WEBVTT - Tech News: Robots Can Be Scary

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and a love of all things tech. And this is

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the tech News episode for Tuesday, March twenty one. Now,

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>last week we had an episode that really went into

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>how various companies and organizations are tracking you. But don't worry,

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>We're only gonna do that a little bit in today's episode. So,

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>which app do you think is the most invasive? TikTok? Nope,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>not that one. YouTube, Nope, Facebook, you're getting warmer. But

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>according to the cloud storage company p Cloud, the actual

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is Instagram, So we're still in the Facebook family.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense, right, that tracks The company came to

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>this conclusion after reviewing updated app privacy labels. See not

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that long ago. Apple updated its privacy policy and it

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>now requires companies to more thoroughly list out the ways

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in which those companies collect and use data through these apps.

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is one of the reasons why it took

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Google a long time to update the company's apps on iOS.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Because it should come as a surprise to no one

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that Google is collecting a lot of user information. Well,

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the same appears to be true of Instagram, only more so.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>According to p Cloud, Instagram collects nearly eighty percent of

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>users personal data, including stuff like search history, location, financial

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>information like what bank do you use, where do you

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>shop that kind of thing, plus who your contacts are,

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram shares that information with various third parties who

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>presumably are paying a decent price for that level of access. Now,

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this is how companies like Facebook, which by the way,

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>was in second place behind Instagram, It's how they can

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>market you to various advertisers. The more these companies know

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about each user, the more they can target that user

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>with specific ads. They can match that user up with advertisers,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and being able to go to advertisers with the message

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that hey, our app is going to put your ads

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in front of the people who are most likely to

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>act on those ads. That's a powerful selling point. We

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are well beyond the old days where you might, as

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>part of your marketing strategy, really rely on putting up

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a billboard in a prominent location in town and hope

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you get as many eyeballs as possible. Now we have

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>companies identifying which eyeballs are the most valuable to any

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.839
<v Speaker 1>given client, and then sending those ads that way. Now,

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>what's the moral of this story, Well, it's that we

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>should all be aware of how apps are collecting our information,

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>how we are providing data to these apps. If we're

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>okay with that, no worries, right, I mean, it's this

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is a personal thing. But if we're not okay with that,

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to consider if those apps are really something

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to use, because there's not really an easy

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>way for us to go in and cherry pick which

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>points of data can and cannot be used by any

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>given app. I mean, just doing that alone would become

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a full time job. Now, in the interest of full disclosure,

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I have Instagram on my phone, So I say this

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as someone who is both aware that the app is

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>collecting a lot of data and still is using that app.

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those people. But I am also very

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>very boring. So my hope is that Facebook is not

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>getting very much money at all for my information, because

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>come on, I'm lame. According to the Korea Herald, the

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>giant tech company l G is now considering just shutting

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>down its smartphone division entirely. You might remember that. Earlier

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>this year, LG announced that it was looking into the

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>possibility of selling off its smartphone division to some other

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>company and just getting out of the smartphone game. Now

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>apparently no suitable parties have made an offer to LGS liking,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 1>so the company may just shut down that division entirely

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and then try to cut its losses. And LG has

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>been experiencing losses through its smartphone division. While LG is

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the third largest smartphone maker behind Apple and Samsung, at

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>least according to market share that is from a counterpoint research.

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Depending on which analysts you look at, you get different

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers for these things. Anyway, despite being a big are

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in the smartphone space, the division has been operating at

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a loss for several years in a row. In fact,

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>according to the website gives China, l G has lost

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>four point four three billion dollars total and has had

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a loss at the end of every single one of

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty three consecutive quarters. This is a pretty

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>big deal. LG had even made a pretty big splash

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>this year earlier at CS with the reveal of the

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 1>rollable smartphone, a smartphone that can actually change screen sizes

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>dynamically because it uses a flexible oh LED display that

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>can unroll as it expands, and it also shows that

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone business is a really tough one to be in.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Development costs are really high. It's a huge challenge to

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>stand out when you've got so many different smartphone companies

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>and models that are all on the market, you know,

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're all competing for the same customers, and the

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>challenge to price units so that they are competitive in

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>such a dense field. So not a huge surprise. It

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the end of an era with LG

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>getting out because LG has played such a big part

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in smartphones. Atlas VPN released a report stating that in

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, there was a one thousand, nine two percent

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>increase in development of malware aimed at the Mac operating system. Now,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>percentages are tricky things, right, because it doesn't actually tell

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you the total numbers. If only one instance of Mac

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>OS malware had happened in twenty nineteen, that would just

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>mean that there were one thousand, ninety two of them

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, and that number is dwarfed by the

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>number of incidents you would expect for Windows based operating systems,

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, the report found evidence of six

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventy four thousand, two hundred seventy three news samples

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of malware for the MA cos. Still that's nothing. I mean,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>half a million is a lot, so it's not nothing,

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's not the same as what you see for Windows.

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's orders of magnitude bigger with Windows. So I just

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear because I don't want people saying

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>my anti Mac bias is coming into play. The same

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>group that is Atlas VbN found ninety one oh five

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>million new Windows malware samples. Now that means that Windows

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>would rack up as many examples of malware new malware

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in just three days as Mac had for the entire

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>year of twenty Still, this is a reminder that Mac

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>computers are not magically immune to malware. I'm not actually

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sure what the perception is these days, but when I

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>got started in podcasting, there was this kind of general

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>belief among the public that Mac computers were effectively malware proof.

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And there was, you know, some truth to that, but

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not because the Mac operating system was just magically better

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>than Windows. It had more to do with opportunity. Because

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>if you are someone who's developing malware you probably want

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that malware to hit as many targets as possible, and

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the market share of Windows versus Mac os machines was

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>really out of whack. It just made more sense to

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>develop malware targeting PCs because there were way more PC

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>users out there. But we've seen a rise in instances

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of Mac based malware over the past few years and

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a solid reminder that there is no bulletproof operating

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>system out there, and no matter what type of machine

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we used to access files and the Internet, we need

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be wary of malware. And now we transition to

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a segment I like to call robots are scary and

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they can be over In the UK, the Defense Secretary

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Ben Wallace said that Britain's mill terry will be able

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to achieve a greater effect with fewer actual soldiers in

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the future thanks to technology, and part of that involves

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>drones now. The established strength of the UK Army in

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the mid two thousands was set at eighty two thousand troops.

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>UH This includes all people who have received basic training

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and then a secondary specialized training to focus on a

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>particular role or area of expertise. Today, the army has

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy six thousand, five hundred personnel, including seventy six thousand,

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>three hundred fifty soldiers. Wallace's plans would reduce this number

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to seventy two five hundred by five. At the same time,

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the defense budget in the UK is to increase by

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four billion pounds over the next four years, So

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the question is where is that money going if the

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 1>army is actually scaling back on the number of soldiers

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>that will be part of the army. Well, big part

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:59.239
<v Speaker 1>of it is automated systems and drones, including replacing existing

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Reaper drones with Protector drones. That is a little bit

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>confusing to some folks, I'm sure, because both the Reaper

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Protector are themselves variants of the Predator B

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>class drone. Other big expenses include establishing a national cyber force,

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>building out a digital backbone for the purposes of rapid

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>data sharing, and the development of a future combat air system.

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Technology is going to play a much bigger role, and

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in theory it will reduce the need to have as

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>many human soldiers as are currently in service in the UK,

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so at least some of that responsibility will fall to

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>technology and the operators who are in charge of it,

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:54.239
<v Speaker 1>including the drones, which, by the way, are pretty terrifying things. Meanwhile,

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on this side of the pond, Ben Callos, a New

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>York City Council member, has raised concerns about the New

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>York Police Force using robots to respond to a hostage

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>situation that took place in the Bronx. The robot in

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>question was a Diggi Dog from Boston Dynamics, and according

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to Ours Technica, Callos reacted with horror seeing this robot

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in use, which then prompted him to propose a ban

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on police forces from owning or operating robots that are

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>armed with weaponry. But I do want to be clear

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Digi Doog robot wasn't armed. It was only

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>equipped with surveillance cameras which gave police a view into

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>an area that was considered too dangerous for a human

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>officer to enter. But it wasn't like Diggi Dog was

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>packing heat or anything. Even so, without weapons, the Digi

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Dog still has its critics. The American Civil Liberties Union

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>has asked why the Digi Dog didn't show up on

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a police list of surveillance devices that they use. That's

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem because New York recently passed a law that

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>states law enforcement agencies have to divulge that kind of information.

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Groups like the A c L You are concerned that

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>there aren't proper privacy protections in place that would prevent

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>police from abusing the surveillance power on citizens. I did

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not realize how many words start with P in that sentence. Uh,

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>there were until I actually said it out loud. But

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there have been a lot of people, myself included, who

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have been warning against the use of armed robots because

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>going down that pathway could lead to another type of

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>arms race, and that's one that will undoubtedly lead to

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>tragic consequences, whether by intent or accident. Callis himself isn't

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>totally anti robot. He said that utility robots like the

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>digit dog are not really what he's concerned about. Despite

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that initial, you know, reaction of horror, I guess, nor

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>would he want to see bomb disposal robots get banned either,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But he is concerned about there being a slippery slope.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>The ARS Technica piece at atually quotes the director of

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the Ethics and Emerging Sciences Group at California Polytechnic, and

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>he points out that what is a non lethal robot

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>today could be tweaked and modified and become a lethal

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>robot in the future, and we've already seen what happens

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>when we militarized police forces. To learn more about this,

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend reading the full article on Ours Technica.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>It is titled New York lawmaker wants to ban police

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>use of armed robots. It's by Sydney Fussele, who writes

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for Wired dot com. So, like I said, I found

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the article over at ours Technica. It is extremely well

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>written and well researched, So go check that out. And

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>now let's move to some varying degrees of weird stories.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Our first one is that the final bid for Twitter

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>CEO Jack Dorsey's first tweet has been made. The transaction

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>has happened. Specifically, this was a bid for the n

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>f T or on fungible token version of that tweet. Now.

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I have an episode coming up explaining what n f

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>t s are and how they work. That's going to

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be later this week, but for the purposes of this story,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to boil it down and just say this

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is a way to certify a digital thing as being

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>unique anyway. In this case, the n f t was

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey's first tweet, which reads just setting up my Twitter.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey posted that back on March twenty one, two thousand six.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Back then Twitter had no vowels. I mean, the service

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>would let you use vowels, but the the company didn't

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>use vowels in the name, so it was spelled t

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>W T t R. The winning bid came from Senna Estav,

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO at Bridge Oracle and stiv Or Stav. His

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>winning bid was for two million, nine hundred fifteen thousand,

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred thirty five dollars and forty seven cents, which

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is not a round number and I don't know if

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that number has any special significance. He paid for the

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>tweet using Ether cryptocurrency, and Dorsey took the money, converted

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it to bitcoin, and then donated it to give directly

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a charitable organization that gives money directly to those who

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>needed That two million and such and such dollars ended

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>up being just under fifty one bitcoin. The actual value

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was fifty point eight seven five one six six nine bitcoin,

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's how bitcoin works. Five of the bid actually

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>went to the platform sent that's c E n T.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>That is the platform that hosted the auction pretty wild.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Also wild is that the actor William Shatner, perhaps best

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>known as the original Captain James T. Kirk in the

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek franchise, has turned ninety years old, and he

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>has also spawned an AI version of himself with the

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>help of a company called story File. Now, according to

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of story File, there will be a video

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>version of William Shatner that will not be a deep fake.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It will not be an avatar. In her words, it

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>will be the real Shatner. What that actually means, I

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>guess is up to interpretation. But the idea is that

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this video version of Shatner will be able to interact

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>with people and respond to people, just as William Shatner

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>himself would if he were, you know, doing like a

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>video conference with you. So, in other words, it should

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>be a digital copy of William Shatner, though I have

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>questions about how faithfully the video will recreate the experience

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of actually interacting with the star. Shatner said he wanted

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to create a way that would allow his family and

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>friends to interact with him for all time. The video

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>version should be up and running by May of this year,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and I really, really hope that if you ask it

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>very trivial questions about Star Trek, it will prompt the

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>video Shatner to respond in the same way that the

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>real Shatner did in an old Saturday Night Live sketch

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>in which he appeared as uh if you were a

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>guest at a science fiction convention and he fields increasingly

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>weird questions from a big group of nerdy Star Trek

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fans until he just explodes and yells, get a life,

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>will you people? That's what I want from my Shatner interaction.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll be disappointed if I don't get it. And our

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>final story for today's episode comes as a huge personal

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>challenge for me, but I will do my best to

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>keep things at the standards that we expect for tech stuff.

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>In San Francisco, a couple who founded a company called

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you Biome have now been indicted on multiple fraud charges

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>by the federal government. You Biome was in the how

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do I put this uh fecal matter testing business? Now.

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The pitch was that this startup company would take your

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>sample and then they would run tests on it and

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>determine like your gut health and give recommendations on how

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>to improve your general well being. The only problem, according

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to the charges anyway, is that their methods were totally

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>untested and without evidence, and there was no proof that

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they were even at all effective. In the meantime, the

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>company developed so called clinical tests that they urged medical

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>professionals to give to patients, but these tests, again according

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to the charges, also lacked any sort of actual validation

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or accreditation. The whole purpose of the tests was just

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to create a way for you biom to seek reimbursements

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>from health insurance companies. So essentially, again according to the charges,

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this was about committing a type of insurance fraud if

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>in fact the tests had no validity and had no

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, medical necessity. The story is very similar to

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that of thora nos in that the pitch for it

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds plausible, right a company that you know analyzes poop

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to determine gut health. That seems like that would be

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>achievable in a startup kind of company. But according to

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the charges, the couple fooled an awful lot of people

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the process of trying to get this business going.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a really crappy situation to me. No

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Beans A dun Winton did the thing I said I

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't gonna do anyway. But they also gained praise from

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>various parties, including Gwyneth Paltrow's lifestyle company Goop, which I

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>mean for Goop to praise Poop not a big surprise

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>if you follow Goop. The story of you Bioms should

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>mind everyone that hype can be exciting, but it can

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>also be really hazardous, not just to your investment, but

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>potentially to your health. If you're counting on something that

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually have any medical validity to it, you could

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be making really bad decisions. So before you Biom began

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to fall apart back in twenty nineteen, and it reached

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a valuation of more than half a billion dollars. That

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>is terrible. It tells us that there is there's something

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>seriously broken in the investment tech sector. It's really just

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>enough for you to give them all the stink. I Well,

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that wraps up all the stories for Tuesday March, or

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>at least all the stories I wanted to talk about.

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll be covering more tech news later in the week.

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>If you have any suggestions for topics I should cover

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in episodes of Tech Stuff, let me know. Reach out

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to me on Twitter. The handle for the show is

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>text of H s W and I'll talk to You

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. Y. Text Stuff is an I heart

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.