WEBVTT - Draft Preview and Q&A

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Call that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm for I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy, you want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for Dake Edith state is that woo woom and Dan

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and tie welcome back to the solid verbal, Boys and girls.

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>My name is Ty Hildebrand, joining me as always my

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>good friend over there in New York City, My man

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Dan Rubinstein, Sir, how are you? I'm pretty good, I'm

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not bad.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Setting up the new home apartment studio coming along, and

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I say, I've got a thing to build later to

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>store everything, sort of a cubby wall unit.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So now, hold on, hold on. Last time we spoke

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of this very issue. Yes, I believe you were in

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>a closet of some sort, weren't you.

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm no longer in the closet. No right, I can

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>come out and say that there has been more work

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>done to the point where there is a rug down

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>on the ground, there is some soundproof foam up on

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the walls, and there's actual light in this room because

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 2>it was a room that didn't come pre installed with

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the light. So I have a sweet ikea pole lamp.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>You need motion in place. No life is good Tai

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Life is good. I'm gonna go for a run after

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 2>this because the sun is out, the sun.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Is out, the guns are out here in the east.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations to everyone who was able to outlast the winter.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're finally through the woods. Although it did

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>snow here yesterday, yes, which is not that as terrible.

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So what are we talking about on today's show, Dan?

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>What are we talking about here? We are doing?

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 2>We have Q and A and related to some timely

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 2>topics and some super untimely topics. So we have what

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>the NFL Draft is in eight days from when we're

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>recording this Wednesday evening right correct, and we have spring football.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Most it turns out most games were canceled. I just

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>how Michigan's was like, they're just cancelations, which is fine,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>fewer people hurt probably, and just we're gonna look forward

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to the season. Maybe a couple quarterback battles, and we

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>don't have I don't think a lot of in depth

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 2>thoughts about the draft as non NFL fans.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, that is accurate? I would say, yeah, very so.

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to try and take a look

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 2>at this, and I mean we can react to we've

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 2>had these NFL draft experts as much as anybody can

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 2>be one on the show before to sort of say, hey,

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 2>this is how this person progressed, and this is why

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 2>this person is considered to be a top twelve pick

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>or a top three round pick.

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Whatever. But you know, we can react to like, oh,

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they're a first round pick. Weird, didn't seem that way.

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But we can just sort of scan through it real quick,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and then we have a ton of questions that we

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>can probably get to about fifteen percent of them. That

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds good. Again. Our email is Solid Verbal at gmail

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We had questions come in via email, also

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter, from Facebook, we had some from Reddit if

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw correctly as well, So a bunch of different

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>sources of questions here on the program. Don't forget. If

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you're finding us for the first time, can subscribe out

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes or Spotify, Google Play, anywhere where you can

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>find a podcast, you can find us. We're the Solid

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Verbal and what else Oh thenewsolid Verbal dot com. Yeah,

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned for that. At some point over the next

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>couple weeks and months, we got more shirts that will

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be forthcoming again weeks and months. Stay tuned right here

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to the show the Solid Verbal. We're a college football

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>show that goes year round, and there was a ton

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of interest. By the way, well, we mentioned on the

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>last show that we were going to be doing our

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>next live show in the Midwest in Chicago some point

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>early to mid August. We had some great suggestions come

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>into the inbox. It seems like there's a ton a

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>ton of steam on this live show that we're going

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to put forth in August our next Fantasy Things Draft

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in Chottown, Dan.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So if anybody listening has ideas or knows people

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 2>like we are interested in hearing about venues because we

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>want it to be the absolute best possible situation. We

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>want there to be food and drink. We're thinking, I

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know about three hundred people. We like to keep

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it sort of intimate, but yeah, we want to have

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>a great venue central everybody can get to know a

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>PA system of stage, that kind of thing, the basics.

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking for venues for that.

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>We're trying to figure out if we can add a

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 2>second show in another city, either before the season starts

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>or within the season at some point. Sure, as we know,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>listeners are spread out everywhere, but no that's the situation, Ty.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 2>We're just living our best lives.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Living our best lives. Again, tell your friends. Solibble dot

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>com is our website. Come on out, subscribe. We'll be

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>here all off season, and obviously once we get a

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit closer to the football season, we'll have more

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>football to discuss. But as you mentioned, we got this

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>whole draft thing, yes, staring us in the face. Now.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>As you know, if you follow these sorts of things,

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a weird hybrid. It's a crossover of sorts. For us,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we've at times ruggled with how in depth we want

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to get with the NFL Draft. There is clearly a

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>stake in the game for a college football film because

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as these players move forth and prosper in the professional ranks,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes we're very interested to see how those players perform,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>see how high up they go. There's certainly plenty of

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>intrigue when it comes to the NFL Draft, with teams

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>moving around and sometimes overvaluing and undervaluing, and it's a

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>whole different dimension. But we're going to try and do

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>our best to cover it. Here. We've got in front

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>of us the Daniel Jeremiah Mock Draft. Yes from NFL

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and I guess the plan would be to

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>go through to examine some of these players to the

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>best of our abilities, not from an in depth standpoint

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of how much can Saquon Barkley squad, but instead what

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>did we see in college do we think that translates

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to the NFL? And what do we think the likelihood

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is of some of these guys succeeding at the same

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>level or to a greater as they move on.

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>In a very certain way. And I do not mean

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 2>this in a crassway, which I really if you're going

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to listen to our show consistently, you should listen to

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>it within the back of your head saying Dan does

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>not mean this in a crassway. The NFL draft and

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the way we in that you know, people interested in

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 2>football on all levels evaluate players is not unlike if ty,

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>if you were just dropped into a different town and

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 2>we're tasked with finding a soulmate every year, you have

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to sort of you know, if you're in a tiny

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.799
<v Speaker 2>town all of a sudden, what you may be looking

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 2>for might be different than if you were dropped into

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a major city or a medium sized town. Like there

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 2>is a context to each draft class, which is interesting

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 2>to me because the most important position obviously is quarterback.

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 2>So we're looking at a quarterback class which is I

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>would say, pretty robust, pretty deep this year compared to

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>some other years.

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a ton of intrigue at the very top of it.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there's intrigue at the top, and then you know

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 2>it's spotty from there. From what I can tell as

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>a definite non expert, but like Sam Donald is somebody

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>who I think we liked watching for a long time,

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and obvious talent and athletic and improvises super well, made

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 2>a good number of dumb mistakes trying to do too

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>much whatever is thought of to be the most valuable

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 2>person in this draft. Yes, by some measures, by some measures,

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 2>by some measures, the position is so important. Let's put

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>this way in terms of quarterbacks, right, you definitely make

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 2>that case. But I've also heard the case made for

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Saquon Barkley. I've heard the case made for Quentin Nelson,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I've heard the case made for Bradley Chubb, all of

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>whom are very good players in their own right. But

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 2>you're correct, at least to the extent that as it

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>relates to quarterbacks, Sam Donald is getting a lot of

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the press. I can't make a good argument that Sam

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Donald isn't the best quarterback in this class. You know,

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>and you know Baker Mayfield is a little bit small,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>and they wonder how Lincoln Riley's system, which has elements

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>of NFL systems but not all NFL systems, how that

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 2>translates to the next level. Josh Rosen has thought of

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>to be the most advanced quarterback brain in terms of

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 2>understanding and computing. But then there's weird worries that he's

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>too smart, right, and then Lamar Jackson might be a receiver.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>If you listen to the worst people who cover the sport,

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen didn't complete a ton of passes.

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Well's in the Mountain West. Let's do this. Let's start

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback. Okay, yeah, the big names that are out there,

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>The Browns draft number one. Now, we're not going to

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>break down what teams need, because neither you nor I

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are NFL experts, but we know that the Browns are

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>drafting one. They actually have the fourth pick as well,

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at least as of now. And the names that you're

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>going to hear, I think that are in contention for

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that first overall pick. It sounds like they want a quarterback.

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not right. The I guess insinuation at this point

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is that they want a quarterback. Sam Darnold is a name.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>We've also got Josh Allen, who has been bullied throughout

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the pre draft process from Wyoming. We've also got Josh Rosen,

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>who has long been my favorite from UCLA. We've got

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield, who has crept into that conversation as well.

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Who am I missing? There's also Lamar Jackson, who won't

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>go that high but is still a name that carries

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of intrigue. Of those guys that I

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have named Dan, which direction would you go based on

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>what you saw in college? If you were picking number one.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Overall, I'd probably go Rosen. Why I don't love Sam

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Darnold of these five guys? To me, like that indefinable

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>thing seems to rest with Donald's in that he seems

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 2>relatively trustworthy to just sort of get a team together

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 2>for a seventy one yard drive at the end of

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the game. But in terms of what the NFL will

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>throw at quarterbacks, which is far more advanced athletically and

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 2>mentally than the college game, I tend to think Rosen

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 2>and even maybe Mayfield. I really like Baker Mayfield. I

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>like that fearlessness, I like that arm I like you know,

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the throwing off platform is like a big thing that

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>you'll hear about him. But I really am a big

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 2>believer in those two dudes, just in terms of ready

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to succeed.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting to me because I think each of them

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>has an interesting quality. Yeah, I don't know if any

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 1>of them are fully rounded enough to truly be the

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick. But Sam Donald has an intangible

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to him. There's no denying he's got an intangible. Everyone

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>who's around him likes him. He certainly would be a

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>good clubhouse guy, and he's got a ton of physical tools.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>The problem that we talked about on the program all

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>throughout the course of the last season is when the

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>first read broke down, so did Sam Darnald. That was

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem. Okay, and maybe is partially his fault, partially

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the play call in the coaching, I don't know, but

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that is the knock on Darnold. Josh Rosen, as you said,

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a smart kid, really smart, has a ton of physical tools,

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but a little bit brittle was banned up a little

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>bit in college and there aren't these lingering questions about like,

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what would what would happen to Josh Rosen if he

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ended up in Buffalo? What you can also what would

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>happen to any of us if we ended up in Buffalo? Well, right,

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and no disrespect to Buffalo, but you can only study

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the Eerie Canal and Buffalo Wings so long before a

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>guy like Josh Rosen, who it seems like wants to

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be intellectually stimulated before he gets bored and wants to

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>do something else. I like that that's looked at as

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. Well it's not a bad thing, but

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying Josh Rosen just seems to kind of have

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a wandering mind that's into everything, and the knock on

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>him is is maybe it's not into football quite enough.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Rightly or wrongly, that's what people say.

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean they try to find things. I mean

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to sort of take into consideration what NFL scouts do

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>in terms of poking holes. I don't think there's a

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of logic at no.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's splitting hairs. The ultimate game is splitting here.

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's Rosen, Baker Mayfield. What's a knock on Baker.

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>What he runs runs a little bit of hot, sometimes

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a wild card, maybe a little undersized.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>How does the Lincoln Riley system, the Lincoln Riley slash

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Bob Stoops system translate to the college game? Sure, I

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>think that's all fair game. And Josh Allen's kind of

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>an unknown. I saw some stuff on Twitter about, Hey,

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Josh Allen and how he likes to

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>always roll out to the right m hm. And what

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw from him last year wasn't all that special.

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>He was probably not one of the best three quarterbacks

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 2>in the Mountain West in terms of production.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So I guess to put a bit of an ambiguous

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and uncertain bow on this thing. I don't know if

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>i'd take any one of these guys if I were

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>picking number one overall. I think if I had to

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>pick a quarterback though, of that group, I would probably

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>go Darnald. I think Darnald might have the highest ceiling

0:12:58.520 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>of all of those.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Maybe throws it to a lot of players wearing a

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 2>different color jersey than what he's wearing.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps Gunslinger Dan Gunslinger.

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll go through this quickly because I don't this is

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 2>not going to relate to any NFL team. I would

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 2>not take a running back in the top five, probably

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 2>even the top ten. Saqwon Barkley is otherworldly, and it's

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>not because he's not. I just am not a big

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 2>believer in that kind of value for somebody who takes

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 2>a hit on every play he touches the ball. I

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 2>love Vidavea. I think vidave is going to be a

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 2>really good player for a long time. If you haven't

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 2>watched him play huge nose tackle for Washington, who is

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>crazy athletic and huge motor really at like three hundred

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>and forty pounds. Mika Fitzpatrick I think is a very

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 2>modern NFL player in that he is hybrid, can come

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 2>up in the slot, can play outside a corner, can

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 2>drop into a safety role. Really like Miga Fitzpatrick, I

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Derwin James, I think we both have just deep, deep

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 2>crushes on time. He's top fifteen, top twenty ish in

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 2>this mock he is at seventeen, but he fits that

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>That hybrid guy still my beating heart.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's there's a lot of that people trying

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 2>to because from what I can understand, the NFL is

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 2>they try to copy year to year and Jalen Ramsey

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>has this huge, huge impact as this super versatile defensive back,

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and there are a couple of guys in this year

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 2>draft that have that potential to be able to be

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>moved around.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I suppose.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Beyond that, there's not you know, Sony Michelle is the

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>last pick in this in this mock love Sony Michelle

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 2>feels about right, But yeah, I tend to gravitate towards

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and this is the big one I suppose is Quentin Nelson. Okay,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Quentin Nelson just a wrecking ball of destruction of.

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>A young man.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 2>And I love when people are described as who he

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>plays angry.

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>He's got a nasty does play angry.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was a total joy to watch. And you know,

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>perhaps not single handedly, but a good reason why Josh

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Adams had the breakout year that he did last year,

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>because that left side of the line for Notre Dame,

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>as I'm sure you know and will deeply miss, was

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 2>was pretty incredible.

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It was incredible. And one thing that I'm noticing here

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>again the Daniel Jeremiah mock draft that we've got up

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>from NFL dot Com. He's got Mike mcglinchy who was

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the tackle on the left side of that line for

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame all the way down at number twenty one

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Bengals. Now, McGlinchey was a guy. Depending how

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>much attention you pay to these mock drafts, at some

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>point or another he was in many a top ten.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I like McGlinchey a lot. I think he will be

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>solid at the pro level. I also am somewhat scarred

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>from the last play in the Georgia game where he

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>just got toasted around the edge. He did. And you know,

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>there were a couple moments like that in Mike mcglinchy's

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>season and really his Notre Dame career where again eight

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time, very solid pro caliber player on

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of your line. A big deal to have

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that in the college game, a big deal to have

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that at any level of the game. Just a couple

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>moments here and there were mcglinchy just got iced and

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't live those down. And when I see him

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>down here at twenty one, I say to myself, out,

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that's about right. You got to go Quentin Nelson higher

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>because you didn't have as many of those moments. If

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you're Quentin Nelson compared to Mike mcglinch, right.

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 2>He generated those moments for other people exactly on the

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 2>other side of them, exactly exactly.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So both those guys, to your point, will sorely be

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>missed when it comes to the twenty eighteen Notre Dame

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>football season that goes, can we sing? Can we transition

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>from there? Who's coming for Notre Dame?

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Who's hitting the left side of that line? And who

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>is coaching that they lost their offensive line coach? Correct,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 2>lost kind of everybody, man, right, So is are the

0:16:55.440 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 2>prospects and my prospects, I mean looking forward? Are are

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>we thinking good things about Notre Dame's offensive line in

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>replacing these two clear top level talents on a decent level.

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>The good news is that they've recruited very well, okay

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>along on the offensive line, So you know, whether it's

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Liam Eichenberg or Josh Lugger some of the other guys

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that got coming in, they'll be okay. They just won't

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be as experienced up front, and it's gonna be difficult

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to follow up the act of mcglinchy and Nelson. Even

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>if mcglinche got toasted a couple of times, it's still

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a tough act to follow. He was a big dude,

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a big presence there on the left side of the line.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And especially now when I think you got questions about

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback situation, Brandon Wimbush didn't little comfortable at all

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>last year. Is Wimbus gonna start? You're gonna have to

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>give me a few minutes before we discuss that point.

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I kind of don't want him to start,

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but will he I got to a point about eighty

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>percent of the way through the year when I started

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>really having these conversations with myself about whether or not

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Wimbush was the answer. When Wimbush was recruited and when

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he ultimately flipped from Penn State to come to Notre Dame,

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and then when he was lurking in the background as

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you had this whole controversy going on between Deshaun Kaiser

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and Malik Zayer, everyone was sort of talking on the

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame boards that I lurk on about how Brandon

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Wimbush could make all the throws. He's the athletic type

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that can run the precise system that we thought Notre

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Dame wanted to run, and things should all just go

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>off without a hitch. Whenever he's inserted into that starting lineup,

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and then all throughout the course of the season last

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>year and the beginning part of the season, everyone was

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>telling me, don't jump the gun. Don't jump the gun.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.959
<v Speaker 1>He's a first time starter at the college level. If

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not doing what you'll want him to do, it's

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>because he's just he's green, Dan, he's learning the system.

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I can honestly say, I don't feel like Wimbush got

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>any better from the start of the year to the

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. In spots, he had moments right,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>moments are brilliant, but he did not get better from

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the start of the year to the end of the season.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's I mean the actual context, though, You're only

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 2>as good as your options and our Notre Dame's options.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 2>At a point where you can get rid of a

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 2>guy who helped to lead a good or pretty good offense,

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 2>just a flawed offense.

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>He gives them something on the ground for sure, that

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Ian book doesn't right. Brandon Wimbush, no doubt a talented runner,

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>but eventually teams figured that out. Dan. Eventually people can

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>key on that, and we saw that happen in spots

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 1>when they forced Brandon Wimbush to throw. He just never

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>looked comfortable. More often than not, he just did not

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>seem comfortable or he wanted to scramble, and that was

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem with him. So ian Book gives them more

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of raw passing talent at this point, and

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw flashes here and there of ian Book. I

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>thought he looked fine as a passer. He certainly plays

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>with the confidence in the passing game that Wimbush didn't.

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>That is, I think something to watch for as we

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>start talking quarterback controversies now moving into twenty eighteen. The

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>other name I'll throw in there is Phil Jerkovic, who

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is there. Freshman comes to Notre Dame from Western Pennsylvania,

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't read much about him getting any serious

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>looks for the starting position, but I could definitely envision

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a situation and wish that were the case.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 2>That's if you are going to roll with a true freshman,

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 2>if there is no smoke around him at least like, oh,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 2>he picked up the offense immediately, he has a contender

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 2>for this job in the way that say Trevor Lawrence.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Immediately you know there was smoke around him, and he

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 2>had a the spring game doesn't actually matter. But in

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 2>terms of just like if those stories don't really exist,

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 2>it almost assuredly won't happen.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem. Now, that's okay, freshmen shouldn't be starting

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>most of the time. Here's the problem I have, and

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>then let's move on. No one wants this much Notre

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Dame talk, except for like five percent of our listeners.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But listen as I raise my hand right, here is

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem that I have, really with my own gut instinct. Here, Yeah,

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the main reason that I sort of want Notre Dame

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to move away from Brandon Wimbush is because I was

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>very disgruntled with Brandon Wimbush, and not because I know

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for certain there is somebody with equal or greater skill

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>set working behind him. The only quarterback on that depth

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>chart that we have any data on is Ian Book,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not totally convinced he's much better than Wimbush,

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>but he's something different. And just because I was so

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>frustrated last year with the old starting quarterback is probably

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>not reason enough to just move in any damn different direction,

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Book or Drkovic.

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>So at the top of the draft, Sam Darnold in

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>this mock obviously gone from USC, and there's no clear

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>successor for the Trojans. So it was Matt Fink and

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Jack Sears battling it out during the springtime, and then JT. Daniels,

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the five star incoming freshman who enrolled early at USC.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 2>He shows up over summer, and I cannot imagine a

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 2>situation which USC is just going to roll with what

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 2>should be a high school senior at a time for

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 2>USC that, even though they are rebuilding, reloading whatever they've

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously recruited very very well. I can't imagine putting that

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 2>much on a true freshman who was not there for

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 2>spring that that hope has to last either into the

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>season to give him time to pick up the offense

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 2>or as a red shirt freshman something that doesn't. It

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem fair to put that much weight on him.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Why what if he's better.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you can be better unless Sears

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 2>and Fink, who are who seems solid like they seem

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 2>like a Cody Kessler model type quarterback, which is fine

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 2>for USC. I just don't know how you roll the

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 2>dice on that. I don't I don't know what.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Will it take in this USC offense to get more

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>consistency and take the team to higher levels than we've seen.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>So Jeremy Prue at Tennessee hired away I think his

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 2>name is Tyson Helton, who called some of the plays.

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>There was a weird breakdown of like one offensive coordinator

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>called some plays the other with him and tem Martin

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>calling other plays. So maybe more consistency of play calling

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 2>just because it's from one person presumably and relying on

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 2>they've got two to three I'm you know, they're obviously

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 2>without the what's it the Texas Tesla Ronald Jones that's

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in the draft, but they've got good options at running

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 2>back to go two or three deep offensive line looks

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>new ish for USC, so I would imagine it is

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 2>recognizing that it's okay to lean on the running backs

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and to think about things in a more play action way.

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 2>And because their receiving corps was not all that good

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 2>last year outside of uh, what's the name Deontay Burnett,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 2>they were just not all that consistent, So maybe there's

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 2>just more development coming. I would imagine it is just

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 2>getting more creative with the run game and asking the

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 2>quarterback to do less until the quarterback is ready okay,

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 2>elsewhere we mentioned Saquon Barkley, Miles Sanders.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Saquon Barkley. Yeah, in this mock draft, here is Daniel

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeremiah's second pick going to the Giants, which I must say,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>as a Giants fan thrills me. Gives me some shivers

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>as a longtime Giants fan. As a Penn State grad,

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Saquon I think would be a great pick, and we

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>can discuss the merits of that. But yeah, we're talking

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders as the replacement. I feel okay about that setup,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, and no one's going to be Saquon,

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>But if you truly look game by game, they are

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>only a handful of games really where Saquon was like

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>up over one hundred yards. That offense was prolific enough

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>even without him, which is crazy to say, But they

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>still have Trace mcsorly, and I think as mcsorly goes,

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so does that Penn State offense. So whether it's Miles

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Sanders or and I don't know, Mark Allen is.

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Another name, Tommy Stevens shovel passes Tommy Stevens. I think

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna be just fine and get plenty of production

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 2>from that spot. Regardless of who's carrying the rock. Fair enough,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll skip down a little bit. Denzel Ward the corner

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 2>for Ohio State. You're gonna be shocked to learn this,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 2>but Ohio State has recruited corner super duper well yeah,

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and should not find too many troubles. Jeffrey Okuda got

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 2>some time last year. He's a former five star. Kendall

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Sheffield's in there. They will be fine at at corner.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>And even with losing what it's Taekwon Lewis, Sam Hubbard

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 2>as just crazy pass rushers, Nick Bose is still there,

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Chase Yong. They have so much talent that the job

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 2>of corner at Ohio State is one of the you know,

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 2>this is all relative but easy considering how quickly quarterbacks

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 2>have to get rid of the ball. Generally speaking against

0:25:55.720 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 2>this defense, we talked about Notre Dame and the offensive line.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Quentin Nelson replacing some Irish up front. Rokwan Smith at

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Georgia was everything on the middle tier of that defense.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 2>And we'll need to be you know, as a three

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>four down linebacker. If you remember, Natrez Patrick was suspended

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>before the playoff after the SEC championship game for I

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 2>think it was a pot arrest or a pot charge.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 2>He's been reinstated and people feel good about him stepping

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 2>in there. Do you know how many defensive backs Alabama

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 2>loses that basically started last year A ton five? Yeah,

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>five defensive backs because they played that you know, sort

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 2>of strange bas Nickel defense. Essentially that Mika Fitzpatrick is gone,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 2>but they've recruited super well. Patrick Sartan junior, if you

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 2>want to feel super old, comes in as perhaps the

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 2>top corner in the country. We talked a little bit too.

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 2>H what's his name, Jared Maiden a couple of years

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 2>ago at the National Championship. He's sort of been in

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>a safety corner. I remember he was super well regarded

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Saveon Smith, who was at LSU or he signed at

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 2>LSU before going JC. He steps in for Alabama. They're

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be fine, but they're going to be green.

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 2>They're going to be green. But that is if there

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 2>is a unit of Alabama's that you trust. With Nick

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Saban's background, it feels like it should be secondary, right.

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess I just I'm sorry. I hate to interrupt,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Please no, I keep laughing. Not at the prowess of

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jeremia of putting the mock draft together. But just

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as the possibility of Josh Rosen in Buffalo, I know

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's right there. I know many nice people from Buffalo,

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and generally I root for the Buffalo Bills. They're not

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>my team, but I root for them to do well

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and sort of exercise their own demons as a franchise.

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know about Josh Rosen going A Southern

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>California kid going to Buffalo does not seem like a

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>great combination as a Southern California kid.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Time we mentioned we mentioned Wilton Spate to UCLA as

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>a grad transfer, which I don't believe the ceiling is

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 2>super high, not for Wilton spate potential coming off of

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>a a spine.

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Injury last something something like that.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he's fine. I think he can be

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. He had some down performances in bigger games.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think the expectations are too high for UCLA.

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So it could be Spade, it could be Devin Modster,

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 2>who got some time behind Josh Rosen last year. I

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>know they have an incoming freshman that's well regarded, but

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't expect a ton from UCLA's offense in year one,

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 2>but hope to be proven wrong.

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's do this. Let's close out our draft

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>discussion here. Let's give me a couple guys, one or

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>two guys that you think A can't miss. I'll go

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>with two of the guys we just mentioned.

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>The two guys that I would say right now, well,

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll do one that we just mentioned, one that we

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of mentioned. I think Minka Fitzpatrick. I know Alabama

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 2>defensive backs recently have got into the NFL, and it's

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 2>not that they've struggled, but trouble staying healthy or playing consistently.

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 2>But Mika Fitzpatrick is to me too versatile not to

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 2>succeed if he's healthy.

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And the other one is Vidavea.

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, I think in terms of finished products physically

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and in terms of their games and pass rush moves

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and ability to see plays happening before they do. For

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 2>somebody taken in the top twelve or fifteen, a defensive

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>player that high, I think Vidavea is bedrock that you

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>can build your team around, or build a defensive unit around.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I won't say any of the quarterbacks. I won't even

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>say Saquon Barkley, even though I love Saquon, I get

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it if the Giants want to take him at two.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>He does seem like a once in a generation prospect.

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not that translates to the NFL. Whether or

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not he can stay healthy at a position, as you eluded,

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>gets pretty banged up, that remains to be seen. I

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>would never want to put a running back in as

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>my you know, most likely to succeed here. Sure, it's

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>just sort of a bad bet, but if I am

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>betting on anyone, I think Quentin Nelson goes without saying

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Quentin Nelson's going to be a lockdown guard for somebody.

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I also think Harold Landry from Boston College.

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Guys on not super great teams who keep succeeding is

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a nice flash.

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a pass rusher. He's a pass rusher, and you

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>put him in the right system, I think he can

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>succeed and would sort of be one of those can't

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>miss guys. You want to aiate some cues, let's do it, baby. Congratulations, Skippy,

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got mail. You've got mail. On the solid verbal.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Each and every month, or as often as we can,

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we do our best to pay homage to those of

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you who write in Solverable at gmail dot com, on Facebook,

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, on Instagram, on Reddit. If you fly a

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>banner over our house, however, you get the question to

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>us to do our best to try and answer them.

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And Dan, you had a prescription for folks out there

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>when you post on Twitter and Facebook and the like.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>What we were looking for in this show? What kind

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of topics did you solicit? Uh? Draft replacements?

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 2>So I guess what we just talked about players coming

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 2>into replaced first round type draft prospects, buying a new house,

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 2>quarterback battles, the office obviously, the phenomenal show The Office,

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and I mean really anything beyond that.

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So that was the meat. Can I start with a

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>question for you please? We were talking at the top

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of the show about podcast studios. Now I noticed that

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>there are some podcast questions that came in. I would

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I would be in the market for a couple podcast

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>questions from the verballer hood if we I have my

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>own question for you that I need answered. Okay, As

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, I am very close to owning a home,

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>very close to owning my own home, and that will

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>happen before long. I will be faced with a decision

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>about which room I want to put my podcast studio in. Now.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>The new place is bigger than the current place, which

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>means I have more options in terms of rooms into

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>which a podcast studio would fit very nicely. I do

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>think eventually, after the solid wife and I decide to

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>remodel the basement area, the podcast studio will be located

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>down there. But right now it's unfinished. It's in good shape.

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>They aren't like bugs crawling around or anything, but it's

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in good shape. It's just a lot of concrete jungle,

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if you will, downstairs. So the question is do I

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>try to occupy one of the unused bedrooms with my

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast studio now it's more of a finished product in there.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We got the carpet, We can put stuff up on

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the walls, nice windows, be more of a comfortable experience

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in one of those rooms. Or do I just sort

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of acknowledge upfront that eventually it's going to be downstairs

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and even though it's unfinished now I sort of have

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>my run of the full basement. I could build a

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>video studio down there if I wanted. For some of

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the video stuff that we've done, some of the Facebook

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we've done here, and there. Sure, I am

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really on the fence about whether or not I want

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to go downstairs with it, or if I want to

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>go more of the finished variety upstairs. So what do

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you think I would go upstairs? I would go upstairs

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>because when you want to eventually build out your your

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast fantasy factory in the basement, that's exactly what it

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>will be.

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not a priority right now in terms of moving in.

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not something that could be done in a week,

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 2>whereas a room upstairs could be done pretty quickly. You

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 2>hang some foam, you know, you just keep it quiet

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 2>and you throw a desk in there, and you're good,

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 2>right essentially, Yeah, you're plugging in some equipment, plugging a

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 2>surge protect or whatever. You don't want to half ass

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>the basement right now just to get in there.

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>This is true.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 2>So I say, temporarily go upstairs while you map out

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>fully what you want to do in the basement.

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm leaning in that direction, but you know me,

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I overthink things, that's true, And I thought a little

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>bit about going in the basement. Anyway.

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I've never lived anywhere with the basement, so this is

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 2>all new to me. I'll stay on the topic of

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>podcasting though, because you apparently have I got a hank

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 2>of whistle that needs whatd Yeah, that's right, Kyle wants

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to know. Huge fan of the podcast as an avid listener,

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I really appreciate the audio quality of your podcast. I'm

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 2>thinking of doing a podcast with somebody's Okay, any recommendations

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 2>on equipment.

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Software, etc.

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 2>So congratulations to Kyle for being the ten thousandth person

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 2>to ask this question. So equipment is like the fourth

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 2>most important thing if you want to start a podcast,

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's still one of the more important things.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think it. Yeah, it has to be.

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the show itself should be listenable in both content

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and audio. But ty, if he's strictly asking about equipment,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 2>so this has nothing to do with the content of

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 2>his show or how often or whatever the type of

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 2>show it is, what is the base level that you

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 2>would recommend. Let's say he, just because we know this

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 2>about our listeners, makes a little bit of money, so

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 2>he has some disposable income. He's mail, he's not, Yes,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 2>we know he's mail, which I don't. Maybe you have

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 2>microphone specifics no inundation wise for men versus women. But

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 2>let's say he has some disposable income and cares about

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 2>audio quality.

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It is his.

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 2>If he's just starting this podcast with friends, then who

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 2>knows if it'll be around in a year, right, what

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 2>would you recommend? Well?

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So, okay, very quick history lesson. He talks about audio quality,

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and like, we've talked about this before, but podcasting has

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>very much gone away that YouTube went very early on.

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>In the beginning, it was whoever could do it, whoever

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>could figure out how to shoot a video and put

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it on the internet. They were the ones that got

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the views. And then over the course of time, when

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>people started pouring money into it, more of yous generally

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>went to the videos ahead better quality. Podcasting is very

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>much in the same vein. If you want to do

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it right, you have to put some focus on your

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>audio quality. So the first thing I would say is,

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>don't buy a blue Yetty. Don't buy a blue Yetty.

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks have them, they work in a

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases. But I can hear when some random

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast has a blue Yetty.

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 2>On the other end, if the theme of your show

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 2>is I Am in a Canyon, yeah, then yes, then

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:29.240
<v Speaker 2>it's fine.

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise I'm telling you, if you're using a Blue Yetty,

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't publicize, I can tell. So, just

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep me sane, don't don't buy a Blue Yetty.

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 2>So give me an option around one hundred bucks or

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 2>hopefully a little bit less that will give you decent

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 2>audio quality and either will go in via USB or

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 2>thunderbolt or whatever.

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Or you can get an adapter. Yeah, I mean you

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>can get a microphone, like a dynamic microphone, a decent

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>one for like a hundred bucks. There's one called an

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Audix D two. Tell me what dynamic means. Dynamic means

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that it captures a pattern, Okay, a directional pattern, let's

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>say in front of the microphone. Ah, I love when

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you're nerd out on this show. Whereas a bluoyetti, which

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I despise, is an omnidirectional mic. So if you put

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it in a room, it'd be great for like a

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>conference call where you need to pick up people in

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 1>various corners of a room. That's what a bluo yetti

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is good at. But if you want a true broadcasting microphone,

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you need a dynamic microphone because then it really only

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 1>captures let's just call it, a radius around the microphone

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a very limited range around the microphone, it tends to

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>pick up better quality. So I'd say I know of

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>an audis one that's like a hundred bucks. I'd think

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the D two. There are audio technica options out

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there if you don't want to spend quite as much money.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I've not used all these, but it has to be

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>better than the blue Yetti And I'd say, just in general,

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in general, by the best microphone you can afford. Fair

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And I assume he's doing this over Skype or something

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>like that, because most people don't have the luxury of

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>always being in the same room with their co hosts.

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So all right, fair enough.

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Any other podcast topics you wanted to hit on as

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 2>it relates to our show, or college football before we

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 2>move to other college football or the just random life questions.

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we move on, because when you get me

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>going on podcasting, I could talk for like four hours.

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>So okay, let's air on some questions. If anything comes

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to mind, I'll bring it up quickly. Top wide receiver corp.

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.240
<v Speaker 1>We only really mentioned one receiver this whole time, DJ Shark,

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>but returning wide receiving cores in the country, do any

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>stand out to you. I have a couple, Okay, who

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do you got?

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I like Penn State actually, especially given the quarterback that

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 2>they have throwing to them. So no Daveshan Hamilton, No

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Daveshan Hamilton, and no Blackmail's gone, right, and I imagine God,

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 2>So it's kJ Hamler coming in and Justin Shorter was

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the true freshman right right, So they have youth, promising

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 2>youth and a promising quarterback and Nogasicki, which means, I

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 2>guess balls would go to receivers more and more.

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's Juwan Johnson is the big dude. Yep.

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 2>DeAndre Tompkins still there, yep. Plus those two Hamdler and Shorter,

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 2>I feel pretty good about Penn State and freshman or

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 2>excuse me and receiver production. Oklahoma State even without our

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 2>guy Junkyard Jim Washington, excuse me and Clark L.

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Eateman.

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, McCleskey, Tyron Johnson and Dylan Stoner caught a ton

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 2>of balls last year, contributed a ton, but now obviously

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 2>without Mason. Rudolph AJ Brown exists for Ole Miss, so

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say Ole Miss. Paris Campbell exists for Ohio State,

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 2>so I'm going to say Ohio State and DeMarcus Lodge

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 2>is still good as well for ol Miss. But out west,

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 2>there's not a hun to love pac twelve wise, there

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 2>isn't There isn't a ton to love for me.

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Anybody else stand out to you wide receiver wise, he

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>stole my aj Brown, although I guess it's not much

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of a secret at Old Miss. No. Yeah, I think

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Penn State's receivers are going to actually be real good

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. Well, I think they'll be made better by

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the offense. And I think still having trace mcsolely around

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>will we'll cover up for whatever growing pains the receiving

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>corp might have in the absence of Hamilton, and that

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:35.919
<v Speaker 1>it just helps development. Yeah, sure of course. Next question, tie, Yeah,

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:40.760
<v Speaker 1>got a notre dame question, not asking it? Nope. Um,

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go to God.

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 2>We have so many questions. I should be I should

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 2>be more organized. This is my apology here. Planning to

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 2>go to Florida at Mississippi State this year. Any Starkville

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 2>recommendations or just Mississippian in general. I usually drive to

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 2>games tailgates, so I would appreciate any tips for tailgating

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>when flying in and his bachelor party is this weekend

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 2>in Brooklyn?

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Were going, Dan, you're going?

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the first time I've heard of a

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 2>bachelor party here and it should be. I think the

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 2>sun's going to be out. I'm going to be out

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 2>of town. I'm going to be out of town this weekend,

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 2>so I will not be attending Gary's bachelor party in Brooklyn.

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 2>But you should eat well and tweet mer eamil mean.

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I can give you some recommendations, but recommendations for Starkville

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 2>or a plan if you were going to Starkville having

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 2>never been there, Tie.

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 1>What would you do? I've never been to Starkville. Okay,

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Go to I think it's Little Dewey's

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is what Joe Moorehead recommended. Yeah, oh that's right, Little Dewey's.

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Go to Little Dewey's. That's all I have for you,

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and tweet or tweet us or whatever.

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 2>We can try to send people your way because a

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of the fund of tailgating is a communal aspect,

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 2>and so we can sort of figure out if we

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 2>can find tailgaters to host you, because that's that's what

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 2>we would do.

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Here you go, Dan, Here's one from Ivan He says

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a huge Notre Dame fan. North of the border,

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>way north. Oh Okay, what's a road trip to any

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>school in Division one, you guys would suggest with a

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>great college town fan base and food. Trying to plan

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>full trip, he said, he's way north of the border,

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:07.879
<v Speaker 1>So we assume somewhere somewhere, maybe the Arctic Circle, maybe

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Hudson Bay, who knows if you're coming from there, sir,

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I would go somewhere warm. I mean, why not. If

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna drive down to the US of A, I

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>would just go all the way down. So I would

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>say somewhere in the sec DAN if you want to

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>get the true college football experience, and plus the weather

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>will be a lot warmer than what you're used to. Yeah.

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean depending on where you go, though, if you

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.439
<v Speaker 2>go in September to a big ten town, it's gonna

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 2>be nice. It's gonna be fine. If you're going to

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 2>go somewhere familiar, so more like Canada, go to Madison.

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Madison, right, go to.

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Madison, Wisconsin. Don't think twice. It's a great college town.

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 2>The food is I mean, it's aggressively Midwest, but one

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of the tastier places to eat in the Midwest. The

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 2>game day experience, the in stadium experience all wonderful. If

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 2>you want to go somewhere warmer, go to Baton Rouge.

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 2>The city itself is not my favorite, but game day

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 2>in Baton Rouge is incredible, and the food's incredible, and

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 2>you'll eat super well and be in a loud place

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 2>that's unlike many other places. If not, yeah, I think

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 2>you're right, Go to Austin. Just eat well. It's very different.

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 2>It's a city, it's not a town. But those would

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 2>be the three options I.

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Would give you. If you're driving, Maybe Madison is a

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>short Madison might be. Or come to the live show

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago in August. Or come to the live show

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago. Next question, along the same lines from Ryan,

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he says he's trying to go to every single D

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>one football school for a game before he dies, which

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is an ambitious adventure. Here he says, what non big

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>time program should I look to put at the top

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of my list?

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Does Florida count for this? Don't put a Gainsville just wondering.

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Go to Colorado State, Okay, go to New Stadium and listen.

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a state where if you like partaking in certain

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 2>hobbies totally illegal and fine that it's they're good, They've

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 2>got a decent coach and Mike Bobo. I would go,

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 2>that's off the beaten path. That's a non power or

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 2>five option and you get to see beautiful country. You're

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in Colorado. I'm I don't really have an answer beyond

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 2>that tie.

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll go Colorado State too. All right, where you want

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to go next year?

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going Rams and for Collins is supposed to

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 2>be super nice. Let's go to do you want to go?

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:21.919
<v Speaker 1>House? Questions? Do you want to go office place? Let's

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>say a couple more football questions.

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a lot of talk in both pro and

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 2>college football about getting rid of kickoffs. From David, what

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 2>are your thoughts? So, how foundational and traditionally important in

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 2>your brain is the idea of a kickoff after scores

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and to start halves.

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like part of my childhood, the kickoff, Right, My

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>introduction into college football was were you a kickoff specialist

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>as a kid? Of course Campton High School? No, I look,

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>my favorite player growing up was rocket Ishmael mm hmm.

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And some of the most exciting plays that I've seen

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>as a fan, have come on kickoffs mm hmmm, whether

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Rocket, whether it's Desmond Howard, whether it's some of

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the crazy plays we've seen elsewhere, the band out on

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>the field, like all of these things are laced into

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the history of college football, and so I know that

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there are legitimate safety concerns about the kickoff play as

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole, But there is intrinsic value to me in

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>keeping that in the game.

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I think people, and I don't mean you necessarily, but

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 2>there is a natural fear of change in that this

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 2>exists because it has always existed, and a certain reality

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 2>is that things have to evolve. And if the evidence

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 2>is insurmountable that this is an enormous, unnecessary health risk

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 2>within the context of football being an enormous undous it's

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 2>a little contradict. But if it is the upper tier

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of risk in an already crazy risky sport, then it's

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 2>at a certain point worth trying to mitigate. And kickoffs

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 2>in general, I know our pal John Boyce did a

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 2>video about this, just how pointless they almost always are,

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.720
<v Speaker 2>like touchbacks are almost always more valuable if you're starting

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 2>at the twenty five mathematically speaking.

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, I mean that's all very logical, and I would

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:28.439
<v Speaker 1>say ninety nine times out of one hundred, I'm all

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in on the most logical argument. Right, kickoffs for me

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 1>were almost my introduction into the game as a fan.

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:37.799
<v Speaker 1>To lose that, I would feel like I'm losing a

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 1>part of my own personal fandom. Do you think fewer

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>people would watch football on a noticeable scale? No? No,

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I would still watch it, right, I would still watch it.

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I would flee the game as a whole,

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just saying it would lose a little bit

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of the luster for me. Right.

0:46:56.239 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, where we're going next, let's go to this is

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 2>a question. It sort of spans everything. It's about losing

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 2>a fantasy football league and getting a belly button pie.

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I got questions about the dude that wrote this one.

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So basically, he doesn't watch the NFL, and he

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 2>only picks college players he likes, notably from Oklahoma, and

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 2>he keeps losing in fantasy football and having humiliating consequences

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 2>because of it. I would recommend never play fans.

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing. Here's the thing. His name is John.

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna read this. I'm gonna read the opening sentence here.

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Last year I came in last place in my fantasy

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>football league and I was forced to get a belly

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>button piercing. Now, look, everybody, and I do mean everybody

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>who is into fantasy sports has at one point been

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>part of the league where they couldn't fully give the

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.479
<v Speaker 1>proper amount of attention to it. Right, But in most

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>cases those leagues aren't for one hundred dollars. There isn't

0:47:56.320 --> 0:48:00.080
<v Speaker 1>like a huge entrance fee. The risk is relatively low. Well,

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>why John, would you go into a league like this

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have the baseline to feel somewhat confident

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that you're not going to have to get your belly

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>button pierce at the end of it seems like an

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary risk to me. Maybe he wanted to get his

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 1>belly button pierced all along and this was his natural

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:22.399
<v Speaker 1>excuse to, oh dark jump into it. Right.

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you're going to play a fantasy football league

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 2>with those kinds of consequences, you should take it seriously

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and not just pick players from your favorite college team

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 2>or just don't play fantasy football because I think it's

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 2>dob Look.

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what the Browns tried and the Browns are drafting

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>one year in and you're out right, So take take

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>some heed from that whole adventure. And if you're going

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to join a league like this, where where the stakes

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.760
<v Speaker 1>are sit dan high, I don't know how much higher

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they can get. Find a friend who knows a lot

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>about it, someone who can be a co manager with

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you or something.

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Ty who's your favorite player from a team you hate

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:02.760
<v Speaker 2>or hate?

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Ed Dustin, Dustin Pedroia Okay college? Oh football? Hmm, that's

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>a tough question. There aren't many teams that I hate anymore. Right.

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I've told the story on this show about how in

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>my younger day, before I went to Penn State, before

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I was a little bit more of a cultured individual,

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I used to hate Penn State. I really did. Growing

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>up a Notre Dame fan Eastern PA, I hated Penn

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:37.279
<v Speaker 1>State and it stayed that way for a long time.

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not that way anymore, obviously, But there were some

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:43.439
<v Speaker 1>players on those teams that, even though I hated Penn State,

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it was hard not to like LeVar Arrington, It was

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>hard not to like LeVar Arrington. It was hard not

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to like Curtis Enis. On some of those teams. Those

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:56.720
<v Speaker 1>guys were dominant in the day, so probably LeVar Arrington.

0:49:56.760 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>For me, I love Reggie bush so much, and I

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't hate USC, and I was from USC, but rooted

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>against USC because of Oregon. Ah, Reggie bush Man, that was.

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 2>That's my earnest answer. My snark answer is Jake Locker

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 2>loved when Jake Locker was at Washington. By all accounts

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 2>of good dude, dude was just an average quarterback with

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 2>superior athletic gifts. But uh loved the Jake Locker era

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 2>at Washington.

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, quick one for you from Wilton Will sent

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:36.359
<v Speaker 1>in that he was interested in the Chicago Live show,

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and I said, I'd put this one on the list

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:41.600
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. Fifteen seconds or less. Your essential go to

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>taco destinations in La or San Diego.

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:46.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know San Diego Taco's that well. Go if

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 2>you're downtown, go to Sonoratown, Marisco, Jalisco. Sit down at

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:53.879
<v Speaker 2>BS Takorea. It's a casual sit down spot. Those those

0:50:53.920 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 2>three I would And oh one more bonus Giesato's g

0:50:57.480 --> 0:50:58.319
<v Speaker 2>U I S A d.

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.760
<v Speaker 1>O S Gisatos. All right, Spencer writes in Trevor Lawrence

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 1>or Kelly Bryant.

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 2>I have a difficult time replacing a conference champion quarterback

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 2>who did struggle at the end of the season against

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:15.319
<v Speaker 2>you know, arguably the best or one of the best

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 2>two or three defenses in the country and did nothing

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 2>against Alabama. But I right now Kelly Bryant. But if

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 2>by mid October, which is when you would assume Trevor

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence would have a pretty good command of the playbook,

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:32.200
<v Speaker 2>or at least a better command, if Kelly Bryant looks

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:35.880
<v Speaker 2>much more in the Alabama direction, what he looked like

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 2>against Alabama than what he looked like against teams like

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Louisville Virginia Tech early on in the season, I would

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:46.800
<v Speaker 2>imagine rotating in Trevor Lawrence at least four drives to

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 2>see how he does.

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Bryant got him too the playoff, Yes, that has

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to stand for something. And when you've got a true

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:55.480
<v Speaker 1>freshman coming in, I think you got to stick Kelly

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Bryant until further notice, until given a reason to make

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that move away from him. I think right now, Spencer,

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer has to be Kelly Bryant, all right, who

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:08.879
<v Speaker 1>has a brighter future Tennessee or Florida I think both

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>programs are going to be just fine in due time.

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I know we've been saying that about each for a while. Okay,

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I apologize to you. Yeah, what's his name, Tyler? Hello? Tyler?

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think right now, for the immediate future, the answer

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is Florida. There are more building blocks in place at Florida.

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee remains a pretty big unknown for me. There are

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of parts in place that I do like,

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:33.760
<v Speaker 1>but as a whole, it's a less finished product.

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:35.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we know nothing about Jeremy Prude as a head coach.

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Beyond did a good job closing out the recruiting class

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:41.879
<v Speaker 2>and hired a pretty good looking staff. I would say

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 2>that all looked like him. I don't know if you

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 2>saw a picture of all of them. But Dan Mullin

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 2>has wanted a difficult place to win. He has developed quarterbacks,

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and he is in a state with much more talent

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that is local and Florida's crossover I believe is LSU

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 2>in the West. Tennessee's crossover is Alabama. So things to

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:12.160
<v Speaker 2>me point to buying a little bit more stock in

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Florida at the moment.

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You get to pick the next couple questions.

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 2>All Right, let's go to Oh man, I'm let's go

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 2>to Noah Pittman about the show The Office. Which how

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 2>far away are you from Scranton?

0:53:25.320 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Roughly about an hour and fifteen.

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, so this is not necessarily your backyard. Now,

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 2>my wife and I have a disagreement over which is

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the most uncomfortable episode of the Office featuring Michael. She

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 2>says it's Dinner Party. He thinks it's definitely. Noah thinks

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:44.800
<v Speaker 2>it's Scott's Tots. Do you remember each of these episodess.

0:53:44.400 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember the Dinner Party, and I definitely Scott's I

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>do remember Scott's Totts. Yeah. I probably haven't watched as

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:53.880
<v Speaker 1>much of the Office.

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm rewatching it right now, and it's better yeah than

0:53:57.760 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't me.

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I love The Office. I just didn't all of it. Okay,

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not an expert on it. But the Dinner

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Party to me feels like it has to be the answer.

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And even though I don't remember Scott's Tots as well.

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Snip snap, snip snap. Yeah, there was no part of

0:54:13.280 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the dinner party scene that wasn't cringeworthy. Yeah, that's there

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was no part of it that was not cringeworthy. So

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:23.839
<v Speaker 1>for me, that's that's like the eight hundred pound gorilla here.

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know.

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:26.799
<v Speaker 2>If there was a B story in the Dinner Party one,

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 2>whereas Scott's Tots at least there was a B story

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 2>in that episode. To get away from it. I think

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:34.239
<v Speaker 2>it's the Dinner Party. And this is one hundred percent true.

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 2>My middle brother was engaged and at the time was

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:44.279
<v Speaker 2>living in Saint Louis, and I had seen the Dinner

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Party episode of the Office. It had already aired by

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 2>that point. I don't know if it was Netflix or

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 2>DVD whatever, but invited me over to his apartment that

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:57.440
<v Speaker 2>he shared with his then fiance now not fiance, and

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the apartment was decoration in such a way that I

0:55:01.200 --> 0:55:02.800
<v Speaker 2>was like, my brother didn't have anything to do with

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 2>this apartment that was like an uncomfortable couch and porcelain,

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 2>weird stuff everywhere, like, and he said, Oh, my god,

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:13.200
<v Speaker 2>you have to watch this episode of the Office with me,

0:55:13.320 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 2>called the Dinner Party. It is my favorite episode. And

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:19.359
<v Speaker 2>as I was watching it and connecting it, I was like, oh,

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:24.279
<v Speaker 2>he is living. He is living this episode and it

0:55:24.440 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 2>worked on such a good meta level that that is

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:29.960
<v Speaker 2>always going to mean more to me than pretty much any.

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Episode that said.

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Scott's Tots, in which Michael Scott promises a group of

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 2>third graders that he's going to pay for all of

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 2>their college tuition if they graduate from high school, and

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:44.959
<v Speaker 2>then has to go back to them watch a performance

0:55:45.080 --> 0:55:47.880
<v Speaker 2>of them singing and dancing to him as a thank you.

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 2>What you're going to do, mister Scott, when you make

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 2>dreams come true? It's and then do you see you

0:55:56.200 --> 0:55:57.879
<v Speaker 2>probably haven't watched this episode in a long time.

0:55:57.960 --> 0:55:59.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while. It's been a while. I remember

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the inner party quite well.

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:05.280
<v Speaker 2>So he tells this group of third once third graders

0:56:05.320 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 2>now high school seniors, that not only is he not

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 2>paying for their college educations, but he turns the conversation

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 2>to but you're gonna need laptops in college. And there's

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:18.240
<v Speaker 2>just like a very brief moment of like, well, pretty

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 2>good consolation prize coming, and he opens up a suitcase

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 2>full of rechargeable on batteries.

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>See, oh, it's so good. It's The Office is great.

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>If you need a show to rewatch and just binge

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 1>out on, I think it's on Comedy Central. Thank you,

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for that. Question. Noah, I'm gonna go back

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and watch both of those this week. Mm hmm, that's great. Ty.

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 2>You ever been to Savannah or Ashville? No, Adrian wants

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to know. No, I haven't been a Savanna. I've been

0:56:49.560 --> 0:56:52.920
<v Speaker 2>to Charleston. I know it's pretty similar. Ashville is awesome.

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Ashville's like it's a West coast college town in the

0:56:57.000 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>middle of the mountains in North Carolina. Ashville. So if

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:02.799
<v Speaker 1>you like beer, really good beer, town, good food, that's

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:06.719
<v Speaker 1>what I would suggest, go to Asheville, find microbreweries, eat food.

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:10.400
<v Speaker 1>All right. Richard, speaking of the office, wants to know.

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Twelve bones is a specific, specific suggestion. Twelve bones, twelve bones.

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Richard wants to know, speaking of the office, is Jim

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a d bag or a good guy?

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, look at you shortening to keep our iTunes

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:26.200
<v Speaker 2>rating as family friendly family show.

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Dan, I think a little of both. I think he is.

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 2>So if we're looking at a meter in which normal

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 2>dude with tendencies of good dudes and d bags is

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:43.640
<v Speaker 2>find yourself in the middle. Where do you stands Hi?

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Where do I stand?

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:48.200
<v Speaker 1>No? No, where do you stand this for Jim? Oh? Well,

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you need to specify, Dan, Yeah, No, you don't have

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:55.200
<v Speaker 1>any d bag consistencies. If normal guy is what fifty

0:57:55.200 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to fifty you're saying, hm, like sixty forty.

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say he's on the wrong side of

0:58:01.920 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 2>fifty with good guy tendencies, Yeah, i'd agree with him.

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:09.080
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't a particularly good boss. He screwed around at

0:58:09.160 --> 0:58:14.320
<v Speaker 2>work way too much. He you know, I should be

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:16.680
<v Speaker 2>want to criticize, but started dating somebody in the office.

0:58:16.720 --> 0:58:20.840
<v Speaker 2>But it worked out for him, right, Yeah, I would

0:58:20.920 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 2>say because it was such a weird place, and because

0:58:23.800 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the camera always looked to him for reaction, they wanted

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 2>you to associate with him, and therefore you want to

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 2>think he's a good guy. But in his actual actions,

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he was great a lot.

0:58:35.920 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Of the time. Yeah. He played great pranks though, mm hmm.

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And we did get a question about what kind of

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 1>office style prank would you play on each other? Would

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I on you? You on me? Oh?

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I know this answer immediately, and it

0:58:51.200 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 2>would It probably will make your skin crawl just hearing

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 2>me say it out loud.

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 1>What prank you would play on me? Yeah, I know

0:58:57.280 --> 0:58:58.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I would do. I mean, it's not really

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a prank. It's just me. What would you do?

0:59:00.720 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 2>But I would before a live show or some sort

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of live recording, I would twist knobs on your board

0:59:11.080 --> 0:59:16.040
<v Speaker 2>randomly or keep keep like because you're you're very good

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:17.320
<v Speaker 2>with diagnostic But.

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:20.200
<v Speaker 1>That would be a prank on you too. It would

0:59:20.280 --> 0:59:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be it's a live show. It's pretty short sighted.

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I do admit that, but I would say, yes

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that that sort of thing drives you batty, so like,

0:59:30.640 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 2>why isn't sound coming through this speaker? And then like

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:34.400
<v Speaker 2>you go to check the board and then I just

0:59:34.480 --> 0:59:35.720
<v Speaker 2>like unplug something in the space.

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:38.440
<v Speaker 1>See the problem that I have. I love the idea

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of pulling pranks, but kind of along the same lines,

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I tend to overthink them, and I tend to think

0:59:45.240 --> 0:59:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of all pranks as if I'm pulling a bank heist.

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So eventually I have them so well planned that you

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:55.000
<v Speaker 1>start thinking, wow, this this is actually more mean than

0:59:55.000 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>anything because I put so much thought on That's exactly true.

0:59:58.680 --> 0:59:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, I have to think about what

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I do to you.

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I know you're too good a guy. You're you're on

1:00:02.720 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 2>the right side of the meter. Okay, okay, quick question, Tye,

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 2>what do you think of when you think about food

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:14.280
<v Speaker 2>from Oklahoma. I loved this question because it was weirdly affirming.

1:00:14.440 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it's great, uh Oklahoma?

1:00:18.800 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? What is Oklahoma food to you? I have two answers,

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're Okay answers. A good, A good, A steak

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>from grassfread, grass fed beef. I don't know, Okay. All

1:00:28.520 --> 1:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I know about Oklahoma food is you know those Hostess

1:00:31.360 --> 1:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>fruit pies. Yeah.

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>I think like the real version of that is it's

1:00:35.480 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>either from Oklahoma or Arkansas. They're called hand pies, which, God,

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:40.959
<v Speaker 2>it's fun to say out loud.

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure. The other thing is I think they fry their

1:00:43.200 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>burgers with onions.

1:00:44.760 --> 1:00:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Like they take up a hamburger patty and throw a

1:00:47.720 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>bunch of onions just like on top of it and

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>throw it down on a griddle, so you get crisp

1:00:51.640 --> 1:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>onions with your burger, which is incredible.

1:00:54.040 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I think that's an Oklahoma thing. All right? Can

1:00:57.000 --> 1:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that's all I know? Can I close out with the question?

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Jump in? Sure? Is this the question about body odor? No?

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to go with that one first? I mean,

1:01:06.680 --> 1:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a very real question, but whatever you want. What

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>was that one?

1:01:10.680 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Somebody asked. I don't remember where this came from. What

1:01:13.960 --> 1:01:17.680
<v Speaker 2>to do if a coworker has particularly bad being.

1:01:17.680 --> 1:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, that's very difficult.

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>The only reason I bring this question to air is

1:01:26.080 --> 1:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>because your life advice is consistently confounding, and so I

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>really wanted to mind share what you thought. Oh yeah,

1:01:33.600 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 2>although the grocery store had more legs than I originally anticipated.

1:01:37.080 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>The grocery where to pick up some good answers is

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what they are. Yeah, man, the body odor one is

1:01:43.880 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, so it has to be. So the question was,

1:01:47.120 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? What steps do you take?

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:51.560
<v Speaker 2>How do you tell or how do you get somebody

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to tell a coworker whose body odor is particularly bad?

1:01:57.320 --> 1:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I assume in this question to the point of distraction,

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it depends how good of friends you are with the individual,

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>because like for example, and I know it's on a

1:02:09.440 --> 1:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>much much different scale, they are very close friends of

1:02:12.960 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>mine that I have at the office who if they

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>have something in their teeth, I would say, Hey, you

1:02:17.640 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>got some in your teeth. Of course that's easily fixed,

1:02:21.600 --> 1:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>easily fixed. And what I found is that bio large

1:02:24.000 --> 1:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>people appreciate that. Oh thank you, thank you. You know

1:02:27.040 --> 1:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you present it in a manner that you know isn't

1:02:29.480 --> 1:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>very threatening body odor. I guess you could kind of

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>go the same route, but you'd really have to be

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>good friends with the person. You really have to be

1:02:38.560 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>good friends with the person, and if they smell that bad,

1:02:40.720 --> 1:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you might not. So I'm thinking maybe I weasel out

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and just go the root of an anonymous note, man Ty,

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>what would you give me? Hold on, mister wizard over there,

1:02:52.160 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>give me your well thought out answer on this matter.

1:02:56.520 --> 1:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't anonymously leave a note that you smell, do okay?

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:04.800
<v Speaker 2>So, if it's an actual distraction on a like, if

1:03:04.840 --> 1:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>you have difficult times working without having to catch wis

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:10.920
<v Speaker 2>are you going to go to the boss and be like, hey,

1:03:11.000 --> 1:03:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Bobby smells or if yeah, if Bobby's a salesperson and

1:03:15.600 --> 1:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>in meetings it's something that is distracting or embarrassing because

1:03:19.280 --> 1:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>of the smell, you probably have to go. Assuming this

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>is an office of some size, you probably have to

1:03:26.520 --> 1:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>go to HR because those are the people that won't

1:03:30.320 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 2>get in trouble.

1:03:30.920 --> 1:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>But then, what do you do if you're HR? If

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you're HR's, you have actually say what do you do

1:03:36.920 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the situation of having to break the

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>news to this individual.

1:03:42.080 --> 1:03:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to start it with you have

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>to be very careful that it's not an actual medical problem, okay,

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:50.680
<v Speaker 2>because I think there can be like some sort of

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>glandular issue, sure, in which it's out of people's control

1:03:54.000 --> 1:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>and they're using you know, prescription grade deodorant or whatever methods.

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>So you have to say, listen, this comes from a

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>place of good faith. Is there something wrong? Does our

1:04:08.880 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>insurance cover it? If not, you may think about changing

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:17.920
<v Speaker 2>up your deodorant because it has been noticed that there

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:19.919
<v Speaker 2>is a little bit of an odor.

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's probably the fair way to go at it.

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's not all that different than a manager

1:04:27.720 --> 1:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>who would have to tell a subordinate that he or

1:04:32.080 --> 1:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>she is dressing inappropriately. Right, It's just a very personal matter.

1:04:36.200 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Or you just always go up to them every

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 2>morning and say you just work out, yeah woo, you

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>just get done with a run, feel the burn. But

1:04:45.200 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>that it's it's much more difficult than somebody with bad breath,

1:04:48.240 --> 1:04:50.800
<v Speaker 2>where you just offer them a mint ten times a day. Right,

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 2>that's it's yeah, still on the on the table, dan Ty,

1:04:56.080 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 2>we are we are trying to preach in this show

1:04:59.160 --> 1:05:01.600
<v Speaker 2>as strange as of my sounds, to try to take

1:05:01.640 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of responsibility and act like a grown up.

1:05:04.360 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, speaking of which, yes, let's close out

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>with this question. I highlighted it. Okay, what do you got?

1:05:10.040 --> 1:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>This is my favorite question, Dan Kloba shar Kloba car.

1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>We're not entirely clear on how to pronounce his name,

1:05:18.440 --> 1:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but DK is pretty consistent when it comes to quality

1:05:22.520 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>questions here on the verbal agree and we appreciate that

1:05:26.320 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this may be my favorite question yet. He says, I'm

1:05:29.520 --> 1:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking of buying a project car to work on with

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>my dad. I like this question, yeah, but I have

1:05:36.920 --> 1:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a limited mechanical experience. Have either of you tackled a

1:05:41.240 --> 1:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>job without any know how whatsoever? Was it as rewarding

1:05:45.320 --> 1:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>as I think this will be? Marriage? Yes? Marriage? Okay, sure,

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>very rewarding Dan. The fact that you can work on

1:05:54.560 --> 1:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>this with your father is very special, sure, and so

1:05:58.040 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, I think, yes, this would be very rewarding.

1:06:01.720 --> 1:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you can do the whole thing without getting hurt.

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>If you can, that would be terrific. If you can

1:06:06.680 --> 1:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>get the car to start, even better, but spending the

1:06:09.160 --> 1:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>time with your father, I think would be priceless. Yeah.

1:06:13.360 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I think projects, especially tangible projects where you are working

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>towards a goal, where you're becoming more skilled, where you're learning,

1:06:22.040 --> 1:06:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I think, are almost always if you're able to afford

1:06:26.040 --> 1:06:30.520
<v Speaker 2>everything involved, worth it, because even if you fail, you

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:33.360
<v Speaker 2>get quality time either with a family member or a

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:37.280
<v Speaker 2>loan or whatever. But you're learning, you're getting stories, you're

1:06:37.480 --> 1:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>not staring at a phone, Like I think, it's all

1:06:40.640 --> 1:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>in all like a clear win.

1:06:42.360 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a clear win. It's a clear win if you

1:06:45.080 --> 1:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>can plan in advance what that project's going to be.

1:06:48.360 --> 1:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>In this case, he's obviously thought it through. Maybe he's

1:06:52.280 --> 1:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>purchased the car already, maybe he hasn't, but either way,

1:06:55.320 --> 1:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>he's given some advanced thought on the matter. Yeah. The

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>projects where you get yourself in trouble are the ones

1:07:02.400 --> 1:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that just sort of happen and you decide, I can

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>go on YouTube and figure this out, Like, how hard

1:07:08.040 --> 1:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>could it be to do this? I had a similar

1:07:10.960 --> 1:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>instance when my garage door broke a couple months ago.

1:07:14.640 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Have I told you this story? Did you build a

1:07:16.400 --> 1:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>new garage door? I didn't build a new garage door,

1:07:18.440 --> 1:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>but I decided that I could fix it on my own.

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you can imagine one of those situations where

1:07:24.920 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the garage door only goes down ninety percent of the way,

1:07:31.560 --> 1:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>so I'll take it away. You just see it, like,

1:07:34.480 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>how hard could this be? It's on a right pulley

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and you got some springs and a coil up there.

1:07:40.320 --> 1:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a smart guy. I can figure this out. M hm.

1:07:43.560 --> 1:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So you go on YouTube. And when you go on

1:07:45.360 --> 1:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube to figure out how to fix a garage door,

1:07:47.600 --> 1:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they see a lot of complicated things. You know, a

1:07:50.400 --> 1:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>sea clamp would be good to have, maybe some vice

1:07:53.520 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>grips to hold things in place so you don't get squashed.

1:07:56.640 --> 1:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any of those. I'm a computer guy, Dan,

1:07:58.800 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't have tools like that. Come on,

1:08:02.520 --> 1:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I can do this. How hard could this be? Before

1:08:05.760 --> 1:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know it, my garage door is a skew, and

1:08:09.760 --> 1:08:11.919
<v Speaker 1>about what I would say is like a forty five

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>degree angle running from left to right. So no longer

1:08:15.320 --> 1:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just nice and parallel, but ten percent of the way

1:08:18.040 --> 1:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>off the ground. You're doing actual tangible damage. I'm doing

1:08:21.320 --> 1:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>real damage to not only the garage door, but as

1:08:24.000 --> 1:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the man who came to fix the garage door in

1:08:27.080 --> 1:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the wake of whatever the hell I did. Told me

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>most of the people who attempt what I attempted end

1:08:32.479 --> 1:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>up having to go to the emergency room after losing digits.

1:08:36.880 --> 1:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Because a garage door is on a very tightly wound spring,

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what helps lift it off the ground, and I

1:08:43.439 --> 1:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>decided that I would try to disassemble that and put

1:08:46.280 --> 1:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it back together. Thankfully, I did not do bodily harm

1:08:49.160 --> 1:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to myself. But it's those types of jobs where something

1:08:53.360 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>goes wrong. You say, I can go on YouTube and

1:08:56.280 --> 1:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. You don't have the tools they tell

1:08:58.880 --> 1:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you on YouTube you need to have, and he decided

1:09:01.160 --> 1:09:03.519
<v Speaker 1>to do it anyway. Those are the bad ones. Don't

1:09:03.560 --> 1:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>do those, Dan I had. In late December, I was

1:09:07.960 --> 1:09:11.479
<v Speaker 1>in the suburbs of Chicago, Jody with an I's family and.

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:17.160
<v Speaker 2>It was negative two degrees yeh, and I and my

1:09:17.320 --> 1:09:19.920
<v Speaker 2>father in law were preparing to leave to go pick

1:09:20.000 --> 1:09:23.439
<v Speaker 2>up dinner, and we went to open the garage door,

1:09:23.520 --> 1:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>just push the button whatever. It started to open and

1:09:26.400 --> 1:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>then closed, and that was a loud sound, and then

1:09:30.000 --> 1:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>suddenly it wouldn't open anymore, at which point we discovered

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>it got so cold that one of those coils or

1:09:36.360 --> 1:09:40.680
<v Speaker 2>spring or something just froze and popped nice. And that's

1:09:40.680 --> 1:09:43.679
<v Speaker 2>when I had my really good Charlie from Lost moment,

1:09:43.880 --> 1:09:44.560
<v Speaker 2>like where am I?

1:09:45.640 --> 1:09:48.599
<v Speaker 1>What am I doing? What is Chicago in the winter?

1:09:49.080 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I do not mess around with garage doors.

1:09:52.400 --> 1:09:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Not a good idea. So Dankloba shar qlobe car if

1:09:56.640 --> 1:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you're out there, I would say, any of these projects

1:09:59.280 --> 1:10:01.759
<v Speaker 1>are fine, but leave the garage doors to professional garage

1:10:01.800 --> 1:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>door people.

1:10:02.760 --> 1:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I had so not me, but my near my parents' house,

1:10:06.320 --> 1:10:09.880
<v Speaker 2>a guy built a helicopter in a head what now

1:10:10.479 --> 1:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>like a mini helicopter. It's it's actually the size of

1:10:15.000 --> 1:10:17.840
<v Speaker 2>like a hatch back, like a smaller version of like

1:10:18.000 --> 1:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a VW golf. He could sit in it, Yeah, you

1:10:21.080 --> 1:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>could sit in it, but that was it was like

1:10:22.960 --> 1:10:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Erkele's car with a chopper with a rotor whatever.

1:10:26.800 --> 1:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's and that's an ambitious DIY project right there.

1:10:31.600 --> 1:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I could not imagine how much money I would need

1:10:34.120 --> 1:10:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to be paid to go up in that chopper. I

1:10:38.080 --> 1:10:42.320
<v Speaker 2>guess alone, because there wasn't room as a passenger to

1:10:42.479 --> 1:10:44.720
<v Speaker 2>like try to train myself to go up in that.

1:10:45.160 --> 1:10:48.519
<v Speaker 1>I did see a thing online about a flat earther

1:10:48.800 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>who built his own rocket. I saw that too, and

1:10:51.439 --> 1:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he postponed. He chickened out right. He did launch the

1:10:53.880 --> 1:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>rocket eventually, and he didn't blow himself up. Oh, but

1:10:57.000 --> 1:10:58.639
<v Speaker 1>he was in the rocket. I don't think he made

1:10:58.680 --> 1:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it as high up to prove his theorem as he wanted.

1:11:01.080 --> 1:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But he was able to launch the rocket eventually. But

1:11:04.760 --> 1:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>he was in it. He was in the rocket, and

1:11:07.080 --> 1:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it was steam powered.

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I believe I so badly wanted it to go, and

1:11:12.080 --> 1:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't wish harm upon many people, but.

1:11:15.840 --> 1:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I wanted it to go very poorly. Let's leave it

1:11:18.760 --> 1:11:21.519
<v Speaker 1>at that, all right. Well, we're at solid verbal at

1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>gmail dot com. If you've got more that you'd like

1:11:26.160 --> 1:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to share with us, please feel free to write in.

1:11:29.960 --> 1:11:33.519
<v Speaker 1>We're also on Twitter at solidverbal. We're on Facebook at

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>facebook dot com slash solid verbal. We're on Instagram. We

1:11:37.040 --> 1:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>post there from time to time. We've got our own subreddit,

1:11:40.000 --> 1:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Reddit dot com slash ry slash solid verbal. Please stay

1:11:44.200 --> 1:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>with us all off season. We promised there'll be more

1:11:47.080 --> 1:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>football on the way, a lot of exciting things, both

1:11:49.560 --> 1:11:53.639
<v Speaker 1>in terms of websites and shirts and forthcoming details about

1:11:54.080 --> 1:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the live show that we are planning in August in

1:11:56.479 --> 1:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the Great City of Chicago. We're very excited about that

1:11:59.240 --> 1:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>than a couple live shows. Now we I think have

1:12:02.720 --> 1:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the formula down patent. We're excited to do more so,

1:12:05.360 --> 1:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe not just Chicago, but a bonus city. Stay tuned

1:12:07.720 --> 1:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>here for more information in the coming days, weeks, and months.

1:12:11.439 --> 1:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>That's all I got, Yeah, same all right for that

1:12:14.280 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself,

1:12:16.520 --> 1:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Tie Hildebrand, thanks for hanging with us for about an

1:12:19.040 --> 1:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>hour or so. We'll be with you again next week

1:12:22.160 --> 1:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and meantimes, stay solid, peace,