WEBVTT - 66: Planes, Trains and Automobiles

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Bank of America. Merrill Lynch. Seeing

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>what others have seen, but uncovering what others may not.

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Global Research that helps you harness disruption voted top global

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>research from five years running. Meryll Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Smith Incorporated. Actually it's a very interesting discussion. We could

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>go on and on and on with that. I mean,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have me on your show weekly on,

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll be happy to be your Canadian contributor. Well do

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>at the infecast. Hi, and welcome back to Bloomberg Benchmark,

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a show about the global economy. It's Thursday, December eight.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kate Smith and editor for Bloomberg News in New York.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Scott Landman and economics editor with Bloomberg in Washington.

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>D Suit Scott, how are you all right? How's it going? Kate? Well,

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I have to say I am kind of regret I'm

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>not regretting, I'm dreading. My ride home. The subway that

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I take to get home is like you remember the

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>pictures that they showed like post Sandy, of all the

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>people's shoulder to shoulder in the subway. Well, it's like that,

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but somehow that's just like my day to day life

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>every day in New York. But I've heard that it's

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>even worse a d C. Well, you should be happy

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that you get a ride home at all, because in

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>d C there are days when the trains aren't even

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>running or they're shutting down large sections of track. I mean,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have the problem with overcrowding anymore because

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ridership has fallen significantly. But that's incredible. I didn't realize

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that I would like to have your problem. I'd rather

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have that than there not running. Do you sound like

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the lesser of two evils though? Yeah, Well, I think

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>what you and I experienced that is obviously pretty reminiscent

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>of what a lot of people experience in the US.

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of just dealing with the failing infrastructure

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>problem that you have here in America. UM, I don't

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>know if you're familiar with the American Society of Civil Engineers,

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but they gave the U S a D plus um

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>when ranking our country's infrastructure. And that's like, you know,

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in an academic scale, So you can't get that much worse.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You could get an F. You could get an F.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So we don't have an F we have a D plus.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Does that even count just passing? Though I don't think

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in some places it doesn't, some it doesn't, Okay, So

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe passing depending where we are. And they also estimated

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to bring us to like a current, so I guess,

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.679
<v Speaker 1>like you know, an a perhaps it would take three

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>point six trillion dollars by you talked about those numbers,

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably why Donald Trump's promised to repair UH

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in the US resonated with voters. You know, it's

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>impossible to know exactly what he's going to do to

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>fulfill that promise because so you know, a few different

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>proposals have been bandied about. One thing that his nominee

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>for Treasury secretary mentioned was doing an infrastructure bank. It's

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>actually an idea that the campaign criticized. So we don't

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>really know what's going to happen, but UH an infrastructure

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>bank is something that our neighbors to the north have

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>announced that they wanted to implement, and that that came

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just recently in what they call the fall Economic Statement.

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>So to tell us a little bit more about what

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we have in Canada, we have the Canadian Parliamentary Secretary

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Federal Minister of Finance, Francois Philippe Champagne. He's

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>joining us over the phone. Francois Philippe is a liberal

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>politician and he represents the writing of Scott. Please try

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not to laugh at me, Saint Maurice, I was sound

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>super about, Oh, you are far too kind. You truly

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>are a politician. So France of Philip, thank you so

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. It's a pleasure. It's a pleasure

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to you, and yes, indeed, I mean

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing you're talking about, you know, public infrastructure

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and public transit in particular. It's a challenge you find

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in the number of capital around the world. And indeed,

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Canada tried to as you were saying in the fall

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>autonomic statement, we we set the Canadians how we're going

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and um you may have seen we're

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>going to invest hundred eighty six billion dollar UH in infrastructure.

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.559
<v Speaker 1>So that's an historic amount because we realized that Canadians

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have asked us to to obviously help them and their

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>families and grow the economy. So as part of our

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>inclusive growth model, within a number of things for Canadians,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>reducing taxes and investing in families. But on the growth side,

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>we decided to invest, as you could see, massively infrastructure,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>not only in public transit, but also in green infrastructure,

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in trade corridors, in rural and infrastructure. And I'm quite

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>happy to be talking to you about that because I

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>think this is going to be transformational for Canada. Well,

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>i'm happy that you're here to tell us about it.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So the United States, obviously, I'm sure you've heard friendship. Um,

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we're like notoriously outdated for our infrastructure. We had nearly

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago. I think it was the Mississippi River

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>bridge clap in Minneapolis that killed thirteen people and injured

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty four. Um. Here in the Northeast,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>do you have the am truck train that a lot

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of people complain about, especially those who travel from DC

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to New York. Um, Scott, I'm sure you've had to

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>deal with that before. Um, the campaign trail, the Guardian

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Airport comes up as the as the Third World country

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>esque airport that we have here in New York. But

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we know, we know all about how bad

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the US is, but trans maybe you can give us

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of an account of what it's like in Canada,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>what what's the reputation for infrastructure where you are, Well,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly you know what we're finding in some of our cities,

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and you would find the same thing in the United States.

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>We realized that the fact that people cannot transit easily

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in city as a social cost and economic costs. So

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that's why as part of the hundred d six billion

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Canadian we said would be investing over twelve years, we

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>put aside twenty five point three billion for public transit

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>because we realized there's a cost. You know, we want

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>people to be able to transit in the city faster,

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>That gives them more time with their family, more time

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>to start a business, and so there's a social cost,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>economic costs, and we realized that in sort any we

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to act because we we heard that from Canadian

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Then there was the green infrastructure piece. We're putting more

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>than twenty two billion in that this is really about

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>clean water, clean hair because um, not just in Canada,

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think you'd find throughout North America there's probably

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>been an under investment in terms of these type of infrastructure,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and we needed to continue to invest in and make

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that people UM in Canada in particularly want to

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>see these green infrastructure being built. And then you have

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the social infrastructure, which is really about social housing. Um

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you mavered, We're gonna put around twenty two billion in

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that because this is really something throughout cities but also

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>rural communities. Socializing is becoming an issue if you want

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people to be fully engaged in the economy before the

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.239
<v Speaker 1>engage in society, they have to be able to properly

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>house themselves. And then the last piece and is really

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>about the trade corridor, and that probably would be interesting

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for the US. So we said we point a found

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a ten billion to make sure that our goods can

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>transit faster to our ports. Our airports are bridges mainly

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>to the United States, in order to facilitate commerce because

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>as you know, we don't need to remind people, but

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have about two billion of trade going

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>on every day between Canada and the United States. You

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have about two thirds of the States and the United

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>States who have Canada as their major export partners. So

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to facilitate commerce. We want to keep building

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>on that extremely good relationship we have UM and making

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sure our trade corridors are very efficient and the last

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>piece of fade to to the people listening to us

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is we put a fight two billion for our rural

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and northern communities, understanding probably just like in the US,

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that they have very particular need to make sure that

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we cover these people as well with a very specific

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>program of investment. Now, now let's let's talk about what

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Kate was saying about. You know, the US infrastructure getting

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a D plus from the Society of Civil Engineers. When

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the condition of Canada's airports, roads, bridges,

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is water infrastructure things like that, what kind of reading

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>would you give it on a scale of one to

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>ten when you would say, like ten is in excellent

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>condition and one is uh, you know, you're you're falling apart,

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>like lookwart here, Well, I would say, you know, just

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>like in the US, if you look across the nation,

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that the answer could be different depending on

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>if you go if you look north, if you look east, west,

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>or in the middle of the country. But suffice to

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>say that what we've seen in Canada and it may

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>be true another we city country. Particularly over the last

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>ten years, there's been an under investment not only a

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>new bill, but also in maintenance so obviously when we

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>entered government UM with the Prime Minister, true though, we

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>found ourselves in a situation where we need to invest

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>massively in our infrastructure. This is also good for the

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>economy because we said to Canadians that we want to

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>have inclusive growth, we want to grow the economy, and

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly infrastructure investments give the right way to do because

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that touches about every on UM in our country. When

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at these different infrastructure you mentioned, everyone's going

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to benefit. And you know, I would say confident nations

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to the invest in their people and in their economy.

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that we've announced in the

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Falltonomic statement was one thing we wanted to create and

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna set up is an infrastructure Bank. The reason

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for that is for us to be able to do

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>more and faster. This is going to be one more

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>tool in our toolbox because we understand that UM we

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>want to attract global investment, global capital UM. I was

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>just at the APEX Finance Minister's summit in li Mont,

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Peru recently, and when I was talking about the Canadian

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>way in terms of infrastructure investment, you see there's a

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>number of nation and global investments that would like to

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>invest in countries like Canada where you have stability, predictability,

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>rule of law, very stable banking system, and we think

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>that the Infrastructure Bank is gonna be allowing us to

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.599
<v Speaker 1>get the leverage we want in order to attract this

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>type of global investment to help us build faster and

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>more um with the time skill that we've given Canadians

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to deliver. So, first off, Philip, we have a we

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have an ad we're going to break for, but when

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we come back, I want to hear exactly how an

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure bank works for our those listeners who aren't policy

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>wanks like us. Definitely be a pleasure brought to you

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>by Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Seeing what others have seen,

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>but uncovering what others may not. Global research that helps

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you harness disruption voted top global research from five years running.

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated. Welcome back. Okay, So,

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>first of Philip, let's take a step back here, how

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly use of our listeners. I know how an infrastructure

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>bank works. It's actually this tool that they use in

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the world of municipal bonds here in the US. But

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>can you help our listeners who aren't perhaps familiar with

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of the basics of how an infrastructure bank works. Yeah,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let me tell you why we did that

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in Canada. May If you look at traditional funding model,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>if you have a project of five millions in Canada,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you would normally have fundings which would be wandered federal,

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>wandered provincial, and one through municipal. Now with the infrastructure Bank,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we think we can get the leverage to four to five.

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So with the same five million project, we think we

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>can raise private capital to the extent of about four million,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the federal government would put one third, the

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>municipal would put one third, and preventional would put one third.

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So what I was thinking is that it allows us

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to do more and faster. So why are we creating

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that first is to obviously attract global investment to help

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>us to do more and faster. And the reason why

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a structure, and like I said,

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>other nations you mentioned it a that' um I know

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>of the Australian model for example, but for us, it's

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>really about making sure that we pull the expertise we

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>would have in this country to make sure that we

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>have all the experts in one place. Um. The second

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>thing is that we can have projects that could be

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>finance uh, so that you need to package these projects

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>into something that you can attract global investments. And the

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>third thing is that you want to have a pipeline

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of projects. So when you have global investors who are

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>looking to invest, for example, in Canada infrastructure, typically these

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>people would want to see what kind of projects you have,

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>what kind of pipeline of projects you have? Are they

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in green infrastructure, are they in public transit? Are they

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in wastewater and water. So by having one structure, you

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>actually pull the expertise. You make sure that you have

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>bankable projects. You make sure that you have a pipeline

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of projects. So when you want to go to the

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>global markets, you have indeed a place where global investor

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and can can call and see what type of investment

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>if they want to invest in infrastructure in Canada, where

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 1>they can go. And I think this is going to

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>be very successful. I mean again, I was at the

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>APEX Finance Ministers summit in Peru just recently and I

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was mentioning a number of projects and um, you know,

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to give you an example, what I mentioned some of

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the projects. Some of the delegation came to see me

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>after and say, that's the type of projects we would

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>really want to invest. So what are the projects and

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>my curiosities peak. Yeah, well, I gave the example in Montreal,

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>which is a great city. In Montreal, we're building what

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we call a regional electric train and this is about

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a four to five billion dollar projects in Canada. This

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is very great because we're building another public transit, a

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>very green one. And when I mentioned that, obviously that

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>sparked a lot of interest. Because you have a number

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of delegations who have sovereign funds or others. We say,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly the type of projects we want to invest

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>because you have you know, you know that matches their liabilities.

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>That those are projects that you can finance over thirty years.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So very interesting for investors to look at. And can

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I interrupt a second now, let me let me turn

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to a couple criticisms that I've heard of infrastructure banks

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and private financing. One is that what Trump and his

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>campaign said throughout the year, which which is that an

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure bank creates a whole new bureaucracy, creates, you know,

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of centralizes decision making. That's one criticism. And then

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of from the other side of the political aisle,

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you hear the criticism that you know, in order to

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>make private financing work, you need you need a pretty

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>significant flow of taxes or user fees, and you know

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that burden either tends to fall on the average folks

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>using the infrastructure, or you know the project doesn't get

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>financed at all. How do you respond to those two issues? Well,

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the first one, I think by pulling the resources and

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the projects and an agency, I think you get economy

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of scale and and actually for me, I think it's

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a better way to market these projects if you want

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to attract global investments, so that people know who to call,

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>who to talk to if they're interested in investing in

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>transformational projects. I mean, we're looking about transformational infrastructure projects

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in our nations. I think there's there's a lot of

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>benefits of having one place where people can actually look

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for and also for this agency to prepare these projects,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>select these projects, and the best way to make sure

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to attract these global investments. The other thing,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the user fees, I mean, if you

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>look at regional light trains, the one that was just

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I mean, people already pay for using these services,

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think that you can necessarily, like you said,

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>equate that would be higher users fees. I think we

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know that global capital is looking at investments like these

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one with very long returns, and I think that people

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>would be um. What I said to Canadians many times,

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and that would apply to the US. Why not put

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>our pension money working for Canadians. So Canadian pension money

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>working for Canadians. So when people enter the train in

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the morning, they know that they're, for example, in this case,

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>their pension has been helping them to build in that

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and when they pay the user fee, they're actually investing

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in their own pension. So there's something you know. When

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we went to the public with that, we really made

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the case that this was something good for people and

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that would benefit everyone, not just the users. But this

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is a good way to reinvest. I mean, we know

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's um, there's a fair amount of capital um

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and pension funds around the world. Insurance companies that are

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>looking for these types of projects which are going to

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>improve our cities, are going to improve our quality of life,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to bring greener infrastructure. And honestly, when you

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>say to Canadians, why don't we put your pension on

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>money working for you? Now, that's something that people relate

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to and they accept willingly to say that seems to

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>be the smart thing to do today. So this has

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>been all very positive, but I have to imagine this

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is politics. There's got to have been some negative feedback.

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>So what's been some of the criticisms of potentially implementing

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>an infrastructure bank in Canada. Well, the main criticism we

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 1>got was, and I would say that, is there there

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not another agency already existing that could be doing that?

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, we had some agency looking at

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>p p P projects, but I think that we thought

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that having a different agency to really with a mandate

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to organize these projects and market them is the best

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>way to do. I think there's been very few this

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>agreement with respected the value and the merit of making

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>sure that um uh, we can structure this project to

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>attract global investment. I think people don't understand the leverage.

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 1>People don't understand that we need to do more and faster. Uh.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Some people like you mentioned question the user fees and

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>what we've been very transparent about is that this is

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>not for all types of project. Like I said, you know,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we're putting hundred D six billion in infrastructure over over

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.959
<v Speaker 1>twelve years, and we're taking only fifteen billion out of

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this dread a D six in the Infrastructure Bank, and

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we think we can raise another twenty billion on the

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>market for the infrastructure bang. So what we're saying to

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>people is that clearly there's some type of investment think

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>about social infrastructure. I don't necessarily think that we're going

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>to find projects that would fit the bill to be

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>fundance to the Infrastructure Bank, but by getting the leverage

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>with the Infrastructure Bank for those projects that could attract

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>global capital, that gives us more money to being able

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to invest in social infrastructure. And when you explain to

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>people and you take the time to say this is

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>about doing more and faster and actually not using public

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>funds that would otherwise be needed to build a type

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure where we need we can get private capital,

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but using these funds too, for example, invest in social housing.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>People really understand that this really makes sense. So how

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>long until this Infrastructure Bank is up and running, until

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it finances it's for projects? Well as you said. We

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>we announced that in the fall coomic statement we have

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in Canada. This is you know, six months after our

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>federal budget, so you know, we're about building the blueprints

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of that. We want to obviously get the bank started

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as fast as possible. I think based on our discussions

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>with a number of international partners, there's a lot of

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>interest in investing in Canada for the reasons we know,

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>because people want to invest in North America, people have

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>confidence in our system, people will see that these green

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>projects are going to attract significant investments. So we're trying

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to set up with you know, a small team to

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>start as soon as possible to make sure that we

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>can start market these projects around the world and get um,

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>these projects built as soon as possible. So let me

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>ask you one final question. UM. Like I mentioned before,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the US does use the infrastructure bank model on a

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>smaller scale. UM. The idea of being you know, for

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>our listeners who don't know about this, certain dates that

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>have small municipalities, UM, they'll use a state level infrastructure

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>bank model. And the way it works is that the

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>state will borrow money on capital markets using the states

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>interest rate UM, which is you know, much lower. Of course,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>than the towns, and then the towns will go to

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the state, you know, saying you know, the infistracture products

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that they want to get done, and the state will

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>effectively lend the money to the individual towns. The whole

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>purpose being that small towns aren't edged out of the

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>capital markets, you know, by either just no investor being

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>interested or having to pay you know, prohibitively high interest rates.

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And the long way of asking you, um, is there

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a reason why you didn't look at look at maybe

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps doing this on a province by province basis as

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>opposed to federal Well, I mean it's interesting you mentioned

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>states because I'm a bit familiar with the Alaskan model.

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think in Alaska there's something similar to that which

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm familiar because I think I've met with people, Uh

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>we're saying the great things you've been able to achieve

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska, which respected that in terms of infrastructure development.

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So clearly, like you said, there's different models and more

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of it with the Alaska example. But I think for us,

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>because we're looking at transformational national type of projects, we

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that this is the best way to to get

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the best leverage was really to have that at the

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>federal level. UM, we want to make sure that we

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>attract some of the best talent in this agency. We

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that we structure these projects to

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be bankable, and I think to do that on a

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>national basis. Obviously it could be different in the United

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>States because obviously our economy or different size, but we

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>thought in Canada that the right thing to do was

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>really to do that on a national basis, so that, UM,

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we can better market as a country some

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of these projects, whether it's the rail projects I mentioned

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in Montreal, or whether you would have a port expansion

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or you would have an apport expansion. I think from

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>our perspective, UM, it's better to market that at the

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>national level. And like I said, there's been a great

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>level of interest because people have seen probably just like

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned in the number of United States, but also

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I know in Australian and other place that once they

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 1>have created that this has been very beneficial in attracting

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the type of global investment that we want to track

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we can build these projects. UM.

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is the smart thing to do.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, today you have all this capital in in

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>pension funds, and insurance company which are looking for these

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>types of projects. I mean, our pension funds and our

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>insurance company are investing abroad, so it just seems to

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>make sense for us to create the structure that would

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>make it possible for them to invest in our own country. Well, first, Philip,

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us uh this week's benfuct.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for making yourself available. Well, it's

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a great pleasure and and look forward to talk to

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>you and very happy to to tell you how this

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>is unfolding. And I'm sure this is going to be

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a model not only for Canada, but something that could

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be replicated in a number of places. Absolutely well, Benchmark

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>will be back next week, and until then, you can

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, as

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>well as on iTunes, Pocketcast, and Stitcher. While you're there,

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>take a minute to rate and review the show so

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that more listeners can find us and let us know

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>what you thought of the show. You can talk to

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and follow us on Twitter at at Scott Landman and

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>at by Kate Smith. And of course a big shout

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>out to our folks behind the windows, Sarah Patterson and

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Al McCabe. So, Scott, what do you think? Do you

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think we have an infrastructure bank around the corner for

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the US. I'm still holding my breath. I'll believe it

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>when I see it. Okay, there you kind of theirs first. Yeah,

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>probably see you next week. Brought to you by Bank

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of America. Meryll Lynch. Seeing what others have seen, but

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>uncovering what others may not. Global Research that helps you

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>harness disruption voted top global research from five years running.

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Mary Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated,