WEBVTT - Does micromanaging actually work?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey everyone, Manny here before we get to today's episode,

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring your attention to the no such

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>thing listener survey. By filling out this survey, you will

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>help us make this show better. You hear from us

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>all the time, but now it's time to hear from you.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it the case that we talk too much and

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear more from experts? Or do you

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>think shockingly that we don't talk enough. Are the episodes

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>too short or are they too long? Please consider filling

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>out this survey and helping us make this show just

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better, even though that's a little hard

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to do because the show is already fantastic. You can

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>find the listener survey in the show notes for this

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>episode and in our newsletter at no such thing dot show.

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy today's episode, gas, I'm Manny, I'm Noah.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Devin and this is no such thing.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 3>The show resettle our dumb arguments and yours by actually

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 3>doing the research this week. Does micromanaging actually work?

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I know there's no no such thing, no such thank.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Such, thank.

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Touch, thank touch, thank so. We got a question from

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>a listener on management styles asking about micromanaging versus quote

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 3>unquote free range, which gets better results. We're going to

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 3>talk about that and a few other work related topics

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>and questions, but let's start with our own histories. How

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 3>do you boys feel about micromanaging slash management styles? And

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 3>you know we're sitting here with a manager ourselves, Devin, Devin,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>you are a manager to both of us in different capacities,

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>wanting you talk a little bit about that.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I guess I did manage you, or attempted to.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's say, yeah, what.

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Is my management style?

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 4>I would say, well, I I guess you guys can

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 4>fact check me on this, but I would like to

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 4>think that I don't micromanage people. I try to manage

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 4>people the way I like to be managed, and I

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 4>really hate being micromanaged. Yeah, in my mind, if you're

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 4>going to micromanage me, why don't you just do the job,

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Like I don't need to just be doing extra stuff

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 4>at work just to stay busy. So in the situations

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 4>that I have been in with managers who micromanage me,

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 4>I often just say, well, instead of you know, both

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 4>of us watching this video leaving notes, how about you.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Just watched the video notes and I'll just do something else.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 4>So Yeah, my style is like you sure to set

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 4>someone up, you give them what they need to do

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 4>to job, and then you check in.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.559
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's been mostly successful.

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 4>There are instances where you get someone who takes advantage

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 4>of someone who's not micromanaging and then doesn't really do anything. Yeah,

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 4>but I think those people are few and far between,

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think micromanaging a person who doesn't really

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 4>do their work is helpful either, because you're just taking

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 4>the time that you would be doing something else to

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>basically do the job as well.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 4>If you have people on your team who you feel

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.119
<v Speaker 4>like you need the micro manage, you need to get

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 4>them off of your team because like you're just wasting

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 4>your time by doing double the work.

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 3>To me, it's always just like we need expectations to

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>be clear, whether that's deadlines or how things should be

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>when it's when a deadline does come or something, Because

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>I think someone who's maybe doesn't have a lot of

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>work experience might just show up and be like, I

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 3>have no idea what I'm doing, and then if their

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>manager is not telling them, then they're like, well what

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 3>am I supposed to do?

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 3>So they need that handholding, but hopefully that's only a

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 3>temporary thing and then they're on their own.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good point.

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 4>If you're not going to micro manage, you got to

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 4>really set expectations because lines and what's expected of people.

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Because then as a freelancer more recently, I've had jobs

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>where I I'm on call or something and then it's

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>like I'm kind of just waiting for stuff and it's like,

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 3>all right, I know this thing ultimately has to be

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>due on Friday, but like do you want to see

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>something before then, or like you know, and it's just

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>on me to send it, and like I'll get it

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 3>done and send it just so it's off my plate.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 3>But it's like yeah, sometimes a little bit like am

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 3>I doing enough for you? Or it's sometimes more helpful

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 3>for there to be some middle ground of like Okay,

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 3>let's get one cut on this stay and then something

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>else the next day a milestone and yeah exactly, versus

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 3>like it's really annoying though when it's someone every two

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 3>hours being like, hey, do you think you'll have this

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 3>edit done? And it's like no, it's going to take

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 3>four hours just to export it, so you know, or whatever.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So we should note too that like we've always been

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>working in media, Yeah, there might be some fields where

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>micromanaging might be more required if you're I don't know,

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear plant or something, throwing that up as an example. Yeah,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we are in media, and Devin had always to me anyway,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>or both of us, I imagine, been kind of a

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture manager, like you know, think about this over

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the course of these few months, versus being in every edit.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>That's true, doing this, this and this. However, you know,

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>there were other times when Devon wasn't our boss exactly,

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and someone else would come in and there was a

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more micromanaging, and that does make the work experience

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>more strenuous, I think, especially because Devin was our manager

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and we were also friends or like you know, or

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I at least liked each other on the very beginning,

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and then other people will come in and you're just like, actually,

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I can hear that from Devin, but hearing the same

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>exact thing from you is much worse because I don't

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like you as much.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Also, I say bias not only in being friends, but

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I know Devin can like. So we're editing videos I

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>know Devin has edited, and you can do it. I've

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>had managers who, as far as I know, haven't edited videos,

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 3>so they're coming to me with notes or feedback, which

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 3>sometimes is valid. You don't need to be a video

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 3>editor to say this video looks horrible, right, obviously, but

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the spectations are maybe misaligned with the reality of the

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 3>footage in what we have and the time and all this,

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's like, Okay, Devin's not going to give notes

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 3>that are insane because he knows that's going to take

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 3>way more work or whatever, versus other times, I've had

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 3>managers who feel like they're leaving notes because they need

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 3>to say something to say they did something. Yeah, yeah.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Otherwise it's like I could have just sent this to

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 3>your boss ahead of you, and you know, we don't

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 3>need to exist. So it's the middle manager issue.

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>And there are some people who are good at managing

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and some people I just aren't. Like I was in

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>charge of someone at Business Insider once and I realized

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>how bad I was at being a manager.

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like they just kept away.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>They just kept asking me, like, you know, what should

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I do today? Or like what do you think about this?

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about this? I'm like, just you

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, use your brain. Get like I'm busy,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I've really got other shit to work on, and

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that's terrible, Like you're not, that's not, that's not. I

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>immediately realize, oh, I should not be managing anyone because yeah,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this is not a good dynamic.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Like, but I guess what do you guys think as

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>far as if we're doing micromanaging versus free range? What

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>do you think is more productive? And I guess this

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 3>could be twofold for you for an employee and as

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 3>a manager or a company side, what do you think

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 3>actually would get better results?

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 4>I think free range with clear expectations, in clear goals.

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Because I've been micromanaged, I've been with managers who are

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 4>more free range. I guess there's no advantages to me

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 4>of being micromanaged. There are sometimes advantages to the free

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 4>range thing, but free range with no clear goals or

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 4>expectations it's also very annoying.

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're kind of set up to film, yeah.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Because then you're just doing stuff in a bubble and

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 4>then you're manager who hasn't been around for a month

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 4>shows up and it's like, this is not what I

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 4>wanted you to do, and it's like, well, you gave

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 4>me no goals expectations.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah at all, So like here's just what we've

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 2>been doing.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, you know, I also hate managers that are

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 4>just micromanaging and looking over your shoulder because it's like

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 4>you put me in this position for a reason. Yeah,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 4>like let me do the job, give me some room

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 4>to sort of figure it this out. So yeah, I

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 4>would prefer free range with clear expectations and clear goals

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 4>and like regular check ins. Yeah you know once a week.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah that's enough.

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a happy medium between yeah, the two styles.

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, if I'm going you know, if I'm not doing

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 4>what you expect in that week, let's talk about it then.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 4>But like every like you're saying these hourly daily check ins,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 4>it's just like it's unnecessary. It doesn't give people enough

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 4>time to like figure stuff out, and like you got

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 4>to break some stuff and like do some things that

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 4>don't work to figure out what does work.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Well said spoken like a true middle manager, I guess

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 3>before we give artics to it, Like Devin, it's interesting thinking,

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 3>as you know, because even middle managers say they have

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I manage a team too at BI, and

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 3>it's really frustrating because when you're the middle manager, you

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>don't have the power to do anything. So all you're

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 3>doing is filtering down what's being passed to you. So

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 3>they say, oh, we want more of this sort of thing,

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 3>then you have to do that, and then the people

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 3>below you are like, well, I don't really like that,

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 3>and you're your hands are tied because you don't even

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>you don't have power to decide really what you're doing.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 3>You're just you're basically just a spokesperson, yeah, the messenger.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 3>And it's like incredibly frustrating because no matter what you do,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 3>it's like your boss is probably getting stuff from someone

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 3>way above them and you know that, and it's just

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 3>like there's not the transparency of just like hey, this

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 3>is no one wants to do this. Someone thinks it's

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 3>a good idea and that might not even correlate to

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 3>numbers or anything. Yeah, so it's to me, I mean,

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 3>that's almost a worse I feel like it's almost worse

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>to be micromanaged, say, but as a middle manager than

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>this as the lower level employee. Yeah, where it's like

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>you can't do anything except maybe micromanager check in and

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>do annoying things like that.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 4>It's like, so much of middle management is like like

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of being like a like a hostage negotiator to

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 4>some degree, right of like, all right, nobody wants to

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 4>be doing this, all right, the people in charge, here's

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 4>what they want. How do I communicate this to the

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 4>people who are actually doing the work in a way

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 4>that makes them not want to kill themselves? Yeah, exactly,

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 4>short of do to work in a way, and then

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 4>how do I communicate their concerns to upper management in

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 4>a way.

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 2>That they're going to be receptive.

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So it's a lot of Yeah, a lot of

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 4>middle management is just like playing politics, and I think

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 4>people deal with that in different ways. Like you were saying, Man,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 4>I think some people, when they get that pressure from

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 4>upper management, they the way they deal with it is

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 4>like by micromanaging and being super in the weeds.

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Many Where do you fall on the micromanaging to free

0:10:59.080 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>range continuum?

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>My, I guess you know. My only kind of intrude

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to this conversation is that one time I managed someone

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and I was in favor of a kind of a hands.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Off like I'm not doing this, I'm not really managing

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 4>figure it out.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You're technically under me, but you just go do your

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>own thing.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess you know obviously without getting into details,

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 3>you feel like that hurt your employees though, oh yeah, yeah,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 3>like I so you think, I mean you think really

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 3>probably a medium happy.

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Medium would be good. A medium would be good. And

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time I was like, I then told my

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>manager at the time, like, I'm not this isn't for

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>me and it's actually bad for the intern.

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So then we fixed that situation yet.

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Eliminated that position. We got a solution, You're gone. I

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 3>think we basically all like.

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Can I provide a counterpoint? And I just thought of

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 2>just in this moment case a real one.

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 4>I do wonder at times if younger or more entry

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 4>level people suffer from the more free.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 2>Range form of management.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 4>In a lot of places that I've been at, the

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 4>people who, like you know, younger people who are just

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 4>have more of that quote unquote entrepreneurial spirit of just

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 4>like I'll figure it out, I'll look it up myself,

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 4>like I'll just get yeah exactly, who just need sort

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 4>of less handholding tend to perform well because managers often

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 4>don't have time to like sit down with someone and

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 4>like coach they actually teach them. So it's basically like

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 4>entry level people are basically just kind of doing the

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 4>job that everyone else at the company is doing, but

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 4>they're just paid less or less experienced versus, you know.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 4>And I think in an ideal world, that person is

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 4>being coached more. They're you know, they're getting more sort

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 4>of like hands on feedback, and there is more of

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 4>a like easing you into the job. Yeah, Like that's

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 4>not really how work works nowadays. It's like you sign up,

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 4>you got the job. Congrats, You're gonna do the job

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 4>everyone else is doing. You're just gonna get paid less,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 4>and sure you won't be as good at it. But

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I think the people who I've seen suffer from that

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 4>lack of micro managing are those younger people who don't

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 4>quite have you know, they're just like not naturally good

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 4>at the thing or they need more like step by

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 4>step directions on how to do those things, and those

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 4>people tend to not last at the companies that I've

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 4>been at.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we'll hear all about this and hopefully get

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 3>some answers when we talk to Eric Baker, a Harvard

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 3>lecturer who specialized in the history of labor and management

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 3>after the break.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, fellas, I need you to help me with

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 4>a problem that I got. You know, usually we're the

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 4>ones helping other people with their problems. But I'm about

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 4>to go abroad and I'm going to watch met games. Noah,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 4>how can I watch them?

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a tough one.

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.239
<v Speaker 3>Maybe get a really large telescope.

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's the best way to do it, Manny,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Do you have any solutions on how I can watch

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Mets games abroad?

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I've got a slightly more practical solution for you, Devin.

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>If you use Nord VPN, you'll be able to change

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the location of your laptop's IP address and watch the

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>content with no problem.

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 3>What about my privacy online? I'm worried someone's watching me.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 3>First of all, no one is watching you, Noah.

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But in case someone was watching you, NordVPN provides you

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with privacy online, leaving no digital footprint by hiding your

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>IP address. It's like wearing an invisibility cloak while you're

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>surfing the web.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Sounds comfy, So, Manny, I've heard about these VPNs and

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 4>how they're super slipt.

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>How do I make sure my internet is not throttling.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>If you want to use a VPN without slowing down

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>your Internet, Devin, You're going to want to use NordVPN

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>because whenever I use it, I don't see any buffering

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>or lagging while I'm streaming my favorite content.

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 2>How do I get NordVPN, Devin?

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>If you or our listeners want to get the best

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>discount off of your NordVPN plan, go to NordVPN dot

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>com slash nst. Our link will also give you four

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>extra months on the two year plan, and there's no

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>risk because Nord has a thirty day money back guarantee.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The link is in the show notes. That's NordVPN dot

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>com slash nst.

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 3>We're back. I'm Manny, I'm Noah Devon, and we are

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 3>joined by Eric Baker. Eric, why don't you introduce yourself?

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Hi all, I'm Eric Kammer, raider and historian and an

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 5>editor at The Drift magazine. A book called Make Your

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 5>Own Job, How the Entrepreneurial Work Ethic Exhausted America, which

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 5>is about how our culture work came to be so toxic.

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Our main question that we're talking about is how efficient

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 3>various management styles are talking about micromanaging versus free range, that.

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Sort of thing.

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 3>But first, can you explain kind of how the basic

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of standard corporate office structure came to be as

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 3>we know it.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and this is a big question and a process

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 5>that takes a long time, so I'll try to try

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 5>to stick to the highlights. In general, the large corporations

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 5>come to start to dominate the American economy in the

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 5>late nineteenth century, and by the early twentieth century, you

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 5>could walk into the downtown of a city like New

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 5>York and you would start to see some office buildings

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 5>that are familiar to us today, cubicles, things like that.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 5>Because these big corporations they need a ton of white

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 5>collar work to make happen. You need accountants, you need

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 5>people to manage all of this paper that's going back

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 5>and forth, you know, transcontinental communication, lawyers, people doing advertising,

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 5>all this stuff, And so increasingly they get concentrated in

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 5>office buildings, and that leads to a demand for new

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:14.959
<v Speaker 5>ideas about how to manage these workers.

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's.

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 5>Important to remember that before all this happened, before this

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 5>turned to corporate consolidation in the late nineteenth century, the

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 5>fraction of the people who were doing what we today

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 5>called white collar work was very very small. You know,

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 5>it was a predominantly agrarian society. You know, they increasingly

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 5>start to get people working in manufacturing industry. But you know,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 5>the office kind of emerges in tandem with the emergence

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 5>of this new workforce who are working primarily with pander

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 5>bensil and paper at desks. That's kind of a novel

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 5>historical development.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 3>So now we have all these kind of you know,

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 3>pencil pushers set up. How were kind of the management

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.959
<v Speaker 3>stuf aisles first developed and then also shared, Like how

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 3>do they become so widespread?

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 5>Well, there are a range of ideas, and you know,

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 5>one of the important things to remember about this history

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 5>is there's what people thought they were doing or what

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 5>experts advised managers to do, and then kind of what

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 5>the reality was actually on the office floor. So you know,

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 5>initially there was the kind of natural school of thought

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 5>is to just say, you know, oh, well, we should

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 5>we have these strategies and schemes that we've developed to

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 5>manage industrial workers in factory settings. You know, let's just

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 5>kind of apply that to our pencil pushers. But that

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 5>often proves actually much easier said than done. These are huge,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 5>sprawling bureaucracies, often quite literally sprawling. You know, there's some famous,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 5>famous silent film from the nineteen twenties of you know,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 5>there's a shot that just you know, shows you row

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 5>after row a kind of almost surreal, sort of endless

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 5>sea of desks. You know, that's that's actually something a

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 5>little different than an assembly line, where you know, you

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 5>can line up, line everyone up, and you know, monitor

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 5>what everyone's doing and sort of dictate really precise steps

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 5>and stuff like that. So, you know, in addition to these, uh,

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 5>this sort of advice or kind of expert schemes for

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 5>for managers, there also emerges what we might call a

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 5>sort of self help literature, you know, how to how

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 5>to survive as an employee in these in these settings.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 5>And you know, reading that literature really showed me how

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 5>many people were sort of navigating with the reality that

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 5>the bosses in some cases they wish that they were

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 5>had more clarity about what they were supposed to be doing.

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 5>And so there's there's really a kind of set of advice.

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 5>You know, this is part of the titular phrase of

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 5>my book Make your Own Job. You know, these people

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 5>sort of cast a drift in these big bureaucratic settings

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 5>where you know, our our image, and often what the

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 5>managers thought they were doing was this high we routinized

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 5>sort of systematic kind of control. But really people kind

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 5>of felt like it was not always obvious what they

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 5>were actually expected to be.

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Doing, and would it be fair to say then that

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 3>kind of this idea of micromanaging in some ways evolved

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 3>from that, where it's like, we don't really have an

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 3>idea what's happening, but maybe we can check in a

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 3>million times a day and try to find some sort

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>of structure in this or how do you kind of

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 3>describe that?

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so in a lot of offices, for you know,

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 5>roughly the nineteen twenties to the nineteen seventies, there's a

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 5>trend of adding layers of what comes to be known

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 5>as middle management. I mean quite literally, they're like in

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 5>managers in between. That's because there's a big communication challenge

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 5>in these workplaces. There's no slack, there's no email. How

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 5>do you get a message? How do you create channels

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 5>of communication between people who are doing some kind of

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 5>like concrete task that's involved in the functioning of one

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 5>of these big firms and executive leadership you have to create,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean almost a kind of like game of telephone,

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, a set of managers talking with each other

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 5>all down the hierarchy. And so if you're a middle manager,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 5>your primary expectation your job is really about communication, you know,

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 5>knowing what's going on beneath you, knowing what people above

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 5>you want, and sort of passing passing messages up and down.

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 5>When we think of the kind of stereotypical bureaucratic office environment,

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's soft and sort of emergence from this

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 5>fact that it's actually kind of hard for people to

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 5>figure out what their subordinates are up to. This requires

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:42.479
<v Speaker 5>a lot of checking in.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 3>That kind of brings me to something we were talking

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 3>about in our intro where and I think this aligns

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 3>with your book and kind of the entrepreneurial work ethic

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 3>where someone will be a you know, regular maybe low

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 3>level employee and then get a promotion and then now

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 3>they're tasked with being a manager without having been trained

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 3>up on how to manage. Or maybe you're balancing like

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Manny was at one point balancing doing his own work

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 3>but then also managing someone kind of.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>On the side.

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Can you talk a little bit about that, like how

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 3>has that own has been put on the employees to

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of figure it out as they go along on

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 3>those kind of dual roles.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 5>One of the big shifts kind of after this period

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 5>that I was just talking about, you know, in the

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 5>nineteen seventies, you start to see a lot of economic

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 5>dysfunction in the United States, a lot of increasing anxieties

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 5>about international competition, slowing rates of productivity and profit. And

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 5>one of those sort of silver bullets that management experts

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 5>arrive on that's often kind of enforced through private equity

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 5>takeover and all this stuff, is to strip out these

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 5>layers in middle management that had been accumulating. You know,

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 5>that a real there's a real sort of shift in opinion.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 5>You know, the fact that we're employing all these people

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 5>basically the past messages up and down the corporate hierarchy.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 5>You know, that's that's a huge that's a huge waste.

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 5>And so you know, really the the ideal firm is

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 5>one in which you know, there are people with managerial roles,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 5>but you know everyone is like doing something productive, everyone

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 5>is uh, you know, creating value. This is the sort

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 5>of uh one of the many kind of neologisms or

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 5>you know whatever buzzwords that gets uh really entrenched in

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 5>this in this period, you know, which which makes a

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 5>lot of sense on paper, you know, but in practice

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 5>again is kind of easier said than done because the

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 5>actual tasks of you know, management, supervision, coordination, communication and

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 5>these are these are non non trivial. They take a

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 5>lot of time. There's there's often you know, a certain

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 5>kind of skill involved. And so you know, if your

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 5>primary task, you know, what you're being evaluated on is

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, coming up with the next big product it's

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 5>gonna save the company from its you know, global competitors

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.719
<v Speaker 5>or something like that, you're not necessarily you know, as

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 5>you say, you're not necessarily going to be skilled at

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 5>the sort of communication and coordination side of management. Furthermore,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 5>there's one problem that sets in is that a lot

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 5>of these shifts stripping down the middle management. This is

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 5>often sort of justified or goes hand in hand with

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 5>the emergence of the sort of cult of the kind

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 5>of charismatic executive. So you know, a lot of these people,

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, they're being celebrated. You know, you're the ones

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 5>who are really creating value you know, you're so innovative,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 5>you're so creative, and then so you know, often you

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, wind up with people where, you know, the

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 5>the ideas, they're not supposed to be doing the old

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 5>kind of bureaucratic managing style, but they frankly have such

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 5>a high opinion of themselves. You know, there's this kind

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 5>of heroic culture personality that develops around them. And then

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 5>so it almost like packfires and you get you know,

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 5>people who really see it. This is their you know,

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 5>mission is to be involved, have their hands on, you know,

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 5>hands on managing. This is another sort of buffsword that

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 5>gets celebrated, you know, and so you get these people.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 5>This is like how we wind up with Elon Muskin

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 5>and Nano managing because he's so great, you know, he

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 5>has to have his hand in every pie.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like the actual design of an office

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>could be born out of some of these management styles,

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Like we've kind of as a society have been moving

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>away from cubicles into these more open office layouts where

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you can literally see what your employees are doing at

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>all times. I'm just curious if you feel like that

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that's born out of different management styles evolving over time.

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe that's just cheaper to do it like that.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, probably a bit of a bit of calm. B

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 5>There's a great book by the scholar Nikhil Saval who's

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 5>actually now a politician as a state senator in Pennsylvania

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 5>or something, but it's called Cubed. It's a great book

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 5>that's about how the design of the office evolved in

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 5>tandem with these, uh, with with shifting ideas about you

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 5>know what it meant to manage well, you know what

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 5>the office should be because you know, as you say,

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 5>it makes it makes sense. You know, if your if

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 5>your vision is one where you know, these your employees

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 5>are almost kind of like factory hands. You know, it's

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 5>more of an assembly line thing that's going to be

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 5>reflected in the layout of an office, you know. Whereas again,

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 5>if you're trying to instead in vision a workplace where

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 5>it's you know, everyone is like productive and contributing and

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 5>you know, heroic, then you're going to try to have

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 5>a less kind of visibly hierarchical sort of setup. And

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 5>if you want your CEO to you know, be have

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:41.479
<v Speaker 5>the hands on, you know, facilitate that by literally like

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 5>removing the walls that would separate the boss from the workers,

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 5>stuff like that.

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess to kind of just answer the main question

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 3>from our listener about how effective micromanaging is versus a

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 3>free range. I mean, do you have data on this

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 3>like both I guess for the employee and for the

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 3>company as as however they measure of productivity.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 5>What stands out to me is not so much that

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 5>the studies say one thing or the or the other.

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, I have a colleague here in the history

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 5>of Science department at arbody has written a lot about

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 5>like nutrition science, and it almost kind of reminds me

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 5>of how whether or not coffee is good for you

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 5>according to the experts, you know, that like changes every week,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 5>and so I think there's good right now they say

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 5>yes though, thank God for that. But I think it's

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's it's it's similar in the you know,

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 5>attempting to sort of evaluate empirically the the efficacy of

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 5>different management styles, and in part because you know, there's

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 5>so many confounding variables, and in the case of management,

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, there's the most important variable is the workers themselves.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 5>And you know, so this there's I mean, going back

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 5>to the nineteen thirties, there's a famous set of studies

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 5>where according to the authors of the studies, and actually

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 5>some retrospectively, there's been some doubt cast on with the

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 5>extent to which they were actually sort of reading the

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 5>data honestly. But what they said was that they tried

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 5>these different kinds of interventions and their work groups. You know,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 5>often this was sort of physical stuff like you know,

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 5>changing lighting or you know, rest break cadence, things like that.

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 5>But they they found that whenever they did anything, including

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 5>stopping what they had been doing before, that this led

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 5>to an increase in productivity. And their interpretation was that,

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, workers just liked feeling like their managers were

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 5>paying attention to them. They liked being, you know, feeling

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 5>like there was a kind of project going on in

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 5>the workplace, and then that you know, ultimately mattered more

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 5>than the details of you know, what they were doing.

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 5>And so that you know, this has again become kind

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 5>of a folk tale and in the management world.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 6>But you know, I think that there's you know, I

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 6>ironically it's that sense that like what really matters is

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 6>trying to make sure that workers are excited about.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 5>What's going on in their work. You know, that has

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 5>sort of taken on a life of its own as

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 5>a management philosophy, and so you know, get endless pizza

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 5>parties and whatnot.

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, in the past few years there's been more remote

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 3>work and hybrid work, which I could see kind of

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 3>going both towards and against micromanaging as far as you're

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 3>not here physically with me, so I might need to

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 3>check in with you if you're my employee. What's your

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 3>read on kind of how management has kind of adapted

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to the kind of new climate of work.

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Initially there was I think some hope in fact the

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 5>range of efforts to you know, come up with new

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 5>technologies that would essentially enhance remote worker surveillance, and that's

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 5>something that you know, people still deal with. But I mean,

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 5>my my read is that return to work is like

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 5>the overwhelming push from the management or the executive class.

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 5>Bosses in general are dissatisfied with, you know, the degree

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 5>of monitoring and you know, frankly kind of like compliance

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 5>that they've been able to get from workers in a

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 5>in a remote environment, and it's hard to say where

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 5>the empirical evidence stops. And these sort of stories that

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 5>take on a life of their own. Again, you know,

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 5>there's all kinds of other narratives that have emerged in

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 5>the last five years, you know, about sort of you know,

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 5>worker wayziness or you know whatever, quiet quitting, all this stuff.

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 5>And again, you know, the the empirical evidence there was

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 5>was always a little dubious. So there's very much a

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 5>strong perception among you know, people who call the shots

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 5>in a huge range of workplaces that there's something missing.

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, they're they're not able to kind of ensure

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 5>the same kind of results and that you know, ultimately

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 5>actually get people back in a physical environment. That's the

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 5>only solution.

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious, how, you know, work in the US as

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 3>far as management styles, like, how does it compare to

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, across Europe or Asia or elsewhere. Is there

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 3>just super wide variance as far as expectations on workers

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 3>or you know, because.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 5>Definitely, yeah, I can't claim to know what it's like

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.719
<v Speaker 5>to work in China or you know, in France or wherever.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 5>But I think that there's a tension because on the

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 5>one hand, different cultures and different places their histories will

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 5>have an effect on basic expectations. I mean, so much

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 5>of our culture of work is not just about what's

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 5>happened in the workplace, but it's related to broader you know,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 5>broader developments, you know, broader facts of American national culture

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 5>and identity and stuff like that. And that's that's true

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 5>anywhere that you're you're going to go. But it's also

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 5>the case that management expertise is increasingly a global market.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 5>The big consultancies, you know, operate globally. Management training, you know,

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 5>this is really a global market. You know, there are

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 5>people from all around the world who you know, come

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 5>into the top of American business schools and learn the

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 5>same things that American executives are learning. And so there

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 5>is I think a certain degree of homogene to or

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 5>at lease, a certain set of shared touchstones, or you know,

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 5>you can count on people who have heard the same

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 5>stories or the same advice, you know, regardless of whether

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 5>or not they follow it. But yeah, I mean I've

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 5>been you know, since my book came out. You know,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 5>I did one interview with the Chinese paper and one

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 5>interview of the German paper, and this sort of confirms

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 5>my suspicion that this American culture of work has to

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 5>a significant extent, really gone global.

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 3>So I dug into some studies on micromanaging.

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 2>And here's what I found.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 3>One report suggested six scenarios where micromanaging might be helpful.

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 3>So here the six count on me. One the strategy

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 3>of the organization is changing.

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense. That makes sense.

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Hey, we got a pivot. We're doing this thing exactly.

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Now we're doing this other thing. I'm a micromanaged because

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 4>we all gotta be on the same page.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 3>But what we're doing, similarly to a new endeavor is starting.

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 3>So not the whole organization, but something. You know, you're

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 3>working on a new project. We've all been there, but

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 3>oh have we?

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>They love to start a new project.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Three, there is a new leader, a new employee, or

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 3>a new division or unit. So again, similar some new

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 3>some of the news happening.

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Four, an employee or leader fails to execute on an initiative,

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 3>and as a result, the program lingers. So the micromanaging

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 3>program linkers, meaning so, yeah, things are getting messed up.

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 3>We got to figure this out. I'm gonna watch you

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 3>extra hard now. Five, serious complaints or errors have occurred.

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 3>What's going on here?

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 2>All right? That's true.

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 4>You know you have an employee makes a you know,

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 4>it's a huge factual error. And a report that goes

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 4>out video going forward.

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 2>That sources.

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, give me access.

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Where did you get Where did you get this from them?

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Where did you get this number?

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 3>You got this from business insidery.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>We can accept that X, double check your sources of right.

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 3>The opposite of that, all right?

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 3>And six the division or department has poor results. Again,

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:23.919
<v Speaker 3>we got to figure out what's going on.

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 2>These either new or things are going poorly.

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think the idea here is these are

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 3>temporary measures and the more stuff we'll talk about. We'll

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 3>get into that. But it's not supposed to be. This

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 3>is just how we work. It's supposed to be we're

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 3>solving a specific thing. There's something new happening or something

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 3>we need to change. Let's focus in and get this

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 3>done and then hopefully we can move on.

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 1>And the study found that micromanaging in these instances, that's

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>where it.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Might be helpful.

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 3>So another quote from that report is me quoting. While

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 3>micromanagement is sometimes necessary, doing it for too long could

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 3>be detrimental, and managers should be attuned to the need

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to reevaluate their role and back off at the appropriate time.

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 3>In the words of one management expert, effective micromanagement through

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 3>setting structure, developing strategy and plans, creating reliable systems for others,

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 3>and teaching people how to be independent thinkers can actually

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 3>empower others to do their jobs with little involvement from

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 3>you at all. Managers need to assess how often they

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 3>are practicing in a micromanaging mode. If managers feel they

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 3>are spending too much time in the weeds, they should

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 3>consider whether they are hiring the right team members.

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, who can disagree every damn day I work

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 4>with you too?

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 2>Consider whether or not.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 3>We need a new MANI another more critical paper you're

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna like this title called the Micromanagement Disease Die Richard J. White,

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 3>or it is the Micromanagement Disease Symptoms, Diagnosis and Cure.

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 3>These guys getting creative with these that if all you're

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 3>writing about is management, all right? The author of that

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 3>said this quote, I'm quoting a lot here, all right.

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 3>That means put some music on the.

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Copy.

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 3>At its more severe level, micromanagement is a compulsive behavioral

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 3>disorder similar to other addictive patterns. People who are micromanaged

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.760
<v Speaker 3>generally do so because they feel unsure and self doubting.

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Micromanagers like many addicts and alcoholics are the last people

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 3>to recognize that they are hooked on controlling others. Extreme

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 3>micromanagers behave pathologically refusing to accept personal responsibility or accountability,

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 3>and create scapegoats to blame for their own mistakes. They

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 3>seldom develop people, but instead exploit them, preferring to control

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 3>results rather than inspiring creativity, fear, and competition. They rarely

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 3>hire people with the talent, experience, and know how to

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 3>challenge them. Micromanagers tend to dumb down their organizations as

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 3>they hire drones. They must work even harder because drones

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 3>take more work to manage than do thinking industrious workers.

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 3>It becomes a visious cycle. Good workers leave, more drones

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 3>are hired, and the organization begins a downward spiral and

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 3>skill morale and productivity. No organization can be truly efficient

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 3>when it is constantly rehiring and training new workers.

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I've worked at a few legacy media outlets, and I

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of drones.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you that much attack.

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Of the drones. There's two things that stood out from

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 2>that paper for me. Okay.

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Number one the idea that micromanagers, despite all the micromanaging

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.439
<v Speaker 4>that they do, despite as annoying as they are, then

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 4>they will still scapegoat if.

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Something goes wrong. Exactly.

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 7>It's like, you are involved in every single step in

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 7>this process. You basically did it, yea, so if it fails,

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 7>you need to be held accountable as well. But they

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 7>love to throw people under the bus. And it's like,

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 7>so what was the point of you micromanaging? Then exactly

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 7>look in the mirror, crazy, Yeah, look at the man

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 7>in the mirror, as Michael Jackson said, yep.

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 4>And then number two this idea of drones, right, like

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 4>micromanagers love a drone. And I think that's where I've

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 4>in my career.

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, my younger illustrious.

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm a young man, So in the places where I

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 4>felt like, oh it's time for me to leave, it's

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 4>when it's gone from a we need you to be

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:22.879
<v Speaker 4>creative and come up with new ideas and blah blah

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 4>blah to okay, actually we just need you to be

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 4>a drone. And then it's like, all right, it's time

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 4>for me to drone up.

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And now this last report I looked at as

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.280
<v Speaker 3>an actual kind of analysis where they look through different

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 3>studies over decades of micromanagement. So it's called micromanagement. A

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 3>systematic literature review and future research agenda, so they looked

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 3>at tons of studies over the years to report findings.

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 3>They said, there still needs to be more research, but

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 3>here are some top line things they found. So micromanagement

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 3>can generate positive outcomes in the short term, such as

0:38:54.600 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 3>increasing organizational productivity, initiating organizational changes something that supervisor's close scrutiny,

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 3>excessive guidance and detailed feedback help inexperience people develop their

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 3>competence and improve their performance. It can help subordins avoid

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:13.439
<v Speaker 3>procrastination and stay focused on their core tasks. So that's

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 3>why micromanagement exists. Again short term and helping build people

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 3>up to the skills they need. As for negative impacts,

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 3>it increases job stress, damp in psychological safety climate in organizations,

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 3>signals distrust and disrespect for subordinates, and on the other hand,

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 3>requests for frequent reports and attention to unnecessary details increase

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 3>subordinates workload, where a strict imposition of rules, directives, and

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 3>arbitrary decision making processes reduce their job autonomy. So again

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 3>just gives people less control of their own work, puts

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 3>more stuff on managers, So they noted it adds stress

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 3>for managers and leads to job or not for all

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 3>due to these perfectionist standards.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 2>So managers and.

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Employees or subordinates are getting more stressed out. This leads

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:05.359
<v Speaker 3>to job dissatisfaction and more employee turnover, which means now

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 3>you're spending this time hiring new people, training them, on

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 3>boarding them, doing the whole thing over again instead of

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 3>just giving people the skills they need to work and

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 3>then everyone can you know, rising tides.

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Then it reduces employee creativity and operational efficiency. So the

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 3>bottom line, it's worse for the bottom line.

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Damn.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 3>After the break, many, Devin and I tackle some work

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:42.800
<v Speaker 3>related questions sent in by the audience. So we are back.

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm Noah, I'm Manny Devin.

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 3>So that was Eric Baker who walked us through management

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 3>styles and more broadly, the history of work. Got into

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot, but we did have a few more questions

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 3>from our listeners that we're going to get into now.

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Some are more advicey and then some are a little

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 3>bit more in the weeds, but let's just go through them.

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 3>The first one, how do I handle an incompetent boss.

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Now many and I have both dealt with this. How

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 3>do we make it through common boss? Yeah, Devin, No,

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 3>but in all seriousness, yeah, it's not a not a.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Laughing yeah, you know this is it's tough.

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 3>What do you guys think?

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, sometimes in my previous job, you know, I wouldn't

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>say it was incompetence per se, but it was definitely

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he felt like an obstacle at times. And what I

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>would do I would have my own little strategies to

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of get what I want, which is like, you know,

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>bake whatever I wanted into a verbal package of the

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>things that he wanted. I don't know how to articulate

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>it really, but.

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 2>It's like you're putting the vegetables in a cake a little.

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Bit, yes, exactly, you're hiding you're hiding peanut butter in

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the dog, or hiding dog the.

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Peanut butter dog menaces.

0:41:57.640 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a dog.

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 2>He has a food. They don't want to eat it.

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>In the medicine just peanut butter, right, the medicine.

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 4>The things you would want to do is the medicine

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 4>in this case, and you're covering it in peanut butter,

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 4>which is what your boss wanted at the time. Yeah,

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.919
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't even realize that you got your medicine in there, right,

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 4>the stuff that you want to following.

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>It, Because the goal ultimately was to have a video

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>or TikTok or an Instagram real that would get a

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of views. And so if I did this and

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we just skipped to the result where I'm showing him, oh,

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>look this kind of went viral or whatever, then he

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have minded the process. So that's what I would do,

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is like try to massage what I wanted into our communication.

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of cheeky, though, so you know, it's

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily great advice for anyone who's dealing with this.

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, have you ever, either of you had a

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>situation where you know, you're frustrated with your manager to

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the point where you're just going to go around them

0:42:56.719 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and complain to their manager or whoever's above them. Ever

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>have you done I don't know if I've ever done that,

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly because everyone above them were also stupid.

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Or I guess read with them, or or my problems

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 3>with my manager are probably coming from a person above them.

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've actually had a few instances knowing like, oh,

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>actually you're not the problem.

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the person's doing. That's when I was a manager,

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 3>That's how what I kind of, you know, not to

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 3>just pass the buck along.

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 2>But I was.

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 3>I would always try to be like, hey, I know

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 3>this is an ideal, but like this is kind of

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 3>what we need to do, and try to figure out

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 3>a way to make make it tolerable at least, and

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 3>be like, listen, trust me, I don't I don't want

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to make a video on how Tom Brady makes and

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 3>spences millions. You know, this is not my choice, but

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 3>this is what people need it. Someone needs it.

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know if I've had I don't think

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 4>I've worked for, let's say, a stupid boss.

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:57.399
<v Speaker 4>I worked for people who are incompetent in that they

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 4>don't want to learn what the team is doing or

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 4>understand what the team is doing, so therefore their suggestions

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 4>aren't helpful or the goals they give are unrealistic. Right,

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 4>And that's in some ways tougher because you know the

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.800
<v Speaker 4>person has the capacity to understand, they just are choosing

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 4>not to.

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like like I've had bosses that.

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 4>Are kind of like Donald Trump to some degree, right

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 4>where it's like Trump to me is like, I don't

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 4>think he's a dumb person. I think he just chooses

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 4>not to understand certain things or to learn about certain things. Yeah,

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 4>and it's to me, yeah, that's more frustrating than if

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:35.399
<v Speaker 4>you were just dumb. Yeah the navigate because like you're

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 4>just stupid, so like, let me just work around you.

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's harder when you have somebody who could

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 4>be competent and is smart but chooses not to learn

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 4>and to understand, because it requires more work and a

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 4>lot of your job becomes just educating that person on.

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 2>What you're doing.

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 4>And because they aren't learning each time you're educating them,

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 4>you have to keep re educating them every conversation that

0:44:57.960 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 4>you're having.

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 2>So it does suck.

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 4>But I guess to Manny's point, I think the way

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 4>you deal with it is you've got to kind of

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 4>learn what they care about. Yeah, and when you communicate

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 4>with them, make sure you emphasize what they care about.

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 2>But you also don't need to tell them the things that.

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:20.240
<v Speaker 4>They don't know or don't care about, Like, don't waste

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 4>your time over explaining things that they're not going to

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 4>remember and they you know, aren't going to effect valuable. Yeah,

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 4>it's it's like working, it's it's a bit of it sucks,

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 4>but you you start, you have to manage your manager

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.399
<v Speaker 4>a bit and just give them the things that they

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 4>need to leave you alone.

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you've got, like, you know, some strategy you

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>want to employ at work for your job, the strategy A,

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>which your boss wants to do, and the strategy B,

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>which do you want to do. Okay, we're gonna go

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>from point A to point B over the course of

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a few months, maybe not so drastically.

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, you're just kind of slowly pushing

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the needle of just inching close or to what you

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>want by like, yeah, doing it.

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Why don't we try this this piece out, try this

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 3>thing out slowly? Yeah, that makes sense. All right, here's

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 3>another one, this one. I don't know, how can I

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 3>politely let my coworker know their body odor is horrendous?

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Something else? And many of you have dealt with this literally.

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 4>Half wow, all three of us thinking of well, now

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:31.280
<v Speaker 4>I am.

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>We I mean we do we basically didn't handle I

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:33.279
<v Speaker 1>mean that's never brought it up. I mean you can't

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>really you can't, like what are you gonna do complain

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to HR.

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess yeah I would. Yeah, HR could say something.

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if they and like what I mean,

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 3>what are you gonna You can make a general announcement. Yeah,

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 3>that that that's the only way to try to do

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:53.919
<v Speaker 3>it is going and say like I'm wearing cologne now,

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 3>like don't we all love wearing cologne?

0:46:57.200 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Like hey, what do you?

0:46:57.840 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Hey you, what do you wear?

0:46:59.480 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Plus, there's no way to do.

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 2>It, yeah with the odor and we all use yeah. Uh.

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Plus sometimes you detect someone's odor and it's not clear

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's because they're not hygienic or something like. Sometimes

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like that is something else and.

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 2>That might be that may be medical.

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I just can't there's a medical great issue.

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:27.879
<v Speaker 4>This is a military grade doctor needs to go into

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 4>the hazmat.

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Suits and a syndrome style. No, there's nothing you can

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>really do in that situation.

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's like in general, I think you could make

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 4>a general announcement around hey, guys, let's all make sure

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 4>you know, when we're coming to work, we're presentable.

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, make sure that we're taking care of ourselves.

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 4>It's we've gotten general complaints in the office about smells.

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 2>But you can't. You can't.

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm even thinking, like, let's say it was one

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 3>of us, like right here, right now. It would take

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot for me to be like, hey, Devin, let

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 3>me pull your like to pull you out and just

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 3>be like hey, like, I can't even imagine doing that

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 3>in the nicest way.

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 4>Let me say this everybody, because if we smelled, it

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 4>would be a one off.

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh ship, well.

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, my boy, my boy, jog over here, West forgot

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 4>it's the owner into We've all had days where it's

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 4>like eleven o'clock.

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, Oh, I'm one one armed right now?

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know.

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 3>You may need help.

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 4>A hit, you know, so one off. Yeah that was

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 4>excuse if you were shown here a week after week.

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what you do?

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We might have to just because we know you so well,

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to be like a man. Different if it's

0:48:40.560 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a coworker, Yeah, exactly, And.

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 4>We had to make a man I don't know what's

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.320
<v Speaker 4>going on, but like you kind of stick, how would you.

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's let's let's let's play so someone you presumably like,

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 3>and yeah me if it was you, So let's say

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 3>we come. We recorded for an hour we're taking a

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 3>break and now we're going to do another session right now.

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 2>And this is like, this is about three or four

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 2>sessions in a road.

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:04.439
<v Speaker 3>That yeah, yeah, so let's say it's not my first off.

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Something is going on.

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 1>We would probably couch it in a joke like no,

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, just we're gonna be real with you for

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a second.

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Would you take me out of this room or would

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 3>you do it in front of.

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Right here on the camera.

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, recording, we'll get.

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll get Connor to do it. Yeah, that'd probably be

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Connor comes in like we we have a new policy, give.

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Him a script.

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Everyone coming into the studio must wear theodor.

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 1>We will be I'd be like, have you been coming

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 1>here straight from the gym or something like kind of

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:37.919
<v Speaker 1>ship joke about it and then maybe get to it.

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>That's actually thankfully we have never had to do this.

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I think my would be go through Julia, you're.

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Gonna offensive no, because if we have so explain, okay,

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 4>so we're coming. If I'm hanging out with you week

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 4>after week and you just start to stink, I would.

0:49:56.760 --> 0:49:58.399
<v Speaker 2>Hit Julia up and like hey, I don't know if

0:49:58.440 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you notice.

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if he has, but Noah's been smelling lately.

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But what if Noah found out that that's how you

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 1>did it, He might be like, why didn't you just

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about it?

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 2>Why do see I'm going through her?

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>She oh, in case there's something bad happen all of

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, getting I'm going through it, and then you

0:50:23.160 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then clear that it's not something medical.

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:28.919
<v Speaker 2>And then that happened at home, Then yeah, I bring

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 2>it up. But she's like, oh, actually that's good sense.

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 4>What happened is he can't shower because she's taking X,

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Y and Z medicine.

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:36.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm gonna shut my mouth.

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:38.479
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense.

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Slash.

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Then you can tell her and then she could easily

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 3>be like, yeah, say something. Yeah, like I'm married to her.

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, do we think that you got to put on?

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, but in a normal workplace, you're not going

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 3>to be able to reach out to their spouse.

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we can't talk, So this is not that helpful.

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Do we think that you know, the people were talking

0:50:57.880 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about what is the likelihood that they know and they

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>don't care.

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 2>No, people get noseline to it.

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 3>It's your own thing.

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Wow. You basically can't say anything.

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:09.919
<v Speaker 4>You can ask hr to make a general announcement about

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:11.040
<v Speaker 4>making sure people are coming in.

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Otherwise, the only thing you can possibly do is

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:18.399
<v Speaker 3>have a vague conversation about deodorant and colognes and hope

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 3>that they're.

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Hope they overhear it.

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, here's what I looked into a little bit.

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:29.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious what your guesses would be. How much of

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the day do people with office jobs actually spend working?

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 4>So the total amount of hours let's say, out of

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:36.479
<v Speaker 4>an eight hour work day that people are actually working.

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about in the office.

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's say in office.

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm being generous, I would say four and

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 2>a half to five.

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I'm lower than that.

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, would your guess be?

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:51.399
<v Speaker 1>It also depends on where I think. I've only worked

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 1>in places that are super social. Yeah, yeah, yeah, that

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was like probably my favorite thing to do in the

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 1>office is like leave my desk and go people, go

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:02.919
<v Speaker 1>to the other floor, see what's up with this guy?

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I would I mean depends on the day obviously, like

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:08.799
<v Speaker 1>if you're on a deadline or something, but probably like

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:11.400
<v Speaker 1>three hours three out of the eight hours I'm like

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>actually working on something. Yeah, but it's true that like

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the other hours, like they are kind of like necessarily

0:52:18.760 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like you are in a meeting. Does that count as

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>working on something.

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Work related stuff?

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was talking about.

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how the survey was done, so I'm

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 3>curious how that would factor in. I would guess no.

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I'm sorry. This is from i'd say.

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Foe or four. Let me be clear, this is not me.

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:37.800
<v Speaker 3>You work eight hours.

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 2>I work more. I'm doing because I'm doing like.

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>He works ten hours in an eight hour shift.

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm doing. I'm doing three four jobs simultaneously.

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:51.399
<v Speaker 8>Yes, so it compounds, Yeah, example a multiplier on your

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 8>all right, with that in mind, this is a survey

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 8>done in the of UK office workers by vouchercloud dot com.

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:05.240
<v Speaker 8>But every basically this is one of those things someplace

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 8>does some survey and then for now almost ten.

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Years, every article is citing this. Yeah, and who knows

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 3>how good it is. So with that grain of salt, Yeah,

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:16.719
<v Speaker 3>the average worker is only productive for two hours and

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 3>fifty three minutes. That sounds right to me, Which sounds

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 3>right to me.

0:53:19.520 --> 0:53:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And to be honest, that's so especially on these computers.

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Like if you have a computer you're on with access

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to everything, you remember when we were working right next

0:53:29.040 --> 0:53:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to each other, like we would be bullshitting for hours.

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember when that fucking Popeyes chicken sandwich came out,

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>we left the office.

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we lost three hours.

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is not good because I was during this time.

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:45.960
<v Speaker 3>So this is not funny too, because we could have

0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 3>easily done a video.

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:49.320
<v Speaker 1>That Yeah, I know, that could have been work for sure.

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 3>So then there's a work life survey. They did a survey.

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 3>It says in twenty twenty three, forty five percent of

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 3>workers said they work four hours or less to day. Yeah,

0:53:57.440 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that's including like that's talking about Amazon, Microsoft, Google Meta employees.

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 3>So those are all in kind of the thirty three yeah,

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:07.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty three to kind of forty percent range saying they

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:12.480
<v Speaker 3>work four hours or less per day. So how effective

0:54:12.520 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 3>our pips? A PIP is a performance improvement plan which

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 3>a manager gives to an employee if they're maybe not

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 3>doing so hot. It's kind of a little usually kind

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 3>of milestones and things to check in on to, you know,

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 3>and usually it's kind of like, Okay, we have three

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:32.240
<v Speaker 3>months or six months to meet these measures. You're basically

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:36.319
<v Speaker 3>kind of on thin ice essentially, Yeah, meet these expectations yeah,

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:38.800
<v Speaker 3>or going to be we can get ready. Yeah, here's

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 3>what our guest Eric had to say.

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question. I mean, the idea that the

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 5>most effective way to manage somebody was by clearly communicating

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:51.719
<v Speaker 5>a set of expectations and then kind of leaving them

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 5>to figure out how to how to meet them. You know,

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:57.320
<v Speaker 5>that's an idea that really goes back to the nineteen forties,

0:54:57.400 --> 0:55:01.280
<v Speaker 5>nineteen fifties in a management by objecting in self control

0:55:01.440 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 5>was the neologism when that became a tool for discipline.

0:55:06.480 --> 0:55:10.359
<v Speaker 5>I'm not exactly sure it's so clear that when you're

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 5>put on a PIP the message is like, if you

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:14.799
<v Speaker 5>get fired, you know, it's your own fault. I mean,

0:55:14.840 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 5>people aren't fooled. You know. That's one of the biggest

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 5>lessons that I've learned and diving into this history, is

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 5>that losses can come up with all kinds of ideas

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 5>for trying to get their employees to imagine that something

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 5>else is going on in the workplace and what really is.

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 5>But you know, at the end of the day, you know,

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:37.320
<v Speaker 5>people understand when they're being manipulated or taken for a ride,

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:40.720
<v Speaker 5>and rather than sort of Mitt Romney style I enjoy

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:43.840
<v Speaker 5>firing people kind of culture. We have this sense of no,

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:47.399
<v Speaker 5>you know, we did everything to help and you know again.

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:50.719
<v Speaker 5>I think that's a response to an increasing sense of

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:54.240
<v Speaker 5>like empowerment or self assertion among my cold workers.

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Have you guys been on the ips?

0:55:57.480 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 4>I have not been on a PITH. I have managed

0:56:02.200 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 4>people who have been put on pips. So I would

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:07.799
<v Speaker 4>have their manager complaining to me that this person is

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 4>not performing.

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I would talk with them.

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 4>I would talk with the manager, I talk with HR,

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 4>and a certain point we'd say, okay, well this person,

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 4>if they don't improve, needs to be put on a PIP.

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:19.359
<v Speaker 4>So I would be part of the conversation, but I

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:21.239
<v Speaker 4>was never the person initiating it.

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:21.839
<v Speaker 3>Got it.

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 4>My experience with it is it's mostly a way for

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:29.839
<v Speaker 4>HR to make sure that you have paperwork so that

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 4>the person can't say that they were fired unfairly right.

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is in regards to unions.

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Part of it is just like companies being afraid of

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 4>being sued, so it is like it forces you to

0:56:44.960 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 4>document feedback.

0:56:46.600 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 3>There's a Wall Street Journal report from twenty twenty four

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:54.640
<v Speaker 3>by Lauren Weber and Chip Cutter about the rise of pips,

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 3>and they're increasing and they have you know, they have

0:56:56.960 --> 0:56:58.879
<v Speaker 3>an example of one. I'll put in the show notes

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 3>for people to look at so you can kind of

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 3>see what they look like. But there's some data in

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:06.319
<v Speaker 3>this story that in twenty twenty thirty three point four

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:10.840
<v Speaker 3>people for every thousand workers had documented performance issues according

0:57:10.840 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 3>to a software firm, and in twenty twenty three that

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 3>number went up to forty three point six, So that's

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:18.800
<v Speaker 3>a pretty high rise in just three years. Then there's

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of executives saying these are basically made to

0:57:22.360 --> 0:57:24.440
<v Speaker 3>get people out and have a paper trail and just

0:57:24.480 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 3>be safe on that way. This one guy, Larry, he

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 3>works out a software company. He estimated that ten to

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent of employees who get put on PIP

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 3>survive the process.

0:57:34.840 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow, And it seems like from reading this article to

0:57:39.160 --> 0:57:41.440
<v Speaker 3>mix of even if people get through, then a lot

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:43.400
<v Speaker 3>of times they'll just decide they want to leave anyway.

0:57:43.680 --> 0:57:46.360
<v Speaker 3>So it's kind of like, you know, you're not wanted basically,

0:57:47.040 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 3>so whether you're a good worker or a bad worker,

0:57:49.600 --> 0:57:51.760
<v Speaker 3>however you wanted to find that it's like, yeah, probably

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:53.440
<v Speaker 3>time to go. Like you can read the writing on

0:57:53.480 --> 0:57:53.800
<v Speaker 3>the wall.

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 4>I would say most of the pips that I've seen,

0:57:57.960 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 4>it's very clear that the person does not have skill

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:04.280
<v Speaker 4>sets or drive to do the thing that they're being

0:58:04.320 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 4>tasked with doing. So you're giving them goals knowing they're

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:11.960
<v Speaker 4>basically they're not going to hit it. But to to

0:58:12.000 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 4>this point, yeah, it's providing a paper trail. It's getting

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 4>rid of some of the ambiguity around oh, my manager

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 4>didn't give me this feedback Because a lot of pips

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:25.479
<v Speaker 4>I've been involved with, HR is involved in the check

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 4>ins from week to week, so it's like there's a

0:58:28.000 --> 0:58:30.480
<v Speaker 4>third person involved to be like, oh no, this per

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 4>your manager did say X, Y and Z. But it

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 4>does to Eric's point, it puts a lot of the

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:41.840
<v Speaker 4>onus on the employee to improve their performance. Right, It's

0:58:41.840 --> 0:58:44.080
<v Speaker 4>seen as like, hey, we as a company has done

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:46.440
<v Speaker 4>all that we can do. It is now on you

0:58:46.960 --> 0:58:50.840
<v Speaker 4>to you know, basically pull up, you know, for.

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Your your boots buttter, what is the foot, pull up

0:58:54.400 --> 0:58:55.640
<v Speaker 2>your bootstraps.

0:58:56.720 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 4>And get your shit done, because we're giving you all

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 4>the two and we're being very clear about what your

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 4>goals are and if you don't hit it, now, there's

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:06.120
<v Speaker 4>nothing more that we could do.

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this guy, Yeah, there's a guy in this article

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:12.680
<v Speaker 3>who worked at Cisco and is like an HR guy.

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 3>He said they did a five year look back at

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:17.640
<v Speaker 3>all the pips and found that ninety percent of people

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 3>who were placed on them, whether or not they survived

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 3>that plan, left within a year. Anyway. He said that

0:59:24.440 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 3>he now gives two envelopes. One is a PIP and

0:59:28.400 --> 0:59:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the other is just a generous severance offer with a

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, separation insurance or a separation agreement and COBRA

0:59:35.080 --> 0:59:37.400
<v Speaker 3>and all that stuff. And seventy five percent of the

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:40.680
<v Speaker 3>time people take that second option and just leave to

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 3>get out of the whole process.

0:59:42.760 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 4>That's really smart, and it's such a better way to

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:47.240
<v Speaker 4>do it, because it just waste every time. Everyone knows

0:59:47.280 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 4>what's happening. And Eric is saying, no one is fooled

0:59:49.600 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 4>by the process.

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:52.439
<v Speaker 3>I like that option. I like the idea.

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like, hey, we know we were going to sort

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 4>of like do this stupid process for three months and

0:59:58.240 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 4>fire you anyway, Hello, we just give you six months

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 4>or nine months severance yep, and like just go find

1:00:04.480 --> 1:00:08.120
<v Speaker 4>something else that's better for you, and like we could

1:00:08.120 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 4>just move on.

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, it's like forget it, and then yeah, then

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 3>they talk to another guy who worked at a law

1:00:13.720 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 3>firm who was an employee who was placed on a PIP,

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 3>and he's he created a document kind of point by

1:00:20.880 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 3>point in response and shared it with the HR people

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 3>and the manager, not disputing anything, but just outlining kind

1:00:27.960 --> 1:00:30.959
<v Speaker 3>of specific things he planned to do to actually meet

1:00:31.280 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 3>what they asked for. So that way, I think it

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:36.160
<v Speaker 3>led to a little bit more clarity to like, Okay,

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 3>is this actually viable? How can we actually do it?

1:00:38.240 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And was a little bit more proactive beyond just like

1:00:40.760 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 3>trying to do these vague tasks. So that's if you

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:46.280
<v Speaker 3>want to if you do get one of these plans

1:00:46.320 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 3>and want to try to say this seems like a

1:00:49.720 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>good way to do it, where like be vocal and

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 3>try to actually argue back as much as you can.

1:00:54.240 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's tough.

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Tough, it seems to be, and it's not going to work.

1:00:57.680 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>A couple of warnings at least before the p IP comes.

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it comes out of nowhere.

1:01:04.280 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 4>I've seen people take that approach of trying to be

1:01:07.000 --> 1:01:09.040
<v Speaker 4>like really specific about Okay, I'm going to.

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Do these things at the end of the day.

1:01:11.760 --> 1:01:13.800
<v Speaker 4>If you don't hit the goals, it doesn't matter if

1:01:13.840 --> 1:01:16.120
<v Speaker 4>you wrote out how you were going to into if

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:20.600
<v Speaker 4>you don't do them, because then it just becomes the

1:01:20.640 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 4>conversation and becomes, oh, you need your handheld to hit

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:24.800
<v Speaker 4>these goals.

1:01:24.720 --> 1:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>And somebody who can just do it.

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:32.000
<v Speaker 4>And you're taking too much of our time and effort,

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 4>whereas the rest of the team doesn't need this much. Yeah,

1:01:37.080 --> 1:01:39.600
<v Speaker 4>my advice to you would be, if you are being

1:01:39.600 --> 1:01:42.560
<v Speaker 4>put on a PIP to start looking for another job. Also,

1:01:42.640 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, try try to you know, hit your goals

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 4>so that you could stay a little bit longer.

1:01:46.720 --> 1:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But all to say, they're effective in a sense effective

1:01:54.760 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're not effective in getting you better at your job.

1:01:57.160 --> 1:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>They're effective at removing from the Hello performers.

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, good looks he hess. No such Thing as

1:02:08.680 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 3>a production of Kaleidoscope content. Our executive producers are Kate

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Osborne and mangesh ho to Cadur. The show is created

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:17.640
<v Speaker 3>by Manny Fideo, Noah Friedman, and Devin Joseph Themen. Credit

1:02:17.760 --> 1:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>song by Manny, mixing by Steve Bone. Our guest this

1:02:20.440 --> 1:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>week is Eric Baker visit No Such Thing Dot show

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>to subscribe to our newsletter, where you can find links

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to some of the studies mentioned in the episode and more.

1:02:27.120 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 3>If you have feedback for us or a question, our

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:31.680
<v Speaker 3>email is Manny no Adevin at gmail dot com, or

1:02:31.760 --> 1:02:33.320
<v Speaker 3>leave us a voicemail by calling the number on our

1:02:33.320 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 3>show notes. And please take the NST Listeners survey so

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 3>we can find out more about what's working and what's

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>not working according to you, the listener. And if you

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:42.800
<v Speaker 3>do like the show, please leave us a five star

1:02:42.840 --> 1:02:44.680
<v Speaker 3>review wherever you listen to and share with a friend

1:02:44.760 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 3>or family number so we can grow. All right, that's it.

1:02:47.760 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 3>We will be back next week with a new episode.

1:02:50.080 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Bye such thing.