WEBVTT - Hot Jobs Report Raises Odds Fed Keeps Rates Higher

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news the Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, as we mentioned earlier, the US job market remains resilient,

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>to say the least. Job growth in April broad based,

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>reflecting gains and healthcare, professional and business services, as well

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>as leisure and hospitality. We're going to talk a little

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 2>bit more about leisure and hospitality later on with the

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Trevago. Keep in mind, though the two prior

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 2>months apparels were revised lower by a combined one hundred

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and forty nine thousand, so important to factor that in

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Back with this on what she is seeing in terms

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of employment needs is Becky Frankowitz. She's Chief Commercial Officer,

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 2>President of North America at Manpower Group. She joins us

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>via Zoom from Milwaukee. Becky, good to have you back

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>with us. Tell us we got another strong jobs report.

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>We saw some revisions the prior to What are you

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 2>seeing specifically, what words would you describe or use to

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>describe the current labor market and how it compares to

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe the last few months.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I would say, you know, better than expected

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 4>job numbers. I like to do the analogy. It shows

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 4>the promise of spring. You know, very low unemployment three

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 4>point four percent CAROL, matching the all time low of

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 4>nineteen sixty nine, so very tight labor market. Two hundred

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 4>and fifty three thousand jobs created. Not so, you know,

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 4>there's some clouds on the horizon. We're not seeing labor

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 4>force participation come back at the rate that we want.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned the revisions are now material. One hundred and

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 4>forty nine thousand is material, and I would say that

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 4>the third kind of storm cloud we want to keep

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 4>our eye on is temporary staffing is now in decline,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 4>which you know is often referred to as the canary

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 4>in the coal mine in terms of going into an

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>economic slowdown. So I think very good overall numbers. Another positive,

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 4>by the way, is reabsorption, and so as people are

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 4>laid off, their being reabsorbed very quickly, as we saw

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 4>continue to unemployment claims tick down. So there's lots of

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 4>in a few storms on the horizon we want to

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 4>keep our eye on.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 5>Becky I'm curious to hear about what industries are seeing

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 5>some strength when it comes to job growth, whereas other

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 5>industries that are struggling right now.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so medical IT and sales are making up forty

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 4>four percent of all the open jobs in our country

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 4>right now, Medical IT and sales, So lots of strength there.

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 4>And again this is we know the job's numbers are

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 4>looking backward. I'm giving you real time data today in

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 4>the country. We're also seeing strength and you mentioned it

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 4>in your opening in hospitality and leisure. Retail starting to

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 4>come back in a very interesting fact. So you know,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 4>the probably the last two years we've talked about the

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 4>three most in demand roles in our country have been

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 4>registered nurses, software developers and logistics or truck drivers. It's

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 4>been the same for at least two years. We've seen,

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 4>for the first time in two years, truck drivers drop down.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 4>They're not in the top five or ten, and surprisingly

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 4>in the number three position now after registered nurses and

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 4>software developers is stock clerks definitely indicating the return to retail,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 4>So nurses, software and now for stock stock clerks, so

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 4>that clerk, So that plays into the retail sector specifically.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, what does that tell you that's an interesting switch

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 2>because I would kind of say that you need logistics

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and supply to bring the stuff to the stores so

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 2>that the stock clerks can do something with it.

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, it's still but it would think about the way.

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 4>What it indicates is the way we're shopping has changed.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Logistics is still you know, in the top twenty in

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 4>terms of jobs in demand, but it's the first time

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>I've seen it fall out of the top three. And

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 4>it tells you that the way we are shopping has changed.

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 4>So you know, we're going back in physical retail, still

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 4>shopping online, but back in physical retail. And it tells

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 4>you that, you know, people are traveling more and so

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 4>going and stocking up before they head out for spring

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 4>break or head out for summer travel with retail expenditure

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 4>and so it's the other interesting fact is if you

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 4>think about who's hiring, what companies are hiring. You know,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Clips the hair company shipped, so you know a little

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 4>counter they're now back on the hiring and then back

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 4>in the top five and they had dropped out. Surprisingly

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 4>Amazon top three companies hiring in the country today.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Oh wow, I'm curious to hear more about what you're

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 5>seeing on the wage front, because we did. When you're

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 5>looking at these month over month numbers in this latest report,

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 5>it rose about five tenths of a percent. Animals, we're

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 5>thinking you'd be round three tens of a percent. Obviously,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 5>wages have been such a big thing that we know

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 5>the Federal Reserve is watching. What do you see there?

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we have continued to see robust wage growth.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 4>I would say the rate of increase has slowed, but

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 4>I like to look at it in two parts, and Jess,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that was your question. I love to look

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 4>at it in two parts. What is the wage growth

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 4>for people staying in their job, and that's about five

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 4>point six percent increase year over year if you stay

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 4>in your job, and if you change jobs, it's up

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 4>to a thirteen point two percent increase. So we still

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 4>are in a labor market that's in sinning movement and

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 4>senting people to change jobs. So wage growth continues. The

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 4>pace is a little slower, but the increase divided by

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 4>those who stay in those who move jobs, still very robust.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. So you know, maybe that is what we

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 2>continue to see pop up in a jolt surveys because

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>there's still a lot of movement around here. So you know,

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Becky add it all up. Does it say to you

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 2>have recession?

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Folks?

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Are you crazy? Or I continue to I've been kind

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>of asking this for a long time. Could we see

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>slow down, recession even but with a strong job market.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a that's actually a fantastic question. What

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 4>I would say is we do anticipate some cooling. We've

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 4>seen some slow down in demand in a couple of areas.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 4>I've talked about the top demand, but a little slow

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 4>down in finance and accounting, in research and development in

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 4>terms of demand. So some of the professional manufacturing industrials,

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, slowing down a bit in demand. So I

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 4>think we're going to see a cooling. But I think

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 4>we may see a recession or a slow down with

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 4>a strong job market than we've seen historically in those times.

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure it will it will have the free

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 4>fall that we're all expecting.

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 2>Are people still labor hoarding? Which has been like a

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>new which has been a new phrase that has come

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 2>out of all of this. But this is basically companies,

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>because they know it's such a tight labor market, saying

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I'll hold on to these workers because I know things

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>are going to turn around, rather than let folks go.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's a little bit of an overhang of pandemic paranoia.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 4>I had to let people go that I couldn't find anyone,

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 4>so then I hoarded all the labor and didn't let

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 4>them go. And yes, we are seeing people hold on

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 4>to the talent they have and in addition hire for

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 4>really specific in demand roles. I do want to caution

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 4>all of us though, this tick down and temp hiring

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 4>is traditionally the leading indicator for going into an economic slowdown.

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, temp powering fall. In fact, it's down, you're

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 4>over year almost one hundred and seventy thousand jobs, and

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 4>so that we all need to keep an eye on that.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 5>What's a particular threshold when it comes to that metric

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 5>that would be more of a red flag to you.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think the decline is the first, you know,

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 4>the month over month decline. We've seen it for several

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>several months now, and it's been a little sporadic. Like

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 4>everything else. It'll decline and it goes back up, and

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 4>it declines again. But I'd say we're in the territory

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 4>now where labor hoarding people will hold onto their permanent workers,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 4>but in fear of recessionary conditions, they won't hire the

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 4>additional flexibility from a temporary workforce. And so I would

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 4>say we see enough of a yellow flag. I will't

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 4>say red flag, a yellow flag now to keep a

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 4>very close eye on it.

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Go back to when you said Amazon now was among

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the top three companies in terms of hiring. They had

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 2>dropped out. That's based on what data. And I'm curious

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>how who else is in that top three?

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so in the number one position is great Clips,

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 4>so the hair haircutter. Then you have shipped the online

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>retailer who had been not even on the list, so

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 4>you know they what happened there is they weren't hiring

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 4>at all, and now they have some needs to catch

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 4>up with the summer travel and stocking up. And then

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 4>number three was Amazon. So what's happening there is we're

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 4>starting to see those stocks, you know, a different version

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 4>of stock clerks, but seeing that same retail phenomenon start

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 4>to come back into the economy.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Where's that data from?

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yes, I'm sorry to answer that. That's we actually

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 4>scan all of the open jobs in the country. We

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 4>scan them all and we aggregate the data and that's

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 4>the source, so any without duplication, so there is a

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 4>duplication in the data.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 5>We only have about forty five seconds left, but I

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 5>wanted to follow up because you had mentioned obviously those

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 5>finance jobs where we saw those starting to lose that momentum.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 5>Is that clearly the obvious reason of what we've been

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 5>seeing the past few months there with those what's been

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 5>happening with the stress and the regional banks.

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think they're definitely related. You know, if you

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 4>think about the macro trends that drive changes in the

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 4>labor market, one of course is banking and the other,

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, depression of demand we're seeing is anything related

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 4>to inflation, so durable goods starting to be under pressure.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 4>So it's all tied to the economy.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 2>That's why we like talking to you man. You give

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 2>us the specific stats, you give us perspective. I am

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>like blown away by that Amazon right figure, because it's

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>they've certainly been among those, you know, who are cutting

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>coming off of the pandemic.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 5>So retailers in the summer, stalkers as well.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Stockers did you say, are stokers.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 5>Stalker's access accent.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.599
<v Speaker 2>Becky, thank you has always have a great week. And

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Becky Frankowitch. She's Chief Commercial Officer, President of North America

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Manpower Group.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, as promised, we want to talk a little

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>bit about the travel and use your in hospitality space,

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 2>and we have a great guest with us. We've talked

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot about folks traveling again again continuing post pandemic.

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see what Axel Heefer is seeing firsthand. He's

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>CEO at Travago. He joins us on Zoom from Dusseldorf, Germany.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 2>So nice to have here with us. Axel. First off,

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 2>how are you.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm good. I'm good. Traveler is coming back now even

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 3>in Asia, so yeah, well getting better every day.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, tell us a little bit and we want to

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>drill down a little because we've gotten from a lot

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>of companies. Your company reported earnings. We've heard from Expedy

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 2>and Booking, They Booking Holdings, they both reported double digit

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 2>increases and gross bookings in the first quarter. Investors reacted

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit differently to each of those. You guys

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>came out and reported on Tuesday, shares did sell off

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday. I just want to go there first of

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 2>First off, what are you hearing from the ALS community

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 2>investors about your results specifically?

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, I guess they if you're looking at our results,

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 3>and we've we've seen solid growth in the first quarter,

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>and we've we've seen a slightly lower margin that we

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 3>had last year because we started to invest into our

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 3>brand marketing and into our hotel direct initiative to prepare

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:05.239
<v Speaker 3>for the sum The reaction on earnings is always against expectations,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>so so apparently expectations have been higher than what we delivered.

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 3>But we're we're happy with with our results and we

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 3>think we are on good track forward summer, So you.

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Expect and then those investments that you're making to work

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>and get through the summer, that'll you'll see that in

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 2>subsequent quarters that will pay off.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean, I guess you have obviously your your

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 3>your direct direct performance marketing investment that have an immediate payoff.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>And then we've always been very strong in in brand marketing,

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>and they're in particularly in TV. You produce our spots

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 3>in house, we we test them in house, et cetera.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's one of our core strengths, and they're

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 3>the payoff is it's not immediate, but you get significant

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 3>payback within the first year, and then you're obviously building

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 3>it up and coming out of the pandemic, we obviously

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 3>need to build up that that brand equity and and

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 3>revamp it in a way so you will see the

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 3>positive effect of the campaigns really of the quarters to come.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 5>Something that I thought was interesting, you did have a

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 5>survey recently that showed that consumers they were comparing prices

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 5>more than they had been, especially as we are going

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 5>into the summer travel season. What is this telling you

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 5>and telling all of us really about the consumers as

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 5>far as just trying to find cheaper prices at this

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 5>point when inflation obviously is still troubling for some of

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 5>these ticket prices.

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's exactly the reason. I mean, the inflation

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 3>is sky high in most of the western countries and

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 3>there real wage contractions in quite a lot of countries,

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 3>so consumers need to save money and they saved money

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 3>in the daily groceries, and they saved money when they

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 3>are traveling. But what is interesting is that that people

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 3>do want to travel. So what they do is they

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 3>compare more prices. As you said, So in the US

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 3>and our survey, more than sixty percent of Americans said

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 3>that they are comparing more hotel prices than they've done before.

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Travelers are cut in their trips short slightly, so the

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 3>length of the average trip is contracting. And the third,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 3>which I think is probably the most interesting, as travelers

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.119
<v Speaker 3>are becoming more and more flexible in terms of destination,

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>so they are going for a similar experience, but a

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.719
<v Speaker 3>cheaper destination. So if you're looking at at the two

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 3>most interesting pairs from a US perspective, Canada is down

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 3>relatively speaking, Mexico is up in terms of nearby a

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 3>new shore international travel, UK down, and Turkey up. But

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the theme is the same. So it is a trip abroad,

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 3>but it is a slightly cheaper experience. And that's how consumers,

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 3>and that's not learning in the US, that that's pretty

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 3>much everywhere in the Western world, are trying to compensate

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 3>for some of the price increases that that you see everywhere.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 2>Does what you're seeing axels say to you recession in

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>terms of what consumers are doing, are just being prudent.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I would talk about a recession. I mean,

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 3>we think that the travel market overall will be up,

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 3>but it will not be up as much as the

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 3>prices are up also, so consumers are obviously trying to

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 3>soften the impact of the price increases. But still, I mean,

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 3>it's a good market, but people cannot print money, so

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>they can only spend a dollar once.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 5>And you're talking about these different regions. I mean, how

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 5>much of a boost when it comes to the reopening

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 5>in China in particular, do you think that'll have on

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 5>that particular corner of the market, I.

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Mean the Asia. I mean this is the year of Asia,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>that's for sure. I mean we don't only have China.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 3>We also have Japan that reopened more recently. We don't

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 3>operate in China. So China for US is only a destination,

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 3>but it's a very very important destination for many of

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 3>our Asian markets, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea, Japan,

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. Japan is for US both. I mean the

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 3>country will operated so it's it's an outbound inbound market

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 3>and we see very strong growth there and we see

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 3>exactly the same thing that we've seen in the West

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>last year and the year before that. There there is

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 3>a huge pandal demand of people that do want to

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 3>see their friends, they do want to visit family, they

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 3>do want to see business partners, and then there's a

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>wave of travel coming, you.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Know, axel over over the last few years, certainly, you know,

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>during the pandemic. Out of the pandemic, we've talked about

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of bigger, broader macro issues of running a company,

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, one of the things is accessing a

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 2>workforce and you tap into a global workforce in a

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 2>big way. Where are you on that Are you hiring?

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you need to hire? What can you tell us

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>about that? On a day where we were focused on

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>us jobs.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean we we are. We are hiring, of course,

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean you need to hire. The labor market in

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 3>particularly for for highly skilled labor is very tight and

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Europe and we are in a fortunate position that we

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>do have a global brand and we can attract people

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 3>from all over the world. So right now we are

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>down to fifteen percent of our new colleagues are from Germany.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Eighty five percent are from outside of Germany. India is

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 3>a strong country where we are recruiting from. Russia actually

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 3>has become a lot stronger in the last twelve months

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 3>for obvious reasons. Yeah, so I think you absolutely need

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 3>to recruit internationally if you want to fill a specialist positions.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about India specifically, because I feel like in

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of months the discussion and narrative around

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>India has changed dramatically, and some of it has to

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>do with Apple in terms of it increasingly focusing on

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 2>that not only as a place to produce, but also

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>to sell. Is that something too that you are pivoting

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 2>more towards or is that Just talk to us a

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit about that if you would.

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean for us, it's a bit different because

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 3>we just operating out of one office. So for us,

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 3>it's more the strength of our brand and the local market.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 3>And India is a very big market for us because

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 3>it's a very big country and we we're not operating

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 3>in China, so it's the biggest country that we operate in,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 3>and that's why there's always been strong Russia. As I

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 3>said has become a more important market to recruit and

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Africa actually is also growing very quickly as as a

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 3>region where we can recruit top talent from.

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 5>We only have about a minute left, but Carol and

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 5>I have talked to so many different people about how

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 5>AI has impacted their business. It's curious. How do you

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 5>use AI when it comes to your platform.

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's an interesting question. I mean our platform

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 3>has been run on AI or on machine learning for

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 3>a very long time. I mean we use machine learning

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 3>algorithms to to to ensure that we show the right

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.239
<v Speaker 3>hotels in the right place and the right prices. If

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 3>you if you think more about CHEDGPT and the next

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 3>generation of AI, that's very very interesting for certain applications

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 3>on the travel space. It's more for the inspiration phase

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 3>from our perspective, So if you don't really know where

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 3>to go and when to go, and then it is

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 3>obviously extremely valuable if you want to generate a lot

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 3>of content in an automated way. So it will make

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 3>a difference with the industry and you need to stay

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 3>open minded of course, and then that's what we've always.

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 6>Been doing well.

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 5>Ax.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 2>We always appreciate the time with you. I know it's

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit later over there, so thank you so much.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Have a great weekend. Axl He for his chief executive

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 2>officer of Travago. On zoom from Dusseldorf, Germany.

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 2>On the Bloomberg story I read in earlier this morning

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>about New York Attorney General Letitia James proposing a state

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 2>a lot of titan rules over cryptocurrency companies. It's her

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 2>latest swing at an industry she claims is suffering from

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 2>quote rampant fraud and dysfunction.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Under her proposal, New York would require independent public audits

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of crypto exchanges and bar people from owning both brokerages

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and tokens to prevent conflicts of interest. In the statement today,

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 2>James calling her proposal quote the strongest and most comprehensive

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>set of regulations at cryptocurrency in the nation and I

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 2>got to say, just one thing we know for sure,

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 2>after the carnage of the last year or so, regulators

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 2>are looking very very closely at cryptocurrencies and anything related

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 2>with it, and.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 5>Even just the dynamic of how say, Bitcoin in particular

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 5>was performing, especially in March, right in the midst of

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 5>what was happening with the banks, I mean, especially after

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 5>we just got off of April. This is the longest

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 5>winning streak for bitcoin since twenty twenty one.

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of holatility and still trying to understand

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>how it all fits together going forward. And on that.

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>In our weekly crypto segment, we have with us Christopher Alexander.

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>He's Chief Communitycations Officer at Liberty Blockchain. They're a blockchain provider.

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>He joins us via zoom from Seattle. Christopher, nice to

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 2>have you here on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 7>How are you good?

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 6>Good?

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 7>Thank you. Checked in on what was going on with

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 7>the news, and it came across the decision in New York,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 7>so an eventful day.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of that specifically, Well, I haven't.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.479
<v Speaker 7>Looked closely at it, to be honest, kind of skimmed

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 7>it listening to your description of it. The concern that

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 7>I have is a lack of understanding by regulators of crypto,

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 7>and I think the biggest breakdown is understanding the difference

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 7>between blockchain and crypto. And you know, crypto is the

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 7>byproduct of essentially time sharing your computer to serve as

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 7>a server excuse me, on a form of internet, and

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 7>you can speculate, sorry, excuse me, you can speculate on

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 7>exchanges with coins. Blockchain is the technology with is amazing potential.

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 7>And when you conflate the two and treat blockchain mining

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 7>and certain things the same as if we're crypto, that's

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 7>where these problems really break down. And I'm a little

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 7>concerned about what they're trying to do in New York

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 7>and how they're stunting the technological development in order to

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 7>deal with a exchange type of issue.

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 5>In what ways would this end up impacting the technology

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 5>behind When we're looking at blockchain in particular, whether it's

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 5>in New York or when we hear obviously officials in

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 5>Congress debating about different regulations.

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 7>Well, I'll give you a great example. There's a mining

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 7>brig of sorts, and it is essentially a piece of

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 7>computer hardware and the signal from the SEC who won't

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 7>actually give us rules as an industry, despite our repeatedly

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 7>asking and Coinbase now suing to compel them to start

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 7>making rules instead of just regulating by enforcement. Their argument

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 7>is that it is a security well by way of analogy,

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 7>what they're saying is, if you buy stocks with the

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 7>computer because you're day trading online, your computer is a

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 7>security that could be regulated by the SEC. Now, I'm

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 7>going to presume they don't mean to do that, but

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 7>I think it perfectly highlights this problem of not fully

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 7>understanding again the difference between buying bitcoin on an exchange

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 7>and being part of a blockchain and looking at developing

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 7>Web three applications could have amazing impacts in the future.

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 5>That's interesting too as far as the regulation that could

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 5>potentially becoming. What are you expecting on that front, as

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 5>far as what other things could be rolling out.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 2>Because would you agree that there needs to be some

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 2>transparency and oversight considering what we've seen in the last year.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 7>Oh, I don't dispute that for a second. And I

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 7>think it's very interesting that two of the recent SEC

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 7>actions that have been notable was a wells notice to

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 7>Coinbase and find a crack, and those are two groups

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 7>that want to work with the SEC and have been

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 7>begging essent to the SEC to provide a clear framework.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 7>There is a very clear framework in Japan and Switzerland

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 7>for example. I've done an amazing job France as well. Yes,

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 7>there does need to be that there should be rules,

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 7>and industry welcomes any effort by the SEC to actually

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 7>maybe so tell.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Us, you know, and I would agree with you on

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 2>a certain level that I agree that blockchain is different

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 2>from cryptocurrencies, but yet they do certainly go hand in hand.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about liberty blockchain, specifically your company, what you

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 2>are doing, because you're not the only blockchain out there,

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 2>So tell us a little bit about what you guys

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 2>are up to.

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 7>I will, and just to clarify, so you can have

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 7>a blockchain with no crypto Deloitte, I believe in Amazon

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 7>Web services both run pieces on the blockchain. I mean

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 7>the California DMV is now putting files on the watchchain

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 7>so you can separate them. But it's very an usual

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 7>and when people think about this, and this is really

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 7>what they're talking about. It is a blockchain that produces

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 7>a proof of work or proof of steak, which is

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 7>a coin, but as as for liberty. We're at a

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 7>veteran led organization and what we believe in is a

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 7>free and open society. And what we're doing is we're

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 7>building the infrastructure from the ground up and then we work,

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 7>which is with a dial with the community of people.

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 7>We're going to decide what we're going to do with

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 7>with that, with that blockchain and those capabilities. And one

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 7>of the things we're working I'm very excited about is,

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, we want to look to build a a

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 7>free and open society for the future. We also want

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 7>to learn from the mistakes of the past and trying

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 7>to do it. So we're kind of a fusion of those.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 7>So one of the first things we'll probably roll out

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 7>it's in development, is a historical explorer app. So you

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 7>can go to save Fort McHenry in Baltimore where I live,

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 7>see what the star Spangled banner was, and then you

0:24:55.600 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 7>might get a reward, a digital reward for participate and

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 7>it's kind of learned to earn it too.

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 5>I know you also have talked about when it comes

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 5>to the off ramping of crypto. Can you explain a

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 5>little bit about what that is and maybe how there's

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 5>some relation there whenever we're talking about the squeeze obviously

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 5>on some of the banks that we've seen in recent ones.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 7>Off ramping is is where for me personally, when I

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 7>listen to discussions about crypto, the fair critiques and the

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 7>ones that perhaps are not, it really frustrates me. Off

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 7>ramping is how you take your Bitcoin or any other

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 7>form of digital currency and turn it into a fiat

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 7>currency to pay locally for something. So you're paid saying

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 7>I'm paid with the US dollar coin so it's a

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 7>stable coin, and then I convert that to dollars to

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 7>a number of different ways when I want to When

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 7>I want to buy something or move my money out, well,

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 7>I do it to a bank, and if I don't

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 7>do it through a bank, I do it through visa

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 7>MasterCard and they've they've certified everything. So with some rare exceptions,

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 7>it's very hard launder money because there's a transaction and

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 7>there's a point where you have to turn that into

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 7>a local currency. Now you can launder in countries where

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 7>you can easily launder money, but this is not something

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 7>that's in any way inherent or essentially a part of

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 7>the blockchain. In fact, what you find is you know,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 7>you have a group out in DC that supports US

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 7>government investigations. The transparency of the blockchain allows them to

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 7>roll all of these transactions up like they did with sobrowth.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 7>So off ramping is turning your crypto in your currency.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 7>And when you say the crypto industry is rampant with

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 7>all these problems, well, the only place you can really

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.959
<v Speaker 7>off ramp is a bank. So I'm not sure how

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 7>you don't critique banks and in all of it on

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 7>crypto it's an issue that's being resolved. And it goes

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 7>back to your point about yes, we do need regulations

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 7>and off ramping is the point where you can very

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 7>effectively tamp down on terror financing and other issues if.

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I may, because we only have about a minute or

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 2>so left. I mean you're interesting too, and you have

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 2>a very very varied background in terms of some of

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>the different companies you've worked with, Disney, IBM, Coca Cola,

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 2>and then you know, tell us attle bit about the

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 2>folks that are involved specifically at Liberty. I know veterans

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 2>is a big part of it. Just what that means

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>in terms of your perspective.

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we mostly met in the special operations community, working

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 7>in Iraq, Afghanistan. I was an information warfare planner.

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I gues should say.

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 7>Some of us had other other jobs, and we were

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 7>fascinated by the potential of blockchain. We wanted to have

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 7>something that again promoted the principles of a free and

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 7>open society. We're going to look to do a lot

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 7>for veterans as well, and so we just knew and

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 7>trusted each other from you know, the most trying of

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 7>circumstances and the most steer environments, and that's kind of

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 7>how we coalesced and started working.

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 2>On Christopher, you know, just thirty seconds here. Who do

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 2>you perceive will ultimately be using your blockchain or are already?

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.479
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a mixed clip. But I think if

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 7>you're concerned about authoritarianism, if you're if you're concerned about

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 7>some of the some of the creeping sort of censorship

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.719
<v Speaker 7>and things that we see in in social media platforms

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 7>and the like, uh, you're great for us. If I

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 7>had to summon in a word, we're kind of the

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 7>libertarian blockchain.

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 2>I think, all right, well, interesting, and I'll be curious

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 2>to see about the future for you guys, So look

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 2>forward to checking back. Christopher Alexander's chief communications officer at

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Liberty Blockchain, joining us via Zoom from Seattle on this Friday.

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>The Journal, Now about you, let me drive? No, no, honey,

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>please gravel. Let's wait, I want to drive.

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question.

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe down well on

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, just under eighteen minutes left, and it's

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a broad based rally on Wall Street. So you are

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 2>seeing a lot of buying into the trade. We're just

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 2>coming off our best level. As you just heard Charlie

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 2>giving the market update, you did see yields moving up

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 2>certainly at the shorter end. So let's get to it

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 2>with our next guest with us. Is Michael Sheldon back

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 2>with us, I should say he's executive director, chief investment

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 2>officer over and High Tower RDM Financial Group, joining us

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 2>once again on zoom from Westport, Connecticut. Michael, nice to

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 2>have you here, Jess says Man. I talked to Michael

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Have for a long time, interesting market cycle. Again,

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we have said that a million times

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 2>since we've come off the pandemic. What are you more

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 2>optimistic right now about the outlook or more pessimistic.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, we had a lot of news this past week,

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 6>and I think going into the week, we sort of

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 6>had a very bifurcated market. It's strange to sort of

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 6>think of that, but we've had Going into this week,

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 6>we had three sectors of the S and P five

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 6>hundred that were up double digits, and we had four

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 6>sectors of the market which were actually negative. So it's

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 6>a very strange kind of market. It's been a very

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 6>narrow market, with a lot of the gains led by

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 6>a few stocks. If you look at the sort of

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 6>health of the market, back when the market peaked earlier

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 6>this year, we had something like eighty percent of stocks

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 6>in the S and P five hundred above their two

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 6>hundred day moving average, and today we only have less

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 6>than fifty percent of stocks above their two hundred day

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 6>moving average. So it's a really kind of difficult market

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 6>to sort of navigate right now. I think we had

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 6>some interesting news this week. We had obviously the FED meeting,

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 6>and I think we were hoping for two things. We

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 6>were hoping to hear whether the FED was done. We

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 6>didn't really hear about that, although we know they're closer

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 6>to the end, and Unfortunately, the FED did not say

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 6>that they were about to cut rates, even though the

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 6>Fed fund futures market is focus currently pricing in three

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 6>cuts this year. So that sort of difference between the

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 6>fan and what the investors are thinking is yet to

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 6>be determined. And then we also got a lot more

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 6>news on earnings, and then today we had the jobs number.

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 5>So how do you position in this type of environment

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 5>when investors are so split? What are you buying? What

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 5>are you selling?

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's important. As investment advisors, we do a financial

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 6>plan for most clients that come in and then we

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 6>sort of figure out what the rate of return is

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 6>they need in order to meet their long term investment objectives.

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 6>So we have different models. We have a more growth

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 6>oriented model, we have a more income oriented model. Some

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 6>clients need to be more aggressive, some can afford to

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 6>be more defensive. I can tell you over the past

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 6>few weeks, for example, we've over the past month or two,

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 6>one thing we've been doing is we've been buying more

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 6>corporate bonds. So we used to own a lot of

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 6>corporate bonds in the past, but many of them matured

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 6>and the yields were just too low to reinvest. But

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 6>more recently, yields are the highest they've been in quite

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 6>a while. So I'd like to say this some income

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 6>and fixed income now. So we've been buying a lot

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 6>of corporate bonds and it's great that we can lock

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 6>in that four and a half maybe five and a

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 6>quarter percent yield, and that's on the fixed income side

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 6>of clients' portfolios.

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I thought was interesting along those

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>lines that you shared in notes with our producer Paul Brennan,

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 2>is that despite the concerns that are out there about

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the outlook, corporate bond credit spreads remain healthy, indicating fixed

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>income investors are not overly concerned about the outlook for

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>economic growth right now. It's a great indicator, correct.

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely. I mean there's so many things going on

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 6>right now. You have the worries about the regional banks,

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 6>you have problems in corporate profits. There's the lagged effect

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 6>of the ten rate hikes that we've already had by

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 6>the FED so far this year. But corporate credit spreads,

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 6>which are often a leading indicator of trouble, especially high

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 6>yield spreads, have really been pretty pretty well maintained, pretty narrow,

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's a fairly healthy sign. You could

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 6>argue that in the high yield bond market, many of

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 6>the corporations have sort of stretched out or refinanced in

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 6>the past, so the quality of the high yield market

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 6>is higher than it has been in the past. But

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 6>if you really thought we were going to a major downturn,

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 6>credit spreads should be widening as opposed to narrowing.

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 5>I know we're going to get the Senior Loan Officers

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 5>Survey on Monday, and this is important because obviously it's

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 5>going to be the first reading since it's quarterly of

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 5>obviously what we saw happen last March. What specifically are

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 5>you going to be looking in this report when it

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 5>comes to credit conditions and banks.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's a great point. I think that comes out

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 6>very soon, maybe next week. I'm not quite sure the date.

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 5>On Monday, it actually comes out Monday.

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 6>So there are a few sort of red flags that

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 6>we've looked at which historically appointed to a weakening or

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 6>a downturn in the economy. There's the monthly Leading Economic Index,

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 6>which has been down something like twelve months in a row.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 6>There's a yield curve which is negative right now, and

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm sure You've talked a lot about the predictive powers

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 6>of that. And then there's the FED Senior Loan Servage,

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 6>which doesn't get a lot of press, and basically what

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 6>it shows right now is I think the number we're

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 6>somewhere around forty percent to net forty percent of corporation

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 6>of banks have tightened lending conditions for various loans, whether

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 6>it's commercial, industrial, or consumer loans. And typically that sort

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 6>of when you see those types of numbers, when banks

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 6>are pulling back in credit, that tends to have a

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 6>negative impact on the economy looking ahead over the next

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 6>two to three quarters. So we haven't really We've seen

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 6>some weakness in manufacturing and housing, but overall the consumers

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 6>held up pretty well. So it'll be interesting to look

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 6>at the FED Senior Loan Survey in Monday to see

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 6>if it gets even see if banks are getting even

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 6>tighter than they were four months ago.

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, just coming off of Milken and so

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 2>many participants in the private lending market and private credit

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 2>market were there, many of them were saying the message

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 2>was that listen, banks haven't been lending generally for a

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 2>long time. When it comes to certainly folks in the

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 2>middle market space, middle market companies, and then that's where

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the private credit has has jumped in. Is there some

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 2>comfort to be found because we do have a shadow

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 2>banking system, so that that is out there to keep

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of the economy going. And I'm curious how you see.

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 6>That, Michael, Well, that's a good question. We do have

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 6>in addition to owning individual stocks, mutual funds, and ETFs,

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 6>we're appropriate, we do own private investments for clients when

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 6>appropriate for certain clients. So we're familiar with the direct

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 6>lending market, and there has been a shift over the

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 6>years from loans made from banks to the I don't know,

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't call it. I don't know if you'd call

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 6>the shadow lending or to other sources of funding. I

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 6>think the way to sort of look at this is

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 6>that deposits in the banks were something like seventeen trillion

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 6>dollars several months ago or six to twelve months ago,

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 6>and we've started to see money coming out of the

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 6>banking system, and that sort of coincides with the money

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 6>supply actually having been negative recently on a year of

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 6>a year basis. So I think generally speaking, it's not

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 6>a healthy thing when people are pulling their deposits out

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 6>of banks because banks need that money to make loans,

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 6>even if on the margin they're making less loans than

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 6>they were in the past.

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've also noted that what we have some five

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 2>point three trillion in money market funds assets today versus

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 2>three point nine trillion at the peak of the last

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 2>economic crisis, a great financial crisis in seven oh eight,

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 2>at least at Bramo. It's tweeting about that earlier today.

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's another concern certainly out there. Smart conversation, Michael,

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 2>have a great, great WEEKND Michael Sheldon, Executive Director, chief

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Investment Officer at High Tower RDM Financial Group.

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 5>This is the.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons from

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app,

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.479
<v Speaker 1>tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Jermalone