1 00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:02,440 Speaker 1: Rich Man, How is your Father's day? 2 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:05,880 Speaker 2: Father's Day was great, super chill, went to the community pool, 3 00:00:06,080 --> 00:00:08,360 Speaker 2: had a nice day. Couldn't be happy. What about you? 4 00:00:09,360 --> 00:00:12,440 Speaker 1: It was good? You know. My daughter had a dance competition. 5 00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:13,280 Speaker 1: She was in nationals. 6 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:15,520 Speaker 3: They got second place in her in her group, in 7 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 3: her category. 8 00:00:16,200 --> 00:00:17,000 Speaker 1: So props to her. 9 00:00:17,320 --> 00:00:21,040 Speaker 3: We got back from that competition, and I got a 10 00:00:21,079 --> 00:00:22,960 Speaker 3: present from my son, who's three. 11 00:00:23,120 --> 00:00:23,440 Speaker 1: Okay. 12 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:26,360 Speaker 3: It was one of those laminated sheets that you know, 13 00:00:26,520 --> 00:00:29,000 Speaker 3: you answer questions based on what their teachers are asking 14 00:00:29,040 --> 00:00:31,960 Speaker 3: about your dad, and so you know, like my dad's 15 00:00:32,080 --> 00:00:33,920 Speaker 3: name is, and he said daddy. 16 00:00:33,720 --> 00:00:35,520 Speaker 1: For that particular question. 17 00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 3: And then one of the questions was my dad is 18 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:41,160 Speaker 3: blank years old, and so you know, usually when kids 19 00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:43,440 Speaker 3: answer that, they could say, oh, my dad's one hundred 20 00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:45,080 Speaker 3: and ten years old, and then it's funny because you 21 00:00:45,080 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 3: know that they have no concept of age, or my 22 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:48,880 Speaker 3: dad's eight years old and they have no idea what's 23 00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:51,120 Speaker 3: going on. But instead, I think that he gave the 24 00:00:51,159 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 3: most insulting answer you could possibly give. 25 00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:55,960 Speaker 1: He said fifty two. 26 00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:58,920 Speaker 3: I'm JJ and over the last couple of years, I've 27 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:01,080 Speaker 3: been doing everything I can to be a best ball 28 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:04,840 Speaker 3: bro and last season things finally fell into place. I 29 00:01:04,840 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 3: got fortieth in the DraftKings MILLI Contest, taking home twenty 30 00:01:08,200 --> 00:01:11,520 Speaker 3: thousand dollars. Maybe I became a best ball bro, but 31 00:01:11,600 --> 00:01:14,200 Speaker 3: I'm still looking to learn more about this game, and 32 00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:15,759 Speaker 3: i still want others. 33 00:01:15,600 --> 00:01:16,800 Speaker 1: To come on this ride with me. 34 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:19,120 Speaker 3: So even if you consider me a best ball bro, 35 00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:22,000 Speaker 3: this could be your year. This could be the year 36 00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:25,119 Speaker 3: that you officially become a best ball Bro. 37 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 1: This episode is sponsored by DraftKings. 38 00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:46,119 Speaker 3: We've partnered up with DraftKings again this year for Best 39 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:48,160 Speaker 3: Ball and we've got to can't miss offer on their 40 00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 3: biggest best ball contest ever, twenty million dollars in total prizes. 41 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:55,840 Speaker 3: It's Draft one, Get one, draft your team once, no 42 00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:59,640 Speaker 3: weekly lineup management, and your top scorers start automatically. 43 00:01:59,160 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 1: Each week all season long. 44 00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:04,120 Speaker 3: Download the DraftKings Daily Fantasy app and sign up with 45 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:07,320 Speaker 3: Chromo Code Late Round. Enter a lineup in the twenty 46 00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:09,880 Speaker 3: million dollars Best Ball Contest for twenty five dollars and 47 00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:13,040 Speaker 3: get a bonus ticket for a second entry two shots 48 00:02:13,080 --> 00:02:17,440 Speaker 3: at the title Draft one Get one only on DraftKings. 49 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:18,960 Speaker 1: The crown is yours. 50 00:02:21,240 --> 00:02:23,760 Speaker 3: Welcome into another episode of Becoming a Best ball Bro. 51 00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 3: I'm jj zacharieson joined as always by Rich Ryan Rich. 52 00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:29,480 Speaker 1: What's going on, buddy, doing good? 53 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:32,240 Speaker 2: It's funny when you were workshopping that cold open. I 54 00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:34,280 Speaker 2: let you know this story. When I was younger and 55 00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:37,720 Speaker 2: my mom was turning forty, my dad told me as 56 00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 2: a joke that she was turning fifty, and of course me, 57 00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:44,360 Speaker 2: I'm talking all my friends they're telling their parents. So 58 00:02:44,639 --> 00:02:46,639 Speaker 2: for the next week or so, every parent is going 59 00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:48,480 Speaker 2: up to tell my mom and they're like, Doren, you 60 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:52,680 Speaker 2: look great, you look fantastic. Such a mean joke by 61 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:53,080 Speaker 2: my dad. 62 00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 1: Yeah. 63 00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 3: I mean, like fifty two is like the perfect age 64 00:02:55,760 --> 00:02:58,320 Speaker 3: where it's believable, right, where like you could you could 65 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:01,399 Speaker 3: understand why someone would be with a three year old, 66 00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:03,639 Speaker 3: like that's not an untotally uncommon thing. 67 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:04,520 Speaker 1: But I'm not. 68 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:07,320 Speaker 3: I'm not that old, Okay. I know some people on Twitter. 69 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:09,760 Speaker 3: I've revealed my age before in the past. I'm thirty 70 00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:12,520 Speaker 3: eight for the record, everybody, but I've revealed my age 71 00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:15,160 Speaker 3: before in the past, and people on Twitter have been like, oh, man, 72 00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:17,120 Speaker 3: like some people thought that I was like maybe early 73 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:19,640 Speaker 3: thirties or something. But then randomly people are like, oh, 74 00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:22,120 Speaker 3: I thought you were like in your mid fifties and such, 75 00:03:22,160 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 3: And I'm like, do I really come across that way? 76 00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:28,000 Speaker 3: Do I really present myself as a as a a true, 77 00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:29,840 Speaker 3: true middle aged man. 78 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:32,280 Speaker 1: I mean, don't answer that question. Actually, you probably don't 79 00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:32,840 Speaker 1: want to answer that. 80 00:03:33,240 --> 00:03:35,000 Speaker 3: I think it's the I think it's the sleeping stuff, 81 00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 3: you know, the East Coast dad stuff that I complain about. 82 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:39,840 Speaker 2: For sure. You guys gotta stay up late for every 83 00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:41,800 Speaker 2: sporting event. But yeah, when I look in the mirror, 84 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:46,360 Speaker 2: I still see the young self more often than not. 85 00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 2: Now I'm starting to see the older guy, the dad, 86 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:51,560 Speaker 2: the guy that's gonna be like you turning forty in 87 00:03:51,600 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 2: a couple of years. But I still squint and see 88 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:56,000 Speaker 2: the young kid that has a lot of heart and 89 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 2: a lot of energy. 90 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:02,400 Speaker 1: I don't feel different than I did. I genuinely like like. 91 00:04:02,440 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 3: Late thirties or like like like you know how they 92 00:04:05,320 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 3: felt last generation about the late twenties. In my opinion, 93 00:04:08,760 --> 00:04:11,280 Speaker 3: you know, like every generation gets younger. Go look at 94 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:14,480 Speaker 3: pictures of your grandparents when they were like fifty six 95 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:17,800 Speaker 3: years old. They look like they're they're one hundred and ninety. 96 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:21,200 Speaker 3: It's it's bizarre. I don't understand how are why that happens. 97 00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 3: Like I look at my dad right now. My dad's 98 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,280 Speaker 3: in his late seventies, and I look at him right now, 99 00:04:25,320 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 3: and I'm like, man, he's in really great shape. He 100 00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:30,320 Speaker 3: looks like like if my grandparents were like when they 101 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:32,760 Speaker 3: were that same age, when they were in their late seventies, 102 00:04:33,080 --> 00:04:35,320 Speaker 3: they look like they were they were on their deathbed. 103 00:04:35,560 --> 00:04:38,640 Speaker 1: Like it's just it's just crazy how each generation just. 104 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:41,159 Speaker 3: Keeps getting younger and younger, and hopefully we you know, 105 00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:42,599 Speaker 3: us US millennials, continue that. 106 00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:46,839 Speaker 2: It is true. There's a famous roster photo or headshots 107 00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:48,960 Speaker 2: of like a ninety one Penn State team that always 108 00:04:48,960 --> 00:04:51,480 Speaker 2: pops up on my feed maybe monthly, and every single 109 00:04:51,560 --> 00:04:54,040 Speaker 2: dude on that team looks forty five. Like I'm like, oh, 110 00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:55,760 Speaker 2: these guys playing gallege football. 111 00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:58,120 Speaker 3: You know those like old high school videos that they'll 112 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:00,159 Speaker 3: put put on like social media sometimes, you know, like 113 00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:02,800 Speaker 3: see like the late eighties, early nineties, I'm like, why 114 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:04,640 Speaker 3: is there a thirty three year old that's in the 115 00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:06,479 Speaker 3: senior in high school. This doesn't make any sense to me. 116 00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:09,840 Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, or basically, like any any TV show or 117 00:05:09,880 --> 00:05:12,080 Speaker 3: movie from back then, all the kids look so much older. 118 00:05:12,279 --> 00:05:14,760 Speaker 1: Anyway, we got to talk a little best ball today. 119 00:05:15,480 --> 00:05:19,640 Speaker 3: My plan is to talk about my top exposures right now, 120 00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:22,440 Speaker 3: a couple of them at each position through twenty eight 121 00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:23,200 Speaker 3: MILLI drafts. 122 00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:25,960 Speaker 1: How many? How many million drafts have you done so far? 123 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:28,120 Speaker 2: I haven't done a single MILLI yet. I've just been 124 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:32,480 Speaker 2: sickened to the three dollars one million prize pool guarantee. 125 00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 2: But I'm up above a dozen. I'm pushing. I'm getting 126 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:39,039 Speaker 2: towards I think twenty drafts in that so I'm holding 127 00:05:39,080 --> 00:05:41,240 Speaker 2: off my millies and just firing the three dollars for now. 128 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:43,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, I had a lot of sloughs that I had 129 00:05:43,640 --> 00:05:46,479 Speaker 3: entered right after the NFL drafts, but I'm only through 130 00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:49,640 Speaker 3: twenty eight MILLI drafts. Obviously I'm gonna be max entering, 131 00:05:49,960 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 3: so I'm through twenty eight. I think overall, I'm at 132 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:54,360 Speaker 3: about like post draft. I'm at about one hundred and 133 00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:58,320 Speaker 3: ten or so drafts that are either ongoing or completed. 134 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:00,680 Speaker 3: But like I said, I'm gonna go through some of 135 00:06:00,680 --> 00:06:02,560 Speaker 3: my top exposures. I guess I'll just kick it off 136 00:06:02,600 --> 00:06:05,480 Speaker 3: at quarterback real quick, and I'm gonna talk about Malik 137 00:06:05,520 --> 00:06:10,039 Speaker 3: Willis now. I do think that there's some concern maybe 138 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:13,720 Speaker 3: about him losing his job late in the season, like 139 00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:16,159 Speaker 3: maybe that would happen and they would go down that 140 00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:18,480 Speaker 3: path like a you know, cover your ears, rich like 141 00:06:18,520 --> 00:06:22,240 Speaker 3: a Justin Fields type situation, right where there's some hope 142 00:06:22,279 --> 00:06:25,480 Speaker 3: that this because it's not like the most extreme contract 143 00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:27,720 Speaker 3: in the world for Malik Willis. It's not like they're 144 00:06:27,720 --> 00:06:29,680 Speaker 3: like locked in for six years and they have to 145 00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:31,120 Speaker 3: play him necessarily. 146 00:06:31,160 --> 00:06:33,280 Speaker 1: So I do think that there's like maybe. 147 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:36,880 Speaker 3: Some risk that Willis is just not it and you know, 148 00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:38,560 Speaker 3: they end up benching him and they want to see 149 00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:41,039 Speaker 3: what other quarterbacks can do within that offense. 150 00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:43,040 Speaker 1: And I mean, look, it's a. 151 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 3: Frighteningly bad offense from a personnel standpoint, right, Like it's 152 00:06:46,440 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 3: devon a chan and then it's the fact that we're 153 00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:53,520 Speaker 3: talking about Greg Dolcic as their top drafted player outside. 154 00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:54,760 Speaker 1: Of a chan is frightening, right. 155 00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:57,560 Speaker 3: So I get I get the downside risk with Willis 156 00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 3: for sure, but I think the upside risk it's simil 157 00:07:00,200 --> 00:07:02,839 Speaker 3: to what we saw or the upside potential. It's similar 158 00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:04,800 Speaker 3: to like like you can use Justin Fields if you 159 00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:08,159 Speaker 3: want as an example, where like, yeah, you need the 160 00:07:08,200 --> 00:07:11,400 Speaker 3: passing numbers to really elevate the rushing stuff to be 161 00:07:11,640 --> 00:07:14,840 Speaker 3: like super relevant fantasy. But Field still could give you 162 00:07:15,640 --> 00:07:18,760 Speaker 3: very usable QB one production, you know when he was starting. 163 00:07:18,800 --> 00:07:22,000 Speaker 3: So I have some notes here about what Willis has done. 164 00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:24,840 Speaker 3: In a small sample he's had six starts, He's averaged 165 00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:27,240 Speaker 3: eight and a half points per game via rushing in 166 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:29,880 Speaker 3: those starts. Now, for context, even if you remove last 167 00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:32,240 Speaker 3: year's season from Lamar Jackson, where he was under that 168 00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:35,440 Speaker 3: four point per game mark via rushing, he's been at 169 00:07:35,440 --> 00:07:38,320 Speaker 3: about eight points per game throughout his career Lamar Jackson has. 170 00:07:38,360 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 3: So in our very limited sample six starts of the 171 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:43,400 Speaker 3: leak Willis, he's given you the same number of rushing 172 00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 3: points per game as Lamar Jackson has. Now, look the 173 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:49,920 Speaker 3: thing with Lamar that I think just still doesn't get 174 00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 3: talked about enough. And even Josh Allen, you know, you 175 00:07:52,320 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 3: could you could blump him in there. But Lamar is 176 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 3: obviously looked at as like, oh, he's a cheat code 177 00:07:56,960 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 3: in fantasy because he runs the ball so well, right, 178 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:03,040 Speaker 3: Like that's that's obviously a great floor and upside play. 179 00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:08,080 Speaker 3: But Lamar Jackson has consistently beaten touchdown rate odds and 180 00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:11,360 Speaker 3: has been a really efficient thrower in terms of what 181 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:13,920 Speaker 3: we look for from a fantasy football perspective, which is, 182 00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:16,040 Speaker 3: you know, being able to throw for touchdowns and not 183 00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:18,480 Speaker 3: just run for them, right, And so I think that 184 00:08:18,520 --> 00:08:19,840 Speaker 3: we have to keep that in mind with like a 185 00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:22,600 Speaker 3: Melik Willis. Is that yes, if you look at twenty 186 00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 3: seven quarterback seasons since twenty eleven where they had seven 187 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:29,800 Speaker 3: or more PPR points per game or you don't say PPR, 188 00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:32,200 Speaker 3: you know they're not catching many passes, but points per. 189 00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 1: Game via rushing. 190 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:36,880 Speaker 3: Only four of those twenty seven seasons ranked outside the 191 00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:40,720 Speaker 3: top ten in fantasy scoring at quarterback in points per game. 192 00:08:40,920 --> 00:08:43,720 Speaker 3: So you have twenty seven quarterback seasons where the quarterback 193 00:08:43,760 --> 00:08:46,040 Speaker 3: had seven or more points per game via rushing. Malik 194 00:08:46,040 --> 00:08:48,120 Speaker 3: Willis has been an eight and a half throughout his 195 00:08:48,520 --> 00:08:51,400 Speaker 3: brief you know, six starts. Only four of those twenty 196 00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:53,559 Speaker 3: seven have ranked outside the top ten in points per game, 197 00:08:53,559 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 3: which is crazy. But if you look at the players 198 00:08:56,920 --> 00:08:59,719 Speaker 3: who didn't, it's like the the Anthony Richardson type right 199 00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:02,040 Speaker 3: where where they can get it done on the ground, 200 00:09:02,040 --> 00:09:05,160 Speaker 3: but their passing is very questionable. That's a very real 201 00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:07,680 Speaker 3: outcome for Malik Willis, and I understand that in drafting 202 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,319 Speaker 3: him and taking that on, but I think his ADP 203 00:09:10,520 --> 00:09:13,760 Speaker 3: is still fairly low given where these quarterbacks are going 204 00:09:13,840 --> 00:09:16,040 Speaker 3: right now. And then on top of that, the nice 205 00:09:16,080 --> 00:09:19,080 Speaker 3: part on DraftKings with having those two extra rounds, it's 206 00:09:19,080 --> 00:09:21,880 Speaker 3: a lot easier to make three quarterback builds. And so 207 00:09:22,280 --> 00:09:24,640 Speaker 3: if you're making a three QB build, you can get 208 00:09:24,679 --> 00:09:28,240 Speaker 3: Malik Willis on top of maybe you know two guys 209 00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:30,079 Speaker 3: that you get in around nine to ten, or Malik 210 00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:32,920 Speaker 3: Willis with a CJ. Stroud and then like a Jalen 211 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:34,720 Speaker 3: Hurts or something like that, and all of a sudden 212 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:36,600 Speaker 3: you have a pretty good trio where there is a 213 00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:39,120 Speaker 3: lot of that upside that you can capture with Malik 214 00:09:39,160 --> 00:09:42,280 Speaker 3: Willis's legs. So because of all of that, I am 215 00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:44,720 Speaker 3: drafting a lot of Malik Willis. I don't know where 216 00:09:44,760 --> 00:09:47,199 Speaker 3: this we'll finish and stand. But he's also one of 217 00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:49,520 Speaker 3: those guys where if you miss out on that quarterback run, 218 00:09:49,559 --> 00:09:52,319 Speaker 3: he's sitting there very often as an easy player to get. 219 00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:55,400 Speaker 2: And Malliku Wills won't be affected as much by that 220 00:09:55,480 --> 00:09:58,320 Speaker 2: market pressure because he is the first person of the 221 00:09:58,360 --> 00:10:01,600 Speaker 2: stack that's going off the board in round eleven. Right 222 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:05,360 Speaker 2: the receivers, Washington going off in fourteen, then Dulsach in fifteen, 223 00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:07,680 Speaker 2: and the rest of the guys are in the final 224 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:10,080 Speaker 2: rounds of the drafts, So there aren't going to be 225 00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:12,560 Speaker 2: players likely there aren't going to be players who have 226 00:10:12,679 --> 00:10:16,080 Speaker 2: drafted receivers on Miami and then need to connect the 227 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:18,400 Speaker 2: dot with that stack that are that are pushing that 228 00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:21,520 Speaker 2: pressure up. So he should just chill in that round 229 00:10:21,559 --> 00:10:23,280 Speaker 2: eleven range. What I was going to ask you is, 230 00:10:23,400 --> 00:10:26,440 Speaker 2: we've seen Greg Dulsich move. He's up two rounds since 231 00:10:26,440 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 2: we started potting, and we've we've spoken about him. Are 232 00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:32,520 Speaker 2: there any witch of if any of these Miami receivers 233 00:10:32,520 --> 00:10:35,240 Speaker 2: are you throwing darts at to complete the stack or 234 00:10:35,280 --> 00:10:36,640 Speaker 2: is it just Dulsag right now? 235 00:10:37,640 --> 00:10:37,720 Speaker 4: No? 236 00:10:37,920 --> 00:10:40,720 Speaker 1: I mean, like I've thrown random darts at other guys. 237 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:44,839 Speaker 3: I started coming in pretty hot with Jalen Tolbert at 238 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:47,560 Speaker 3: the beginning of the of the you know, the summer. 239 00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:49,800 Speaker 3: I haven't really been doing that as frequently because I 240 00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:51,400 Speaker 3: actually think there's a chance that they just don't want 241 00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:53,200 Speaker 3: to use him and maybe even like cut him if 242 00:10:53,200 --> 00:10:55,240 Speaker 3: they just really like the depth that they have. I mean, 243 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:57,240 Speaker 3: there's a lot of just random directions that you can 244 00:10:57,280 --> 00:10:58,520 Speaker 3: go in. You know, Kevin Coleman. 245 00:10:58,559 --> 00:11:00,720 Speaker 1: Even there's Slot, their rookie slot guy who. 246 00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:03,920 Speaker 3: The ZA model actually liked a decent bit versus where 247 00:11:03,960 --> 00:11:05,280 Speaker 3: the consensus had him. 248 00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:07,320 Speaker 1: But you know, he's kind of limited just as a 249 00:11:07,360 --> 00:11:07,920 Speaker 1: slot player. 250 00:11:07,960 --> 00:11:09,640 Speaker 3: I think he's only going to be a slot player 251 00:11:09,880 --> 00:11:11,960 Speaker 3: at the NFL level, you know, you could. I haven't 252 00:11:11,960 --> 00:11:14,280 Speaker 3: really drafted much Caleb Douglas just because I'm not that 253 00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:17,360 Speaker 3: big of a fan of his talent in that profile. 254 00:11:17,600 --> 00:11:19,800 Speaker 3: So it's really just sprinkling in the wide receivers. I 255 00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:21,559 Speaker 3: think Dolsich is the easy one to go to. I 256 00:11:21,600 --> 00:11:23,960 Speaker 3: haven't drafted a ton of Malik Washington either, just because 257 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:26,840 Speaker 3: I think the market it's like odd that the market 258 00:11:26,880 --> 00:11:29,880 Speaker 3: is so bullish on him being like the guy when 259 00:11:29,920 --> 00:11:32,760 Speaker 3: the opportunity cost in getting him is actually not insignificant. 260 00:11:32,840 --> 00:11:35,840 Speaker 3: I mean, it's not significant, you know, in the grand scheme, 261 00:11:35,880 --> 00:11:38,720 Speaker 3: but it's not insignificant when you're talking about Malik freaking Washington, 262 00:11:38,720 --> 00:11:41,600 Speaker 3: who hasn't really done anything since he entered the NFL. Right, 263 00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:43,800 Speaker 3: So you know, I understand why he would be the 264 00:11:44,080 --> 00:11:47,200 Speaker 3: top wide receiver drafted, you know, from Miami, but I 265 00:11:47,200 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 3: don't understand why it would be such a massive gap 266 00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:51,760 Speaker 3: as it is right now, which right now it's like 267 00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:53,679 Speaker 3: five or six rounds, you know, in those in those 268 00:11:53,760 --> 00:11:54,760 Speaker 3: later parts of the drafts. 269 00:11:54,800 --> 00:11:57,840 Speaker 1: So and I think you can go naked Malik Willis if. 270 00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:00,800 Speaker 3: You want to right where he I mean, I just 271 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:03,400 Speaker 3: showed you his point per game rushing numbers, like he's 272 00:12:03,880 --> 00:12:06,360 Speaker 3: very capable of just scoring a lot of points and 273 00:12:06,440 --> 00:12:09,000 Speaker 3: maybe not bringing along one of the wide receivers or 274 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:10,360 Speaker 3: even Greg Dolcich with them. 275 00:12:10,600 --> 00:12:14,679 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm Malik Washington up fourteen spots since we've started 276 00:12:14,720 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 2: this summer. People in love with the presumed I guess 277 00:12:18,600 --> 00:12:20,439 Speaker 2: you are one. But yeah, I mean there's. 278 00:12:20,280 --> 00:12:23,160 Speaker 3: Been some there's been some positive coach speak and talk 279 00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:26,559 Speaker 3: about Malik Washington, but I don't know. To me, I 280 00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:29,960 Speaker 3: don't want to like get so bullish on a player 281 00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:32,160 Speaker 3: that just really hasn't proven anything. I didn't mind him 282 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:33,960 Speaker 3: as a prospect. I think he's a good yat guy. 283 00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:37,360 Speaker 3: I don't think that he's like the most traditional, you know, 284 00:12:37,440 --> 00:12:40,560 Speaker 3: perimeter wide receiver or X guy that we're gonna rely 285 00:12:40,679 --> 00:12:43,480 Speaker 3: on or that can find a really consistent place in 286 00:12:43,480 --> 00:12:46,559 Speaker 3: that offense. So he just like he's fine, but I'm 287 00:12:46,600 --> 00:12:47,520 Speaker 3: not going to be overweight. 288 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:52,359 Speaker 2: Let's move to another quarterback, another mobile fella up in Philadelphia, 289 00:12:52,400 --> 00:12:54,320 Speaker 2: Fly Eagles, Fly Galen Hurts. 290 00:12:54,520 --> 00:12:54,720 Speaker 1: Yeah. 291 00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:57,000 Speaker 3: I love where Jalen Hurts goes in these drafts. I 292 00:12:57,000 --> 00:12:59,280 Speaker 3: think he's just really undervalued. You can even go naked 293 00:12:59,280 --> 00:13:02,400 Speaker 3: and not get him on Smith, especially McKay lemon falling 294 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:05,760 Speaker 3: recently in some of these drafts, Like it's you can 295 00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:08,120 Speaker 3: even you know, stack him if you get Hurts. You know, 296 00:13:08,160 --> 00:13:10,559 Speaker 3: there's Dallas Goddard, there's Dantavian Wix at the end of 297 00:13:10,679 --> 00:13:13,760 Speaker 3: drafts that you can you can go with. Obviously Eli Stowers. 298 00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:16,960 Speaker 3: So I like Hurts from the standpoint of, like you 299 00:13:17,000 --> 00:13:19,439 Speaker 3: can be flexible, you don't absolutely need to and obviously, 300 00:13:19,480 --> 00:13:21,680 Speaker 3: like I had a team last night that I drafted, 301 00:13:21,679 --> 00:13:24,320 Speaker 3: and I drafted DeVante Smith and then I got Jalen Hurts, 302 00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:26,079 Speaker 3: So I just got the go to stack. 303 00:13:26,120 --> 00:13:28,040 Speaker 1: But I don't think you have to have DeVante Smith. 304 00:13:28,280 --> 00:13:29,199 Speaker 1: Over the last. 305 00:13:28,960 --> 00:13:32,439 Speaker 3: Five years as starter, Jalen Hurts has averaged twenty or 306 00:13:32,440 --> 00:13:34,280 Speaker 3: more points per game in all but one season. That 307 00:13:34,400 --> 00:13:38,040 Speaker 3: was last year with Kevin Batulo, where he was almost 308 00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:40,560 Speaker 3: at nineteen points per game. Which is still not that bad. 309 00:13:40,920 --> 00:13:43,600 Speaker 3: That's standard scoring, that's not even drafting scoring. He's still 310 00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:45,760 Speaker 3: ranked eighth last year though in points per game like 311 00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:49,840 Speaker 3: he still wasn't like horrific last year as a fantasy quarterback. 312 00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:51,920 Speaker 3: You don't have Aj Brown anymore, I get it, but 313 00:13:51,960 --> 00:13:53,959 Speaker 3: you get mkay Lemon, you have Dantavian Wicks, you have 314 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:55,959 Speaker 3: Eli Stowers, you have a new offensive coordinator. 315 00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:57,880 Speaker 1: And then the other thing to point out is what 316 00:13:57,920 --> 00:13:58,760 Speaker 1: I talked about on the. 317 00:13:58,679 --> 00:14:02,040 Speaker 3: Market Score episode yesterday, which is that market score loves 318 00:14:02,120 --> 00:14:05,079 Speaker 3: Jalen Hurts like right now. So market score, if you 319 00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:07,680 Speaker 3: guys don't know, market score is a metric that Brandon 320 00:14:07,720 --> 00:14:10,240 Speaker 3: Godola and I created where we're looking at average draft 321 00:14:10,280 --> 00:14:12,480 Speaker 3: position and we're looking at other inputs from the previous 322 00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:14,880 Speaker 3: season to basically give a score of zero to one 323 00:14:14,960 --> 00:14:17,959 Speaker 3: hundred for a player, and then you can essentially rank 324 00:14:18,040 --> 00:14:19,840 Speaker 3: players that way if you want to, just based on 325 00:14:19,880 --> 00:14:22,840 Speaker 3: their overall scores. And Jalen Hurts right now is number 326 00:14:22,880 --> 00:14:26,160 Speaker 3: two in markets He's right above barely above Lamar Jackson, 327 00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:29,080 Speaker 3: but he's above Lamar Jackson. It's not how I'm ranking guys, 328 00:14:29,480 --> 00:14:32,640 Speaker 3: but it is a additional context as to you know, 329 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:36,760 Speaker 3: understanding player evaluation and how we should feel about certain players. 330 00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:40,000 Speaker 3: So market Score really likes Jalen Hurts, which means it's 331 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:43,200 Speaker 3: taking ADP. It's looking at all these predictive metrics around 332 00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:45,640 Speaker 3: ADP to help predict how well this player is going 333 00:14:45,680 --> 00:14:48,080 Speaker 3: to perform this year, and it's saying Jalen Hurts is 334 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:51,040 Speaker 3: a value right now. So I think he's just undervalued. 335 00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:54,200 Speaker 3: It's crazy seeing some of these plays, like Dak Prescott 336 00:14:54,280 --> 00:14:58,080 Speaker 3: went above him in the draft I did yesterday, which 337 00:14:58,480 --> 00:15:00,960 Speaker 3: I get from the standpoint of step And that's why 338 00:15:01,040 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 3: that's happening. Because you have multiple inputs in the early 339 00:15:04,240 --> 00:15:07,240 Speaker 3: rounds with George Pickens and Cedee Lamb at either end 340 00:15:07,240 --> 00:15:09,680 Speaker 3: of the draft too, which which makes it even more 341 00:15:09,720 --> 00:15:12,800 Speaker 3: of like this this game of Chicken with those two teams, 342 00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:15,560 Speaker 3: because the CD Lamb manager might even reach for Dak 343 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:17,840 Speaker 3: in round six, right because like at the beginning of 344 00:15:17,960 --> 00:15:20,160 Speaker 3: round six with Cede Lamb going at the end of 345 00:15:20,240 --> 00:15:23,080 Speaker 3: round one. But then if he doesn't or if that 346 00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:26,280 Speaker 3: drafter doesn't, then you get into that six seven turn 347 00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:29,400 Speaker 3: and the George Pickens manager sitting there and they're saying. 348 00:15:29,440 --> 00:15:31,360 Speaker 1: I gotta get Dak now. Because he's not gonna fall. 349 00:15:31,320 --> 00:15:34,160 Speaker 3: To the eighth right, So all that's doing is creating 350 00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:38,560 Speaker 3: Dak Prescott's ADP to be inflated. Right, And it's nothing 351 00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:41,240 Speaker 3: against Dak, He's fine, but Jalen Hurts objectively as a 352 00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:45,040 Speaker 3: higher ceiling than Dak Prescott, Like, objectively, right, he's objectively 353 00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:49,040 Speaker 3: a better fantasy asset than Dak Prescott is. So from 354 00:15:49,120 --> 00:15:51,400 Speaker 3: that perspective, this is what we were talking about. I mean, 355 00:15:51,400 --> 00:15:53,400 Speaker 3: we talked about it for like a year and a half. 356 00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:56,920 Speaker 3: Now it feels like, but this is why quarterback ADP 357 00:15:57,080 --> 00:16:00,320 Speaker 3: can get so funky and weird and best ball, and 358 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:03,200 Speaker 3: it's so different in season long, where we're gonna sit 359 00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:05,640 Speaker 3: here and be like, yeah, we're gonna draft Jalen Hurts. 360 00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:08,120 Speaker 3: We'ren't even gonna care about stacking our in our home 361 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:11,800 Speaker 3: leagues and stuff. But you know, hopefully, well hopefully for 362 00:16:11,880 --> 00:16:16,480 Speaker 3: our benefit, the best ball ADP transfers over to season long, 363 00:16:16,520 --> 00:16:18,000 Speaker 3: because then we'll be able to get some of these 364 00:16:18,040 --> 00:16:20,160 Speaker 3: quarterback values. But I don't think that's going to happen 365 00:16:20,160 --> 00:16:21,440 Speaker 3: in the same way. So this is a really good 366 00:16:21,480 --> 00:16:23,400 Speaker 3: way to get exposure to some of these early round guys. 367 00:16:23,480 --> 00:16:26,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, the gravity of stacking. Just it's a thing, right 368 00:16:26,920 --> 00:16:30,320 Speaker 2: these quarterbacks, because of the selections that have been made previously, 369 00:16:30,640 --> 00:16:32,480 Speaker 2: they get pulled into that direction. And like you said, 370 00:16:32,520 --> 00:16:35,240 Speaker 2: it's very interesting when there's two pieces. We see this 371 00:16:35,280 --> 00:16:39,720 Speaker 2: with Cincinnati as well, where there's two guys competing for 372 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:43,720 Speaker 2: fulfilling that stack later on, which creates this interesting pressure 373 00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:46,720 Speaker 2: as to when that player comes off the board. Let's 374 00:16:46,720 --> 00:16:48,960 Speaker 2: do the running back, Let's go to Denver, Let's go 375 00:16:49,040 --> 00:16:50,000 Speaker 2: to Jonah Coleman. 376 00:16:51,160 --> 00:16:53,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, I just feel like I'm kind of on an 377 00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:55,240 Speaker 3: island with Jonah Coleman at this point because I think 378 00:16:55,240 --> 00:16:58,680 Speaker 3: his ADP has dropped since since the draft, so since 379 00:16:58,720 --> 00:17:01,520 Speaker 3: since the Millie opened, And I feel like I said, 380 00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:03,160 Speaker 3: I feel like I'm kind of on an island because 381 00:17:03,320 --> 00:17:04,920 Speaker 3: I see a lot of people who are JK. 382 00:17:05,040 --> 00:17:08,000 Speaker 1: Dobbins Bros. And RJ. Harvey Bros. But there's not many 383 00:17:08,200 --> 00:17:09,280 Speaker 1: Jonah Coleman bros. 384 00:17:09,359 --> 00:17:11,680 Speaker 3: And it's not to say that I think Coleman's amazing 385 00:17:11,760 --> 00:17:15,680 Speaker 3: and that you know, I'm purely on team Coleman. I've 386 00:17:15,880 --> 00:17:17,840 Speaker 3: sprinkled in more RJ. Harvey, but I will say I'm 387 00:17:17,880 --> 00:17:18,760 Speaker 3: not drafting much JK. 388 00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:19,280 Speaker 1: Dobbins. 389 00:17:19,320 --> 00:17:22,000 Speaker 3: I just don't get the allure, especially on draftings where 390 00:17:22,080 --> 00:17:22,920 Speaker 3: it's full PPR. 391 00:17:23,320 --> 00:17:25,480 Speaker 1: I don't get the allure of JK. 392 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:29,160 Speaker 3: Dobbins that much when you know he's had injury history, 393 00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:32,600 Speaker 3: when you know that Jonah Coleman is stepping in, I 394 00:17:32,600 --> 00:17:33,600 Speaker 3: think they drafted Coleman. 395 00:17:33,640 --> 00:17:34,400 Speaker 1: I've said this all along. 396 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:36,760 Speaker 3: I think they drafted Coleman because he can kind of 397 00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:39,800 Speaker 3: back up both players in this backfield. Like he's a 398 00:17:39,880 --> 00:17:42,840 Speaker 3: do it all back who's just good enough at pass catcher. 399 00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:45,919 Speaker 3: He's good enough in pass protection, he's good enough at 400 00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:48,400 Speaker 3: the early down stuff in between the tackles, and he's 401 00:17:48,440 --> 00:17:50,440 Speaker 3: big and he can play the goal line role too. 402 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:53,080 Speaker 3: So like he's good enough at all of these things 403 00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:56,040 Speaker 3: that number one, he can back those guys up. But 404 00:17:56,119 --> 00:17:59,640 Speaker 3: number two, I also think there's a real genuine possibility 405 00:17:59,680 --> 00:18:01,919 Speaker 3: that he just carves out a role in the Denver 406 00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:06,240 Speaker 3: backfield that he Joonah Coleman sees some sort of backfield 407 00:18:06,320 --> 00:18:08,280 Speaker 3: share with those guys being healthy. 408 00:18:08,359 --> 00:18:11,600 Speaker 1: RJ. Harvey He's a legit threat as a pass catcher. 409 00:18:11,640 --> 00:18:13,560 Speaker 3: But not so much as a rusher, just based on 410 00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,560 Speaker 3: what we saw last year with his bottom tiered rushing 411 00:18:16,600 --> 00:18:19,360 Speaker 3: yards over expected per rush JK. Dobbins, Like I said, 412 00:18:19,400 --> 00:18:21,760 Speaker 3: four percent target share last year for JK. Dobbins, and 413 00:18:21,800 --> 00:18:25,040 Speaker 3: there's durability concerns. So Coleman being a do it all back, 414 00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:26,800 Speaker 3: it's a good offense that you're attaching him to. 415 00:18:27,320 --> 00:18:27,960 Speaker 1: I just think he's a. 416 00:18:27,920 --> 00:18:29,639 Speaker 3: Good pick right now, and I'm getting him in a 417 00:18:29,680 --> 00:18:31,440 Speaker 3: round fifteen consistently now. 418 00:18:31,720 --> 00:18:33,680 Speaker 1: And I thought he was gonna rise. 419 00:18:33,840 --> 00:18:36,600 Speaker 3: Honestly, I thought getting him in around fourteen after the 420 00:18:36,680 --> 00:18:39,280 Speaker 3: draft was I thought he would get to like round twelve, 421 00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 3: and he just hasn't. There's been some positive favorable reports 422 00:18:43,160 --> 00:18:45,520 Speaker 3: with him too, which is another reason why I'm surprised 423 00:18:45,560 --> 00:18:47,320 Speaker 3: there hasn't been that much moving with Jonah Coleman. I'm 424 00:18:47,320 --> 00:18:49,359 Speaker 3: sure people in the comments are gonna give me a 425 00:18:49,400 --> 00:18:50,359 Speaker 3: reason as to why this is. 426 00:18:50,359 --> 00:18:51,600 Speaker 1: Happening and why I'm a moron. 427 00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:53,560 Speaker 3: But I do think that that there's a lot of 428 00:18:53,640 --> 00:18:56,879 Speaker 3: outs for Jonah Coleman to be a useful piece in 429 00:18:56,920 --> 00:18:57,720 Speaker 3: Best Ball this year. 430 00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:01,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. Sometimes we've seen this time in time Again, Sometimes 431 00:19:01,440 --> 00:19:05,480 Speaker 2: just going with the cheapest option in an ambiguous situation 432 00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:10,800 Speaker 2: oftentimes is a pretty solid strategy, right You're getting the 433 00:19:10,880 --> 00:19:15,159 Speaker 2: cost off, and as we see throughout the summer, Which 434 00:19:15,320 --> 00:19:18,960 Speaker 2: of these Denver running backs could benefit the most from 435 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:23,240 Speaker 2: some sort of buzz or news or injury in the summer. 436 00:19:23,359 --> 00:19:26,320 Speaker 2: It's most likely Jonah Coleman, because like, how high could R. J. 437 00:19:26,480 --> 00:19:29,600 Speaker 2: Harvey and JK. Gobbins reasonably go. I don't think it 438 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:31,680 Speaker 2: could be much higher than where they're going already. 439 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:32,560 Speaker 4: R J. 440 00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:35,640 Speaker 3: Harvey's dealing with an injury too, Like there's that's that's 441 00:19:35,680 --> 00:19:38,160 Speaker 3: going on, and like, like I do think that we're 442 00:19:38,160 --> 00:19:41,560 Speaker 3: doing ourselves a disservice when we lump together day three 443 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:44,480 Speaker 3: picks and day three draft capital as all the same 444 00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:48,960 Speaker 3: because like he was like top one ten Jonah Coleman, 445 00:19:48,960 --> 00:19:51,320 Speaker 3: he was an early fourth round pick. That is not 446 00:19:51,520 --> 00:19:53,879 Speaker 3: that much different than a third round pick from a 447 00:19:54,280 --> 00:19:57,679 Speaker 3: draft capital and an investment standpoint, and for whatever reason, 448 00:19:57,800 --> 00:19:59,800 Speaker 3: like people, you know, I think that part of it 449 00:19:59,840 --> 00:20:02,800 Speaker 3: is people like me, and it's our faults because when 450 00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:05,560 Speaker 3: we communicate these ideas, we lump these guys together and say, 451 00:20:05,560 --> 00:20:08,000 Speaker 3: Alwa's a Day three pick, et cetera, et cetera. 452 00:20:07,560 --> 00:20:09,159 Speaker 1: But it's a gradient. It's the same way that I 453 00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:10,240 Speaker 1: view average draft. 454 00:20:10,040 --> 00:20:12,160 Speaker 3: Position and like all the threshold stuff that I work 455 00:20:12,200 --> 00:20:14,280 Speaker 3: on on the draft guide where you know, I bucket 456 00:20:14,280 --> 00:20:16,720 Speaker 3: these players up into top eighteen wide receivers and then 457 00:20:16,880 --> 00:20:19,320 Speaker 3: you know wide receiver nineteen to forty two to represent 458 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 3: the middle rounds in each of those groups. There's different 459 00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:24,760 Speaker 3: trends that we look for to see if a player 460 00:20:24,800 --> 00:20:27,960 Speaker 3: is gonna bust or if they're gonna break out. Realistically, though, 461 00:20:27,960 --> 00:20:29,960 Speaker 3: if you're at the low end of you, if you're 462 00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:33,080 Speaker 3: wide receiver eighteen, if you're like Tedoro McMillan right now, 463 00:20:33,440 --> 00:20:36,560 Speaker 3: your trends, yes, you might get bucketed in with the 464 00:20:36,600 --> 00:20:39,680 Speaker 3: top eighteen guys. The trends in the next group matter 465 00:20:39,800 --> 00:20:41,320 Speaker 3: just as much as the one in that group, right, 466 00:20:41,359 --> 00:20:45,080 Speaker 3: Like it's it's similar with the with draft capital and 467 00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:48,320 Speaker 3: not having these harsh cutoffs, because a sixth round running 468 00:20:48,359 --> 00:20:50,840 Speaker 3: back is not the same at all as a one 469 00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:52,719 Speaker 3: hundred and tenth or one hundred and eighth or whatever 470 00:20:52,920 --> 00:20:56,840 Speaker 3: Jonah Coleman was overall running back. Jonah Coleman's ADP or 471 00:20:56,920 --> 00:20:59,480 Speaker 3: draft capital is not that far off from like what 472 00:20:59,600 --> 00:21:02,560 Speaker 3: Caleb Johnson was last year. Now I know he busted, 473 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:05,359 Speaker 3: of course, but like it's it's not as bad as 474 00:21:05,400 --> 00:21:07,879 Speaker 3: draft capital as you think. And like base Jall Tuton 475 00:21:08,240 --> 00:21:10,920 Speaker 3: was was a fourth rounder last year, right, and people 476 00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:12,840 Speaker 3: were looking at him a little bit more favorably than 477 00:21:12,880 --> 00:21:16,360 Speaker 3: they're looking at Jodah Coleman. So I actually think that 478 00:21:16,400 --> 00:21:19,720 Speaker 3: like the fourth round for running backs in today's game 479 00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:21,840 Speaker 3: is sort of like what it was in the third round, 480 00:21:21,880 --> 00:21:23,360 Speaker 3: maybe like five or six years ago. 481 00:21:24,280 --> 00:21:27,400 Speaker 2: Moving out west a little bit further in my backyard 482 00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:31,640 Speaker 2: training in Costa Mesa, it's Keaton Mitchell of the Los 483 00:21:31,680 --> 00:21:32,479 Speaker 2: Angeles Charters. 484 00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:37,080 Speaker 3: This is not an anti Amarion Hampton stance. I like Hampton. 485 00:21:37,280 --> 00:21:42,800 Speaker 3: This is just a pro Keaton Mitchell pro Chargers situation stance. 486 00:21:43,000 --> 00:21:45,400 Speaker 3: I love the Chargers offense this year. I don't care 487 00:21:45,440 --> 00:21:48,240 Speaker 3: how chocky that is. I don't care if everyone's backing them, 488 00:21:48,800 --> 00:21:51,800 Speaker 3: they should be good offensively this year. Quintin Johnson has 489 00:21:51,840 --> 00:21:53,600 Speaker 3: seen like a crip by the way, as in the side, 490 00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:56,720 Speaker 3: Quentin Johnson saw like a two round rise in ADP 491 00:21:56,840 --> 00:21:59,040 Speaker 3: out of nowhere the last like two weeks or week 492 00:21:59,040 --> 00:22:02,199 Speaker 3: and a half. I love drafting the Chargers offense have 493 00:22:02,240 --> 00:22:04,600 Speaker 3: a lot of everybody. Quentin Johnston, like I said, he's 494 00:22:04,600 --> 00:22:05,840 Speaker 3: a little bit high right now, so I haven't been 495 00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:07,640 Speaker 3: getting as much as him, But I'm still drafting him. 496 00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:09,720 Speaker 1: But with Keaton Mitchell, I just. 497 00:22:09,640 --> 00:22:12,960 Speaker 3: Think he's like the perfect best ball guy, where yes, 498 00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:14,560 Speaker 3: I don't like I do think that it being a 499 00:22:14,560 --> 00:22:17,040 Speaker 3: full PPR platform, you know, I don't think he's gonna 500 00:22:17,040 --> 00:22:18,840 Speaker 3: catch a ton of passes because it's never really been 501 00:22:18,920 --> 00:22:22,800 Speaker 3: his game necessarily. But at the same time, Mike McDaniel 502 00:22:22,960 --> 00:22:26,840 Speaker 3: with speed is just check mark right like we've seen 503 00:22:26,840 --> 00:22:29,720 Speaker 3: it with Devon Chen. Devon Ahen's obviously very good, and 504 00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 3: he's a much more prolific runner and rusher than Keaton 505 00:22:32,320 --> 00:22:34,960 Speaker 3: Mitchell has been. Even if you look back at you know, 506 00:22:35,040 --> 00:22:37,760 Speaker 3: collegiate numbers and such, I do think that Mitchell brings 507 00:22:37,760 --> 00:22:40,439 Speaker 3: that big playability you get Slater and all back on 508 00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:42,680 Speaker 3: the offensive line. I think the run game is gonna 509 00:22:42,680 --> 00:22:44,119 Speaker 3: be a lot better than it was last year just 510 00:22:44,160 --> 00:22:46,199 Speaker 3: based on that, and he's gonna have some role on 511 00:22:46,200 --> 00:22:48,639 Speaker 3: that team, like there's gonna be some usage for Keithon Mitchell, 512 00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:51,040 Speaker 3: and he has the big playability because of that speed. 513 00:22:51,160 --> 00:22:53,600 Speaker 1: So you will get spiked weeks from Keaton. 514 00:22:53,359 --> 00:22:54,840 Speaker 3: Mitchell and best ball, and that's part of the reason 515 00:22:54,880 --> 00:22:56,720 Speaker 3: why I've been drafting him as much as I have. 516 00:22:56,840 --> 00:22:58,960 Speaker 1: I think, right now he's my highest roster running back. 517 00:22:59,119 --> 00:23:01,520 Speaker 2: The arrow is pointing out up right now in terms 518 00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:04,760 Speaker 2: of ADP for every single man, almost every single member 519 00:23:05,200 --> 00:23:07,960 Speaker 2: of the Los Angeles Chargers. Hampton's up two spots, lads 520 00:23:08,040 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 2: up two spots, like you said, Quentin Johnson's up seventeen 521 00:23:11,119 --> 00:23:14,200 Speaker 2: and a half spots since we started doing this, Heaton 522 00:23:14,200 --> 00:23:17,200 Speaker 2: Mitchell's up nine, Trey Harris is up nineteen point four. 523 00:23:17,359 --> 00:23:20,080 Speaker 2: I think people are starting this is the meme of 524 00:23:20,359 --> 00:23:23,800 Speaker 2: the dumb guy and the genius who have the obvious 525 00:23:23,880 --> 00:23:26,439 Speaker 2: thought of, hey, maybe Mike McDaniel's gonna be awesome, and 526 00:23:26,480 --> 00:23:28,000 Speaker 2: the guy in the middle like, oh, the praise is 527 00:23:28,040 --> 00:23:30,919 Speaker 2: too much, we can't do it. But like, Mike McDaniel's 528 00:23:30,960 --> 00:23:33,560 Speaker 2: just that guy, like he's gonna have a very strong 529 00:23:33,600 --> 00:23:34,600 Speaker 2: impact on this offense. 530 00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:37,960 Speaker 3: I've also had this thought about the current landscape of 531 00:23:37,960 --> 00:23:43,479 Speaker 3: fantasy football, where I believe that this spike wouldn't have 532 00:23:43,600 --> 00:23:47,520 Speaker 3: been happening until August five or six, seven years ago, 533 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:50,200 Speaker 3: right within the landscape, not necessarily the best ball landscape, 534 00:23:50,240 --> 00:23:52,439 Speaker 3: but like just the fantasy landscape in general. 535 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:53,840 Speaker 1: Like we were, there was a delay. 536 00:23:53,880 --> 00:23:56,160 Speaker 3: There was like a period of time where you could 537 00:23:56,200 --> 00:24:00,480 Speaker 3: get these players in these obviously upgraded situations a lot 538 00:24:00,560 --> 00:24:02,680 Speaker 3: cheaper than what's happening right now. And we've talked about 539 00:24:02,720 --> 00:24:04,720 Speaker 3: this plenty, you know, over the last couple of weeks 540 00:24:04,720 --> 00:24:06,760 Speaker 3: of just like I think the market's sharper in the 541 00:24:06,800 --> 00:24:08,760 Speaker 3: way they're looking at running backs in general. You know, 542 00:24:08,800 --> 00:24:11,600 Speaker 3: like the fact that Trayvon Henderson and Ramandre Stevenson, which 543 00:24:11,640 --> 00:24:14,040 Speaker 3: by the way, honorable mentions for running back. Ramondre Stevenson 544 00:24:14,040 --> 00:24:16,000 Speaker 3: and Chase Brown are two guys that I've I've drafted 545 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:20,159 Speaker 3: a decent amount of, but Ramondre Stevenson going, you know, 546 00:24:20,920 --> 00:24:23,800 Speaker 3: two rounds ish after Traveon Henderson at this point, maybe 547 00:24:23,880 --> 00:24:26,160 Speaker 3: round and a half depending on some drafts, but about 548 00:24:26,160 --> 00:24:27,840 Speaker 3: two rounds after Traveon Henderson. 549 00:24:28,400 --> 00:24:30,880 Speaker 1: It's crazy because most years. 550 00:24:30,560 --> 00:24:32,280 Speaker 3: I would just be like, yeah, I get Trayvon Henderson, 551 00:24:32,320 --> 00:24:35,720 Speaker 3: He's the ascending player, you know, year two guy, whatever. 552 00:24:36,119 --> 00:24:37,720 Speaker 1: But now I'm getting Ramondre Stevenson. 553 00:24:37,720 --> 00:24:39,560 Speaker 3: Because I'm sitting here, I'm like, oh, the market's kind 554 00:24:39,560 --> 00:24:43,200 Speaker 3: of like downplaying what happened in the playoffs last year 555 00:24:43,200 --> 00:24:46,080 Speaker 3: and what the situation looks like in New England, et cetera, 556 00:24:46,119 --> 00:24:49,199 Speaker 3: et cetera. And it almost feels just completely backwards right 557 00:24:49,200 --> 00:24:51,000 Speaker 3: because like year two running backs are the backs that 558 00:24:51,040 --> 00:24:53,560 Speaker 3: we generally should be going after. It's it's just not 559 00:24:53,600 --> 00:24:56,800 Speaker 3: as clear as clean and clear cut. I do think though, 560 00:24:57,040 --> 00:25:00,440 Speaker 3: that we're working with sharper drafters who are playing ball 561 00:25:00,480 --> 00:25:03,680 Speaker 3: in May and June, like we are sick individuals. If 562 00:25:03,680 --> 00:25:05,840 Speaker 3: you're listening to this right now, you're a sick individual, 563 00:25:06,280 --> 00:25:09,439 Speaker 3: and you know naturally you're going to be more in 564 00:25:09,480 --> 00:25:12,000 Speaker 3: tune with what we should be doing from a trend standpoint. 565 00:25:12,119 --> 00:25:15,160 Speaker 3: I think once season long draft pickup and stuff, we're 566 00:25:15,160 --> 00:25:17,440 Speaker 3: going to see a different kind of situation with Ramandre 567 00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:18,080 Speaker 3: and Trevion. 568 00:25:18,480 --> 00:25:22,359 Speaker 2: Nobody is anti sweating. Ramandre touches more than people playing 569 00:25:22,359 --> 00:25:25,240 Speaker 2: best ball in June. I can promise see that they're 570 00:25:25,280 --> 00:25:28,200 Speaker 2: graping every time he touches the ball. Moving through receiver, 571 00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:31,240 Speaker 2: a guy we've discussed a lot. He's got a new 572 00:25:31,280 --> 00:25:35,679 Speaker 2: coordinator in mister David Bling. Blang Blou. It is scary 573 00:25:35,720 --> 00:25:37,400 Speaker 2: Terry McLaurin with the Commanders. 574 00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:40,880 Speaker 3: I just think that this offense could very much run 575 00:25:40,960 --> 00:25:43,920 Speaker 3: through Terry McLaurin. I mean, Blao has said that himself 576 00:25:44,520 --> 00:25:46,679 Speaker 3: multiple times, and there's been a lot of favorable reports 577 00:25:46,680 --> 00:25:48,280 Speaker 3: about what he's trying to do with the offense. 578 00:25:48,680 --> 00:25:50,960 Speaker 1: I also just don't think that Terry McLaurin is dust. 579 00:25:51,040 --> 00:25:52,760 Speaker 3: I mean, he saw his best yards per out run 580 00:25:52,800 --> 00:25:54,640 Speaker 3: of his career last year at two point two two, 581 00:25:55,040 --> 00:25:57,719 Speaker 3: his best targets per out run rate at twenty three percent, 582 00:25:58,000 --> 00:25:59,920 Speaker 3: his best first downs per route run rate which is 583 00:26:00,040 --> 00:26:04,199 Speaker 3: thirteen percent. Historically, players with that kind of combination do 584 00:26:04,440 --> 00:26:08,040 Speaker 3: very very well against ADP expectation. So McLaurin I think 585 00:26:08,040 --> 00:26:11,320 Speaker 3: you could draft realistically, just given the landscape right now 586 00:26:11,320 --> 00:26:13,760 Speaker 3: and how things have shifted in that like third to 587 00:26:13,880 --> 00:26:16,200 Speaker 3: fourth round area. I don't have a problem if you 588 00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:18,000 Speaker 3: want to take him in the at the three four turn, 589 00:26:18,280 --> 00:26:21,399 Speaker 3: just because that's when that like wide receiver tier starts 590 00:26:21,400 --> 00:26:24,200 Speaker 3: for me, where there's just a lot of upside type players. 591 00:26:24,640 --> 00:26:27,199 Speaker 3: I think McLaurin belongs in that tier. You don't have 592 00:26:27,240 --> 00:26:28,840 Speaker 3: to take them there because if you're doing a lot 593 00:26:28,840 --> 00:26:30,359 Speaker 3: of drafts. I mean, I've gotten him at the at 594 00:26:30,359 --> 00:26:32,800 Speaker 3: the four or five turn plenty. But I think McLaurin 595 00:26:32,840 --> 00:26:34,400 Speaker 3: is set up to have a very very good year. 596 00:26:34,680 --> 00:26:37,480 Speaker 2: Speaking of stacking, it's so funny his ADP's forty five 597 00:26:37,600 --> 00:26:41,240 Speaker 2: Jaden McDaniels is a very nice sixty nine exactly twenty 598 00:26:41,320 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 2: four spots after him. I wonder why it's exactly Yeah. 599 00:26:45,960 --> 00:26:48,520 Speaker 3: I mean, look, it's an easy stack to like you 600 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:51,000 Speaker 3: can usually get Jayden Daniels if you get Terry McLaurin 601 00:26:51,040 --> 00:26:52,800 Speaker 3: because the person, you know, the other teams are not 602 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:54,320 Speaker 3: looking at Jayden Daniels. 603 00:26:53,960 --> 00:26:56,160 Speaker 1: If they don't have ter McLaurin, and. 604 00:26:56,119 --> 00:26:58,520 Speaker 2: We might even get a discount. There's a world I'm 605 00:26:58,560 --> 00:27:00,800 Speaker 2: happy getting him at ADP. Now there's a world where 606 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:03,080 Speaker 2: this Ayuk thing does come to fruition and we might 607 00:27:03,119 --> 00:27:07,240 Speaker 2: even get a slight discount on on Terry McLaurin because 608 00:27:07,240 --> 00:27:09,240 Speaker 2: people are worried about target distribution. 609 00:27:09,320 --> 00:27:11,639 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean it's a very real possibility. I've actually 610 00:27:11,720 --> 00:27:16,840 Speaker 3: drafted a lot of AYUK teams with McLaurin and with 611 00:27:17,040 --> 00:27:20,199 Speaker 3: Jade Daniels, and like, I think Ayuk is actually not 612 00:27:20,240 --> 00:27:22,200 Speaker 3: a bad pick right now. We've kind of talked about that, 613 00:27:22,359 --> 00:27:24,879 Speaker 3: you know, with the guests and stuff. But you know, 614 00:27:25,440 --> 00:27:27,679 Speaker 3: if and when he signs, his ADP is going to 615 00:27:27,720 --> 00:27:30,159 Speaker 3: go up. Now he hasn't played in a while, so 616 00:27:30,200 --> 00:27:31,879 Speaker 3: who knows what that's going to look like. I'm not 617 00:27:31,960 --> 00:27:34,760 Speaker 3: having like you know, crazy crazy aspirations about what Brandon 618 00:27:34,800 --> 00:27:36,359 Speaker 3: and Ayuk might be able to do after coming off the 619 00:27:36,359 --> 00:27:38,400 Speaker 3: couch and you know, doing the Instagram thing that he's 620 00:27:38,400 --> 00:27:41,080 Speaker 3: been doing over the last six months. But I do 621 00:27:41,119 --> 00:27:43,160 Speaker 3: think that, like, if you're looking at like just expected 622 00:27:43,240 --> 00:27:46,680 Speaker 3: value and cost benefit eighteenth nineteenth round pick, I think 623 00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:47,919 Speaker 3: it's fine to go that direction. 624 00:27:48,480 --> 00:27:50,360 Speaker 2: Back on the Bolts, you could probably make this one 625 00:27:50,400 --> 00:27:52,200 Speaker 2: short Trey Harris as your others. 626 00:27:52,760 --> 00:27:55,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, well, look, I'm fine with lad, I'm fine with QJ. 627 00:27:55,359 --> 00:27:58,200 Speaker 3: Even even though qj's ADP is skyrocketed. I think that 628 00:27:58,280 --> 00:28:00,359 Speaker 3: might settle a little bit. But this is just a 629 00:28:00,440 --> 00:28:03,400 Speaker 3: cheap play in an offense that I think is gonna 630 00:28:03,400 --> 00:28:06,000 Speaker 3: be really good. Reports are saying that there's gonna be 631 00:28:06,040 --> 00:28:07,560 Speaker 3: a bigger role for Trey Harris. I mean, I think 632 00:28:07,600 --> 00:28:09,280 Speaker 3: he's the wide receiver three on that team, and so 633 00:28:09,800 --> 00:28:12,399 Speaker 3: there's some role for him to just be used and 634 00:28:12,480 --> 00:28:13,359 Speaker 3: have you know. 635 00:28:13,680 --> 00:28:15,240 Speaker 1: Sixty targets or something this year. 636 00:28:15,440 --> 00:28:17,800 Speaker 3: But then there's also the upside of you know, him 637 00:28:18,119 --> 00:28:21,640 Speaker 3: being a year two breakout of QJ or Ladd going 638 00:28:21,680 --> 00:28:23,359 Speaker 3: down to injury and then him being used more. 639 00:28:23,400 --> 00:28:25,639 Speaker 1: There's multiple injury outs for him, and it's just a 640 00:28:25,640 --> 00:28:26,240 Speaker 1: good offense. 641 00:28:26,280 --> 00:28:28,400 Speaker 3: So you know, part of this is also like I'm 642 00:28:28,400 --> 00:28:31,000 Speaker 3: getting so many chargers that he's just a stacking partner, 643 00:28:31,200 --> 00:28:33,400 Speaker 3: right So I have a lot of Trey Harris right now. 644 00:28:33,440 --> 00:28:34,359 Speaker 3: As a result of all. 645 00:28:34,280 --> 00:28:38,240 Speaker 2: That moving the tight end, We've got a little Homer 646 00:28:38,360 --> 00:28:42,160 Speaker 2: jj here he goes back to the berg Ceesians people, 647 00:28:42,480 --> 00:28:44,400 Speaker 2: and all of a sudden, he's clicking a lot of 648 00:28:44,440 --> 00:28:45,160 Speaker 2: Pat Fryerman. 649 00:28:46,280 --> 00:28:46,880 Speaker 1: Yeah. 650 00:28:46,960 --> 00:28:49,800 Speaker 3: By the way, two honorable mentions that wide receiver Davante Smith. 651 00:28:49,920 --> 00:28:51,920 Speaker 3: A lot of DeVante Smith right now. That was pre 652 00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:54,760 Speaker 3: boosted ADP before the aj Brown stuff happened. I was 653 00:28:54,800 --> 00:28:56,520 Speaker 3: getting a lot of them, and then I still think 654 00:28:56,560 --> 00:28:58,760 Speaker 3: Ricky Piersall is a good pick based on his previous 655 00:28:58,760 --> 00:29:01,440 Speaker 3: season peripherals. I think he and play the number two 656 00:29:01,440 --> 00:29:05,080 Speaker 3: wide receiver role. You know, market score doesn't love Mike 657 00:29:05,160 --> 00:29:06,600 Speaker 3: Evans right now. 658 00:29:06,720 --> 00:29:09,040 Speaker 1: I don't. I'm not like heavily drafting Evans. 659 00:29:09,080 --> 00:29:11,560 Speaker 3: I'm not, you know, not drafting him, but I've had 660 00:29:11,560 --> 00:29:13,640 Speaker 3: a hard time clicking Mike Evans' name just because of 661 00:29:13,680 --> 00:29:15,479 Speaker 3: the running backs and wide receivers that go around him. 662 00:29:15,480 --> 00:29:17,160 Speaker 1: So Ricky Piersall, I think is an interesting click. 663 00:29:17,240 --> 00:29:21,360 Speaker 3: But yes, Pat Fryermouth underutilized in my opinion, in that 664 00:29:21,480 --> 00:29:24,280 Speaker 3: Arthur Smith rotation that he had at tight end, you know, 665 00:29:24,320 --> 00:29:27,680 Speaker 3: with the John new and Darnell Washington stuff. He's there's 666 00:29:27,680 --> 00:29:29,920 Speaker 3: a new offense might feature him a little bit more, 667 00:29:30,120 --> 00:29:31,920 Speaker 3: and he's still just twenty seven years old and you're 668 00:29:31,920 --> 00:29:34,360 Speaker 3: getting him in like the nineteenth round of these drafts. 669 00:29:34,400 --> 00:29:37,280 Speaker 3: So again, part of this too is that I'm attaching 670 00:29:37,520 --> 00:29:40,040 Speaker 3: him to like a late prayer stack with Aaron Rodgers, 671 00:29:40,040 --> 00:29:43,160 Speaker 3: who I think Aaron Rodgers from a from a fantasy 672 00:29:43,160 --> 00:29:46,560 Speaker 3: perspective is pretty undervalued right now. To me, there's truly 673 00:29:46,680 --> 00:29:50,240 Speaker 3: not really a reason that Aaron Rodgers should be going 674 00:29:50,280 --> 00:29:53,040 Speaker 3: after Bryce Young, let alone two or three rounds after 675 00:29:53,080 --> 00:29:55,120 Speaker 3: Bryce Young in a lot of cases, right because like 676 00:29:55,160 --> 00:29:57,240 Speaker 3: a lot of times people get their quarterbacks and they're 677 00:29:57,280 --> 00:29:59,360 Speaker 3: at two or three and they don't really force the 678 00:29:59,400 --> 00:30:01,520 Speaker 3: issue with some like the Genos of the World. And 679 00:30:01,520 --> 00:30:03,440 Speaker 3: obviously there's stuff going on off the field now with Geno, 680 00:30:03,520 --> 00:30:06,640 Speaker 3: But like the Genos of the World or Aaron Rodgers 681 00:30:06,720 --> 00:30:08,800 Speaker 3: or these guys who we think are gonna play for 682 00:30:08,880 --> 00:30:11,840 Speaker 3: the majority of the season, I think Rogers is gonna 683 00:30:11,840 --> 00:30:14,640 Speaker 3: be the starter for this team throughout the year, and 684 00:30:14,800 --> 00:30:17,520 Speaker 3: especially because we know this is last season or supposedly 685 00:30:17,560 --> 00:30:20,560 Speaker 3: his last season, it just seems like they're not gonna 686 00:30:20,640 --> 00:30:22,640 Speaker 3: just bench him at the end of the year, you know, 687 00:30:22,840 --> 00:30:25,080 Speaker 3: like and the Steelers should probably be like at least 688 00:30:25,080 --> 00:30:27,600 Speaker 3: semi competitive, at least you know, in that like eight 689 00:30:27,600 --> 00:30:31,240 Speaker 3: to ten win range potentially. So as a result of that, like, 690 00:30:31,360 --> 00:30:33,280 Speaker 3: I think Rogers is just kind of undervalued, And so 691 00:30:33,440 --> 00:30:36,200 Speaker 3: I've been attaching Pat Fryarmouth to him because I'm. 692 00:30:36,000 --> 00:30:37,920 Speaker 1: Not getting up I'm not definitely not getting a lot. 693 00:30:37,840 --> 00:30:40,720 Speaker 3: Of Dk Metcalf and I'm getting some Michael Pittman, but 694 00:30:40,800 --> 00:30:43,560 Speaker 3: not enough to like really force the issue. So Pat 695 00:30:43,560 --> 00:30:45,560 Speaker 3: Fryarmuth is kind of my and I get some German 696 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:47,880 Speaker 3: Bernard too, but Pat Fryarmouth is kind of like the 697 00:30:47,920 --> 00:30:50,800 Speaker 3: easy late stack if I'm if I'm missing out on 698 00:30:50,840 --> 00:30:53,480 Speaker 3: that on that third stack or even second stack in 699 00:30:53,520 --> 00:30:54,120 Speaker 3: some cases. 700 00:30:54,560 --> 00:30:57,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, And when in instances where I'm not going elite 701 00:30:58,000 --> 00:31:00,800 Speaker 2: tight end, it's a great click in the end of 702 00:31:00,800 --> 00:31:02,280 Speaker 2: the drafts when I just want to fill my tight 703 00:31:02,400 --> 00:31:04,320 Speaker 2: endroom with guys that are going to be on the field. 704 00:31:04,320 --> 00:31:07,400 Speaker 2: Because we know Darnold Washington has his role on the team. 705 00:31:07,440 --> 00:31:09,480 Speaker 2: He's not going out there and running a bunch of routes. 706 00:31:09,600 --> 00:31:09,880 Speaker 5: Right. 707 00:31:10,000 --> 00:31:12,440 Speaker 2: This is this is Pat Firenmouth show at the tight 708 00:31:12,480 --> 00:31:16,520 Speaker 2: end position in Pittsburgh. Your other tight end speaking of 709 00:31:16,560 --> 00:31:20,280 Speaker 2: a crowded tight end room, but a very explosive young 710 00:31:20,320 --> 00:31:22,320 Speaker 2: player in Terrence fergus. 711 00:31:22,880 --> 00:31:25,480 Speaker 3: Look, I'm kind of a Terrence Ferguson Truther. I understand 712 00:31:25,520 --> 00:31:29,440 Speaker 3: that the Zap model liked him. I think he's good. 713 00:31:29,520 --> 00:31:31,760 Speaker 3: You know, he gave us some production last year down 714 00:31:31,800 --> 00:31:33,600 Speaker 3: the stretch. We know the Rams are going to be 715 00:31:33,600 --> 00:31:36,800 Speaker 3: heavy with their twelve and thirteen personnel usage, so he 716 00:31:36,840 --> 00:31:39,360 Speaker 3: should be on the field plenty. Now he's gonna be 717 00:31:39,400 --> 00:31:42,720 Speaker 3: competing with other tight ends for sure, Colby Parkinson being 718 00:31:43,080 --> 00:31:45,680 Speaker 3: sort of like the top one that and I'm trying 719 00:31:45,720 --> 00:31:49,400 Speaker 3: my best to sprinkle in Colby Parkinson and not just 720 00:31:49,480 --> 00:31:51,000 Speaker 3: like he's so enamored with. 721 00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:53,320 Speaker 2: I like having a take this is this is one 722 00:31:53,320 --> 00:31:54,760 Speaker 2: of the spots in the draft door. I just like 723 00:31:54,840 --> 00:31:57,000 Speaker 2: having a take like, I don't think this is a 724 00:31:57,000 --> 00:31:59,120 Speaker 2: part where you need to be balanced right when we're 725 00:31:59,120 --> 00:32:02,440 Speaker 2: in the eighth I think you can kind of here's 726 00:32:01,760 --> 00:32:02,080 Speaker 2: the thing. 727 00:32:02,480 --> 00:32:03,000 Speaker 1: But I don't want to. 728 00:32:03,040 --> 00:32:04,600 Speaker 3: I don't want to walk away from the Millie this 729 00:32:04,680 --> 00:32:06,760 Speaker 3: year and have eighteen percent Terrence Ferguson in. 730 00:32:06,720 --> 00:32:08,120 Speaker 1: One person Colby Parkinson. 731 00:32:09,080 --> 00:32:10,600 Speaker 2: That just seems like. 732 00:32:10,200 --> 00:32:13,440 Speaker 1: Like not playing you know, the ev game very well. 733 00:32:13,360 --> 00:32:15,840 Speaker 3: Right, where Whereas could could I walk away with thirteen 734 00:32:15,880 --> 00:32:18,720 Speaker 3: percent Terrence Ferguson in four percent Kobe Parkinson? 735 00:32:18,760 --> 00:32:18,960 Speaker 5: Sure? 736 00:32:19,040 --> 00:32:20,000 Speaker 1: Like, I think that's a little. 737 00:32:19,840 --> 00:32:22,680 Speaker 3: Bit more reasonable, right, And so I am getting some 738 00:32:22,760 --> 00:32:25,600 Speaker 3: coolby Parkinson because they're their ADPs are shrinking the gap 739 00:32:25,640 --> 00:32:27,400 Speaker 3: between the two. It's really just a coin flip at 740 00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:31,000 Speaker 3: this point, whereas before Parkinson was going pretty consistently ahead 741 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:34,200 Speaker 3: of Terrence Ferguson. So I've gotten more Ferguson, or sorry, 742 00:32:34,200 --> 00:32:35,960 Speaker 3: I was getting more Ferguson before. I'm getting a little 743 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:39,640 Speaker 3: bit more Parkinson now. But there's nothing scary after puk 744 00:32:39,680 --> 00:32:42,200 Speaker 3: and Aku and Devonte Adams on this team, Like they 745 00:32:42,200 --> 00:32:45,320 Speaker 3: don't have a third wide receiver, They're gonna clearly use 746 00:32:45,800 --> 00:32:48,040 Speaker 3: their tight ends in pass catching roles, and to me, 747 00:32:48,160 --> 00:32:51,280 Speaker 3: Terrence Ferguson's most athletic and the most versatile tight end 748 00:32:51,320 --> 00:32:54,240 Speaker 3: that they have on that roster to move around the 749 00:32:54,280 --> 00:32:56,480 Speaker 3: formation and kind of be the de facto wide receiver 750 00:32:56,560 --> 00:32:59,360 Speaker 3: three on that team, right, So I think he's a 751 00:32:59,360 --> 00:33:02,120 Speaker 3: good prospect. There's good it's a good system to be in. 752 00:33:02,520 --> 00:33:04,760 Speaker 1: You know. I don't think that he's one of those players. 753 00:33:04,360 --> 00:33:07,640 Speaker 3: That I'm going to be heavy on in season long 754 00:33:07,680 --> 00:33:10,560 Speaker 3: this year just because he'll be a waiver wire guy. 755 00:33:10,600 --> 00:33:12,440 Speaker 1: I don't think you need to draft him, you know. 756 00:33:12,440 --> 00:33:15,200 Speaker 3: I don't think you need to throw that dart and 757 00:33:15,240 --> 00:33:17,800 Speaker 3: be like so confident in that player unless you're in 758 00:33:17,880 --> 00:33:20,160 Speaker 3: a deeper format. But you can, you know, obviously have 759 00:33:20,240 --> 00:33:22,320 Speaker 3: him on speed dial off the waiver wire. But I 760 00:33:22,320 --> 00:33:23,800 Speaker 3: think that he can give you some musable weeks. It 761 00:33:23,880 --> 00:33:26,000 Speaker 3: might not be predictable, but he'll give you some musable weeks. 762 00:33:26,000 --> 00:33:26,920 Speaker 3: Just given the environment. 763 00:33:27,200 --> 00:33:30,400 Speaker 2: There are eight rounds that pass from when Blake Korm 764 00:33:30,440 --> 00:33:33,760 Speaker 2: goes off the board until the next RAMS player, And 765 00:33:33,800 --> 00:33:37,840 Speaker 2: if you just go pass catcher, there's thirteen rounds between 766 00:33:38,120 --> 00:33:41,480 Speaker 2: DeVante Adams and Golbi Parkinson. We know the target funnel 767 00:33:41,560 --> 00:33:44,040 Speaker 2: is going to be very narrow. We know these guys 768 00:33:44,040 --> 00:33:46,200 Speaker 2: at the top are going to get a ton of targets. 769 00:33:46,680 --> 00:33:49,440 Speaker 2: But somebody else that has to catch some balls and 770 00:33:49,480 --> 00:33:50,920 Speaker 2: be productive in this offense. 771 00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:54,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's crazy. It's crazy. 772 00:33:54,520 --> 00:33:58,840 Speaker 3: So it's a really really interesting build for that offense 773 00:33:58,840 --> 00:34:01,840 Speaker 3: in general. And I think Terrence Ferguson is going to 774 00:34:01,880 --> 00:34:03,640 Speaker 3: play you know, it's a year two tight end. We 775 00:34:03,640 --> 00:34:05,520 Speaker 3: should be looking at into players like that. I know 776 00:34:05,560 --> 00:34:07,400 Speaker 3: people are gonna say, but what about Max Claire. I 777 00:34:07,400 --> 00:34:10,000 Speaker 3: think Max, like they the Rams have shown us pretty 778 00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:13,279 Speaker 3: consistently under McVeigh that they kind of red shirt their rookies, right, 779 00:34:13,360 --> 00:34:15,000 Speaker 3: Like it's kind of like a like. 780 00:34:15,120 --> 00:34:17,000 Speaker 1: They did that with Quorum. You know they've done that. 781 00:34:17,160 --> 00:34:18,919 Speaker 3: I mean, if you want to throw dark West Hunter 782 00:34:18,960 --> 00:34:21,200 Speaker 3: in there, you know, technically they just didn't use him 783 00:34:21,200 --> 00:34:21,480 Speaker 3: at all. 784 00:34:21,800 --> 00:34:23,800 Speaker 1: I mean, I think Dark Ois Hunter has bigger problems 785 00:34:23,800 --> 00:34:27,920 Speaker 1: than just you know, let's go, we're not gonna We're 786 00:34:27,920 --> 00:34:30,120 Speaker 1: not gonna unleash him this year. Yeah, look it's an 787 00:34:30,239 --> 00:34:31,160 Speaker 1: l I like Dark. 788 00:34:30,960 --> 00:34:33,319 Speaker 3: West as a prospect, but we've seen it, We've seen 789 00:34:33,320 --> 00:34:36,040 Speaker 3: it happen with them, right Obviously pokin Akua was just undeniable. 790 00:34:36,400 --> 00:34:37,719 Speaker 1: But and they use them. 791 00:34:37,719 --> 00:34:39,319 Speaker 3: But you know, you got I think you have to 792 00:34:39,320 --> 00:34:41,719 Speaker 3: be that kind of talent in order to really be 793 00:34:41,760 --> 00:34:44,640 Speaker 3: heavily utilized for them. And Max Claire is a really 794 00:34:44,640 --> 00:34:47,160 Speaker 3: good prospect too, but I think that that's more of 795 00:34:47,200 --> 00:34:50,240 Speaker 3: a looking forward thing because Tyler Higby and Colby Parkinson 796 00:34:50,239 --> 00:34:52,239 Speaker 3: could be gone next year and they know that they're 797 00:34:52,280 --> 00:34:54,839 Speaker 3: going to continue being tight end heavy, so they got 798 00:34:54,880 --> 00:34:56,520 Speaker 3: ahead of it in a good tight end class and 799 00:34:56,520 --> 00:34:58,000 Speaker 3: they got Max Claire where they did. 800 00:34:58,719 --> 00:35:00,880 Speaker 1: So I'm not like overly whereorried about that this year. 801 00:35:00,920 --> 00:35:02,840 Speaker 3: I think I think Terrence Ferguson is set up to 802 00:35:03,080 --> 00:35:05,200 Speaker 3: at least give us a handful of usable weeks. 803 00:35:05,480 --> 00:35:07,520 Speaker 2: Who do you got for honorable mention at tight end? 804 00:35:08,400 --> 00:35:10,120 Speaker 3: I think Doultic was one. I realized I didn't put 805 00:35:10,120 --> 00:35:12,879 Speaker 3: that on here, but I I think Doulcic was one 806 00:35:12,920 --> 00:35:15,320 Speaker 3: of them. I think I actually had a decent amount 807 00:35:15,360 --> 00:35:20,799 Speaker 3: of Kate Oughton, oddly, which it's just a dude, right, Like, 808 00:35:20,920 --> 00:35:23,600 Speaker 3: I don't have like conviction about Kate Oughton. You know, 809 00:35:23,960 --> 00:35:27,040 Speaker 3: the Dulsaice thing has been Malik Willis. But also I 810 00:35:27,040 --> 00:35:29,120 Speaker 3: was drafting Doulsic because he was one of the players 811 00:35:29,160 --> 00:35:30,560 Speaker 3: we talked about right away. 812 00:35:30,800 --> 00:35:34,040 Speaker 1: When we started this season of the show, where I 813 00:35:34,080 --> 00:35:35,239 Speaker 1: was drafting him a decent bit. 814 00:35:35,880 --> 00:35:38,720 Speaker 3: But his ADP's gotten up like three rounds since that happened, 815 00:35:38,719 --> 00:35:41,160 Speaker 3: So I haven't gotten him as much, but Dulcie is 816 00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:44,120 Speaker 3: still pretty pretty highly exposed for my in my portfolio 817 00:35:44,280 --> 00:35:46,400 Speaker 3: right now. I think Kate Oughton was another one that 818 00:35:46,440 --> 00:35:48,520 Speaker 3: I was drafting a lot, partially just as like a 819 00:35:48,600 --> 00:35:51,120 Speaker 3: you know late stack you know Baker. I think it 820 00:35:51,160 --> 00:35:53,480 Speaker 3: is kind of an interesting click sometimes because he slips 821 00:35:53,560 --> 00:35:56,080 Speaker 3: and you know you can stack him with like McMillan 822 00:35:56,120 --> 00:35:57,279 Speaker 3: and Kate Otton late. 823 00:35:58,000 --> 00:36:01,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's also Gunner Home or kad outen Aj 824 00:36:02,760 --> 00:36:04,080 Speaker 2: or kade Oton, you know the I. 825 00:36:04,080 --> 00:36:07,360 Speaker 3: Will say I've gotten some Gunner Helm too. I don't 826 00:36:07,400 --> 00:36:10,200 Speaker 3: know if he is. I don't think he's as high 827 00:36:10,200 --> 00:36:12,600 Speaker 3: as as Otten, but I part of that is again 828 00:36:12,719 --> 00:36:15,440 Speaker 3: cam Word just throwing the dart and getting him when 829 00:36:15,440 --> 00:36:17,439 Speaker 3: he slips and stacking him in some way. 830 00:36:17,480 --> 00:36:20,480 Speaker 1: If I don't get Carnel Taate or Wandell Robinson. Let's 831 00:36:20,520 --> 00:36:20,960 Speaker 1: move on to. 832 00:36:20,960 --> 00:36:23,320 Speaker 3: Our glorious guest for today, a friend of mine that 833 00:36:23,400 --> 00:36:25,520 Speaker 3: I have gotten to know since starting becoming a best 834 00:36:25,520 --> 00:36:28,640 Speaker 3: ball bro. Really he's a great YouTube channel the flannel verse. 835 00:36:28,640 --> 00:36:32,000 Speaker 3: It's Neil Orfield. He's successful in dfs, He's won the 836 00:36:32,040 --> 00:36:35,120 Speaker 3: Millie and DFS. He's had many six figure wins in 837 00:36:35,200 --> 00:36:37,960 Speaker 3: Daily Fantasy. He's also a successful best ball player. He 838 00:36:38,000 --> 00:36:41,440 Speaker 3: actually last year in the Millie he finished two spots 839 00:36:41,440 --> 00:36:44,400 Speaker 3: ahead of me. There's so my When I was screenshotting 840 00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:48,440 Speaker 3: my my finish of being fortieth, every time I look 841 00:36:48,440 --> 00:36:50,399 Speaker 3: at that, I got to see Neil's freaking user name 842 00:36:50,440 --> 00:36:53,719 Speaker 3: two spots ahead. So he got the same payout though 843 00:36:53,920 --> 00:36:56,560 Speaker 3: same payout, it's all the same. You know, he'd beat 844 00:36:56,560 --> 00:36:58,840 Speaker 3: me by like I think, like less than half a point. 845 00:36:59,120 --> 00:37:02,120 Speaker 3: But we chatted about this year's landscape, like I've done 846 00:37:02,120 --> 00:37:04,200 Speaker 3: with the other guests so far, because I think it's 847 00:37:04,239 --> 00:37:06,640 Speaker 3: just an interesting topic running backs at the one two 848 00:37:06,760 --> 00:37:09,359 Speaker 3: turn where we're seeing a lot of those guys go. 849 00:37:09,440 --> 00:37:11,359 Speaker 3: So I wanted to get his take on that, how 850 00:37:11,400 --> 00:37:14,280 Speaker 3: he's handling quarterback and so much more. So, without further ado, 851 00:37:14,640 --> 00:37:34,560 Speaker 3: here is that interview with Neil Warfield. So, Neil, a 852 00:37:34,640 --> 00:37:37,279 Speaker 3: question I've been asking other guests, and I want to 853 00:37:37,320 --> 00:37:40,160 Speaker 3: hear your take. I'll probably eventually stop asking this to guests, 854 00:37:40,160 --> 00:37:42,399 Speaker 3: but I think at this point, since it's still June, 855 00:37:42,440 --> 00:37:45,840 Speaker 3: I'll continue asking it. But you look at the landscape 856 00:37:45,840 --> 00:37:48,359 Speaker 3: this year on DraftKings, and you look at it last year. Now, 857 00:37:48,400 --> 00:37:50,880 Speaker 3: last year you obviously had a lot of success. You know, 858 00:37:51,120 --> 00:37:53,120 Speaker 3: I won't mention that you beat me by two spots 859 00:37:53,320 --> 00:37:54,960 Speaker 3: in the. 860 00:37:54,719 --> 00:37:56,000 Speaker 1: Final last year. 861 00:37:56,080 --> 00:37:58,920 Speaker 3: I was telling Rich that every time I look at 862 00:37:58,920 --> 00:38:01,560 Speaker 3: that screenshot or something or it like pops up, I 863 00:38:01,640 --> 00:38:05,520 Speaker 3: always see your freaking user name right above it. So 864 00:38:05,560 --> 00:38:08,640 Speaker 3: you get to hold that over me forever. But when 865 00:38:08,680 --> 00:38:11,319 Speaker 3: you look at the landscape on DraftKings year over year, 866 00:38:11,719 --> 00:38:13,520 Speaker 3: what do you think one of the biggest differences is 867 00:38:13,800 --> 00:38:15,600 Speaker 3: for this year compared to last year. 868 00:38:15,840 --> 00:38:17,200 Speaker 4: Yeah, First of all, I want you to know I 869 00:38:17,239 --> 00:38:18,520 Speaker 4: was not going to bring up the fact that I 870 00:38:18,560 --> 00:38:21,080 Speaker 4: finished in thirty eighth place in the DraftKings Midlily Maker 871 00:38:21,200 --> 00:38:24,720 Speaker 4: last year, besting you on whatever the final reception. 872 00:38:24,400 --> 00:38:27,000 Speaker 1: For Puka or Bijon one by point two. 873 00:38:27,320 --> 00:38:29,560 Speaker 4: No, I don't, yeah something like that, like it it 874 00:38:29,600 --> 00:38:31,160 Speaker 4: was nothing, and you were beating me until like it 875 00:38:31,200 --> 00:38:33,600 Speaker 4: was just like PPR scamming my way there with both 876 00:38:33,600 --> 00:38:35,360 Speaker 4: Puka and Bijon on the team. 877 00:38:35,680 --> 00:38:37,520 Speaker 5: So yeah, I got there at the last second to 878 00:38:37,840 --> 00:38:38,319 Speaker 5: beat you up. 879 00:38:38,320 --> 00:38:40,239 Speaker 4: But we made the same amount of money, that's really all. 880 00:38:40,239 --> 00:38:43,200 Speaker 4: It's all pretty the same fortieth and thirty eighth. Oh yeah, 881 00:38:43,200 --> 00:38:46,040 Speaker 4: So the landscape, I feel like There's a few different 882 00:38:46,040 --> 00:38:48,640 Speaker 4: ways you could answer this question how has the landscape changed? 883 00:38:48,680 --> 00:38:51,239 Speaker 4: One of them being running backs are kind of an 884 00:38:51,239 --> 00:38:53,440 Speaker 4: obvious one. But I feel like quarterbacks, to me, is 885 00:38:53,480 --> 00:38:57,600 Speaker 4: almost the biggest change in the landscape on DraftKings this year. 886 00:38:57,640 --> 00:39:01,200 Speaker 4: And it was already pretty like a quarterback thirsty landscape 887 00:39:01,200 --> 00:39:03,040 Speaker 4: on draftings last year. I feel like that was a 888 00:39:03,040 --> 00:39:04,440 Speaker 4: big thing that we talked about quite a bit. A 889 00:39:04,480 --> 00:39:07,120 Speaker 4: lot of people wanted to get their three quarterbacks. They 890 00:39:07,160 --> 00:39:10,200 Speaker 4: would pull up kind of the pocket passing quarterbacks to 891 00:39:10,280 --> 00:39:12,200 Speaker 4: an odd range last year. But I think it's gotten 892 00:39:12,200 --> 00:39:14,439 Speaker 4: even worse this year. I mean, we have the range 893 00:39:14,440 --> 00:39:16,600 Speaker 4: of quarterbacks. I mean, you have Josh Allen kind of 894 00:39:16,800 --> 00:39:19,600 Speaker 4: his own tier going in the third round, but then 895 00:39:19,800 --> 00:39:22,799 Speaker 4: after Josh Allen, you've got between rounds five and ten, 896 00:39:22,920 --> 00:39:26,600 Speaker 4: eighteen quarterbacks come off the board. There's just sixty picks, 897 00:39:26,640 --> 00:39:30,640 Speaker 4: just just over sixty picks separating Lamar Jackson and Tyler Shuck, 898 00:39:30,680 --> 00:39:32,799 Speaker 4: Whereas in past years, I think that would have been 899 00:39:32,840 --> 00:39:34,640 Speaker 4: like one hundred and ten one hundred and twenty pick 900 00:39:34,680 --> 00:39:37,640 Speaker 4: difference between those two. And then even after that rang 901 00:39:37,760 --> 00:39:41,479 Speaker 4: so I said, eighteen between rounds five and ten, six 902 00:39:41,560 --> 00:39:44,440 Speaker 4: more quarterbacks come off the board in rounds eleven and twelve, 903 00:39:44,560 --> 00:39:46,200 Speaker 4: and then this year we're dealing with some kind of 904 00:39:46,840 --> 00:39:49,359 Speaker 4: uncertain quarterback room. So I think it kind of makes 905 00:39:49,400 --> 00:39:52,520 Speaker 4: sense because we have so many situations like the Browns 906 00:39:52,520 --> 00:39:55,280 Speaker 4: and the Falcons and all these like kind of uncertain 907 00:39:55,320 --> 00:39:57,200 Speaker 4: quarterback rooms going into the year. But then we also 908 00:39:57,239 --> 00:39:59,959 Speaker 4: have like quarterbacks that we think could lose the job 909 00:40:00,040 --> 00:40:02,520 Speaker 4: Jakobe Brissette by the end of the year, Geno Smith, 910 00:40:03,040 --> 00:40:06,319 Speaker 4: so like it is kind of important to get those quarterbacks. 911 00:40:06,360 --> 00:40:07,400 Speaker 5: But to me, that's that's. 912 00:40:07,320 --> 00:40:10,640 Speaker 4: Kind of the bigger shift is just all the quarterbacks 913 00:40:10,680 --> 00:40:14,839 Speaker 4: have moved up so much this year relative to even 914 00:40:14,880 --> 00:40:17,040 Speaker 4: last year when quarterbacks, you know, people are already pretty 915 00:40:17,040 --> 00:40:21,680 Speaker 4: thirsty for their quarterbacks this year. Just like the separation 916 00:40:21,840 --> 00:40:24,760 Speaker 4: between the like kind I mean, I would still consider 917 00:40:24,880 --> 00:40:28,200 Speaker 4: Lamar Jackson, Jade and Daniels like these are top tier quarterbacks. 918 00:40:28,239 --> 00:40:29,799 Speaker 4: I kind of consider them to be the same tier 919 00:40:29,840 --> 00:40:32,640 Speaker 4: as Josh Allen. They're going like there's like no separation 920 00:40:32,719 --> 00:40:35,160 Speaker 4: between the top tier and the second tier, and it's 921 00:40:35,200 --> 00:40:39,080 Speaker 4: just like really just a quick, you know, growth from 922 00:40:39,160 --> 00:40:42,000 Speaker 4: the from the top tier to like the fifth tier 923 00:40:42,040 --> 00:40:45,239 Speaker 4: of quarterback teams, like there's just five six round separating them. 924 00:40:45,719 --> 00:40:48,200 Speaker 4: So to me, that's that's actually the biggest change this 925 00:40:48,320 --> 00:40:50,880 Speaker 4: year is you really need to get your quarterback pretty 926 00:40:50,920 --> 00:40:52,560 Speaker 4: early or you're gonna fall behind it. You're going to 927 00:40:52,640 --> 00:40:55,239 Speaker 4: be fighting for some quarterbacks who might not even be 928 00:40:55,719 --> 00:40:58,319 Speaker 4: the starter to start the year or you know, have 929 00:40:58,719 --> 00:41:00,480 Speaker 4: some risk of losing their job by the end of 930 00:41:00,480 --> 00:41:02,960 Speaker 4: the year. So the quarterback landscape to me is even 931 00:41:03,040 --> 00:41:04,319 Speaker 4: thirst year than it was last year. 932 00:41:04,600 --> 00:41:06,880 Speaker 3: So how are you handling that? Like, are you kind 933 00:41:06,920 --> 00:41:07,680 Speaker 3: of alluded to it? 934 00:41:07,719 --> 00:41:08,000 Speaker 1: Are you? 935 00:41:08,600 --> 00:41:10,319 Speaker 3: I don't want to call it early round because it's 936 00:41:10,360 --> 00:41:12,600 Speaker 3: not really early around. It's not like Lamar and Jade 937 00:41:12,680 --> 00:41:14,799 Speaker 3: Daniels are going in round three or round four or 938 00:41:14,800 --> 00:41:17,160 Speaker 3: opportunity costs is a little bit higher. Are you leaning 939 00:41:17,160 --> 00:41:21,160 Speaker 3: into drafting those players because again you mentioned like Tyler 940 00:41:21,200 --> 00:41:23,719 Speaker 3: Shuck and where he's going, and nothing against Shuck. I 941 00:41:23,800 --> 00:41:26,000 Speaker 3: like Shuck this year, but like, you know, Shuck, where 942 00:41:26,000 --> 00:41:29,440 Speaker 3: he's going, that gap being closer to where Lamar is 943 00:41:29,480 --> 00:41:31,680 Speaker 3: and stuff. That is that making those elite guys a 944 00:41:31,719 --> 00:41:32,839 Speaker 3: little bit more enticing for you? 945 00:41:33,280 --> 00:41:33,440 Speaker 5: Yeah? 946 00:41:33,520 --> 00:41:37,000 Speaker 4: For sure, Like I love taking the Lamar Jackson, Jade 947 00:41:37,000 --> 00:41:40,000 Speaker 4: and Daniels, Drake May, Jalen Hurts like where they're going. 948 00:41:40,280 --> 00:41:43,000 Speaker 4: It's also kind of a great range to take quarterback 949 00:41:43,200 --> 00:41:46,360 Speaker 4: because you're dealing with some if your profiles at other positions. 950 00:41:46,360 --> 00:41:48,880 Speaker 4: It's like, okay, I can take Drake May, who I 951 00:41:48,920 --> 00:41:51,440 Speaker 4: wouldn't be surprised if he's the quarterback one overall this year. 952 00:41:51,480 --> 00:41:54,560 Speaker 4: Should not surprise anybody if Drake May or Jalen Hurts 953 00:41:54,719 --> 00:41:56,320 Speaker 4: or Jane Daniels if they end up as like the 954 00:41:56,400 --> 00:42:01,240 Speaker 4: quarterback one overall. Or you're taking Tony Pollard, taking remondros Stevenson, 955 00:42:01,239 --> 00:42:02,960 Speaker 4: who's the you know, the running going going as the 956 00:42:03,040 --> 00:42:04,719 Speaker 4: running back to on his own team, or you know 957 00:42:04,800 --> 00:42:08,680 Speaker 4: Jalen Warren, so you're dealing with some more questionable profiles 958 00:42:08,719 --> 00:42:12,080 Speaker 4: at running back or wide receiver. Or you can just 959 00:42:12,080 --> 00:42:15,560 Speaker 4: take an elite quarterback. So to me, I love taking 960 00:42:15,840 --> 00:42:18,160 Speaker 4: that range of quarterback, and then you can get back 961 00:42:18,200 --> 00:42:20,879 Speaker 4: to taking your your running backs receivers in a later round. 962 00:42:20,920 --> 00:42:23,080 Speaker 4: Whord to me, it's a pretty flat tier, you know, 963 00:42:23,320 --> 00:42:25,880 Speaker 4: taking the like I said, romondro Stevens and Tony Pollard, 964 00:42:25,880 --> 00:42:29,160 Speaker 4: whereas later on instead of taking a quarterback, you know, 965 00:42:29,280 --> 00:42:32,120 Speaker 4: in the nineth tenth round. You can take a Jonathan Brooks, 966 00:42:32,120 --> 00:42:34,279 Speaker 4: common Ung guy Blake Koran, and it's not that big 967 00:42:34,320 --> 00:42:37,000 Speaker 4: of a separation in those tiers. So I love taking 968 00:42:37,120 --> 00:42:40,160 Speaker 4: the you know, kind of the top of that range 969 00:42:40,160 --> 00:42:42,720 Speaker 4: of quarterbacks starting around like five or six, as opposed 970 00:42:42,760 --> 00:42:46,160 Speaker 4: to waiting on quarterback. I'd rather get my my quarterbacks early, 971 00:42:46,160 --> 00:42:49,160 Speaker 4: where you're just getting way more fantasy points from I mean, 972 00:42:49,200 --> 00:42:51,560 Speaker 4: Tyler Shuck to to Lamar Jackson is I think a 973 00:42:51,560 --> 00:42:54,920 Speaker 4: pretty good, pretty good example of that separation. You're just 974 00:42:54,960 --> 00:42:57,680 Speaker 4: going to get so many more fantasy points from Lamar 975 00:42:57,800 --> 00:43:01,359 Speaker 4: Jackson than Tyler Shuck or Jade and Daniels from Tyler Shuck, 976 00:43:01,640 --> 00:43:04,879 Speaker 4: et cetera. Then you know, the running backs you could 977 00:43:04,920 --> 00:43:07,160 Speaker 4: get in that range versus the running backs that you 978 00:43:07,200 --> 00:43:08,120 Speaker 4: can take later on. 979 00:43:09,040 --> 00:43:11,720 Speaker 3: So a question that I've gotten in that I feel 980 00:43:11,760 --> 00:43:14,799 Speaker 3: sometimes as I'm as I'm you know, doing a lot 981 00:43:14,800 --> 00:43:18,800 Speaker 3: of drafts and obviously wanting to not get too crazy 982 00:43:18,840 --> 00:43:22,960 Speaker 3: with exposure. Is sort of so from your perspective, and 983 00:43:23,040 --> 00:43:27,000 Speaker 3: I agree, it's optimal to be sort of at the 984 00:43:27,040 --> 00:43:29,719 Speaker 3: top of the quarter of any run. But then let's 985 00:43:29,760 --> 00:43:31,719 Speaker 3: just call it a quarterback run, right, because there is 986 00:43:31,760 --> 00:43:34,680 Speaker 3: a run that happens from that like six to seven 987 00:43:34,800 --> 00:43:38,640 Speaker 3: range through round like ten. Right, there's there's this massive 988 00:43:38,680 --> 00:43:40,719 Speaker 3: quarterback run where if you're getting the guy at the 989 00:43:40,800 --> 00:43:43,720 Speaker 3: end of that run, especially if it's not an upside 990 00:43:43,719 --> 00:43:45,720 Speaker 3: guy that you like, and you're just drafting a quarterback 991 00:43:45,760 --> 00:43:47,040 Speaker 3: to draft a quarterback, you're. 992 00:43:46,880 --> 00:43:48,719 Speaker 1: Obviously devaluing that pick. Right. 993 00:43:48,800 --> 00:43:50,640 Speaker 3: So it's it's it's smarter to be at the top 994 00:43:50,680 --> 00:43:52,680 Speaker 3: of that run than the back of that run. 995 00:43:52,760 --> 00:43:52,960 Speaker 5: Right. 996 00:43:53,440 --> 00:43:55,719 Speaker 3: But the thing that I always struggle with is then 997 00:43:56,239 --> 00:44:00,160 Speaker 3: getting proper exposure based on what I think I think 998 00:44:00,280 --> 00:44:03,440 Speaker 3: is the optimal strategy to take in some of these drafts. 999 00:44:03,480 --> 00:44:05,839 Speaker 3: Like for instance, like if you think going running back 1000 00:44:05,880 --> 00:44:07,600 Speaker 3: running back is like the way to go, especially if 1001 00:44:07,600 --> 00:44:09,120 Speaker 3: you're in the back half of the first round or 1002 00:44:09,120 --> 00:44:10,680 Speaker 3: something like that, which we'll get to in a second. 1003 00:44:11,000 --> 00:44:12,920 Speaker 3: If you think going running back running back like that 1004 00:44:13,000 --> 00:44:16,600 Speaker 3: is optimal, then sure you'll get some different iterations for 1005 00:44:16,719 --> 00:44:18,879 Speaker 3: the running backs that you're taking, but maybe you never 1006 00:44:18,920 --> 00:44:21,640 Speaker 3: get CD Lamb, even though you probably want some exposure 1007 00:44:21,680 --> 00:44:23,960 Speaker 3: to ced Lamb. Is that something that you're constantly thinking 1008 00:44:24,000 --> 00:44:26,800 Speaker 3: about in general? Is it something that you're thinking about 1009 00:44:27,200 --> 00:44:29,200 Speaker 3: right now in June, or is it something that you 1010 00:44:29,239 --> 00:44:31,239 Speaker 3: worry about a little bit later in the season if 1011 00:44:31,239 --> 00:44:33,799 Speaker 3: you're doing something like the MILLI where you know that 1012 00:44:33,840 --> 00:44:36,480 Speaker 3: you can kind of even out exposure as the summer 1013 00:44:36,560 --> 00:44:36,880 Speaker 3: goes on. 1014 00:44:37,600 --> 00:44:40,400 Speaker 4: Yeah, and it's definitely something that I'm thinking about constantly, 1015 00:44:40,520 --> 00:44:43,439 Speaker 4: but it's not something that I'm acting on as much 1016 00:44:43,520 --> 00:44:46,000 Speaker 4: right now as it will be later on. Like you said, like, 1017 00:44:46,239 --> 00:44:48,920 Speaker 4: because you and I we're gonna be drafting all summer, 1018 00:44:49,239 --> 00:44:51,960 Speaker 4: we have time to even at our exposures if we 1019 00:44:52,000 --> 00:44:55,120 Speaker 4: want to. But generally, I think it's just draft to draft, 1020 00:44:55,200 --> 00:44:57,640 Speaker 4: just making the best pick for that draft. I think 1021 00:44:57,640 --> 00:45:01,000 Speaker 4: it's generally the correct approach because ADP is going to 1022 00:45:01,040 --> 00:45:04,000 Speaker 4: shift throughout the year, and you're going to have different 1023 00:45:04,040 --> 00:45:06,840 Speaker 4: opportunities throughout the year because you know, ADP shifts like 1024 00:45:06,880 --> 00:45:09,240 Speaker 4: we saw with you know, we've seen a J. Brown 1025 00:45:09,280 --> 00:45:11,879 Speaker 4: shift from a third round pick to a second round pick, 1026 00:45:11,920 --> 00:45:13,759 Speaker 4: and so you know it's better to get him in 1027 00:45:13,800 --> 00:45:16,360 Speaker 4: the third round, and you see that throughout the summer, 1028 00:45:16,800 --> 00:45:19,200 Speaker 4: all these different players are going to shift in their 1029 00:45:19,239 --> 00:45:22,840 Speaker 4: ADP now for you know, the opposite example would be 1030 00:45:22,880 --> 00:45:25,160 Speaker 4: like I'm not really taking Melik Neighbors right now, but 1031 00:45:25,200 --> 00:45:27,160 Speaker 4: I'm not worried about it because I think Melik Neighbors 1032 00:45:27,239 --> 00:45:31,040 Speaker 4: is going to move backwards later in the summer. We're 1033 00:45:31,040 --> 00:45:32,640 Speaker 4: going to be able to get him later. So I think, 1034 00:45:32,640 --> 00:45:34,919 Speaker 4: you know, generally, it's something that's always on my mind, 1035 00:45:34,960 --> 00:45:36,719 Speaker 4: what are my exposures looking at and my comfortable with 1036 00:45:36,760 --> 00:45:39,560 Speaker 4: these exposures. But I also know that ADP is going 1037 00:45:39,600 --> 00:45:42,600 Speaker 4: to shift over time. And also just like draft to draft, 1038 00:45:42,800 --> 00:45:45,040 Speaker 4: you can see even right now, if I do ten 1039 00:45:45,120 --> 00:45:48,719 Speaker 4: drafts today, I can keep my rankings the exact same, 1040 00:45:48,719 --> 00:45:51,080 Speaker 4: but I'm gonna have different opportunities draft to draft, so 1041 00:45:52,080 --> 00:45:55,880 Speaker 4: you know, I might always be taking those those running 1042 00:45:55,880 --> 00:45:59,160 Speaker 4: backs in the later rounds. But there's gonna come a 1043 00:45:59,280 --> 00:46:01,440 Speaker 4: draft where, like it you say Ceedee Lamb, if you 1044 00:46:01,480 --> 00:46:03,239 Speaker 4: want to get Ceede Lamb, there's gonna come and draft 1045 00:46:03,280 --> 00:46:05,000 Speaker 4: where Seedy Lamb is just gonna fall to you at 1046 00:46:05,040 --> 00:46:07,080 Speaker 4: the eleven pick or something. So you can keep him 1047 00:46:07,280 --> 00:46:10,040 Speaker 4: ranked behind Justin Jefferson, Alman ros Saint Brown and Christian 1048 00:46:10,080 --> 00:46:12,319 Speaker 4: McCaffrey or whoever it is that you're taking over him, 1049 00:46:12,440 --> 00:46:16,200 Speaker 4: and you're gonna have opportunities to draft him without reaching 1050 00:46:16,239 --> 00:46:18,200 Speaker 4: to take him ahead of players that you like better. 1051 00:46:18,280 --> 00:46:20,480 Speaker 4: So I don't worry about it that much right now. 1052 00:46:20,840 --> 00:46:22,719 Speaker 4: But yeah, once we get to August, if I'm like, 1053 00:46:23,000 --> 00:46:25,720 Speaker 4: you know, I don't really see a big separation between 1054 00:46:25,920 --> 00:46:29,000 Speaker 4: Ceedee Lamb and Alman Ross Saint Brown, then I might 1055 00:46:29,040 --> 00:46:31,200 Speaker 4: start just I'll reach a little bit and take Ceedee 1056 00:46:31,239 --> 00:46:32,560 Speaker 4: Lamb over Alman Ross Saint Brown. 1057 00:46:32,960 --> 00:46:34,200 Speaker 5: But yeah, for now, I'm not. 1058 00:46:34,680 --> 00:46:37,040 Speaker 4: I'm not really you know, going out of my way 1059 00:46:37,080 --> 00:46:38,919 Speaker 4: to even out my exposures that much. 1060 00:46:38,960 --> 00:46:39,160 Speaker 5: Now. 1061 00:46:39,280 --> 00:46:41,840 Speaker 4: Yeah, I say this, I think that that is the 1062 00:46:41,880 --> 00:46:43,799 Speaker 4: correct approaches to not do it that much. I do 1063 00:46:43,840 --> 00:46:45,920 Speaker 4: it some like I can't help it because there are 1064 00:46:45,960 --> 00:46:47,799 Speaker 4: players that I'm like, you know, I really don't feel 1065 00:46:47,840 --> 00:46:50,560 Speaker 4: that differently about. Like I had this conversation with Karan 1066 00:46:50,640 --> 00:46:53,120 Speaker 4: last week, Ted Roe McMillan and Luthor Burden, Like, yeah, 1067 00:46:53,480 --> 00:46:56,440 Speaker 4: if I use his product, I'm always gonna get Tedero 1068 00:46:56,560 --> 00:46:58,680 Speaker 4: McMillan ahead of Luthor Burden. I'm to me, like, to me, 1069 00:46:58,760 --> 00:47:01,560 Speaker 4: it's not that clear that of like t Mac that 1070 00:47:01,680 --> 00:47:04,040 Speaker 4: much better than Luther Burden, because I think there's pros 1071 00:47:04,080 --> 00:47:06,400 Speaker 4: and cons to both. So I might sometimes reach and 1072 00:47:06,719 --> 00:47:09,360 Speaker 4: take you know, a Burden over tetromopile and you know, 1073 00:47:09,480 --> 00:47:11,759 Speaker 4: profiles like that where it's like, it's not that clear 1074 00:47:11,800 --> 00:47:13,760 Speaker 4: to me that this is a different tier of player. 1075 00:47:14,040 --> 00:47:16,080 Speaker 4: So I do I do sometimes reach a little bit, 1076 00:47:16,080 --> 00:47:18,480 Speaker 4: but I think that the correct approach is is the 1077 00:47:18,560 --> 00:47:20,879 Speaker 4: you know, let it, you know, work itself out over time. 1078 00:47:21,280 --> 00:47:22,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, makes a lot of sense to me. 1079 00:47:23,000 --> 00:47:26,799 Speaker 3: So also this year, we're definitely seeing more people. I 1080 00:47:26,840 --> 00:47:29,440 Speaker 3: will say, I think that part of like the running 1081 00:47:29,440 --> 00:47:31,160 Speaker 3: back heavy discussion, which is why I love that you 1082 00:47:31,200 --> 00:47:34,160 Speaker 3: answered that first question with quarterback and not running back, 1083 00:47:34,160 --> 00:47:34,760 Speaker 3: because I think. 1084 00:47:34,600 --> 00:47:36,960 Speaker 1: It's sort of like the default to talk about the 1085 00:47:37,040 --> 00:47:37,480 Speaker 1: running back. 1086 00:47:37,480 --> 00:47:40,080 Speaker 3: Not to say that it's right or wrong, but I 1087 00:47:40,120 --> 00:47:42,040 Speaker 3: do think that it might be a little bit overblown, 1088 00:47:42,200 --> 00:47:44,360 Speaker 3: like the idea that people are like going so crazy 1089 00:47:44,400 --> 00:47:46,360 Speaker 3: for running backs right now and such and like that, 1090 00:47:46,600 --> 00:47:49,080 Speaker 3: like it's so totally different than what we saw last year. 1091 00:47:49,080 --> 00:47:51,360 Speaker 3: I would argue that last year we still saw a 1092 00:47:51,400 --> 00:47:54,320 Speaker 3: decent amount of running backs going early in these drafts, 1093 00:47:54,600 --> 00:47:57,280 Speaker 3: especially because the year before that running back was actually 1094 00:47:57,280 --> 00:48:00,319 Speaker 3: pretty strong, and so we are seeing some like I 1095 00:48:00,320 --> 00:48:02,040 Speaker 3: think that part of it is the narrative of like 1096 00:48:02,440 --> 00:48:06,359 Speaker 3: some zero rb bros who are now touting you know, 1097 00:48:06,440 --> 00:48:10,560 Speaker 3: going earlier around running back is making the entire industry 1098 00:48:10,600 --> 00:48:13,240 Speaker 3: be like, oh, man, like everyone's going earlier around running 1099 00:48:13,280 --> 00:48:14,920 Speaker 3: back now, which is probably true to a degree, but 1100 00:48:14,920 --> 00:48:16,680 Speaker 3: there's still some good wide receiver picks in there, but 1101 00:48:16,920 --> 00:48:19,120 Speaker 3: the meta has certainly shifted. Let's just say that, let's 1102 00:48:19,160 --> 00:48:22,040 Speaker 3: say that people are more okay and drafting multiple running 1103 00:48:22,040 --> 00:48:23,440 Speaker 3: backs with their first couple of picks. 1104 00:48:23,840 --> 00:48:26,239 Speaker 1: So my question though, and this is one that. 1105 00:48:26,200 --> 00:48:29,160 Speaker 3: I asked Liam last week as well, is this a 1106 00:48:29,239 --> 00:48:32,239 Speaker 3: year then to zig when everyone's zagging and go zero 1107 00:48:32,440 --> 00:48:36,440 Speaker 3: RB as people are more comfortable with a robust RB approach. 1108 00:48:37,120 --> 00:48:39,640 Speaker 4: I think that the correct approach is always to just 1109 00:48:39,760 --> 00:48:43,480 Speaker 4: take what the draft room gives you. So no, I 1110 00:48:43,520 --> 00:48:45,719 Speaker 4: don't think that it's necessarily the right year, Like I 1111 00:48:45,719 --> 00:48:48,680 Speaker 4: don't think that you should be forcing zero RB this 1112 00:48:48,800 --> 00:48:51,759 Speaker 4: year because we don't have the same type of late 1113 00:48:51,840 --> 00:48:53,879 Speaker 4: round running backs that we used to have. So part 1114 00:48:53,880 --> 00:48:56,040 Speaker 4: of the reason that you know, I was really in 1115 00:48:56,160 --> 00:48:58,080 Speaker 4: on zero RB, I mean even last year when it 1116 00:48:58,080 --> 00:49:00,839 Speaker 4: didn't really work out for me, was because I thought, 1117 00:49:00,920 --> 00:49:02,799 Speaker 4: at least last year that there were tons of late 1118 00:49:02,880 --> 00:49:06,200 Speaker 4: round running backs that had really strong profiles. It was, 1119 00:49:06,680 --> 00:49:10,120 Speaker 4: you know, a really strong rookie running back draft class 1120 00:49:10,120 --> 00:49:12,479 Speaker 4: where you could get these rookie running backs late who 1121 00:49:12,600 --> 00:49:15,479 Speaker 4: should have a ton of upside, have some continued value. 1122 00:49:15,520 --> 00:49:17,400 Speaker 4: Now for me, I took all the wrong ones. I 1123 00:49:17,400 --> 00:49:19,640 Speaker 4: was taking Richard Smith, Darks Hunter, et cetera, et cetera. 1124 00:49:19,840 --> 00:49:22,080 Speaker 4: But I know you started talking about kaman Ungay late 1125 00:49:22,160 --> 00:49:24,239 Speaker 4: later on in the season after not really loving him 1126 00:49:24,280 --> 00:49:27,480 Speaker 4: early on. Woody Marks like, there were these running backs 1127 00:49:27,480 --> 00:49:30,160 Speaker 4: that you could get later on, so it made more 1128 00:49:30,200 --> 00:49:33,640 Speaker 4: sense to do more zero RB when they're were stronger 1129 00:49:33,719 --> 00:49:36,080 Speaker 4: running backs later. Now you have a lot of the 1130 00:49:36,160 --> 00:49:39,200 Speaker 4: running backs that were that are like young running backs 1131 00:49:39,200 --> 00:49:41,399 Speaker 4: that we see have a lot of upside, you can't 1132 00:49:41,400 --> 00:49:43,280 Speaker 4: really get them in the later rounds anymore. 1133 00:49:43,320 --> 00:49:46,040 Speaker 5: Like even last year you could get like a Tyler Lgier. 1134 00:49:46,080 --> 00:49:48,560 Speaker 4: So I love the running backs, particularly in Best Ball 1135 00:49:48,600 --> 00:49:51,560 Speaker 4: that have some standalone value, like they don't need anything 1136 00:49:51,560 --> 00:49:53,439 Speaker 4: to happen, and they're going to have some double digit 1137 00:49:53,520 --> 00:49:56,640 Speaker 4: scoring weeks, but then also have like awesome contingent upside. 1138 00:49:56,640 --> 00:49:58,600 Speaker 4: So last year was like Tyler Lgiear, if something happened 1139 00:49:58,640 --> 00:50:01,600 Speaker 4: to be Jean Robinson is going to be awesome. You 1140 00:50:01,719 --> 00:50:04,400 Speaker 4: just don't really have a ton of those guys later on. 1141 00:50:05,280 --> 00:50:07,320 Speaker 4: So if you and you need to score some running 1142 00:50:07,320 --> 00:50:10,600 Speaker 4: back points early on, so you really can't wait too long, 1143 00:50:10,680 --> 00:50:13,239 Speaker 4: I think to start drafting running backs now. I still 1144 00:50:13,280 --> 00:50:16,080 Speaker 4: do some zero RB ish builds where I won't take 1145 00:50:16,080 --> 00:50:19,000 Speaker 4: a running back until like the seventh round, but it's 1146 00:50:19,040 --> 00:50:22,439 Speaker 4: tougher because we don't have, you know, a ton of these, 1147 00:50:22,640 --> 00:50:24,200 Speaker 4: and you do have some like you. I mean, Brian 1148 00:50:24,280 --> 00:50:26,680 Speaker 4: Robinson might be an example this year, replacing Tyler Aldiere 1149 00:50:26,719 --> 00:50:29,080 Speaker 4: in Atlanta, who knows like you can. You can probably 1150 00:50:29,080 --> 00:50:31,080 Speaker 4: find some of those later on in drafts who are 1151 00:50:31,080 --> 00:50:33,120 Speaker 4: going to have who will have those you know, ten 1152 00:50:33,120 --> 00:50:36,200 Speaker 4: point weeks here and there throughout the season, even without 1153 00:50:36,239 --> 00:50:38,960 Speaker 4: an injury. But they're more difficult to find because people 1154 00:50:38,960 --> 00:50:42,760 Speaker 4: have gotten sharper about how to find the right running 1155 00:50:42,760 --> 00:50:45,520 Speaker 4: back profile. So like the running backs who have that 1156 00:50:45,640 --> 00:50:48,799 Speaker 4: you know, standalone value, Blake Quorum is now going in 1157 00:50:48,800 --> 00:50:50,520 Speaker 4: the top one hundred bick, Kya Munungai going to the 1158 00:50:50,560 --> 00:50:52,920 Speaker 4: top one hundred bicks. The type of running back that 1159 00:50:53,120 --> 00:50:54,600 Speaker 4: you used to maybe be able to get at like 1160 00:50:54,640 --> 00:50:58,360 Speaker 4: pick one forty one fifty, you can't get them there anymore. 1161 00:50:58,440 --> 00:51:01,640 Speaker 4: So it is to me more difficult to go zero 1162 00:51:01,760 --> 00:51:04,360 Speaker 4: RB this year than it has been in years past. 1163 00:51:04,800 --> 00:51:07,239 Speaker 4: But then you know, the tricky part there is it 1164 00:51:07,280 --> 00:51:09,120 Speaker 4: does feel like, you know, we have a lot of 1165 00:51:09,200 --> 00:51:11,800 Speaker 4: kind of aging running backs with a lot of miles 1166 00:51:11,840 --> 00:51:13,759 Speaker 4: on their legs at this point who are going in 1167 00:51:13,800 --> 00:51:16,160 Speaker 4: the early rounds. So it does feel like we're probably 1168 00:51:16,200 --> 00:51:19,080 Speaker 4: going to find some later a round running backs who 1169 00:51:19,600 --> 00:51:21,960 Speaker 4: don't have a ton of standalone value but probably do 1170 00:51:22,040 --> 00:51:26,719 Speaker 4: have massive continent value behind Saquon Barkley, Derrek Henry, Jonathan Taylor, whatever, 1171 00:51:26,800 --> 00:51:29,120 Speaker 4: and name any of these running backs who are veterans 1172 00:51:29,120 --> 00:51:31,680 Speaker 4: who have a ton of miles on them. But to me, 1173 00:51:31,719 --> 00:51:35,000 Speaker 4: it's like, you can you can still go after some 1174 00:51:35,040 --> 00:51:39,719 Speaker 4: of those backup running backs without going zero RB, because, like, 1175 00:51:39,760 --> 00:51:41,279 Speaker 4: I just think that the tough part is, you do 1176 00:51:41,360 --> 00:51:43,360 Speaker 4: need to get points early in the season to advance 1177 00:51:43,400 --> 00:51:44,960 Speaker 4: your team. You need to get some points from running 1178 00:51:44,960 --> 00:51:47,400 Speaker 4: back early on, and it's tougher to find those running 1179 00:51:47,400 --> 00:51:50,160 Speaker 4: backs who are going to score early points later in 1180 00:51:50,239 --> 00:51:52,719 Speaker 4: drafts this year. So I'm doing I am doing some 1181 00:51:52,960 --> 00:51:55,400 Speaker 4: zero RB, but I'm not taking it to the extreme 1182 00:51:55,440 --> 00:51:57,160 Speaker 4: that I've done in past years where it's like I'm 1183 00:51:57,160 --> 00:51:59,160 Speaker 4: not taking a running back till the tenth or eleventh round, 1184 00:51:59,200 --> 00:52:01,600 Speaker 4: like to me, zero RB now is like sixth or 1185 00:52:01,640 --> 00:52:03,920 Speaker 4: seventh rounds when I started taking running backs. 1186 00:52:04,200 --> 00:52:05,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, agreed. 1187 00:52:05,480 --> 00:52:08,040 Speaker 3: Are there any middle or late round backs that you've 1188 00:52:08,160 --> 00:52:09,759 Speaker 3: really gravitated towards overrun DK? 1189 00:52:10,480 --> 00:52:13,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean a lot of the ones that I mentioned, 1190 00:52:13,520 --> 00:52:18,000 Speaker 4: I've taken a fair amount of Blake Korum, Kamon Unguy. 1191 00:52:18,640 --> 00:52:21,160 Speaker 4: The one that I'm really in the middle rounds that 1192 00:52:21,200 --> 00:52:23,719 Speaker 4: I've gravitated toward is Jonathan Brooks. I just I can't 1193 00:52:23,800 --> 00:52:26,719 Speaker 4: can't get enough Jonathan Brooks. Just I think I've just 1194 00:52:26,880 --> 00:52:29,799 Speaker 4: memory wiped the past two years and just like you know, 1195 00:52:29,840 --> 00:52:31,759 Speaker 4: he was so exciting a couple of years ago coming 1196 00:52:31,800 --> 00:52:34,920 Speaker 4: in And I don't know, like I'm not a doctor. 1197 00:52:35,040 --> 00:52:36,640 Speaker 4: I don't know how to read the medical reports, and 1198 00:52:36,640 --> 00:52:38,680 Speaker 4: I think like depending on who you read, you're going 1199 00:52:38,760 --> 00:52:41,560 Speaker 4: to get a different vantage point on like Jonathan Brooks's 1200 00:52:41,560 --> 00:52:44,280 Speaker 4: outlook this year, Like did he have did he actually 1201 00:52:44,280 --> 00:52:46,640 Speaker 4: tear his ACL twice or was it a repair the 1202 00:52:46,680 --> 00:52:48,799 Speaker 4: second time? And he's good to go now. I don't 1203 00:52:48,800 --> 00:52:51,320 Speaker 4: know that stuff, but I know that there are some people, 1204 00:52:51,440 --> 00:52:54,960 Speaker 4: some you know, Twitter doctors who believe Jonathan Brooks should 1205 00:52:55,000 --> 00:52:57,360 Speaker 4: be good to go at this point, should be healthy 1206 00:52:57,400 --> 00:53:00,640 Speaker 4: and then we just get such bullish coach week on 1207 00:53:00,760 --> 00:53:03,360 Speaker 4: Jonathan Brooks that kind of leads me to believe that, like, 1208 00:53:03,680 --> 00:53:05,880 Speaker 4: you don't really need an injury ahead of him to 1209 00:53:06,200 --> 00:53:09,080 Speaker 4: Toobe Hubbard for Jonathan Brooks to take over as the 1210 00:53:09,120 --> 00:53:11,360 Speaker 4: top running back on a team that really wants to 1211 00:53:11,440 --> 00:53:14,640 Speaker 4: run the ball. So to me, Jonathan Brooks is is 1212 00:53:14,719 --> 00:53:16,799 Speaker 4: kind of that mid range running back that I've really 1213 00:53:16,800 --> 00:53:19,960 Speaker 4: gravitated toward. Now he is, He's getting a little bit 1214 00:53:20,000 --> 00:53:22,720 Speaker 4: more difficult as he gets closer to the Blake Korum 1215 00:53:22,800 --> 00:53:24,960 Speaker 4: and kamon Unga because to me, like that's kind of 1216 00:53:24,960 --> 00:53:27,600 Speaker 4: the tier that he belongs in now. I do think 1217 00:53:27,600 --> 00:53:31,279 Speaker 4: that he has a probably better odds than either of 1218 00:53:31,320 --> 00:53:34,719 Speaker 4: those two to take on like the one A role 1219 00:53:35,000 --> 00:53:38,160 Speaker 4: without an injury, but I think that they have probably 1220 00:53:38,560 --> 00:53:41,560 Speaker 4: a stronger hold on the or you know, we're surer 1221 00:53:41,760 --> 00:53:44,080 Speaker 4: of their floor, like as the one B for a 1222 00:53:44,120 --> 00:53:46,399 Speaker 4: guy like kaman Unguy Blake Orm. So to me, that's 1223 00:53:46,480 --> 00:53:49,279 Speaker 4: kind of the right range for Jonathan Brooks until we 1224 00:53:49,280 --> 00:53:52,560 Speaker 4: hear something more bullish, and he's moving kind of in 1225 00:53:52,600 --> 00:53:54,600 Speaker 4: that direction, but he has not quite gotten there yet. 1226 00:53:54,600 --> 00:53:57,400 Speaker 5: So I've been drafting just a ton of Jonathan Brooks. 1227 00:53:57,719 --> 00:53:59,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, I like that call a lot I have been too. 1228 00:54:00,160 --> 00:54:02,520 Speaker 3: And some of it is when you look at the 1229 00:54:02,560 --> 00:54:05,320 Speaker 3: way you mentioned the market's being been sharper, and I agree. 1230 00:54:05,520 --> 00:54:07,560 Speaker 3: And one of the ways that it's been sharper, and 1231 00:54:07,600 --> 00:54:09,239 Speaker 3: this has been brought up before on the show, but 1232 00:54:09,640 --> 00:54:11,600 Speaker 3: you know, you look at some of these like like 1233 00:54:11,680 --> 00:54:14,239 Speaker 3: New England for instance, where Trayvon Henderson goes in round 1234 00:54:14,320 --> 00:54:17,840 Speaker 3: five and then Remandre goes in round seven, and I 1235 00:54:17,840 --> 00:54:20,400 Speaker 3: feel like historically that would have been flipped where the 1236 00:54:20,480 --> 00:54:22,640 Speaker 3: younger guy would have been the easier click, like very 1237 00:54:22,719 --> 00:54:25,600 Speaker 3: much easier, or like Bashall Tuton before would. 1238 00:54:25,440 --> 00:54:27,120 Speaker 1: Have gone in like round eight or nine. 1239 00:54:27,200 --> 00:54:29,640 Speaker 3: You know, like now he's going in like the five 1240 00:54:29,760 --> 00:54:31,759 Speaker 3: you know, the five range like pretty comfortably now. 1241 00:54:31,800 --> 00:54:33,800 Speaker 1: He was more in the six range before. 1242 00:54:33,840 --> 00:54:37,319 Speaker 3: But like, I feel like the Carolina backfield is one 1243 00:54:37,320 --> 00:54:40,800 Speaker 3: of the few backfields where like maybe you could maybe 1244 00:54:40,840 --> 00:54:43,040 Speaker 3: make an argument about Tampa Bay if you're really pro 1245 00:54:43,160 --> 00:54:46,600 Speaker 3: Kenny Gainwell, but the Carolina backfield is one of the 1246 00:54:46,640 --> 00:54:50,680 Speaker 3: backfields where like the younger potentially ascending talent. Now obviously 1247 00:54:50,719 --> 00:54:53,520 Speaker 3: this is all because of the ACLS, but the younger 1248 00:54:53,560 --> 00:54:56,319 Speaker 3: potentially ascending talent is the one that's actually going a 1249 00:54:56,360 --> 00:54:58,360 Speaker 3: decent bit later than the other guy, And like that's 1250 00:54:58,760 --> 00:55:01,600 Speaker 3: kind of attractive because we're not getting those situations very 1251 00:55:01,600 --> 00:55:03,960 Speaker 3: frequently right now, you know, within the environment. 1252 00:55:04,080 --> 00:55:06,040 Speaker 1: So I love the Jonathan Brooks call out. I think 1253 00:55:06,040 --> 00:55:06,520 Speaker 1: that's a. 1254 00:55:06,400 --> 00:55:08,919 Speaker 3: He's to me, he's like the like, if I go 1255 00:55:09,200 --> 00:55:10,960 Speaker 3: early running back and get a couple of them in 1256 00:55:11,000 --> 00:55:13,600 Speaker 3: the first like two or three rounds, I'm fine with 1257 00:55:13,640 --> 00:55:15,680 Speaker 3: him as my RB three, you know, and and then 1258 00:55:15,719 --> 00:55:18,279 Speaker 3: and then just tagging on a few, you know, two 1259 00:55:18,400 --> 00:55:20,880 Speaker 3: or three of them later after Brooks, because I do 1260 00:55:20,920 --> 00:55:23,359 Speaker 3: think he has that upside of just being the one 1261 00:55:23,400 --> 00:55:25,000 Speaker 3: A in the backfield, like you said, and if that 1262 00:55:25,120 --> 00:55:27,640 Speaker 3: hits while you have the other two running backs you 1263 00:55:27,719 --> 00:55:29,799 Speaker 3: drafted early, that's a really good stable of running backs 1264 00:55:29,840 --> 00:55:31,000 Speaker 3: for your for your best ball team. 1265 00:55:31,280 --> 00:55:31,480 Speaker 5: Yeah. 1266 00:55:31,760 --> 00:55:35,040 Speaker 4: I feel the exact same way. He's really strong as 1267 00:55:35,040 --> 00:55:37,400 Speaker 4: a running back three who could break in and be 1268 00:55:37,640 --> 00:55:40,680 Speaker 4: like your your top top two running back pretty easily. 1269 00:55:40,800 --> 00:55:42,440 Speaker 4: The funny thing is we talk about this, but it's 1270 00:55:42,440 --> 00:55:44,080 Speaker 4: still like you know, and it's one of those rare 1271 00:55:44,120 --> 00:55:46,319 Speaker 4: situations where like you can get the more exciting younger 1272 00:55:46,400 --> 00:55:48,600 Speaker 4: running back later, but it's still like you you still 1273 00:55:48,640 --> 00:55:50,120 Speaker 4: have to take him in the you know, ninth round, 1274 00:55:50,160 --> 00:55:51,640 Speaker 4: like we're not getting like. 1275 00:55:51,760 --> 00:55:52,920 Speaker 5: The crazy good discounts. 1276 00:55:52,960 --> 00:55:54,680 Speaker 4: So it's like I love the pick, but it's not 1277 00:55:54,840 --> 00:55:57,400 Speaker 4: like such a clear obvious one where whereas there was 1278 00:55:57,440 --> 00:55:58,920 Speaker 4: a point where he was going you know, in the 1279 00:55:58,920 --> 00:56:01,279 Speaker 4: one forties. One fifties is something where where it was 1280 00:56:01,600 --> 00:56:03,879 Speaker 4: a more obvious click. Now it's like, all right, it's 1281 00:56:03,880 --> 00:56:05,759 Speaker 4: still like I still really love taking it. I still 1282 00:56:05,760 --> 00:56:07,520 Speaker 4: feel like that the profile here relative to the other 1283 00:56:07,600 --> 00:56:09,799 Speaker 4: running backs around, I love it, but it's it is 1284 00:56:09,960 --> 00:56:12,839 Speaker 4: like the draft drafters have gotten a lot sharper than 1285 00:56:12,880 --> 00:56:14,520 Speaker 4: than they were in past year. So I so I 1286 00:56:14,560 --> 00:56:16,480 Speaker 4: love doing it. I think he's a really strong, you know, 1287 00:56:16,560 --> 00:56:18,920 Speaker 4: like running back three. Like you said, I'll even sometimes 1288 00:56:19,000 --> 00:56:20,640 Speaker 4: use him as like my running back to it. It's 1289 00:56:20,680 --> 00:56:22,920 Speaker 4: pretty rare though at this point that I'm that I'm 1290 00:56:23,000 --> 00:56:25,799 Speaker 4: drafting and running back to that late or he can, 1291 00:56:26,080 --> 00:56:27,840 Speaker 4: like to me be the final running back on like 1292 00:56:27,840 --> 00:56:28,759 Speaker 4: a four running back bill. 1293 00:56:28,880 --> 00:56:30,000 Speaker 5: Yes on DraftKings. 1294 00:56:30,080 --> 00:56:32,520 Speaker 3: Yes, I'm hoping that in regular season long leagues and 1295 00:56:32,520 --> 00:56:34,719 Speaker 3: home leagues that it's not that that he's more of 1296 00:56:34,760 --> 00:56:37,560 Speaker 3: an afterthought, like I'm hoping that we end up seeing 1297 00:56:37,560 --> 00:56:41,680 Speaker 3: adp in like the season long environment, not be I 1298 00:56:41,680 --> 00:56:43,440 Speaker 3: guess as sharp, but like you know, we see a 1299 00:56:43,440 --> 00:56:45,480 Speaker 3: little bit of these changes and like makes it easier 1300 00:56:45,520 --> 00:56:47,520 Speaker 3: to get guys like Tootin and stuff like that than 1301 00:56:47,520 --> 00:56:49,320 Speaker 3: it is, like nothing against those guys, I think you 1302 00:56:49,360 --> 00:56:51,400 Speaker 3: can draft them. I'm just saying, like I want it 1303 00:56:51,440 --> 00:56:53,240 Speaker 3: to be like the most obvious click in the world, 1304 00:56:53,280 --> 00:56:55,200 Speaker 3: you know what I mean, instead of you actually having 1305 00:56:55,239 --> 00:56:56,200 Speaker 3: to think about it and be like. 1306 00:56:56,360 --> 00:56:58,200 Speaker 1: Do I want to take on this cost when I'm 1307 00:56:58,200 --> 00:56:58,920 Speaker 1: taking on this player. 1308 00:57:00,600 --> 00:57:02,720 Speaker 3: With the running backs, like we've been saying, like we're 1309 00:57:02,760 --> 00:57:05,200 Speaker 3: taking them early and oftentimes, especially if you're in the 1310 00:57:05,200 --> 00:57:07,840 Speaker 3: back half of the first round, you're double tapping running 1311 00:57:07,840 --> 00:57:10,479 Speaker 3: back a lot, right, just because of the group that's there. 1312 00:57:10,640 --> 00:57:13,480 Speaker 3: So I want to ask you, are there any favorites 1313 00:57:13,520 --> 00:57:16,120 Speaker 3: that you have at that one two turn area. 1314 00:57:16,160 --> 00:57:19,080 Speaker 1: I mean, you can you can extend it into middle. 1315 00:57:18,920 --> 00:57:21,080 Speaker 3: Round two and even late round two if you really 1316 00:57:21,160 --> 00:57:23,880 Speaker 3: like a Derreck Henry or something. But are there any 1317 00:57:23,960 --> 00:57:26,920 Speaker 3: running backs that you've seen seem to go after a 1318 00:57:26,920 --> 00:57:28,320 Speaker 3: lot more in that range or are you kind of 1319 00:57:28,320 --> 00:57:29,320 Speaker 3: just spreading things out more? 1320 00:57:29,320 --> 00:57:29,720 Speaker 1: Evenly? 1321 00:57:30,640 --> 00:57:32,920 Speaker 4: I love Ashton Genty in that range like he's I 1322 00:57:33,000 --> 00:57:34,440 Speaker 4: mean to think he kind of goes at the top 1323 00:57:34,480 --> 00:57:34,919 Speaker 4: of that range. 1324 00:57:34,920 --> 00:57:36,320 Speaker 5: Maybe he goes after James Cook. 1325 00:57:37,200 --> 00:57:39,880 Speaker 4: And I sometimes I question whether I'm foolish for for 1326 00:57:39,960 --> 00:57:42,160 Speaker 4: liking Ashton Genty better than James Cook. But I just 1327 00:57:42,200 --> 00:57:45,800 Speaker 4: think he has like krue belcow upside, like the offense 1328 00:57:45,840 --> 00:57:48,440 Speaker 4: could take a step forward. The question is like, am 1329 00:57:48,440 --> 00:57:50,920 Speaker 4: I just wishcasting that he'll become James Cook like what 1330 00:57:51,000 --> 00:57:53,000 Speaker 4: James Cook has been the past couple of years. I'm 1331 00:57:53,000 --> 00:57:55,120 Speaker 4: not sure about this, but I but I really like 1332 00:57:55,200 --> 00:57:58,040 Speaker 4: taking Ashton Genty kind of at the the end of 1333 00:57:58,280 --> 00:58:00,440 Speaker 4: round two and then you know, if you can pair 1334 00:58:00,480 --> 00:58:02,640 Speaker 4: him up with Saquon Barkley. I think Saquon could take 1335 00:58:02,640 --> 00:58:05,400 Speaker 4: a pretty big step forward with the new offensive coordinator 1336 00:58:05,440 --> 00:58:08,120 Speaker 4: this year. You've kind of talked me into you, among others, 1337 00:58:08,120 --> 00:58:10,280 Speaker 4: have talked me into Chase Brown as being a really 1338 00:58:10,320 --> 00:58:12,960 Speaker 4: strong second round running back target. So there are kind 1339 00:58:12,960 --> 00:58:15,760 Speaker 4: of a number of these second round running backs that 1340 00:58:15,800 --> 00:58:16,080 Speaker 4: I like. 1341 00:58:16,200 --> 00:58:16,840 Speaker 5: Kenneth Walker. 1342 00:58:16,880 --> 00:58:18,360 Speaker 4: I think it's kind of fun, like just just going 1343 00:58:18,440 --> 00:58:20,680 Speaker 4: to the Chiefs. We haven't really seen the Chiefs with 1344 00:58:20,720 --> 00:58:23,000 Speaker 4: a good running back in a while. And who knows 1345 00:58:23,040 --> 00:58:25,520 Speaker 4: how they're going to change their offense, especially with Patrick 1346 00:58:25,520 --> 00:58:28,080 Speaker 4: Mahomes kind of coming off an injury. Maybe they go 1347 00:58:28,160 --> 00:58:31,320 Speaker 4: a little bit more run heavy with Kenneth Walker there. 1348 00:58:31,320 --> 00:58:34,520 Speaker 4: So I like Kenneth Walker in the second round, and 1349 00:58:34,560 --> 00:58:37,440 Speaker 4: then Omar and Hampton. I do think, like the Chargers 1350 00:58:37,880 --> 00:58:40,680 Speaker 4: were so injured on the offensive line last year, Like 1351 00:58:40,720 --> 00:58:43,040 Speaker 4: if they can just keep their offensive line healthy, I 1352 00:58:43,080 --> 00:58:46,000 Speaker 4: think it'll be an above average offensive line. And amar 1353 00:58:46,040 --> 00:58:49,640 Speaker 4: In Hampton was pretty good last year, so I'm pretty 1354 00:58:49,680 --> 00:58:52,160 Speaker 4: into him also. So yeah, I do kind of like 1355 00:58:52,240 --> 00:58:55,200 Speaker 4: that range of running back in the late first, early 1356 00:58:55,280 --> 00:58:57,720 Speaker 4: second round, Like it feels pretty good to doubliclick running 1357 00:58:57,720 --> 00:59:00,560 Speaker 4: back there, where you know in years past it's difficult 1358 00:59:00,600 --> 00:59:02,880 Speaker 4: to do so because you feel like you're getting behind 1359 00:59:02,920 --> 00:59:05,440 Speaker 4: at wide receiver. And part of the reason that it's 1360 00:59:05,480 --> 00:59:08,240 Speaker 4: also easier to just do these early round running backs 1361 00:59:08,280 --> 00:59:10,520 Speaker 4: is like the mid late rounds, there's a lot of 1362 00:59:10,520 --> 00:59:13,120 Speaker 4: receivers that I kind of like, So I'm I'm totally 1363 00:59:13,160 --> 00:59:16,680 Speaker 4: willing to double click those that that kind of range 1364 00:59:16,720 --> 00:59:19,440 Speaker 4: of running back I'm like, And one that I'm that 1365 00:59:19,480 --> 00:59:21,240 Speaker 4: I didn't bring up here that I'm kind of overlooking 1366 00:59:21,360 --> 00:59:23,320 Speaker 4: is Devin h Chan, who you know, to me is like. 1367 00:59:23,720 --> 00:59:24,640 Speaker 5: It's hard for me to do it. 1368 00:59:24,680 --> 00:59:26,640 Speaker 4: I don't want to bet on the Miami offense. And 1369 00:59:26,640 --> 00:59:28,640 Speaker 4: then it's like he's just going to be targeted so 1370 00:59:28,640 --> 00:59:31,320 Speaker 4: so often that I'm probably overlooking him more than I 1371 00:59:31,360 --> 00:59:34,720 Speaker 4: should on on DraftKings. And then of course there's the 1372 00:59:34,720 --> 00:59:36,320 Speaker 4: the elephant in the room is that I told you 1373 00:59:36,400 --> 00:59:38,479 Speaker 4: last year that I was probably not going to draft 1374 00:59:38,520 --> 00:59:40,880 Speaker 4: Derreck Henry at all on DraftKings, and then he took 1375 00:59:40,920 --> 00:59:45,120 Speaker 4: you to to fortieth place in the draftings. You still be, well, 1376 00:59:45,160 --> 00:59:46,880 Speaker 4: that is true, but that's because I had be John 1377 00:59:46,960 --> 00:59:52,080 Speaker 4: Robinson absolutely crush also. But yeah, Derek, he's a tougher 1378 00:59:52,120 --> 00:59:54,920 Speaker 4: profile for me on draftings just with the lack of PPR. 1379 00:59:55,000 --> 00:59:57,600 Speaker 4: Even if he's fallen a little bit back in drafts, 1380 00:59:57,600 --> 01:00:00,680 Speaker 4: you can get him sometimes in the late second round, 1381 01:00:00,840 --> 01:00:02,720 Speaker 4: in which case I'm willing to take it Derrick Henry, 1382 01:00:02,720 --> 01:00:05,000 Speaker 4: but he's He's He and Devin h And are kind 1383 01:00:05,000 --> 01:00:07,320 Speaker 4: of the running backs in that room that I'm a 1384 01:00:07,360 --> 01:00:08,760 Speaker 4: little bit less excited to take. 1385 01:00:09,200 --> 01:00:09,400 Speaker 1: Yeah. 1386 01:00:09,520 --> 01:00:12,440 Speaker 3: No, the a chance stuff is really really difficult for me. 1387 01:00:12,480 --> 01:00:14,439 Speaker 3: I think he's one of the hardest players to really 1388 01:00:14,480 --> 01:00:16,520 Speaker 3: evaluate this year. You know, I've been doing a lot 1389 01:00:16,560 --> 01:00:18,960 Speaker 3: of work with the draft guide, and he checks all 1390 01:00:18,960 --> 01:00:20,880 Speaker 3: the boxes that you want for an early round pick 1391 01:00:20,960 --> 01:00:24,040 Speaker 3: until you get to the situation part. And the situation 1392 01:00:24,160 --> 01:00:27,560 Speaker 3: is just putrid for Miami. And we do see the 1393 01:00:27,600 --> 01:00:31,200 Speaker 3: best outcomes typically when they when these running backs have 1394 01:00:31,240 --> 01:00:33,880 Speaker 3: good team environments, and his team environment's terrible, and so 1395 01:00:34,800 --> 01:00:37,040 Speaker 3: it is something that it's like how much do we 1396 01:00:37,040 --> 01:00:39,560 Speaker 3: weigh that in the end. You know, I do think 1397 01:00:40,000 --> 01:00:41,840 Speaker 3: that a chan can pay off, but I think he's 1398 01:00:41,880 --> 01:00:44,320 Speaker 3: gonna need like a twenty percent target share to do so, 1399 01:00:44,440 --> 01:00:47,120 Speaker 3: Like it's gonna have to be that high, and that's. 1400 01:00:46,920 --> 01:00:49,680 Speaker 1: Scary, especially with a mobile quarterback. So I'm with you. 1401 01:00:49,720 --> 01:00:50,760 Speaker 1: I haven't drafted him. 1402 01:00:51,080 --> 01:00:53,000 Speaker 3: Sometimes he'll fall, Like if you do enough drafts, he 1403 01:00:53,280 --> 01:00:55,080 Speaker 3: does because a lot of people have the same logic 1404 01:00:55,400 --> 01:00:58,720 Speaker 3: as we're throwing out there right now. So like sometimes 1405 01:00:58,720 --> 01:01:00,800 Speaker 3: he falls to like the back half for the second round, 1406 01:01:00,800 --> 01:01:02,600 Speaker 3: and it's like, yeah, I'll click them there so I'll 1407 01:01:02,600 --> 01:01:04,720 Speaker 3: get some exposure and that's where I'll get my exposure. 1408 01:01:05,080 --> 01:01:06,560 Speaker 3: But I'm with you with a lot of the takes 1409 01:01:06,560 --> 01:01:09,240 Speaker 3: that you just had, you know, Ashton Genty looks great 1410 01:01:09,280 --> 01:01:12,720 Speaker 3: in market score, you know, published that episode yesterday and 1411 01:01:13,240 --> 01:01:15,520 Speaker 3: Ashton Genty looks awesome in there. And then the Amri 1412 01:01:15,600 --> 01:01:17,000 Speaker 3: and Hampton thing, I need to get a little bit 1413 01:01:17,040 --> 01:01:19,680 Speaker 3: more of him because and it's not that I was 1414 01:01:19,720 --> 01:01:21,760 Speaker 3: like aggressively fading or anything. It's just the way that 1415 01:01:21,840 --> 01:01:24,280 Speaker 3: like drafts have kind of unfolded for me. But the 1416 01:01:24,320 --> 01:01:26,240 Speaker 3: thing I feel like with a Mari and Hampton is 1417 01:01:26,240 --> 01:01:29,440 Speaker 3: that I think the floor is actually probably pretty decent 1418 01:01:29,600 --> 01:01:32,280 Speaker 3: because the offensive environment's so good, and then he's gonna 1419 01:01:32,280 --> 01:01:35,760 Speaker 3: get work in that offense. But then the ceiling could 1420 01:01:35,800 --> 01:01:39,160 Speaker 3: really hit if things just sort of go his way, 1421 01:01:39,240 --> 01:01:41,000 Speaker 3: you know, like if he if he gets like a 1422 01:01:41,000 --> 01:01:43,120 Speaker 3: little bit more of a backfield chair than what people 1423 01:01:43,160 --> 01:01:45,040 Speaker 3: are projecting and stuff. And I have enough Keaton Mitchell 1424 01:01:45,040 --> 01:01:47,360 Speaker 3: that I probably should get more Amri and Hampton. So 1425 01:01:47,680 --> 01:01:50,040 Speaker 3: I do think that this range is probably why people 1426 01:01:50,080 --> 01:01:52,800 Speaker 3: have the idea that they have about running backs this year, right, 1427 01:01:52,840 --> 01:01:54,320 Speaker 3: where like second. 1428 01:01:54,160 --> 01:01:56,440 Speaker 1: Round we're pounding them when we don't. Like last year 1429 01:01:56,520 --> 01:01:57,600 Speaker 1: was wide receivers. 1430 01:01:57,200 --> 01:01:59,000 Speaker 3: In this range, you know, and they screwed a lot 1431 01:01:59,000 --> 01:02:01,240 Speaker 3: of people, including me and in some drafts, right, So 1432 01:02:01,720 --> 01:02:04,080 Speaker 3: I do think that's probably where the narrative is really 1433 01:02:04,320 --> 01:02:07,080 Speaker 3: stemming from. But in the end, it's not dramatically dramatically 1434 01:02:07,120 --> 01:02:09,800 Speaker 3: different if you look at the totality of round two, 1435 01:02:09,800 --> 01:02:12,000 Speaker 3: I suppose just the early parts of round two. Now, 1436 01:02:12,400 --> 01:02:14,920 Speaker 3: another decision you have to make in that area is 1437 01:02:15,000 --> 01:02:18,040 Speaker 3: brock Bowers, because he will go smack dab in the 1438 01:02:18,040 --> 01:02:20,280 Speaker 3: middle of those of those running backs now and that 1439 01:02:20,600 --> 01:02:23,040 Speaker 3: running back run. And then there's also Trey McBride, who 1440 01:02:23,160 --> 01:02:25,560 Speaker 3: will slip to the early third round pretty frequently at 1441 01:02:25,560 --> 01:02:28,280 Speaker 3: this point. But I guess my question for you is, 1442 01:02:28,320 --> 01:02:31,120 Speaker 3: like on DraftKings, are you going with an elite tight 1443 01:02:31,200 --> 01:02:31,720 Speaker 3: end approach? 1444 01:02:32,160 --> 01:02:34,280 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm the guy who falls for elite tight end 1445 01:02:34,360 --> 01:02:36,680 Speaker 4: every year. I'm the goofy meme. I'll f and do 1446 01:02:36,720 --> 01:02:39,240 Speaker 4: it again. I'm doing it again with with brock Bowers 1447 01:02:39,240 --> 01:02:41,920 Speaker 4: in particular. This year's funny because Trey McBride is the 1448 01:02:41,960 --> 01:02:45,440 Speaker 4: one who actually did separate last year, you know, outscored 1449 01:02:45,480 --> 01:02:47,520 Speaker 4: the tight end two by over one hundred ppr mad 1450 01:02:47,640 --> 01:02:48,600 Speaker 4: weeks one through seventeen. 1451 01:02:48,640 --> 01:02:49,400 Speaker 5: He was so good. 1452 01:02:49,600 --> 01:02:51,880 Speaker 4: But like, I just have so little faith in Like, 1453 01:02:51,960 --> 01:02:53,520 Speaker 4: is it even going to be Jacoby Verst? Is it 1454 01:02:53,520 --> 01:02:55,760 Speaker 4: going to be Jacoby Brissett in the weeks that matter, 1455 01:02:55,840 --> 01:02:58,280 Speaker 4: and does it matter? Can Jacoby Brissett repeat what he 1456 01:02:58,320 --> 01:03:00,640 Speaker 4: did last year? So I have so many questions about 1457 01:03:00,680 --> 01:03:03,320 Speaker 4: Trey McBride, whereas brock Bauer was just like, man, he's 1458 01:03:03,360 --> 01:03:05,439 Speaker 4: so good when he's healthy. Like last year, I feel 1459 01:03:05,440 --> 01:03:07,640 Speaker 4: like last year was just a huge just like forget 1460 01:03:07,680 --> 01:03:10,200 Speaker 4: about it, four brock Bowers, because not only did he 1461 01:03:10,240 --> 01:03:12,560 Speaker 4: miss time, but while he was playing, he played like 1462 01:03:12,840 --> 01:03:15,280 Speaker 4: three or four games where he was just clearly hampered 1463 01:03:15,280 --> 01:03:17,120 Speaker 4: by injury early in the year. So I think you 1464 01:03:17,200 --> 01:03:19,080 Speaker 4: throw out most of the year four brock Bowers. And 1465 01:03:19,080 --> 01:03:20,640 Speaker 4: then on top of that, there's a whole just the 1466 01:03:20,680 --> 01:03:24,160 Speaker 4: offense wasn't working, the team fell apart. I think rock 1467 01:03:24,200 --> 01:03:26,960 Speaker 4: Bauers could take just a massive, massive step forward this 1468 01:03:27,040 --> 01:03:30,080 Speaker 4: year and separate in a big way from other tight ends. 1469 01:03:30,360 --> 01:03:33,280 Speaker 4: And yeah, I love the elite tight ends because and 1470 01:03:33,360 --> 01:03:35,800 Speaker 4: it might just stem back from like I've been playing 1471 01:03:35,840 --> 01:03:38,520 Speaker 4: season long for thirty years now and I just yearn 1472 01:03:38,600 --> 01:03:41,120 Speaker 4: for the days of Tony Gonzalez or Gronk and just 1473 01:03:41,160 --> 01:03:42,880 Speaker 4: feeling like I'm going to beat my opponent by ten 1474 01:03:42,920 --> 01:03:45,240 Speaker 4: points every week. And I feel like you can get 1475 01:03:45,280 --> 01:03:46,840 Speaker 4: that from from a brock Bowers, so he can just 1476 01:03:46,880 --> 01:03:49,880 Speaker 4: separate so much from the other tight ends that I 1477 01:03:50,320 --> 01:03:53,600 Speaker 4: do really love going after rock Bowers that year. Now, 1478 01:03:53,760 --> 01:03:56,440 Speaker 4: with that said, I'm not like strictly e elite tight 1479 01:03:56,560 --> 01:03:58,920 Speaker 4: end guy, like I don't like reach to get brock Bowers, 1480 01:03:58,960 --> 01:04:00,720 Speaker 4: which I did last year, as I've taking about the 1481 01:04:00,720 --> 01:04:01,280 Speaker 4: one two turn. 1482 01:04:01,840 --> 01:04:02,640 Speaker 5: Yeah last year. 1483 01:04:02,760 --> 01:04:05,200 Speaker 4: I'm doing less of that this year, but I'm still 1484 01:04:05,240 --> 01:04:08,480 Speaker 4: going to be pretty significantly overweight. The difference for me is, 1485 01:04:08,800 --> 01:04:11,400 Speaker 4: especially with twenty rounds on DraftKings. In Best Ball, you 1486 01:04:11,440 --> 01:04:13,560 Speaker 4: can just take five tight ends and hope that you 1487 01:04:13,560 --> 01:04:16,360 Speaker 4: know they'll cobble together scores week to week. That it's 1488 01:04:16,400 --> 01:04:20,280 Speaker 4: like the separation of rock Bowers versus my five tight ends. 1489 01:04:20,280 --> 01:04:21,920 Speaker 4: You just need one of them one of their scores 1490 01:04:21,960 --> 01:04:24,560 Speaker 4: every week to get close to his to not just 1491 01:04:24,920 --> 01:04:29,000 Speaker 4: get completely bashed in by the rock Bower score. So 1492 01:04:29,040 --> 01:04:31,640 Speaker 4: I'm because it is Best Ball and because you like 1493 01:04:31,720 --> 01:04:34,400 Speaker 4: have enough draft spots that you can take five tight ends, 1494 01:04:34,520 --> 01:04:36,520 Speaker 4: I'm doing it less, so I'm not like. 1495 01:04:36,480 --> 01:04:37,040 Speaker 5: Reaching for it. 1496 01:04:37,080 --> 01:04:39,640 Speaker 4: But yeah, if I can get rock Bowers that pick 1497 01:04:39,800 --> 01:04:42,120 Speaker 4: twenty twenty one, I love it. I'm always excited to 1498 01:04:42,160 --> 01:04:43,240 Speaker 4: get Brock Bowers there. 1499 01:04:43,440 --> 01:04:46,480 Speaker 3: Have you gone, have you frequently gone five tight ends 1500 01:04:46,600 --> 01:04:48,360 Speaker 3: or have you gone like you'll go up to that 1501 01:04:48,480 --> 01:04:49,720 Speaker 3: number of tight ends. 1502 01:04:50,200 --> 01:04:52,120 Speaker 4: I don't think that I've done more than five. I 1503 01:04:52,120 --> 01:04:55,280 Speaker 4: think I've done five a number of times. Just like 1504 01:04:55,440 --> 01:04:57,800 Speaker 4: you get to those later rounds, and maybe it'll happen 1505 01:04:57,880 --> 01:05:00,760 Speaker 4: less as we get more clarity on like running back 1506 01:05:00,800 --> 01:05:04,560 Speaker 4: two situations, pecking orders for wide receivers, et cetera, et cetera. 1507 01:05:04,600 --> 01:05:05,560 Speaker 5: I think it might happen less. 1508 01:05:05,560 --> 01:05:07,640 Speaker 4: But now it's like you can get like a number 1509 01:05:07,680 --> 01:05:10,400 Speaker 4: of starting tight ends pretty later or tight ends with 1510 01:05:10,640 --> 01:05:13,520 Speaker 4: really fun upside later in drafts. So yeah, I have 1511 01:05:13,680 --> 01:05:17,560 Speaker 4: done five five tight ends on DraftKings a number of times. 1512 01:05:17,560 --> 01:05:18,720 Speaker 1: Interesting, I think the most. 1513 01:05:18,840 --> 01:05:22,440 Speaker 3: I think the most I've done is four is the like, 1514 01:05:22,440 --> 01:05:27,080 Speaker 3: like I'm thinking, like from an allocation standpoint, is it 1515 01:05:27,120 --> 01:05:30,360 Speaker 3: a for you when you do that and you have five, 1516 01:05:31,360 --> 01:05:33,920 Speaker 3: is it basically like final five rounds? You're basically just 1517 01:05:34,000 --> 01:05:36,680 Speaker 3: like doing that at tight end and then you have 1518 01:05:36,840 --> 01:05:39,600 Speaker 3: what I guess seven wide receivers if you go wide 1519 01:05:39,600 --> 01:05:42,320 Speaker 3: receiver early or something, and then like five running backs, 1520 01:05:42,320 --> 01:05:43,840 Speaker 3: you're kind of going with that approach with it. 1521 01:05:44,680 --> 01:05:47,120 Speaker 4: Yeah, So I try not to make most of my 1522 01:05:47,160 --> 01:05:51,480 Speaker 4: analysis based around using the sidekick. So I use pack 1523 01:05:51,640 --> 01:05:55,760 Speaker 4: Rains sidekick tool from legendary Upside, which simulates the season 1524 01:05:55,800 --> 01:05:59,280 Speaker 4: and simulates the contests. And I never would have done 1525 01:05:59,680 --> 01:06:02,200 Speaker 4: five tight ends in the past just using my brain, 1526 01:06:02,440 --> 01:06:04,360 Speaker 4: like you using my own logic. Yeah, I never got 1527 01:06:04,360 --> 01:06:06,440 Speaker 4: to five titands. It is because I've been using this 1528 01:06:06,560 --> 01:06:08,919 Speaker 4: tool that's like keeps on telling me. So I did 1529 01:06:09,000 --> 01:06:12,000 Speaker 4: a live draft yesterday on DraftKings where I took Rock 1530 01:06:12,040 --> 01:06:15,000 Speaker 4: Bowers and still kept on getting recommended to take up. 1531 01:06:15,200 --> 01:06:17,520 Speaker 4: I took five tight ends in this draft even after 1532 01:06:17,600 --> 01:06:20,560 Speaker 4: like it was, I was getting recommended Jackson Hawes, and 1533 01:06:20,600 --> 01:06:22,320 Speaker 4: I was like, I'm not going to take Jackson Hawes. 1534 01:06:22,320 --> 01:06:23,760 Speaker 4: So I took somebody else and kept let in and 1535 01:06:23,760 --> 01:06:24,960 Speaker 4: fall and final I was like, I guess I'll do 1536 01:06:25,080 --> 01:06:27,600 Speaker 4: whatever that this will be my one share of Jackson Hawes. 1537 01:06:28,040 --> 01:06:31,560 Speaker 4: So it's honestly, it's based largely on the SIMS tool 1538 01:06:31,600 --> 01:06:33,280 Speaker 4: that I'm using telling me, hey, you should just take 1539 01:06:33,440 --> 01:06:34,880 Speaker 4: take tight ends. Here it's you you're taking a tight 1540 01:06:34,960 --> 01:06:36,840 Speaker 4: end who's going to score you some points, or you're 1541 01:06:36,880 --> 01:06:39,360 Speaker 4: taking a running back who's probably going to be a 1542 01:06:39,440 --> 01:06:42,560 Speaker 4: zero most of the time, but yeah, that one, that 1543 01:06:42,680 --> 01:06:44,520 Speaker 4: was one where it surprised me. Usually it kind of 1544 01:06:44,560 --> 01:06:46,520 Speaker 4: makes sense where i'say, okay, you're getting five tight ends, 1545 01:06:46,520 --> 01:06:49,200 Speaker 4: but they're all in the final seven rounds of draft. 1546 01:06:49,000 --> 01:06:50,480 Speaker 5: Like that is usually when it happens. 1547 01:06:50,520 --> 01:06:53,200 Speaker 4: It's not usually when you have a Bowers of McBride, 1548 01:06:53,240 --> 01:06:56,040 Speaker 4: But yeah, so sometimes I do. I do find that 1549 01:06:56,120 --> 01:06:59,600 Speaker 4: I'm being recommended taking fourth and fifth tight end when 1550 01:06:59,640 --> 01:07:01,439 Speaker 4: I'm like, this doesn't make any sense to me. I've 1551 01:07:01,440 --> 01:07:05,920 Speaker 4: taken Brock Bauers and Harold Fannin and Dalton Schultz, and 1552 01:07:05,960 --> 01:07:07,520 Speaker 4: why do I need a fourth tight end here? 1553 01:07:07,920 --> 01:07:10,080 Speaker 5: But occasionally I just give in and do it anyway. 1554 01:07:10,560 --> 01:07:13,560 Speaker 3: The beefier tight end room approach, if you want to 1555 01:07:13,560 --> 01:07:17,760 Speaker 3: call it, that makes sense when you factor in what 1556 01:07:17,800 --> 01:07:20,880 Speaker 3: you just said about where we're at in the off season, 1557 01:07:21,400 --> 01:07:24,400 Speaker 3: right or you know, we don't have clarity in a 1558 01:07:24,400 --> 01:07:27,080 Speaker 3: lot of these running back rooms and even wide receiver rooms, 1559 01:07:27,080 --> 01:07:30,439 Speaker 3: but we do get these usable, startable tight ends late 1560 01:07:30,920 --> 01:07:33,480 Speaker 3: that we'll be able to find our lineup more frequently, 1561 01:07:33,520 --> 01:07:35,400 Speaker 3: probably than some of the other running backs and wide 1562 01:07:35,400 --> 01:07:37,680 Speaker 3: receivers that we would be drafting. But then on top 1563 01:07:37,720 --> 01:07:39,960 Speaker 3: of that, it is easy to forget that the tight 1564 01:07:40,040 --> 01:07:42,680 Speaker 3: end can find your flex right, Like, it's not like 1565 01:07:42,720 --> 01:07:46,440 Speaker 3: you're only using that player in the singular tight ends, 1566 01:07:46,440 --> 01:07:48,960 Speaker 3: but now they generally score a fewer points than the 1567 01:07:49,000 --> 01:07:52,280 Speaker 3: other positions do, but there's still the possibility. It's a 1568 01:07:52,280 --> 01:07:55,120 Speaker 3: full PPR platform where like tight end can match running 1569 01:07:55,120 --> 01:07:56,880 Speaker 3: back in some way, especially a late round running back 1570 01:07:56,920 --> 01:07:58,960 Speaker 3: in some weeks and such. So I haven't gotten up 1571 01:07:58,960 --> 01:08:01,920 Speaker 3: to five, and I've done four or frequently because like 1572 01:08:01,960 --> 01:08:04,880 Speaker 3: when I can get like Terrence Ferguson type players in 1573 01:08:04,920 --> 01:08:08,560 Speaker 3: the nineteenth round, like when I feel confident or Pat Fryarmouth, 1574 01:08:08,560 --> 01:08:11,080 Speaker 3: when I feel confident that those guys are gonna have 1575 01:08:11,120 --> 01:08:13,880 Speaker 3: some role, I do like kind of kind of putting 1576 01:08:13,880 --> 01:08:16,639 Speaker 3: that together and not having to worry about the position 1577 01:08:16,720 --> 01:08:19,280 Speaker 3: as early. But it's interesting that you've done it, you know, 1578 01:08:19,320 --> 01:08:21,599 Speaker 3: based on what some of the sims are saying, even 1579 01:08:21,640 --> 01:08:23,240 Speaker 3: with some of the earlier round tight ends. 1580 01:08:23,240 --> 01:08:24,679 Speaker 1: So it's a really interesting approach. 1581 01:08:25,080 --> 01:08:27,920 Speaker 4: Yeah, honestly, that's one that's like I never love doing it, 1582 01:08:27,960 --> 01:08:30,600 Speaker 4: Like I even when I'm using the simulations tool. I 1583 01:08:30,680 --> 01:08:32,519 Speaker 4: want the team to make sense to me. I want 1584 01:08:32,520 --> 01:08:34,200 Speaker 4: the pick to be like, Okay, that's a pick that 1585 01:08:34,280 --> 01:08:36,599 Speaker 4: I like, I want to make that pick. So sometimes 1586 01:08:36,640 --> 01:08:39,599 Speaker 4: i'll ik be off of the sims suggestion, but sometimes 1587 01:08:39,600 --> 01:08:41,840 Speaker 4: like just to kind of follow, like see what the 1588 01:08:41,840 --> 01:08:43,519 Speaker 4: sims will do and then try. 1589 01:08:43,360 --> 01:08:45,000 Speaker 5: To figure out why they did what they did. 1590 01:08:45,320 --> 01:08:45,519 Speaker 1: Yeah. 1591 01:08:45,520 --> 01:08:47,719 Speaker 5: So yeah, it can be fun to kind. 1592 01:08:47,560 --> 01:08:50,040 Speaker 4: Of make teams that you wouldn't otherwise draft because I'll 1593 01:08:50,080 --> 01:08:51,800 Speaker 4: do some drafts where it's just like I'm just doing 1594 01:08:51,840 --> 01:08:53,280 Speaker 4: what I want to do throughout the draft, and then 1595 01:08:53,280 --> 01:08:55,000 Speaker 4: I'll have a mix of these that it's like, I 1596 01:08:55,280 --> 01:08:57,639 Speaker 4: don't know why this team makes any sense at all, 1597 01:08:57,680 --> 01:08:59,320 Speaker 4: but this is what the sims are saying, So I 1598 01:08:59,360 --> 01:09:00,320 Speaker 4: guess I'll do it this time. 1599 01:09:00,400 --> 01:09:02,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, I love it. I love it all right. I 1600 01:09:02,120 --> 01:09:03,920 Speaker 1: get a question all the time from listeners. Do you 1601 01:09:03,960 --> 01:09:05,080 Speaker 1: care about Bye Weeks? 1602 01:09:05,880 --> 01:09:06,080 Speaker 5: Yeah? 1603 01:09:06,080 --> 01:09:08,200 Speaker 4: I feel like this is a loaded question where you 1604 01:09:08,240 --> 01:09:10,559 Speaker 4: want me to answer no, in part because I've heard 1605 01:09:10,640 --> 01:09:12,120 Speaker 4: you say that you don't care about by Weeks. 1606 01:09:12,800 --> 01:09:15,599 Speaker 1: Look, I want your true genuine answer to this. 1607 01:09:15,800 --> 01:09:18,040 Speaker 4: Yeah, my true genuine answer is yes, I do. Actually 1608 01:09:18,120 --> 01:09:20,559 Speaker 4: I do care about Bie Weeks. You know I've been 1609 01:09:20,560 --> 01:09:22,640 Speaker 4: I've been doing Best Ball content for a few years now, 1610 01:09:22,680 --> 01:09:24,559 Speaker 4: and a few years ago that was sort of like 1611 01:09:25,000 --> 01:09:27,360 Speaker 4: my my thing. Like people knew me as the bye 1612 01:09:27,360 --> 01:09:29,599 Speaker 4: week guy. Neil is the guy who cares about bie weeks. 1613 01:09:29,640 --> 01:09:33,040 Speaker 4: He's always breaking every tie based on bye weeks I have. 1614 01:09:33,160 --> 01:09:36,240 Speaker 4: I've become a bit less bi week pilled over time, 1615 01:09:36,880 --> 01:09:38,960 Speaker 4: but I do think like so it's different to me. 1616 01:09:39,040 --> 01:09:42,040 Speaker 4: It's a pretty big difference between best ball in redraft. 1617 01:09:42,160 --> 01:09:43,680 Speaker 4: I don't care at all in redraft because in a 1618 01:09:43,720 --> 01:09:45,519 Speaker 4: redraft you can just pick somebody up off the waivers 1619 01:09:45,560 --> 01:09:47,160 Speaker 4: to fill in your bye week, but best ball, like 1620 01:09:47,200 --> 01:09:49,080 Speaker 4: you can't do that. So to me, it's just like 1621 01:09:49,080 --> 01:09:52,679 Speaker 4: a matter of I'm trying to find stack every little 1622 01:09:52,800 --> 01:09:56,919 Speaker 4: edge i can find to beat this room of twelve opponents, 1623 01:09:56,920 --> 01:09:59,519 Speaker 4: being the top two of the twelve opponents in my room, 1624 01:09:59,560 --> 01:10:01,679 Speaker 4: and that's one of those edges that you can stack. 1625 01:10:01,840 --> 01:10:03,320 Speaker 4: Is just like I'm not going to take a zero 1626 01:10:03,400 --> 01:10:06,120 Speaker 4: at quarterback, and ideally I'm not gonna take a zero 1627 01:10:06,240 --> 01:10:08,880 Speaker 4: at tight end, and ideally I'm going to have like 1628 01:10:09,000 --> 01:10:12,000 Speaker 4: multiple players that can cover every week at every position. 1629 01:10:12,120 --> 01:10:14,800 Speaker 4: So it is it is something that I pay attention to, 1630 01:10:15,640 --> 01:10:19,000 Speaker 4: but I also acknowledge that part of the reason that 1631 01:10:19,240 --> 01:10:22,200 Speaker 4: I maybe pay more attention to somebody like yourself. You've 1632 01:10:22,240 --> 01:10:27,400 Speaker 4: been doing fantasy football analysis for I don't know, a decade, yeah, decade, 1633 01:10:27,720 --> 01:10:30,000 Speaker 4: a really long time at this point, so you're almost 1634 01:10:30,040 --> 01:10:33,760 Speaker 4: certainly better than I am at picking players just just 1635 01:10:33,800 --> 01:10:36,640 Speaker 4: like finding like the profiles and layer in the profiles 1636 01:10:36,640 --> 01:10:39,360 Speaker 4: together of players, whereas I'm more of like I come 1637 01:10:39,400 --> 01:10:42,080 Speaker 4: from DFS, Like I have been playing fantasy football for 1638 01:10:42,120 --> 01:10:43,760 Speaker 4: three decades. I've had a lot of success at it, 1639 01:10:43,800 --> 01:10:46,559 Speaker 4: so I don't want to, you know, downplay my strengths also, 1640 01:10:46,600 --> 01:10:48,280 Speaker 4: but I feel like my strength is more in the 1641 01:10:48,400 --> 01:10:52,120 Speaker 4: like game theory and try to find other little edges, 1642 01:10:52,160 --> 01:10:55,719 Speaker 4: whereas I think like you are elite at like find 1643 01:10:55,800 --> 01:10:59,320 Speaker 4: picking players and ranking best of like fantasy football players, 1644 01:10:59,520 --> 01:11:01,320 Speaker 4: in which gay, if you're really good at that, then 1645 01:11:01,360 --> 01:11:04,240 Speaker 4: maybe your edge is actually in just like finding all 1646 01:11:04,280 --> 01:11:07,040 Speaker 4: of the best players and stacking all those best players together. 1647 01:11:07,120 --> 01:11:09,519 Speaker 4: So I think it makes more sense for those of 1648 01:11:09,600 --> 01:11:12,000 Speaker 4: us who have not been you know, doing fantasy football 1649 01:11:12,040 --> 01:11:14,760 Speaker 4: content and you know, creating a zap model, you know, 1650 01:11:15,040 --> 01:11:17,519 Speaker 4: all of this for a long time, maybe makes more 1651 01:11:17,560 --> 01:11:20,200 Speaker 4: sense for me to focus more on the minutia stuff, 1652 01:11:20,200 --> 01:11:22,840 Speaker 4: the little edges that I can find, as opposed to Yeah, 1653 01:11:22,840 --> 01:11:24,479 Speaker 4: I just think this player is way better than this player. 1654 01:11:24,520 --> 01:11:25,880 Speaker 5: So I'm not gonna worry about the bye week. 1655 01:11:26,200 --> 01:11:28,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, just another thing for us to worry about, guys, 1656 01:11:29,040 --> 01:11:31,559 Speaker 3: Just just another thing for us to think about as 1657 01:11:31,560 --> 01:11:32,519 Speaker 3: we're drafting these teams. 1658 01:11:32,560 --> 01:11:34,479 Speaker 1: All right, One question I do want to ask. 1659 01:11:34,439 --> 01:11:37,280 Speaker 3: Before I get your bold take, because I love asking 1660 01:11:37,320 --> 01:11:40,599 Speaker 3: about the bold takes too. The round four to five 1661 01:11:40,720 --> 01:11:42,639 Speaker 3: range of wide receiver, which, by the way, we were 1662 01:11:42,640 --> 01:11:44,599 Speaker 3: in a draft together. I didn't even realize it until 1663 01:11:44,600 --> 01:11:46,000 Speaker 3: we were in like round three or four, but we 1664 01:11:46,000 --> 01:11:48,599 Speaker 3: were in a draft together the other day. I loved 1665 01:11:48,600 --> 01:11:51,200 Speaker 3: your team. You guys drafted a great team. Mine was 1666 01:11:51,240 --> 01:11:53,600 Speaker 3: kind of whatever. It was fine. It was one that 1667 01:11:53,680 --> 01:11:55,679 Speaker 3: I walked away from them, like this is at least usable, 1668 01:11:55,760 --> 01:11:57,360 Speaker 3: Like I don't think it's a dead team. But in 1669 01:11:57,400 --> 01:11:59,000 Speaker 3: that draft I was really mad because at the four 1670 01:11:59,040 --> 01:12:01,519 Speaker 3: or five turn, you Tookarry McLaurin and Jalen Waddle, and 1671 01:12:01,600 --> 01:12:05,040 Speaker 3: I had taken Luther Burden at four or eleven, hoping 1672 01:12:05,040 --> 01:12:07,160 Speaker 3: that maybe one of them would come back around and 1673 01:12:07,200 --> 01:12:08,960 Speaker 3: I could get one of them, because I like both 1674 01:12:09,000 --> 01:12:12,040 Speaker 3: Jalen Wattle and Luther Burden and Terry McLaurin quite a bit, 1675 01:12:12,680 --> 01:12:15,240 Speaker 3: but that four to five round range maybe or maybe 1676 01:12:15,280 --> 01:12:17,560 Speaker 3: like late third because of the way that ADP is 1677 01:12:17,600 --> 01:12:20,040 Speaker 3: sort of like changed and morphed, like where you know 1678 01:12:20,160 --> 01:12:22,920 Speaker 3: Lad Goes or z A Flowers at this point that 1679 01:12:23,000 --> 01:12:25,679 Speaker 3: whole group. Are there any favorites that you have from 1680 01:12:25,760 --> 01:12:27,400 Speaker 3: that group or are there any guys that you just 1681 01:12:27,439 --> 01:12:29,479 Speaker 3: don't like? Because to me, I look at all these 1682 01:12:29,520 --> 01:12:31,599 Speaker 3: wide receiver profiles and I'm like, yep, I can get 1683 01:12:31,600 --> 01:12:33,360 Speaker 3: behind that, Yep, I can get behind that, And I 1684 01:12:33,400 --> 01:12:36,040 Speaker 3: really want the wide receivers in that range so much, 1685 01:12:36,560 --> 01:12:38,920 Speaker 3: And I'm just curious if there are any guys that 1686 01:12:38,960 --> 01:12:40,519 Speaker 3: like really stand out to you or if you're just 1687 01:12:40,600 --> 01:12:42,479 Speaker 3: kind of even with those guys. 1688 01:12:42,760 --> 01:12:44,639 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean we already kind of like Jalen Wattle 1689 01:12:44,720 --> 01:12:47,080 Speaker 4: to me has been a pretty big target just because 1690 01:12:47,320 --> 01:12:50,799 Speaker 4: he goes so late. So I have over twenty percent 1691 01:12:51,080 --> 01:12:53,719 Speaker 4: Jalen Wattle on DraftKings. He's the one that really stands 1692 01:12:53,720 --> 01:12:57,439 Speaker 4: out to me. I'm big time. I have zero percent 1693 01:12:57,479 --> 01:12:59,519 Speaker 4: of DJ Moore so far since you open it up 1694 01:12:59,680 --> 01:13:02,360 Speaker 4: to face, I just have not been doing DJ Moore 1695 01:13:02,760 --> 01:13:05,400 Speaker 4: at all. I just like the profile is not great, 1696 01:13:05,439 --> 01:13:07,200 Speaker 4: and I know he's going to Buffalo. He's playing with 1697 01:13:07,240 --> 01:13:09,559 Speaker 4: Josh Allen, so maybe he revives his career. But like 1698 01:13:09,960 --> 01:13:12,519 Speaker 4: he had not a ton of tart competition early in 1699 01:13:12,520 --> 01:13:14,639 Speaker 4: the year last year with Caleb Williams playing pretty well, 1700 01:13:14,800 --> 01:13:18,479 Speaker 4: I didn't really do anything, so you know, And sometimes 1701 01:13:18,479 --> 01:13:21,000 Speaker 4: I like betting on the like resurrecting their career, like 1702 01:13:21,040 --> 01:13:24,439 Speaker 4: the bounce back for a wide receiver, especially who changes teams. 1703 01:13:24,479 --> 01:13:26,880 Speaker 4: But so far I have not been doing that with 1704 01:13:27,080 --> 01:13:29,599 Speaker 4: DJ Moore, so he's a pretty big fade. But yeah, 1705 01:13:29,760 --> 01:13:31,840 Speaker 4: the favorites for me Jalen Waddle and I kind of 1706 01:13:31,840 --> 01:13:34,320 Speaker 4: like the old guys Devanta Adams and Mike Evans. Just 1707 01:13:34,600 --> 01:13:37,160 Speaker 4: I think the price is really fair for players who 1708 01:13:37,160 --> 01:13:38,840 Speaker 4: should have a lot of receptions and a lot of 1709 01:13:38,840 --> 01:13:43,120 Speaker 4: touchdowns this season. The more kind of off the wall 1710 01:13:43,120 --> 01:13:45,559 Speaker 4: one for me would be Christian Watson is somebody that 1711 01:13:45,760 --> 01:13:48,360 Speaker 4: I feel like I'm buying in more than most just 1712 01:13:48,400 --> 01:13:52,800 Speaker 4: because he was so efficient last year. Loses a couple teammates, 1713 01:13:53,040 --> 01:13:55,639 Speaker 4: so I could see Christian Watson being an even bigger 1714 01:13:55,680 --> 01:13:57,519 Speaker 4: focal point of the Packers offense this year. 1715 01:13:58,080 --> 01:13:58,880 Speaker 5: And I like the price. 1716 01:13:59,360 --> 01:14:00,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, I just love that range. 1717 01:14:00,880 --> 01:14:02,519 Speaker 3: The whole range is like, I can tell a story 1718 01:14:02,520 --> 01:14:04,479 Speaker 3: about all these guys, but it's funny. I agree with 1719 01:14:04,520 --> 01:14:06,200 Speaker 3: you totally. Like the one guy that I have a 1720 01:14:06,200 --> 01:14:09,280 Speaker 3: hard time clicking. It's probably because I haven't gotten super 1721 01:14:09,280 --> 01:14:11,599 Speaker 3: crazy with Josh Allen either, but it's DJ Moore right, 1722 01:14:11,640 --> 01:14:15,000 Speaker 3: Like his his last two season peripherals have been pretty horrendous, 1723 01:14:15,160 --> 01:14:18,040 Speaker 3: and it's just a scary bet to make whenever it's 1724 01:14:18,080 --> 01:14:21,519 Speaker 3: amongst so many other good wide receivers. Like to me, 1725 01:14:22,320 --> 01:14:24,320 Speaker 3: DJ Moore would be clickable in like the early to 1726 01:14:24,360 --> 01:14:27,559 Speaker 3: mid sixth right where he just goes around or two 1727 01:14:27,600 --> 01:14:29,560 Speaker 3: before that often, you know, and I think part of 1728 01:14:29,600 --> 01:14:32,599 Speaker 3: it is probably the Josh Allen stacking stuff, but also 1729 01:14:33,000 --> 01:14:35,519 Speaker 3: you know, people are like, I can see where this 1730 01:14:35,600 --> 01:14:38,400 Speaker 3: goes south. Where where both of us are sitting down, 1731 01:14:38,680 --> 01:14:40,720 Speaker 3: you know, in January, and we're like, why did we 1732 01:14:40,800 --> 01:14:43,040 Speaker 3: do that? Like it's a it's a a guy who 1733 01:14:43,040 --> 01:14:45,400 Speaker 3: has a backbone that's that's playing in a Josh Allen 1734 01:14:45,479 --> 01:14:47,519 Speaker 3: led offense. So like, I understand where it can go south, 1735 01:14:47,520 --> 01:14:49,439 Speaker 3: But a lot of the trends and the stuff that 1736 01:14:49,600 --> 01:14:51,960 Speaker 3: his historically worked for these players and like where they 1737 01:14:52,040 --> 01:14:55,280 Speaker 3: hit in this range, DJ Moore does not check those Boxes. 1738 01:14:55,320 --> 01:14:56,760 Speaker 1: So I'm with you on that one. 1739 01:14:56,800 --> 01:14:59,240 Speaker 3: But before I let you go, I need I need 1740 01:14:59,280 --> 01:15:02,639 Speaker 3: your your your old take for this season, whether it's 1741 01:15:02,680 --> 01:15:05,840 Speaker 3: player or roster construction anything. I just need I need 1742 01:15:05,840 --> 01:15:06,920 Speaker 3: some some fire for me. 1743 01:15:06,960 --> 01:15:07,200 Speaker 5: Neil. 1744 01:15:07,560 --> 01:15:09,400 Speaker 4: Yeah, I've been going back and forth on like do 1745 01:15:09,479 --> 01:15:11,840 Speaker 4: I want to just a player take on like AJ 1746 01:15:12,000 --> 01:15:15,759 Speaker 4: Brown or Jonathan Brooks. I've been toying with the idea 1747 01:15:15,880 --> 01:15:18,840 Speaker 4: of the winning three million dollar team has already been 1748 01:15:18,880 --> 01:15:21,639 Speaker 4: drafted because it kind of ties in all these players together, 1749 01:15:21,640 --> 01:15:24,200 Speaker 4: because there was a period where all of Jonathan Brooks, 1750 01:15:24,160 --> 01:15:26,760 Speaker 4: A J. Brown, Brock Bauers. You get all of them 1751 01:15:26,760 --> 01:15:29,000 Speaker 4: like at a pretty nice range together. I'm gonna I'm 1752 01:15:29,000 --> 01:15:29,880 Speaker 4: gonna go Jonathan Brooks. 1753 01:15:29,880 --> 01:15:30,360 Speaker 5: I'm just gonna go. 1754 01:15:30,439 --> 01:15:35,080 Speaker 4: Jonathan Brooks outscores Chewba Hubbard on the season and is 1755 01:15:35,120 --> 01:15:37,080 Speaker 4: a league winner. Is the player that you need in 1756 01:15:37,120 --> 01:15:38,040 Speaker 4: the playoff weeks. 1757 01:15:38,439 --> 01:15:40,479 Speaker 3: I love it. I love that take, Neil. This is 1758 01:15:40,520 --> 01:15:42,800 Speaker 3: great as always. Let everyone know where they can find you, 1759 01:15:42,880 --> 01:15:44,760 Speaker 3: where your YouTube channel is, and where we can we 1760 01:15:44,800 --> 01:15:46,840 Speaker 3: can watch that beautiful face of yours. 1761 01:15:47,200 --> 01:15:49,920 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm the flannel Verse on on YouTube is just 1762 01:15:49,960 --> 01:15:53,679 Speaker 4: at flannel verse or on x or Blue Sky. I'm 1763 01:15:53,760 --> 01:15:56,320 Speaker 4: player q so yeah, you can find me at player 1764 01:15:56,360 --> 01:16:00,000 Speaker 4: actually player q dfs, Player q dfs on the social 1765 01:16:00,640 --> 01:16:02,720 Speaker 4: otherwise you want to find me on Twitter, I'm just 1766 01:16:02,960 --> 01:16:06,040 Speaker 4: Flannel Versa or actually, i just just launched a new 1767 01:16:06,080 --> 01:16:08,599 Speaker 4: podcast which JJ was already a guest on, called Best 1768 01:16:08,640 --> 01:16:11,799 Speaker 4: Ball Whenever. Wherever you get your podcasts on Spotify, Apple, whatever, 1769 01:16:12,320 --> 01:16:13,920 Speaker 4: just search for Best Ball Whenever. 1770 01:16:14,400 --> 01:16:15,760 Speaker 1: Yes, definitely check that out. 1771 01:16:15,920 --> 01:16:18,320 Speaker 3: Also check out lateround dot com pre order that draft 1772 01:16:18,360 --> 01:16:20,400 Speaker 3: guide to make sure you're subscribe to the YouTube channel 1773 01:16:20,439 --> 01:16:22,480 Speaker 3: YouTube dot com slash at LATEROUNDFF. 1774 01:16:22,920 --> 01:16:25,320 Speaker 1: Otherwise, everyone, thanks for tuning