2: his extremely limited offensive skill set a role like when 579 00:28:30,640 --> 00:28:32,320 Speaker 2: it would go to the half court offense, he would 580 00:28:32,359 --> 00:28:34,479 Speaker 2: literally just be standing almost off the screen, like out 581 00:28:34,520 --> 00:28:36,119 Speaker 2: in your half court, like all right, well let me 582 00:28:36,160 --> 00:28:38,120 Speaker 2: just get back and play some defense now, and now 583 00:28:38,120 --> 00:28:41,160 Speaker 2: you're playing four and five and like like it, think 584 00:28:41,200 --> 00:28:44,720 Speaker 2: of Ben Simmons again, like you need a specific sort 585 00:28:44,760 --> 00:28:48,600 Speaker 2: of offense and four specific players around him, And so 586 00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:50,240 Speaker 2: I think you have to at least consider that a 587 00:28:50,240 --> 00:28:51,840 Speaker 2: little bit, like who do we have and who are 588 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:54,760 Speaker 2: we adding to our team? So I agree, you know, 589 00:28:54,800 --> 00:28:57,360 Speaker 2: like if you're drafting this time in the lottery, it's 590 00:28:57,400 --> 00:28:59,680 Speaker 2: because you need a star, and if you think Scotty's 591 00:28:59,720 --> 00:29:01,320 Speaker 2: gonna be star, you just take him and you figure 592 00:29:01,320 --> 00:29:04,080 Speaker 2: the rest out later. But I think he's an interesting 593 00:29:04,120 --> 00:29:05,000 Speaker 2: player for sure. 594 00:29:05,760 --> 00:29:08,360 Speaker 3: Well let me ask you, like, would you bet? Would 595 00:29:08,360 --> 00:29:09,080 Speaker 3: you bet his prop? 596 00:29:10,240 --> 00:29:10,320 Speaker 1: Like? 597 00:29:12,200 --> 00:29:14,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think I wouldn't right now. I think I 598 00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:17,480 Speaker 2: think when I wrote the column a couple of weeks ago, 599 00:29:17,640 --> 00:29:19,880 Speaker 2: at plus four, I think he was like four fifty 600 00:29:20,440 --> 00:29:22,479 Speaker 2: and at that number, I think out if that were 601 00:29:22,560 --> 00:29:24,440 Speaker 2: number were still available, I think I might be willing 602 00:29:24,520 --> 00:29:28,600 Speaker 2: to take a shot on it. It does there is 603 00:29:28,640 --> 00:29:33,000 Speaker 2: starting to be a little bit of Kuminga Ea sort 604 00:29:33,000 --> 00:29:36,160 Speaker 2: of vibe to Jalen Suggs. And here's what I mean 605 00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:38,840 Speaker 2: by that. For a long time we had okay, here's 606 00:29:38,880 --> 00:29:41,600 Speaker 2: the top five, but we always would list the guys 607 00:29:41,600 --> 00:29:44,160 Speaker 2: off in some order. But Kuminga was the fifth guy allays. 608 00:29:44,800 --> 00:29:47,040 Speaker 2: It feels like like he's out, He's not in the 609 00:29:47,040 --> 00:29:49,440 Speaker 2: top five. Now we kind of know that. It sort 610 00:29:49,440 --> 00:29:52,040 Speaker 2: of feels like we've moved to four and that Suggs 611 00:29:52,240 --> 00:29:56,440 Speaker 2: is four, Like whatever the top three is, It's really 612 00:29:56,440 --> 00:29:58,680 Speaker 2: hard to imagine at this point Mobile and Green not 613 00:29:58,800 --> 00:30:01,280 Speaker 2: being two and three in some order. Like it seems 614 00:30:01,320 --> 00:30:04,360 Speaker 2: like we know who the top three is, even even 615 00:30:04,400 --> 00:30:06,600 Speaker 2: the books have been listing from like who are the 616 00:30:06,640 --> 00:30:09,200 Speaker 2: exact top four, and switch it to the exact top three, 617 00:30:09,800 --> 00:30:13,480 Speaker 2: and it just like my my spidy senses tingle a 618 00:30:13,520 --> 00:30:16,160 Speaker 2: little bit on when there's the guy that everyone agrees 619 00:30:16,280 --> 00:30:19,520 Speaker 2: is the bottom in a tier, then I just wonder, 620 00:30:19,640 --> 00:30:21,920 Speaker 2: like all it takes now is what if Toronto just 621 00:30:21,920 --> 00:30:24,600 Speaker 2: doesn't really like Jalen sucks? Or what if they're confident 622 00:30:24,680 --> 00:30:27,160 Speaker 2: Lowry's coming back, and they got Lowry and Van Vliet 623 00:30:27,240 --> 00:30:29,800 Speaker 2: and and they want a forward or a center. I know, 624 00:30:29,920 --> 00:30:31,400 Speaker 2: I know, spoiler alert. 625 00:30:31,840 --> 00:30:33,160 Speaker 1: They do not. They are not. 626 00:30:33,120 --> 00:30:37,440 Speaker 2: Confident that Kyle Lowry, you know, But like, what what 627 00:30:37,480 --> 00:30:38,880 Speaker 2: if they just don't like him? Well, what if they 628 00:30:38,960 --> 00:30:40,520 Speaker 2: feel like he's too similar to a game to Fred 629 00:30:40,600 --> 00:30:42,560 Speaker 2: van Vleet too, actually think he is similar to like 630 00:30:42,800 --> 00:30:45,920 Speaker 2: all takes them not liking him and then Barnes him play. 631 00:30:46,000 --> 00:30:48,680 Speaker 1: Okay, so I think at four. 632 00:30:49,000 --> 00:30:52,360 Speaker 3: Look, one thing I have tried to do in the 633 00:30:52,400 --> 00:30:55,400 Speaker 3: past with props betting for the draft is try and 634 00:30:55,400 --> 00:30:58,600 Speaker 3: single in on what the early rumors are. There's this 635 00:30:58,680 --> 00:31:00,760 Speaker 3: idea that like, well, you know, change and it can 636 00:31:00,920 --> 00:31:02,480 Speaker 3: like you can be really high on a guy early 637 00:31:02,520 --> 00:31:05,120 Speaker 3: and then do an interview or an individual workout and 638 00:31:05,120 --> 00:31:10,800 Speaker 3: it can change. Barnes very early was talked about as 639 00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:18,000 Speaker 3: raptors of four. There's risk here on a number of levels. 640 00:31:20,080 --> 00:31:23,800 Speaker 3: And the reason is so Barnes to go fourth is 641 00:31:23,800 --> 00:31:30,280 Speaker 3: plus two twenty five and Sugs to go fifth is 642 00:31:31,240 --> 00:31:34,040 Speaker 3: at BEMGM is plus four to twenty five. 643 00:31:35,080 --> 00:31:38,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, for sure, that's the play if you're going 644 00:31:38,520 --> 00:31:41,360 Speaker 2: to bet Barnes at four, you absolutely need to bet 645 00:31:41,400 --> 00:31:42,280 Speaker 2: Sugs Thugs five. 646 00:31:42,720 --> 00:31:46,320 Speaker 3: The Magic will not Yeah, here's the big thing. The 647 00:31:46,360 --> 00:31:49,320 Speaker 3: Magic will not let one of Barns or Sugs go 648 00:31:49,440 --> 00:31:53,840 Speaker 3: past that. That is consensus is that if it's Barnes, great, 649 00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:58,480 Speaker 3: if it Sugs great, So even if somebody completely screws 650 00:31:58,520 --> 00:32:01,200 Speaker 3: both of us and jumps up into Kaminga at three 651 00:32:01,840 --> 00:32:04,640 Speaker 3: or at four, rather, the Magic are still going to 652 00:32:04,720 --> 00:32:07,680 Speaker 3: take Sugs at five because he's does it's there better 653 00:32:07,720 --> 00:32:11,280 Speaker 3: than Barnes, and then Barnes is the one that slips. 654 00:32:13,080 --> 00:32:16,080 Speaker 2: So then if you don't want to play both of them, 655 00:32:16,200 --> 00:32:19,960 Speaker 2: then by that logic, shouldn't you just play Sugs Because 656 00:32:20,080 --> 00:32:22,200 Speaker 2: if a team jumps up, they're jumping the four to 657 00:32:22,240 --> 00:32:24,960 Speaker 2: maybe take someone else, so Josh Giddy or someone and 658 00:32:25,000 --> 00:32:27,920 Speaker 2: that's worse odds. Why not just play Sugs at five? 659 00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:30,880 Speaker 2: And you're getting like I was saying, I would maybe 660 00:32:30,880 --> 00:32:32,760 Speaker 2: play this if I was still getting the four fifty, Well, 661 00:32:32,800 --> 00:32:35,360 Speaker 2: we're getting almost that number to do Sugs at five, 662 00:32:35,400 --> 00:32:37,640 Speaker 2: which is kind of the same bet as what we're saying, 663 00:32:37,920 --> 00:32:40,520 Speaker 2: So why not play just that one instead? Is that 664 00:32:40,680 --> 00:32:43,160 Speaker 2: not kind of playing Barnes to go four? In the 665 00:32:43,200 --> 00:32:46,600 Speaker 2: same way where it's playing Sugs not to go for Basically. 666 00:32:46,280 --> 00:32:48,400 Speaker 1: I think you're getting ev On Sug. 667 00:32:48,480 --> 00:32:50,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think you're getting ev On Sugs not to 668 00:32:50,560 --> 00:32:53,160 Speaker 3: go four at plus four twenty five, Like I think 669 00:32:53,200 --> 00:32:56,240 Speaker 3: that's value at fifth at fifth, I don't. I don't 670 00:32:56,240 --> 00:32:58,280 Speaker 3: see Sugs following past me, past Orlando. 671 00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:02,440 Speaker 2: And I also don't know that I really see a 672 00:33:02,520 --> 00:33:05,760 Speaker 2: path for him going higher, in part because one spot 673 00:33:05,840 --> 00:33:08,480 Speaker 2: higher is Cleveland, that number three. That doesn't make any 674 00:33:08,520 --> 00:33:12,560 Speaker 2: sense to me that Cleveland. Cleveland has Sexton and Garland 675 00:33:12,960 --> 00:33:16,240 Speaker 2: and Sugs. Again, you don't take for fit, but like, well, 676 00:33:16,360 --> 00:33:18,760 Speaker 2: they can't keep drafting a point guard every single season. 677 00:33:19,600 --> 00:33:21,560 Speaker 1: They're not gonna have Sexton after this off season. 678 00:33:22,400 --> 00:33:24,880 Speaker 2: Sure, but that's the saying like that's. 679 00:33:24,800 --> 00:33:27,080 Speaker 3: A concern, right, is like they is that they negotiate 680 00:33:27,080 --> 00:33:30,360 Speaker 3: a sign trade for for they trade Sextion thing because 681 00:33:30,360 --> 00:33:34,120 Speaker 3: they don't want to give them Max, which is out there. Uh, 682 00:33:34,160 --> 00:33:39,520 Speaker 3: and then they take Sugs as basically like the guard 683 00:33:39,520 --> 00:33:41,760 Speaker 3: replacement they play, and they play Sugs in Garland together. 684 00:33:42,480 --> 00:33:45,040 Speaker 2: But but why would you Again, I know you're saying 685 00:33:45,080 --> 00:33:46,880 Speaker 2: like you just take the best talent, but. 686 00:33:47,440 --> 00:33:52,280 Speaker 3: This is really, this is really important is that I'm 687 00:33:52,320 --> 00:33:54,200 Speaker 3: with you, Like I this is how I used to think, 688 00:33:54,400 --> 00:33:56,560 Speaker 3: is like you can't do this, like this doesn't make 689 00:33:56,600 --> 00:33:59,080 Speaker 3: any sense with your roster construction. And then like I 690 00:33:59,360 --> 00:34:01,520 Speaker 3: got into common versations about this with people that build 691 00:34:01,560 --> 00:34:03,760 Speaker 3: the teams, and they're just like, there's no like you 692 00:34:03,800 --> 00:34:06,719 Speaker 3: will just wind up hurting yourselves and you get fired 693 00:34:06,760 --> 00:34:09,000 Speaker 3: for not taking the better player because you're worried about 694 00:34:09,680 --> 00:34:12,040 Speaker 3: you're about how it fits with your team, and like, 695 00:34:12,480 --> 00:34:14,399 Speaker 3: self motivation is a big part of this. If you're 696 00:34:14,440 --> 00:34:17,319 Speaker 3: the guy that drafted a star, that's a tip in 697 00:34:17,360 --> 00:34:20,160 Speaker 3: your cap, like that, that's a feather in your cap, 698 00:34:21,080 --> 00:34:25,200 Speaker 3: so like and it's it's not even it's not even 699 00:34:25,239 --> 00:34:26,680 Speaker 3: like well it's clear, like you just figure out, like, well, 700 00:34:26,680 --> 00:34:28,720 Speaker 3: these guys are clearly better. You can't like you can't separate. 701 00:34:29,120 --> 00:34:31,719 Speaker 3: The way that the draft kind of tears break down 702 00:34:31,800 --> 00:34:35,719 Speaker 3: is there's top three, there's well, there's a there's a 703 00:34:35,719 --> 00:34:38,000 Speaker 3: differential on whether or not you think kid is clearly better. 704 00:34:38,160 --> 00:34:40,640 Speaker 3: Like some people think that there's like kid and then 705 00:34:40,680 --> 00:34:43,799 Speaker 3: a drop off and then two and three and then 706 00:34:43,840 --> 00:34:45,640 Speaker 3: a drop off, or there's people that think the top 707 00:34:45,640 --> 00:34:47,640 Speaker 3: three or together and then there's a drop off, but 708 00:34:47,680 --> 00:34:49,879 Speaker 3: that's like where we're at now. It's like top three 709 00:34:50,239 --> 00:34:53,840 Speaker 3: drop off, Sugs and Barns drop off, and. 710 00:34:53,840 --> 00:34:55,560 Speaker 1: Then the rest of the way, right. 711 00:34:58,960 --> 00:35:00,920 Speaker 3: That's one of the problems is like, look, draft, I 712 00:35:00,960 --> 00:35:06,120 Speaker 3: think trades are on the board for everybody's is open. 713 00:35:06,400 --> 00:35:10,480 Speaker 3: The conversations have been I think tough because there's not 714 00:35:10,520 --> 00:35:13,040 Speaker 3: a lot of veterans that are available. That's the kind 715 00:35:13,080 --> 00:35:14,680 Speaker 3: of the weird thing. Usually picts are more available than 716 00:35:14,719 --> 00:35:17,080 Speaker 3: veteran or picts are more scarce than veterans, but now 717 00:35:17,120 --> 00:35:18,759 Speaker 3: it's the opposite, like you can get picks, but you 718 00:35:18,760 --> 00:35:22,759 Speaker 3: can't get veterans. Toronto's a real threat to move down 719 00:35:23,040 --> 00:35:24,719 Speaker 3: and I don't know how to kind of factor that in, 720 00:35:24,840 --> 00:35:28,440 Speaker 3: Like who does someone trade up to get at four? 721 00:35:29,680 --> 00:35:33,200 Speaker 2: Well, to me, the question, I think that's the wrong question. 722 00:35:33,239 --> 00:35:35,560 Speaker 2: To me, the problem is why are you trading down? 723 00:35:35,960 --> 00:35:39,520 Speaker 2: We literally just said we all agree on the top three, 724 00:35:39,600 --> 00:35:42,279 Speaker 2: we all agree on the top five. Like this top 725 00:35:42,320 --> 00:35:45,440 Speaker 2: tier has really separated itself and become very clear to 726 00:35:45,480 --> 00:35:48,800 Speaker 2: me the problem in this draft. Last year, in the draft, 727 00:35:49,080 --> 00:35:51,920 Speaker 2: we didn't really have that top top tier of guys, 728 00:35:52,320 --> 00:35:54,960 Speaker 2: and so all the rest of the lottery felt like 729 00:35:55,120 --> 00:35:57,520 Speaker 2: everyone was reaching a little bit because everyone else got 730 00:35:57,560 --> 00:36:00,200 Speaker 2: pushed up. This year, we have those top guys all 731 00:36:00,280 --> 00:36:03,520 Speaker 2: agree on them. We're missing that like six to ten, 732 00:36:03,800 --> 00:36:06,520 Speaker 2: the second class guys, and so we've got this big 733 00:36:06,600 --> 00:36:09,000 Speaker 2: middle class that starts jumping up and we're like, well, 734 00:36:09,320 --> 00:36:11,200 Speaker 2: I gotta take one of these guys at number six? 735 00:36:12,040 --> 00:36:15,200 Speaker 2: Can I trade down? Well, if I'm four or five, 736 00:36:15,880 --> 00:36:18,560 Speaker 2: why would I want to trade out of that top tier? 737 00:36:19,000 --> 00:36:22,200 Speaker 2: I won the lottery literally, and I'm in that group 738 00:36:22,239 --> 00:36:24,880 Speaker 2: in that spot. Now, why would I give up? If 739 00:36:24,920 --> 00:36:28,000 Speaker 2: I'm going out to get a veteran, Sure, that's different, 740 00:36:28,520 --> 00:36:30,520 Speaker 2: But why do I want to move down out of 741 00:36:30,520 --> 00:36:33,520 Speaker 2: this clear top tier into like the morass of twenty 742 00:36:33,560 --> 00:36:35,799 Speaker 2: other people that no one knows what order they're going 743 00:36:35,880 --> 00:36:36,279 Speaker 2: to go on. 744 00:36:36,600 --> 00:36:39,600 Speaker 3: Because Toronto, I think, is trying to work out something larger. 745 00:36:40,920 --> 00:36:43,040 Speaker 3: I think that's part of the conversation, and I also 746 00:36:43,480 --> 00:36:45,520 Speaker 3: I think a lot of it is just that Toronto 747 00:36:45,680 --> 00:36:48,960 Speaker 3: doesn't view. Here's the thing is, like we're taking this 748 00:36:49,040 --> 00:36:52,920 Speaker 3: base off of like consensus evaluations what I'm doing going on? 749 00:36:53,000 --> 00:36:54,919 Speaker 3: And you kind of agree that there's like top three 750 00:36:55,000 --> 00:36:57,200 Speaker 3: and then there's Barnes and Sugs and then drop off. 751 00:36:57,280 --> 00:36:58,879 Speaker 1: Right, do you agree on that? 752 00:37:00,920 --> 00:37:02,719 Speaker 3: Is there a guy that a guy that you think 753 00:37:02,760 --> 00:37:05,680 Speaker 3: belongs in that top tier that's not we haven't talked about. 754 00:37:06,520 --> 00:37:10,240 Speaker 2: I have Jaden Springer in my second tier with Sugs 755 00:37:10,280 --> 00:37:11,000 Speaker 2: and Green. I have k. 756 00:37:13,920 --> 00:37:16,279 Speaker 1: We'll get to Springer. Don't don't trust me. I need 757 00:37:16,320 --> 00:37:21,600 Speaker 1: you to to soothe my fears. But if there's not 758 00:37:21,719 --> 00:37:23,960 Speaker 1: a guy out that we don't know and thinks that 759 00:37:24,000 --> 00:37:27,719 Speaker 1: Springer's going that high, so right, if he's not. 760 00:37:27,840 --> 00:37:30,239 Speaker 3: If he's not that high, then it's like okay. But 761 00:37:30,280 --> 00:37:33,040 Speaker 3: if you're if there is top three and then four 762 00:37:33,040 --> 00:37:35,760 Speaker 3: and five are basically the same. If you're the Raptors 763 00:37:35,760 --> 00:37:37,240 Speaker 3: and you're just like, yeah, but we don't like Sugs 764 00:37:37,320 --> 00:37:39,719 Speaker 3: or Barns, we're just not blown away by it. And 765 00:37:39,760 --> 00:37:43,200 Speaker 3: if you can pick up multiple picks later, you'd probably 766 00:37:43,239 --> 00:37:47,000 Speaker 3: do that. Because they're looking at like their conversations have 767 00:37:47,040 --> 00:37:49,359 Speaker 3: been about overhauling a lot, but they're not looking at 768 00:37:49,400 --> 00:37:49,879 Speaker 3: small moves. 769 00:37:49,920 --> 00:37:51,200 Speaker 1: They're looking at major moves. 770 00:37:52,280 --> 00:37:55,200 Speaker 3: I reported this week on Action Network about their conversations 771 00:37:55,200 --> 00:37:58,520 Speaker 3: with the Sixers UH for a ridiculous offer that they 772 00:37:58,520 --> 00:38:02,960 Speaker 3: turned down. I should note, but they are their interest 773 00:38:03,000 --> 00:38:06,879 Speaker 3: in in their interest in Simmons is referred to as substantial. 774 00:38:07,280 --> 00:38:10,040 Speaker 3: It is not a passing glance. Like the Raptors have 775 00:38:10,040 --> 00:38:14,200 Speaker 3: actually made serious calls about Simmons. They haven't gotten serious 776 00:38:14,239 --> 00:38:17,480 Speaker 3: offers in return, but they've they've actually they have interest 777 00:38:17,520 --> 00:38:20,440 Speaker 3: in those things they're looking at overhauling, and so if 778 00:38:20,440 --> 00:38:22,920 Speaker 3: that's the case, then I do think like a trade 779 00:38:22,920 --> 00:38:24,440 Speaker 3: down is at least plausible. 780 00:38:25,600 --> 00:38:26,840 Speaker 1: But at the same. 781 00:38:26,640 --> 00:38:28,759 Speaker 3: Time, to me, if you're going to trade up, the 782 00:38:28,760 --> 00:38:30,439 Speaker 3: only guy that you trade up to get at four 783 00:38:30,520 --> 00:38:33,319 Speaker 3: is Sugs, like that you're the guy that looks at 784 00:38:33,360 --> 00:38:38,640 Speaker 3: and says, if you know that Orlando is not going 785 00:38:38,680 --> 00:38:40,799 Speaker 3: to let one of those two go, and you know 786 00:38:40,920 --> 00:38:43,960 Speaker 3: that the Raptors are like, well, we're not really sold 787 00:38:44,000 --> 00:38:47,680 Speaker 3: on either one, and we may just take Barnes, And 788 00:38:47,719 --> 00:38:50,640 Speaker 3: you're like, well, okay, if you take Barnes, I'm still 789 00:38:50,680 --> 00:38:52,200 Speaker 3: I still can't get Sugs because. 790 00:38:52,000 --> 00:38:53,480 Speaker 1: The magic you're going to take him. 791 00:38:53,840 --> 00:38:56,400 Speaker 3: Then I think that's probably that's probably still it with 792 00:38:56,800 --> 00:38:59,240 Speaker 3: you know, Sugs going four, that's the risk with betting 793 00:38:59,280 --> 00:39:02,839 Speaker 3: Sugs five, it's right, but I think I still think 794 00:39:02,840 --> 00:39:04,799 Speaker 3: of four to twenty five, there's probably value based off 795 00:39:04,800 --> 00:39:10,560 Speaker 3: of how hyped Barnes is at this point for reference, 796 00:39:11,040 --> 00:39:13,440 Speaker 3: and if we want to look at on bet MGM, 797 00:39:13,800 --> 00:39:19,080 Speaker 3: Barnes is not on the board for the for his 798 00:39:19,400 --> 00:39:22,520 Speaker 3: prop uh differential like player position. 799 00:39:23,440 --> 00:39:25,480 Speaker 2: I think the top five guys don't really have that 800 00:39:25,560 --> 00:39:25,919 Speaker 2: be other. 801 00:39:26,360 --> 00:39:29,279 Speaker 3: At well one book under five and a half is 802 00:39:29,400 --> 00:39:36,080 Speaker 3: minus four hundred. That's how heavily Scottie Barnes is projected 803 00:39:36,080 --> 00:39:36,799 Speaker 3: to go top five. 804 00:39:37,239 --> 00:39:39,080 Speaker 2: So like, so what's the what's the over? 805 00:39:39,840 --> 00:39:42,040 Speaker 3: It's plus two seventy five. You're not even getting great 806 00:39:42,080 --> 00:39:43,040 Speaker 3: value on the other side of it. 807 00:39:44,040 --> 00:39:46,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, are you do you want to bet 808 00:39:46,200 --> 00:39:48,480 Speaker 1: plus two seventy five on on Barns over base off 809 00:39:48,480 --> 00:39:48,799 Speaker 1: of the fact. 810 00:39:48,880 --> 00:39:50,959 Speaker 2: I mean, I'm just I'm betting. 811 00:39:51,160 --> 00:39:53,080 Speaker 3: I'm asking because like you like to take these shots. 812 00:39:53,120 --> 00:39:55,239 Speaker 3: And if you're like, I don't think he's that good. 813 00:39:55,920 --> 00:39:57,799 Speaker 2: Well, it's just when I hear when I hear a 814 00:39:57,840 --> 00:40:00,319 Speaker 2: prop and I and I think one side is looted Chris, 815 00:40:00,480 --> 00:40:02,360 Speaker 2: then I you know, like, well not ludicrous, but like 816 00:40:02,400 --> 00:40:04,680 Speaker 2: there's no chance I'm betting the minus four hundred. I 817 00:40:04,760 --> 00:40:07,000 Speaker 2: just I don't like to pay that for to juice something. 818 00:40:07,160 --> 00:40:09,479 Speaker 2: So if I see that, then I then ask myself, well, 819 00:40:09,719 --> 00:40:12,439 Speaker 2: then what's the other side. So I asked, I don't 820 00:40:12,440 --> 00:40:14,239 Speaker 2: think I want to play it, but you know, if 821 00:40:14,239 --> 00:40:16,440 Speaker 2: you don't like Barnes, if you feel like he's just 822 00:40:16,480 --> 00:40:19,040 Speaker 2: not gonna fit those two teams, then that's a play. 823 00:40:19,080 --> 00:40:21,840 Speaker 2: But all the intel certainly points to him being pretty 824 00:40:21,880 --> 00:40:22,840 Speaker 2: safely in that group. 825 00:40:22,960 --> 00:40:25,040 Speaker 3: All right, let's let's get into this is where they 826 00:40:25,040 --> 00:40:29,719 Speaker 3: gets messy. Okay, we got about tears, top three, four 827 00:40:29,719 --> 00:40:36,360 Speaker 3: and five. To me, six through fifteen is liquid. Maybe 828 00:40:36,600 --> 00:40:40,760 Speaker 3: maybe six or fourteen, Maybe six through twelve. 829 00:40:42,200 --> 00:40:45,000 Speaker 2: I would say like six to twenty five. Like I 830 00:40:45,120 --> 00:40:47,200 Speaker 2: legitimately think that there's gonna be guys that are in 831 00:40:47,200 --> 00:40:49,239 Speaker 2: the twenties in mock drafts that go in like the 832 00:40:49,239 --> 00:40:51,719 Speaker 2: top ten and everyone's like what, And then I think 833 00:40:51,719 --> 00:40:53,919 Speaker 2: there's gonna be guys that are going like eight and nine. 834 00:40:54,200 --> 00:40:56,840 Speaker 2: They're gonna slide quote unquote all the way to twenty. 835 00:40:57,680 --> 00:40:59,680 Speaker 2: I just think it's so fluid. I think that this 836 00:40:59,800 --> 00:41:03,080 Speaker 2: next tier is just this big ooey, gouey middle class 837 00:41:03,120 --> 00:41:03,919 Speaker 2: of prospects. 838 00:41:04,120 --> 00:41:06,400 Speaker 1: You have a guy that you think is going to 839 00:41:06,440 --> 00:41:06,880 Speaker 1: go higher. 840 00:41:08,719 --> 00:41:10,640 Speaker 2: I mean, is this is this where I get to 841 00:41:10,680 --> 00:41:12,640 Speaker 2: talk about James Springer? That's this guy? 842 00:41:12,760 --> 00:41:15,040 Speaker 1: This is the guy that, yeah, let's let's talk about Springer. 843 00:41:15,120 --> 00:41:15,520 Speaker 1: Go ahead. 844 00:41:16,760 --> 00:41:19,720 Speaker 2: So so here's what I like about James Springer. He's 845 00:41:20,120 --> 00:41:23,960 Speaker 2: he's a very high floor prospect, I think because he's 846 00:41:24,040 --> 00:41:27,640 Speaker 2: he's good at everything. He doesn't have he doesn't have 847 00:41:27,840 --> 00:41:31,000 Speaker 2: a he's good at everything without being great at something, 848 00:41:31,360 --> 00:41:34,400 Speaker 2: And those sort of prospects tend to be undervalued because 849 00:41:34,880 --> 00:41:38,359 Speaker 2: we love to talk about this guy's jumper or this 850 00:41:38,400 --> 00:41:40,600 Speaker 2: guy's defense, or you know, like fill in the blank. 851 00:41:40,960 --> 00:41:43,520 Speaker 2: We love to to put them into a bucket of Oh, 852 00:41:43,640 --> 00:41:46,440 Speaker 2: I know that guy, he's this prospect because he has 853 00:41:46,480 --> 00:41:50,080 Speaker 2: this skill. Springer doesn't really fit that because he has 854 00:41:50,120 --> 00:41:54,919 Speaker 2: a quieter, more rounded game. But he's he's a very 855 00:41:54,920 --> 00:41:57,960 Speaker 2: good defender. He really locks in, plays high effort, high 856 00:41:58,040 --> 00:41:59,799 Speaker 2: energy on that. And he's gonna be a good guard 857 00:41:59,840 --> 00:42:02,719 Speaker 2: to which is only so valuable admittedly, but he's gonna 858 00:42:02,719 --> 00:42:06,880 Speaker 2: be a good team construct guy. He fits well in 859 00:42:06,920 --> 00:42:09,280 Speaker 2: a lot of team concepts, like I think he's slopped 860 00:42:09,280 --> 00:42:11,239 Speaker 2: into a roster well because he can play on or 861 00:42:11,280 --> 00:42:14,160 Speaker 2: off the ball. His shooting numbers this year were good, 862 00:42:14,320 --> 00:42:16,480 Speaker 2: though not super high volume, so there's a little bit 863 00:42:16,520 --> 00:42:19,279 Speaker 2: of concern there. But free throw looks good, the shot 864 00:42:19,320 --> 00:42:22,200 Speaker 2: looks confident. He can dribble, he can pass, he can 865 00:42:22,200 --> 00:42:24,920 Speaker 2: create for himself, you can create for teammates a little bit. 866 00:42:25,280 --> 00:42:28,120 Speaker 2: He's not great at any of those things. The one 867 00:42:28,160 --> 00:42:30,200 Speaker 2: thing that that was a bit of a concern this year. 868 00:42:30,600 --> 00:42:32,719 Speaker 2: He's not super bursty, like he's not going to be 869 00:42:32,760 --> 00:42:35,279 Speaker 2: the guy to just attack the rim or just you know, 870 00:42:35,320 --> 00:42:39,160 Speaker 2: beat his guy on his own. But and here's the key, 871 00:42:39,200 --> 00:42:41,200 Speaker 2: here's where I really like Springs and why I think 872 00:42:41,239 --> 00:42:46,200 Speaker 2: he's being undervalued. So to me, Springer and Suggs are 873 00:42:46,239 --> 00:42:49,279 Speaker 2: somewhat comparable to each other in sort of their like 874 00:42:49,920 --> 00:42:52,080 Speaker 2: understated nature of their game. I don't think either one 875 00:42:52,120 --> 00:42:53,680 Speaker 2: of them is gonna ever be like a big time 876 00:42:53,960 --> 00:42:56,480 Speaker 2: NBA score sort of guy. They're gonna be like a 877 00:42:56,520 --> 00:42:59,839 Speaker 2: winning player Kyle Lowry Van Vliet sort of guy, which 878 00:42:59,840 --> 00:43:04,000 Speaker 2: I I love those guys. So here's the thing. Though, 879 00:43:04,320 --> 00:43:07,600 Speaker 2: Number one, Jamee Springer played hurt this whole season. He 880 00:43:07,680 --> 00:43:10,680 Speaker 2: is playing on his sprained ankle that he kept reinjuring, 881 00:43:11,200 --> 00:43:12,719 Speaker 2: and a lot of the reports on the combine this 882 00:43:12,760 --> 00:43:15,000 Speaker 2: summer that he looked a lot healthier and he looked 883 00:43:15,160 --> 00:43:18,240 Speaker 2: he had that pop again. So of all the things 884 00:43:18,280 --> 00:43:20,160 Speaker 2: we didn't like about him, if it's that burst, that 885 00:43:20,200 --> 00:43:23,759 Speaker 2: first step, well, that jives with a thing that would 886 00:43:23,760 --> 00:43:27,560 Speaker 2: have been hampered by an injury. Number two, Tennessee had 887 00:43:27,680 --> 00:43:30,920 Speaker 2: horrendous spacing and offense this year that had no shooting. 888 00:43:31,400 --> 00:43:34,239 Speaker 2: It was a really rough spot for him versus Gonzaga, 889 00:43:34,480 --> 00:43:36,720 Speaker 2: which had like one of the best situations you could 890 00:43:36,760 --> 00:43:39,680 Speaker 2: possibly ever have had for a point guard, all the spacing, 891 00:43:39,760 --> 00:43:43,840 Speaker 2: all the modern offense. And Suggs is fifteen months older 892 00:43:43,840 --> 00:43:47,120 Speaker 2: than Springer. I really value, especially at the top of 893 00:43:47,160 --> 00:43:51,719 Speaker 2: the draft, youth, because youth means unknown, and unknown can 894 00:43:51,760 --> 00:43:56,560 Speaker 2: mean upside. And here's what I keep asking myself. If 895 00:43:56,560 --> 00:44:00,480 Speaker 2: you swapped them and said, Okay, Jade Springer, get healthy, 896 00:44:01,000 --> 00:44:05,279 Speaker 2: develop fifteen months to be Jalen Suggs's age, and now 897 00:44:05,440 --> 00:44:10,160 Speaker 2: put that Springer into Gonzega's offense and Suggs's place, could 898 00:44:10,160 --> 00:44:12,799 Speaker 2: he have led that team to the National title game 899 00:44:12,800 --> 00:44:14,840 Speaker 2: an undefeated season along the way. And I think he 900 00:44:14,920 --> 00:44:19,160 Speaker 2: absolutely could have. So I have Springer in my tier 901 00:44:19,200 --> 00:44:21,279 Speaker 2: with Suggs. I just think he's a He has a 902 00:44:21,360 --> 00:44:25,520 Speaker 2: very high floor to be a very good contributor, like 903 00:44:25,560 --> 00:44:29,440 Speaker 2: a like think like a George Hill or Malcolm Brogdon player. 904 00:44:30,160 --> 00:44:32,719 Speaker 2: I think that's like a median outcome, but I think 905 00:44:32,719 --> 00:44:34,799 Speaker 2: there's a lot more upside than people are giving him 906 00:44:34,800 --> 00:44:38,840 Speaker 2: credit for. It baffles me. Despite all of what I 907 00:44:38,960 --> 00:44:41,239 Speaker 2: just said, I have a number five on my board. 908 00:44:41,239 --> 00:44:44,240 Speaker 2: He's in my second tier. But then I read boards, 909 00:44:44,280 --> 00:44:46,359 Speaker 2: I read all the intel. Everything I see as Ah 910 00:44:46,480 --> 00:44:50,399 Speaker 2: Springer like twenty fifth, thirtieth, twenty second, like I think 911 00:44:50,400 --> 00:44:53,560 Speaker 2: that's his over under twenty two point five. I don't know. 912 00:44:53,680 --> 00:44:56,640 Speaker 2: I don't understand what I'm missing or what everyone else 913 00:44:56,680 --> 00:45:00,200 Speaker 2: is missing, because there's a real cognitive dissonance, and I'm 914 00:45:00,200 --> 00:45:03,400 Speaker 2: not usually this far off consensus on a player. I 915 00:45:03,400 --> 00:45:08,600 Speaker 2: will say, though, draft Twitter, yeah does like Springer, not 916 00:45:08,680 --> 00:45:11,480 Speaker 2: quite as much as me, more like tenth than fifth, 917 00:45:11,520 --> 00:45:14,080 Speaker 2: I think, but they do like him. So I don't know, 918 00:45:14,080 --> 00:45:15,680 Speaker 2: what do you think of the case for Springer. 919 00:45:16,680 --> 00:45:19,160 Speaker 1: So let's talk draft Twitter for a little bit. 920 00:45:19,200 --> 00:45:21,560 Speaker 3: Springer was one identified almost immediately because the guy that 921 00:45:21,600 --> 00:45:24,080 Speaker 3: I trust most on this stuff has him fifth on 922 00:45:24,120 --> 00:45:26,320 Speaker 3: his board too, and. 923 00:45:28,680 --> 00:45:29,560 Speaker 1: So I bet. 924 00:45:29,400 --> 00:45:31,719 Speaker 3: Springer out the gate at twenty three and a half 925 00:45:31,920 --> 00:45:35,759 Speaker 3: minus one ten when when the props first hit, I 926 00:45:35,840 --> 00:45:39,279 Speaker 3: hit that every book I could find it at. So 927 00:45:39,840 --> 00:45:45,680 Speaker 3: I have built on Springer, I have more on him there. 928 00:45:46,719 --> 00:45:51,440 Speaker 3: Draft Twitter can be it's messy because there are guys 929 00:45:51,480 --> 00:45:54,000 Speaker 3: in there that are in quote unquote draft Twitter that 930 00:45:54,080 --> 00:45:56,799 Speaker 3: are just like guys that really love prospects and dive 931 00:45:56,840 --> 00:45:59,480 Speaker 3: into it and are part of the conversations. And then 932 00:45:59,480 --> 00:46:02,160 Speaker 3: there's guys there that do legitimate they've done work for 933 00:46:02,239 --> 00:46:05,480 Speaker 3: teams and they have like high level expertise in this stuff. 934 00:46:06,000 --> 00:46:07,759 Speaker 1: The gap there, I think is significant. 935 00:46:09,040 --> 00:46:11,560 Speaker 3: Draft Twitter will also all latch onto a guy and 936 00:46:11,600 --> 00:46:12,879 Speaker 3: they'll be higher on him. 937 00:46:13,400 --> 00:46:16,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, he won't go as high as they think that 938 00:46:16,719 --> 00:46:17,800 Speaker 1: he should. 939 00:46:18,480 --> 00:46:22,200 Speaker 3: Like that's a that's a real thing where and I 940 00:46:22,239 --> 00:46:26,239 Speaker 3: think the gap there is likely intel on the background 941 00:46:27,000 --> 00:46:30,560 Speaker 3: or the interview, right, Like, I think that's probably got 942 00:46:30,600 --> 00:46:32,960 Speaker 3: something to do with how those conversations evolve. 943 00:46:33,520 --> 00:46:35,560 Speaker 1: Look, draft Twitter, there's a there was a guy. 944 00:46:35,400 --> 00:46:38,680 Speaker 3: That actually did the some folks actually did an amalgamation 945 00:46:38,800 --> 00:46:44,760 Speaker 3: of where they're at. They have Springer as the tenth 946 00:46:44,800 --> 00:46:48,600 Speaker 3: pick overall, with the highest was four, and there's and 947 00:46:48,680 --> 00:46:52,719 Speaker 3: the low was thirty five. So that's like a wide range, 948 00:46:52,800 --> 00:46:54,680 Speaker 3: right because again you got a lot of folks thing. 949 00:46:55,120 --> 00:46:57,640 Speaker 2: And that's kind of like Nix ninety six boards I 950 00:46:57,680 --> 00:47:00,319 Speaker 2: think too. So that's not just a couple outliers. That's 951 00:47:00,360 --> 00:47:01,439 Speaker 2: that's a lot of work in there. 952 00:47:01,719 --> 00:47:05,600 Speaker 3: He's a high IQ player, which I really like at 953 00:47:05,600 --> 00:47:08,240 Speaker 3: this point in time, I think. I think in general, 954 00:47:08,280 --> 00:47:10,400 Speaker 3: executives are more concerned with can you play? 955 00:47:10,800 --> 00:47:11,720 Speaker 1: Than are you athletic? 956 00:47:12,239 --> 00:47:15,160 Speaker 3: Is a good defender, he's all around, he's productive, and 957 00:47:15,200 --> 00:47:18,120 Speaker 3: he's a playmaker. He makes other guys better, which again 958 00:47:18,239 --> 00:47:20,719 Speaker 3: is something that a lot of teams are looking for. Uh. 959 00:47:20,920 --> 00:47:23,000 Speaker 3: I did ask somebody yesterday for kind of like a 960 00:47:23,040 --> 00:47:24,719 Speaker 3: bigger deep dive, and one of the things that they 961 00:47:24,760 --> 00:47:26,960 Speaker 3: mentioned was they were like, everything that he does offensively 962 00:47:27,000 --> 00:47:28,680 Speaker 3: is off the hop step. You do that in the 963 00:47:28,760 --> 00:47:31,040 Speaker 3: NBA and you're gonna get blocked. Like that's like a 964 00:47:31,040 --> 00:47:31,720 Speaker 3: real concern. 965 00:47:32,080 --> 00:47:34,560 Speaker 1: He shot forty from three, but he was only on 966 00:47:34,680 --> 00:47:35,839 Speaker 1: forty five attempts. 967 00:47:36,160 --> 00:47:40,000 Speaker 3: His shot releases like painfully slow. It's he's got a 968 00:47:40,040 --> 00:47:43,359 Speaker 3: really slow release. My only thing is if you're if 969 00:47:43,360 --> 00:47:45,239 Speaker 3: you're a team and you're looking at that and you're like, 970 00:47:45,680 --> 00:47:48,200 Speaker 3: you know what, if we give him eight hundred reps 971 00:47:48,200 --> 00:47:50,719 Speaker 3: a day, he's gonna like, we're going to get that 972 00:47:50,800 --> 00:47:54,680 Speaker 3: speed up, like working with coaches every single day, he's 973 00:47:54,719 --> 00:47:55,359 Speaker 3: gonna move up. 974 00:47:55,600 --> 00:47:56,440 Speaker 1: The bigger thing is. 975 00:47:56,440 --> 00:47:58,920 Speaker 3: That despite all of this, the books and like we've 976 00:47:58,920 --> 00:48:01,040 Speaker 3: been talking about it, I've been on show Who's talking 977 00:48:01,040 --> 00:48:03,480 Speaker 3: about on You Better you Bet, I've talked about this consistently. 978 00:48:03,800 --> 00:48:06,280 Speaker 3: His props still twenty two and a half the unders 979 00:48:06,440 --> 00:48:10,279 Speaker 3: is juiced at plus one ten on bet MGM, the 980 00:48:10,280 --> 00:48:13,319 Speaker 3: officials provider of the Action Network. For me, like, I 981 00:48:13,400 --> 00:48:14,920 Speaker 3: just think Jayden and Springer twenty two and a half 982 00:48:14,920 --> 00:48:17,040 Speaker 3: still has to be a best bet. Like I don't 983 00:48:17,040 --> 00:48:18,759 Speaker 3: think twenty two. Like usually you want to look at 984 00:48:18,760 --> 00:48:20,759 Speaker 3: the stopping point, right, like twenty two. I don't like 985 00:48:20,800 --> 00:48:23,120 Speaker 3: twenty two because I think that there's three guys that 986 00:48:23,120 --> 00:48:24,040 Speaker 3: I think the Lakers have have. 987 00:48:24,040 --> 00:48:27,840 Speaker 1: Penciled at twenty two, including Io assumed now, but if. 988 00:48:27,680 --> 00:48:30,879 Speaker 3: We move higher, I still think there's a good chance 989 00:48:30,880 --> 00:48:32,239 Speaker 3: that one of those teams in the teams is going 990 00:48:32,320 --> 00:48:35,560 Speaker 3: to be like, yeah, let's just take Springer, right Because 991 00:48:35,640 --> 00:48:38,319 Speaker 3: like I just go over the list of guys that 992 00:48:38,360 --> 00:48:42,879 Speaker 3: are that are mocked in the top ten on most 993 00:48:42,920 --> 00:48:46,799 Speaker 3: of the quote unquote big name boards, and I'm not 994 00:48:47,680 --> 00:48:51,839 Speaker 3: convinced that there's these guys are are absolutely going to go. 995 00:48:52,000 --> 00:48:52,600 Speaker 1: I just don't. 996 00:48:52,800 --> 00:48:55,319 Speaker 2: Well, that's that's the problem that I was saying, is 997 00:48:55,400 --> 00:48:58,560 Speaker 2: like we don't have the sixth to tenth best prospects. 998 00:48:58,680 --> 00:49:01,520 Speaker 2: We have this big middle group, and to me, Springer 999 00:49:01,640 --> 00:49:04,080 Speaker 2: is the exact sort of guy that I could see 1000 00:49:04,120 --> 00:49:06,879 Speaker 2: a Raptors or a team in that four five sixty 1001 00:49:06,880 --> 00:49:10,759 Speaker 2: seven range. Look around and can I be like I 1002 00:49:10,840 --> 00:49:13,359 Speaker 2: missed out on Mobiley and Green. I'm not really in 1003 00:49:13,400 --> 00:49:16,080 Speaker 2: love with these guys. I kind of like Springer though, 1004 00:49:16,080 --> 00:49:18,480 Speaker 2: And it sure looks like he's available eight, ten, twelve 1005 00:49:18,480 --> 00:49:21,920 Speaker 2: picks from now, let's trade down. You know, the thunder 1006 00:49:21,920 --> 00:49:24,279 Speaker 2: of two picks. The Knicks have two picks, so that's 1007 00:49:24,320 --> 00:49:26,960 Speaker 2: a perfect range to pick up an asset and maybe 1008 00:49:27,000 --> 00:49:29,680 Speaker 2: grab Springer when it looks like he'll be available there. 1009 00:49:29,680 --> 00:49:32,560 Speaker 2: And if you think that, if you agree with with 1010 00:49:32,600 --> 00:49:34,719 Speaker 2: what we're saying that he's a top five or ten guy, 1011 00:49:34,760 --> 00:49:37,000 Speaker 2: but you can get him at fifteen or twenty, that's 1012 00:49:37,040 --> 00:49:39,000 Speaker 2: a great, you know, asset play to be able to 1013 00:49:39,040 --> 00:49:41,600 Speaker 2: do that. He seems like a trade down Canada. 1014 00:49:43,040 --> 00:49:45,759 Speaker 3: If we look at the guys at fifteen twenty, like Garuba Kispert, 1015 00:49:45,920 --> 00:49:47,920 Speaker 3: I think go somewhere between thirteen and twenty. 1016 00:49:48,880 --> 00:49:50,160 Speaker 1: Kai Jones I think can slip. 1017 00:49:50,320 --> 00:49:53,560 Speaker 3: Chris Dwarte I think can slip Keon Johnson I think 1018 00:49:53,600 --> 00:49:56,759 Speaker 3: probably goes somewhere between thirteen and twenty. Zaire Williams I 1019 00:49:56,800 --> 00:49:59,560 Speaker 3: think can slip. Sharif Cooper I think probably moves does 1020 00:49:59,640 --> 00:50:04,080 Speaker 3: higher them where his props are projected that he is 1021 00:50:04,120 --> 00:50:06,239 Speaker 3: twenty two and a half as well. I think sure 1022 00:50:06,239 --> 00:50:10,200 Speaker 3: Reef's another good candidate to go higher the Springer. Jared 1023 00:50:10,239 --> 00:50:12,600 Speaker 3: Butler I think is in that range. I think the 1024 00:50:12,680 --> 00:50:14,600 Speaker 3: Knicks are a very likely spot for Jared Butler, that 1025 00:50:14,719 --> 00:50:16,000 Speaker 3: they've been linked to him for a while. 1026 00:50:16,040 --> 00:50:17,960 Speaker 1: There's a lot. I thought that Jared Butler and Isaiah 1027 00:50:18,000 --> 00:50:19,399 Speaker 1: Jackson are going nineteen twenty one. 1028 00:50:19,480 --> 00:50:22,000 Speaker 3: That's the two picks some things. I think the guys 1029 00:50:22,000 --> 00:50:24,080 Speaker 3: that are gonna slip. Springer seems like a guy that's 1030 00:50:24,080 --> 00:50:26,360 Speaker 3: going to move up. Moses Moody. 1031 00:50:26,680 --> 00:50:31,160 Speaker 5: Moses Moody, Moses Little Rock Lightning. 1032 00:50:31,880 --> 00:50:35,080 Speaker 3: Okay, I've got a lot on Moses Moody unders and 1033 00:50:35,239 --> 00:50:37,200 Speaker 3: he's sliding a little bit late in the process. I'm 1034 00:50:37,200 --> 00:50:40,000 Speaker 3: trying to hold the line on this. My assessment on 1035 00:50:40,080 --> 00:50:43,280 Speaker 3: him based off of what I've heard is high floor player, 1036 00:50:43,440 --> 00:50:44,040 Speaker 3: Like he's just. 1037 00:50:44,000 --> 00:50:44,600 Speaker 1: Gonna be good. 1038 00:50:44,680 --> 00:50:46,759 Speaker 3: He's gonna be good, he's gonna score for you, he's 1039 00:50:46,760 --> 00:50:50,080 Speaker 3: gonna play defense. Like you're not really there's he's not 1040 00:50:50,120 --> 00:50:52,239 Speaker 3: going to be your superstar. But if you're just like 1041 00:50:52,239 --> 00:50:54,600 Speaker 3: we gotta nail this pick, Moses Moody is your guy. 1042 00:50:55,080 --> 00:50:56,600 Speaker 3: And if we've talked all the time about like in 1043 00:50:56,640 --> 00:50:59,120 Speaker 3: the top ten, you're shopping for a superstar, that's not 1044 00:50:59,200 --> 00:50:59,799 Speaker 3: what you do. 1045 00:51:00,120 --> 00:51:01,319 Speaker 1: And I get it. 1046 00:51:02,160 --> 00:51:04,360 Speaker 3: I just feel like somebody's gonna be like, you know, 1047 00:51:04,520 --> 00:51:06,239 Speaker 3: let's just take Moody. He's the best player on the board, 1048 00:51:06,239 --> 00:51:06,960 Speaker 3: Like he's just better. 1049 00:51:08,080 --> 00:51:08,600 Speaker 1: What do you think? 1050 00:51:09,239 --> 00:51:12,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I agree. He's another guy that draft Twitter 1051 00:51:12,200 --> 00:51:14,600 Speaker 2: is very high on. I've never been quite as high, 1052 00:51:14,680 --> 00:51:18,120 Speaker 2: but I agree with everything you just said. Like he's young, 1053 00:51:18,360 --> 00:51:22,200 Speaker 2: he's long, his shot is pure and looks great, Like 1054 00:51:22,280 --> 00:51:24,640 Speaker 2: he's the exact three and D guy that you want 1055 00:51:24,680 --> 00:51:26,719 Speaker 2: to slot in. And I think upside for more as 1056 00:51:26,719 --> 00:51:30,040 Speaker 2: he developed, Like he could easily be a sixteen eighteen 1057 00:51:30,160 --> 00:51:32,799 Speaker 2: twenty points a game guy in time once he gets 1058 00:51:32,800 --> 00:51:35,520 Speaker 2: a little more opportunity. I think what you're hoping for, 1059 00:51:36,239 --> 00:51:39,879 Speaker 2: you know, with Moody, I'm looking for like the Warriors 1060 00:51:40,000 --> 00:51:43,759 Speaker 2: at seven or the Kings at nine. Like, what I'm 1061 00:51:43,760 --> 00:51:47,760 Speaker 2: looking for is a team in that top range who's 1062 00:51:47,840 --> 00:51:50,440 Speaker 2: not just like the Rockets or Magic where it's like, well, 1063 00:51:50,440 --> 00:51:52,320 Speaker 2: we're not even close. We need to take a swing. 1064 00:51:52,760 --> 00:51:55,799 Speaker 2: Moody doesn't feel like a swing. Moody feels like like 1065 00:51:56,320 --> 00:51:58,840 Speaker 2: a swing for a double. Like if I'm the Warriors 1066 00:51:58,920 --> 00:52:02,479 Speaker 2: or Kings, can I can sell this as I'm gonna 1067 00:52:02,480 --> 00:52:05,120 Speaker 2: take a guy that can fit in right now and 1068 00:52:05,200 --> 00:52:08,920 Speaker 2: play for my winning team right now. Let's just imagine 1069 00:52:08,960 --> 00:52:11,080 Speaker 2: winning with the Kings. They're going for the playoffs though 1070 00:52:11,080 --> 00:52:13,160 Speaker 2: they're trying to make a move for right now. But 1071 00:52:13,239 --> 00:52:16,520 Speaker 2: I can put him in there and then hope that 1072 00:52:16,640 --> 00:52:19,600 Speaker 2: he can, you know, develop more later, kind of like 1073 00:52:19,680 --> 00:52:23,120 Speaker 2: the Jalen Brown or Jason Tatum thing. So I think 1074 00:52:23,200 --> 00:52:25,239 Speaker 2: you can go both ways. You're shaking your head at me, 1075 00:52:25,360 --> 00:52:26,839 Speaker 2: What do you why? Why are you shaking your head 1076 00:52:26,880 --> 00:52:27,080 Speaker 2: at me? 1077 00:52:27,120 --> 00:52:28,960 Speaker 3: On this one, I feel very commident. The Kings are 1078 00:52:28,960 --> 00:52:31,200 Speaker 3: going to take Fronz Wagner or Shanghun. 1079 00:52:31,360 --> 00:52:31,839 Speaker 1: Those are two. 1080 00:52:31,880 --> 00:52:33,200 Speaker 3: Those are the two guys that are going to go there. 1081 00:52:33,440 --> 00:52:34,920 Speaker 3: The Kings are not are going to take one of 1082 00:52:34,960 --> 00:52:36,279 Speaker 3: those two guys. If they do not take one of 1083 00:52:36,280 --> 00:52:37,960 Speaker 3: those two guys, it's because somebody that they did not 1084 00:52:38,000 --> 00:52:38,560 Speaker 3: think was going to. 1085 00:52:38,600 --> 00:52:40,279 Speaker 1: Fall fell to them. 1086 00:52:40,280 --> 00:52:42,000 Speaker 3: Whether that's maybe they don't think Kminga is going to 1087 00:52:42,080 --> 00:52:43,640 Speaker 3: maybe that may be part of this, right, Like they 1088 00:52:43,680 --> 00:52:45,160 Speaker 3: don't think Kminga is gonna be off the board they 1089 00:52:45,160 --> 00:52:47,240 Speaker 3: expect I mean, they may be still operating on Comminga 1090 00:52:47,840 --> 00:52:49,719 Speaker 3: is going to go five. You'd be surprised how how 1091 00:52:49,800 --> 00:52:52,160 Speaker 3: much these guys don't pay attention to the conversations around 1092 00:52:52,160 --> 00:52:55,440 Speaker 3: there around the draft. I'm not surprised by because sometimes 1093 00:52:55,440 --> 00:52:58,440 Speaker 3: we're just wrong, right, right, So. 1094 00:52:58,520 --> 00:53:00,080 Speaker 1: If like that's the case, maybe they just take too. 1095 00:53:00,520 --> 00:53:05,640 Speaker 3: Or maybe you know, the conversation about Josh Giddy gets 1096 00:53:05,680 --> 00:53:07,919 Speaker 3: them to reevaluate Giddy and they just decide like, ooh, 1097 00:53:07,920 --> 00:53:09,520 Speaker 3: we could take him and then you know, maybe somebody 1098 00:53:09,520 --> 00:53:12,279 Speaker 3: will want him or whatever else. There's like a lot 1099 00:53:12,320 --> 00:53:14,400 Speaker 3: of ways I can see them not going there, But 1100 00:53:14,520 --> 00:53:16,719 Speaker 3: like I don't I'll say this, like I don't think 1101 00:53:16,840 --> 00:53:20,239 Speaker 3: Moses goes to the Kings at nine. I think that 1102 00:53:20,239 --> 00:53:23,239 Speaker 3: that's awful and so that gets dangerous, right. The only 1103 00:53:23,280 --> 00:53:25,040 Speaker 3: thing is that his over unders eleven and a half. 1104 00:53:25,840 --> 00:53:29,520 Speaker 3: So at eleven and a half, you've got ten. The 1105 00:53:29,560 --> 00:53:32,400 Speaker 3: Grizzlies just moved to ten, and the Grizzlies are trying 1106 00:53:32,440 --> 00:53:37,520 Speaker 3: to move up. So if the Grizzlies move up and 1107 00:53:37,560 --> 00:53:41,200 Speaker 3: they take who, presumably Giddy is like the guy that's 1108 00:53:41,239 --> 00:53:44,600 Speaker 3: like everyone's like when he went when the Memphis moved 1109 00:53:44,600 --> 00:53:49,640 Speaker 3: into ten, draft Express the athletic everybody penciled in, like 1110 00:53:49,880 --> 00:53:53,480 Speaker 3: circled Giddy at ten. But the problem is is like 1111 00:53:54,480 --> 00:53:56,840 Speaker 3: Golden State likes Giddy, not as much as maybe some 1112 00:53:56,840 --> 00:53:58,440 Speaker 3: of the other guys, but he's on the board for 1113 00:53:58,480 --> 00:54:01,239 Speaker 3: them at ten or at seven. And so if you're 1114 00:54:01,360 --> 00:54:02,920 Speaker 3: if you're the Grizzlies and you were just like, we 1115 00:54:02,960 --> 00:54:06,920 Speaker 3: think Getty's the guy you're moving up. But then somebody 1116 00:54:06,920 --> 00:54:09,279 Speaker 3: that moves back to ten, they're clearly not worried about 1117 00:54:09,280 --> 00:54:10,040 Speaker 3: getting a superstar. 1118 00:54:10,080 --> 00:54:11,600 Speaker 1: They're like, we just got good value on this. We 1119 00:54:11,640 --> 00:54:13,120 Speaker 1: got an extra player, and we. 1120 00:54:13,080 --> 00:54:14,920 Speaker 3: Picked up the ten seed and then a tenth spots 1121 00:54:15,200 --> 00:54:17,239 Speaker 3: draft pick, and you get taped the tenth pick, and 1122 00:54:17,280 --> 00:54:19,920 Speaker 3: then you're like Moses Moody feels that that works perfectly, 1123 00:54:20,440 --> 00:54:22,480 Speaker 3: you know, and that gives you another and even after that, 1124 00:54:22,560 --> 00:54:24,920 Speaker 3: you still got another pick at eleven to kind of 1125 00:54:24,920 --> 00:54:25,399 Speaker 3: work that day. 1126 00:54:25,520 --> 00:54:28,680 Speaker 2: Get room there, Well, you're your other out with Moses Moody. 1127 00:54:28,760 --> 00:54:32,120 Speaker 2: Is this the whole point of Moses Moody is that 1128 00:54:32,320 --> 00:54:34,319 Speaker 2: you can put them on every team in the NBA, 1129 00:54:34,520 --> 00:54:36,880 Speaker 2: Like the whole thing is the NBA. You need shooters 1130 00:54:36,920 --> 00:54:39,200 Speaker 2: that can play on the wing and play defense. So 1131 00:54:39,840 --> 00:54:42,760 Speaker 2: he's a potential pick for any team, like he fits 1132 00:54:42,800 --> 00:54:45,600 Speaker 2: into any construct of a roster. So it gives you 1133 00:54:45,719 --> 00:54:48,240 Speaker 2: like a little slight extra out at all those spots. 1134 00:54:48,239 --> 00:54:51,040 Speaker 2: So I think that the understillm makes sense. It is 1135 00:54:51,120 --> 00:54:53,480 Speaker 2: starting to squeeze a little a little bit though, because 1136 00:54:53,600 --> 00:54:55,920 Speaker 2: of the swinging for upside nature. At the top of 1137 00:54:55,960 --> 00:54:56,440 Speaker 2: the draft. 1138 00:54:57,400 --> 00:55:00,080 Speaker 3: You've got Garuba in a like the as like a 1139 00:55:00,080 --> 00:55:05,360 Speaker 3: a top at the higher level of this tree. Go 1140 00:55:05,400 --> 00:55:07,560 Speaker 3: ahead and talk about. 1141 00:55:07,840 --> 00:55:10,640 Speaker 2: I like Garuba best out of the three international guys. 1142 00:55:11,080 --> 00:55:13,840 Speaker 2: And it's partly Garuba. It's partly that I'm just a 1143 00:55:13,840 --> 00:55:16,800 Speaker 2: little bit underwhelmed by by both Gady and by Shangen. 1144 00:55:16,920 --> 00:55:19,800 Speaker 2: But what I Garuba reminds me a ton of Serge 1145 00:55:19,840 --> 00:55:22,600 Speaker 2: of Baka, and I'm hoping that that's not just because 1146 00:55:22,680 --> 00:55:25,759 Speaker 2: he's like a Spanish power forward and He's literally playing 1147 00:55:25,760 --> 00:55:27,560 Speaker 2: on the Olympics team right now, which I think speaks 1148 00:55:27,600 --> 00:55:29,360 Speaker 2: to how good of a player you are. At nineteen 1149 00:55:29,480 --> 00:55:32,160 Speaker 2: Spain is good, Like Spain might win the gold if 1150 00:55:32,280 --> 00:55:36,640 Speaker 2: USA doesn't. They're probably the favorite. So Garuba I think 1151 00:55:36,719 --> 00:55:38,839 Speaker 2: is probably the best defender in the draft right now. 1152 00:55:39,120 --> 00:55:42,640 Speaker 2: He's gonna be a classic four that can play the five, 1153 00:55:42,840 --> 00:55:45,840 Speaker 2: just kind of like Abaki eventually was. He's a monster 1154 00:55:45,920 --> 00:55:51,040 Speaker 2: shop blocker. He's he moves really smoothly latterly, so he's 1155 00:55:51,040 --> 00:55:52,800 Speaker 2: gonna be able to switch and defend on the perimeter 1156 00:55:52,880 --> 00:55:57,440 Speaker 2: while also protecting the rim. On offense. He's definitely gonna 1157 00:55:57,440 --> 00:55:59,640 Speaker 2: be like a play finisher type, like he's a center 1158 00:55:59,680 --> 00:56:01,880 Speaker 2: and off he's gonna play in the dunker spot. But 1159 00:56:02,640 --> 00:56:05,359 Speaker 2: I like that he kind of moves naturally. He gets 1160 00:56:05,360 --> 00:56:08,719 Speaker 2: into easy spots for good buckets. He doesn't really like 1161 00:56:09,160 --> 00:56:12,279 Speaker 2: being a center on offense is kind of like, you know, 1162 00:56:12,400 --> 00:56:15,080 Speaker 2: not a good thing the way that we would say that, 1163 00:56:15,239 --> 00:56:19,040 Speaker 2: but he he uses that ability well. He can pass 1164 00:56:19,040 --> 00:56:21,080 Speaker 2: on the short roll a little bit, like he can 1165 00:56:21,120 --> 00:56:23,960 Speaker 2: do enough on offense to be able to fit that. Well. 1166 00:56:24,440 --> 00:56:27,359 Speaker 2: What I'm bummed about is to me, like more and 1167 00:56:27,400 --> 00:56:31,120 Speaker 2: more NBA teams have you know that the Jokic or 1168 00:56:31,200 --> 00:56:36,600 Speaker 2: Towns or you know Vosovich that like that offensively skilled center, 1169 00:56:36,800 --> 00:56:39,480 Speaker 2: but you need some help at the four. I would 1170 00:56:39,560 --> 00:56:41,520 Speaker 2: love one of those teams to get their hands on 1171 00:56:41,640 --> 00:56:44,040 Speaker 2: Usman Garuba. I'm a Timbrels fan. I would I would 1172 00:56:44,160 --> 00:56:46,520 Speaker 2: kill to have Garuba next to Towns on my team. 1173 00:56:46,520 --> 00:56:48,600 Speaker 2: I think that's a perfect fit. And there are more 1174 00:56:48,640 --> 00:56:51,760 Speaker 2: and more teams like that. He'd be great with Evan Mobley, 1175 00:56:52,040 --> 00:56:54,400 Speaker 2: he'd be great with you know, chet Holmgren, who's one 1176 00:56:54,400 --> 00:56:56,759 Speaker 2: of the favorites for next year's number one pick. We're 1177 00:56:56,760 --> 00:57:01,400 Speaker 2: getting more skilled seven foot dudes. We'd be offensive centers, 1178 00:57:01,920 --> 00:57:04,920 Speaker 2: and I think Garuba just fits really well what the 1179 00:57:04,960 --> 00:57:07,600 Speaker 2: modern NBA defense looks like. So that's why I like 1180 00:57:07,680 --> 00:57:09,880 Speaker 2: him a lot. 1181 00:57:11,760 --> 00:57:16,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, you're out there on him, I'll say that, let's 1182 00:57:16,760 --> 00:57:20,440 Speaker 1: not Giddy. So Giddy has Risen is the late riser. 1183 00:57:21,440 --> 00:57:25,560 Speaker 3: He is now at bet MGM. The over unders as 1184 00:57:25,680 --> 00:57:28,240 Speaker 3: ten and a half. The under is minus two hundred. 1185 00:57:29,480 --> 00:57:32,960 Speaker 3: I think there's probably still value at minus two hundred 1186 00:57:32,960 --> 00:57:34,880 Speaker 3: on Giddy. I know that sounds crazy because this is 1187 00:57:34,920 --> 00:57:36,960 Speaker 3: a draft and anything can happen, and teams can do 1188 00:57:37,320 --> 00:57:38,280 Speaker 3: unpredictable things. 1189 00:57:38,360 --> 00:57:40,320 Speaker 1: I just think that there's here's a lot of it. 1190 00:57:40,680 --> 00:57:41,200 Speaker 1: There's been. 1191 00:57:41,440 --> 00:57:43,240 Speaker 3: You don't want to get caught up in my opinion 1192 00:57:43,320 --> 00:57:47,160 Speaker 3: on like Patrick Williams is one of these where last 1193 00:57:47,240 --> 00:57:50,920 Speaker 3: year he was a guy that rose very late and 1194 00:57:51,640 --> 00:57:53,600 Speaker 3: he was in my props article we advise the under 1195 00:57:54,120 --> 00:57:55,960 Speaker 3: on him and he went to the balls of four. 1196 00:57:56,880 --> 00:58:01,280 Speaker 3: A lot of it was it wasn't just the Bulls, 1197 00:58:01,480 --> 00:58:04,640 Speaker 3: it was the Bulls like him, the Pistons like him. 1198 00:58:05,080 --> 00:58:07,000 Speaker 1: Like there was about I. 1199 00:58:06,880 --> 00:58:10,400 Speaker 3: Think I remember four different teams really liked him. With Giddy, 1200 00:58:11,120 --> 00:58:14,200 Speaker 3: it's the same thing where you hear that, like the Raptors. 1201 00:58:13,800 --> 00:58:14,600 Speaker 1: Really like Giddy. 1202 00:58:14,800 --> 00:58:18,640 Speaker 3: Would I be blown away if the Raptors took him 1203 00:58:18,640 --> 00:58:20,840 Speaker 3: at four. No, if they don't get another pick and 1204 00:58:20,880 --> 00:58:23,320 Speaker 3: they're just like they go for the highest upside, I 1205 00:58:23,360 --> 00:58:26,520 Speaker 3: would not be shocked to see Giddy go four. These 1206 00:58:26,560 --> 00:58:30,120 Speaker 3: guys can slide right, Okay, see at six, which we'll 1207 00:58:30,120 --> 00:58:31,600 Speaker 3: talk about it in the second before we get out 1208 00:58:31,640 --> 00:58:34,240 Speaker 3: of here. I think they're somebody that, like I will 1209 00:58:34,240 --> 00:58:37,760 Speaker 3: not remove entirely from the equation for Giddy. Warriors at 1210 00:58:37,800 --> 00:58:42,160 Speaker 3: seven is definitely in play, and then the rest of 1211 00:58:42,160 --> 00:58:45,760 Speaker 3: it is it's Orlando again at eight, which they might trade. 1212 00:58:47,200 --> 00:58:48,080 Speaker 1: Nine. I don't think so. 1213 00:58:48,240 --> 00:58:50,320 Speaker 3: Like we talked about, I think the I think the 1214 00:58:50,360 --> 00:58:54,320 Speaker 3: Magic are zeroed in on Wagner or Shangoon. 1215 00:58:55,840 --> 00:58:58,600 Speaker 1: But at ten and a half. 1216 00:58:58,440 --> 00:59:01,280 Speaker 3: You've still got the Grizzlies if they don't move up. 1217 00:59:01,480 --> 00:59:04,360 Speaker 3: He's probably going to the Grizzlies at ten. So even 1218 00:59:04,400 --> 00:59:06,560 Speaker 3: in mis two hundred, I know you hate paying the Juwice, 1219 00:59:06,600 --> 00:59:09,360 Speaker 3: but I think Josh Giddy at minus two hundred, if 1220 00:59:09,360 --> 00:59:11,360 Speaker 3: you can get it anywhere else, I think it's probably 1221 00:59:11,400 --> 00:59:12,960 Speaker 3: worth it. The problem is that you're going to have 1222 00:59:13,000 --> 00:59:15,520 Speaker 3: a hard time finding a number that's like that you're 1223 00:59:15,520 --> 00:59:16,919 Speaker 3: going to get the kind of price that you want 1224 00:59:16,960 --> 00:59:19,280 Speaker 3: on it. Like he's higher, he's minus two h five, 1225 00:59:19,320 --> 00:59:20,760 Speaker 3: and in the book, I'm looking at ten and he's 1226 00:59:20,800 --> 00:59:22,479 Speaker 3: priced at ten and a half everywhere right. 1227 00:59:22,360 --> 00:59:26,480 Speaker 2: Now, Yeah, I don't. I don't like the Juice, and 1228 00:59:26,680 --> 00:59:30,800 Speaker 2: I'm I'm not totally sold on Giddy. Just my quick 1229 00:59:30,840 --> 00:59:33,440 Speaker 2: case against him is that he's an incredible passer. You 1230 00:59:33,560 --> 00:59:36,680 Speaker 2: make every angle, every creative pass, all the passing and 1231 00:59:36,840 --> 00:59:41,080 Speaker 2: vision and know how on the game brilliant. I don't 1232 00:59:41,080 --> 00:59:42,960 Speaker 2: trust him as a shooter. I don't trust him as 1233 00:59:43,000 --> 00:59:45,880 Speaker 2: a scorer and I don't think he defends. So we're 1234 00:59:45,880 --> 00:59:48,160 Speaker 2: back to that sort of player, like the thing that 1235 00:59:48,200 --> 00:59:50,400 Speaker 2: we everyone thought LaMelo was going to be, but he 1236 00:59:50,480 --> 00:59:52,360 Speaker 2: turned out to be a much better scorer and a 1237 00:59:52,400 --> 00:59:55,520 Speaker 2: little better defender, the thing that people thought, you know, 1238 00:59:55,640 --> 00:59:57,640 Speaker 2: still think that Rubio kind of is. But Rubio is 1239 00:59:58,040 --> 01:00:03,160 Speaker 2: a pretty solid defender also. But like that, that's my concern. However, 1240 01:00:03,240 --> 01:00:05,320 Speaker 2: he's very young. He can improve in a lot of 1241 01:00:05,360 --> 01:00:08,160 Speaker 2: those areas, and he has a lot of those you 1242 01:00:08,240 --> 01:00:10,680 Speaker 2: can't teach it sort of things about him. Here's the 1243 01:00:10,720 --> 01:00:13,040 Speaker 2: case for the Giddy under beyond all the things you said. 1244 01:00:13,800 --> 01:00:17,400 Speaker 2: Every NBA team right now is watching the Olympics and 1245 01:00:17,480 --> 01:00:19,919 Speaker 2: watching the finals we just saw, and watching the MVP 1246 01:00:20,080 --> 01:00:23,200 Speaker 2: race we just saw, and what are they seeing? International 1247 01:00:23,320 --> 01:00:27,720 Speaker 2: ball is taking over no NBA team. Every team is 1248 01:00:27,960 --> 01:00:31,880 Speaker 2: terrified of missing the next great euro Star. If you're 1249 01:00:31,920 --> 01:00:35,120 Speaker 2: an NBA GM, you're trying to keep your job and 1250 01:00:35,560 --> 01:00:37,520 Speaker 2: make sure that you don't miss out on that next 1251 01:00:37,560 --> 01:00:41,160 Speaker 2: euro Star. And right now, Giddy is the hot name 1252 01:00:41,600 --> 01:00:44,040 Speaker 2: and he's the like, oh, it's the next big wing 1253 01:00:44,520 --> 01:00:48,120 Speaker 2: passer from Europe, Like oh, look at Luka Doncic lighting 1254 01:00:48,160 --> 01:00:50,920 Speaker 2: up the Olympics right now. This this is like it's 1255 01:00:50,920 --> 01:00:53,680 Speaker 2: almost like there's a pure pressure to don't be the 1256 01:00:53,680 --> 01:00:56,760 Speaker 2: one that screwed up and passed on the next euro Star. 1257 01:00:57,360 --> 01:01:00,520 Speaker 2: And I think that that is going to push up 1258 01:01:00,520 --> 01:01:02,880 Speaker 2: the boards. And I still I don't want to pay 1259 01:01:02,880 --> 01:01:05,240 Speaker 2: the two hundred the minus two hundred on the juice, 1260 01:01:05,480 --> 01:01:07,200 Speaker 2: But to me, that's the case I think for it 1261 01:01:07,240 --> 01:01:09,880 Speaker 2: is just the international star. These guys are going to 1262 01:01:09,920 --> 01:01:12,040 Speaker 2: go higher, I think than they should have because people 1263 01:01:12,080 --> 01:01:13,000 Speaker 2: don't want to miss them. 1264 01:01:13,080 --> 01:01:14,920 Speaker 1: What is the most you will pay on juice? Brandon? 1265 01:01:14,920 --> 01:01:16,040 Speaker 1: What is the most you will pay? 1266 01:01:17,280 --> 01:01:20,480 Speaker 2: Well, so it depends on the sort of the sort 1267 01:01:20,520 --> 01:01:22,360 Speaker 2: of bet Like on props this year, I would do 1268 01:01:22,840 --> 01:01:25,440 Speaker 2: minus one twenty one fifty one seventy five and not 1269 01:01:25,560 --> 01:01:28,120 Speaker 2: think twice. The difference on props is it's a math 1270 01:01:28,160 --> 01:01:30,320 Speaker 2: game to me, and it's like, Okay, what's the percentage 1271 01:01:30,400 --> 01:01:33,360 Speaker 2: this is hitting versus what's the percentage implied on just 1272 01:01:33,400 --> 01:01:35,160 Speaker 2: a straight like does this thing happen? 1273 01:01:35,560 --> 01:01:35,760 Speaker 1: Yeah? 1274 01:01:35,920 --> 01:01:37,880 Speaker 2: I don't have any idea how to how to place 1275 01:01:37,920 --> 01:01:41,520 Speaker 2: in my mind, will Getty sixty seven percent or better 1276 01:01:41,640 --> 01:01:44,080 Speaker 2: be into the top ten? I have no way to 1277 01:01:44,120 --> 01:01:47,040 Speaker 2: measure that, and so yeah, I don't know, like that's 1278 01:01:47,040 --> 01:01:50,680 Speaker 2: the risk. I'll say that I would rather take my 1279 01:01:50,880 --> 01:01:53,520 Speaker 2: one bet at the minus two hundred and bet like 1280 01:01:53,600 --> 01:01:56,200 Speaker 2: two half units on like the thirty five to one 1281 01:01:56,320 --> 01:01:58,800 Speaker 2: kid to go number two, and just like I just 1282 01:01:58,800 --> 01:02:01,200 Speaker 2: would rather do that and and hope that I eventually 1283 01:02:01,280 --> 01:02:06,360 Speaker 2: hit a couple. It's you're always looking for the big one. 1284 01:02:06,800 --> 01:02:12,520 Speaker 1: Uh, book Night, Yeah, it's frustrating to me. 1285 01:02:12,720 --> 01:02:17,680 Speaker 3: I don't understand why this, Like, Okay, here here's kind 1286 01:02:17,680 --> 01:02:20,880 Speaker 3: of the deal with book Night. Book Night had an 1287 01:02:20,960 --> 01:02:24,640 Speaker 3: incredible workout one on oh I should mention a one 1288 01:02:24,640 --> 01:02:27,040 Speaker 3: on oh workout with a bunch of people in attendance 1289 01:02:27,080 --> 01:02:29,200 Speaker 3: at the combine and blew a bunch of people away. 1290 01:02:30,120 --> 01:02:34,520 Speaker 3: And what I've got, Uh, you were the second person 1291 01:02:34,600 --> 01:02:37,919 Speaker 3: that at the Jon Ling comparison. And when I've talked 1292 01:02:37,920 --> 01:02:47,280 Speaker 3: about this, so he does this workout. The analytics hate him. 1293 01:02:47,440 --> 01:02:49,920 Speaker 3: He shot thirty percent from three last year. There's no 1294 01:02:50,000 --> 01:02:52,040 Speaker 3: evidence that he's going to be like a really quality 1295 01:02:52,040 --> 01:02:55,920 Speaker 3: shooter mathematically, so there's they don't like him from that perspective. 1296 01:02:55,920 --> 01:02:59,200 Speaker 3: We talking about guard the can't shoot draft. Twitter is 1297 01:02:59,200 --> 01:03:00,960 Speaker 3: not high on him. The consultants I talked to are 1298 01:03:00,960 --> 01:03:03,040 Speaker 3: not high on him. Every exact I've talked to is 1299 01:03:03,120 --> 01:03:06,280 Speaker 3: very high on him, extremely high. He has publicly said 1300 01:03:06,280 --> 01:03:08,840 Speaker 3: he had dinner with Sam Presty, which has a lot 1301 01:03:08,840 --> 01:03:12,040 Speaker 3: of people being like penciling him in at six, he's 1302 01:03:12,120 --> 01:03:13,240 Speaker 3: over under is six. 1303 01:03:13,080 --> 01:03:15,760 Speaker 1: And a half. 1304 01:03:16,600 --> 01:03:20,680 Speaker 3: This is I will ultimately tell you that I think 1305 01:03:20,720 --> 01:03:23,280 Speaker 3: this is a stay away. That at six and a 1306 01:03:23,320 --> 01:03:25,640 Speaker 3: half it's the under his minus one thirty five. The 1307 01:03:25,720 --> 01:03:29,040 Speaker 3: over is plus one ten. I will ultimately say that 1308 01:03:29,080 --> 01:03:31,240 Speaker 3: I think this is a stay away. Because the noise 1309 01:03:31,320 --> 01:03:33,560 Speaker 3: is so strong on him, I can't recommend the under. 1310 01:03:34,440 --> 01:03:40,320 Speaker 3: But all of my analysis or analysis based sources say over. 1311 01:03:41,680 --> 01:03:44,920 Speaker 3: A lot of it comes down to, Okay, he's not 1312 01:03:44,960 --> 01:03:46,880 Speaker 3: going one, he's not going two, he's not going three, 1313 01:03:46,960 --> 01:03:53,880 Speaker 3: he's not going four. When we get the five, maybe 1314 01:03:54,080 --> 01:03:58,480 Speaker 3: like maybe the magic go in another direction and they 1315 01:03:58,480 --> 01:04:02,000 Speaker 3: go five. Maybe Barnes fall and book Night jumps over 1316 01:04:02,120 --> 01:04:08,760 Speaker 3: over over Barns. There's an assumption for him at six 1317 01:04:09,880 --> 01:04:10,760 Speaker 3: which I hate. 1318 01:04:11,400 --> 01:04:13,600 Speaker 1: Six is Okac. Two things. 1319 01:04:13,760 --> 01:04:17,240 Speaker 3: One, the worst cap secret is that Okay, see like 1320 01:04:17,240 --> 01:04:18,920 Speaker 3: a lot of teams, like a lot of teams, but 1321 01:04:18,960 --> 01:04:22,600 Speaker 3: more especially Okac desperately wants to move up, like they 1322 01:04:22,600 --> 01:04:27,080 Speaker 3: want they want a top four pick. They don't want 1323 01:04:27,360 --> 01:04:29,440 Speaker 3: eighteen hundred picks. They'd rather move up and get a 1324 01:04:29,480 --> 01:04:32,160 Speaker 3: better one. And so they've offered like a lot of 1325 01:04:32,200 --> 01:04:36,160 Speaker 3: stuff to try and move up. Okay, and if somebody does, 1326 01:04:36,200 --> 01:04:40,400 Speaker 3: somebody trade down to take Booknight, I have a hard 1327 01:04:40,480 --> 01:04:45,040 Speaker 3: time seeing it. It's not impossible, but I have a 1328 01:04:45,080 --> 01:04:49,160 Speaker 3: hard time seeing it. You could just if you're four 1329 01:04:49,240 --> 01:04:54,400 Speaker 3: or five, just take Sugs or Barns. If you're three 1330 01:04:54,720 --> 01:04:57,080 Speaker 3: and you're the Calves who have talked about moving down, 1331 01:04:58,800 --> 01:05:01,640 Speaker 3: you trade down in you're losing Sexton and you get 1332 01:05:01,680 --> 01:05:06,520 Speaker 3: book Night, and so then becomes just like Oka see 1333 01:05:07,200 --> 01:05:09,320 Speaker 3: Okaysee's draft room, I think is tighter than any others 1334 01:05:09,320 --> 01:05:11,560 Speaker 3: in the league. There's less intel coming out other than anything, 1335 01:05:11,600 --> 01:05:13,720 Speaker 3: there's people in that, like most people in the Thunder 1336 01:05:13,800 --> 01:05:15,240 Speaker 3: organization don't have any idea. 1337 01:05:15,240 --> 01:05:16,920 Speaker 1: They're just it's sectioned off, like the. 1338 01:05:16,920 --> 01:05:21,640 Speaker 3: Draft talk is like purposely their war room is purposefully quarantined, 1339 01:05:21,880 --> 01:05:25,040 Speaker 3: not from the usual sense these days, but to make 1340 01:05:25,080 --> 01:05:26,680 Speaker 3: sure that leaks don't get out. There's just like not 1341 01:05:26,680 --> 01:05:30,600 Speaker 3: a lot of information, so you don't have any sort 1342 01:05:30,640 --> 01:05:32,720 Speaker 3: I don't have any like I don't try. You're you're 1343 01:05:32,720 --> 01:05:35,520 Speaker 3: basing it off. If he went to dinner with Sam Presty, 1344 01:05:35,720 --> 01:05:37,520 Speaker 3: Sam Presty's gonna telegraph. 1345 01:05:37,120 --> 01:05:41,280 Speaker 1: What he does. That doesn't sound right. So like, I'm 1346 01:05:41,280 --> 01:05:43,760 Speaker 1: more concerned about cominga at six the Book Night. 1347 01:05:45,120 --> 01:05:51,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I agree, I I it. I agree one 1348 01:05:51,360 --> 01:05:53,919 Speaker 2: hundred percent. Everything that you just said Book Night six 1349 01:05:53,960 --> 01:05:56,600 Speaker 2: point five makes no sense to me. We we had 1350 01:05:56,680 --> 01:05:59,080 Speaker 2: we talked for like ten minutes a while ago about 1351 01:05:59,080 --> 01:06:01,840 Speaker 2: how we know what the top five guys are. Five 1352 01:06:01,960 --> 01:06:04,600 Speaker 2: is only one less than six. All that leaves left 1353 01:06:04,680 --> 01:06:07,440 Speaker 2: is one spot for Booknight to sneak in, And it 1354 01:06:08,200 --> 01:06:10,800 Speaker 2: doesn't make sense. He doesn't make sense to Oklahoma City. 1355 01:06:10,800 --> 01:06:12,840 Speaker 2: It doesn't make sense that we would know, of all 1356 01:06:12,880 --> 01:06:15,720 Speaker 2: teams the Thunders pick. That's just not a thing that 1357 01:06:15,760 --> 01:06:19,160 Speaker 2: has ever happened. That's you know, they make out their 1358 01:06:19,200 --> 01:06:22,200 Speaker 2: picks every time that we never see coming every like 1359 01:06:22,760 --> 01:06:27,640 Speaker 2: it's such an obvious, such a clear play that it 1360 01:06:27,760 --> 01:06:30,320 Speaker 2: makes me not want to play it because it just 1361 01:06:30,320 --> 01:06:33,360 Speaker 2: see it seems like like when you look at a 1362 01:06:33,400 --> 01:06:35,880 Speaker 2: thing and you're like, hey, guys, free money, free money 1363 01:06:35,880 --> 01:06:38,720 Speaker 2: on Booknight over six point five. This this screams free 1364 01:06:38,760 --> 01:06:41,960 Speaker 2: money to me, and free money is never free. I'm 1365 01:06:42,000 --> 01:06:45,480 Speaker 2: seeing like the the meme, it's a trap like it. 1366 01:06:45,920 --> 01:06:48,600 Speaker 2: It looks so easy and so clear to me that 1367 01:06:48,680 --> 01:06:51,720 Speaker 2: I'm just like, you know what, maybe they know about 1368 01:06:51,720 --> 01:06:54,240 Speaker 2: a trade up that's lined up. Maybe I don't know 1369 01:06:54,280 --> 01:06:57,400 Speaker 2: what somebody knows, but it's more than I know, and 1370 01:06:58,440 --> 01:07:01,400 Speaker 2: I just everything it's like that is such a strong 1371 01:07:01,520 --> 01:07:04,160 Speaker 2: play that makes no sense and I can't. I can't 1372 01:07:04,200 --> 01:07:05,600 Speaker 2: do it. 1373 01:07:05,640 --> 01:07:07,400 Speaker 1: Is there too, boor Gather? 1374 01:07:07,480 --> 01:07:09,080 Speaker 3: Are there any of the props that you really feel 1375 01:07:09,120 --> 01:07:11,720 Speaker 3: strongly about. 1376 01:07:12,120 --> 01:07:14,440 Speaker 2: You know, things that have been They keep moving around 1377 01:07:14,440 --> 01:07:16,160 Speaker 2: so much that I don't know if I have another 1378 01:07:16,200 --> 01:07:18,080 Speaker 2: one that jumps out to me, because the numbers keep 1379 01:07:18,080 --> 01:07:22,040 Speaker 2: moving around. I haven't definitely Definitely Springer is one that 1380 01:07:22,040 --> 01:07:25,400 Speaker 2: I'll be looking at. I've got to look a little 1381 01:07:25,400 --> 01:07:27,600 Speaker 2: bit more today, because you know, I have to. I 1382 01:07:27,640 --> 01:07:29,480 Speaker 2: have to be careful with the guys I really like 1383 01:07:29,640 --> 01:07:32,360 Speaker 2: versus It doesn't matter who I like, It just matters 1384 01:07:32,360 --> 01:07:34,160 Speaker 2: what the NBA is going to actually do, So I've 1385 01:07:34,160 --> 01:07:36,040 Speaker 2: got to be careful with that. I've been doing a 1386 01:07:36,040 --> 01:07:39,240 Speaker 2: lot of my personal mock board and everything. So who 1387 01:07:39,280 --> 01:07:39,880 Speaker 2: else do you like? 1388 01:07:40,520 --> 01:07:40,680 Speaker 1: Uh? 1389 01:07:41,040 --> 01:07:42,640 Speaker 2: Do Sumnu has. 1390 01:07:43,160 --> 01:07:45,920 Speaker 3: Dosumu has an over under of twenty six and a half. 1391 01:07:46,920 --> 01:07:49,760 Speaker 3: Ioh Has has twenty six and a half. I think 1392 01:07:49,800 --> 01:07:52,920 Speaker 3: that's an under my understanding. There was word earlier in 1393 01:07:52,920 --> 01:07:54,880 Speaker 3: the week that he doesn't get past twenty two with 1394 01:07:54,920 --> 01:07:55,440 Speaker 3: the Lakers. 1395 01:07:55,520 --> 01:07:58,120 Speaker 1: However, however, there are two other. 1396 01:07:58,000 --> 01:08:01,240 Speaker 3: Names that are associated with the Lakers right now, so that like, 1397 01:08:01,680 --> 01:08:04,200 Speaker 3: maybe they liked him and moved on, and that may 1398 01:08:04,240 --> 01:08:05,080 Speaker 3: just be agent noise. 1399 01:08:05,600 --> 01:08:06,840 Speaker 1: I do think that your gap there. 1400 01:08:07,040 --> 01:08:09,240 Speaker 3: I want some cushion with all these So if I 1401 01:08:09,320 --> 01:08:12,280 Speaker 3: hear like hey, teams nineteen and twenty and twenty two 1402 01:08:12,480 --> 01:08:19,080 Speaker 3: like him, then at that point, if my number is 1403 01:08:19,120 --> 01:08:20,760 Speaker 3: twenty six and a half, I've still got four more 1404 01:08:20,840 --> 01:08:23,759 Speaker 3: spots and that gives me like a little bit of 1405 01:08:23,800 --> 01:08:29,400 Speaker 3: a breathing room. Isaiah Jackson is his over under is 1406 01:08:29,439 --> 01:08:32,120 Speaker 3: twenty and a half. I think probably over it's juice 1407 01:08:32,160 --> 01:08:35,400 Speaker 3: of minus one twenty. I think he's more likely to 1408 01:08:35,439 --> 01:08:39,040 Speaker 3: go Nicks at twenty one than he is anything higher. 1409 01:08:39,479 --> 01:08:40,800 Speaker 3: I just don't think bigs are going to be in 1410 01:08:40,840 --> 01:08:42,479 Speaker 3: that big of a demand this year. 1411 01:08:42,479 --> 01:08:43,040 Speaker 1: I think we're. 1412 01:08:43,080 --> 01:08:45,840 Speaker 2: What what if the next thing at nineteen though, that's 1413 01:08:45,840 --> 01:08:47,559 Speaker 2: the problem there because if we think the Knicks are 1414 01:08:47,560 --> 01:08:49,559 Speaker 2: taking which order do they take those two in? 1415 01:08:50,000 --> 01:08:55,080 Speaker 3: Well, I guess, like, here's the question, is man Butler's 1416 01:08:55,080 --> 01:08:58,080 Speaker 3: not on the board at bet MGM. That's a pain. 1417 01:08:58,960 --> 01:09:02,800 Speaker 3: Butler's also better Jim but well, no, he's off the 1418 01:09:02,800 --> 01:09:03,479 Speaker 3: board everywhere. 1419 01:09:03,640 --> 01:09:04,760 Speaker 1: Jared Butler is off the ball. 1420 01:09:06,000 --> 01:09:09,280 Speaker 2: I was he's got he's got some some injury red flags. 1421 01:09:09,320 --> 01:09:11,439 Speaker 2: I think that was scaring some teams away. So I 1422 01:09:11,439 --> 01:09:13,000 Speaker 2: wonder if that's the reason he's off the board. 1423 01:09:13,080 --> 01:09:15,040 Speaker 3: No, they's well, he does, Yeah, he does have an 1424 01:09:15,080 --> 01:09:17,240 Speaker 3: injury concern, that's true. He does have another injury concern 1425 01:09:17,280 --> 01:09:21,200 Speaker 3: that's going to cause some issues I think with his 1426 01:09:21,200 --> 01:09:23,880 Speaker 3: his stock. But I would say that like, if you 1427 01:09:24,040 --> 01:09:26,320 Speaker 3: like the under on Isaiah Jackson, you should go over 1428 01:09:26,400 --> 01:09:29,800 Speaker 3: on Jared Butler. If you like the uh under on 1429 01:09:29,880 --> 01:09:31,840 Speaker 3: Jared Butler, you should like the over on Isaiah Jackson. 1430 01:09:31,840 --> 01:09:34,640 Speaker 3: I'm not saying that the teams lower can't reach for 1431 01:09:34,680 --> 01:09:36,760 Speaker 3: those guys. I would just think like they are most 1432 01:09:36,760 --> 01:09:41,280 Speaker 3: associated with those guys, so I think those are good. 1433 01:09:41,320 --> 01:09:42,960 Speaker 3: I think Corey Kispert at thirteen and a half is 1434 01:09:43,000 --> 01:09:46,599 Speaker 3: too sharp. His over is juice minus one sixty five. 1435 01:09:46,680 --> 01:09:49,000 Speaker 3: I wouldn't be shocked if he went higher. I think 1436 01:09:49,040 --> 01:09:50,080 Speaker 3: he profiles pretty well. 1437 01:09:50,640 --> 01:09:50,760 Speaker 1: Uh. 1438 01:09:51,280 --> 01:09:54,160 Speaker 3: Duarte is slid. He was being talked about as like 1439 01:09:54,200 --> 01:09:56,200 Speaker 3: a potential lottery pick. I think he's sliding. I think 1440 01:09:56,200 --> 01:09:58,280 Speaker 3: one of the reasons is because Davion Mitchell is sliding. 1441 01:09:58,280 --> 01:09:58,439 Speaker 2: Two. 1442 01:10:00,200 --> 01:10:04,559 Speaker 3: Davion Mitchell is His over under is twelve and a half. 1443 01:10:04,920 --> 01:10:06,760 Speaker 3: The twelve and a half is plus one hundred. I'm 1444 01:10:06,800 --> 01:10:11,120 Speaker 3: going to bet the over it at plus one hundred. 1445 01:10:12,160 --> 01:10:14,439 Speaker 2: Yeah. I think my general m O when I'm looking 1446 01:10:14,439 --> 01:10:17,240 Speaker 2: for plays right now is going to be looking for 1447 01:10:17,360 --> 01:10:20,280 Speaker 2: guys in that like where they're over under is somewhere 1448 01:10:20,280 --> 01:10:22,200 Speaker 2: in like the six to twenty range, And I'm looking 1449 01:10:22,200 --> 01:10:26,120 Speaker 2: for overs just because my generalm is that this is 1450 01:10:26,160 --> 01:10:27,600 Speaker 2: just going to be wonky. Guys are going to go 1451 01:10:27,600 --> 01:10:29,640 Speaker 2: all over the place, So I'm looking for that like 1452 01:10:29,720 --> 01:10:32,200 Speaker 2: six to twenty five range and thinking that the guys 1453 01:10:32,240 --> 01:10:34,600 Speaker 2: projected at the back of it might go sooner, and 1454 01:10:34,880 --> 01:10:37,360 Speaker 2: especially that the guys earlier might end up going later. 1455 01:10:37,439 --> 01:10:39,080 Speaker 2: I just think it's going to be a weird mix 1456 01:10:39,080 --> 01:10:40,400 Speaker 2: in the middle of the first round. 1457 01:10:40,840 --> 01:10:42,400 Speaker 3: I don't know how to pronounce this gentleman's name, and 1458 01:10:42,400 --> 01:10:44,479 Speaker 3: I apologize I need to learn these things before the draft. 1459 01:10:44,520 --> 01:10:46,760 Speaker 3: I understand that this is a personal failing that I'm 1460 01:10:46,760 --> 01:10:51,680 Speaker 3: admitting to rocas Joku bitis. 1461 01:10:51,320 --> 01:10:52,880 Speaker 2: Jock gobitis is how I've heard it. 1462 01:10:52,920 --> 01:10:56,240 Speaker 3: I think Bidas his over unders forty three and a half. 1463 01:10:56,520 --> 01:10:57,920 Speaker 3: He's got a first round interest. 1464 01:10:58,880 --> 01:11:01,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, so I like the under on that one. I've 1465 01:11:01,960 --> 01:11:03,880 Speaker 2: seen him in a lot of like high second rounders, 1466 01:11:03,920 --> 01:11:06,439 Speaker 2: where a lot of international kind of draft um stash guys, 1467 01:11:06,439 --> 01:11:08,240 Speaker 2: which I think he might be as well. 1468 01:11:08,320 --> 01:11:11,760 Speaker 3: Somn Treyman twenty four and a half is too sharp. 1469 01:11:11,760 --> 01:11:13,160 Speaker 3: I think he's a great shooter. I think whoever gets 1470 01:11:13,360 --> 01:11:14,680 Speaker 3: is going to get a good pick. But I think 1471 01:11:14,720 --> 01:11:16,400 Speaker 3: the twenty four and a half is too sharp. I 1472 01:11:16,400 --> 01:11:18,519 Speaker 3: think he's right in that range. Like I wouldn't be 1473 01:11:18,520 --> 01:11:20,200 Speaker 3: shocked if he went twenty six of the nuggets that 1474 01:11:20,200 --> 01:11:22,439 Speaker 3: would be And I don't let the over enough because 1475 01:11:22,439 --> 01:11:22,760 Speaker 3: I think. 1476 01:11:22,680 --> 01:11:26,599 Speaker 1: He is maybe the best shooter of that group. Primo 1477 01:11:26,720 --> 01:11:29,400 Speaker 1: is an interesting one at twenty seven and a half. 1478 01:11:29,439 --> 01:11:33,679 Speaker 1: He's just both sides even I think that that that one, 1479 01:11:33,840 --> 01:11:35,280 Speaker 1: the under I think is kind of missing. I think 1480 01:11:35,360 --> 01:11:37,840 Speaker 1: Primo might go a little lot. You like him too, 1481 01:11:37,880 --> 01:11:38,920 Speaker 1: he was playing the draft too. 1482 01:11:39,160 --> 01:11:41,559 Speaker 2: No, I actually don't. I just don't know enough about him. 1483 01:11:41,560 --> 01:11:43,360 Speaker 2: I never thought he was a draft prospect and then 1484 01:11:43,360 --> 01:11:45,880 Speaker 2: he declared much earlier than I thought. But youngest guy, 1485 01:11:45,960 --> 01:11:48,000 Speaker 2: so there's definitely upside there. J T. 1486 01:11:48,120 --> 01:11:50,439 Speaker 1: Thor is my last one under thirty one and a half. 1487 01:11:50,479 --> 01:11:51,959 Speaker 1: I'm gonna bet yeah. 1488 01:11:52,040 --> 01:11:53,880 Speaker 2: I love J. T. Thorer. I've got him near a 1489 01:11:53,960 --> 01:11:55,880 Speaker 2: lottery for me. He's definitely not going to go near 1490 01:11:55,920 --> 01:11:59,280 Speaker 2: a lottery, but I can see some like Pascal siakam 1491 01:11:59,320 --> 01:12:02,479 Speaker 2: development career there. Just a guy with a lot of 1492 01:12:02,720 --> 01:12:06,760 Speaker 2: defensive skills, like a deep tool set. So yeah, I 1493 01:12:06,800 --> 01:12:08,439 Speaker 2: definitely am looking at his under for sure. 1494 01:12:08,800 --> 01:12:10,559 Speaker 3: All right's gona wrap it up for the Action Network 1495 01:12:10,640 --> 01:12:13,000 Speaker 3: NBA Draft Preview. Thank you for joining us so you 1496 01:12:13,000 --> 01:12:15,479 Speaker 3: can follow Brandon and all his props and everything as 1497 01:12:15,560 --> 01:12:17,760 Speaker 3: NFL coverage and everything else in the Action Network. We 1498 01:12:17,800 --> 01:12:19,679 Speaker 3: will talk to you guys again next time. A first 1499 01:12:19,880 --> 01:12:22,960 Speaker 3: heads up, several new podcasts are debuting next week from 1500 01:12:23,040 --> 01:12:27,439 Speaker 3: the Action Network, including one dedicated just for NBA betting. 1501 01:12:27,760 --> 01:12:28,880 Speaker 1: So to hear me and the rest of. 1502 01:12:28,880 --> 01:12:31,160 Speaker 3: Our crew going forward, you need to subscribe to a 1503 01:12:31,200 --> 01:12:33,320 Speaker 3: new podcast debuting next week. 1504 01:12:33,360 --> 01:12:34,440 Speaker 1: It'll be called buckets. 1505 01:12:34,720 --> 01:12:37,320 Speaker 3: But we'll announce and make that official announcement right here 1506 01:12:37,520 --> 01:12:39,559 Speaker 3: on the Action Network podcast feed next week, and we'll 1507 01:12:39,560 --> 01:12:41,559 Speaker 3: get you guys a link so you can subscribe and 1508 01:12:41,640 --> 01:12:42,639 Speaker 3: not miss an episode. 1509 01:12:42,880 --> 01:12:43,519 Speaker 1: Stay tuned,