WEBVTT - Amazon, OpenAI Strike $38 Billion Nvidia Chip Deal

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and ed Lo Lolow in San Francisco.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Amazon's cloud unit signs a thirty eight billion dollar deal

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 3>to supply open Ai.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 2>With computing power.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Plus how Shaomi's pivot from smartphones to electric vehicles may

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 3>have come at a human cost, And all eyes on

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Paneteer posting its earnings results after the closing bell. This

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>is defense tech spending is ramping up. But first we

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 3>check on the markets.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Also ramping up.

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Not quite at a record high for the Nasdaq one hundred,

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>but we are up some four tenths of percent for

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>the big Tech benchmark as we focus in once again

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:54.319
<v Speaker 3>on earnings and.

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>The never ending desire for AI compute.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's go there, because the key points drivers on this

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 3>particular benchmark are two stocks. We shine a light on Amazon,

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 3>pushing on four point five percent higher after significant gains

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>on Friday after its earnings.

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 2>This is a company that is of.

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 3>Course shrinking its workforce but focusing in on AWS growth,

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>and it manages to sign open Ai as that new

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 3>client thirty eight billion dollar deal will dig into it

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>in video. Well, they're the GPUs that go inside all

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 3>these data centers. It too climbs in terms of a

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 3>market capitalization up another two point seven percent. I just

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 3>want to go to the top story that is Amazon

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>and open Ai as they sign a thirty eight billion

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 3>dollar deal for further cloud compute. And it's been likest

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 3>Seth Figeman that we turned to Seth in.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>The grand scheme of Things. Scheme of things.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>It's not three hundred billion dollars of Oracle Cloud that

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 3>we saw before, but it is notable that open Ai

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 3>turns to more and more cloud providers at this moment.

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 4>That's right. It really is telling about this moment for

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 4>both companies. Open Ai just tapping every possible resource that

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 4>can to meet its cloud computing needs, and Amazon, which

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 4>had previously been investigating Anthropic, is also trying to have

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 4>a piece of open Ai and possibly other players down

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 4>the road. So it contributes to that incestuous where we

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 4>keep talk about everyone long is backing everyone else.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>And of course we've seen a deal to offer open

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 3>a eyes opens large language models into the.

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Overall bedrock offering of AWS. But this is different.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 3>This is a seven year deal, it goes out, but

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 3>actually by end of twenty twenty six, we're going to

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 3>see the amount of computer or any necessary for open

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Ai to go on to a.

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 4>A bit more near term than some other deals we've

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 4>see Opening Eye Broker and Opennie Eyes leaving the door

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 4>open to expanding with more investment down the road. I

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 4>do think it's telling though, that this is Amazon providing

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 4>in video chips, not Tramium not as so. On the

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 4>one hand, it's a testament to Amazon's ability to build

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 4>up cloud computing infrastructure at scale to meet Open Eyes needs.

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 4>But you have to wonder what that means about the

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 4>quality of Amazon's own chips.

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 3>We go into that for us because they talk about

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>the tens of thousands of video chips that are going

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 3>to be used, but they then talk about the millions

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 3>of potential CPUs that they might eventually help using. Is

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 3>that where Aws's own vertical integration comes from.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 4>You know it's possible because I think the larger industr

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 4>is also thinking more about investments in inference as opposed

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 4>to training. So with training, you want those GPUs the

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 4>best possible, But with inference CPUs and some maybe second

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 4>tier GPU type chips could meet the needs. So maybe

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 4>that's where we see them play more.

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 3>And then take us to how AWS continues to therefore

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 3>show this twenty percent growth that we saw on the Friday.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to be more.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Deals coming from open Ai? How much farther can they sprawl?

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Or is it more about individual enterprises or sovereign AI

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 3>for example.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a little bit of all those. And

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 4>I think what we're seeing with OpenAI in particular is

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 4>that now that the exclusivity arrangement with Microsoft is kind

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 4>of a done deal, they can tap everyone. They already

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 4>have Google as a partner, they have Amazon, They've been

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 4>video brought them everyone, and I think Amazon's ready to

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 4>play ball in that category.

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, Soethig, I've been playing ball with us this morning.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 3>We really appreciate it. Meanwhile, in video, of course, as

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>we just talked about it, the GPU supply, it made

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>history last week with the first company to ever hit

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 3>a five trillion dollar market cap according to Luke Capital Markets,

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 3>so the company could add trillions more. As in video

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 3>leads the quote golden wave of Genai adoption. Let's get

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>out to really most round Plastelica, because all paths lead

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>back to in video when we talk about any of

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>these compute deals right now, Ryan.

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, absolutely, it certainly feels that way. This is the

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 5>latest in a series of street high price targets that

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 5>we've seen on in VideA. Before Loop, we had HSBC,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 5>which forecasts I think seventy or eighty percent upside. Before

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 5>that we had an additional loop street high price targets.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.679
<v Speaker 5>People keep sort of outdoing each other trying to estimate

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 5>how high up this stock is going to go. So

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 5>right now, the latest s men points to about eight

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 5>point five trillion market capitalization. Like you said, it just

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 5>hit five trillions, so that points to still a lot

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 5>more potential upside from here. And the story hasn't really changed.

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 5>People continue to see a lot of long term demand

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 5>for all kinds of AI related hardware and infrastructure, and

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 5>certainly it will expand out a little bit. And Vidia

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 5>has a very important software business for example. But in general,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 5>this is all about the GPUs that have been driving

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 5>the AI trade really for the past couple of years now.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>And look, their GPUs are also part of the Microsoft

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 3>Iron deal that we're talking of today. A nine point

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 3>seven billion dollar look for compute Microsoft using yet another neocloud,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 3>this time in Australian one. We've also got in the

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 3>news how Alphabet's selling this huge amount of debt to

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>be able to finance the overall AI trade and compute purchase.

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 3>But Ryan, you've got a great story and just showing

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 3>how last week, if we reflect a bit, we started

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 3>to be discerning about which companies we're going to celebrate

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 3>AI investment and ones that we're not going to Yeah.

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely so. Really the poster child on the other end

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 5>of this trade is Meadow That stockfel quite sharply last

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 5>week after it came out, really talked about its expense growth,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 5>it's campex growth, it's talking about taking write offs in

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 5>all of this. There, I think there is more skepticism.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 5>People want to see that all of this spending is

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 5>being done in a diligent and disciplined kind of way,

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 5>and that this is really going to lead to some

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 5>kind of pronounced return on all this investment. Now, I

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 5>think there's still a lot of support for AI related

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 5>strategies overall, especially yet companies like Amazon and Alphabet, which

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 5>are showing a pretty direct link between all of this

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 5>spending and improved performance in their cloud computing businesses. But

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 5>for someone like Meta, which doesn't have an equivalent cloud

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 5>type business, the story is getting a little bit trickier

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 5>for them. People are getting a little bit more discerning,

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 5>and like you said, we did see this dot come

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 5>down last week, as I think people just are maybe

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 5>getting a little bit of cold feet.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, Ryan, is also you shine a light on

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 3>how we've had a bit of dispersion outside of the

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 3>key well, mag seven and then some names Brawd, Common

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 3>others thrown in. We've got some of the suppliers to

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 3>the data centers or suppliers to some of these compute

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 3>powers that are also winning. I mean, Micron's another key

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 3>winner on the day, but you shine light and other

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>companies that out performed.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, certainly.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's not purely an a or an mbidious

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 5>story anymore by any stretch of the imagination, anything that

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 5>is involved in any kind of components here. I mean,

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 5>we've certainly seen Broadcom another major winner, Micron, storage companies

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 5>like Steagate and Western Digital, these have been some of

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 5>the biggest performers of the year, and they're a little

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 5>bit less high profile, but They are certainly seeing very

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 5>strong growth inflections because they are just part of the

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 5>overall ecosystem that is required to build out all these

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 5>data centers, power all the data centers, do storage memory,

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 5>all the stuff that is involved with AI and having

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 5>it produce the you know, the material that people are using.

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 5>It's a much bigger trade than it was, you know,

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 5>a couple of years ago, for sure.

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Rand Vastelica always with the must reads. We thank you.

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more on this AI compute trend that's never ending.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Tony answer us tro Price Science and Technology from Portfolio Manager.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Your top holding is in video and all Parsley back,

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 3>but Microsoft's a big one, Broadcom, Alphabet really all of

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the big winners. Is this playing out as you anticipated?

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think that, you know, AI is a huge

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 7>productivity driver in my opinion, and I think that these

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 7>companies are really well positioned to essentially capture that and

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 7>would be the platforms for I think growth in the economy,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 7>and you know I'm looking for and going forward is

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 7>like you know, the new use cases really come through,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 7>like agentic AI for example.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 6>I think it's to fill this capacity.

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 7>It can't just be you and me using chat to

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 7>et it's got to be you know, thousands of agents

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 7>for each company, like making decisions and executing and unlocking.

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 7>I think labor essentially is what I'm looking for, and

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 7>that's what's exciting going forward.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 3>It's exciting when you see in video's name reference in

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 3>about three of the compute deals just on this Monday alone.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 3>But take us to perhaps the one that you don't

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 3>hone interestingly, you don't have exposure to Amazon and AWS,

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>but it signs it's deal with open AI.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't been methodology.

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Around that about its own cloud prowess or perhaps worries

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 3>about the lack of growth that we've seen in previous quarters.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Bar from the previous numbers they just reported Friday.

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 7>Hey, well, I think that they had a nice earnings report,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 7>and I do think that there seems to be a

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 7>lot more momentum now, you know, you talk about the

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 7>deal that they just did today and just say like

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 7>rolling out a lot more compute and accelerating a w

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 7>S I think is really good for the business. I

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 7>think they they're well positioned to essentially leverage AI and

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 7>their e commerce business as well as being an infrastructure provider.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 7>So I don't think you can count them out at all,

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 7>and uh, you know, it's good to see them, you know, outperforming.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is someone who got beaten up as in

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 3>the portfolio, which is Meta. And I'm interested on your

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 3>take of how we're deciding who we reward of capital

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>expenditure and who we don't.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, I think that uh, you know, AI is

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 7>a long term investment for Meta, and I think that

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 7>the market is probably digesting the you know, high end

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 7>level of cappex and the depreciation that's coming through the

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 7>P and L. But I think that's a little bit

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 7>too short term to view it, and you look past that.

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, the returns are there and these are going

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 7>to be great investments. And you know, Meta definitely has

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 7>the digital formats to leverage you know, AI and tremendous

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 7>scale across customers, and so I think it's exciting what

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 7>they're doing in the SMB segment as well.

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 6>If it lost a lot of ability for.

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 7>Companies to essentially like reach customers with just a credit

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 7>card and.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.599
<v Speaker 6>Asking for the ROI from ad campaigns.

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.359
<v Speaker 3>I just want to go to what President and Microsoft

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>was telling our network a little bit earlier today about

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the risks of underinvesting.

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Really here we spoke with Brad Smith. Just take are listen, Tony.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 8>Our biggest challenge is not a risk of getting ahead

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 8>of demand, it's actually keeping pace with demand. And what

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 8>we are finding is that our customers, you know, whether

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 8>they be enterprises across the economy or governments, are nonprofits,

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 8>they are looking to us to build out this capacity.

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 8>They want to use this computer. So for us, if

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 8>we build it, it will be put to use. As

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 8>it's put to use, there will be a return to

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 8>our shareholders.

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 3>You, of course have exposure to Microsoft, Tony, Brad really

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 3>talking about how they're expanding more geographically as well and

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 3>investing over in the Middle East, not just taking money

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 3>from the Middle East. And I'm interested in what you

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 3>think about Microsoft's need to depend on neoclouds. We saw

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>them strike a deal with an Australian neocloud provider for

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 3>Texas data centers. Is that something you like to see,

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that use of their money and capital expenditure on neocloud

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 3>as well as their own Yeah.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 6>I think it allows them to be flexible and nimble.

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 7>I think that standing up these data centers is no

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 7>small feet and a lot of times, it requires various players,

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 7>it requires the data center capacity, the power, and so

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 7>I think it's encouragency Microsoft collaborating with the ecosystem and

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 7>plug in partners and so to.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 6>Me, I think it makes sense.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 7>I think it's also a testament to the demand signals

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 7>they're seeing and kind of the workloads.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 6>Really take off. And you know, I think AI is

0:11:58.000 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 6>really hard new.

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 7>Not every company that is trying to do it is successful,

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 7>but I think the ones that are finding success are

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 7>you know, seeing tremendous promise, and so I think that's

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 7>what essentially it gives people confidence to invest.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Here, confidence to keep adding.

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 3>When we've seen runaway performance not just of Nvidio at

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 3>five trillion, but another one of our holdings, Micron for example,

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean significant outperformance, when do you decide that you

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 3>want to cash in profit take.

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we're all constantly managing position sizes in the portfolio.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 7>But you know, in my opinion, I think that you

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 7>want to be invested in the areas where there is

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 7>essentially a bottleneck, there's scarcity, and that performance depends on it.

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 7>So I think that HPM memory, you know HGDS and

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 7>now you know nand there's there's becoming more of a

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 7>shortage and so to me, the industry is getting better

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 7>and it's a critical component. So you know, from my perspective,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 7>there is opportunity for these companies to compound value over time.

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 3>You are, of course equity focused, but when we have

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>ours bets selling debt in Europe and the US, any

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 3>of that financing of this AI spend give you pause.

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, I think it's novel.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 7>But you know, you look at the cash generation of

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 7>a lot of these companies. They're really blue chip and

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 7>you know, to me, I think that this investment is smart,

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 7>and to do some appropriate level of.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 6>Debt financing I think can make sense.

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 7>In addition, I think that the infrastructure, you know, there's

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 7>a lot of debate of like the useful life of this.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 7>I know that Invidia comes out with a new generation

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 7>every year, but I think that these are longer lived

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 7>assets than people appreciate potentially, and they're not just like

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 7>three years obsolescence, but probably more like five or six.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 7>And so you know, in terms of the appetite to

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 7>leap against it, I think that in three or four years,

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 7>it's going to be more commonly accepted. I think we're

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 7>probably on the path there because these are really, like

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, revenue generating assets and there's a

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 7>lot of protivity coming off of them.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 3>And Tony that productivity, as you started the conversation is

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 3>about how we use deploy general to AI.

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Impalent is one.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 3>That really has but how do they fight also the

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>macroheadwinds the government shutdown? Do you have any concerns at

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the valuations that some of these companies trade at.

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 7>Hey, absolutely, I mean these are you know, very elevated multiples,

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 7>and so they need to keep delivering the growth here.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 7>You know, Paltier is definitely I think at the tip

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 7>of the sphere in terms of implementing AI.

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean they started doing that and.

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 7>The government and now the commercial businesses growing rapidly, and

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 7>so you know, I think the government's shutdown, like, I

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 7>think that's probably a temporary thing. They could get a

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 7>pass for that just because government's not going to be

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 7>shut down forever. And you know, you look forward and

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 7>I think what really matters is that they're driving significant

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 7>ROI for their customers and they're able to do it

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 7>in a way that connects their data and I think

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 7>that's like the change in it services is I think

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 7>that you need to come with a solution and the

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 7>engineers to help your customers instead of implementing like a

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 7>Saaspace off the shelf solution.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 6>So I think that's what's exciting. And yeah, we'll see

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 6>later on today.

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Tony Wang is always great catching up with you. Another

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 3>busy week with volunteer after the bowel. We so appreciate

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 3>your expertise. T ro Price, thank you. Coming up Shaomi's

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 3>pivot from smartphones to elexit vehicles when it may have

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 3>come at a very high human cost.

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>We're on that next. This is Blue Mead Tech China Shawmi.

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 3>It's set a relentless pace the pivot from smartphones to evs,

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 3>but it may.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Have come at a human cost.

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Blumeag spotlight story this week follows the intense schedule of

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 3>one page as he transferred Shami's retail network before ultimately

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 3>collapsing of a heart attack in twenty twenty four. Brim

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Boxspeter Altrastrom joins us Now it's a deeply reported story

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 3>through the bravery of a widow who is convinced that

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 3>it was his work schedule that in many ways contributed

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 3>to his death At the age of thirty four, Peter.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 9>That's right. So Wang was one of the key managers

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 9>as Shaomi, the company best known for its smartphones, decided

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 9>that they were going to push into electric vehicles. The

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 9>founder late June, said this was going to be one

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 9>of his last strategic plays for the company. He had

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 9>really earned a fantastic reputation for himself in the smartphone arena,

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 9>but he wanted to succeed in EV's too. Remember this

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 9>is something that Apple tried and wasn't able to pull off.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 9>Shaomi has actually designed a very good car. They've been

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 9>able to succeed in the market. They've been able to

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 9>gain some traction in that space. But Wang was one

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 9>of the key employees who was responsible for redesigning stores

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 9>as they were shifting these us from really showcases for

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 9>smartphones to something that could show you an auto, full

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 9>size automobile that would have the infrastructure to be able

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 9>to show that off and demonstrate what kind of cars

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 9>they actually had. So at one point he was responsible

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 9>for two hundred and sixty seven stores. He was working

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 9>almost NonStop hours. His wife told our reporter that he

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 9>would he would frequently work until the wee hours of

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 9>the night. We also saw as we chat messages where

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 9>he was exchanging messages at two thirty in the morning

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 9>and working on and on and on, and as you mentioned, tragically,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 9>at the age of thirty four, he died of a

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 9>heart attack. And so it's a story really about how

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 9>this extreme, these extreme hours can take a toll on managers,

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 9>especially in an area so competitive like technology.

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Shami has responded in part to our investigation and talking

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 3>about their sympathies that go to the family. But set

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 3>this in the context of nine ninety six of what

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 3>is very much a cultural focus on working extremely hard

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 3>in China and tech.

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 9>Right, Yeah, you're referring to nine ninety six. In China,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 9>they talk about working from nine am in the morning

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 9>until nine pm, six days a week, which is extremely

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 9>long hours. The World Health Organization defines over work as

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 9>working more than fifty five hours. Now in China they

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 9>work even harder than the United States. It's about forty

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 9>nine hours on average for full time workers, compared with

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 9>forty five in the United States. In the tech industry,

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 9>it's far beyond those kinds of hours. At Shaomi, the

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 9>workers in independent surveys showed that they were working eleven

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 9>and a half hours a day, so you're talking about

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 9>almost sixty hours a week that they were working, and

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 9>Wang seemed to be one of the workers who was

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 9>going even beyond that at this point. So, of course,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot at stake here. They're competing for leadership

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 9>in AI, in chips, in electric vehicles, et cetera. And

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of money at stake. When you look

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 9>at the most valuable, the wealthiest people in the world,

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 9>they're all tech entrepreneurs led by Elon Musk, of course,

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 9>but you've got Larry Ellison and Jeff Bezos in there too.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 9>There's a lot of money at stake. There's also geopolitical advantage,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 9>and Shami was pushing very hard to make this pivot

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 9>into electric vehicles.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Peteilstrom, thank you so much. It is an emotive story

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 3>and I must read we appreciate it. Now, coming up,

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 3>we'll dig into Apple how it's set for a make

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 3>or break year on the regulatory front as it gears

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 3>up to start twenty twenty six with a one hundred

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 3>and forty billion dollar quarter.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>This is BLUEBG Tech.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Apple when it's set to kick off it's fiftieth year

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 3>with what's expected to be a nearly one hundred and

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 3>forty billion dollar quarter. For more, Bloomberg's Consumer Tech Managing

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 3>editor Mark Gumman has the details on this week's Power

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 3>On newsletter, hotly read as always Mark and one hundred

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.239
<v Speaker 3>and forty billion is what the math reads out us

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 3>of what their.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Holiday quarter will look like.

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Important when April is a fiftieth anniversary.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's quite interesting. They normally in the last half

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 10>a decade or so, since the beginning of COVID, haven't

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 10>really given guidance, but for this holiday quarter.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 6>They're back to that.

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 10>So they said that the quarter would grow ten to

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 10>twelve percent. That's the current quarter of the holiday period,

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 10>and that comes in anywhere between around one hundred and

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 10>thirty five to one hundred and thirty nine billion. Typically,

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 10>when they've given guidance in the past, they've been conservative,

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 10>so they like to sort of smash through that, and

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 10>so you can imagine that internally they're aiming for something

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 10>north of one hundred and forty billion, which obviously would

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 10>be quite impressive given where they've been the last few years.

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 3>And therefore take us where they're going in the next

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 3>year or so. Because Power on really outlines the myriad

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 3>of areas they're trying to leap forward on, not just

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 3>sory but real hardware and chip updates too.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, there's a lot going on. You're going to see

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 10>a series of M five related updates to the Mac

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 10>things like the Macmini, the Mac Studio, the MacBook Air,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 10>and the MacBook Pro across the first nine months or

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 10>so of twenty twenty six. You'll see a foldable iPhone

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 10>at the end of twenty twenty six, perhaps the introduction

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 10>of the smart glasses at the end of twenty twenty six.

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 10>The first three four or five months of twenty twenty

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 10>six are going to be chalk full of things push

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 10>into smart home devices, that home pod with a display,

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 10>the MacBook Pro, and MacBook Air. I mentioned a ton

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 10>of things on the software side related to Siri. So

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 10>it's going to be a pretty jam packed year for

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty six. Then you go into twenty twenty seven,

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 10>where you're going to see even more major leaps and

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 10>bounds when it comes to hardware and.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Want to be the same people at the top.

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 3>How do you see the talent and the focus and

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 3>reworking of Apple continuing a midutes fiftieth anniversary.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 10>You know, Apple's biggest challenge right now is retaining talent,

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 10>specifically for its AI division, its machine learning folks. They're

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 10>bleeding talent to places like Meta, to Nthropic to Xai.

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 10>It's been very difficult for them to hold on to

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 10>people because Siri, really it has a really bad reputation.

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 10>The big things they're going to be doing for Siri

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 10>to improve it is using a custom model developed by

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 10>Google's Gemini team. It's going to run on Apple servers,

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 10>but Apple's paying Google to develop it, and that's a

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 10>bit of a setback for Apple's internal models team, and

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 10>so they basically for now have split it. Whereas the

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 10>models that run on Apple devices themselves, the ones for

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 10>Apple Intelligence, those are those in house models, which have

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 10>been somewhat problematic depending on who you ask. And then

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 10>for the serie models, they're moving to Gemini to power

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 10>some of it. So it's an interesting dynamic they've created there.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Our German is always it's a muster read. We so

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's check in on these markets because well, we're close

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 3>to record highs and then ask that one hundred. We're

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 3>just up by about three tenths of a percent, as

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 3>the wall of warrior when it comes to geopolitics is

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 3>put to one side as we focus more on earnings

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 3>to come after the ball palanteer, of course, and more

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 3>on what the AI trend is. When it comes to compute,

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 3>let's focus in on that the two key points contributors.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Don't ask that one hundred are these two stocks.

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Amazon up four point six percent, a new record high.

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 3>It's now worth two point seven trillion dollars, But that kind.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 2>Of pales into significance for me.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Think with a five trillion that in video is now

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 3>worth and that's because all.

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Roads lead back to in video GPUs.

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 3>This time Amazon striking a deal with open Ai to

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 3>offer many many GPUs in further data centers, a seven

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 3>year relationship with open Ai now as they turn ever

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 3>further into compute and data centers for various places.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 2>But look, it's not the only wall of news we

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 2>have on compute.

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 3>And Microsoft is another one that's planning to spend more

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 3>than seven point nine billion dollars on data centers, on

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 3>cloud computing and employees all over in the United Arab Emirates.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 3>And it's over the next four years capitalizing on a

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 3>US government clearance to ship AI chips to the Gulf nation.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft Vice chair Bradsmith explained.

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Why just during an interview with Bloomberg's Jomano Basecci in

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Abadab earlier today.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 8>If you look at the UAE, the UAE now literally

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 8>leads the world in the percentage of the population using

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 8>AI fifty nine point four percent. One Singapore about a

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 8>point behind is number two. Well, but what we're seeing

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 8>here in the UAE is across the economy, whether it's

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 8>companies like ADNOC and the energy sector, or the financial

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 8>services or the healthcare sector, all of this is being

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 8>quick to.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Work discuss all of this.

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 3>Oubrimegs pready for who covers Microsoft for US, And this

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 3>was Brad trying to articulate, we expand in there. We've

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 3>got the ability and the permission. Why do they want

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>to be building out and expanding in the Middle East?

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 11>Because they need power? Right, The Golf is a very

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 11>interesting market for data centers because in the US and

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 11>Europe in many ways they're kind of tapped for power.

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 11>Everyone is kind of scrounging for a megawatt here or there,

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 11>and the Golf, you know, they have oil power and

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 11>they are really keen to want to diversify their economies

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 11>and it seems like a pretty natural fit for data

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 11>center companies. So we've seen Microsoft, we've seen Oracle want

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 11>to expand their presence out there, and today is kind

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 11>of the latest example of Microsoft coming out to say,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 11>look at all the money we're this is a serious

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 11>bet for.

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 3>US and capal expenditure that they did articulate in their

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 3>earnings just last week. But Microsoft's been perhaps more upfront

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 3>than many as to how they're having to use other

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 3>offerings neoclouds in particular, they've been leaning on Nscale and

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Nevia sover in Europe, but here in the US they're

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 3>going ever more into Texas, but with an Australian company.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 4>Correct.

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we saw them make about a ten billion dollar

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 11>deal with an Australian company this morning, and it's funny

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 11>because ten billion sounds huge, but it's really like what

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 11>fifteen percent of what they've announced so far. I mean,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 11>the spending quantities here are really getting hard to fab

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 11>and Microsoft has committed around sixty billion to a variety

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 11>of providers just to be able to rent these AI

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 11>chips quicker.

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>And what's interesting is IRN is one of those sources

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 3>of power and compute that all used to be in

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 3>crypto and another one of those that now suddenly finds

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 3>itself the darling of an AI trade exactly.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, Corey is the classic example this, you know, crypto

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 11>market crash and all of a sudden they said, hey,

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 11>wait a second, AI data centers is the way forward.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 11>And Microsoft's been the most kind of prominent customer of

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 11>these neo clouds. But you know, we expect over time

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 11>that every major hyperscaler looking for capacity is going to turn.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 3>To these companies, And when we think about the scale

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 3>and the numbers, it can just become almost arbitrary. But

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the three trillion dollar figure that Morvid Stanley's

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 3>wrapped its head around is an important one, right, that

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 3>three trillion of data centers are likely to be built

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 3>out by twenty twenty eight, But actually half of that's going.

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 2>To come from their own money, and then maybe the

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 2>rest is.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Coming from debt markets in the light, but Microsoft really

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 3>does seem to be talking up how it's leaning on

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 3>its own cash flows.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 11>Correct its own cash flows. But part of the neo

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 11>cloud stuff that's interesting is that they are leases right,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 11>you are leasing. If you build a data center, you're

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 11>stuck with it for a good twenty years, right, you

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 11>lease for five years. If the demand environment changes at

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 11>the end, you say, well, thank you, nebis it's been beautiful. Right,

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 11>So it gives them a lot more financial flexibility. I

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 11>think we should see that within the context of hyperscalers

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 11>apping unique financing sources. Even like Google hitting the bond

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 11>market today, you lead.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Us perfectly to unnecessarily already four we are as one.

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 2>We so appreciate you as always. And meanwhile he said it.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet looking to raise about fifteen billion dollars from a

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 3>dollar bond.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Sale in the United States. According to sources, the dealer

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 2>is being.

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Offered in many as eight parts maturities ranging from three

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>to fifty years.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 2>But the company's also tapping the.

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 3>European market seven and a half billion dollars of notes

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 3>in Europe too. And this all adds to a wave

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 3>of borrowing from tech companies. Remember METUS thirty billion one

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 3>last two week. And it's all about investing aggressively in AI.

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 3>And let's dig into the impact of all of this

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 3>AI financing a little bit further. Anna RATHMNS with us,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 3>founder and CEO of Grenadilla Advisory. You think this is

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 3>smart the way in which that they're tapping debt markets

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 3>or depending on their own cash flow.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 12>Good morning.

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 6>I did think it's smart.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 12>I mean, sometimes cash on hand is the most powerful thing,

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 12>and so it doesn't make sense to spend all of

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 12>your cash and put it into you know, the future

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 12>investment and AI. Sometimes it makes sense to borrow from

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 12>the debt market and to finance it and so that

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 12>you have some leeway and some flexibility in what you

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 12>want to do with the assets that you have.

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 3>And what about even more creative financing such as these

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 3>private credit deals in the way in which we've seen

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 3>blue ol be Meta's partner of choice here, is that

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 3>what you're likely to see more of, not just ever

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 3>more debt being tapped, but just off balance sheet.

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think so. You know, private credit market is

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 12>constantly looking for ways to deploy their capital that they're

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 12>getting from the investors. And right now the investment that

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 12>seems the most exciting seems to be this data center

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 12>and AI play. And if we heard from Microsoft and

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 12>others last week during the earnings call, the demand is

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 12>just out of this world. And they're having a hard

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 12>time supplying that demand and therefore I think you're going

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 12>to see more of it. And by the way, people

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 12>are worried about this off balance sheet financing. In my opinion,

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 12>it's dangerous if you don't know about it. But everyone

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 12>knows about it, so you can definitely put that into

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 12>your calculation for the valuations of these companies.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's really interesting because in many ways Meta has

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 3>led the way in that creativity a messagal b not

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 3>last week because of their capital expenditure, and perhaps it's

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 3>becoming in a more rapid clip than the revenue growth

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 3>that we're seeing. And how do you make the discernment

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 3>that's currently happening among the AI players.

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, with regards to Meta, I think there are a

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 12>lot of things that were idiosyncratic. I mean, if we

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 12>were to think about the cat stack, if debt is issued,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 12>equity investors don't like it, right, But if you look

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 12>at the debt market, a lot of investors in the

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 12>debt market actually liked it, and there was a lot

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 12>of demand for it. But there was also the deal

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 12>about Meta not being a hyperscaler, investors wondering where all

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 12>of the investments are going and they're going to invest

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 12>more of it, So that's meta. But everyone else, I

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 12>think there is a race here and there's a bit

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 12>of a fomo in all of the AI players, and

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 12>there's a higher risk to missing out than to spend

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 12>today and to see where we are tomorrow, because I

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 12>think the demand is still going to be high tomorrow.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 3>But is that fomo leaching into the investment community and

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 3>is that a good way in which to invest one's money?

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 12>So here here are a few things I think people

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 12>thinking about valuations, and that's myself included. It's very very

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 12>high compared to historical norms. It's nerve wracking, but it's

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 12>a short term sentiment driven play. Data is subject to

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 12>a lot of noise and it's going to happen. There

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 12>may be a correction or people are going to get nervous. However,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 12>if you're a long term investor, like a lot of

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 12>our clients are, you're going to take a look at

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 12>the fundamental value add of these data center buildouts and

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 12>AI moves, and I do think that there is something there.

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 12>If you look at the S and P five hundred

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 12>index and the companies in there, how many can actually

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 12>do the AI play. How many have them have the expertise,

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 12>the vision, the balance sheet capacity to do all of this,

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 12>and they are just a few. And that's one of

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 12>the reasons why investors who want to put capital into

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 12>the AI play had no choice but to go into

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 12>it in the public markets.

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 12>So, I think the valuations, although they are high, they're

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 12>telling us something about the future growth of these companies

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 12>and AI in.

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 3>General, and that can withstand what has been a torrid

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 3>time of geopolitics of angst of trade.

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's interesting that you said it's noisy.

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 3>It's been really noisy in other players, like rare earth stocks,

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 3>for example, tumbling today because well maybe China will continue

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 3>to export and many had run up MP materials and

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 3>other players thinking that we would be cut off more

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 3>significantly from rare earth materials that were necessary for this

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 3>whole AI trade. What do you make of some of

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 3>the highs and the lows in ultimately a geopolitical war.

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you know, if we think back to the sheet

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 12>Trump meeting from last week, in my mind, I think

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 12>saying that it's a one year truce is a little

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 12>bit misleading, right, So it might not be fully one year.

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 12>We might have a surprise even next month.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 6>Who knows.

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 12>And the truth part is also misleading because what I

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 12>think is we just de escalated. We just went back

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 12>to where we were about two months ago. So it

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 12>means that we're going to continue to negotiate, but behind

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.719
<v Speaker 12>the scenes, we're going to continue to push this forward

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 12>in terms of actually racing each other. What happened after

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 12>that meeting was that mister Trump came back to the

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 12>United States, but mister she stayed and talked about having

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 12>like an international body that governs AI. There is a

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 12>lot of push here to having more power in AI

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 12>and also in national security. This is just going to

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 12>get more heated as we turn into twenty twenty six.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Wow, good place to leave it and a good food

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 3>for thought for the investor base and Rathman, we appreciate it.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Founder and CEO of going to did our advisory. The

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 3>final day is in a closely watched campaign here and

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, perhaps not the local elections you're thinking of.

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about will.

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Shareholders vote to approve a trillion dollar package for Eno

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Musk Well.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Of course that decision is about more than just money.

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Control of the company shareholder value, corporate governance issues, they're

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 3>all at play here.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's speak with the University of.

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Arkansas law professor Rob Anderson about all of this. You

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 3>are a retail investor in Tesla, and you're very active

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 3>within the ex community of teserati or tezl retail investors

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 3>more broadly, Professor Anderson, but just lay it out for

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 3>us as an active investor. Talk to us about the goals,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the milestones, how you interpret them as well as being

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 3>a professor in corporate governance, Are they that hard to

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 3>achieve for En Musk to get what could be up

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 3>to a trillion dollars in pay.

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, well, thank you for having me on. I mean,

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 13>there's been a lot of talk about how large potential

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 13>awards are here, but I think there hasn't been enough

0:33:55.520 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 13>talk about how ambitious this plan actually is. Requiring Elon

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 13>Musk to throw this company to eight point five trillion

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 13>in market capitalization and four hundred billion in ebit DA,

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 13>So I think, you know, this is ultimately a question

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 13>of what will this company be able to retain Elon Musk,

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 13>who I think it's fair to say his value has

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 13>been priced into the shares already quite significantly, And it's

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 13>more than just, in my opinion, more than just a

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 13>good idea to approve this pay package. It's actually essential

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 13>for this company to transition to that the next stage

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 13>that's contemplated by the award.

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 3>You talk about the eight and a half trillion that

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 3>they need to reach in terms of market cap, but

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 3>there's also the milestones. Twenty million cars, how many in MFSD.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 3>You've got to see what million robots out there?

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 2>An army that he calls them.

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 3>But Professor, what's interesting is Summer pointed out potential caveats here.

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 3>They've talked about the board potentially being able to award

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 3>him perhaps the first three tranches of the money promised

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.919
<v Speaker 3>if perhacks. There's the milestones were interfered with in some way.

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's disaster's war, maybe it's inferenced by government, but

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 3>also just other unspecified circumstances.

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So does that give you any pause from a corporate

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 2>governance perspective.

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 13>Well, I mean not not really. I mean it's normal

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 13>for force masure type consideration to be taken into account.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 13>I mean, somewhat somewhat ironically, when ISS recommended a vote

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 13>against it, it you know, took into account that it

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 13>specified that there was a lack of precision in some

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 13>of the milestones, but also simultaneously said that the milestones

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 13>didn't give the board enough discretion in the future to

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 13>adjust it. So, you know, I think there's it's a

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 13>no win situation in terms of writing a plan like this,

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 13>because obviously unexpected events can occur that you can't fully

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 13>anticipate in writing the plan. So I don't think I

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 13>don't I don't think those are particularly problematic. I mean,

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 13>you know, I think probably the most common criticism I've

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 13>heard is that the initial the first step of a

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 13>milestone at two trillion dollar market cap, people would say

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 13>have said it's too easy to achieve. But I think

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 13>what that doesn't fails to appreciate is that the market

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 13>is already priced in the fact that it believes this

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 13>pay package will pass and that Elon will be retained

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 13>for at least some period of time. So it's priced

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 13>in his value already, and it's a situation where he's

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 13>kind of cursed by his own success of you know,

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 13>making the milestones easier to achieve because it's already priced

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 13>in the value of his contribution. So you know, I

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 13>sort of feel like some of the criticisms have been

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 13>a bit unfair in that regard.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, some of the criticisms more broadly have been almost

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 3>reminiscent of what happened in twenty eighteen, and the idea

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 3>that basically corporate governance is lacking is a lot of

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 3>people on the border too close to him. How do

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 3>you think that this pay package in twenty twenty five

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 3>arenswered that?

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 13>So, I mean the pay package now had the benefit,

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 13>if you want to call it, that of a completely

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 13>adjudicated Delaware opinion on that twenty eighteen pay package. So

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 13>they were able to address just about everything that the

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 13>Chancellor identified in that including a totally different having a

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 13>special committee this time with totally different composition, addressing all

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 13>the procedural aspects that the Chancellor took issue with in

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 13>the court opinion, as well as producing an extensive report

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 13>that is more extensive than anything that I recall seeing

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 13>in recent memory to try to address all those concerns.

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 13>In addition to of course the shareholder vote.

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 3>You are, of course a shareholder. Musk himself is a

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 3>significant shareholder. He wants to be more of a significant one.

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.359
<v Speaker 3>He's got about fifteen percent that he could put weight

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 3>behind he in Texas is allowed to vote for his

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 3>own pay package in this respect, So many say, actually,

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 3>this is just going to pass, but it's more idea

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 3>of the court of public opinion. They need to pass

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 3>with such a majority to prove that this is born

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 3>out right.

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of that role? Do you think

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>that it's it's will pass with.

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Flying colors in that respect and enough to stop the

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 3>criticism continuing.

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 6>I think it will.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think the I think the shareholders other than

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 13>Musk and Kimball will vote very substantially in favor of it. Frankly,

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 13>the main criticism I here are certainly not coming from

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 13>the retail shareholders, who overwhelmingly are not just supported, but

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 13>I think are are nervous that it won't pass by

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 13>by enough. And I think you know the value that

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 13>Musk brings this company. It's it's undeniable. If if if

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 13>he left tomorrow, you can imagine what would happen to

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 13>the stock price. And so I think it's unfair not

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.959
<v Speaker 13>to give him the benefit of that of the fact

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 13>that the stock price has gone up. By looking at

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 13>it now at one hundred and thirty thirty dollars. Since

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 13>this pay package is even announced right, so the market

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 13>loves it. I don't see any criticism there. Really, it's

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 13>just the sort of rigid voting restrictions of the proxy

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 13>advisors that are going to be the obstacle here. It's

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 13>the cookie cutter approach they have to apply because they

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 13>have to try to treat Tesla like every other company

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 13>when it's it's not similar to a hired CEO who's

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 13>come in from the outside to manage a mature company.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 13>This is a founder led company.

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Anwance approach from Professor Rob Anderson. We appreciate it from

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the University of Arkansas. Thanks for joining us and a

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 3>retail investor in Tesla. Now coming up Palentier shoes there

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 3>are up ahead of companies earnings.

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Later today, we'll discuss what to expect next. It's a

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 2>brute BG Tech earning season.

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 3>It rolls on an AI balls where they're going to

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 3>be watching Palenteer closely.

0:39:57.600 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 2>It reports after the bell.

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 3>The stock's already is you can see one hundred and

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.359
<v Speaker 3>seventy percent let's call it on AI enthusiasm. But most

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 3>Lazett Chapman joins us now and there are high expectations

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent increase in revenue. Just talk us through what's

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 3>going to fuel that growth, lizet right.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 14>So, like you said, there is a lot of built

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 14>in anticipation eagerness around this. We're going to be see

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 14>they've beat the last four consecutive quarters. We're going to

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:24.879
<v Speaker 14>see if they're going to beat that again or maybe

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 14>they're going to fall short. What we're going to be

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 14>looking for is whether they're able to translate these small,

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 14>smaller customer deals, these one million dollar deals into ones

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 14>that expand into you know, ones that that really drive

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 14>the US commercial deals as well as international that's on

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 14>the commercial side. On the government side, we're going to

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 14>be looking at how things are going here domestically as

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 14>well as internationally with the boost that they've seen that

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 14>they've invested in the UK and a lot of NATO

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:56.959
<v Speaker 14>expansion efforts as well. So we're going to be looking

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 14>to see whether they've been able to you know, continue

0:40:59.880 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 14>to to expand the sizes of those deals.

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, government spending for them in defense in particular

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 3>has been such a tailwind. But we're also amid a

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 3>government shutdown. Is it is that any sort of headwind.

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 14>The people that we've spoken to indicate that is unlikely

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 14>because of the lumpiness and long term nature of these contracts,

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 14>that doesn't seem to be a major factor that we

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 14>have anticipated so far. And what we will be looking

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 14>at going forward though, is again like, you know, will

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 14>they be and then where and how? And traditionally international

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 14>sales have been much softer than the US ones, and

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 14>you know, CEO Alex Karp has repeatedly said, you know,

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 14>it's US commercial growth driving this, So we'll see if

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 14>that continues to be the case or whether they've been

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 14>able to boost their strength abroad.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, really analyst calling out the uncharacteristically large beats

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 3>and raises that we've had prior quarters from Alex Carp

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 3>and team.

0:41:58.239 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Is that what he needs to do?

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 3>The the narrative, because boy is he good at driving narratives.

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that is.

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 14>A great question, and I think the markets are going

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 14>to tell us right.

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, he has a.

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 14>Famously very antagonistic relationship with Wall Street. He considers financial

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 14>results of vulgar and inadequate way to judge a company success,

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 14>and he's consistently married the financial results with what he

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 14>considers is a philosophical mandate to create AI software for

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 14>the use of the US defense forces and allies, and

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 14>so that's going to be what he's driving towards. So

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 14>there is not just the focus on profit, but also

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 14>there's there's some philosophical support that he may get or

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 14>may not.

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to that philosophy after the bows that Chapman,

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 3>it's always great to have you on.

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. That does it. But as addition

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:00.720
<v Speaker 2>to bring the tech, don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 3>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 3>online on Apple, Spotify.

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 2>An I heart from New York. It's a brittybag tech.

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmmm

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 13>Hm