WEBVTT - Inside the Multi-Year Quest to Create a Bitcoin ETF

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another edition of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe Wisenthal. So Joe. They

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>say the best way to learn about something is to

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>actually do it right, or the best way to understand

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>something is to try to do it yourself. I have

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>heard people say that, and I think that it's definitely true.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>In my experience. You only get so much from reading

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>about something or talking about something, and then you try

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it and you learn a ton. Well why

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>why do you bring this up? Well? Sometimes I think

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in finance and markets, we talk about complicated or sort

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of abstract topics and the best way for people to

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>learn about them would be if we went out and

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>tried our hands at them ourselves. But given its finance

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and markets, that's difficult and or in some cases illegal.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, we're not going to do an episode

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>where we go out and launch a trading operation or

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. No, we're not. But we're gonna do

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the next best thing, which is we're going to have

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a guest come on and talk about his specific experience

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to set up a bitcoin exchange traded fund. I

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>am very excited about this. Of course, this was a

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>huge topic late last year, so many different companies rushing

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to try to be the first with a e t

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>F that gave people direct exposure to bitcoin. It was

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to watch. It still hasn't happened yet, but that

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>exact process, I agree. I think it is still shrouded

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in mystery for most people, how you go about it

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and what it actually takes to get there. So the

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>great thing about this conversation, in my opinion, it's not

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the emphasis on bitcoin. It's the emphasis on the

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>e t F structure and how you would apply that

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to a new type of asset. And I should also say,

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>as a bonus, we have an extra guest on our

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>thoughts today. That is Rachel Evans. She is our e

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>t F guru for Bloomberg News. She covers all sorts

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of e t F. She's going to be in on

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the conversation and to begin with before we bring on

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>our main guest, she's going to help us lay out

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.839
<v Speaker 1>well the lay of the land really when it comes

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to E t S. So Rachel, let's start with you.

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for coming on. Thank you guys

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for having me. So I guess the first question to

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you is we talk about building a Bitcoin e t F.

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>It's been a multi year attempt. Why has it been

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so difficult? So with bitcoin e t F, I mean,

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it basically takes us back to what it takes to

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>create a successful exchange trade of fund. First, of of course,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you need to have a great idea. Now with Bitcoin,

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>people feel like they have a great idea. But the

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>next step in that process is trying to get approval

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>from the Securities and Exchange Commission, the regulator for e

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>t f s to actually be able to launch that.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And now the sec has really been dragging its feet

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a list a bit on this for for market participants anyway,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>because they have some serious concerns about how Bitcoin would

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>operate within an exchange trade of fund. Now what this

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of comes down to, it in essence, is really

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the back office operations of an exchange trade

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of fund um. To make an e t F actually work,

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there are three key aspects that you need to have

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in place. The first is kind of the fairly sort

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of vanilla back office type arrangements. This is kind of

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the custodian the board that kind of monitors um. You

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>know how the manager is actually doing and make sure

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that the e t F is on target. And that's

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>something that I think on the custody side they've kind

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of had concerns about, but that the second and the

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>third kind of pillars are really kind of where the

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>sec has actually had issues. That's kind of on the

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>authorized participant side of things, which sounds a lot like jargon,

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>right and and it is, but basically, the authorized participant

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is the gatekeeper for e t F, so they are

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the most import autant person when it comes

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to making an exchange trade of fund work. What they

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>do is that when you decide to buy an e

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>t F, you give your cash to your broker via

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>any of the many online platforms that you have. That

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>cash then wends its way through to the hands of

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>an authorized participant, who is the one that actually goes

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>out and buys the stock or the bonds or the

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>commodity that then gets put into the fund, and the

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>fund manager will then manage the same process happens on

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the way out that the fund is going to give

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you your money back. The security is goes to the

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>authorized participant, who then sells those securities in the market.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And gives you your money back. So basically they are

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>the middleman, and the SEC is a little bit concerned

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>about how that might work with bitcoin. There's then of

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the third pillar, and this is really related to the

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that e t f s are something that you

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>can invest in for the long term or you can trade.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So the third pillar for for ecfs is the market

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>makers who are really dealing with e t f s

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on the secondary market. So the thing that's really important

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>for these guys is that they do something called arbit Now.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Arbitrage is very important to to e t f s

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>because it makes sure that the price of the e

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.239
<v Speaker 1>t F doesn't diverge too significantly from the actual value

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of the e t F. Now, the way that the

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>market makers go about doing this is that if they

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>see that the shares of the e t F A

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are trading more than the underlying securities, and what they

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>might do is they will go into the market, buy

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up for all the underlying securities, take them to that

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>authorized participant, get some shares for the e t F

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and then sell them at that higher price. They've basically

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>been able to buy something cheap and sell it high

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and lock in that profit. Now that is not only

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>great for them because they take that margin, it's also

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>really good for investors because it makes sure that the

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>price of the e t F doesn't diverge too far

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>from the actual value of the securities. Tracy, I just

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot from that answer about e t f s,

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff I didn't already know about how

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they work. Well, I mean, I think we have the

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>essential building blox for the next leg of our conversation,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>which is our main beust. Greg King, the CEO of

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>rex Shares and someone who has actually attempted to begin

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin based e t F. So Greg, thank you

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for coming on all thoughts, Hey, Tracy, Joe, Rachel, good

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to be here. So Greg, Before we get into the

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:23.679
<v Speaker 1>specifics of the bitcoin et F endeavor and your journey

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to get there, why don't you tell us a little

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>bit who you are? What's your background? What is rex Shares?

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, uh, there are a lot of

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>some well known brands in the e t F space,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But what is your firm and how did you get there?

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>There are there are so many new entrants in the space,

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>right I I started back when there were I don't know,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just a handful of et F companies. But my journey

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>into e F started when I was at Barkley's so

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand's, and Barkley's was already with with I Shares,

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>the sort of eight pound gorilla in the space, and

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>was developing all kinds of new asset classes, mainly commodities,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and so I was on a project with them to

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>develop some of the first commodity exchange traded products. That's

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>how I got in, and like a lot of things

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in life, is sort of just happened unintentional. And then

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I got to know a little bit about the et

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>F space and was fascinated and start to dig and

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>do a little more and work on more projects with

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Barclay's and kind of one thing led to another. It's

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>been fourteen years or so, and during that time I

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>worked for a bank, Swiss Bank Credit Space, developing some products.

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Previously founded and sold a company called Velocity Shares, which

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we sold to Janice Capital, and so rex Shares is

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>my next company. We wanted to focus on democratizing access,

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>right I. I sort of believe that investors um the

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>e t F is a great tool for democratizing access

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to new asset classes or new investment strategies. You know,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>as we're going to talk about there's there's lumps along

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, but that's what REX is all about. You

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned democratizing access to assets. I wonder how that applies

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin specifically, because of course, one of the selling

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>points of bitcoin is, you know, it's this decentralized currency

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and anyone can buy it. So walk us through how

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly you came up with the idea to apply the

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>E t F structure to bitcoin. So I remember I

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>was on a business trip in Washington, d C. Actually,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and I came across I don't know if the I

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>was at a conference and the session was that very

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>entertaining or something, and I was flipping through the news

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and I read an article on bitcoin. It was sort

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of late two thousand thirteen. Bitcoin was having a big

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>run up, and I remember I think I had heard

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of it before, but hadn't really paid that much attention.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, price action tends to tend to focus the mind.

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>We saw last year as we saw last year in spades.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So within the span of of a couple hours, I

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>decided to open an account with coin base and buy

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 1>some bitcoin, and so I personally got involved in bitcoin then,

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't on my radar for purposes of product development.

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It just was it just seemed like, you know, those

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>worlds were too far apart. But shortly thereafter, or some

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>time around then, of course, the Winklevoss filed for an

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>e t F and uh, you know, if you were

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in the E t F world, you saw that and

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>it was like, wow, okay, here we go. But knowing

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>something about how these things get done, I thought, well,

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's gonna have a lot of hurdles

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to overcome, and you know, just watched from a distance.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>But for me, that the turning point was in two

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand fifteen when the CFTC you know ruling. I think

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that it was a it was some sort of enforcement

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>action against one of the early exchanges that in the

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>course of making that ruling, the CFTC basically said, hey,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is a commodity and therefore, you know, we're its regulator.

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's when the light bulb went off for me

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that I saw a route to an e t F

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps didn't necessarily involve bitcoin itself, but futures contracts,

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>something that was regulated by the CFTC, and of course

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>there were no bitcoin futures, but now we actually have them,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and last year we did see the launch of two

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin futures that are currently trading. Yeah. Yeah, it took

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a while for that to develop, but for for us,

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that was the kind of the first glimmer of Okay,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I see, I see a path here. Because physical bitcoins

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are just so intangible, it seemed like it would take

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a while for everyone to get comfortable. I want to

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>ask before we talk too much about the specific process

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of getting the bitcoin e t F off the ground,

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask about the business of running a

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>niche e t F company in this world where we

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>have these huge eight pound gorillas like I shares and

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.319
<v Speaker 1>so there are obviously some strategies that are well known

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and well trodden, whether it's just sort of indexing strategies

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>against the SMP five hundred, or emerging market strategies or

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>country specific strategies or factor strategies buying low volatility stocks

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in a basket. In the world of sort of very small,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of startup E t F companies, what is the

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>goal is it to find something that becomes the next

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>mega E t F? Like, how do you think about

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>these sort of upsides and downsides of the business and

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the general opportunities. I could answer that question for a while,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I think actually the bigger companies are

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the ones these days that really need to look for

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the mega hits to move the needle. Uh. The smaller

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>companies can actually survive with with much smaller niche products

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>and so um. But it is it is more difficult

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>there are so many players out there. UM. The way

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we look at it is we have to believe in

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>something and and believe that it's going to add value

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to the market. Just generally, that's something that investors want,

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>something that hasn't been done before, hasn't been done in

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a way that we think we can do it, and

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>uh and and where there's a demand. Right. So, but

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>if you don't, if you don't have that drive to

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>to kind of discover these opportunities and really work towards them,

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>then it's a difficult place. So when did you decide

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.239
<v Speaker 1>that that your idea for investing in bitcoin um individually

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>could actually be transferred into something that would work as

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>an exchange trade of funds for a variety of investors.

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So in two thousand and fifteen, when the CFTC came

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on the scene. We started to say, all right, well,

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, how far are we away from a futures contract.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>We visited a number of the futures exchanges and and

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>really started to understand you know, who's out there, who's

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>working on this. Uh. Index providers are also important, um.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The exchanges in for example, the CME was developing an

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>index which at the time you know, was not publicly announced. UM.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>So we just tried to learn the ecosystem. We also

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>decided to approach the SEC and speak to them about

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this off the record, and even though futures didn't exist,

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we generally got favorable kind of remarks from them. They

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they thought, okay, well this would sort of help address

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the concerns that we have regarding physical bitcoin.

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So when you embarked on that process, you know Rachel

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier these three necessary ingredients for the et F structure,

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the custodian, the authorized participants, and the market makers. When

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you were in the early stages of your idea, did

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you go out and talk to potential custodians or aps

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>or market makers. We did. We talked to a few

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of the market makers and they were active in in

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>physical trading of bitcoin already. So there's a few firms

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>that have been that that sort of do E t

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>F market making that were early in cryptocurrency trading. Um,

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>so we knew that there would be support from at

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>least a few market makers, which is which is critical.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>As Rachel pointed out, without that, you know, you don't

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>really get too far. The custody piece though, skipping back

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>up to her first sort of back office category, um,

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that is the part that that kind of really gets

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>cleaned up with the futures contract. Right, everyone can custody, uh,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a CRME or c a listed future, but

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>customing these you know ones and zeros, you know, a

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>little bit trickier. Yeah, it was just gonna ask exactly that,

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>because without the futures you could theoretically have an E

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>t F that held the private keys of bitcoins. Right,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but this just sort of makes it much easier, so

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about getting hacked or all

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>those other things. Yeah, yeah, that's right, and this is

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know a couple of years ago. So really I

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>think even the custody of the physical bitcoin, and when

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I say physical bitcoin, I you know, it's how physical

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is it really? But the private keys, even the technology

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there was not where it is today. I think that's

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>come a long ways as well. But thinking through the

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem that Rachel explained, we just thought that a derivatives

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>contract would be would be the way to do this.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>If you look at other e t F s right say,

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, we we already had bitcoins of commodity, and

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look at gold, the way that the et

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ups have been done is to hold the physical gold.

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>That's great, and everybody's comfortable with that process. That works well.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>If you look at oil, however, the e t F

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>don't hold physical oil. They just roll oil futures contracts.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Same for natural gas, etcetera. So with commodities you really

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have to look at the characteristics of the underlying and

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in some cases it's just more pragmatic to hold the

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>futures contract as a proxy for the underlying. So we

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that this cleaned up several of those issues really

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty nicely. So Greg, I gotta ask you said, you

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>went to the sec uh, you got an initially what

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be a favorable response. Um, what happened after that?

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>After that we sort of had to hurry up and

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>wait because the futures didn't exist, So we uh focused

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>on a few other things and and kept trying to

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>encourage the futures ecosystem, for lack of a better term,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to populate with contracts. So being helpful, we did speak

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to a number of exchanges and helped however we could,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>but it took a while, you know, they was the

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>bulk of last year, and then as we know, in

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in December we had a couple of contracts that finally launched.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, by that time there were a lot of

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>people interested because I think the buzz preceded the you know,

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the actual launch. Yeah, tell us a little bit about

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>last year, because obviously the second half, or really the

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter of seventeen, it was just an absolute frenzy

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and there were numerous applications

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin e t f s. Everybody wants one. I

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>think everybody knows how big the SPDR Gold Fund is

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>become truly democratized the way people could invest in gold.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Now it's one of the biggest e t f s

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Talk us to us about that sort

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of frenzy and competition and what really happened over the

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>last few months. Yeah, it was. It was a really

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting time and and obviously speaking from a product development perspective,

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting and but also at the same time,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the price was just really cranking and it was on

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>TV all day. You know, we just it was. It

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>was surreal in the sense that you know, in learning more,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>if you if you go back a year trying to

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>find articles or trying to find clips or or different

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>research on bitcoin, it was sparse, and then by the

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the year it was just everywhere and every

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>everybody had an opinion on it. But I think what

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>happened is there was a press release, I think that

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the exchanges was going to launch, and you know,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>we had not filed anything publicly because, as I mentioned there,

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of no point to do that quite yet

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.239
<v Speaker 1>if the futures don't exist. Um, and so we we

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>had just sort of been waiting. We'd had our discussions

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC but people started to file, so you know,

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we thought, well, we the environment might be changing quickly,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so let's go ahead and file as well. Um. And

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, we weren't. We weren't the first and we

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't the last. And there were a lot of filings

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that came through, but ultimately the sec UH decided on

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different occasions to really asked people to

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>take a step back, and I think they, you know,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>they were clearly getting bombarded and just wanted to to

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.239
<v Speaker 1>basically slow things down. I think to put that all

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in context, when we actually had the most kind of

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>e t F filings out there, it was more than

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was seventeen or even more than that.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So the SEC was really kind of being bombarded by

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>all these filings that all wanted a bitcoin ETFC the

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>physical as physical as you can get. All the futures.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Is the expectation that in worthy SEC to give a

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>green light at some point that all of them would

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>get approved, or that some of them would be approved,

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>or do people think maybe one or two would be

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>approved and those would be the big winners? Like how

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>do how does the SEC think about these situations where

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of entities are competing for the exact same roughly

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Yeah, that's a great question. So and

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of nuance here because there are different

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>divisions of the sec um. There is the CFTC, which

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:07.959
<v Speaker 1>is totally separate regulator um, and there's some I guess

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>diversion of opinion in terms of where those boundaries end.

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>But specifically with respect to ETFs, you basically have two kinds. Right.

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Your typical ETF is is what we call a forty

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Act fund. Right, it's an investment company. It's basically a

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund that has applied for certain exemptions that allow

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it to trade like a stock. That's essentially how we

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>t fs really started. But then you have and and

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>keeping in mind that bitcoins a commodity, you have a

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of e t f s. They're they're actually not

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>forty Act funds at all. They're filed under the thirty

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>three Act, and they don't have an investment manager. So

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens is that and strictly speaking, there's probably four

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or five permutations of this. So if you're filing a product,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to go to the regulator that governs that

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>particular type of product, and in all cases it might

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>lead to a different department. And that sounds a little

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess, um, you know, silly, but the reality is

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that there are bodies of law that govern different types

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of investments differently, and that's just kind of the way

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the the ecosystem has evolved here since, you know, since nineties,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and it hasn't changed a whole lot. So the letter

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that got sent out was sent by the Division of

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Investment Management at the SEC, and that division is specifically

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>concerned with forty Act funds. There are a number of

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>filings that are still in and they basically don't have

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>an access to the Division of Investment Management. UM. So,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>so a letter was sent back in January by Dahlia

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>blast Um and the Investment Management division of the SEC

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>regarding the bitcoin funds that had come to them seeking approval. UM,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us a little bit about what that

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>letter said regarding their concerns? Sure. Yeah, that was a

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of an industry wide letter that came out and

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they articulated I think it was like thirty eight different

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>questions in that letter. UM. Really as a as a

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>letter to the I c I and really all mutual

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>fund or forty Act fund providers that ask them questions

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>regarding valuation policies around bitcoin, uh, custody issues around bitcoin

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage mechanics with the market making community. Essentially, I thought

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it was helpful to understand where they're coming from. So

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of an extraordinary move. You don't

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>typically see something like that, But they essentially put down

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>on paper all of their issues and I think a

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>number of them had, at least in our communication with them,

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>already been addressed. But I think this was their way

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of saying to the industry formally and very you know,

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of loudly, here is what we're concerned about. And

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and they said it very clearly. Until these issues are addressed,

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't think it's appropriate to file for these products.

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So each provider got their own version of that letter.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>We got one privately as well that was tailored to

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>our our products, and each provider, I assume we are

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>is responding to the SEC. It's just happening outside of

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the registration process. That was going to be my question.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So these letters get sent out in January. I realized

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's only um four or five months since then. But

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like virtually every day that passes, there's another

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>financial institution that's tiptoeing into the crypto space, or at

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>least says they are. So are we any closer to

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>alleviating some of the SEC's concerns? Are we any closer

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to getting you know, a real group of potential authorized participants,

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>market makers and especially custodians who might be able to

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>do those I think we are actually so. Um. The

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>market makers have been there for a while. I think

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the futures volume, for example, is one of their concerns.

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's developing nicely. Um. The staff has been

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>responsive in terms of our private dialogues, so it's not

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>like that they're not focused on this. I think they

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just needed to slow down the timeline. I don't want

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to predict obviously the timeline, um, but I do think

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that progress is being made, and to your point, just

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>industry wide, there continue to be resources poured into this,

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>just from all over the place. Yeah. One thing that's

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>striking in your recounting of the early history is things

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that we may not think about as having been important

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>bits of infrastructure. So you talk about an early attempt

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>to create a bitcoin price index, which of course is

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>probably important for some sort of reference for a future,

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>which then becomes important for obviously the custodial aspect of

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>an e t F. So right now, when you look

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>at the lay escape and we see, oh, there's a

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>new trading desk at expert or there's new something. These

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 1>all are sort of even if we don't really think

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of it that directly, bits of infrastructure that are coming

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>in place that could see theoretically, uh support of an

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>eventually TS. Yeah, there are a lot of building blocks

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that need to need to happen. And I was as

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you were talking, I was thinking about a house. Right.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>You go in the house and switch on the lights

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, wash your hands or whatever, and everything

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>works right. But without those systems electrical or plumbing or

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, it's just it's not really a fully

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>functioning house. So there was a lot of UM. I

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a lot of interest obviously because

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is such a phenomenal thing and it's it's so

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>new and and and it's it's so interesting to a

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. But the capital markets infrastructure just wasn't there,

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's getting built out, and I think it's um

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's only a matter of time. So obviously we'll see

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened. It is on the development of the bitcoin

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>etf at all the different companies trying to get that out.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Your firm wreck Shares is not just doing a bitcoin ETF.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>You also have a filing out for a blockchain e

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>t F. What could you say about the other irons

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in the fire seth week the yeah, sure, the So

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin ETF technically we withdrew, but we're talking to

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>them on the side. That's actually why I can talk

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>about it uh now, is because we're not in the

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>filing process. But we do have a blockchain ETF that

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>we're hoping to launch in the upcoming weeks. We're excited

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about that because we think investors want exposure to this technology,

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and we've partnered with um, a portfolio manager who runs

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a crypto hedge fund, so he's going to be an

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>active manager for this e t F, which is a

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>little unusual in et F land. Usually you're following a

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>passive index, but this is taking the active approach and

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to get exposure to companies you've got some form

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of blockchain exposure or cryptocurrency related activity. That's that's material.

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Got it, alright, So both the potential bitcoin et F

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and a blockchain e t F maybe on the way. Okay,

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>so special thanks to our bonus guest for this episode,

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Evans. She's a reporter at Bloomberg News. She covers

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>all things et F and also thank you to Greg

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>King's CEO of wreck Shares for sharing your story. Thanks

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>so much, Thank you both. Thank you so Joe. I

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed that conversation because I like talking about the

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>nuts and bolts of e t f s, whereas I

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>don't really like talking about the nuts and bolts of

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and blockchain so much. To be honest, no, I agree.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I I feel the same way because there's been a

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>million bitcoin conversation We've had them on this podcast specifically,

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 1>but using bitcoin as a lens through which you can

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>understand this process in this massive industry and the unique

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>challenges that bitcoin poses with regards to custody and the

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage and all that stuff. I learned a ton just

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>about the mechanics of e t f s and the

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>regulatory aspect that I definitely didn't know about before. Yeah,

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and I guess it's worth pointing out that learning about

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the mechanics of e t f s actually helps you

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.479
<v Speaker 1>learn about potential strengths and weaknesses in the structure. Uh.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You hear all the time about this idea that maybe

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>e t f s aren't going to work one day,

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and what people are worried about there is that maybe

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the market makers or the ap s won't do their jobs. Essentially,

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, one day they won't do the arbitrage, maybe

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>because the market is so volatile that they don't want

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to come in and take that sort of risk. But

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, a lot of people in the

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>E t F industry would say, well, if you understand

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>how that works, it's very, very unlikely that we're ever

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>going to encounter a day when a big AP which

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a large bank doesn't want to make money.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So it helps to understand both sides. Yeah, absolutely, And

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of course something that you've done a lot of reporting

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>on is you hear about this, particularly with h bond

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 1>E t F which people fear that the underlying are

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a liquid or don't trade or don't price enough. Some

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of the people get anxiety every couple of years about

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>junk bond e t f s, and so understanding that

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>exact mechanics really illuminates what it is that people get

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. Yes, how I learned about bond e t

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>f s through the mechanism of a bitcoin exchange traded fund. Okay, well,

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this has been another edition of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wiser though you can follow

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at The Stalwart and you should follow

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>our producer so for Foreheads at for has T, as

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>well as the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levy. She's

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>at at Francesca Today, as well as our guests follow

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Evans at Rachel Evans Underscore and Why. And our

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>guest Gregg isn't on Twitter, but his company Wreck Shares

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is on Twitter at rec Share. Thanks for listening