WEBVTT - Brian Deese on Unleashing Competition (Podcast)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>M This is Mesters in Business with Very Results on

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Here. I know I say it every week,

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but really this week I have an extra special guest

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>straight from the White House. Brian Deese is the Director

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of the National Economic Council. He is essentially the chief

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>economic advisor to the President of the United States, and

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we spent a lot of time discussing the President's new

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Council on Competition, which is a very, very big deal.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a big driver of policy from

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch over the next four years. And we

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>really got deep into the weeds. We talked about everything

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>from farmers to employee contracts, to net neutrality UH, to

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the right to repair your own um products that you buy,

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to you know everything, any trust enforcement. It really was

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a policy wonks delight. If you're remotely interested in economic competition,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>any trust enforcement, employee contracts, well you're gonna find this

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to be absolutely fascinating. With no further ado, my conversation

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with the National Economic Council's director, Brian Diese, this is

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Mesters in Business with Very Results on Bluebird Radio. This week,

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I have an extra special guest. His name is Brian

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>dies He is the Director of the National Economic Council

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>at the White House and essentially the chief economic advisor

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to President Biden. Previously, he was the global head of

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Sustainable Investing at black Rock, and he was President Obama's

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Senior advisor for Climate and energy policy. Brian Diese, welcome

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>back the Master's in Business. Thanks Erry, It's great to

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>be here. So, so let's start with your role in

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this new administration. You are the thirteenth director of the

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>National Economic Council. I think most people are more familiar

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Council of Economic Advisors. Tell us a little

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>bit about this group, what it does, and how it

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>differs from the c e A. So the National Economic

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Council was created by executive order in the early nine

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>nineties with the goal of having a White House entity

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that could coordinate economic policy on behalf of the president

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the Some people think about the c A, but I

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the more natural analog is the National Security Council.

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So the National Security Council existed in the White House

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>as a way of coordinating policy on national security and

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy issues. The National Economic Council was modeled to

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>do the same for UH for both domestic and international

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>economic uh priorties. So if you go back and you

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>read the executive order that was creating early the early

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it founds pretty true to today. So what does that mean?

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Number One, have an effective way to coordinate and aggregate

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the views of all of the key economic policy principles.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>The Secretary of the Treasury, the Chair of the Council

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of Economic Advisors are Commerce Secretary or Labor Secretary, and

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>down the line, create a common table around which we

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>can debate and discuss and provide the president clear policy

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>recommendations and clear economic advice, and at the same time

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>have a coordinated way to take the direction from the

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>President about his views and his his direction on the

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>economy and drive that across the broad inter agency of

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch. To your question about the Council of

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Economic Advisors, the Council of Economic Advisors is designed as

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a almost an internal think tank of economists and experts,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>many of whom came out of academia and spend one

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.839
<v Speaker 1>or two years at the Council and provide an analytical

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>base and an economic base to think through issues, to

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>provide analysis um and really be a kind of thoughts center.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Nash Economic Council is really designed to coordinate bringing those

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>views to the table, but also um connecting them to

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the legislative and political realities that we're operating in to

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>try to get the best outcomes possible in service of

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>the president schools. So, so let's talk a little bit

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>about your boss, the President and some of his goals.

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Last week, he signed an executive order to quote, promote

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>competition in the American economy. We've kind of become used

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to these sort of one page or photo ops for

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>executive orders, but that was not what this was. It's

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a seven thousand word, seventy two bullet point document and

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's very serious policy initiative. Tell us what was

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the thinking behind rolling out this new policy this way? Well,

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you counting words and actions, because we're we're

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly focused on that as well. But we're really excited

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about this executive order, and it's based on a kind

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of very simple but important intuition, which is that having

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fair and open competition is a fundable, fundamental ingredient of

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>a healthy capitalist economy. It's what actually drives better outcomes,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>lower prices, higher wages, more innovation, more economic growth, and

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>so the core goal of this executive order is to

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>reset across the entire executive branch a focus on where

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and in what ways can we encourage healthy competition in

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>service of achieving those outcomes lower prices, higher wages, more innovation.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And what we've seen across time is that our economy

0:05:54.960 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>has gotten less competitive. UM. We have a larger umber

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of our industries that are now more concentrated than they

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>were twenty or thirty years ago. We've seen the rate

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of new business formation, particularly small business formation, fall by

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>almost since the nineteen seventies. And if you look across industries,

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, in in me packing or in

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>broadband internet, UM, consumers choices have been constrained and we

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that kind of the follow through benefit that

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at least has been argued by folks who say, you know,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>more consolidation will actually generate lower prices for consumers. We

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that either. In fact, if you aggregate up

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the impact of consolidation to an American household in terms

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of prices and wages and other attending costs, you know

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the best estimates so that it's costing about five thousand

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year for the typical household. So the goal

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of this executive Order is to say, how can we

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>start to get at that? And fundamentally, this is this

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.559
<v Speaker 1>is it's it's this is not about being pro business

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>or anti businesses about being pro competition. A lot of

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the ideas in this Executive Order are actually deregulatory in nature,

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to remove some barriers to entry that actually keep

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>workers from more effectively moving and competing for jobs or

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>new businesses to enter into new markets and grow and

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>gain market share as a result. So that's the that's

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the at a high level, that's our goal. But

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you're right, um, we we wanted to take a really

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>serious effort to go agency by agency and look where

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>where the challenges, what are the tools that we have,

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.679
<v Speaker 1>and how could we advance the ball. It looks different

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in different agencies. There's a lot uh to unpack here,

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but that's the goal at the high level. And I

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>have to tell you that's a shocking number. The lack

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of competition caused by industry consolidation and concentration plus the

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>average American family five thousand dollars a year, that that's

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a giant number. Yeah, and you when you just strow

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it down. You know. That's that's a if you you know,

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but I also would say embedded in that is a

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>big opportunity because if we can actually break down some

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of those barriers and we can encourage better competition, what

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that means is that we have a way of, um

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>actually boosting economic outcomes for the typical family in a

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>significant way. But that sounds pretty esoteric, but you break

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it down into very practical things. Um, something like hearing.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It's today, you need to get a prescription. You need

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to go to a doctor and get a prescription. You

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>can't buy hearing it's over the counter. There's almost fifty

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>million people in the country who have some form of

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>hearing loss. Um. A lot of those are older, but

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of younger people as well. UM. And that

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>requirement operates, you know, as economists say, as a barrier

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to entry. And so what that means is that it

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>just costs a lot more. It's also a hassle, but

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it costs a lot more to get hearing. It's so

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that this executive order directs is

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to plement a rule to allow hearing aids to be

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>bought over the counter. What that's gonna do is it's

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going to make it easier for those fifty million people

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>to get hearing aids more cheaply. But we also hope

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it will spur innovation by reducing that barrier to entry. Now,

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>new companies, new market entrance, can come in and innovate

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in providing hearing aid products at a lower price point,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and so that that that's just one example. Could you

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think about how that five thousand dollars aggregates up. That's

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one very practical example, but HiT's a lot of people

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in their daily life not only can you not only

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>can you you know you have a little less hassle

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that you can just go to the pharmacy and buy

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>a pair of hearing aids. But overwhelmingly we know that

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>room removing a barrier like that will make it cheaper

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully we'll generate more innovation and more opportunity for

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>new business entrance to you know, succeeded. That's really interesting.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk a little bit about part of this

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>executive order, which is the formation of the President's Council

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>on Competitiveness, beginning with the Council membership. This is this

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>is quite a list. It's the Secretary of Treasury, the

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, Chair of the FTC,

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Chair of the Consumer Financial Protection Board FCC, Agriculture, Commerce,

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on and on. It's practically the full cabinet. Why so

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>broad a membership? What what's the thinking behind that? While

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you're making me realize, I'm gonna have to get a

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>bigger office to get everybody around the table, particularly now

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that we can um start to do these convenings in person. Look,

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea of this was pretty simple, which is over

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the last several months, where we have done is we've

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>run a process of going out to agencies and understanding

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>from the agencies where the where their authority exists in

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of competition policy or antitrust um and how they

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>think it could be better deployed in service of encouraging

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>competition that will be good for consumers and families. And

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>what we found in that process is there's the breadth

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of acts and the breath breath of tools and authorities

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>really runs across um often climes. This conversation starts and

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>centers around the core antitrust statutes UH and the core

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>antitrust enforcement agencies, the Department of Justice and the FTC.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Their role is critical and they operate into independently when

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes to enforcement matters, but in fact the actual

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>tools and authorities are much broader. So in U s

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>d A, for example, we just had the UM hundred

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>year anniversary of the Packers and Stockyards Act, which is

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the antitrust statute that that applies to UM to food UH,

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>food and agricultural commodities meat packing in others UM we

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have at the Department of Transportation authorities to look at

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>competition in the airline industry, in the railroad industry, in

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the shipping industry UM and across the board. So what

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we realized in putting this executive work together is that

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the actual coordination across these different parts of our government

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is really important for two reasons. One because it's important

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for the agencies to understand how when they're taking action

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to encourage competition in a particular segment of the market,

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>like when HHS finalizes this rule to make hearing aids

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>available over the counter, how does that fit into a

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>broader economic strategy to encourage competition in UH, in the

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>railroad industry, or in the shipping industry. And the second

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is to make sure that we are we are effectively

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>coordinating and not getting across purposes. So if if if

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>one agency is moving out in a certain way, and

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>try to make sure that it's consistent and that the

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and that businesses and other stakeholders that are actually having

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to operate within these rules of the road have as

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>clear as possible guidance from the executive branch um on

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>on what our policies and what our intentions are. So

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the goal of the Council. It's been a long time,

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>uh in American economic policy that we've really priority tized

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>competition policy in this way, and we're going to need

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a structure to have that ongoing focus across time and

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>where we hope that this Council will serve that purpose.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's stay with that structure a little bit. I

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned all the members of this council. I didn't mention

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the chairperson that would happen to be you. How big

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of a job is this going to be relative to

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>your role as as director of the National Economic Council.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>How large of a priority is this and what do

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you hope to accomplish with it? Well, I think you

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>saw from the President's speech and announcement last week. The

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>priority that he and that we and as administration are

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>putting on this effort, which is very high. UM. That

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we are obviously very focused on the immediate economic challenges UM,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the rescue plan and the impact that has had on

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the economy over the last couple of months. The effort

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a Congress right now working on an infrastructure

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>pack it and on a human infrastructure element as well. UM.

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But but but equally in that category is this effort

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to try to lower prices for consumers, increased wages, generate

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>more innovation by encouraging competition. So I would say that, look,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a big priority and part of why we wanted

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to move out early. UM. This is relatively early in

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>administration to put on an executive order that is this

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this broad in terms of directives to different agencies. Was

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that we were getting going because some

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of these things, UM, appropriately will take some time. The

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>rulemaking process, uh, you know explicitly builds in time for

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>notice and comment and engagement. UM. So we know that

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>these things will take some time. But we wanted to

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>get the ball rolling and as a result, our focus

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on this council and my role in in in trying

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to lead and coordinate that will be a big piece

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of business. But we're really excited about being out of

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the game um early and uh and and aggressively here.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think what you're gonna see, hopefully is that

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of end uh end recipients, typical families, businesses,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a real welcome uh, real

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>welcome opportunity because whether you're a small family farmer who

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>has been struggling under the sense that you know, costs

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>keep going up and your choices are are going down

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>because you keep seeing consolidation in the market, or you're

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>just you know, somebody who is looking for the best

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>job possible and realizing that there are restrictions on you know,

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>moving from job to job that you didn't even know existed.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>These are kinds of things that could help people in

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>their daily lives. But if we're going to get to

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>helping in at that end point, we really got to

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>be organized and coordinated as a federal government. So we

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta you know, it's gonna be a big piece of business,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>but one that we're very excited about. So we're going

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to drill down into some of the specifics on a

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>sector by sector basis. But before we get that, Granu Lare,

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to just discuss briefly the genesis of this.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Your White House colleague Tim Woo, along with a bunch

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of others, published a large research paper back in November,

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>right right after the election, and their analysis identified that

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much since the Microsoft anti trust case in the

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety nineties, the US has kind of given up on

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>um anti trust enforcement and the result has been huge

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>industry consolidation, reduction of competition, increase pricing power, and higher

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>costs two consumers. So that leads to the question what

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>happened to anti trust enforcement in the United States. Yeah,

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an important question and and also one that

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I think is helpful to put in historic context, because

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the arc of competition policy and

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>any trust enforcement in the U s. It really you

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>do see ebbs and flows, you know, going back as

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>far as the passage of the Sherman Anti Trust Act

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen nineties, right, that was a reaction to

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>thee both the political corruption but also the sort of

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>behavior that of monopolies in the in the in the

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Gilded Age, and laid the groundwork for of course, you know, UH,

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>President Teddy Roosevelt becoming famous in in trust busting and

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>UH and and the activities in the early nineteen hundreds UM.

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And then you saw another acceleration on the back end

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>of the UM in the in the nineteen thirties, on

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the back end of the First World War UM, and

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>then coming out of the Second World War with with

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>FDR UM reflecting that as well, you then saw a

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>different a different approach that emerged in the nineteen seventies

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and a new school of thought that was very was

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>was very narrowing of the view of competition policy UM,

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and that led to a multi decade approach, as you say,

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>limiting enforcement of antitrust and a view that kind of

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>all things equal, UH, letting consolidation occur would generate economic

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>benefits and so therefore at the margin we should be

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of accommodating of consolidation unless there was radically clear

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that it was bad for bad for UH consumers, or

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>bad for prices. And so we've seen the implications of that,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and to your point, we've seen over the last couple

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of decades the number of annual mergers has increased by

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>five or six folds UM, and we have seen in industry.

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>The measure of industry consolidation has increased significantly over the

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years, and we haven't seen the attendant benefit

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of lower prices um or or more innovation

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in the economy. And so over the last five years

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>or so, there's been a growing body of economic research

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to try to identify the fact the harms that have

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>come from this consolidation UH, and that work started. Some

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of that work started and was really put on the

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>map at the end of the Obama administration UM, including

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>by UM Tim Woo who you mentioned, Jason Furman, others

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of my former colleagues, who really started to pinpoint this

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>decline in any trust enforcement and the decline and focus

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>on competition policy as one thing that has added to

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the stagnancy a small business formation, the inequality that we

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have seen UM, and in the academic realm, we've seen

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that that work only accelerate over the course the last

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>five years. And so certainly the executive order here and

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the actions and the work that is embedded here is

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>really building on that framework and building on the findings

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that have come out over that and we certainly we

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>do view it in historic perspective of now trying to

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>really shift back to a focus on prioritizing UM. The

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>enforcements of anti trust statutes focus on competition and a

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>focus on the end outcome and the end benefit to

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the end consumer and worker. And and for those people

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>who may not be familiar with Tim Woo, not only

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is he the person who coined the phrase net neutrality,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>he is the author of a couple of books, The

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Curse of Bigness, Anti Trust in the New Gilded Age

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as The Master Switch, where he describes how

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually these information systems they become consolidated, they become closed

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and less and less competitive until some disruptive innovation comes along.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And my sense is this council is trying to encourage

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>less of that concentration and more of the disruptive innovation. Yeah,

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. And uh and Kim as Kim works

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>for Obvious here at the NBC and has been a

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 1>thought leader on these issues for some time. And you characterize,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, accurately, the one of the key objectives of

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>this council is to try to get toward how we

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>can encourage that type of innovation. UM. And one thing

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say is that This really is something that

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we've increasingly seen cuts across traditional um lines

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>or dividing lines in economic thought, and it cuts across

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>to traditional political dividing lines to I mean, some of

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the things we're talking about here are really about getting

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>rid of regulations that stand in the way of that

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of innovation. You know, one of the examples that's

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Executive Order is around is in them is

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in uh fear and line the the the the alcohol market,

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and you've got some incumbent rules on bottle size and

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>bottle labeling that when you really unpack them and say,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>what why is it that you know, to operate in

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a market you have to meet certain bottle size requirements

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>because maybe you've got an idea to ring a product

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to market that just looks different and that's going to

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>be your you know, that's going to be your branding edge. Well,

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you unpack and and look at the

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>reason why those regulations exist, you know some of them

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>are because they're just protecting incumbents. Uh and uh. You

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>know the similar to a number of these occupational licensing

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>requirements where you have requirements to get a license to

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>be um to braid hair or to cut hair um

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>or you know, to do all manner of jobs, particularly

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>at the m in different states where you know, if

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you if you're moving from one state to another, you've

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>got to go through a whole process of getting a

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>new license. UM. And you know, look, having licensing requirements

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>for uh, you know, for jobs that require you know

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that are that where they're safety or there's other things

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>involved obviously make a lot of sense. But in a

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases, when you unpack it, rules like that

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are have been put in place to favor incumbents and

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 1>make it harder for new entrance to get into the market.

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>And so we're really you know, we we think this

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>real opportunity both to be disruptive in terms of the

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>economic slock, but also disruptive in terms of some of

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the embedded political realities of this we've had. You know,

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these items have strange bedfellows in terms

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the support behind them, and that's part of what's

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>exciting about it for us as well. Right, clear clearly

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these licensing rules are anti competitive. UM.

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Before we dig down and get granular into the individual sectors,

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I have one last broad overview question and it's on

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>anti trust enforcement. There has been a deeply embedded sort

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of less a fair doctrine at both the Department of

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Justice and the FTC. Obviously, Lena Khan and Marrick Garland

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>represent a break from that philosophy. But how do you

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>turn around two decades of I was gonna say lacks enforcement,

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's really a skepticism about anti trust law. How

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>do you reverse that? Well, I think you start by

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>doing what we did in the Executive Order, which is

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to articulate that it is the policy of the executive

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>branch to vigorously enforce our antitrust laws, and more than that,

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>UM to enforce them in the context of a um

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>UH an economic policy that views increasing competition as a

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>key way of improving lives and economic outcomes for the

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>American people. So part of it is you start by

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>articulating a clear economic strategy and economic crossoity behind why

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it is that we need greater UM and more vigorous

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>enforcement of our antitrust statutes. And you know some of

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the some of the work that UH in the nineteen

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>seventies and early eighties that led to this kind of

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>multi decade effort to try to undermine it. For orsman

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>of antitrust started from articulating a similarly articulating a philosophy,

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>but a philosophy to very different ends. So that's you know,

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>one important step is I think what we're trying to

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>do is to articulate clearly the policy of the government.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>A second I do want to be clear is that

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the actual enforcement appropriately and necessarily operates independently, independently at

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice and the FTC. But I think

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>getting high quality personnel in that will do that effectively.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>UM is a is a second important step, and so

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, we're moving on that front as well.

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, we we do you know, we

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>do have an issue, which is that ultimately these things,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the antitrust doctrine gets UM gets developed in the context

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the judicial branch and and and challenges to decisions.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen that obviously over the course of decades

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as and so you know, there are also some places

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>where we may need to change the law, We may

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>need to clarify or strengthen uh, the UM the antitrust authorities,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's bipartisan work in Congress that's going on on

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that front right now. Particularly it relates to the tech industry,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and so that's something that we are engaged on as well.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But we we feel quite good about the fact that

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>even within the existing authorities that we have across the

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 1>federal government, we can make a lot of progress. And

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're focused for the time being. All Right,

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's dive into some of these sectors and and

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>really this executive order covers everything from healthcare to financial

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>products to net neutrality, data farmers labeling. Let's start with

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>labor and employee contracts. I recall a couple of years ago, UM,

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of reports sort of surfaced about various tech

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>companies Google, Apple, Facebook that had these anti poaching agreements

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't hire each other's senior personnel. Obviously illegal and

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a restrictive um comminence amongst them. But but less obvious

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>are some of the basic restrictive contracts, non competes, non disclosures,

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>other onerous clauses uh that are common in Silicon Valley

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>but have spread out to the rest of the country.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>What can this council do to allow greater competition for uh,

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>those sort of employees who want to switch jobs. Yeah,

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>so this is an incredibly important issue. You know, our

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>our our labor market will work more effectively when workers

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are competing for jobs, but also employers are competing for workers.

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And when we have you know, fewer frictions and better

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>matching between the workers and the jobs that they will

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be most successful in, we have better you know, outcomes

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>over um. But to your point, we've got some real

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>frictions and we have real opportunities to address them. So

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>this executive order and the work through the Council, we're

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna go at three of those. The first is which

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you refer to as non compete agreements, and it's striking today,

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>about one in three employers require that an employee will

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sign a noncompete agreement. So you're talking about about sixty

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>million people in the workforce. UM. And it's not just

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as you say in Silicon Valley, and it's not just

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 1>in uh, those circumstances where there's an obvious uh or

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>or clear um competitive reason why you need it. So,

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, the President joking, not jokingly, but you know,

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>illustratively pointed out to the fact that you know, you're

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're the scientist who owns the secret recipe for coke. Um.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You know you may need to sign a noncompete to

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>not just go to PEPSI and give away that trade secret,

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>right um, when the um and so so clearly these

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these noncompete operate as a as a as a legitimate tool.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But when you got to sixty million people and one

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of free employers, this goes much broader. Construction workers, hotel workers, um.

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You know you work in a restaurant and hospitality, fast

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>food um. And also for the for low wage jobs,

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>entry level jobs, not just more senior jobs where you'd

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be access to more sensitive information. And so you know this,

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the executive order is operating from a pretty basic principle

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that if particularly if you're operating in those sectors and

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>someone offers you a better job, you should be able

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to take it. And if your existing employer wants you

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to stay, they should compete for your talent. Um. And

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>so the order uh UM is is directing the FTC

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to look at either modifying or banning non compete clauses.

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's number one. The second is what I mentioned earlier,

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>which is about the licenses required to operate in a job.

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So again about one in three jobs, about jobs in

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the us also require a license, and so that spans

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the uh you know that that spans the horizon. Obviously,

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you need a pilot's license to be to

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to operate an aircraft, but you also need a license

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to be on accountant, and interior decorator, a hairdresser, and

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>importantly one in free today need that. That was five

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen fifties. So we've seen a significant increase

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>in the number of jobs that require a license, and

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>so likewise disorder goes out. Saying in those cases where

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary licensing is actually reducing mobility, um that we should

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>put limits or restrictions on them. At one point, I was,

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>how light here is? You know some some people really

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>need to be mobile. Uh that you know, it's part

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of how our economy works. You take military families, for example,

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to move every couple of years in order

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to do your job. Well, if you're a spouse of

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>if you have a you know a one one one

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>member of a partnership is in the military and moving.

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>The other person works in a job where state by

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>state you have different licensing requirements. Then you know, every

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>time they move, that could be free six months of

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>friction in terms of getting into the labor market and

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>finding a job. The last thing we're focused on here

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is about wage data. And one of the things that

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that is true today is that employers can share detailed

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>wage data between employers without having to share it to employees.

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And again this is just what the concern that is

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>raised is that if you know, if employers can share

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>wage data without sharing it to employees, that it makes

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it easier for them to um to you know, either

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>explicitly colluded or just implicitly reduce uh, you know, competition

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and not have to compete as vigorously on on on

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>wages and so and you could end up, you know,

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>putting downward pressure on wages. So it all three of

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>those days. We think we can make some progress by

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>either eliminating or restricting um uh non competes, licensing, uh,

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, wage data sharing, and so that's that's our

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>real focus on the labor market, and we think if

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we can make some progress on all free, what you

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>end up with again is a more competitive labor market,

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>actually reducing regulation and making it easier for people to

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>move from job to job. So so I get the

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of leveling the playing fields, increasing mobility. It would

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>be great if states had reciprocity on various licensing UM.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of these non competes and a lot

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of these employee contracts are governed by state law. What

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is the authority for the FDC or or the federal

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>government to come in and say, hey, this, UH, this

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>very weak permissive state statute allowing these restrictive employee agreements

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be bypassed by the federal government. From

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>whence does that authority come? So in a lot of

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>these cases, UH, these are lawyer contracts or they are

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:06.479
<v Speaker 1>employer agreements. UH. And even in cases where U states

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have UM, the states have authorities UH the employers are

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>making UH contracts where there is a a federal nexus,

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and and that that extends to FTC authorities to UH

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to limit or ban UH anti competitive practices. So the

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>FTC does have UM pretty broad authority in these areas,

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>even in cases where the you know, the the a

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>state rule or a state requirement UM is comes into play.

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna gonna we're gonna do it we can

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>at the federal level, we think we have UM some

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>real scope here. Obviously, the FTC will sort through that

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>UM and and make its determinations ultimate determinations on how

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to use that authority independently. But also, you know, part

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of what we're doing and part of what we're trying

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to encourage here is a consideration of this at the

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>state level as well. So one of the things we

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>will be doing is reaching out and engaging with um

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>UH state and UH municipal actors as well, because you know,

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we found is that there's

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>appetite to try to address this at the state level too.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, where where the ultimate authority actually is

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>not a federal authority, we also have a certain ability

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to convene and use the bully pulpit to encourage action

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of the state as well. So let's switch over to

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>real estate. UH. Many people may not be aware that

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States has a much higher real estate Transaction

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Commission than many other countries. The prior administration had cut

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a sweetheart deal with the National Association

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of Realtors. You guys, this administration put the n a

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>R unnoticed that that deal was off the table, and

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to do something about how they're maintaining high

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 1>real estate prices. Tell us about what the Competitive Council

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>can do about excessive real estate commissions. Well, look, I

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very you know, it's it's it's a

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a very similar uh dynamic. But again, you know,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>operating in a different industry, which is, you know, can

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we bring more transparency uh and can we also bring

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>more more competition into into a market with the with

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the goal of trying to ultimately identify what's good for

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the uh, you know, for the for the for the

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>end consumer. So you know, the the the Justice Department

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>UH did um uh did take take action independently to

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>try to um uh to try to take another look

0:35:55.960 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>at this question. UM and you know, the a real

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>question at issue here is whether this sort of the

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>structure of commissions is going to advance competition, encourage more

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>competition with better outcomes for uh, for consumers. And this

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>question of whether you have very high and also uniform

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>commissions across an industry, what is is the question of

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>whether that's actually you know, that's that is the result

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of a competitive outcome, or whether that is the result

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of a lack of competition. So ultimately, you know, this

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is a this falls in the category of an enforcement

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>action that the Department of Justice will operate independently. But

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I think lifting up what you see is again an

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>important question being asked, right, which is that um, if

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you if you have it, if you have history, if

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>you have if you have high commissions UM and UNI

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>warm commissions UM. It is you know, it's appropriate to

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>ask that question of is that the result of a

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>competitive outcome or is that the result of lack of competition?

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I anticipate that that's what will that's

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>what we'll see and hopefully that's that's the outcome that

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>we will uh that will will arrive will arrive at.

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately the Department of Justice full will independently navigate

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that m consistent with their enforcement role. And let's stay

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>with real estate a minute. One of the things that

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked by in the Executive Order and surprised

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to learn very often landlords of rental buildings or even

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>condos sell exclusive rights to the building to a cable company,

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>meaning no competition between fiber optic cable satellite for customers.

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea this existed. I can't imagine it's legal.

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>It has to be anti competitive and make things so

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>much more expensive for consumers, tell us a little bit

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>about what you want to do with that. I'm glad

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you picked up on that. And it goes to a

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>broader issue, which is, how do we actually achieve the

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>goal of affordable high speed internet access for all Americans?

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>UM And that's a big goal, um and there's big

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>challenges for us as a country to get to there.

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But part of getting there is actually not only creating

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 1>UM access. You know, people in rural America live in

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a jurisdiction where there isn't even access to high speed internet,

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but also creating competition where the fiber has been laid

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and the um uh and the the access is there,

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's unaffordable and unaffordable in part because there isn't

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>sufficient competition. So, you know, a a really strikingly high

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>share of Americans live in jurisdictions where there is only

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>one uh one reliable broadband provider. And this gets to

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 1>your point. Many people live in circumstance is where they

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 1>are themselves restricted to only accessing one uh one internet

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>provider UM and and yeah it's um, it's not it's

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>not as well known, but it is the case that

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in some cases you have these agreements these landlord provider

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 1>agreements where UM, just by dint of deciding to live

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in a particular building you you then lose access to

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a competitive market for for broadband services. I would say,

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, anecdotally, one of the things that I think

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you hear a lot is that I mean is that

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people can't really understand what it is, why what they're

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>paying for, and why they're paying with respect to UM

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>internet providers UM. And I think that you know, the

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here is to say, if we can create more competition,

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a place where ultimately consumers will end up

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with with with more options and that I could drive

0:39:56.600 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>lower prices and better and better outcomes as well. So

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that particular issue of landlords and tenants is a particularly

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>evocative example of the challenge, as you've noted, But the

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>challenge is actually much broader than that, which is at

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, every American you know, high

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>speed internet today is like electricity was a hundred years ago.

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>It is the power by which you interact with the

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty one century economy. And if you don't have access

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 1>to high speed internet, you really can't be a full

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>participant in the nation's economy today. UM, and we need

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that everybody has that access. Some of

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that is, you know, about building out more fiber and

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>building out more actual access, but encouraging healthy competition in

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this sector is a big part of this as well.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>And something else I found in the Executive Order that

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I never heard of and kind of blew my minds

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>paid a delay big Farmer paying Janet eric drug companies

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:05.879
<v Speaker 1>to not make cheaper generics. How on earth could that

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be allowed? Well, look, you know, UH, there is a

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>we we have a uh, we have a set of

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 1>challenges in the market for prescription drugs UM and UH

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and and that I think is is is well known. UM.

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's a there's a obviously, there is

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate issue here about UM, the upfront investment needed

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to innovate and identify prescription and and the the um

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>innovations that go into prescription drugs and making sure that

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>companies can recoup those. But there's a lot of elements

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>of how that market operates that go well beyond that

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and actually end up just driving up prices for consumers. UM.

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>And you're you're raising one of them, which is you know,

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>there's one of the one of the strategies that manufacturers

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 1>have used in the past is if you're the UM,

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're the brand name drug manufacturer, you encourage generic

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers to to stay out of the market by providing

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>them UH incentive payments and UH and that you know,

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, there's no there's a

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>there's to two negative impacts the economy. One is less

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>innovation UM, but the other is higher prices for and consumers.

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And we see in the evidence of these pay for

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>delay UH schemes that it produces both of those outcomes,

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>less innovation and higher prices. So that's the kind of

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that we want to work to try to reduce

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>or eliminate and also just encourage more competition in the

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>market for generics as well. So the other, you know,

0:42:55.920 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>another element that UM that the Executive Order directs is

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 1>for the FDA to work with states to allow them

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to import prescription drugs from UH Canada UM consistent with

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>safety standards. And this is again something that a number

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>of states have expressed an interest in doing because it

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>would create more competition and lower prices for their UM

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there for consumers in their states. And the federal government

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.439
<v Speaker 1>has been operated traditionally as a barrier to that, and

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we want to change that. We want to have a

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>federal government again consistent with safety standards, encouraging that kind

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of UH state action to increase competition UM in the

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 1>In the prescription drug market as well, It's always seemed

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>weird to me that US consumers are the one subsidizing

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>drugs for the rest of the world than U S

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>consumers were paying so much more. It's not just Canada,

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's throughout Europe and in the UK. It just

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>seems so weird to me that Americans pay a much

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>higher price for the same exact drug, including those made

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>by American drug companies. Yeah, look at striking right, if

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you're a U S consumer, you are likely to pay

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:21.879
<v Speaker 1>two and a half times as much for the same

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>prescription drug than your international counterpart. Obviously it's varies from

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 1>country to country, but on average, that's uh, that's the reality.

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:34.439
<v Speaker 1>And we think that there's a lot that could be done,

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>common sense things that could be done, you know, banning

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a pay for delay arrangement that reduces innovation drives the prices,

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>lighting states imports safely from Canada. There's also some steps

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need to work with Congress to do as well, though,

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of the things that we're working on

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, in fact, is to try to finally give

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Medicare the ability to negotiate UM as the largest bulk

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>purchase of prescription drugs in the market, UM, give Medicare

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the ability to use that market position to actually negotiate

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for lower prices, which would not only increase reduced prices

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>for UM the end participants in Medicare, but also it

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>would have a downward pressure on prices across the industry

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>because Medicare is the sort of the the benchmark rate

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>UH in in many cases, So you know, we just

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you're right, it's the kind of thing that it's also

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that so many Americans know and

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>uh understand and actually feel on their daily lives, and

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:38.439
<v Speaker 1>they know that it just doesn't make a lot of sense.

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that we're paying so much UM. But

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, it's hard to pinpoint, well, how

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 1>can we fix that. We're trying to break that down

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and say there's some really concrete, practical things we could

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>do and we and in doing so, where this is

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this is about government eliminating rules, eliminating regulations that just

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>don't make a lot of sense um, using market power

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to actually bargain for better prices. These are the kinds

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:04.959
<v Speaker 1>of things that we think make a lot of sense

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.479
<v Speaker 1>and kind of make intuitive sense to the American people

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>as well. I want to talk about big tech and

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>net neutrality, but before I moved to that space, which

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I know is going to take a lot of time,

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I have to talk about farmers a little bit first.

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Why can't farmers repair their own tractors? This is the

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>most insane thing I can imagine as someone who likes

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:33.759
<v Speaker 1>to tinker and do some of my own repairs. If

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're a farmer, why can't you take your

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>John dear tractor and fix it yourself when it breaks? Well,

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, it's you're you're you're keying in on

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these pragmatic things that we're very focused

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on as well. It's hard to it's hard to prosecute

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:53.879
<v Speaker 1>an argument why that makes a lot of sense um.

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 1>And part of the reason why we are where we

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>are is because of a set of rules that have

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>been in place that end up favoring the incumbent. Right

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>If you are the incumbent, and you sell contractor and

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you restrict uh the where somebody can get it fixed,

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>then it you know, makes it easier for you to

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>keep you know, to maintain control of the customer base. UM.

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But the question that you're appropriately raising is what's the

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the broader consumer benefit and what's the broader rationale

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>behind it? Um. And we think that that's the kind

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing that we need to uh, you know, we

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>need to fundamentally rethink. You know. It's It's true across

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the across the economy, there are the sort of right

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to repair provisions that again are rules in place that

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to take a hard look at to make

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:48.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that if they're in place, they are actually serving

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:53.320
<v Speaker 1>some important safety benefits, safety rationale or otherwise and not

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just there to uh to favor or or keep out

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>new entrance into a market. In that particular case, we're

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>quite excited about the idea that you know, if you

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>open up uh and give um. And that's why I've

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>encouraged the FTC to look at saying give you give

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>farmers the right to repair their own equipment how they

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like without having to rely on any particular expensive manufacturer,

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and in doing so that will also you know again

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing you know that should make life

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>easier for farmers, UH, it should make it should bring

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>prices down, but also encourage innovation because if you're you know,

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a if you're a pair shop, an independent repair shop

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that works on some other you know small um, small

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>mechanical issues, and that you open this up, well, then

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you have a market to enter into. You can learn

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>how to fix tractors UH efficiently and cheaply, and then

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you can grow grow as a result. UM. And I

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>think that that's the point I would I would emphasize

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 1>if this is not a bad out keeping businesses in

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the US from growing, gaining market share UM and doing

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>what businesses need to do to be successful, which is

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>internew markets, innovate, grow and as a result get bigger.

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the goal of effective UH capitalism. This

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is not about stifling that. It's more about looking at

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>those areas where a rule actually keeps incumbents from being

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 1>able to enter into the market and really ask the

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.800
<v Speaker 1>hard question of is there a legitimate economic rational to

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that other than rents or other than stifling competition. And

0:49:34.640 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not just factors. It's it's cell phones. My my

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple iPhone is dying, and I can either swap the

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>battery out and then cause all sorts of problems because

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not allowed to change a battery, or i could

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:50.240
<v Speaker 1>go buy a brand new phone. Um. But before again,

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>before we get to technology, let me stay with farmers.

0:49:53.760 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>There are some pretty surprising restrictions on seeds, including liability

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for some farmers for seeds they never even used. What's

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>going on in that area. I've read some pretty horrible

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>stories about farmers being sued by by big agg For

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better phrase, what can be done to

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>allow farmers to take more control of their own crops,

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of their own planting and their own harvesting. Well, this

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:29.359
<v Speaker 1>is a really good example of when you see consolidation

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in the market, that should raise a question, a legitimate

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>question of is that consolidation um UH encouraging healthy competition

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:42.680
<v Speaker 1>or consistent with healthy competition, or is it actually um

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>stifling that competition. So, if you look at the market

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>for agricultural inputs UM, seeds, feed, fertilizer, we've seen significant

0:50:55.920 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 1>consolidation over the last few decades. To your point on seeds, UM,

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 1>you know uh to you know, to a first approximation

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>about for companies control most of the world market at

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this point, and we've seen prices go up very significantly

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>across time. And so what that does, what we've seen

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in that market is that the increase in price and

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the reduction and competition also puts those providers in a

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:31.320
<v Speaker 1>position where they can put increased demands because the the

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:34.320
<v Speaker 1>end farmer, the small farmer just doesn't have choice to

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 1>get there, uh, to source their seeds from any other producer,

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 1>so they can limit options, they can you know, they

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>can require the use of those in certain ways that

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>then can create liability for um the end producer. What

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it also does is it means that the end farmer

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 1>ends up getting less and less of the total aggregate

0:51:56.120 --> 0:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the output that they grow. So, you know,

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're using a seed to wrote a food commodity,

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, the farmers, as we've

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>seen this consolidation consolidation increase, they've gotten less and less

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of the total aggregate economic benefit of um of of

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of that output. And so you've got you know, more

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:21.359
<v Speaker 1>consolidation prices increasing and less of the benefit of each

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:26.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar being uh garnered for that end output food product

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>declining for for decades. And I think this is an

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:33.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting place with respect to this executive order where the UM,

0:52:33.600 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten an enormous amount of outpouring from agricultural constituencies,

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:43.120
<v Speaker 1>those small farmers organizations in states. UH, we've seen you know,

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody from from Senator Kester in Montana to Senator Grassley

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:52.719
<v Speaker 1>in Iowa saying, UM, this is what we need to

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>try to take on consolidation and incourage get better competition,

0:52:56.640 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Get competition back into markets. Four seed into mark it's

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:03.760
<v Speaker 1>her feet into markets for fertilizer, to give the smaller

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>farmers a real fighting chance, um, and to give them

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>more of the share of the economic output of the

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>product the producer. And ultimately, if there's more competition, not

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>only does the benefit farmers I have to assume in

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this current inflation concerned environment, this can help drive food

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 1>prices down over the long haul. I think it's a

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>way to to create a stable UH and and better

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:36.479
<v Speaker 1>price outcomes over over the longer term. Yeah, because you see,

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:39.759
<v Speaker 1>you know that prices when prices for input goods are

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>going up. That was true in in agriculture markets prior

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic UM and certainly it remains a concern.

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Now this is this These types of steps we hope

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:53.359
<v Speaker 1>will actually put downward pressure on on those markets over

0:53:53.440 --> 0:53:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the longer term. Alright, so let's talk about everybody's favorite segment,

0:53:57.920 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 1>big Tech. I read n y U Professor Scott Galloway's

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>book The Four I think it came out in seventeen

0:54:07.280 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 1>UH and the basic premises the biggest companies in technology

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>have become very large, very powerful. They buy up nascent

0:54:17.719 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 1>competitors before they're even out of the womb, and they

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just have incredible market power. What can be done about

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:35.879
<v Speaker 1>this concentrated UH strength of these giant trillion dollar technology companies. Well,

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I would start by saying, look, the UM our technology

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 1>sector and our tech companies are a reflection of the

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 1>unparalleled innovation of the American economy. UM and reflect um

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and and and drive and have generated a lot of

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the innovation and benefits that Americans across the board, you

0:54:57.120 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and I benefit from on a daily basis. And so

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:03.840
<v Speaker 1>um that's that's that's that's important and important at the

0:55:03.880 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>starting point. And at the same time, there are really

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>significant problems with concentration and with any competitive behavior in

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 1>uh in the tech sector. And that's what we're really

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to focus on in this executive order h and

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>across across the board, and it's it's not you know,

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this conversation can often be sort of very um, yeah,

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:32.719
<v Speaker 1>can drive to sort of in co Wait, there's just

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>something there's something inherently wrong with big tech, right, and

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to break that down and say, let's try

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to identify those areas where we have real questions about

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:49.839
<v Speaker 1>dominant you know, uh tech platforms and where they may

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>be under commining competition or uh um, you know, reducing competition.

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's that's that's our focus. So you know,

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:02.839
<v Speaker 1>for example, where you know, the the the executive orders

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>encouraging the FTC too, but not new rules on how

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 1>tech platforms can gather and collect data and use that

0:56:13.960 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 1>data in places like retail marketplaces on their own platforms,

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:23.960
<v Speaker 1>um uh And and that's you know, that's that's a

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>that's a more concrete example, but one that I think

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know a lot of end consumers have um

0:56:31.080 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have observed or have interacted with in their in their

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:38.840
<v Speaker 1>daily life. That's clearly a place where we need to

0:56:38.920 --> 0:56:42.160
<v Speaker 1>take a very hard look and apply scrutiny. Another is

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with respect to mergers, right, and this is a place

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:50.720
<v Speaker 1>where clearly, UM, we we need to increase the focus

0:56:51.360 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 1>again the antitrust. The actual enforcement UH, we will leave

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Department of Justice and will leave to the FTC.

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's a matter of policy. We have to focus

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in particular, in a particular focus on the acquisition of

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>competitors and the impact of those in the tech sector

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:11.759
<v Speaker 1>on platforms that then are dominant enough that they can

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 1>use mergers to just basically to squeeze out competition UM

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:19.920
<v Speaker 1>by competitors in the first place. And at the end

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the day, you know, we want to create a

0:57:21.400 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>circumstance where the next generation of great tech companies in

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States come from the innovative capacity of this

0:57:29.360 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>economy which is unparalleled UM and continue to drive innovation.

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But we think that these types of UM reforms are

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:38.760
<v Speaker 1>actually necessary to do that, so that we don't end

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>up stifling competition and and losing that kind of next

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:46.760
<v Speaker 1>generation of innovation. You mentioned encouraging the FTC to establish

0:57:46.880 --> 0:57:50.200
<v Speaker 1>rules on surveillance UM. There are also some rules on

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:54.760
<v Speaker 1>accumulation of data. It seems that other countries like Europe

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:58.760
<v Speaker 1>or even the state of California have very robust data

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>privacy laws. Does that require separate legislation or can that

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be done through this Council and through the FDC. Well,

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a lot that we can do.

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:13.120
<v Speaker 1>There's there's there's a lot that we can do, and

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the lots that that the UH, the FC in the

0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice can can do and can move on

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 1>their own. And I think that, UM, we will see

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that with respect to I anticipate we'll see that with

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:28.240
<v Speaker 1>respect to data. UM, we'll see that with respect to

0:58:28.840 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 1>UH scrutiny on mergers and also I think on some

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:39.680
<v Speaker 1>more specific behaviors and methods UH that UH that we've

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:43.120
<v Speaker 1>seen emerge in the industry and that we have um

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>uh called out you know in the UM in the

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Executive Order, particularly around competing on your own platform, right

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that UM and so using the the platform dominance to

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 1>then compete with others on your platform. That's a place

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:06.840
<v Speaker 1>where is sort of intuitively you really need to apply

0:59:06.920 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny to activities in that space. At the same time,

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you you are right that there's both at the state

0:59:12.480 --> 0:59:14.680
<v Speaker 1>level UM and at the federal level as well. There's

0:59:14.720 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>an active conversation about where UM additional authority will be necessary.

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And I mentioned earlier, you know there's a there's an active,

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:25.640
<v Speaker 1>robust conversation going on the US Congress on that front.

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Bipartisan in nature. Should anticipate that we're gonna see more

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:33.320
<v Speaker 1>activity on the legislative front, which reflects the fact that, UM,

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we probably are going to need more authority as well.

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Makes makes a lot of sense, and it's kind of

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting coalition of people criticizing the market power of

0:59:45.360 --> 0:59:48.920
<v Speaker 1>big tech. Conservatives are looking at it from one perspective,

0:59:49.000 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Progressives are looking at it from a very different perspective.

0:59:53.200 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there is there a coalition to be had to

0:59:55.480 --> 1:00:01.760
<v Speaker 1>actually get some legislation passed on this? Well? I think

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that here's what I say. We've seen bipartisan activity principally

1:00:07.600 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of weeks. We've seen that in

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the House, UH, and we're encouraged by that work because

1:00:13.040 --> 1:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is it is raising appropriately UH

1:00:16.680 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the authorities necessary to go at UM some of these

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>concerns that we've talked about, UM, they're similar work going

1:00:23.920 --> 1:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on in the Senate, and I anticipate that that you know,

1:00:26.560 --> 1:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>will will progress. It's always one of the things I

1:00:29.320 --> 1:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>found in this job is it's both not a good

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>idea UM and very difficult to really predict with accuracy

1:00:36.200 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly what the U. S. Congress is going to do. UM.

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So I won't I won't try to do that in

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this context, but I would say that if you look

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>at the work that's going on, there's a lot of

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thought behind it. There's been a lot of energy building

1:00:49.360 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on this issue across time. It is bipartisan in nature,

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and so it's complicated. It's a complicated SEPs and issue,

1:00:55.000 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's complicated politically as well. But certainly we are

1:00:57.720 --> 1:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>encouraged by it because I think you know, at the

1:01:01.480 --> 1:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, the President does believe that we

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we really need to focus on these sets of issues.

1:01:06.640 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>We cannot just allow the status quo to continue. The

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>actions that we are taking in the Executive Order are

1:01:14.880 --> 1:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a big step in that direction. But we're going to

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>keep working with Congress and hopefully we will will be

1:01:19.840 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>able to progress on the legislator front as well. And

1:01:22.440 --> 1:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I have to just quickly ask you about net neutrality

1:01:25.360 --> 1:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that was undone by the last administration. What are the

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:32.439
<v Speaker 1>plans in this administration. Are we going to restore net

1:01:32.560 --> 1:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>neutrality so that certain consolidated companies they might own the

1:01:37.440 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>pipes and the content, can't give their own materials preference

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>over the rest of the Internet. So the Presidency on

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty clear. He's held it since the campaign

1:01:51.560 --> 1:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that he believes that net neutrality rules are necessary and appropriate,

1:01:57.840 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that the steps that the prior administrator and UM took

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we're in the wrong direction. And then and in the

1:02:05.280 --> 1:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Executive Order encourages the SEC to restore those rules. UM.

1:02:11.760 --> 1:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And so that's where we are, UM, and we're with

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the key steps that was embedded in

1:02:17.680 --> 1:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this Executive Order. UM. The FEC operates independently, but the

1:02:21.240 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>President's got a clear view and is encouraging the FEC

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to take action on that front. And I see, I

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>only have time for one more question, So let me

1:02:29.560 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>make it a big one. Let's look back from four

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>years in the future at at this council. How will

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you be able to tell if this council was successful

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>or not. At the end of the day, this is

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>about improving economic outcomes for people, whether that's in higher wages,

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>lower prices, or the impact of more innovation in their

1:02:58.520 --> 1:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>lives and in the communities in which they operate. So

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>at core, if we look back, success will be because

1:03:05.400 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>across the economy, lots of people have been able to

1:03:08.880 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>improve their economic prospects in practical ways. People will be

1:03:13.400 --> 1:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>able to go into a pharmacy and by hearing it's

1:03:17.360 --> 1:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>over the counter, cheaper, more innovative, better outcome. People will

1:03:22.920 --> 1:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>have more opportunity to go across the street to the

1:03:26.400 --> 1:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>employer that might want to offer them a better job,

1:03:29.840 --> 1:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and get employers to compete for their talent rather than

1:03:33.200 --> 1:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>being locked into a non compete prescription. Drop prices will

1:03:37.480 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>be lower than they otherwise, will be people who have

1:03:40.840 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>more options to get high speed internet even if they

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>live in an apartment building with a particular landlord. And

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, people will be able to do other things

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't touched on in this conversation, like move

1:03:52.640 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions shift their data from bank on to bank too,

1:03:56.640 --> 1:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>without having to go through a complicated process. All of

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>these things just go to very practical frictions in a

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>person's life. But at the end of the day, success

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>will be we have made those frictions easier and gone

1:04:11.120 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>at that five dollars in the aggregate that is dragging

1:04:15.520 --> 1:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on the typical families economic outcomes and started to reverse that.

1:04:20.880 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's how we think about success um. It

1:04:24.840 --> 1:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>will require structure and process and a kind of focus

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>on executing across these these seventy two executive actions. But

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that's our north star, Brian. This has just been absolutely enlightening.

1:04:38.960 --> 1:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you again for being so generous with your time.

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with Brian dec He is the

1:04:44.960 --> 1:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>director of the National Economic Council and the new chairperson

1:04:49.840 --> 1:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of the President's Council on Economic Competitiveness. If you enjoy

1:04:54.240 --> 1:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, check out any of our prior four hundred

1:04:57.360 --> 1:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>such interviews. You can find those wherever you feed your

1:05:01.200 --> 1:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast fix iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, etcetera. We love your comments,

1:05:08.040 --> 1:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions right to us at m IB podcast

1:05:12.120 --> 1:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. You can sign up from my

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>daily reading list at Ridholts dot com. Check out my

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>weekly column at Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion. Follow me

1:05:23.760 --> 1:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Rid Halts. I would be remiss if

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I did not thank the crack team that helps put

1:05:28.960 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>these conversations together each week. Tim Harrow is my audio engineer.

1:05:34.760 --> 1:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Latica val Bron is my project manager. Paris Walt is

1:05:39.320 --> 1:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>my producer. Michael Batnick is my head of research. I'm

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholts. You've been listening to Masters in Business on

1:05:47.240 --> 1:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.