WEBVTT - Humanists, the Happy Heathens

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh. And there's

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 2>chalk and cherries here too. And this is stuff you

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>should know about humanism, which I find fairly relatable in

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a lot of ways and in other ways not necessarily.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Can we we'll get into it.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Can we say Whatlivia titled this one? She's been really

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 3>killing it lately.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go ahead.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>This is on humanism, the bright side of being a

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 2>godless heathen.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:44.639
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I was looking for that, aha definition, because that put

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>it about as good as anything in this whole article.

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>The is it American Humanist Association? Is it an association?

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they are associated.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 3>They put it like this, It's a progressive philosophy of

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 3>life that without theism or other supernatural beliefs. Bit of

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>a dig affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 3>lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 3>And of course, if you don't know what theism is,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about, you know, religion and God. So it's like, hey,

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 3>you can be a good person and have a moral

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 3>and ethical center and strive to do those things without God.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 3>At the center of it.

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. And most humanists, I yeah, I think

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 2>it's fair to say most are atheists or at least agnostic. Yeah,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 2>at the very least if they do believe in a God,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 2>he's not an interventionist God. He's not playing our role

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in our lives day to day. Maybe you could also

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>interchange that definition of God with the universe or nature

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>or something like that, but not God in any religious

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 2>way whatsoever.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, like if you do believe that, a

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of like like strict humanists will say, well, you

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>can't really be a humanist because not believing in God

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 2>in that sense is a core part of humanism. And

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of other people say, hey, you're a humanist.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Who are you to tell me what I believe? Now

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the humanist says, you got me.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>And as we'll see it, you know, it had kind

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 3>of been tangled up with religion here and there until

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 3>it kind of landed eventually where it did.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna talk a little bit about the history though.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 3>That term humanism goes back to at least Cicero in

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 3>first century BCE, Rome, when that very famous writer and

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 3>I think lawyer and Statesman use the word humanitis to

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 3>describe like people developing or the development of these qualities,

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 3>these virtuous qualities that Chuck will talk about, like a

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>moral and ethical center, compassion, good judgment, like being a

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>good person and doing good things.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then we leap frog all the way over

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>to the Renaissance. And you'll know that we leapt over

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>what are called the Middle Ages, the Dark Ages, Medieval era.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>The Renaissance humanists are the ones who gave us the

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 2>term and the idea of the Dark Ages, that there

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>was a part of history where essentially the Church ruled

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 2>everything with an iron fist. Corruption was rampant, and people

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 2>were removed from their relationship with God and the Church

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 2>was inserted. And what these earliest Renaissance humanists did. They

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>were all Christians to a person, most of them Catholics too.

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>They changed that whole idea and said, what happens if

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>we get the church out from between the individual and God.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a connection between you, this person who

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 2>is important and matters just because you're a person, and

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 2>God who made you. And this is where the very

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>beginnings of humanism find themselves. Even though no one in

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the Renaissance would have called themselves a humanist because that

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 2>concept didn't really exist quite yet. This is the first step.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, looking back, we apply the tag to

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different people. We're going to talk about

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 3>some of them, but yeah, they wouldn't have called themselves that.

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Then.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 3>Petrarch was probably looked at as maybe the first humanists

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 3>or the first modern man sometimes called. And in the Renaissance,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>it was it was a pretty hot ticket depending on

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>what crowd you ran with. If you were among the

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>elites in the Renaissance, you might have hired humanist scholars

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 3>to come and teach your kids all about like sort

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 3>of the moral systems of the classical era to you know,

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 3>and very much in the effort, like you were saying,

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 3>to bring us out of what they call the dark ages.

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 3>And some aspects of this whole movement in the Renaissance

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 3>included three things we're gonna kind of touch on here

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 3>are realism, dignity of the individual human, and application of learning,

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 3>like putting it in to practice.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So humanism contrasted with scholasticism, which had been going

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 2>on for hundreds of years. It was essentially the church's

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>form of teaching and that was basically reconciling the concept

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>of reality that came from the classical Greeks like Aristotle

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 2>with scripture and basically using scripture to explain the world

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 2>and reality as it is. And these humanists came along

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>and they were like, what happens if we stopped doing that?

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 2>What happens if we just study the classical Greeks and

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>just basically also still stay Christians, but stop using this scripture.

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 2>This received wisdom that the Church gives us, what if

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 2>we study it ourselves instead? And that brings up that

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 2>other the second part you mentioned, which is the dignity

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 2>of the individual human Up to this point, individuality was

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 2>not prized. You were not supposed to look inside yourself.

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 2>You're supposed to look outside the glory of God, you yourself.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 2>If you paid too much attention to yourself, that was

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a quick one way trip to hell for you when

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>you died. The humanists were like, no, let's look inside ourselves,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 2>like we're important, you the individual is important.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 3>And also part of that first one with the realism

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 3>was that we are flawed. So if we want to

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 3>learn about each individual and human the nature, what it

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 3>means to be human, we have to look at the

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 3>bad stuff too, like the vices and the disorders and

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>things like that. And then that last one that I

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 3>mentioned was application of learning, like all this stuff is great,

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>but it's not naval gazing like or we don't want

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 3>it to be navel gazing. We want to actually stimulate action.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you're not learning just so you can give

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 2>more money to the church or something like that too.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 2>And if this sounds a little bit like Protestant thought

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>about the connection between the individual and God, that's exactly right.

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 2>These thinkers eventually led to the Protestant Reformation, which basically

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>pushed the face of the church off to the side

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and said you and me God we're connected.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>And it'll also tie into the Unitarian Church in a

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 3>big way later on. A church that has interested me,

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 3>oh yeah, yeah, I mean, I like my Sunday's free,

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 3>so probably not going to go.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>But if any quote unquote church.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Appeals to me at this age and where I am

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>in life is definitely those guys.

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, those people that you see out and about at

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 2>like ten am on a Sunday. Can give that a

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 2>little knowing head nod too.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So something I think is we're pointing out real

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>quick though, to Chuck is everything we're talking about involves God.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Even though the Church has been pushed out of the way,

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 2>God has not. Yeah, God is still front and center.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Christianity is still the most important thing around, and that

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 2>is this is the cradle of humanism. And one of

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the frequent criticisms of modern humanism is that it's never

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>really shaken off its birthright from Catholicism or Christianity, even

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>though it opposes religion itself. We'll get more into that,

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>but I just wanted to put that out there for

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the moment.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 3>And we're also talking about like coming out of a

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>time where atheism could get you killed. Yeah, you know,

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 3>like saying that there is no God, you know, was

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 3>against the law unpunishable by death for sure.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that started to change gradually around beginning in

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the seventeenth century. One of the people we have to

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 2>thank for that is Francis Bacon. Yeah, known as the

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>father of empiricism. He also invented bacon and he also

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 2>had a big hand into coming up with the scientific method.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, we talked about him and that.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, which has been largely abandoned by science

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in the last one hundred years.

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, he argued for really studying like like what

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 3>we call social sciences. Now he kind of kicked that

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>off as well, the systemic study of like the human passions.

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>But all these people that we're gonna talk about here

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 3>in the next little bit, we're Christians. So this is

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of this is where it was still a time

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 3>when it was still tangled up even though they had

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 3>these ideas, All of these people, Bacon and this next person,

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 3>Thomas Hobbes, were Christian.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the fact that there are Christians who identify

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>themselves as humanists and vice versa, that goes to show you,

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>like that those two things are not incompatible. Yeah, you

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 2>can be religious and care about human beings and like

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 2>they don't have to oppose one another, although humanists have

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>eventually said yes they do.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that's the deal, right, I mean, did

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I read that correctly? Is that it's the modern humanist

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 3>movement was really where they were like, we're really separate

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 3>from and congruous with belief in God.

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, Okay, so we mentioned Bacon. What about Thomas

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Hobbes because he came up with the social contract, which

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 2>is ba like you and me. We basically allow a

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>government to rule us in exchange for protecting us from nasty, brutish,

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 2>short lives which we would otherwise have without the state

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 2>or without society. Right. That doesn't sound very humanist, even

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>though it's human centered, because he assumed that humans were

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 2>essentially bad and we'd club you over the head and

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>kill you first chance. They got. That's why we need government,

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 2>according to Hobbes. But he's considered one of the early

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>humanists for sure.

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and he was Christian as well, but he did

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 3>not write a lot like and his writings didn't write

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot about God. He kind of put that to

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 3>the side and said, you know, if we want to

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 3>understand who we are and what it means to be human,

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 3>we have to look at it through a just a

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 3>very sort of secular and like, very reasoned approach.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly, so humanist rationalism to understand ourselves in the world.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Paine was also one. He was probably Yeah, he

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 2>was like the first person that you can point to

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and be like, the guy's a humanist. He even says

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 2>so himself in not so many words, or more than

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 2>those words. He was a pamphleteer who helped get the

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>American Revolution started despite moving to America just two years

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 2>before the revolution started. That's how effective his pamphlets were.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was very forward thinking. He was arguing very

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 3>early against slavery. He's had an idea for what we

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 3>might call universal basic income now, very much believe in

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 3>the equality of all humans. And he has this quote

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 3>that's really pretty great, like I'm a big pain guy.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 3>After reading up more on him, Sure, my country is

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 3>the world that my religion is to do good. Pretty nice.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's pretty much no better way to sum up

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 2>the humanist view in a nutshell than that.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>The French Revolution also, there's a couple of people who

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 2>get called out a lot, Jacqui Beart and Twant Francois Momorro,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>because they established the cult of Reason, where they would

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>actually go in and seize churches in France during the

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>revolution and repurposed them. I saw into Temples of Reason.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I read about them on the Collector, which is a

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 2>great website that explains all sorts of different philosophies and stuff.

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Great website. Anyway, the French Revolution itself basically said Catholic Church,

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 2>you're out. And then they were like, okay, well, wait

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 2>a minute. We're all about reason and enlightenment. What are

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>we going to fill the vacuum left by getting rid

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 2>of the Catholic Church? And all of these ideas like

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the Cult of Reason kind of came along, which was

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 2>essentially create humanist temples to logic in humans and humanity,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>remove God from the equation altogether.

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 3>And buddy, do you think I like Thomas Bain. Don't

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 3>get me started on Jeremy Bentham, because after reading up

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 3>on Jeremy Bentham, I wish I had named my daughter

0:12:58.400 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Jeremy Bentham Bryant.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>That would have been a great name.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I really missed an opportunity because Jeremy Bentham was a

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 3>great dude. He was working for welfare, fair programs for

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the poor early on. He didn't believe in slavery obviously

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>child labor, and this was like decades before anyone else

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 3>was talking about this stuff. He was into animals. And

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 3>we'll see. That's some of the criticism from humanists is

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 3>that they kind of stop at humans. And that's not

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 3>to say that humanists can't be like pro animal or

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 3>pro environment, because most of them probably are right but

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 3>ben them very early on when it talked about like

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 3>the suffering of animals, he said, the question is not

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 3>can they reason, because that's what animals were, just animals,

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 3>because they can't reason, they have brains like us. He

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 3>combatd that with the question is not can they reason

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 3>nor can they talk? But can they suffer?

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? What a thing to say in the seventeen hundreds.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm glad you explained what you meant by he

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 2>was into animals because I was confused at first.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, come on.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 2>One of the other cool things about Jeremy Bentham is

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 2>he willed his body to science. He donated to science

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 2>early on and they used it. They said, thanks a lot, buddy,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>here's your skeleton back. Because as part of his wishes,

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to remain at University College London, which he helped

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>found as a secular college open to everybody. And he's

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 2>still under glass at the University of College of London,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>dressed up in his own clothes. He's got wax hands

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>with gloves on, he has a wax head and apparently

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 2>he originally wanted his head to be part of it. Yeah,

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 2>so they used some I guess some Maori technique of

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 2>desiccation and it didn't go very well, and his descated

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>head is still around. But they're like, Jeremy, you do

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 2>not want us to leave this on your body because

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>you look so great with the wax head. We're just

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>going to keep this separate under class itself.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Up with Jeremy Bentham?

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you mentioned the secular college Like he went well

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 3>beyond like the separation of church and state, where he

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 3>was like, colleges should have nothing to do.

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>There should not be religious colleges.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 3>He really wanted to draw a strong divide between God

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 3>and kind of all the institutions.

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Right. He was also the father of utilitarianism, which is essentially,

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 2>if at its worst, killing one person saves two people,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>then you kill that person, which gave us things like

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the trolley problem as a utilitarian thought experiment. Essentially, Bentham,

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I think, didn't really think that way, but he was

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 2>basically like, we want to maximize the most good for

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the most people. That's the way he developed it.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, pretty cool stuff.

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 3>You want to take a break, Yeah, I think we're

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 3>off to a hot start, So I'm gonna go take

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 3>a cold shower and we'll be right back.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Chuck, we're back, and we're going to talk about

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the development of humanism in the way that we know

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>it today, because up to this point we've been talking

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 2>about a little bits here, little bits there that all

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 2>together changed the world and essentially took all the power

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>in the West, especially Europe and eventually the United States,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>away from the Church and organized religions in general and said, no,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a way for you to live an upstanding, meaningful,

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>ethical life without even believing that there's a God or

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>in afterlife. And here's how we're going to do it.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean the idea at the time, and there's

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 3>still people that believe this in twenty twenty six. Which

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 3>is pretty scary, is that if you were not religious

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 3>and devout, then you were a heathen and you were

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:05.239
<v Speaker 3>like morally bereft. And those like people very early on

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 3>stood up and were like that didn't make any sense,

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Like why is it I don't believe in God? Like

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>people have feelings in their heart or whatever. And someone realized, like,

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>why is it that in my heart? Like I don't

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 3>believe in a God, but like I believe in doing

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 3>like really good things, Like why are those tho? Why

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 3>are those two things have to be tied together. And

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>that was humanism, or if you look at philosopher and

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 3>theologian from Germany Friedrich Niedhama, the term was HUMANISMUS in

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 3>eighteen oh eight, and that is he was kind of

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 3>talking about that Renaissance humanism, those studies that they were

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.479
<v Speaker 3>doing with the people that are trying to sort of

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 3>reform education during the Renaissance.

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but very quickly people latched onto that. He just

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of came along at the right He was in

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the right place at the right time, Yeah, which was Germany,

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 2>because Germany eventually became kind of the cradle of modern humanism,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 2>and eventually humanismths what we would call humanism now we

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 2>just dropped the US or the US And if you

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of subscribe to that, it was way beyond the

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 2>way that you interpreted scripture. You supported women's equality, You

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 2>were all about separation of church and state. You had

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 2>compassion for all people, not just people that looked like

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 2>you and had the same amount of money as you.

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 2>You cared about actually doing stuff to get the government

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 2>to take care of poverty and things like that. Like Quakers.

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 2>The conception of Quakers at this time was a really

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 2>good view of what it meant to be a humanist

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 2>at the time, because you still believed in God, but

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 2>you really cared about other people. And this was fairly

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>new for Europe at the time.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure, you mentioned the French Revolution, but in

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.959
<v Speaker 3>the nineteenth century, during the time of all those European revolutions,

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 3>was it also started to kind of touch on socialism,

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 3>of course, and like this idea of a utopian society

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 3>that we could strive for. It was starting to become

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 3>a little more acceptable in the United States at the time,

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 3>where well partially because of German immigration to the United

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 3>States and you were talking about them being the cradle,

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 3>but also Charles Darwin and just this idea that you

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 3>don't need these theist beliefs to be a good person,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 3>and there's something called free thought that can happen, like

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 3>prethinking is very much at this time aligne with deism.

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah for sure. And free thought essentially as a concept

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is it's just questioning everything, Yeah, especially received wisdom. You

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 2>stop and ask click, well, wait a minute, why do

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 2>I think that? How do I know that? You just

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 2>challenge all of your own assumptions, and by doing that

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>you can kind of free yourself from being indoctrinated by

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 2>the man essentially. So this is when it seems to

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 2>me the progressive movement in the United States really started

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 2>to come about. Yeah, right, this is the till late

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>nineteenth century. One of the next big things that happened

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>was the establishment of the New York Society for Ethical

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Culture by again named Felix Adler. And this became essentially

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.959
<v Speaker 2>the ethical movement E in capital E, capital M. And

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>they were basically like the very first humanists. They tried

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 2>to essentially provide the same thing, that's say, moral upstanding

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 2>structure that the church provides for so many people to

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 2>people who don't believe in God.

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and not more than that. But alongside that, I

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 3>think they realized that the church had something that people

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 3>clearly liked in tradition and in ceremony, and they're like, hey,

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 3>if we're going to be a thing like, maybe we

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 3>should have some of that stuff too. So they organized

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Sunday services and they said, how about a how about

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 3>a deist marriage ceremony, like kind of substituting religious ritual

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>for non religious ritual because people like that kind of stuff.

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, They're like, how about atheist holy communion, and the

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>humanists are like, how does that work?

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 2>They're like, oh, we don't know. This is new. We're

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 2>just throwing everything we can at the wall. See what sticks.

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, maybe instead of the blood and body of Jesus,

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 3>it's just crackers and grape juice.

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 2>There you go. And they were like grape juice or flavory,

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, grape juice.

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 3>We used grape We used grape juice at our church

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 3>because even the Baptist did not take wine as a communion.

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of funny to think about.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 2>I remember moving to the South and being like, you

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 2>don't drink any wine, like even in church because I

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 2>was raised Catholic.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Welch's baby.

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's funny. So this whole kind of evolution is

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 2>still going on. In the United States in particular, it

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 2>started to take off. Humanism really is huge today or

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 2>through the twentieth century in the US and the UK.

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>They're kind of like hotbeds for humanist activity. And the

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 2>people who were attracted to this were very frequently liberal intellectuals, yeah, philosophers, literati,

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 2>intelligentsia like academic elites and people who ran in their circles,

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>which included communists at the time in the twenties and thirties,

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 2>like basically super radical liberal thinkers were very much attracted

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 2>to the early establishment of modern humanist organizations.

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. That in the United States in particular, the University

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 3>of Chicago nineteen twenty seven was one place where it

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 3>really got cooking. There were efforts there by students and

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 3>so professors who belonged and this is where the Unitarian

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Church comes into play. They were Unitarian Church members, which

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 3>is technically Protestant denomination. It's very political, has always been

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 3>very politically progressive. And in this group in Chicago, there

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 3>were a lot of ministers, even in theologians who had

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 3>non Christian ideas that they were putting forth, like transcendentalism,

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and they had a magazine. They organized what was called

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the Humanist Fellowship and put out the New Humanist Magazine.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 2>It was like all ads though yeah, probably so all

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 2>ads and perfume samples.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, and at the very end they had the little

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 3>fold thing like the Mad magazine did.

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's very popular.

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 3>But they were trying to move Unitarian and as Unitarianism,

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 3>even in nineteen twenty seven, completely away from Theism.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Unitarian Unitarianism as a church was like, yeah,

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 2>let's go and then stop just short. And that's where

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 2>it stays today. Essentially, they're like, you don't believe in God, Great,

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 2>you can be a member of our church. Do you

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>believe in God? Yeah, great, you can be a member

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 2>of our church. It's universalist Unitarian. Right.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Should we talk about the manifestos?

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because you can't have liberal thinkers and communists together

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and not come up with a manifesto. Right, It's just

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 2>going to naturally bubble up from those people being together.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And in nineteen thirty three, I think they drafted the

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 2>first humanist manifesto and it basically said so and this

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 2>is where this is one reason why religious people don't

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 2>like humanists. It took direct aim at religion, right, Yeah,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and then this is why people who are religious don't

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 2>like humanists. It also called humanism its own type of religion. Yeah,

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>take that, chuck and run with it.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 3>Mixed messages. Can I read this bit from the seventy

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 3>three manifesto?

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Or wait?

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 3>This was Okay? The seventy three was a manifesto Part two?

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sorry, nineteen thirty thirtight. I believe thirty three was

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the first one, I think, thank you, we got there.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, thirty three was the first one. Seventy three was

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Manifesto two, and this was from seventy three. Using technology wisely,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 3>we can control our environment, conquer poverty, markedly reduced disease,

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 3>extend our lifespan, significantly modify our behavior, alter the course

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 3>of human evolution and cultural development, unlock vast new powers.

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Starting to sound a little bit like scientology there, and

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 3>provide humankind with unparalleled opportunity for achieving an abundant and

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 3>meaningful life.

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it also smacks of transhumanism too. Oh yeah, it's

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 2>just denoted by h plus Stellarc. It's a branch. Yeah,

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a branch of humanism where you graft a human

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 2>ear onto your forearm.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Right. Oh boy, man, I can't believe you remembered his name.

0:25:58.400 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>It just came right up.

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 3>If you're a long time listener, you remember when we

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 3>first talked about Stellarc, the transhumanists who did, in fact,

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 3>graft a human ear to his arm, complete with a

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 3>little speaker like it heard and worked, right, Yeah.

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it. Yeah, I had a Bluetooth speaker which

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 2>is probably dead by now.

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>How many c tips do you think that guy's gone through.

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Oh, crisps, he's like got catch up in there again.

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh man.

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 2>So the reason that they wrote the nineteen seventy three

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Manifesto two was because Manifesto one had a lot of well,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 2>it was of its time. Yeah, it was very pro

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 2>communist and socialism, it was anti capitalist. It even said, quote,

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 2>the existing acquisitive and profit motivating society has shown itself

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 2>to be inadequate. Yeah, it said it was a religion.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 2>So in nineteen seventy three they're like, let's just kind

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 2>of get rid of some of this. Let's not call

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>ourselves a religion of any kind. We'll still take aim

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 2>at religion, but we're not going to call ourselves a religion.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>We're going to drop the whole life communist, capitalist, you know,

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 2>West Coast, East Coast war in our own manifesto.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 2>And then as time went on, there were more affirmations,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 2>there were more manifestos. There was one in nineteen eighty,

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty eight, two thousand and three, in two thousand

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and two, so all these were American, by the way.

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 2>In two thousand and two it finally went international, which

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 2>what's called the Amsterdam Declaration of Humanism from two thousand

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and two, and it basically it basically says like, yeah,

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 2>everything these guys have been saying, but take out the

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 2>religion stuff and the anti capitalist stuff.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 3>And they said, we need a word though, if we're

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be consistent, and so instead of religion, let's

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 3>settle on this word life stance.

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 2>You were like, oh, sure, sure, LifeStance.

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knows what that is. We did a little digging.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 3>It's a pretty obscure term. I think Wikipedia, which is

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 3>not a website. We really like to go to a

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 3>lot for this, but that's kind of the only place

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 3>we could find anything. But this is how they define

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 3>it is the relation that one has with what he

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 3>or she accepts as being of ultimate importance.

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a great definition of life stance for sure. Yeah,

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>it really gets across. And essentially it's what they use

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 2>in place of religion, not just what they offer, what

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 2>humanism offers people, but what people need. And that's one

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 2>thing that humanism is always basically said, is you need

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the things that religion give to you, like people need that.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>It's been around for thousands of years for a reason, right, Yeah,

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 2>And there's all these different ones around the world that

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 2>billions and billions of people subscribe to because it gives

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>their life meaning, It gives you purpose, it tells you

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 2>how to be a good person. And humanists were like,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 2>all we're saying is that you don't need religion. You

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 2>don't even need to believe in God to have all

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>those same things. And as the world and in particular

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the United States and the West, has gotten more and

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>more secular and less and less religious, there's this there's

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>a debate that's developed, like, is humanism up to the

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 2>task of providing meaning in people's lives in the absence

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 2>of religion, And that definitely remains to be seen, but

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 2>it seems to be leaning a little more like No, Actually,

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>things kind of fall apart when you don't have a

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of people who believe that their lives have meaning

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>because they believe in religion. That seems to be the

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 2>way things are leaning right now. That's not the endpoint

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 2>necessarily though.

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>No, for sure.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I think I'm like you, like, a

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of this stuff seems very appealing to me, a

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of the thoughts. But you know, when I was

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 3>reading that one thing, I was like, man, this sounds

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>a little scientology like here and there.

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure, sure, and then let's not like LifeStance.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it just feels like the kind of word where

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 3>you go to a meeting, like a humanist congregational meeting,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 3>and they're like, and now Josh would like to rise

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 3>and share his life stance, and then everyone like clucks

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.239
<v Speaker 3>and goes LifeStance, LifeStance or something, right, and that's when

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 3>they and I like back out of the room very slowly.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 2>You know what LifeStance says to me, It says I

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know what I mean. That's what that word screams.

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 2>If you use a word to describe what you're talking

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 2>about and no one else knows what that word is.

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 2>As a matter of fact, it's much more widely understood.

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Is the name of an insurance company than then? Yeah,

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 2>then you you kevin't figured out exactly what you're trying

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 2>to say. That's my take on it. And what the

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>reason they're using life stance is because they can't use

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the word religion. They're using that in place of the

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 2>word religion. So a lot of people kind of look

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>at humanism like, man, these guys really tie themselves up

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 2>into knots to get around this religious thing. They're really

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 2>preoccupied with religion, despite saying you don't need religion to

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>live a good life. If you don't care about religion,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 2>stop talking about religion so much. Stop focusing on religion

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>so much. That's a big criticism of humanism that it's

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>just it's like those you know, those hilarious parodies of

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>like Southern preach or whatever, and it's taking aim at

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>hypocrisy and stuff. If you really feel that way about

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 2>the church or religion or God or whatever, just go

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 2>your own way, do your own thing. Stop paying attention

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>to it, stop giving it your oxygen. If you really

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>feel that way about it, and if you don't, if

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 2>you still are focused on it like that, there's something

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 2>there's some disconnect between what you claim to believe in

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>what you're actually doing.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Brother Josh, I want to thank you for sharing your

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 3>afflack flat nice.

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>That was great, Chuck, that was great. I like that

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that screed.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we should take a break and talk about what

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>happened in nineteen forty one right after this.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody, we're back.

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about what happened in nineteen forty one,

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 3>not the movie nineteen forty one from Steven Spielberg.

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Good one.

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking not really, I'm talking about did you like it?

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey man, anything has got Bellushi in it? I like,

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 2>all right, Yeah, I don't see what was wrong with it.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 3>It was a notorious bomb. But that's not to say

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 3>you can't like it.

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 2>No, I do like it. I just have never heard

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 2>that other people didn't like it.

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, yeah, it's pretty well regarded as a big plot.

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 3>But I appreciate you sharing your affle, Like once again.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I had that's my life stance on in nineteen forty one.

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a good movie.

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait to get sued, all right. So in

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 3>nineteen forty one, there were two Unitarian ministers that form

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 3>the AHA that we referenced at the very beginning of

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 3>the American Humanist Association. They, you know, they advocate for

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 3>humanist causes like separation of church and state of course

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 3>in schools that is, like, hey, let's legalize birth control,

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 3>things like that. They have about thirty four thousand plus

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 3>members with two hundred and thirty local chapters, and they're like,

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, their goal is I think not only to

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 3>spread the word, but I think like you are saying,

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 3>is to like try and unify into something that's with

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 3>a coherent message that people can actually say, like, Hey,

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 3>that's a legitimate thing that you can believe in and follow.

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like that appeals to me. So I'm going to

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 2>go find out more about what you guys are saying.

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 2>So there's a guy named Andrew Cops and he's very

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 2>frequently cited when you're talking about humanism. He's the executive

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of Chief Chief Executive of Humanists UK, and he basically says,

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 2>here's what humanists are about. One, we use the senses

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and reasoning when we're seeking out the truth to understand

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 2>what the world's all about. We are all about rationalism.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>We're all about scientific inquiry. That's what our stuff is

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 2>based on. It's not based on supernatural beliefs. Again, it's

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 2>not based on receive wisdom. It's about using rationalism in

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 2>our own senses to understand the universe for ourselves.

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Can I just make a quick comment. I don't want

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 3>to get too political, but using the sensus and reasoning

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:23.280
<v Speaker 3>like that is missing I think a lot today because

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 3>we're in a world now where they are very powerful

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 3>people in the world that are literally sort of gaslighting

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the world and saying, like what you're

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 3>seeing and hearing is not the truth, Like even though

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing it and hearing it. So to see someone

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 3>stand up and say, hey, one of our big tenets

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 3>is going to be the use like to see stuff

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 3>and hear stuff, and like that's what it is.

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I find your reasoning sensible.

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, aflack I flic what else?

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Viewing humans as the product of natural biological processes and

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 3>seeing death is the end of individual consciousness. So you're

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 3>not going to an afterlife. You're not gonna go hang

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 3>out with Elvis and Tom Petty. Once you're gone, you're

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 3>a warm dirt.

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's nothing after that. It's a real bummer part

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 2>of it, for sure.

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 3>But I've always, well I've always in my adult life

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>believe that, and I don't think it's a bummer. That's

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 3>just yeah, I don't think it's a bummer.

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 2>You know. I believe that for years and years and years,

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 2>and I've just recently kind of started to I don't

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.240
<v Speaker 2>want to say go back, but just kind of expand

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 2>the possibilities. Yeah, that's good, more than I used to

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 2>because I was exactly what you're talking about, like that's it,

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Like you're just it's lights out. You don't even know

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 2>it's lights out because you don't exist anymore. Yeah, just

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 2>like you didn't exist before you were born. This is

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 2>exactly the same thing. It's just tacked onto the end

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of your life, not the beginning of your life.

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I like that you're exploring that.

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that's I think I'm not opposed to anyone

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 3>in their beliefs, So I think it's great, Especially when

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 3>you get older and you're in the like forties and

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 3>fifties and you start kind of radically.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Exploring new ideas. I think that's very valuable.

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 2>It's funny. I have been doing that a lot lately.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the reasons why I wanted to do

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 2>this episode in Humanism. I've been reading a lot of

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 2>different philosophy and just yeah, yeah, exploring ideas that I

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 2>hadn't before. And I didn't realize why. Apparently it's because

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm about to be fifty.

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, probably, so I've been hurry.

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I got I have to find meaning in life before

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I die.

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been watching a lot of Kids in the Hall reruns.

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Nice. You can do a lot worse than that.

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 3>And reading rock bios. But that's fine, everyone has their

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 3>own thing.

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 2>What else, Chuck, How about if you want to live

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a good life, Yeah, what are you going to do?

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 3>You have to develop yourself personally, like keep striving, sure

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 3>to be better and do better, try to connect with others,

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 3>pursue things that are truly meaningful. But you don't necessarily

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 3>have to believe in the meaning of life to do

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff.

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not what you're seeking.

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And from my recent exploration, that is essentially the

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 2>basis of a philosophy called existentialism, which actually, yeah, is

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.919
<v Speaker 2>born out of nihilism, and it's basically saying, yes, there's

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 2>no God, there's no meaning to life, we're all a fluke.

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't mean you can't live a great fulfilling life,

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 2>right that has meaning that is meaningful to you. So

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 2>go figure out what your life is, what you want

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 2>it to be, and make it meaningful. And I think

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 2>that's if you do believe that there's no such thing

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:32.919
<v Speaker 2>as God, That to me is essentially the best mentality

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.959
<v Speaker 2>you can take on that if there's no afterlife before

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 2>all a fluke, then it's up to you pal to

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 2>go make meaning for your own life.

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like live with intention, I think is another good

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.760
<v Speaker 3>way to say that, to like not just be someone

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 3>who things happen to.

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or live without Netflix. That's another way to put it.

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 3>To What's another one view moral behaviors, like you know,

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 3>consider other people's needs, Like humanism is not a self

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 3>inward looking thing, like you're looking inward, but you're acting outward.

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>If that makes sense, Oh, it does.

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 2>It makes perfect sense. It's not a self centered or.

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Self Yeah, self center I was looking for.

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're not self involved. You care about other people.

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, by doing that, you're you're you're developing yourself.

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 2>That's part of self personal development. Right. You're also not

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 2>relying on any doctrine to teach you ethics, although you

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 2>can go find ethics from like say the great Greek

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>philosophers or Buddha or you know, Taoism or Confucianism, like

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 2>you can go find these from wherever you want. You

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 2>can even read the Bible or something and sure, you know,

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 2>like Thomas Jefferson edited the Bible, he took all the

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 2>miracles out and just basically made it a really great

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 2>moral handbook. You could do the same thing. Right and

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 2>still gain these idea.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 2>The point is you're not supposed to take anything wholesale,

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 2>including ostensibly humanism. Like you should not just go, okay,

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to be humanists, tell me how to be,

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 2>because they're going to say no, you got to go

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 2>figure that out.

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you should probably start with the New Testament too

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 3>and just leave it at that.

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that Old Testament is grim.

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's pretty grim.

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you're a humanist, you're you're definitely like

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 3>opposed to war, you value universal rights of all humans,

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 3>in equality. It's not tied to a political system necessarily.

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I know it has its roots in sort

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 3>of liberal progressive think, but you don't have to be like, oh,

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm a registered Democrat and a humanist. Like you can

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 3>be anybody. I'd argue, maybe not. You could vote for anybody,

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 3>But as far as political affiliation, it's not tied to

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 3>anyone thing.

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 2>No, nor should it be.

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 3>We should probably name some famous humanists through the years.

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 3>You could start and end with Albert Einstein, but we're

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 3>just going to start there. He supported the Capital the

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 3>E Capital C Ethical culture movement, and was a founding

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 3>member of the First Humanist Society of New York, and

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen fifty published Essays in Humanism. And he was

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 3>he was walking the walk.

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, he definitely was. He was big time into world

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 2>peace and civil rights. And he was a pantheist apparently

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 2>as well. So yeah, he was definitely the real deal

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 2>as far as humanists are concerned. So too was Isaac

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 2>Asimov and Kurt Vonnegut. Apparently they were both very much active. Yeah,

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 2>in the American Humanist Association.

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 1>No surprise.

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Vonnegut had a great quote, if you don't mind

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 2>me taking.

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It, Yeah, do your best Vonnagut. I want to hear this.

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 2>He said that. By the way, Kurt Vonneguet and I

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 2>are basically voice doubles. Okay, does he have a I've

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 2>never heard him talk, man. Does he have an unusual.

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Or significant Well, I don't know.

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Weirdly, the only time I think I've ever heard Kurt

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 3>Bontaguet talk was if I'm not mistaken, He had a

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 3>cameo and Broughtney Dangerfields back to school. Yeah, because he

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 3>hired he paid him to tutor him in college.

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, how about this. You take this quote, but do

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 2>it as Dangerfield?

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, no, no, it said.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.760
<v Speaker 2>He said, being a humanist means trying to behave decently

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 2>without expectation of rewards or punishment after you're dead. Yeah,

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 2>that's nice, it's great, great description of it.

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 3>What else, if you're a Star Trek fan, you even

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 3>if you're not, you're probably not surprised that Jeane Roddenberry

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 3>was a very big in the humanist movement. He I

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 3>means Star Trek is a is a great example of

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 3>just a group of people that are doing humanist things

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 3>that that's kind of the culture of that show.

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>A they're trying to solve.

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Problems peacefully, high tech, but of course it's they're always

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 3>trying to do the right thing.

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>On Star Trek.

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, yeah, there are a bunch of do gooders. Yeah,

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 2>they don't want to use their phasers. It's why they

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 2>always set them to stunt. So there are many critiques

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 2>to humanism. They get it from all sides, other atheists,

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 2>other philosophers, Christians obviously. Christian thinkers basically are like, dude,

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 2>you can't have meaning in your life without God. Theology

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 2>teaches us that God is what gives your life meaning,

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you chump, And that's essentially the most basic criticism of humanism.

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 2>They basically say you can't be ethical or moral or

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 2>have meaning or value in your life without believing that

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 2>there is such a thing as God.

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, you mentioned atheists, there are also atheists that say,

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 3>you know what, a little too much credulity going on

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 3>about the value of humanity and like that we can

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 3>all just improve ourselves. And I mean, I think there's

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 3>some very prominent philosophers from the twentieth century that are

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 3>very much anti humanist.

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they call themselves anti humanists. Apparently the structuralists and

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>post structuralist movements of philosophy that came out of France

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>in the sixties and seventies, I think maybe even into

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the eighties, they were very much anti humanists, and they

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 2>were like, the individuals don't matter other than you know,

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 2>we don't go make our own meaning everything we are

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 2>is basically created by institutions and structures that were born

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 2>into and there's basically no way out, So stop being

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 2>silly and naive.

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's interesting to me, not to do an episode

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 3>on necessarily, but I'd like to poke around the structuralism

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more.

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd never heard of that.

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I have been doing that, and it is very interesting. Essentially,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 2>what they're saying is like, you are so shaped by

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 2>institutions that these cool thoughts that you think you have,

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the interactions you have with other people, all of them

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:08.919
<v Speaker 2>are shaped by the institutions we're born into. Argue with that, right,

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 2>but so much so, Chuck, that those cool thoughts, those

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>amazing things that you're saying, those interactions with people, all

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>they're doing is reinforcing those institutions because they're all within

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 2>that structure. So you're just teaching other people how to

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 2>be in that structure too by even rebelling against it

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>as a form of reinforcing the structure.

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Wow, it's very grim.

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's actually a very grim approach.

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's interesting.

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 2>One other thing too that they get held up for

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 2>a lot is that they that they believe that man

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 2>is inherently moral, and that a lot of philosophers are like,

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 2>how do you prove that? What are you talking about?

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Where'd you get that from? That's not a universal given,

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Like philosophies never turned that up. And did you see

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 2>that thing that I found from Francisco Jay Eliah? He

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 2>basically said, so, basically, this guy kind of proves that

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 2>humans are actually biologically moral, resulting from a consequence of

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 2>natural selection. Francisco j. Eliah says that one, we have

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 2>the ability to anticipate consequences of our own actions. Two

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 2>we have the ability to make value judgments, and three

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.439
<v Speaker 2>we have the ability to choose between alternative courses of action.

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 2>And so because of our abilities, our natural abilities to

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 2>do that, we are naturally moral creatures. Which is the

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 2>only support I've seen for that idea that people are

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.920
<v Speaker 2>inherently moral. I've only ever seen attack. This guy did

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 2>a pretty good job of making a case that supports that.

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, isn't the idea that humans are inherently

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 3>evil much more common?

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Like, wasn't that what Hobbes was all about?

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 2>That's what Hobbes was about Satanists, Yeah, basically, or I

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>think they're like, it's not good or evil, and I

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:07.359
<v Speaker 2>think Satanists are really they don't like humanists very much either. Yeah,

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a Yeah, there's a lot of it's definitely not

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 2>settled whether humans are inherently good or bad.

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So we haven't figured that one out.

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 2>I guess, not meaning toward the bad lately though.

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you.

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned environmentalists and animal rights activists earlier that sometimes

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 3>there's they believe there's just a little too much human

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 3>and humanism, But there are certainly a lot of people

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 3>and humanists that have kind of worked on the environment

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 3>and animals and the value of all that stuff into

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the cause for sure.

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Very very Jeremy bentha mask Yeah. Yeah, although if you

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 2>want to get down to it, I've seen an example

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 2>given where a genuine humanist if if somebody killing a

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 2>deer kept a human family alive, they would be like,

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 2>killed that deer. Dear interesting, that deer is secondary, It's

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 2>life is secondary to human life. Humanists might be like,

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 2>no way, man, go eat go eat a plant, go

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 2>eat some lichen.

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:09.760
<v Speaker 3>I've never been a hunter, but if the zombie apocalypse happened,

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 3>like I could, I could do it.

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 2>You could eat zombie. I think it's if they bite

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 2>you that you become a zombie. I've never seen any

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 2>problems with somebody eating them.

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's true, you definitely need a healthy spice rack though.

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like that rotted shark they eat in Iceland.

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh god, Yeah.

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 2>That's essentially like eating zombie. From what I understand, okay,

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 2>tastes like zombie. You got anything else?

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I uh, you were right. I didn't.

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think I was gonna be able to get

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 3>through this because it's very petty stuff for me. But

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 3>you said, settle down, jerk, you'll be fine.

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you did great. When when't like a philosophy class

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 2>one of your favorite classes in college too.

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and every time we do anything philosophy related, I

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 3>get all scared and it always works out.

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, he did great, man, you always do great.

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so do you?

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks well, check and I agree we both did great.

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Patting ourselves on the back. He let me pet you

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 2>on the back, dude, Oh thank you. That means, of

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 2>course it's time for listener mail.

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, this is going to be short and sweet.

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 3>I think I jokingly asked for a haiku as it

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 3>relates to mcguffins, because many years ago we put out

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 3>the call for haikus and got hundreds and hundreds of them,

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 3>to the point where I think we just quit reading them,

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 3>so and hopes people quit sending them, and time marched on,

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 3>and they did. But David centnasen a haiku about the

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 3>mcguffin amt coukay man, you ready. The mcguffin lives, critics argue,

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 3>and gnash teeth. The ending still comes wow, and David

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:55.959
<v Speaker 3>goes on to say, this great show, guys, y'all create

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 3>an entire universe of stuff, insider stories and jokes. I

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 3>hate it when I can't recall one of the callback

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 3>tangents and you just want to say, lastly.

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The Jackhammer episode. Wasn't that terrible? Guys? It was needed

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world.

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Can you read the high cup again? It's still sinking

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 2>in like the genius of what David did.

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's pretty good. The mcguffin lives, critics argue, and

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:22.839
<v Speaker 3>nash teeth. The ending still comes, man, pretty good.

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 2>That's a T shirt if I've ever heard one. Aaron Cooper, that's.

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:26.959
<v Speaker 1>A high quality coup.

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Buddy.

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.759
<v Speaker 2>If you want to be like David and well, I'll

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 2>not send us a high coup, but just write in

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 2>about something we would be happy to hear from you.

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:40.280
<v Speaker 2>You can send it off to Stuff Podcasts. I Heart

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Radio Huh.

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:49:53.080 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows,