WEBVTT - Surveillance: New Covid Variant With Pekosz

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane, along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jay Leye. We bring

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Terminal. Let's

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>get right to a Dr Andrew Pekosh has been joining

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>us for years. It feels like actually it may just

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>be almost years as we deal with this pandemic for

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a second year, his professor and viroologists at Johns Hopkins University,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg School of Public Health. We are so lucky to

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have you here, Dr Pakosh, on the morning where everyone

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is all concerned about the virus once again. What's your

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>view into how serious this particular variant is. Well, let

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>me first start by saying all the credit goes to

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>South African scientists and scientists across Europe for not only

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>detecting this, but using social media in a good way

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to spread all the information that they have about this.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We criticize social media a lot about misinformation. This is

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>an example of how good it can be when it

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to spreading the right information. We know that just

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>before Thanksgiving it became obvious that there was in South

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Africa a new variant that had an abnormally high number

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of mutations across its gene but in particular in the

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>spike protein, which is the target for the vaccines that

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>are being distributed globally. Now, Um, what happened recently is

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that the South African public health officials realized that one

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of their PCR tests could actually serve as a surrogate

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>for this variant. And if you use that data, it

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like this five to nine variant is increasing at

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly fast pace across areas of South Africa and

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>multiple provinces of South Africa. So that was the real

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>significant piece that caused us to get on everybody's radar screen.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Do we even send of how much it evades the

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>natural immunity conferred by prior infection or by some vaccine,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>just theoretically from looking at the sequence and you could

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>probably see it right behind me on my desktop here. Um,

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it has a number of mutations which have been predicted

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to evade antibody responses. Now it has a few that

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>are conserved, so this won't be a case of something

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that's completely able to evade the vaccine induced immunity, but

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it has more than other variants that we've seen so far,

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>which again on paper, is what is concerning to us

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and the good morning to you. We're just getting some

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>lines coming through from from beyond Seck, who of course

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have been working with fins around that vaccine much used

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world. They're just giving us some time scales

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>around what they're going to do next, and I think

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting. They expect data from lab tests on

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the new varias in two weeks that it depending on

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that lab data may require vaccine adjustments. That gives us

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a sense that will we will know then in the

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>next couple of weeks or into the time just how

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>well in a lab environment the Fiser vaccine will stand

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>up to this. Then the real world will be another thing. Absolutely,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>And that sounds like about the right timeline. As I

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned the sequences on my desk right now, emails

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>have gone out to try to get my laboratory group

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>together to try to prepare to do some of these tests.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually here in the office today doing some of

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>these antibody tests against other variants that we have in

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the laboratory, So that sounds like the right time frame.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of the general public, what this

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>serves as an example of is now is the time

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to actually go out and do something proactive. If you

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten your booster, go get your booster. If you

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten your vaccine, go get your vaccine. Because by

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the time this variant becomes a global threat, if it does,

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>um now is the time to act to try to

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>do something to help curve the impact of this variant.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So it just serves as a reminder we have tools,

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to use them affect efficiently, and if you

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't been vaccinated, now's the time to get it. If

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you haven't got your booster, and now's the time to

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>get it to really give you the best tools to

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>fight off this variant. And I think, what do you

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>take away as a sort of big learning from the

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>way that this this variant has emerged and maybe out

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>there in various parts of the world. We know it's

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in Southern Africa, of course, we know it's in Hong Kong,

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and we know it's in Israel, and you know it

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>could be elsewhere as well. We don't know yet. The

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 1>UK has said it's not here in the UK, but

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll wait to hear from lots of places. What do

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you take away, is this all about making sure that

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we get better distribution of vaccines globally, because that sounds

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>an appealing argument to make, and you can definitely see

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the humanitarian reasons behind that. But in South Africa, our

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>reporting suggests that they don't have full vaccination, but it's

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>not to do with a lack of vaccine. It's a

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>lack of the right information getting to the right people

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to persuade them to go get the vaccine. Absolutely, he

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>had some important points there. I think first it starts

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with testing. Good testing, couple with sequencing allows for the

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>detection these variants early, and that helps us prepare for

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>these variants. And then to it informs the current public

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>health interventions. As I mentioned, getting yourself vaccinated is the

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>first thing that you can do right now. It may

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>be that we need to reformulative vaccine if this virus

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>does become dominant in the world. That can be done.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>We have anti virals on our way that can be

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>utilized effectively. But we have to think about these things

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as layered approaches to protect us from COVID nineteen. None

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of them are effective, but combined approaches allow us to

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>minimize the severity of this disease. And again, this variant

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be another test if it doesn't work globally,

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of how well we can do the things that we've

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>already learned can turn the tied on COVID nineteen cases. Well,

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Dr peck gosh. Less than twenty four hours ago before

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>this news rocked the world, families were getting together all

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>across the US for Thanksgiving dinner. Do you worry about

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a holiday surge akin to last year? Well, across the US, Actually,

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see signals of a surge even before

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>people traveled for Thanksgiving, and that's even be four. We

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about this five to nine variant. So

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the data from the U S alone is telling us

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>that case numbers are going up, that going up in

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>regionally very distinct manners. But in some places they are

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>causing um significance train in our public health, on our

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>hospital infrastructure already. So even without this variant being a

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>concern for us, the US cases, we're not doing enough

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to really limit these cases. And I am concerned that

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see another surge of in this case

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>delta here in the US after the Thanksgiving holidays. All right,

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Packash of Johns Hopkins, thank you so much for

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>being with us, especially with the idea that you have

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>rushed to the office to start doing some of these

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>lab tests yourself in order to get ahead of this

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>emergent virus. How much do travel curbs really change the

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>backdrop the supply demand dynamic on ritacent founder and director

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of Research and Energy Aspects joining us now, I'm rida,

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Happy Thanksgiving. Thank you for being with us. What's your

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>sense of how much of a game change the potential

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>entrant of the South African variant could be? Well? Happy

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving to all of you. Um look, I think this

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is a huge overreaction in terms of the market. The

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>market is fearing the worst the calculations we've done so far.

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>With all the borders closed globally, we are talking about

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just fifteen one five thousand barrels per day of lost

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>jet fueld demand. Um sure Europe could potentially kind of

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>come up with a bigger kind of blanket ban uh

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for travel to South Africa. Even then, you are talking

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about a few like ten twenty thod barrels per day

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of jet fueld demand. The big roots the trans Atlantic

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that remains open, that's kind of the biggest driver for

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that jet travel, and Asia still reopening,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>um hasn't really kind of we haven't seen that startups,

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>say between long haul flights between Asia and the pasts

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of the world, so that's not going to get severe

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>affected to begin with. But look, this is the market

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pricing in the worst possible scenarios. Where should oil be

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if this is a blip, if this is something that

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is grasp a ball and conquered, conquerable. Excuse me, yeah,

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course there are lots of fis. But

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, if if it turns out that the

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are perfectly effective against this new variant, prices should

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be about eighty dollars um. You know, the SPR really

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>showed us. We've we've had sixty five million barrels of

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>global SPR release outside of China and prices rarely two dollars.

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Compared that to when we had Libyan outage sixty million

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>barrels of SPR, when prices went down ten dollars. It

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>tells you how strong the market is right now, how

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>low stocks are. We've got the Open Plus meeting coming up.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>If this, if these concerns around demand persist um, it

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is likely that the group is going to consider pausing

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>output increases anyway, so that roots of floor under prices.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But fundamentally we should be above eighty dollars unless demand

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>really takes a hit. So does this So so amry

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to just expanding on that. This is the market moves

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing here, and the risks to oil demand demonstrated

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>by the by the threat at least of this virus variants.

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>That plays into the opaque argument that there are risks

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of oversupply for parts of twenty two. Does it absolutely?

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is why your PEG plus have been cautious.

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>This is why your PEC plus have been very clearly

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>only increasing production by four hundred thousand barrels for their quarters,

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>by four hundred thousand barrels per day, even though the

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>White House and other consumers have been calling for a

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger increase in production. They've been talking about the winter,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they've been talking about look there could be potential mobility restrictions,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and their own numbers show really big stock bills. Now,

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, you've had the SPR release which balloons their

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Q one stock bills further to about three three million barrels.

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But now these are way higher than our numbers. But

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this is why all PEG plus have been cautious, and

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I think today's move justifies their actions so far and

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>does call into question why the White House and other

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>consumers released spr going into a season which is bound

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to have uncertainties around demand as we're thinking about things

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that could influence demand. I just want to draw your

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>attention tow lines from at the e c B S

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Louis de Gwyndall saying deceleration sorry, saying that euros On

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>economy has lost some dynamism in the fourth quarter and

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the deceleration is due to supply bottlenecks and energy costs.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Is there any sense, then, emory to that there's demand

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>destruction has been taking place at these levels above eighty

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars of arrel so I would say, particularly for Europe,

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been higher gas prices more than oil prices that

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>have had a big impact on industry. You have seen

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>industrial demand being cut back, so I think that's where

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the comments are coming from. For sure, Look,

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest risk to next year is going to be

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>around the supply chain issues and high energy prices. In

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of the downside risk, we still think in terms

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of GDP growth or economic growth slowing down. That's more story.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>But you can't ignore the fact that those are your

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of real bottlenecks going on right now. But regardless,

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>there's so much bent up demand across the world. In

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Asia is just opening up, so there is a lot

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>more upside to demand. As long as, again, this variant

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't prove to be completely it just proves to be

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you can't use the existing vaccines against it,

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>then that's a different story. But otherwise demand still has

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>more upside. And Marina, something that's got lost amid all

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the talk of this variant and that spr released that

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>was coordinated by many countries is the fact that they're

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>still talking about an Iranian nuclear deal and actually Iran

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>is attending a meeting in Vienna on Monday to talk

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. And we understand from a phone call they

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>had with the EU earlier today that they say a

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>quicker turn is possible if sanctions are lifted. If that happens,

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the impact of that arounding crewed coming back

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>onto the market. Look, you if if it's a big

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>if I'll come into that second, you're going to get

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a big pull back rightly. It's it could be ten

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>even fifteen dollars lower. But I will really stress this,

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Iran has been dragging its feet for a very long time.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 1>This is no longer just about the j C p

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>o A. We absolutely don't think you're going to get

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a quick resolution. It's going to probably drag on for months,

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and we don't think Iranian barrels come back to September

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>two with with the whole process of sanctions lifting and um.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I said it's going to be a

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>big drop like ten fifteen dollars potentially is because Iran

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>has about sixty seventy million barrels of oil just sitting

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>there in tankers, and you know that can come out

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to the market very quickly. So I can see crude

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties. But of course they no PEC plus

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>will act as well I would expect them to. But

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but equally, you know this isn't an Irun that's ready

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to do a deal overnight. Yes, there will be a

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of headlines going into r and around this, but

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the demands that they have are very, very difficult for

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Europe or particularly the US to meet. Yeah, I read

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's funny that you said that, because my next question

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was going to be, doesn't even matter if OPEC plus

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can just come in and counteract That is that just

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be permanently true in the oil market, that

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the only actual factor that matters is the policy of

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>OPEC plus. Well, the irony that it's great you're asking

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you the question because you know so many people analysts

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>have kind of ruled or they've just said OPEC plus

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>don't matter anymore, and um, they've kind of ruled out

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>their importance in the market. But I think you're exactly

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>right OPEC plus and particularly the alliance between South Arabian Russia. Uh,

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's shown how they have stabilized the market, and

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that alliance is going to continue. Of course,

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the current deal only goes on till the end of

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the next year, but there will be cooperation and some

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>form of market management, depending of course, on the situation.

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the market continues to tighten from here into

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. They will continue to bring back production and

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the market is going to need it. We just don't

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>have production anywhere else. But there will be cooperation between

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this these countries for the foreseeable future. Yes, we're speaking

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with the rediscent of energy aspects. You said at the

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>outside of the conversation that you think that this is

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge overreaction to what we heard out of South Africa.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>How much of a buying opportunity is this, especially considering

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the fact that people do shift their minds are knee

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>jerk reactions and policymakers in Europe, in the United States,

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in Asia want to see the price go lower. Yeah,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is this is great, right. I think

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>from the policy maker's point of view, this is this

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is what they'd hoped for after the spr but they

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>got it because of the variant, so ultimately they still

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>got what they wanted. But I think the very fact

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that is Thanksgiving and liquidity is law is exacerbating the

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>price move. I think in a normal trading environment we

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't have gone down as much because there would

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>be some buias here. Right now, it's the fear that's

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>driving prices, and I wouldn't necessarily get in the way, right,

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like catching a falling knife. Um. But I think

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>once we get a bit more clarity around this, variant

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just mere speculation. I think that's when

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a buying opportunity, But that could very well

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be that that's early next week or maybe even mid

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>next week, because you do need that clarity first. Emucent

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of energy aspects, thank you so much. Yea. So, how

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>much of what we're seeing right now is true risk

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>off and is a reassessment of the global growth picture?

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And how much is thin liquidity with everybody still in

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>their Thanksgiving commas. David Riley joining US blue Way Asset Management,

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>chief investment strategist. I do wonder, David, what you make

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of today's move. Well, I think the move is reflecting

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the we viewed the pandemic, The market viewed the pandemic

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and COVID essentially in the rearview mirror, and I think

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>what you know, this unwelcome news has done. It's kind

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of challenged that assumption. I mean, the assumption was that

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>we'd go from a pandemic to endemic where we kind

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of learned to live with co of it. The macro

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and market impact is pretty limited and diminishing over time,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and something we get this news, which maybe it's a

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>much more infectious varying maybe heaven forbid, Um it is uh,

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, less effectively dealt with in terms of vaccines,

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and that would you know that clearly increases the kind

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of left tail risk of a much bigger sort of

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>impact on global growth and macro. But the reality is

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is that we actually don't know. And I think the market,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>because of the low liquidity and we're coming into year end, um,

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of you know, reacting as if, um, you

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>know this, this is an arguably greater risk and we

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>can really kind of price at this point in time

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>because we simply don't know. David, the movement bonds really

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>gets my attention. Bonds should not be this volatile, especially

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Fed still putting their thumb on the scales here.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But we see actually the implied volatility and treasury yield

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>surging to the most it's March, and that was of

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>us when everything was falling out of bed. We have

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>seen the idea of a complete retracement of rate hikes

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>next year. Does this make sense to you? Well, I mean,

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the reality is is that we've seen a

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of volatility now for some time, particularly in short

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>term interest rate UH markets and and that's because we

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.719
<v Speaker 1>are an inflection point in terms of global monetary policy

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly in terms of the FED. I mean

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, you write, Lisa, the moves today are

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>very large, and yesterday the market was effectively pricing I

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think something like a sixty chance that the FED was

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>going to announce an acceleration of its tapering of on

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>purchases at the meeting in December and then actually start

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>hiking rates quite you know, probably in in in mayo

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>June with free rate hikes in the course of two

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the you know, today's action is kind of taking at

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>least one of those hikes out. And I think this

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is one of the dilemmas that now that the FED

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is facing, because it's allowed itself to get behind the

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation curve, is caught between a rock and a hard place.

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, it needs to start tightening policy given where

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation is and and those inflation pressures that are boardening now.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think actually bred the speaking the outlem, the

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>global the U S economy is pretty pretty strong. But now,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, has this added potential uncertainty as to what's

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with the COVID and the pandemic and

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the global implications of that as well. And

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you about an extended excension of that

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>topic then, David, and that is the banking sector. We're seeing.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the big sectors that's being hit really

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>hard here in Europe, and it looks as if US

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>banks will also be will also be hit by the

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And this is to do with that. If

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a flatter yield curve and that

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>takes us back some months, then in terms of our

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>thinking on rate hikes and and that leaves banks in

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>a in a stickier situation. Does that make sense to you?

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you see some of the selling in in that

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sector as being overdone because there's also concern around what

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>for what further variants could do to it. Coconomies in Europe,

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, But is it really about the Yielker that's

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>what's weighing on banks? Well, I think it's a combination

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of the term and I think, you know, if if

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you have concerns around UM a COVID coming back to

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the forefront, if you if you like, rather than being

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in the background UM, then you know, banks are you know,

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical asset and they're going to get take a hit,

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>just as we're seeing some of you know, oil going

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>going much lower, um you know, more other sort of

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>cyclical assets moving lower. This move to sort of safe havens,

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the preference for sort of you know, stay

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>at home stocks, you know, versus the sort of reopening

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>um trade. So I think it's kind of consistent with

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>what else we're seeing happen in the market. But actually

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think it is we've done in the sense

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we've gone for a very severe stress

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>test with the financial sector and with banks in particular,

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the you know, worse of the

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>pandemic in the course or you know earlier this year

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and last year, and they've actually come out actually and

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the guy actually you know, stronger capital buffers, stronger liquidity buffers.

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is where I think, as as investors you

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>need to you know, stay calm. I wouldn't be doing

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.479
<v Speaker 1>too much in these kind of markets with this kind

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of bit offer spreads. But where you have call convictions,

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and I do actually have a core conviction around banks

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>up there, then actually if we see much more of

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a sell off, then I think that's an opportunity if

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>you've got some dry powder to actually add to your

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>risk position. David, you said investors need to stay calm,

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of times to stay calm, you need

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to know that you're at least somewhat protected. What do

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you tell investors serves as the best hedge in this

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of environment. Well, I think it's it's it's difficult

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to hedge your portfolio against um, you know, a tail risk,

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>which would be a very bad um uh, you know,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>very bad outcome. So you know what you have to do.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I think with the portfolio is that you say, look,

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm sticking with my core convictions. If I

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>think there's opportunities and the market has over shot, then

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I looked to add to that, but also be disciplined

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in where you have kind of you know, low conviction

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>trades that within your portfolio you take the opportunity to

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>start reducing your exposure there. And and actually that's something

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing to be frank going into what we

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>thought was going to be quite a volatile year end

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>because of these major central bank meetings that we have

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>UM in December. But you can't hedge your way from

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the kind of extreme terrorists that we're kind of um,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, scaring the horses right now in terms of markets.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>David Riley of Lubiasa Management, thank you so much for

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>coming on our show. When we should be talking about shopping,

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we should be talking about the incredibly strong data, and

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>instead we're talking about a new variation. Today is Black Friday.

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>We are going to talk about shopping and it is

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>olive into the entire picture. Joe Pelban joining us, We

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are so lucky to have you seen your research analyst

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and assistant director of research at Telsey Joe. When we

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>look at the shopping scenario, just tying it into the

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>news of the morning, how much have we seen a

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>return to stores and how much are people now accustomed

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to shopping online? It is safer, it is easier, It

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is the way that people are going. Well. For the

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>few stores that were open this morning at five am,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the online was still very prevalent because there

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>was not a mad rush to get into the stores. Uh.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>It does seem like people are shopping more online these days,

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's going to be the case.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>If you really wanted to get something, you could get

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it in advance. I assume there will be some quite

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a bit of store pick up today. People probably did

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>some shopping yesterday online that they want to pick up

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in the stores. But we're hearing that this weekend should

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty good weekend from a footfall perspective, as

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>people do want to actually get back into the stores. Uh,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know that the new variant of COVID

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is a little scary. So far, we haven't heard of

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it here in the U, so I don't think it's

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>going to impact this weekend per se, but it could

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>have an impact as you get deeper into the holiday

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>season in terms of the store versus online. So there

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>has been a shift also, though not just in where

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>people shop, but when they shop. And Black Friday used

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to be the time when everybody would go to the stores.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But what we're seeing is actually less shopping than previously

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>expected online heading into the Black Friday holiday. This isn't

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>because people aren't buying a lot of stuff. They are.

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It is because they've spread it out over more time.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>How much is that becoming the new normal? Yeah, we

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think that is the new normal that spread through the

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>holiday season, which is why it makes it very difficult

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for analysts like myself to go into a store today

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and then try to make some assessment, Oh, it was

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a good Black Friday, a bad Black Friday so much

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>as online, so much was pulled forward earlier, so a

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>lot's going to happen after. I do think this year

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the one big difference though, is because the inventory is

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>so tight and the supply cha constraints are there, people

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are buying earlier for sure if they want to get

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>something well, and to that point, Joe, inventory is really tight.

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>There's not necessarily all the goods that people want to

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>buy available. So does that mean that you weren't going

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>to get your traditional big bargain Black Friday discounts? You know,

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that's a terrific observation because the truth is you're really

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>not getting what you've seen in years past. Uh. Last

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>year was okay, people a little you know, more more

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>focused on on full price. This year, same thing. We're

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot more UH pricing closer to the full price,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>so that in other words, the discounts aren't a steep

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing anywhere twenty for most stores, so I won't

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be deeper. I think I saw some signs on the

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>gap today for off, but generally speaking, there weren't many,

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, deals to be had that were just screaming

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>at you this morning, at least a few stores that

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw that you had to rush in to get it. Well.

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You you mentioned gap there, which of course reported results

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week, and it flagged inventory as a problem

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:55.959
<v Speaker 1>because of all the supply chain issues that retailers are

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing with. Do you expect that some retailers just simply

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>will not have the inventory this holiday season? I do

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>think that there are some that will be very tight, uh,

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, from for the most part, we got through

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this third quarter earning season and the inventory position for

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.479
<v Speaker 1>most retailers was actually pretty good. It was better than

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us expected, and still not great where

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd like it to be heading into the holiday season.

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>But there is this fear that there may not be

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that second wave of inventory coming in, so it could

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>be pretty tight as you get deeper into the season. Um,

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>but I think that we are going to see some

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure through through on the inventory, but again it will

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>mean prices will be closer to full price as opposed

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to steep discounts. Joe, I'm already running behind. I still

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>owe somebody in my family a gift from last holiday

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that still has us not so I'm already in trouble.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of availability, I mean, is it really

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the sticker prices that you know, the big discounts that

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>are going to get people through the door this time around,

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>or is it really about the availability, you know? I mean,

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>if I knew that a certain store had plenty of

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a thing that's very popular, install might that be the

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>thing that this year actually gets me to to to

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>show up in person on the doorstep rather than the prices.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>And consumers have shown that they're prepared to pay up

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to the stuff they want, is getting their hands on

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it that's difficult? Yeah. I think that's a great observation

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>because you are going to see any people will want

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>to get the item that they want, and you know,

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that they will go to the store if

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>need be to get that item. I don't think it's

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the discount that's going to drive it right now. I

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>really do think it is much much more item driven

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to see people wanting, uh that special

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>toy or electronics item and whatever is particularly popular. It

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>really has been tough to get and so people will

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>go wherever they need to to get it to satisfy

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>their that demand. Yeah, and an army tail is falling

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>into two camps. Then for you, Joe, that the ones

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that have the pricing power and the ones that operate

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in the field where they really don't. Is that what

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing. We do believe that, you know, and those

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>with the inventory and the pricing power are really likely

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the big winners. I mean, Walmart, Target, you know,

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Costco's Amazon. We think those are going to be some

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>of the big winners this holiday season, just given that

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they do have inventory, they've got the best pricing, and

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they really have the broad base of of items across

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the categories that people would want to shop for. So

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty optimistic about those guys hanging in the season. Joe,

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>if we do see a resurgence in new cases of COVID,

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I hate that I'm saying this, But if we see

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>this new variant actually take hold and start to create

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a prolonged feeling of the pandemic, again, I hate that

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying this. Do you expect there to be a

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>conditional and an additional consolidation among the biggest players here

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>because of their supply chain UH power because of their

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>ability to negotiate independently with particular suppliers with particular nations.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We think we're already starting to see it where, you know,

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the market share gains for some of those big Bucks guys,

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the Walmarts and Targets of the world costcos where they

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>were able to, you know, get the products that they need.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>They were able to negotiate with their their shipping partners

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases do it on their own. And

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>so I think you're absolutely right that they're getting what

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they need, they're consolidating that inventory. They also have the

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>best prices out there, so they can be really competitive

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in this environment. I think it's been really much more

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>challenging for some of the smaller retailers to deal with

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>this environment and with it. If there is another flare

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>up in the pandemic here in the US, UH you know,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>fourth wave or something, I would think we're going to

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>see similar type of behaviors. And that's part of why

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Walmart and Target, even the grocers are holding

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>up a lot better than people thought they would have

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I think that we all thought they

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>would have been much bigger reversion to the means, so

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to speak, and it really hasn't been you know, We've

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just elevated the level of sales and we're growing on

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>top of that. Joe Felban, thank you so much for

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>being with us. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Join us five weekdays from seven to ten

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>day from six to nine am for insight from the

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And subscribe

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg