WEBVTT - New York Tech Sector Prepares for Mayor-Elect Mamdani

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. AMD fails to impress

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>with its latest earnings. Shares volatile amid rising AI valuation

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>concerns from investors, plus a historic victory for Zoram Mamdani,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 2>the new mayor of New York, will discuss what is

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 2>election means for the city's tech scene, and all eyes

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>on Tesla as the company's shareholders are set to vote

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>on a proposed one trillion dollar pay package for Elon Musk.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>There are two names in the markets that we're watching

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>most closely, and that's in the earnings context right now.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>AMD is basically swung between modest declines and modest gains

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>all morning long. It gave an outlook for the current

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>period that was well in line with consensus but did

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>not beat the most bullish estimates. And everyone's trying to

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 2>work out is they're making some ground up in the

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>AI data center context in the near term, or is

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 2>it their legacy businesses processes for pc CPUs for serverts

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 2>doing the business super Micro similar story. The outlook for

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 2>earnings in the current period below consensus traction struggles when

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 2>it comes to have they worked this whole AI thing

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>out on the server side? That stock down seven percent.

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's get those stories with Bloomberg's executive editor for Tech,

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Peter Elstrom, and start with AMD. It's been really hard

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>to pass this one. Right when the stock felon issue,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 2>You're like, Okay, the stock rally over in chips, but

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>actually investors are just playing what AMD is put in front.

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Of them right right, It's been a rough twenty four

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 3>hours for chip stocks. We saw that in Asia, we

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 3>also saw it in Europe. AMD is a bit of

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 3>a different story. The stock has been on such a tier.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 3>It's up about one hundred percent this year's so far.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I think investors were looking for an impressive result from them.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>What they're really looking for is AMD. As you alluded to,

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 3>they still have a hand in the traditional business of

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 3>PCs and servers, and they're moving more aggressively into this

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 3>AI space to compete with in Vidia. Now they're not

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 3>growing as quickly as in Vidia. Video is up growing

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>in the fifty percent range. At this point, AMD has

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 3>been more in the thirty percent range. People really want

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 3>to see whether the AI business, the AI chips that

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 3>AMD is offering, are going to take off and AMD

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 3>is going to be able to accelerate that growth rate.

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>We didn't see that. As you mentioned, they did have

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 3>a pretty solid beat on the revenue side, but it

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 3>was not as high as some people had been expecting. Also,

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>the operating expenses were a little bit higher than expected,

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 3>probably suggesting that more of their business was on the

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 3>old traditional PC business rather than the AI business.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Peter, help us make sense of super Micro. There was

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 2>a time where that was a stock and a name

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>caught up in broad and enthusiasm for AI. But at

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, super Micro assembles servers and

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>server designs for others. What do we learn from their print.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, Well, super Micro has had a few cross currents

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 3>that we have been looking at. They had some accounting

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.839
<v Speaker 3>accounting issues. They announced a couple of revisions to what

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>they were reporting in their financials, and now their outlook

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 3>is coming in a little bit light. Their revenues for

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 3>the current quarter were a little light. Also, their projection

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 3>from the next quarter is a little bit light. I

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 3>think people are concerned that This has been an AI play.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>They have benefited from the fast growth and AI demand

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 3>in the past, but it looks like they're losing some

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 3>of that momentum at this point. That could be because

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>competitors like Dell are picking up more market share. It

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 3>could also be because we're seeing some of these companies

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>do more of this construction, the building the AI chips

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>into servers themselves, and that would take away business from

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 3>super micro.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Max.

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Peter Elstrom with the summary, thank you very much. Let's

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>get some more on AMD, the Wyder chip sector, and

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 2>what's really happening with AI evaluations. Joe Ane Feenie Advisors,

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Capital management partner and portfolio manager joins us. I restart

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>with you how I did with Peter, right that the

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 2>market is confronted with AMD's earnings and trying to work

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>out is this then gaining some territory on Nvidia in

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.799
<v Speaker 2>the accelerator card market or are they getting a boost,

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the court of gone from those legacy business

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 2>lines PC processors, CPU for server. Let's just start there.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>What did you learn from AMD?

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, good morning, ed. We're seeing all of that from AMD,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 5>and let's start with the old, boring part of AMD

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 5>right the PC, the CPUs, the standard server CPUs where

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 5>they're clearly continuing to gain share versus Intel, and that's

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 5>a good cash generator for the company. So we shouldn't

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 5>dismiss that acceleration that we saw there, that success that

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 5>they're continuing to deliver in terms of share gains. Obviously,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 5>a lot of investors are still focused pretty much on

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 5>the AI opportunity, and what's interesting there is that they've

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 5>just gotten started. They've only now developed solutions for those

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 5>accelerators that meet the quality for inference, for example, potentially

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 5>for training that in Vidia has in the past. When

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.119
<v Speaker 5>we've seen AMD leapfrug Intel back in the old days,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 5>they gained an enormous amount of share. We saw that

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 5>again this time around. Now they have a new opportunity

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 5>to gain share in the AI accelerator. We're not seeing

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 5>them gain share except for just a little bit as

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 5>they get started today. But I think that's something we

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 5>can look forward to.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Ian King, who you know, made a really simple

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 2>point yesterday on the program ahead of AMD earnings. The

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>data center category is just north of four billion dollars

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 2>a quarter business. In Vidia's data center category is forty

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars or north of forty billion dollars each quarter

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 2>in aggregate. Do you see all those ships rising right now?

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 2>With the tide that is AI infrastructure investment?

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 5>It still is ed. We're still seeing the pie expand

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 5>or tie rise, or whatever analogy you want. But what

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 5>AMD has that Nvidia doesn't have is an opportunity to

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 5>take a greater share of that pie as it grows.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 5>And so you know, I expect we're going to see

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 5>both companies continue to grow very strongly over time. We

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 5>own both of those for clients. I own both of

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 5>them personally because I think this is an opportunity in

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 5>AI that is just beginning. I think we have many

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 5>years ahead. And what we're seeing also in those results

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 5>from AMD and elsewhere is that enterprises, sovereigns are looking

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 5>to deploy AI and that's what's helping to continue to

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:38.679
<v Speaker 5>grow that pie.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 2>John Phoenix to bear with us New York City mayor

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>elects or A mum Dani is speaking in Queens, New York.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I now hold, the poetry of campaigning may have come

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 4>to a close last night at nine, but the beautiful

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.799
<v Speaker 4>prose of governing has only just begun. The hard work

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 4>of improving New yorkers lives starts now. That process begins

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 4>with transition. In the coming months, I and my team

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 4>will build a city Hall capable of delivering on the

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 4>promises of this campaign. We will form an administration that

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 4>is in equal parts capable and compassionate, driven by integrity,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 4>and willing to work just as hard as the millions

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 4>of New Yorkers who.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Call this city home.

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 4>And central to that effort is a transition team that

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 4>is defined by the excellence New Yorkers will soon come

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 4>to expect from government. Our team will be directed by

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Ilana Leopold, whose roots in this city extend back to

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 4>her grandmother running the trams on Roosevelt Island. She has

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 4>extensive experience in city government and has been a key

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 4>part of our campaign to become the next mayor of

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 4>this city. And it will be led by our formidable

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:58.239
<v Speaker 4>co chairs former Federal Trade Commissioner Chair Lena Khan, former

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 4>First Deputy Mayor Maria Tis Springer, United Way President and

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 4>CEO Grace Bonia, and former Deputy Mayor for Health and

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Human Services Melanie Hartzog. Over the coming days, we'll start

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 4>announcing the leaders who will implement our agenda. People like

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 4>deputy mayors who oversee entire areas of government, and the

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 4>commissioners who carry out the critical work of city agencies.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Some of these people will have familiar names, others will not.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 4>What will unite them will be a commitment to solving

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 4>old problems with new solutions. We will cast a wide net.

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 4>We will speak to the organizers on the front lines

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 4>of the fight to improve our city government, veterans with

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 4>proven track records, policy experts from around the country and

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 4>the world, and working people who know better than anyone

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 4>what their neighborhoods need. Throughout this campaign, I've worked hard

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 4>to be accessible and transparent with New Yorkers. That same

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 4>spirit will animate this transition and the city all we built.

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 4>Because New Yorkers deserve a government that they can trust.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 4>And on January first, when our city celebrates the inauguration

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 4>of a new administration, let us also celebrate a new

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 4>era for our city, one that we all feel invested

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 4>in and whose success we all work to achieve. Now,

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 4>it is my pleasure to invite Ilana Leopold to deliver

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 4>a few words Thank you, thank you.

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Good morning.

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 6>My name is Ilana Leopold and I'm very honored to

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 6>serve as the executive director of Mayor Elect Mom Donnie's

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 6>leadership team. I want to thank Zoron for his faith

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 6>in me both on.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 2>The campaign that was New York City Democratic Mayor Elect

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Zorah Mamdani generation, speaking after his win last night, elected

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the one hundred and eleventh mayor of New York City,

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the youngest mayor elect in a century. Let's get the

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 2>reaction now and some of the technology is respective and

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>avowed democratic socialist in charge of the city that serves

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>as the capital of global finance, increasingly a major technology hub.

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Judy Samuels is the CEO of Tech NYC, a network

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>of tech leaders working to foster New York's tech scenes.

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>She joins us now and will give us the reaction

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Tech NYC. Will this mayor be a good mayor for

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>your industry in New York City?

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 7>Oh listen, I think we don't know. I think what's

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 7>good for New York tends to be good for tech here.

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 7>Zornmamdannie ran on a campaign of making New York affordable

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 7>of He ran in a campaign that really celebrated a

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 7>lot of what people love about New York. People love

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 7>to be out in the streets. So if people want

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 7>to be here, if young people want to be here,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 7>the tech companies will continue to want to be here.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 7>And clearly we heard loud and clear yesterday that a

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 7>lot of young people want Zurmumdannie to be mayor. There

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 7>are a lot of tech workers who voted for him.

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 7>Of course, you know, that's the bull case, right The

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 7>Baar case, of course, is that you're going to have

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 7>someone who is anti business. I hope that's not the case,

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 7>but there's so many unknowns right now.

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Julie, you said that a lot of the technology industry

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 2>turned out and voted for him. Voter turnout was a

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>critical data point overnight. What's your reaction to that data point.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, listen, as a practical matter, I think more people

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 7>voting always better, So we're really glad to see that

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 7>was the case. And in fact, even as early as

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 7>the primary months ago, the data was the data were

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 7>very clear that people who worked in tech were donating

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 7>a lot of money to Zorn Mamdani's campaign. So it's

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 7>not a surprise. You know, we can quickly or easily,

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 7>I should say, draw a line to understand that a

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 7>lot of tech workers, young tech workers did vote for

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 7>him yesterday. Clearly you know so much about Zoron's campaign,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 7>I think resonated with people in the tech industry. It

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 7>had the flavor of a startup. It really disrupted the

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 7>status quo of politics in New York and I think

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 7>that resonated with a lot of people who work in tech.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Julie, there is always a difference, of course, between policy

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 2>platform in the context of a campaign's and then policy

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>platform when in office. But the consensus seems to be

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 2>that mister Mumdani is in favor of sort of pro

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>housing revisions to the city's charter right making housing available

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>and more affordable. Technology as a sector tends to have

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 2>higher pay and perhaps you know, apply to a higher

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 2>to middle income earning bracket. Are they really going to

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>be focused on a policy around affordable housing.

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think that's a really great question. And in fact,

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 7>the organization I run Tech NYC put out research with

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 7>Zillah just maybe a year org that showed that even

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 7>people who have high paying jobs in tech are having

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 7>a hard time affording housing in New York City. So

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 7>it is not when we talk about affordable housing is

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 7>it runs across the entire spectrum. For so many people,

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 7>it's unaffordable, and so I think that more housing is

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 7>better for tech in New York. We've seen the same

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 7>dynamic in San Francisco, of course, that the need to

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 7>build more housing so more people from across the economic

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 7>spectrum can live here, build their careers here, grow their

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 7>family here. I am really incredibly in favor of the

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 7>pro housing initiatives that won yesterday.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Is there an opportunity, Julie, for you to work with

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 2>this mayor and this administration to bring it a sort

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 2>of closer relationship apologies between you and the administration.

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, I think there's a lot of opportunity. I think

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 7>the thing I'm most hopeful about is modernizing government government efficiency.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 7>So our mom, Donnie is what is a very progressive

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 7>candidate now Mayor elect, and progress means government that works better.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 7>So we need to unleash technology in New York City

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 7>government to work better for New Yorkers. But we also

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 7>will need to be really careful and when we work

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 7>with his team, or sometimes when we disagree with his team,

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 7>to ensure that the tech economy continues to thrive here,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 7>that businesses continue to grow here. This is the future

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 7>of the economy in the world. Technology is of course

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 7>and needs to also be the future of the economy

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 7>in New York City. So we have to work together.

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 7>We have no other choice.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 2>What do you disagree with his team on and what

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 2>would you ask mister Mumdani to reconsider in terms of policy.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 7>Oh, that's a really that's a great question. I think

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 7>that I don't know what we disagree with necessarily at

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 7>this point, but I can tell you what we'll be

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 7>watching for again, the use of technology in government. We

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 7>think that's crucial, and I want to make sure that

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 7>his team that the incoming may understand that some of that,

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 7>you know, requires some experimentation and requires being open minded

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 7>about new uses of technology. Also, you know, I think

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 7>there are concerns that I hope don't come to be,

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 7>but there are some concerns that there's kind of like

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 7>an anti business dynamic. We haven't talked about raising taxes.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 7>I haven't brought that up because you can't do that

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:26.119
<v Speaker 7>without the state. You can't do that without Albany. Obviously,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 7>a lot of people in tech would not be excited

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 7>about more income tax, more corporate tax, So that I'm

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 7>sure will be an issue that comes up over the

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 7>next four years.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 2>New York City Mayor elect Zura Mundani, the one hundred

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>and eleventh mayor of New York to be elected, is

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 2>an avowed Democratic socialist, and one of the big stories

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>of this year twenty twenty five has been the move

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of key figures in the technology industry to put themselves

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>in close proximity to President Trump and the administration currently

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 2>in the White House. Are both of those things achievable

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 2>at the same time for mister mum Dannie to have

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 2>relationships of key figures in your industry at the same

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 2>time that they try and be close to this president

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and the Republican Party.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 7>I think I think that's a really good question, and

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 7>I think we're going to see. I'd point out that

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 7>most of the particular tech leaders you're talking about are

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 7>actually not New Yorkers, but they do run companies that

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 7>have incredibly large presences in New York City. I think

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 7>that I hope that, let me say, I hope that

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 7>zoramum Danni and his team fundamentally understand that the future

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 7>of our city's economy, the future of opportunity for New

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 7>Yorkers is inextricably intertwined with the growth of the tech

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 7>sector here. And if those jobs aren't here, they will

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 7>go somewhere else. And if those resources aren't here, they

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 7>will go somewhere else. And I just have to believe,

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 7>I do believe that we can find a way to

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 7>work together to ensure that all New Yorkers have the

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 7>opportunity to benefit from the growth that technology is bringing

0:16:59.360 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 7>to the city.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's end that there then July by asking what is

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the one first ask that you have for Mayor Elect

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Mumdani on behalf of your members and the technology industry

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>in New York City.

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 7>I think the first big ask will be to really

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 7>drill down and figure out how we can find a

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 7>way to use technology to make New York City government

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 7>work better for New Yorkers.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Julie Samuel's CEO of Tech NYC, with immediate reaction to

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Mayor Elect Zora Mumdani speaking for the first time since

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>his win last night. There are other news headlines It's

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>time for talking tech and first st up. The US

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 2>government says it's nearing the end of its investigation into

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Google's thirty two billion dollar acquisition of cybersecurity firm Wiz.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>The deal, announced in March, prompted an in depth probe

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 2>by the Justice Department. While that review is now wrapping up,

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the acquisition remains under scrutiny from other anti trust regulators. Plus,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Google and Epic Games have reached a settlement in their

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 2>long running anti trust dispute over how developers distribute my

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Tize apps on the Android platform. The deal follows Google's

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 2>court ordered play store changes to allow more competition. Exact

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 2>terms of the agreement weren't disclosed, and the scientist who

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 2>led ten cents flagship AI model has raised fifty million

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 2>dollars for his new startup, Video Rebirth, which aims to

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 2>rival OpenAI Sourra. Founded by Leeway, the company seeks to

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 2>make video creation as intuitive as chatting with an AI.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The platforms expected to launch in December. Okay, coming up.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Amazon goes after Perplexity, suing the AI startup from using

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 2>its own AI tool to help shoppers. We've got more

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:56.719
<v Speaker 2>on that next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Amazon is suing

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Perplexity over its AI shopping tool, known as Common, which

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>helps users buy items on Amazon. The retail giant alleges

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Perplexity committed computer fraud and violated its terms of service

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 2>by failing to disclose when Comet was making purchases on

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 2>behalf of real people for more, as Sketz of bloemost

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Matt Day, who leads our coverage of Amazon, this is

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>an interesting move. We've covered Comet and Perplexity on the

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>show We Understand Amazon, just I think start by explaining

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the grievance that Amazon has and the accusation Amazon's making

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 2>against Perplexity and what they're doing.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 8>So Amazon says that you know, what Perplexity is doing

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 8>here is masking who's on its website.

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 8>They've alleged that Perplexity inserted sort of the same code

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 8>that would make Amazon Systems think it was just a

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 8>regular Google Chrome user, when in fact it was not

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 8>a mad agent going on their site. And so Amazon's

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 8>raised a whole host of concerns, you know, saying account

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 8>integrity could be compromised, saying, you know, if someone has

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 8>to make a return, you know who's at fault. What

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 8>goes on here? Basically kind of a turf war over

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 8>the customer experience on their retail side.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we've heard from Perplexity both through a spokesperson, but

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 2>they also put out their own commentary and a blog

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 2>summarize it for us.

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 8>So they are accusing Amazon of bullying.

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 8>They say they don't see a meaningful distinction between a

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 8>user who said, listen, I want to purchase something on Amazon.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 8>I'm going to authorize Perplexity to go, you know, make

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 8>the computer plumbing that makes that work. They say that

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 8>that's no different than someone navigating with a mouse and keyboard.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 8>Obviously Amazon has a different view, but Perplexity seems to

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 8>want to take a stand here and kind of stick

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 8>up for this new potential commerce venue that they're deploying

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 8>with their comment browser.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 2>Right, you cover Amazon so deeply, like, is this the

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>playbook Amazon goes to? Are they typically litigious? Are they

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>looking over their shoulder in a real way?

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 8>I think they really are looking over their shoulder here.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean they've said AI is going to change everything.

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 8>You know, there's debates going on right now about what

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 8>is a browser. So this is probably the first of

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 8>many debates that we're going to have, you know, in

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 8>public and in private, as these companies negotiate on just

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 8>how you know, who owns the experience when agents are

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm going all over the internet rather than individual users

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 8>with hands and eyes really quick.

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 2>What happens next?

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 8>Oh, we'll see if they settle right, And I don't

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 8>think anybody wants to see if they scott a court

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 8>and all this NFTY discovery come out right. So I

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 8>think the obvious question in a case like this is

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 8>can they come to some agreement?

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloombo's Matt Day Ada, Seattle, Thank you very much. Another story.

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 2>It was the breakout hit of the summer. K Pop

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Demon Hunters became Netflix's biggest original film of all time. Now,

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 2>with the chance to build a global franchise, there's just

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 2>one thing missing for the holiday season. The merch. Bluebag's

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 2>entertainment editor Lucas Shaw is here with more I've learned

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 2>through you in attending screen time in the context of movie, TV,

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 2>video games, that merchandising and franchising into other IP or

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 2>from the core IP is so important. Basically, those big

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 2>K pop fans are not going to be able to

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.479
<v Speaker 2>get hold of so C toys and other things this

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 2>holiday season. Explain the story to us.

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, comes back to the movie, which was a surprise hit.

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 10>You know, when you have a new property, you go

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 10>to retailers and toy manufacturers, your Mattel, your Hasbro, Walmart, Target,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 10>and say, hey, we have this movie coming in like

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 10>a year or two. We think it's going to be

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 10>really popular with kids. Do you want to partner on things?

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 10>Will you give a shelf space because they need that.

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 10>The toy manufacturers in particular need time to make the toys,

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 10>which takes a while, and it involves international shipping and

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 10>all of that. And there was not a lot of

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 10>confidence in this project, both because it was an original

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 10>animated movie, which hasn't Those types of movies haven't done

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 10>very well at the box office. Mostly sequels have been

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 10>doing well, and Netflix just doesn't have a track record

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 10>in this regard. And so it was only after this

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 10>movie became so popular that everyone scrambled and they now

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 10>say they're.

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 9>Moving the fastest they've ever moved. But it still means

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 9>that a lot.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 10>Of the projects, a lot of the toys and other

0:22:58.560 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 10>things won't be.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 9>Available until next time.

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 2>We know that the holiday quarter is really important. For example,

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 2>we talk about it in the context of the new

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 2>iPhone being on sale. But I guess in this story

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 2>who's suffering here? Like, is it Netflix that is going

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 2>to have to claw to make up some ground. Where

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 2>is the kind of opportunity lost revenue loss?

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think it's it's shared between the toy companies,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 10>the retailers, and Netflix. But they would all like to believe,

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 10>and they're all saying that it is sort of short

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 10>term pain. That yes, you know, they won't have all

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 10>they can't maximize what they're getting from the holiday season,

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 10>but they will have properties next year, and that this

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 10>is something they're building for the long term, and that

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 10>if the second movie, which won't come for four years,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 10>is really popular, that this will all sort of.

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 2>Be a footnote in history.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 10>Now that's dependent on them making a good second movie

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 10>and building the bridge.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 9>But short term.

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Pain, Lucas really quick, Warner Brothers, Discovery. What's the need

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to know?

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 10>I mean, all everyone's going to want to know about

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 10>is who is buying them? And how you know the

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 10>company is. The cable networks are not doing so hot?

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 10>Is streaming growing? How's HBO max looking? The movie studio

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 10>had a pretty decent summer, but the big question hanging

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 10>over the company is who's going to buy it?

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Binos Lucas Shaw, who leads our coverage of screen Time

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>and Entertainment. Thank you very much. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a look at the markets some of the

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 2>other stories. So we're trying to pass a lot of

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 2>it's still earnings related, and look at this one. Pinterest

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 2>is down more than twenty one percent, on track for

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>its biggest drop since the middle of twenty twenty two,

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's all about an outlook for the holiday quarter

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 2>that is completely tepid. The market is reactioning to this

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 2>with some severity, and how common is that story across

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 2>all of the names that we've been tracking. But when

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 2>the team met this morning planned the show, we were like, whoa,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 2>we need to get this one in. It's as simple

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>as the out look for the holiday period, and we'll

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 2>give you more when we get it. Okay. Other news

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 2>that we're tracking, Apple is said to be adding a new,

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 2>cheaper MacBook to its lineup, rivaling Google's Chromebooks and Windows

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 2>PCs Bluebos. Samantha Kelly joins us now for more. So

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 2>this is an interesting one. I'm a MacBook user. I

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.959
<v Speaker 2>also have a Windows based PC that I used through work.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 2>The main thing is the price differential in the market.

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>MacBooks are typically very expensive relative to a much broader

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 2>range of available Windows or other operating system based PCs.

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a place to start tell us about

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 2>what we know from the reporting about a new cheaper MacBook.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 11>That's right, and thanks for having me. Yeah, it's really interesting.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 11>This would be a pretty big departure from what we've

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 11>seen from Apple before of the more premium standpoint with computers,

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 11>but this would bring it down to a lower end,

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 11>probably in the six hundred to eight hundred dollars range.

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 11>It would be more targeted towards students, small businesses. It

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 11>wouldn't be able to do everything. You be able to

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 11>surf the web, some documents, some light editing, and would

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 11>really open up the market for a lot of people

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 11>who might have an iPhone but aren't ready to make

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 11>that jump for some MacBooks start, you know, at nine

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 11>hundred and nine and nine dollars. To your point, these

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 11>are pretty expensive computers.

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Do we know anything about the timeline for this, Samantha, Like,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>is Apple going to surprise us with this this year

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 2>or when do we expect to hear about it.

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 11>We're expecting it soon, but it's not eminent, so it's

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 11>in development. It's already in production, So we're thinking the

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 11>first half of next year, probably in the spring, maybe

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 11>somewhere between maybe March and June.

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 2>What has Apple done to you know, Like sometimes I

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 2>reflect about how Apple does something in the iPhone, or

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 2>it might do it in the wearables category or even

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 2>the iPad, and then it will say, how do we

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>apply that to a different category like MacBook. Is there

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 2>any reporting on like how there's a technology transfer that

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 2>they have got the cost down or are they going

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to the playbook that they've done a base version iPhone

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 2>took a long time to get after having many premium models.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's interesting you say that. So my colleague Mark

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 11>German is reporting that some of the components would obviously

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 11>be a lot cheaper, making the price go down. But

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 11>they might use an iPhone chip, which is very advanced

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 11>at this point and exceeds some that we're seeing in

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 11>the earlier m chip center in some of the MacBooks.

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 11>So they would be able to take an iPhone chip,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 11>put it into a device and really open it up there.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 11>Also in other ways, you know, people might not need,

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 11>you know, certain features, but they are still looking for

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 11>battery life in some cases they're using an iPad a

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 11>with an external keyboard, but that really increases the price too.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 11>This would be able to take everything, boil it down

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 11>and give people perhaps an entry point into the ecosystem

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 11>that they haven't been able to enter before.

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I should say that an Apple spokesperson declines a comment

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>on our reporting. Now that's out the way, we should

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 2>probably acknowledge the other side of the competation, which is

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the Chromebook and other laptop piecs. They are providing more

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 2>competition to Apple exactly.

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so there's been a lot of success around the

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 11>chromebooks for Google. I mean a lot of schools have

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 11>students using these devices. Of course you have Dell and

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 11>HP of major players as well, a lot of people

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 11>who can't afford a premium device will go to these

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 11>very strong products. So it definitely will you have a

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 11>new player involved, and it'll really increase competition. We saw

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 11>some dips yesterday as far as stock with those related

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 11>companies as well.

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Samantha Kelly with the original reporting, Thank you very much.

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Tesla shares are pushing higher ahead of tomorrow's big shareholder meeting,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>where the spotlight will be on Elon Musk's proposed one

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollar compensation plan and Shane Goodwin, executive director for

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 2>SMU Corporate Governance Initiative. Shane was a governance advisor to

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the Special Committee, engaged to counsel them on corporate governance matters,

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 2>including satisfaction of fiduciary duties under Texas law when that

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 2>special Committee of two on Tesla's board put the package together. Shane,

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. I want to start by

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 2>just clarifying some things for our audience. Now that the

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 2>proxy's filed and the proposed compensation plan is out there,

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 2>have you continued to be engaged with Tesla's Special Committee

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>or was that work finished Now.

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 12>We've still been very actively involved with the Special Committee

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 12>throughout this whole process. Obviously that was just the start

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 12>of it to kind of work with them, but we've

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 12>been we're working with them ongoing, and they've been engaged.

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 9>With all their advisors and legal prisoners along the way.

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 2>And since the proxy was filed and shareholders became aware

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 2>of the terms of the proposed compensation agreement, what is

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 2>it specifically that you have been talking to the Special

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Committee and the board about.

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 12>Well, the issue is that most people see every single day,

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 12>that a lot of the headlines that come up, and

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 12>then how can we proactively really address those And more importantly,

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 12>it's just really can make sure that it's clear.

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 9>Obviously, as your viewers certainly saw.

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 12>The proxy advisors came out and actually commented on the

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 12>plan and some other aspects as well, and then we

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 12>just wanted to make sure that the shareholders, not the

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 12>proxy advisors, were very fully informed about what the plan

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 12>is and why this is different from what the DSS

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 12>from Glass Lewis is really reviewing.

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 2>So the biggest headline of this week is that Norway's

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Sovereign Wealth Fund came out and voted no against the

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 2>proposed pay package. Not an advisory but an actual shareholder,

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I believe Tesla's ninth biggest shareholder, and their argument was

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 2>very simple that they appreciated the significant value that mister

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 2>Musk has created, but argue that this this proposal, the

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 2>total size of the award is too great and like

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the advisory services, they're worried about dilution. Could you respond

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 2>to that dilution part?

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, well, first let me just address obviously, they also

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 12>oppose the pay plan on the ratification last year as well,

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 12>So for me it was a little hard to understand

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 12>kind of the Rederck versus the reality because they've been

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 12>a shareholder in Tesla since twenty eleven, so right after

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 12>the IPO they had a very small position, and they've

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.479
<v Speaker 12>actually continued to build that position to where they are today.

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 12>So although they may have some concerns, they've enjoyed the

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 12>benefit of a nearly a forty thousand percent increase in

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 12>their share value during that particular time and constantly adding

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 12>to their position, so they're obviously willing to enjoy the

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 12>benefits of that. You know, with respect to the dilution,

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 12>it's been very clear about what the plan was, and

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 12>I know we talked about this last time ED, which

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 12>was when the Special committe Robin.

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 13>Denholm and Kathleen Wilson Thompson sat down with Elon to

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 13>understand not only his vision for Master Plant four but

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 13>obviously what he wanted to would accomplish. And Elon has

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 13>been very clear about this and obviously the chair as well,

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 13>which is he wanted to make sure he has enough

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 13>voting influence and that number was around twenty five percent

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 13>that would matter for him. This has been discussed as well,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 13>which is the committee reviewed numerous ways of finding a

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 13>way to actually accomplish the voting and decoupling the economics,

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 13>and unfortunately, under current exchange rules that we have today

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.719
<v Speaker 13>with either EEno Navdak any ways, he has a similar rules.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 13>You can't go and do a high vote or dual class.

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 9>Listing once you've been listed in the exchange, Shane.

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>We've also spoken to Tesla's board chair, Robin Denholm subsequently,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 2>since you're on the program right and there is an

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 2>acknowledgment that there is a very real risk that if

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 2>this is a no vote in the end and Elon

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Musk either leaves Tesla, or he pays back his activities

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 2>in a different role, or he focuses more attention elsewhere.

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 2>You are privy to these conversations. You've just told us

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>that what is the plan B, what is the I

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 2>guess mitigation of key man risk in the event that

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 2>you don't secure the votes?

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I don't know.

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 12>Robin has addressed this specifically with both you and Carolina

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 12>as well, you know, quite frankly, and this is really

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 12>what I classify really as a kind of a super

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 12>Bowl performance that we're doing right now, we're focused on

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 12>winning the game and not looking at what happens if

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 12>we lose. I actually do believe that the shareholders are

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 12>going to come out in a very strong way tomorrow

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 12>and really support not only the plan, but the directors

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 12>were obviously a phnomination and all the proposals that are

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 12>put forth, and I think a lot of that is

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 12>already out there, so I don't think there's really a

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 12>need to focus on Plan B.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 9>I can assure you that they're a very diligent board.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 12>They thought through these things, but I think everyone's very

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 12>focused on winning.

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 2>We continue to get the same question for you and

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 2>for the board, which is this is the first vote

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 2>under Texas law. What do shareholders need to know that's

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 2>different under Texas law from what they voted previously under

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Delaware law.

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 12>I would say the biggest one, if it comes up,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 12>is that you know, insiders, particularly in a transaction like this,

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 12>are allowed to vote their shares in this particular election,

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 12>so you know Elon's shares will definitely be counted as

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 12>and included in part of this process, whereas previously, as

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 12>it was discussed within Delaware, it's not.

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 9>I'd say that's really the fundamental big change.

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 12>But quite frankly, if everyone recalls the previous plan of

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 12>a twenty eighteen plan, both originally in twenty eighteen but

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 12>also in the ratification in twenty twenty four, it had

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 12>over seventy plus percent shareholder approval, which did not include

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 12>elons in that particular time. So I do think we're

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 12>going to have a lot more of a support here

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 12>than some of the headlines reacting to right now.

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 9>But that is that is really one of the bigger

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 9>changes here.

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 2>For textas Shane Goodwin, executive director SMU Corporate Governments Initiative

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 2>and an advisor to the special Committity on Tesla's board

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that put together the proposed pay package, thank you very much.

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 2>By coming up, we're going to talk to an investor, Vinodekostler,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 2>and also David Zoo, CEO of startup revo ai about

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the go to market platform's debut and it's funding. That's next.

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 2>This is Bimbo tech Ai. Startup revo is emerging from

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.720
<v Speaker 2>self with the aim of unifying the steps and data

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 2>necessary for businesses to develop and execute go to market strategies.

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 2>The company has eighty million dollars from a combination seed

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>and Series A funding round co led by the Benches

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and Kline Perkins. Revo CEO David Zoo and investor Fino

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Kosler are with us now. David, I would love to

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 2>start with you. You're trying to tackle the concept that

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 2>you have labeled the Frankin stack. Even though the term

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 2>is new to me, the concept is something that's been

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 2>discussed on this program a lot. Just to explain what

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Revo wants to achieve here.

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 14>Sure, well, first off, thanks for having me. It's a

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 14>big day for us. Look, AI is the biggest shift

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 14>in enterprise software since the cloud, but the reality is,

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 14>revenue teams are still stuck in, like you said, what

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 14>we call the Franklin stack, which is a dozen different

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 14>tools that don't really talk to each other, causing sellers

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 14>to waste over seventy percent of their time wrangling software

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 14>instead of talking to their customers, and that's really painful.

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 14>Revo is looking to fix that via one unified revenue

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 14>operating system built from the ground up with AI at

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 14>its core, and with this eighty million raise, we're scaling

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 14>quickly to help all companies win in the age of AI.

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Vinod I was talking with my team this morning about

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 2>the structure of this round, and so it's basically a

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 2>combined seed in Series A and Revo is coming out

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 2>and kind of announcing itself to the world. Would you

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 2>kind of give us the backstory? You know, you are

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 2>an experienced investor in the world of technology. When this

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 2>crossed your desk, how did you know that you needed

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 2>to get involved and how did you determine at this

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 2>very early stage the potential that that Revo had.

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 15>The opportunity didn't actually cross our desk in a traditional way.

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 15>We've known David for a long time from door dash

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 15>to open Door to open Store Sorry, and now Revo.

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 15>We've been incubating ventures with him. My partner Samira has

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 15>worked closely with him on Revo, and we cooked up

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 15>the concept, rainstormed it and talked it was important enough

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 15>to do in the age of here, I think most

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 15>applications and application stacks need to be retarded. And this

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 15>is David just a superstar armed to know, so it

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 15>was pretty easy.

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, is this an example of you investing in

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the known quantity founder then rather than the idea?

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely, you mainly invested the idea. Wasn't clear that was

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 15>a year and a half or two years ago. But

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 15>the founder was very.

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Clear, David, I'm trying to track the growth that you've had.

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 2>So spring of twenty twenty four, you kind of come

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 2>up with the idea, I guess incorporated business and you've

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 2>hired I guess aggressively. You know you're sub one hundred

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 2>people still, but you've basically gone to companies that are

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.800
<v Speaker 2>well known globally, not just here in the valley, and

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 2>taken the best people you can.

0:38:55.560 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 14>What was that like, Well, yeah, that's you're spot on there.

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 14>The company you build taking a page out of Vanotes book,

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 14>But the company you build is the team you build

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.439
<v Speaker 14>as a company you build, not the plans you make.

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 14>And when we thought about tackling the space of unifying

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 14>all of go to market tech in one system spanning marketing, sales,

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 14>and success, we really needed to make sure that we

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 14>had the talent density both from a technical perspective but

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 14>also from a go to market to really bring together

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 14>the combination of the depth of domain knowledge plus the

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.439
<v Speaker 14>ability to access the first party data to really pull

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 14>this vision off. So global talent is necessary for us

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 14>to make this a reality.

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 2>David, what else do you need the eighty million dollars.

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 14>For Yeah, well it's over the next few months and

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 14>quarters and years.

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Our vision is clear.

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 14>We need a continue accelerating our product role map to

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 14>build out both the breadth of the surface area to

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 14>serve our customers, but also making sure that every single

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 14>capability is the best possible from a death perspective. But

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 14>more importantly, in the age of AI, context matters, and

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 14>it's very important for us to double down on making

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 14>sure that our AI operating system is able to work

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 14>seamlessly across every single one of these modules. Capabilities job

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 14>to be done, so we're not replicating another Franken Stack

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 14>for the future world. So that's what we're going to

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 14>use the proceeds to do.

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Vinod I go back to you with the concept of

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the Franken stack. You know you're invested everywhere. One of

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the first checks into open AI. The world has changed

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot since then. You know, we had yesterday Shrida

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>from Snowflake on the program talking about the problems right

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 2>now and in the data layer. What do you make

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 2>of the Franken stack. Is that a real thing or

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 2>this is just a marketing opportunity around this round.

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 15>No, I think it's a real thing. Push AI enables

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 15>each startup to do a lot more than it could do.

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.359
<v Speaker 15>Only engineers can do the work of sixty engineers if

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 15>you use the productivity tools AI enables. But more than that,

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 15>the user experience can be dramatically different with the help

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 15>of AI. As I like to say, in the old

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 15>world of applications, users had to learn an application, and

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.720
<v Speaker 15>they learned to each vertical stat. In the new world

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 15>of AI, the application learns the human and responds the

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 15>way it shift. It's my favorite way to think about

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 15>the transition AI makes possible.

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 9>You don't have to.

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 15>Be trained on an application like SAP or hubstat. The

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 15>application gets to know you and other humans on your team,

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 15>and so it facilitates not only the function, but also

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 15>workflow across people and across applications. I think pretty important

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 15>shift in software.

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 2>It's both you. I kind of like to end the

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.439
<v Speaker 2>conversation by going a little bit bigger on the world

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 2>that we're in right now. You know, David, if you

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 2>could reflect on what it was like doing this round.

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.720
<v Speaker 2>There is a lot of energy behind AI right now,

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 2>but at the other end of the spectrum there is

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 2>valuation concern. You know, there's no difficulty in open AI

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 2>or anthropic those kinds of frontier labs gaining capital, But

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 2>there is a lot going on right now. Would you

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 2>just reflect on what the last few weeks has been

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 2>like in trying to close this.

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 14>Well, you know, the fundamental difference is clear with our approach.

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 14>We're AI native and purpose built for revenue teams, and

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 14>so you know when you talk about the old players

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 14>that are trying to built AI onto legacy stack, it

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 14>just doesn't work. What we're building with Revo is akin

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:46.439
<v Speaker 14>to how Tesla build its cars vertically integrated with AI

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 14>at its core. This way, our AI is able to

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 14>see and act across the full customer journey. So the

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 14>old players are held back by their past, and the

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 14>new players, to your point, you know, don't have the

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 14>of the main knowledge nor the access to the full

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 14>suite of first party data to pull this vision off.

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 14>So Revo's building with both, and yes it's hard, but

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 14>that's really what makes it defensible and worth doing.

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:14.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, you know you're co leading this round with

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 2>your friends at Kina Perkins. Again, the same question, like

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 2>what does the environment look like to you? Right now?

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 2>This is a very sizable debut round you had the

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 2>conviction to do that. Well.

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:31.399
<v Speaker 15>It was a while ago we did the seed round

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 15>of ten million, there wasn't announced, and now we just

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 15>participated in the seventy million dollar round. Obviously we think

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 15>highly of the team, but I think it's the magnitude

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 15>of the opportunity this opens up for AI native companies.

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 15>I like to say most valuations won't hold up in

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 15>the AI space, but the ones that are really high

0:43:54.560 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 15>quality companies will return disproportionate returns. In twenty eight Keen

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 15>people said to me a billion dollar valuation for Open

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 15>the Air was too high. Then they said twenty six

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 15>billion was too high, and then one hundred billion, then

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 15>three hundred billion, and then five hundred billion.

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Were all too high.

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 15>So a small percentage of the companies I suspect, much

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 15>less than five percent, will actually do extremely well and

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 15>return ten fifty one hundred times stare money invested. Most

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 15>companies will still lose money, and I think that's why

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 15>you want to back quality founders like David. David just

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 15>superstar right back him in almost anything he did.

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 2>David Zuocio Revo Ai Vino cost co founder Coast Adventures,

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 2>and as we just discussed, I let that round. Great

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 2>to have you both on the program. Frank you that

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 2>does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tag Earnings, but

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 2>also AI valuation concerns are driving this market right now

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 2>one way and the other. Has been a volatile session.

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot to recap, in particular in the

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 2>case of AMD, so do so on the podcast. You

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 2>know exactly where to find it. This is Bloomberg Tech