WEBVTT - Key Moment for Women in VC

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Earlier this year,

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News reported on how female founders raised Paul just

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>two percent of venture capital in the US last year.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>That was the smallest share since twenties sixteen. And it's

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>really a sign that efforts to to really diversify the

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>famously male dominated industry, I mean, continues to struggle. It's

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>an old story, unfortunately, No, it's a frustrating one because

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there has been lots of efforts over the years financial

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>services to change that narrative around and it just never

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>seen to get that real tracks and particularly in Silicon Valley.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So we have a great guest on this

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and working on that gap that could persists there between

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>men and women, especially when it comes to raising BC money.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Ruth Fox later, she is partner at Anthemus. It's a

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>fintech venture capital firm. She's lived and worked around the globe.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>She joins us on the phone from San Francisco. Ruth,

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here with Paul and myself. How

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>are you? And first of all, let's just get to

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the crux of this, why is it still so difficult

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>for women to launch companies and access capital and get

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>some help here? Yeah, I mean, I think and first

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of all, thank you so much for having me today.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's a really simple answer in some

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ways to a somewhat complex question. The answer is really discrimination.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of systemic discrimination that women face

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and also kind of bilateral day to day discrimination. Um.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think where I'm really encouraged is that I have

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio which is full of outstanding female founders. I

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>am a partner in the venture capital practice at Anthemous,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so a little bit against all odds, myself and I

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of optimism, but you know also, um,

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of work to do. And and Ruth,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things when I think about the venture

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>capital firm, you know, you think of places like you know,

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Sandhill Road out in Silicon Valley. It's just it feels,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it looks, it sounds very insular. Like if I can't

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>raise my capital from some of those people out in

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the valley, and I know it's getting better with Austin's

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of the world and think think things like that, but boy,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if I can't make it there, it's hard to make

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it anywhere in the VC world. Is that changing at all? Yeah?

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it is, particularly for the sector that I

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>look at, which is financial services. London and New York

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and Singapore and places you know, where the markets UM

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>really are have always been quite vibrant venture capital scenes.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that the diversification though that you're talking about

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of venture capital and where it lives, the geographic diversification

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly has a role to play in diversifying the founders

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that we invest in UM. There's a sort of sense

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that venture capital came from a small group of people

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>who are looking to invest in people that look like them.

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>For me, this is just completely counterintuitive. Venture capital is

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a game of exceptions. You're looking for exceptional companies that

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to beat a lot of odds and really

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, strange stories, interesting founders. So how

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>would you get those exceptional outcomes if you keep investing

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in people that you know look the same and have

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of pedigree. It doesn't really make any sense.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. Somebody once said to me a few years

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>ago that what you need is more women to create

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a Google or an Apple or so and so forth

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and then the money will come. Is that what it's about?

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it that simple or difficult? No, there really are

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>some exceptional female founders that have raised an enormous amount

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of capital and and also run huge companies. So I

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think that we should. You know, it's quite exceptional

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for anyone to build a company at that scale, right, UM,

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we probably need more women in venture capital.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>This is something that I've been working on UH in

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different places, both at Anthemous and also

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>UM in another organization that that I've been working on

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. UM. I think that female investors tend to

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>back diverse founders, So I think this is one kind

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of simple band aid solution. But I think it's also

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>generally just a sense that venture capital and great ideas

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>can come from anywhere and can really stem from UM

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>any background, any diverse background, and probably the more diverse,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the more likely people are to have outsized impact. So

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Ruth I do a lot of work with DO universities,

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Graduate School of Business and in their venture capital fund,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>their private equity fund, their alternative investment funds. UH teams,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of women represented. What happens where do

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you tend to lose them. If you will, Where does

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it not translate, because again I see a lot of

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>demand at the university level. Yeah, it's a tough question

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for me to answer because I really do UM invest

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in a much more diverse way than many of my peers. UM.

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, sometimes women will UM self

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>select out. You know, this is something which has been

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>studied and shown not only in venture capital but in

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in other fields. UM that there are certain demands or

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:02.559
<v Speaker 1>expectations of demands around building a startup UM where women

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's incompatible with other choices that they might make. Uh. Similarly,

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I've I've spoken with a lot of women on their

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>path to partner and venture capital firms who say the

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing. You know, will this be compatible with having

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a family? I think it absolutely can be. I think

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>we probably need some more support structures and and also

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of deeper understanding amongst the LP and GP world

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of what it takes and how we can create support

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for exceptional people to bring exceptional ideas to life. It's

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>really never the founder alone who does that. So how

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>do we help founders create teams which are more sustainable

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>and allow them to achieve a lot of their different

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>goals and objectives that could be um, you know one

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one answer. I think obviously there's also just a funding gap. Yeah,

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we certainly see it continue to play out. Ruth Fox

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>later partner at Anthemus