Speaker 1: Now here's a highlight from Coast to Coast AM on iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2: And welcome back to Coast to Coast George Norri with
Speaker 2: you were with the Emmy Award winning producer and director
Speaker 2: Melissa Tittle. Melissa, the name of your documentaries called Code twelve.
Speaker 2: What does that mean?
Speaker 3: So the pattern that I have discovered is this pattern
Speaker 3: of twelve that is prevalent in all ancient texts, in
Speaker 3: some designs of ancient monuments and temples, and also in
Speaker 3: our structures, whether it's quantum physics, biology, and then we
Speaker 3: have these subsets all around us. You know, think about
Speaker 3: this by twelve months it's called zodiacally and so that
Speaker 3: pattern I started to notice it. Yeah, So taking out
Speaker 3: remember I had to read this stuff all the time,
Speaker 3: you know, was like, yeah, sure, twenty years in my life,
Speaker 3: just like coming across this random information and not really
Speaker 3: knowing if it was important or not. But then, George,
Speaker 3: I don't know if you've ever heard of this, and
Speaker 3: I just I just thought, because this is such the
Speaker 3: biggest news, and I remember it being big. But in
Speaker 3: two thousand and three, the US and France were working
Speaker 3: on kind of to figure out how if they could
Speaker 3: map out the universe. You know, the thought is that
Speaker 3: the universe is infinite and it's flat. But in two
Speaker 3: thousand and three they published a paper in Nature that
Speaker 3: suggested that they discovered that the universe was shaped like
Speaker 3: a dough decahedron. Now, dough decahedron is a twelve sided
Speaker 3: figure geometry shape, and it was shaped like this because
Speaker 3: they were able to measure after the Big Bang, this
Speaker 3: radiation left over. They were able to map that out
Speaker 3: in measurements of the cosmic microwaves background, if you will.
Speaker 3: And it had a shape, it literally had a boundary,
Speaker 3: And I thought, God, that's huge news. I don't remember
Speaker 3: anybody making a big deal out of the fact that
Speaker 3: they found the walls of the outside of the universe.
Speaker 3: Was crazy. And then you know, let's if you go
Speaker 3: back to what Plato talks about. Plato is very specific
Speaker 3: about the planet Earth, right, He's got this idea that
Speaker 3: he talks about how the Earth is like a leather
Speaker 3: ball with twelve points on it. He specifically does the
Speaker 3: same thing with how the Earth is structured with these
Speaker 3: twelve points. So you have again another dodecahedron. So I
Speaker 3: when I saw that, when I started digging into this
Speaker 3: and I thought, God, that's so odd. And here I
Speaker 3: have all of this weird numbering system throughout all these
Speaker 3: ancient texts of a reference to twelve. And here's why
Speaker 3: I think it's interesting. All mythology has some point of
Speaker 3: reference or story that they're trying to tell. You know,
Speaker 3: when people say to me, do you think mythology is real?
Speaker 3: I think that what the ancients were trying to do
Speaker 3: was relate a situation to people so they can keep
Speaker 3: telling the story. And in all mythology, there seems to
Speaker 3: be a number code that we just overlook and a
Speaker 3: lot of that has to do with twelve. Later in
Speaker 3: the documentary I talk about thirteen, but let's just stick
Speaker 3: with the twelve. And with the twelve you have, like,
Speaker 3: let's just hit the Bible and Revelations. There the twelve
Speaker 3: Tribes of Israel, You've got, You've got the twelve Sons
Speaker 3: of Jacob. You know, like, there's all this, there's the
Speaker 3: twelve Apostles, there's numerous amounts of the mention of twelve.
Speaker 3: And what fascinates me just not about that number, is
Speaker 3: that texts, ancient texts like the Bible and other texts
Speaker 3: reference this number all the time, and to the point
Speaker 3: that I don't need to know why you know, Jesus
Speaker 3: is twelve steps behind phill and so why do I
Speaker 3: need to know that? Why does that have to be
Speaker 3: in that story? Like it makes sense to say that
Speaker 3: there were twelve tribes of Israel, but it doesn't make
Speaker 3: sense in some of these ancient texts for the measurements
Speaker 3: or the steps or the pieces that it's almost like
Speaker 3: they keep putting it in plain sight for us to
Speaker 3: figure out. So I went to ancient Egyptian tests, and
Speaker 3: they also have broken up as a lot of their
Speaker 3: ancient texts, like the Book of the Dead or twelve
Speaker 3: the Book of the Twelve Gates, and these ancient texts
Speaker 3: talk about a journey, hero's journey, a journey of which
Speaker 3: you have to take to survive each level of those gates,
Speaker 3: and when you get to the twelve, you are reborn.
Speaker 3: So whether it's the twelve, the twelve hours of the
Speaker 3: night versus the twelve hours a day, is the duat
Speaker 3: the surviving the darkness and then coming in rebirth. This
Speaker 3: is all an understanding of a bigger mechanism. And it's
Speaker 3: the same thing with quantum physics. The dodecohedron is a
Speaker 3: shape that helps propagate space and time. How you move
Speaker 3: through space and time is shaped into this same kind
Speaker 3: of dodecoxedron shape. We see this, you know. I started
Speaker 3: investigating the you know, just modern day you know, where
Speaker 3: are they using this kind of technology or this understanding,
Speaker 3: uh in our modern day signs. I came across a
Speaker 3: couple of articles where they were using uh dodecahedron shaped
Speaker 3: uh virus, not a virus, but they were they were
Speaker 3: creating some kind of vaccine using their dodecohedron that would
Speaker 3: go into the body and restructure the DNA. And I'm like,
Speaker 3: what is what is like? What is going on with this?
Speaker 3: It's like no one's talking about it, but it's everywhere. Uh,
Speaker 3: even the the the concept of the of the twelve
Speaker 3: points and the the the understanding of ancient text If
Speaker 3: you go to you go to other ancient texts, you'll
Speaker 3: see that the twelve is there as well.
Speaker 2: Are they afraid to talk about it?
Speaker 3: Uh? You know, this is where people are are always
Speaker 3: kind of suspicious of these secret societies and people that
Speaker 3: know things about how the universe works, and no one's
Speaker 3: really talking about it. You know, one of the things
Speaker 3: that I that I talked about with documentary is that
Speaker 3: there was this shift that happened in our human experience,
Speaker 3: if you will, uh. And it'll be debated on what
Speaker 3: that was, but but I think everybody in their in
Speaker 3: their research can say that there was a shift, and
Speaker 3: whatever happened was so dramatic that it changed our way
Speaker 3: of being in our in our in our consciousness and
Speaker 3: our structures. And that could be this concept of the
Speaker 3: fall of Atlantis, the flood, the this this catastrophe. But
Speaker 3: in that moment, we have evidence at some point that
Speaker 3: these ancient cultures were running on an understanding of a
Speaker 3: system of a base twelve system of base sixty systems,
Speaker 3: and then all of a sudden it turned over to
Speaker 3: a base ten system. This is the binary system that
Speaker 3: we live today, the financial system that we are in today.
Speaker 3: This is how we as a species look at everything,
Speaker 3: how we calculate everything, how it becomes meaning within our reality.
Speaker 3: But before that shift, whatever that shift was there, all
Speaker 3: these ancient cultures were tapped into some other kind of design.
Speaker 3: And so I make the case that the idea of
Speaker 3: twelve is really the construct, the real construct that we
Speaker 3: have access to that we do not access. We've accessed
Speaker 3: some kind of false system of the evidence that we
Speaker 3: have is in this kind of base ten understanding of
Speaker 3: how we calculate our reality. There was a NSA document
Speaker 3: that was published. This is notting like. This was a
Speaker 3: NSA document was published using a nineteen fifty two British
Speaker 3: scientist Lancelot Hoghen. He delivered an address where he talked
Speaker 3: about the idea that if we were to ever communicate
Speaker 3: with alien life, it would probably be in a number system,
Speaker 3: and he was pretty sure that it would have it
Speaker 3: would be a base twelve system. Like, where is he
Speaker 3: coming up with that? That's published in this NSA document
Speaker 3: called Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence. That's just such a random statement.
Speaker 3: There's nobody that's really discussing that unless you're in esoteric
Speaker 3: circles of this base twelve based kin system. So this
Speaker 3: is where I think there's people that have studied this design.
Speaker 3: You know, I don't want to get into the Illuminati
Speaker 3: conversations or that there's people that get it and they
Speaker 3: know it and they understand that that is a universal
Speaker 3: design that they can tap into and they can use
Speaker 3: that energy while everyone else is operating in some other
Speaker 3: systems that is completely blind to how the universe really works.
Speaker 2: How did this code twelve lead you to the simulation theory?
Speaker 3: The the code twelve meaning this this kind of twelve design,
Speaker 3: the theory really kind of presented itself that you know,
Speaker 3: here you have everything from NASA to other publications talking
Speaker 3: about this structure that that we that apparently we live
Speaker 3: in that nobody seems to think that's a big deal.
Speaker 3: And then you have all this ancient mythology and weird
Speaker 3: calculation that some of these uh these the monuments and
Speaker 3: temples that suggest that they too were connected to that construct.
Speaker 3: So what I think that construct is is that when
Speaker 3: you think of a matrix, you're thinking you think of
Speaker 3: the movie The Matrix, right, You think of like, Okay,
Speaker 3: so I'm canon reason and I'm living in a false
Speaker 3: reality and I'm really just hooked up to a tube
Speaker 3: somewhere in a pod, and I'm you know, that's That's
Speaker 3: not what I'm saying. What I am saying is that
Speaker 3: our souls are real, we are living some kind of experience,
Speaker 3: but we are inside a construct of a construct. The
Speaker 3: universal design is the design of this twelve the design
Speaker 3: that we have decided to create our reality around is
Speaker 3: this false construct. And and when you talk about all
Speaker 3: these spiritual leaders in the past, you know where they
Speaker 3: about Buddha or Jesus or whatever you whatever mythology or
Speaker 3: story or a religion that you follow, they talk about
Speaker 3: whoever that prophet is or whoever that person has come forward,
Speaker 3: that person has able to seek. They've been able to
Speaker 3: come out of this human construct and they've been able
Speaker 3: to bring some kind of power in and they're able
Speaker 3: to heal, they're able to help people, they're able to
Speaker 3: to commune with the gods, if you will. And that
Speaker 3: just means that they tapped into the universal design versus
Speaker 3: this construct that we've that we live in. In my documentary,
Speaker 3: I make the case that whatever this fall was, Uh,
Speaker 3: there's there's texts like the Emerald tablets, but talk about
Speaker 3: at one point to created kind of a the Great
Speaker 3: pyramid to become some kind of energy is some kind
Speaker 3: of device, if you will, this great architecture to admit
Speaker 3: some kind of frequency. Now I am paraphrasing the Emerald
Speaker 3: tablets because they're very hard to read, and there's been
Speaker 3: a pushback that that's not real. But there is this
Speaker 3: idea that at one point there was something else made
Speaker 3: to kind of stabilize the structure of the earth. And
Speaker 3: so in my documentary I explore that a little bit,
Speaker 3: that this kind of great fall from our universal design
Speaker 3: is cutting off our ability to be part of the
Speaker 3: gods and goddesses, if you will. Was something that was deliberate,
Speaker 3: but that we must have all agreed to, and then
Speaker 3: we just forgot that we agreed to it, and we've
Speaker 3: become part of this consciousness that doesn't fit where we
Speaker 3: are right now. It's like we've outrun all the programs.
Speaker 3: We've been to war with each other a million times,
Speaker 3: nothing ever really gets solved. It's the constant. We've run
Speaker 3: the system dry. And now we've come to a point,
Speaker 3: a precipice, if you will, where if we live in
Speaker 3: a simulation, why am I able to talk about it
Speaker 3: unless the simulation is designed for you to figure out
Speaker 3: what it is?
Speaker 2: Is there an overseer of the simulation or is it
Speaker 2: just running a mark?
Speaker 3: Now I don't think they're I mean, we could get
Speaker 3: into that theory, but I really think the over sphere
Speaker 3: is us. We have something might have been put in place,
Speaker 3: but we have believed it for thousands of years. That
Speaker 3: we are now the keepers. We are the key out,
Speaker 3: and we are the We are the keepers of ourselves
Speaker 3: in this construct. We've created this collective consciousness and we
Speaker 3: believed it for thousands of years. And therefore, you know,
Speaker 3: if you've got one or two people or two hundred
Speaker 3: thousand people that believe that we live in a simulation,
Speaker 3: well we've got you know, billions of people on the
Speaker 3: planet believing that this is this is the reality we
Speaker 3: need to live in, and so it holds stronger frequency.
Speaker 3: I really think that instead of trying to find one
Speaker 3: person to blame for such a construct, we really need
Speaker 3: to look to ourselves that this, if we've created a
Speaker 3: false reality within a construct that we have access to,
Speaker 3: do we really could we live without it? We could
Speaker 3: we undo that? And I think, I mean, I don't know, George,
Speaker 3: you can probably agree with me that the world seems
Speaker 3: like on edge, not just just not not just the
Speaker 3: United States, not just America, but every country is at
Speaker 3: some point of a precipice of the policies, the laws,
Speaker 3: the under gone crazy. And why is that because we
Speaker 3: run the program dry like we've done all of this before.
Speaker 3: It's not working, and and it's scary to think, Okay, well,
Speaker 3: well how do we change everything? How do we just
Speaker 3: like you know, turn around and just everything falls apart.
Speaker 3: I think it's really this unraveling. You know, we talked
Speaker 3: about You probably talk about disclosure more than anybody, right.
Speaker 3: Disclosure is not the White House admitting that the aliens
Speaker 3: are real. Disclosure is when we as a consciousness are like, yeah,
Speaker 3: that's real, and we are we are part of that
Speaker 3: interdimensional existence. It's it's uh. And it's the same thing
Speaker 3: with being connected to our universal design I believe.
Speaker 1: Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at
Speaker 1: one a m. Eastern and go to Coast to coastam
Speaker 1: dot com for more