WEBVTT - What Elon Musk Could Learn from the #EndFathersDay Hoax

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Internet hate Machine. I'm Bridget and I'm joined

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with my producer Sophie, and we are also so thrilled

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to have our very first guest in the studio with us.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I am joined by the lovely Joel Monique. Joel, thank

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here, Hi, Bridget, what's up?

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me so Joel. I have to

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>start by saying, like, you're a pretty prolific Twitter user.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>What has that been like for you as a black

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>woman with a pretty visible public profile on Twitter. I

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>really liked Twitter up until recently. Now it's causing me

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>headaches because I have to leave it. And I realized

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that what I really like about it was the fact

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's just words. How do you think about my image?

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to tell you where I've been, Like,

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I could just be like I really love this TV

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>show or the song rocks or sucks or whatever. You

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>can just so easily to share an opinion and it

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>can live there and you can respond or not respond,

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's been great. And I mean, yes, there have

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>always been assholes on Twitter, but my black fingers are strong.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not you know. I know. Maggie was like let

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>him talk, and I'm like, I can't. I'm not as

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>strong as you my knees nor my emotions. Apparently I

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>can't deal with people being mean, and so I just

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>blocked heavy and it's been a pretty smooth journey. And

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>now man, I'm on not Mams Sabertooth. I know it's Masthodon, Mastodon.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>There it is. I got me one of those don't

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>know how to use it yet. I presumeed my TikTok

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>name ages ago have never posted anything. So now I'm

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>just lurking in there, like do I want to come

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to this space? How life? You know? On camera? All

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that much? That frequently you know? And so I just

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know what I'm gonna do when

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the trolls take over, but I do, like if I'm

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for silver linings. Elon must downfall on this. He

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>spent so much money and people, really I can tell

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>because my follower account drops every day by like way

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>too many of you. I haven't posted anything controversial or like,

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>no strong opinions as of late, and so I can

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>tell people are like and it's done. The worst part

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>those I have a black Lady professional group chat on

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>there that has been life saving, got me a lot

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of jobs, got me through a lot of crap, like

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>has really helped solidify my career. And that check mark,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I first got it, I was freelance

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and it really boosted my profile and gave me a

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of access that I didn't have previously. I do

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>worry about what's going to happen. You know, we're trying

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to as a group or tegure out like where do

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we go next, and we're just not quite sure what's

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have that same kind of connection. So it's

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>been a whild ride on Twitter. That's such a good

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>point that you make about the access, particularly for folks

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and industries that are more traditionally marginalized. It's different for

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>us to build up a platform, and it just has

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the stakes are different. And you know, I'm also verified

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, and I do think that it's gotten me

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>into spaces and gotten me access that I don't think

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I would have otherwise. And so like, if you're an

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>editor and I tweet something I've gotten the d M

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>that's like, oh, do you want to turn this into

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a piece for us? And I would be lying if

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I said that I wasn't going to miss that, But

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you're right, like, who who wants to be on a

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>platform that is run by someone who has made it

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>clear that they don't really care about the safety of

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the folks who are showing up on a platform like Twitter.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I knew it was over when he was like, I'm

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>going to charge for verification. I was like, well, then

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that defeats the point of verification, Like the check mark

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>was there solely. I know a lot of people think

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it was like for a cloud that came with it,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But the initial thing was like this famous person that

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you think you're talking to, that's actually them If they

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>have the check mark, no check mark, you don't know

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>who you're talking to. And I wonder like, if I

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>set up on account it's called like the Rock, can

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I verify it? And then people think they're talking to

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne the Rock Johnson, Like there's what value is there

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in that check mark except that and and and the

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>cloud that came with it before. Now that you can

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>purchase it, I don't think companies or celebrities or anybody

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>who was following you because you had that check mark

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue that behavior. I don't think people

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to get booked jobs because they have the

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>checkmark once you can pay for it. When the when

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the actual like transition happens and it's and you are

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>paying for it, I can't wait to find out who

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>actually is paying for it. That will that will because

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>it was again, unless if I was still freelanced, I

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>might because without the profile I have now, I think

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I would still consider it because it did, like I said,

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>coming so many jobs when I first got it, and

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>so I do feel bad for those people who are

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like sort of on the cusp of having like a

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>well known career. That checkmark really sort of verifies a

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>lot for you. But yeah, as of now, like it

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>would be weird again unless people really feel the need

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to try to verify, like yes, you're talking to me,

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. I saw some actor the other day was

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>posting about how they don't like social media, but when

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it first started, they got concerned messages from parents saying,

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>why are you talking to my fifteen year old child,

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, I'm not, and so that caused

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it a whole downward spiral for them. And it's like, yeah,

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to your you know, bridge, and I just don't think

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they care about safety that's clearly not an issue, and

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>there's so much danger online. We we've been known. We

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>grew up in the early odds. I remember early Internet

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>safety danger lessons and news reports, and so it's it's

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>weird to me that that's suddenly not a concern. So

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I that's right. That you're talking about is actor Robert

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Kazinski talking about, you know, what verification has meant for

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>him and his career as an actor. And I'm so

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>glad that you bring all of this up because it

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>really dovetails exactly into what I want to talk about today,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which is that's sort of dirty, messy business of people

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>being able to impersonate others on Twitter and the incredibly

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>high stakes that it comes with your experiences of maybe

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>wanting to leave the platform. Really set us up nicely

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>into that conversation because we know that Twitter has not

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>always banned the most secure platform, has not always delivered

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a very secure experience for its users, and now with

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk at the helme, I think it's poised to

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>only get worse. And f y I we're recording this

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>on a Friday. My understanding is Twitter is planning on

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>rolling out this new pay to be verified system on Monday,

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so in just a couple of days, the same day

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>or like just days before firing half their staff and

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a day before a fucking election. So I'm I'm very concerned,

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that my concerns have real historical precedent,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>which I want to get into right now. So, a

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>classic bad actor tactic is pretending to be somebody that

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not on social media, specifically to create confusion and

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize online spaces. Right, Like, this is probably not

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to you, Joel, This is like something we

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>all have mainly know, right, yes, And I think something

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that really just burns me up about this is that

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.559
<v Speaker 1>it's very much unknown tactic. Right. The leadership at social

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>media platforms like Twitter and Facebook have been made well

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>aware that this is a tactic that bad actors used

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to threaten the security of their platforms, but they have

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>really done fuck all to prevent it from happening, and,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Twitter, or maybe making it easier

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to happen, which is a real head scratcher. So another

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>classic bad act or tactic is inflaming existing tensions around

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>groups of people who are traditionally marginalized, right and so

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that is a common day. Yeah, who who would have

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>guessed it right, that that would be a common tactic

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to distabilized communities. So what happened around End Father's Day,

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>around we don't want to talk about today? That's like

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I think it's so important

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>because it utilized both of those tactics to hijack and

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>exploit conversations around feminism, race, and gender online. And it's

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>really concerning because you know, it's concerning that our social

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>media platforms are so easily gamified in this way and

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that social media platforms aren't really doing anything to prevent it.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about End Father's Day. To really understand

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>what the fun was going on with End Father's Day,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you really need to understand what Fortune was calling Operation Lollipop,

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and essentially Operations Lollipop was this campaign to create fake

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>activist causes on social media. Basically, people on Fortune, trolls,

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>bad actors, whatever you want to call them, would pose

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>as feminists of color, so like black feminists, brown feminists, etcetera,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and essentially try to get people to agree with these

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>bogus campaigns. They would start and just generally try to

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>seed conflict with one another. The whole point is to

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:40.599
<v Speaker 1>create confusion inflame tensions, generally to make feminists look like

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of you know, crazy man haters whose causes

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>have no merit and who can't even agree with one another.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>This is so wild when you see it happen just

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>organically on your timeline, where you'll be like, so, here's

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a picture of you know, some as a black woman,

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a black man using way too much like currently

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>popular and the guy's black lingo, where you're like, they're like, yeah,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>no cap. You be like, I don't know if the

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>situation necessarily calls for a no cap and yeah, And

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>then you go on their page and they follow a

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people, but maybe only have like a handful

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of followers. Most of their tweets are retweets. It's they

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>become easier to spot the more you come across them organically.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's very strange to be like this is this

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like internet black face, and it's annoying and upsetting and

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>again ruining these spaces that have you know, I know

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>some people don't agree with the idea that there's community

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on these spaces, but I just think that for somebody

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>who has found a great group of friends that I

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>meet with regularly. I r L who you know again

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>uses a space and platforms for for job opportunities, Like

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>it does feel communal to me, and it does feel

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>almost it's just invasive. It's invasive to have people come

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>into those communities and try to erect them in that way.

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>The reason why these bad actors pretending to be black

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>women were exposed, it's exactly what you just picked up

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on when they use language where you're like, I don't

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>know if a black person would actually say no cab

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in this situation. I don't know that a black person

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>would actually say, you know, as a black I think

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump is lit little things where you're like, my spidy

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>since it's tingling, I don't know if you're a black

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>woman like you say you are Twitter user like five

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>five six seven. And I think this is one of

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why I am always kind of screaming from

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the rooftops that this kind of disinformation and media manipulation

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is a clear racial and gender justice issue because bad

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>actors and trolls know that exploiting and inflaming these legitimate

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like tensions and trigger points per particularly between marginalized groups

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>can really work because it does tap into these like

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>legitimate traumas and baggage and anxieties that we do have.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, the experience of being a black woman, or

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a queer person, or a trans person, or really any

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of marginalized identity in the United States is often

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>marked with these very real historical traumas and baggage. And

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>so people who are interested in using the Internet to

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>spread chaos target marginalized people, and they do it by

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>tapping into these existing traumas. And you know, a good

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>example is like, as we approach the midterm elections, the

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of disinformation that we're seeing around the election is

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>really meant to dissuade people of color from voting. You know,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they tend to do this via things like fogus images

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>purporting to show ice making arrests of undocumented people at

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>polling places, or you know, images warning that, oh, you know,

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>when you go to vote, they're gonna be checking if

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you have outstanding warrants when you do try to vote, right,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>These lies that are clearly meant to tap into very

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>real fears and anxieties that black and brown folks have

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>around being criminalized in the United States. So it plays

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on these like real traumas that we have in ways

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that exploit these things, these like tensions that we carry

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>around just by virtue of being a marginalized person in

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Yeah, it's sinister when you essentially try

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to brainwash someone into acting in their own disinterest, right,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly when we're talking about voting, This idea of if

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you exercise, you're right, there's a threat there and you

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>should avoid that threa at all costs. It's it's really cruel.

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And the craziest thing is like when we see a

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of like who is participating in these acts, Like

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's either very young kids who've been indoctrinated over many

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>years YouTube fix your system, or like old people who

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>again have been indoctrinated mostly by Fox News slash Fox

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>News to feel it's and that sort of gets really

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>under my skin, to this idea of either people who

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>should know better or people who never had a chance

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to learn better doing so much damage. You know, I'm

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>really glad that you framed it that way. It's sometimes

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult for me, but I always try to remember that,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's not necessarily the individual, it's like systems and

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>institutions that are getting rich and profiting off of, you know,

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>misleading individuals in this way. It can be hard to

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>remember that when I'm like, why can't you just not

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>fall for this? But you're exactly right that sum is

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a very effective tool that is being wielded expertly right now.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>It's hard because you do you do. Your instinct is

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>to just get angry about it. You know, I am

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>angry about it, But at the same time, I know

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>my anger can't resolve the issue. And so my hope

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is that more white mothers, if we're just being very

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>honest about it, are figuring out ways to talk to

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>their young sons about how to better navigate the internet,

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>are making sure they're putting up roadblocks and interventions where necessary.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that's the only way we can

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>hope to really get ahead of this, because it seems

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a wave that isn't stopping anytime soon. Unfortunately.

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that you are correct. Um So, when we

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>look at end Father's Day and the kind of tensions

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and traumas historically that that campaign really tapped into, it's

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this clear wedge between black women and white women. And

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, I kind of get it. You know,

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time, black feminists have not always

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>felt meaningfully represented or centered by white feminists. If you

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>look at early the early Suffragette movement, for instance, they

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.479
<v Speaker 1>left black women's voting rights out of their advocacy altogether

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>as a strategic turn. It's not your turn, they said,

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not for women, we are for white women, exactly right.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And so when you look a little further in time,

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know white feminists writing about things like being stuck

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>at home with domestic duties, they weren't really talking to

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Black women. They were not centering our lived experience in

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>their in their advocacy. In that way, this reminds me

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Health when if for listeners, if you don't

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>know anything about the help or how it was crafted. Uh,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy, a white man from the South, was essentially

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>writing and from the perspective of his childhood maids. And

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>when you go into a larger cinematic history and you

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>understand birth of a nation and how a lot of

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of you know, the guy who crafted

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that was so proud of it. He invited again a

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>childhood made who taking care of him, who was not

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>taking care of his son uh and she she left

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>service after that. She said you were a racist and

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this is ridiculous and I'm going to bounce. But yeah,

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea that there's so much space available and so

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>much um I want to say, like bad blood, but

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely four hundred years of oppression and discord that we

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>have to advocate. It's a it's an easy place to

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>spark a fire, exactly that right, and so these tensions

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>are very much still with us today. Author of Mickey Kendall,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>who wrote an excellent book called Hood Feminism, which you

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>should definitely get if you have not read it. I

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>love it. It's one of my favorite books. Basically, her

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>book is all about the ways that white feminism have

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>left the most marginalized women behind in their causes. Here's

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Kendall speaking to now This News about her work

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>with hood feminism. Hood feminism is about survival because for

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>those who are facing all of these issues from gun

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>violence the housing, their first concern has to be staying

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>alive long enough to fight for their rights. The movement

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>has to do a better job of addressing displacement and

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>hunger if it expects support for reproductive justice marches or

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for electing the first woman to be president of the

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>United States. It's hard to believe that women will be

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>better leaders when the feminist women you've seen gaining power

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not only don't help you, but are likely to actively

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>participate in harmony. Okay, I think that gives a good

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>sense of it. But Nickey, yes, So Mickey Kendall started

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the hashtag. Hashtag solidarity is for white women to really

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>have a real conversation about the ways that feminists, white

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>feminist namely had really failed Black women. And a great

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>example of this is that a sensibly feminist organizations and

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>outlets continue to have a relationship with a white male

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>writer named Hugo Schweizer. You don't know who that is.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Hugo Schweiser is a passage or was a Pacadya City

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>College professor of history and gender studies, a blogger, and

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a self described male feminist who wrote about feminism. I know, like,

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is there anything more of a warning than someone who

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>was a self proclaimed male feminist? Right? Uh? And he

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>really like he had that's at this time he did

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have a like pretty big footprint on online feminist basis.

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>He wrote about feminism for places like The Atlantic and

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Jez bell Um and some other like feminist sites in

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the sort of ecosystem of online feminism back in the

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>two fourteen era. Here's a little taste of Hugo speaking

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>at a slot walk in l A. For too long,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>there's been division in the feminist community over the issues

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of sexuality and sex work, and that's one of the

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>things we are here to end today. So I wrote

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a little speech, and I can't read a speech. Um,

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, it is very difficult to stand

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>up here as a man after the stories that you've

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>just heard and that I've heard as well. The fact

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is that we've heard a series of very personal, very powerful,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>very painful accounts of sexual violence, and in every one

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of those cases, the violence was committed by men against women.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And while it is true that men can also be

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the victims of sexual violence, and while it is true

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that in a few cases women can be the perpetrators

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>of sexual violence, there is no question that the vast

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>majority of sexual violence is men assaulting women. And part

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why we allow that to continue, and

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why the words slut continues to

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>have its enormous power in our lives, is because of

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a myth we believe in and a myth we need

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to march against today. It's a myth I call the

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>myth of male weakness. All right, I think you get

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea there. So you know something to know about

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Hugo Schweizer is that he his thing was kind of

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>being this sort of reformed bad boy, like bad boy

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>turned feminist. He wrote, really, yeah, so that was what

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>like that? That was his like being that I would

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>say allowed him to kind of grow in his public profile.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>He wrote very openly about how when he was struggling

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>with addiction issues, he tried to murder his girlfriend by

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>turning on the gas stove in their apartment. And he

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>also wrote about having sexual flings with his female students

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>when he was a professor. So it's interesting that he

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>would get up on a stage at a slut walk

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and talk about like man, this man of male weakness,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. Here's the other thing. If you are

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>coming to a marginalized community and you are not actively

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a member of that marginalized community, and then you speak

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of that marginalized community, you have not fully

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>done your work or your research, Like there's that time

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>should have been given to an actual woman, like any

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>woman with any kind of sense could have taken that

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>spot and done what you did in much much better. Uh.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>That is foolish and ridiculous. Yes, absolutely, And you know

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 1>who didn't let any of that ship slide? Black women?

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>They were no. Black women have been calling this guy

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>out for a very long time, and he was really

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>able to use this behavior test a mass power at

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a public profile in online feminist spaces for a long time.

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>When black women would speak up against him, he would

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like attack them pretty pretty horribly on social media. And

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>despite all this, he was able to really remain this

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of feminist darling writing for you know, ostensibly feminist

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>outlets like jez Bell that had this large white woman

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>readership and writership. He ended up having this public meltdown

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter in which he all but admitted all of

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>this behavior. He talked about how he didn't really have

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the educational credentials to be teaching a class on feminism

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at the college level, and yet he did it anyway.

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>He talked about how he had been trashing black women

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of apologized for it and all of that.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.719
<v Speaker 1>So all of these things that black women had been

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>accusing him of this whole time and basically have been

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>had been going ignored, he admitted in a meltdown on Twitter.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like when he admitted all this in

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>his meltdown, but the white feminists and the websites who

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>who were frequented by those white feminist they didn't really

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>take ownership of what they had done to allow him

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>to build such a platform in these online feminist spaces.

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, they weren't really denouncing him like you might

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>have expected them too. And they certainly were not, you know,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>seeking solidarity or trying to make amends with the women

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that he pretty clearly the black women that he pretty

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly harmed. I think there was just this general sense

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of of no accountability and to really move forward, they

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta have accountability. And so Mickey Kendall spelled it out

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>really well on a piece that she wrote for The Guardian.

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Folks should really read the whole things. It's a great piece,

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>but here's a little snippet. She writes, it appeared that

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>these feminists were once again dismissing women of color in

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>favor of a brand of solidarity that centers on the

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>safety and comfort of white women. For it to be

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>at the expanse of people who were doing the same

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>work was exceptionally aggravating. Admittedly, this is not a new problem.

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>White feminism has argued that gender should trump race since

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>its inception. That rhetoric not only erases the experiences of

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>women of color, but also alienates many from a movement

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that claims to want equality for all. This is especially

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>clear when posts and articles about racism and feminism from

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>five years ago involved some of the very same players.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>When I launched the hashtag solidarity as for white women,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would largely be a discussion between people

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>impacted by the latest bout of problematic behavior from mainstream

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>white feminists. It was intended to be a Twitter shorthand

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for how often feminists of color are told that the

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>racism they experience isn't a feminist issue. The first few

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>tweets reflect the deeply personal impact of such a long

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>running structural issue. And damn that that bit really speaks

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to me, because I totally get at this tension in

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>this fracture that she is naming and exposing here. Yeah,

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and this is what we used to sit at intersectionality, right,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>It's it's weird because sometimes as black women will or

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a queer black woman, I'll get the

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>same question from black men, like you're gonna put your

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>gender or your queerness ahead of your race, which is

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous question no matter who it's asked by, because

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't get to choose any of it. None of

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it is a decision, none of it can come one

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>before the other, or like it's all equal. It's always present,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's it's infuriating to have to sometimes link up

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with people who are not um understanding that intersectionality in

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>an effort to make things better for you know, a

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>community that you're a part of. It's a lot of work.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It's why we're all tired. I would also say, if

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you're a white feminist in any of this, is you know,

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>ringing out for you to borrow a quote from a

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>show that has some of its own feminist issues, but

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, desire to be free and not make a

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>window in the wall of your own prison. Okay, it's

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>really weird to me anyway to rely on a van

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>to to speak up for your woman community. That's it's

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>how did he get on stage? It's very confusing to me.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>It is confusing and honestly, I mean like I had

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to give like major, major props and shouts to Mickey

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Kendall because she was doing the work of exposing these

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>fair the same kinds of very real, deep fractures between

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>black feminists and white feminists that you were just talking about.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And I need to be like super clear here, Mickey

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Kendall was doing this like important, necessary work of bringing

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>these tough conversations to the forefront. And it is a

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>shame that Twitter as a platform failed Kendall and all

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of these other women who really needed to have this

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.959
<v Speaker 1>conversation failed them all by failing to provide a safe,

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>secure platform to have this conversation about these very real

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>fractures and how they show up in our communities. Right.

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I also think that white feminists really should have done

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a better job of digging into this conversation and taking accountability.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And it might have they done that, it might not

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have been left this like open wound for bad actors

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to swoop in and exploit. But that is a common

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>tactic of bad actors, trolls, extremists whoever, when conversations require

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of like thoughtfulness or new ones, or

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are just tough conversations to have, so folks don't really

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have them. You can met that these trolls will step

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in and hijack that conversation and exploit it for their

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>own means. In this case, their means we're making feminists

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>all look bad, and this is the backdrop against which

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Fortune starts their end Father's Day campaign. So basically, trolls

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on board Chane decide they want to pose as black

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>feminists and start the hashtag and Father's Day to make

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it seem like black feminists and feminists more generally are

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>actually calling to an end to the holiday Father's Day.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The hashtag Solidarity is for White Women exposed all of

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>these rightly raw feelings and tensions between black and white feminists,

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which we know are the perfect conditions for bad actors

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to swoop in and inflame those very real, pre existing

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>tensions within a community. Their goal is to undermine solidarity

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>so that when those tensions are exposed like they were

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>with Solidarity Is for White Women, bad actors want to

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>deepen and exploit those tensions because what they really want

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is chaos. They want people being distrustful of one another,

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>people not being able to reach common ground, or move

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>forward on any of those big issues that caused those tensions.

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the goal. You know, if black women are appearing

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to get on board with a hashtag as silly and

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>stupid as end Father's Day, maybe some of the white

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>women looking on are like, well, that's ridiculous, and they

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they start thinking that some of the issues that these

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>black feminists are raising are also kind of ridiculous, and

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe they start thinking that these black women are not

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>worth taking seriously and are not worth meaningfully centering in

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>their movement and in their activism. So you can really

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>see how bad actors can destabilize a whole community or

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole movement through these tensions. So trolls on for

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Chane decide that they're going to pose as black feminists

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and try to start the end Father's Day hashtag to

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>make it look as though black feminists are actually genuinely

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>calling for an end to the holiday Father's Day. On June,

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a Furtune user posts this to Fortune. Almost all cases

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of domestic violence, domestic rave, child abuse, adultery, and discontent

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in the home are caused by men i e. Fathers.

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>A holiday that celebrates this is another symptom in the

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>disease known as patriarchy, and it has no place in

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a progressive society. This is a holiday celebrating misogyny, demanding

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciation and gifts for doing what a father should be

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>doing anyway, especially when in almost all cases domestic abuse

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.239
<v Speaker 1>stem from the father. Fathers all over the country are

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>refusing to pay alimony or child support, which should not

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be celebrated and rewarded, but it should be shamed fathers.

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>They should not be about celebrating the role of fathers

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 1>in the family, but about correcting it. It should not

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>be celebrated in its current in its present form, we

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>are calling on all feminists and social justice warriors to

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>join us in a campaign to redefine this disgustingly misogynistic

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>holiday and Father's Day in its present form, if not entirely,

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we will be descending on Twitter and Tumblr to get

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>this message out that the patriarchal holiday has no place

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in our society. So that's all bullshit, right Like, this

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was them, This was them trying to feed their fake campaign,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>right Like, Like that is definitely not I mean, and

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you could probably almost tell from the way that they've

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>written it it's not It's not commentary written in seriousness.

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to mess with feminists and disrupt online feminist spaces.

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's zero logic and it all the idea

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that because there is domestic abuse, then there are no

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>good fathers is such a wild and congruent leap that

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's wild that and it took off at all

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>even within this zone like group, Like, I don't know,

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you think they want to think these things out a

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit more and make um stick, you would think,

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but but but I do think like you're onto something.

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason why these fake campaigns can kind

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of like have a little bit of stickiness even when

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they're so ridiculous on their face, is because they tend

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 1>to follow this like very specific cycle who have these

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>accounts using abbey images of black women purporting to be

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>black women tweeting about this campaign, and then real social

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>media users start reacting to the hashtag, giving it more

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>reach and more visibility and helping it grow. Side note,

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a great reason not to engage with hashtags

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that you see popping up on Twitter that might look

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit sass. Another good example would be the

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter trend hashtag hut for amber that was a

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>top trend earlier this year that was purporting to call

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for Amber Heard supporters to self harm in the aftermath

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of the verdict in the defamation trial that she had

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>against Johnny Depp or john against her happening. Oh my god.

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So these trends can be like harmful. And what what

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes happens is that people who either are skeptical of

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.959
<v Speaker 1>them or know that they're fake, will tweet using the hashtag,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>calling it out or being like can you believe this?

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And they might think that they're actually, you know, shedding

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>light on it, but by engaging with it, they're actually

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>just helping it grow. So whenever you see one of

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>those hashtags that you're like, this seems us, do not

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>engage with it, because nine times out of ten you're

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.719
<v Speaker 1>just helping it get more visibility and helping it spread

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to more people. So the next part of that cycle

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is that it gets picked up in the pressed. In

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>this case, first it was smaller right wing blogs like

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The Daily Caller who wrote about it, and then it

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>actually made its way to Fox News and they had

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this to say about it. Let's start out as a joke,

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>but the hashtag end Father's Day is picking up steam

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>with feminists online and with others in social media. Tweets

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like end Father's Day because it's a celebration of patriarchy

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and oppression have been popping up all over the place.

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Susan Patton, a k a. The Princeton Mom.

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>She gave notoriety for imploring young women to lock down

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>their future husbands while still in college. Remember this we

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about this morning should be here Like some of

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>these tweets, here is from Tasha. She wrote, and everyone

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>knows we only need mothers. Why do we even need

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Father's Day? Fathers are useless? Hashtag and oh come on

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you more? Is this nasty feminist rhetoric that they're not

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just interested in ending Father's Day of interesting ending men?

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>That's really what they want. It's absurd for them to

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>say that Father's Day is a creation of male oppression.

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous. But why is for women? I mean, there's

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a reason that there are more women living in poverty

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>now than it ain's time in my lifetime. Because there

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>if you, I mean, when you rush men, you hurt

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>women without a doubt. And we're obviously not talking about

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>celebrating the deadbeat dads are celebrating the men who abandoned

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the family. We're talking about men who love their children,

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>who provide for their family, right. I think you get

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea hate these people so many thoughts, Like first

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of all, both of the tweets they pulled had egg abbeys,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>which people get a life. One of them, I don't

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>remember the name, but it definitely started ana something and

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it felt like somebody pulling a joke, which is nuts.

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing, it's like I want to be like, gosh,

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish Bill Hooks were alive and willing to go

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on these shows. Should you give me like that's actually true.

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>When you crush men, you do her women, but not

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for the reasons you're thinking. It's not about providing financially

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for people that we're emotionally hurting men and we could

0:33:55.600 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>be doing better as a community, as a society. Ridiculous

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and Joel very good eye because the the Twitter, the

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>tweet that they showed belonged to Twitter USERNA can't stop

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>who if you go to that Twitter profile now, oh wait,

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't because it's been suspended because it was a

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>fake account. They showed someone who is a known troll

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>impersonating a black woman to create chaos and confusion on

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms. They showed that tweet not knowing or

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm not even gonna say not knowing, not caring

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to check to see whether or not that was an

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>actual person espousing their actual views to showing show and

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>pop up. I wonder if there's because some of these

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>people actually went to journalism school, and you wonder if

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>there's any like moment where there's just like deep regret

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>or concern or like they have to know that the

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of the journalism community is just like beside themselves,

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like what are you doing? Your one job is to

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>research and report facts, you fools? I mean, who has

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>who has time for deep regret when there's money to

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>be made? And you know what's interesting and I feel

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like I should should really know is that I'm talking

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>about how this campaign was like sort of successful, but

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean successful. You know, every person that I talked

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>to in my research, who was every black woman who

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>was involved in all of this, They really make it

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>clear that it was really people who were predisposed to

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>be suspicious of black women and feminists in general who

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>fell for this. So it wasn't not. Like when I

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>say it was effective, I mean effective specifically among people

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>who don't like black women are feminists and also have

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>platforms like thoughts News, And I I don't think that black

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>women because we're you know, we're a skeptical bunch. We're

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like a like a we're you know, where we do

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>our due diligence as black women, we weren't the ones

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>who were being fooled. And I actually don't think this

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>campaign was necessarily meant to target us. I think this

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>campaign was meant to trick people like the folks at

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>bots News into amplifying it. So in that way it

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>was successful. I don't mean to say that like black

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>black women didn't fall for this, No, and we went

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like the black community has some of those active fathers

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>as far as like directly direct involvement with children on

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a day to day basis in America anyway, Like the

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>statistics are very clear, So it's always funky and pretty

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>noticeable when someone's like black dads are not around and

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be like boo, sir, no, this is not the eighties.

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And we're very aware of what's happening in our own

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>communities because we're part of them fools exactly and what

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you just said, like like if if a black person,

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>if somebody who says they are a black person says

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>certain things on social media and then this makes you

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of scratched your head and say are you really black?

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't know that a black person would really

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>say that. That is exactly what kind of undid this

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>troll and Father's Day campaign. You know, if you've ever

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>seen somebody on social media pretending to be a black woman,

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>some ms will say things that are just off, well,

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>let's same things that just like don't make sense. Um.

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>In an interview that I did with Twitter user Safika Hudson,

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>she says that the big giveaway is how often these

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>people pretending to be black women bungled the linguistic construction

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that we call the habitual be I see you nodding.

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you familiar with the habitual will be? Yes? Yeah.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>My My favorite little truism about the habitual will be

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is that some linguists were doing studies on children and

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they showed a bunch of white children a picture of

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Cookie Monster and a picture of Oscar the Grouch, and

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they and Oscar was eating cookies and cookie Monster wasn't

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and so they asked who is eating cookies? And they

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>were like cookie monster. Even though that wasn't correct. They

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>showed black children the same question, and they asked who

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is eating cookies and they were like Oscar the Grouch

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And they were like, but who be eating cookies? And

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they were like, oh, cookie monster. Of course, like they know.

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And so all of these little nuances of black lived

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>experience and black identity. You really can't think that if

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you have no proximity with blackness, and you really don't

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>know what you're talking about. And so all of these

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 1>black women were ended up reporting to Twitter that people

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>were pretending to be black feminists and using the platform

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to try to so discord and confusion. But Twitter pretty

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>much didn't do anything. They were like okay and like

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>took no action. And so Shafika Hudson created a hashtag

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>called hashtag your slip is Showing to help weed out

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>these trolls pretending to be black women. Um, Joel, where

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>are you from? Geographically? Are you from the South? I'm

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>from Chicago. Okay, does the phrase your slip is Showing?

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Does this mean anything to you? Yes, my folks did

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>come up from the Mississippi mind half feeling yes and

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>heard it as a child in church because I did

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>wear a slip under my dress in church because I

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>went to a Southern Baptist exactly. So if a black

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Southern lady tells you, oh, your slip is showing, basically

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what she's telling you is that you don't look as

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>put together as you think that you do. And that

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is why Shefika Hudson used that phrase to weed out

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>these people posing as black women, right, like, you think

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're coming off as a black woman, but actually

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>your hashtag, your slip is showing. She created a list

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter users pretending to be black women, and some

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of them were really really obvious, Like one of them

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they they're avy image was of like well known black

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 1>podcaster Heaven negat To so like someone that people know,

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>just like really stupid. And I think, to me, the

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>fact that a regular Twitter user like Safika had to

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>take it upon herself to do this work like creating

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a hashtag, creating a whole list that she added to

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 1>doing that labor of making Twitter a safer platform, despite

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that like she didn't work at Twitter, she

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>was doing it completely unpaid at a time when she

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was actually between jobs. It says a lot to me

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>about the way that platforms like Twitter operate. You know,

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't tech leaders at places like Twitter want their platforms

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to be more secure. Shouldn't they be interested in not

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>having their platforms be places where bad actors can completely

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>hijack conversations? You know, it should not be up to

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>just regular black women like Shafika Hudson to do the

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>work of making Twitter safer. Yet time and time again

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.959
<v Speaker 1>that labor, which is often unpaid and often dangerous work

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>falls on the shoulders of just regular black women because

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the powers that be do nothing when we are harmed. Yeah,

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely shouldn't be anybody outside of getting a Twitter

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>paycheck responsibility to keep its users safe. That's foolish. But

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>capitalism being what it is is and these social media

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>spaces making money the way they do. I mean, even YouTube,

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>which has a pretty good system of like, here's how

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we make money, here's how we pay out the users

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>who create content for us, still understands at the end

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of the day, it's down to videos watched and ads consumed.

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, I have no interest in people's

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>safety Because this sort of unrelegated wild West of post

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>what you want. Let's create a lot of hate, which

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to hopefully create more comments. I mean, it's

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's weird because we're sort of seeing Netflix happ into

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this too, where they create these shows that are like

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>mildly devised. If you think, like an Emily in Paris, right,

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Emily in Paris has a pretty sackcast, but it didn't

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>cause that much to make. It's easy and fast to make,

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>so I can turn that out. And if you hate it,

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>all the better because when you hate watch it. At

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 1>least you're tweeting about it. At least you're giving that

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>show promotion. At least you're watching it. At least you're

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 1>spending more time on Netflix. And I think we're seeing

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this throughout our internet landscape. You know, we're still in

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the infancy of the internet, uh just by you know,

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us grew up with me. I had

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the Internet since I was like four or five. I

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>don't really recall a time without their being Internet access

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>available to me. And because of that, I think, to

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a our degree, because our government has not stepped in

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and decided to make any rules or structures or has

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>made very limited rules and structures for how the Internet

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is to be used. I think we're just going to

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>keep conceiving these things until something like that, until there's

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:32.760
<v Speaker 1>actual laws passed, because it's financially uh, people are financially

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>behooved to continue to allow this kind of negative reactions

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and interactions. I could not have put that better myself,

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that at this point what we we

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>really the first step is we need to acknowledge the

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 1>way that this kind of hate as an engagement strategy

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>on social media platforms, one typically targets people who are

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:59.800
<v Speaker 1>traditionally marginalized and to just keeps us all locked into

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>this same toxic engagement system of hate. The studies are

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>super clear that people who use social media are not happier.

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>It makes us all unhappy, and that social media algorithms

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>by design amplify content that makes us angrier, more polarized,

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 1>more divided, and less less informed. And so it's not

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>doing any of us any good. But I'll tell you

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>what it is doing. It is lining a lot of

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>people's pockets. And I don't want to create I don't

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 1>want us to have an Internet ecosystem and landscape where

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a marketplace for our pain, right, Like, I don't

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>want our negative experiences to just be lining the pockets

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of some asshole tech leader somewhere. We deserve so much better.

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And the people, the young people who come behind us,

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the next generation, they don't deserve to have, you know,

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>their negative experiences be weaponized and marketed and profited from

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in this callous way. Like, we really need to think

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>about what kind of Internet landscape we want to have.

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Do we want to have one that makes us more

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>informed and more thoughtful or one that allows people like

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk to add another fucking comma to their paycheck.

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would argue, it's it's not that. Yeah,

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's hard too, because as much as I know I

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>should be avoiding the negative, you know, like on the

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>day that we're recording this, Drake dropped his new album

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>late last night, I think earlier this morning, and so

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it has been a wave of black women being like

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not you, going after Serena and Megan in the same

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>album You Fool, And it's hard not to instantly be like,

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? Like gz Jake out here, Slandering black women

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is number one? Like holding down fan base? What is

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>going on. You're like, you're probably just telling my voice,

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:51.799
<v Speaker 1>like there's an actively engaging aspect about that, but I do.

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But you're right when we continue to modify our own English. Really,

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean even you can go pandemic days when we

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 1>were starting to see the beginnings of an uprising, uh

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>and at the very least activation of a lot of

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>black people in America. I mean, there's a time that's

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all we or It felt like all we

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>were talking about was like black liberation in America and

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the struggles to find it. It was dark and a challenge.

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know the Internet as a tool, as

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a mother would say, and you can use a tool

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to help build something great and you can use a

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 1>tool to destroy. And I think we are struggling to

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 1>find a good balance between those two positions, just like snap.

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So give it up for Joel's mom first of all,

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>because I had someone them. But I think you know,

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I was reading the Drake stuff before I hopped out,

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think it really shows that attacking black women

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>will always have an audience. If you trash black women

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, that will always be a winning engagement strategy.

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's hell to engage because we have

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to protect our cells. As you've just perfectly laid out,

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we feel compelled to because if we don't know one

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:09.239
<v Speaker 1>else is going to do it. Yeah, exactly, And yeah,

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that we need to be honest about the

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 1>ways that massage, noire and and hate against the black

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 1>women has propped up our Internet landscape and really been

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a feature, not a bug, that is at the heart

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of engagement strategies for so many Internet platforms, and we're

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not even being honest about it. Like you see it,

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I see it. I feel it when I'm on the Internet.

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:36.919
<v Speaker 1>I cannot help myself but to engage when a black

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>woman is being smeared in this way. And I know

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that I am just a cog in this hate cycle,

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this Internet hate machine that tells me that I have

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to vocally support this black woman. But that's just another

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>engagement point that it's helping to amplify an ugly toxic

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation that I know to humanize as us. It's like,

0:46:57.560 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we are so locked into this fucked up cycle. I

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 1>ate it, and why I think we're all about to

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out how we get off of it, just by

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>virtue of a new owner, which is sort of crazy

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about, Like we maybe all should have made

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this move much earlier, but it was hard. It's hard

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>to leave Twitter. There's a lot of comfort and a

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of support there as almost as much as there is. Hey,

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be really interested to see where black women

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 1>as a community, specifically this this corner of black women

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:30.439
<v Speaker 1>wind up. Yeah, I'd be tumbler. And it's it's sad

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>because like black women and black people more broadly, like,

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we make these platforms. Nobody was sucking showing up on

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter before Black Twitter, Like, we made these platforms cool

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>places to be and it amazing exactly, and here we

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>are feeling like we need but we're being pushed off

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of these platforms. So so so let's talk about Elon Musk

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>and his ownership of Twitter, because I feel like it

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just feels so this conversation we're having feel so timely.

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're talking about this against the backdrop of

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk taking over Twitter and talking about making users

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>pay for verification. As we've talked about. I feel like

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>so much in this episode. Having a blue check mark

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is not just a vanity thing. You know, it started

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>as a way to help users identify people that that

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they actually were who they say they are. And this

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 1>is an extra level of security for people who were

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at risk of being impers stated online. And we already

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 1>know from all the stuff I've talked about in this

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 1>episode that marginalized people are particularly at risk for being

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:29.839
<v Speaker 1>impers stated online. We already know that this is a

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>thing that is used to create chaos on the part

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of bad actors. And so you know, I got verified

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter not because I'm like so great or this

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and that. It was because in twenty sixteen, somebody was

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>using my picture, like a terrible picture of me from

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:47.840
<v Speaker 1>LinkedIn to create a Twitter account essentially to like shoot

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on Hillary Clinton. Not that I was something like huge

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton like person, but like clearly they just wanted

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>an image of a black woman who would say things

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>about Hillary Clinton. Right, And so we already know this

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is a huge issue on Twitter, and it kind of

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like a bad idea to overhaul this one tool

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that we have to combat it via verification. And it

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>also seems like a really bad idea to do this

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 1>when you've like gutted your staff days away from an election,

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the staff whose job it is to make the platform

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit safer. Um. You mentioned the Twitter thread

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>by the actor Robert Kazynski earlier, and I really really

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>appreciated um what he had to say. He writes years ago,

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>before verified accounts were a thing. Back when I was

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>on East Enders, I was contacted multiple times by parents

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of children who had been conversing with me online. Eleven

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen year old children who had been talking with

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the fake me. I was informed that one of these

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>children went missing. I didn't have social media at the time.

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand it. It's a horror show. For years,

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>people pushed for some way to root out the fakes.

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:54.720
<v Speaker 1>There was a phase, if you remember, of people posting

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 1>images of themselves with their U r L. I did

0:49:57.360 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that on every side. I could find Facebook, my Space,

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.799
<v Speaker 1>b boot anything. I felt powerless to stop people using

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>my face and name a scam or groom people. That's

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 1>why verification came to be, because it was important to

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 1>protect people. It wasn't for cloud or for leveraging money

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>from a platform. It was to protect people from utter scumbags.

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that perhaps in the age of social media,

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some CEOs who may have forgotten the importance

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of protecting people or having trustworthy sources. I don't tweet much.

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm scared of the Internet. I struggle with a lot

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of things in life. But this account exists so that

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>fake accounts can't. If Elon Musks removes that simple ability

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to protect people, to protect children with verification, then this

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>company is dead in the water. I don't know if

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:39.439
<v Speaker 1>it's been expressed to him. I doubt he will see

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this thread, but I hope someone is explaining to Elon

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Musk the actual dangers to children and the vulnerable and

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>why removing that protection is an action that will lead

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 1>directly to children being endangered. Verification is a public service.

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It is a good deed performed by companies who contribute

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>very little good to the world. In my opinion, we

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 1>should be making easier, clearer paths to verification for everyone,

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not making it harder. It is their responsibility, not a

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>business model, and I really identified with that because it

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be a business model. It should be a base

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for you know, one of our largest communication platforms

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:18.359
<v Speaker 1>in the fucking world. And what's worse, you know, as

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 1>we're about to have an election, one that you know

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:24.399
<v Speaker 1>officials have already warned, is an election where we could

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>see political violence, violence at the polls, blowing up verification

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and having users be able to pay eight dollars to

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be verified after gutting half of your staff. I think

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it could create a disaster in terms of people being

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:41.359
<v Speaker 1>able to depend on our communications platform to get information

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:44.839
<v Speaker 1>about the election. Uh. And I would just also just add, like,

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that bad actors are going to continue using

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this as a tactic, you know, impersonating people, gamifying platforms

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>via importonation. And I also think that, like we know

0:51:57.160 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that folks can really steer and dominate and hijack national conversations.

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you look back at amidst the mobilizations

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for Racial justice and Twitter announced that a fake account

0:52:09.000 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 1>at antifa underscore US that was yeah, that was called

0:52:12.920 --> 0:52:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for violence was actually run by the white supremacist group

0:52:16.360 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it identity Europa? Is how you say it? I

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's Europa who cares. It's one of

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the most active white supremacist groups in the US. From

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and so this was during the height of like protests.

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Intention This account tweeted Alert Tonight's Tonight Comrades, Tonight, we

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 1>say funk the city, we move into residential areas, the

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>white hoods, and we take what's ours hashtag black Lives

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Matter hashtagu America and Twitter has confirmed that this was

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not the only account that they booted off of the

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:55.200
<v Speaker 1>platform for impersonating racial justice like demonstrators. Uh. Donald Trump

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Junior tweeted absolutely insane with a screenshot at that tweet.

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Just remember what Antifa really is a terrorist organization. They're

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not even pretending anymore. And this was the same I

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's like the same day that Trump basically blamed

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Antifa scare quotes for violence that you know, for like

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:18.919
<v Speaker 1>violence during protests, and you know, I just think back

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to that, and I think, how long did we have

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to endure this ridiculous news cycle about like law and

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:31.399
<v Speaker 1>or violence and like, it is very concerning that extremists

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 1>are successfully able to dominate the national dialogue of like

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:39.120
<v Speaker 1>what our convert what the conversation is, Uh, just by

0:53:39.239 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>using these tactics on Twitter that Twitter is aware of.

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say that are if bad actors can hijack

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 1>our communication platforms in that way, these platforms are not

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>secure and they're not safe, and they're not really serving us.

0:53:51.880 --> 0:53:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It was super crazy. So like, historically this is the call, right,

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Like they clearly know their audience, which is like, how

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>do scare white people? You know, no person of color

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is using the term white hood. First of all, unless

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we're referring to KKK members like, oh, this is the

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>white hood. I was like, are you out of your mind?

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 1>The second of all, we understand clearly as as black

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:20.399
<v Speaker 1>people in America that white people have this natural fear

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that white that black people are going to retaliate and

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>create like white slavery. It's a it's a narrative. We've

0:54:26.960 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>heard a lot. It's how a lot of lynchings take place.

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we can look as far back as him

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>until and the fact that he whistled at a white woman,

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>and that was considered a threat because the twelve year

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 1>old boy whistled, whistled a thing we know didn't happen

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at a white woman. And so for them to tap

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:45.799
<v Speaker 1>all the way back into that fear even today on

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 1>social media, to say, hey, they're going to come into

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:52.879
<v Speaker 1>your neighborhoods and like shake things up, it's it's frustrating

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and kind of horrifying to still think about just your

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>your blackness, just your presence being a threat. And again,

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we've been articulating throughout the episode, every

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 1>time that's stated, it's it causes us to have to

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be extra defensive, extra alert for ourselves and for our

0:55:12.960 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>direct community, because we don't know who's going to take again,

0:55:16.280 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just our presence as a threat and then act on

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that threat. Exactly. I think it was Tony Morrison who

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>said that the business of racism is like creating a

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.279
<v Speaker 1>situation where you can't get anything done because you're so

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:31.400
<v Speaker 1>busy defending yourself and defending your blackness and defend like

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>showing up defensive, but you then can't do the good

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 1>work that you want to do. You can't put your

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>your energy towards something else. And I think that's exactly

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:43.280
<v Speaker 1>what is happening here, that these bad actors and trolls

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and extremists are able to create the conditions where folks

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like you and me, just like regular black folks, are

0:55:49.160 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 1>put in a situation where we have to constantly be

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:55.839
<v Speaker 1>defending ourselves against the backdrop of a complete fabrication. Right

0:55:55.880 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 1>like a black activists didn't tweet that a white suprematist did,

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm having to offend myself against something I

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 1>guess a caricature that a white supremacist dreamed up on

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:07.879
<v Speaker 1>my behalf that I had nothing to do with. Yeah,

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and then we see the real life percussions, not only

0:56:09.719 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 1>so not only the emotional and mental toil online, but

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:16.760
<v Speaker 1>then you know, when we're out in the streets protesting

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for our goddamn lives, then all of a sudden again

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>just our presidence of being in the street, even if

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the peaceful protests, it's abots to be the difference in

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:28.120
<v Speaker 1>police presence. Where I went to the women's march where

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>too many people hit on that stupid pussy hat. Uh,

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the police presidence, they're soups calm, just lots of daughters

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:39.480
<v Speaker 1>hanging out, totally fine. Whatever. Two. If you know, if

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you were at any of the early Black Lives matters rallies,

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if you marched for George Floyd or anything like that,

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you saw us start difference and how you were just

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:52.160
<v Speaker 1>being treated for doing the exact same action. And I

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it is like this year mongering

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that we saw on social media spilling into real life.

0:56:57.000 --> 0:56:59.879
<v Speaker 1>And that is kind of my point. These are sent

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 1>aative conversations that involve very real hot button issues that

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are super raw for many of us, and the fact

0:57:07.520 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that our social media platforms are so easily exploited and

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:15.359
<v Speaker 1>hijacked by extremists and bad actors to completely derail these

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:19.440
<v Speaker 1>conversations is a problem with very big implications. In the

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>case of End Father's Day, many of the people reporting

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on it, you know, journalists, they talked about it like

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the four controls behind the hoax were just joking, you know,

0:57:29.000 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>just trolling. But black feminists they knew it wasn't a

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:35.160
<v Speaker 1>joke because they could see what was at stake, and

0:57:35.160 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they could probably see down the line what was going

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to happen next. When it comes to online harms, it's

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:44.600
<v Speaker 1>always marginalized people who are harmed. First. First, it's error problem,

0:57:44.680 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and nothing is done because nobody takes black women seriously,

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and then it is everyone's problem. Back in it was

0:57:51.800 --> 0:57:55.960
<v Speaker 1>just destabilizing black feminist online spaces through impersonating black folks

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter with hoaxes like end Father's Day, and then

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:01.439
<v Speaker 1>about a year or two later, it's gamer Gate. Then

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it was bad actors using that same tactic in an

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>attempt to sway the presidential election. It's hijacking, and in

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>flaming national conversations around protest, race crime, and policing. And

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 1>by the time folks are listening to this episode, it

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>will be election day. Elon Musk is blowing up verification

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and gutting the teams that actually exist on

0:58:25.720 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the platform to try to make some kind of headway

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 1>into making those platforms safer. So what's next? Where does

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it end? Jabel? Thank you so much for being here.

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Where can folks follow all the amazing stuff that you've

0:58:39.680 --> 0:58:42.320
<v Speaker 1>got going on? Pretty? Thank you so much for having me.

0:58:42.400 --> 0:58:44.960
<v Speaker 1>This is really lovely and I'm so excited about this show.

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Folks can follow me all over the internet. Actual, Moniqu,

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I be on Twitter anymore, so

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we're expanding on the internet as well. Anique, It's j

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:56.480
<v Speaker 1>O E L L E M O N I q

0:58:56.760 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>u E. If you find me on Instagram. I got

0:58:58.600 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 1>there too late, so there's an underscore between the two names.

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:03.600
<v Speaker 1>But please come come find me on all I'm on

0:59:03.600 --> 0:59:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on on the discords, the Masodons, try Sarah tops all

0:59:07.080 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of them now, just looking for a new home. If

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you like a social media space that's mostly word based,

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>hit me up and tell me about it. I'll try it.

0:59:15.360 --> 0:59:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I am, I need the outlet. I love it. Thank

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:22.439
<v Speaker 1>you for being here. I think that's it. So yeah,

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll do this week on Internet Hate Machine. Joe will

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:30.200
<v Speaker 1>be appreciate you. I appreciate you, guys, so be so

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 1>good to see your face and hopefully I'll talk to

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you you definitely about next anything you need the answer? Yes,

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, thank you girl. You have a good one.

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Bye guys. Internet Hate Machine is a production of Cool

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media. But more podcasts from cool Zone Media. Check

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:49.800
<v Speaker 1>out our website cools on media dot com, or find

0:59:49.880 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>us on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts.