WEBVTT - US-China Tariff Tensions' Impact on Tech Sector

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>The trade war between the US and China it continues,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>China raising its own tariffs on all US goods from

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>eighty four percent to one hundred and twenty five percent

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>starting tomorrow, after the US raised tariffs to one hundred

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 2>and forty five percent on China. China saying your tariffs

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>are a joke. United States, It's no joke to investors.

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>What an extraordinary week we have had. We are are

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>currently up almost six percent over the course of the

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>past five trading days ed on the NASDAP. But it

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>really doesn't paint the picture of the extent of the

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 2>whiplash that we've seen throughout that week as you pull

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>back on tariffs towards other nations. Look at what we've

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>done on the month, though, this context is needed sure

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>up on the week. On the downside, for the course

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>of April the trading month were off five percent on

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the nast like one hundred dig into the details.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>ED.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm looking at the chip sector and across semi conductors.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 4>There's divergence in the session between fad less names, those

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 4>American companies that design chips that don't make them, and

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 4>those with domestic operations in the US. And buried among

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 4>the headlines overnight was the Chinese regulator and industry body saying,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 4>by the way, when we think about tariffs on US

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 4>goods imposed by China, this is how we'll define it

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 4>you and are going to get into that throughout the

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 4>course of the show. We have to talk about Apple.

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 4>I feel like Bloomberg Technology as a show was early

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 4>to this discussion on Monday. Will the US build an

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 4>iPhone in the future five days we're higher, but it's

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 4>been so volatile and the analysis from different corners of

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 4>the market is so different. I think we should get

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 4>into it.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Carry we should because we've been debating time and time again.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 2>A made in America iPhone is the goal that President

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Trump believes could be a reality ED. But replicating China's

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 2>advanced supply chain it's skilled labor in the United States

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 2>will prove nigh on impossible for the tech giant and

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 2>rak Rana of Blue meg Intelligence joins us, You've got

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a new note out just talking about the implications of

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 2>taris on the margin of Apple. But what would it

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 2>do to the margin of Apple if they ever brought

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 2>production for the iPhone to the United States?

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Anag see, I think a lot would depend on our

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 5>materials that go there, the component costs, the labor cost,

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 5>and I think it'll be very hard for Apple to

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, let's say, raise the price of the phone

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 5>to two x and then make it in the US.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 5>It has to be done in a way that actually

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 5>keeps the cost down and at that point, I mean

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 5>keeps their margins. The reason why Apple shines compares to

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 5>any of the consumer electronics companies because it has very

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 5>high gross margins compared to you know, let's say somebody

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 5>who just sells an Android phone in Asia, for example.

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 4>But those margins run the threats heem. Let's bring up

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Anaag's research that published I think about thirty minutes ago,

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 4>twenty minutes ago. I'm just going to read it. Our

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 4>analysis suggests a margin impact of one hundred to one

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 4>hundred and seventy basis points for every ten percent tariff

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>increase on China manufactured products. Apple could mitigate some of

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 4>the impact through price increases. You've been talking about price

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 4>increases a week. The key question seems to beware and

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 4>you think that will be on the services side, not

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 4>on the handsets.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Because as I said, it's you know, it's very difficult

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 5>to take a thousand dollars phone and double it up

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 5>two thousand, but it's slightly easier to take a you know,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 5>two ninety nine dollars to ninety nine nicloud plan and

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 5>let's say make it up to five or seven dollars.

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 5>And also remember some of those you know, revenue streams.

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 5>When it comes to the services business, especially cloud services,

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 5>they have very high incremental margins. These are products with

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 5>seventy five, eighty percent or margins much much more than

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 5>the product side of it. And it doesn't really pinch

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 5>the consumer that much. And you know, they could praise

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 5>it as it's only going to be done you know,

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 5>over the next six months or the time period when

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 5>the tabs are and then they can scale it back.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 5>I think from a consumer point of view, it is less,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, it hurts them less. But again, you know,

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 5>that's just one service.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 6>I talk about.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 5>They could be others as well, but I feel very,

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, strongly that I don't think they can raise

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 5>the price of a phone up by you know, fifty

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 5>sixty percent, maybe maybe slightly, maybe five percent, ten percent

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 5>or so, but anything above that, you know, I think

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 5>destructs demand.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Aner Rana Bloomberg Intelligence, thank you very much. They stick

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>with Apple and the impact of tariffs on technology. Tony

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 4>one trow Price, science and Tech equity portfolio manager joins us.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Now Apple the number one holding a tro Price is

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Science and Tech fund that Tony oversees. Tony, when I

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 4>was learning about the technology industry and the markets and

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 4>making my way through Bloomberg Televisions newsroom, I was always

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 4>told that Apple and names like it had an entrench

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 4>market position, strong balance sheet, and in crises or recession,

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 4>that's where they would survive and thrive. But I think

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 4>right now, you can't necessarily look back at history and precedent.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 4>How on earth are you modeling the future of this company?

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.119
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well it's a great question.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 8>Obviously, it's historically been a kind of a balancing name.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 8>Just that whether a real kind of stock market storm,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 8>I'd say here, you know, I think that there is

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 8>a lot of fear in the market and concerns amount

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 8>of trade war and what deglobalization could possibly do to

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 8>kind of Apple's manufacturing advantage in China. And so you know,

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 8>when I take a step back, they do have diversified

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 8>supply chains.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 7>I think they are.

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 8>They do have the ability to move around, and they

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 8>do produce iPhones.

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 7>In India, and when we think.

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 8>About the US, the consumption of iPhones is roughly twenty

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 8>five or thirty percent, and so I expect that there's

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 8>some flexibility to move some of that production to India

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 8>more and therefore diversify that risk a bit. And you know,

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 8>at the end of the day, I think that it

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.679
<v Speaker 8>is about like, you know, how much of a staple

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 8>the iPhone is, and so there's price you know, kind

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 8>of sensitively among the customer to actually you'll pay up.

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 7>For the iPhone. I think that actually could be bullish

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 7>for the stock.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 8>That just demonstrates more of a it's more of a

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 8>staple than people appreciate. But here I do think that

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 8>there is a lot of fear there and so generally,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, historically you've been a reward for leaning into weakness.

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Then in this weakness Tony. Yes, on the day Apple

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 2>is trading somewhat higher. On the week it is too,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>but on the course of the month it's down fourteen percent.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 9>Have you been adding to your number one holding?

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Has it at any point looked attract him to get

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 2>back in with more addition, I think, you know, the.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 8>Company's still really well positioned over the long term. You

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 8>look at like the ecosystem they built, the quality of

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 8>the product, and then you're also an iPhone upgrade cycle coming,

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 8>and you know, a placement cycle has been elongated, and

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 8>if you get a new form factor, I think that

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 8>could be like really attractive.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 7>And you know, at the end of the day, like

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 7>the evaluation has become more.

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 8>Attractive, especially at these levels versus where they were, you know,

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 8>six and nine months ago. You know, in addition, it

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 8>is one of the Max seven that hasn't been spending

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 8>a ton on large language models.

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 7>So the capital intensity.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 8>And the free cash flow quality of the company is

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 8>still very, very high quality.

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Go there, Tony for a moment, Because people were ringing

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 2>their hands about Apple before the trade war because of

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 2>a lack of urgency on AI, the implementation within Siri,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>this distraction that Tariff's cause does it set them back

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>even further about upgrading the product from an AI perspective.

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think that they are, you know, constantly optimizing

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 8>their supply chains. Obviously it's additional work on their their plate,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 8>but I don't think that they are standing still on

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 8>the AI front. I think they're besting more actually, and

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 8>you see that, you know some news are them purchasing

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 8>more GPUs And you know, when I when I think

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 8>about the space, there's just a lot of things evolving

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 8>and what we thought a year ago.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 7>Uh has has kind of changed in a lot.

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 8>Of ways in terms of, you know, who can participate

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 8>in AI and like what these large language models can

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 8>cost and which one is the best. So every time,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 8>like it feels like every month, there's a new headline

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 8>of who is in the lead. And so it could

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 8>be prudent of Apple to kind of, you know, focus

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 8>on what they're really good at, what their competitive vantage is,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 8>which is designing really high quality products that fit into

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 8>our lives, that can be incorporated elegantly. And at the

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 8>end of they do own that kind of ecosystem and

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 8>you know, over time, I think they can you know,

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 8>drive value from that for their shareholders.

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Tony, let's end this conversation on Apple with a yes

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 4>or no. Does Apple manufacturer and assemble an iPhone in

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 4>the United States in the future.

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 8>I think it's possible in the very kind of long

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 8>term future. I think in the near term. And you

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 8>look at kind of what it takes the man manufacturing iPhone.

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you know, there's thousands of people that are

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 8>living at the factory that can be woken up, you know,

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 8>anytime the hour to make a change. And so you know,

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 8>I think that in the long term that could be

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 8>possible with additional advancements and robotics and AI.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 7>But I don't think it's going to be a next

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 7>year kind of thing, right.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 4>I saw a headline overnight that we think is a

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 4>critical right, which is China Semiconductor Industry Association issue this

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 4>emergency notice and they clarified that in the context of tariffs,

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 4>they define point of origin where a semiconductor is taped out,

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 4>in other words, where the electronic instruction set is formulated

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 4>before it goes to the fab And if you think

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 4>about the fabulous US names, many of which you have

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 4>big holdings in, they use TSMC or maybe Samsung. So

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 4>the tape out happens in those countries as well. How

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 4>much insulation do you think that gives them from the

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 4>heavy China tariffs on US products.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, I think that if you take a step back, right,

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 8>like the two countries have been trying to disentangle them

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 8>each other from major kind of supply chains and you know,

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 8>areas of where if you could substitute a domestic product

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 8>that would be preferred.

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 7>And that's nothing new over the past few years.

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 8>And I think that you know, this kind of the

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 8>latest piece of news is further kind of a step

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 8>in that direction, where you know, it doesn't make sense to.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 7>Hurt yourself by kind of terrifying.

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 8>The only source that you have, and so like in

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 8>terms of stuff made in TSMC, like both countries need that,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 8>so it makes a little bit less sense to put

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 8>a high tariff on that when it's when it's sole source.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 8>So that's kind of my perspective. That's a continuation of

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 8>industrial policy that kind of kind of makes sense.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the others though, that are exposed now.

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested as to whether you have holdings in those

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 2>that are manufacturing in the United States or looking to

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>even more with the cost money coming from federal government

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 2>wanting them made in the US, and what that does

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 2>to the business model if they ship to Asia to

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 2>China specifically, Tony, do you have to get out of

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>intels and Texas instruments?

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think that over the long term, it's more

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 8>about the technology and the differentiation and what you can

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 8>the value add that you can. So if you have

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 8>leadership products, I think that's still number one, you know,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 8>I think number two. I think that divers sized supply chains,

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 8>like serving the local industry that it's based out of

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 8>or the region is probably going to be a good thing.

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 8>And so at the end of the day, I think

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 8>it's those two things, like some flexibility manufacturing, but like

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 8>the main thing is the product, leadership and the seculor

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 8>trend that a company is kind of, you know, kind

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 8>of positioned to capitalize on.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Tony, like all technology investors, you have had to digest

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 4>and understand communication from policymakers. How would you rate and

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 4>rank what you've heard from the President, Treasury, Secretary best

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 4>and others.

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 8>Well, I'm a tech investor, so you know, geopolitics is

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 8>above my pay grade obviously, but you know, at the

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 8>end of the day, I think that the US leap

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 8>administration and the leaders that we have acted, you know,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 8>they will do what's best for the country for companies

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 8>here in the US. So I think that we need

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 8>to trust them and they do. You know, I think

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 8>they are trend trying their best, and you know, at

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 8>the end of the day, I think that they will

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 8>protect American interest and what's most important is keeping US

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 8>technology at the forefront. And you know, that's that's what's

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 8>what I look for as an investor.

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 9>Tony one, thank you so much of trow price.

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>So important to have the investor take today and after

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 2>one long week Chinese social media and giant bite dance,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>it saw its revenue jump twenty nine percent last year.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 2>It was driven by the global expansion of you guessed at.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 9>TikTok.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>International sales grew thirty nine billion dollars, contributing about a

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 2>quarter of the company's revenue.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 9>It's all according to people.

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Briefed on the numbers, now that as the Chinese business slowed. Now,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of course, tensions between Washington and Beijing expect to impact

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 2>both the global economy possible sale of TikTok in the

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>United States.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 9>We've got to get to it.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 6>All.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 2>Mitchell Green, founder, managing partner of lead Edge Capital, longtime

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>investor in names like Byte Dances with us. Mitchell, have

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>you been adding to Byte Dance. What do you make

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of where we stand in terms of TikTok in the

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 2>United States?

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and hey, Carolyn, thanks so much for having me on.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 10>What do I think we can talk about that for

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 10>a while. The company continues to see you very well.

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 10>As we've said past, in the grand scheme of things,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, uncertainty kills deals. I wish I could tell

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 10>you exactly where things stand in this negotiation between the

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 10>White House, White Dance, the Chinese government.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 6>Discussions are on tariffs.

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 10>Look, we've always had frankly questions on the on the

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 10>US TikTok uh. You know, again, as I've mentioned in

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 10>the past, we model out TikTok usa to be worth zero.

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 10>I suspect something will come of it. I don't know

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 10>if it's in a month from now, three months, or

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 10>now from six months or now.

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 6>We shall see.

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 10>It is obviously a very valuable business that a lot

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 10>of constituents want to figure out, not only board members

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 10>and shareholders and the CEO of Bite Dance, but we

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 10>now have this giant taraph war going on between the

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 10>US and China, So.

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 6>It's all going to get dragged into it and play

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 6>out together.

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Mitchell, you've been on the secondary market picking up Byte

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Dance in recent months. Would you want exposure to us

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>TikTok if it was indeed extricated out of bite ants

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 2>and had US ownership.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, And we have also not bought any Byte Dance

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 10>shares this year. There's been some there's been some changes

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 10>with Sippius.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 6>A lot of people don't know about this publicly known

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 6>that Syphius came out and put some.

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 10>Restrictions on what kinds of companies you could buy globally

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 10>related t if the AI model speed was fast enough

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 10>or not. It's a questionable area if White Dance falls

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 10>into this or not. But in order to just stay

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 10>conservative and be on the right side, you know, we

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 10>have not bought anymore of the last several months.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 6>We do on it.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 10>What I like, What would I like to own TikTok Usa? Absolutely,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 10>if you know, if they're allowed existing investors, and again

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 10>about sixty percent of investors in the company are non

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 10>Chinese investors. If we could add to our position, obviously

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 10>it depends on price.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, we could be quite interested, Mitchell.

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Starting Monday night into Tuesday morning, I started getting phone

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 4>calls that there was quite a lot of activity on

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 4>the secondary's market for byte dance valuation range two eighty

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 4>to three hundred and twenty billion, depending on the offer

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 4>lot size.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 4>But to your point, what I was told is a

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of that activity was from Asia, right, China, maybe Singapore.

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 4>But it followed the President on Sunday night. You may

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 4>have seen the clip on Air Force one saying that

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 4>if it weren't for tariffs that he'd put in place,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 4>they had a deal. How do you interpret that trading?

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 4>You know, if the outlook for the deal is poor,

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 4>but you see private market investors in Asia trying to

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 4>get more of a foothold.

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 10>Oh, the Chinese business is doing phenomenally well, which is

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 10>absolutely incredible, given I don't think the Chinese economy is

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 10>like rowing right now, and I don't know if it's

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 10>far apart, but I mean it's just it's been unique.

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 10>And you can look at some of the other ecomerce

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 10>businesses across China and so, actually, how are the performances

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 10>in right answers doing in China is strong. I wouldn't

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 10>read into I have no clue if the deal is

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 10>almost done or close to done or whatever.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 6>I have. When it comes to politics.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 10>I tend to just listen and not really make opinions

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 10>and I don't really know.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, we'll see it again again. There's a handful

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 6>of people that need to be involved. Chi President of

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 6>the United States had.

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 10>The CEO bite dance, and I can't say any of

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 10>them are good friends of mine.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 4>So if they do telephone you, you let us know.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 6>I'll let you know if she calls me die.

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 4>There is a there is a technology conversation here right.

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 4>I go back to when I was at CEES and

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 4>at GtC very recently, and Jensen Wong's point the CEO

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 4>of and Video that basically more than fifty percent of

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 4>all the computer scientists in the world working on artificial

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 4>intelligence are doing so in China or they are from China.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 4>What kind of future is there to sort of work

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 4>with that country on technology and founding new companies.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 10>I strongly believe whether it's technology transfer, technology exports, imports.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Like the trade trade is global, we all need to

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 6>figure out how to work together. China plus the us

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 6>working together is a good thing.

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 10>I am a strong believer in like the education system

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 10>in China, the entrepreneurship in China as well as in

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 10>the United States as well. But again, like for instance,

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 10>we I've talked about this another I think I'm Bloomberg

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 10>and other sessions.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Chinese regulate social media.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 10>You know, in the United States, kids go on TikTok

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 10>and post ridiculous videos about all kinds of stupid stuff.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 10>In China, they learn about science and math on TikTok.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 10>I think maybe we should ask should we be regulating

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 10>this stuff more?

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 6>Should we be.

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 10>Repeeling some of these laws that don't hold social media

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 10>companies accountable by the.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 6>Way that gets does in China? And so I think

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 6>there are things that we should be learning at. And

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 6>some of those things that are happening in China and

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 6>applying to the United.

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.239
<v Speaker 2>States interesting tat Mitchell and I want to go there

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 2>because you have exposure, not just to China. We bring

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 2>you on because you've been so long in the names

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>like Ali Baba, you're an aunt, you're in byte Dance,

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 2>long term investor, understanding that economy. We look at the

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>rest of your old portfolio. You know, well, us exposure

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 2>too uber bumble, you know, Europe with Spotify. How difficult

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 2>is it to remain committed to China right now when

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 2>Sophius is changing up the rules, When you are unable

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 2>to commit capital and the way you'd like to, it's complicated.

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 10>And again, most of our business is actually North America

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 10>and Western Europe. You know, we have a team of

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 10>eighteen associates that are twenty two to twenty four years

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 10>old that you know, speak about nine thousand companies a year,

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 10>and we all you know, we might speak to ten

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 10>to twenty companies and all across Stasia. So what we've

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 10>done in China is a very handful of some of

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 10>the largest businesses over there where they could effectively be there.

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 6>They are a to be public companies, it just happened

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 6>to be private. We tend to like to be contrarian,

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 6>you know.

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 10>And it was funny a year ago, nine months ago,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 10>nobody liked wanted to invest anything in China. Yet then

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 10>you saw stocks like Ali Baba go from once, you know,

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 10>from sixty seventy dollars a share, it's like one hundred

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 10>and thirty hundred and twenty. Now people were liking China

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 10>again because they saw Chi and Jack ma. I think

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 10>it's some conference together and I don't know where all

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 10>about this today. Maybe it's back at one hundred a share.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 10>So this stuff is so volatile, but we find that

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 10>you buy China when the rest of the world hates it,

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 10>you can tend to make lots of money. But again,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 10>most of the stuff we invest in is right back

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 10>in in the United States and right now. Look, I

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 10>think in the terriff situation, I can have an opinion

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 10>of it today, it'll probably change.

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 6>In a week, a month, and six months.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 10>But uncertainty is what actually slows down the economy, right

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 10>And you know, our portfolio has made the high high

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 10>margin software companies that don't have direct you know, inputs

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 10>coming overseas and things being chipped in.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 6>With that being said, if.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 10>You sell airline software, are you sell software manufacturing companies?

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 10>And those companies are nervous about what's going to happen

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 10>in their businesses. They might start to pull back on

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 10>spending and the whole thing kind of like unravels on itself.

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 2>And if there's cuts to R and D in healthcare

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>research and you're in a name like Benchling, which is

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>all about community of scientists. I'm really interested in Mitchell

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 2>ultimately how difficult this environment is when some of the

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 2>companies that we thought were going to go public now

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 2>can't or don't want to. How is that impacting the

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 2>way in which you raise the next fund for example?

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so we were so, we were very We don't.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 10>Talk about performance on obviously and pull me or anything

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 10>like that, but you know, we believe that investor funds

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 10>that took advantage of getting the quidity and what's called DPI.

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 10>It's so much money you've given back on a net

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 10>basis to your investors over the last few years, in

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 10>the last five years, is really going to matter for

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 10>funds as they go forward graating money.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 6>We are we are going to everybody.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 10>Thought two thousand and six, twenty twenty five is going

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 10>to be the year of the IPO. There was maybe

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 10>this giant IPO. Aa, Well that's dead, Like that's not

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 10>happening now.

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 6>Again. I think these companies could go public.

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 10>It's just the question of what valuation will could they

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 10>and will they then go public?

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 6>And you know, your guess is as good as mine.

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 10>But I think this liquidity drought is going to continue,

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 10>and I think as a result of liquidity drought, you're

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 10>going to have a lot of endowments and foundations and

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 10>other big institutional investors that are networks that are over

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 10>allocated to private equity, venture capital, growth equity, real estate,

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 10>private equity, everything that are going that are.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 6>Going to unlock the secondary market. And the secondary market

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 6>has already been busy.

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 10>It is about to if this continues, call it six months,

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 10>nine months, and twelve months, you are about to see

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 10>a huge amount of institutions that are going to be

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 10>massively over allocated to private equity, that are going to

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 10>need to turn to the secondary markets and sell things

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 10>that for us will create a great opportunity. Did you

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 10>want to be buying from sellers that are forced to sell?

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Mitchell Green, lead Edge Capital. Thank you really appreciated conversation, Caroline.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 7>What you got a's time.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>For talking tech head and first up, Logitech It withdrew

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 2>its full year twenty twenty six outlook due to quote

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 2>continuing uncertainties of the tariff environment.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 9>Now Vonda Bell analysts.

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Say this is a sensible move, but the company's margins

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 2>will certainly be challenged, and you saw the impact on

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the shares plus Tesla, it stopped taking orders in China

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 2>for its model ES Sedans its model Export utility vehicles,

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 2>both of which are imported from the United States. That's

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 2>after the country has raised tariffs on one another. Of course,

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 2>this could be a setback to the company's already shaky

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 2>position in the Chinese market. Meanwhile, Ali Baba co founder

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Jack Maer He's worn that AI shouldn't replace humans, but

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 2>work instead to meet their every need. The Chinese billionaire

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>who wants like an AI to love here hogued that

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 2>the technology should protect livelihoods and make lives better.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 4>Okay, coming up analog devices, Texas instruments, big declines. We

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 4>take it deep dive into two a city's top semiconductor pigs.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 4>The timing of that call very different from where the

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 4>stocks are heading right now. This has been bo Technology.

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology and Caroline hid in New

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 2>York and.

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. San Francisco's mayor, Daniel Lurie,

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 4>is pledging an economic and tech revival, aiming to restore

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 4>the city's status as a global innovation hub. I sat

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 4>down with the mayor to discuss his growth strategy in

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 4>the face of tariffs.

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 11>First, we're the most beautiful city in the world. Second,

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 11>the horse power is here, the intellectual horsepower is here.

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 11>We have great universities, including UCSF around here, and young

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 11>people want to be in.

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 7>Urban environments.

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 4>They want to be in San Francisco.

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 11>That's been proven truth throughout history, and we're going to

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 11>prove that again. We have great arts and culture institutions.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 11>We were just named the culinary capital of the country,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 11>so we have so much to be proud of. And

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 11>we know that workers want to be here. Our CEOs

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 11>who were talking to they know that their employees want

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 11>to be in San Francisco. No offense to my friends

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 11>down in the Peninsula, but people live in San Francisco

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 11>and we want them to work here. And we do

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 11>have to get competitive, but it starts with safe and

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 11>clean streets. Our property crime rates have dropped thirty five percent,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 11>Our violent crime has dropped fifteen percent. Car break ins

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 11>in February the lowest in twenty two years. This is

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 11>a safe American city and we want everybody coming back

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 11>to work here, to play here, and to live here.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Mis very how is the White House and is tariffs

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Paulus going to impact your ability to do what you've

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 4>just outlined, bring more of the technology industry to the city.

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, listen, we are all and you all are reporting

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 11>on it minute by minute. The uncertainty is impacting everybody

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 11>around the globe, and so we have to plan for

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 11>that here at city Hall. We're working with our department heads.

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 11>We have a big budget deficit. We inherited one of

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 11>the largest deficits in our city's history. So we're working

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 11>day and night to make sure that we tighten our belts,

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 11>we deliver core services to our taxpayers and to our residents,

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 11>making sure that we focus on public safety, focus on

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 11>the behavioral health crisis and the drug crisis that is

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 11>causing people to feel the disorder on our streets. But

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 11>that is all starting to improve. And so we can

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 11>only control what we can control here in San Francisco,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 11>and that's our fifteen point nine billion dollar budget. We

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 11>have a one point one billion dollar budget deficit. Over

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 11>the next two years, we're going to get that under control.

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 11>We're going to fix our structure or budget deficit, and

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 11>I'm telling you we're then going to be off to

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 11>the races.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 7>Data bricks knows it.

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 11>They just secured an office space one hundred and fifty

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 11>thousand square feet open AI just open new headquarters by

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 11>Chase Center. We are on the cusp of lift off

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 11>here in San Francisco, and we want everybody to come

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 11>be a part of it.

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 4>So that was my conversation with San Francisco Meytor, Daniel Lurie,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 4>and Caro. Like the pitch to the technology industry seems

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 4>to be San Francisco is beautiful and it's full of nerds,

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 4>and that's not really a policy platform. But if you

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 4>think about how the history of Silicon Valley's works, right,

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 4>there are many tech people here in the city, and

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 4>what do they do each day?

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Where are all the big tech companies that they.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 7>Go to work at.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 2>They're not an SF they reverse commute out to the valley.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 2>But also what I wonder about is when we've got

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>an economic quandary coming from the United States, when advertising

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 2>dollars might be pulled back, when we've already got a

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 2>meta for example, that has been laying off people, how

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 2>does that affect in NEEF economy going forward. We'll have

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 2>to debate that a little bit more in terms of

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 2>what's happening over in San Francisco.

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 9>But we also want a little bit more in.

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Context about what the global tech policies look like in

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 2>this current context. That meta has to navigate, that alphabet

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 2>has to navigate, that these SF giants have to navigate.

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Liza Tobins with US Managin director at are not Global,

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and Liza, I'm so interested in just your take right

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>now and where we stand in this so called tit

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>for tat that today China's leader came out and said,

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a joke. We're going to stop raising to meet you.

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 2>But we stand at one hundred more than one one

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty five percent tariff on US goods. The

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>US has one hundred and forty five percent tariff on

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Chinese goods.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 9>Where do we go from here?

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So, of course, about a week and a half ago,

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 12>President Trump declared a trade war on the entire world,

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 12>and then over the last couple of days it seems

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 12>to have kind of slipped into an isolate China strategy.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 12>Clearly the president is torn between his deal making and

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 12>his decoupling instincts. He's hoping for a phone call with

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 12>Chi Jinping. But what we've learned really over the last

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 12>twenty years of US China relations is that US trade

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 12>negotiators are always disappointed with what Paiging brings to the table.

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 12>And I'm seeing things play out this week that remind

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 12>me of when I was in the White House in

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty, and that, of course was when President Trump

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 12>got his Phase one trade deal with the Chinese, and

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 12>then a couple months later he started getting seriously disappointed

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 12>and blaming Sheijinping for COVID, which of course tanked the

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 12>global economy and he felt ruined his electoral prospects, and

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 12>so in some of the President's comments just a few

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 12>days ago in a speech, he's talking about she He's

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 12>hoping for a phone call, but he's referring back to

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 12>COVID and saying, you know, I like Sheijinping, we get

0:29:58.080 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 12>along great, but COVID.

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 9>That was a bridge too far.

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 12>That's what the president's saying. So he seems to be

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 12>remembering the disappointment and the anger from twenty twenty, and

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 12>he seems to be shifting from deal making to decoupling.

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 2>We go to you because of your depth of expertise,

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 2>when you've worked with the CIA, when you've been in

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the US Indo Pacific Command analysis for them as well, Liza,

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>not to mention what you've done over at the when

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 2>you're sc CP SCSP, I should call it, of course,

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 2>and I'm interested, Lisa therefore on where you go from,

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 2>who has the upper hand, where the TikTok's involved in

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 2>this negotiation. Just take us forward as to what plays

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 2>out next. If we are seeing a US president getting

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 2>more and more triggered by what happened in twenty twenty, right.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 12>So I think we could potentially see some kind of

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 12>a deal. Clearly, the President still would like a deal,

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 12>perhaps involving some tariff concessions, maybe americanizing TikTok, although he's

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 12>already conceded that aging will retain the algorithm, which is

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 12>really the brain that controls TikTok and controls Americans media diet.

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 12>So we may or may not see that. But I

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 12>want to remind your audience not to over index on

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 12>the strategic importance of a deal, because we've always been

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 12>disappointed by how China actually implements that deal. So I

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 12>think if folks are looking for some kind of grand

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 12>bargain that really makes some goes beyond symbolism and short

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 12>term measures and really addresses the fundamental imbalances of Chinese economy,

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 12>this massive trade surplus, unfair trade practices. They're going to

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 12>be disappointed by that. So markets will react and go

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 12>up and down on news or rumors of a potential deal,

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 12>But a true grand bargain is really off the table.

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 4>I think, Liza, I'd like to hold you to account

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 4>on two points that you've made, or at least debate them.

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 4>One isolate China as an accidental strategy. And then the

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 4>data that you just flag the deficit between the United

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 4>States and China. So this is the ECTR function on

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 4>the Bloomberg terminal. It's twenty twenty three data showing the

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 4>deficit with China two hundred and sixty billion dollars. But

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm right in saying prelim data showed the

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 4>deficit growing in twenty twenty four. Materially, when we think

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 4>about technology, what we're talking about is a country that

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 4>dominates the manufacturing of most of the world's consumer electronics

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and other things. So forget numbers and tariffs and markets

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 4>and trade. Do you see the White House ever resulting

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 4>this policy in more of that stuff happening in America.

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 12>The President certainly wants to, and he and his advisors

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 12>that are constantly talking about reindustrialization. I mean, the problem

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 12>is the devils in the details here, and it does

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 12>it's unclear if President Trump really understands the details and

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 12>the extreme intricacies of these supply chains and what it

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 12>actually takes to reindustrialize. And of course there's big structural

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 12>challenge is like do we have the workforce for this.

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 12>The administration talks about manufacturing jobs coming back. Well, that's great,

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 12>but actually we have a shortage of skilled manufacturing workforce,

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 12>and advanced manufacturing is now a knowledge industry. This is

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 12>a highly skilled profession. It's more like software coding and

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 12>applying AI to the factory floor. And it's not yet

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 12>clear to me if that kind of advanced manufacturing is

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 12>front and center on the administration's agenda.

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 9>It's very much right.

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 12>Now a teriffs first, tax cuts, the regulation and energy

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 12>and those may be a great start, but they also

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 12>need to be kind of leaning into these more structural.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Issues suddenly if they want to make iPhones in the

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 2>United States. Pizeitoven, managing director of Ghano Global, was great

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to have you join us. Thank you now Federal is

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 2>a bank of New York President John Williams. He expects

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 2>slow economic growth, high unemployment, and a pickup in inflation,

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 2>all of this due to the US tarris policy and

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 2>reduced immigration. Take listen to what he had to say

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 2>just moments ago.

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Well uncertainly about the economic outlook reflects many factors. Effects

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 3>of tariffs and trade policy and the economy are certainly

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 3>at the top of the list. For example, my business

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 3>in financial market contacts highlight that this has made it

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 3>more difficult to plan for investments and for hiring.

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's get right back to financial markets. It's Friday, at

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 4>the end of a long week. Basically flat on the

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 4>Nasdaq one hundred, but up more than five percent over

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 4>the course of the week. Basically flat on the Philadelphia

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 4>Semiconductor Index, down to tens percent, but up more than

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 4>seven percent on the course of the week. And Cara,

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 4>if you allow me to there was a really important

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 4>headline overnight that I think our audience needs to understand,

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 4>and it came from China's semiconductor industry body, basically citing

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 4>customs regulators that how are they going to define the

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 4>point of origin of a semiconductor right think about global

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 4>supply chains. And in the market right now you see

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 4>names like in video higher and Vidia doesn't manufacture its

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 4>own chips, names like Intel and Texas instruments that do

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 4>significantly lower. Here's what they said. The point of origin

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 4>for a chip in deciding whether to apply tariffs or

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 4>not will be the point it is taped out. And

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 4>what that means is when an American company, for example,

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 4>is done designing its chip in San Diego or here

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 4>in the Bay Area, it then needs to send the

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 4>designs to a contract manufacturer. We're talking TSMC and Korean

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 4>names like Samsung, but that happens locally, and so they're saying,

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 4>that's how we decide where your chip comes from. You

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 4>tell me the big story that we've learned in the

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 4>last two years about all these American chip makers. What

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 4>are they actually not?

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're not makers of chips, but some of them

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 2>are trying to be. Some of them trying to be

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 2>contract makers of chips. Intel, for one, which is actually

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 2>expanding its presence of making chips in the United States.

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:13.439
<v Speaker 9>What does that mean in terms of business model?

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 2>You've just got to take out China from the equation

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 2>and on the flip side. Of course, domestic chip makers

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 2>in China rallied hard. You saw the CSI three hundred

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 2>index up more than thirty percent on the day. This

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 2>had real tailwinds for Chinese local players and of cause

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 2>pressure on some of the local makers here in the

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:29.879
<v Speaker 2>United States.

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 4>Said yeah, And the one thing I would say is

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 4>that it all comes back to the end market. What

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 4>does China do. It makes most electronics high end or

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 4>low end, And so that's why I've tracking this so closely.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 4>But you're exactly right. But in some of the names

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 4>you've just mentioned, analysts are paying attention for other reasons.

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 9>They certainly are.

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to one of those analysts calls because likes

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 2>of Aanamon Devices or Texas Instruments, as you say, pressure today.

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 2>But City named actually those two companies, and it's top

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 2>semiconductive picks amid tar of pressures and recession fears. Like

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.399
<v Speaker 2>City manager director and semiconductor analyst Chris Stanley writing, high

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 2>end analog companies such as ADI and TXN have outperformed

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 2>during downturns. We would expect the same to occur in

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.240
<v Speaker 2>a recession, with ADI performing best given higher margins. Nimas

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 2>rym Vstella can can break down some of the moves

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 2>on Semi got a fair few downgrades in terms of

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 2>price targets today as well on Semi meant to feel

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 2>more of headwind versus some of these players.

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.280
<v Speaker 13>According to City, absolutely, I think people are still really

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 13>struggling to kind of figure out what this environment is

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 13>going to be like for different chip makers, depending on

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 13>their in market, depending on their manufacturing systems, their supply chains.

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 13>It's all very uncertain, very up in the air at

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 13>the moment. So beyond the naming TI on one of

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 13>its top picks, City also said it was taken out

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 13>the lawnmower. Those are exact words, cutting estimates by twenty

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 13>percent on average across the board for chip makers. That

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 13>just speaks to how much uncertainty there is when it

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.439
<v Speaker 13>comes to this sector at this point in time.

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 4>They the firm City had this estimate a while ago

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 4>that the socks the index would drop twenty percent if

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 4>there were to be a recession, and I think I'm

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 4>right in saying that they now assume a recession is

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 4>a firm there's a lot happening in the market. You

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:15.720
<v Speaker 4>also wrote about the takes out point of origin story

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 4>yourself this morning, just go back to explain some of

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 4>the moves of the market in the here and now.

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so absolutely, like you were saying before, companies like TI, Intel,

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 13>Global Foundries, Microchip, all these have sort of domestic manufacturing

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 13>plants for their products, and these are the stocks that

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 13>are really falling today. Other ones that do most of

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 13>their manufacturing are Broad Taiwan, Simi, Vidia, AMD, Qualcom, BROCM

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 13>all those names. They're probably higher in the morning. It's

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.280
<v Speaker 13>obviously a very volatile situation. There's a lot of cross

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.760
<v Speaker 13>currents going on right now, but certainly we are seeing

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 13>Texas instruments in particular weaker today, Intel particularly weaker today,

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 13>whereas companies like Nvidia are higher.

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Nvidia for a moment, because for an

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 2>analyst over at City has actually been downgrading in video

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 2>as well. Their key concern is that these hyperscalers, meta

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 2>alphabet you name them, are going to actually start to

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 2>curtail they're spending on AI data centers.

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 9>How much of an overhang is that for names.

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 2>Like whether you're a fablus or fab kind of a

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 2>chip maker.

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 13>Well, for Nvidia in particular, I had to go and

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 13>look but I think forty percent or so of their

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 13>revenue comes from just four companies, which is Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet,

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 13>and Amazon. So to the extent those companies pull back,

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 13>and I'll say Alphabet a couple of days ago it

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 13>had a bigger cloud conference and it did affirm its

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 13>CAPEX plans. Microsoft, you know, it affirmed its own plans

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.919
<v Speaker 13>earlier this year. So right now, it seems like maybe

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 13>for the next twelve months, all those spending plants are

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 13>pretty intact. But if we get to twelve months from now,

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 13>and maybe especially if we're not seeing a huge ROI

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 13>on all this AI spending, especially if the cost picture

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 13>has changed dramatically due to tariffs, if the whole picture

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 13>has just changed because of weaker economic growth, all these

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 13>other kind of factors, it would not be super surprising

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 13>under those circumstances if these companies started pulling back on

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 13>their CAPEX, especially as it retains to their AI infrastructure,

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 13>which is at this point a lot of Nvidia products,

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 13>and what that means for them in terms of their growth,

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 13>in terms of their profitability. While just given its customer concentration,

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 13>that would be a pretty dramatic hit a company like

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 13>it in video.

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 4>Blimbo's Ryan vlastatica terrific, Thank you very much.

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 14>A single shipyard in China now produces more ships every

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 14>year than all of the American shipyards combined. Think of that,

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 14>and it was a business that we used to dominate.

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 9>President Trump.

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 2>There now one startup looking to manufacture ships in the

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 2>United States.

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 9>It's blue Water Autonomy, preparing.

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 2>To build large vessels able to travel between San Francisco

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 2>and Hawaii without a captain or a crew. Rdan Hamilton

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 2>as the CEO co founder of blue Water. Rather, you're

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 2>coming out of stell fourteen million dollars in the bank.

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 2>You've got vcs that batch your prior really successful companies.

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 2>You were in warehouse automation prior to this. How much

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 2>is the time now to be making automated ships? Suddenly

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 2>far more prevalent when we've got us China tensions.

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 15>The time is definitely now. If we hear the current administration,

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 15>they're talking about shipbuilding, shipbuilding and shipbuilding, and we're designing

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 15>and building autonomous ships. And when you make them autonomous,

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 15>you can remove the bridge, the birthing, the galley, the showers,

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 15>so you can make them a lot smaller. And because

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 15>they're smaller, you don't have to build them at the

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 15>big navy shipyards. So we should continue to build the

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 15>big warships, the guided missile destroyers, the aircraft carriers, the

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 15>submarines as quickly as possible. But our ship can be

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 15>built at all these mid tier shipyards that have capacity today.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Why is now the right time from a technology perspective

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 2>as well, what is going into making automation far more

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 2>easy or certainly not easy, but far more able to

0:41:59.000 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 2>enact ry now?

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, this is a hard problem.

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 15>This is not easy because for designing ships that can

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 15>operate across the open ocean, and the last thing our

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 15>Navy needs is for these ships to be dead in

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 15>the water of the mill the ocean, and the ocean

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 15>is extreme. You're thinking about extreme temperatures and salt water.

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 15>In fact, ships get hit by lightning, and so we

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 15>need to build a very It happens as we did

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 15>research for this and we talked to the chief engineers

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 15>on some of the sort of workboats that operate around.

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 6>The United States.

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 15>They said, yeah, last week my ship got hit by

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 15>lightning and a fried all the electronics. And so there's

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 15>a ton of challenges to do this. But we feel

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 15>we have the team to do this because we've been

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 15>at some of the most successful robotic companies in the

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 15>United States, and two of my co founders include myself.

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 15>We were also in the Navy.

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 4>Ryland. The big picture is to modernize the maritime industry,

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 4>but this is a Navy application. As you just point out,

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:55.919
<v Speaker 4>American dynamism, this big emphasis on the private sector's relationship

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 4>with the military industrial complex. What is it you actually

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 4>want the president to do to allow for you to

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 4>make this a success.

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 15>So we want to move fast, and we'll move as

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 15>fast as the Navy wants us to move. And so

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 15>we definitely want the president to continue to focus on

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 15>shipbuilding and innovation, especially around autonomous systems. And there are autonomous

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.240
<v Speaker 15>systems that are in the air, that are on the surface,

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 15>and that are underwater. Our focus is on these autonomous

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 15>ships that can operate on the surface of the water

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 15>and have high endurance and range, the range that you

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 15>need for the Pacific Ocean.

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Anderill picked Ohio for its skilled labor and for its

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 4>history and aviation. For example, where is your Ohio? Where

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 4>do you think you need to build these ships?

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 15>So we'll have more to announce later this year. But

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 15>we've definitely been looking for the perfect place to go

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 15>build these ships, and there are a lot of really

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 15>good options, whether it's on the East coast or the

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 15>West coast or sort of in the Gulf, and so

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 15>we'll make an announcement later this year.

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 2>You were early leader in Amazon Robotics. When you are

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 2>building six river systems. How good is US at manufacturing? Now?

0:43:58.160 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 9>Can we bring back what we want to bring that?

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so the US is actually really good at advanced manufacturing.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 15>So early in my career I was at Amazon Robotics

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 15>when there are a couple thousand robots.

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 6>In the field.

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 15>They're now over a million robots in Amazon warehouses throughout

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 15>the world. That is amazing what that company has done

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 15>over the last ten years. So when it comes to

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 15>complex systems where you need to take sort of commercial

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 15>off the shelf components and put them together and then

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 15>write the software on top, we're amazing at that.

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Rylan Hamilinson, CEO, co founder of blue Water Autonomy, you

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 4>have to come back when you announce the location rights.

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 4>That's how it works. That does it for this distion

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:37.720
<v Speaker 4>of Bloomberg Technology. What a week? This is what markets

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 4>look like Caroline. I mean, it's kind of odd in

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 4>a way to give a snapshot of a session in

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 4>the moment and now's that one hundred higher by modestly

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:48.439
<v Speaker 4>right pressure on US listed shares of Chinese names. Take

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 4>it away, what are you seeing.

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 2>What's extraordinary is we had a week where we're actually

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 2>more than five percent higher, but what a volatile five days.

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 2>The bond market has seen extraordinary moves, and then over

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the course of the month that now's back, it's lower ed.

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Happy weekend everyone, This is Bloomberg.

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 6>H