Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt, Omar Rossa's Book of Lies,
Speaker 1: half Truths and ms Direction. Oh there's more today, my
Speaker 1: friends will talk about that, plus meeting against Trump. A
Speaker 1: hundred newspapers are going to run an editorial against the president.
Speaker 1: No shock, but worth discussing. And then what does the
Speaker 1: struck firing really tell us about how deep the rock
Speaker 1: goes in the deep state? A Moore coming up on
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show. This is the bus Sexton Show
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a
Speaker 1: great American Again. The buck Sexton Show begins our welcome
Speaker 1: to the buck Sex and Show everybody, great to have
Speaker 1: you here, coming to you live from this so womp
Speaker 1: oh it is so swampy. I actually just went over
Speaker 1: and had a chance to join Eric Bowling on his
Speaker 1: new show over on CRTV. I believe Eric wrote a
Speaker 1: book about the swamp and we got to chat a
Speaker 1: bit about what's going on down here in d C.
Speaker 1: I like the the the Conservatives and the Trump people
Speaker 1: that are down here in d C with me. We
Speaker 1: all feel the same way about it. We all we
Speaker 1: all feel like aliens in a foreign land. You know,
Speaker 1: we we realized that even though our guys in the
Speaker 1: White House, and even though our party has a majority
Speaker 1: in the Congress, d C is a a liberal enclave
Speaker 1: of insanity, and it's reflective. I think of many of
Speaker 1: the worst progressive tendencies, and you see this with the
Speaker 1: nastiness to people who work for the administration, restaurants, and
Speaker 1: the the political monoculture that exists here where you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to have a different point of view. And in fact,
Speaker 1: they try to enforce a kind of left wing solidarity culturally,
Speaker 1: and you know that they're there are stories about how
Speaker 1: they The the much fabled DC cocktail party circuit is
Speaker 1: in the dumps because all the famous and fancy hosts
Speaker 1: and hostesses with the big mansions in Georgetown and Colorama,
Speaker 1: and this is all. That's all. This is an old cliche,
Speaker 1: right that there's not enough people now to go to
Speaker 1: them from the Trump administration because no one wants to
Speaker 1: invite them, or that they won't go one or the other.
Speaker 1: It's probably both. And uh, I think this is a
Speaker 1: good thing. I think the business of the American people
Speaker 1: should be business. I think that the government needs to
Speaker 1: be a lot smaller. I think the government needs to
Speaker 1: have a much lesser sense of its own importance. It
Speaker 1: should be service. It also should, in many cases probably
Speaker 1: be temporary. And this idea of d C not as
Speaker 1: a place full of government servants, but as our overseers,
Speaker 1: those who make it all work and make the decisions
Speaker 1: for us. Uh, that's gotta go. That's part of the
Speaker 1: mentality that I think we need to combat, and I
Speaker 1: think that Trump is doing that. And that's why Trump's
Speaker 1: success on all this is so troubling to these left
Speaker 1: wing swampers, the swampsters whatever we call them, swamp dwellers,
Speaker 1: because they've been telling themselves for a very long time
Speaker 1: that their attitude, their approach to life there the powers
Speaker 1: that they have either taken for themselves or that they
Speaker 1: have been given uh over the American people is justified
Speaker 1: because they know more than us. So this is the
Speaker 1: center of the collectivist mindset right now, can be found
Speaker 1: in the DC federal bureaucracy and in the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: that has overtaken it. So that's just a quick note
Speaker 1: on what's going on in in Swamptown. And then you
Speaker 1: have what the media is focusing on so many different
Speaker 1: stories that and by the will talking about Iran policy
Speaker 1: later on, I might even get what's going on with Turkey.
Speaker 1: You've got the possibility of economic contagion, they're saying from
Speaker 1: Turkey to India. Um, and you know, Trump is I think,
Speaker 1: making an example of Turkey for everybody else. He's saying, Look,
Speaker 1: Turkey's Turkey steps out of line, kidnaps, well, arrests, but
Speaker 1: it's basically kidnapping, holding them as hostage hostages. Uh, Turkey
Speaker 1: steps in a line, Turkey gets slapped down. You know
Speaker 1: who's next. It's a much more effective approach to deal
Speaker 1: with authoritarians and strong men and bad status governments around
Speaker 1: the world than sending them a strongly word letter from
Speaker 1: the UN. We have a much to get into there though,
Speaker 1: and I have more thoughts, by the way, on the
Speaker 1: this struck situation after yesterday. Oh, nothing wrong from Peter Strong. Um.
Speaker 1: But let's start with m Arosa a little bit, because
Speaker 1: I view this mo or as a story about the media.
Speaker 1: In a story about m Rossa. This woman is making
Speaker 1: all these accusations and saying all this stuff that if
Speaker 1: it were anyone other than Trump being accused, we would
Speaker 1: be told Hey, you know this, this sounds like nonsense.
Speaker 1: It sounds like somebody has gone through sifted through the
Speaker 1: comments section of the Huffington Post and the Daily Coast
Speaker 1: and these other left wing You're like, Buck, what are
Speaker 1: these sites? Don't worry, you don't have to. I read them,
Speaker 1: so you don't have to gone through them and picked
Speaker 1: out the craziest allegations about Trump that they can, and
Speaker 1: then made claims publicly using her access to the president
Speaker 1: to give them some veneer of credibility that this is
Speaker 1: what happened. Um, now, this is what omar Rossa, who
Speaker 1: is now inflicted herself upon him work in political discourse.
Speaker 1: She is now such a big part of the new
Speaker 1: cycle folks that I would be remiss to ignore her
Speaker 1: and her allegations against the president. She's being used as
Speaker 1: a weapon against this administration. I don't like that. We
Speaker 1: have to play defense sometimes. But the other side, it's
Speaker 1: got a bunch of crazies and they're gonna take us
Speaker 1: down unless we fight back. You know, there's a real
Speaker 1: People always say, oh, why is Trump so petty? Why
Speaker 1: does he respond to this reporter that reporter? And I say,
Speaker 1: you know, I remember what it was like for eight
Speaker 1: years of the Bush administration. Bush just getting slapped in
Speaker 1: the face by everybody and anybody in the media and
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party and going, whoa shucks. You know, I
Speaker 1: don't want to be mean enough enough of that. And
Speaker 1: we can't let the media in mid August, you know,
Speaker 1: when things really quiet down, because everybody's in Nantuckett, in
Speaker 1: the Hampton's in the media and the political elite class
Speaker 1: can't let them get away with using this while they
Speaker 1: can as they can to hurt the president because they're
Speaker 1: gonna move on from this because there's no there's no
Speaker 1: verification for any there there's no validation. This is it's lies.
Speaker 1: She's lying, and the media is eating it up because
Speaker 1: they love they love lies about Trump. Anything that's bad
Speaker 1: about Trump, I'll go for it. But this is Amarosha
Speaker 1: then black clip one. Donald Trump is a very kind person.
Speaker 1: He has a really good heart. I've spent time with
Speaker 1: him and his children and his family, and you can
Speaker 1: look at his family and see how close in it
Speaker 1: they are. He's not going anywhere. He has staying power.
Speaker 1: Asked me if I would vote for him. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm a chickalist first and foremost, but I'm also interested
Speaker 1: in watching this political process unfold. He's like the Tiger
Speaker 1: Woods about me in my personal experience, Craig, which is
Speaker 1: why you have me here. Um. I have never seen
Speaker 1: Donald Trump act inappropriately with women. He's always been very respectful.
Speaker 1: I stand with Donald Trump because I know that he
Speaker 1: has an incredible vision for this country and he will
Speaker 1: and indeed make America great, not just for this group
Speaker 1: or that group, but for everyone. You make him very
Speaker 1: great for everyone? She said, Now, what kind of stuff
Speaker 1: is she's saying? Play it? I'm roast. If you have
Speaker 1: any other recordings, you wouldn't share them here? If you
Speaker 1: got some, oh, I have plenty. Anything more I would
Speaker 1: like to see if he if he if his office
Speaker 1: calls again, would you be a great un investigation by more?
Speaker 1: Absolutely anything that they want out world certainly think should
Speaker 1: be impeached at this point, Yes, Trump should be impeached,
Speaker 1: she says. I mean, can't she say anything else that's
Speaker 1: gonna get Chris Matthews to got a thrill up his leg?
Speaker 1: I mean, is there anything else that she could say
Speaker 1: that would really just play into all the media biases
Speaker 1: about Trump? I don't know she's saying at all. Trump
Speaker 1: Trump should be impeached. Trump is an idiot, Trump is
Speaker 1: a liar, Trump is mean. Trump said the N word.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, that's the big allegation now that the President
Speaker 1: of the United States said the N word. Um, that
Speaker 1: doesn't withstand much scrutiny, because, first of all, who did
Speaker 1: he say it to? Under what circumstances did he say it?
Speaker 1: Why is it this? Well, maybe she heard it, Maybe
Speaker 1: she didn't hear it. Maybe she heard the tape of it.
Speaker 1: Oh no, she heard somebody say that they heard it
Speaker 1: on a tape. This is the kind of thing that
Speaker 1: if it had happened, folks, you would know about it.
Speaker 1: You know, if I asked you who hit you in
Speaker 1: the back of the head with a two by four
Speaker 1: one day on the way to work, you'd remember that incident.
Speaker 1: You wouldn't be like, well, I don't remember if that happened.
Speaker 1: And if you had heard the President United States, or
Speaker 1: even before that, if you had just been Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: a very famous person, say that word, you would remember it.
Speaker 1: You would know when it was, you would know the
Speaker 1: context of it, and why not come forward with it
Speaker 1: right now? But by keeping it murky, you see, it
Speaker 1: is an allegation that can't be disproven, just like the
Speaker 1: Mueller probe. By the way, this is what they've resorted
Speaker 1: to with Trump insinuation, allegation, rumor conspiracy. You know, they're
Speaker 1: not saying it happened. They're just not saying it didn't happen.
Speaker 1: I mean, can you prove prove that they that he
Speaker 1: didn't ever say this, Well, then he might have said it.
Speaker 1: This is a part of the of derangement though, Trump
Speaker 1: arrangement syndrome. When your main allegations revolve around what cannot
Speaker 1: be disproven in principle, then then you've got a very
Speaker 1: very serious psychological issue. I think then you've really lost
Speaker 1: the plot. You've lost all contact with reason and reality.
Speaker 1: And that's only where we are. In fact that it's
Speaker 1: a Daily Beast reporter who approach the issue, dealt with
Speaker 1: the issue as a win suba sang Uh party that
Speaker 1: name I cannot I cannot pronounce the last name. Apologies
Speaker 1: on that one, um, but spoke about Omrosa's claim of
Speaker 1: an N word being said by the president. And here's
Speaker 1: what this Daily Beast reporter had to I had to
Speaker 1: share on play three back during the campaign and up
Speaker 1: through the presidential transition. In late I actually looked into
Speaker 1: this because it's been a longstanding rumor since the days
Speaker 1: of the campaign that there is a Donald Trump N
Speaker 1: word tape dating back to his days of The Apprentice. UM,
Speaker 1: I talked to dozens upon dozens of people at the
Speaker 1: Apprentice for a series of stories, or who used to
Speaker 1: work at the Apprentice. I still do so don't know
Speaker 1: any more. Uh, to sort of get Donald Trump related
Speaker 1: stories as the campaign was wrapping up, we published a
Speaker 1: lot of them, some of which look made Donal Trump
Speaker 1: look pretty nasty. I couldn't find a single person who
Speaker 1: knew what the hell people were talking about when it
Speaker 1: came to this with the table, this mythical nword tape,
Speaker 1: And so far that's still the case, based on my
Speaker 1: reporting and the reporting of other people, including Yasha Ali
Speaker 1: the Huffington Post, who popped a story I think about
Speaker 1: nine or ten hours ago where the person who omar
Speaker 1: Rossa had claimed to people had come to the White
Speaker 1: House and played her a tape of Donald Trump saying
Speaker 1: that Rachel Hypothet sort of laughed on the phone. It's like,
Speaker 1: know what what is omar Rossa talking about? She's a liar.
Speaker 1: I've been told by numerous people today in d C.
Speaker 1: Because I am now here in close proximity to the
Speaker 1: White House and can talk to people in the White
Speaker 1: House and get a sense of what's going on. I've
Speaker 1: been told my numerous sources, look, Omar Rose is just
Speaker 1: a liar, and they all kind of roll their eyes.
Speaker 1: They I'll be honest with you, folks, they all roll
Speaker 1: their eyes, like, you know, Trump shouldn't have brought her in.
Speaker 1: It was not a good idea. And John Kelly sniffed
Speaker 1: out the nonsense right away and showed her the door,
Speaker 1: and thank Heavens for that. You know, clearly bringing in
Speaker 1: the general was the right move. But think about how
Speaker 1: damaging this is, folks. A lot of people are gonna
Speaker 1: hear this allegation from Omar Rosa that the media has
Speaker 1: given tremendous credibility to now um and a lot of
Speaker 1: our our fellow Americans who are black are gonna hear
Speaker 1: this and say that they're gonna believe that the President
Speaker 1: said it, and that's gonna stay with them and that's
Speaker 1: going to change their thinking. And you know, we've just
Speaker 1: started to see this surge in black support for the president.
Speaker 1: We've just we've seen I think a doubling in recent
Speaker 1: polling are close to it of of Black Americans who
Speaker 1: support the President of the United States. And I do
Speaker 1: think that there's a real urgency among the Democrats to
Speaker 1: stamp that out right away. I mean, the worst fear
Speaker 1: the Democrats have is that you start to see large
Speaker 1: scale support from the Black community for Trump because he's
Speaker 1: bringing uh jobs into their communities, because he's showing them
Speaker 1: results that make their lives a little better, make their
Speaker 1: lives a little easier, allow them to pursue their dreams
Speaker 1: and their destiny. Uh. And Democrats hate that, right because
Speaker 1: Democrats prefer the model of let's just assume that all
Speaker 1: black people with you know, five per cent or so exception,
Speaker 1: but you know, over black people are gonna vote Democrat.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't matter that Democrat run cities are a disgrace,
Speaker 1: the Democrat run schools are terrible, the Democrat policies and
Speaker 1: Democrats statism and welfarism has done nothing but harm all
Speaker 1: minority communities. You know, That's that's their their fear is
Speaker 1: that Trump starts to break that stranglehold on the minority
Speaker 1: vote that Democrats have, and so they'll they'll jump on
Speaker 1: this story at omar Rosso as much as they already have,
Speaker 1: they'll keep running with it. And by the time we
Speaker 1: were really by the time this is all disproven, the
Speaker 1: damage will have already been done. And that's what I
Speaker 1: think is so discouraging about it. By the time it's
Speaker 1: clear that omar rosis just I mean, she's just all
Speaker 1: this stuff she's thrown out there is it's like she
Speaker 1: heard she heard rumors about what people say Trump did.
Speaker 1: Her said it was, oh, yeah, I heard him do that.
Speaker 1: I saw him do that. You know, if she was
Speaker 1: so horrified by all that, she should have resigned. She
Speaker 1: didn't resign. She's a complete and utter opportunist in the
Speaker 1: media and her are symbiotically opportunistic with each other. Now.
Speaker 1: It's very distressing, um, but we'll stay on this one, folks,
Speaker 1: eight to five eight four four buck. We have a
Speaker 1: whole lot more show. I want to talk to you
Speaker 1: for sure about this. This idea of a hundred newspapers
Speaker 1: writing an editorial about Trump's rhetoric. These people are crazy, Okay,
Speaker 1: they really have lost it. Trump is much less an
Speaker 1: enemy of press freedom, not just than presidents before him were.
Speaker 1: Then Obama was oh I'll make that case and I'll win.
Speaker 1: You gotta stay with me, the president of This has
Speaker 1: absolutely nothing to do with race and everything to do
Speaker 1: uh with the President calling out someone's lack of integrity. Uh.
Speaker 1: The idea that you would only point a few of
Speaker 1: the things that the President has said negative about people
Speaker 1: that are minorities. The fact is the president's um an
Speaker 1: equal opportunity UH, person that calls things like he sees it.
Speaker 1: He always fights fire with fire, and he certainly does
Speaker 1: and hold back on doing that. Across the board. The
Speaker 1: individuals in this room continue to create a large platform
Speaker 1: for somebody they know not to have a lot of credibility,
Speaker 1: for someone they frankly refused to give a platform to
Speaker 1: when they worked here at the White House. Uh. It
Speaker 1: wasn't until this individual started to negatively attack this president
Speaker 1: in this administration uh and try to tear this entire
Speaker 1: place down that she received the type of platform and
Speaker 1: rolled out that she's getting. I think it would be
Speaker 1: great if every single person in this room, uh and
Speaker 1: every single person in the administration never had to talk
Speaker 1: about this again, and we actually got to focus on
Speaker 1: the real policies and the real things that not matter.
Speaker 1: Just to uh people in this building, but certainly all Americans,
Speaker 1: African Americans, Hispanics, and everybody in between. I think that
Speaker 1: would be the best thing that we could certainly do
Speaker 1: for our country. Amen to that. Totally true. So Aaron
Speaker 1: Hockey Sanders is a tough job, you know. I used
Speaker 1: to I used to sit around and joke around, although
Speaker 1: it was kind of serious that I would have been
Speaker 1: a great White House Press second Harry for Trump. But man,
Speaker 1: it's it's rough these days. It's a lonely road, not
Speaker 1: a fun one, given the way the media treats her,
Speaker 1: the way the Democrats in America are treating her. But
Speaker 1: you know, there's one part of this that I have
Speaker 1: to say, I'm even a little I I can't use
Speaker 1: the word surprise. It's just it's disappointing once again. And
Speaker 1: and that is that this this is it's not enough
Speaker 1: to say that Omar Rossa's allegations are credible, to treat
Speaker 1: them as credible. It's not enough to give her a
Speaker 1: huge platform for the sale of her smear book. But
Speaker 1: you've also seen a lot of people making the claim
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump, in his tweet about Omar Rossa, is racist.
Speaker 1: They're saying that Donald Trump is racist because he referred
Speaker 1: to Omar Rossa as a at the end of a tweet,
Speaker 1: as a dog. And I'm hearing this a lot of people.
Speaker 1: They're saying, Oh, here's here's yet another incidents. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump's that dog attack on Omar Rossa is the latest
Speaker 1: insult in an African American. They want to make that
Speaker 1: about race two. I mean, I could sit here, in
Speaker 1: courtesy of my friend Sean Davis tell you that here's
Speaker 1: a list of people that Trump has also referred to
Speaker 1: publicly as a dog. Mitt Romney, David Gregory, Chuck Todd,
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon, Glenn Beck, Bill Maher, Eric Ericsson, Rick Tyler,
Speaker 1: David Axe, Rod Kristin Stewart. Those are all white people.
Speaker 1: So how is it that dog, all of a sudden
Speaker 1: is a racial slur or a dog whistle of some kind.
Speaker 1: I do need someone to explain that logic to me.
Speaker 1: I mean, you could say that he shouldn't call any
Speaker 1: woman a dog. Fine, I wish the president wouldn't do
Speaker 1: that either, But let's not pretend that it's racist just
Speaker 1: because it's Trump. He's holding the line for America. Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton is back sir, we referred from the president via
Speaker 1: Twitter on Armor Rossa describing her as crazed, the crying
Speaker 1: low life a dog. Is this anyway for a president
Speaker 1: to talk about any American, let alone somebody that he
Speaker 1: hired and made the highest ranking African American woman to
Speaker 1: serve in his White House. What the Trump campaign is
Speaker 1: doing is he's forcing her essentially to defend herself and
Speaker 1: potentially even paying damages. Why is that necessary? Why did
Speaker 1: you hire her? I mean, why didn't we hire somebody's
Speaker 1: describing as a dog. Pattern of insulting prominent African Americans people,
Speaker 1: he's taken criticized race plaint with John Lemon next to waters.
Speaker 1: He's playing that football players protesting racial injustice. Don't know
Speaker 1: if they're protesting. If you asked the President if he's
Speaker 1: ever used the young word, have you asked him directly? Sarah?
Speaker 1: Why didn't you asked him direct again there at the
Speaker 1: podium and guarantee the American people they'll never hear Donald
Speaker 1: Trump uttered and word on a reporting in any context.
Speaker 1: Just to be clear, you can't guarantee it, can I
Speaker 1: go back to the racist question again. There's our our
Speaker 1: stalwart press Corps asking the questions America needs to know,
Speaker 1: same question pretty much over and over again. Trump a racists?
Speaker 1: Trump a racist? Hey? Is Trump a racists? Trump a racist?
Speaker 1: There are other things going on in the world, then
Speaker 1: slanderous allegations about the president. You'll notice how little they
Speaker 1: really can do on Trump's record because it's going so
Speaker 1: well so far, because he's doing such a good job
Speaker 1: as a president. I do not seek a president who
Speaker 1: is a preschool teacher who's gonna tell my kids, you know,
Speaker 1: how to be some people. I know people feel differently
Speaker 1: about that. They have this no you know, the presidents
Speaker 1: like the father of the nation to them, and they
Speaker 1: feel very you know, emotionally tied to his every word
Speaker 1: in action. I just want a good executive in charge
Speaker 1: of the the United States government so the things are going well,
Speaker 1: so the American people and live their lives. I don't
Speaker 1: obsess over every word, every tweet, everything that Trump says,
Speaker 1: or any other president says for that matter, because ultimately
Speaker 1: we shouldn't all care that much. I think that's one
Speaker 1: of the big problems here, folks, is that we've been
Speaker 1: led to believe we have to care so much about
Speaker 1: everything going on with politicians. Everything that an administration says
Speaker 1: every utterance, every statement, when really I just want to
Speaker 1: see what the results are. I want the pursuit of
Speaker 1: sound policies. I want the execution of government that is
Speaker 1: limited in scope, but that is at least efficient what
Speaker 1: it's supposed to do and successful as much as government
Speaker 1: can be. That's it. I don't need government to be
Speaker 1: my best friend. I don't needed to give me a
Speaker 1: warm hug. I don't need it to be my buddy
Speaker 1: and tell me that everything's gonna be okay. I've got
Speaker 1: friends in a great family for that right. Why do
Speaker 1: you feel the same way. I'm sure you're even luckier
Speaker 1: than me because you probably have a dog and I
Speaker 1: haven't gotten a dog yet, which makes me sad that's
Speaker 1: gonna happened. Um, But you know, they just want to
Speaker 1: focus in on all this stuff. With with omar Rossa.
Speaker 1: I can't I can't get her name. It's amor Rossa
Speaker 1: or omar ross I say it both ways. I'm sorry
Speaker 1: I switched back and forth. I know it's minards not menards,
Speaker 1: and it's I think omar Rossa. Um. But the big
Speaker 1: thing here, as I said, is the the disparity between
Speaker 1: what the White House wants to talk about and focus
Speaker 1: on as a matter of policy, and what the media
Speaker 1: wants to focus on. They just want to find some
Speaker 1: validation of their hatred of this president. That's their daily routine.
Speaker 1: That's what they're really interested in. And that's why I
Speaker 1: Sarah Huckaby Sanders is up there having to um deal
Speaker 1: with someone saying that someone said something at some point
Speaker 1: in history that nobody can actually prove or even say
Speaker 1: when it happened or how it happened. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is a new level of unfair undermining, isn't it. You know,
Speaker 1: they've gone from Russia collusion. Oh, you don't think this
Speaker 1: is an accident, Folks, don't think that this is just
Speaker 1: happenstance Russia collusion goes, it starts to fade in the background.
Speaker 1: We see Struck, we see McCabe, we see Page, we
Speaker 1: see Comy, we see or we see Yates, all of
Speaker 1: them scummy anti Trump, deep state left behind cabolsters. And
Speaker 1: now the narrative changes from that, Oh that's right, Trump's
Speaker 1: a racist. Oh and it just so happens at this
Speaker 1: coincides with the week of the Charlottesville remembrance, and right,
Speaker 1: these are not accidents. Why do we think that there
Speaker 1: were so much attention given over the weekend to a
Speaker 1: protest rally with twenty people because they're really hoping to
Speaker 1: make something of this, right, They want to switch the
Speaker 1: narrative now from Trump is a traitor, a Kremlin puppet,
Speaker 1: despite the fact that he's tougher on Russia objectively, factually
Speaker 1: than Obama wasn't eight years, despite the fact that he's
Speaker 1: getting more results in eighteen months, then Obama and his
Speaker 1: team of self righteous clowns could get an eight years.
Speaker 1: They want to say that he's a Kremlin puppet, and
Speaker 1: he does. He does Putin's bidding, But they shift from
Speaker 1: that now, Oh, he's also a racist. Oh and also
Speaker 1: also a sexual harasser. We'll get into that in the moment.
Speaker 1: But Sarah Huckaby Sanders had to deal with the the
Speaker 1: supposed uh the N word allegations. Here's how that one.
Speaker 1: This is somebody who has been in business for decades
Speaker 1: and you're just now hearing some of these outrageous accusations.
Speaker 1: After the fact, he's dealt with people all over the world.
Speaker 1: It wasn't until he became a candidate for president that
Speaker 1: you started to hear some of these salacious, uh and
Speaker 1: ridiculous claims. And certainly, I think if you look at
Speaker 1: the actions that this president has taken, certainly the policies
Speaker 1: that he's enacted, you can see the heart of who
Speaker 1: he is and you can see exactly uh what he
Speaker 1: has done and the type of president in person he is.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is just not a racist. They can say
Speaker 1: it as much as they want, and it really makes
Speaker 1: me sad when I hear people that I know, friends
Speaker 1: of mine in the black community, who who they really
Speaker 1: do believe they believe he's racist. And I asked him,
Speaker 1: I say why, And then there's always this, of course
Speaker 1: he is how how do you not see it? And
Speaker 1: I say why? What has he done that makes him
Speaker 1: a racist? Why do you believe this? What actions has
Speaker 1: he taken? What? What word? Oh? Because he because he
Speaker 1: says that Don Lemon is stupid? Don Lemon is stupid,
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with Don Lemon's race. Don Lemmons
Speaker 1: just not very smart. Why why do we have to
Speaker 1: sit around and pretend you know who else? Because he
Speaker 1: gets into spats with a handful of NFL players who
Speaker 1: can't figure out that there are there are some things
Speaker 1: the country still more unified on than the need to
Speaker 1: play into minority grievance. Politics and support for the flag
Speaker 1: and for are ins and for our troops is one
Speaker 1: of them. So if if NFL players can't figure that out,
Speaker 1: and by the way, they've also they keep shifting the ground. Right, Oh,
Speaker 1: it was it was about cops killing black men and
Speaker 1: black lives matter. Now it's just more about raising awareness.
Speaker 1: You know that the ground is always shifting on this
Speaker 1: the moment you get them and you get them in
Speaker 1: a position where they have to defend one thing that
Speaker 1: it's something else. Right, Kaepernick wears pigs in police hats
Speaker 1: on his socks, but you know he's not being disrespectful
Speaker 1: or anything. That means that he's a racist. Well that
Speaker 1: means it's seventy of the country's racist or whatever. Does
Speaker 1: it disagrees with the kneeling or that doesn't think that
Speaker 1: it's respectabi, whatever the number is. But what's more likely?
Speaker 1: I keep returning this, what is more what is more
Speaker 1: plausible in the real world that Trump is a trader
Speaker 1: working with the Russians, That Trump has uh committed all
Speaker 1: kinds of financial crimes. Don't forget that, And that's why
Speaker 1: he won't release his taxes. That Trump is a racist,
Speaker 1: That Trump is a serial sexual assaulter, That Trump is crazy,
Speaker 1: uh and not of sound mind. I'm trying to think
Speaker 1: what else is in there? That Trump has never read
Speaker 1: a book, That Trump is you know, each cheeseburgers and
Speaker 1: sits around in a rowb all day and watches fifteen
Speaker 1: hours a day of TV. I mean, these are all
Speaker 1: the things. What's more likely that that this is true
Speaker 1: of the man who is running the country better than
Speaker 1: his Harvard Law educated predecessor did for eight years. Remember
Speaker 1: Trump also went to Warden. That always gets left out
Speaker 1: of all this. But you know, I think that's kind
Speaker 1: of funny that they act like Trump just you know,
Speaker 1: came straight out of the back room of some billiards
Speaker 1: hall somewhere with like a bunch of Cheetos in one
Speaker 1: hand and a bunch of beer and the other things
Speaker 1: like I want to be president. But um, the guys
Speaker 1: a billionaire who went to an Ivy League school as well,
Speaker 1: so he understands the elites. And you see, that's that's
Speaker 1: really what bothers them so much about Trump is that
Speaker 1: he's a class traitor. He has betrayed the elites. By no,
Speaker 1: he knows who they are, and he's supposed to play
Speaker 1: by their rules. He's supposed to be on their side.
Speaker 1: That's how they think about But because he doesn't do that,
Speaker 1: now they're throwing everything in Canada. And I come back
Speaker 1: to this, is it more likely Trump is all those things?
Speaker 1: A traitor, crazy, a racist, a rapist, a crook, a thief,
Speaker 1: all of those things, because those are accusations that are
Speaker 1: made by supposedly serious people, or our Democrats and progressive
Speaker 1: as a bunch of cry babies who can't handle what's
Speaker 1: really going on in the world, who won't accept that
Speaker 1: Obama was not the genius they pretended he was, that
Speaker 1: he was not the savor that they were telling He's
Speaker 1: telling us he was every day that the media destroyed
Speaker 1: its reputation by walking around giving Obama the equivalent of
Speaker 1: a BackRub every day with their editorials and with their
Speaker 1: news coverage. It was an embarrassment, it was a joke.
Speaker 1: And Trump just came along and told us the truth
Speaker 1: about this. And now we can finally say it out loud.
Speaker 1: Now we don't have to pretend like there's some special
Speaker 1: magic about Cooper or Tapper or uh what's this the
Speaker 1: little the little short uh steph uh, he's gonna say, Papadapolis, Stephanopolis.
Speaker 1: You know, there's nothing about these eyes other than their
Speaker 1: fat paychecks that makes them unique. In fact, they're part
Speaker 1: of a system that has been engaged in a long
Speaker 1: standing fraud. And the fraud is that they don't have
Speaker 1: a bias, that they don't have a point of view,
Speaker 1: that they're just bringing you the news, just the facts.
Speaker 1: It's a lie. And the ones who are the most
Speaker 1: sanctimonious about it, by the way, Tapper Stephanopolis, Uh, they're
Speaker 1: the worst actually because they're they're they're pushing propaganda all
Speaker 1: the time. They just pretended or just just journalists here,
Speaker 1: just journalists, no point of view, not presenting an agenda.
Speaker 1: We're not activists, sure buddy, sure you aren't. You know,
Speaker 1: if what Trump was saying about them wasn't true, they
Speaker 1: wouldn't be so upset. And oh, by the way, then
Speaker 1: there's also the results component of this. Not only they
Speaker 1: say all these lies about Trump all the time, they
Speaker 1: don't want to deal with what's really going on in
Speaker 1: the country Playcliff nineteen. This is a president who is
Speaker 1: fighting for all Americans, who is putting policies in place
Speaker 1: that help all Americans, particularly African Americans. Uh, just look
Speaker 1: at the economy alone. This president since he took office,
Speaker 1: in the year and a half that he's been here,
Speaker 1: has created seven hundred thousand new jobs for African Americans.
Speaker 1: That's seven hundred thousand African Americans that are working now
Speaker 1: that weren't working when this president took place. When President
Speaker 1: Obama left after eight years in office, eight years in office,
Speaker 1: he had only created eight hundred or one hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety five thousand jobs for African Americans. President Trump and
Speaker 1: his first year and a half has already tripled what
Speaker 1: President Obama did in eight years. Not only did he
Speaker 1: do that for African Americans, but for Hispanics. One point
Speaker 1: seven million more Hispanics are working now. This is a
Speaker 1: president who cares about all Americans, who is committed to
Speaker 1: helping them, and is putting policies in place that actually
Speaker 1: do that. And all of that truth, my friends, is
Speaker 1: why they hate him so much. He's not supposed to
Speaker 1: be better for minority communities in terms of employment. That
Speaker 1: Obama was. Obama was our great savior. Obama was going
Speaker 1: to slow the rise of the seas. They haven't forgotten,
Speaker 1: of course, that Trump was unwilling to genuflect to Obama
Speaker 1: back when he was president. Media is very upset about this.
Speaker 1: My friends. There in the narrative creation business, they are
Speaker 1: not just bringing you information and letting you decide what's
Speaker 1: what's important what's not. Beyond that, they're presenting you with
Speaker 1: a narrative that always places those who are making that
Speaker 1: narrative very high on the list of priorities for this country.
Speaker 1: You'll notice that too, journalists have incredibly high opinions of themselves.
Speaker 1: I think that it's amazing that so many of them
Speaker 1: can run the scams they do, to be as untalented
Speaker 1: as they are, get as much attention and make as
Speaker 1: much money as they do. When I see more impressive
Speaker 1: people day to day cooking food, opening doors, and fixing
Speaker 1: toilets than I see on TV channels across the country
Speaker 1: talking about the news. They hate Trump because it's working.
Speaker 1: And what is their answer for that, Oh, he's he's
Speaker 1: all these terrible things, just venom and hatred and bile.
Speaker 1: Don you notice that they can't even really come up
Speaker 1: with what he's doing wrong on policy? They just disapprove
Speaker 1: of his very existence as president. I've got some follow
Speaker 1: ups on Antifa, speaking of disapproving that I wanted to
Speaker 1: get you today. We will discuss that. And then this
Speaker 1: hundred newspapers all colluding against Trump. That's a discussion worth having.
Speaker 1: And people calling for a boycott of Sam Adams producer Mike,
Speaker 1: what is this all about? This is crazy calling for
Speaker 1: a boycott of Sam Adams because he said is the
Speaker 1: tax cuts helped his company? This is so so uh
Speaker 1: you know what, we'll get into this. This is so soviet.
Speaker 1: You can't even tell the truth. You're not even allowed
Speaker 1: to state objective reality about what the president has done
Speaker 1: that's good without getting in trouble. Now, and they think
Speaker 1: we're the crazy ones, folks. They think you and I
Speaker 1: I have something wrong with us. Huh wow, eight four
Speaker 1: four eight to five eight four four much much more
Speaker 1: show coming, team, stay with me. I'm sure. Look, we
Speaker 1: we've all had enough of of omar rossa palooza, right,
Speaker 1: so we're we want to get past that, and uh
Speaker 1: and I will I promised the next hour. I've got
Speaker 1: lots of other stuff to talk about the left, defending
Speaker 1: big journalists like bro Cuomo, defending Antifa, Antifa. We have
Speaker 1: that somewhere on the board. I always like that one Antifa.
Speaker 1: There we go, thank you. Um, but I wanted to
Speaker 1: finish off our armar rossa discussion hopefully once in role
Speaker 1: though it's useful for bashion Trump just like that guy,
Speaker 1: remember Fire and Fury, Michael Wolfe made a lot of money.
Speaker 1: That guy wrote that book, Fire and Fury, and then
Speaker 1: they figured out, wait a second, this guy is total,
Speaker 1: total scum and was willing to with just no evidence
Speaker 1: and no one believed him, and it was a complete
Speaker 1: force insinuate that there was some kind of a sexual
Speaker 1: relationship between Trump and Nicky Haley, which is just a
Speaker 1: horrifying thing to say that nobody believed nobody, but even
Speaker 1: even people hate Trump were like, that's not no, that's
Speaker 1: not come on, you can't do that because it really
Speaker 1: Also it defamed Nikki Haley completely unfairly. Um so there's
Speaker 1: there's that part of this. Uh. But it took that
Speaker 1: until people finally backed off. And now, um, I think
Speaker 1: we're gonna reach that point with alm Rossa soon if
Speaker 1: we're not already there. But here's what she says about
Speaker 1: about Trump with women play, you feel like you were
Speaker 1: harassed by him in the White House for being a
Speaker 1: woman harassed in a sexual way at any point did
Speaker 1: he harass anybody in a sexual way? Any me two moments.
Speaker 1: I don't know that I would characterize them as me too.
Speaker 1: But I saw in your book, for instance, where he
Speaker 1: grabs you and he kissed you without you welcoming. That
Speaker 1: He did that very often with women anytime he wanted.
Speaker 1: He's very physical. He would grab women kiss them unsolicited
Speaker 1: anytime any day. You've heard that before, of course about Trump.
Speaker 1: So that's one another thing that joeme Arosi is saying
Speaker 1: that it's going to get her attention from the media.
Speaker 1: And then there's the Mueller probe because if she really
Speaker 1: wants their attention, got to throw something in there. Have
Speaker 1: you been interviewed by the special Counsel? I have a
Speaker 1: said Robert Mueller could be interested in. He might want
Speaker 1: to call you again. What sort of tapes would he
Speaker 1: be interested in? You know, if he calls me, I
Speaker 1: certainly will um participate with anything that he needs. I'll
Speaker 1: provide him what way he needs. But that's the extent
Speaker 1: that I can talk about. But you said he's interested,
Speaker 1: that's that's that's dangling something. Can you give us a
Speaker 1: little bit more that's information to say this that there's
Speaker 1: a lot of corruption that went on both the the
Speaker 1: campaign and in the White House, and I'm gonna blow
Speaker 1: the whistle on all of it. She's going to blow
Speaker 1: the whistle on all of it. Don't hold your breath, folks,
Speaker 1: don't hold your breath. I think that that you're gonna
Speaker 1: wait in a long time for that whistle, kind of
Speaker 1: like when that waiting a long time for that collusion
Speaker 1: evidence to show up. It's gonna be quite a while. Uh,
Speaker 1: we're gonna talk about the left actually defending Antifa coming up.
Speaker 1: If you need a boost to get through your day,
Speaker 1: whether it's right before you're heading to the gym, going
Speaker 1: out for a run, or just push through those TPS
Speaker 1: reports sitting at your desk in the office, strike Force
Speaker 1: Energy is for you, my friends. Strike Force is Veteran
Speaker 1: owned and American made, and it is an energy drink
Speaker 1: and energy liquid that you can add to six of water, tea, lemonade,
Speaker 1: anything you want. It'll add to and give you a
Speaker 1: tremendous boost. It's available in four flavors, has zero sugar
Speaker 1: or calories. Only the finest ingredients. Folks, check it out
Speaker 1: for yourself, because Strikeforce also is all about giving back
Speaker 1: to America's troops overseas. For every for every packet you
Speaker 1: buy a Strikeforce, when you get a Strikeforce Energy dot
Speaker 1: com and our discount code buck at checkout, you will
Speaker 1: be donating effectively ga Strikeforce a packet to military members
Speaker 1: around the globe. So go to strike Force Energy dot
Speaker 1: com use the discount code buck at checkout. For every
Speaker 1: packet you buy, they'll be one donated to military service
Speaker 1: members overseas. Buck Sexton mission to coding the news and
Speaker 1: disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America, You're
Speaker 1: a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Activity Analysts. Sexton, No, welcome back to the Buck Secton Show. Everybody.
Speaker 1: I know, I know, I said we were done with
Speaker 1: Elma Rosa, but we gotta Pauler who wants to weigh
Speaker 1: in on this one stand in Mississippi. Hey Stan, Hey Buck,
Speaker 1: I know, I know it's Twitter and you know how
Speaker 1: that goes. But word on the street is Omar Rose
Speaker 1: who works for al Gore when he was vice president
Speaker 1: for Clinton. Yeah, she most certainly did. That is a
Speaker 1: true statement. So this is not even the first White
Speaker 1: House she has been invited. Well, my god, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump knew all this before he ever got her in there.
Speaker 1: And see was the plants, you know, Stan, I just
Speaker 1: I don't know if Trump's you know, I don't know
Speaker 1: if she got to him because of Trump's ego or
Speaker 1: because of his sense of loyalty or a combination. But
Speaker 1: you know, with this one, this was this is an
Speaker 1: own goal, you know. And I give the President credit
Speaker 1: for all the good stuff he's doing and all the
Speaker 1: unfair stuff he's up against. Look, this isn't a big deal,
Speaker 1: but this was not. It's not great. It's not great.
Speaker 1: I mean, the mooch SCARAMOCHI, nobody knows you're gonna call
Speaker 1: up You're gonna call up a report and be like,
Speaker 1: hey about a being bleep bleep bleep oyut of being.
Speaker 1: You know, like, no one knows that someone's gonna do
Speaker 1: that until the Mooch did it. But with olmar Rossa,
Speaker 1: they had plenty of warning. I think you know that too. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so well, I just wanted to let you know I
Speaker 1: didn't know that. Now that you've confirmed it, forming I think,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, no, that's that's true, Stan, that's Stan Shield. Sorry,
Speaker 1: thank you for calling in. Let me tell you a
Speaker 1: bit more about this. Uh. This is from Carry Pickett. Oh,
Speaker 1: I know Carry, She's over at the Daily Caller quote.
Speaker 1: The Trump White House is not the first to be
Speaker 1: unsatisfied with the work performance of Omar Rossa Menigal, the
Speaker 1: former senior Trump staffer who already released secretly recorded conversations
Speaker 1: she had with the President and Chief of Staff John Kelly.
Speaker 1: Despite Omar Rossa's complaints that she was poorly treated in
Speaker 1: the Trump White House during her tenure as one of
Speaker 1: the highest paid staffers there, former numerous staffers for Vice
Speaker 1: President Al Gore's office told The New York Times last
Speaker 1: year that she was a terrible employee for the then
Speaker 1: Vice president during her days on Trump's NBC program. The
Speaker 1: Apprentice People magazine reported in two thousand and four that
Speaker 1: she held four jobs within two years. When she worked
Speaker 1: for the Clinton administration at twenty four years of age,
Speaker 1: she scored an entry level twenty five thousand dollar per
Speaker 1: year post applying to invitations for the Vice president. According
Speaker 1: to the Times, she left a mound of thirteen months
Speaker 1: worth of unanswered correspondence addressed to Gore below her desk.
Speaker 1: People magazine reported a former staff are saying, quote, she
Speaker 1: didn't do her job, and she got everybody in trouble.
Speaker 1: She was the worst hire we ever made. Mary Overbee,
Speaker 1: Gore's former office administrator, told The Times, that's that's pretty definitive, folks,
Speaker 1: the worst higher we've ever made. That was. But you see,
Speaker 1: you're probably wanting buck. I don't understand why is there
Speaker 1: all this reporting out there on her, you know, because
Speaker 1: this obviously under minds are now. Oh, but you see,
Speaker 1: this is when she was in the Trump white House
Speaker 1: and they were trying to undermine Trump's entire staff and
Speaker 1: just trash everybody. And so that reporting, uh, that was
Speaker 1: I mean, the information in there came via the New
Speaker 1: York Times, a lot of it. The New York Times
Speaker 1: reported on this. Oh, I can't believe they actually had
Speaker 1: previous as the chief was previous was the chief of staff.
Speaker 1: It's kind of amazing we think about it. I do
Speaker 1: not think the guy was really up for that one.
Speaker 1: But anyway, I don't know Ryan's I've heard he's a
Speaker 1: nice guy, but I don't think I don't think he
Speaker 1: was ready to be Trump's chief of staff. I think
Speaker 1: that's fair, all right, So I said, I said, we're
Speaker 1: gonna limit the omar Rosa talk. We're gonna have limits
Speaker 1: on on that one, because there's other things that, uh,
Speaker 1: I think deserve attention. You know, today on My Hill,
Speaker 1: My Hill TV show, where you know, it's a left
Speaker 1: right show, it's like Hannity and Combs back in the day,
Speaker 1: and you can figure out who you think is Hannity
Speaker 1: and who you think is Comes. But we're trying that.
Speaker 1: It's different, different format, and I have to deal with,
Speaker 1: you know, a fair amount of liberals. And recently I
Speaker 1: had to show professional uh manners to a guy who
Speaker 1: came over from Not Media Matters, which is, you know,
Speaker 1: just for me, a step above like a you know,
Speaker 1: a Jehada group in terms of how much I de
Speaker 1: spies them. Um, but this group right Wing Watch, which
Speaker 1: I think I've actually popped up in some of their articles.
Speaker 1: So I've got that going for me, which is nice.
Speaker 1: But he looked like he was very, very nervous, and
Speaker 1: I didn't want him to have some kind of an episode,
Speaker 1: so I didn't. I didn't push him all too hard
Speaker 1: on what he had to say. Um. But then today
Speaker 1: we had somebody from the Committee to Protect Journalists, which
Speaker 1: is a fascinating little organization because you know, they talk
Speaker 1: about journalists abroad. And I said, that's you know, that's good.
Speaker 1: We should we should certainly spend some time thinking about
Speaker 1: how we can make the world more open and fair
Speaker 1: and free when it comes to journalists and and the
Speaker 1: First Amendment. And I'm I'm all for it. I'm all
Speaker 1: about it. Right, that's great. But what they've been doing lately,
Speaker 1: kind of like the Southern Poverty Law Center, is they
Speaker 1: become a left wing outfit under the guise of just
Speaker 1: being an issue organization. You got the Southern Property Laws Center,
Speaker 1: which ever, I'll tell you this, they've become just a
Speaker 1: left wing a left wing group that attacks anybody that
Speaker 1: is in the crosshairs of of progressivism or anybody that
Speaker 1: the progressives don't like. But they've got a war chest
Speaker 1: with hundreds of millions of dollars in it, and they're
Speaker 1: all lawyers, so people tend not to deal with them,
Speaker 1: mess with them that they just don't want to have
Speaker 1: to handle the blowback from the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Speaker 1: So you've got you've got that going on. Um, But
Speaker 1: this group, the community proctor protected journalists a little a
Speaker 1: little less left wing, but we have one of their
Speaker 1: people here today. If she has a PhD, it's very
Speaker 1: nice for her. And we talked a bit about this,
Speaker 1: and they're worried about Trump's rhetoric. You see, it's Trump's fault,
Speaker 1: and this is a this is another one of these
Speaker 1: things you hear. It's another one of the talking points.
Speaker 1: It's Trump's fault that foreign dictators are talking about fake news. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: they've been talking about how the press lies and and
Speaker 1: there's conspiracy and stuff for as long as there's been
Speaker 1: a press, So there's no none of this is new
Speaker 1: at all. But if there's a way to tie any
Speaker 1: mouthfeasance around the globe to President Trump, you know our press,
Speaker 1: we'll do it. And they do do it. Okay, So
Speaker 1: I sat down with her and with with Crystal, my
Speaker 1: co host, and I just had to note that they're
Speaker 1: worried about and this is going to tie in in
Speaker 1: a few minutes to a couple of things. One antifa journalist,
Speaker 1: and then we'll talk about this effort to write some editory.
Speaker 1: All the newspapers are getting to together. I think the
Speaker 1: Washington Post is actually sitting this one out, but a lot,
Speaker 1: you know, a hundred newspapers getting together to criticize Trump
Speaker 1: and his rhetoric, because that's really gonna convince people that
Speaker 1: the media is not out to get Trump. We'll get
Speaker 1: to that, and also the role that anti or what
Speaker 1: the media has been saying about anti fuss since this
Speaker 1: all happened. But I'm sitting down next to this woman
Speaker 1: from the Community to Protect Journalists and I say, Okay,
Speaker 1: what can you tell me about the assaults on journalists
Speaker 1: that happened in Washington, d C. A few blocks from
Speaker 1: where we were doing the interview, And she responded, uh, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: there was there are a couple of assaults against journalists,
Speaker 1: including a police officer who assaulted a journalist. And I'm like, oh,
Speaker 1: I see what we're doing here. First of all, I
Speaker 1: didn't see any of that, a police officer assaulting a journalist.
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe a journalist was, uh, was breaking some
Speaker 1: kind of ordinance and didn't like the fact that cop
Speaker 1: was trying to move him off the street or something.
Speaker 1: I didn't see any of that. I did see journalists
Speaker 1: getting punched and hitting their gear destroyed by left wing maniacs,
Speaker 1: and I would think the Committee to Protect Journalists, which
Speaker 1: has been running around trying to get attention for itself saying,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, Trump's rhetoric, it's gonna inspire violence against journalists.
Speaker 1: They've been saying that. Meanwhile, hasn't happened. Jim Acosta is fine.
Speaker 1: Jim Acosta is richer and more famous than he's ever
Speaker 1: been before, folks. He's just fine. Okay, same thing with
Speaker 1: you know, the rest of the CNN anti Trump crew.
Speaker 1: They're all fine. It's been this has been career enhancing
Speaker 1: for them. They just don't like anyone challenging them publicly.
Speaker 1: They're just used to being able to use their bigger
Speaker 1: platform to punch down. They don't like when somebody punches
Speaker 1: down on them. That's what this is really about. When
Speaker 1: I asked this woman from the Committee to Protect Journalists
Speaker 1: what about the assaults that happened at the weekend, and
Speaker 1: she immediately talks about a police assault on a journalist,
Speaker 1: which I'm sure was a non assault, and I thought
Speaker 1: that was so telling, And she couldn't give me any
Speaker 1: specifics about the assaults on journalists in Charlottesville, the assaults
Speaker 1: on journalists here in d C. Not to myself. Well,
Speaker 1: this seems quite strange. You've had violence against against people
Speaker 1: for doing the job of journalism, mind you, uh, in
Speaker 1: the last seventy two hours. And you're not your your
Speaker 1: your group is the Committee to Protect Journalists, and this
Speaker 1: is not top of mind for you. You're here to
Speaker 1: tell us that Trump says mean things, therefore are to
Speaker 1: Juan Is jailing journalists and Turkey. You really think that
Speaker 1: that's how this works? She said, Oh, she said she'll
Speaker 1: look into it some more. I said, oh, okay, if
Speaker 1: I looking a little way, I said, well, what about
Speaker 1: the violence against journalists who are attacked and some case
Speaker 1: really brutally hit. I mean they're bleeding all over the
Speaker 1: place in in Portland again? Oh oh, anyone want to
Speaker 1: guess who hit them? Was it white nationalists? Was it
Speaker 1: neo Nazis? Was it TEA Party members? Oh no, that's right,
Speaker 1: the people who attack journalists in Portland. We're also left
Speaker 1: wing maniacs. This just seems so strange to me, folks.
Speaker 1: I thought that all the extremism was supposed to be
Speaker 1: on the right. I thought, you know, the Southern Poverty
Speaker 1: Law Center, all these groups they talk about hate, and
Speaker 1: they're always talking about right wing hate. Right, that's the
Speaker 1: only hate that exists. There's no left wing hate. One
Speaker 1: of the one of the ironies here is that antifa
Speaker 1: h antifa protests there you go. Antifa protesters think that
Speaker 1: they are the direct ideological descendants of the anti fascist
Speaker 1: movements in Europe that were that led up to the
Speaker 1: first the Second World War. They think that that's there. Um,
Speaker 1: they think that that's their lineage, their heritage, you know,
Speaker 1: ideologically speaking. And what's fascinating is that they, I'm sure
Speaker 1: in many cases don't know, and certainly the media that
Speaker 1: covers them don't know because most people have come across
Speaker 1: the media, don't read a lot of books, they don't
Speaker 1: know much, not very smart on the and the left
Speaker 1: wing media. I really do mean this. It's gonna sound
Speaker 1: pandery and it's gonna and I know that it's fine.
Speaker 1: But the conservatives I come across and media are much
Speaker 1: more with it and well read and and interesting than
Speaker 1: because most of the liberals they just get pushed along. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, you're saying the right things. We're just push
Speaker 1: you along. Conservatives have to be able to fight. I've
Speaker 1: got to know some stuff or else they're gonna get squashed.
Speaker 1: But most of the liberal media, i'm sure, has no
Speaker 1: idea that the true anti fom movements, meaning the anti
Speaker 1: fascist movements on the streets of Germany and and and
Speaker 1: France and and other European countries, involved a lot of communists.
Speaker 1: And when you go back and look at the history
Speaker 1: of fascism and the rise of fascism in Europe, it
Speaker 1: was always that the fascist and the communists were vying
Speaker 1: for the same recruits. And the advantage that fascism had
Speaker 1: over communism, whether it was in Italy or Germany or elsewhere,
Speaker 1: was that they had nationalism. It wasn't just this international
Speaker 1: Marxist revolution situation, right, There was a nationalism that people
Speaker 1: still wanted. They wanted that sense of identity to their nation,
Speaker 1: and fascism provided them of that. But they're both statist,
Speaker 1: collectivist ideologies. And when I think it's so interesting is
Speaker 1: that these antifa protesters today aren't just opposing fascism, they're
Speaker 1: also calling for revolution because I heard them say it,
Speaker 1: so people can't tell me they're not saying it. They're
Speaker 1: also calling for violence against people that disagree with them
Speaker 1: for claiming that violence or that that speech, that they
Speaker 1: don't like equals violence, and they also have Marxist ideological roots.
Speaker 1: So anti fascism historically and today is in fact linked
Speaker 1: to communism. You'll notice it's the far left that is
Speaker 1: into into anti fall. It's the far left that is
Speaker 1: supporting these black clad anarchists unning around the street. And
Speaker 1: they also are the same people who are often going
Speaker 1: to verbalize their support for universal health care and you know,
Speaker 1: much higher taxation and government and government control of industry
Speaker 1: and redistribution of wealth and reparations and all these things.
Speaker 1: And I think it's fascinating that once you make that connection,
Speaker 1: then you also can begin to connect the antifa movement
Speaker 1: to the incredible and inhumane violence of communism which gets
Speaker 1: brushed away and so much of of the of the
Speaker 1: the histories that are told the kids these days that
Speaker 1: learn in school that the media thinks is true. Soviet
Speaker 1: violence was in terms of numbers on a and I
Speaker 1: mean repressive political violence was not just on a scale
Speaker 1: similar to the worst fascism in either Germany or Italy.
Speaker 1: But when you look at the numbers of the Great
Speaker 1: Purge under Stalin and what happened to the cool Locks,
Speaker 1: the decaloguisation process, the liquid liquidization, a liquidation rather of
Speaker 1: the cool locks on the famine in Ukraine, the millions
Speaker 1: and millions of people killed for political reasons, in many
Speaker 1: cases bruly murdered or starboard death in the name of communism.
Speaker 1: Then you also have a sense of just why these
Speaker 1: maniacs are so radical running around the streets, because that's
Speaker 1: a part of the history too. That is now their history,
Speaker 1: whether the media wants to tell you that or not.
Speaker 1: All right, I have much more for you, including how
Speaker 1: the media is trying to defend anti fun. We'll talk
Speaker 1: about this collusion among the papers, and oh so much more.
Speaker 1: Stay with me. Two wrongs and what is right. The
Speaker 1: biggots are wrong to hit anti far or whomever, anarchists
Speaker 1: or malcontent or misguided. They are also wrong to hit,
Speaker 1: but fight hate is right, and in a clash between
Speaker 1: hate and those who oppose it, those who oppose it
Speaker 1: are on the side of right. Think about it, Well,
Speaker 1: it gets worse. Do we have more of that one?
Speaker 1: We gotta get more of that. That that's quote. That's
Speaker 1: bro Cuomo is like a hey versus you know the
Speaker 1: good people. Uh, he's somebody who just so you know,
Speaker 1: one of these imbeciles who tweets out the d D Landing.
Speaker 1: You know, this was a while back, during some of
Speaker 1: the anti fostuff in August, he tweeted out anti fascist
Speaker 1: disrupting a large gathering of white supremacists. Uh, and the
Speaker 1: d D Landing. You know, because because the d D
Speaker 1: Landing and fighting Nazis in World War Two, that's similar
Speaker 1: to a bunch of under employed malcontents running around punching
Speaker 1: reporters and breaking windows and screaming about revolution. There's a
Speaker 1: lot more crazies on the left, folks, and they're on
Speaker 1: the right. It's just a fact. They're all over the country.
Speaker 1: They're all over you see Anti Fall and all these
Speaker 1: different cities, these Black Lives Matter protesters, a lot of
Speaker 1: them hate the cops. I was there, I saw it.
Speaker 1: I've been there many times. Okay, they have been told
Speaker 1: they have been trained to despise police officers, black, white,
Speaker 1: Asian male, female, It doesn't matter. They hate all cops.
Speaker 1: But they want to be taken seriously as a political
Speaker 1: movement that wants reform and police and community relations to improve.
Speaker 1: And they hate the cops. But this justification of Nazi punching,
Speaker 1: which is what they call it by Cuomo or this
Speaker 1: soft pedaling of Nazi punching is deeply troubling because I
Speaker 1: need you guys to all understand this. They think anybody
Speaker 1: who supports Trump is is basically kind of sort of
Speaker 1: a Nazi. Anything that white supremacy now just means, uh,
Speaker 1: whatever they wanted to mean. I can't even find a
Speaker 1: a real definition of what white supremacy in the left
Speaker 1: wing cannon currently is defined as. I think it's the
Speaker 1: structure of white advancement and power in society over other groups,
Speaker 1: or something that is structural and institutionalized and historically base.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I used think white supremacy was people
Speaker 1: that thought that white people were better than other people
Speaker 1: based on their skin color. Pretty straightforward, a grotesque and
Speaker 1: an evil thing to think. But now white supremacy is
Speaker 1: you know, yeah, we should have more police in that
Speaker 1: dangerous neighborhood. Oh, that's white supremacy. No. I just thought
Speaker 1: that the cops would be able to stop innocent people
Speaker 1: from being murdered and raped and be able to go
Speaker 1: to school and go to work and not be harmed
Speaker 1: by gangbangers. I I thought that's no, no, no, it's
Speaker 1: white supremacy. Now, you see, Okay, what about being upset
Speaker 1: about Asians being discriminated against the college emissions? That's white
Speaker 1: supremacy too. I need someone to explain that one to me.
Speaker 1: But you know, the the Cuomo line here on this
Speaker 1: from CNN is when you hear from a lot of places,
Speaker 1: which is, you know, basically, Antifa are left wing crazy.
Speaker 1: They're not that bad because they're fighting against hate. That's
Speaker 1: not true. They're full of hate themselves. So I don't
Speaker 1: know how they think they're effectively fighting hate when their
Speaker 1: hatred extends well beyond white nationalists to you and me.
Speaker 1: He's back with you now, because when it comes to
Speaker 1: the fight for truth, the funk never stops. There are
Speaker 1: a lot of different activists who are like, why are
Speaker 1: you in riot here? We don't see no riot here.
Speaker 1: There is a belief by many activists, including Antifa, that
Speaker 1: the police support this kind of violence, because do you
Speaker 1: think the police, the police there were there to protect
Speaker 1: white nationalists. To believe that when you look at how
Speaker 1: the police respond to white nationalists that's composed the Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter protesting again, you do Look, I never liked
Speaker 1: the idea of journalists getting attacked, but no one has
Speaker 1: a reason to believe even and you look at how
Speaker 1: the police responded last year. When you look at the
Speaker 1: fact that they shut down the Metro in d C
Speaker 1: that let these guys go in, people have reasons to
Speaker 1: doubt the police's dedication to eradicating races wherever it comes
Speaker 1: from politically, and we should be the first to call
Speaker 1: it out. I disagree. There. You have somebody who's just
Speaker 1: straight up saying on MSNBC, yeah, act like a thug.
Speaker 1: You're in Black Lives Matter, You're an anti punch people
Speaker 1: do whatever you want because you know the cops are
Speaker 1: on the side of the bad guys. You know, I
Speaker 1: wrote in The Hill earlier this week you can read
Speaker 1: on the Hill dot com. I mean, I I go
Speaker 1: into some detail there about how these anti hate protesters
Speaker 1: hate the cops. Why is that? Okay? Who who thinks
Speaker 1: that's justifiable? Oh? Well? There he there. He had a
Speaker 1: journalist on National TV named what's his name, Jason Johnson saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right there, tools of white supremacists. What do do
Speaker 1: they not teach the First Amendment school? I don't think
Speaker 1: they do. Do journalists not read the First sent to
Speaker 1: the understand what it's supposed to mean. What would have
Speaker 1: happened if those white supremacists had walked into d C
Speaker 1: without the police there to guard them. There would have
Speaker 1: been violence, and then you would have had Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter protesters and ANTIFA people getting thrown in prison because
Speaker 1: they outnumbered the white nationalists about a hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: to one. And then then you have people saying, well,
Speaker 1: no Nazi punching is okay, maybe Nazi killing is okay too,
Speaker 1: that's the next step. And they say, well, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know if we can really press charges against
Speaker 1: them because we don't like what they say. Keep in mind, folks,
Speaker 1: they think that these guys, these are white nationalists. They
Speaker 1: also think that, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center,
Speaker 1: Leginas is an anti Muslim extremist. Ben Shapiro has appeared
Speaker 1: in an article in the Southern Poverty Law Centers site
Speaker 1: alongside I think The New Yorker actually had a profile
Speaker 1: on uh Spencer the white nationalists, and they they also
Speaker 1: mentioned Shapiro, who's a target of white nationalists. And they're
Speaker 1: just they're just lying about this stuff all the time.
Speaker 1: But if they can expand the categories of who's a
Speaker 1: white nationalists or white supremacist, to include anybody who's worked
Speaker 1: at Brightbart anybody who and I is a as a
Speaker 1: vocal supporter of Trump, and they can justify that violence
Speaker 1: against white nationalists. They it's a very small lead to
Speaker 1: justify that violence against any of you. And that's what
Speaker 1: this really comes down to. They're looking for a reason,
Speaker 1: looking for an explanation to allow their emotions to take
Speaker 1: full control, so that they can take their political disagreements
Speaker 1: with the right and make it about violence. And I
Speaker 1: would note that the uh fights on the streets of
Speaker 1: Germany leading up to World War Two, and the storm
Speaker 1: all uh ab Thai lung or you know, I can't
Speaker 1: remember the name of the German stormtroopers, of the s
Speaker 1: S and the the brown Shirts, and all this different
Speaker 1: stuff at all blends together in the German. My German
Speaker 1: skills and fortunately are very h not to say their
Speaker 1: lacklusters being kind to me. I took it for two
Speaker 1: years in school. I took German, I took French, and
Speaker 1: I took Arabic, and speak really none of them. My
Speaker 1: French is okay, My Arabic is about fifty words now.
Speaker 1: And my German is probably ten words. Um, But the
Speaker 1: brown Shirts, the black Shirts, these were fascists and communists.
Speaker 1: They were fighting on the streets of Germany street brawls.
Speaker 1: Those were the original anti fascist. But the original anti
Speaker 1: fascist that these anti protesters today harkened back to. We're
Speaker 1: very violent and we're willing to use extreme violence for
Speaker 1: political ends as well. Once they had achieved power. They
Speaker 1: weren't pacifists, they weren't peaceful. They didn't have democratic liberalism
Speaker 1: in mind. Because ultimately, when you resort to force in politics,
Speaker 1: it's clear you can't win the argument. You've been unable
Speaker 1: to win the argument. You aren't seeking converts, you are
Speaker 1: hunting heretics, and that's certainly what anti food does. But
Speaker 1: this justification of violence against reporters and the police, that's see,
Speaker 1: this is why I won't take reporters seriously. Trump is
Speaker 1: on me and was in the White House that Jimmicata,
Speaker 1: an old lady said something to him that was mean
Speaker 1: at a rally. So scary because when actual reporters get
Speaker 1: punched in the face and get bloody and get attacked,
Speaker 1: it's by left wing loons who support Bernie Sanders, who
Speaker 1: loved Obama who love you know, Nancy Pelosi and all
Speaker 1: the rest of them, And they don't want to cover that.
Speaker 1: That's not a big deal. NBC News ignored in its
Speaker 1: reporting initially that one of its own reporters had been attacked.
Speaker 1: They will justify this stuff, though. They will find somebody
Speaker 1: I'm I play you the audio, right, I'm not making
Speaker 1: this stuff up. They will say this is okay. They
Speaker 1: will say police are tools of white supremacy. Well, if
Speaker 1: police are tools of white supremacy, is violence against them? Okay?
Speaker 1: This is not just rhetorical, folks. There have been assassinations
Speaker 1: of police officers, including a mass assassination in Dallas that
Speaker 1: was a direct response to left wing Black Lives Matter
Speaker 1: rhetoric jammed down the throats of the American people by
Speaker 1: the press, by the media and the so called activists
Speaker 1: for months and months, and it led to bloodshed. And
Speaker 1: they take no responsibility for that whatsoever. And now they're
Speaker 1: gonna lecture us. Now they're gonna tell us that because
Speaker 1: Trump pushes back on these clowns in the media, he's
Speaker 1: inspiring violence. Where is the violence on our side? Where
Speaker 1: is it? You had a mass assassination of cops in
Speaker 1: Dallas by by a Black Lives Matter zealot. You've had
Speaker 1: other people assassin including two for my old my old
Speaker 1: p D NYPD in New York. Two of our officers
Speaker 1: assassinated sitting in their car. Why did that guy kill them?
Speaker 1: Because of Black Lives Matter? He said, so antifas punching people,
Speaker 1: hitting them with with rocks and bats and clubs. They're
Speaker 1: pulling brass knuckles off of people who were showing up
Speaker 1: at this rally in d C yesterday. I had somebody
Speaker 1: come up to me today in conservative media. I won't
Speaker 1: say who was. He said, Buck, you can't go to
Speaker 1: these rallies. What are you doing? And I said, well,
Speaker 1: what do you mean? He said, well, you know he
Speaker 1: used to do CNN and and he made a little joke.
Speaker 1: He's like, I'm not saying you're famous or anything. And
Speaker 1: I said, yeah, I know I'm not. But he said no.
Speaker 1: But in all seriousness, if one of these black block
Speaker 1: guys from the ANTIFA sees you and mobs you, you
Speaker 1: know you don't want to be the first one. You
Speaker 1: don't want to be the cautionary tale. And I said, now,
Speaker 1: I can handle a few of them, but you're right.
Speaker 1: I mean, there were hundreds and hundreds of them, and
Speaker 1: I can assume that they probably wouldn't know who I was.
Speaker 1: But you know, they they're on Twitter, they sometimes will
Speaker 1: turn on Fox News. They sometimes can do some internet
Speaker 1: services to see who the rising young conservatives are these
Speaker 1: days in the movement. But that was a really that's
Speaker 1: you know, it's just so funny to me. Jim Acosta
Speaker 1: is going to be fine. I guarantee you no one's
Speaker 1: going to attack Jim Acosta, and that's a good thing.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't be attacked, you should be he should be mocked,
Speaker 1: not attacked. Okay, I don't want anyone from seem getting
Speaker 1: attacked on anyone from any news organization get attacked ever,
Speaker 1: But I'm consistent about it. You'll notice the left, well,
Speaker 1: you know, cops that are gonna get attacked, journalists get attacked.
Speaker 1: If it's left wing people attacking them, they have they
Speaker 1: have an excuse for it, so they will excuse the
Speaker 1: actual violence on the left while decrying theoretical violence coming
Speaker 1: from right wing rhetoric. This is why we don't trust them,
Speaker 1: this is why they're fake news. That's why they're a
Speaker 1: bunch of lives by. They do we have the rest
Speaker 1: of that. I wanted to finish that. Cuomo bro Cuomo
Speaker 1: is um, So we stop when you've got a sense
Speaker 1: of it, right. Um, Actually, Brandon, you know what, play
Speaker 1: the whole plate from the beginning. I want him to
Speaker 1: hear the whole things. I don't want it to be
Speaker 1: accused of taking out of context. So play the first
Speaker 1: Quomo clip and then the second addition to it. Okay,
Speaker 1: two wrongs and what is right. The biggots are wrong
Speaker 1: to hit Antifa or whomever anarchists or malcontent or misguided.
Speaker 1: They are also wrong to hit. But fighting hate is right,
Speaker 1: and in a clash between hate and those who oppose it,
Speaker 1: those who oppose it are on the side of right.
Speaker 1: Think about it, I argue to you tonight. All punches
Speaker 1: are not equal morally. In the eyes of the law, yes,
Speaker 1: But in the eyes of good and evil, here's the argument.
Speaker 1: If you're punk who comes to start trouble in the
Speaker 1: mask and hurt people, you're not about any virtuous cause.
Speaker 1: You're just somebody who's gonna be held to the standard
Speaker 1: of doing something wrong. But when someone comes to call
Speaker 1: out bigots and it gets hot, even physical, are they
Speaker 1: equally wrong as the biggest they are fighting. I argue, no,
Speaker 1: fighting against hate matters. Now how you fight matters too,
Speaker 1: There's no question about that. But drawing a moral equivalency
Speaker 1: between those espousing hate and those fighting, because they both
Speaker 1: resort to violence, Embolden's hate legitimizes hateful belief and elevates
Speaker 1: what should be stamped out. He's just justifying Nazi punching. Said, yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: maybe the law says one thing, but you know, morally speaking,
Speaker 1: and I sit here and I say to you, you
Speaker 1: fight hate with words, and then this is going to
Speaker 1: sound incredibly corny, but the real way you would fight
Speaker 1: hate is with love and understanding and knowledge. No, he says,
Speaker 1: if you show up in a mask and you're trying
Speaker 1: to hurt people, you're a punk. You're not good. But
Speaker 1: if you're showing up to fight hate. What bro Cuomo
Speaker 1: doesn't seem to understand is that people in the black
Speaker 1: mask are the ones who think they are fighting hate.
Speaker 1: That's the whole point. That's why there were hundreds and
Speaker 1: hundreds of them among a crowd of thousands of people
Speaker 1: who hate Donald Trump, hate Republicans, hate the Tea Party hate,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, there's a lot of hate in there, folks.
Speaker 1: Hate the patriarchy, hate white male Christians, you got on
Speaker 1: the whole line, hate Sarah Hugby Sanders. But their anti
Speaker 1: hate people are deranged. They are deranged. Um, and you know,
Speaker 1: all punches not equal. That was a very telling statement,
Speaker 1: wasn't it. You know what he's really saying here is
Speaker 1: that you know, if you punch a right winger, maybe
Speaker 1: maybe it's illegal, but like you're doing the right thing
Speaker 1: because you know, you're fighting hate. This is a rent,
Speaker 1: This isn't This is the same press that a week
Speaker 1: ago was saying, Oh, look at the old ladies that
Speaker 1: are at the Trump rally. They're yelling at CNN sucks
Speaker 1: because CNN does suck. How about that? Look at all
Speaker 1: the lady they're saying, okay that they want us to
Speaker 1: be worried about all the book they're inspiring rhetoric. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be a danger to journalist. Then journalists actually get attacked.
Speaker 1: I'm there, I see what's going on at this rally,
Speaker 1: and I had to sit around for a week with
Speaker 1: the go well, you know, it just kind of fizzled out,
Speaker 1: and you know, yeah, there was a little bit of
Speaker 1: answers from left wing people. But you know, they're fighting hate,
Speaker 1: so it's not that big a deal. People have no ethics,
Speaker 1: they have no morals. They are hypocrites. They want to
Speaker 1: be the moral conscience of a country, and they are
Speaker 1: immoral in their actions and in their words on a
Speaker 1: daily basis. They are losing their grip on power because
Speaker 1: of Trump. That's why they hate him so much. There
Speaker 1: is a massive transfer of power happening away from the
Speaker 1: elite establishment media. Trump is at the center of it.
Speaker 1: They think that they have to do everything in their
Speaker 1: power to stop him, and that includes making complete jackasses
Speaker 1: of themselves. I mean this Cuomo uh and he was
Speaker 1: the only one play the guy from ms NBC. There
Speaker 1: are others too, but just idiocy, just idiocy. You know,
Speaker 1: maybe they should go down there and see what it's
Speaker 1: actually like to be around these anti fum maniacs. Eight
Speaker 1: four four to five. If you want to chat, team,
Speaker 1: lines are open. We'll be right back. Alright, lines are late.
Speaker 1: We've got Stephen in Springfield, Massachusetts on the line. What
Speaker 1: off Stephen? Hey Buck, how are you doing. I'm good.
Speaker 1: Thanks for the calling, buddy. Oh yeah, I was. I
Speaker 1: was definitely driven the call because I've been listening to
Speaker 1: you lately, and um, I think I think you're starting
Speaker 1: to think along the lines that I do. That the
Speaker 1: left is no, is not really an ideology. They're just
Speaker 1: like a utilitarian use anything at their disposal to gain power.
Speaker 1: I I'm I totally believe that they would flip everything
Speaker 1: that they believe tomorrow if it suited their political purpose. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I don't think that it's the pursuit of any principle.
Speaker 1: I think the power is the central goal of the left,
Speaker 1: and I do believe that there's a there's a very
Speaker 1: different mindset that is at the heart of what it
Speaker 1: is to be a liberal today, what it is to
Speaker 1: be a conservative. I mean, I think it goes very
Speaker 1: deep into the core of people's identities. And I think
Speaker 1: that for liberals, because they largely reject um, they largely
Speaker 1: reject a relationship with well, so we say traditional religion, Uh,
Speaker 1: contemporary liberalism at least rejects traditional religion. Their political beliefs
Speaker 1: are their religion, and so they viewed as deeply personal
Speaker 1: and even existential. And once you start to view it
Speaker 1: in that under through that lens, then I think it
Speaker 1: makes more sense. Oh yeah, definitely. And the thing is
Speaker 1: too but but what they're doing is like so dangerous,
Speaker 1: trying to equate conservative speech with evil and and basically
Speaker 1: just trying to say Conservatives equal evil, equal racism equal hatred. Uh.
Speaker 1: This is what the Nazis did to the new Joos
Speaker 1: Nazi Germany in the thirties. Thank god we don't have
Speaker 1: the hyper inflation of Germany debt because on socialist revolutions
Speaker 1: Jews respawn from like incredibly bad economic times, lots of
Speaker 1: luck liberals with the booming economy. All right, thank you
Speaker 1: for calling in, Steven, appreciate it. Good to talk to you. Um.
Speaker 1: One thing that I did want to get you here
Speaker 1: for a moment is this newspapers that are calling across
Speaker 1: the US calling for editorials about Trump's attacks on the press.
Speaker 1: You got to hear The Boston Globe and the this
Speaker 1: from NBC News. The Boston Globe in the American Society
Speaker 1: of News Editors put out the call to publish editorials
Speaker 1: on Trump's escalating rhetoric about US journalists. The newspapers are
Speaker 1: prepared to answer. CNNs Brian Selter reports that more than
Speaker 1: a hundred publications are prepared to publish an editorial on
Speaker 1: Thursday that will be not tomorrow the next day, which
Speaker 1: would make it one of the widest coordinated efforts collusion
Speaker 1: in the history of American media. Uh quote. This dirty
Speaker 1: war on the press must and the Boston Globe is
Speaker 1: reaching out to editorial boards across the country to propose
Speaker 1: a coordinated response. The Globe proposes to publish editorial in
Speaker 1: August sixteen on the dangers of the administration's assault on
Speaker 1: the press and ask others to commit to publishing their
Speaker 1: own editorial. Blah blah blah. Trump is the worst. They're
Speaker 1: all gonna write at the same time. Uh you know,
Speaker 1: I thought there was a very good, very good responses
Speaker 1: from Victor Davis Hansen that's worth playing. I think v
Speaker 1: d h is brilliant. Let's hear from Victor play four.
Speaker 1: What Trump hasn't done this is rhetoric. He's fought back
Speaker 1: at the media what he calls fake news. But he
Speaker 1: has not jailed uh two and two reporters like JFK did.
Speaker 1: He did not survey associate reporter the Associated Press reporters
Speaker 1: like in the way that Obama did with James Rosen
Speaker 1: at Fox News. He didn't introduce a bill like the
Speaker 1: Roosevelt allies and Congress did called the libel Bill the
Speaker 1: stifle opposition. He didn't do it Hilly Clinton in two
Speaker 1: thousand and eight when she tried to stop that Hillary documentary. So,
Speaker 1: and the final tragedy is what's not really being reported.
Speaker 1: We have the fourth highest member of the d J
Speaker 1: rus or who was colluding with Fusion GPS after the
Speaker 1: election to underminer president. And we've got, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: we just had Diane Feinstein admit that for twenty years
Speaker 1: her chauffeur was a spy for the Chinese government. And
Speaker 1: it's not news. Yep, yep, that's not news. No one
Speaker 1: cares abouty of that Omrose's allegations. So that's big news.
Speaker 1: And oh, let's have a bunch of better. The press
Speaker 1: is already against Trump. They're convincing no one of anything here.
Speaker 1: This is just a tantrum. It is a mass coordinated
Speaker 1: media tantrum against Trump. But then again, I guess that's
Speaker 1: also called CNN's nightly lineup. Oh be sure to tap
Speaker 1: your waitress. Um, all right, we've got talk a little
Speaker 1: about the struck fire and coming up here and then
Speaker 1: much more. Stay right there, Team buckets, decoding the news
Speaker 1: and disseminating information with actionable intelligence, or make no mistake, American, Ready,
Speaker 1: you're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Former CIA analysts, Remember this is a guy who was
Speaker 1: in charge of two investigations and was political about it.
Speaker 1: He started in the Hillary Clinton email server investigation, favored her,
Speaker 1: started started digging up dirt on on Donald Trump. Everybody
Speaker 1: watched his testimony a few weeks ago. He was just
Speaker 1: a jerk with a smirk, and now he's just a
Speaker 1: sort of two bit x FBI employee with a Twitter feed.
Speaker 1: The American people deserve an FBI that's not biased. They
Speaker 1: deserve an FBI that's going to focus on the truth. Obviously,
Speaker 1: Peter Struck wasn't that individual. Of course, as lawyer says
Speaker 1: that it was a railroad job. There's only other option
Speaker 1: is to say, you know what, my client prejudged two
Speaker 1: major investigations. He made up his mind that Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: was innocent before he interviewed her. He made up his
Speaker 1: mom that Donald Trump should be impeached before he bothered
Speaker 1: to interview him. And oh, by the way, he did
Speaker 1: a lot of this on the government phone. And he
Speaker 1: violated other FBI policy. Without Peter Struck and a handful
Speaker 1: of other individuals, this investigation would never have gotten where
Speaker 1: it is. The Only reason that the former director Mueller
Speaker 1: is even empowered is people like Struck set up a
Speaker 1: false narrative. We're gonna be interviewing on behind closed doors.
Speaker 1: It's a deposition Bruce Or, And the reality is that
Speaker 1: we're gonna be asking him questions about how we came
Speaker 1: to have a false dossier that his wife was involved in,
Speaker 1: and that in fact he made individual calls too Struck.
Speaker 1: So it's not going to end with one disgrace FBI agent.
Speaker 1: We've got more to do to clean up the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice. Here's our prediction, folks. I think Bruce Or
Speaker 1: is toast. Bruce Or is gonna get fired. He's the
Speaker 1: next one, another one bites the dust. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: h Bruce Or getting his walking papers. How could he
Speaker 1: not look at what he was doing, look at the
Speaker 1: way he conducted himself. The conflicts of interest to your
Speaker 1: alre enormous. Your wife is basically passing you information. She's
Speaker 1: a a paid hatchet job person for the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Speaker 1: You're taking your wife's information as hatchet job lady, and
Speaker 1: you're using that to to present to the d o
Speaker 1: J to run five awards. I mean, this is just crazy,
Speaker 1: it really is. And they want us to be worried about,
Speaker 1: you know, Trump calling someone the D word a dog.
Speaker 1: They want us to think that they have our best
Speaker 1: interests at heart here as a nation. This is all
Speaker 1: about defending our our essential institutions. You know, there was
Speaker 1: a part of me that thought at some point the
Speaker 1: liberal left that they'd move on to issues more and
Speaker 1: it would move away from just that. They would be
Speaker 1: like infants that cry themselves out right, you know, an
Speaker 1: infants will just cry and cry. So I'm told that
Speaker 1: I haven't spent much time about infants, but they'll cry
Speaker 1: and then eventually they just exhaust themselves in the fall asleep.
Speaker 1: I thought that the left would have to go through
Speaker 1: a period like that where this anti Trump tantrum would
Speaker 1: exhaust them at least long enough, if they would start
Speaker 1: focusing on some other things, at least long enough that
Speaker 1: there would be focuses on on other stuff out there.
Speaker 1: And I just don't see it. You know, it's really
Speaker 1: all about how much they hate Trump, and they've corrupted
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice. They've corrupted the FBI. I think
Speaker 1: there's gonna be more people that suffer real consequences because
Speaker 1: of their actions, as they should, by the way, as
Speaker 1: they very well should. And I'm still watching the situation
Speaker 1: as it plays out with Manifork. By the way, our
Speaker 1: buddy Andy McCarthy, I was on Fox now you know,
Speaker 1: he's on Fox fair amount and he's he's such such
Speaker 1: a good you know. I I think you guys all
Speaker 1: probably know that a lot of the people I have
Speaker 1: on the show I'm very fond of personally, and that's
Speaker 1: that tends to be. One of the things about the
Speaker 1: guests that I have on is that I generally no
Speaker 1: my guests, not always, you know, I'd say seventy five percent, uh,
Speaker 1: seventy five percent of the time, I at least know
Speaker 1: the guests some up about fifty percent of the time.
Speaker 1: It's somebody that I would call a friend or at
Speaker 1: least an associate, close associate in the business, somebody that
Speaker 1: I really respect. And he's great and and has been
Speaker 1: somebody I've known now for seven years. Um. And he
Speaker 1: was talking about the the Manifort case and how that
Speaker 1: could tell us, you know, because they didn't call any witnesses.
Speaker 1: They just the defense. The defense rests. They're just like,
Speaker 1: all right, that's what you got. Well let's see, let's
Speaker 1: see what happens. And people are trying to extrapolate from that,
Speaker 1: well a whole lot. I'm no surprise there, um, But
Speaker 1: here's what and he says about a playlip twelve if
Speaker 1: he loses the case. Again, Manafort was kind of presented
Speaker 1: as the big fish when he was charged because he
Speaker 1: was the chairman of Trump's campaign, and he's if there
Speaker 1: was any collusion, he would be at the center of it, presumably, right,
Speaker 1: So if he loses the case, it would be a
Speaker 1: big blow. But I think the stakes for him because
Speaker 1: this case has nothing to do with the rationale Famular's investigation,
Speaker 1: which is this allegation of collusion or coordination between the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign and the Kremlin. The point of the case
Speaker 1: has always been to try to squeeze Manifort into cooperating
Speaker 1: with the investigation. So that's the steak. I mean, if
Speaker 1: he gets him convicted, uh, then he's got cards to play.
Speaker 1: So if he convicts him, then he can try to
Speaker 1: flip him. If he doesn't convict him, what does that
Speaker 1: tell you about this whole situation. But look, I think
Speaker 1: I think Manafort's probably gonna go down, but he's gonna
Speaker 1: go down on tax charges. Could he flipped Maniford, Well,
Speaker 1: that's the other question. I don't think Manaford has any
Speaker 1: of the goods. I don't think there's anything for or
Speaker 1: manna Fort to flip on. And then there's this part
Speaker 1: of me that just I know, this is I'm being
Speaker 1: a little trouble making here. I'm being a little bit
Speaker 1: of a rabble rouser, a little bit of a fire starter,
Speaker 1: if you will. But then there's this part of me
Speaker 1: that thinks, you know, it would just be sweet if
Speaker 1: if they get Manaford on tax charges and then Trump
Speaker 1: commutes his sentence, so that all, yes, it is because
Speaker 1: Manafort should make financial restitution if he's guilty. I'm that's
Speaker 1: that's my sense of all tax crimes. You should have
Speaker 1: to pay back everything over the government, and you should
Speaker 1: have to pay an additional fine, you know, prison time
Speaker 1: though thirty years of prison time, You'll notice the government's
Speaker 1: running up a huge debt without Manafort failing to pay them.
Speaker 1: You know, I just think sending somebody into putting somebody
Speaker 1: in a concrete box for decades because they didn't give
Speaker 1: Uncle Sam all up. I'm sure Manaford, by the way,
Speaker 1: this is never gets talked about. I'm sure he paid
Speaker 1: some taxes. It's not like he wasn't paying any taxes.
Speaker 1: He just didn't pay all his taxes. Uh, But it
Speaker 1: would be really funny for me. And I shouldn't think
Speaker 1: this way, but I do. Sometimes I just gotta own
Speaker 1: the Libs, you know. I just want the Libs to
Speaker 1: get a little owned. I get a little frustrated. They
Speaker 1: needed they need some ownage. And it will be fun
Speaker 1: if you were to just commute the sentence down, or
Speaker 1: maybe I mean maybe even pardon him just cause why not.
Speaker 1: And once he's paid back the money, once he's made
Speaker 1: financial restitution, that that he gets pardoned because he has
Speaker 1: been targeted for political reasons. That's the truth. That's that's
Speaker 1: what's gone on here, you know, Democrat this is also
Speaker 1: why uh you know, Democrats are just better at at
Speaker 1: weaponizing bureaucracies because they're of a bureaucratic mindset, and very
Speaker 1: few of them are really to stand up and say,
Speaker 1: because of a principle, we should not use our full
Speaker 1: leverage against this Conservative because there's something else at stake here.
Speaker 1: We should we should hold back and not just give
Speaker 1: in to our desire to own the conservatives. But you know,
Speaker 1: we'll see what ends up. Oh but but the dirsh
Speaker 1: we got the dirsh wing and two on Struck. I
Speaker 1: meant to get to this one. Another point that never
Speaker 1: gets talked about here. Why is it that the only
Speaker 1: people who recused themselves from very politically sensitive information investigations
Speaker 1: are on the right. Lauretta Lynch. Never recuse yourself in
Speaker 1: the Hillary Clinton email investigation, even after the tarmac meeting
Speaker 1: with Bill Clinton that debacle. Never accused yourself. So why
Speaker 1: why is it that you'll notice this pattern? Right? Jeff
Speaker 1: Sessions recused himself, but to Peter Struck recuse himself because
Speaker 1: of his biases? Did Comey recuse himself as Rose and
Speaker 1: c No, No No, they don't recuse themselves. Durst brings up
Speaker 1: this point play eight. He should have recused himself once
Speaker 1: he said the messages that didn't only say I don't
Speaker 1: like Trump, but I'm gonna stop him. We need an
Speaker 1: insurance policy that created at least the impression of bias.
Speaker 1: All we know is it appears that he could have
Speaker 1: been biased, and that's what the Inspected General found that
Speaker 1: the the appearance of bias was enough, So he should
Speaker 1: have accused himself. He's a professional, and his failure to
Speaker 1: accuse himself, I think is what led to his firing.
Speaker 1: I think what led to his firing is that he
Speaker 1: is single handedly tarnished the reputation the FBI. And for
Speaker 1: people who are going to sit down, Remember, the FBI
Speaker 1: has tremendous power. They sit down with you, they talked
Speaker 1: to you about an investigation, and you lie to them,
Speaker 1: you've got to prison. They have a lot of power.
Speaker 1: Maybe too much power, some people would say, quite honestly,
Speaker 1: but discussion for another time. But they have a lot
Speaker 1: of power, and their word and their integrity is everything
Speaker 1: because they're taking away people's freedom often based on that.
Speaker 1: There's a reason why FBI agents have to attest in
Speaker 1: writing and under oath, attest to whatever it is that
Speaker 1: their statement is that that there's a reason that the
Speaker 1: charging document, that the indictment has you know, FBI agents
Speaker 1: saying I where that this is the truth. Basically I'm
Speaker 1: forgetting the exact language. And Peter Struck has made that
Speaker 1: now a little harder for them. A little less believable,
Speaker 1: a little less credible. And I can tell you this,
Speaker 1: if I were an FBI agent, I would be furious.
Speaker 1: I would be furious. We've got more on the Trump
Speaker 1: Tower meeting coming up here in just a few minutes. Team,
Speaker 1: I will talk to you about that and much more.
Speaker 1: Stay with me. Secretary of Pompeo has announced our strategy
Speaker 1: very clearly. Iran must halt nuclear Richmond halt, halt the
Speaker 1: development of nuclear ballistic missiles, UH withdraw their forces from Syria,
Speaker 1: and stop stop aiding proxy militious and militant groups like
Speaker 1: his buff We're calling for change in regime behavior, not
Speaker 1: regime change. But I don't see how this Iranian regime
Speaker 1: can do what we're asking them to do to get
Speaker 1: back to the table. I think what we're asking them
Speaker 1: to do would be in anathema to their national security strategy.
Speaker 1: And I think that's where the rubber is going to
Speaker 1: meet the road. Frankly, let's see how the Iranian economy
Speaker 1: continues to struggle and and whether protests developed. Iran is
Speaker 1: extraordinarily concerned about the potential for a populist uprising of
Speaker 1: the sort we saw in the Middle East during the
Speaker 1: Arab spring and what we've seen in Iran with a
Speaker 1: Green movement. Yeah, I think we got ourn actually frankly
Speaker 1: back on the hills a little bit here. First of all,
Speaker 1: that their economy is struggling, their currency to reality is
Speaker 1: in absolute free fall. They've they've both committed themselves in
Speaker 1: Lebanon in Syria in a rock and Yemen. They've stretched
Speaker 1: themselves rather significantly in doing that. Certainly financially. They have
Speaker 1: got unrest in the streets as a matter of norm
Speaker 1: now by their people because of the actual economic impact
Speaker 1: on everyday lives, and they are demonstrating, you know, for
Speaker 1: the first time seriously against the regime. You know, you
Speaker 1: just heard some real analysis there from a couple of
Speaker 1: different folks, Daniel Hoffman and General Jack Keane over in
Speaker 1: Fox News on what's going on in Iran. And this
Speaker 1: brings me back to one of the areas of greatest
Speaker 1: Trump arrangement syndrome out there, and that is President Trump
Speaker 1: can't be successful on foreign policy because it would make
Speaker 1: the elites and the establishment questioned too much about themselves,
Speaker 1: and so they are actively rooting against the president, whether
Speaker 1: it's on Iran, on North Korea, any foreign policy issue,
Speaker 1: and they are trying to convince their fellow Americans that
Speaker 1: President Trump is already failing on these issues. Just as
Speaker 1: an experiment, as as I was preparing for the segment today,
Speaker 1: I did a quick Google search on Iran and news.
Speaker 1: You know, the first stories that pop up are I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just a this will just give you some
Speaker 1: sense of of what we're dealing with. Your CNN, Washington
Speaker 1: Post and uh, some oil thing. Uh. But the CNN
Speaker 1: pieces why sanctions against Iran won't make America safer. The
Speaker 1: Washington Post pieces u S sanctions on Iran hit an
Speaker 1: unintended target ordinary iraqis you go through, Oh Politico, Trump's
Speaker 1: Iran sanctions are backfiring. In Iraq Newsweek, Iran shows off
Speaker 1: ballistic missiles as tensions rise. You know, guys, I just
Speaker 1: at what point do they wake up and say to themselves,
Speaker 1: you know, we could just tell stories about what's happening
Speaker 1: without always trying to do it so that we stacked
Speaker 1: the deck for our favorite political narrative. But they won't.
Speaker 1: I suppose they they'd rather just hang on and and
Speaker 1: this is really about and this is what's so crazy
Speaker 1: the Iran situation For most of the press here down
Speaker 1: the street for me at the Washington Post and CNN
Speaker 1: and the other the other very uh hoity toity, super
Speaker 1: fancy elite news outlets out there. Uh, it's really about Obama,
Speaker 1: Isn't that remarkable. It's really about the Obama legacy because
Speaker 1: they know that what Trump has been accomplishing, whether it's
Speaker 1: on regulatory rollback any number of issues, is regulatory reform.
Speaker 1: He's been pulling back these regulations that I've been hurting
Speaker 1: small businesses, that have been hurting the economy. And that
Speaker 1: was really Obama. Obama's main series of actions when he
Speaker 1: was in office. It was executive orders and Obamacare and
Speaker 1: a terrible foreign policy with a lot of bowing and apologizing.
Speaker 1: That was what to find the Obama administration in terms
Speaker 1: of what they did, what the what that White House
Speaker 1: accomplished or failed to accomplish. So the arguments over Iran
Speaker 1: that you're seeing now are much more about protecting Obama's
Speaker 1: legacy and trying to create a perception that no matter
Speaker 1: what Trump does, he's failing. No matter what pressure he
Speaker 1: puts Iran under, it's not enough, or it's not a
Speaker 1: good idea, or it's counterproductive. In many ways, the media
Speaker 1: lies to you more about foreign policy than domestic policy
Speaker 1: because they think they can get away with it. And
Speaker 1: there's greater reliance on foreign news bureaus to bring us
Speaker 1: information about what's going on in all these places. Right,
Speaker 1: so it's just a natural inclination to say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: CNN must know what's going on and on better than
Speaker 1: most folks do. Right. But just like with so many
Speaker 1: other issues, it's much posturing. You know, you you see
Speaker 1: this with the liberal media on on any number of
Speaker 1: of issues of of of of concern, right that their
Speaker 1: their concern trolling is incredible, but just their general posturing
Speaker 1: around pretending to be concerned. The media doesn't really care
Speaker 1: about I mean, the people that work in the news
Speaker 1: bureaus at the top and that are flying around in
Speaker 1: private jets and going on The Tonight Show and all
Speaker 1: this stuff. They don't care about poor people. They like
Speaker 1: to talk about how much they care about poor people
Speaker 1: because us. It makes them feel good about themselves, makes
Speaker 1: them feel virtuous, but they don't spend time with poor people.
Speaker 1: They are not really trying to help poor people. They
Speaker 1: do stories about how much they love the poor and
Speaker 1: the and the working man, generally speaking, also around minorities
Speaker 1: because it's useful for them to do those stories. And
Speaker 1: on foreign policy, you always have to remember it's it's
Speaker 1: largely a reflection of how they view the world based
Speaker 1: on what they see here at home. So people who
Speaker 1: think that, uh, for example, America is a racist country.
Speaker 1: There's there's white supremacy. Uh that's a structural constant, and
Speaker 1: the police are racist, and there's these power dynamics and
Speaker 1: and and all these things that are so negative with
Speaker 1: you know, the the white male oppression and the patriarchy
Speaker 1: and all that stuff. Those same people, I guarantee you
Speaker 1: are going to view the plight of the Palestinians as
Speaker 1: being of great importance to them, and they're gonna be
Speaker 1: are gonna pretend that they're tremendously concerned with, you know, uh,
Speaker 1: military interventions in the Islamic world, because it's really just
Speaker 1: about how quote we don't like brown people, or quote
Speaker 1: you know, we we hate Muslims or something, right. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's you'll see the same you know, the the ideological
Speaker 1: disposition of people here at home then gets pushed into
Speaker 1: the international policy sphere. And this is why you see
Speaker 1: what with the media every opportunity to run a story
Speaker 1: on our foreign policy is really an opportunity to run
Speaker 1: commentary about domestic politics. They care not about what really
Speaker 1: happens in Iran. They care about the legacy of the
Speaker 1: previous administration on Iran and there. That's why they've been hiring,
Speaker 1: by the way, hiring up all these former Obama foreign
Speaker 1: policy types. You know, they want them out there. They
Speaker 1: want the echo chamber, which remember Ben Rhodes said they
Speaker 1: created inside the White House. They want that now to
Speaker 1: be trends supposed from the White House into the media.
Speaker 1: And that's what's been happening. That is what has been
Speaker 1: accomplished so far. Um. But Trump's not having it. And
Speaker 1: on Iran and on Turkey, he is bringing the pain
Speaker 1: to some countries that need to need to know who
Speaker 1: the boss is. And unlike years and years prior with
Speaker 1: Trump and charge the boss is America. Alright, that'll be
Speaker 1: eight minutes. So what really happened at Trump Tower? If
Speaker 1: you listen to enough Democrats, it was treason, It was collusion,
Speaker 1: It was treason as collusion. It was all of these things.
Speaker 1: But what if it was something else. We're joined now
Speaker 1: by Lee Smith. He's an investigative journalist who's got a
Speaker 1: piece up on real clear investigations. The teen Trump Tower
Speaker 1: meeting looks increasingly like us set up by Russian and
Speaker 1: Clinton operatives. Lee Smith, Great to have you on the show, sir, Hey,
Speaker 1: thanks very much for having me on Buck I really
Speaker 1: appreciate it. All right, So tell me what you what
Speaker 1: you're able to find out in your investigation, because you know,
Speaker 1: up to this point we've been told the Trump Tower meeting,
Speaker 1: this is the centerpiece of the Russia collusion allegation. What's
Speaker 1: the other side of this? Why was this a set up? Right?
Speaker 1: I mean, look, everyone is triedent well not everyone, but
Speaker 1: lots of depression. Of course, the as you were describing before,
Speaker 1: the proponents of collusion, um, they've tried to picture this
Speaker 1: meeting in one particular way, from particular angle, and the
Speaker 1: picture is Donald Trump Jr. Meets Russian lawyer named Natalia
Speaker 1: vusselman Skaya. Therefore collusion. She offered him dirt on on
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. He took the meeting, as it said, as
Speaker 1: in the famous Steele dossier, the Trump administration of the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign was eager to take dirt on the Clinton campaign,
Speaker 1: on its rivals this meeting in the Trump Tower proves
Speaker 1: that that was really the case. Therefore, collusion what is
Speaker 1: not being explained, And this has been out there for
Speaker 1: a while. It's just again much of the press and
Speaker 1: the collusion proponents won't go into any detail on this.
Speaker 1: But frankly, it's quite simple. The Russian lawyer was a
Speaker 1: client of Glenn Simpsons and Fusion GPS, the same firm
Speaker 1: that produced the dossier for Hillary Clinton and hired Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele to write the dossier unearthing all these astonishing alleged
Speaker 1: ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. This person, Glennon
Speaker 1: Simpson Fusion GPS was actually working on behalf of pro
Speaker 1: Kremlin interest with this woman. To tell you of the
Speaker 1: sloman Skaya that seems pretty damning. Lee, Why why doesn't
Speaker 1: this get more more attention to this discussion? I mean,
Speaker 1: are we really to believe just the We're all clear
Speaker 1: that it's a coincidence that the woman who called for
Speaker 1: the meeting in Trump Tower, the russiaman who called for
Speaker 1: that meeting, just happened to be directly connected to Glenn
Speaker 1: Simpson and Fusion GPS. That that's quite a coincidence. Exactly,
Speaker 1: she was working not disconnected. She was working with them
Speaker 1: on a project on behalf of pro Kremlin interest. The
Speaker 1: different job. It was to undo American sanctions on Putin
Speaker 1: on Putin regime officials and other Putin associates. So Glenn Simpson, again,
Speaker 1: the guy who was supposed to be uncovering Trump's relations
Speaker 1: with Russia, was working on a pro Kremlin project to
Speaker 1: undo American legislation. Why hasn't it been framed. I guess
Speaker 1: it's for the same reason that all these other ridiculous
Speaker 1: things are just taken for granted. For instance, let's just
Speaker 1: look at the fact that the FBI had a counter
Speaker 1: intelligence investigation on Michael Flynn. A right, Michael Flynn was
Speaker 1: a retired three star general and the former director of
Speaker 1: the Defense Intelligence Agency. And people actually believe, we're actually
Speaker 1: supposed to believe that this was legitimate. The smells like
Speaker 1: third world exactly, Carter Page. There was a FIZ and
Speaker 1: warrant on Carter Page. The man had helped the FBI,
Speaker 1: and no one at FBI headquarters where they got the
Speaker 1: fives a warrant on Carter Page did they not call
Speaker 1: up the FBI field office in New York to find
Speaker 1: out that Carter Page, a graduate of the Naval Academy
Speaker 1: and a retired naval officer, that this guy had actually
Speaker 1: helped out the FBI in two thousand thirteen, roll up
Speaker 1: a Russian inspiring in New York. It's astonishing the number
Speaker 1: of different things that people have shoved the press and
Speaker 1: collusion proponents have shoved down our throats. Still, Clinton operatives
Speaker 1: and the press are shoving down our throats on this
Speaker 1: which don't bear screwed, which don't with don't withstand scrutiny
Speaker 1: if you look at them at all closely. Tell me
Speaker 1: about this connection between Vesnitskaya, the Russian lawyer who went
Speaker 1: to that Trump Tower meeting, and and Russian American lobbyists
Speaker 1: n not mentioned. Yeah, yeah, I've mentioned is uh as
Speaker 1: A as A apparently a well known figure in Washington,
Speaker 1: working frequently on behalf of pro Kremlin interest. Uh he
Speaker 1: was also in that meeting at the Trump Power along
Speaker 1: with the Salmanskaya, and the two of them were working
Speaker 1: again on this project to repeal the Magnitsky m the
Speaker 1: Magnitsky Act, which is sanctions against Putin regime officials. Now,
Speaker 1: if we come up further to the president, we see
Speaker 1: last week the release of certain documents texts, UM, emails, notes, UM,
Speaker 1: other documents UH showing showing the relationship between DJ official
Speaker 1: senior d J official Bruce or Glenn Simpson again and
Speaker 1: expert of spy Christopher Steel. They're speaking about different things. Well,
Speaker 1: they refer at one point to a Russia and former
Speaker 1: Russian intelligence agents, uh now living in the United States.
Speaker 1: We don't have any evidence yet. This appears to point
Speaker 1: to that Russian American lobbyist who was in the Trump meeting, UM,
Speaker 1: who was in the Trump Tower meeting in June two
Speaker 1: thousand and sixteen. So again, I wanna I want to go.
Speaker 1: I want to make it clear we don't have any
Speaker 1: evidence yet, but I think it's important to look at
Speaker 1: that meeting. Who were the people in that meeting? Uh?
Speaker 1: What were they? What were they doing? This is not
Speaker 1: about collision, it's about something else. Do you ever think
Speaker 1: we've only got a less than a minute here? Let know?
Speaker 1: Do you do you think we're gonna get the answers here? Well?
Speaker 1: What do you need to know to make this thing
Speaker 1: finally all come together? Um? I mean I think we're
Speaker 1: I believe we're gonna get more documents. I know that.
Speaker 1: Uh you know, congressional committees are asking for more documents,
Speaker 1: and I believe they'll eventually be redacted and we'll see them.
Speaker 1: But I mean, I find it astonishing that two years
Speaker 1: were two years after these is our accusations against Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and the Trump campaign have started. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think we're going to have a clearer picture. I think
Speaker 1: we have a pretty good picture right now what happened.
Speaker 1: I think we will get a much clearer picture. But
Speaker 1: how long that people will continue to push this nonsense?
Speaker 1: And I'm it's bad for the country, It's bad for
Speaker 1: our public sphere, it's bad for the press, it's bad
Speaker 1: for the FBI. Uh J Yeah, lately, I agree. We
Speaker 1: gotta leave it there. We gotta leave it there. But
Speaker 1: thank you so much for your work on miss Lee Smith. Everybody,
Speaker 1: investigative journalists will be back with roll call. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get into roll call for today, my friends. If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the action, you
Speaker 1: know where to go. Face book, dot Com, slash buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: um me me right. I would like to recommend win
Speaker 1: Big Lee in a World Persuasion in a world where
Speaker 1: facts Don't matter? By Scott Adams, creator of the Dilbert Cartoons.
Speaker 1: I highly recommend it because I think as observations about
Speaker 1: persuasion techniques would serve you well in your career, giving
Speaker 1: you even greater ninja powers, and because he's an interesting
Speaker 1: case study on the left eating its own. It would
Speaker 1: also be a good interview. All right, Mimi, thank you
Speaker 1: for the suggestion, and we will look into it. I
Speaker 1: will check it out for sure. Eric Rights, welcome to me.
Speaker 1: I think Eric is a bot. I don't know if
Speaker 1: he's a Russian bot. But yeah, that's not a That's
Speaker 1: not a thing that you write to somebody. Doesn't make sense,
Speaker 1: Eric the bot Spencer rightes Heybuck, great show as always
Speaker 1: on the Alex Jones issue. I never see your posts
Speaker 1: on Facebook, like never once since I've liked your page.
Speaker 1: I spend quite a bit of time scrolling during my
Speaker 1: night job and have yet to see one post by
Speaker 1: you that seems strange. By the way, Range fifteen is
Speaker 1: a film by Ross Patterson and Matt Best and the
Speaker 1: Black Rifle Boys and Friends. A silly, funny kind of
Speaker 1: movie keep up the good Fight. I keep trying to
Speaker 1: watch Rising when I can. Crystal's comments almost ruined it
Speaker 1: for me, but I'm still trying. Stansbury and the Freedom
Speaker 1: Hunt are still great. Bring back shields high when you can,
Speaker 1: and I'll listen. Cheers from Spencer. Well, thank you Spencer
Speaker 1: working on all those things. I appreciate you listening to
Speaker 1: all the different projects I'm involved in. It really really
Speaker 1: means a lot. Thank you very much for that, Michael.
Speaker 1: It's a great book that you'll truly appreciate. Don't Make
Speaker 1: Me pull Over by Richard Ratte, The Story of the
Speaker 1: Great American Automobile Family Vacation. His family's ride was a
Speaker 1: nine seventy five Lincoln town Car. I recall yours being
Speaker 1: a Cadillac of some sort. Yes, that's true. Its eight
Speaker 1: blue Cadillac uh Sedan. I forget what the model was.
Speaker 1: The thing you've missed out on living on a hat
Speaker 1: is the great American road trip. Not the family vacation deal,
Speaker 1: but the long trips to nowhere, particularly with your close friends.
Speaker 1: You know, Michael, we used to do these family trips.
Speaker 1: You know. Some of you saw my my uncle James.
Speaker 1: Uncle James we call him when I posted on Facebook.
Speaker 1: He's a locksmith and wood carver in Virginia. We used
Speaker 1: to drive down as a family to see my uncle
Speaker 1: and my grandmother in Charlottesville, Virginia, at least once a year.
Speaker 1: Sometimes I think we made it down twice a year
Speaker 1: for major holidays. And there were six of us in
Speaker 1: that Cadillac. The air conditioner in the Cadillac was was
Speaker 1: broken for a good period of that time. And we
Speaker 1: had some adventures there. Uh, there was some speeding tickets.
Speaker 1: There was a fender bender here. There almost ran a
Speaker 1: gas a couple of times. My dad's a wild man
Speaker 1: on those family trips um but it was always good stuff.
Speaker 1: And I'll tell you this, we were fascinating. We got
Speaker 1: to Charlottesville. There's all this beautiful history and the University
Speaker 1: of Virginia and the Quadrangle and all that stuff or
Speaker 1: whatever they call it. And we're fascinating because there was
Speaker 1: something called the mall. There, an outdoor mall, a place
Speaker 1: where you can just go to all these different stores
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, into a mall. Place you can go to
Speaker 1: all these different stores in this environment where they're our
Speaker 1: trees and skylights and things. And when I was a kid,
Speaker 1: we used to think the mall was so because we
Speaker 1: didn't really have malls like that in New York. We
Speaker 1: just had stores. Also, we did other things. We went
Speaker 1: to University of Virginia and we went to uh some
Speaker 1: other places down there. Went to grandmother's house. The grandmother
Speaker 1: had a He always had a lot of animals, so
Speaker 1: I like that we visit. There were cats and dogs
Speaker 1: running around all the time, so that was always fun.
Speaker 1: But we had, trust me, we had some road trips.
Speaker 1: You know, you catch nine five at the wrong time
Speaker 1: of year, trying to make your way from you know,
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving time, for example, from New York City to charlottes VILLETS.
Speaker 1: It's supposed to be I think a six hour drive
Speaker 1: very easily turns into an eight or nine hour drive
Speaker 1: with some traffic. So yeah, we used to play game
Speaker 1: with my dad. Would say, Dad, well, what did a
Speaker 1: fight a blue whell a pterodactyl. My dad, to his credit,
Speaker 1: would would really walk us through the ins and outs.
Speaker 1: You know, the ale clearly has size weight, the pterodactyl
Speaker 1: has nenuverability in the air, and they couldn't really fight
Speaker 1: because ones in the air and ones in the water.
Speaker 1: But you know, if you somehow made a go of it,
Speaker 1: you gotta figure that whale tail probably comes out with
Speaker 1: the victory. Dado a little fight a proud bell or
Speaker 1: a black bear, but the black beard is really angry
Speaker 1: and also has rabies. You know, we would play this game.
Speaker 1: My parents remember that stuff. William writes Buck. Who in
Speaker 1: the FBI or the federal government can I trust with
Speaker 1: information that I have involves uh, criminal activity? William, I,
Speaker 1: I just I would call your local FBI office. Man,
Speaker 1: I don't, I don't have anybody. First of all of
Speaker 1: this is maybe an opportunity to say, most folks in
Speaker 1: the FBI are very trustworthy, law abiding, doing a great job.
Speaker 1: Don't let all this stuff about the anti trump ism
Speaker 1: and everything else. Don't let all that mess things mess
Speaker 1: things for you in terms of whether or not you're
Speaker 1: willing to trust the FBI in general. That would be
Speaker 1: going That would be going too far. That would be
Speaker 1: an unnecessary um unnecessary place to take all this. Uh,
Speaker 1: most folks in the FBI, like I said, you could trust.
Speaker 1: So William I would say, call whatever the closest FBI
Speaker 1: field offices to you and tell them what information you've got.
Speaker 1: And this is how, by the way, I think people
Speaker 1: always assume that there's some other way that criminal cases
Speaker 1: often get launched, and then solved. Uh. It is people
Speaker 1: who tell law enforcement about things that that's a very
Speaker 1: big way. It's not always a law enforcement you know,
Speaker 1: there's a dead body and they gotta find out who
Speaker 1: did it. Sometimes they get a phone call they're like,
Speaker 1: this thing is going on, and that's that's how they
Speaker 1: start the investigation. So by all means, William give them,
Speaker 1: give them a ring, and uh, good luck to you.
Speaker 1: Mark right s'l hi buck. I had a quick thought
Speaker 1: regarding me unsealing of classified documents by President Trump. My
Speaker 1: theory goes like this, maybe he doesn't want to declassify
Speaker 1: because of the harm it would cause the country. Point
Speaker 1: being that the corruption goes so deep it could hurt
Speaker 1: us more than it helps us. Thanks Mark, um No, Mark,
Speaker 1: I you know it's it's you have an idea there,
Speaker 1: and it's plausible, but I don't think it is correct.
Speaker 1: I think that what keeps Trump from declassifying it is
Speaker 1: all of the criticism he would receive, all of the
Speaker 1: outrage he would be subjected to for interfering in this
Speaker 1: sacred investigation known as the Mueller probe. And I think
Speaker 1: that's what I think that's what holds him back at
Speaker 1: this point. I think that. You know, also, I'm of
Speaker 1: the mind that the d o J would just be
Speaker 1: unwilling to release the information even if Trump said release it.
Speaker 1: I think they would just say no, and then it
Speaker 1: would go to a court. They would take it to court.
Speaker 1: That's that's what I think would happen. And people say, Buck,
Speaker 1: how is that you'd fire the person that refused, Okay,
Speaker 1: you fire that, when you fire the next one. How
Speaker 1: many people are gonna fire if none of them, if
Speaker 1: none of them were are willing to do it, what
Speaker 1: happens then? So just something to think about. H Evan
Speaker 1: next up here, Oh, Evan's got the go fund me
Speaker 1: for Peter Struck, which had a three d and fifty goal,
Speaker 1: and Evan wrote me this was a while ago that
Speaker 1: in the first twelve hours this guy has raised a
Speaker 1: hundred fifty grand basically w T F Evan. It took
Speaker 1: the words or the acronym right out of my mouth,
Speaker 1: but it's it's not really surprising you, McKay braised. I
Speaker 1: think over half a million all these hashtag resistance anti
Speaker 1: trumpers know that they can count on cashing in on
Speaker 1: Trump arrangement syndrome, and that these people will uh you
Speaker 1: know that people will come to their aid, will assist them.
Speaker 1: They're gonna have they're gonna have even better jobs than
Speaker 1: they've ever had, They're gonna make more money than they've
Speaker 1: ever had. This is what the left does. It's very seductive.
Speaker 1: You know, if you become a warrior for progressive ism,
Speaker 1: if you become an enemy of truth and strap on
Speaker 1: your helmet for the left wing in this country, you'll
Speaker 1: always have good You'll have even better jobs than you've
Speaker 1: ever had, more money than you've ever had, more social
Speaker 1: acclaim than you've ever had. But you'll be a sellout
Speaker 1: who's harming your country and has no integrity. So there
Speaker 1: is that. That is the tradeoff that is offered to
Speaker 1: people in these situations. And unfortunately, far too many anti
Speaker 1: trumpers we we know what side of it they come
Speaker 1: down on. Uh. Next here, Josh writes, I'm a huge fan,
Speaker 1: best show on radio. Thank you, Josh, You're doom quote
Speaker 1: describes the left better than anyone could keep it up.
Speaker 1: Shields high. Oh, Josh, very much, very much appreciative of
Speaker 1: your kind words. Sir h Michael writes, Buck Spike Lee
Speaker 1: will go on Anderson Cooper and spew false propaganda. But
Speaker 1: I bet Spike's bank account he'd never venture into the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut to debate a single thing he said on
Speaker 1: Cooper and Wind. That goes for Lebron and all the
Speaker 1: other misinformed celeb spreading liberal lies. There's a silent coup
Speaker 1: based in lies with personal gains for the individuals involved.
Speaker 1: To stay strong in your jihad for truth and Shields High, Michael,
Speaker 1: You're correct. No, no fancy rich libs will come on
Speaker 1: the show to debate me on any of this stuff,
Speaker 1: you know. And that's just the way it is for now,
Speaker 1: but that will change at some point and in the meantime, Um,
Speaker 1: thank you very much for your note, thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to and that's gonna be it for today in the Hut.
Speaker 1: Got much more coming up tomorrow from New York City,
Speaker 1: The Freedom Hunt up there, Shields High. Let's say you've
Speaker 1: got this resume on your desk. You've been looking for weeks,
Speaker 1: maybe months, to find the perfect person, and you've got
Speaker 1: this one resume that sticks out in your mind. Is
Speaker 1: this is who we need? This is our new CFO,
Speaker 1: this is our new head of business development, whatever the
Speaker 1: case may be, right, But is this person really who
Speaker 1: they say they are. Have they gone to the school,
Speaker 1: worked at these places? Are they presenting themselves as they
Speaker 1: really are? If you want to answer that question, whether
Speaker 1: you are a startup or a fortune one company, you
Speaker 1: need to call my friends at Global Verification Network. I
Speaker 1: know the CEO of this company, I know they're ethos,
Speaker 1: I know how they do their business, and in the
Speaker 1: background investigation and vetting company world, they are the best.
Speaker 1: It's also a dual certified veteran owned company, So support
Speaker 1: a veteran and support your own business interest by making
Speaker 1: sure you've got the best background investigators in the business.
Speaker 1: Call eight seven seven six nine five one seven nine
Speaker 1: eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine,
Speaker 1: or go to my g VN dot com. That's my
Speaker 1: GVN dot com.