WEBVTT - The BroadCast | Setting the Stage for the Celtics

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is part of the seventy Sixers podcast network

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>search seventy Sixers podcast wherever you get your pods. They've

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>met over five hundred fifty times and played each other

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs in twenty series. Chamberlain the CUCA put

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia ahead, followings the Bobby Gold Chris to the ball.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the Sixers at their best here in twenty twenty,

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>under unprecedented circumstances, the seventy Sixers and Boston Celtics will

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>do it again as old rivals beat up inside the

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 1>bubble in the opening round. There's plenty of talent on

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>both sides. We certainly have our eyes settle on Joel

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and be at what type of force he can be

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in this series repeat against smart spins, couples with the

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>right hand gets free and Ammerson hope right do. We'll

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>also talk about the importance of Tobias Harris, Josh Richardson,

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Al Horford and the rest of the roster. Horford gets position,

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>bakes upt, Tice goes up Horford. That stars now Horford

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>put him into the way back machine. He's used it

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of food. I'm I'm Devon Gibbons, I'm Brian Seltzer,

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is the broadcast first round preview from the

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>seventy six Ers podcast network. The Playoffs, The Playoffs, Finally,

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.839
<v Speaker 1>at long last, about three months later, the NBA Playoffs

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>are here. Seating games, guys. I enjoyed them. They were fun.

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll even throw the scrimmages in there too. However, I'm

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>ready for a change of scenery and significance when it

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to the impact and meaning of these NBA basketball

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>games we're watching inside the bubble. Yeah, the stakes are

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>high now. Every minute, every quarter, every play, it all counts,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of exhilarating to be back in that

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>playoff mindset. It's been what fifteen months, which is kind

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of insane. This is exactly what the restart was for

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to crown the champion, to get to playoff basketball, to

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>see the best of the best in the NBA at

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the top of their games. So I'm really looking forward

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to everything that the NBA has instored. Of course, certainly

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>here in Philadelphia. Listen, guys, we know that this is

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not the conventional arrangement. You put twenty two teams inside

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>a bubble, you'll let them duke it out. You get

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen for the cutoff for the postseason. But I'm

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>with you, guys. I think it is going to be

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>nice and it'll bring some closure to the fact that

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>even though this is an untraditional arrangement, there is going

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a champion for the two, nineteen two and

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty season, and I think that there is importance to that,

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad we're going to see it. So far,

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>so good, right, and we've seen some very good basketball.

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>We've seen some people step up that maybe we didn't

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>expect once this bubble was upon us, and looking at

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the top people and understanding how different teams we're going

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to approach games as well. So this has been, as

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you said, the most unique situation that we've seen in

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>professional sports in a long time. But for all of

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>us to get back together to give this the sport

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>back to us, to take a peek at it and

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoy some basketball from one o'clock in the afternoon all

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the way to one o'clock in the morning, whatever it is,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been fantastic. And now we get the actual playoffs

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to go along with it. And seriously, a moment of

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciation for the league too. Devan. You just alluded to it.

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they've pulled this off and now

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>they're getting ready to play a full playoffs with the

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the league's key players healthy in terms

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic and in terms of their health they've

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>gotten back to credit to all the players as well.

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that this is actually happening, I think

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is just huge, and there are a lot of people

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that deserve a lot of credit. It is the oldest

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>rivalry in the sport. The seventy Sixers and the Boston

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Celtics were doing it again for the second time in

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>three years. The cast of characters obviously different for the Sixers,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>nucleus for the Boston Celtics, still intact. Before we deep

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>dive into all the different layers of this matchup, guys

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>would have put you on the spot the vine. We'll

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>start with you. Do you think this is the matchup

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we would have seen had the regular season not been

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>interrupted back in March? Is this how we would have

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>ultimately ended up? Was it meant to be six three

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 1>six or Celtics? I actually don't because I do feel

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point that the seventy six Ers, despite the

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>up and down nature of the season the discrepancy from

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>home and road records. There were enough home games and

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they would have probably moved up, in my opinion, to

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a higher seat, whether it be four or even as

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>high as as Harmony, whether it's five or even as

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>high as four. I just think that at some point

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they would have made enough of a push to get

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>back even though Ben Simmons was not available during the

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>end of the regular season as we knew it back

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>in in the spring, I believe that they would have

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>moved up at least one spot higher than the sixth seat.

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now, but as you said, so this is what

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it was before the season was put on hold, this

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is what it is right now as they get ready

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>to start this game number one. And you said it

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>arguably the best rivalry in sports, best rivalry in basketball,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm here for it all. I agree with you, Divon.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that if they had played out the full season,

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>they would have found themselves in that five or that

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>four spot facing Miami or Indiana. Like he said, a

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of home games were left, and the strength of

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>schedule was just not there. They were playing a lot

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of teams in those last few games that were already

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>eliminated back then, or not necessarily officially eliminated, but teams

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that weren't going to be contenders, teams that weren't going

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to put up much of a fight, even when the

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Sixers visited them on the road. So I do think

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if they had played out the rest of the season,

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they would have had more wins, they would have found

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves in a higher seed, but the same situation obviously,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>sadly for Ben Simmons. He was out then and he's

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>out again now, and that's just such a shame for

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Ben personally. He worked so hard to get back, but

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>now it means that the lineup now is probably what

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it would have been then. I too, agree with both

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of you guys. I do feel the Sixers were probably

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>going to move up at some point, doing part of

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I thought they were Listen. I know

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the record didn't show for it, but I thought they

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>started to play better on the West Coast, and then

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>they played great in that game against the Detroit Pistons.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of felt like the mojo was moving

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction right around the time the suspension happened.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Will we ever know how it would have ended up?

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we won't but what we know now is

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the Sixers and Boston going up against each other

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic Division rivals in the opening round of the playoffs.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>The Sixers, they finished four and four during seating play,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they blew out the Houston Rockets. I was initially surprised

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with the extent of action that some of the top

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>guys for the Sixers got in that seating game finale

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>against Houston. I was also surprised that so many of

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets top guys played for as long as much

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>as they did, But I think that was a good

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>way for the Sixers to springboard in the postseason on. Thankfully,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>they got out of the game without any incident in

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of injury, and they were able to knock off

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>their rust as a top group one more time, which

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something to be said for that. Yeah,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the second largest margin of victory that the Sixers

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>had all season, and obviously the second half wasn't necessarily

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 1>indicative of how great either team is, but they really

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>got off to a hot start and just stayed hot

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. I think if I remember correctly, eight

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Sixers in double figures. That's obviously huge and again a

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>result of the heavier minutes, and some of those bench

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>guys did play. But like you said, in terms of

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a springboard, beating a good team by such a steep

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>margin has to feel good as you enter these couple

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>days before the intensity begins, I too was surprised that

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the amount of time that they played. Certainly, I have

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, I didn't think many of

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>them would even play in the game at all, just

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get ready for the practice during their off days and

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>starting for the game number one against the opponent which

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was already known to be the Boss and Celtics, I

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was surprised. And then for them to come out and

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>perform at the level that they did despite not having

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Russell Westbrook for the Houston Rockets, James Harden, PJ. Tucker,

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Eric Gordon, Robert Covington, they all came to play and

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they took the game seriously, and the Sixes did come

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>out on top. They beat the starters. James Harden's James Hardy,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he does what he does. That's gonna happen. But Sixes

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>were able to, despite some very very good runs by

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets, hold them off and come away later on

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>with that victory. So a good way for them to

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>get ready for the start of the postseason, knowing how

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>serious things are when they get underway. In game number one,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I hear you somewhat on the surprise of the amount

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of minutes that the starters played on Friday, But you

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have to think about this playoffs scenario, with no travel days,

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they only have one day off between

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>each game, and the fitness level, an endurance level that

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to require. You have to wonder if putting

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the starters in that game on Friday breaks up what

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>could have then been five days off before starting the playoffs.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it helps a little bit with the fitness level,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>with getting in the rhythm. So that was the only

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>reason that I wasn't super surprised to see those guys

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>getting some significant run in because you don't want them

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to be caught off guard on Monday when things are

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>really in test. Despite the fact that he played, I

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>mean regardless of whether or not he had played, just

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>merely the fact that Joel Embiid was available was good news.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Finished with fourteen point six rebounds in that game. Another

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>strong showing from it to Bias Harris on both ends

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the floor and a lot of guys were able

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to build more and more confidence going into the playoffs

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna get to Boston. But I think before

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we shift the conversation to this series, to me, there

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of guys who you might not put

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in that same tier as certainly Joel Embiid, Ben Simmons

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>if he were healthy, or some of the starters, but

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>some guys who when you're thinking about the playoffs and

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it's the Celtics the Sixes are going

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>up against in the first round or knock on wood,

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's later on in deeper rounds of the playoffs, but

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>guys who will need to step up and give you

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>something more than perhaps you might of your standard baseline

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>level of expectation for. And I think those are guys

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>like and Alec Burks for con Corkmise Matisse Styble. We're

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about some of the bench players. Certainly who will Nato,

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>who used when, who knows when or how often he's

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be used. But there are some guys who

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>really build up some justifiable confidence I think based on

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>how they played in the bubble during the seating games. Sure,

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and I would certainly start with Alec Brooks to continue

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>play that he had where he would put up those

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty points easily on these given nights, three straight twenty

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>plus point games. He missed the game, then he came

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>back and he performed well once again. And just to

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to have that type of punch coming off

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the bench for you, the scoring load that he might

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have to pull for this basketball team when he does

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>come in, providing that spark for the team. Knowing that

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>now that you have someone as good as good defensively

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the offensive punch overall the Boston Celtics have, but now

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the defensive acumen of someone like Marcus Smart coming off

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the bench who plays started minutes alis, I believe he

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a key contributor to this basketball

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>team in this series because of all the things I've

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned for the opposition, and knowing that with no

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons, while others may pick up their play offensively

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 1>in the starting five, you're gonna need that also from

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the bench unit as well. So being able to see

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Alec Burks do what he did, I agree with you

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>one cells that some of these games for some people

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>really helped out. And he's number one for me and

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>especially since the health status of someone like Glenn Robinson,

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the third another veteran bench option, is somewhat murky right

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>now with this left tip injury. Absolutely absolutely, he was

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>one that I thought that with the amount of wings

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Boston Celtics have, that Glenn Robinson would would

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>ring key in this particular series because of his two

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>way play, his defensive ability at least be able to

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>match up with Hayward Tatum and Brown as well. Lauren, Yeah,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I agree with both of you. Obviously, Alec

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Burks has kind of been a revelation. Maybe he shouldn't

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>have been based on how good he was Olden State,

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think what a pleasure it is to see

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>someone perform at a level that you were hoping that

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they would perform when they first came to Philadelphia. And

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously with that trade, you didn't know exactly how he

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>was going to fit into this lineup, and it took

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit to get warmed up. But to

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>see him producing at this high clip now in the

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>year twenty twenty, it's nice to see something live up

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to or even exceed expectations the way that Alec Burks has.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So I love that he's doing well. I love that

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he's getting credit for doing well, and hopefully he can

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>keep riding this way and helping the team in a

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>big way in these playoffs. I think if something's good

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 1>by normal standards in the year twenty twenty, we can

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>automatically qualify it as an exceptional rating or something like that.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it comes beyond great in twenty twenty. All

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the bonus points for just performing how you're supposed to do,

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>all right. So the Sixers, they went four and four

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in the bubble, finished the regular season plus the seeding

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>games forty three and thirty, the Boston Celtics forty eight

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and twenty four. Between the regular season and seeding games,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they went five three inside the bubble. I look more,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>guys at their five and two record before they played

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a meaningless game against and already eliminated Washington Wizards team

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in their finale, they played some really good teams. They

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>had a challenging schedule. In their seating games. Talking about Boston,

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>they lost to Milwaukee by three and their opener. They

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>then beat Portland. They lost by six to Miami, another

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>top seat out of the East. They beat Brooklyn Handley,

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they got past Toronto Handley beat the Orlando Magic the

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>eighth seat out of the East and overtime, and then

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they knocked off Memphis by fifteen. I mean, those are

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all teams that, with the exception of their finale against Washington,

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>could have been at some point in time during the

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>bubble in position to move on to the playoffs. So

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I do take note of sure, and

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>knowing that it's the one that really stood out to

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>me was that Toronto game. And I understand that there

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>were games for all of these twenty two teams where

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>certain players star level were key important players for their teams.

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Set out that being said, Boston just kept riding at

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a very high level steadily throughout the entire time that

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>they were there inside that bubble against their opponents. So Cells,

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I, I I agree with you one percent with that five

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and two record. It was real. They were very good

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and you saw some of their players, the key players

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in Brown, Tatum, even Hayward Walker when he was out there.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>While the point production may not have been as high,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know he's probably going to be ready to go

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for the postseason. Those two in particular, with Tatum and

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Brown taking those necessary steps every time out, just hitting

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>those those benchmarks, if you will, for young players, and

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they were really, really good in those seven eight games

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Boston Celtics. Yeah, Tatum d average around twenty

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>two and a half points per game. He shot terrific

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>from the outside, just under forty five percent. You mentioned Kemba.

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>His offensive numbers didn't jump off the page during the

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>seating phases, around fourteen points per game. But I kind

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of looked right at that three point shooting percentage, which

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was roughly forty three percent. So yeah, I think to me,

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I test passed actually based on how he did. And

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>quickly remember the very first game that Tatum played. I

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>don't remember if it was a scrimmage or the first

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>game of the seating games, where he was terrible. He

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>performed terribly and you know, make fun of the haircut

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it was, right, we had to shave his

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>hair and get back to his normal self. But once

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>he got back to his normal self, that's when we

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>saw him start to become the All Star Jason Tatum

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that we were accustomed to see him throughout the season,

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>except for when they played the seventy six or during

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a regular season. Yeah, that first game against the Bucks.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think was super indicative of what Jason Tatum

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>has been doing and can do. He's been such a

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>revelation and it was cool to hear Al Horford talk

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about the way that he's seen Tatum grow even in

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the time that Horford has left the Celtics. That's someone

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that he says he took under his wing while he

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>was in Boston. So separate as much as we can

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>separate the Celtics from the Celtics that we're playing in

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Jason Tatum has been fantastic and he's going

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to be someone that the group is going to have

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to contain, especially, like you said, while Kemba Walker's numbers

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>are a little lower, obviously we have to consider the

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's playing without nagging knee injury. But Kemba

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is someone that does rise to the occasion, and as

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we all talked about a little bit earlier today, he's hungry.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He's looking for an opportunity now that he's in Boston,

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>now that he's playing with a serious contender. So I

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised to see Kemba show some really special

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff once the playoffs begin. Guys, I'm gonna switch some

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>things up on the fly to let the people in

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>out there with some inside or insight. On our pre

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast production meeting, I was like, well, do we go

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>position by position in sequential order and take a look

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>at the series through that lens? Do we then run

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>down the Sixers players, give some reason of them individually,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and then do the same for Boston scrapping both those ideas,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's just focus on what the key storylines are for

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this series and I have the utmost confidence in the

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>two of you that we will be able to cover

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the aforementioned material. I just said, so I

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>love it. Biggest storyline I think is the big Man.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there anyone on the Boston Celtics who can contain

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid? Daniel Tys is a very good defender for

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>who he is, and I give him credit of course,

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>being the way that they are built the Boston Celtics.

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>He fits with what they do, very low maintenance in

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of wanting needing the basketball to be have an

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>impact and be successful for what they do. But defensively, yes,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>this is his role to defend Joel Ebid. When we

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about in bid though as good as Tys may

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>be as a defender for the team, and they're gonna

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>do it as a team collectively. It's not just gonna

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>be Daniel Tys and its cancer. You will see a

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of double teams come the way, come the way

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for Joel Eenbid. That being said, he has had some

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>great success against them this season. He is the best

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>player in the series in this series against the Boston Celtics,

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and I expect him at his best to give us

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly what we want to see from your franchise player

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in a seven game first round matchup against a team

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>that you know very well. They know you very well

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>from playing in the same division. They will throw some

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>different looks at him, but I still ultimately believe that

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he will have enough success for him individually to impact

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the game, where the Sixes then have to do other

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>things to come away with the victories. Well, Javan, you

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>narrowly beat me to the punch there. But Selts ask

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>can anyone defend Joel Embiid And my answer was also

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be negative. We know that Joel is hungry.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>If we look back at the last ending of the playoffs,

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's still painful to remember Kawai's shot and the

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>way that Joel took that shot personally, But he's hungry.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>He's ready to prove himself in this type of situation. So,

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed before the Bubble Games even started, if

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Joel is healthy and hungry, the Celtics are going to

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have problems. He's had success against Tice. Like you said,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Robert Williams hasn't been a good match for him, and

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>it's Cantor hasn't been a good match for him. And

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going to throw all those guys together separately at

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid and try to make something happen. But if

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Joel is firing, they're not going to have an answer

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for him. So hopefully Joel can come in and be

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that guy that plays with the chip on his shoulder,

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that plays wanting to sort of avenge last season's ending,

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and Celtics are going to have a lot of problems

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>if he does. Guy. It's one of the many things

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that I love about the playoffs is that it's truth

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sermon time. We find out if all the things we've

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>heard about and discussed and seen from the regular season

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>actually translates, and going back to you would probably be

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>able to find evidence of this even before the Sixers

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>gathered for training camp. What was the regular season all

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>about for Joel Embiid? It was about getting him ready

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>for the playoffs. So between the different stuff that he

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>has talked about as far as his own mental psyche

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>during the regular season, when the switch was on when

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it might not have quite been there. It's the playoffs now,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and now we're going to find out if the holistic

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>approach for the Sixers was what Joel needed to get

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>ready for the playoffs. And I think that's going to

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>be fascinating to see. This is a rivalry right off

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the bat where I think he should be pumped up for.

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I know this is something to divide. We could probably

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>do a podcast d about this subject entirely. Maybe we

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>can set the date on the calendar and do it

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>on the anniversary of one of these two games. What

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>has been the best game in Joel Embiad's career? I

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>know you say, I think it was November seventeenth, two

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seventeen, whatever it was at Staples Center against Characters.

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I might I go back and forth, but I think

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that I would put it if I had to give

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it the edge December December twelve, Thank you. I was

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>going to guess either second or twelve. I knew there

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>was a two in there. December twelfth, a TD garden

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>where Joel was just getting bashed and thrown around by

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Charles and Kenny the NBA on TNT. He was put

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on the spot by the media talking about his leadership

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and his engagement before the game of the Garden, and

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>then he came out and he helped lead the Sixers

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to a six point road win at Boston, and he

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>finished with thirty eight thirteen and six. Yep, No, a

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>tremendous game for him individually. Defensively, they did your part

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>as a team, Ben Simmons as well, where they're four

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>key scorers twenty nine for Kimba Walker, but you're talking

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>about nineteen for Hayward, fifteen Tatum, eight for Jalen Brown

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on another tough shooting night, three of nine from the floor.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But yes, thirty eight, thirteen and six in that game,

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that victory on the road in a tough environment in Boston.

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>We've seen them struggle, We've seen him struggle, and he

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>came away very very impressively in that game. So I

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>agree with you now we know there is no TV garden.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that we're going to see are the

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>things that of course going to be on that big

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>screen surrounding the arena in the bubble, and the logos

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on the floor that will say whatever they say, Boston

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and whatever their sponsor is at this point. But you're right, man,

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>he was fantastic in that game. And while we can

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>go through the Laker game in twenty eighteen, and we

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>can go through this Celtics game here in nineteen, but

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the type of performance that we are expecting

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>or wanting to at least see Joel and B. This

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is on him number one, because he's the franchise player.

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You number two guy is. He's not there anymore, so

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>all eyes will be on him and he will certainly

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>get not only a lot of attention from us on

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the outside, but on that floor in between those lines

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>at ninety four feet, there will be a lot of

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>attention surrounding Joel and B. Let's see if you can

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>put up some dominating numbers. Again, we mentioned the absence

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of that number two guy. It's worth noting that on

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>December twelfth, the six or second most productive player was

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Tobias Harris, and he had a great game, finishing with

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, eight and seven, which sort of seems just

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>like clockwork for Tobias at this point, he's always somewhere

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in that range. When we think about the fact that

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>now he's going to have to continue being that second

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>leading score, there's a lot of pressure on Tobias Harris too.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that's another topic that we're going to cover

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit, but I just thought it was

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>worth noting that Joel and Tobias played really well together

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 1>in that big game. And like you said, Selts, that

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was the game where Charles Barkley, the national media a

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of people giving Joel a lot of flack, and

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>as we know, the media likes to kick up more

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of a storm as we do as well for the playoffs.

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 1>So what I have to say is I hope the

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>media keeps it coming for Joel because he feeds off

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of that. He wants that, he needs that. So if

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone wants to throw stones, now is the time, because

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid will respond to the way that he did

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 1>when they played in Boston on December twelve. I mean

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to admit something, there's a part of me that really

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>loves going on the road and knock on wood been

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>fortunate enough to do this a couple of times and

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>being in the road element, especially obviously for the postseason.

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But the atmosphere in Boston, much like it is in

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Toronto even in the regular season. It's outstanding, and I

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>am grateful that there's going to be basketball. I am

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>also really going to miss the fact that this series

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>can't be played in front of the fans. So I

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>just hope that all that like juju that everyone out

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there wants to feel if you wish you could go

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to a game or go to a watch party, somehow

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>in your own special way, you're able to recreate that,

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, we know how awesome this would be

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>if fans were involved. You can comment on that and

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want. But before we move off, Joel and Bead,

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw this out there and anyone can respond

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to this. Would you be surprised if, at some point

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this series we saw perhaps in his Canton or get

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.479
<v Speaker 1>put into the Boston starting lineup, depending I don't want

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>to get too far ahead, depending on how things go

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with Daniel Tis. I mean Cana. I mean I think

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>back to that game of the Garden a few years

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>ago when Canneron and Bead went at it. They had

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good matchup. Would we be surprised to see

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that development at all, or even if Tye stays as

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>a starter, that Cannor gets heavy minutes on Joel not

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at all. Celts that's some and its Cantor has given

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Joel problems here and there in the past, and that's

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a weapon that they have if things aren't going well

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with Tyson. We have to consider the fact. But they're

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>going to see a lot of looks with Joel and

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>beat and alf Warford out there together, so you never

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>know what they're going to do. Obviously, you don't expect

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Boston to totally reconfigure their starting lineup. That's worked quite

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>well for them at this point. But you never know

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to throw it another big body out

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>there to try to come out the Sixers size if

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they eat it. I agree with you, Lauren and the

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>part of it. I don't remember how long or if

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers played the Portland Trailblazers when Cantu was there,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but from the Celtics time this season, the Oklahoma City

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Thunder run of course during his career there with Oklahoma City,

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he has caused some problems, some fits. If you will

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>afford dwell MB, and we know it's not necessarily defensively,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it's offensively where he has great footwork, he has great touch.

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>His offensive rebounding is tremendous. His rebounding overall against him

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>has been very good. So if they struggle, which it

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>will see because they have a lot of really good scores,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>if they struggle with that starting lineup of their four

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>guys plus Daniel Tye and they're scoring is an issue

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with the starting group, then maybe quite possibly will see

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that Robert Williams will they do something there, even though

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>MB will simply overpower him, but moving up and down

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the floor, this guy's like a gazelle at the center position,

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Robert Williams running and rim the rim and being able

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to fill that lane get into position for lobs or

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>layups as well. So curious to see what Brad Stevens

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>would do there. And I also wanted to say this

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>about him be before we move on. Is that speaking

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to you guys on sixers dot Com during the hiatus

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>where he said, you know, this is my time and

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>right now This is certainly his time, So whether it's

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the opposition making changes because of him, or figuring things

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>out how to defend the team, overall, this is certainly

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be Joel and Bad's time, and those words

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>cannot be truer than right now. Completely agree with you

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>guys on off fronts, but especially on that point. Divine

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the next big storyline, of course, I think you have

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to Jason Tatum from the Boston Celtics and

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>what the seventy Sixers will do against him. We have

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot already and you certainly won't be able

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to ignore. It's going to be something that's probably gonna

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>be referenced throughout the series, depending on how it goes.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The fact that the Sixers will not have Ben Simmons

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Jason Tatum before the restart, averaging around twenty three and

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a half points per game shout forty five percent from

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the field. Ben Simmons guard him for about twenty five

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>total minutes over the four games the Sixers and the

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Celtics played with each other, and during those stretches, according

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to this is to the NBA dot Com stat data,

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Tatum was held to five or sixteen, which says something,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think if you watch those games, you could

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>just see how effective Ben Simmons was in defending Jason

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Tatum taking the lead on that And now, as we discussed,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>it might probably be someone like Tobias Harris who's going

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to be called into duty on that front. Well, and luckily,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Tobias has been so focused on defense this year and

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>defending Tatum it almost feels like one of those matchups

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>where you can't stop him, but you can slow him down.

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And Tobias is taking a lot of pride in the

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>way that he's defending, so hopefully this is an opportunity

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>for him to showcase those skills. Brett Brown also mentioned

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that there will be a rotation of folks that are

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>assigned to defending guys like Jayson Tatum Jalen Brown. So

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're going to be looking for big performances from

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy who obviously a little bit smaller, but a

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>great defender like Josh Richardson or Matisse Stible with that

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>length that he has. So it's probably, I think, going

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>to be defense by committee, but like you said, a

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of that the leader of that committee might end

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>up being Tobias Harris. Who has worked really hard on

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this craft, specifically for these moments. Yeah, this is a

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>step that he's talked about from the off season when

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>he resigned with the seventy six ers, stating that defensively,

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to be just a guy out there.

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to prove that yes he can score, but

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.239
<v Speaker 1>he can also defend and not be the one that

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody searches for on that end. And now that Ben

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Simmons is out, He's going to take on that key

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>responsibility probably of either Brown or Tatum and see where

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>things go from there. So this is a matchup that

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have my eye on as well, just

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like you two guys are. And look, no one wants

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to see anyone get injured. But if Jason Tatum is

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>being honest, he's wiping his forehead saying, man, I get

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>away from from Ben Simmons for a series. Is It's

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>not a bad thing because Simmons did a tremendous job

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on Jason Tatum. When I just look at the first

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.479
<v Speaker 1>three wins that they had, Tatum was eight of twenty

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>two in Game one, five of eighteen in Game two,

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and four of thirteen in Game number three. All wins

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>for the seventy six is the Celtics picking up the

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>final victory in their fourth game this season, and he

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>did a fantastic job against him, Lauren, As you mentioned,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't stop these type of players. You can only

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>hope to slow them down and just make things difficult

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>for them, not allow the looks to be so easy

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>for them out there on the floor. So Tobias Harris

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>has a big challenge against him, and let's see what

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>he has defensively in store for Jason Tatum. I mean

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what you just talked about Devon. That was kind of

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>thing in the Toronto series last year, right in respect

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to Kwhi Leonard, you couldn't totally slow him down. But

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end of it, regardless of the

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers that Kawai put up, everyone said that Ben Simmons

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>totally acquitted himself defending a player of Kawai's caliber. So

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think for me, when I'm looking at this, at

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>least through the defensive lens, for what Tobias Harris can

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>do in this series or whoever ends up on him,

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>regardless of who's out there on the floor, just obviously

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.239
<v Speaker 1>make it as difficult as you possibly can, and not

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>let him get into a groove unearned, make him earn

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 1>whatever rhythm or groove that he could get into because

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he is that good. Is there any area that you

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>guys have seen out of him where you feel like

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about Tatum taking his game to a different

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>level this season defensively, defensively being in conversation for an

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>All NBA defensive team coming in again, He's a scorer,

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what he is. And yes he can be a

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>mid range killer. He has certainly improved his range from

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>behind a three point line. But I think one of

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the things that under has not looked at as one

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of his strengths now is his defense. He has improved

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in his time in the NBA now as a defender.

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So I know most people are going to go offense,

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but for me, guys, I'm going to go defense. Then,

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>when speaking about offense on the offensive side of the ball,

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>for Tobias Harris, bring the conversation back to him. Sixers,

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>leading scorer in the bubble, just over twenty one and

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a half points per game, shot forty six and a

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>half percent from the field. Three point numbers were really strong.

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>He was forty one percent out there increasingly got the

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>line down the final few games, rebounded really well distributed.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought he played on balance, very solid basketball in

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the seating games. He got a vote for the All

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Seating Game team, for whatever that means. But Tobias this

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is and I agree with you, guys, I think that

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>he would tell you the same thing as well. This

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is a big moment for him, not just defending Jason Tatum,

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but in a series with Ben Simmons being down, you

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have Joel Embiid, which we've established, but after that, people

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to look at Tobias Harris well. In the

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>last few years set even before Tobias joined the seventy

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>six ers, he's been really committed to proving himself, to

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>betting on himself, just proving to everyone that he can

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.959
<v Speaker 1>show up that he is a All Star caliber player.

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So I would argue maybe he should already be an

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>All Star. And this is the perfect opportunity for Tobias

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to step up in the way that he wants to,

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>especially without Ben Simmons, to show that he is that

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.719
<v Speaker 1>All Star, that he is, that max player that he

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>knows he is. It's just time to show the world

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is the perfect, perfect chance for him to

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.719
<v Speaker 1>do it, and last season joining the club after the

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>trade with Butler, Reddit Harris Simmons and Harris will look

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at it and probably think, of course, some people that

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know he was more of the fifth option. This

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>role wasn't necessarily established. He was too good to be

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a fifth option, Lauren, as you talk about betting on himself.

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And now the role is clearly defined. He's the second

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that you're going to look too offensively for the

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy sixers. You may go Horford second to and be defensively,

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but he has a big, big responsibility on his hands defensively.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But now the role is cemented as to what he

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is for this team on the offensive and it has

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>flat out score the basketball. So if he wants to

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>continue that trend of the twenty one and a half

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's averaging side the bubble, this is now the

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>time to do that and up with a few more

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>point we sentage points as well. There are plenty other

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>talented players in this series with talking about We will

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>do that in just a moment, but before we do, listen,

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>if you want to win, there's only one place to go.

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Parks Casino Parks is the official winning partner of the

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy Sixers, and if the Sixers win, you win with Parks.

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>After the game, go to PA dot Parks Casino dot

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>com and enter the promo code posted on seventy six

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or social to earn free play on the Parks Online

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Casino App. Again, just look on our social feeds. The

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>code will be posted there and then you can play

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>for free on the Parks Online Casino App. Terms and

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>conditions do apply to see Parks's website for more details.

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>You've got to be twenty one or older to play.

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>If you've got a gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's PA dot Parks Casino dot com. Parks Casino, the

0:33:54.560 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>official winning partner of the seventy Sixers. When we think, guys,

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>about the different things that make a rivalry great, there's

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the pedi you are there for the Sixers and the Celtics.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>That's already been built up by the forefathers of today's

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>NBA players. But what's making this even better this year

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is that, much like the case two years ago, you

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>do have star power on each of these teams that

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>only heightens the intensity. You would think of rivalry and

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>there's so many talented players in this series. And a

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>new entry to the mix who was not with Boston

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:32.919
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, was of course All Star

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Kemba Walker. This is his shot, his chance kind of

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the same vein to a certain degree as Tobias Harris,

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>where now you're on a legit contending team. You've talked

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>about wanting to deliver in the playoffs. This is your opportunity.

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think Kim is really good guys, not that

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it means much coming from me, but he has obviously

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of talent. This was a great acquisition

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason by the Celtics, someone who is and Lauren,

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>you can say, lad, I don't want steal anything that

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you said earlier show pre podcast taping about the guy

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>just being a great teammate. And he has had some

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>time with these players before the season got underway at

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics for Team USA. He had, of course the

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>season overall another All Star appearance for him, and the

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>knee injuries started to nag him. But when the lights

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are on, we've seen it through college, his professional career,

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and this guy can play. This guy is really really good.

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the top point guards in the game, one

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of the top scoring point guards as well in the game.

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And he may not have to shoulder the load like

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he had to before and his former home of residence

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Charlotte Hornets, but right now, yeah, you have

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to definitely pay attention to what he does on the

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive end as a scorer for the Boston Celtics. This

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>guy can get it up. He can fill it up

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 1>at any given time. We saw it with the Charlotte

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Hornets last season, not this season, last season eighteen nineteen

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 1>when he erupted for what was it sales sixty points

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 1>against the Sixers and almost had fifty and another one.

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, he has success against his basketball team. And

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you even think of the second and third games between

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>these two teams this year when Kemba went for twenty

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>nine and he had eight assists in Game two, and

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>then he and Josh Richardson had a pretty good back

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and forth in Game three. Kemba finished with twenty six

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Richardson with twenty nine points in that game. So even

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>this season, we certainly saw his firepower on full display. Well, Celts,

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's exactly the game that I was going to cite

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the way that he went back and forth with Josh

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, and that's something that we could see again,

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>there's never been a better time for Josh to be

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>recently coming off of a tying a season high or no,

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a season high his season high game with

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers thirty four points against the Portland Trailblazer, So

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that'll be something interesting. But I just wanted to chime

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in real quick about Kemba. Obviously, I am loyal to

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers, and I hope I don't have to say

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that at this point on the podcast, But Kemba deserves

0:36:58.160 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credit for just being such a stand

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up guy. He has one of the best reputations in

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the league. He stays after he signs autographs. He was

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in a tough situation with Charlotte, and he never talked

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>about how tough that situation was. So credit where credit

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:12.919
<v Speaker 1>is due to Kemba for just keeping his head down,

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>working hard, being productive even on a bad team. And now,

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>like you guys said, on a good team. This guy's

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of the limit. For this guy, and he also not,

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>unlike Joel Embiid, is going to come into this series

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>with something to prove. So He's definitely someone to look

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>out for. If I had to guess, I'd say he's

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be dangerous. But luckily, the Sixers have some

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty good defenders on their roster, even in the absence

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of Ben Simmons. So I think this is going to

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be a really key matchup when we look to try

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>to defend Kemba Walker as a Sixers team. And I

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>saw the quote from him, I believe it was Saturday

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.399
<v Speaker 1>where he pointed out, Hey, I just cannot get rid

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of Josh Josh Richardson. He's speaking of you know where

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they played the Charlotte Horners will play the Miami Heat

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in the postseason, and they've had their battles, of course

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>playing over the years, and I'm sure we'll see plenty

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of those two guys paired up against one another throughout

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>this series. Big series obviously for Josh Richardson, two new

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>spot with seventy Sixers, and I would think you guys

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>can correct me if you think I'm wrong, but he

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>will probably at least in the beginning draw the lines

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>share of the defense on Kemba Walker. Maybe we'd see

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Shake Milton on someone else, perhaps a Gordon Hayward that

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. But Josh Richardson, I think he had

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a solid few games inside the bubble and this is

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be an important time for him

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think the Sixers come into this year

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>really valued his fit, what he could do on both

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>ends of the court. And we know that he has

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>had playoff experience with Miami Heat in the past, but

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not quite at this level, and he's going to be

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>thrust in the spotlight in a big prime matchup. Well,

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting what Devon said about Tobias Harris last year,

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.240
<v Speaker 1>how we ended up sort of back fourth or fifth option,

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't quite get enough touches to really shine in the

0:38:57.760 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 1>situation that Tobias was in last year, And it's almost

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>like found himself in a similar situation. He's a new

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>guy on the team. We know he can be productive,

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>we know how good he was in Miami, but he's

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>playing sort of behind a lot of primary options. So

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously we've said this a million times. You never want

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to lose Ben Simmons, But in losing Ben Simmons, it's

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>opened the door for Josh Richardson to get some more touches,

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to have some plays run, for him to really show

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what he's got on a big stage. So I almost

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>see Josh this year in the same situation that Tobias

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 1>was in last year, and hopefully he can rise to

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the occasion and work off that momentum that he started

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to build in these seating games, and hopefully these games

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's had the outburst that he had against the

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Portland Trailblazers, playing steady offensively will give him not only

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>him the confidence to go out there and again try

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to duplicate what he did in that way, maybe not

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to the tune of thirty four but efficiently good shooting confidence,

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>but also the coaching stand to draw those to call

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>his number when the opportunity presents itself for him to

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>also continue if he gets hot with a few of

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>those jump those layups and gets into free to a

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>line as well finishing in transition, that they call his

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>number and give him some opportunity because they're gonna need

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>every bit of scoring possible losing the seventeen and of

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>course the assist from Ben Simmons and every outing. So

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this is why you got him in the deal in

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the off season to come out here not only defensively,

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but now when the opportunity is presented himself offensively as well. Yeah,

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the best part about this series is like, well, we

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about this guy, that guy, the other guy. Oh,

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's still so and so and so and so

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and so and so who we haven't discussed yet. And

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>some of those so and sos are Jalen Brown for

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics and Gordon Hayward and for the seventy Sixers.

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:44.280
<v Speaker 1>You throw al Horford's name in there, absolutely and shake Milton.

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>He's going through something like this for the first time

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in his elevated rolebot. Let's let's go back to Jalen

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Gordon Hayward for the Celtics. What to expect

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>from them? I mean, Jalen did not play well against

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers until that final game in the four game

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>series that Boston won at TD Garden. Through his first

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 1>three games, he only scored a combined twenty two points

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and he seemed totally out of it. Yep, eight points,

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>eight points and six points. Couldn't find it. And a

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of that was due to the defense team defensively

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, for sure, but definitely al Horfor with what

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>he was able to do defensively against Jalen Brown, and

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>he played very well inside the bubble also, so you

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>would have to think confidence wise with somebody who has

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>some momentum coming into the start of their playoff series.

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna come out here and yeah, they'll point out

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the bad things that he did against the team during

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the regular season, but they're going to focus on what

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>he has done as of late, and he has performed

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>very very well. This matchup I have my eye on

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>as well because pride wise, as someone especially Al horfor

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>being a former teammate, he knows their games. So knowing

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>their games, how much is that going to help? They've

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:01.439
<v Speaker 1>developed and improved from a year ago? Those players, Jaylen Brown,

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Jason Tatum, So what does that do for Al Horford?

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>He knows their tricks, but they may not have new

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>tricks now. So watching film is going to be important.

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>The coaching, the assistant coaches that have the knowledge and

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the scouttering report of course, is what these players do

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.479
<v Speaker 1>well and what they have done so far very well

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be key for their success. And Jalen

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Brown has turned himself into a very very good player

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that just coming in being an athlete and defender, he

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>can now score at a very high clip, and the

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Sixers did a really good job against Jalen Brown in

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>those first three games. But it's also worth noting that

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Jalen really found his stride towards the end of the season,

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Sixers haven't played the Celtics since February first.

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>That's just wild. And obviously the hiatus affects every matchup

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that's going into these playoffs, but a lot can change

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.959
<v Speaker 1>in six seven months, so to a certain extent, we're

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>still yet to see exactly how these teams match up

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>six months later. I mean we saw it obviously, Bensimon

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is no longer in the lineup, but we've seen a

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys. Bodies change and their skills are changing.

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are getting better, some of them look winded,

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and so you never know how that matchup is going

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to shift all this time later. But yeah, Brown is

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not to be underestimated. He was so good at the

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the season, and I don't know he could

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>give some trouble to these Celtics have a lot of weapons,

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:19.399
<v Speaker 1>like you said at the very beginning of the show,

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and emiliary guys of Gordon Hayward. He had a couple

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of good games against the Sixers the start of the season.

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>His last two weren't quite at the same level as

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the first two games in the regular season series, but

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he played well in the seeding games. He played all

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but one of them, and there's a lot of things

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that he does well and divine. We were talking about

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this before we hit record on the old podcast, but

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like, you know, there's certain guys that perhaps draw

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>your first line of attention, your primary attension, and then

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>well oops, if there's someone like Gordon Hayward who's just

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:52.800
<v Speaker 1>they're waiting in the wings, I mean, he's he's excellent,

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, And that's like I kind of felt the

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>start of his time with Boston. The national view is like, well,

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>when are you going to see the payoff? And I

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>feel like, while the numbers may not be explosive, that

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he puts up kind of what at the level we

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>saw when he left Utah, he still fills the gaps

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's probably doing him in disservice really really well

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and can jump in where you need him depending on

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>what's going on and the attention being drawn by the

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>other guys who are out there, You're a problem to have,

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>right to have a former All Star on your team,

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and we know that things change once he had the

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>devastating injury to start off his Celtics career in Cleveland

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with the leg problem that has now existed, and he's

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>overcome that and he's trying to really get back into

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that form. But we've seen that form quite a few times,

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like the twenty five points that he had in Game one,

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>even though it was the Sixers win, he played well.

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Game two, as you said nineteen, he still played well

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and struggled down the stretch. Now when you look at

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that one in the matchup with the Sixers, who's it

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be? Is it going to be someone like

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Shake Milton? If Josh Richardson is going to be defending

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Kemba Walker, does that cross match now mean that Shake

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Milton is going to be on Gordon Hayward? Are his

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>eyes going to light up with a young player opposite

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>him defensively and maybe not even known really as a defender,

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:11.439
<v Speaker 1>albeit the great wingspan six four or six five in height.

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Hayward is going to be someone again on that

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>scattering report that we're going to have to pay attention

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.959
<v Speaker 1>to and see. You cannot let him get going, because

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:21.839
<v Speaker 1>if he gets going and the others are getting going,

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it could be a long night for the opposition. So, yes,

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 1>a good problem to have for the Boston Celtics when

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you have that level of talent so far down the line,

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>if you will, with all due respect in terms of

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the focus of the offensive output. Having worked through now,

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the Boston starting lineup is Gordon Hayward the X factor

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 1>to you, guys, great question. Yes, okay, all right, so

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there's an answer which kind of segues into the next

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>point I was going to bring up when we start

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about a few of the reserves that these teams have.

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Boston almost has like a six man

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup because Marcus Smart is someone who can jump

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in there if needed, depending on scenario or depth player health,

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would put I think, for me, it's either

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Gordon Hayward or Marcus Smart when I look at X factors.

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That's my kind of non committal answer to your question,

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But go ahead, d The only reason I would lean

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the only reason I would lean Hayward is because I

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:23.359
<v Speaker 1>think that Marcus Smart's role is clearly more defined as

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the sixth man, and that sixth starter knowing who he

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is and what he provides for you. I mean, this

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>guy is a All NBA defender, first team as the reserve,

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's because he's that sixth starter, and that is

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 1>basically because you have to have a big man in

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the starting line. We know if it was just what

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it was and they went to Houston Rockets route, that

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Smart will be starting for the Boston Sucks because

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that's how important he is. So I think his role

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 1>is way more defined where the flow of the game

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>dictates what Gordon Hayward's role is on any given night,

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>because he is such a good score. Because the importance

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of him coming in via the free agency, a big

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 1>freezer to pick up the injury that follows. That's why

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I lean more Gordon Hayward because first and foremost is

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be stopping Tatum Brown Walker and then you

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>get to Gordon Hayward again, no disrespect, that's just how

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it is. That's how stacked they are offensively for this team.

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think something too, is when we're talking about someone

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:24.320
<v Speaker 1>like a Marcus Smart, he's a guy who is certainly

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit farther along and being established where you

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>could describe him in terms of being like a sixth starter,

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 1>where I think there are some guys in the sixers

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>right now who maybe this time next year or the

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>year after that could fall into that category, whether it's

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>someone like a fur Con cork Mase or a Matisse Styble,

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but just maybe aren't quite far along as some of

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the members of this Boston courre. And the thing about

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Smart is like when you look at his numbers, he

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:51.359
<v Speaker 1>shoots below the league average, but as we saw even

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this season, when he catches the wave, it can go

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and he could win you a playoff game potentially. And

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think to the sixer side of that, we've seen

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>two guys in Alec Burks and Furkon Korkmis who could

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>also fill that same type of role where I think

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hopefully for them they can build upon the good that

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they did yes during the regular season. For Burke's whether

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it was in Golden State where he was having a

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>career year or when he joined the seventy sixers, or

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>fur Coon Korkmise, who took another step this year, that

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>those are two guys where if you if you're getting

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what you get out of the guys, you know what

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you typically get from that those are two guys, and

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about Burks and Korkmas for the Sixers that you

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>know that they give you something a little bit more

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and that could put you over the hump in a game.

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>That's for sure ourselves the Sixers sort of six the

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>man by committee situation that they've had is going to

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.399
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting. And over the last few games, of course,

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's looked like Alec Burks is the guy that's going

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to be that spark plug off the bench that comes

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in and just makes magic happen. But we saw Kurkon

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Quorkmase do the same thing this year, even Mattie Stibel

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So it's nice to see that the

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Sixers have a group that can contribute that sort of thing.

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But you want to make sure you can count on

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that group if it's going to be a by MIDI

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>situation for the Reserves, you want to make sure that

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a group that's being consistently productive and is put

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in a position to highlight their strengths, because obviously, when

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you talk about those three in Burke's Quirkmisin Bible, they

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all have different strengths and they can all be really

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:16.720
<v Speaker 1>useful in a series like this, So it'll be interesting

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to see how it shakes out minutes wise among that group.

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:23.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a really great player, all of them combine Burke's quark,

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 1>mos stiable right, the shooting, the defense, the ball handling

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and scoring punch. That would be fantastic to get the

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:33.279
<v Speaker 1>best of each one of those those players when they

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 1>do come in, And you're right, Lauren, the options that

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Brown has this is going to be very very telling

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>because Quirk Moiles is going to come in with his

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>skill set of shooting, some playmaking. How will he fare

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 1>on the defensive end when Alec Burks comes in. Let's

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>say if he is the first one to come in,

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 1>he paired up with Marcus Smart, how that's going to

0:49:57.360 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>play out with the top defender with the defend Alec

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Birks with one of his strengths, and certainly the Tista

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>was a young player. Yes he's gotten this bubble experience.

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But playoffs of the playoffs, and I know the playoffs

0:50:07.880 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>are the playoffs is self mentioned earlier outside of the

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 1>TV Garden, But the playoffs are the playoffs in the

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>intensity really really picks up. How is he going to respond?

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Will he be able to knock down some shots to

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 1>go along with his defensive acumen that we already know,

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe maybe maybe playoff of the confidence and success

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that he had against the Celtics throughout the year with

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>what he did defensively and not get rattled. Absolutely devon.

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 1>But I also want to say no disrespect we talk

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>about Bible, corks, burks, sort of those first three options

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as it seems today, whatever day it is, August sixteenth,

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's no disrespect to a guy like Glenn Robinson

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the third who's been dealing with that hip pointer, to

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:50.319
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Mike Scott and even Howell Netto who

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>were both so good in those seating games. So I

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's if it's an embarrassment of riches

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 1>or if it's a problem to try to figure out

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:01.720
<v Speaker 1>how to whittle down that group, but it'll be interesting

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 1>to see. I know we probably want to get a

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>little deeper on a guy like Burkes. Talk more about Bible,

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 1>talk more about cork munks, but shout out to those

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 1>guys too, because they really did prove themselves in these

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seating games as available options that can be productive in

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a bind producing this one thing. It's also then showing

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that you are ready, and I think that not to

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 1>boil it down to something even more simplistic. When there

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>was a need there for them in the seating games,

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Brett Brown went to them and they did what they did.

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>They produced, which, going back to what we talked about

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>at the start, all the more reason for them to

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>feel confident in the Sixers, to feel confident in them

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:36.800
<v Speaker 1>going into the playoffs. I think we are nearing the

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 1>end of our checklist for different layers of the series.

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think that whole Nato has earned the opportunity

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to be given a look at some point if needed.

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not necessarily sure how high you should be in

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the rotation, but he's piqued interest enough and he performed

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>well enough that I think if you're in a certain

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 1>type of spot, maybe you give him a shot. See

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:59.879
<v Speaker 1>what he can do lightning in a bottle situation, anything else.

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to yield the floor to you, guys that

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you think we have not given enough attention yet as

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we begin to wrap up our dissection of all things

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Sixers and Celtics Celts, do you feel that we gave

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:14.640
<v Speaker 1>enough time or credit to the difference that Al Horford

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 1>can make in this series. No, I'm glad you mentioned

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that because I do have one item circled on my

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sheet right here, and it's Al plus Joe together circle.

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:26.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that was something that really became

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>It was obviously a question that underscored the entire season,

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but when Ben Simmons went down with his injury in

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the bubble, what would it look like with the two

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of them together. I think by all accounts they did

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty well together in appairing and also when playing separately.

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And yes, the seventy sixers part of their investment, A

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>large part of their investment, I would think in al

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Horford was what you're going to do this time of year,

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>How is his veteran savviny experience going to play at

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this time of year? And wouldn't you know it's his

0:52:51.200 --> 0:52:52.799
<v Speaker 1>old team for the last three years that he's going

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to go up against in that first round. Well, what

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say about al Celts is he

0:52:57.080 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>looks better now than he has all season, I think,

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that that's really up for debate.

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>He is rounding into form and he's even said it himself,

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the healthiest he's felt this is the sharpest

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he's felt since being in Philadelphia. So all signs point

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that he is going to peak this

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:12.239
<v Speaker 1>season in the playoffs, which is what we're accustomed to

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing from a guy like Al Horford. And then we

0:53:14.600 --> 0:53:16.359
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about the fact that he's a bit

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>of insurance when Joel is off the court. Obviously, if

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they start together, we might not see that quite as often.

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But as we talked about, with a guy like Mike

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Scott really rounding into form, you never know when you're

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:28.840
<v Speaker 1>going to see them get separated and have Al Horford

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:32.320
<v Speaker 1>come in as that backup for Joel Embiid, which is

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what the Sixers were really lacking in the playoffs lack season.

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So you would hope that they'll continue to play well together,

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>but in relief of Joel as well. That gives second

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>units a lot of problems. If Al Horford is going

0:53:43.719 --> 0:53:46.399
<v Speaker 1>to come out sharp and play against perhaps not your

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup if you're the Celtics, and being that it

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:52.239
<v Speaker 1>is his former team, the little subtle nuances of what

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics do. They're going to change a lot of things,

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, but they are who they are and he

0:53:57.280 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 1>was there for a lot of they are who they are,

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>so he'll still know some things that they do. They'll

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>change some of those things around, of course, but at

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, it is basketball. He knows

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>them very well. What's the counter going to be if

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>he needs some help things of that nature, how is

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it going to flow? What's you know, can he get

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in the head of if you will, Brad Stevens and

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:24.360
<v Speaker 1>those guys and then cause them some problems just because

0:54:24.400 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>of his great IQ of the game and the great

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:30.280
<v Speaker 1>IQ of the Boston Celtics. Just simply pointing out again

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 1>little subtle things that will be a benefit for the

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:36.919
<v Speaker 1>seventy Sixers and hopefully a negative for the Boston Celtics. Yeah,

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:38.760
<v Speaker 1>even just as like a fan of the game myself,

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm so curious about how Al Horford's relationship with Brad

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Stevens can move in the sixers favor in this series. Obviously,

0:54:47.360 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I've never played in the NBA for a multitude of reasons,

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but you have to imagine that if you play under

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 1>someone like Stevens, and I think that it's it's pretty

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 1>clear that Horford and Stevens had a good relationship and

0:54:58.280 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 1>even collaborated together in a lot of big moments such

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:05.800
<v Speaker 1>as the playoffs. How much can that sort of sway

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers advantage when it comes to plays after time out,

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's plays late in games. Does Al Horford know sort

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of where Stevens is going to lean in certain situations?

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be a really interesting sort of

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>sub storyline in this series, Like if you have one

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 1>team who had a player with his foot on the

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:24.400
<v Speaker 1>line in the corner and a long jump shot and

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>then you need an inbounds play to win a game

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to take a commanding advantage of the series, those types

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of situations. Oh yeah, good time. All right, We do

0:55:37.520 --> 0:55:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it on the podcast here each and every week. Did

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you hear? As we begin to wrap up this series

0:55:44.280 --> 0:55:47.840
<v Speaker 1>preview episode between the seventy Sixers and the Celtics, I

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>will say as we segue and combined our two segments,

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the first one and this one, Lauren someone who I

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like we did not give enough attention to young

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Watise Thyble, So I will yield to you and set

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:01.400
<v Speaker 1>us up for did you hear? Sure? Soful? My? Did

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you hear? This week? Was Brett Brown talking about Matisse's

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Bible following the team's last Seaton game against Houston, I

0:56:09.520 --> 0:56:12.920
<v Speaker 1>asked coach Brown how useful Matifs can be in Ben

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Simmons's absence and how much he trusts Matif after he's

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>shown the growth that he's shown so far this season.

0:56:20.560 --> 0:56:24.520
<v Speaker 1>The aspect of his game defensively that has impressed me

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the most is there is I think I labeled him

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:32.399
<v Speaker 1>a reckless thief at the start of the year as

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the season has unfolded, and that now is the playoffs

0:56:36.360 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>are right in front of us. Just the crazy swipes

0:56:40.040 --> 0:56:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and a foul being lifted off the floor with just

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a subtle up fake and Matisse jumps and some really

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:50.720
<v Speaker 1>good player like jumps into him and gets three free throws.

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:54.800
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been doing that, Like his heart is completely

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in the right place. And then you take the physical

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 1>gifts in his length, in his instants, and if you

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 1>combine that with like intellect of NBA sort of scouting,

0:57:08.080 --> 0:57:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you got it all. And I feel like he has

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 1>really settled down as far as being able to be

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>bounced around. To Jim, I think that he's he's been

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 1>leveled and he's thinking he's not as emotional and he's

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be huge. He really can't. I can't understate

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that he is going to be huge as a defensive requirement,

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 1>especially since you don't have been with the great wing

0:57:33.680 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>plays the Celtics have in the upcoming series, he's going

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to be He's going to assume a massive role. So,

0:57:40.680 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like Coach Brown said, especially when you don't have been,

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Matise can play a really big role. Obviously,

0:57:47.240 --> 0:57:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we see his steals. We've almost become used to him

0:57:49.560 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>getting two three steals at night and that'll be crucial

0:57:52.280 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Celtics team. But those deflections too, He's consistently

0:57:56.280 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the leader in deflections. He's so pusky he can get

0:57:58.920 --> 0:58:01.880
<v Speaker 1>under even really good player's skin. And it'll be interesting

0:58:01.960 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to see how he's grown since that first matchup against

0:58:05.080 --> 0:58:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics on October twenty third. Mattie still calls that

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>his favorite or most memorable game of his rookie season,

0:58:10.320 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of that is due in part to

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the back and forth that he had with Kemba Walker

0:58:14.200 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and the way that Kemba was able to get him

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to bite and makes them maybe not I don't want

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to say immature, but like younger fouls, younger mistakes that

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Brett Brown has talked about, and then as the game

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:26.520
<v Speaker 1>went on, Matisse was able to get him back with

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple blocks and they had a bit of an

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:32.520
<v Speaker 1>exchange of words together. And Matisse really really respects Kemba,

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>He respects the situation, he respects the game. So this

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 1>should be a really cool opportunity for him to show

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that growth that Brett Brown is really proud of. I'm excited.

0:58:40.800 --> 0:58:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to see what Matisse Thyble as he wraps

0:58:43.200 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>up his first full professional season does on the playoff stage.

0:58:46.400 --> 0:58:48.640
<v Speaker 1>He obviously has a tremendous head on his shoulders, and

0:58:48.720 --> 0:58:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm really looking forward to see how he factors into

0:58:51.240 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the series. See what'd you hear? What I heard was

0:58:53.760 --> 0:58:57.320
<v Speaker 1>from Tobias Harris during the final games of the Bubble,

0:58:57.480 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>speaking about the chemistry and the camaraderie that the team

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>has built, of course during this time and seeing the

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>difference in these guys together both off the floor and

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. I think our chemistry is, um, you know,

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 1>really good right now, an all time high. Um. We're here,

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:19.520
<v Speaker 1>We're around each other daily, you know, every every day

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we pretty much get to see one another. Um, and

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:26.040
<v Speaker 1>when we're playing, we're continuing to find our flow. I think,

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we played in games where we've had some

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 1>guys we haven't you know, even um last game we

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 1>had with myself, Joel al and Jay rich sitting out.

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're coming together. We're seeing different guys step

0:59:42.520 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 1>up because we know we're gonna need everyone tonight. Um,

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether it's us out, they're playing fourth quarter,

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we're letting the second unit kind of handle business, and

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we're just bonding and that's a great

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>thing about this time together as team, and we truly

1:00:02.320 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>understand that when playoffs come, you know, with our team

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and our depth, that's going to be needed throughout throughout

1:00:09.800 --> 1:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>our run. And that's important. Even when Ben Simmons went down,

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Especially when Ben Simmons went down, I noticed a lot

1:00:16.720 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of communication from We've seen it from Tobias Harris, Al Horford,

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>even Josh Richardson doing a regular season, but Joel Embid,

1:00:24.880 --> 1:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just as we talked about small, little subtle things, whether

1:00:28.280 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it be Al Horford with a quick touch pass, receiving

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball at a high low trying to hit him

1:00:34.560 --> 1:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Bed who was being fronted by his defender to get

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a quick catch. So the double team is not allowed

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to come over for a layup or dunk, foul, whatever

1:00:41.440 --> 1:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it might be. There was one that pointed out against

1:00:43.800 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Rockets where the ball was sailed out of bounds,

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but instead of seeing and be frustrated maybe sulking or

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>upset with the fact that it was a turnover and

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>missed opportunity for him to get a bucket, he looked

1:00:57.280 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>at him, pointed at Al Horford patted himself when the chest,

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, I see what you did there. So those

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>little things like that are going to be very important

1:01:06.000 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for this basketball team to not blame one another. Turnovers happened.

1:01:10.760 --> 1:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Their turnover numbers have been down, which is tremendous. Love

1:01:13.320 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to see it. But things like that are going to happen,

1:01:15.600 --> 1:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>especially with a good defensive team like the Boston Celtics,

1:01:18.040 --> 1:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and for them to have that and a leader liked

1:01:20.600 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to Bias Harris to openly shared that with the rest

1:01:24.160 --> 1:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of us, that their communication and their chemistry overall has

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>has picked up being inside the bubble because this is

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>all that they have. I love to hear that, and

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I hope that that carries over into the first round

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of the playoffs and beyond what did I hear? I

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>heard Al Horford looking ahead to a postseason matchup against

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>his now second former team, the Boston Celtics. It's part

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of the business, you know, obviously, it's you know, we've

1:01:50.320 --> 1:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>already played them plenty of times this year, so that

1:01:55.200 --> 1:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>effect is kind of out of the way, so now

1:01:57.720 --> 1:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>we can just you know, go out during compete and

1:02:00.840 --> 1:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>should be a fun series. We can all agree that

1:02:03.560 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Al Horford is a valuable player who does valuable things,

1:02:07.320 --> 1:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's understandable why any team on the NBA would

1:02:10.840 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>want to have him. I was really encouraged by some

1:02:12.640 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that we saw in the bubble after

1:02:14.960 --> 1:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons went down to injury. I thought Al played

1:02:17.880 --> 1:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>really really well, shot terrifically from outside the arc. So

1:02:21.120 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>pick and pop. You look at Al Horford right there,

1:02:23.160 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be in a rhythm. I think he

1:02:25.120 --> 1:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>showed more than at least to what I thought based

1:02:27.120 --> 1:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>on his comments going into the bubble kind of made

1:02:29.440 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it sound initially like he was just going to gradually

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>get ready for the time the playoffs started. I thought

1:02:34.080 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he was ready to go from the jump, and he

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>helps set the tone for the Sixers and as we've

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>all seen firsthand going back to two years ago, he

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>can do things defensively that take away a really good

1:02:43.600 --> 1:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>scoring option on your team, and the Sixers will need

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that type of presence as they go up against Boston.

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited to see how al Horford plays into

1:02:50.960 --> 1:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the series. I think it'll just add yet another subplot

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to it is already a great rivalry last but not

1:02:58.160 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>least around the league. Any final closing thoughts on something

1:03:04.360 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It could be something related to the

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>sexture that we haven't talked about yet, or something else. Well, look,

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>every time we've gone around the league, I've gone with

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the West, and the bottom of the

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>West is now set, obviously, with the Portland Trailblazers fighting

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and calling their way into the first round matchup against

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers, which honestly could be a little bit more

1:03:21.000 --> 1:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting than maybe your average one eight matchup with the

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks or series of games that Damian Lillard has had.

1:03:27.920 --> 1:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think this week I'd like to give credit

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>where credit is due to a team like the Memphis Grizzlies,

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who way overperformed expectations in the regular season, fighting their

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>way into that eight seed before the hiatus, and then

1:03:40.840 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously into the play in game that was on Saturday.

1:03:45.040 --> 1:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And then I'd also like to give some credit to

1:03:47.400 --> 1:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Phoenix Suns who came to the bubble and did

1:03:50.120 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely everything they could do. You can't do better than

1:03:53.040 --> 1:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>eight and o inside the bubble, and they were this

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>close to controlling their own destiny, but not quite there.

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think between teams like the Grizzlies and the Suns,

1:04:00.680 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of fun young teams out there

1:04:02.480 --> 1:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in the league that are going to be contenders for

1:04:04.760 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>years to come. So even if it was just an

1:04:06.880 --> 1:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>appetizer to sort of see what's to come from teams

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Grizzlies like the Suns, it was really cool

1:04:12.640 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to see them sort of show out as much as

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>they could. Obviously, the Grizzlies during the regular season and

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Suns in the bubble. So props to those two teams.

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see what happens with the Blazers moving forward,

1:04:23.200 --> 1:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's been Dame time for about a week and

1:04:25.600 --> 1:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a half now. Yes, I have to have a conversation

1:04:28.560 --> 1:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>with Karis la Bert. I don't know I was I

1:04:34.040 --> 1:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>have to have a conversation why not take them off

1:04:36.440 --> 1:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the dribble. You have the you're rolling last shot. But yeah,

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I hear you, so sales of you don't mind if

1:04:41.960 --> 1:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I can jump in and give my what we heard,

1:04:45.000 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of course from around the league. I'll stick with the

1:04:47.280 --> 1:04:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Western Conference and have to give credit to the NBA

1:04:50.600 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>number one with the work that they've done inside the bubble,

1:04:53.640 --> 1:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the zero positive test for the coronavirus since they've been there,

1:04:57.120 --> 1:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>which is amazing and we love to see. This is

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>why i wis were able to have the sport, but

1:05:01.960 --> 1:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>also getting it right where on the last day, if

1:05:04.600 --> 1:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you will, Technically Saturday was the last day with the

1:05:07.400 --> 1:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>playing game, but leading up to the playoff game was

1:05:10.640 --> 1:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that Thursday where you had four games that meant something

1:05:14.280 --> 1:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Portland Trailblazes, Phoenix Suns, sant Antonio Spurs, and

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the Memphis Grizzlies all playing important games and putting themselves

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in a position to play in for that play in game,

1:05:27.800 --> 1:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it be one or two games. We saw the

1:05:29.640 --> 1:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Blazers already won it, so they only needed to won

1:05:31.760 --> 1:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>games to knock off one game to knock off the

1:05:33.760 --> 1:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Memphis Grizzlies. That was theater that was fantastic. I was

1:05:37.080 --> 1:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to that. Once we knew what the scenario was,

1:05:40.200 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I could not wait to watch it. And of course

1:05:41.920 --> 1:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I had a vested interest in the Phoenix Suns. But overall,

1:05:46.480 --> 1:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they got it right and this is something that could

1:05:49.240 --> 1:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially be a conversation for the NBA down the line

1:05:52.880 --> 1:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in future playoffs if you will. For should the NBA

1:05:57.520 --> 1:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>have a play in game in each of the conference?

1:06:00.200 --> 1:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Is because of how this whole thing played out. So

1:06:03.040 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it was fun, it was fantastic. Obviously disappointed in the result,

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>but the future for the Phoenix Suns, of course is

1:06:08.960 --> 1:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>very bright. Same for the Memphis Grizzlies. And hats off

1:06:13.280 --> 1:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to the San Antonio Spurs for ending a great, great

1:06:16.680 --> 1:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>playoff running over twenty plus years in the playoffs. It

1:06:19.720 --> 1:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>was amazing, no question about it. That is some feat.

1:06:22.640 --> 1:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's like bridging multiple generations. I'm gonna stick

1:06:26.800 --> 1:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with you guys. I'm going to stay in the Western Conference.

1:06:29.960 --> 1:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm ashamed to admit this. It's just

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a revelation. It may change people's opinions of me I

1:06:35.520 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the potential, at least in my opinion,

1:06:38.800 --> 1:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>greatness factor in sports. I am drawn to following things

1:06:42.840 --> 1:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like that, and I kind of want to see it

1:06:45.800 --> 1:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>played out to its fullest potential. For instance, Chicago Bulls

1:06:49.640 --> 1:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties going for two three peats. I didn't

1:06:52.600 --> 1:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>care about seeing the Utah Jazz win. I wanted to

1:06:55.400 --> 1:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>see how great Michael Jordan and the Bulls could be.

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest, not that I was the team, but

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees in the mid nineties late nineties, Like I

1:07:04.360 --> 1:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see how great that team could be. Could

1:07:06.560 --> 1:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we see something special that we might only see once

1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in a generation. The Patriots do not fall into that

1:07:11.120 --> 1:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>category for a number of reasons. But I look at

1:07:14.920 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the West and the top of the West, and I

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>see the Los Angeles Lakers, who did not have a

1:07:18.200 --> 1:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>great seating round in the bubble Lebron James. You know,

1:07:21.080 --> 1:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>people already starting to sew the seeds of doubt in

1:07:23.000 --> 1:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of the national narrative with him and the LA Clippers.

1:07:26.720 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see those two teams make it as

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>far as they can in the West. And I'd love

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to see one of those two teams come out of

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the West. I'm just intrigued, obviously by the strides the

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Lakers made this year compared to last year with Anthony

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Davis and the LA Clippers bring in the two free

1:07:40.400 --> 1:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>agent acquisitions the headliners in Kawhi Leonard and Paul George.

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So as we get ready for the postseason, I personally

1:07:48.760 --> 1:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it may be not that exciting, It might be predictable,

1:07:51.720 --> 1:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but I want to see those two teams on a

1:07:53.600 --> 1:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>collision course in the Western Conference and one of those

1:07:56.240 --> 1:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>two teams come out to the West, because I think

1:07:58.040 --> 1:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the best of what that conference has to offer.

1:08:02.160 --> 1:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that might disappoint some people. Should be fun,

1:08:06.160 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>should be fun. I'm intrigued by the Avery Bradley absence,

1:08:09.760 --> 1:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>especially as Lauren mentioned in that first round, with Damian

1:08:12.200 --> 1:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Lillitt playing at such a high level. CJ McCollum with

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:18.519
<v Speaker 1>his twenty nine or thirty one in the play in game,

1:08:19.280 --> 1:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>just I'm curious to see how they decide to defend

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>those two since they are the head of it and

1:08:26.200 --> 1:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Carmelo Anthony Lebron James as you just said, so seventeen years,

1:08:30.439 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>two of the closest friends in the league and they

1:08:33.400 --> 1:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>get to go at it in the postseason. Should be

1:08:35.720 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous start. To the playoffs. It does feel though,

1:08:39.160 --> 1:08:41.719
<v Speaker 1>like it's about that time, like right before the playoffs,

1:08:41.760 --> 1:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that people start doubting Lebron James. And if you've been

1:08:44.280 --> 1:08:47.599
<v Speaker 1>watching the NBA in the last seventeen years, specifically maybe

1:08:47.640 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>more in the last nine or ten years, you know

1:08:49.560 --> 1:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that that's a mistake. So maybe this time the doubters

1:08:52.400 --> 1:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>will be correct about Lebron and his so called decline.

1:08:56.000 --> 1:08:58.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think anytime Lebron is playing in the playoffs,

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen over all his consecutive finals runs, it's

1:09:02.080 --> 1:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be mus CTV, it's gonna be exciting, Dame playing

1:09:04.840 --> 1:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>better than ever. So I'm on that series two for sure.

1:09:08.400 --> 1:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But I also always have to question people when they

1:09:10.800 --> 1:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>start doubting Lebron James. It's just a bad idea. Agreed, Well, guys,

1:09:16.439 --> 1:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>we did it. I think we topped an hour if

1:09:18.600 --> 1:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at my stop watch correctly, an accomplishment, but

1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the scene, that's right. We have to set the stage

1:09:27.640 --> 1:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and if it takes an hour, gosh darn it, it's

1:09:29.400 --> 1:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>going to take an hour, and hopefully we'll be able

1:09:31.320 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to set the stage for a series again before this

1:09:34.439 --> 1:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty postseason comes to an end. What we will

1:09:37.520 --> 1:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>do is we are going to effort a brand new,

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>fresh episode of the broadcast, not just with us, but

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>with guests as well, the day of So check your

1:09:48.360 --> 1:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>feeds the day of each game in the series, the

1:09:51.720 --> 1:09:54.479
<v Speaker 1>day after every game, morning after you'll find Rewind breaking

1:09:54.520 --> 1:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>down the game with Tom Againnis divided myself. The morning

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of each game in the series, a new episode of

1:10:00.400 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast with the three of us. So that is

1:10:03.160 --> 1:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna try to do. Guys, thank you very much,

1:10:05.600 --> 1:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you, Selz and Lauren. Let's go playoffs.

1:10:09.720 --> 1:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Amen to that. We'll talk to you next time. See

1:10:11.800 --> 1:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you