WEBVTT - The High Tech Heist

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I am your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I am an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? I am recording live here from the

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Podcast studio powered by Bose at the House of

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Music at the iHeartRadio Music Festival. I'm sure you're gonna

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to hear some of the ambience, let's call

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it here at the festival. And that's just proof that

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually here. I don't know how that happened. I

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>am nowhere near cool enough to have been invited here.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess they didn't listen to the show first. That's

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>fine with me, though. There's some pretty incredible musical acts

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be rocking out in the arena

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that's right in front of me, and I will sit

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>here and talk about geeky tech stuff. So the question

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is then, what topic should I cover for this episode?

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And I asked myself that several times. I had a

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of possible answers. Maybe I could talk about the

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>tech of running a concert, for example, there's a lot

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>of tech involved in that. Maybe I could just talk

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>about the tech needed to make sure a band's equipment's

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all working properly. I could talk about sound systems, or lasers,

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>or pyrotechnics or all sorts of stuff, but I'm in Vegas, baby,

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And what's more, I'm staying at a hotel that's owned

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>by MGM Resorts. So I think the topic to tackle

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is the recent hacker attack on that company. So what

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly happened, who is responsible or who do we think

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is responsible, how did it unfold, and what are the

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>ongoing consequences. So sit back, folks, it's time to do

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a casino heist podcast episode tech stuff style. Now, Originally

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought I do a quick history of MGM Resorts International,

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the company that became the target of the hackers.

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>But as it turns out, that company's history is, let's say,

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>it's super complicated, and it overlaps the history of MGM Studios,

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the film company, as well as numerous other companies both

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>within the gambling world and beyond.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So rather than go through all of that, which would

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>be confusing in an entire episode by itself, I'm just

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of give you a summary. So, since the

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>mid nineteen eighties, the company that we now call MGM

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Resorts International has had some major ups and downs. It

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>has also over time swallowed up other companies that operated

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>resorts and casinos in Vegas and in other places. Today,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>MGM Resorts International operates but does not own, numerous resorts

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas and beyond. Among the Vegas properties are the

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>MGM Grand and assorted MGM properties like Park MGM, the Blagio,

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the Aria, the Cosmopolitan New York, New York, Excalibur, the Luxor,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Mandalay Bay, and some more. And it also has a

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>more than forty ownership of the T Mobile Arena, the

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>building that is directly in front of me, just the building. However,

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they do not own the land. The company made somewhere

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in the neighborhood of thirteen billion dollars in revenue last year.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>That was an increase from nearly nine point seven billion

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>from the year before, and it seems that twenty twenty

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>two saw the highest revenues in the company's history so far.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, revenue is not the same as income. That's

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>more to the tune of one point four billion dollars

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.119
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty two. That's a lot of money, princely

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>sum as I might say they own more than thirty

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars worth of assets. So, in other words, to

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>enterprising thieves, MGM Resorts International is a tempting target. Heck,

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the stuff of heist movies, right, except a heist

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is typically a high risk endeavor and it's almost bound

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to fail. Successful heists have happened in the past, even

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas, but more often not, the house comes out

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>on top. Moving the heist into the realm of computer

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>systems becomes a different matter. However, it's more likely that

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you can find a way to pull off your crimes

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>while you protect yourself. Now, before we move on to

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the actual hacking attack, I also need to mention the

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>company Caesar's Entertainment. Like MGM, Caesar's has a really, really

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>complicated history. It's filled with mergers and acquisitions and sales

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and even bankruptcies. It gets bonkers. The most recent move

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>of that company was in twenty twenty. That's when another

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>company called El Dorado Resorts Incorporated acquired Caesar's Entertainment Corporation.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Then El Dorado Resorts changed its own name to Caesar's Entertainment.

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But there are other companies that are lumped in there.

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>As well, like Hera's Entertainment is part of that. Anyway.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>In twenty fifteen, Caesar's went into bankruptcy, and as part

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of the effort to get out of bankruptcy, the company

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.039
<v Speaker 1>split into two entities. One would be a company that

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>would actually operate the various resorts and casinos. The other

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>would be what is called a real estate investment trust

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>or REIT, which would actually own all the properties. To

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get into riits is beyond the scope of the show,

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>but y'all, they can be monsters anyway. The spin off

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>OREIT took the name VICH after Vinnie vid Vic. You know,

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I came, I saw I conquered, So VICH technically owns

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>many nineteen in fact of Caesar's properties. Here's the wild thing.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Last year VICH acquired ownership of thirteen MGM properties. So

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>both Caesar's Entertainment and MGM Resorts International pay rent to

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>VICE in order to operate their respective casinos. So you

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>want to know what the power behind the throne is,

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>look to vch. Anyway, while all those dealings are worthy

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of a deep and engrossing podcast series, this is a

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>hint somebody make a podcast series about these real estate

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>companies and their involvement in Las Vegas because it is fascinating,

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>but our focus should really be on the hacker attacks. Now.

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It is important that I mentioned Caesar's because while the

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>attack on MGM's properties was the major attack that's been

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in the news for a couple of weeks, now, those

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>same hackers, or at least some of them, first targeted

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Caesar's Entertainment a little earlier. Two of the biggest gambling

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>companies in the world have fallen prey to hackers, and

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it appears that the foothold the hackers established came courtesy

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of a third party security firm and also involves a

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>very important company in tech, namely Octa. Now, y'all, the

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>hacker attack is bad news for MGM, there's no way

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>around it. But I would actually argue it could be

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>way worse for Octa, at least as far as reputations go.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's because Octa is an identity and access management company.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the company that markets the user authentication system

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that tons of other companies rely upon. With Octa, a

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>company can hand over the trickier elements of user authentication.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So as companies grow more complex, they might add more

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>systems that employees rely upon, and it can be a

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.679
<v Speaker 1>hassle if you need a different log in for every

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>single service you use. A service like single sign on

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>really simplifies things. You have a username and password and

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that gives you access to a suite of different services

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>all with just one log in, So you can see

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>where the value of that is right well, with Octa,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a company can hand over all of this and Octa

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>handles it, and you pretty much have to just trust

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Octa to be a good steward of this process now.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd McKinnon and Frederick Krist co founded Octa back in

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine. The company has been the focus

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of security incidences since it's founding. In

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, a hacker group secured limited access to

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>octasystems by compromising a camera network inside the Octa offices,

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>specifically a system designed by Verkaida, a company that I

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>should probably talk about in a future episode. In early

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, a different hacker group known as Lapsus

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>accessed OCTA's systems. This time, the attack vector was a

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>third party support engineer. Lapsus shared information suggesting that the

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>data breach was far greater than what Octa was telling

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the public. But Octa executives really held their ground. They

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>said that are only around two point five percent of

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>OCTA's customers were potentially impacted by this data breach, and

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that the hackers had limited access to customer data. Octa

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>said the data breach lasted for less than half an

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>hour and it only hit two customers, whereas Lapses claimed

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and maintained a presence in OCTA's systems or this client

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>of OCTA's systems for the better part of a week. Now,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that attack was bad, but it could have been worse,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And to be totally fair to Octa, it was really

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the third party security person who was at fault for

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the breach. Though I never really saw details on exactly

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened with that one, I imagine it was something

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>fairly similar to what we are talking about today. So

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>let's set the scene. We're not going to go strictly

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 1>chronologically because some information we wouldn't know about until later,

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to be jumping around a little bit

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of our story. Will begin on September tenth,

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. That day, some folks who were staying

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>at MGM Resort International properties began to encounter errors while

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to interface with various systems connected to

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>those properties. The following day, September eleventh, twenty twenty three,

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>things got much worse. Players who were members of MGM

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Resort's loyalty program saw that their loyalty features weren't working.

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>The websites went down. People staying at MGM properties found

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that their digital keys that they depended on on their smartphones,

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they they weren't working anymore. They couldn't get into their

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>rooms using their digital keys. They these effects got worse.

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of video slot machines went offline.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>That was a huge indicator that something really bad had happened.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Sports betting features were interrupted even ATMs on casino floors

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>went out of service. At eleven twenty seven am Eastern Time,

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>MGM Resorts posted on x you know, the platform formerly

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>known as Twitter, a little message and it read quote

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>MGM Resorts recently identified a cybersecurity issue affecting some of

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the company's systems. Promptly after detecting the issue, we quickly

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>began an investigation with assistance from leading external cybersecurity experts.

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>We also notified law enforcement and took prompt action to

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>protect our systems and data, including shutting down certain systems.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Our investigation is ongoing and we are working diligently to

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>determine the nature and scope of the matter. You know

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it's serious when they say that they responded promptly and quickly.

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>When you get both of those back to back, you

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>know it's a bad, bad time. And what exactly happened, Well,

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>i'll tell you after we come back from this quick break.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back. You are listening to tech stuff

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>live at the iHeart Podcast Studio powered by Bows at

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the House of Music at the iHeartRadio Music Festival, in

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>the house that John built. This is a pretty incredible experience.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Whenever I look up, I'm just seeing tons of people

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in various trendy outfits wandering around getting ready for the

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>festival and hanging out the House of Music. It's pretty cool. Again,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm totally out of place here, but

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they invited me, so I guess I should just embrace it.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to jump back into this cybersecurity incident

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that hit a couple of major gaming and hotel companies

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and dozens of properties so as you might expect, speculation

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>ran rampant regarding the nature of the cybersecurity issue that

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>MGM Resorts International mentioned. Some thought that it could just

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be a massive systems failure, like you know, maybe some

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>key system that connects everything went down. Some people figured

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it had to be a ransomware attack. Lots of folks

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>assumed that the issue would receive a ton of coverage

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>on certain podcasts. No one mentioned me, which just hurts

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>my feelings, and folks were complaining right away about the

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>issues they encountered. One x user posted quote, we are

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>at one of your resorts. It's pretty widespread. We can't

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>check in, pay with card, use comps, receive our gifts,

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>get tickets out of machines. End quote. Others claimed they

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>had unexplained charges on their bills. Some of these incidents

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>happened before September eleventh, so whether they are accurate, or

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe they reflect some other issue that's unrelated to this,

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they're the attempt of cashing in on a

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem, I can't say. I don't know. I just

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>know people reported it. The websites for various MGM resorts,

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>as well as the sites for restaurants on MGM properties

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>all went down. MGM replaced its website with kind of

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a landing page that directed people to call resorts directly,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>so it just listed each resort and its phone number,

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>so you would have to call them on the phone,

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a caveman. That's a joke. I'm old

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I still call places on occasion. The following day, MGM

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Resorts gave an update saying that much of its services

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>were operational, including entertainment, dining, and gaming, but people were

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>still encountering issues. There were still problems with slot machines.

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Hand pay became the method to cash out. This is

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>when you have to signal for a casino employee to

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>come over and count out by hand your winnings rather

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>than getting the machine to print out a ticket, and

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you take that ticket to a payout machine feeded in

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you get your cash that way. The ATMs

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>were still having issues. People still couldn't check in online,

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>They could not make a card payment to book a room.

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>At that point, lines were forming at the desks of

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>various MGM resort properties because you couldn't use your digital

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>keys at all, so you couldn't just check in with

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>your phone and then use your phone to get into

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>your room. You had to go and get a physical

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>key card. It was still like an RFID chip key card,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>so you could hold it up to the door and

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it would open, but you had to have one. You

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't just use your phone to do it. So that

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>meant everybody had to go and wait in line to

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>get a key. On September twelfth, we heard that a

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>hacker group called Alpha ALPHV. Actually that's the way they

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>style their name. Sometimes they're also called black Cat. We

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>heard that they could have been behind the attack. Now,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the black Cat name actually comes from malware that this

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>group has created, you know, some malicious software, ransomware to

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>be precise, and Alpha introduced that in late twenty twenty one.

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And here's how an Alpha attack would typically work out.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So the group would end up collaborating with someone to

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>inject the malware into a targeted system. That person might

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be a disgruntled employee of the target. Maybe they're not

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>even disgruntled, maybe they're just very greedy. Because Alpha would

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>offer up to ninety percent of a ransom to the

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote affiliate. The affiliate could also be some other

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>hacker group that its job is just to gain access

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to a system through some means, and Alpha would provide

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the malware while the other group actually would get access

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to the target. It would become this, you know, this

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>collaborative effort. Now, this means the business model for Alpha

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is r a as that stands for ransomware as a serve.

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That as a service trend has gotten out of control, y'all.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So these hackers, who primarily communicate on Russian language platforms,

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>build the tools, but they don't necessarily carry out the

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>attacks themselves. They're facilitators. The black cat and malware encrypts

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a target computer system, so it makes it inaccessible to

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the system's rightful owner. So imagine you log into your computer,

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>but you find out you can't access anything. All the

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>files are encrypted, all the methodologies are encrypted. You can't

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>decrypt it, so it's just a brick without the key.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>The data on your machine stays out of your reach.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And then you see a message, and the message tells

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you that the hackers will give you access back to

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>your data. They will give you the decryption key, but

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>only if you pay them a ransom. Usually this is

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the realm of millions of dollars. Typically they ask

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for it in the form of cryptocurrency to avoid being

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>traced back to the people responsible. And if you don't

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>pay up, the hackers will say either you will not

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>get access to your data again, it's just gone, or

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll delete it. Sometimes they'll say, all right, we won't

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>delete it. Instead, what we're going to do is we're

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>going to release all that data on a public platform

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so that anyone and everyone can see what it is. Typically,

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>ransomware hackers want to target organizations that have a lot

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of money and a lot of incentive to protect data. Now,

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every organization has an incentive to protect its

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>data at least to some extent. Information is the currency

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>of the modern era, after all, and while you can't

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>spend information, you can sure affect the value of a

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>company by stealing their information. But ransomware hackers typically want

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to target organizations that have access to buckets of cash.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>So prime targets for these hackers ideally fall into a

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:08.239
<v Speaker 1>couple of categories. If it's a really big company and

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>its business depends upon the safe keeping of information, particularly

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>really personal information, that ends up being a big target.

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So hospitals and other healthcare companies fall into that category.

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>By law, these companies are meant to keep patient data secure.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>There in big trouble if they don't, And obviously any

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>healthcare company that fails to live up to that would

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>have a massive problem, not just from the government or

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>from law enforcement, but you know, they would lose the

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>confidence of patients, and patients could have their lives really

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>upturned if their personal health information gets shared everywhere. So

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the thinking goes that those companies are more likely to

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>pay a ransom in order to make the problem go away.

0:18:56.000 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why ransomware hackers target healthcare companies so frequently. They

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have a very high incentive to get the problem fixed

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible. Well, casinos and resorts definitely fall

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>into a similar category. Right first, you've probably heard the

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.239
<v Speaker 1>phrase the house always wins. Well, that phrase references the

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that the odds are ever in the favor of

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the house. You might have a good night at the tables,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and you might leave with more money than you brought

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>with you, but lots of other people will end the

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>night down with less money than what they started with.

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe you'll also be down a little bit, and

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>other folks will also be down a bit, and some

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of them might be down a lot. All casino games

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>favor the house, and that makes sense because if they

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't favor the house, then casinos would soon be out

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of business, right So instead, collectively the casinos in Nevada

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>can make at least a billion dollars every month. That's

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>across all the casinos in Nevada. Some games will give

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you better shot at winning that other games. Blackjack is

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a game that has fairly decent odds, somewhere in the

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood of forty percent to win. Dealers have about a

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>forty nine percent chance to win. And you might think, oh,

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>forty nine plus forty's that's not one hundred. Well, that's

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.239
<v Speaker 1>because the rest of the odds kind of cover the

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>case where you could have a draw or a push

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>where you go to the next hand. Meanwhile, games like

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>kino or the Wheel of Fortune, they have some of

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the worst odds in gambling. So that doesn't mean you're

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>destined to lose if you play, but the chances are

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn high. So anyway, this means that casinos make

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. If I might elaborate, they make

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a crap ton of money and that puts them firmly

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in one of the categories that ransomware hackers love to target,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that are flush with cash. On top of that,

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>these casinos deal with a lot of customer data, whether

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's someone staying at a resort or a gambler who

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>has signed up to participate in a loyalty program, which

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty frequent thing, because the casinos here have

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>lots of incentives to get people to sign up to

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>their loyalty programs. You can get gifts, you can redeem credits,

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you can get a free room if you're a frequent

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>gambler and you're part of the loyalty program. There are

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reasons for that. In return, one, the

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>casino has a repeat customer, which is very valuable, and two,

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the casino can gather data about the people who visit

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>their resorts and learn more about them and thus cater

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to them more and make even more money. So this

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>information has value not just because of how it can

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>be used to advertise to individuals, that's often what we

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about when we talk about data in the modern world,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but it has value because the customers are trusting the

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>casinos with this information. Even if they aren't aware of

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the implications, and so when there is a data breach,

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>suddenly customers get very much concerned about that data. It

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>affects them directly. If there's the possibility that the customer's

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>own finances could be compromised, that's a huge problem for

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>both the customer and the casino. So this means casinos

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and resorts are in that sweet spot for ransomware hackers.

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So how did we find out about Alpha's alleged involvement

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with the MGM Resorts International hack. Well, one early statement

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>came from the x account, the Twitter account of a

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>group called VX Underground. Vx Underground bills itself as the

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>largest collection of malware source code, samples and papers on

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and they work with lots of researchers, They

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>work with hackers, They work with tons of people largely

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to educate about malware. They are rather cheeky, I would

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>say they kind of have that cheeky sense of hackers.

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>They do not necessarily come across as being buttoned down,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say. So. On September twelfth, VX Underground posted all

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Alpha ransomware group did to compromise MGM Resorts was hop

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>on LinkedIn, find an employee, then call the help desk.

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>A company valued at thirty three billion, nine hundred million

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars was defeated by a ten minute conversation end quote. Now,

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>MGM did not comment on this, and as far as

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm aware, has never actually referenced their cybersecurity incident as

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>an attack, but lots of other folks have not been

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in the mood to mince words, and the information that

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>would come out later seem to align with what VX

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Underground was claiming. The attack happened through social engineering. So

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>stage one, you learn about the person you're going to impersonate.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>You find someone on LinkedIn who has listed their job

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>title and where they work. If you can find someone

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>who has a very high profile job title, something that's

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>really high up in an organization, that's potentially much better,

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>or if it's not high up, at least someone who

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>works within the IT department, because that typically means you're

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>going to find someone who has a lot of access

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to the systems if you're able to compromise their account. Now,

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about social engineering a ton on this show,

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>how it is a huge part of hacking. See if

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got a system that is at least in theory,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really well secured. Your best bet of infiltrating the system

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is to target a vulnerability. And sometimes you find out

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about technical vulnerability, right. You might find out that there's

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a vulnerability in some software that a company is dependent upon,

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and by targeting that software vulnerability, you can penetrate the system.

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>You can gain access to it, you can get a

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>foothold there, and if you're really good, or really quick

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and or really lucky, you can exploit that vulnerability and

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>then you're in. Obviously, there's way more to it than that.

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just because you get access doesn't mean that

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>you can do anything, and even if you can do something,

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you might get found out before you're able to really

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of damage. But you get the idea.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>That's one method of penetrating a secure system, as you

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>target a vulnerability in some software. But another way is

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>not to worry about the tech side that much at all.

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You target people. You look at people who have access

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to the system you want to infiltrate. People are frequently,

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>in fact almost always, I would say, the weakest point

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of a security system. If you can convince someone who

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>has access to hand that access over you're in. Maybe

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you outright trick the person, Maybe you pose as someone

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>in authority, or maybe someone who needs help, and you

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>convince them to do something they absolutely shouldn't do. As

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it turns out most of us anyway, if we are

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>presented with someone who who is saying that they really

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>need help, they're in desperate need of some assistance, we

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>want to try and be the person to give them

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that assistance. It's not universally true, but it's true often

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>enough that this approach works a lot. Or maybe instead

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 1>you actually are promising this person a cut of the money.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're counting on their greed to push them into

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>granting you access. If you target someone who has a

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of administrative access to a system but they are

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>not in a high paying job, sometimes just promising them that,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, sweet cold hard cash is enough to let

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>them be kind of a conspirator on your side. Now,

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in this case, it seemed that someone talked to a

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>third party IT staffer, and as part of that conversation,

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they convinced the IT staffer to reset some multi factor

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>authentication settings so that the hackers could gain access to

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a single sign on system. You know, the kind of

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff that ACTA provides out. I'm guessing a lot of

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>you know that there are different levels of access with

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>computer systems, whether we're talking about a network or even

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>just a single computer. So, for example, a user typically

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>has limited access to a computer or a system. They

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>might be able to do stuff like open specific programs

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and call up files and that kind of thing, but

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to make actual changes to the computer, the user might

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>need administrator access, while other levels of access come with

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>specific permissions, and administrator level access has no such restrictions.

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And so the attackers wanted two target accounts that would

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have the highest administrator access to systems to have as

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 1>much opportunity to do whatever they wanted as they could.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So on September fourteenth, news broke that Caesar's Entertainment had

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>also been the target of a ransomware attack. The company

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>had filed a report with the SEC on September seventh.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>In that report, the company leads with Caesar's Entertainment Incorporated.

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>The company we or are because it's a unofficial filing,

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>recently identified suspicious activity in its information technology network resulting

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>from a social engineering attack on an outsourced IT support

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>vendor used by the company. Our customer facing operations, including

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>our physical properties and our online and mobile gaming applications,

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>have not been impacted by this incident and continue without

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>disruption end quote. So that's a big difference between the

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Caesar's attack and what happened at MGM. The report goes

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on to say that an investigation determined that the hackers

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>were able to access information in Caesar's Entertainment's loyalty program interface. Obviously,

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that includes customer information, including stuff like driver's license numbers

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and or social security numbers. If you enroll in these,

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you typically have to allow them to make a copy

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of things like your driver's license in order to get

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of the loyalty program. Now that's clearly a

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>risk for things like identity theft. They said there was

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>no evidence that the hackers were able to access things

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like passwords, bank account information, or payment card information, so

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's good, but the identity theft issue is still a

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>big concern. They did say they would offer credit monitoring

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to all members of the loyalty program and that it

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>had already taken steps quote to ensure that the stolen

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>data is deleted by the unauthorized actor end quote. So

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>how do they make sure that this data gets deleted

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>by a party they have no control over. Most folks

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>interpreted that to mean that Caesar's had paid the ransom. Now,

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the rumor mill said that the hackers were asking for

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty million dollars and in return they would pinky swear

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that they would delete the stolen data. Caesar's ultimately agreed

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay fifty fifteen million dollars to delete information yaoza.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, fifteen million dollars means that technically this

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>would have been the second most successful casino heist that

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I have ever encountered. And granted, it's not quite the

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>same as a casino heist, but then number one really

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't either. I'll talk more about that toward the end

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of this episode. In fact, we'll talk a lot more

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>about the hackers and what they did. But we're going

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to take another quick break. Okay, we're back. You're listening

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to Tech Stuff live at the iHeart Podcast Studio powered

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>by Bose at the House of Music at the iHeartRadio

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Music Festival. All right, Moving forward a little bit more.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Around September fifteenth, a different hacker group called Scattered Spider

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>claimed responsibility for the MGM attack but not the Caesars attack.

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>VX Underground referred to Scattered Spider as a subgroup. According

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to numerous sources, this group mostly consists of young hackers

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think like seventeen to twenty two who live in places

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>like the United States and the United Kingdom. They appear

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to be native English speakers or extremely fluent English speakers,

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and they have a reputation for being very very good

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>at social engineering. Scattered Spider is suspected of using tools

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>like phishing websites in addition to social engineering, so they

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>typically will direct someone to a login page that looks

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like it's a legit page, but in fact it allows

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the hackers to fish for credentials. As for multi factor authentication,

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>calling an it helped us to reset MFA is an

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>effective way to get around that. There's also SIM cards

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>swapping that they've done, where they've convinced phone companies to

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>swap a digital SIM card to a different device. They

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pose as a customer and then they talk the telecommunications

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>wrap on the other end of the line to change

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a SIM card setting, which then gives them the ability

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to access things like multi factor authentication when the code

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>gets sent Instead of going to the valid person, it

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>goes to their phone number, which has now been switched

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to a different phones simcard very nefarious. Now, you might

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>wonder about resetting multi factor authentication why anyone would even

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>agree to do that in the first place. I mean,

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of multi factor authentication is to have

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>multiple ways of authenticating a person's identity. But with just

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a little thinking it becomes clear. So let's say that

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you call into an IT help desk and you claim

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can no longer access your work account because

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you recently changed phone numbers. So that means that when

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you try to log in, you get a text message

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>sent to your old phone number and you can't receive it.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So you are talking with them saying, I need you

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to switch this because I still have my username, I

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>still have my password, but I can't get access because

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I no longer have that phone and I need to

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to access my work, So you ask for

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a reset. Maybe you have a lot of information about

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the person that you're posing as so as you can

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>convince the person on the other end of the phone

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>call that you're legitimate. Again, that's what you do with

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. When you're using LinkedIn to learn a little

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about your kind of patsy if you will, Maybe

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you just sound really clueless and stressed and you just

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>trigger the I person's desire to help you get out

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of the tight spot. Like I said, most of us

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>typically want to help someone when they are really struggling.

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>They reset the MFA on the account, They put a

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>new phone number in that phone that you happen to control,

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and now you don't have to worry about that multi

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>factor authentication process anymore. So I want to be clear,

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Scattered Spider, these are not script kiddies, right. These are

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>not people who just download some code and then they

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>make use of it. They have an understanding of how

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>computer and cloud systems work. They have an understanding how

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the underlying businesses work. They do their homework. By knowing

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>how these businesses work, they know how to target and

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>make their social engineering efforts have the best chance for success.

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So I want to be clear, like they are good

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>at what they do. They're not just fast talkers. They

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>know their stuff. So it's possible that they were involved

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in one or maybe even both of the attacks, though

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>again they weren't claiming that. However, Alpha has also claimed

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.959
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for the MGM attack, and they argued that any

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>reports stating it was teenagers were inaccurate and based on rumors.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>There was another rumor that Alpha was very quick to

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>deny that was reported in at least some outlets that

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>had to do with slot machines. So, according to this rumor,

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and I love this rumor, but according to this rumor,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Scattered Spider originally wanted to essentially reprogram slot machines so

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that they just started to pay out cash, kind of

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like a scene that's in you know, The Ocean's Eleven movies,

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Except this would mean that the slot machines would sort

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of spit out tickets, kind of like receipts with winnings

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>on them. The rumor goes that the hackers found this

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really possible. In fact, one of the rumors said

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that the person who was making this suggestion hadn't even

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>seen The Ocean's Eleven movies, So they were just talking

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>about something they had heard of and wanted to try.

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And when they found out that it wasn't going to

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>be as easy as they thought, they moved on to

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>just steal data from the computer systems. Now, Alpha categorically

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>says this story is totally false, it's completely fiction, and

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that it somehow got you know, circulated among news outlets.

0:35:54.920 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>What's the truth, dawn't know. Back to OCTO, So, David Bradbury,

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of OCTA, has said that social engineering attacks

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are at the root of five OCTA clients who have

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>recently found themselves compromised by ransomware attacks, and that Caesar's

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Entertainment and MGM Resorts are two of those five, but

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't named the other three. He also referenced Scattered

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Spider and Alpha as business associates or affiliates, suggesting that

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>at least some of the hacks of OCTA clients are

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the product of cooperation between these two groups. So this

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 1>story is still unfolding as a record here in Las

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Vegas right now. Currently, MGM Resorts International says that all

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 1>operations are back to normal, that's how everything's being reported,

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and that it's continuing to investigate the quote unquote cybersecurity issue,

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that the FBI is involved, and that they're taking this

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>very seriously. There are concerns that these attacks will have

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a hefty impact on the value of both MGM and

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Caesar's Entertainment. It's certainly had an impact on MGM's ability

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to generate revenue while all this was going on. Loyalty

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>program members should probably sign up for credit monitoring because

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their personal information is stored in those systems,

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like hackers got access to all of

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. So credit monitoring is not a bad idea

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to make sure that your information hasn't

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>just started been trading around on the dark web and

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>people start like taking out credit cards under your name,

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. So probably a good idea at

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>least to keep an eye on your credit. It's easier

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>if you do sign up for credit monitoring, but you

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>can do it on your own if you're really diligent

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>about it. But yeah, scary stuff. I'll also say this,

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:49.919
<v Speaker 1>So I've been staying at the Aria, like I said,

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>which is an MGM Resorts property, and have encountered some

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>technical glitches which may or may not have any connection

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to the hackers. According to the people I spoke with,

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they recently used a new computer system and brought it

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 1>online and that the issues they're running into may very

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>well just be working the bugs out of a new

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>system and have nothing to do with the hackers at all.

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But what I will say is that they have connected

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially all room controls through an Internet interface, and you

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 1>can use a tablet or I assume an app to

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to access those things. But when I got

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to my room, what I found was that I could

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>not close the curtain on the window. I could not

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>turn off the lights in my room, none of the

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>buttons worked. The tablet that was part of the room

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>would not connect. I did not want to use the

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>app for reasons that I think should be pretty obvious.

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>And so again I don't want to say that that's

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the hacker attack, but it was unfortunate to

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>have that's of experience right on the tail end of

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>this hacker issue. It's it's concerning, and it's one of

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>those things that will continuously come up. Another thing I

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>will say this again not directly connected to the hacker attack,

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>but just something that I observed. The Wi Fi in

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that hotel is an open Wi Fi connection, like you

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can just connect to it and you you know, you

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>do a little sign on on a web landing page,

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>but then you're connected. There's no password security on the

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Wi Fi network at all, And I gotta tell you,

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are a major hotel that has just been

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the target of a massive ransomware attack, maybe you should

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>start offering a password protected Wi Fi network. I'll tell

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 1>you this, I won't connect to it unless I'm using

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a VPN. I just refuse to do it. They may

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be perfectly safe, but it might not be with an

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>open network like that. And a recent attack in not

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>even a week old at this point, there were still

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>issues unfolding this past week. Don't do it, so yeah,

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting observations. As for moving forward, I think these attacks

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are the most recent reminders that organizations have to make

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>some really big decisions about cybersecurity now. Part of that

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>really involves an ongoing educational approach that reinforces how to

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 1>spot social engineering and phishing schemes and why it's important

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not to share credentials or to act on suspicious emails

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or phone calls. This is particularly true for people who

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>are working in positions that have administrative level access to

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>certain computer systems within an organization. If we count the

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>ransom that Caesar is allegedly paid to have sensitive customer

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 1>data deleted as a heist. Like I said, it would

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>be the second biggest casino heist in history from what

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, at least from a monetary standpoint. If

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering what is the number one well that goes

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to a kiwi? A New Zealander named James Manning, who

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>would the help of a casino services manager, managed to

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>cheat his way to thirty three million dollars by cheating

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 1>at blackjack. So supposedly he and this casino employee were

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>able to breach the security camera system and they used

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 1>things like hand signals and stuff in order to cheat

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on eight successive hands of blackjack that ultimately resulted in

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty three million dollars of winnings. Manning was confronted and

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>then by casino security, and then he was banned from

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the Crown Casino in Melbourne, Australia after they picked up

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on the scam, and fortunately before the casino had actually

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>credited him most of his winnings so he didn't walk

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>away with thirty three million dollars. The casino chose to

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>keep this matter quiet rather than suffer embarrassment by admitting

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that they got taken for thirty million. This was made

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a little more complicated because Manning was supposed to participate

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in a PR stunt later in that week. He was

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to order an outrageously expensive cocktail called the Winston.

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The Winston was priced at twelve thousand, five hundred dollars

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>for a single cocktail. The casino had even promoted that

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this was going to happen, so this was going to

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be like an event type of thing, and that it

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 1>would establish a Guinness World record for the most expensive

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>cocktail ever purchased. But with Manning's scam uncovered and then

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>him banned from the casino, they had to scramble to

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>come up with an alternative customer, and then they had

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to arrange to pay the guy back. So really it

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a purchase at all. Like money changed hands, but

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>it changed hands back, so there was no real purchase here.

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that story also has its own share

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of drama and scandal that goes beyond what I just said.

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>But I think we've had enough for one episode if

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>you ask me. So that means that we're reaching the

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>point where it's time for me to sign off from

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the iHeart Podcast studio powered by Bows. Here at the

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio Music Festival in Las Vegas, Nevada, and maybe in

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>light of these recent hacker attacks, we should actually change

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that saying to say the house almost always wins. I

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 1>hope you are all well, and I'll talk to you

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.