WEBVTT - Tesla Drops and SBF Pleads Not Guilty

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde at Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and then made Lovelow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Technology and it was a tough first day of trading

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>for the year, especially for Tesla shareholders to stop falling

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>by the most after deliveries they miss and Sam bankman

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Fried pleads not guilty as the ft X founder faces

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>trial in October. The same day, the top US banking

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>watchdogs send a warning about crypto activity and the slowdown

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in ad spending will continue to shake up Silicon Valley

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>giants like Google and Meta. That's as Netflix and TikTok

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>come into play. We bring you expert analysis. But first

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on this first day of three trading, editor is good

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to be back with you, and we talked about it

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>all with Dana Hall, where Piece of Station joins us

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to kick off this new year's show. These new glasses

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, whether we love them, but down people don't

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>love the numbers that came out of Tesla. What is

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it four hundred, five thousand, two hundred seventy eight vehicles

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last three months. Why was that such a

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>shock to the four hund and twenty that they promised, Well,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's always about expectations. A beat is a beat,

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>and a miss and a miss is a miss, and

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a clear miss. I mean Elon Musk spent

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the last earnings call talking about Tesla is going to

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>have this epic year end, and we saw on social

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>media that Franz, the chief designer, was at the delivery

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>center helping to hand over the car. So everyone was

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of expecting that the numbers would be pretty close

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to consensus, but they missed consensus by a mile, even

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the company's own the consensus. And you can't, you know,

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you just can't be that way when you're this kind

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of a company. In the SNP five, I mean, people

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>are expecting things to be better. The other thing is

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that over thirty or four thousand cars were quote unquote

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in transit, and so it's like Tesla is this big

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>company now, and yet they still have this logistical problem

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting cars into the hands of customers

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>at the end of every quarter, third consecutive quarter of

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>missing delivery estimate this thing I'm right and saying. And

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>then the other kind of thing that jumped out with

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>me your story is that they didn't quite make that

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent average annual growth rate. A lot a lot

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of analysts of cut price tuggets. I mean, what is

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the picture now for Tesla going forward? In well, they

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>report earnings later this month, and the big question is

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the hit too margins? So you know, they cut all

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>these prices to try to make to try to make

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the delivery target. That didn't work, So now there's gonna

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>be a great hit to gross margins. And I think

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the big thing too is guidance, Like why didn't Tesla

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>lower their guidance? You have Elon Musk selling shares of

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>his stock in the company mid December when he clearly

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>had a clear look at what demand was like for

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the quarter. So he unloads his stock. Everyone else is

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>holding the bag. And then they missed by several units.

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And so going into earnings, everyone's cutting their targets and

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants more conservative guidance for the going You're going forward,

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, Bloomberg's Dona Hole, Thank you very much. Want

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to continue the conversation is stick with Tesla with all convests.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Chief futurist Brett Winton. Brett, we'll get into two arcs

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>long term call around Tesla shortly, but just first your

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>reaction to the fourth quarter of deliveries miss and as

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing with Dane of the third consecutive miss

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for deliveries for Tesla, I think it's ironic that you

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>qualified as a miss when a company delivers year in

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>your growth against an auto market that's declining. Eight. I

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's very clear from our perspective that electric vehicles

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to become the dominant drive trains um for

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>um for automotive over the next five years. And we

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>think there'll be sixty million evs sold in and Tesla

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>will take a plurality of that. Uh, and so they

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have a huge tail wind behind them. Uh. You know,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>equities are priced on the basis of future expectations of

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>cash flow, not the quarterly delivery results. And so I

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>expected over the you know, long term, this will resolve

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and will be seen as just a blip in the

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>company's trajectory. Right, you called it ironic. What I'm saying

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, we need a yard stick, a

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>benchmark by on which to go by. Right, it's three

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>consecutive quarters of miss against consensus. But you also mentioned

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that and your growth Tesla set out once again in

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>two hopes of reaching a fift annual average growth target.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>They didn't hit that either. Do you expect them to

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>hit it going forward? Yeah, Then whether or not they

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>hit their growth target is a function of production, not demand.

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And so right now the market is talking a lot

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about demand. I think it's probably um true that consumers

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are confused by the u S regulation and which evs

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>will qualify and what mix and models will and so

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>there is probably a demand kind of hiccup as people

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>tried to assess and wait out kind of tax guidance

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>for for getting money off the vehicle starting in the

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>new year. But ultimately it's a question of whether or

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>not Tesla can scale production, and they've demonstrated over time

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that they can, and and I think that's the you know,

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we're making a huge transition from one drive train to another.

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is is at least three or four years ahead

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of the industry and driving that transition. And we believe

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to continue to scale drive down costs of manufacture.

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And and that's not a scenario where you end up

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>with a problem on on even margins as as as

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Dana mentioned, who knows what the margins will look like

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>this quarter. I think over time, the company has delivered

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>an ability to expand gross margins and and operating margins

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>as they have this incredible tailwind of demand for electric vehicles,

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the way in which we're going to ride

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>around to us. Though about the competition, of course, you

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>say that what ahead of it? But competition is coming,

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's coming firstly bred sure. So Tesla released the

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>Model three in sen and it basically took the industry

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>four years before there was a range and cost competitive

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>vehicle with the Model three. With that Model three, and

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>their cars haven't stayed the same. In March, we think

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla's gonna announce a new vehicle platform and that

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the cost of manufacturer for that vehicle platform will be

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>roughly half the cost of the Model three. If you

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>look at what happened when they released the Model three,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>they had a massive gross margin expansion and massive unit

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>volume expansion over multiple years. I think the same thing

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen with the new vehicle platform they

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>announced in March, and so they're gonna set the standard

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for the industry again. The industry will again be four

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>or five years behind UH and for shareholder it's it's

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a great outcome. Uh. You you end up with a

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>company establishing a strategic footprint in in a massive, literally

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar plus market UH and UH and and likely

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to dominate and soak up all of the profits out

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of that industry, as as the rest of the competitors

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>struggle to catch up. Well, I mean, China's a slightly

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>different UH market than than the US and Western markets.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that Tesla will remain at the higher end

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese market and UM and clearly they have a

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>beneficial and synergistic relationship with the government in China, and

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're providing demand for the Chinese battery ecosystem and

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and releasing a product into the market that the Chinese

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>domestics really enjoy and love. UH and that market is

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>likely to be more competitive just because costom manufacturers so

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>much lower. There right, brett Arc has a sort of

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>long term call on the stock hundred dollars per share,

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>which you expect to materialize in six I asked Twitter

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>users and our followers, our audience on the show kind

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of what they wanted to ask you. Many wanted to

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ask about that call if it's still is intact. But

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they also wanted to ask how much of it is

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>reflective of the promise of full self driving away from

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just the simple business of selling vehicles. Sure, so, just

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>just a note that forty dollars to show that was

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>pre stock split, so you have to make in a

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>split for the stock split, for the for the for

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the UH. You know, current adjusted UH share price expectation,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>though our expectation hasn't um changed UH and in fact,

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going through the process of of updating our numbers

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, so keep an eye out for that as

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>well as our overall EV forecast and and in our

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Big Ideas report that will release later this month. UM

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the roughly a third of the value of the business

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is the EV manufacturing the business in our view, and

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of the value of the business is expectations

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for GROBOTAXI. And that's a really important consideration here. People

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>act like, oh, this unit number in matters tremendously in

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in the the scheme and scope of of the business model.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>If they can deliver full self driving, that will transform

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the company. You go from getting one time profitability from

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>each asset sold to ongoing cash flow generation from every

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>asset in field per annum. On a go forward basis,

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>as these um individually owned vehicles that are used you know,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the time and spend their time part

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>turn into robotaxis that can take you know, five or

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>ten people around in a day uh and and deliver

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>ongoing returns to shareholders. So it will be a business

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>value transformation if and as they deliver it, and the

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>evidence on the ground is they'll be able to. I mean,

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I use it every day. It makes driving safer less stressful.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and I'm less tired after driving. It's a

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>great product. And by the way, it improved yesterday while

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it was sitting in my driveway. The car I owned

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>today is better than the car I owned yesterday. There's

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>almost no other vehicle in the world you can say

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that about. And so I think that the promise of

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that transformation to the business models is really extreme and

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to assume it's going to happen in

0:09:54.920 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>order to underwrite a really material return for the company. Right. Well,

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly the bill case, we thanks for you for having

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>new on and do come back with the updated numbers.

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the pragmatic case. I mean, like, let's be honest,

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a world class um product that people love

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and that makes them safer and gets them to and

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>from places faster and easier. Uh, and I don't expect

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it that that hasn't changed, and so we expected to

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>continue of arc. We thank you, hands up, have a

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>great start to twenty three. Thanks for coming on. All

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>things tess are all things pragmatic, or some would say,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 1>in all case, what to expect from tech stocks? Of course,

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, next to you bull more generally, we're gonna

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>be asking, ever core I s I Senior Imagine Director

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and head of Internet Research, Mark Mahaney, that's next is

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a bloomberg. These take investors really haven't had to focus

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on business fundamentals for a long period of time. They've

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>been writing this lower inflation rate cycle and riding the

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>right you know, the rising in stock prices that come

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>as a result of that. So tech investors are now

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>actually having to do the work that we have been doing,

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, as active stock pickers our entire career. So

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why we think there's a lot of opportunity there,

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But you really need to be stockpickers. Franklin Mutual Advisors

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager Katrina Dudley. There was some tough love tech investors.

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>As we entered this new year, let's continue the conversation

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>with a man who does a lot of fundamental analysis,

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Mark Mahaney of ever Core. And it's great to start

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the year with you, Mark and talk to us about

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>what was cautious and muted two now turns to constructive

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>after a brutal last year. Mark, some of your best

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>ideas and one of them is Uber. It's interesting we

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>just finished a conversation had on the heels of Tessa robotaxis.

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>What fundamentally looks nice to you with Uber? Mark? Well, Caroline,

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>thanks and happy new year to you. It's nice to

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>see you again. The this last year wasn't terrible year.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>There was the worst performing year for stocks, especially for

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>growth equities since two thousand and eight. So yeah, that

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was that was very challenging. I'm going into this year

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>we try to be tactically constructive, which means we're looking

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for companies that are somewhat recession resistant and I don't

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>cover a defensive space, so somewhat recession resistant, maybe have

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>new revenue streams and then have taken cost actions because

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you need to do that at demand is going to

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>soften and that leads us to like to two stocks

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in particular. You mentioned one Uber, the others Netflix Uber.

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think that the ride sharing part of the

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>business is more for utility than a discretionary spend environment.

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>We still need to commute, We still have our weekend outings,

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>and we still have some airport trips, and leisure demand

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>trends seem to be holding up very well. So I

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>just think that that part of the business holds up well.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Company has taken a lot of costs out it was

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>forced to, and it was probably to its own benefit. UH.

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And they've now turned a corner on free cash flow,

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think they'll be able to continue to grow

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow. So I think it's that as the

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>story changes from a growth at all cost company to

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>a im positive free cash flow company. I just think

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you're going to find a lot of

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>valuation support for the name UH and that's why I

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>think the stock and outperformed this year. It's interesting just

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>there already you're getting to the nuts and the bolts

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of fundamentals and decisions while you're picking certain companies to

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>perform over and above others. Do you think it's true

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of technology investors out there haven't done

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental analysis or indeed aren't able and set up

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for an environment that is completely out odds with what

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they've been used to, which is basically lower rates for

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>longer there's no question and easy money time, you know,

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>with with practically zero interest rates allowed multiples for one

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to get in times very aggressive, and it kind of

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a fools follow fools, and I was certainly

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those fools. From time to time on certain stocks.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>We all make mistakes. I've made fit more than my

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>share of them. But in terms of the fundamentals, you know,

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I still stick with those, and I think a lot

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of tech investors do. I don't think. I don't think

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that's hot rising interest rates. So this caused names like

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Amazon or Google or Meta to underperforming stocks. I think

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>there are other issues, including now increasingly cyclical risk. In

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>case of Meta, there are these Apple privacy changes. In

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the case of Amazon, there's also some MISSE execution on

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the airport, and then also just full exposure to inflationary concerns.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So there really were a lot of issues besides just

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>rising rates. Rising rates really affected those long term profitable,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>near term profit less companies, and that would be more

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>names like a Shopify for example, and that's why you

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>saw names like that with the highest multiples correct the

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>most last year, Mark, Caroline and I spent a lot

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of the last few weeks of the year talking about

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>layoffs or hiring freezes, cost cutting. I'm trying to summarize

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>all of your your points that you seem to be

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that all the pain is gone, like it's been done.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We we we we We've gone through it, We've d risk.

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that your conclusion going into this year? No, I

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go that far, wouldn't be that bold. US

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>multiples have been de risked. Could multiple still fall, of

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>course they could, but they have fallen pretty dramatically. And

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got a good number of these large cap internet

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>names that I look at that are trading at five

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>year trop multiples. Doesn't mean they can't go down further,

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the risk has been taken out.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>The same thing with estimates, and one of the things

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's caused estimates to come down are these companies

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>taking costs out of their business. The six percent riff

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>reduction enforce at door Dash, the riff production enforce at

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Meta these companies and Amazon did this to There are

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>companies that have yet to do this, though Google is

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>one where I just think they had five quarters in

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a row of accelerating in record high employee ads up

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>through the September quarter of last year. It's really kind

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of a little bit shocking in hindsight. I'm surprised that

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the company didn't start tempering down it's number of new employees.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna have to start, you know, reducing

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that employee footprint or else margin is gonna be under

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure. Mark we took to twin at

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to Oscar already it's how they see three. We asked

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>are you bullish on tech or you barish on tech? Vs?

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Are the results will bring them up for you mostly

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bullish respondents bullish? What would it take to make you

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>bullish on technology broadly going into the rest of the year. Well,

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually surprised that the survey was that bullish. Frankly,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm surprised by that. So, uh, you know, I

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>want to be tactically constructive, and I tell you one

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>thing I still want to get across the point here.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think demand trends are going to continue to soften

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they did in Q three. I think when the Q

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>four results come out over the next month, we're going

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to see the revenue trendsfer online retail, online advertising, cloud

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>computing companies. Those are all continued to soften, and I

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>think they will continue to in the middle through the

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>middle of twenty three. Then I hope and the market hopes,

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that fundamental trends stabilized, revenue growth starts to re accelerate.

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>If that happens, you'll start seeing multiples go up. And

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>especially with cost taking out, you have revenue growth reacceleration

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>on a lower cost base, you get this EPs slingshot opportunity.

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what's going to cause these stocks to work well.

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So the market is sort of hoping thinking that that

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>will happen in the back cap of twenty three. And

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the question we all need to ask ourselves is is

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the market going to be too early or too late

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>on that call? All right? Mark mehadia ever call a

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>day one three in the bag, Thank you. It was

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Sam bang Winfried's day in court. The ft X founder

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>appeared before a federal judge in Manhattan and pleaded not

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>guilty to criminal charges he's now set to face a

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>trial in October. Stood outside, this is the one the

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>only Asian hallibus joining us from the courthouse, and we'll

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>where next Shannani. What a day it's been, Caroline, Because

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in addition to him playing not guilty as we had

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>expected to eight criminal counts here, there's a lot else

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that happened. A trial date has been set for October. Second, now,

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>if everything goes correctly, and that does indeed happen on

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>October seven A second, Sorry, this is expected here to

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>take a number of weeks to play out in terms

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of the trial that we made too later this year.

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>In the coming weeks, we expect the US to start

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>presenting their evidence, to present evidence at greater scale on

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the charges that they have made. And remember, then there

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>is a process by which Sam Bangmun freed and his

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>lawyers set forward their motions. So there is a process here,

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and again things could change before October, certainly, but we

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>did get a lot of information today about the nature

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of what we'll play out ahead and the timelines in

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>which we are preliminarily operating on. Now. I will also

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>say there was contention in the court. Sam Bangmun freed

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>came in wearing a suit north face backpack that was

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>his arms crossed as the prosecutors asked to amend the

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>terms of his bail package. Now this is very interesting

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>because Bloomberg is separately reported Aba Beny Morrison for US

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>has broken that US prosecutors are separately investigating this idea

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>here of money being transferred out of FT and Alameda wallets. Remember,

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the part of a THEIL amendment now is for them

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to seek the spf SA. Magma Freed himself cannot be

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>taking money. It cannot be taking any cryptocurrency assets or

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>any other assets from Alameda and f TS wallets. Now

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he himself has tweeted as we know that he has

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not done so, but the prosecutor had said the assistant

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>attorney has said that this is something that they've seen

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>him lie about before in general, and so again a

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>point of contention here. But we will see this play

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>out in real time, all right, thanks to bloombergs Snali Bassett.

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>October seems a long way away, given that that story

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is dominated headlines for the last two months. Welcome back

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to Bloeveog Technology of Caroline Hide in New York alongside

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>at Ludlow in San Francisco and big text we out

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of the world of hedge funds in fact today, Yeah,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting because throughout the day this was

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the most read stories on the Bloomberg terminal

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and online. It's about Serga cap okay debut Tuesday. It's

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the first or biggest launched by a woman led hedge

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>fund one point eight billion dollars in assets under management.

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And I found this so fascinating because we've been writing

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Bloomberg about how hedge funds suffered in

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>two Those that kind of looks more to private markets

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fed a little bit better. But this is really interesting

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>based on what Serga Cap is going to be focused on.

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Malagan caused the founder. She's kind of this alumni of

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Lone Pine Capital and according to sources, this is interesting Caroline.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>She's going to be using data science to invest in

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>themes that look at how technology can improve pretty bog

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>standard areas. So how technology enhances financials, industrials, healthcare is

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>enterprise data. But really the why we care here is

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is the largest debut of a woman led

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund in the industries here streak given all of

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the volatility literally around this industry and the under performance

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of two. It was a headline that caught my eye,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and certainly this is a name that we want to

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on going forward. Historic day, it would

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>seem there's some history being made in politics as well.

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>If I briefly want to bring you the headline after

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Macarthury suffered a historic rebar remember and a pretty drawn

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>out speaker vote, they are going to be a journeying

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>now until tomorrow Wednesday noon, after failing to elect a

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House. Of course, that's in the United

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>States politics. So for now we see an adjournment after

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>three rounds of votes to elect a Speaker of the House.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But let's get back to our bread and butter. Let's

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>get back to technology. Let's get back to in fact

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>precede investing as well, and in this environment, many saying

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that's still the area that's going to be humming along

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>quite nicely. My al gave as with our CEO of

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>tech Stars. It is invested in Get This more than

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>three thousand three early stage startups, making it one of

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the world's largest precede investors, having written early checks to

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>companies such as Uber and Twilio. It is wonderful to

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>have you here in York. And how are you feeling

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>as we enter twenty three? How are the companies which

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you help fund feeling. I think three is going to

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>be one of the trickiest year on record since the

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>dot com the dot com bubble, for both investors and startups,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and mostly because there are so many things happening at

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the same times. On one hand, you have valuations going down,

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>found raising lasting much longer I p O not happening,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and as a result of that, we expect a lot

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of companies are going to fail. At the same time,

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing an influx of early stage ideas and a

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of entrepreneurs on the back of some of the

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>tech layoffs that have met the headlines. And then on

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>top of that you have the VC industry which is

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>going through a fundamental restructuring and what looks more and

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>more like a pretty deep consolidation. So trickier for everyone. Tricky,

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>many say, from the ashes rise the roses and and

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>d We saw that perhaps in the thousand and seven

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>eight after the financial crisis, we saw the birth of Uber.

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>We all the birth of Airbnb, and there likes. What

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>do you look for at the moment in the people

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that you're wanting to be helping, wanting to be mentoring,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>want to be giving money. How we started to see

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a focus on perhaps the profit side of the equation.

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So we we've been investing in early stage for fifteen

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>years and we have continuously looked for the same thing.

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>We want resilient, unstoppable founders who are working on really

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>innovative ideas and big markets. And the reason why three

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>four early stage investors like us is really exciting is

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>because we see a lot again talking about the tech

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>li off, a lot of tech workers coming and being like,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to be an entrepreneur, and they come with

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>very big idea and then when you look whether it's

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>by geography or by industry, there's like massive pool of

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>innovation happening. And so I don't think there's ever been

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a better time to be an early stage investor. Actually,

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>mail one of the conversations Caroline and I were having

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of two was about the positives that

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>come out layoffs. Obviously incredibly tough losing your job, but actually,

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look back at prior recessions, the dot com

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>bubble t eight, a lot of those laid layoffs. Laid

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>off go on to be entrepreneurs in their rights start

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>their own companies. Do you agree with that the school

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of thoughts absolutely, and we're seeing it right now. The

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>number of entrepreneurs who are peaching us to become their investors,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>who come from the midle of this world, the Google

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of this world, has increased dramatically, and so that's extremely positive.

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And again across multiple industry and multiple geographies, we're seeing that.

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The other positive that is not always talked about is

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>for early stage companies UM there was a lot of

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>pressure on compensation to hire tech workers, and with the

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>layoff that have happened in the pressure on compensation has decreased,

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and it has been a lot easier for a lot

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of our portfolio companies to hire the head of product

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>that they had always dreamed about, or the c for

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that they had always dreamed about. I find text I

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting. You've got about a billion dollars in

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>assets under management, right, but you look at precede, that's

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>very different size and scale to the industry. As I understanding.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, lots of players in the seed stage or

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>precde have tens or maybe a hundred million dollars. It

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>makes me think about consolidation and this idea that actually

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>small venture capital firms are all trying to buy for

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>similar promising names. What do you expect the industry to

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>experience this year. So, because we are one of the

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>major deal flow to the venture world, we talked to

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>thousands of investors every year, and we are seeing now

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>something that is not yet reflected in the data. We're

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing an increasing number of emerging managers. Managers will have

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>less than a hundred million dollars of assets under management,

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>will have raised one, maybe two fonts, telling us behind

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>closed door, we're not going to raise our next FONT.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>And so we expect that the number of small venture

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>capital firm is going to decrease dramatically, potentially up to

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty of the venture capital firm that exists today seizing

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>practically to function in the next few years. May your

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>background also really fascinating And we speak here as a

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of Europeans basically around a table talking about US opportunities,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but go global for us. You're someone who's led businesses

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and in Russia, in Europe, your farm of course France.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>What what a the global opportunities here? Is everything going

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to revert to the mean, the normal of Oh, we're

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>going to back tech entrepreneurs out of Selicon Valley and

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they're kinda gonna look like US. I don't think so.

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I think what's what's happening right now is a lot

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of other places creating very vibrant ecosystem. Uh. Look at

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East and Africa right now, it is booming

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of entrepreneurs, lots of capital flowing their big

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>market that are completely untapped. Even Europe, where we're both from,

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like Paris, has done a phenomenal job at at creating

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary ecosystem, and so we are textures are very

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>bullish on opportunities. Not just in the US obviously the

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 1>US remained the leading market for tech entrepreneurs, but also

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, Africa and Europe for sure. Male the I

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>p A market ground to a halt last year. Will

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it revive this year? I don't think so. It looks

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to flatlock, continue to flatline. Um. The unknown, obviously,

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is around a few of the big I p O

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>which are supposed to be in the pipe, things like

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Insta carts or or Stripe and not made changed. The

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>sentiments on the market, but as of today, we advise

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>or portfolio companies to look at alternative We tell them

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that if they're desperate for an exit, they probably already

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>lost the battle and that they should be focusing on

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>alternative option down round of venture debts or M and

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>A as an alternative to I P. We we do

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit hung up on I P O

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>s right, this kind of north star that you look

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to to go public but actually precede seed stage. You

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>have options, right, strategics can acquire you. You can you know,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>basically shop yourself to a bigger party. What are some

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of those options? I mean, do you see M and

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>A broadly taking place in absolutely and again behind closed

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>door Because of our large portfolio, we have a lot

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of conversations with a lot of people in the market,

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and what we're seeing is an increasing number of large

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>companies looking at M and A. Because the valuations are

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>going down, it makes it more attractive for them, and

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>because the founders are struggling to found raise from the

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>VC world, there are more amenable to have this conversation.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So I would expect a lot more M and A

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this year and next year. Let's talk industries or problems

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>looking to be fixed right now, because you talk about

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>M and A, and a lot of the issues about

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>M and A is sometimes regulatory in their minded people

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>can't make the acquisitions they perhaps would like to. What

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>are the problems that people want to fix that they

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>would like to fix right now? What are you seeing

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>from these entrepreneurs who perhaps getting laid off at some

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of the big companies that can't do the purchasing right now.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So Number one climate climate tech, and it's a It's

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>at a point right now where I'm starting to wonder

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>whether there's not going to be a big bubble specifically

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in climate tech. But the market is hard, lots of innovation,

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of capital, and look objectively big problems to solve,

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's an interesting market. We're also seeing a lot

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of things happening in foot tech and arctech UM in

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>particular following the war in Ukraine and the problem was

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>supply chain, so I think a lot of people have

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>started realizing that actually, um, we needed to be more

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>focused on creating food for the world. And then health

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>tech is also booming. Lots of things happening in that environment, uh,

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>especially in developing countries where people are starting to get

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>access to better healthcare. Really good to have some time

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>with the head. Yeah, well, you know we're very focused

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on that. You know that what I would call the

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>sexy end of the startup curve. Right, we talked all

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>about these growth stage companies. Actually, everything you and I

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have heard in recent weeks says look at seed and

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>presead stage because that's where we'll see some activity. Ine

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>mile Garv, CEO of Textiles, will find out over the

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>course of the next twelve months if you're right. Thank you. Now,

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>coming up from the I p O drought to the

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>ads drought, how will Matter and Google fair as the

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.479
<v Speaker 1>advertising market moves out of their favor? What does that

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>mean for media? This is Bloomberg. I want to bring

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you some headlines that cross the terminal. This our Twitter

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>is easing its political ad policies in an effort to

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>boost revenue. Will dig into that as we get more information.

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>But a slowdown and advertising markets could present a big

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>problem for tech. This year, US advertising growth is expected

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to have from ten percent to five three according to

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>an analysis published Tuesday by Bloomberg Intelligence. Here to discuss this,

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Douglas, CEO of Mountain a software to help companies

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>launch direct response campaigns on television in particular Mark, Let's

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>start with that forecast, the idea that broadly the ad

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 1>markets growth will slow from ten per cent to five three.

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Does that reflect what you're seeing? Um? Yeah, And it's

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>occurring for a couple of reasons. I think in when

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at like paid search and paid social, especially

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>paid social like we're talking Instagram, TikTok, those kind of

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>platforms which you're seeing there, I think it's a lot

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of concerns about brand safety around the political discourse on

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>these platforms, and also just a sheer performance. Apples changes

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>did wind up having an impact. Their changes in terms

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of identification and device did wind up having an impact

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in particular one Meta and Snap and others. The other

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that's affecting it when you look at the television market,

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>there's just a supply demanding balance. You have a lot

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of inventory coming online from Netflix, Disney Plus and other suppliers.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And while brand advertisers are literally not spending more, they're

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>spending less. So that's going to create a price war

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna see declining prices. The two of those combined,

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they're having a pretty negative impact UM in the near term.

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Oneis markets, but I think you'll see more growth in

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the second half. Two was just packed with news and

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a significant events. And you think about two February in

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the start of the war in Ukraine, the impact that

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>had on advertising, in the shock that Meta gave us

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in February, and then by the end of the year

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about add supported tiers for Disney, for Netflix,

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and the markets changed its conversation. How important were those

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of big ticket items in two in shaking up

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the landscape and advertising. Yeah, I don't think that kind

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of news. I mean, obviously the war in Ukraine then

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>affected the stock market. So I think what we saw

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is over the summer, advertisers just somewhat panicked and didn't

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know what to do, you know, so, but they that

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>started to recover in the second half of the year,

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at least in our business, we ended the year with

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>record breaking months, So you know, if that's any indication

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of larger market UM, advertisers, like I said, panicked over

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the summer, and I think once they got in the

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>holiday season, they realized, look, if we're gonna grow up business,

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have them spend money to reach consumers. So

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately the market, the market in the second

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>half kind of stabilized. But again these macro forces, you know,

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>especially like price war is coming from so much supply,

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>those kind of things are just having a big overall effect.

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it will create a better future though, and

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>meaning that there's no longer this duopoly of Jet, Google

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and Meta, you know, dominating advertising. I think television is

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>now digital is going to really have a big impact

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on the overall market. Okay, so who wins that mark

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>from your perspective in terms in terms of TV, it's

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the big players. I think you're likely to see a

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of M and A. So what's gonna happen is

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>there are new advertisers coming in the market. I mean

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>TV is now The way to think of this is

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there what's this duopoli between Google and Meta. They now

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>control less than half of the advertising body, so that

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>their overall controllers applient as other areas have grown. And

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so what has happened is television with connected TV streaming

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.919
<v Speaker 1>is digital also and it's now benefiting in the same

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>way that digital advertising benefited Google and Meta. And so

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you see this growth occurring there more customers coming into

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the market, They're spending more. It's diversifying the customer base

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>away from just a thousand or two thousand advertisers to

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>many more. And so television is coming on strong as

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this third big scale channel that's now a true digital channel.

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that means Men and Google lose,

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but it just kind of means that they no longer

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>dominate in the way they have in the pass and

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that's really good overall for avertis for the advertising industry,

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's new sort of rules of the game. The

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>load of the companies need speech. You have to learn,

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.919
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it comes to maybe Disney Plus not wanting

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to advertise you're thinking of alcohol if they give a

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>politics and just have the headline about Twitter perhaps going

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more into political advertising. But how are

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the clients you speak to how companies and

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>advertises marketers thinking about where they place the ads, how

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they place the ads. Yeah, I mean, so the advertising

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>market is splitting the brand advertisers and that you don't

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>sell alcohol like over the internet, right, so so so

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you certainly and so you know the brand advertisers that

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone thinks of when they watch sports and what and

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>watch other TV there there's not actually that many of them.

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It's about you know, thousand and two thousand and but

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's what everyone thinks of. It's the direct response advertisers.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Meta has ten million customers advertising on their platform.

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are numbers they in nown school Goal has an

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>equal or higher number and so and now you're seeing

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those advertisers come to television and so

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>those advertisers really don't care about those rules. It's the

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>brand advertisers that worry about how their brand is being perceived.

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The direct response advertisers that really truly dominate advertising. Um

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're like, if you think of the direct response

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>market the US is three times the size of the

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.919
<v Speaker 1>brand average sizing market and television. Those direct renaissance advertisers,

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they just want to reach consumers wherever they are. They're

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not worried about rule, you know, they're not thinking of

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>those rules. So so you know, all of these things

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in terms of the you know, rules like

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that that really just pertains to to the advertisers that

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>are not directly measuring the response the ads, which is

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>what we mean when we say direct response advertising are

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>great to get your direct analysis with us on direct

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>response advertising and all of the gamute maybe sensitability there,

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Mark Douglas, we thank you so much, CEO Mountain. Meanwhile,

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>well from advertising year ahead to perhaps your own resolutions

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>around work, what about perhaps we have fewer meetings? He

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>d e commerce giant shopper fight. Did you hear it's

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>clear today putting an end to unproductive meetings saying look,

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>employees just say no. They're currently saying, look, we are

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>calendar purging right now. We were removing all recurring meetings

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>if we can't remember why or if they started. And

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>also they're reupping the ruler that on a Wednesday tomorrow,

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not a single meeting to we had. That's quite a

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>commonplace thing here in on the West Coast, you know,

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Twilio Meta have no meeting Wednesdays. When I read this story,

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought, how are they going to make this happen?

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>You and I are calendars are full of meetings right

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And in the story they say that there will be

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a boss to enforce this. So every time somebody organized

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>as a meeting, you get this bot pop up and

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>say a reminder. You know you don't need to have

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this meeting. Right, it's bizarre, It's completely bizarre. But it's

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>also like the opposite effect of the pandemic. Right, we

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>all worked at home but then became so accustomed to

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>doing constant zooms or meets or whatever it is, and

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a money suck. Basically, the University of North Carolina

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are saying a hundred million dollars on average is lost

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>by a big company because everyone spending their time of meetings.

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's the opportunity cost. It's what you're not doing

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>when you're in that meeting that perhaps didn't need to

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>be arranged. You're not being productive and perhaps being a

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more stressed. I can hear the producers in my saying,

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think about it. You're already late enough as it

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 1>is to our meetings, all the meetings, all the time

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>going viral and outcoring of support for Damar Hamlin, the

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four year old Buffalo Bill safety who suffered from

0:38:56.000 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>cardiac arrest on Monday night. Football Hamelin is unsurprisingly gaining

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>support with well wishes, but he's also gaining support in fundraising.

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 1>His go fund me page, astonishing it was from to

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>purchase toys for underprivileged children. Barely at that point a

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 1>cross two thousand, five hundred dollars. The goal was without two.

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Now the fund has more than four and a half

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, more than three million donated to the fund

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in a seven hour period from more than seventy five

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand donors. Really, the outpouring here is substantial, and indeed

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>from some key executives. I know you've kept any on. Yeah,

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is our going viral segment, right, and

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's fair to say that in those moments after it

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>happened on the field, it did go viral, particularly on Twitter.

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>An example, Bob Iger, the returned CEO of Disney, took

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter and said, you know, tonight we should all

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 1>be praying for Deamar Hamlin. But that for me. You

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and I have been covering Twitter in particular, but social

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>media broadly for weeks months, and this is the first

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>moment where I saw a very widespread um support, sympathy,

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>empathy which has been missing from that platform for some time.

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And what was so fascinating to me, Carrow, is how

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>many people tweeted please do not share the footage of

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the incident itself, which is very interesting. Yeah, there are

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>times where humanity comes together, and in many ways, social

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>media can be a divisive, sometimes sport like environment where

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>people have their teams and they go against one another.

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>In this moment, there were no teams, there was no division,

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's just everyone coming together to try and tosform

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>one individual. Yeah. I meanwhile, that does it. From this

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology tomorrow, we have the so far

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Investment Strategy Liz Young. Yeah. Then don't forget

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, to check out our podcast. You can find

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it on the terminal, on Apple, Spotify, and on iHeart.

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg