WEBVTT - Luigi Mangione Pleads Guilty, Details Motive For Murder

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that folks did. It's Saturday, August fifteenth, and after

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.239
<v Speaker 1>pleading not guilty to all charges in its state and

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>federal case, and after a year and a half of

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>going in and out of state in the federal course,

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>dealing with hearing, after hearing and fighting the charges, Luigi

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Mangioni has pleaded guilty. And with that, welcome to this

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>episode of Amy and TJ. Robes. The last couple of days,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of bubbling up that this was a possibility.

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Still still stunned by this.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I was just going to say it was still remarkable,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and yes, stunning, that is the right word to describe

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 2>what it was like to see and to read about

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Luigi Mangioni fully admitting guilt to what we all saw

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>there in midtown Manhattan, captured on surveillance video. But still

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.959
<v Speaker 2>to hear him admit it, you don't get that, and frankly, victims'

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>families don't get that very often.

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Road he's pleading not guilty, We're all curious what argument

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is he going to make in court when there is

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a video of the crime that's everywhere. The evidence is

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>as close to insurmountable as you're going to get in

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a case like this, so we were all curious. But

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he was fighting, even had some victories in some of

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>these hearings roads with some things getting thrown out. Hew,

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>he even had some murder charges federally dismissed, so it

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>looked like he was putting up a decent fight with

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>some damn good lawyers.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he has the best lawyers in the business, and he, yes,

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>at one point was facing the possibility of the death penalty.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 2>But the federal case and the charges that he pleaded

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 2>guilty to, interestingly enough, technically neither one of them were

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 2>murder charges, which is pretty significant. So yes, his lawyers

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 2>made significant headway in terms of getting some of those

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>charges reduced thrown out, and yet he still faces life

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>behind bars.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's get your caught off, folks on what exactly happened

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this week. There was not was not a scheduled hearing

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for Friday, at least that's how the week started. But

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the attorneys, as the judge in the federal case, they asked, Robes,

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 1>can we have a conference on Friday? So that got

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 1>everybody kind of buzz who Yes.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>A joint request from the prosecution and the defense. You

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>rarely see a joint petition filed. When you've got some

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>case as significant as this, or truly any criminal case,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 2>they usually can't agree on anything.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And what's the word that was everywhere was hurriedly or hastily.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Hurriedly this is what I saw everywhere, hurriedly put together

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 2>this request. And that's why everyone began to put the

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>pieces of the puzzle together and thought, surely there must

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 2>be some sort of plea deal even that has been

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 2>struck between the two.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So that was and that makes sense. And you add

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to this Rhodes people piecing this together, and both sides

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>weren't talking, of course, but Robes there was word that

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Brian Thompson's family was going to be in the courtroom.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That stood out to a lot of.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Folks absolutely, and they were there to hear what luism

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 2>MANNGIONI had to say.

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 3>I can't even imagine.

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>This was December of twenty twenty four, this crime where

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 2>Brian Thompson was shot in the middle of a Manhattan

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>street with a sidewalk as he was walking into a

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 2>business conference, just being thrust into that sort of trauma

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>in front of the world. And now to sit there

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in this courtroom and hear this young man admit what

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 2>he did and why he did it.

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So, like you just said, Ropes, he's going to admit

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to it. So with the past couple of days, both

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>sides asking for this conference, like you just said, and

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:40.839
<v Speaker 1>everybody was throwing around plea deal, that is not what

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this was. It was a plea but there was no

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>deal apparently, Yeah.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>And they made that very clear.

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>The prosecutors, as we pointed out, did not speak, but

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>as they were going into the courtroom, they were still

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>telling reporters there is no plea deal. There is no

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 2>plea deal, and they wanted that to be very clear

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 2>that they're not offering him something in exchange.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>For this guilty please.

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 2>So there are a lot of questions as to why

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 2>he chose this route. Earlier in the summer we heard

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>him potentially going to put up a insanity defense. So

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>there have been a lot of ups and downs, and

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>this case has been surprising from the get go.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's no plea, right and he goes into court

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to plead guilty. Now the question will be, and we

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>will answer it here, why he would do this? Now

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>there does seem to be a clear answer to that,

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's not clear if it's going to pay off

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for him, we will explain. But in the court room

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>yesterday we just mentioned Brian Thompson's family, it's something rope.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>They have to sit in the front row right feet

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>away from this guy. I don't know what that feels like.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>We see this plenty of times in criminal cases. I

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>just see it's remarkable to see.

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 2>The energy that would be emitting from you towards him,

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 2>just to be in the same room, to be breathing

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the same air, and yes, to just be a robe

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 2>back from where Luigi Mangioni is, that had to be

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 2>an unforgettable and gutting situation.

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Mangioni, who was in the courtroom in a tan prison

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>out fit, white T shirt underneath, and they say he

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was shackled. I saw this, Robes. He was shackled behind

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>his back. His hands were behind his back. So that

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>again federal court, they don't mess around too much. But yes,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that's how he came into court. It started with the

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>defense saying to the judge that their client is prepared

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to plead guilty to the indictment at this time, and

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Robes this is where well, at least those in the

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.239
<v Speaker 1>courtroom hearing Mangioni hearing his voice and hearing him explain

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>things for the first time, so he had to be

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>asked a series of questions for the judge to just

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>know he's of sound mind and he was able to

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>make this decision on his own. But then Robes, he

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>asked him a series of questions and Mangioni is required

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>because he's pleading guilty, to tell the truth about the incident,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and Robes this, I mean, this was the drama of

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the day. After a year and a half and of

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>us seeing that video, we heard from the guy who

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>pulled the trigger about why he did this and to

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a certain degree, how he did this.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it was pretty remarkable.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>He talked about how he had years of severe back

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>pain and had spent those years trying to fight insurance

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 2>companies the healthcare industry to get the treatment he needed,

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the pain relief he needed, and the frustrations he felt

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:33.119
<v Speaker 2>from that experience led him to come up with this plan,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 2>and I thought it was pretty interesting. He actually posed

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>as an investor of the United Healthcare Leadership. He emailed

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>them so he could get the details of their conference

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 2>so he would know where to be lying in wait

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 2>to do what.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 3>He intended to do. I mean, this is a smart kid.

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 2>He's an Ivy League educated kid, and he planned this

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>out meticulously, but it came from a place of pain.

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>And again, there were some suggestions about this right during

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>when the crime did happen and after he was arrested,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that he had some problem, yes with the health care industry,

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and this was him exacting revenge on it. And that's

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>why a lot it's weird to say a murderer gained popularity,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of people robes do have problem with

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the health care industry and jumped on and became supporters

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of his because of that.

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, one of them actually shouted out America Loves Luigi

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 2>to Brian Thompson's family as they were leaving court.

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's how passionate some of these people are.

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 3>They're called what is it manginist does or something like that.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 3>It's so weird.

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 2>It's as if he's some pop stars, some Taylor's Swift adjacent,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 2>just hero or something. Among this group of people who

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 2>come out. They say it was a smaller crowd yesterday,

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>which is interesting outside the federal courthouse, but he has

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>a he brings a crowd of folks to cheer him

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 2>on at all of these court hearings. It really is

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>hard to imagine people celebrating this man who took a life,

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 2>a father, a husband, and you could see the pain

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 2>on his wife's face.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily I would love to get some psychologists

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to explain this type of fandom. Are they all just

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>just it's I don't know, there's no reason to celebrate,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to cheer, to root forward. Now, everybody's deserving of a

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>robust defense, sure, but that's not what we're talking about.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But to celebrate as if we're celebrating him for what

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>he did, to clap, to applaud, to be a fan

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of someone specifically because they murdered somebody who was representing

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>an industry you don't like. It's just that there's no

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>discussion in that. There is no argument to be made.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no debate. We should have no regarding that.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely not.

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>There are plenty of other methods in which you can

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 2>voice your concern, try to make change in the industry. Again,

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a smart kid, there were plenty of things he could do,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 2>including running for office and making changes. I mean, there

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 2>are that people can do other than destroy someone's entire family.

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So we did hear from Mangioni at at some point

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this seems I couldn't tell Rosie there's a script he

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>was reading from, but he I don't know. Some of

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the language in the way he said it seemed a

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>little odd, but maybe he had to read a particular

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>script trying to remember it. Even I don't know.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>It seemed very You know when you have a legal

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 2>document and you know a lawyer, like, whatever your statement is,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 2>it's been thoroughly lawyered. That's what this seemed like to me,

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a thoroughly lawyered statement.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>So this was him in the courtroom. Quote. This is

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>from Mangioni again. Quote on the morning of December fourth,

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, I shot mister Thompson in Manhattan and

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>he died. When I did so, I understood that my

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>actions could place him in fear of death or serious

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>bodily injury. I knew what I was doing was illegal.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So and there it is Ropes. After all this we've

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>been waiting a year and a half, like what defense

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is there? Where we see you on camera? What is

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the defense? But does have him say it out loud?

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I did it, YEP, I was responsible and I knew

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>what I was doing was wrong.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I mean, look it is.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a relief I would imagine for Thompson's

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 2>family and certainly for federal prosecutors, even that he stood

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 2>there in front of a judge, sworn in under oath

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and it fully admitted this crime and explained why he

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>did it. Think about how many victims' families get that

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of And I hate to use the word closure,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 2>because it's never over it. There's never full closure for

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>someone who loses someone that young.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 3>In their life. I mean, that's just an awful story.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 2>But most families don't get that, and there is some

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of there has to be some sort of emotional

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>satisfaction or it allows certain healing to begin when you

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 2>know someone's admitted the crime, explained why they committed the crime.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 3>He didn't apologize for it, but so rarely do you

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 3>get the why.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's a good note to bring up robes.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>He didn't apologize for Dan. By all accounts, he was

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>not remorseful in the least bit.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Unemotional is how he was described.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Never showed an ounce of remorse for what he did.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>How does that play into sentencing. How does that play

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>into closure for the family, don't know.

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 2>It usually does play into sentencing, though, judges usually do

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>take that into consideration, and he'll have another opportunity to

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 2>speak when he is sentenced, and maybe then, maybe then

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 2>we would see or hear some sort of remorse. Don't know,

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and don't know how sincere it would be.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So after fighting for a year and a half, why

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>do this now? It's legal strategy. We're told this is

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>his federal case. These were two stalking convictions because the

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>previous charge having to do with murder in the federal

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>case was actually dismissed some months ago. Has to do

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>with the legal precedent, has to do with the Supreme

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Court President, the whole bunch of back and forth. Even

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>if I did fully understand it, I wouldn't be able

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to fully explain it. So what I'm saying is there

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>was a reason, a technical, legal, technical reason, that that

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>had to be dismissed. So robes he just pleaded guilty

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to two charges, neither one includes murder. It seems counterintuitive, like,

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, he murdered the guy he's admitted to murdering,

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so why isn't he pleading guilty to a charge of murder.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's stalking resulting in death basically, and it still

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 2>carries life a maximum life sentence.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 3>He could serve less than life, that is true.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 2>And when you have a federal sentence, you serve eighty

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>five percent of it period.

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 3>There is no.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Parole or you get out early for good behavior. None

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 2>of that happens in federal prisons.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 3>But he does.

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>And he could serve less than life if he ended

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 2>up with just the federal charges and he only served

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 2>eighty five percent of that sentence.

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>There's your answer, folks. So why do this now? Why

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>plead guilty now? Because Robes, this is the possibility of

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>keeping him out of prison for the rest of his life,

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>because it's a pretty tough statute in the state of

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>New York that doesn't allow for double jeopardy, and Robes,

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting here. Yes, it's stalking, it's not murder. The

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>state charge is a murder charge. But the way the

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>statute in New York is written, Robes, it says that

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't be charged for the same incident and not

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't have to be the exact same charges exactly.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 2>And so it's been that that is their long game

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 2>that it seems he'd rather be in a federal prison

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>than their state prison. Actually looked it up and said

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 2>federal prisons are considered safer and better funded than state prisons.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 2>They have fewer violent offenders and better programs. The drawback

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>for a federal prison is that you do have to

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 2>serve eighty five percent of your sentence. But look, if

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 2>you're already looking at an extended sentence and nearly most

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of your life, you'd rather be in a better funded

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 2>facility that has fewer violent criminals. So he's literally trying

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>to choose where he spends he This was them knowing

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and acknowledging that they did not actually have a snowball's

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 2>chance in hell of getting him on guilty. Please, so

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>let's just pick the better prison system to be in

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 2>federal versus state.

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>That does seem like what their choice was.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Sick crazy, You've got bad options. If those are your options, Yep,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>which prison do you want? I'll take the federal. Better

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be in an embusy suite than a motel six.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Are his choices exactly exactly, and Manngioni's attorneys this was

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>in a statement correct after explaining basically why they believe

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>this state trial should not proceed, he said. They say

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>he's been unfairly treated since the outset in every way,

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>two simultaneous prosecutions in two jurisdictions. Who are trying to

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>punish him twice for his exact conduct. New York law

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>does not permit a person to be prosecuted and punished

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 2>twice for the exact same crime under a statute that

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>covers successive prosecutions. It's also known as the jeopardy law.

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Today's guilty plea triggers this statute. And we just filed

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 2>our motion in state court explaining why the state charges

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 2>must be dismissed under New York's double jeopardy protections.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>They make it clear what they're doing here. This is automatic,

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>so robes. What if what if this judge, this federal judge,

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't give him life in prison? What could he give

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>him for the stalking charges? Twenty five five?

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 2>If he could, I mean he could give him twenty five,

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 2>He could give him thirty.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>He knows the world is watching.

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>He also knows if the state drops his case or

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>is forced to drop its case, that this will be

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 2>his only punt.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>This is it, This is it, and we should rose

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>because this state trial is supposed to be happening in

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a matter of weeks, right September eighth. I think I

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have it right, So Robes, there needs to be movement

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on what's going to happen here before September eighth. So

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>after a year and a half of hearing after hearing

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>after hearing, we have like a three week sprint to

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>get this case resolved completely. With MANGIONI ropes, how could

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the jet There's no way he's going to give him

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five what's eighty five percent of twenty five?

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's not anywhere near enough, and I don't think

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 2>anybody would accept that.

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 3>But I was even thinking, how do you quantify life?

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that fifty years?

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>He's twenty eight, so what is that fifty years? And

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>then what's eighty five percent of fifty years?

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the family or many people will accept

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>anything short of him spending the rest of his life

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in prison. Will that?

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so.

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I think most everyone agrees he should be in prison

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>for life.

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, what is a life term? What is that

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>equal to in years?

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>In years? For god, that's twenty eight? Yeah, to guarantee

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that he'll still end up behind that. This is going

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to be fascinating for the next couple of weeks. Here

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we did here, of course, we just let you hear

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>from Mangioni's attorneys. We also heard from the district attorney

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>who is none too pleased that his case might be

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>getting hijacked. We'll let you hear that. Also, will let

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you hear from the family. Brian Thompson's family also put

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>out a statement to express how they felt about what

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in this case in the past twenty four hours.

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, folks, we continue here on this Saturday on

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Amy and TJ have several developing stories. We usually get

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>up in the morning robes and we like to do

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>something a little lighter, a little more fun. But there

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of stories that have been bubbling this week.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Mangioni now with his case, but also

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there were two other significant stories with significant updates that

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be getting into on our morning feed

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that you can look for right after this episode. What

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>having to do ropes with that Cambridge professor who is

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>at the center of plagiarism charges. He is now dead

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>been found dead in London we're going to get into that.

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And also another story out of Texas. This one's fascinating

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, the legal back and forth over a surrogate

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>who didn't want to have an abortion at the request

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of the parents.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and now that baby has been born and there

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>are plenty of legal filings flying, but yes, it's forcing

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot of well certainly the state of Texas to

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 2>make some decisions because there is plenty of legal action

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 2>going on because yes, the biological parents didn't even want

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the child to exist.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So yes, those were significant, very buzzy stories. This week,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we're get the updates on both of those as well.

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Again those episodes of being our feed right after this one.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>But Ropes. Getting back to Mangioni the DA as you know,

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the state and the Feds have been arguing over who

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>gets this guy first, and it looks like the state

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>was going to via trial, but now the Feds have

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>with the.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Plea and there are so many angry folks, including the

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 2>judge who it seems was overseeing the state case. He

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 2>basically said that the Feds renigged on their agreement basically

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>because the state had done all the work and was

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 2>prepared and was ready to go, and it had already

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 2>been agreed that they were going to try their case first.

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So the guy wants the plee we're supposed to do.

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but obviously there was negotiations going on behind.

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't let him plead? What is the option there?

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Exactly? But yes, feathers are ruffled, so to speak. The

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:08.959
<v Speaker 3>DA put out this statement.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Since December twenty twenty four, the Manhattan DA's office has

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>been tirelessly preparing to pursue a trial conviction in New

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>York State Supreme Court for the alleged cold blooded murder

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>of Brian Thompson. We are encouraged that mister Thompson's family

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 2>received a measure of accountability today. While federal sentencing is pending,

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 2>we are prepared to litigate the defense motions. The Manhattan's

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 2>DA office remains committed to seeking justice for mister Thompson

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and his family.

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Or is that line in there? Federal sentence is a

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>measure of accountability, a measure. What they're saying is that

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>ain't good enough. So that's where we're coming in.

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 3>We want him convicted of this murder. That's exactly what

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>they're saying.

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>The family did put out a statement as well, saying

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that the guilty plea marks an important step toward justice

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for Brian and for our family. Nothing will use the

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>pain of losing him. We're grateful for the federal justice

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>system been holding him responsible for this heinous act. Now

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we look to the court to ensure that sentencing reflects

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the severity of this crime. We remain mindful that additional

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>proceedings in New York and Pennsylvania are still to come,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and we continue to seek the justice Brian deserves. Robes.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like they left room to be open for

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the state case to go away.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because they understand that it very likely might.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure they have been prepared for the possibility that

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>this is it and he's going to prison for the

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 2>rest of his life. It's probably annoying that he in

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 2>a way, if this ends up being his only proceeding

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 2>and the state charges go away, it is probably annoying

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 2>to the family. Do you think he kind of in

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 2>a way got to manipulate or got to choose what

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 2>prison system he's in. Look, I mean, you have less

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 2>violent criminals in federal prison. It's going to be a

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>better experience for him, and that might be a little

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 2>annoying that he got to, in a way choose by

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 2>quickly pleading to the federal case ahead of the state trial.

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>What's acceptable ultimately to the family. I suppose Robes would

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just be life knowing he's not going to get out

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of prison. But there's that line in there saying we

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>look to the court now to ensure sentencing reflects the

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>severity of the crime. That makes it sound to me

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Robes is we don't care that much about the murder conviction.

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>We just want to make sure whatever sentence he gets

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>reflects what he did. And that makes sense, And that

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But I mean, I'm they always consult with

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>families prosecutors do I wonder do they want to go

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>sit through a state trial?

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't know. Everyone's different.

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 2>If you have the if it actually would make you

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>feel better to see it litigated and to see everything

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 2>take place, does that give you some sense of I

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know, you're a part of the process where you're

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>getting justice for your loved one.

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 3>Or is it better to just not have to go

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 3>through that you knew.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>He already is going to prison for the rest of

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>his life. Do you want to go sit in state

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>court every day for several months, walking past those protesters,

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>walking past his supporters, doing all that. Is it that

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>important to you that on the record it says murder

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>conviction for me and wouldn't for me.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 3>It wouldn't be. But it's and you don't know. I

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Until you go through it, until you've lost your husband,

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 2>your your children's father.

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 3>You don't know your son. Yeah, it's hard to say.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, the sentencing we speak of will happen

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>on December eighteenth, at least that's when it's scheduled. And

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we do not know, folks, what is going to happen

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in the state case. Is a state trial going to

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>go forward? Are these charges going to get dropped? We

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know, But answers have to come. They have to

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>come soon, because that state trial is scheduled for September

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the eighth and rope. They already announced that the jury

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be anonymous. Yeah, so things are in motion.

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 3>We shall see, all right, folks.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Just wanted to give you that update again. Two other

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes you'll see this morning on our Feet having to

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>do with those other major stories that are bubbling as well.

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>So look for those. We appreciate you always spending some

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>time with us on TJ on behalf of my dear

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Ammy Robot. We'll talk to yall soon, m