WEBVTT - China Pivot, Sweden's innovation engine, US Army Sec. Driscoll

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston, bringing you

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>stories of capitalism. Last week, the US Army announced plans

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>to transform itself for a new world and a new

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>way of fighting wars. We talked with the Secretary of

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the Army, Dan Driscoll about what of the old has

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 2>to go out to make room for the new to

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>come in. Plus, we traveled to Stockholm to see how

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the rest of Europe could follow Sweden's lead in building

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 2>an innovation ecosystem on the back of capital markets with

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 2>just about everyone owning a piece. But we start with

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>China and a story about the two biggest economies in

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the world trying to come to trade terms. Who has

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 2>the upper hand and is it possible for both to win.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 3>President Trump wants to rebalance the American economy back to

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 3>a manufacturing economy with high precision manufacturing. I think everyone agrees,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 3>including Chinese leadership, that they need to rebalance towards more

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 3>of a consumption and consumer economy. And the dream scenario

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 3>would be if somehow we could do that together.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Turning first to our special contributor, Larry Summers of Harvard,

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 2>So Larry. This week we heard about the tentative agreement

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 2>for ninety days at least between the United States and

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 2>China dialing back on the tariffs. Was this a step

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 2>forward for the Trump administration?

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I salute Secretary Bessant. The avoidance of value subtracted is

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 4>value added, and by that standard, we added value. The

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 4>United States backed off of what we are extremely imprudent

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 4>and potentially economically very damaging prohibitive tariffs to the point

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 4>of embargo on China. That was a good thing for

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 4>the US economy, and as a consequence, the US stock

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 4>market rose substantially in recognition of that. It was not

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>an increase due to Chinese concessions. You could see that

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 4>from the internals of the market. Companies like toy companies

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 4>that were dependent on imports retailers performed particularly well. But look,

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 4>when you make a mistake, when you've done something imprudent,

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 4>it's a good idea to salvage what pride you can

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 4>and to retreat. And that's what the Trump administration did,

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 4>and I salute Secretary Vessant for his leadership in doing that.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Part of any high stakes negotiation is trying to assess

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the pressure points on the two sides, and one of

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the things we've heard from President Trump is he believes

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of pressure on China right now because

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 2>it is a manufacturing economy and as he says, a

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of factories have gone quiet. Is he right? Is

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>there a lot of pressure on China right now to

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>come to terms.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 4>I think there's some pressure on China, but I think

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 4>there's more pressure on us because we're the one that's

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 4>a democratic country that's responsive to our people. We're the

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 4>one that has a highly inflation conscious population and prohibitive

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 4>tariffs raise price levels. We're the one that's the active

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 4>player here. So I think there was a lot of

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 4>pressure on us, to which we responded. I think it's

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 4>a very important part of governing to be willing to

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 4>recognize when you push things too far and to pull back.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 4>But let's not be confused about what the path eater was.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 4>It was an overly aggressive, overly truculent, erroneous approach from

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 4>which there has been a significant but still not total retreat.

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Larry Ticket step back from the particulars of balance of

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>trade and fairness and trade. As a macroeconomist, we do

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 2>have the second largest economy in the world by most measures,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 2>by some even the largest economy in the world that

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>is not market driven fundamentally, it is centrally planned and

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>they've built up a huge productive capacity. How does one

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 2>deal with that? I don't think we ever had to

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 2>do that in the past. How do you deal with

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that in terms of trade terms and making sure that

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't distort things in our country?

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think what you do is you focus on

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 4>your own economic interests and if others want to subsidize

0:04:54.760 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 4>your consumers, if others want to subsidize your producers, that

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 4>can very easily be a good thing. And so you

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 4>try to define what your core interests are. We have

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 4>a core interest in national security. In everything that's national

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 4>security sensitive. We need to be trying to pivot away

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 4>from China. We need to be very attentive to the

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 4>security risks of Chinese presence in the United States. That's

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 4>issues like TikTok. We need to be very focused on

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 4>preventing China from getting access to intellectual property and ways

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 4>that's going to enable them to surpass us. But you

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 4>have to focus on your core interests, and when you're

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 4>worried about the export of Barbie dolls. You're not focusing

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 4>on your core interests when you're worried about trying to

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 4>get jobs here, putting together other the different components of

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 4>an iPhone, you're not worried about your core interests. So, yeah,

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 4>we do need a strategy with respect to China, a

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>strategy directed getting them to follow rules of the road

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 4>where that's important for our core national security interests. But

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 4>this kind of broad, indiscriminate attack that has been launched

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 4>that mostly serves to cause Americans to feel poorer, mostly

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 4>serves to increase our inflation. That's not the right way forward.

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 4>So I'm glad to see the adjustments that the Trump

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 4>administration has entered into.

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 2>The tentative agreement reached in Geneva was just that tentative,

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 2>leaving a lot of work to be done before the

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>United States and China can reach a long term solution

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to their trade conflicts. Elizabeth Economy is a China expert

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 2>at the Hoover Institution who keeps careful track of the

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 2>relative strengths and weaknesses of the world's two largest economies.

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 5>I think both countries have economic vulnerabilities. I think the

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 5>assessment on the part of the Trump administration was that

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 5>China was more vulnerable because it exports much more to

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 5>the United States than the US does to China. Its

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 5>economy has also been struggling. It's been in a prolonged

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 5>economic slowdown for at least three years now. But I

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 5>think there was a fundamental miscalculation on the part of

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 5>the administration. They didn't appreciate that we have a much

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 5>greater soul or near soul source reliance on a number

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 5>of critical products from China, critical minerals, rare earth elements,

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 5>active pharmaceutical ingredients. These are all things that are essential

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 5>for our economic security, our national security, our human security,

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 5>and will devastate quite frankly, our pharmaceutical industries and our

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 5>defense and technology industries. So there's a balance, I think

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 5>between the Chinese vulnerabilities and the US vulnerabilities. Both of us,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 5>I think, have vulnerabilities to in the space of this

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 5>tariff war.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.239
<v Speaker 2>Does the rest of the world give one side between

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I say, some China advantage over the other. I mean

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>both sides historically have tried to recruit the rest.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Of the world.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 5>I think for the advanced market democracies, what we've seen

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 5>has been in some respects somewhat surprising. I think there

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 5>was a belief on the part of the Chinese government

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 5>that given this tariff for this global tariff war that

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 5>President Trump has launched, that it would be easy pickings

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 5>that China would walk in and basically say, we are

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 5>a stabilizing force in the global economy, We're a stabilizing

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 5>force in the international system. And they've gone around saying,

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 5>let's join hands and work together to push back against

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 5>President Trump and this tariff war. I think what they've

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 5>found is that really nobody's that interested in buying what

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 5>they're selling. There's an entire world now emerging that is

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 5>set to support the current rules based order that doesn't

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 5>include the United States, but also doesn't include China.

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 2>One destination of Chinese goods that otherwise might be expert

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>would be domestically increased domestic consumption, which has been talked

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 2>about for years now. What are the prospects In fact,

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Xi Jinping might say, Okay, we're going to stimulate the consumer.

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Chinese economists have been saying for years now

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 5>that the government needs to do more to support the

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 5>consumer economy, and part of that would be, you know,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 5>investing more in the healthcare system, the education system, the

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 5>pension system, giving the Chinese people a sense that they

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 5>don't need to continue to save in the case of

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 5>an emergency. But Chijinping is allergic to what he calls

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 5>social welfare ism. He doesn't want to give the Chinese

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 5>people any incentive not to work, at least that's how

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 5>he looks at it. So again we've seen President she

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 5>over the course of this taraf war take a few steps,

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, in the form of raising wages for civil servants,

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 5>notwithstanding the fact that a year ago or a year

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 5>and a half ago he actually cut those same wages.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 5>So I don't know whether this is actually increase or

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 5>just taking them back to where they were. And also

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 5>again having this massive goods trade in program. But mostly

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 5>what he's done I think is, you know, encourage banks

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 5>to loan to small and medium sized enterprises. You've seen

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Ali Baba, for example, reduce the cost of companies putting

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 5>their goods on its platform, to encourage small and medium

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 5>sized enterprises to be able to export. So there are

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 5>steps that are being taken, but there's nothing in the

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 5>way of sort of a massive boost to the consumer

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 5>economy that I think Chinese economists would.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 6>Like to see.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Coming next the story of Nasdaq in Europe and how

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Sweden's deep and robust capital markets connection to tech startups

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 2>could give the rest of Europe an example to follow.

0:10:53.200 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Six fam today two and this is a story about

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>attracting bees with honey, specifically the honey of rich capital markets,

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>attracting the bees of tech entrepreneurs, something that has helped

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 2>drive US economic growth, but that has largely been lacking

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 2>in Europe, except in one particular corner.

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 7>About thirty nine percent of household assets in the United

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 7>States are invested in equities, which is the highest in

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 7>the world. But here in Sweden it's thirty six percent.

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>And it's not just how much, it's how broad.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 8>About ninety percent of the sweet savings are in some

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 8>financial assets, which makes us the most investing country, at

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:43.599
<v Speaker 8>least in Europe.

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 9>We're blessed to have a broad equity participation, so lots

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 9>of people who own stocks directly. What that does is,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 9>of course, it creates this economic alignment, etc.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 2>We've come to expect robust capital markets supported by retail

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 2>investment in the United States, but not necessarily in Sweden,

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 2>a Nordic country with a population of just a little

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 2>more than ten million people that punches above its weight

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>in the depth of its capital markets and is home

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.599
<v Speaker 2>to Nasdaq's European headquarters.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 7>We operate our markets here and also in the Nordics.

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 7>We own and operate almost all the markets in the Nordics.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>We spoke to Nasdaq CEO Adina Friedman in New York

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 2>in April, not long after President Trump had roiled the

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>markets with his sweeping tariff announcements.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 7>So on options in twenty twenty four, we had an

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 7>average of about twenty four million contracts traded a day.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 7>On Friday, we had ninety four million contracts traded. Now,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 7>what generally said that what's really really interesting is options

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 7>markets are extremely data heavy.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 2>Friedman and her Nasdaq team have plenty to handle with

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>US markets, but they also run European operations almost as large,

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 2>in what they call Nasdaq Nordic, which became part of

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 2>the group in two thousand and eight. We accompanied Friedman

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>on a trip to the European headquarters in Stockholm.

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, Stockholm is one of the great markets that we

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 7>own and operate here in the Nordics, but it also

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 7>is the headquarters to our market technology business where we

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 7>serve one hundred and thirty markets with our technology that

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 7>helps them power all the market those markets around the

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 7>world as well.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.359
<v Speaker 2>How much of nasac's overall operation is represented in Stockholm, Well.

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 7>We have about eight hundred employees here in Stockholm, slightly

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 7>smaller than New York, where we have about one thousand

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 7>employees in our New York office. So it kind of

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 7>gives you a sense that this really is our second

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 7>headquarters in the world. It's one of the special places

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 7>that I get the benefit of being able to come

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 7>to as we engage with the markets here in Sweden.

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 7>One of the things that I find interesting is how

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 7>similar it is here in Sweden versus New York. So

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 7>the markets in Sweden have a lot of characteristics to

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 7>the markets in the US, which is different than the

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 7>rest of Europe. So when we look at it, we

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 7>look at how liquid are the markets, how many new

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 7>companies come and list here in any given year, how

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 7>active are the markets in terms of having retail ownership

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 7>of equities, and in many many cases those are very

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 7>similar to the US. So we have twelve hundred companies

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 7>that are listed in the Nordics and in any given year,

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 7>we'll have dozens of companies list here, both small companies

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 7>on our SME market which is called First North, and

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 7>on the main market. So we're really really proud of

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 7>the fact that the markets here are very vibrant and

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 7>have a lot of similarities to what we see in

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 7>the US. But sitting here in Europe, almost.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>One sign of its strong capital markets is Sweden's IPO pace.

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Between twenty thirteen and twenty twenty four, there were more

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>IPOs in Sweden than in Italy, France or Germany, second

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>in Europe only to the UK.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 7>The US markets are the largest, deepest, most liquid markets

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 7>in the world, but when you look at how that's

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 7>translated into the markets here in the Nordics, it actually

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 7>has a lot of a lot of the commonalities of

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 7>the market cap. The listed companies here in the Nordics

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 7>are about two trillion versus of course, we have about

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 7>thirty trillion in the United States just on Nasdaq. However,

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, the liquidity that underpins that market cap here

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 7>in the Nordics is quite vibrant, very active.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 8>We have lots of IPOs in Sweden, we have more

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 8>IPOs than any European countries together, and I would say

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>that is one important source.

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Sweden's vibrant IPO market is no accident. It results in

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 2>part from government policies that encourage household participation in the markets.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Starting with taxes. Nicholas Wickman is Sweden's Minister for Financial Markets.

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 8>First of all, for the smallest entrepreneurs and new entrepreneurs

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 8>closely held corporations as they are called, they have strong

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 8>tax incentives because there's a twenty percent tax on dividends

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 8>within the rate of return. Allow it's quite complicated, but

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 8>it's also quite strong incentives to do business. And then

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 8>we have the isk system that takes down the cost

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 8>of capital, so to say, it provides at least more

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 8>capital into the system because you have a low effective

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 8>taxation on your invested savings. So I would say those

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 8>are two important aspects, one for the entrepreneurs and one

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 8>for the providers of capital. We have strong incentives to

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 8>stay in business for a long period of time. We

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 8>don't have any inheritance tax, we don't have gift tax,

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 8>we don't have tax on accumulated wealth or wealth tax

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 8>as you normally say. So I would say there's strong

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 8>incentives to provide capital in the system. They are strong

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 8>incentives to do something good with it, and it's strong

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 8>incentives for active owners to remain active and perhaps to

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 8>have all their families and keep their businesses over generations.

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Another big driver of retail participation is an investment account

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 2>known as an ISSK, a government program under which two

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 2>point five percent of every employee's wages are put into

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 2>an account in their name, which they can allocate among

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 2>a range of funds. These funds are not subject to

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 2>capital gains tax. Instead, they are taxed one percent each

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>year on the value in the account.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 7>One of the great examples of where regulation has played

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 7>a really key role in driving liquidity in the markets

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 7>has been that ISK program where they started in twenty

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 7>twelve and they said every citizen should be investing in

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 7>the markets. So therefore they said, okay, well we'll create

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 7>a tax account where your only tax about one percent

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 7>of your total assets every year, no cap gains tax.

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 7>So it means that investors can really bring their money

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 7>into the markets. Their only obligation is to invest in

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 7>the public markets anywhere, and it allows investors to have

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 7>a great engagement with the economy.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Christian cedar Home is the CEO of Investor AB, a

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 2>company which serves as the investment arm of the Wallenberg family,

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 2>one of the most prominent families in the country. In

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen seventies, Wallenberg family businesses employed forty percent of

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Sweden's industrial workforce and accounted for forty percent of the

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>total worth of the Stockholm stock market.

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 9>This has created this sort of positive flywheel effect where

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 9>owning stocks in a company, you may even work for

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 9>that same company. By the way, and we're blessed to

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 9>have a great number of even just going in looking

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 9>in Sweden, great number of high quality companies, so you

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 9>may work for them, you may be invested in them,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 9>and of course that creates this this engagement around business

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 9>as part of a society.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the breadth of ownership with equities in Sweden,

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>as I understand that there are ten million people roughly

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 2>in Sweden, you have six hundred and fifty thousand shareholders

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 2>yourself investor AB. How do you explain that bread How

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 2>does that happen?

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean, first of all, we're really thankful for

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 9>the trust that the people put in our work, and

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 9>you know that they appreciate what we're doing, so we're

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 9>quite humbled to that and the way I look at investor,

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 9>what you get is you get engaged ownership and active

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 9>investment in a portfolio of about twenty five really good

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 9>companies or high quality companies and at the relatively sleam

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 9>costs as well. And then of course over time it

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 9>helps that we have created a strong total shareholder return

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 9>over most sort of longer time periods at least, so

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 9>something seems to be working with them Orther and I.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 8>Think it serves two purposes. First of all, it's about

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 8>social coherence. You have your job, you have your salary,

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 8>but you also have a share of the most productive

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 8>part of the economy that belongs to you because of

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 8>your savings. And it's about then, of course economic efficiency.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 8>It provides capital for inventors and entrepreneurs. So's I would

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 8>say both about social coherence and economic efficients in a

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 8>very nice combination. Our social security system is important. It

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 8>makes it possible to take risks both with your savings

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 8>of course, but also in your work life as a whole.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 8>When you have some basic, trustworthy welfare system, you know

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 8>that you could have a bit more risk of course

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 8>in the rest of the economy. So I think that

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 8>is one important one important topic. But of course also

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 8>the culture doesn't come from one source. The welfare system

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 8>could be one such source, education system could could be another.

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 8>And also of course that we provide financial stability, that

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 8>we safegoud our financial system.

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>What does all this mean for Sweden's economy as a whole.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>It's GDP is projected to grow two point three percent

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five, compared to just one point seven

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 2>percent for the United States. Perhaps as important is Sweden's

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>level of productivity, which drives future growth.

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 8>Recent years, we have had the same problem as most

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 8>of the Western world, or especially the the Europe as large.

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 8>We have a productivity problem. But if you extend the

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 8>time period a bit, you can see that Sweden is

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 8>exceptionally productive.

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Sweden's approach to encouraging broad and deep capital markets comes

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>in sharp contrast to some of the rest of Europe.

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 2>In his report on European Competitiveness, former ECB President Mario

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Draghi pointed to the lack of sufficient capital support as

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 2>one reason why Europe has lagged behind the United States

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>in the growth of tech giants. Henry McVay is the

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>head of the Global Macro and Asset Allocation Team at KKR,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and we spoke to him after he returned from a

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>trip to Europe.

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 10>When you look at as a percentage of GDP, it's

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 10>about a third of the US. And so there's clearly

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 10>been a differential over the last ten and twenty years

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 10>on that's on the equity side. On the credit side,

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 10>what I think Europe has missed is it's really been

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 10>so bank controlled that you've missed the real growth in

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 10>the securitization market. So if you think about the US,

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 10>what we securitize everything guys into the capital markets.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 2>The Drug Report talking about that, well that shift capital markets?

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think in Europe?

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's it's certainly been a big wake up call

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 9>first of all. And if I take my positive had

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 9>on what I say is that hopefully now what what

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 9>you can read in the Drug Report, etc. Is turned

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 9>into really concrete actions as well, so that Europe can

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 9>leverage all the advantages it has. I mean it's a

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 9>large market, stable institutions, whatnot so and and high high

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 9>equity participation in some parts of Europe as well. And

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 9>then where do it shift? I mean, it's it seems

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 9>to just looking at where evaluations have gone recently, some

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 9>of the shifts you describe seem to you know, be

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 9>in the making where that goes long term, Probably others

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 9>are better position to tell.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, If capital markets are key to innovation in tech,

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>what has the Swedish approach to retail equity investing meant

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 2>for its startup record? That's where we turn next. After

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 2>a short break for coffee and Fica, the pastry that

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 2>sweeze enjoy during their workday afternoons.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 7>We're in Sweden, so we have to we have to

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 7>we have to have fica so well, Fica's Queen's cake. Yes,

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 7>Feica is cake with coffee, so yes, exactly. So we're

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 7>going to have a pika leaders that tradition, right, It

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 7>is actually every Wednesday normally we have a Pica celebration

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 7>where we just get everyone together. So the whole purpose

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 7>is not to talk about work, is to talk about

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 7>each other and to create that sense of community. So

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 7>I love it. But it's a huge tradition here and

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 7>now we've brought it everywhere. Don't toast in Sweden? Do

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 7>you want to learn how to toast?

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 7>You toast? You say skulls? Don't you don't clean? You

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 7>look at each other in the eye, you drink and

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 7>you look at each other again. It's an old Viking tradition,

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 7>like the idea was that if I had poisoned you

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 7>would I wouldn't be able to look in the I.

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 2>The Dragi report on the Future of European competitiveness called

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>for Europe to develop a deeper pool of angel investors

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 2>and increase European IPOs to fund high growth companies. So

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 2>has Sweden's commitment to these sources of capital resulted in

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>a more robust startup culture. Sweden has produced more tech

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 2>unicorns per capita than any other country in Europe after Estonia,

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 2>and according to the World Intellectual Property Organization, Sweden ranked

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>second in global innovation among fifty one high income countries,

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>second to Switzerland and just ahead of the United States.

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 11>Swedeness has some well known brands going to iq H

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 11>and m Ericsson or more recently Spotify in Klana. So

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 11>it's a strong culture entrepreneurship which has fostered in a

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 11>way innovation of course, but also investments in the community

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 11>large and from a capital market perspective. So in Stockholm

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 11>in particular, I think it's a small city, but investors

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 11>are ever far away.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Ali Landin is the CEO and one of the co

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 2>founders of Froda, a tech startup that provides small and

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 2>medium sized enterprises with access to financing.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 11>We start the company back in twenty fifteen. We came

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 11>across the idea when we're sitting at Stock and School

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 11>Economics have an incubator called Stock School Economics Business Lab,

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 11>and we realize at the point in time that all

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 11>these entrepreneurs who were sitting at that incubator starting their

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 11>businesses were struggling to get access to external financing. And

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 11>we realize that this is a huge problem and it's

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 11>really hampering innovation and growth and competitiveness all across Europe.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Even Sweden's retail banks work to bring their customers into

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the world of investing.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 12>One of our things to do is to help people

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 12>to educate get them in financial literacy. So that means

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 12>that in the old days, the savings banks gave like

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 12>a few kroner two when you were new born and

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 12>you could save it. And what we do is we

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 12>talk with youngsters who educate them on financial literacy. We

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 12>give them easy ways to invest in equities, to put

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 12>their money into pensions and things like that, so we

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.479
<v Speaker 12>help people through that journey to make sure that in

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 12>the end they have good financial health.

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Jens Hendrickson is the CEO of Sweatbank, one of the

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 2>largest Nordic banks, with around seventy five percent of its

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 2>revenue coming from Sweden.

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 12>Were nation of engineers, and we're small and open economy,

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 12>and sometimes people that are you not afraid that the

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 12>new technology will will sort of make you lose your job?

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 12>And people say, no, we're afraid of the old technology

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 12>because the old technology might hurt them, might sort of

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 12>make us weaker. We need new technology develop going forward,

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 12>increased growth and make Sweden welfare and a better society

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 12>to live.

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 2>In Sweden, support for innovation goes back decades.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 11>I remember back in the early or mid nineties there

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 11>was sort of an initiative called bring a Computer into

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 11>Every Home, which was launched by the government and essentially

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 11>meant that each and every household in Sweden could get

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 11>a computer for almost no money at all. I think,

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 11>but we don't have to the same extent as for instance,

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 11>the US. You have the the pockets of Silicon Valley,

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 11>those huge funds that can invest billions and billions of dollars.

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 11>We don't have that, So I think what that means

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 11>is Swedish tech companies or startups need to show profits

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 11>earlier in their journey compared to for their US counterparts. Also,

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 11>it's it's kind of a small market. You need to

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 11>demonstrate scalability to be able to show that this is

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 11>an idea that's not only sustainable in this tiny sort

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 11>of Nordic market, but this is an idea that you

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 11>can actually export across the globe. So as a requirement

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 11>that you need the people to show how this works

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 11>across the globe or at least in a lot large market.

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 11>Not only Sweden.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 2>Sweden innovation ecosystem is supported by more than it's tech

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 2>or tax and savings policies. Today, the country's social welfare

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 2>policies also have expanded to support the risk taking needed

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 2>to foster entrepreneurship.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 7>It is a very vibrant innovation ecosystem. I think that

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 7>the government has done a lot of work intentionally to

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 7>make sure that they allow companies to take risk, allow

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 7>companies to grow and expand become global players, and then

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 7>they have a great system that also encourages citizens to

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 7>invest in these innovators.

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 8>Our social security system is important. It makes it possible

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 8>to take risks both with your savings of course, but

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 8>also in your work life as a whole. When you

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 8>have some basic, trustworthy welfare system, you know that you

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 8>can have a bit more risk of course in the

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 8>rest of the economy. So I think that is one

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 8>important topic. But of course, also the culture doesn't come

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 8>from one source. The welfare system could be one such source,

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 8>education system could be another. And also of course that

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 8>we provide financial stability, that we safegout our financial system

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 8>make it in the long term high functioning, well functioning.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 9>We don't do a lot of call it early venture

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 9>capital startup investment ourselves. But if I look at the

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 9>innovation more broadly, then I think one part of that

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 9>is maybe our small home market, right, meaning that we've

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 9>always been forced to go out there and compete with

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 9>the best in a way, So that's one big driver.

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 9>Then I also think that we have some more societal

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure that works for us. Just to mention, I fil

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 9>mean one is free and generally high quality education for

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 9>all is broadly available. We also have pretty generous welfare systems,

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 9>including childcare, which has helped, of course to create a

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 9>labor market participation.

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Access to capital through private markets is an important part

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 2>of the innovation puzzle.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 10>Europe actually has about the same number of venture capital

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 10>companies per year that the gets hatched, which is interesting

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 10>relative to the US. What Europe has been missing is

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 10>those global dominant firms one hundred billion dollars in more.

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 10>Typically those companies are actually getting bought by US firms.

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 10>So there is the beginning of the food chain on innovation, right.

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 10>Entrepreneur is actually a French But what's happening is you

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 10>haven't made it to create a global dominant giant. You

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 10>have ASML, but you don't have the type of companies

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 10>that you have a Google and Meta and Microsoft, and

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 10>so that to me is the opportunity set is to

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 10>really see that value chain all the way through. You

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 10>haven't had the same opportunity set. In the US. It's

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 10>maybe twenty five percent of the index and in Europe

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 10>at seven. So there is entrepreneurs and there's growth, but

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 10>a lot in the public markets. A lot of that's

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 10>been concentrated in the US markets.

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Investor AB is one of the most important sources of

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 2>private capital for Swedish companies, but its take on private

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 2>equity looks different from the United States.

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 9>Basically, when we make an investment, we do it not

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 9>having exit as part of the strategy, and that means

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 9>that we're really picky about getting companies who are in

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 9>industries or in markets or niches where you have some

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 9>kind of structural growth tailwind. We don't love to sort

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 9>of fight gravity, so we prefer the tailwind and then

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 9>companies with a long term right to win in those markets.

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 9>And typically, and it goes back to the point about innovation,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 9>if we look at our companies across I mean call

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 9>it twenty five or so companies, most of them have

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 9>leading market positions and they have that thanks to leading

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 9>or sort of best in class products and this obsession

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 9>about the products and the customers. So that's I think

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 9>our We really pick on the long term attractiveness of

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 9>both the company but also the industry that they're in,

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 9>because we're weary that it's it's it's better basically with

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 9>some tailwind and some heldwind. To be clear, we have

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 9>shareholders in all parts of the world. We have Nordic roots,

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 9>but we see ourselves as global investors and if you

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 9>look at our companies, they typically have the Nordic roots

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 9>and the Nordic carriatter. But coming back to our small

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 9>home market set, and they're typically active across the globe.

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 9>If I look at investor ab in the company as such,

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 9>we have operations here in Stockholm, any New York. So

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 9>those are our two sort of home markets, and that's

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 9>where we go look for new platform investments or new

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 9>logos if you want.

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Sweden's model has worked to jumpstart its innovation and growth,

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 2>but replicating it in other parts of the EU is

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>not as easy as it sounds.

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 8>There is a huge interest from other European countries and

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 8>from the European Union about the Swedish case. How did

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 8>we succeed to have our households to have this large

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 8>retail participation in the financial markets, How did we succeed

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 8>in reforming our pension system, How did we succeed in

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 8>getting those tax incentivized saving products in place that provides

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 8>the households with a better return than they would have

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 8>just the system where you pay taxes and get benefits

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 8>from the government, and then of course also provides corperations

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 8>with more capital than in other countries. So there is

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 8>a huge interest in the Swedish example, and since we're

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 8>humble people, of course will will say that, well, it's

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 8>it's a matter of several factors. It's it's it's not

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 8>a it's not one thing you could do here.

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 2>If Europe manages to adapt the Swedish model of supporting

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 2>capitalism with social welfare, the growth upside of the EU

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 2>is high, but Sweden is setting its sites even higher.

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 8>We say that the United States need to watch out

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 8>if we if we manage for the whole of Europe

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 8>to do this, because then we will be a much

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 8>more efficient competitor.

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 12>And that means that you have a free education, you

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 12>have free universities, you have the daycare, shine care, you have,

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 12>and you can continue with all these things, and then

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 12>peakop can take a bit more financial risk. And you're right,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 12>it is risk in that sense, but when you know

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 12>that risk usually pays off in the long run, well,

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 12>at least history has shown of that.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we talked with the new Secretary of the Army,

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Dan Driscoll about the transformation plan he presented to Congress

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 2>last week and how it would address some of the

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 2>issues at the Pentagon we reported on last fall. This

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.919
<v Speaker 2>is an update of a story we reported on last

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 2>November about getting our money's worth in our national defense spending.

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Last week, the new Secretary of the Army presented to

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Congress his plan to transform the largest branch of the

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>US military.

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Jacob the system is broken, but nobody felt like they

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>had the power to change it.

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Dan Driscoll is the Secretary of the Army Army serving

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.760
<v Speaker 2>in Trump's current administration, which plans to redirect eight percent

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.720
<v Speaker 2>or fifty billion dollars of non lethal Defense Department spending

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to innovative weaponry.

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>With President Trump's leadership and his kind of incredibly high

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.439
<v Speaker 1>risk tolerance, we were empowered and given the top cover

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to basically go fix the things that are broken. And

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so fundamentally what Army Transformation Initiative, what we call ATI,

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is it does four things. So the first bucket of

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>things that it does is it looks at our obsolete

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>equipment and processes and the things that have led to

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>bad outcomes, and we stop buying those things. And so

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>some examples of that are humbies. We have Gray Eagles,

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>which are big, large drones that have been around for

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>decades and they just don't fit on the modern battlefield.

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And a robotic combat vehicle on our CV, it's an

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>exquisite three million dollar piece of equipment that can be

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.399
<v Speaker 1>taken out by an eight hundred dollars drone. The math

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't work. Bucket two is what has led to

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the types of contracts have gotten us into these outcomes

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that we don't want. So in some instances we have

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>given away our right to repair our own equipment. We

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>would see this exquisite equipment sitting on the sidelines for

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>eight or twelve months at a time, and our soldiers

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>could three D print the two to twenty dollars part

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>to get it back in the game. Bucket three is

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>essentially taking the savings from cutting the obsolete equipment and

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>recycling it to the things we know we need. Modern

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 1>warfare is going to be a mixture of autonomous vehicles

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and drones and data. It's buying all of that equipment

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and really just giving us a command and control layer

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for the modern battlefield. And then Bucket four is the bloat.

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>We have just too many people up in our leadership,

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and so we're going to do things like cut one

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand people from the Pentagon. We're going to push those

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>soldiers that are stuck up here pushing paperwork around. We're

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:47.399
<v Speaker 1>going to get them back in helmets, get them back

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in formations to do the jobs that they actually signed

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>up wanting to do.

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Those who know have been calling for changes like these

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 2>for a long time. Former US Deputy Secretary of Defense

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 2>John Hamry says the Pentagon's fail failure to adapt compromises

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 2>its ability to fight.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 13>We are not well organized for sustained long term conflict.

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 13>It would really be a strain for us to manage

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 13>a three year war. We tend to buy too few

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 13>weapons for long term warfare. Our industrial base is sluggish.

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 13>It's not that the companies aren't willing to produce, but

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 13>the government isn't willing to give them resources for search capacity.

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 13>We could fight a terrific short term war, but if

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 13>we had a prolonged war, it would be a challenge.

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 6>I think there are two problems. One is that we're

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 6>not spending enough, and two is that we're not spending

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 6>wisely enough.

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Amy Zgart is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 6>Or overall defense budget has a yawning gap with the

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 6>capabilities that this nation needs to advance national interests. At

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 6>the same time, we need to be spending money on

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 6>low cost, high tech, affordable unmanned systems and other capabilities.

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 6>There's been a lot of discussion about doing that in

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 6>the Pentagon, a lot of discussion about doing that in Congress,

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 6>but those kinds of systems are still rounding dust in

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 6>the Pentagon budget compared to where we need to be.

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 6>This is the most dangerous and the most complicated threat

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 6>landscape the United States has faced since nineteen forty five.

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 6>We have great power competition with China and Russia, then

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 6>there's Iran and North Korea, and we also have non

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 6>state actors. Terrorist threat levels are increasing again, and they're

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 6>enabled by new technologies which are spreading rapidly. It's a

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 6>very demanding landscape. The United States Defense Department is having

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 6>to do more, and our budgets have not kept pace

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 6>with the threat landscape. So as a percentage of GDP,

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 6>the US government is spending half as much today on

0:39:56.400 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 6>defense as we did in the nineteen eighties, one twentieth

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.479
<v Speaker 6>as much on defense as we did in the Korean War.

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 6>So the needs are growing, the funding is declining.

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the Pentagon for the last thirty

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or forty years, you've had this very inefficient bureaucratic system

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that has calcified, and we like to talk about it

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 1>as kind of like a pretzel for decision making, contorting

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it on itself.

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 13>We've done things inside the Defense Department for many years,

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 13>but this revolution that's taking place in digital technology is

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 13>in the private sector, and we don't know how to

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 13>bring that into the government because we want them to

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 13>slow down and fit our model. Well, they're not going

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 13>to do that. Defense acquisition runs at x and the

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 13>private sector is moving at five X. I think the

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 13>greatest challenge going forward is going to be how do

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 13>we bring in the cutting edge technology the private sector

0:40:55.880 --> 0:41:00.919
<v Speaker 13>is developing and incorporate it into our weapons storms And

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 13>we do not have an answer to that question.

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 14>With this new idea of having non traditional defense contractors

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 14>and Silicon Valley companies like Pallanteer and SpaceX that lots

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 14>of people have heard of, it's bringing new ideas in

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 14>new innovation, and it's giving us the best of breed technology.

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Andy Lowry is the CEO of Epirus, a defense tech

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 2>contractor that focuses on drone technology, an essential part of

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 2>fighting the wars of the future. The company is valued

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 2>and an estimated one billion dollars and has raised over

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and fifty million dollars in the private sector.

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 15>ePRESS makes force fields just like you see on science

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 15>fiction movies. We have created the first version of a

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 15>human made force field that can protect things like bases, aircraft, tanks, cars, vehicles, stadiums, refineries, borders.

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 15>All of these things right now are falling prey to

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 15>a infiltration of drones. Not just flying droms. You have

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 15>drones on the water, drones on land, drones in the air,

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:11.879
<v Speaker 15>drones in space. You have cyber powered drones everywhere.

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Enter ePRESS.

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 14>ePRESS, with our force fields can now line up right

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 14>at an edge of a fence and knock everything down

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 14>like there's a wall of energy that anything that comes

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 14>into falls to the ground and is rendered useless.

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Epreus delivered counter drone technology to the Navy as recently

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 2>as March. The goal of their Leonidas system is to

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 2>take down drones.

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:39.399
<v Speaker 14>These force fields will prevent massive attacks. Because we can

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 14>only make dozens of missiles a month as a country,

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 14>they can make tens of thousands of drones per month,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 14>tens thousands of drones per month. That ratio doesn't work

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 14>will never keep up. We'll lose to the attrition, the

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:57.800
<v Speaker 14>war of attrition unless we come up with what force fields.

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 14>If we put force fields up in those drones, doesn't

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 14>matter ten hundred thousand, just rack it up the cash book,

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 14>because every one of those is ten K, fifteen K,

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 14>and you're losing them one again, again and again. So

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.320
<v Speaker 14>we actually flip this whole paradigm over on its head

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 14>and cause them to have to say, now, what are

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 14>we going to do do we still want to fight

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 14>fights with drones and just risk them getting lost to

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 14>these new systems. We've kind of grown a little comfortable,

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 14>i would say, in the way that we've.

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 15>Been fighting this sort of war of deterrence. But now

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 15>enter this new age of consumer electronics, highly distributed, highly networked.

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 15>No one single thing can do that much damage. But

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 15>when you add hundreds and put them in a swarm configuration,

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 15>it's the new way that wars are being fought, and

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 15>it's confounding our defense department, and they need help. They

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:53.359
<v Speaker 15>need solutions not from the traditional primes, but from a

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 15>new age prime, a neo prime that's able to use

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 15>the best of Silicon Valley combined with the best to

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 15>defense in combination to help mitigate and fight and defend

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 15>against this new emerging threat.

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 2>The Silicon Valley's money is also piling into the potential

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 2>of new defense technology. Defense related US startups have raised

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 2>more than ten billion dollars in venture capital since the

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:18.800
<v Speaker 2>start of twenty fourteen.

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Warfare has changed in the last couple of years. It's

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>an inflection point that humans have been fighting very similarly

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 1>since probably the dawn of mankind. You didn't have things

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like autonomous vehicles, you didn't have things like generative AI,

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have drone swarms that could be using such

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>cheap equipment. Russia, we think, has manufactured one million drones

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in the last twelve months. That just fundamentally alters how

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to think about these things. And so what

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we've tried to do is start to include our partners

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>much earlier in the process. We are hopeful that our

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Army Transformation initiative will be a renaissance for the defense

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>industrial based small and medium businesses. We want to get

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>their products in the hands of soldiers as quickly as

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we possibly can. The larger primes that have been around

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 1>for a while, they have served at function. They will

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>likely some of them at least will continue to serve

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>a function for the United States Army, but we can

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>no longer allow them to take five or ten years

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 1>where we just pay for the innovation that we as

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a nation need. And so specifically what we were doing is,

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>as an example, we were out on the West Coast

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>with a company that does the autonomous software for a

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of vehicles in the United States, and we asked them,

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have you done this with any military vehicles, and they said, no,

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. The process is miserable. It takes two years,

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to come up, go through all these requirements.

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We just can't do it as a company. And so

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we just turned to our team and said, hey, get

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>them a Humby and get them an infantry squad vehicle.

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>In the next week we got it to them. They said,

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you want us to do? We said, just

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>ten days, take it. Do whatever you can possibly do

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to transform our vehicles. They sent us a video ten

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>days later they had made our vehicles fully autonomous. Seven

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks later, our soldiers are actually testing that equipment and

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to fly in those software developers to come

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>see the outcomes. And so these are the types of

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>things that we have to be doing as an army.

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>This exists in venture backed businesses. This is how they

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:06.839
<v Speaker 1>do it every single day, and we as an army

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>just have to get better at it.

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Other people have tried to reform the Pentagon. There are

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of constituents up on Capitol Hill, in the

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 2>contractors that you work with, even within the Pentagon itself.

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 2>What has been the reaction of those people who have

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 2>vested interest in keeping it the way it was?

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I think change is hard. I think many of them

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that this is necessary. A lot of their sons

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and daughters and grandsons and granddaughters serve. The Army has

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.720
<v Speaker 1>its two hundred and fiftieth anniversary this year. We're actually

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.479
<v Speaker 1>older than the United States of America itself. And what's

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>incredibly powerful about that is we touch most Americans in

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>some way, whether it's a coach or a neighbor or

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a parent, and so I think deep down they know

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that these are the right changes. I think deep down

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they know that President Trump is Secretary Heagseth are going

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to allow us to make these very difficult changes. And

0:46:57.040 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>so my perception of most of the conversations has been

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and once they've appreciated that we are not backing down,

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>we are conceding no ground. We are taking zero parochial

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>interests into account. We have set that stage with everyone Republican,

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat. We are doing the right thing for soldiers

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in the American taxpayer, and that is it. I think

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>once they can process that and appreciate this is that

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the actual time work change is happening. We then transition

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to a mode of what can their business do to

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 1>thrive and survive in this new model? And we are

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>going to keep testing and learning from our soldiers and

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>closing the innovation loop and executing on the things that

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:32.840
<v Speaker 1>are necessary.

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Don't that does it for us here at Wall Street Week,

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm David Weston. See you next week for more stories

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 2>of capitalism.