WEBVTT - What is an impossible color?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>If you love iPhone, you'll love Apple Card. It's the

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>credit card designed for iPhone. It gives you unlimited daily

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>cash back that can earn four point four zero percent

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>annual percentage yield. When you open a high Yield savings

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>account through Apple Card, apply for Applecard in the wallet

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>app subject to credit approval. Savings is available to Apple

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Card owners subject to eligibility. Apple Card and Savings by

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch, Member FDIC

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>terms and more at applecard dot Com. When you pop

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a piece of cheese into your mouth, you're probably not

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the environmental impact. But the people in the

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>dairy industry are. That's why they're working hard every day

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to find new ways to reduce waste, conserve natural resources,

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. How is US Dairy

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>tackling greenhouse gases? Many farms use anaerobic digesters to turn

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the methane from manure into renewable energy that can power farms, towns,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and electric cars. Visit us dairy dot COM's Last Sustainability

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to learn more.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Everyone loves getting good at advice and staying in the know.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing like getting a heads up on something before

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>you've even had time to think about whether you need

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>or want it. Well, Thankfully, AT and T provides personalized

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 2>recommendations and solutions so you get what's right for you.

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Whether right for you means a plan that's better suited

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 2>for you and your family, or a product that makes

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 2>sense for you and your lifestyle. So relax and let

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>AT and T provide proactive recommendations to help empower your

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 2>best connected life.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 3>As a United Explorer card member, you can earn fifty

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>thousand bonus miles plus look forward to extraordinary travel rewards,

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>including a free checked bag, two times the miles on

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>United purchases and two times the miles on dining and

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>at hotels. Become an Explorer and seek out unforgettable places

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 3>while enjoying rewards everywhere you travel. Cards issued by JP

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Morgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC subject to credit approval Offer,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 3>subject to change terms apply.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey Ortay, As an artist, do you have a favorite

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>color that you use for scientific cartoons or some colors

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>more science y than others?

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, it depends on the science. I mean some science

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 4>it's just more colorful than others.

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So then what's the color of physics.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 4>It kind of depends on the topic too. If it's

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 4>about lasers, I might use red, or if it's about

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 4>the sun, I might use a yellow. I've used Cian

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 4>for particle physics.

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>What makes particle of physics cian?

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that just kind of would seem like

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 4>fit to the topic at the time. It just gives

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 4>you the blues, yeah, Or if it's a red hot topic,

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 4>I might go for a nice intense red. But for

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 4>our books they usually go with purple.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what's purple about our curiosity?

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 4>It's more about the process, you know. It's kind of

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 4>mentally bruising, I mean mentally enlightening.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a supervision of both of those.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 4>It's both blue and red, which makes purple. There you go. Hi,

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm Hoorham Mack, cartoonas and the author of Oliver's Great

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Big Universe.

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>at U See Irvine. And my daughter tells me I

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>can't see mad.

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 4>WHOA wait? Does that mean that you can't get mad

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 4>or that you don't see the color red?

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes. As a parent of a stubborn toddler, I never

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>once got mad, absolutely kept my cool every single moment. No,

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>she and I disagree a lot about what to call

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>various colors. And she's convinced I'm partially colorblind.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 4>WHOA have you ever had it checked? Maybe it's true.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 4>What does that mean? You can't tell colors apart or

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 4>you can't seek certain colors? But how do you know

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 4>you can't see them?

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>You can do these tests where you're supposed to see

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers out of dots. But she just likes showing me

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of different shades and asking me to come up

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>with names of them. And I'm always like, I don't

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>know wild Mountain raspberry, and she's like, that's not red,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it's purple or something.

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 4>Sounds like she just likes to disagree with you.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I raised her right, Yeah, you raised

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>her to make you read all the time.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 4>But anyways, Welcome to our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 4>the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio in.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Which we try to pencil in an explanation for how

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the universe works. We try to color inside the lines

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and help you understand how this incredible, glittering, beautiful, bizarre

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and crazy cosmos actually works. How all those quantum mechanical

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>little particles come together to emerge into this incredible experience

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that we all enjoy.

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 4>That's right. We try to paint a picture for you

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>of our amazing and beautiful universe using all of the

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 4>hues of the rainbow to try to communicate to you

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 4>all the feelings and impressions that the universe has given

0:04:58.360 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 4>us as a human race.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>In science is trying to build a bridge between our

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>visceral experience, what you actually feel as a conscious entity,

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and our mental picture of what's out there in the universe,

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the mental model we're all putting together trying to explain

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>how the universe itself, absent from our humanity, actually works.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, we never probe that deep reality

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>independent of our senses. We're only limited to understanding how

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it works as filtered by our eyes and ears and

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>fingertips and everything else.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and as we look at the universe and filter

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 4>it through our eye, sometimes it makes us red with

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 4>anger about the things we don't understand, or blue about

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.119
<v Speaker 4>the things we may never understand, and sometimes maybe even

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 4>green and envy of maybe possible aliens out there that

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 4>have figured it out. Did it miss a color? Orange?

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Mass orange for a nice glass of orange trees?

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Aren't you glad you made that pun?

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Nice?

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.119
<v Speaker 1>All these things are part of our experience. The color

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>purple in your mind is not actually part of the universe,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is just part of your experience of the universe. Somehow,

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>over the centuries and millennia, we have been able to

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>piece together a picture of how the universe out there

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>might actually work, perhaps independent of our senses, though of

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>course we won't know until those aliens come and talk

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to us about the colors they see in the universe.

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Do you think they're a colored line too? Like Daniel,

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 4>we think the answer to the universe is a light

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 4>shade of lavender summer breeze. And then we end up

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 4>disagreeing about what that means.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think whatever answer they have, my daughter will

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>disagree with him. That's how I raised her.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's not put her in the greeting committee.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>I think we agree on that. Oh my gosh. Yes,

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>let's not send Daniel's children to meet the aliens.

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, unless they start an intergalactic war.

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the colors are sacred to them. And if Hazel

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>disagrees about what's purple and what's red, she's going to

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>really piss them off.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, or they might disagree about the color hazel itself.

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, exactly are.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 4>You called hazel if you're not the color of a

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 4>hazel nut. That's it. Forget this human race. It doesn't

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 4>make any sense.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make any sense. You know, we named her

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>hazel before we knew her. But she does turn out

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to like the color hazel and hazel nuts, so there's

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a win.

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but how do you know she's actually seen the

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 4>color Hazel's hazel blind?

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>M hazel blind.

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 4>Wow, it's all hazy to her, it is.

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But we are fascinated by this concept of color, not

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>just because it's such a visceral part of our experience,

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but because it's deeply connected to the physics of what's

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>happening out there in the universe. It tells us something

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about how photons are wiggling, or how neutrinos are flying

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>through the universe, if you're willing to apply red and

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>blue shifts to them as well. So this concept of color,

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>what we see what's out there in the universe. It's

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>very confusing but also very illuminating about how the universe

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>actually works.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a lot of physics in light and in

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 4>all the colors. But then, as you said, it gets

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 4>filtered through our eyes and our brains, and sometimes what

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 4>we see is not quite what's out there, and maybe

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 4>there might be things out there that are maybe impossible

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 4>for us to experience.

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's right. We know that there are frequencies of

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>light the humans can never experience, but are there also

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>colors that are impossible to see?

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 4>So to the end podcasts, we'll be tackling the question

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 4>what is an impossible color?

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a job for Tom Cruise.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Dunt dunt du du dunt stunt.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>This color will self destruct after you view it.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 4>We need a movie in which Tom Cruise is a physicist. Yeah,

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean he'd have to wear a lot of like

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 4>wigs and prosthetics. Of course, he can't look like Tom Cruise.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's too sexy to be a physicist. Is that

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. I didn't say that he violates some

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>physical law.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>He's to orange.

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely very physical, even if he's not a physicist. Right,

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>he does his own stunts.

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right. Yeah, I wonder if he would do

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 4>his own stunts in a physics movie. Like, would you

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 4>actually sit on the couch all day? I mean, that's

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 4>it's probably more dangerous and jumping off a cliff.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Then you put all those professional nap stunters out of

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>work and you can just take naps on film as.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 4>A Wait wait, wait, that's a career. I can be

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 4>a stunt napper exactly.

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, there's a career for everything.

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>They're doing it all this time for free.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Daniel, you know that the sign of an advanced civilization

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is specialization, right, And I think once we've achieved stunt napping,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we've reached the pinnacle of civilizations. The aliens will be impressed.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh they might even hire us to nap for them.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Well there's a.

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Twist ending, but yeah, this is an interesting question, the

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 4>idea that there might be colors out there that are

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 4>impossible to create, to experience, to see, to generate what

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 4>side of the color spectrum.

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Are we Yeah, it's a complicated question because color is

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>intimately connected with frequency, and we think about it as

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>controlled by light, but really it's something inside our minds,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>something generated by our brain. It's an experience, and the

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>colors you experience in the end come from the signals

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that travel up the optic nerve, which are not physical,

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they're just interpreted by your brain, and so it's interesting

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to think about whether there are colors that cannot be

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>described by those signals.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy, is this going to get into philosophy, Daniel, Like,

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 4>what colors can a bat see?

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>That's actually a great idea for paper. I'm going to

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>write that when we're done with this episode.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what color is your bad wing?

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Everything in the end is philosophy if you care about

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what it means. Right, So if you're going to answer

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the question what does that mean anyway, then yeah, you're

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>getting into philosophy.

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 4>That sounds like a philosophical statement in itself, Daniel.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>The philosophy of philosophy.

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you can get a phphphd.

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>In recursive philosophy.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 4>In computer science philosophical puzzles. Well, as usually, we were

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 4>wondering how many people had thought about this question of

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 4>what is an impossible color? And so, as usual, Daniel

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 4>went out there to the internet to ask people this question.

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much to everybody who answers these questions for

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. If you would like to hear your voice

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on future episodes, please write to me two questions at

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>danielan Jorge dot com.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 4>So think about it for a second. What do you

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 4>think is an impossible color? Here's what people had to say.

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 5>So color is just a construct of our brain decoding

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 5>the frequency of electradiation. If you think about it and

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 5>imagine our rods and cones were tuned a little wider

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>and we could actually see an infrared and ultraviolet, and

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 5>colors we can't see would be associated with those frequencies.

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 5>So I guess every color associated with low frequency radio

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 5>all the way to gamma rays would be impossible colors.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 6>If color is just how we perceive different wavelengths of light,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 6>and light can be in a huge range of wavelengths,

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 6>it has something to do with the limits of the

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 6>wavelength approaching either zero or infinity, where suddenly color doesn't

0:11:57.840 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 6>make any sense anymore.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 7>An impossible color, oh, very interesting. I'm going to say

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 7>some sort of combination of spectral outputs that are that

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 7>is a different spectral resolution than what our the receptors

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 7>of our eyes are able to something to do with

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 7>color metamerism.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 4>The interesting answers. I feel like nobody pitched the idea

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>that maybe it's a color that's made out of plant based.

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Proteins vegan colors.

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Wow, yes, No, no animals or creatures were harmed in

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the making of this color.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't even imagine a way you might harm an

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>animal to make a color you're talking about, like, oh,

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>let's see red, We're going to spill something's blood. Like

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems pretty unnecessary.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 4>I think, Daniel, you just don't have this strong enough imagination. No,

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 4>but there are colors that are based on or additionally,

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 4>there are dyes that are based on like insects, like

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 4>insect juice.

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, okay, interesting, But.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how vegans draw that line.

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're gonna have to have some of them

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast to answer the question.

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sounds like good question for Katie. All right, well,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 4>let's dig into this question of what an impossible color is.

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Whether it means we can't see it, we can't make it,

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 4>it can't exist in the universe. Let's figure it out. So, yeah,

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, what are the basics of light and color?

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's start outside the human brain before we

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>get into like signal processing and all that stuff, and

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just begin with light. Right, light we know is made

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of electromagnetic fields. There are ripples in electromagnetic fields. So

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 1>we have electrical fields that can be made by like electrons,

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and magnetic fields that are made by magnets. And light

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is a coupling of the electric fields and the magnetic

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>fields together. Electric fields can induce magnetic fields, magnetic fields

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>can induce electric fields. Light is like this perfect little

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>packet where it's slashing back and forth between electric fields

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and magnetic fields in amazing harmony, and it can propagate

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>through the universe, this little oscillation of the fields. And

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>these oscillations have frequencies that have a wavelength, they have

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a frequency that relates to their energy. So if you

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>have a beam of light, for example, coming out of

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a flashlight, it's actually made out of little photons, and

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>each photon has a specific energy which has a specific

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>wavelength and a specific frequency. So that's what light is, right,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>these packets of photons.

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 4>So I have this laser and I'm shooting it and

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 4>there are photons coming out of it, and each photon

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 4>is like a wiggle in the electromagnetic field. Is that

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 4>what it is?

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, each photon is a wiggle in the electromagnetic field,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Not a wiggle that's like propagating like if I throw

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 4>a pebble in a pond, it's not spreading out there

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 4>like that, right, Like in a laser, these things are

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 4>going in a straight line.

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>These things are going in a straight line. And we

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just did a really fun but very confusing episode about

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>how long is the photon? And if you didn't listen

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to that one.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 4>I was going to listen to it. But it's a

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 4>little long. It was not a light topic.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And that tells you that real photons out there in

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe are a little packets. They have a length

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that's determined by the spread of the frequency. So in

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of idealized sense, you can imagine every photon

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>has exactly one frequency. It's like a pure little packet

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of one energy, one wavelength, one frequency. But that's actually

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>mathematically very confusing because if it was like that, it

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>would be everywhere in the universe. And so to build

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>up a little packet that actually moves through the universe,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a little blob that stays together and flies through space,

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a little bundle of frequencies. So

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, blue photon is like a little spread of

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>various blue frequencies, and a red photon is a little

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>packet of a handful of differently red frequencies.

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 4>And they're all going at the same speed, which is

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 4>the speed of light.

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, they all go the same speed even though

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they have a different wavelength and a different frequency, and

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light is the same across the spectrum.

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>That's at least in our current theory. There are theories

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of physics like rainbow gravity, where different frequencies travel at

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>different speeds and you get like weird effects around the

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>edges of black holes are in their current theory physics,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and according to all of our measurements, every photon travels

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>at the same speed.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 4>And the spectrum of frequencies that light can have. It's

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 4>basically one dimensional, right, Like there's only one knob for

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 4>the frequency of light.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you're going to think about a photon.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 4>From zero to infinity, hmm, But it's just a line,

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 4>and if you were to draw a plot of.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It, Yes, exactly, it's one dimensional. It's a great way

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to think about it. And it is infinitely dense, right,

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there's an infinite number of frequencies there. We think of

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>these things as like, oh, they're quantum mechanical, so it

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>must be discrete. Must be broken up into chunks, right,

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is that free objects, even free electrons,

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are not quantized in their energy levels. They're quantized in

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the number of photons. Like you can't have one point

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>seven photons or two point two seven photons. You can

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>have one or two or nineteen. But each photon can

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>have any energy. There's no limitation, there's no quantitization, there's

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>no descritization of the energy spectrum. But yes, it is

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>one dimensional that.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 4>You know of the right, Like, is it possible that

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 4>maybe frequency is quantized as well.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in our current theory, that's the case. There are

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>theories of quantum gravity in which like space is pixelated,

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>which would make like a minimum wavelength, and in that

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>case every distance is quantized. In our current theories, there's

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>no minimum frequency, but that doesn't actually really make sense

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>below like the plank length, where every photon would like

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>collapse into a black hole anyway, So it only really

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>applies up to a very very high energy, but much

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>higher than we could probe today.

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, So that's the physics of it. Now let's

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 4>get into the biology of it. So when these photons

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 4>hit our eyes, they create and experience in our brains.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's one step before that, which is reflection. Like,

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>let's imagine we're looking at a banana, right, why do

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>we see the banana as yellow. We see the banana

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>as yellow because white light hits the banana from the sun,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and then some of it is absorbed and some of

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it is reflected. You start with almost every frequency of

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>light you can see hitting the banana, but then the

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>banana has chemicals in it and atoms, and those atoms

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>prefer to absorb some colors and not absorb other colors.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And so when you see yellow as banana, that means

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that the wavelength of light that is being reflected is

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a specific band in this case, like between five hundred

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and seventy and five hundred and eighty nanometers. So you

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>see something as red, it's not because it's like absorbing

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the red light, right, It's because it's reflecting the red

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>light and absorbing everything else. But then, yeah, it hits

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>your eyeball, and those photons with a certain frequency are

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>now going to be interacted with by your eye, which

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>is like basically little observational device.

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 4>But wait, the banana, So the banana absorbs all frequencies

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 4>except maybe the kinds that are my brain will interpret

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 4>as yellow.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not all frequencies, but all visible ones. Right, banana

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>can't necessarily absorb all X rays and gamma rays or infrared,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but in the visible spectrum. And again and not even

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>all of that, right, Like you see it yellow because

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's dominant in the yellow. It's never like intense and

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>yellow and zero in every other frequency.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 4>It just peaks unless it's like a perfect banana, Like,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 4>is it possible to create a perfect banana that only

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.719
<v Speaker 4>reflects like one frequency of yellow.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>If you make a shade which only reflects one frequency

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of yellow, I think Hazel would call that perfect banana.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>That is a nice name for a yellow.

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exact banana, yes.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Exact scientific banana.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So there's a reflection. And also I mean there's

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 4>filtering too. But while we're talking about it, like it right,

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 4>like if I have rose colored glasses, the world looks

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 4>rose to me because it's filtering out all frequencies except

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 4>the ones that I see is rose.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, it's filtering. There's a reflection. All this affects

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the frequencies that actually hit your eyeball. But I hear

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confusion out there and the questions I

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>get from listeners about what makes something a color, whether

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>it's absorbing it or reflecting it, And so it's important

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to remember that the color is something that's in your

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>eye depends on the light that hits your eyeball. You

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>can only see something if it hits your eyeball. For example,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>if a photon was flying in front of your face,

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't see it, right, It just flies past you.

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't see like a little glowing blob going through

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the universe. You imagine your visual perception is giving you

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>an accurate description of everything that's out there in the universe,

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>but you only see things that hit your eyeball. Photon

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that passes in front of you doesn't send any signals

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to you, so you don't see it.

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Like if someone to my right shoots a laser to

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 4>my left, I won't see it. It has they have

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 4>to be shooting into my eye for me to see.

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>The laser, yeah, Or it has to hit dust particles

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>along the way or air and ionize that and make

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a glow or a reflection. Right. But a perfect laser

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum you will not see until it slices

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>your head open.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 4>The photons, ever, split into other photons.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Photons can convert into electron positron pairs, which can then

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>interact with other stuff, like including other photons and do

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff. That efferthing could happen, and those could create

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>other photons. So that can happen, but it's quantum mechanically

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty rare. If you pass a photon through a special

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of non linear crystal, it can split into two

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>other photons. Use that for important experiments to like detect

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>single photons. But mostly photons just fly through the universe.

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>That's why we can see them after billions of years

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and across billions of light years. They're pretty reliable indicators

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of what emitted them.

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 4>All right, So photons can't have all these frequencies. Sometimes

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 4>they get filtered, or when they bounce off of things,

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 4>they get some of them make it out of the

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 4>bounds and they sometimes hit our eyes, and then that's

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 4>our experience of seeing.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Things, yeah, exactly, and also our eyeballs do some filtering,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>right to be experienced. The photon has to make it

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>into the pupil and then through the lens and then

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the back of the retina where

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it can actually be interacted with. That's where there are

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>these proteins which either turn on or turn off based

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>on the frequency of light. So you have these like

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>array of sensors in the back of your eyeballs which

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>can detect photons.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Did you look into how that works? Like there's a

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.239
<v Speaker 4>molecule on the surface of the receptor there and then

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 4>it just gets activated and it wiggles, and then how

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 4>does that Does it release a chemical or does it

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 4>create an action potential? How does it work?

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's actually really amazing. It's like a little machine

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and it actually changes the protein's configuration when it absorbs

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the photon. It flips like almost a physical switch on

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>this chemical to change its configuration and that adds energy

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to it and then that's picked up by the optic nerve.

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It's really kind of amazing chemistry. And you have these things.

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>They're scattered all over the back of your eye. Of course,

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>people know there's two different kinds. There's rods which basically

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>give you black and white vision. They're sensitive across the

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>spectrum wall.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 4>What does that mean, Like any photon of any frequency

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 4>will activate them or not.

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not exactly flat across the spectrum. But essentially, yes,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not very frequency specific, they're not choosing. They're very

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive. Yeah, they're not choosy, but they're very good

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>at picking out photons. They're much better than the cone.

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So they're good for like at night, is there a

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>predator there or not? You don't really care if it's

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>red or green. You just want to know if it's

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>something there.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 4>Basically, it gives the sense of like brightness or darkness.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, it's like black versus white. But then you

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have these other sensors, these cones. There's three different kinds

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of them. You have like six or seven million in

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the back of each eyeball, and most of them are

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>actually concentrated in a tiny little spot in the retina

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>near the center of your vision, so you have like

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>color vision near the center of your eyeball, but mostly

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>black and white in the rest, which is fascinating. And

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>each of these cones responds to a different frequency of light,

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>so it has like a protein on it, and a

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>different protein for each kind. You have three different kinds,

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>and those proteins are tuned to flip or to not

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>flip for different frequencies of light, So one of them

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly flips on for blue light, another one mostly flips

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>on for green, another one flips on for like yellowish red.

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Light, and it so did they sort of ignore the

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 4>other frequencies.

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't exactly ignore them, right, They're not in very

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>narrow bands. So one of them does peak in the blue,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and one peaks in green, and one peaks in the red.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 1>If you imagine, like, what's the probability for this protein

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>to flip based on the frequency of light, Well, the

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>blue one will almost always flip for a blue one,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>but it'll sometimes flip for a green one, though not

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>as reliably. And the red one will always flip for

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>a red one, and sometimes for a green one, and

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>occasionally even for a blue one. So they're a little

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>bit overlapping. They're not like perfect bands.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 4>Right, They're fuzzy. They can each will react to a

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 4>certain range of frequencies. Where those frequencies are centered it

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of depends on the type of cone.

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And so you have three of these, each

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of which are centered at different places in the spectrum,

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and then what your brain does is interpret the signals

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>from these cones to figure out, oh, how blue was it. So,

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you get a signal only from blue

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>cones and nothing from the red and the green one,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>then you're like, Okay, that must have been pretty blue

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>in order to signal the blue ones and not signal

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the other ones. But if you get something that signals

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the blue one and the green one and not the

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>red one, then you're like, okay, it was blue green,

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And so you can sort of trying where it is

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on the spectrum by the ratios of how these things react.

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Interesting. All right, Well, let's get to this idea that

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 4>maybe there are colors that are impossible for us to

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 4>see even with our rods and cones. So let's dig

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 4>into that. But first let's take a quick break.

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>With big wireless providers, what you see is never what

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you get. Somewhere between the store and your first month's bill.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>The price, your thoughts you were paying magically skyrockets. With

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>mint Mobile, you'll never have to worry about gotcha's ever again.

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>When mint Mobile says fifteen dollars a month for a

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>three month plan, they really mean it. I've used mint

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Mobile and the call quality is always so crisp and

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>so clear. I can recommend it to you, so say

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>bye bye to your overpriced wireless plans, jaw dropping monthly

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>bills and unexpected overages. You can use your own phone

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>with any mint Mobile plan and bring your phone number

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>along with your existing contacts. So dit your overpriced wireless

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>with mint Mobiles deal and get three months a premium

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>wireless service for fifteen bucks a month. To get this

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>new customer offer in your new three month premium wireless

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>plan for just fifteen bucks a month, go to mintmobile

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash universe. That's mintmobile dot com slash universe.

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Cut your wireless build a fifteen bucks a month at

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>mintmobile dot com slash universe. Forty five dollars upfront payment

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>required equivalent to fifteen dollars per month new customers on

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>first three month plan only. Speeds slower about forty gigabytes

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>on unlimited plan. Additional taxi, s, fees, and restrictions apply.

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>See mint mobile for details.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 9>AI might be the most important new computer technology ever.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 9>It's storming every industry and literally billions of dollars are

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 9>being invested, so buckle up. The problem is that AI

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 9>needs a lot of speed and processing power, So how

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 9>do you compete without cost spiraling out? Of control, It's

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 9>time to upgrade to the next generation of the cloud.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 9>Oracle Cloud Infrastructure or OCI. OCI is a single platform

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 9>for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs. OCI

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 9>has fourty eight times the bandwidth of other clouds, offers

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 9>one consistent price instead of variable regional pricing, and of course,

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 9>nobody does data better than Oracle, So now you can

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 9>train your AI models at twice the speed and less

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 9>than half the cost of other clouds. If you want

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 9>to do more and spend less, like Uber eight by

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 9>eight and Data Bricks Mosaic, take a free test drive

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 9>of OCI at Oracle dot com slash Strategic. That's Oracle

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 9>dot com slash Strategic Oracle dot com slash Strategic.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>If you love iPhone, you'll love Apple Card. It's the

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>credit card designed for iPhone. It gives you unlimited daily

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>cash back that can earn four point four zero percent

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>annual percentage yield. When you open a high Yield Savings

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>account through Applecard, apply for Applecard in the wallet app,

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>subject to credit approval. Savings is available to Applecard owners

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>subject to eligibility. Apple Card and Savings by Goldman Sachs

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Bank USA Salt Lake City Branch member FDIC terms and

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>more at applecard dot com. When you pop a piece

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of cheese into your mouth or enjoy a rich spoonful

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of Greek yogurt, you're probably not thinking about the environmental

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>impact of each and everybody. But the people in the

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>dairy industry are. US Dairy has set themselves some ambitious

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>sustainability goals, including being greenhouse gas neutral by twenty to

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty That's why they're working hard every day to find

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>new ways to reduce waste, conserve natural resources, and drive

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>down greenhouse gas emissions. Take water, for example, most dairy

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>farms reuse water up to four times the same water

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>cools the milk, cleans equipment, washes the barn, and irrigates

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the crops. How is US dairy tackling greenhouse gases? Many

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.719
<v Speaker 1>farms use anaerobic digestors that turn the methane from maneuver

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>into renewable energy that can power farms, towns, and electric cars.

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>So the next time you grab a slice of pizza

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>or lick an ice cream cone, know that dairy farmers

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and processors around the country are using the latest practices

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and innovations to provide the nutrient dense dairy products we

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>love with less of an impact. Visit usdairy dot com

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>slash sustainability to learn more.

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, we're talking about color today, hopefully not getting

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 4>too off.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Color depends on if you think philosophy is off color

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>or not. What is the color of philosophy?

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Jorge, WHOA, Well that's getting a little purple.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Are I didn't mean to ask a lavender question.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 4>Well you don't have to yellow it, Daniel. All right, Well,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about how we experience light, and so we

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 4>know that light are photons. They come in different frequencies.

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 4>There are frequencies from here to infinity. But our eyes

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 4>have these sensors that can detect photons around certain frequencies

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 4>and those are the ones that generally we would associate

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 4>as red, green.

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And blue right RGB. And it's fascinating that here we've transformed,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>as you said, an infinite one dimensional spectrum, photons could

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be anywhere along the spectrum to now sort of this

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>three D spectrum RGB, right, And the color that we

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>perceive depends in principle on the photon, but really depends

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on the signals from these neurons, which is in this

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>three D space of red, green, or blue. You got

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>these signals from these neurons, and once you experience is

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in your mind is just an interpretation of this point

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in this three dimensional RGB space.

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 4>I guess maybe a question you could ask is like,

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 4>why are we doing it this way? Why are we

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 4>seeing the world this way? Why don't we just why

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 4>didn't evolution come up with a answer. They can just

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 4>tell you what the frequency of light is.

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating question. And there are some clues based on

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the variety of the way the color perception works in

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the animal kingdom, Like we know that we have these

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>three sensors, but there's nothing special about three. Like people

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think of RGB as the fundamental basis of color, but

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just so the way the human eye works. There

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>are critters out there with like eleven different sensors. The

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>mantis shrimp I think has like fourteen, and there are

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and there are species out there that can see a

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>broader range or a narrower range of colors, just depends

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>on what's more efficient. The fascinating thing is that the

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more sensors you have, the better you are typically of

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>being able to tell the difference between shades. So if

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you like really need to know the difference between dark

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>green and light green. You might evolve more sensors or

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>more sort of like processing power to be able to

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>distinguish these signals.

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I guess the more sensors you have, like kind

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 4>of like posts you put in the frequency spectrum, the

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 4>more you can tell things apart.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes, like the mantis shrimp is famous for having like

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>fourteen different sensors. You might think, wow, they must see

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the world and really vivid color, but they have very

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>very few neurons to back it up behind that, so

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like they have really really good hardware but terrible software,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So they might actually not experience more colors than we do,

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like the actual experience of a Manti strimp who can

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>never know right until we write that paper. But I

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>think it takes both complex hardware and complex software to

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>experience a broad variety of colors.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure those fourteen sensors are doing something right, like

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 4>it's letting it discriminate the certain specific colors or certain

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 4>specific patterns. But maybe after that, it's just not like

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 4>the manta strip is not appreciating the color.

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>It depends a lot on the processing, right, you get

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>these signals if you have very crude responses to them,

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>very crude, like neural networks behind them to help you

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>know how to respond to them, very wide bins in

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>your response, for example, you could be wasting a lot

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of that information. You know. Imagine you have like a

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>super excellent microphone and then a terrible cable to store

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it in very low fidelity file format could be very lossy.

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>This is all very very speculative, of course, and there's

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>experiments going on to try to understand what mentustrimp experience.

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But there are some humans that have more than three cones.

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>They're called tetra works. Yeah, like mutants, Yes, mutants exactly,

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But there are people have four different kinds of cones.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>When I first heard of that, I thought, whoa, they

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>must have a fourth color.

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 4>How does that happen? Like they have a mutation that

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 4>produces a whole different fourth kind of cone.

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very rare. Then you can spot them, not because

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they see a different color we think. It's not like

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a fourth color that adds to RGB that they

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>can experience that we can't. It's just that they tend

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to be better discriminating between colors, so like they might

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>pass a color blindness test that the rest of us

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>would fail. If you put like a really really subtle

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>difference between the greens and the blues, for example, they

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>might pick something out that other people can't.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 4>If you put like a Stanford athlete next to a

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Harvard athlete and you'd ask them like, which one is which,

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 4>you'd be like, wait, what, They're the same? They just

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 4>look red. But you know, maybe a more discerning person

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 4>might say, oh, no, that's a crimson and then the

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 4>other one's like a wine red.

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Junior college red. Yeah exactly. Yeah, yeah, way to come

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>up with an example that's really relatable. I'm suing a

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people really struggle with their things.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you put a banana slug next to

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 4>an ant eater, is it the same yellow or not?

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's actually a really fun question because all

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the University of California campuses are blue and gold, but

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they all have different shades of gold.

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Now, which one is more relatable? To exclude people who

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 4>don't live in California, or to exclude people who've never

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 4>heard of Stanford and had Harbor.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, let's hear from the listeners.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're going to be like you excluded everyone.

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, It's fascinating because the biological transformation of these photons

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>into optic signals puts us sort of like a distance

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>from the actual photon. Like, what you're experiencing in your

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>mind is reaction to the optic nerve signals, not the

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>photon directly.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, it lands in your cone, and then the cone

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 4>generates the signal that then gets transmitted to your brain.

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly what you mean. But you could simulate that

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>signal without the photon, right, you create that same signal

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and the optic nerve somehow without the photon, sort of

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the matrix style. You can experience that color without a photon,

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of that energy actually arriving on your optic nerve, and

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it tells you that. Like we say, photons have color,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 1>we call them red photons or blue photons, but that's

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>not really accurate. The photons themselves don't have a color.

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>The color is in your mind. The photons have an

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>energy to have a frequency, to have a wavelength. The

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>color is just like your experience of the photon.

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, it's our brains trying to figure out

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 4>what that frequency is. It just that we came up

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.479
<v Speaker 4>with a name for things like, oh, that thirty point

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 4>seven hurts a frequency light, we will call that yellow.

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Why not because we don't have decimal put decimal numbers

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 4>back in the day.

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It's our brain trying to give us what it thinks

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is a useful experience, or what evolution has proven to

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be a useful experience, the way that like touching something

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>hot gives you a painful experience, turns out to be useful.

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Having these different experiences in your mind for these different

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>bands of frequencies turns out to be useful. But what's

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.439
<v Speaker 1>fascinating is the sort of philosophical question of like, where

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>do these experiences themselves come from? And are they the same?

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, you put two people in black and white

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>rooms and raise them without color and describe colors to them.

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Could they come out of that room and identify red

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>versus blue versus green? Or is it purely captured in

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the innate experience and can never be described in any

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>other terms. There are fascinating philosophical questions.

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 4>I think has been proven our brains have evolved to

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 4>react to certain colors in certain ways, right, Like green

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 4>usually has a calming effect, Red has a certain sort

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 4>of anxiety raising effect, right, is that kind of what

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 4>you mean, like our brains are cute to react to

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 4>certain colors or what.

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not familiar with those studies, though imagine it's probably

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is true that there are emotional responses to various colors.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, like the actual experience of the color,

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 1>like the red that you feel in your mind, is

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>just an experience in your mind the way pain is, right,

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Pain is like a reaction to heat, to damage to temperature.

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Red is a reaction to certain frequencies of light hitting you.

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But the light itself is not red the way they

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like the heat from the burner is not actually literally painful.

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>The pain is part of your experience of it.

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I guess. But I feel like maybe we're

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 4>sort of maybe confusing things by trying to get to philosophical.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 4>It's basically just your brain trying to detect what's happening

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 4>in the world, right.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's your brain's interpretation of these signals, And you're right,

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Getting philosophical does always confuse things because you end up

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with questions you can't answer and you don't know if

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they actually teach you anything.

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 4>So then let's get back to this topic of it,

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe that there's a color that's impossible for us to

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 4>see or to make. We're both.

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a few decades ago a theory developed about how

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we experience color. It's actually slightly more complicated and actually

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>slightly simpler than what we just described. Instead of imagining

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that you get like three signals red, green, and blue

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>actually the way.

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 4>But I guess maybe just from a very basic level,

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 4>of course, our colors we can see, like we can't

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 4>see light up up on the infrared, and we can't

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 4>see light down or up in the ultraviolet. Right, Like,

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 4>there's a whole range of light frigans, these infinite range

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 4>of light frequencies that we there our eyes just don't detect,

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 4>like they just go through our eyes or they hit

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 4>our eyes and don't activate it, right.

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, there are lots of frequencies of light that

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>don't generate in a signal. I don't know if those

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>frequencies of light have a color though, right, color is

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just our experience, and so you just don't assign a

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 1>color to those frequencies. So there are frequencies we cannot see.

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if those frequencies have color.

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 4>What would you call a color. Is it like if

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 4>we have like a visual spectrum, right, Like, there's a

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 4>range of frequencies that our eyes can detect, and so

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 4>let's call color the light that is within that range,

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 4>the frequency of the light within that range.

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say color is our response to frequencies

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of light within that range.

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I mean that sounds like an arbitrary definition. I

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 4>could also just posit colors the frequency of the light

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 4>that we can see.

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So that all works really well if you think about

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>individual frequencies of light, it all makes sense. But you know,

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>we never see individual frequencies. You we see a mixture.

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>You see a little bit of this frequency, a little

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of that frequency. And once we start thinking about

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>mixtures of frequencies, things get more complicated. And actually a

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>different theory of how we experience color emerged a few

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>decades ago. It's called opposing neuron theory. It says, instead

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of having like a three dimensional space RGB red, green,

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and blue, one for each of these different kinds of cones,

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>actually we only really have two because we have opposing neurons.

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>That we have neurons that fire more when light is

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>red and less when it's green. And we have another one,

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a blue versus yellow one that fires more when things

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>are yellow and less when things are blue. So instead

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of having like three dimensional information, our nerves have figured

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>out a way to incorporate this in just two dimensions,

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like a green versus red axis and a blue versus

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>yellow axis. It's still pulled out of the same cones,

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's a little bit of processing there to convert

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it into this red versus green and blue versus yellow.

0:39:57.360 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 4>I think you're talking about what happens after it hits

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.439
<v Speaker 4>your optic nerve and maybe after it goes up into

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 4>your like visual cortex, right, you're talking about like, you know,

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 4>maybe your brain or evolution said, you know, maybe we

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 4>don't need three signals to figure out what color thing

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 4>the banana is or whether that's a spotted leopard or not. Like,

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe we can just instead of having three variables, maybe

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 4>we can just do with two variables, and maybe that's

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 4>more efficient and faster and just enough to survive.

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. I'm not exactly sure where this happens, and

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know where the brain technically ends and the optic

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 1>nerve begins. But yeah, this is part of the process

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that happens in your brain. This is opposing neuron theory,

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and that means something really interesting because it means there's

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a loss of information, and it

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>means that there are some colors which now cannot be

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>described in this two dimensional plane. For example, a mixture

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.959
<v Speaker 1>of green and red. You have this one opposing neuron

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to fire more if it's red and

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>less if it's green. What does it do if you

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>send it red and green? Right? Does it fire more

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>for the red and fire less for the green. It's

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>an ore system. It can tell you whether this light

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is red or it's green. There's no response that that

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>neuron can make that says I see red and green.

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 4>Wouldn't it fire like somewhere in between? Like neurons and

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 4>code things by the frequency of which they, you know,

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 4>send signals right, like little like Morse codes. So if

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 4>it's like doing red and for green, wouldn't like a

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 4>mixture give you something in between?

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You can see a color that's between red and green,

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but you can't see like intense red and green simultaneously.

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh, you're talking about the intensity of things, not like

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 4>which frequencies are present.

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It's also true if this is fairly dim. But what

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you can see is a color between red and green. Right,

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>If you see like something on the spectrum that's between

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>red and green, it's like a yellow, then you can

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>see that, and the response of the neuron will be

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>between its response for red and for green. If you

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>shine pure green and pure red on it, it's supposed to

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>both trigger it and inhibit it, and it doesn't know

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>how to communicate that there's no place on its response

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that means green and red.

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Now, as you said, this is a theory, is like,

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 4>are there experiments back it up? Or like do we

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 4>know where in the brain this this happening?

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't know where in the brain this is happening.

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's a controversial set of experiments. People were like,

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>is it possible to see these things? What happens if

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you put like strips of color near each other and

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.919
<v Speaker 1>ask people to like focus on the line between them.

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>So they have these experiments that they'd originally in the

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>eighties where they put like strips of blue and strips

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of yellow next to each other, or strips of red

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and strips of green next to each other, and ask like,

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you experience? Right, at the edge, you know,

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>where you're seeing like red and green at the same time.

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's this paper in eighties by these two guys,

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Crane and the Piantanita, and they claim to see these

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>impossible colors. They ask people to describe what color they

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>were seeing at the boundary and it was like indescribable.

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And so this paper was really controversial for a long time.

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:59.919
<v Speaker 1>And then there were experiments two decades later at Dart

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 1>in the mid two thousands that sort of disputed these

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>results and said, like maybe people are just seeing sort

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 1>of like an intermediate color. They're not simultaneously experiencing what

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>happens when you have red and green photons. It's just

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of like hard to describe. So this controversy in

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the literature about whether this theory is right. There are

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 1>other theories of how we experience color and whether it's

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:24.919
<v Speaker 1>possible to see these colors in some way.

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 4>So what do you mean by impossible colors? You're talking

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 4>about like combinations of color that we can experience.

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly that maybe.

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Our optic nerves are picking up because they're definitely picking

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 4>up something, but we just because of the way that

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 4>our brains have maybe streamlined and gotten rid of certain

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 4>information that doesn't think it needs. Now we have kind

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 4>of blind spots in the color spectrum.

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And I read a really fascinating paper that

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>suggested you might be able to experience this if you

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>can come up with a way to like differently trigger

0:43:57.560 --> 0:43:59.959
<v Speaker 1>different parts of your optic nerve. Like if you could

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we get some of these opposing neurons to respond to

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the green light and some of them to respond to

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the red light, then instead of all sending the same signal,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd have some sending the green signal and some sending

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the red signal, both intensely, and then maybe your brain

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>would know how to interpret that, and we'd give you

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this experience of this red green combination. That's one theory,

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And people argue, like, maybe that's what was happening in

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the eighty three experiments, that they somehow like parts of it.

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:28.439
<v Speaker 1>We're triggering this part of your nerve and other parts

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are experiencing other parts.

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 8>Of the nerve.

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's about these mixtures of colors that we

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>can't see. We can see all the pure colors, but

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.320
<v Speaker 1>these mixtures of colors we can't see.

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I guess you would see them, you just wouldn't

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 4>be able to maybe tell them apart from some of

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 4>the primary colors.

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps this is novel color, which is a mixture of

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>these two which we do not have an experience of

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>because we think that the sensory mechanisms and the optical

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>nerve processing can't carry the information to describe it. The

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 1>loss of information means there's no way to encode it,

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>basically those signals.

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Now, do these impossible colors have a specific frequency or

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 4>would you call it a different color because it's a

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 4>mix of different frequencies.

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's see, that's fascinating because we think about color

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>as associated with the frequency spectrum, right, and so pure

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>frequencies we think of as pure colors, and that makes sense.

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>But here we're talking about combinations of different frequencies, like

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>shooting red and green photons or blue and yellow photons

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>at you at the same time. And so that's why

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's helpful to separate the question of frequency

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and color, because color is what you experience in your mind,

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's not always connected to just one frequency like

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this red green color, whatever it is that would be

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>an experience in your mind. Your brain's interpretation of seeing

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>both red frequency photons and green frequency photons at the

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 1>same time. You wouldn't experience red, or you wouldn't experience green,

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd experience some red green thing we don't have a

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 1>word for.

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:57.720
<v Speaker 4>I guess it kind of goes back to the question

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 4>of like what is yellow? Like, if we have sensors

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 4>that the tech red, blue, and green, what is yellow?

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you just think about the spectrum, right, yellow

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is the color that triggers the green and the red

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>about the same amount and doesn't trigger the blue.

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 4>Like, there's a specific frequency that will do that, right,

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 4>I imagine, mm hmm. And now you could call that

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 4>frequency yellow. But you can also kind of fool the

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 4>eye into thinking of yellow by mixing frequencies. That's kind

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 4>of what your TV and your phone screen do.

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there is a specific frequency range that we know

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>triggers the experience of yellow in your minds five hundred

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and seventy to five and eighty and animeters. Absolutely, And

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the same way that there's like a cyan

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's a purple. You don't have a special cone

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for these things. There are brain creating an experience for

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>this whole range of possible signals that it's getting.

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Right, and you can sort of fool it into thinking

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 4>of yellow by mixing frequencies, right, I mean, like in

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 4>your TV or your phone screen, there's only like three

0:46:56.520 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 4>kinds of LEDs in it, right, There's red, green, yellow, ones.

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 4>And so when you look at something yell on your phone,

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:05.320
<v Speaker 4>it's not actually shooting yellow light. You're shooting some combination

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:08.839
<v Speaker 4>of red, blue, and green that's making your brain think

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 4>it's yellow. But there's also a frequency that wouldn't trigger

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 4>that same Oh that's yellow. Anyways. The point is that

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:18.879
<v Speaker 4>there are combinations of frequencies that maybe our brains are

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 4>not designed to like trigger your consciousness of them.

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. There should be a unique experience for those combinations,

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:30.240
<v Speaker 1>but the brain has nobody interpret it because it doesn't

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 1>get a unique signal for those combinations. So Raven like

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>developed a unique experience.

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 4>It's like you're blind to those colors kind of mmmm, yeah,

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 4>like it just looks red to you. You're like Stanford, Harvard,

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the Irvine. I don't know, mm, it could be any athlete.

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.680
<v Speaker 1>There's two other sort of ways to think about impossible

0:47:48.719 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 1>colors as well. There are colors that can't be generated

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>by any physical source. And then there's these things they

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>called chimerical colors.

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, all right, let's get into those possible to make

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 4>colors and dig into what that means. But first, let's

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 4>take another quick break.

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>When you pop a piece of cheese into your mouth,

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>or enjoy a rich spoonful of Greek yogurt, you're probably

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not thinking about the environmental impact of each and every bite.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>But the people in the dairy industry are. US Dairy

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:25.799
<v Speaker 1>has set themselves some ambitious sustainability goals, including being greenhouse

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:28.399
<v Speaker 1>gas neutral by twenty to fifty That's why they're working

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:30.760
<v Speaker 1>hard every day to find new ways to reduce waste,

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>conserve natural resources, and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. Take water,

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, most dairy farms reuse water up to four times.

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>The same water cools the milk, cleans equipment, washes the barn,

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and irrigates the crops. How is US dairy tackling greenhouse gases?

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Many farms use anaerobic digestors that turn the methane from

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>maneure into renewable energy that can power farms, towns, and

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 1>electric cars. So the next time you grab a slice

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of pizza or lick an ice cream cone. Know that

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.279
<v Speaker 1>dairy farmers and processors around the country are using the

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>latest practic and innovations to provide the nutrient deents dairy

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 1>products we love with less of an impact. Visit us

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:08.399
<v Speaker 1>dairy dot com slash sustainability to learn more.

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 8>There are children, friends, and families walking, riding on paths

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.439
<v Speaker 8>and roads every day. Remember they're real people with loved

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 8>ones who need them to get home safely. Protect our

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 8>cyclists and pedestrians because they're people too. Go safely California

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 8>from the California Office of Traffic Safety and Caltrans.

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:26.880
<v Speaker 10>Hey their fellow globetrotters and destination dreamers. If you're anything

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 10>like us, you'd note that life's too short for boring

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 10>toasters and towels. That's why we decided to ditch the

0:49:31.880 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 10>traditional wedding registry and went with honeyfund dot com. Imagine

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 10>your friends and family chipping in to send you on

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:42.280
<v Speaker 10>a dreamy, exotic honeymoon. Practical check, meaningful, double check. Plus,

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 10>it's fee free and so fun for wedding guests to shop.

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:48.879
<v Speaker 10>So why get more stuff when you can have unforgettable experiences?

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 10>Join the revolution at honey fund dot com and start

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:53.720
<v Speaker 10>your adventure today.

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:58.240
<v Speaker 11>Whether you like fresh faced, full glam, or somewhere in between.

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:02.920
<v Speaker 11>You've probably seen Thri Cosmetics viral tubing mascara, you know,

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 11>the one in the turquoise tube all over your socials.

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 11>It's easy to see why their best sellers have thousands

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 11>of five star reviews. I love their high performance formulas.

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 11>The Brilliant Eye Brightener is one of my faves, and

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 11>I love it because it's so versatile. You can use

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 11>it as a highlighter or an eyeshadow. It's amazing. Refresh

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 11>your everyday look with Thrive Cosmetics Beauty that gives back.

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 12>Right now, you can get an exclusive twenty percent off

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:35.800
<v Speaker 12>your first order at Thrivecosmetics dot com slash nine o

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 12>two one oh. That's Thrive Cosmetics d A U S

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 12>E M E T I c S dot com slash

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 12>nine oh two one oh for twenty percent off your

0:50:47.320 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 12>first order.

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 4>Are we getting very colorful today? Looking at all of

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 4>the rainbow of ideas around the concept of color and

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 4>how we perceive it and what is a color anyway?

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 4>And what color is your been in it? As well?

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that's a personal question, man.

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Whoa well, you just got really really purple there. I

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 4>wasn't even thinking about that. I see what's on your mind.

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Daniel m lunch.

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's even racier.

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's steer back to physics.

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 4>But we talked about how maybe there are combinations the

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 4>frequencies of light that we can't see, because really color

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 4>is our experience of how light hits her eye and

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 4>sometimes sets of specific frequency. Maybe that's sometimes that's a

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 4>combination or the absence of certain frequencies. So color is

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 4>a complicated thing. But there are maybe combinations of frequencies

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:50.320
<v Speaker 4>that we our brains are just not equipped to deteg

0:51:50.520 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 4>unless maybe you're maybe trained to see them, or maybe

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:55.720
<v Speaker 4>you're one of these people born with extra sensors.

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, it could be. And in the end, we

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what other people experience. We can just ask

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>them to compare previous experience to current experience or to

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 1>some references, but we can't cross correlate across brains. We

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:11.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to extract from inside the brain the

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>actual encoding of these things and interpret it in any

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of objective way map from one brain to another.

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 1>In the end, it's frustrating, but we can't try to

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>reverse engineer the system and think about ways to experience

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:28.399
<v Speaker 1>like weird colors or things that we can't experience. That's

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. And the system, the way it works,

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 1>because it has these overlapping responses, also creates these things

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:38.840
<v Speaker 1>called imaginary colors, colors not that we can't experience, but

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that no physical source could generate.

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, I think that's a question that I had

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 4>from the beginning. Are there colors that are impossible to make?

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 4>But I guess to be clear, all colors are possible

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:52.919
<v Speaker 4>in the universe, right, Like you can always stretch light

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 4>to be a certain color infinitely with infinite precision in

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 4>the universe.

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yes, all frequencies of light can exist out there

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:03.719
<v Speaker 1>in the universe. But remember color is our experience in

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the mind, and it's this interpretation of these red, green,

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and blue cones and then perhaps through these opposing neurons.

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.880
<v Speaker 1>But because those things overlap, there's a question of like

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>what would happen if you only triggered the green neuron.

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the green neuron and the red neuron are

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:22.800
<v Speaker 1>almost overlapping, they're almost identical, like there's a very small

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>shift between them. So any physical photon that hits your eyeball,

0:53:27.200 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that triggers the green is very likely going to trigger

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>also some red ones. So you shoot like pure green

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>light at somebody's eyeball, some of those red cones are

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>also going to get triggered.

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Right because I think what we said before is that

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 4>our cones are not perfect, right, Like, they don't just

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 4>respond to one frequency. They respond to a range of frequencies,

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 4>and in our eyes, those ranges kind of overlap, So

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 4>there's some frequencies that will activate both.

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and the red and the green in particular are

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 1>very close to each other. They respond almost the same

0:53:56.640 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>way to different frequencies, and so like if you shoot

0:53:59.560 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>something right in the middle of the green, then the

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>green cone is always going to respond, and the red

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:05.760
<v Speaker 1>cone is going to respond like ninety percent of the time.

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>The blue is like further shifted down. But it makes

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you wonder, like what would happen if you could somehow

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just tweak the cones. Don't worry about the light you're

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:17.800
<v Speaker 1>shooting at it, just somehow get only the green cone

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to respond without the red cone responding.

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Like what would happen? In your brain?

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they call this hyper green, like the greeniest green

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that you could experience without any pollution from the red.

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:33.360
<v Speaker 1>In reality, it's essentially impossible to generate this using photons

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:37.360
<v Speaker 1>because all these photons will also stimulate that red cone.

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh you're talking about like it's an impossible experience of

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:41.360
<v Speaker 4>that color.

0:54:41.480 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that it's impossible. Like technically, if I

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 1>attached little electrodes to all the nerves behind the green

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 1>cones and stimulated them, then you would have this experience.

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But I can't create a photon that would do the

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 1>same thing.

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 4>You mean, like you can't create a photon that will

0:54:56.760 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 4>ignore the red cones, yeah, and only hit the green

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.880
<v Speaker 4>cone exactly well as you can somehow aim them really well.

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, super precise lasers in the back of your

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>eye to only hit those green cones. So it's possible, then, well,

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we think it's possible for it to happen. It's just

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that there isn't a physical source we could make that

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:17.359
<v Speaker 1>can do that yet. But that's the experience of hyper green.

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Right right, And it's probably the color of like mountain

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 4>dew or like if you took a green highlighter and

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:27.320
<v Speaker 4>like paint this ear the back of your eyeball.

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so those are imaginary colors. Then there's another really

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:35.279
<v Speaker 1>fun kind of color that you actually can experience.

0:55:35.360 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 4>But I mean it's not just green, right, and it's

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 4>like all of them right, Like, it's probably possible to

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 4>create a hyper blue or a hyper red.

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. It's trickier with green and red because those

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 1>two response curves are basically on top of each other,

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's harder to separate. Blue is further away, so

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's possible to experience a purer blue than it is

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:58.040
<v Speaker 1>red or green. But in principle, yes, these same things

0:55:58.040 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 1>are true. Even blue photons will state a fraction of

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the green and red cones.

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:06.879
<v Speaker 4>All right, So that's one kind of impossible color. You said,

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 4>there's another kind.

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 1>There's another category. These are called chimerical colors. These are

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>colors you experience if you change the way that your

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:19.400
<v Speaker 1>cones respond. Remember, these are little biological machines, and they

0:56:19.440 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can sort of get tired. You know that if you

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 1>look at a really bright light and then look away,

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, you still see it, right, that's because your

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:29.719
<v Speaker 1>cones are tired and they're responding differently. Now there's something

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like residual effect there. So for example, if you stare

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at like really bright yellow light, it sort tires out

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:39.239
<v Speaker 1>these opposing neurons. Then if you close your eye or

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at something really really black, then you see

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this blue response. There's no blue there. You're seeing a

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 1>reaction to tiring out your blue yellow neurons. And so

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:53.399
<v Speaker 1>what you see is this super dark blue, this blue

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that you otherwise could not experience because to experience it,

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd need to receive a bunch of blue photons and

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that would make it bright. So you see this like

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:03.160
<v Speaker 1>impossibly dark blue.

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:06.759
<v Speaker 4>WHOA, But couldn't you just sit in a dark room

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 4>and shoot blue photons at my eyeball?

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>You could do that, but then receiving those photons would

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 1>create an experience of a brighter blue, and if you

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 1>dial it down eventually you just wouldn't see anything. You

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>just see black. So this is like a blue you

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 1>can experience without receiving any photons.

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:23.959
<v Speaker 4>Right, because you're basically doing the same thing as these

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 4>imaginary colors. Right, you're sort of like knocking out your

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 4>perception of certain rots and cones, right exactly.

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is actually pretty easy to do. You just

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>go to like Wikipedia and google chimerical colors. They have

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:39.200
<v Speaker 1>these templates, and you like staring yellow dot and then

0:57:39.320 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>look at a black field and you can see this

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>blue which is different from just like a really really

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:46.520
<v Speaker 1>dark blue. It's fascinating. It's called sticky and blue.

0:57:47.040 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Whoa, it's wild to think that, Like, if I'm just

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 4>staring at something yellow, like my brain and my eyeballs

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 4>and brains are constantly going yellow yellow, yellow, yell ye yellow,

0:57:56.520 --> 0:58:00.040
<v Speaker 4>and eventually just like I give up, forget it.

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, then they're tired, and then the blue wind's out right,

0:58:04.560 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and then they're sort of like leaning over their biased

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 1>against it. They're like exhausted the yell. They're like, don't

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 1>show me any more yellow. We're leaning blue for a while,

0:58:11.800 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're basically sending you blue information even though there's

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing there. And so because there's no brightness to it,

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but you're getting blue, your brain is like, well, I

0:58:20.360 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 1>got to give you something blue, but there's no brightness there,

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So what do we do. Let's make the darkest blue

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we can. So it's a very deep blue.

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Does that mean that if I stare at a banana

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 4>long enough, it'll eventually look blue?

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it means if you stare banana long enough

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and close your eyes, you'll see an impossibly blue banana.

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 4>I guess you won't see it because you won't be

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 4>like experiencing photons from the banana. It'll be like sort

0:58:43.320 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 4>of this lingering memory in your visual cortex of a

0:58:46.960 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 4>blue banana.

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you'll be experiencing a deep blue banana even though

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not getting blue photons from the banana.

0:58:53.000 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 4>From the banana, yeah, yeah, I guess it's all because

0:58:57.760 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 4>we have this kind of flawed by logic machinery that's

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 4>trying to interpret with the frequencies that we see in

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 4>the world, but maybe through evolution, it's done it in

0:59:06.040 --> 0:59:08.280
<v Speaker 4>a weird way where you have these weird effects right

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 4>where we can see certain combinations or you know, we

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:13.480
<v Speaker 4>see residual colors.

0:59:13.760 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all of these colors in the end are brain's

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of these signals, signals that are typically generated by

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this experience or that experience facts. For the corners of

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this and the limitations of it, we can try to

0:59:25.280 --> 0:59:27.880
<v Speaker 1>get some understanding of what it means to see color,

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>what it tells us about what's happening out there in

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe.

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Because I guess, you know, as physicists or as scientists

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 4>we can think about all the different frequencies of light.

0:59:37.000 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 4>But maybe if you're like a simple creature, you don't

0:59:39.800 --> 0:59:41.680
<v Speaker 4>need to know all that information, Like you don't need

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:44.200
<v Speaker 4>to know whether something's ten point seven herds. You just

0:59:44.240 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 4>need to know, like, is this thing going to eat

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:48.480
<v Speaker 4>me or not? That's in front of me? Is it red?

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Is it the red kind that's going to eat me?

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Or is it the blue kind that's going to not

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 4>eat me?

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Exactly. And that's why some bees can see into

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the ultra violet because they have to despot the right

0:59:57.200 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of flower. For example. That's probably why mantis have

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>super impressive hardware for ultra fast processing of this color

1:00:03.960 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and then like mostly waste that information because they don't

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>really need to know specifically, they just needed fast processing.

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Now, if a manta shrimp looked at a banana, would

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 4>it think it's a banana?

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>That's another philosophy paper I want to.

1:00:16.840 --> 1:00:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Write over to think, Oh, that's a nice digim blue banana.

1:00:21.680 --> 1:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>What is it like to be a manta strip eating

1:00:23.440 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a banana?

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Nobody knows that's the right feel. I'm pretty sure nobody

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 4>has published that paper.

1:00:30.760 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get on it, all right.

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, the interesting discussion here about what color is and

1:00:38.240 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 4>what we can perceive when you know it has a

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:45.120
<v Speaker 4>physical basis, but our brains the way it's evolved. Don't

1:00:45.160 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 4>experience maybe the world the way physics has built it.

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's important to remember that our experience in the

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>universe is always one step divorced from the reality of

1:00:54.160 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe, which is, in the end, our interpretation of

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a model we are building in our brain. Are a

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>direct experience is what we actually can count on. Everything

1:01:03.120 --> 1:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>else is our interpretation.

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and if that makes you red with anger or

1:01:07.600 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 4>blue with sadness, just close your eyes, don't yellow at us. Yeah,

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:16.360
<v Speaker 4>imagine a more beautiful universe of colors. All right, Well,

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:18.960
<v Speaker 4>we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us. See

1:01:19.000 --> 1:01:19.560
<v Speaker 4>you next time.

1:01:24.360 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>For more science and curiosity, come find us on social

1:01:27.240 --> 1:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Discorg, Instant,

1:01:32.280 --> 1:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel

1:01:36.000 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.

1:01:39.720 --> 1:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. When you

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>pop a piece of cheese into your mouth, You're probably

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not thinking about the environmental impact. But the people in

1:01:57.520 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the dairy industry are. That's why they're working hard every

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>day to find new ways to reduce waste, conserve natural resources,

1:02:04.040 --> 1:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and drive down greenhouse gas emissions. How is us dairy

1:02:07.680 --> 1:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>tackling greenhouse gases? Many farms use anaerobic digestors to turn

1:02:11.840 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the methane from manure into renewable energy that can power farms, towns,

1:02:16.360 --> 1:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and electric cars. Visit you as dairy dot COM's Last

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Sustainability to learn more.

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>As a United Explorer Card member, you can earn fifty

1:02:24.520 --> 1:02:28.440
<v Speaker 3>thousand bonus miles plus look forward to extraordinary travel rewards,

1:02:28.520 --> 1:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>including a free checked bag, two times the miles on

1:02:31.120 --> 1:02:33.800
<v Speaker 3>United purchases and two times the miles on dining and

1:02:33.840 --> 1:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>at hotels. Become an Explorer and seek out unforgettable places

1:02:37.160 --> 1:02:40.600
<v Speaker 3>while enjoying rewards everywhere you travel. Cards issued by JP

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Morgan Chase Bank NA Member FDIC subject to credit approval offer,

1:02:44.760 --> 1:02:45.720
<v Speaker 3>subject to change.

1:02:45.840 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Terms apply.

1:02:47.080 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 11>You know when you're living your life and then all

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 11>of a sudden, you're out there helping comps solve crimes.

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 4>ABC Tuesday, I have an IQ of one sixty.

1:02:54.760 --> 1:02:56.840
<v Speaker 7>I spot things and detectives miss.

1:02:56.680 --> 1:03:00.480
<v Speaker 10>The series premiere of falls most anticipated new drama, Hype Potential.

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:01.760
<v Speaker 9>That big brain of hers.

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:03.440
<v Speaker 7>Is going to help us close out a lot of cases.

1:03:03.640 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Caitlin Olsen is the new face of investigation.

1:03:06.520 --> 1:03:08.280
<v Speaker 7>You're a single mom pretending to be a god.

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I am not pretending.

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:12.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm just out here super copping. High Potential.

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:16.040
<v Speaker 8>Series premiere Tuesday, ten ninth Central on ABC and stream

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:16.680
<v Speaker 8>on Hulu