WEBVTT - Amazon's Big Spending Plans and Bitcoin's Rebound 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and ever low in sentrances, go.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Amazon shares drop after

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>announcing plans to spend two hundred billion dollars this year

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 2>on data centers, chips and other equipment.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Mean while Bitcoin rebounds, having plummeted on Thursday when it

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 3>neared the sixty thousand.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Dollars level, and we break down more tech earnings of

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>the CEOs of Roadblocks, a firm, and the Warner Music Group.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 3>First, we check in on what is a tentative bounce

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 3>back after what has been a punishing week. Remember the

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Nasdaq is on track for its worst week ed in

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>three months since the beginning of November. But now we

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 3>see a little bit of a reprieve, a little bit

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of dip by We're up percentage point if you're looking

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 3>at the big indexes, and.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 4>I know you're going to drill into the individual movers

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 4>that push and pull.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>But Crypto up almost nine percent, but only about eradicating

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 3>half of yesterday's losses. We're still only at sixty eight

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 3>thousand what are remarkable beginning to the year for this

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 3>asset class that in many ways people feel is not

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:20.279
<v Speaker 3>a store of value.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 4>But what are you looking at?

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 2>The analyst are calling it sticker shock. Amazon pledging to

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>spend two hundred billion dollars capital expenditures on AI infrastructure.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 2>The stock down more than eight percent right now, on

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 2>track for its biggest drop since April of last year.

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Operating income in the current period twenty one billion dollars

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 2>at the high end below consensus. So the concern is

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>is the trade off worfit here? There is a big

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 2>backlog for AWS and AI business. By the way, it's

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 2>one of the few names on the NAZAQ one hundred

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>that's down because in reaction to that capital expenditures pledge,

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you see everyone from the GPU providers and videos now

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 2>up more than six percent in response. Memory names, infrastructure names,

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>energy names all higher because the capital expenditures for all

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 2>of the hyperscalers in aggregate plus meta is growing. We're

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 2>going to get to that with ananilyst just a few

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 2>minutes time, and the water cryptocurrencies traders are buying the

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 2>dip carry outlined it. Bitcoin's rebounding after plummeting on Thursday,

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>raising all the gains since Donald Trump's twenty twenty four election,

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 2>falling close to sixty thousand US dollars, popping back up again.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Blueberg Distal financial reporter Emily Nicole joins us with the

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 2>latest difficult Emily, what's going on?

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 5>And your guests as good as mine. To be honest,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 5>We've been watching bitcoin over the last twenty four hours

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 5>and it's really been a roller coaster. As you said,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 5>it dipped about thirteen percent yesterday. Now I think we're

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 5>up about ten percent, so we're recovering some of that,

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 5>but it's really just been a roller coaster week. It's

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 5>been hard to kind of guess at why that's been happening.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 5>There's been a lot of instability over the last few

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 5>months with geopolitical tensions, and bitcoins really struggled to perhatch

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 5>onto any narrative within that, whether or not it's a

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 5>safe haven, a saw of value if it can latch

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 5>onto stocks as it used to trade pretty in line

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 5>with tech stocks back in the day. None of that

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 5>seems to be sticking, and it's just kind of doing

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 5>its own thing right now.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Fud some would call it in the market.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Fear, uncertainty, doubt just consumed the asset class as a whole,

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>and it's consumed companies that have written so high on

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 3>the back of the climb in crypto. I think of

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Strategy in some of these other digital asset treasury companies.

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 3>That's how have you seen, particularly on the back of

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Michael Sailor's earnings yesterday, have you seen people still questioning

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 3>how long they can ride this?

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 6>Boy?

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 5>If we look at Strategy, for example, that has also

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 5>had a similarly up down two days, So yesterday it

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 5>was down about seventeen percent of the close before the earnings,

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 5>Investors were really bracing for some bad news coming from that,

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 5>particularly with bitcoin having such a bad day, and then

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 5>today we're seeing it up more than sixteen percent. Because

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 5>of that kind of whipsawing effect, the earnings weren't as

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 5>bad as people expected. Losses were in line with what

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 5>we thought was happening. No new debt was being created,

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 5>and so people trying to stretch for you know, where

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 5>can we see some some like staying power within this rally?

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 5>Where is there a bottom? Where is their stability? And

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 5>that might be where we're now starting to see a

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 5>sort of bottom. Maybe that sixty thousand mark was it,

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 5>and for strategy as well, maybe it's kind of starting

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 5>to see a way out of that.

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting, even with the headlines coming from China as

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 3>they tighten curbs on crypto and stable coin issuance, still

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 3>managing to catch some buying of the dick today.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Emily Nicole, what a busy week. Thanks for joining us.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's talk Waymo now using DeepMind's Genie three AI

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 3>model to create realistic worlds for a new Waymo world models,

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>according to the company.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 4>In a blog post today, the self.

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Driving tech developer argues this collaboration with another segment of

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Google's tech ecosystem is going to help the expansion of

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Waymos's self driving services across many more markets.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Ed, let's get back to Amazon, big mover, big stories

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 2>stock lower is. The company announced it's set to spend

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 2>two hundred billion dollars this year data centers, chips and equipment,

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 2>supercharging its bets on AI roll. Hit Ko carne Is

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Managing directors see the analyst for Internet and Capital markets

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>research at Rough Capital Partners. They call it sticker shock right.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>The reaction to the big capital expenditures number, But there

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 2>was a time where a big capital expenditures number was

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 2>what you wanted to see. Why the negative reaction, I.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 7>Think the negative reaction is just because outside of the

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 7>caps people expected spotless earnings. I thinks Sticker Shop was

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 7>expected given what Google, Meta Microsoft did last ten days.

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 7>But what was not expected was slight yellow flags and

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 7>operating margins, and certainly people realizing that Amazon has to

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 7>spend a lot more given they are launching satellites to space, right,

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 7>they are building new whole foods and so on and

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 7>so forth.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>You have a buy on Core, on the stock, and

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I believe let me just check here on my Bloomberg terminal. Yeah,

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and eighty five dollars price target. Right. There

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>are lots of pieces of data in there. Some people

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>looked at the operating income forecast for the current period

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 2>and thought that's a little worrying, bearing in mind AWS

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>is the majority of operating income. Some looked at the backlog.

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Some looked at the AWS growth twenty four percent, fastest

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 2>pace of growth in almost three years. Where would you

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>look all of the above.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 7>There are many positives in the report and in the outlook,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:38.679
<v Speaker 7>and the various moving parts in Amazon accident aws, improving

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 7>retail margins, better advertising growth as well as better efficiency

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 7>in the retail. Overall, I think what is spooking the

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 7>market here is there are more investments beyond AI that

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 7>this company is doing, unlike many other peers that are

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 7>just doubling down on simple, simply one thing. So the

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 7>wordy hear is next two to three years. How high

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 7>of an investment curve are we looking at for Amazon

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 7>and what level of ROI do they get beyond the

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 7>core AI investments. I think that's the worry here. But

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 7>all in we think this is a GENEAI winner, very

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 7>underappreciated and over time time retell.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 3>What's diggins why it's a GENAI winner? Is it trainium, graviton?

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Just seeing the triple digit percentage growth, the fact that

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 3>they've got that vertical integration, making their own chips, using

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 3>that for the compute that they offer in the efficiency

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>theres it gains. Then is it more that their own models,

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Like we don't talk much about the own models that

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 3>they're producing. We talk so much about Google's, for example,

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 3>but not so much Amazons.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 7>I know, I think Amazon is with all of the

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 7>ambo okay, they are vertically integrating in a way that

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 7>absolutely know the company on Earth is trying to replicate

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 7>at the scale at which Amazon is trying to do,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 7>Vertically integrating cloud, vertically integrating retail, and having the diversity

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 7>of advertising. So I feel when all three pillars of

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 7>Amazon start to crank up higher operating margins, which we

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 7>will we will see over the next college six to

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 7>nine months, that's when the real potential of profitability of

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 7>this company will will manifest in the numbers. And that's

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 7>when That's why I believe the surface area of investments

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 7>as well as surface area of ROI on those investments

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 7>is so much wider at Amazon that is being underappreciated,

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 7>and that's that's where we feel this is a Jenny

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 7>I winner across the board.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.359
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting we have such short term memory loss sometimes

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 3>this was always a company that focused more on investing

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 3>in itself rather than producing profitability.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 4>But push us forward.

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 3>As to how Annie Jasse continues to manage the cost basis,

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 3>because that was the headline that stole the show previous

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 3>to earning season was the amount of job cuts they're making.

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Is that still what you need to be seeing from

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Mandy Jesse.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 7>I think there is room probably the company needs to

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 7>make after the over hiring of almost two and a

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 7>half years after the COVID, I think there is still

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 7>digesi period, but which probably one would argue that has

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 7>been a little bit more prolonged than what would have

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 7>one would have preferred to see. So I think they're

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 7>finally getting there, and I think a little bit of

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 7>extra cost cuts would be much more appreciated to make

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 7>room for more CAPEX.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>CAPEX across the Hyperscals plus Meta is now at six

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty billion dollars for the year for Microsoft.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>That's based on consensus. The difference with Amazon is that

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 2>they might tip into negative free cash flow. We have

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 2>thirty seconds. How worried are you about that?

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 7>Not worried at all. This company has gone through negative

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 7>free cash flow cycles in the past and delivered ROI

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 7>unlike many other become and easier for the first time

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 7>going through this cycle. If you look at fifteen years,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 7>Amazon has delivered r I C probably in a besting

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 7>class manner.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>O Kakarni of Growth Capital Partners, thank you very much,

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 3>indeed for joining us today and coming up with all

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 3>more earning.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 4>We're speaking of the Roadblocks CEO Dave Bazuki. As a

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 4>company season one hundred.

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 3>And forty four million daily active users. You don't even

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>want to hear how many hours people are spending on

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 3>this platform.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 4>We'll break it down. This is Blue meg Tech.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Chackap Chairs of Roadblocks company on fire up ten percent

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 3>after they reported fourth quarter users and bookings at topped expectations.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Daily active users.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Jumped sixty nine percent to one hundred and forty four million.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 3>It beat alas forecasts and pleased to say we're now

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 3>joined on the results by Dave Bazuki, CEO of Roadblocks.

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 3>Your engagement levels was jumping to a similar degree. I

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 3>think it was like sixty eight per What is is

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 3>this the games that are driving this day?

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 8>It's really the games, the platform and the creator. You know,

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 8>we are on a mission to get ten percent of

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 8>all global gaming content running on Roadblocks, and we're well

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 8>on our way. We had a banner year, as you

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 8>mentioned in twenty twenty five, we had fifty five percent

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 8>year on year bookings growth. And in addition, as we

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 8>started rolling out what we call the gold standard for safety,

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 8>we're age checking our users and we now have accurate

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 8>you know data on the eighteen and up segment, which

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 8>is growing at over fifty percent year on year. In addition,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 8>around the world, countries like Japan are growing one hundred

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 8>and sixty percent year on year. Really, people are creating

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 8>new genres and types of games, whether it was dressed

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 8>to Impress a year ago or grow a garden. So

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 8>we're powered by both platform and an amazing creator community.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you call Bruno Mars singing live on brain rot,

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean tolve million people all using and.

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Coming to watch that at the same time. The records

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 4>are interesting.

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Given as you say, these safety measures have been put

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>in place, how has that impacted? Has that created any

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>friction or indeed, it seems as though you're leaning into

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity of these safety measures.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 8>I think leaning in is a good way to mention it.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 8>I believe the last time we chatted we mentioned our

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 8>vision for the gold standard for safety. In addition to

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 8>filtering and monitoring all chat for critical harms and not

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 8>allowing image or video sharing, we have now are full

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 8>into our roleout of age estimation, which is understanding the

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 8>age of everyone on our platform and using that to

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 8>allow people to communicate with people of similar age. We

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 8>gave our teams an ambitious goal to have no friction

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 8>for this, and when you lean into something like this,

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 8>a lot of innovations pop up. On the side, our

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 8>matchmaking has gotten better. We continue to refine the way

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 8>we filter text and make trusted connections, so we're optimistic

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 8>we're going to go through this and ultimately come out

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 8>with minimal friction from this.

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Dave. I fired up my new gaming PC last night,

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Asa Nitro V fifteen, Intel I five and Video g

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 2>fours ID X forty fifty and I thought to myself,

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 2>what am I going to play? And for you guys

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>and everyone else, it's about pipeline, right. You rely on

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 2>these third parties to keep the pipeline going, but you

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 2>also have like the you know, the ambition on these

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 2>higher fidelity games. How do you guarantee the pipeline and

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>how are you going to manage the pipeline going forward?

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 2>So I have some more things to play.

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 8>The pipeline on Roadblocks is very, very healthy. We watched

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 8>the distribution, the variety, the diversity of the experiences that

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 8>our creators are growing, and over the last year we've

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 8>made amazing really advances, not just our technology platform, but

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.599
<v Speaker 8>in search and discovery, so that the pipeline is robust.

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 8>Right now, we have a unique vision with our platform,

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 8>especially for eighteen and up expansion, that when a creator

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 8>makes an experience on roadblocks, it works at good performance

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 8>on a low end to gigabyte Android phone, for example,

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 8>but also can scale up and look beautiful on your

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 8>brand new gaming PC. This is a unique technology. It

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 8>requires a vertical stack going from cloud to game engine,

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 8>to discovery to the apps on everyone's desktop. It's why

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 8>we're optimistic that that fifty percent growth in eighteen and

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 8>up can get more and more of that part of

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 8>the global gaming market. I'll highlight in the US our

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 8>ambitions are more than ten percent, and in the US

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 8>a big majority of that fifty billion approximate gaming market

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 8>is eighteen and up. So what we see really good

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 8>trajectory in that direction.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Dave Advertising, we check with you regularly on it, and

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 2>you're consistent that it's not yet a meaningful contributor. Right

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>when will it be? Will it be? Or do investors

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>now start to change how they factor in ads?

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>For you?

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Going forward?

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 8>I want to highlight the big picture, you know, in

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty five, I believe we gave guidance in the

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 8>load twenties and we ended up with fifty five percent

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 8>bookings growth. So I want to highlight the big picture

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 8>is we continue to exceed guidance and expectation on how

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 8>we grow. We're seeing great progress both on rewarded video

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 8>advertising and also developer sponsor tile advertising, which is creators

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 8>on roadblocks who are monetizing really well accelerating their own

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 8>growth by purchasing advertising. We do believe it'll be a

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 8>big segment. It will ultimately as we roll out Roadblocks moments,

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 8>which is I'm really used for discovery of video capture

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 8>of roadblocks, that'll be a part of it. So we're

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 8>continuously bullish, but not ready to really split it out yet.

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Dave, briefly, how going to show you on the AI

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 3>platform and indeed the model that you have We've got

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Cube foundation model that you've just unfailed, but Google's also

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 3>got Project Genie. How are you seeing that changing the

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 3>development of games and how do you stick to your

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 3>sort of more blocky esthetic that people love.

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 9>Well.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 8>What we believe we will see over time as we

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 8>advance AI, our avatar system and our technology platform a

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 8>much bigger diversity of the types of experiences you see

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 8>on the platform. We've shared our notion of novel games,

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 8>which is games you'd never expected to see on Roadblocks

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 8>and genres like RPG or in sports, and really with AI,

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 8>we see that as an acceleration technology for both creation

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 8>for the way games look. We shared some video on

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 8>X this week around three D in the cloud up

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 8>sampling and also how models will be used for driving creation.

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 8>I'll highlight one key thing about Roadblocks. We are a

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 8>connection and a communication platform. We're a multiplayer platform where

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, in sci fi terms, we're building the hollow

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 8>deck where people go together. Some of the technologies out

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 8>there that we're building as well, like world models, are

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 8>currently video single player technologies. We think the big long

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 8>term opportunity for us is synchronizing thousands of players in

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 8>the cloud, which is much different technology and stuff were

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 8>you know is actively part of how we build Roadblocks.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Dave Bazuki of Roadblocks, thank you very much. Coming up

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 2>on boom bag Tech, Affirm CEO Max Lefchin joins us

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about his company's results. Stick Around It's next Spinbag Tech.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Shares of Affirm down about six percent. The buy Now

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>pay later. Company reported results that beat analyst estimates, though

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>some on the street say that the outlook part is

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 2>a little bit conservative. Fortunately, we can talk through it

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>with a firm CEO, Max left Chin. Actually, there's been

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot this morning about the outlook the financial Strong

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 2>couarter gone. I actually just want to talk about what

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you're doing, and I'd like to start, if I may,

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>with the affirm card, how's that coming along? And Max

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 2>with you? If if I may, what's the end game

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>with the affirm card?

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, there is no endgame for there's so much

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 10>to do. I have a hard time saying we'll be

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 10>done when this feature. Ships are from card rocketed once again.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 10>For a long time, I think it looked like a

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 10>gently super linear growth curve, and in our latest letter,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 10>we finally showed.

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 2>That it's that's kind of what I mean, you know,

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the trajectory's changed.

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 10>It's you know, we didn't do anything very specific to

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 10>make it go obviously exponential, but it is accelerating. And

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 10>it's just the great work of our product teams that

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 10>have been putting in new features, integrating all of our

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 10>zero percent deals into the card. The card grew, you know,

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 10>something like four times the rest of the business, or

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 10>you know, it's just a rocket ship that we built

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 10>a few years ago and it just keeps going. The

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 10>endgame is to get you to put away your credit

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 10>card forever and use a deviit card powered by a firm.

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 2>The other growth part of the story, because it is

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 2>a growth story, and whatever you feel about the end

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 2>list saying you're being conservative. Is international expansion a bit

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>so in my home country, in Caroline's home country, the UK,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 2>it's a really interesting case study. How is that going?

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 2>But then what comes next after that?

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 10>Well, we just announced some exciting brands. We're live with Shopify,

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 10>our great partner in the US. Now in the UK

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 10>it's a real business now. So for a couple of quarters,

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 10>we said, look, we're we've crossed upon We're in London,

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 10>we're hiring where we're building. It's now a business, it's

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 10>making real revenue, it's generating some very significant sales lifts

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 10>for emerging partners. We have a whole slew of new

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 10>partnerships to go live with soon, so feeling great about

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 10>it and eyeing continental Europe next of course, and so

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 10>we're definitely not going to be a North American phenomenon only,

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 10>but we're still very, very committed and very focused on

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 10>our North American stronghold.

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 3>So as Ted Securities is truest is Bloomberg Intelligence Analysis right,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 3>that you do guide conservatively and you just feel that

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 3>that's the right thing to do in this consumer context.

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 10>I think the guide is the guide, As our CFO

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 10>always reminds me to say, you know, I encourage folks

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 10>that hold our stock or eyeing our stock to see

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 10>how we've done in the past. Quarter after quarter. We

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 10>make promises and we deliver on them. So we take

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 10>our guidance very seriously. We intend to always do well

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 10>relative to what we said will do and better and

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 10>that's what it is. I mean, ultimately, the results speak

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 10>for themselves, and we are in it for a very

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 10>long term. So at some point people will figure out

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 10>exactly just how much more growth there is in this business.

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Credit quality holding up clearly, and that's the litmus test

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 3>in many ways to success within delinquencies.

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 4>Are they on the rise? How are you seeing a

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 4>consumer right now?

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Max?

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 10>You know, we have underwritten tens of millions of American

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 10>households in the order of seventy million twenty six million

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 10>actives just last twelve months alone, we reported we see

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 10>a pretty big swath of America. Our consumer is healthy.

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 10>They are paying us back their shopping. They had a

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 10>great holiday season. A lot of outside observers underestimated our

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 10>growth over the holidays. We proved them wrong yesterday. Once again,

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 10>American consumer as we see her, is doing just fine.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Max, I think this is the first opportunity we've had

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 2>to speak since the President's initiative to cap credit card

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>interest rates. You know, we start this conversation by you saying, well,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 2>we want people's their credit card away. That you obviously

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 2>have some some bias in that narrative, but just your

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 2>viewpoint on it, please, and what's happened in the weeks

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 2>that followed. We just have thirty seconds. Sorry.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 10>I think the most important thing in this conversation about

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 10>affordability is transparency. Like raide caps are a conversation for

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 10>the legislators, but the most important thing is people understand

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 10>what they're getting into. The reason affirm has been successful

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 10>is because of upfront pricing. If you know what you'll pay,

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 10>you'll be just fine.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Max slash Joan always great to have your transparency on

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the show.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 4>See you over firm. Thank you. Coming up, we.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 3>Dive on this week's market moves, the lay shoe of

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Alliance Bernstein.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 4>That's next. This has been bad tech.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. We're looking at the NASAK

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred right. It's kind of the go to index.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 2>It has the mag seven, the kind of broadest and

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 2>diversified list to tech companies. And on the week, we're

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 2>headed for our biggest weekly drop since November. Carol pointed

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>that out earlier, actually a percentage point more, and then

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 2>as that one hundred beyond track for its biggest weekly

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 2>drop since April. In the moment, we're actually a little

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 2>bit higher in the session, and that's the reaction of

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the supply chain to Amazon and Amazon's projection of spending

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>two hundred billion dollars capital expenditures in twenty twenty six.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Of course, the big beneficiary when you're spending hundreds of

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars on AI infrastructure and data center is

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 2>in video, and that is one of the best performers

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>right now in this session. If we move super fast,

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 2>we might be able to change the chart and show

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 2>you what that looks like. Boom and Video up seven percent,

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Amazon down eight percent, actually way way more widespread than

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>that across memory chip equipment makers, Nuclear names, the whole lot, charrac.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Names, bloom its numbers extraordinary. Let's dissect this a bit

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.719
<v Speaker 3>more ed because you've just been talking us through the

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 3>sheer scale of the Hyperscaler's plans. If you add in matter,

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 3>it's six hundred and fifty billion dollars. It really underscores

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 3>just how quickly the AI race is accelerating.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk more on what this wave of investment means

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 4>for markets.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 3>For disruption across industries, the actual use of the models

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 3>that this compute brings. Hey, shoot is with us Ann Spensteen,

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 3>CIO of Thematic Innovation Equities.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 4>You own the whole array.

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 3>You own the hyperscalers plus the infrastructure layer.

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 4>What from this week did you think?

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Do you agree that six hundred and fifty billion is

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 3>what we should be seeing from these sorts of names.

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 9>I think what we're seeing, and we've been saying this

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 9>is this is the third year into if you think

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 9>about from the start of CHRAGYBTM where we are today,

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 9>this is a third year into the build, and I

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 9>would say this is the year that we should start

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 9>to see adoptions, and in fact, I think that's what's

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 9>causing a lot of disruption in the marketplace.

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing rapid.

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 9>Model drafts and largers and new model, new versions of it,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 9>and the speed of that is accelerating, and that is

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 9>something that we should be expecting to see at this point.

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 9>But what's also interesting is that what it also means,

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 9>and we said this, this is an interesting time the

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 9>large cap themselves. They're spending a lot of money because

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 9>it's as defensive as it is offensive. Right, it's for growth,

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 9>but it's also to defend your competitive mode. AI has

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 9>the ability to disrupt many models, and this time it's

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 9>interesting is AI has holds the potential to disrupt tech.

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 9>How we think about the way that the infrastructure layer

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 9>is and how we think about enterprise software, how the

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 9>traditional business model with high competitive mode, how that could

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 9>be changing going forward. And that's exactly what we're seeing.

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 9>So it's kind of hard for us to judge. Is

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 9>six hundred and fifty the right number or is it

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 9>a different number?

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Can I jump in and ask where do you

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 2>look for the evidence? Then? So, for example, Amazon talked

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 2>up its backlog, which is very different from our pa

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>right in the world of software because it's not invoiced.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 2>They talked about, you know, the operating income. A backlog

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 2>would suggest, oh my goodness, they've got hundreds of billions

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 2>of dollars of revenues waiting in the wings from their

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 2>AI offering. The market doesn't seem to believe that. Do

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 2>you believe that metric?

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 9>I think it's less about whether or not that is

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 9>indeed just that one metric that we focus on.

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 4>But rather, if you think about all.

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 9>These this is basically a rebuild of the digital infrastructural layer.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 9>And that's why I said, what is six hundred and

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 9>fifty billion? Is that precisely the right number we should

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 9>be anchoring on, but just the fact that how it

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 9>could unlock the future of workload and when we think

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 9>about it, it's not just the hyper skelets per se,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 9>but also what does it mean for the rest of

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 9>the economy. What could it unlock in terms of the

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 9>potential in productivity And you're actually seeing the early evidence

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 9>of that. You can see in the traditional retail industry.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 9>What does the future hold for shopping and what does

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 9>agent mean for future of shopping? Or if you think

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 9>about the traditional manufacturing industry. We are in fact seeing

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 9>real productivity gain from using AI, and that's only the beginning.

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 9>And time and time again, I think if we look

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 9>at look back in history, when you have such disruptive

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 9>technology changes, what happens in a near term the way

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 9>that we do things gets disrupted, But then new business

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 9>model productivity gain actually do emerge. And that is the

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 9>power of innovation. It requires little imagination. So if you

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 9>look at this point in time, yes, it's a huge

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 9>number that we're spending, but you probably could look back

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 9>and back then when electricity was first invented, that probably

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 9>was a tremendous amount of money to be spent on

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 9>the grid.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 3>What if this is the future of the grid, Well,

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about that for the innovation that we're seeing

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 3>at the moment.

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 4>And I just want to bring to our viewers.

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Of course, the latest that happened about midday yesterday Whenanthropic

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 3>released a new version of its AI model, claud Opens

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 3>four point six. It's designed, we know, to carry out

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 3>financial research other work related functions. The company says it

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 3>can scrutinize company data, regulatory filings, market information to come

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>up with really detailed financial analysis that would normally take

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 3>a person days to complete. This is after the market

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.479
<v Speaker 3>kind of fell out of bed following their legal plug

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 3>in to Cowork. So how are you seeing these models

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 3>becoming an entry point into software? What did you think

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 3>about just the gargantuan selloff across data services and software names.

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's in the time of such disruption, it's

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 9>very it's too early to call what's cheap?

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Who is going to be the future.

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 9>Winner because this is only the beginning, And ultimately it

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 9>comes back to what is the real long term competitive mode?

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 9>And that's what the question really is at this point,

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 9>because you know, it's if you talk to the private companies,

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 9>you probably are seeing some of the private companies this

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 9>is the fastest way for a company to get to

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.479
<v Speaker 9>one hundred million doll revenue. But my question would be,

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 9>what is the real way to look at it? Who

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 9>can hold on to that one hundred million dollar revenue

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 9>for a long period yees? And what we are seeing

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 9>right now, what's interesting is it's not in the near

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 9>term numbers that's going down. But the question that we're asking,

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 9>and I think all the mesters are asking, is well,

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 9>it brings in the probability of what is the terminal

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 9>revenue we should be paying, what's the terminal multiple we

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 9>should be paying for the revenue because the probability of

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 9>holding on to that revenue and the profit is probably

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 9>changing really fast, and that's why we're seeing the terminal multiple.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 9>Actually it is coming down pretty fast, and that's the

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 9>disruption that we're seeing in the market today.

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 4>But with disruption and chaos, there's.

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 9>Always opportunities because on the other side of it is

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 9>while we are really concerned about I feel like six

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 9>months ago everyone is concerned about the ROI, and now

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing models being dropped, and then in the meantime

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 9>there's a massive seale off in the market. So I

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 9>would say think there's also an opportunity as well, because

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 9>now we're probably a little more comfortable with the ROI.

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 9>And then the six hundred and fifty billion dollar question

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 9>for everybody is we're building a road to nowhere, And

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 9>I would say, well, maybe there's hope that we're building

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 9>a road to somewhere. So it actually creates huge opportunities

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 9>if you have long term horizon, and because there's dislocation

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 9>in the market.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Lay two of Alliance Bernstein, deeply pensive on what's happening

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>in the markets long term and short term. Thank you

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 2>so much. Like coming up, we're joined by Warner Music

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Group CEO Robert Kinsel to break down the company's earnings

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 2>that conversation. Next, don't miss it. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 4>He the upbeat music.

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 3>After record quarterly revenue in fiscal fourth quarter, Warner Music

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Group rose another ten percent in its first quarter thanks

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 3>to increases in digital in artist services and expanding rights

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 3>and licensing revenue and leaning into AI. The shares are

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 3>up five percent on the day, as you can see.

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk it through with the CEO, Robert Kensal.

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much.

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Indeed for joining us today. Robert, and you talk about

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the creative wins here. So is it the fourth factors

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 3>of Alex Warren, of Cardi b of ed sharing that

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 3>drive these sorts of revenues or where else are you

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 3>managing to pull the leavers?

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 11>First of all, thank you for having me. It's really

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 11>great to be here to talk about the success that

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 11>we're seeing with our strategy working. You're leading them with

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 11>the right way, which is artist development. Is that the

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 11>core of what we do and finding artists like the

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 11>ones you mentioned is how we succeed. But it is

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 11>not just that Our market share growth has been broad

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 11>based across regents, across business units. So both our catalog

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 11>division as well as our frontline divisions North America, America

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 11>Europe have been growing and gaining share, and that is

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 11>what underpinned our consistent results over the past three quarters

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 11>of driving sustained, sustained growth and toleration while we're cutting.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Costs, cutting costs.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 3>How much you were able to cut cost with AI,

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 3>because Robert, here in lies your background, the fact that

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 3>you've worked always with a focus on digital, the intersection

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 3>of music with technology, and the fact that you have

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 3>led the charge striking deals with Suno, for example, putting

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 3>out blog posts as to why this can be a

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 3>win for the.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 4>Artists you develop.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 3>How much is that actually helping cut costs at this moment.

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So it's good to step back on AI because

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 11>the way we approach it is that it has to

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 11>deliver against our three core priorities. Probably number one is

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 11>growing our share. We just spoke about that and their

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 11>activities that we do within that using AI that help

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 11>us automate our marketing across our entire catalog of over

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 11>a million songs. It is humanly impossible to touch all

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 11>of those songs and promote them. With AI, we can

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 11>do that and we're well underway to delivering on that.

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 11>So it's a major major accomplishment for a large IP

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 11>owners such as Cells two. We have to increase we

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 11>have to increase the value of music, and AI is

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 11>helping us to do that by introducing new pricing tiers

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 11>on existing DSPs digital service providers, but also by having

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 11>new entrants such as Suno and Udio, And that is

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 11>where we focused initially, and we want to make sure

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 11>that now we're not only getting paid from consumption from

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 11>the spotifyes and youtubes of the world, but also from

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 11>creation from the SunOS and audios of the world, and

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 11>those two worlds over time will merge as well. And

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 11>then third is growing our efficiency. And on the efficiency front,

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 11>we're deploying AI across finance, across legal, across HR. These

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 11>are the three departments that we started with obviously, in

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 11>addition to market that I mentioned before, and all of

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 11>that is helping us be more effective handle more copyrights

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 11>and more artists at the same or lower employee base.

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 11>And at the same time grow revenues and profit.

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Robert, we got some early insight into what your strategy

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>is when you joined us at Bloomberg screen Time right

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 2>in October, and you know, my interpretation of your time

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 2>on stage was that this was pretty early. Like Sono

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 2>is a case study now that there were a few

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 2>months on. Are there any examples of work you've deployed,

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 2>either internally or work you've done with Sono and the

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 2>four or five other companies that you've done deals with

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that's new, you know, that's tangibly made an impact in

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the core to gone.

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 11>So actually when I was with you guys, you know,

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 11>at your conference in October, we were actually heads down

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 11>on deals with those companies, so those were not even close,

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 11>so it was super early. I've published principles that we

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 11>as a company uphold to doing these deals, which is

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 11>the partners have to commit to licensed models. They have

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 11>to probably reflect the value of music, which means the

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 11>right commercial terms that we're really happy with. And three

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 11>that artists have to have the right to opt in

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 11>for the use of their name and likeness in uh,

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 11>you know, in derivative works. And we're in the process

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:12.959
<v Speaker 11>of transitioning these partners to licensed models. So the answer

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 11>to your question is not yet, because we're extremely early

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 11>in that. But they're well underway. They're signing more partners

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 11>and they're working on their new models, and as soon

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 11>as they transition to license model, which is our condition

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 11>number one, then we will be able to start cooperating

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 11>much more deeply.

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 2>We just had the Grammys, right, let me just you know,

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 2>we just had the Grammys, and that puts the focus

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:41.280
<v Speaker 2>back on the artists, the songwriters other side of the table.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 2>How have they responded to your strategy and the work

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you want to do with the AI companies.

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 11>It's been it's been fantastic. You know, We as a

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 11>company h take our role of guiding the development of

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 11>AI and music very seriously because we've learned from the past,

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 11>where where the music industry waited for far too long

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 11>during the file sharing era twenty five years ago. So

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 11>we believe in being early, you know, taking the reins

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 11>together with our partners and defining the future of music.

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 11>So it's and there are a lot of artists who

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 11>want to be part of that. They also have learned,

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 11>they studied the past, and they want to be part

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 11>of it. So we are having conversations both with our artists,

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 11>their lawyers, their managers, and there are many artists who

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 11>are reaching out and they just want to be part

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 11>of experimentation with us. So it's been a surprisingly positive response.

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it was a positive day few with the

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Grammys as well as some of your R and B wins.

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 4>For example, I'm.

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Interested about the joint approach briefly that you're doing with

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Bain because it feels as though you think the value

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>of music is going up if you're wanting to be

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 3>buying these back catalogs even more so.

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So we firmly believe that music is undervalued. It's undervalue.

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 11>It's roughly fifty cents of value of a video, and

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 11>it shouldn't be based on its consumption. It's just for

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 11>historical reasons.

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 9>So there's a.

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 11>Tremendous opportunity for value appreciation in the future. And we

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 11>believe that the industry is finally moving from just volume

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 11>based subscover based growth to volume based and price based growth,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 11>and that's really important. We started on the strategy over

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 11>a year ago where we started to retool our partnerships

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 11>with our distribution partners to have certainty around our wholesoli

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 11>rate increases rather than hope and wait and welcome price increases,

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 11>which we always do welcome, but we're really focused on

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 11>creating certainty around rate increases. So in a phase of

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 11>that and with the added step change of value caused

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 11>by AI and additional tiers, companies experience investors like Bain

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 11>see this as something that has potential to really unlock

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 11>a lot of value in the industry, under putting their

0:37:58.280 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 11>money where their mouth is.

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Robert Kinson, CEO of one of Music Group. Great to

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 2>have you back with us on Bloomberg Tech. Really appreciate it.

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Let's turn back to the earning story elsewhere.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Shares have Reddit actually now softer four tens percent, basically flat.

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 2>One point in the session have been up eight percent,

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 2>So we kind of fizzed out a little bit. The

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 2>company projected current quarters sales that did surpassable streets expectations

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 2>thanks to growing ads its advertising business. Get out to

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 2>bloombs Kirt Wagner, what's going on with the Reddit story here?

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I just got an analyst note my inbox saying that Reddit's

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 2>on a roll, but the stock would suggest otherwise.

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, when it started up this morning. That made sense

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 12>to me because, as you pointed out, the projections for

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 12>the current quarter were good, there was a big beat

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 12>in the holiday quarter. It feels like there's a lot

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 12>of momentum for this advertising business. I think they have

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 12>an AI story to tell too. They're obviously not building

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 12>these massive data centers like we're seeing from these hyperscalers.

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 12>They're not, I mean this massive Capex, but they have

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 12>this called Reddit Answers, which is basically an AI search

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 12>engine built into Reddit and years and years and years

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 12>of forums of people discussing things, and they are also

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 12>licensing that data, as you know, to some of these

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 12>AI players, So they have a bit of an AI

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 12>story that isn't quite as capital intensive as a lot

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.919
<v Speaker 12>of these other big tech players coming down.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting, Analys said.

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Many had reiterated that overweight some neutral, but pypasanla counter Fitzgerald.

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:27.399
<v Speaker 3>We're also seeing bed cut their price targets, so maybe

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 3>there's a little bit of a view on how much

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 3>the what's already priced incut. What was really interesting I

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 3>thought was the international growth here and is that so

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 3>much to do with AI and the translation capability?

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 12>Now, yeah, I think they've been working to make sure

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 12>that it's accessible to people who don't just speak English.

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 12>This is a lot of these consumer products, as you

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 12>both know, know as they grow, they have to build

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 12>their product for all of these various markets, and that

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 12>does take time. I think that's part of it. One

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 12>of the things that's interesting in you'll see in some

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 12>of these analysts notes of this debate around logged in

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 12>versus logged out users. If you guys remember Twitter back

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 12>in the this was the big debate, you know, could

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 12>you show ads to someone showing up to Twitter who

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 12>doesn't have an account. I think Reddit's in a better

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 12>position because of the focus of these forums and being

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 12>topic based, and.

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Gus kat Wagner all over social media is always we

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 3>thank you ed what we got.

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, We've got the Boring company going full speed

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 2>on a tunneling project in Nashville, but there could be

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 2>some headwinds along the way. Bloomberg big take coming up.

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Tesler's evaluating multiple sites across the US to.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Manufacture solar cells.

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 3>It's part of Elion Musk's one hundred giga whatsolar ambition.

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Its sort according to sources and the company is considering

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 3>expanding production at its Buffalo, New York factory, with Arizona

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 3>and Idaho also under consideration. That longer term, another scenario

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 3>would involve building a second facility in New York State

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 3>once source set. China currently dominates output of solar cells.

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 3>And on the back of your scoop, you've seen some

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 3>big share price moves.

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and his other companies are busy too. The Boring

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Company is about to embark on its most ambitious tunneling

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 2>project yet, its first full fledge transit corridor underneath Nashville,

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 2>but critics worry the company is winging it. Bloombst Kyle

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Porter is here with the details in this week's Bloomberg

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Big Take. It is the most ambitious project that Boring

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 2>has undertaken, but people are worried. So balance those two things.

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Why is it the most ambitious and what's the concern?

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's the most ambitious on several levels. They are Boring,

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:47.760
<v Speaker 6>that is, are looking to build two tenmile tunnels between

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 6>the airport and downtown Nashville, and they're looking to do

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 6>it through limestone, which is compared to other projects such

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 6>as the Las Vegas one. They're running through sandstone predominately

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 6>at that point, getting through limestone is very tricky and

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 6>you have the risk of things like sinkholes. It's also

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 6>it's a very heavy wet rock, Like actually transporting it

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 6>through out is going to be incredibly difficult.

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 4>That's some of the technical difficulty.

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your big take was so eye catching simply

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 3>because of the headline, must Sporing Tunnel in Nashville has

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 3>mayor hoping? Now one dies just how realistic are they

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.280
<v Speaker 3>worried that that's some sort of opportunity.

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 6>Costing Well, if you read the story, the city have

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 6>largely been cut out of this entire process. Having been

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 6>involved at the start, they felt that it wasn't the

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 6>right time. Depending on who you talk to, and people

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 6>around Boring say they just weren't interested. So they went

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 6>and it's the entire route now has been designed to

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 6>go on state land. So until you get to things

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 6>like fire safety and like really into the construction process

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 6>and looking at things like egress points where you know

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 6>emergency services could get in if there's a problem in

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 6>the tunnel, the city don't have much say. So you know,

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:53.959
<v Speaker 6>the mayor, depending on your point of view, is either

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 6>being alarmist or is just expressing concern on behalf of

0:42:57.160 --> 0:42:58.240
<v Speaker 6>this constituents.

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 2>You've been reporting on Boring Deeply for a little while now,

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.320
<v Speaker 2>and the timing of the big takes are interesting because

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 2>also the company is looking to the golf right. What

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 2>can you tell us about Dubai and their international expansion.

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 6>Dubai is the first successful contract signed for an international expansion.

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 6>They're looking at putting multiple exit points in to that network.

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 6>Our understanding is that they may have already sent a

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 6>test vehicle out there that we've not been able to

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 6>confirm that yet. Again, it's a very aggressive timeline for

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 6>getting these things done. If you look at the Las

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 6>Vegas project, I believe they started tunneling their pre COVID

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 6>that was supposed to be you know, sixty eight miles

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 6>worth of tunnel's doug by. Now I think they've got

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 6>five miles operational. So either they've dramatically improved the machine

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 6>and their processors, or it's not going to go as

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 6>quickly as they're saying.

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 3>In mex Car Porter Deeply research story, we urge people

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 3>to go and read it.

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 2>What Week ed Yeah, you know, it's like the mic

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 2>drop week for capital expenditures undred and eighty five billion Alphabet,

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 2>two hundred billion Amazon, the repercussions next week recap on

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 2>the pod. You know where to find it. It's there

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 2>on the screen. And this is Bloomberg Tech