WEBVTT - To impeach or not to impeach?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Next Question with Katie Curic is a production of I

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio and Katie Kuric Media. Hi everyone, I'm Katie Curic,

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to Next Question, where we try to understand

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the complicated world we're living in and the crazy things

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that are happening by asking questions and by listening to

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>people who really know what they're talking about. At times,

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it may lead to some pretty uncomfortable conversations, but stick

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with me, everyone, let's all learn together. If you've gotten

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>into the habit of scrolling past the NonStop breaking news

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>alerts dominating your notifications, I get it. Headline fatigue is

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>very real. But so many names and titles it's almost

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>impossible to keep them straight, especially when it comes to

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>these latest impeachment hearings. That's why we're dedicating today's episode

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to all things impeachment. We'll talk about the arguments for

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and against, and why the country is almost split down

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the middle. So to impeach or not to impeach? That

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is our next question today. I'm talking with two legal

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>experts who represent two different sides of the debate. First up,

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Neil Cartiel. Neil was the acting Solicitor General under President

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Obama and drafted the Justice Department rules that guided the

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Muller investigation. So yeah, when it comes to investigating government officials,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Neil really knows what he's talking about. Neil welcome. So

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot to talk about. But hot off

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>the presses the US Ambassador to the EU, Gordon Silan's testimony.

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>You've called it every bit the bombshell we expected it

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. Why in your view was his testimony so

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly important because this was the guy that Trump pointed

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to to exonerate him. There's been a whole bunch of

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>characters in this thing, Ambassador Taylor and Colonel Vinman and

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this and that, but there's been one guy throughout that

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has said is going to exonerate him, who

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>even said I hope testifies, but he won't be able

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to testify because he won't get a fair shake in

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the Congress and so on. Well, he did testify today,

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and before he walked in the door, he had a

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty page written statement. And that twenty page written statement

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.119
<v Speaker 1>is remarkable. It says there's a whole section called there

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>was a quid pro quote, which is of course exactly

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>what for many months we've been hearing as the talking

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>point of President Trump and his followers, so much so

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that actually Senator Lindsey Graham, who's one of the president's

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>closest allies in Congress, said last month, well, if there's

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>a quid pro quo then everything is different, then I

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>want to look at it. But otherwise I don't see

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>anything here. Well, today, Trump's own guy, the person that

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump nominated to be the ambassador to the European Union

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and the guy who Trump took and put in control

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of Ukrainian Ukrainian matters, it said, yes, there was a

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>quid pro quote. There's lots of other stuff too, but

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that to me is you know, incredibly significant. That's the

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>high water mark of the Trump defense. Before we talk

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about this testimony some more, were you surprised, Well, I

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't surprised in the sense of a couple of things

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>have happened recently. One is you've had Roger Stone get

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>convicted essentially for obstructing justice in a congressional investigation. So,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think anyone could have seen that.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're solon last weekend and you're watching

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that conviction and thinking to yourself, boy, I've already been

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>accused by at least one member of the House Intelligence

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Committee for committing perjury. Um, and now all these people

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>are coming forward and saying stuff that I didn't say

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in my earlier statements. Yeah, I'm in trouble. So for example,

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he said he was supposed to detail his

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>conversations with the President about Ukraine in his earlier deposition

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on October eight. There's not a word about this phone

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation that he had with President Trump on July and

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>set the one in the restaurant exactly unsecured line on

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a mobile phone. Random. And that's just random. It's a

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>total security threat. I mean, look, I mean when I

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>was in the government, I wouldn't even talk on my

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>home line at home land line because you know, you're

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>always worried about interception. And the idea that you would

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to just sit in a restaurant in Kiev,

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of all places, and not just on a on a

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>hard line, but on a cell phone and talking not

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>just to any government official but the President of the

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>United States is baffling. What's even more baffling, of course, Katie,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is that he forgot about the conversation, like he just

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>mysteriously never mentioned it to the investigator. So do you

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>think he came forward or came clean to save his

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>own hide? Basically, I mean, you couldn't watch any one

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>minute of the hearing today and think anything else. This

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>was a guy who was bent on self preservation. In

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>his opening statement, he said he worked with Rudy Giuliani

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>at the express direction of President Trump on matters involving Ukraine.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So it was almost as if Rudy Giuliani was conducting

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a shadow government here right, Well, he was conducting a

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>shadow a government, but at the president's request, So you know,

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what you know. Sanlon also said, so it wasn't

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>as if this was a circumstance in which it was

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>some rogue private attorney for President Trump who was conducting

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian foreign policy. So can you conduct a shadow government

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>at the president's past. It's like a secondary government. That's

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>very legal and very cool to Trump. But I think

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in the real world, of course, presidents don't do such things. Um.

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>It's an incredibly damaging and dangerous And you know, the

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>reason why Katie I wrote this book Impeach is basically

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that everyone doesn't focus on these little

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>twists and turns every day in this story of you

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>know what Sonlon said one day or what Giuliani said

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>another day. There's like a one central narrative, and it's

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>actually one that the Republicans in President Trump doesn't disagree with.

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.679
<v Speaker 1>And that central narrative which comes out in that July

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in script in which the President himself released between a

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation between him and the President of Ukraine, is the

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>president of Ukraine it's wanting this aid, this military aid.

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>And President Trump says, well, wait, though, I need a

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>favor first. And that is the idea that a president

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>or you know, our nation's most powerful official would use

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>congressionally appropriated aid or a White House meeting in order

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to advance his own political ends. Um, there's nothing I

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think that is a better definition of what is an

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>impeachable offense. Well, let me yea, so help us understand

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this as as the expert you are, professor, Um, you

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>know what laws? Were there actual laws that were broken?

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Even if you think it's grossly inappropriate or just obnoxious

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>or weird or self serving, was there an actual law

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>broken here? Yes, but that's actually not the question when

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you think about impeachment. So there are Constitution and this,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whole chapter about this in my book

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that the our Constitution says you impeach for what are

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>called high crimes and misdemeanors. And that's a phrase of

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>art the founders used, not to mean just actual crimes.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But the core thing that our founders are getting at

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is is there an abuse of government power. And our

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>founders didn't actually even want to put impeachment in the constitution.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Many of them didn't, and um, you know, uh, And

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what one the day was a series of Founders

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Hamilton and others who said, well, what if a president,

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a sitting president, goes and tries to get help from

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a foreign government to win an election. That's their example

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment. Now at the time, that's not criminal. It

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is now actually, and I'll talk about that in a minute.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>By the time, there was no statute I get criminal

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>statute on bribery and the like, but everyone understood that

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a high crime and misdemeanor. Today we actually

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>do have statutes that prohibit bribery, and this is again

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a textbook definition of that. When did that come about?

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The bribery statutes? I think I've been around more than

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years, um, And so they've been they've been

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>around for a long time. And what they do is

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they they criminalize asking for a thing of value in

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>order to get a certain government act. And that's what

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a bribery of any government are conducted by any government official,

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>including the president exactly. So if you seek a bribe,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're the president and said, and the president says, hey, Katie,

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that ambassadorship? Great, you know, if you'll donate

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred thousand dollars to my campaign, Um,

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I will make you ambassador. That is him seeking a

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>thing of value hundred thousand dollars from you in exchange

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for an official act, namely your ambassadorship. And here he

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>did the same thing. Hey Ukraine, I'll give you this money. Um,

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that Congress is appropriated, but you've got to do a

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>favor for me first. Though. Isn't it an implicit understanding

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that big donors become ambassadors? I mean, isn't that kind

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of an unspoken bride. Well, there's a there's a dance,

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a complicated dance that's done if you do it and

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is literally quit pro quo and exchange. It's it's illegal.

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you do it as the way many people do,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you, wink wink, I really appreciate it. There might

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be something really great for you if I get electric.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes wink winks will get to the point of being

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>actually criminal. But for that most part, what you have

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is fairly sophisticated actors in this kind of wealthy ambassadorial circle,

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>of which looks like Sondlon traveled in donating a million dollars.

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not suggesting at all that you know, that

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing happens. You know, someone donates a lot

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and some good plum job comes along for them later.

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>That's very different than this, which is the president himself saying, hey,

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>if you want the foreign aid, you know what you

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>gotta do. You gotta go investigate my chief political rival.

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you think the president pleaded ignorance instead of

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>claiming this call was perfect. Why wouldn't he just say,

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I didn't think this was a problem. Well,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, only he can answer that question. But but

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one point of speculation is this, that call took place

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on July. One day before on July, something pretty significant happened.

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Robert Mueller, who had been investigating the president for almost

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>two years, testified in Congress, and I would say didn't

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>testify particularly clearly. Um, there was a lot of garble

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and so on, and the president, I think, you know,

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and you just it comes across even in this fake transcript.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not a full transcript. We don't know exactly what

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 1>was said, but even just what they released, it really

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>shows kind of a person who has no appreciation for

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law. I mean, we've seen this in

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>other ways, but I think on that day in particular,

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>he was really feeling it explained though, why you think,

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if Muller was sort of garbled and

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't seem to come down that hard on the president, right,

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>why would he have done this? Why would the president

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of that? Because at that moment in time, because it

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>seemed to me that Mueller was sort of wishy washy

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as everyone said. Yeah. So because of that, I think

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the President felt like, Okay, I can do I can

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>do this kind of award by Muller Exactly, I can

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>do this kind of stuff. I mean, Trump's instincts all

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>along have been pretty much to not respect the rule

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of law, to not respect institutions. That pushed back against them,

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to call them never Trumpers or whatever at you know,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>labels he wants to use. So that's always been his

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of m oh. But I think on that day

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular, he must have felt particularly empowered. You know,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting that Salmon said that he really wanted

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the investigation to be announced, almost more than he wanted

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the investigation to take place, which is pretty significant. He

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do the damage and kind of a whisper

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>campaign almost against Joe Biden as he was as he

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>runs for president and against Hunter Biden and suggests this

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of scandal. Katie, I'm so glad you brought that up,

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>because to me, that was one of the most important

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>things in today's testimony. Ambassador Snlon said that what Trump

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted was the announcement of an investigation by the Ukrainians,

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>not them actually doing it. Now, you know, I've been

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>a law enforcement in two different administrations. The idea that

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're conducting a criminal investigation, you would announce it.

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Of course, not that's the last thing you do, because

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to do all the interviewing and all the

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>confidential inquiries first in order to catch people in perjury

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, and so you know, they're the

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>president has been saying this is about corruption, this is

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>why he did this corruption in general. But when drilled

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>down and asked and people say, well, did you ever

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>care about corruption in any other country? There's a hundred

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety four other countries you ever know Ukraine? And with

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>respect to Ukraine, did you ever care about any other

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of corruption besides this one thing? If acting Vice

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>President Biden? No, At some point this starts to smell.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not a particularly powerful story. Let's talk about just

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>because I want this to be impeachment one oh one

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>for people. Um, But before we talk about sort of

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the nuts and bolts of the process. I think that

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>even the suggestion of impropriety by Hunter Biden, you know,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as part of this Ukrainian oil company Barisma. Um, I

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's something that that President Trump is very good

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>at sort of putting things out in the ether and

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of letting it kind of enter people's psyches in

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Layman's terms. Is there any there there, Neil with Hunter Biden? Well,

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>because it does, it does sound a little fun. Yeah. Now,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean in the book, I say, you know, I

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have a whole section about did Hunter Biden and Biden

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>do something wrong. I think you did something, you know,

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>morally wrong, not legally wrong. But the idea that you

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>take a job because of who your dad is, I

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with that. So it's a little sketchy,

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's a little sketchy. I don't think it means

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that you go in launch some secret investigation and hold

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>up congressionally appropriated aid and do all the things that

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the President did. That's you know, even if Biden did

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>something that was let's say, criminal, which I don't think

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone agrees that there there was that on the part

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of the sun And indeed, even Trump's own witness Vulgar

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday testified that I've known Biden for twenty four years

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and he would never do something that would compromise his

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>values to this nation's interests. So, you know, but even

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>if you put all that aside and said, Okay, Trump's right,

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>there was something really bad that was done here that

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>would never justify you going and deputizing your private attorney

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to Rudy Giuliani, to go to another country and to

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>threaten and hold up military aid that our taxpayer dollars

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>have appropriated for the nation's interests and the Ukraine really

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>needs right to protect itself from guess who, Russia. Exactly,

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad you brought that up, because again Trump's

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>witness yesterday, Ambassador Vulcar said exactly that said, look, I'm

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the idea of holding up to say this

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>aid is really important encountering Russian aggression in the region.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So once again we see this thing in which the

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>president is just out doing favors for Russia. Now, I

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that motivated him here. It's probably he

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>had more personal motivations here in terms of a political agenda,

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but it does demonstrate the stakes here in which you

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>have a president who cares more about himself, who cares

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>more about his re election than what the taxpayers and

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Congress have appropriated in the nation's interest. We're going to

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. We'll have more from Neil Cartiel

0:15:49.240 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. Solon said also in his testimony,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone was in the loop, referring to senior administration officials,

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>including Mike Pompeio, the Secretary of State, Vice President Mike

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Penn's acting chief of staff, Nick bolvany Um. So have

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>they been implicated and what might the repercussions be for them.

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these guys aren't going to be impeached. What

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>will happen to them anything? Uh? They I do think

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>things will happen to them. So Solon's testimony today really

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>was a kind of detonation that he basically took the view, Look,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if I'm going down, I'm picking a lot of other

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>people with me. Mulvaney, the acting Chief of Staff, Bolton,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the former National Security Advisor, Um, you know, Pompeio, the

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State, Uh, you know, and the list goes

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>on and on and quit sort of. And and didn't

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>he direct the White House lawyers to be notified about this?

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he clearly felt uncomfortable with this. Correct, that's

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what the reporting says. But you know, I think one

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the hard things about this, Katie, is we don't

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>know because the President has gagged every one of these

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>people from coming forward and telling the truth to the Congress.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you do that? I mean, can't they subpoena these folks?

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>They can, but it's going to take some time in

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the courts. And I think the Democrats have taken the view,

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>which I actually agree with, is they've got enough evidence

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.479
<v Speaker 1>now to impeach and do we want to delay things

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>more and more in the courts. Now, there's gonna be

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a decision coming down in a few days by the

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>d C Court on some privilege issues, and it may

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>open the door for Bolton to testify in his own

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's notable that a lot of the

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>testimony we've heard over the last week, like from Colonel

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Vinman or Ambassador Yanovov Yanevovich and people like that, are

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>all folks have come forward despite the President's gag order

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and said I'm just going to tell the truth and

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>might do that. I think he might, you know, I

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think for the courts decide I do. I mean, at

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, Bolton is a lawyer, um,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know he's far more conservative than I am.

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that in you know, deep in

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>his heart is a respect for the kind of common

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>calling we have as a profession, the idea that you know,

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're a witness to important events, um, you tell

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>them to the American people and let the chips fall

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>where they may. Meanwhile, Ambassador son Land said he never

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>heard directly from President Trump that the military aid was

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>conditioned on an announcement of investigations, saying that assumption was

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>his own personal guests. So is that enough? Well, I

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>mean if he never heard those exact words, Hey, if

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't happen, there won't be foreign aid and ps

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that White House visit will be canceled. If this were

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>the If the case against President Trump was built all

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>around the son Land testimony, I think it certainly wouldn't

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be enough. The problem for Trump is Sonland is not

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the is not the prosecution witness. He's the defense witness.

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So he's the best story Trump has got, and all

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>he's got is well the President directly say this, but

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone knew and everyone was in the loop on exactly

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>what was going on. What do you think? What do

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>you think President Trump was thinking when he watched this,

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>If he watched it, even though he claims he wasn't

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>watching it, right, Yeah, I I don't think that there's

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a way anyone can watch this, you know, if you're

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're the president, and watch this being said about

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you without having a deep pit in your stomach. And

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why we see the more and more

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>lashing out by this president. You know, um, but at

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>some point he's going to have to face the facts.

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And the facts are not based on Sun Len's testimony alone,

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>but on that July transcript in which the quid pro

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>quo is right there. It's not you know, I need

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>a favor from you, though, That's what the president says,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, there isn't really a way for

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>him to walk away from it. Well this really mattered, though, Neil.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the question. Let's talk short term and long term.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Short term being uh, if he is impeached a trial

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, is there anything that we heard today

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>that might move the needle for Republican senators to vote

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to convict President Trump or for some of them to

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>basically abandoned the president. I think so far they're only two.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I do think that as senators go and look at

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the evidence and ask themselves, you know the question that

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I put in my book, which is, you know, just

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>flipped the parties around. Pretend this is what we do

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>with law students in their first year. You say, everyone's

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>got certain biases when they walk in and you say, well,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just pretend you're representing the defendant instead of the plain

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>if if you are planiff focused and vice versa. I

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>think the same thing has to be put to the Senators,

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and they've never actually been asked this simple question, which is,

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the shoes on the other foot, if

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>it's President Obama who went and got secret help from

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a foreign governmor tried to do so and held up

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>congressionally appropriated aid or doled out White House meetings to

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>countries that investigated his political rivals, would you sit by

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, yeah, that's cool, he can be president.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that, you know, a senator could

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>look at herself for himself in the mirror and say, yeah,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of government I want. And I know

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there are so many Americans who have been disparited over

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the last three years as Congresses look the other way

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on this and that, But we've never actually forced them

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to go and cast that vote. And here it will

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be one of the most solemn votes I'll ever cast

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>in their lives, most solemn things they ever do. And

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>can they really do that? I don't know, um, but

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I have faith that in the Senate and that they

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>will study this, think about it, ask the question that

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I just asked, What if the shoe were on the

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>other foot, and reach the right judgment. I don't mean

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to be cynical, but politics seems to be the number

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one priority for many these Republican senators. So why do

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you believe that suddenly they'll have an epiphany and uh,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a crisis of confidence in the president and

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>their conscious consciences will emerge at this moment in time. Well,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I have to think that two things. One is I

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.959
<v Speaker 1>have to think when you go into public office, you know,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of ways to make money or

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>get power. I think you do it for some sense

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of the public good. And so, um, you know, I

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think I think at first you do, and then it's

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>all about staying in power, don't you But maybe but

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>even if so, Um, the idea of associating yourself with this,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with this kind of lawlessness, I don't know makes for

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>very good politics, um in in the long term. Um.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we're seeing this election after election, the

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>elections just you know, last week, you know, again and

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>again the president is losing. And I do think one

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons he's losing is because of this corrosive

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>view about the law. So even if the Senate does

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>not vote to convict you think he there will be

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hell to pay in November President Trump. Oh my, yes,

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I I you know, I understand there's

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people out there who say we should

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have defeat President Trump at the ballot box and not

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>impeach and removed. And I think, look, I think that

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, with this kind of record, there's no way

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>President Trump could be re elected. Um, you know so.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I think worth

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>setting something here that's far bigger than just the next election,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which of course has moment to stakes. But we're setting

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the ground rules for what our American experiment is all about,

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>what our democracy means. And if we don't do this,

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>if we say a president can go and in secret

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>try and hold up foreign aid to investigate his chief rivals,

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, what are we saying about our elections?

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>But Neil, a new NPR PBS News Our poll found

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that while most Americans are paying attention to these hearings,

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>less than a third say or you know, around a

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>third say their minds could be changed. So there are

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who say, we don't care whatever happens,

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's a witch hunt. You know, they've bought the

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>president's talking points and by the way. I watched Sean

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Hannity last night, and it's almost as if we live

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in two different countries or there are two different stories.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>If you have a steady diet of Fox News, you

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>have a very different opinion about what's going on in

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Washington right now. Yeah. No, Look, I my argument is

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>not that Sean Hannity and Laura Ingram are going to

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>change their minds. So you know, they've got a certain,

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, set of incentives to say the things that

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>they say. I'm talking about Fox viewers, and I do

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.679
<v Speaker 1>have more faith in those viewers and more generally the

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>viewers across the American public and listeners and and so on.

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not ready to give up on the idea that

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>we live in such two different countries that there is

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>no truth anymore, or that we shouldn't ask these questions

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and we throw in the towel because we're worried about

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a you know, splintered, hyperpartisan environment. I mean, at the

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.719
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, every time America has transcended that

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we transcended it in seventeen seventy six and seventeen eighty seven,

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen sixty six and nineteen thirty seven, and the

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>civil rights movement, marriage equality. So many other times people

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have said, Katie, the kind of stuff you're saying, and

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know you're just voicing, you know, a

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the frustrations of a lot of people and

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>views of a lot of people. But there's also this

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>other counter tradition in American history. You know, in the book,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I talked about the Andrew Johnson impeachment, and uh, you know,

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Johnson was a terrible president and racist and and so on,

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but he was impeached not for that. He was impeached

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for a violation of the tenure of office at the

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>technical violation. And it was a really close vote in

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and Senator Ross, who hated at the Senor

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Russell was from camp Us and he hated President Johnson,

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but nonetheless cast the impeachment vote, the deciding vote the

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>other way to not impeach, because he said that's not

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do. It maybe the right thing

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>to do for my party, but it's not the right

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>thing to do for the country. And time and again

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen examples of that, and um, we won't know

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>unless we try. And um, you know, that's I'm proud

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that to see our Congress trying and to force some

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>attention by this administration to the rule of law. Let

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>me ask you if you could break it down, how

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>many articles of impeachment are there right now? And you know,

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>how is this different from a criminal trial. Yeah, So

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the main differences are that it's not, of course about crimes.

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So so that's the first thing it's about, really, is

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>there an abusive power by the president. Is the president

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>putting his nation his personal interests above those of the nation.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>That's really I think the best definition of what a

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>high crime and misdemeanor and that can come into sort

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of shapes and forms exactly, and so here I think

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they're basically kind of three buckets that of offenses when

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we think about Ukraine, and you know, there may be

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>others involving the Moller investigation and so on. I personally

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think Congress should get into all of that here,

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, because there's some indication that he might

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>have lied on his questionnaire exactly. The the House General

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Counsel this week in the d C Court said they

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>believe that there may be evidence that the President lie

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>de Muller and that, of course is itself a criminal offense,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So there may be other things going on. We'll have

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to see. Um. In terms of the process, there is

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a big difference. I mean, the House does what's called impeachment,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>which is like the formal indictment of the president, like

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>saying he did something wrong, and that is just by

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a majority vote, and that's kind of like a grand

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>jury in the criminal context. And then you've got if

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the House impeaches, then it goes to the Senate for

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the punishment phase and uh, and the kind of trial

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>about what, you know, what what the president did and

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>is it, you know, a convictible offense. Um. And there

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a two thirds vote of the Senate to convict.

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And unlike a criminal trial in which it's a jury

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of twelve peers who don't have any prejudices about the case,

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this is decided by a hundred senators, many of whom

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have already said certain things about their view of the case.

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So it is quite different in that sense. It's a

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>mix of a legal proceeding and a political proceeding. Would

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>President Trump ever be asked to go to the Senate

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to testify? Oh? Absolutely, And would he be compelled to

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you can't formally compel him in the sense of, uh,

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, attached criminal sanctions to him. But you can

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>create an adverse inference. You can say, look, Mr President,

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>if you don't come forward and tell the truth, we'll

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>take that as an admission that these accusations against you

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in these articles of impeachment are accurate. And you would

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>ask before about what that case would look like. What

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are those articles of impeachment? And it seems to me

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Article one is kind of abuse of power, the president

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>saying I am going to cut off congressionally appropriated aid

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>aida that our taxpayers approved to another country to benefit myself.

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Count Number two is bribery, the idea that we were

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier, seeking something of value for yourself in

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>order to exchange in order for the performance of an official,

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and it would be called bribery absolutely. And indeed, one

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting things, Katie, is the Constitution actually says

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there are defines impeachable offenses as treason, bribery, or other

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>high crimes and misdemeanors. It's actually in the Constitution itself

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>as one of the two things our founders said was impeachable,

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and cited by Alexander Hamilton as you said earlier about

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a foreign exactly, is that in the Constitution too, Well,

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what's in the Constitution is just the word bribery. No,

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the foreign nation. What you mentioned that Alexander Hamilton's used

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as an example, So it's an example of what is

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>an impeachable offense, but itself is not in the text

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution. Like much of the Constitution, they used

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>more capacious words like other high crimes and misdemeanors. And

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then we have methods to try and understand what those

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>words are here in some of Hamilton's writings exactly. So

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's writings in the Federalist papers. Indeed, Federalist sight, I

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>think is the critical one. Um, they make this argument

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about foreign interference, you're sure it's not and then uh,

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the last article of impeachment. And I think

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>today we saw a lot of evidence of this is

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>obstruction of justice, the idea that the president is gagging

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>all these witnesses from coming forward. He's saying no documents

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>can come. And we started this interview, Katie, with you

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>asking about the Ambassador Solilon testimony it six and its significance,

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and we've talked a lot about the substantial significance, like

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>what did Simon say about Trump and Giuliani and so on,

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But there was a procedural significance to what he said today,

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>which is really important. He said, and again, this is

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump's guy. He's saying, the President is acting wrongly by

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>not allowing me to look at my emails, not provide

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>them to you, not provide my call records. He's preventing

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>me from all of this. And that's preventing the American

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>people from learning the truth. And that is quintessential obstruction

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of justice. And and what could happen to Rudy Giuliani.

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious. Oh heavens me, I would not want

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to be. I mean, if in fact he did all

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the things he's being accused of doing in the course

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of these hearings and by various witnesses, what will happen

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to him? Well, so, first of all, it's not just

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what he's being accused of in the hearings, which are

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>about you know, this part of Ukraine and Barisma and

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>all that. There's a separate criminal investigation in the Southern

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>District of New York, his former office that he used

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to head, about whether or not he committed various cribes,

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, we don't know exactly what they are, um,

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, so he's facing legal liability there. Separately,

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>now he's got a bunch to worry about here, um,

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the Ukrainian foreign aid scandal and so on.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think that there's a deep question

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>here whether Giuliani is going to say, oh, I did

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>this all on my own. Trump wasn't involved, hoping perhaps

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>for a pardon or something like that, or he's going

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, I wasn't a rogue agent here. I

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>was doing all of this at the President's best, which

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Mr Salmon today I think suggested was the truth. And

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is Roger Stone going to be pardoned? Who knows? Um?

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I would think so. I would think that a president,

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>when there was that mountain of evidence from his own

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department to convict Rogers own, any decent president could

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not impeach, it could not pardon Roger Stone. But this

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.719
<v Speaker 1>is a president who pardoned Joe R. Pio, who pardoned

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a niche to Suza, who pardoned three war criminals just

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>last week against the advice of his own Defense department.

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So anything goes with respect to this guy. And his

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>abuse of the pardon power. You made the case that

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's efforts to hinder the House investigation is as

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>much of a threat to the rule of law as

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the case against him, and that it quote strikes at

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the heart of American democracy. Explain that, yes, I wrote it.

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I've be in the New York Times last week, which said, look,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna obviously all focus on these witnesses and what

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>what happened with respect to Ukraine. But there is a

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of more fundamental thing. And you know, I saw

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it in two different tours in the government, which is

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>when the Congress of the United States asks you, how

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are you doing your job? Why did you take certain

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>actions and the like? You know, that's a sovereign and

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>solemn obligation for you to go and explain what you

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>did to the people. Uh. And this president has thumbed

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>his nose at Congress, has said it's so illegitimate that

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he won't even bother turning over a single piece of

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>paper or a single witness. Um. And again I asked

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to go back to that kind of yardstick rule shoe.

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>On the other foot, if this were a democratic president,

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>how would the Republican senators and congresswoman and men feel

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about someone who stime me that. I mean even at

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst, you know, an air culture was accused of,

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, in Fast and Furious of various things. But

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he turned over thousands and thousands of pages of material.

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>That was the only time President Obama invoked executive privilege

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and his time in office. This president, you know, invokes

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it kind of like candy, you know, whenever and does

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it wantonly um and uh, you know, you'd have to

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>go back to Nixon, to someone who did it with

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>any frequency approaching approaching this president. But this president has

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>done that and squared it many many times over. Do

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you see anyway the impeachment hearings Neil could help the president,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>could galvanize his base and that people might buy in

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that he's being unfairly targeted. And note that

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>these people never thought his election was legitimate. YadA, YadA, YadA.

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's Katie, with all respect, the wrong question.

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we can do this because of politics.

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to do this, and I think

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this is where the Congress of the House is moving

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>because there is no other option when you have a

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>president who betrays the nation's interest and tries to do

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in secret, and then gets caught and then doesn't even

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:54.879
<v Speaker 1>admit to it and says he'd do it again, he'd

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do it with China. You've got a president who's a fundamental,

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>existential threat to the rule of law, to everything the

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>country is built on. And if you lose elections over it,

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>so be it. Lose the election, because there's something far

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>greater at stake here, which is the operation and soul

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>of American democracy. You're a purist, but I would say

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that there are plenty of Democrats in the House who

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>really weighed the political ramifications of this pretty long and hard. Neil, Sure, No,

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I am not. I'm not denying any of that. And

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe that it's not bad politics for them

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>or good politics or whatever. I'm just saying, you know,

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>is some things have to rise above politics. And as

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>your listeners think about, you know, how do we think

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>about this question that we're about to embark in as

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>a nation over the next two months, what should we

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>do about the president? I think they have to ask,

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, do they really want a system in which

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a president can do this and put the politics aside

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 1>At least try to. It's, if nothing else, a thought experiment, because, Um,

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the shoe will be on the other. Life is long

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and the country hopefully has many, many years ahead. And

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>if we allow this president to do this, another president

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 1>can do it, and that president may not be one

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that you politically agree with. I know, I'm asking you

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to speculate, and that's something that current and former government

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>officials hate to do. Colin values to always tell me, Katie,

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I will not speculate on that, but can you give

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>us an idea of the timeline and what ultimately you

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen? Neil, sure. So I'm not

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>afraid to speculate here. So I wrote a whole book

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.919
<v Speaker 1>that's about this. Um and Uh. I think that by

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the end of December. By December, I suspect we'll have

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a vote in the House of Representatives and Merry Christmas.

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that the president will be impeached

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and representatives. It will then go to a trial in

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Senate in January. And January, you know, I think

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Senate rules require kind of an immediate trial to

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>move quickly. It required them to be I think in

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>session six days a week. UM and you know, some senators,

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Republican senators have said it maybe as long as six

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to eight weeks. I'm not sure that that's right. I

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably the House has already taken a lot

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of testimony, so I'm not sure that it will be

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that long. But I again, I hope that it's a

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>thorough serious trial that everyone can see exactly what happened,

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>because the president's story has been shifting while this has

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 1>been going on in the House of Representatives and in

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the early stages in the investigation. I mean, first it

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>was I didn't do it. Then it was it's all

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>perfect and beautiful. Then it was no, it's all hearsay,

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there's no firsthand witnesses. Now that the

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>first hand witnesses have come forward, we're back to it's

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>beautiful and perfect. Um. And I don't really know that

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>guy som Blander whomever. So there's been a bunch of

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>shifting stories, um. And once it goes to trial in

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, I suspect that they're gonna have to drill

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>down and pick one. And at that point, I do

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>think the eyes of the nation focus on the question.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>The eyes in the Senate, they look at themselves in

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the mirror and say what's the right thing to do here?

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the president will be removed from office?

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Do wow? So you think he'll be gone and Mike

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Pence will run for president? I I don't know, but

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know you know that very well. Maybe or maybe

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>they have something else. Wow, Well, fasten your seatbelt. Do

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you ever wish that you had waited to write your

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:41.240
<v Speaker 1>book and impeach the case against Donald Trump? Since there's

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so much happened since you I'm sure handed this in

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:47.919
<v Speaker 1>no actually their verse. I mean I wrote the book

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>because I knew a lot was going to happen. I

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>knew there'd be all these witnesses coming forward, and I

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things that Trump does, and

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>you actually started today's session by talking about it, is

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the flood of information that happens. And it's so hard

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to separate the wheat from the chaff, and remember what's important.

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>In the book, it's just a hundred fifty pages is

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>just designed to say, here's the central narrative. And yes,

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be any number of details and people

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>saying this and that and taking pot shots at each other,

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>but here's the central narrative. That central narrative is not

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>going to change. Like you know I've done. I've argued

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine cases at the Supreme Court and one hundreds

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of other cases. You know, in a case and the

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>basics architecture of the case is done. That basic architecture

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the case is done now and that's what the book

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 1>lays out. And go back to those three articles of impeachment,

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:44.399
<v Speaker 1>high crimes and misdemeanors in the Constitution, abuse of power, bribery,

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and obstruction of justice. Neo Cartiel, Neil, thanks so much

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>for helping us understand all this and make some sense

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. Thank you. It's an honor to be with you.

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone agrees with Neo Cartiel. Up next, we're going

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation with a vocal critic of the

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>impeachment inquiry, former Independent Council Robert Ray. Robert Ray made

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a name for himself leading the Whitewater investigation as the

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>former head of the Office of the Independent Council. He

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.919
<v Speaker 1>recently wrote a piece for Time magazine arguing that while

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>President Trump may have acted inappropriately, his actions do not

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>meet the constitution strict requirements for impeachment, which say that treason, briberary,

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 1>or other high crimes and misdemeanors need to be proven

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>in order to remove a president from office. Robert Ray,

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for coming on the podcast so

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 1>your predecessor as Independent Council can start. Described today's testimony

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>as quote one of those bombshell days and said that

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>quote things do not look it for the president substantively.

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Bob Well, I don't agree with that. Um.

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I've dealt with media days throughout this saga for more

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>than the past two months, where every day is another

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 1>bombshell day. So I don't think there was really anything

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that I heard today that was that much of a

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>surprise and what I had anticipated that we would hear.

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>His testimony, though, did confirm a quid pro quo. Right, well,

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>let's be careful about that, because you know, first of all,

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, the Hoorray Henry's who all want to

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about quid pro quo as if they seem to

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>understand what bribery is. Let's just slow down. A second.

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Bribery is something like the following, whoever, being a public official,

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>corruptly demands or seeks personally in return for the performance

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of an official act is guilty of a crime, and

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the in return for a language essentially is what people

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>understand to be the quid pro quo requirement of a

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>bribery offense. But that's not what we talk about and

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what much of the discussion has been about. I mean,

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, if there's an exchange of a quid pro

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>quo involving foreign assistance generally, and the linkage is over

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>something as benign as we want a particular country to

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>do more with regard to internally prosecuting or investigating corruption,

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody would ever contend that that kind of an exchange

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is something that the law is prepared to recognize as illegal.

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:47.240
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't it change when it's a political rival, Bob,

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>when it's specifically about Joe Biden and his son. And

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>according to son Land, Hello, that's not what Ambassador Sonland

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>testified to today. What his understanding is that it was

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:04.400
<v Speaker 1>barisma and the origins of the two thousand and sixteen

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>election interference. He only came to learn, I think, he said,

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and not until after the transcript of the call was

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>released between President Zelinsky and President Trump that uh, you know,

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in his mind, he then came to a presumption that

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 1>there was a linkage between the two involving specifically the Bidens.

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, look, I think much of how you

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>would view this is colored by whether or not you

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.720
<v Speaker 1>think there's any merit to an investigation of the Biden's

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>first second, I think it's colored by what your view

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is about whether or not such an investigation is of

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>personal benefit to the president that would be sufficient to

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>um make out a crime. The Democrats have tried that

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 1>on for size. They first contended that that was an

0:44:56.400 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 1>illegal foreign campaign contribution. Well, that's an interesting legal theory,

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but it runs up against the fact that the Justice Department,

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:05.840
<v Speaker 1>apparently through the Criminal Division, after consultation with the Public

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Integrity Section, said listen, that's not a thing of value

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that the law is prepared to recognize as a campaign

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:15.280
<v Speaker 1>contribution that would be of personal benefit to the president

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:21.399
<v Speaker 1>United States, meaning an investigation into Hunter Biden and Barrisma. Right. Look,

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the notion that a public official is,

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>as a result of running for office or being a candidate,

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>immune from uh an investigation is in my judgment, anathemas

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and consistent with with our past history, and it's even

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent with my own past history. I conducted an investigation

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 1>of Hillary Clinton, who was then at the time while

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I was serving as Independent Council being investigated in connection

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 1>with a whole slew of investigations Whitewater, the Travel Office,

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 1>FBI files, a number of things, while she was a

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 1>candidate for office for the United States Senate in New York.

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So are you suggesting that Joe Biden did something wrong here?

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't and and it was in your estimation it's

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 1>worthy of an investigation. I don't know. I mean, apparently

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General has thought at least so that matter

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>has been referred, among a number of different specific issues

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to John Durham, who is the currently serving U S

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Attorney in the District of Connecticut. He enjoys a bipartisan

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>reputation as a kind a fine one as a bipartisan,

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>nonpartisan prosecute career prosecutor. I don't know whether that investigation

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>has any merit or not. I imagine he'll figure it

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:36.720
<v Speaker 1>out one way or another. That's why we have investigations

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to find out. I I wonder if you believe that

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador Solon's claimed that the President was seemed to be

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:49.359
<v Speaker 1>more interested in the announcement of an investigation rather than

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the investigation itself, might sort of counter this assessment that

0:46:55.880 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't he wouldn't stand to gain from that in estigation.

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador Simon made very clear, although that was completely overlooked

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.919
<v Speaker 1>in the testimony today, that the primary reason to ask

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for a public announcement was to fix their position publicly

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so that they couldn't walk back the fact that they

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>were committed to rooting out corruption. I think that's separate

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and apart from whether or not you think that's also

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of personal benefit to the president, because of the fact

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that it would have potentially had an impact on an election.

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Everything has an impact on an election. The question is

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 1>whether there is anything inappropriate about that ask and I

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 1>have already commented publicly and I think, um, this is

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:39.279
<v Speaker 1>where I do agree with Ken Starr. I do think

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>it was an error in judgment not to have done

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this through the usual channels. Why Because the usual channels

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>provide you with insulation in the ordinary affairs of the

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.840
<v Speaker 1>country where people don't second yes your political motivations, and

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>so one of the reasons that you'd go to the

0:47:56.480 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>FBI and the Justice Department and also admit what there's

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>already a treaty process to allow a request to the

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian government through official channels for what's referred to as

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty. That's the kind of appropriate

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>way in which you would be seeking in a sensitive

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 1>area assistance with an investigation. So I guess what I'm

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>saying is that, you know, it's hard for me to

0:48:21.000 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine that the president does something directly that if he

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>did indirectly through usual channels, it certainly would be entirely appropriate.

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But now all of a sudden it's illegal. You can

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>argue about a lack of judgment and whether or not

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it would have been better practice and a better idea

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not to have had what amounts to a second channel

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 1>through Rudy Giuliani to try to accomplish this end. But

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that I would jump to the conclusion

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that the end in itself was inappropriate. I think the

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 1>means are subject to question, but that doesn't mean that

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the means were illegal. But having said that, I mean

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it was in your view and error in judgment, but

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 1>does not necessarily qualified as a high crime or misdemeanor.

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it qualifies as bribery either. I don't

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think it. I don't think it involves extortion because I

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think there was sufficient pressure applied. What about abuse

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of power, Well, abuse of power is an interesting concept,

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and I know you've talked to about that. I do

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>not think that abuse of power untethered from the constitutional language,

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:26.839
<v Speaker 1>which requires that it be treason, bribery, or other high

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:31.319
<v Speaker 1>crime and misdemeanor, is sufficient. I know there's reasonable disagreement

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of opinion among legal scholars about that. I think. I mean,

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I've read a lot of books. I've considered the question

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment, going all the way back to Watergate and

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:43.439
<v Speaker 1>historically even before um I think the better, more considered view.

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, this was Neil cat y'all's view

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and a Chiel Lamar and a number of other people

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>when they were trying on for size of the question

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of the Clinton impeachment. I do not think abuse of

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>power on its own as a sufficient basis to remove

0:49:57.080 --> 0:49:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a president from office. I think it has to be both.

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I think the lesson of the Clinton impeachment was very

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>few people were arguing over whether or not the president

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>had committed obstruction of justice or perjury. The only question

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 1>was whether or not those crimes were sufficient to rise

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to the level of abuse of his office, abuse of

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 1>his oath of office. And I think the considered judgment

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate following a trial was, you know what, Um,

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a problem here, but it's not sufficient to remove

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the president from office because he didn't abuse his office

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this one. Um. You know, I sort of stepped back

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and just look at it. And the Nixon cases, of

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>course entirely different because there I think it was clearly both.

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It was not only that obstruction of justice was committed,

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but it was committed in such a way that undermined

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the president's oath of office to take care that the

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:46.439
<v Speaker 1>laws be faithfully executed. And there was a slush fund

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in the White House with cash coming out of a

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>safe in order to pay off witnesses to ultra testimony

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in connection with an ongoing criminal investigation that the president orchestrated,

0:50:56.320 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and he was on tape directing it. And everybody can

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>understand it appreciate that that's not only a crime, but

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 1>it's also a problem for a president to be involved in.

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anything like that here. I mean,

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>are we seriously and I'm asking the American people this,

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are we seriously going to impeach a president based upon

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>today's testimony about the announcement of an investigation tied to

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 1>a meeting at the White House, I really think tied

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to foreign aid. Well, let's start with where they started today,

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>because the only thing Sonlon was able to say for

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador son was able to say for sure is that

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the link that he saw was with a meeting at

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the White House, despite what you hear in much of

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the media, and meeting at the White House as recently

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:45.360
<v Speaker 1>as the Supreme Court's decision involving Governor McDonald is not

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 1>an official act under the bribery law, so that can't

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be the predicate for a bribery offense. And I believe

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schiff recognizes this because all before these hearings even started,

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.239
<v Speaker 1>he was already saying, you know, we don't have to

0:51:57.280 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>prove the elements of a bribery offense like a prosecu

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>puter would bribery. It only has to be as the

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>founders understood it. Well, okay, fair enough, but bribery is mentioned,

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>and the founders did put in place a Congress which

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>was capable of passing laws, and among the other laws

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Congress ultimately passed was the Federal Bribery Statute.

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's no bribery with regard to a meeting in

0:52:19.480 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the White House. Don't believe me, but that that's what

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court says. So what about foreign aid? I mean,

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:31.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe Somlon didn't say that he saw no connection, but

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other witnesses have said that, and

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:37.720
<v Speaker 1>more witnesses are to come. Well, he said, So if

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 1>if in fact someone says, uh, there was an undeniable

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>link between an investigation of Hunter Biden and the delivery

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of foreign aid to Ukraine, would that constitute bribery? Well,

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 1>no one is going to say that. And more importantly,

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really interested in what other people have to say.

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 1>This is not an impeachment of an administration. This is,

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:06.359
<v Speaker 1>after all, the impeachment of the President of United States. Said,

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter what anybody else thinks. The question is

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>where does the president thing? And today you know, again

0:53:12.160 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 1>something skipped over. You know, largely the President was asked

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>directly by Ambassador Sunlin in no uncertain terms and emphatically,

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.359
<v Speaker 1>because I think he was exasperated more than anything else

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Mr President, what do you want? And the answer was,

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anything from President Zelinsky. I want him

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to do what it is he ran on and I

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want any quid pro quotes. I'm not

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>asking him for anything. I'm asking him to do what

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he said he was going to do. So. Look, I

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 1>do not think that investigations generally, including one's conducted overseas,

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and including one's conducted overseas of United States nationals, which

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is something that we do do. Um.

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I have represented clients that have been on the receiving

0:53:56.640 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 1>end of that, so I know, UM, there's nothing inherently

0:54:00.640 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that. That's you know, that's part of what

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>investigations are all about. I do not think that that notion,

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and specifically what you're suggesting, which is the personal benefit

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to the president of a politically motivated investigation of the bidens,

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are mutually exclusive. I mean, the sense in the in

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the in the in the country right now is it

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it's either a legitimate investigation or it's this thing involving

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the Biden's barisma and corruption in the Ukraine, and the

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:32.239
<v Speaker 1>one is unlawful. It's a foreign campaign contribution and it's

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the basis of a quid pro quo, and the other

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 1>one is entirely appropriate. I don't think life doesn't work

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that way. They are not They are not mutually exclusive.

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:44.720
<v Speaker 1>There is space enough for there to be. Again, depending

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:46.839
<v Speaker 1>on how what your view is about whether or not

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>either Hunter Biden and or his his father, that then

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>vice president did anything wrong. And again I'm not suggesting

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he did or he didn't. I don't know. That's why

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we have investigations to find that, and in fact, we

0:54:57.120 --> 0:55:00.799
<v Speaker 1>are having one right now. That's what's going on. So

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you basically don't believe when it comes to the specific

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:08.800
<v Speaker 1>articles of impeachment that Neil identified, abuse of power, bribery,

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and obstruction of justice, that you can check off any

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of those. And if not, why not obstruction of justice? Bob.

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>If in fact President Trump is prohibiting many people from

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 1>testifying in the House hearings, well that's a process, fell

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:26.839
<v Speaker 1>and I guess ultimately, you know, the American people will

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>decide whether they think that's significantly What do you think.

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, And I think you know, look,

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>if there are legitimate reasons and basses to object to

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>cooperating with the investigation that include the assertion of presidential

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:42.920
<v Speaker 1>or executive privilege. I know that they tried this in

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the Nixon impeachment. It wasn't particularly persuasive, nor was it,

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>frankly in the in the Clinton impeachment. UM, that's a

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 1>process argument and dispute between the branches of government. To

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>equate that with obstruction of justice seems to me to

0:55:57.200 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 1>be a bridge too far. Um, they're a legit him

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 1>reasons why you would object to uh subpoena compliance, both

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:07.799
<v Speaker 1>for documents and for witnesses to protect the office of

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the president, not the president, you know, Donald Trump personally himself,

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:16.879
<v Speaker 1>not only for this administration, for administrations in the future. Uh.

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:19.279
<v Speaker 1>That has been consistently the position of the White House,

0:56:19.440 --> 0:56:22.080
<v Speaker 1>not again, not just with regard to this administration, but

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for administrations going back at least as far as President Eisenhower. UM. Uh,

0:56:27.120 --> 0:56:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I don't think that UH an attempt

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to try to make that argument, you know, Adam Shifts.

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:39.279
<v Speaker 1>UH typical approach to this has been every time the

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>White House objects to providing us with a document or

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a witness, we're going to just add that as another

0:56:45.280 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 1>article of impeachment under obstruction it doesn't wash with me.

0:56:49.440 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it will wash with the American people.

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And more importantly, in this process, if you have any

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 1>hopes of trying to persuade the other party to join

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 1>with you, which after all, is necessary in order to

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:03.880
<v Speaker 1>remove the president from office in the United States Senate,

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get there by making an argument.

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Ah ha, we got you on obstruction of justice. You

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:12.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't give us that document from the State Department. You know, Please,

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we got more important things to worry about. That's not

0:57:15.080 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 1>one of them. But what about prohibiting witnesses from testifying.

0:57:18.720 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're not talking about handing over documents. We're

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about saying to people you cannot appear well. Sure,

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And and the reason for that is because the internal

0:57:27.360 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 1>discussions at the highest level within the White House are

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 1>subject to privilege. And it has long been recognized to

0:57:33.600 --> 0:57:36.960
<v Speaker 1>be the case. Uh, it's implied essentially in the Constitution

0:57:37.000 --> 0:57:39.280
<v Speaker 1>by virtue of separation of powers. And the President has

0:57:39.320 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 1>no obligation to try to make the House's case for

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:46.320
<v Speaker 1>impeachment against him. He has constitutional rights as well, in

0:57:46.360 --> 0:57:50.560
<v Speaker 1>addition to the fact of his office. And I do

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:55.720
<v Speaker 1>think that again, pushing that too far is encroaching on

0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an area that is long recognized to be a proper

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 1>separation of powers question. And and the related notion that

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>has expressed most recently by the Speaker of the House,

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, that the president has some obligation to come

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>forward and testify or explain or provide his people. Um again, Um,

0:58:15.200 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that there's nothing in the constitution that requires that.

0:58:19.000 --> 0:58:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's in the public interest. And again,

0:58:21.080 --> 0:58:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that the president is entitled to rely on

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 1>AIDS without having to worry about the fact that all

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of those people are going to appear to testify against

0:58:28.440 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 1>him because the Congress is conducting an impeachment inquiry. And

0:58:31.680 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 1>if we really have reached the point in this country

0:58:34.120 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for the future, which is one of the things that

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned about, that it simply as the result of

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:41.320
<v Speaker 1>having the House of Representatives in the UH in the

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 1>hands of the opposite party, that we're going to now

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 1>be endlessly in a situation in which every administration is

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be saddled with the potential of an impeachment inquiry.

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I do not think ultimately that that is in the

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 1>country's best interests. I don't think that that's what the

0:58:54.840 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>founders intended, and the you know, recent history suggests now

0:58:58.040 --> 0:59:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that we sort of string together, you know, Nixon to

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Clinton to Trump. You know, the question one has to

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>logically ask, and I think most fair minded Americans will

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:11.040
<v Speaker 1>be asking when this when and if this gets to

0:59:11.080 --> 0:59:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States Senate is ultimately is that what we

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 1>want to see here? Is that really in the country's interests?

0:59:16.360 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And I've even thought about things like, you know, I

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:21.160
<v Speaker 1>wonder for the future whether or not a simple majority

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 1>vote in the House should be sufficient to warrant the

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>impeachment of a president. I mean, I think there perhaps

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 1>should be some serious question that a bipartisan vote be

0:59:30.440 --> 0:59:32.960
<v Speaker 1>required in the House before it ever gets to the Senate.

0:59:33.280 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Not suggesting that it would be a two thirds majority,

0:59:35.520 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but when you know, I think could think seriously about

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it's in the country's interests with the

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:42.040
<v Speaker 1>future to prevent just this sort of thing from happening,

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that rather than fifty be required, which would would mandate

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in effect, that you would have to have, in an

0:59:50.560 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>example like this one, not only all Democrats in favor

0:59:53.840 --> 0:59:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment, but you'd have to have bipartisan support, meaning

0:59:57.040 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 1>some Republicans to join along with it. So you think

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there's m legitimacy to President Trump's contention, this is a

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>kangaroo court. He's kind of dismissed the whole process. He said,

1:00:07.120 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, on Fox News they say it's a shift show.

1:00:10.600 --> 1:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, look, I hear all that. I've been on

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Fox News. I'm a regular guest. Um, I do not

1:00:17.120 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think it helps anybody or our institutions in the country's

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>best interest to be disparaging the mission of the House

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of Representatives. I don't and I won't do it. Um.

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You know they have a tough job to do. Are

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is there partisan excess on both sides? Sure? Did anybody

1:00:36.280 --> 1:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>think that that wouldn't be the case? Go all the

1:00:38.920 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>way back to Alexander Hamilton's He certainly recognized that this

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>would inflame partisan passions on both sides as the result

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment, particularly involving a president, which is why the

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>protection was built in that it would require two thirds

1:00:54.200 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate to actually remove a president from office

1:00:56.640 --> 1:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and overturn an election. Whow it is you know under

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>liably true that a president is subject to impeachment all

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>during his term in office. This obviously was intended by

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the founders to be an extraordinary thing and and reserved

1:01:11.720 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for the most extreme situations. My view is that there's

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not ever going to be given these facts unless something

1:01:19.400 --> 1:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>magically changes, clear and unmistakable evidence of both a crime

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that fits the definition of trees and bribery or other

1:01:27.840 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>high crimes and misdemeanors, and uh one sufficient enough that

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it constitutes abuse of the president's office. And I do

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>firmly believe, based upon history and practice and frankly good

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>common sense, which was ultimately where the American people are

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>going to weigh in here, I think that unless you

1:01:49.040 --> 1:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have both, that's not sufficient to warrant the removal of

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a president from office. I think that's the considered judgment

1:01:54.960 --> 1:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of history and the idea that someone put forth in

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>his testament me that everyone was in the loop, from

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pence to Mike Pompeo. UM, not that significant in

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>your view, Well, I don't. I don't know what in

1:02:11.240 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the loop. I listened to it carefully to see what

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly do you mean by in the loop and how

1:02:16.760 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>much knowledge did they really have. I think that it

1:02:20.760 --> 1:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is a reflection of the fact that Ambassador Sondling thought,

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>based upon the direction given by the President that this contention,

1:02:27.880 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>which is frankly contrary to what you heard the day before,

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>UM from Lieutenant Colonel vinman Um. You know, when the

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>President directs that wants something done, UM, that makes it

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not an outside channel. That is the President's prerogative to

1:02:45.600 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>choose the channel that he would like in order to

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>troll accomplish what it is he's trying to accomplish. Frankly,

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>what I thought I saw here was the President was

1:02:54.720 --> 1:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>prepared to temporarily withhold foreign aid to see what the

1:03:00.160 --> 1:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians would do. He didn't make a demand that they

1:03:04.920 --> 1:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>commence investigations in exchange for that aid. That's not the

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>tenor of the call, which is going to be ultimately

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the best, probably the only real evidence of the President's intent,

1:03:15.800 --> 1:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>other than the limited color that UM Ambassador Sonlon was

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>able to add today, I don't think you're going to

1:03:21.800 --> 1:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>hear from anybody else. I think to answer your question, yes,

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>would there be potential benefit to hear from UM, the

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, UM, from the from the

1:03:32.440 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Acting Chief of Staff McK mulvaaney, and potentially other people

1:03:36.680 --> 1:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Giuliani among them. Sure, but I think there's understandably

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a concern that the President is asserting, and I think

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in most situations that should be respected. That unless you're

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>prepared to say that these people were co conspirators in

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>connection with the illegal activity, which I don't think you're

1:03:52.280 --> 1:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear anybody say. No, one's gonna stand up and

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>then say, you know, I was involved in a in

1:03:56.240 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a corrupt bargain here, and I was a co conspirator,

1:03:58.880 --> 1:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and now let me tell you what it is I

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>did and what the president thought. That's the difference between, frankly,

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this case and the impeachment of Richard Nixon. No one's

1:04:06.680 --> 1:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>going to say, oh, yeah, I was, Yep, I was.

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>We were all we were all involved, and we were

1:04:12.040 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>all involved in a conspiracy to commit bribery. You're not

1:04:14.920 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>going to hear that. You're not going to hear an

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>acknowledgment that they thought that what they were doing was illegal,

1:04:19.720 --> 1:04:21.439
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think they thought what they were doing

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>was illegal. Do you believe that any Republican senators will

1:04:24.640 --> 1:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>change their minds after today's testimony or do you think

1:04:28.160 --> 1:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll still feel supportive of the President minus the two

1:04:32.240 --> 1:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>who seemed to be wobbily or have said otherwise. I

1:04:36.120 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>think to be careful, honestly, you don't know right until

1:04:40.720 --> 1:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>after both there's a vote in the House and you

1:04:44.080 --> 1:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>see what the partisan lineup looks like. I expect I

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>think the import of your question is I expect that

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it will be probably entirely along party lines. I think

1:04:55.640 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that will send a message to the Senate, which is

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>likely to have a rejoinder that is going to be

1:05:03.040 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>equally partisan the other way. So I guess that's a

1:05:05.560 --> 1:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of a roundabout way of answering your question. At

1:05:08.160 --> 1:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>least at the moment. I don't expect that that's going

1:05:11.120 --> 1:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to change the result. And I think what that will mean,

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>um is that it will it will it will not

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>succeed in the Senate. I guess the only question is

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>how long and painful will that process be? Will there

1:05:22.360 --> 1:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>be a full trial? I mean, this is different then

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>our most recent history, which is the Clinton impeachment. In

1:05:28.880 --> 1:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this situation, the president's party is in control of the

1:05:33.880 --> 1:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>United States Senate, so they they they set the rules,

1:05:36.760 --> 1:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and they determine how much of a proceeding there there

1:05:39.600 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>will be. They may I have suggested that if if

1:05:43.120 --> 1:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>really uh, this should be short circuited because it doesn't

1:05:47.680 --> 1:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>have merit, that it would be appropriate to consider emotion

1:05:50.400 --> 1:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss, which could be And I understand that there

1:05:53.400 --> 1:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>are political consequences to this, particularly among Republicans in districts

1:05:57.880 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>where or I'm sorry, in states where they're for re

1:06:00.360 --> 1:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>election this year. UM. I can think of a few

1:06:03.200 --> 1:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of them that would be vulnerable to a process that

1:06:06.240 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>was arguably curtailed in the Senate. But I mean it,

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly it was. There was a moment put it this way.

1:06:10.720 --> 1:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>There was a motion filed during the Clinton impeachment to dismiss.

1:06:13.480 --> 1:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>It was denied. This situation is different because Republicans control

1:06:17.000 --> 1:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the president's party control the United States Senate, and so

1:06:20.320 --> 1:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>if they have a majority vote UM plus in the

1:06:23.120 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>event of a tie the vice president of vote, they

1:06:25.080 --> 1:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>can they can move to dismiss for indefinitely adjourned the proceedings.

1:06:29.240 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And do you think that might happen? I think that's

1:06:31.800 --> 1:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a politically dicey thing. I think the safer course is

1:06:35.560 --> 1:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>probably to allow there to be a trial, uh and

1:06:39.920 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and for the members to give considered judgment to the question.

1:06:43.920 --> 1:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think most people want to appear to their constituents

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>as having carefully considered this to the extent that you

1:06:50.520 --> 1:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>were to short circuited. I suppose there would be a

1:06:52.360 --> 1:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>reasonable argument about you're not taking it seriously, and so

1:06:54.560 --> 1:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a backlash from Democratic opponents and upcoming elections from Democrats,

1:06:58.920 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>from voters, and you know, look, we're undeniably we're in

1:07:02.200 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>an election year now, right and a third of the

1:07:04.680 --> 1:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Senator is up. So that's obviously something that they have

1:07:07.840 --> 1:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye on. And that brings me to

1:07:09.920 --> 1:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>my final question, what impact do you think, Bob, this

1:07:12.480 --> 1:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>will have on Could this embolden the president, helped him

1:07:16.280 --> 1:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in fact get re elected if it is a long

1:07:19.960 --> 1:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>party lines, or do you think that people will think

1:07:25.360 --> 1:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>he just behaved, there was a serious error in judgment

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and his actions were questionable at at the very least.

1:07:34.560 --> 1:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know too many things. But what I do

1:07:36.840 --> 1:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>know from having a review the history of all of

1:07:40.040 --> 1:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the impeachments is that they have consequence, whether intended or unintended,

1:07:47.360 --> 1:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes those consequences can be quite severe. We really

1:07:51.520 --> 1:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know how the electorate will view this at the

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the day. I think there's a reasonable question

1:07:57.240 --> 1:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>as a result of so much of what has surface.

1:08:00.280 --> 1:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Whatever you think the merit of it is, is that

1:08:02.360 --> 1:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think already this is seriously damaged the Vice president's

1:08:06.520 --> 1:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>prospects to become the nominee for the Democratic Party. I

1:08:09.520 --> 1:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can really argue to the contrary. Do

1:08:13.360 --> 1:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you think it's that or do you think there are

1:08:14.800 --> 1:08:17.879
<v Speaker 1>other factors? There may be, There may be other factors.

1:08:17.920 --> 1:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And of course we ultimately don't know if he became

1:08:20.040 --> 1:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the nominee, how what the long you know, run effect

1:08:23.000 --> 1:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of that would be all the way through November of

1:08:24.880 --> 1:08:27.839
<v Speaker 1>next year. We also don't even know in the primary process,

1:08:27.920 --> 1:08:30.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, how this will play out. I suppose it

1:08:30.520 --> 1:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>depends on how this plays out before the United States Senate,

1:08:33.840 --> 1:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>presumably in January of next year. The short answer is

1:08:37.880 --> 1:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the dangers of impeachment is that you go

1:08:40.160 --> 1:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>down this road you never really know where it leads.

1:08:42.400 --> 1:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I the fall out of the Clinton impeachment,

1:08:45.160 --> 1:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There was an intended or unintended consequences

1:08:48.040 --> 1:08:51.879
<v Speaker 1>that I think that probably cost al Gore the election

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>against George W. Bush. You know, you can talk about

1:08:54.960 --> 1:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a good thing or a bad thing, but

1:08:57.120 --> 1:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the consequences I think of impeachment.

1:09:00.920 --> 1:09:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Were there other factors, sure, but I don't think that

1:09:04.520 --> 1:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that was an insubstantial factor. I think that was a

1:09:06.920 --> 1:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>significant effect. I don't know that that would have been

1:09:09.960 --> 1:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>anticipated at the time of impeachment. Only you would only

1:09:13.200 --> 1:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>know that with the benefit of history. And I think

1:09:15.960 --> 1:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the same will be true here. We're not really going

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:20.519
<v Speaker 1>to know all of the consequences of an impeachment until

1:09:20.920 --> 1:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>probably years later. One thing is certain. Only time will tell, right,

1:09:25.760 --> 1:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Like a lot of things in life, But this is

1:09:27.400 --> 1:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a big one, right, this is a big one. Well,

1:09:30.479 --> 1:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting to get your perspective, Bob Ray, Thank

1:09:33.600 --> 1:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you so much for stopping by. Thanks very us pleasure. Yeah,

1:09:37.600 --> 1:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>nice to see you. Nice to meet you. Same here.

1:09:41.400 --> 1:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much everyone for listening to this episode of

1:09:44.120 --> 1:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Next Question. We hope we've provided you with some information

1:09:47.800 --> 1:09:51.479
<v Speaker 1>in some context so you can better understand what's going

1:09:51.560 --> 1:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on these days on Capitol Hill with the impeachment hearings

1:09:56.160 --> 1:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and what constitutes or doesn't high crime and misdemeanors. If

1:10:02.280 --> 1:10:05.479
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to know what's happening every morning and have

1:10:05.640 --> 1:10:09.719
<v Speaker 1>some original content in the form of interviews, and inspiring stories.

1:10:10.080 --> 1:10:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Please sign up for our daily morning newsletter called wake

1:10:13.640 --> 1:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Up Call by going to Katie Couric dot com and

1:10:17.080 --> 1:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>follow me, of course, on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Next

1:10:23.000 --> 1:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Question with Katie Curic is a production of I Heart

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Katie Curic Media. The executive producers are Katie Kuric,

1:10:28.920 --> 1:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Bright Pacheco, Julie Douglas, and Tyler Klang. Our show

1:10:32.400 --> 1:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>producers are Bethan Macaluso and Courtney Litz. The supervising producer

1:10:36.720 --> 1:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>is Dylan Fagin. Associate producers are Emily Pinto and Derek Clemens.

1:10:41.280 --> 1:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Editing is by Dylan Fagin, Derrek Clements, and Lowell Berlante.

1:10:45.200 --> 1:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Our researcher is Barbara Keene. For more information on today's episode,

1:10:49.160 --> 1:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>go to Katie Kurik dot com and follow us on

1:10:51.360 --> 1:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Instagram at Katie Curk. For more podcasts from

1:11:01.000 --> 1:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple podcast,

1:11:04.240 --> 1:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.