WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Looking For Hope

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Let's go. Are you

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, And so much for that.

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>wall with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, A bar Garcia, and

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Friday, November six, two, twenty, season sixteen,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>episode number sixty. Welcome to the latest edition of The Break.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>We are live from the s WBC Mortgage studios at

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Star at Dave Amber and Dave All joining me.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you guys taking us some time to listen

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to us in whatever way you listen to us, including

0:00:58.360 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the newest way to listen to us, which is on

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>our Alexa app. If you want to do that, just

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>make sure you say open Dallas Cowboys and play Cowboys

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Break and you'll get our latest episode. We got a

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>lot to talk about today. We're gonna jump in and

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about some injury updates, talk about the matchup between

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys and the Steelers, and we are going to

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>spend quite a bit of time today taking questions from

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>from fans. I know Amber has some stuff already lined up.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>If you have some questions that you'd like to send now,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you can always tweet Amber as well. I think it

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is Amber Garcia TV is how you tweet her and

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>you can get your questions to her and we'll try

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to answer as many questions as we can in the

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>final two segments of the show. All right, so let's

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>jump in. Let's get some updates on some injuries. Yesterday

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I ask you guys about Ezekiel Elliott and Alden Smith.

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>They were limited on Wednesday. Yesterday they were limited again,

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So catch us up to date on the status of

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly first Zeke and where he is in his trek

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to being able to play Sunday. Nick sounds like he's

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>expected to play. He's been limited a little bit, but

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from everybody that is talking about it doesn't sound like

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the worst of hamstring injuries. And I think that

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he should be able to play. I mean, now how

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>limited he will be in the game. Maybe they rotate

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>more and maybe they get you know, let me to

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have him play wildcat and do all that stuff. I mean,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that's gonna kind of limit him a

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But it sounds like he's gonna be ready, David,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you at all concerned with the fact that he has

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>been out and it's a hamstring injury for a guy

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that plays the running back position. I just want to

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>say hi to Nick real quick, just because you glazed

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>over him at the top of I'm here. I'm hi, Nick, Hi,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>good to see you on this lovely Friday. Glazed over there.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, and it's not a big deal what I do.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Just it's okay, we're here. Did I not say your name?

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You didn't? Sorry, you said you didn't. That's okay. I

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>thought I said, I'm sorry. Sorry, man, it's okay. I'm sorry.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I could have just let it go. But that wouldn't

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>be me. No, it wouldn't be um. I thought I

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>heard that right. I looked at Dave. Dave was kind

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of like, what and whatever you were rolling, you know,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>episode fifty seven or whatever. I'm so sorry. I was

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>doing that for Yeah, our producer. Not the worst slight

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>against me today, So that's fine. I'm fine. Oh he's talking. Yeah,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little worried. Anytime. I'm trying to drive us

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>back onto the road like I took us off the road,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm like, Okay, we should probably get back

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on the road. Uh yeah, anytime somebody. You know, the

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>word run is in his name. So if he's got

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a hamstring, that's not great. Um, I think I think

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll play. Maybe they limit him, Maybe we get to

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>see some Rico doubtle, that's I mean. I hate to

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be a I hate to be a pessimist or a hater,

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but if this game goes away, most of us think

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go. You know, Zeke probably doesn't have any

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>business being in there in the second half anyway, So

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe they can use that as a way to limit

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>him and keep him fresh, well, or at least the

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. I don't know. I don't know, Hey, Amber,

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>how confident would you be in Tony Pollard if he

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>needed to carry the full load for an entire game?

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>With everything you've seen of him, I guess to this

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>point in his career, well, this year is just kind

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of just on the fence right there. I don't quite

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>know how I feel about him at this point. I

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>was really excited for him this year based on what

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I saw from him last year, but then this year

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is just like hit or miss. Sometimes he has some

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>really good runs and then some other times he just doesn't.

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that maybe this is an opportunity. And

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this is hard to say, because yes, you still have

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to play a football game. Yes you still have to

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>act like you're trying to win this game when you

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>go out there on the field. But at the same time,

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like, you gotta make sure you protect your your starter.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't want any thing to happen, anything like make

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the injury worse for sequel Eliot. So I would think

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>that we get to see more Tony polar on this

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 1>game in this game, and it's just it's it's tough

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>because he just doesn't have a good setup with the

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>old line right now, so it doesn't help him. But

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a guy that hostalent and the ability

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to make runs and make it happen. But it's just

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in general, it's just not a good scenario for him. Nick.

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm looking at the stats, and I mean

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to suggest that that Pollard will be better

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>than Zeke. I mean, he does seem quicker to the whole,

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>but they're both averaging three point nine yards exactly. They're

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, receiving. They're averaging six point six point five

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and Pollard six point four. A lot less, you know,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot less um touches for for Pollard. But I

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>mean just saying you don't there's nothing to suggest that

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that he is going to be better. Um, you know,

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>his longest rush is you know, fourteen yards or something

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. And I mean, so it's not like he's

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>done a whole lot with it. I mean they did

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>have a big kickoff return that that was a nice

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>play and the one nice play in Washington. But I mean,

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll provide that they need each other, not

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>just one or the other. So I think it would

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>be worse because who's If Pollard is the guy, then

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>who's who's Pollard? You know, It's like that old thing

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about Jordan and Pippen. I mean, you know, if becomes Jordan,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>pip never had a Jordan. You know, Pippen never had

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a Pippin you know, I mean that kind of stuff.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>You gotta have a second guy. I don't know, Maybe

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Ricco's the guy. Yeah, Dave, what do you think? Yeah, Rico,

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>let's see him. We've been saying that. I'm six years Dave,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>You're you're right, Um, yeah, I mean I don't know. Yeah,

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I feel fine if Tony If I mean,

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if if Tony would have to play the whole game,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel fine that he would do. Okay. I don't

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>think that he would be better than the best that

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen from Zeke. I think, all things being equal,

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he's probably capable of going out there and carrying the

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>ball twenty times for up to one hundred yards, assuming

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the game doesn't get away from him. But I still,

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Zeke will have a role. I

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think if I had to guess today, I think Zeke

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>still finishes with more carries than Tony. But like I said,

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is an opportunity for Rico Dowdle to get

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>some actual point time. What do we know about Alden

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Smith at this point? And he also was limited yesterday.

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like he's expected to play as well. I mean,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, both these guys, Zekens Alden Smith talked on

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>their conference calls. You know this week doesn't sound like

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>players that aren't going to play in the game. But again,

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe limited a little bit. Cheetah, both of these things,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you take the cheetah both well, both of

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the other two guys just seem like load management things

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to me, just like reading all the tea leads. Yeah,

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that both guys were available for their interview.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>You fact that Jerry Jones said he thinks they'll both

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>play on the radio today, That just it feels like

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>precaution more than actual injuries. Whereas Cheeto Mike McCarthy's yesterday,

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy was like, today, it'll be the big day.

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And then we asked him again today and he was like, Saturday,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it'll be the big day. And I'm just like, all right,

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna see Cheeto. Yeah, we're not gonna see Cheeto.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And they don't sound good. I mean when he was

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 1>asking the press conference, his erstone was kind of like, well,

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we waited to see how he reacted at practice, and

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>then we viloated him. But the way that he said

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we re vivoiated him just made it sound not us

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 1>optimistic as to having him played this weekend. Yeah, I

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think the sad which okay, I'm sorry, I just I

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>wrote about the secondary earlier this week, and you know,

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Nick's been calling at the hamstring from hell and I'm like, yeah,

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess so I'm sitting here thinking Cheeto's been out

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>since maybe week four. No, I was wrong. Cheo has

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>been out since week two and it's week nine. So yeah,

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a hell of a hamstring issue, allright.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You well, often if you're saying contract, which I think

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what I heard, like you would think that would

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of move things along. But again, maybe if he

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.599
<v Speaker 1>doesn't think he can play, if he doesn't think he

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>can play well with a hamstring. Jason Hatcher threw it

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>out there, you know, but ten years ago, five years ago.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm putting bad taping myself out there, and

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and there's a reason for that. I mean,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>like it's not think about it. If he goes out

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and plays in a game and gives up the touchdown

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>or two touchdowns, I mean then it's like, let's rank

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the free agents this year, and then all of a

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>sudden there's a play like that. I mean, it's not

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the worst thing in the world. I mean, like, that's

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>what these guys are, especially the guys that are going

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for their second contract. This is it for them. This

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest contract they're ever has A takeaway he

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>has he has a takeaway on film. You're talking about

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>film and putting out there. He has an interest option

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>before he went out with the injury, so at least

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he has that. Yeah, but if he goes out there

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and gets dusted by juju a couple of times because

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not at one hundred percent, nobody's gonna care that

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he had a pick two months ago. He's got a

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>bad Yeah. It's just but I know all the injuries

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>are different, but it's just it's it's funny how Zeke

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>is like, well, he's got a hamstring injury and he's

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna play in this game. And I get it,

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not torn or whatever, different different thing, but eight

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks for a hamstring or seven or eight, because think

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about it, if he didn't play this game, which doesn't

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>sound like he will. You know that that they got

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the bye week next week, so they're like, all right,

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>let's come back and then maybe he'll play at the end.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but it just it kind of seems like

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a for who for what situation? Right now? Okay, Um,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>here's what we're gonna do. We're gonna go ahead and

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>take an early break. When we come back. I want

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Cowboys versus the Steelers. Asked some

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>questions I'm gonna line up for you guys, the biggest

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of which is who's going to start at quarterback? And

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>does the person that start a quarterback do you think

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they'll actually end the game at quarterback. We'll talk about

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>that when we come back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. There's nothing as unique as our eyes, which

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is why Selor pioneers wigs to make lenses as unique

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>as you. Varilux for super sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection,

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:28.479
<v Speaker 1>and Krisol for freedom from glare. Three cutting ex solutions

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in a single unique lens. So whatever your needs, insist

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>on Selor visit your local SLOR experts and find a

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>perfect lens for you. Seemore do Moore Slor Since eighteen

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty five. Stetson hats are American made with pride right

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>here in Texas, and Stetson is proud to be on

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the field with America's team. Want to show your Texas

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and Team pride too, You can by purchasing your own Stetson.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You can look just like how the flag guys do

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on field at every home game. Stetson the official crown

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of all self respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Get yours today at shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>or at Stetson dot com. I'm Jay Novachek, former tight

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day. I

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was the guy who always got the tough yards, and

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>that's why I run with John Deer today. In fact,

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a John Deer three zero twenty five E

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>tractor that can handle any yardwork I need to do,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you. Visit a John Deer

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Here it's nineteen oh eight.

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think we should get electricity and stop using

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>candles to see at night? It's just electricity lights up

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the room fast, It's more reliable than candles blowing out,

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and people seem to love it nationwide. Well, dear, did

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you just run into the wall. I have a new candle. Please. Historically,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>switching to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>at and T five G, fast, reliable, secure, and nationwide.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Switch to at and T five G. It's not complicated.

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Five G requires compatible plan, may not be in your area.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>See att dot com slash five G for you for details.

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break, don't miss your chance to get

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>tickets to see the Cowboys at AT and T Stadium

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>this season. There's home matchups after Pittsburgh, We've still got

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>one against Washington, San Francisco and Philadelphia. A limited number

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of tickets are on sale now. Get yours today at

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com slash tickets. Welcome back to the break.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>We're in the second segment. We're life from the s

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>WBC Mortgage studios. At the start, we're gonna talk Cowboys

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>versus Steelers that happens this Sunday three thirty at AT

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and T Stadium. Let's start first with the question that

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody's trying to figure out, and I'm not

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>sure you guys have the answer, but I still will

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>ask the question, who starts at quarterback for the Cowboys?

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And do you think the person that starts ends up

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>finishing the game. Let's start first with you Amber. I

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna end up being Cooper Rush. I kind

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of hesitate after hearing Mike McCarthy said his comments and

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>just stating that for some reason, he thinks Gary Gilbert

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>has a little bit more experienced based on the fact

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's been a couple of weeks more here than

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Rush. But I think that maybe once they get

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>into conversations between him and Kellen Moore, Kellen Moore maybe

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>voices his opinion on the fact that he has known

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Rush for a longer amount of time, and maybe

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that helps in just the communication and getting them on

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the same page. But I do think that if the

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are losing pretty badly, I do think that there's

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance for us to get to see both quarterbacks

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in the game, because at that point, why not why

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not get a chance to see who could be a

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>better backup to Andy Dalton once he gets back. Dave.

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think I've said Cooper Rush five or

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.479
<v Speaker 1>ten times already this week, but I do have to acknowledge,

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Like again, you just sort of get some vibes listening

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to McCarthy and talking to people that maybe they like

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Gilbert a lot more than I thought they did,

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so I would start Cooper Rush. I'm not going to

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if it's Gilbert. Having said that, I'm with

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a g I think it's kind of a mood point. Like,

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, David Moore from the Dallas Morning News made

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a joke this morning about how Tom Landry rotated quarterbacks

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like every snap or every series. I'm not saying you

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>need to do that, but maybe give each of these

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>guys a quarter or you know, give the backup guy

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the third or something. I mean, I think there's nothing

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong with acknowledging the situation that you're in and just

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>saying like, yeah, let's give each of these guys a

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fair opportunity to show. I know, like you you should

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>try to win every game. You play to win the game,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>like Herm Edwards said, But I don't think there's anything

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong with acknowledging that you are in very dire circumstances

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can change up the way you do things

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>because of that. Yeah, I would go with Cooper Rush.

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I think sounds like Dave said, it sounds like it

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>could be Gilbert. But then again, you know McCarthy doesn't

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>want to tip his hand at anything because you know

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that's worked this year. But I don't get me a

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it worked, But that's okay, I don't. I really don't

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think the Steelers. I don't think. I don't think t J.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Watt or Bud Dupree is gonna be like, what who's that?

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you see, you're looking into the Pittsburgh practice

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>facility right now, and everybody's like, Oh my god, which

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>one is he gonna be? I don't know which one's

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be. Like they're really ringing their hands over this one, right. Yeah.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a better question would be and I don't

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>know who finishes. I mean, I agree they all should

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>should play. If it's this close, then it's not going

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to take much to sway your opinion. But if there's

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a way to do it, I think I would probably

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>make all three quarterbacks active, including Denucci. Why not? Why

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not him? I mean in the second half if he

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>gets out of hand. You know, Dave said something earlier

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to I want to bring up. He said, if the game,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like Pollard, if the game gets out of hand, I

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think it will get out of hand to run

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball. If it's twenty one to nothing, like Atlanta

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>up twenty one nothing, hey, let's go get back in

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. Pittsburgh up twenty one nothing, you're like running

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Yeah, but you know NFL coaches they're never

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>can they're never going to concede it. I mean, did

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you watch that game last night? A game was over

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>before it started, and end of the game, they're still

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get down there and score that last touchdown.

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Hurting in fantasy, but still they're trying to get down

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>there score that touchdown. So I just think that's the

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL coaches. They're gonna keep pressing like and they're gonna

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>if they're behind, they're gonna be throwing the ball because

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to get back in even though they know

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>they they won't get back in. It's an opportunity to

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>test those guys under those kind of circumstances, right, maybe,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>but he's not gonna get he didn't want to get

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>beat by Pittsburgh fifty to three. Yeah, So I don't know.

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you still run your offense. I

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think what Bucky said, he slowed down so the game

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>as much as you can, and you know, see what happens.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>But I would play all three quarterbacks. I mean, i'd

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>make them all active. I was say this, I don't

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't really honestly care who starts, but I do

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think if down a significant amount at halftime, I think

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you make a switch. Like I think that's a to me,

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a no brainer, yeah, because I think I go

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>through the first half and I see where we are,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and if the guys are on a bit of a

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>role by the way, he may be down, but he

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>may be playing okay. Then I still stick with him

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and I keep seeing okay, can he dig his way out?

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Give him a chance to see if he can dig

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>his way out of the hole. Right, But if it's

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>just a blowout by halftime, if it's just the offense

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not moving, there's nothing going on, then why not throw

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the other guy in there and just see what he

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can do. He might not be able to dig out

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of the hole either, but he might show you something

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that makes you say, huh, not bad. Maybe he's a

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 1>guy that we can continue to kind of keep developing

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here, and if there's other opportunities to

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>play him later in the season, then we continue on

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that track and we'll maybe get him some more opportunities.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go ahead and move on to the

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>next question. I got an over under question for you guys,

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh five sacks over or under, Dave, I mean, it's

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>easy to joke about that. I feel, situation, it's always

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>smart to take the under. Like it's very rare to

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>see an NFL team get more than five or six

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sacks of the game. I know what happens. I mean,

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it happen in the Cowboys, but way more

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>often than not, No, and and the Cowboys will game

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>plan for ways to get the ball out of their

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>guy's hands or just to run the ball to protect

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks. So yeah, I mean, like I can see

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>four or four and a half, but if you're telling

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>me over under five, I'll go under. Yeah, And that

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, it was not meant necessarily to

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be a joke. You look at what they did last week.

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>They gave up four sacks last week, and in my opinion,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>they're facing a tougher pass rush against the Steelers than

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>what they faced last last week against the Eagle. So

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to me, that five number is a legitimate number, and

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it certainly isn't a joke for whoever's gonna be back

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback, because they're gonna have to deal with that.

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>But Nick, what do you think probably under. I think

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll try to get the ball out quick. Like Dave said,

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>if if you would have said, if you would have

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>said four and a half, you know that, then you

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>think get about it. Yeah, maybe, but or four he

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>said four. I mean, but I think I think it'll

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>be it'll be close to that. Well, that makes it

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>so much better, does it? Does? It makes a difference.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It makes an absolute difference. Yeah, it doesn't. You're still

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. Five, big deal. Same thing. You're

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>getting pressure, you're getting dropped in the lane. You're just

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>ignoring the whole concept of over under. Like yeah, I mean,

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>like we all agree that they're gonna get sacked in

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>this game. But five is a lot, you know what,

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it. I'll take it. I'll take it. I'll

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 1>put five on my name, I'll put five. I'll say

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be one of those games they're gonna

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>get pressure. And the thing is a lot of those

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>plays might not necessarily count as a sack because maybe

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback just gets rid of the ball quicker, but

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>he's still gonna get hit and pressure constantly. I just

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>don't trust our offensive line unfortunately, and I am scared

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of what the Steelers have over there, So yes, I'll

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and take five sicks. It's not gonna be

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>a pretty game. I'm which j G. I think this

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be. I think that really the toughest part

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of this matchup for the Cowboys is going to be

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that not only do the Steelers have good rushers,

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but as Bucky was saying earlier in the week, they

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>blitz a lot, and you never know who those five

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>guys are that coming because they play that three four defense,

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it can be a different five all the time, like

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they're sending different guys, and what happened in that Arizona game,

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>similar thing. When you've got guys coming from different points,

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem for the Cowboys. And you've got a

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>much higher grade pass rusher with Steelers with the Steelers

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and a much higher grade secondary with the Steelers than

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you had with Arizona. So I think that's gonna be

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge challenge for this Cowboys offensive line. Let's move

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>on to the next question. How much does the fact

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that Pittsburgh's offense is a quick passing attack help the

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Dallas defense if at all. What I'm getting at there

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas has had a lot of problems with the

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>deep ball. Doesn't seem like that's what Pittsburgh does regularly. Now,

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is a week when they find that part

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of their offense, but that isn't something they do regularly.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Does that help the Cowboys defense. I don't know if

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys secondary it will tackle that well. I mean,

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that's where it's going to come down to. The reason

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>why they do that is because they get it blocked,

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and they also, you know, have playmakers that are going

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to break tackles, and that's where I think. You know,

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys have had some issues where they're not

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>making tackles in the open field like that, so you know,

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's gonna do whatever they can score points. I think

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it was what Bucky was saying last week, I mean

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple days ago about Ben doesn't take as many

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>shots down the field. It's not the same as it

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>as it was in the past, but they're still effective

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this way, so I think it helps a little bit.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But if the Cowboys aren't going to tackle, they're gonna

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>have those games where where they're not out there making

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>plays to stop them, then you know it could be

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just as ugly. Yeah, Amber, this question is a little

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>confusing to me, but if I'm trying to make sense

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of it, I mean, I would say it would help

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>them if we get the type of defense that we

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>saw last weekend, but that most likely is not going

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to happen because you got a very different offense and

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>a very different quarterback. So I would say I agree

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.479
<v Speaker 1>with what Nick said. I don't think it necessarily helps

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>them much, if anything at all, But the defense is

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>just it. I don't I don't have any answer. I

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>don't trust this defense to do anything either, So I

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Dave Well said on Namber's part, I mean,

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>halfway through the season, how could I possibly be expected

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to say like the Dallas secondary has an advantage. I mean,

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I know Carson Wentz struggled against them, but Carson Wentz

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is struggled in a lot of games. I put that

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>more on him than the Dallas secondary suddenly being great.

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen let them up the week before that maybe

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it won't look as ugly as it has at times,

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but Hall of Fame quarterback, and I mean, that's a

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>nice receiving corps. Maybe not as good as it has

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>been at times during the Steelers run, but Chase Claypool's

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>six four, Juju's obviously great deanteum, and then you know,

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>James Washington's a deep ball guy too, even though he

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't had a huge role. So no, I don't I

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. I don't like this matchup at all. Yeah,

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and I'll say this, it's not to me. I agree

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>with you. I think this is this is a challenging

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>matchup for the Cowboys, pretty much as every week is

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be for the Cowboys. But from the from

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the standpoint of the fact that if if they are

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>not a team that really takes those deep shots often,

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I've seen the biggest problem with

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys secondary being them tackling. I think the biggest

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>issue has been they let guys get loose and for

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know it, there's a forty r touchdown or fifty

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>yard touchdown, know whatever it is, right, they they just

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to be able to always be on the

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>same page with whatever's going on down feel, And I

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's the part where if there's a team you're

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>running up against it doesn't really do that a lot.

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it can be an advantage and I shouldn't

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>even say an advantage, it could help the Cowboys because

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't do to them. It's kind of like what

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we talked about last week with the running game, Like

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we were like, why didn't they keep running the ball? Well,

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that helped Dallas. They didn't keep running the ball, right

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's just not what they wanted to do. They

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to keep giving Wins an opportunity to throw the ball,

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and that helped Dallas. So I do think there can

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of that that might happen this

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>weekend where if they're not willing to take those shots

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>down field, not to say they won't be there, but

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if they're not willing to take them, then I think

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that does help Dallas a little bit. And I think

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it can help Dallas again if they can tackle well,

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>then I think it can help them maybe in this

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>game a little bit and to keep them away from

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what's really hurt them in the past few weeks. All right,

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>let's roll into the next question. As Dallas corrected some

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of its rushing defensive problems, or do you expect James

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Connor to have a good day. Let's start with you,

0:25:53.720 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Dave No. I mean, like I just show me you

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>know they played great, they played great last week. I

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>tend to think of it more as an operation until

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I see more. And you know, we talked more when

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we were reviewing the Philly game. I think the success

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>against the run was a lot more about Philly being

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to do it than Dallas suddenly buckling down. So

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they should have this new defensive tackle Longkou

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>who can maybe help am Anchor down Neville Gallimore continue

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>getting reps. But until I see them do it, I

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>absolutely do not trust them to shut down anybody's rushing attack,

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>especially you know somebody. Again, maybe the Steeler's offensive line

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't what it used to be, but it's still very

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>good and James Connor is a good back, so that no,

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that at all. They've given them more

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with less to less, Right, Amber, what do you think? Yeah? Yeah?

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I have to add to what they've

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>said is that I think the Steelers defense is going

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get the Cowboys offense off the

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>field a lot. So I just feel like the Cowboys

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>defense is gonna be pretty tired in that game, and

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna hurt them once they try to stop whether

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the passing game or the run. It's just they're

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be physically tired in this game. So that's gonna

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>be a problem in that aspect. So yeah, I don't

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're gonna be able to stop the run.

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. No, I don't think the offense

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be able to do much. So, yeah, they're

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the field thirty five minutes plus in

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that game, and I think they'd have a hard time

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>stop in the run in the first quarter, you know.

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So I just think you said James Connor's gonna have

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a good day. I think he could have a really

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>good day. If you were playing fantasy, you're playing him,

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I would a team you're playing, I would not even

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking twice about yeah, yeah, I've got the quarterback over there,

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's I don't think he's gonna

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>do it much because I think they'll run the ball.

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I think that, you know, they'll you know,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those games. I mean, I know

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it's his doom and gloom, but it just is just

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this team. They just don't have the firepower on offense

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to compete with that Steeler defense, and then on defense

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't have it to compete with Pittsburgh's offense. But

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the crazy part about this, and we all know

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>because we've been watching the NFL for a long time.

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>It's these kind of situations that often create these weird

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>moments in the NFL when everybody is convinced of one

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>thing and I don't even know, I don't even know

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where that would actually work out like that

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>this this week, Like there's no reason at all to

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>believe the Cowboys will be better offensively, defensively or special teams.

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no reason to believe that. They've given you, no

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe that. It's just weird because you look

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at this. But the point is, the point is it's

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>just weird because we've seen this happen in the NFL.

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And again, Pittsburgh they would go to eight. No. I

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think Pittsburgh has been eight. No. I want to

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>say I heard a statistic like they haven't been eight. No,

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe in their franchise history. But but again, you're talking

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>about these just these these weird moments that sometimes happened

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. I think if it happens it would

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>happen because of what Day said earlier in the week.

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Dallas comes in with this completely different game plan where

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>basically they're like, or do a wildcat the whole day

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and they somehow take Pittsburgh off guard and they catch

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>them doing some stuff that that they're not really prepared

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for it. That would be the only case scenario. But

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I just don't even see that really working against a

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>team this good. All right, we're gonna take our final,

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I will say, sorry, good Dave. I mean, yeah, any

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>given Sunday, anything can happen, Like, you can never completely

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>rule that out. But like, when the deck is this stacked,

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean we saw it last night. I watched that game.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>The forty nine ers are decimated, they don't have any

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of their good players, and green Bay went in there

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and rolled over them. I think it was thirty one

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to three, and then green Bay let off the throttle

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco got some mercy points. So when the deck,

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>when the deck is this stacked, I just don't know

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>what all you can expect to do. Doesn't mean that

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys can't win, But forgive me if I'm not

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>really entertaining it as a legitimate possibility. There's no logical

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.479
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe that they will win. All right, we're

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna take our final break. When we come back, we're

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some questions from you guys again. You can

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>even I mean, I'm sorry, you can tweet Amber at

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Amber Garcia TV. She'll get your tweets there. But we'll

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>also have some other questions as she's worked up. We'll

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>do that when we come right back. This is Dallas

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. We're back in a tasty treat

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor pepper

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.959
<v Speaker 1>and Cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor and Cream Soda.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Is he a new combone that's music to my ears? Okay,

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>doctor music to my ears and mouths, New Doctor pepper

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and Cream Soda, delic just do. There's nothing as unique

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>as our eyes, which is SLOR pioneers ways to make

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>lenses as unique as you. Varilux for super sharp vision,

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Essential Blue for protection, I'm Crisolve for freedom from glare,

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>three cutting up solutions and a single unique lens. So

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever your needs, insist on Salor visit your local SLOR

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>experts and find a perfect lens for you see more,

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>do more selre The Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Famers and five championships shows us what success looks like.

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Where Turkey is always the second best part of Thanksgiving Day,

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Where we are all defined by one single thing, the Star,

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>where we as fans know it's our job to keep

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the tradition going. Bank of America is proud to be

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the official bank of the Dallas Cowboys and to support

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the quest of living life The Cowboys Way Copyright twenty

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty Bank of America Corporation. Dear, it's nineteen o eight.

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think we should get electricity and stop using candles?

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>To see it? It's just electricity lights up the room fast,

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>It's more reliable than candles blowing out, and people seem

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to love it nationwide. Well, dare did you just run

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>into the wall? I have a new candle please. Historically,

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>switching to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>AT and T five G fast, reliable, secure and nationwide.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Switch to AT and T five G. It's not complicated.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Five G requires compatible plan may not be in your area.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>See att dot com slash five G for you for details.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break. If you're looking for something to

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>change up your dinner routine, you can help support local

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.959
<v Speaker 1>firstco businesses by choosing one of the Star District restaurants.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>For more information on delivery, take out, curbside, pickup, and

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>dine in availability, visit the Star District dot com. Absolutely,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we are in our final segment of the Breakwheel live

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>from the s WBC Mortgage Studios. I got Dave and

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Amber with me, and we're going to jump into some

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>questions here Amber, what you got out there? I still

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of questions about the tackle position, but

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically about Tyren smith future. What do he guys? And

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I know this is kind of hard to tell us

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, but what do you guys expect here to

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>happen with just him and his time here with the

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>cot Boys? I would imagine I'll go ahead, Dave, go ahead,

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>next Sorry, I bet he's coming back. It comes back

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>next year. God. Yeah. At the risk of sounding like

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a crazy optimist, like, I'm not very worried about Tyrant Smith,

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, like, I think a lot

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that have plagued Tyrant Smith over the

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>last three or four years stem from him trying to

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>gut through it, like he hasn't had this surgery that

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>shut him down, because he's like he's a warrior. He's like,

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm good to go. I can fight through this. And

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>he'll miss some games and the problem never really goes away,

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but he fights through it. And so give him a

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>whole year to have the surgery and really get himself right.

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Not saying he's gonna play in sixteen games a year

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>for the next five years, but I think this will

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>help him finish his contract. And you know, the Cowboys

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously you can't take that at face value. They need

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to address their depth at offensive tackle. But I don't

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think Tyron's going anywhere. I think he'll be starting for

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this team for the next couple of years, at least

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the contract. How much longer is it on their contract?

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys know? I want to say three seasons?

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Hang on, I'll look it up. I will say this

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>while David it's here, three or four more seasons. While

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Dave is looking it up, I'll say this. I disagree

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>with you guys a bit. I think he'll be back.

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any reason for the Cowboys to say, oh,

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>let's get rid of him. I do think the Cowboys,

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>if they go into next season relying on the fact

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that that both their tackles are going to be healthy

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and healthy for sixteen games at a mistake, So that

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>means they need to I think invest some resources into

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that because right now, I don't think I've seen a

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>single guy that they've rolled out there to play tackle

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.439
<v Speaker 1>at this point other than their guard who they don't

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>want to put a tackle actually do it well. So

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this offseason, whether that means they got to

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>go out and invest something in free agency, whether that

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>means they got to invest a mid round pick, or

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>whether that means that they take one of the guys

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that maybe are playing guard and really invest working them

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 1>at tackle, I think they got to address that position,

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think they got to address it in a

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in a significant way because they can't trust that both

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>these guys coming off injury, and with the injury history

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 1>of Tyron, they can't trust the fact that that they're

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have those gas for sixteen games. I think

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>they can make the argument they did that last year

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>though when by getting Cam Irving wasn't great though, And

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying. If you're going to go out

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and do it in free agency, you better get a

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 1>better quality guy than Cam Irving. I mean, he can't

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.959
<v Speaker 1>remember he got he Actually they made a decision that

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>he was worse than Terrence Steele. This coaching staff made

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the decision he was worse than Terrence Steele. If they're

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>accurate in their assessment, I'm not sure that Terren Steele

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't beat out Lyle Collins for the starting job. I'm

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>not sure he hasn't been that. He hasn't lost the

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>job to anyone since he's been here. Regardless of how

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>poor he has played, he continues to be the right

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>tackle of this team. Yeah, but you're saying that tongue

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in cheek obviously, I mean that's there's no way he

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was beating out Lao. But the point is, I think

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it speaks more about cam Irving personally. I don't think

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>cam er I think this coaching staff will look at

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Cam Irving and said he's not a very good tackle.

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>They played him when they had to, when they absolutely

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>had to. I thought he's played pretty well. It's hard

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to do that, though. It's hard to get a guy

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and pay him to be a backup, and you see

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it even at quarterback. Andy Dalton has to make that decision. Yes,

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be a backup there. So I think you

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>have to draft someone second round, third round, draft someone

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and hope that you know you can develop him or

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>move Connor Williams out there exactly, And maybe that's the answer.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you give Connor more time working at that. Maybe

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean he moves there initially, maybe he's still

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>your starting left guard, but you start working him there

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and seeing if maybe he has the ability to slide

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>out to it. Man, you think about that, Dave Williams

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>say that the next year they moved him to tackle.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>This would be his fourth year, next year right contract

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden europe swing tackle. Yeah, that

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>would be terrible for well, I mean, yeah, you're right,

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 1>because it wouldn't be a starting situation. But I mean

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that they did that for Lyle and it helped him.

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, Lyle was playing guard and they moved him

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and he I mean, you know, he's happy about the

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>way that way, but they loved him to be a

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>starter that they didn't move him to be right, No,

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, Yes, Connor I would think would

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>be livid if he gets moved out of the starting

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lineup in his contract year. If that would not I

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine that would make him happy. Tyran is under

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>contract for three more years. I will go on the

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>record and say I think he finishes his deal. But yeah,

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I said that too. I mean they need to invest

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in in a good backup, whether preferably in the draft honestly,

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, finding finding a Stallar starter caliber tackle in

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>free agency to not start is that's going to be tricky,

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So use a draft pick. Well, speaking of free agency,

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and this is tough again because there are other factors

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like Dak Press contract and all that. But do you

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>guys think that the Cowboys maybe learned a lesson this

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>year by shopping for Bower Gains and all that dream

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>free agency and maybe they kind of start handling free

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>agency a little bit different this upcoming year. I doubt

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it they should. I mean, they they haven't really hit

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on a free agent investment in the time that I've

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>covered the team, and I don't, you know, you get

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it like a pleasant surprise, like a Jeremy Mincy. That's

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>not what I'm talking about. Like, they haven't they haven't

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>really spent big money on a guy, and on the

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>rare occasion that they've spent medium money, it hasn't really

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>worked out. And with what they've got to figure out

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with Dak and some of the other pieces, I have

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a hard time believing that they're going to do it

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>next year either. Yeah, I don't think they necessarily trying

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 1>to bargain shop as much. I mean, they are trying

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to get bargains, but I think it stems from the

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that they they're going to I mean, they had

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the highest quarterback in the in the NFL right now,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>highest paid quarterback right per year thirty one million. I

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I think, I mean, I know there's guys that

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to be making more, but I mean he's

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>making thirty one minute. That's one of the top seeks,

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the top running backs, Mary's on the top receivers,

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the left guard or right guard, left tackle, left defensive end.

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So when you do all that, you just don't have

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>money for it. And I'll complicate that even more. This

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>next year's salary cap is gonna go down. Guys, it's

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down, and because of COVID, it's gonna go down.

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, I don't think that they'll have

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the money to be able to go out and just spend,

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, in free agency and just completely change the

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>way that they look at free agency in a year

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>when their salary cap is actually down. That would have

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to be in a year when your salary cap is

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>up and you're like, all right, we got a little

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>extra money, let's play around a little bit more than

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we normally would. I think this year they're going to

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>be as frugal as they possibly can because of the

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that they do still have to sign Deck, which

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>might actually end up being a savings for them, but

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.919
<v Speaker 1>they have all these other guys with these big contracts. Yeah,

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is gonna be the year they're

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna change up their strategy. Even if they wanted to

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 1>change up their strategy, I don't think financially this is

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a year to do that. Well. And we know the

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys love drafting people, and that's the preferred route when

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he comes to player at consisition. So here's the next question.

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go around the room and just talk about because

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:32.479
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants to talk about draft already. So what would

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 1>be the position your biggest position of need right now

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when you look at drafting a player, I'll start. I

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>think that when you look at where they are projected

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick, like I am, I'm just getting the best

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>defensive player on the board and it really doesn't matter.

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>And if that's vague, that's fine. That's how bad the

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>defense is. Because if he is a catalytic line back,

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm for it. If he is a badass cornerback, definitely.

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>If he's a pass rusher, okay, and if he is

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a run stuffing defensive tackle that he's just like controls

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the middle. Bring it. So whoever the best defensive player is,

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>defense is so bad. I am for that. See I

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.879
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't completely agree. I actually I was talking

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>about that on Twitter the other day. Is I think

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you just got to look at positional value here. And

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to mention any specific players because I

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't done I haven't started researching this draft class, or

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just watching college football world get to that, don't worry.

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But so I don't want to. I don't want to

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>throw any specific players under the bus. But this defense

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is so far away being top notch, like an off

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>ball linebacker. I don't know if I can justify that

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>with a top ten pick, or a defensive tackle who

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't rush the passer. I hate to sound like Stephen

0:41:57.680 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Jones because we know they hate one techniques, but like,

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>if I've got a pick in the top ten, I

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 1>need a little bit more bang for my buck, which

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is why you know, and I don't even know the

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>names of any of these players, but I'm hoping like

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.959
<v Speaker 1>hell that like a very very top tier defensive back

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.479
<v Speaker 1>is available, either a cornerback that can completely take away

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:19.399
<v Speaker 1>half of the field, or one of these safeties we've

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>been dying for for years, like a Derwin James who

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>can play six positions Like that is my pipe dream.

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>If I'm picking in the top ten, is a defensive

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>back who can help me just completely revamped the secondary.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm completely with you, David. I love your point, Nick,

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>because if there is I will say this, if there

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is a dynamic type player at linebacker, a type player

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that's all over the field and can do a lot

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of different things, then that's the guy I would I

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>would be okay with spending that high pick. The likelihood

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you got that guy sitting in the top ten probably

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>not great. But if you've got one of those top

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:56.320
<v Speaker 1>notch cornerbacks, you know, the kind of guys that like

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>kin a Couta that came I was as a Couta

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that came out of Ohio State, that kind of back

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like he's gonna come in and he's

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an immediate impact player. And now I'm gonna

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>pair him up with this other corner I got in

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the second round last year that I think now can

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>give me a really good tandem. I'm going for that,

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>like that's my preference. If I can get that cornerback

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a great cornerback, I think that will help everything

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>all the way around. I think he helps more than

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>just a cornerback position. I think he helps the safety.

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 1>He helps the pass rush. I that's where I go

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>if I have a choice. Yeah, And the quarterbacks will

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>factor into this. If the Cowboys are drafting that high, right,

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>always look at the quarterback situation. Not so much so

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys will do it. Maybe they will, that's

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a that's a discussion for another time. But the times

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have traded that first round pick in the past,

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's because someone else wanted a quarterback. They wanted a

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Brady Quinn or whatever. The Cowboys are trade. I'm not

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>saying they drifted three guys this year, right, Dave? Have

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 1>you nick you guys at least Georgia and I mean,

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sorry, at least Ohio State and uh yeah,

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we know those two. Maybe isn't a third one. I

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that was a third one that's kind of being

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about. Yes, No, the North Dakota State kid and

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the BYU kid are both going to be first round picks,

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and um, Kyle Trask out of Florida I think has

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:13.839
<v Speaker 1>a chance to Okay, I just think, I mean maybe

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>as many as five. Yeah, it look at Jerry of

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 1>like using that to maybe trade back if you need

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>it to or whatever. I find Derek's answer pretty amusing

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.840
<v Speaker 1>because I thought, if I remember correctly, that all we

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>needed was some really good pass rush. They didn't will

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't get it. Now you're over here to

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 1>talk and they didn't get it. Did you do you

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think this is a really good pass rush? Absolutely not, Okay,

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's my point. They did. I'm just saying, like, maybe

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can get it. Maybe I would have expected

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you talking about maybe reinforcing the past rush rather than

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about now They both play off each other. They

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>both play off each other, so you gotta give me

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them that's really good. If I have a

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>really good secondary, then I can afford have pass rush

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>that's not as good because they're gonna be helped by

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the secondary. Or if I have a really good pass rush,

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 1>then my secondary will be helped a little bit. It's

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of an either or. But when you're getting neither

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>like they got this year, this is what you get

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as a result of a really bad defense. No, I agree.

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to give you some crap on some

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>previous climents that you've said in the past. It's all good.

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Do we have time for one more? And yeah? Yeah, no, oh,

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. No, we gotta do picks. We gotta do picks.

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go and jump the pics real quick, all right. No,

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>not that we are have any suspense here with our picks,

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>but at least we can get some some suspense with

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the scores. And let's start with you. How do you

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>go on this pick, Cowboys versus Steelers. I'll do it

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple. Cowboys loose and the Steelers they end up

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>scoring at least like thirty five points. Cowboys somehow get

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 1>lucky and score. For some reason, I'll keep seeing number

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>thirteen in my head, so I'm just gonna go with that.

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>So thirty five thirteen, m okay, Nick, thirty one twelve Pittsburgh.

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't need that. That field goal. You're gonna stick

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with that. Yeah, I heard this morning you were kind

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 1>of walking. But just just see why holding Pittsburgh under

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty like, I don't see that. Yeah, thirty one, thirty

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one to twelve. They fail to cover the spread for

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the ninth consecutive week, which I think is the record. Yeah,

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's unbelievable, all right, Dave, Uh, you know it sounds

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>weird to say, but I think the efforts gonna be

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:35.879
<v Speaker 1>there again. Like, I think they're gonna be scrappy again.

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is, what kept them in the Philly

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>game was Carson Wentz turning the ball over. Roethlisberger has

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>been amazing at not doing that. He's actually only thrown

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 1>an interception in two of his seven games, so five

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>times he's gone out there and protected the ball very

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>very well. I don't see them taking advantage of him,

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>so I think they'll scrap. But I think Pittsburgh pulls

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.760
<v Speaker 1>away pretty easily. I got thirty four or to ten,

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think the Cowboys do score a touchdown,

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's like in the last five minutes when nobody's

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:11.359
<v Speaker 1>really paying attention. All right. I think that this game

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be one where I agree. I think the

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>defense will be scrappy early. I think that there will

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>come a point though, whin the bottle will break, and

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think score affiliate. I mean, I'm sorry Pittsburgh ends

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>up scoring points much much more than than what they

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.279
<v Speaker 1>did last week. I do think though, I look at

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys offense, if they could only get nine last week,

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 1>then my thought is this week it's going to be

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>less than that. I just don't see them being able

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to I think the biggest problem this week is just

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be offensively. They just can't match up or

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at least anything we've seen so far doesn't suggest that

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they have a good matchup here against the Pittsburgh Steeler defense.

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>So I actually think it's gonna be kind of a

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:53.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a you know, the offense doesn't score

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown for sure, I think I'll give them six points.

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll give them two field goals. I think Philly scores

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty four thirty four six is what I see as

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a final score. All Right, I appreciate you guys join us.

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back on Monday. We'll let you know what

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>went right and what went wrong for the Cowboys. Remember

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>next week, on Tuesday and Wednesday, it will be the

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bye week, so we're gonna flip things around. We've got

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole new lineup for every one of the shows.

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Did put it on my Twitter page? You can check

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that out. We'll also give you some more information about

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:19.959
<v Speaker 1>that next week. Till then for Nick Eatn, Dave Hellman,

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Amber Garcia on Derek Eagleton. This has been The Break

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Football Club.