WEBVTT - Ray Dalio Live (Replay) with Barry Ritholtz (Podcast)

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>This week we have a bonus Masters in Business. Addition,

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it is our premier episode of Masters in Business Live.

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>We recorded a live show in the Bloomberg headquarters. It

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>was in front of a live audience broadcast live on

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>television and radio. People ask me, weren't you nervous about

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>doing this? And to be honest, I didn't have time

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to get nervous. I just jumped right into our questions.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>My guest was Ray Dalio of Bridgewater and dear Lord,

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he was just spectacular. He knows exactly what he thinks. Uh.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>He understands his own philosophy, and he knows how to

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>articulate it in a way with tremendous clarity and transparency. Uh.

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>He spoke for about an hour, or at least two

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>questions for me for about an hour. Then we opened

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it up to the audience and we did another thirty

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes of Q and A. And I gotta give Ray

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>huge kudos. He sat and signed a copy of his

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>book for every single person who was in the audience

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that were over a hundred people there. He didn't have

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>to do that. It was just charming and delightful. I

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>could ramble about how much fun that day was. But

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than listen to me, Babel, why don't we simply

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>say the premier episode of Masters in Business Live with

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewaters Ray Dalio, This is Masters in Business with Barry

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. So I have to admit to

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>cheating a little bit when when we first proposed the

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>idea of Masters in Business Live, Alan Dave were very

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>supportive and I said, I'm going to bring in a

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>ringer with Ray Dalio. So I really don't have a

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of work to do. I assume most of

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the viewing and audience present knows who read value is.

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But let me just give you a quick version of

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>his background. He is the founder, co chairman and co

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>c i oh of Bridgewater Associates the world's largest hedge fund,

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>managing over a hundred and sixty billion dollars in assets

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>for institutional clients. According to Forbes, Bridgewater has made more

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>money for their clients than any other funds in history.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh He is the author of the New York Times

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>best selling book Principles for Life and Work, and most recently,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>his new book is principles of big debt crises. Ray

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>dally Out, thank you for being our first guest on

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business Live. Let's start with the reboot of Bridgewater,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>which you describe in great detail in the first book,

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>which came about after a not so great two for you.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you just subscribe it as disastrous. What happened

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in too well, you know, I I formed Bridgater in

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy two, is like seven years later. That's the reboot. Yeah,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the reboot, right, um. And I had in I

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>had calculated that America, that American banks had went way

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.839
<v Speaker 1>more money to emerging countries in those countries were gonna

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>pay back and it was about two of their bank capital,

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and so we were going to have a big banking crisis.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that was going to happen, and I

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of attention for for that, um. And

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>then in August two, Mexico defaulted and there was a

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sequence of other defaults and there was a big dead crisis,

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that that was going to cause an

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>economic crisis. And I couldn't have been more wrong. That

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>was the exact bottom of the stock market when Mexico defaulted.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And anyway, I received tension. At the time, I was

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street week and was on as to testify

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to Congress, and and I was wrong and I had

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think at the time, maybe eight people who work

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for me. I had to let them all go, and

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I lost money for me, I lost money for clients.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I had to um I borrow four thousand dollars from

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>my dad because I didn't have really enough money even

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to take care of my family at that point. And

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it was very painful, but it was the most valuable

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>thing probably that happened in my life, certainly one of those,

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>because it changed my approach to thinking, because it made

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>me start to think, you know, how do I know

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm right? How do I continue to take risk and

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not go through these mistakes? And it made me change

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Like I wanted to find the smartest people

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I could would disagree with me. I wanted to build

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>an idea meritocracy in which independent thinkers would challenge each other.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to deal with risk. How do I

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>um maintain the returns but diversive I and do certain

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>things to deal with risk. And it was from that

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>point really on that everything started to change. So that

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was my terrible experience. And I think that that's, by

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the way, one of those lessons. Like there was a

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>book that my son gave me in two thousand fourteen,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Campbell here over thousand faces, and he describes about

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>how that crashing occurs and that changes. Do you have

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a metamorphosis? So the whole approach to learning from mistakes

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and painful mistakes and making the most out of them

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>and writing principles down um in other words, recipes for

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you deal with the circumstances learn the lesson

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>write those principles down. This is the thing that I

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>would recommend to you know, everybody, write them down. And

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I learned also that by being able to write them

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>down clearly enough that they could be expressed in what

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>were then called equations, are now algorithms that allowed me

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to make decisions and us to make decisions in a

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in a very powerful way. So that experience is really

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the turning point, and that's very abstract. I want to

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>describe some of the ideas and products that came out

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of that. Post eight two. You describe in your early

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>history some of the products that you had a role

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in the creation of, tips, the inflation protected treasury bonds,

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar futures Index, the entire concept of risk parity.

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>You're very humble and saying you had only a little

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>bit to do with the Chinese stock market creation, but

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I know you consulted with very senior people there and

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>help that come about. And what I think is the

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>least known thing about you, but the most fascinating, You

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>helped to engineer chicken McNuggets. Explain that to us, because

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely intriguing. Well, I traded commodities then back then.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean that was my big thing, and I really

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>uh learned, you know, how to make chicken. And I'm

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>much feed what what a chick cost, how uh soybeans

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>were grown, how they competed with cotton and corn, and

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that hole mechanics. I liked that whole mechanical thing. Um

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and at the time that and and McDonald's was a

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>client of mine at the time, and they wanted to

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>uh come out with this chicken McNuggets, but it was

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>very volatile. Prices were volatile at the time, and they

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>were worried about whether they can get stable menu prices

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>or they would have the volatility and that being disrupted.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Um and I had a chicken processing UH producer was

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think at the largest at the time, and a client,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and I could engineer UM the ability to lock in

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the feed prices because it basically the cost of a

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.559
<v Speaker 1>chick is not much relative to the cost of the feed,

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and you have futures contracts on that, and I was

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>able to work a deal so that UM that chicken

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>producer could get the McDonald's contract and McDonald's could get

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a stable price by engineering how they could do the

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>hedge to be able to do that. So that was

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what I did. The word engineering comes up a lot

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>for a person who's not an engineer UM, and I

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>was very much reminded of that in one of the

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>first long form videos you did, how the Economic Machine Works.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So first, what's the engineering background for the overall economy

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and what motivated you to put that together in a

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>video and release it to the world. Well, the one

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that I learned over the years is you know,

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like everything has it's every effect, Everything that happened has

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>a reason that happened, cause effect relationships, and these things

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>happen over and over again. So whenever I got surprised

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>by something UH, it was usually because of something that

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen in my lifetime before, but it happened, you know,

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like these financial crisis is and so on. And what

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I did is I went back and I saw I

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>started to see that. If you start to see everything

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is happening over and over again, and then you study

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the cause effect mechanics behind that at a nitty grady level,

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you learn how reality works, and then you can write

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>your principles for dealing with reality, which are the recipes

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially for making good decisions. So to me it, you know,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>history has shown like the same things happen over and

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>over again for the same cause effect relationships. So that

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>debt book that you're referring to, you know, it's a

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>good example. Um, if we don't spend time understanding the

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>mechanics and the cause effect relationships, we just argue with

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>each other about what should be done. And it's like

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>two doctors who have not spend time understanding and agreeing

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on how the body works, arguing about, you know, what

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>should be done for the body. And so the reason

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I did that video how the economic machine works, and

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I did the book and the reason

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that I wrote principles is to put on the table.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>What I think that those cause effect relationships are so

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we can understand the timeless and universal mechanics behind it.

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's been invaluable to me because once I understand

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>that mechanics and we could test it, we could test

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it in all time frames, we could test it in

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>all countries, and we could understand it. And then with

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that framework, we know how to deal with it. And

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>but nowadays being able to deal with it with algorithms

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and technology means you can deal with it all over

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. And it's been a powerful force. So it's

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>evolved from those experiences, like I remember the first time

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I was clerking on the floor of the New York

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange UM in UM. I was just between college

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and going to business school and the stock and uh,

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a dollar crisis. We can't pay for our goods,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and you if nobody's accepting dollars and UM On August fifteen, uh,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Richard Nick's and gets on the television and he basically says,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we're severing the connection between dollars and gold. Back then,

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>money was like a check and then checking the checkbook

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>has no value. It only what the money is has value.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And so it would get you money, would get you gold,

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and that was and it was a breakdown. So it

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>was a default. And I remember thinking, um, when I

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to walk in on Monday morning to the

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange, this is a big crisis. And

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought the stock market would fall a lot. And

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the stock market went through the roof and I and

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I realized, I said, well, did you have currency breakdowns before?

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>And then I was. I studied h currency breakdowns that

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>happened in this system, and I realized why when you

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>value the currency it's bulls and how that whole thing

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>works that I didn't understand. So it's that perspective about mechanics.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Do we understand? Can we agree on the mechanics of

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>how it works? Because once you can do that, you

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>know how to deal with it. So you mentioned Principles

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>before we talk about big debt crisis. Let's talk about

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the book a bit. He came out last year. It

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>became a New York Times bestseller and you kind of

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>went on a not quite world tour on the book.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>You said that experience was really educational. What did you

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>learn speaking to people about the book Principles? Well, I

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't like I didn't like. I never liked being in

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>above the U, in the press, above the radar. You

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>don't do a lot of media historically, although you're beginning

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to flower now that you're an author. I'll do that,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll do that. I'll do this in my face. I'm

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>in a phase of life which is a transition from

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>my second phase to my third phase. And so the

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>way I look at it is uh, in the first

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>phase of life, one is dependent on others, one is learning,

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>one's basically a student. Um in set and phase of life,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.719
<v Speaker 1>one is working, others are dependent on them, and one

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is trying to be successful. As you get to my

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>stage in life, which is a transition from the second

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to third stage, the way I think it is, the

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>joy is no longer as much to be successful as

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to pass along what you've learned that has helped you

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be successful, the joys and seeing other people be successful.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And because these principles have been written down over a

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>long period of time and they have kind of the recipes, um,

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to pass those a log and that's what

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the process of doing, and then I'll phase out.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But to answer your question in terms of the surprises. Like,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was going to be a very uncomfortable experience.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought even the communications would be bad. And I

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have found such a joy in the interactions that I've

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>had with people in the in the public and and

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so on. Um So it's been a really pleasurable good experience,

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a sense of relationships, and a think people are now

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for principles, and I want to emphasize forget my principles.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to be my principles. But I do

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>think that everybody would benefit enormously by being crystal clear

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>about their principles. I want to pass this this thing along.

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Number one, I will pass this along that if every

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>time you're encountering your situation, um at that moment or

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>right after you write down the court the criteria for

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>making your decisions in words, and that allows you to

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>communicate with others, allows you to clarify your decision making,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and you could take in from others what the best

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>criteria is for those circumstances in the future. That is

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>invaluable because in all your relationships with people, know people

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>will know what your principles are, how you will interact

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with them and why, and then you can go even

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>beyond that to convert those into equations and help them

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>make the decision that I think that's a powerful thing

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in the future. And so I wanted to pass along mind.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>But I also wanted to more importantly pass along the

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>importance of other people doing that. And that's what I'm

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in the phase of. There are two things. So I

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>did the Life and Work Principles, and now I'm working

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on Economic and Investment Principles. That will be the third

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>third book in the series. So middle one was sort

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of an accident. Well, we'll get to the middle one

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in the moment. Before we leave principles, I have to

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ask about what I think is the most interesting approach

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you bring to managing a firm, which you call being

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>radically open minded, having radical transparency, and bringing about thoughtful disagreement.

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell me how that developed, because that doesn't seem to

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>be the way most of corporate America operates. That's our edge.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Your edge is thoughtful. Okay, yeah, um okay, So let

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>me give you one one sentence. I want an idea

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of meritocracy. In other words, I want the best ideas

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to win as opposed to where it comes from. Right,

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to be. It doesn't have to come

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>from me. I just want the best decisions to be made, UM,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and I want to What I want is to have

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>meaningful work and meaningful relationships. A meaningful work meaning you're

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>on a mission together. And those relationships are are deep

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and meaningful in their high quality, there a reward in

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and of themselves, and they make an organization more effective.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So uh, an idea meritocracy, I'll get it out of

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>one sentence. An idea meritocracy which the goals are meaningful

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:40.479
<v Speaker 1>work and meaningful relationships through radical truthfulness and radical transparency.

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Radical truthfulness means say what you're thinking and others will

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>say the same, and let's get away from the behind

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the scenes and the politics of it. And the radical

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>transparency means most people can see most everything so that

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>they can form the opinions of what's going on themselves,

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>independent thinking, and that builds trust. First of all, it

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>cuts through the notion of politics and bureaucracy. UM. By

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>everybody being able to see most things, you, you build

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>trust you and you're dealing with most things without the

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>blur of hiding stuff that's in people's heads. And in

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the investment business, UM, I think it's a particularly special important.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also an entrepreneurs it's especially important because

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.479
<v Speaker 1>you you have to have the independent thinking in the markets. Um,

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the markets discount the consensus, so whatever the consensus is

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>is in the price. So in order to be successful

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the markets, you have to think differently than from

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the consensus, and you have to be right. And in

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>order to have that, you have to have independent thinkers.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>And when you have those differences in independent thinkers, if

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you can work that through through thoughtful disagreement, you have

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the art of thoughtful disagreement. If you work that through,

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you raise your probabilities of getting at the best answer.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And and that's been a very very powerful thing. And

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>it also builds trusts and it builds better relationships because

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>trust comes from you know, opting, operating an organizations and

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>have this politics. It's all behind the scenes. Everybody gives

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>them high fives and they're all happy and so long,

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and they talked behind each other's back. So that's been um,

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been a big deal for us. That that's your edge.

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's some Let's go forward to the new book

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>which just came out, Navigating Big Dead Crises. You mentioned

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you decided to write that because a couple of folks

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>ask you to put it together. Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner,

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>other people. I really like the way the book is assembled.

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It's broken into three parts. The template for what the

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>big debt cycles look like. Then you use three detailed cases,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Great Financial Crisis, the Great Depression in the Weimar Republic,

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you you put together forty eight case studies

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>from the past century. So let let's start with the

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>first one to template what makes all of these very

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>different crises follow the same mechanical sort of cycle. How

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>how is that even possible? Well, everything's got these cause

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>effect relationships and the way you know, in a nutshell,

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to make it simple. Um, there's productivity over

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a period of time, our living standards rise because we

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>learn how to do things better, and the output per

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>man hour work increases, and that moves at a fairly

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>um it'll go up and down its pace. But by

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>nine and large it's not what causes volatility and around

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that we have to debt cycles. We have a short

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>term debt cycle, which we understand because that's the business cycle.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're in a recession. Central banks E's monetary policy.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>They changed the relationship between short term interest rates, long

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>term interest rates, asset prices, but liquidity in and then um,

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you have debt grow. The credit is spending power. So

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>when you extend credit, you are extending spending power and

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>when and that's good for the economy when that credit

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>can be paid back. And what it does, of course,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is it pushes asset prices up while levels of debt

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>continue to increase. And at that part of the cycle,

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>people and everybody sort of um conservative about that and

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:30.239
<v Speaker 1>it pays back. But asset prices when you mean, the

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>barrowers have the ability to service that debt even as

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>asset prices right, that's right, and everybody wins, and that's

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>good credit growth and it's a wonderful thing. Um. Then

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>as you get later in the cycle, it's a very

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>self reinforcing cycle because as asset prices go up, you

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have more collateral. People are more confident, they believe asset

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>prices will continue to rise. They become a little bit

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>less careful in terms of that kind of lending. They

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:02.239
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate that into the future. It and then um and

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of course as um, then there's the shadow banking system.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>There's always a shadow banking system really, not just a

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>way or nine. All the time, there's always a shadow

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>banking system. There's a shadow banking system now. Um In

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>other words, there's a banks and they're regulating controlled within

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>their parameters. And then outside of those banks are other

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of new forms of lending and capital markets and

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>and so on, or it could be online, could have

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>different forms, and the there's a pressure to develop that

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>outside of the systems shadow banking because the more regulated,

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more controlled one doesn't make as much money and so on,

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and so by being at the periphery, you can use

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>higher amounts of leverage, you can do certain things, and

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so that grows. So you develop the shadow banking system

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>which is not regulated. And also investors want to go

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>to because they'll give you a bit higher return. Like

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even think about how the money market funds

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>developed because by comparison to banks and so on, and

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so that develops outside and it becomes so self reinforcing

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>because everybody makes money at it, and also they believe

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it because when things go up, you know, everybody thinks

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>things will go up. So so less regulation, more risk,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 1>better return, that's right, and that's late in the cycle,

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and then what happens, and of course what that does

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is all that demand and liquidity causes rates to come down,

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>liquidity go out, So like we see in this cycle,

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>um last cycle, we brought interest rates basically down to zero,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>practically down. That wasn't good enough, So central banks brought

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen trillion dollars of assets, push the asset prices up,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>push liquidity into the system, and so asset prices go

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>up and people extrapolate. And the funny thing about it

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is as you get to later in the cycle, when

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>there is more debt and you know that you're coming

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>closer to the end of the cycle, there is more

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of an extrapolating in the market prices of that moving on.

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at what the discount of growth

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>rates are laid in the cycle, they become high, they're

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult to meet, and then you get the changing, you

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>get the tightening of monetary policy. Tightening, and monetary policy

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>has its effect first on asset prices, and then it

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>becomes a self reinforcing effect. And that's the normal business cycle,

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>a normal sort of debt cycle, because debt is credit

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and credit is buying power, and economy runs on that

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>um then you have this longer term debt cycle, which

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is the accumulation of those other cycles. Because the world

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>wants to be long. The world wants to be leverage long.

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>They want everything to go up, said we all, do

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know central banks better times? Assets go up, businesses, activity,

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.479
<v Speaker 1>and so on, and there's a strong desire to push credit.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And so the limitations that start to encounter is when

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you get close to zero interest rates, like we had

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>zero interest rates, that changes the game. And when you

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have UH and then the the you need to print

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>money and buy assets. That happened in so te to

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty two interest rates at zero that central banks need

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>to buy assets, They buy assets. They cause that carried

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to very similar situation that we've been in, and so

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>will we carry that from two thousand and eight and nine?

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Then and then you come into about you know, a

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>year year and a half ago, we start to tighten

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the monetary policy, we pull that in, we have higher

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>rates of death growth. That thing goes on and on

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>all over in all countries, that same pace of dynamic.

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot more on that in the book. I mean,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the time to go, so let me

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>let me pull you forward to today. Given that these

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>things are cyclical, they repeat, they look very similar. What

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>parallels would you draw from history to today? What what

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>eras is today most remind you of? What? What's the

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>most intriguing aspect of the current set up? Well, the

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>most the most recent period, that's a now guess of

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>this is the late thirties. Let's say if you take so,

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>why do I say that, I'd say, Um, we're UM,

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>well along in the business cycle, the short term debt cycle.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>We're in the seventh or eighth thinning of that. Central

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>banks are tightening monetary policy. That's where we are in

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that cycle. UM. Similar to then, uh, when we have

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>because of the printing of money and because technologies and

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>other reasons, we have a greater amount of UM polarity,

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>political polarity. I think this is UM an important important

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>issue UM. And that political polarity causes populism around the world.

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>In other words, a strong individual to come in get

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>control of that situation while they're having that type of polarity. UM.

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So the word populism, for example, in developed countries, was

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>not widely used until you go back to the thirties,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Until more recently now it's of course common and so

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we and we're also late in the longer term death cycle,

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>meaning if you were to turn down, if the economy

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>was to turn down, UM, the ability to deal with

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that with lowering interest rates is very limited, and the

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ability to deal with that with quantitative easing is very

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>limited for a variety of reasons. So it's very much

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like the late thirties. You can't you can't find a

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>time that in which both of those circumstances exist. Populism

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>together with that difference is wealth caaps and so on.

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And then also we have a situation which is quite similar,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I think, and we have rising, arising power in the

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>form of China. Let's talk about that, because in the

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>thirties you had Italy and Japan and Germany rising to

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>challenge the existing powers. How parallel is a growing China

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>today to that, to that era um? I think it's

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not only analogous to that era UM, but there's

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a concept UM called the fucidities trapped by the way

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that in an excellent book by Graham Allison Um called

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Destined for War, he goes through but you can study

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for war well, he's dealing with China relationship. And but

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>if another excellent book, by the way, is um UM

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul Kennedy's The Rise and Decline of Great Powers. And

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 1>if you study history, I've made a point now to

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>study history over the last five hundred years, very very carefully.

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 1>What you see is that in the last five hundred

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>years there have been sixteen times where a power UM

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to challenge and existing power arising power. So like

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you say, in Germany, UM in within Europe or Japan

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.959
<v Speaker 1>within Asia, that was the nature of of that beast.

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>That means that there's certainly rivalry. So a trade war

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a comparable power creates an issue. So sixteen previous examples

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of a rising power, twelve of which led to UM

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>actual shooting wars. So I'm not saying we're going to

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>get into a shooting war, but I am saying that, UM,

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the history has shown that when you have wars after

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a war, you have a dominant power and you have

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>periods of peace because you have a dominant power. After

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>World War Two, UM, the United States was powerful both

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>economically and also it had a monopoly on nuclear power. UM.

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And so as a result of that power, the you know,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations is in New York, the World Bank,

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and the IMF in Washington, d C. Because it determined that.

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And in history, UM, then when you have the rising

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>power to challenge the existing power, you have elements of conflict.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying I don't want to overdo this, but I

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:00.719
<v Speaker 1>am saying that we are entering an era in which, um,

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody who reads history and policy makers around the world

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and recognize this, that this issue with China rising means

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that there are naturally going to be conflicts. And how

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>do you resolve conflicts in the world market. You don't

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>go to a court system. There's not a rule of

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>law in the world that becomes dominant. So there is

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>more of a rule of power, and that's a dynamic.

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So all I'm saying is, if I was to pick

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you asked me when is most analogous, and I would

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>say that the nineteen thirties, where you take that period,

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen thirties is an analogous period. If you

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>were to say cause effect relationships, because how much power

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>do we have in terms of monetary policy, how much

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>populism do we have analogous? These are important things. And

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>then also, um, you know where are we in the

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle, how our asset prices priced and so on.

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.239
<v Speaker 1>So it looks now the most analogous period you can

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>go back to periods in other periods in history you

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>could find also other analogous types of periods. But that's

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>what it looks. But well, we know how the nine

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>ended and it wasn't well with World War two? What's

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the implication. Are we at risk for a shooting conflict

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>with China? Or is this going to take more in

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the terms of an economic or competitive I think that

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what our circumstances lead to has a lot to do

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with how we all deal with each other given those circumstances.

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>In other words, um, do you mean us individually? Do

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you mean between President she and President Trump? Between? Let's

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>history is shown that how conflict is handled is the

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is the big thing. Um so Uh, there's a tendency

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of polarity to cause greater conflict and then hard times

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to quasi and worse conflict in those cases. Um. You

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you even had in Germany and Italy, Japan, Um and Spain,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you had four democracies that chose to be autocracies because

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of the would somebody get control of the situation because

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it was fairly the chaos of the conflict, it became

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>worse and so there was conflict within countries and there

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was conflict between countries. And I think the real question is,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, can you have thoughtful disagreement, can you have

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>strong negotiations but with the notion of reaching um, whether

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they're compromises or paths that are you know, not damaging

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>type of conflicts. I don't know. This is beyond me,

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but I am saying that I think I can't. I

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you whether you go to world I think

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that um and that you were I would say that, ah,

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be to not consider it as a possibility

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and not be worried about it. Uh, internal conflict and

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>external conflict would be dangerous. In other words, I think

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the worry and the attention paid to it, and

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the notion of, you know, how do we work together?

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>How do we work together as a country. Is there

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is there in America that has common values that we're

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>pursuing a common mission and and and what is that?

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>How do you deal with that polarity issue? You know?

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are issues in terms of how effectively

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>capitalism is working for everybody. Um, it's it's working, I

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>think less effective. I'm a capitalist, I'm professional capitalist. I

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>believe in the system. But as it how do you

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>deal with all of those those are education equal education?

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>These types of things have become fundamental and they're they're

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they're big challenges. Anyway we're going before we move from that,

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you're getting from markets. But you point out in the

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>book that every time there's a financial crisis we seem

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to run into issues of economic inequality and widening gap,

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>widening gap between the halves and have nuts? Is that

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the machinery? Is that something that always happens

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>when there's a financial crisis. History is shown that, Um,

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in places where there's a big disparity in conditions at

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the same time as you have an economic downturn, there's

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>greater levels of conflict. Now, you could be a poorer

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>country in which there's not much difference and you have

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a downturn and you have less conflict, or you could

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>be a rich country. Um, you know Switzerland is going

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to have less conflict down there because they're not that

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>same element of disparity. So history has shown that when

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>there is that and there's a downturn, there's more like

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>there's more to argue about. Interesting. We're gonna open this

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>up for questions from the audience, but first we're gonna

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>do a speed round five questions in in a minute. Uh,

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll and then we'll do Q and A.

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's jump right into this. Tell us the

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>most important thing that people don't know about you? Most

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>important that I have a great wife for forty um

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>plus years, who is a is a force of nature

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm crazy about it, and that is also doing

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>amazing things in her world. Um, you mentioned a few books.

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Give us your favorite book you would suggest people should

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 1>read outside of your own. I would I would say

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Lessons from History. It's a hundred four pages. Uh. The

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Durance wrote that who are the Great? One of the

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>probably the greatest historians, brought five thousand years of five

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They distilled it down in to onion four pages. Fabulous.

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say, here of a thousand faces the life cycles,

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>which is right? And I particulate Joseph Campbell. And then

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I would particularly say that now they should read which

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think is a masterpiece, Paul Kennedy's The Rise and

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Decline of Great Powers, so we have some millennials in

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the room. If a millennial came up to you and

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>said they were interested in a career in finance, what

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of advice would you give them. Well, let's see.

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important thing is as you're young,

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>is to realize that your success comes from knowing how

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to deal with your not knowing more than it comes

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>from anything you know. So how to be open mind,

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 1>how to take in the best of the around there.

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't think that you're be humble, take in the best,

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>know how to deal with not knowing, and then you'll

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>be more successful. And um, what is your favorite philanthropic

0:35:54.280 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>focus these days? Um? For me personally, it's two things, UM,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>ocean exploration and particularly micro finance. Microfinance interesting micro finance

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and ocean expedition because I basically believe, I believe this

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>issue is a big issue, and I think that you know,

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals are blessings that I've had. Can I have

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a family that's a good family take care of me.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>That that's a very important thing, and sometimes that's difficult. Um. Education,

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to a good public school.

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, can you have good public education? And then

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a few bucks to get you going in terms of

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.280
<v Speaker 1>being able to make decisions. I've seen on micro finance.

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a supporter of gramin America from from the beginning. Uh.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>For every dollar that I give to that UM, there's

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve dollars in lending that gets paid back in the

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>in the first ten years, and it just keeps going

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>round and round and it becomes self financing. So I

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>think that's um an important. And then I'm, you know,

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>thrilled about ocean exploration because I think it's our biggest

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>asset and it's and it's thrilling. And my final question,

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about the world of investing today?

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You wish you knew forty plus years ago when you

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>were beginning. UM, I guess it would be the same thing,

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>which is, I wish I knew how to deal with

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>my not knowing, how to how to bring in the best,

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>how to deal with that thoughtful disagreement, to be radically

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>open minded, to be um audacious and going after my goals,

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to try to do great things. But to know that

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I could change my risk return ratio by being able

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to raise my confidence by the art of thoughtful disagreement,

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and to diversify effectively my bets so that I could

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not have anyone that dominates my returns. And uh, you know,

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to place those bets with both aggressiveness and humility. All Right,

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's open this up to the audience. I know

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of handheld mike's running around. What questions

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>do we have from the audience anywhere? Right over here

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on the corner, I told you there was a plant.

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a plant, but I've always wanted to ask

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>you this. UM, thank you for thank you for this,

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, where this has been great? Um, you've

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>been one of the most successful funds ever, maybe the

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>most successful. A lot of funds that have had success

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>have eventually either kicked out their investors and run house

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>money or have drastically limited how much outside capital they've

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>taken or had become family offices through the years. Is

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that something that you ever considered? And why have you

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>completely gone the other way and grown the firm? Um?

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Given how successful you've been, UM, good question. We're we're

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there's alpha, there's alpha, and there's beta. So this is

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna probably be a little bit of a technical answer

0:38:55.760 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to your question first, but UMU beta which is what

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is your strategic acid allocation? Next, you're timeless and universal um.

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of liquid and a lot of capacity.

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>And so those are the only two accounts we've taken alpha.

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>We have capped our alpha. We I don't think, you

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>know what, We just don't take in new money that

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is capped UM. And then the way that we do

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, yes, we we invest a lot in there,

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>but there's a hundred and sixty billion dollars of total

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>assets invested, and we haven't had the need to not

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>invest for other people. So I don't expect that I

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 1>have no expectation that that would change. I saw her

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>hand back in the corner over there. I M. I've

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>luckily been lucky enough to read this book already, which

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is very, very entertaining. Could I just ask you to

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>talk in a little more detail about one of the shortest,

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>most punchy sentences in the in the book, which was

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in the end, policymakers always print? Are we confident that

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>they will indeed always print? Might there be any exceptions

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and go ahead? Well, it just takes how much pain

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 1>that gets them to print? You know? I mean, at

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, what I'm saying is when

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a dead crisis and it keeps going and

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it becomes painful, you'll print money when you hit zero

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, Um, then you print. That's been true throughout history.

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's not a case that I know

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>of that's that's different from that, because it's the better alternative.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, at the in the end, you know, when

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it gets bad enough, they'll always bread some question over

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>here and we'll try and get through as many questions,

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>which is, by the way, an interesting consideration if you

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>take longer term, not immediate, but you think of what

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean longer term in terms of reserve currency.

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>If you start to think where are we in the cycle,

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and and you start to extrapolate what you know, what

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to have to be sold? You the United

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.879
<v Speaker 1>States is going to have to sell a lot more

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>debt in the world because of the larger elements of

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>budget deficits. You're gonna have to sell more and from

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a buyer of that that what what a bond is

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:35.399
<v Speaker 1>is a promise to get a lot of currency. That's

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>what it is. You get currency and so and we're

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 1>in a monetary system. So if you take you know,

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know five, ten, fifteen years later. UM, I

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>think it'll increasingly be UM an issue. You know, what

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is the currency, what is the storehold wealth? Where you know,

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>those are elements that lurk in the back, not immediately.

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>As as as issues with on on that path of

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the maintaining power, global economic power. You know, many of

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the economies have been on nine stimulus, that is, stimuli

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that can be considered a little bit of a steroids.

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>You know. You mentioned that for those economies, you know,

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 1>to succeed in remaining power, um, they have to keep

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the growth growing. So given the current scenario and the

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>trade agreements that we're trying to reach, do you have

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>an expectation of which economy will fold first? Um? You

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have it. And I think that Europe is

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>um is a is an area of conflict and there

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>are issues that exist within Europe, but there you know,

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:49.439
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know that I have I would say

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>when we have the downturn, it will be an issue

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of you know, continuity, cohesiveness. I think Europe will have

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>a greater out of challenge because they don't have a

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 1>common fiscal policy, they don't have unity within the countries.

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>They don't have unity between the countries and they have

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>big structural issues. Um So I would say that Europe

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 1>probably would be the most strained. I saw handback over

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 1>there to Tende being from Forrinstan Globe Partners. The question

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is in the long term, what do you think the

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>US market will be and what the long term US

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>markets where do you see them going? Um? I think

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 1>US market what you mean in terms of size or

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>valuation or in terms of performance, I think that we're closer,

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not. Long term, well, let's say five or ten years.

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we have squeezed a lot out of the

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>U S market. I think we're an environment that we

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to have low return going forward for a

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>very very long time. Because, um, if you look at returns,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>there's the present value effect of lowering interest rates and

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>putting liquidity into the system, and that has largely run

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>its course. And all assets compete with each other, so

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you can almost look at the yields of those assets.

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:24.480
<v Speaker 1>What's the yield on cash, the yield on cash, the

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>yield on bonds, and then assets equities and so on,

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the brisk premiums of each of those and then that

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>carries through to private equity, carries through the real estate,

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and so on. And because so much money has come

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 1>out and interest rates were squeezed, we've brought asset prices

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>up to very high levels um um in a storic context,

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but not relative to cash. They haven't gone to such

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily high levels UM. And now in that tightening, as

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we're raising cash rates um and the spreads between short

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:00.760
<v Speaker 1>term interest rates and the longer term exp active returns

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 1>get squeezed, that also squeezes those returns. So when you're

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at almost a zero interest rate low in the United States,

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>zero interest rate in Europe, and a zero interest rate

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, which are the main reserve currencies, and that

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that has all been supported by quantitative easing. Beyond that,

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we've squeezed out a lot of assets. I

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>think the world by and large is leverage long um

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>meaning assets. Let's let's say the buying of um debt,

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt. One of the biggest sources of returns on

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.399
<v Speaker 1>assets was the fact that the interest rate was low

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>relative to the return on equity. And so there's been

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of buy backs, a lot of mergers and acquisition.

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>In other words, by companies buying companies and bidding that up,

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's been a factor. And that's also then you

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.359
<v Speaker 1>have the tax boost because if you lower corporate tax rates, uh,

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it's are worth more. All of those things have pushed

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>those asset prices up to levels where it's difficult to

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>see how you can squeeze that with and so you

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>can't get the rate structure down much and which is

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the wind to the back and you can't. So all

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of that means I think you've squeezed out a lot.

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So so going forward from here, if you're an investor,

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.840
<v Speaker 1>does that mean you just have to prepare for um

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>lower expected returns in the future or is there a

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>place where you can hide. No, I think like like

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:41.839
<v Speaker 1>crypto UM, I think if you're an average investor, I

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>think that you again, there's alten this beta um. You

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have to prepare for lower expected returns in the future

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>because if you take all these obligations. I'm talking to

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>some extent about the debt obligations, but there are unfunded

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 1>pension obligations, they're also healthcare obligations. There's a lot of

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>obligations and essentially a lower real interest rate and therefore

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>lower asset returns, assets are held by those who are

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:12.399
<v Speaker 1>more rich relative to that. I think all of those

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>things are going to pull that you can expect lower returns,

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and you can expect probably more taxes those in a

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 1>longer term. So that's going to be the nature of

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the beast. As far as and how to deal with it, um,

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I think most people should not be making tactical movements

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in and out of the markets to produce alf I

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's difficult. So I think that they have to

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 1>know how to balance their accounts. That's why when I

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 1>refer to what we call all weather, what's risk parity?

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you balance those things back? You have to

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>have a balance portfolio unless you're going to be able

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to you know, concentration is a risky thing. And then

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>or you have to be able to time markets, and

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of course that's that's a difficult thing too. I saw

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of hands up, Um, why don't we come

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>down to the front row over here with this woman?

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you hi, Raight, So my question is actually more

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>about management, because I really think that's been that's from

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>what my hataway it was from principles was just what

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>an incredible and strange culture. You've built a bridgewater and

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I love your advice. You know that to deal with

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:24.240
<v Speaker 1>not knowing, that's such a horror problem for most people.

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>People are uncomfortable to admitting I don't know. So how

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>do you teach someone who is either resistant to admitting

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, or worse yet, who is not aware

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of how much he or she doesn't know. Well, one

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of the best I was gonna just say, play the

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:45.840
<v Speaker 1>markets and then you'll needalize how difficult it is to

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be confident. That's a but honestly, what happens is to

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>make the transformation. Um, you have to explain that through

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>them in a way where let's go through this, Like

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>if I was to say, um, do you want to

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>know what your weaknesses are? Do you want to know

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 1>what I think? Do you want to know be able

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell me what you think? Do you want to

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>have disagreement when we're disagreement? Do you want to have

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful disagreement? Because if there's disagreement, there's some chance that

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe you that's wrong rather than the other person. Intellectually

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you can get people there, not all people, but intellectually

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you can buy and large say you're struggling with yourself really,

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's this intellectual self that said, yeah, I'd like

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to know my weaknesses. I know everybody has strengths and

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses I can develop. I'd like to have that honest relationship,

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you will. Once you intellectually get that you wanted,

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to encounter your emotional barriers to it.

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 1>And the emotional barriers are either your ego barrier that

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:52.839
<v Speaker 1>you know that you're going to have to get over,

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>or your blind spot barrier. I mean, in other words,

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>by ego barrier means um you somehow feel challenged or whatever,

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you feel bad about not knowing, feel good about not knowing.

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And curiosity. If I can get you to see that

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>world that way intellectually, you'll you'll want it. And then

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the blindness barrier is you could be really curious. But minds,

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:17.400
<v Speaker 1>different people's minds work differently. They see things. Some people

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:20.279
<v Speaker 1>see the big pictures, some people see details, and so on.

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And when you come to see that, different people see

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>things differently, and you could when you see things through

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 1>others eyes, that you can see in three dimensions in

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>color rather than seeing in this one flat dimension black

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and white, and you can do much better if you

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>get them to intellectually understand that and say we're going

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to go through this in a in a way where

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>there's trust, where there's meaningful relationships. But you can get

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 1>trust because you can get to see things for yourself.

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Everything is transparent, will talk about it and so on.

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you get people to want to be that way,

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but they have to start to realize intellectually that it's

0:50:57.239 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>really a good way of being. It builds better work

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:04.880
<v Speaker 1>results of builds better relationships, and that's a tremendous power

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to get to the right answer and also get the

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>rewards of good work and good relationships. They have to

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>go through that, and then they have to go through

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the experience. And then when you take them through the experiences,

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to help them through that experiences because some

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of that is different different. I think it's also how

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:23.959
<v Speaker 1>we teach kids, and we teach our in our own

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.280
<v Speaker 1>environment that you know, did you get the great grade?

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:29.880
<v Speaker 1>In there? In there? And it's all kind of do

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you know? And the life is not like this. Life

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>when you leave school is not like did you get

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the great grade? Life starts succeeding when you start to fail.

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>When okay, and and then it's the learning that comes

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>from those failures that produces it. So I think that

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:51.360
<v Speaker 1>whole intellectually getting that being that way is healthy in

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:54.400
<v Speaker 1>all of those respects. And then once you have that

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 1>in their mind and they experience it, you help them

0:51:57.360 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>through that, then they know they're experiencing and that's what

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 1>works for us to help people make that transition. Thank

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you have about read on here all the way this way?

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 1>H got it, Hi rate. One of my favorite shows

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is a show called Billions, and some people have said

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that the character Babby as Rod in his office is

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:22.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhat based on you. Have you ever seen the show?

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Any truth to that or what do you think of that?

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea you speak to those guys. I

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have no idea whether it's true. I um. I watched

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>three episodes out of curiosity. I thought it was entertaining,

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and then I, you know, just didn't have the chance

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to pursue it. So I don't have much to had y.

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess they got the writers. When you read the

0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>book that you talk Paul Kendy, the book that Act,

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and read that book well. Of that book, the message

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I take from that book is that every great Paul

0:52:54.719 --> 0:52:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it's because they're all leverage. They borrow too much. At

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that the message you wanted the massive from the focus.

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Now the US really looks like, oh, defice getting bigger

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and the bigger do you see we we are? That's

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>where we're going. And then what's the implication to the

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 1>currency of the U store. So in the Polkenny book,

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 1>over leverage is the US over leveraged relative to historical companies. Yeah,

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:20.800
<v Speaker 1>so there are a number of lessons. One of those

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is UM and it can take the ark by the way,

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:27.520
<v Speaker 1>typically is two hundred years, two hundred and fifty years,

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so the arc is quite long UM and it by

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the way, it starts off with technological advances that raises

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:38.000
<v Speaker 1>g d P and then makes them very competitive in

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the world markets. Like UM. The Dutch was the reserve

0:53:42.160 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>currency before the British Empire in ours and then what

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:49.280
<v Speaker 1>happens is later in the cycle there is that desire

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to push it in leverage UM. Usually it's a matter

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of they become global, they have global trade routes, when

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:01.239
<v Speaker 1>they travel around there carrying their currency. Then people then

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>use that currency, that's what they pay in, that's what

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they lend in. UM. UM Holland. Essentially Amsterdam became half

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:13.239
<v Speaker 1>of world trade at that time, and it became very

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 1>rich because of those things, and the world use that

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:20.359
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency, so there was borrowing and lending, and then

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the cycle goes that. Of course, when you have a

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:27.279
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency, others want to save in it because the

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 1>choice is their local currency and so on, and they

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that that's the thing to save in. And when

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they're saving in it, that means that there's borrowing in

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it by that country, and they usually overextend, and as

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a result of over extending, they make they get the

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>debt problems that you're dealing with, and then it becomes

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 1>a challenge. I think the United States is following that

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:52.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of an arc, and we are over extending, and

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're operating in this world reserve currency uh fiat

0:54:57.360 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 1>currency type of assistem. And so if you were to

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>take you know, let's say years in the future, I

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the role of the US dollar will diminish,

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and the returns on US dollars will US dollar denominated

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:12.839
<v Speaker 1>debt I think will suffer for the reasons that we're

0:55:12.840 --> 0:55:16.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about here. And then I think then you see

0:55:16.239 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the emergence of other currencies. What those currencies will be

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly how that will work is an interesting question. Um

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:25.279
<v Speaker 1>So that's too big of a topic to get into

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>an answering your uh in this brief a couple of minutes.

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But I would say that that becomes an issue, and

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:35.799
<v Speaker 1>that probably over the next five and ten years, we're

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>going to see that play more of a role. Rate

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 1>given in Kennedy's book, each of the great powers became

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>global powers by expanding beyond their borders. What do you

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>make of the current deglobalization that seems to be taking

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 1>place in the United States, in the UK and elsewhere. Well,

0:55:55.480 --> 0:55:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're you're talking about there are two different things.

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>In those case, says, there wasn't so much the globalization.

0:56:03.400 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>There was the globalization of those countries, just like the

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>globalization of China. We're now seeing the One Belt, one Road.

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing investments all around the world. That's that's carrying

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that forward. With that, you will see more lending in

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>uh m MB, you will see more Chinese banks in

0:56:24.120 --> 0:56:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the world, and so on and and so forth, and that

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:31.719
<v Speaker 1>will expand very very analogous regarding globalization, which is the

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:34.800
<v Speaker 1>idea of producing at one place and selling it someplace

0:56:34.800 --> 0:56:37.479
<v Speaker 1>else in the most efficient ways that there's not much

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 1>trade barriers so that you can do that. Or the

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>globalization of capital markets, the free flow of money into

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:47.479
<v Speaker 1>and out of countries and all of that. UM, I

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>think that that's peaked, and that where now in an

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 1>environment in which will go to a you know, more

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of a D globalization kind of environment. And because of

0:56:58.480 --> 0:57:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this somewhat threatening environment that perceived UM worry that you

0:57:04.160 --> 0:57:06.840
<v Speaker 1>could have a conflict. I think that that creates a

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 1>force that reinforces the D globalization because let's say, if

0:57:11.120 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>you're going to produce something, if you're producing things in

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:16.440
<v Speaker 1>China that we need in the United States, by way

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of example, there might be a concern about doing that.

0:57:20.040 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you're producing PCs, you might say and might

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:26.080
<v Speaker 1>need PCs here, there might be a pressure to go

0:57:26.360 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>D globalization that sort of feeds on itself. I think

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing those kinds of pressures. I think the

0:57:31.560 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>same thing is true that that could happen with capital flows. UM.

0:57:35.680 --> 0:57:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, if Chinese investors are more concerned that you

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 1>could have a conflict, there could be more sanctions of

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:44.120
<v Speaker 1>investments in the United States, so they're less inclined to

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 1>invest in the United States and so on. So those

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>issues I think, UM, I think we're more moving more

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 1>towards d globalization and almost independent self sufficiency is probably

0:57:57.200 --> 0:57:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the more of the direction. And we have time for

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:06.200
<v Speaker 1>one last question. Let's go right over here. I have

0:58:06.280 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 1>two questions regarding China. The first one is where do

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you see China's debt situation today? And the second being

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:18.040
<v Speaker 1>given that China has started to increase the amount of stimulus,

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is that an area that you would potentially increase an

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 1>investment in in this at this point in time, Uh,

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like I said, applying the template to China, UM, Chinese

0:58:33.360 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 1>debt is mostly in their local currency. The amount of

0:58:36.400 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>foreign currency denomin data debt for China is very small. Okay,

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:45.520
<v Speaker 1>so now you're dealing mostly with an internal issue. And

0:58:46.000 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>also the lenders to China are within their system. And

0:58:52.440 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the like I said, the capacity to handle a debt

0:58:57.080 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>crisis by spreading it out in one way or another,

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>UM is quite large. Um. They have the expertise to

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:07.200
<v Speaker 1>know how to do that, to do that spreading it out,

0:59:07.680 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So UM, I think that when you look at debt cycles, uh,

0:59:12.040 --> 0:59:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there were four cases in which I know the United

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 1>States default had had major debt crisis is and won't

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>rattle them all off, and that they were able to

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 1>be managed. The lesson I gave, for example, of the

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand excuse me, the debt crisis that I was

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so wrong about was the ability to spread that out

0:59:32.440 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and lower interest rates at the same time. China has

0:59:35.240 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that ability. I think everybody's focused in on that and

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and too focused in on that, and they're not focused

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in on their productivity growth and how they're making changes

0:59:44.680 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of that productivity growth. I think, um, you know,

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like a bad year of growth, uh will be probably

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>twice as good as a good year of growth from

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:57.120
<v Speaker 1>us in terms of that that whole productivity thing. And

0:59:57.160 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at indicators of productivity over a period

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of time, quality of education, quality of infrastructure, those kinds

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of things, you know, they have the reasons to continue

1:00:08.040 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to have high productivity. So to me, it looks like

1:00:11.080 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those cycles, their version of a cycle to

1:00:13.720 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>do a debt restructuring and and a debt organization. They're

1:00:17.320 --> 1:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>doing it on a proactive basis before the cycle is

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>actually caused a crisis. In most of the other cases,

1:00:23.920 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like in our financial two thousand financial crisis, we had

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, and then you have reactive. They're doing proactive.

1:00:30.760 --> 1:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very um. I'm not worried about the debt

1:00:34.040 --> 1:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>crisis in in China or the debt situation in China,

1:00:37.760 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm you know, I believe that it's going to

1:00:40.160 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>be a very good place for long term investing. I

1:00:42.720 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>think it has to be an important part of everybody's portfolio.

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just opening up to foreign investors. It's a different

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of place, so you have to get to know it.

1:00:51.320 --> 1:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm basically bullish, and I won't get

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>into the particulars of what particular investments I would make

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>there though. So that is all we have time for.

1:01:01.320 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Ray for being so generous with

1:01:03.440 --> 1:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>his time. Let's give him a nice round of applause.

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very Oh my pleasure. If you're gonna hang

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>around a little bit and sign some books for people,

1:01:10.480 --> 1:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is that right? If you're fantastic, So stick around rail

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>sign some books and thank you so much for coming