WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Don't Throw the House Out the Window

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hello, and welcome to Stuff to Blow Your

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Mind Listener Mail. My name is Joe McCormick. My regular

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>co host, Robert Lamb is out today, so I'm going

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to be recording this episode. Sol one announcement. Rob and

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I are both going to be out the rest of

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this week and the very beginning of next week. So

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got some vault episodes lined up for you starting tomorrow.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But I should be back with all new listener mail

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>on Monday then, and we'll have other new episodes for

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.319
<v Speaker 1>you sometime that week, I believe on Wednesday. So right

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on to your messages. This first message comes from Raphael

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's a response to our episodes on t Rafael says, Hello,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Joe. I just finished part three of your

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Exploration of Tea, and I wanted to say I really

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed these episodes. I'm not a big tea drinker, though

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>various tea varieties seem to proliferate in our kitchen cabinet.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>That said, Rob's poetry readings made me brew a cup immediately.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>As a food scientist, I always appreciate episodes where you

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>get into the history, science, and culture of foods. What

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>put the t series over the top for me was

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the digression in part three on the topics of reology

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and philosophy. This is why I love your show. I

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to expand on a few comments you made in

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>part two while talking about you lose preference for blue

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>glazed teacups. Uh and plenty of the elder I couldn't

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>agree more with your point that visual presentation can really

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>influence our perception of the flavor of foods and beverages.

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been involved in proprietary research that showed that changing

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>food color can influence taste perception. Broadly speaking, the effect

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of color on food is well known and significant. A

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>quick web search found an open access review by Charles

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Spence titled on the psychological impact of food color. Flavor, intensity,

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>detection thresholds, and even basic flavor identification can all be

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>manipulated with color changes. It is amazing what a little

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>food coloring can do. Uh. Yes, Raphael, that is true,

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and so we made general reference in the episode to

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that say, changing the color of the plates

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>or cups in which food and beverage are presented can

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>affect the perception of the properties of that food or beverage.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to highlight a few specifics about the background color,

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in particular because that was the original context youlu talking

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>about blue glaze teacup. So how much does the color

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of a cup or a plate affect what you taste

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>or or how you consume food? I found a review

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>article but the same author you mentioned, Raphael This is

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>also by Charles spin Charles Spence is a psychologist at

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Oxford University who studies food perception. UH. This was a

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>different review. It was called Background Color and its Impact

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on Food Perception and Behavior, published in Food Quality and

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Preference in the year eighteen and so after reviewing the

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>existing research as of this year, Spence writes, UH, this

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>year being when it was published. Spence writes that there

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is clear evidence that quote, while people obviously cannot literally

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>taste the plate, the color of the plate, bowl, glass, cup, cutlery, pot,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and package in slash against which a product is seen

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>can certainly influence how appealing of food looks, what it

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>tastes like, and even how much we end up consuming

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and or serving ourselves. However, that the interesting thing I

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>found from reading His conclusions is that background color and

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>food perception relationships are not static and linear, they are

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>dying amic and complex. So it's not just like, oh,

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>food tastes better on a red plate or something like that. Instead,

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Spence writes that one example is a trend of findings

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that desserts taste sweeter when served off of white plates,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>then when served off of black plates. And meanwhile, black

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>plates may enhance the experience of savory dishes. And so

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the dynamic aspect is that whether these effects are desirable

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 1>or not may depend on the properties of the food

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>itself and the expectations of the diner. So uh, if

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>a if a dessert tends to taste sweeter off of

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a white plate, and that dessert is already considered too

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sweet in isolation, it may actually be more enjoyable if

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's consumed off of a black plate, dulling the sweetness,

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the opposite holds true as well. A dessert that

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>people consider not sweet enough can be enhanced by a

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>white plate, heightening the perception of sweetness. And there are

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>other interesting findings well that Uspence mentioned and his conclusions.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>One is that when a food is considered an unhealthy indulgence,

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>people seem to naturally eat less of it when it

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is presented on a red plate, and the reasons for

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>these effects of color on food perception and consumption behavior

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>are still up for debate, like do the colors function

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>by triggering environmentally salient associations between certain colors and certain

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>types of nutrient contents? You know? Could it be that

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>when you see this color in the natural environment, it

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>often has this kind of uh, maybe a poisoning danger

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>associated with it, or this kind of nutrient reward associated

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with it? Or are these associations learned or are they

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>simply a result of color effects on mood? And questions

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like that, uh, And I think those are not fully

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>solved yet. But anyway, back to Rafhaile's message, however, I

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think you may both have done Plenty wrong. There was

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>a bit of chuckling over Plenty. This is our reference

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to Plenty the elder. Uh. There was a bit of

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>chuckling over Plenty writing that sappa boiled in copper pots

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>tasted bitter, while the same beverage boiled in lead pots

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>tasted sweet. At least in this case, Plenty may have

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>been accurately reporting a real phenomenon. If his starting grape

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>juice had been sitting around long enough to form some

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>acetic acid, Plenty may well have been cooking up some

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>lead acetate, also known as sugar of lead. Lead acetate

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>is a toxic compound with a sweet taste. By the

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>same token, dissolved copper has a metallic and bitter taste

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>at least according to determination of the taste threshold of

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>copper in water by Zacharias. At all the lead pot

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>might actually have made the sappa taste sweet, though also poisonous.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And to come back on this, Yes, Raphael, this is

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>a great point to explore for those of you who

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know or don't remember the original context of this

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>little digression we did some years back. Rob and I

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>had an episode where we talked about people intentionally consuming

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>lead acetate as a medicine or a food additive, which

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you absolutely should not do. It is highly poisonous. But

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the examples we discussed was a passage in

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of the Elder where he writes that leaden pots

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and not copper pots, should be used for the production

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of sappa. Sappa was a like a sweet syrup used

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>by the ancient Romans, I think used kind of in

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that you know a bartender might use simple

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>syrup today. It was a sweetening agent, though not as

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>sweet as today's simple syrup would be, but um, it

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was a It was a sweetening agent to syrup that

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Romans made by boiling down and reducing a

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>liquid called must, which was a type of lightly fermented

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>grape juice, kind of a weak wine. And the reasoning

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we discussed in that episode is exactly what Raphael is

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:59.119
<v Speaker 1>saying here that Plenty's recommendation was probably because boiling must

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in a metal pot would cause some chemical reaction between

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the acetic acid, which is the type of acid that

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is in vinegar, uh and uh, the acetic acid in

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the juice and the metal walls of the pot. So

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's copper pot, this is going to result in

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>copper acetate salts, which tastes disgusting, bitter, nasty, metallic flavor.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And uh. If you boil it in a lead pot,

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, the same thing happens, but it

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>forms lead acetate, which is very poisonous but is also sweet.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>So yes, Raphael, your analysis is spot on. I think

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Plenty's advice about pot metal selection was exactly right from

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a flavor point of view, just without any understanding of

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the dire health effects that could flow from this. Uh

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And to supplement this, I wanted to read from the

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>entry on sugar of lead in the Oxford Companion to

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Sugar and Sweets. This entry was written by the American

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>chemist Michelle in FRANCEL. Francile Wrights quote. Chemical analysis of

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>sappa produced according to the recipes dating from the Ascle

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Roman period using kettles of similar metallic composition as those

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>found at Pompeii and other sites, suggests that the lead

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>content of sappa was eight hundred and fifty milligrams per leader,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>many thousand times higher than what is generally allowable in

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>drinking water, even diluted and used sparingly. Sweetening with sappa

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>posed a serious risk. However, to come back on what

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you said, Raphael, about the validity of Plenty's idea that

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that it really did make the sapa sweeter to use

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a lead pot France, Will argues in this entry in

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the Oxford Handbook here that the amount of sugar of

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>lead produced by boiling down a pot of must probably

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>would not have made a major contribution to the sweetness

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of the syrup, because it would only represent a taste

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>change equivalent to adding a pinch of sugar to a

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>product that was already pretty sweet. So you know this,

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sappa would already have levels of glucose and fructose equivalent

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to roughly one cup of table sugar per leader of liquid.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So in the specific example of sappa, the preference for

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>lead pots over copper might be more due to the

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that lead pots do not produce the disgusting bitter

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>copper flavor than to the small amount of additional sweetness

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that the lead would add. And while we're on the subject,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I just thought I should add that the practice of

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>intentionally adding lead to food products was not limited to

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this sweetening effect for sappa. In ancient Rome. Up until

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, lead metal and lead salts

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>were used in a number of ways. Were used as

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a preservative and an antimicrobial agent, and just got into

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>foods because people used lead machinery and cookware to make

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>foods with, but it was used as an antimicrobial agent

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and beverages like wine and cider because sugar lead is

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>poisonous to bacteria. In the same way it's poisonous to

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>us and Francile writes quote Vintner's observed the filtering fermentation

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>mixtures through lead sieves or dropping some lead shot into

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>bottled wine noticeably reduced spoilage. A firm connection between ingesting

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>low levels of lead in these beverages and lead poisoning

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was finally made in the early nineteenth century, in part

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>because of the correlation between outbreaks of colic of Potu

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>uh and the arrival of wine shipments containing lead. Colic

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of Potu, by the way, is the name for an

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 1>originally mysterious condition also known as Devonshare colic, which was

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>observed I believe beginning in the seventeenth century, but it

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>affected uh people in France I think, mostly through wine,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and people in Devonshire, England through their cider. In both

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>cases it was eventually determined that lead was the was

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>the culprit lead used as a preservative in some cases,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>or because of production processes using lead lined machines. Finally,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>coming back to the end of Raphael's message here file rites. Lastly,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I have noticed Joe building confidence in understanding rayology and

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>fluid dynamics over the years. I don't know about that, Raphael,

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but I appreciate uh. He says, you both did a

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>great job making the physics behind the teapot effect more accessible.

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Reyology is one of those areas where the concepts can

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be really hard to understand, but once you do, you

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>will see its principles in action everywhere, especially in the kitchen. Also,

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I can confirm that the periodically mentioned on the rayology

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of cats is hilarious to rayologists in equals three sample

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of three. I think thanks for the great show, Rafael. Ps. Unsurprisingly,

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm also a fan of Lauren and Annie over at Savor.

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Everyone should go listen to them too. So yes, thank

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you for the message, Rafael, and absolutely people should go

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>check out Savor. That is a podcast hosted by our

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>friends Lauren Vogelbaum and Annie Reese and it's a wonderful

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>home for food nerds everywhere. Again, it is called Savor

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>s A v O R. You can find it wherever

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Tell him we sent you. Okay,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>This next message about Tea comes from Stephanie. Stephanie says, Hello,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to the first episode on t and

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got about nine of the way to explaining one

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite facts about tea. In English, the word

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>tea can refer to all sorts of beverages, including those

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>made with Camillia senensis, but also herbal teas and other

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>usually hot steeped beverages. The French language differentiates between unta

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>rhymes with bay made with Camillia senensis and untizan made

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with other plants. The lack of this easy distinction in

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>English can definitely cause some confusion. Interestingly, French also differentiates

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.719
<v Speaker 1>between caffeine and teen or I think in English, I've

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>heard it pronounced theene, but tayene or theene the caffeine

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>found in Camilia senensis in common parlance. At least that

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>distinction is made in the Quebec dialect of my husband

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and in laws. I had wrongly assumed that this was

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>another example of French being more precise about tea related

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>vocabulary than English, and thought there were two different chemicals,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>caffeine and taine. I only realized through listening to your

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>episode that they are in fact the same compound, despite

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the different names. I also learned today the English word theene,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>which means the same as the French one, but which

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I had never heard before despite being an avid drinker

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of teas and tissan's. Thanks for always expanding my knowledge

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and my concept of what stuff can be fascinating. Stephanie,

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Stephanie. Okay, this next message is from Andreas.

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Andrea said, Dear Robert, Dear Joe, I'm a longtime listener

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and currently very much enjoying your episodes about te I

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>write in to tell you a little bit about a

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>t tradition in Germany, especially in the region called East Frisia.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Even though I live around two hours removed from that area,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>several vacations there made me really appreciate the fine drink

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>called post freeze and tea. It is a quite strong

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>blend of black teas, almost exclusively a psalm tea, and

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it never fails to pick me up on those gray

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and rainy days. There is a special ritual to drink it.

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I copied a text from a German website of one

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of the traditional suppliers of the tea and ran it

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>through an Ai translation for you to enjoy. Thanks for

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>all the great content. I hope you will do this forever.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Regards Andreas. Okay, so this is how you make the

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>post freeze and tea, at least as mediated through an

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>AI translator. It says placed the loose tea leaves in

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a well preheated pot of fresh boiling water so that

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they are covered. Allowed the tea to steep for three

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to five minutes, preferably in a kettle or teapot. Then

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>fill the fragrant infusion with the remaining water. It is

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>best to pour the finished teeth through a strainer into

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a preheated serving pot and keep it warm on a

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>tea warmer. Now comes the pleasure in the cup, as

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>East Frisians love it. First, a cluntia, a white sugar candy,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is placed in the cup. When the hot tea is

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>poured over it, the rock candy crackles, creating anticipation and

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>giving the tea a fine sweetness as it melts. A

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>few drops of fresh, high percentage cream, which is not

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>stirred in the East Frisian way, conjures up the famous vulcia,

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the little cloud, which makes the enjoyment of the tea perfect.

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The cream is added to the tea counterclockwise to symbolically

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>stop time. That's nice. East Frisian connoisseurs divide the unstirred

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>experience in to three phases. The first sip of tea

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>with cream is followed by the second sip of tea

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 1>with cream. Something might have been lost in translation there.

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure which completes the three tiered pleasure with

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.479
<v Speaker 1>the sweet finish. It offers the courtesy to enjoy at

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>least three cups, which is why it is not called

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for nothing. Dree u dree dry dree st uh ost

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Friesian wrecked or three is East Frisian right, It's better

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>by a country mile. The small teaspoon is only used

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>to signal to the host after the tea has been

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>poured into the cup that you do not want any more.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So thanks for sharing this, Andreas, and I've never heard

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>of this before I looked it up. I encourage everyone

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to go look up images of East Friesian tea to

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>see the patterns left by the unstirred cream. That seems

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to be the most interesting thing about it, the the

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>visual uh flower. Coming back to the how the appearance

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of food affects the flavor, the appearance of the unstirred

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>cream dropped into the cup forms mostly beautiful but occasionally

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>disgusting shapes, and I only say, disgusting, because there are

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>some cases where it looks like maybe it's when there's

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit more dribbling of individual drops. To me, this

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>has the unfortunate effect of looking like the spots that

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>form in a petrie dish when bacterial colonies are blooming,

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>especially when the you know, the translucence of the tea

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>naturally somewhat resembles an agar plate. But in most cases

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>this tea looks lovely. I think it's a nice variation

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on that other beverage art tradition, the designs that people

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>make in latte foam. So if latte foam is a

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>bit more controlled, a bit more representative, maybe making a

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>hard or a cat face or whatever, the East Frisian

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tea is a bit more abstract. It's kind of fractal,

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>an emergent, but very cool. Thank you, Andreas. Okay. I

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna finish up to day with a message

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>about weird House cinema. This one comes from Pat and

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's in response to our Weird House Cinema episode on

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>let Sleeping corpses Lie, which was the nineteen seventy four

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Italian Spanish horror movie about how science is bad and

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>if we don't kill Science once and for all, it

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>will inevitably raise the dead from their graves with ultrasonic radiation. Uh.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>This movie was a real hoot to cover, and one

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>thing we discovered in that episode was this movie has

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a very long list of alternate titles. One was let

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Sleeping corpses Lie, which is okay, but others were things

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like the Living Dead Manchester Morgue, which is strange because

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the movie does not take place at a Manchester morgue,

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>though I think some scenes were shot at a Manchester

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>adjacent morgue or hospital. Uh. And finally, there was one

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>title of the movie which was Don't Open the Window,

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>which as far as we could tell, has absolutely nothing

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to do with the film at all. A onto the message,

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Pat says Robert Joe. The last Weird House was a

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>good one. I'll have to see this one. You guys

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about the strangeness of one of the release titles,

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>don't Open the Window. Seems that this phrase is idiomatic

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in Spanish and means quote to bring something to light.

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems the title suggests that the enemy Science is

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>invoked and leads to horror. Thanks for all the fun, Pat,

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Pat I've never heard that idiom before. I tried to

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of look it up and didn't find much. But

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe you other Spanish speakers in the audience please

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>right in about that. What's the deal with with opening

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the window? Is science opening the window of knowledge? And

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>thus according to this movie, uh, you know, don't open

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the window, like don't don't do those experiments. I'm not sure,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but despite never hearing that one, I do know of

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a a window idiom in Spanish which is tire lacasa

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>poor love antana, which basically means uh to well, literally

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it means to throw the house out the window, and

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand, this means like to go all out,

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>as we say in English, to spend a lot of

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>money on something, to spare no expense. That's a really

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>good one. Okay, I think that does it for the

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>mail bag today. Just a reminder that we will be

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>running Vault episodes this week and Tuesday of next week

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>while Rob and I are out. But I should be

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>back with a new Listener mail episode on Monday, and

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>then we will have more new episodes for you that week,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>probably on Wednesday, March one. In the meantime, if you're

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>new here, this is the Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Please subscribe wherever you get your podcasts uh we. We

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>do different episodes throughout the week. Our core episodes publish

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>every Tuesday and Thursday. Those are most often about science

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in one way or another, but we like to jump

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>across disciplines. On Monday's we read back listener mail in

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>episodes like this one, though usually my co host Robert

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Lamb is here with me. On Wednesdays we do a

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>short form scripted episode called The Artifact or the Monster Fact.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And then on Friday's, when the week is done, it's

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>time for Weird House Cinema, which is an episode where

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Rob and I feature and discuss a weird movie. They

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>can be good, they can be bad, they can be classic,

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they can be obscure. All movies are fair game as

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>long as they are weird. And then, finally, on Saturday's

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>we uh we highlight an episode from the vault from

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the olden days uh Big thanks to our audio producer

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>J J. Pauseway. If you would like to get in

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>touch with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>say hello, you can email us at contact at Stuff

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind dot com Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a production of I heart Radio. For more podcasts

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.