WEBVTT - Surveillance: Russia & China with Bremmer

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownowitz Jaily. We bring you

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg Terminent. This is a joy,

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>not that it t And Bremer, president founder of You

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Raise Your Group. I'm going to read you a single

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sentence from December of this year. If Putin doesn't get

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>concessions from the US lead West, he is likely to

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>act one of the top risks for Dr Bremer. And

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>as you Raise your Group and he joins us here

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Ian, I want to frame forward with you.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to get without the breaking news that you've

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>been on all weekend, the end of the free market.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>One of your books talks about that adjustment from free

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>market to some form of new capitalism. What does President

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Putin or whoever's after Putin, What does their free market,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>what does their business structure, what does their command economy

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>look like in two or three years? Well, it's not

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>our target. I mean we talk about Putin as if

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a global pariah. UM. That's of course not true,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's a G zero world. You can't make someone

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a global paria. But he is a pria in terms

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of the advanced industrial economies of the world, the G

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>seven as it were. So what does that mean? Well,

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>when you have the Chinese government saying that the relationship

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with Russia is like a rock UH, that means that

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see a far more integration of Russia

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>UH into the Chinese economic network, both in terms of

0:01:55.440 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the technology that supports the military industrial complex for Russia,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the financial transactions that allow them to function as

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>UM an advanced economy UM, and of course also the

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>energy flows and infrastructure that will need to be built,

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>not just in terms of oil production and next fort

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>also eventually for gas. They'll be moving towards China to

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Russia will also be working with a lot of other

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>developing countries around the world, the Gulf States, India, Brazil,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>China is going to be absolutely critical for the Russian

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>How do we adapt? How do we move from two

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight in Bucharest, NATO, where Gates and Rice

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>begged the United States to not sell democracy to the

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Far East of of of Europe. How do we adapt

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to a new regime? Were just maybe possibly we can't

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>sell democracy twenty four seven. Yeah, the fact that the

0:02:54.440 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>American model of democracy is seen by China as pasted

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 1>seld and they're going to be the largest economy in

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the world, means that we're in a hybrid system. It's competitive.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The big question I have here is not about the

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>tilt of Russia, because Russia, of course, we've been steadily

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>losing for decades now. It's rather whether or not new technologies,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>which are top down the data and surveillance economy, actually

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>facilitates authoritarian consolidation and also undermined civil society in ways

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that can't be redressed. Back in two thousand and eight,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>technology was something we thought of as supporting democracy and

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>undermining authoritarian states. Think about how it was the Soviet

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Union collapse. Think about the Arab Spring and the Colored revolutions. Well,

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>those are all quaint and in the back view mirror

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. Instead, technology is what allows the Chinese to

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>repress a million leaguers and it doesn't lead to any

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>demonstrations on the ground. Why because they can monitor and

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>police the behavior of every single citizen. If the Russians

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>can do that. If other smaller economies can do that,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a big challenge to American democracy. And a lot

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of people right now are hoping for the bandwidth to

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>worry about selling democracy. Right now, people are worried about

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>selling wheat. They are worried about selling nickel and aluminum

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>and corn and soybean oil. And what we are seeing

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>right now is China coming out over the weekend and

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that domesticizing food production is an issue of national security.

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>We have heard from the US supply chain security is

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a national security issue. How much are we seeing a

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>pivot point moving to the mass deglobalization of our economy. Well,

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm glad you brought up grain in particular,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>when you have um, the largest grain producer in the world,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>invading the fifth largest grain producer in the world, one

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>would think you're going to have big food problems. And

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly coming off the pandemic where extreme poverty after decreasing

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for decades is going up in the next twelve months,

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be absolutely critical and you're gonna

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>see a spike in starvation around the world. Yes, in Afghanistan,

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but also across sub Saharan Africa, and when you have

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>pigs in Europe and the United States UH fighting for

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>grain supply UH, that will allow wealthy people in the

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>world to eat the meat that they want, competing with

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>people in poor and the poorest countries in the world

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that can't buy that grain for themselves. You can see

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.239
<v Speaker 1>that the globalization of the world that had been leading

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to an increased global middle class is now unwinding, especially

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>on the back of this crisis, which, frankly, I mean

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the the U the Russia Ukraine invasion is going to

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be worse for global poverty in my view. Um, then

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>when all is said and done, than the pandemic has

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>been and that's a pretty traumatic statement. How will this

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>conflict rearrange the economic outlook as we know it? Um,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to increase inequality because you know, when you

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have massive supply chain challenges and when you have energy

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>price spikes, it doesn't affect nearly as much the wealthy

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world, who have the ability to move their assets,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>they have the ability to change their lives. Who gets

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>really stuffed. The advanced economies can do more even to

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>help support their poor and middle income economies, But the

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets have vastly more debt on their books after

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the last two years of crisis and now don't have

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>any more flexibility to help their populations. But this is

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a massive shock um to their imports coming down the pike. Okay,

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>not for the major commodity producers who benefit for higher prices.

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But you're up, You're on the other side that trade.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be hurt dramatically coming out of this. And

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bremer, let's steal something from Freed Cicaria here, and

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about not the post American world, but the

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>post putent world. I read a lot this weekend on

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Mr Putin's inner circle, his defense minister who never served

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>as a professional army guy, etcetera. What does the post world? What?

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>What does the post putent world look like for Russia?

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But we'd have no idea if it's gonna be in

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty years or in twenty days. Uh. It's important to

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>recognize that the likelihood of removing Putin from power is

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>extremely low until the moment that it happens, and so

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not very useful to speculate on when it could happen.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's important to understand that the pressure is there, um.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And of course that leads to more erratic behavior domestically

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for Putin himself, who in the last week has been

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>taking all sorts of measures to create a North Korea

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>style police state. That just doesn't work well for a

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>country of relatively educated one fifty million digitally literate Russians. Um.

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's true that the average Russian believes

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what the Russian state media is putting out um, but

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of urban, younger Russians do not. And the

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand Russians that have already been arrested um for

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a non violent protests against the war. As the economy

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>starts to literally implode in the coming days and you

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>don't find goods on shelves and you have to rash

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and people don't get their wages, some of those are

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna turn violent, and the Russians are gonna repress it.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So we have to at least consider that. You know,

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the only ways this potentially gets resolved in

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the near term is if you have a dramatic discontinuity

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in Russia itself. And uh, that's that's a very hard

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thing to plan for in a country with five thousand

0:08:52.040 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons and thank you. Let's look at the equity

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>markets now. A briefing with Lori Calvacina, head of US

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>equity strategy at RBC Capital Markets. Laura, I want to

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>rip up the script here. You have the advantage of

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>one h Croft. She is absolutely exquisite on commodities. How

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are you folding the analysis of Halima Croft into your

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>equity work? All right, well, thanks for having me as

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>always in look, I am very fortunate to be working

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with Helima these days. And you know that, you know

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the drill tom in December, they start trotting out all

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the strategies to do panels and I was fortunate to

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>be on a number of these with Halima, and she

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>had been warning us that there was going to be

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>a problem with Russia and Ukraine to start the year.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Frankly, I think a lot of market participants

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>were not listening to her. And it's not that we

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>necessarily grasped how bad this was going to be in

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment that we did have an inkling that this

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was coming. So as I've been able to operate through

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>this environment, I feel fortunate that you know, I have

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily been as reactive to the news as some

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>other market. How you change I mean we got we

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>just short on Tom, Lauria, how many have you change

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>your allocation given the outfrontedness you've got with Helma Croft. Well, look,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we stuck with our energy overweight, even though we were

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>getting a little bit nervous frankly on how bullish everybody

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>had become. So we did stick with that. That's been fortunate.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It's been one of the best performing sectors to start

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the year. Um. We've also been talking about how we

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>expected the market to sort of pivot back towards growth

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>stocks later this year, and one of the reasons for

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that is we thought economic growth expectations, we're going to

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>start focusing on a return to trent. We thought that

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>would happen in I think this crisis raises the risk

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that we bring that economic projection, that raining and of

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>economic expectations in a little bit earlier than anticipated. Secular

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>growth stocks tend to do well when the economy is cool,

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>so that has helped us sort of stay very steady

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in some of those sector allocations we had to start

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the year. Lauria, is this a bible dip? I don't

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>know if you necessarily want to buy it today. And

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the framework we've used is that we view this as

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>a growth stare, something that doesn't necessarily push us into

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>a recession that makes everyone feel like we're gonna hit one.

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at growth scare pricing, it can

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>take the S and P five hundred down to round thirty.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>In the short term, growth scarce tend to see markets

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>fall fourteen pie to trump. We simply haven't done that yet,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>despite how terrible the sentiment has done. Laura, you said

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that it can make everyone feel like we're going to

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>into a recession even though we're not, and that's been

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of the tipping point of a lot of strategists

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>whether this is or isn't a recessionary event. What are

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you looking at it for? The resilience that could potentially

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>tip over should the commodity surge continue. So look, I think,

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the silver lining of coming out of

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this hand down and I use that in quotes with

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit of irony, but we've all got this arsenal

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of high frequency economic barometers that we've been living and

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>breathing for the last couple of years because of COVID,

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and I'm peeping a very close eye on those. Right now.

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>We're still seeing improving trends and open table dining, flyne

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>return to work is still in the process of recovering

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and has a way to go, but none of these

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>are shining any signs of slowing down right now, Lisa.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have to keep an eye on

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the resiliency of the consumer in here and what or

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>not that holds up. Laurie, this question might sound counterintuitive

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of first approach. I just wonder how nuance this might be.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Is there a point where crude goes so high that

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>energy equity stopped going high with it. I think it's

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a point at which the market starts to sense

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>out demand destruction. And I don't think there are any

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>easy answers to that question in terms of where that

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>exact level is. Frankly, we would have thought we would

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have already seen it by now. Um. I think that

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to sort of counterbalance the oil price impact

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>with the psychological impact of reopening, and many consumers very

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>eager to get back to their lives. We're seeing that resilience,

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.599
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing that eagerness to get back to normal dominating

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the data right now. There will eventually probably be

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a point at which that won't hold up. But all

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you today John is we haven't hit

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it yet. Laurie, Thank you, Laurie Canvassin or MBC Capital

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Markets wonderful as always, John, what's so important here in

0:12:55.800 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this anticipated interview is it is eight thousand four miles

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>from Midland, Texas to re Odd and that is a

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>world a part of global oil economics, in the marginal

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>economics of getting the marginal barrel out of the ground

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to be marginally refined. John, we can speak with Paul

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Sanky of sank You Research. We'll catch up with Paul

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Sanky right now. Paul, let's start right here. Often these

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>conversations and sometimes it's our fault, sometimes it's the fault

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the people we speak to. We talk as if

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>there is this special tap down in Texas that you

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>can just turn, go down there and just turn and

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, crude output is up. Talk to

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>us about how difficult that effort is if we even

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>tried to well, I mean it's even basic labor. But

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, then if you get into engineers and and

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 1>you're just the ability to add capacity as being wildly

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated here simply because there aren't the people. As Thomas referenced,

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Midland is kind of in the middle of the desert.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it is in the middle of the desert,

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and there's tremendous competition from Austin for both labor and

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>engineers is and so just in people terms alone, for

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>commentators to turn around and say, you know, the USCMP

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>industry should add, should add capacity and volume is completely misguided.

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I was in Midland in late December talking to the

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>service companies, talking to diamond Back, a major reamp there,

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and the fact is that things are drum tight prior

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to this crisis, and yes they could add on a

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>one year view, but there's nothing they can do this week.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>But they are damned if they pump. Environmentalists criticize them,

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and investors punished them, and they're seemingly blamed if they don't. Well,

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the relationship between the administration

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and they all patch in America at the moment? I

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>mean absolutely appallingly badly managed, because of course, as you know,

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they came in with almost no oil expertise on the

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>basis that they would change the energy system. I don't

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>know how you can change the energy system without oil expertise.

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And now you're in a situation where you're talking to Venezuela,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to Iran, and you're basically pretty much not

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>talking to Texas. So it doesn't make any sense to whatsoever.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>How much could they actually though, influence the output in

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Texas quickly, given the fact that there has been a

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>lack of investment, given the fact that a lot of

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this has been driven not by Washington but by a

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of the shareholders that have looked for fiscal discipline. Well,

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the point that John highlighted from my research yesterday was

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that if they try to aggressively increased capacity now they're

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>simply going to compete with each other. And Tom also

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>picked up on the point, you're just going to inflate

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>things more because all you're gonna do is take the

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>guys from the next door rig and put them on

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>your own rig. And the list goes on, because it's

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not just about people. It's about steel, it's about cement,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's as they would say, cement um. It's even about

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sand actually at a given level. So there's just all

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>sorts of tightness down there because we know that we

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>were in a commodity squeeze already before all that has happened,

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>which is why it's so dramatic. The answer is, you know,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>if you really started to reorganize towards more capacity, you

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>would begin to see an impact towards the end of

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this You so, Paul, what could this administration do it

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>would you like to see them do in order to

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>support more more domestic production as opposed to coin event

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>as well, as you point out, well, the grand scheme,

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>as you know, is nuclear with a new grid. But

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, can we do that? The utilities

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>don't really want it. You know, the utilities have a

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of vested interests and don't get the criticism they should.

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Nor does Amazon get the criticism it should for you know,

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the amounts of oil that's used to deliver a package

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to everyone in return half of them. You know, all

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff is not really examined in the grand

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things. But above all, what the industry wants

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is consistency. So one of the latest things that we're

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing is suddenly they're saying we'll reduce the federal federal

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>gasoline tax. Totally idiotic, just in terms of environmental friendliness

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and not encouraging efficiency. What they're saying is will take

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>off the stupid mandate for ethanol but you know, being

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>used again. Just as the industry is moving towards major

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>investment in renewable diesel, the administration says, actually, we might

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>have to change this because there's a cry. It's a

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>crisis management. And that's exactly what you know leads to

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>what I call the energy regression. We're in an energy regression.

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going backwards. Paul. Let me go to the third rail,

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's not the expensive summer camp that was a

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>third rail this weekend. Let me go to the third

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>rail of the Keystone pipeline. Is it a valid economic

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>project and it can it actually enhance United States energy independence? Yes?

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it could and absolutely more Canadian oil is

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>an obvious outlet here to to as a long term

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>solution because obviously we have such a tremendous ally right

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>there with the available oil who by the way of

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>doing a tremendous job of Scope one and two ementionance reductions.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So yes, that shouldn't have been delayed back in ten,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>which was one of the obomber administration first through a

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>wrench in the works. Actually, the Biden administration was just

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>bad messaging because by then the project was pretty much dead.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>In so far as the Biden administration canceled, it is

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the first, literally the first thing that they did. Um.

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.479
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you could really easily resuscitate with stuff if

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>you could get around the environmental opposition. Environmental opposition is local,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a problem of negotiating very specific issues.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>The latest one has been this Mountain Valley pipeline, which

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>would release more US gas from the Marcellist into the

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>general U. S economy and to export. And that's nineties six,

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>complete with six billion dollars sunk, and a federal geodge

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>judge blocked it for crossing the Appalachian Trail. You know,

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that just makes no sense environmentally. Pasanki gasoline

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>triple A unloaded from three six D two I believe

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>four oh seven in seven travel days. If you will

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in your head, where is the tip point on triple

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>A unladed where it really begins to affect our behavior

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for fifty four fifty nationwide? But then you add sixty

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>cents to well, that's the retail price. But then you

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have to add a dollar in New York and a

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar in California, you know, in the higher tax states.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to get to five fifty. And by

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, that's in the post. That's going to happen

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>because essentially the gasoline price is trailing the crew price,

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously quite quite severely. So what happens when we get

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to five fifty, Well, people change behavior quite radically because

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's a lot of discretion over how much you

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>drive your car, which car you drive, whether you drive

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like a crazy idiot, or you know, very conservatively, whether

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you pump up your tires. We saw all of this

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in O eight on, and you know, there's actually quite

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a significant ability to change behavior. What's interesting now is

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously that you have very low unemployment and therefore people

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>do need to drive. And so I think the elasticity

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>here is going to be pretty sticky, to say the least,

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think we'll get to really significant, significantly higher

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>gasoline prices are absolutely guaranteed. Well, that's the test, and

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is really interesting for you and I

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to try and talk through work out. It's an open

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>question in the treasury market when you would go higher

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>aggressively high. We talk about how self limiting a sell

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>off would be, because it's nice to bite the U. S.

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Economy and yours come back in. Does the same dynamic

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>exists in the commodity market for crude and I'm trying

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to work out what that might mean for say, the

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>likes of oxy are more than ninet here today. At

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>what point do energy prices go too high for even

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>energy equities to continue running with it? Yeah, I mean

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you get into the point of demanded structure. Obviously, oxously

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>was an outlier move because we now know that Warren

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Buffett was building a significant stake and seems to want

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to do it entirely in a week so. But generally speaking,

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>if the market begins to believe the strip, which is

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>now over a hundred all the way down as far

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>as the I can see, then these things move higher.

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's really the back end of the price curve

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that matters, which is aggressively higher. I think because there's

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a total question mark of what Russia will look like

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in the future. I think there's two things here. Number

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>one is that very good news this morning Russia has

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>softened its stance, and I think we see the markets

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>coming back it given that Russia is softening its stance

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe at the point of admitting defeat here quite possibly.

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the good news. The bad news is we

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>may actually see Russia now permanently out of the market um,

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, for multiple years, long enough to make a

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>difference to the strip, at which point the future strip

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>will be at a hundred. And these things are hugely

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>undervalued against that um once you get to on a

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>spot basis. Obviously, we worry about demand destruction. And really

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the big question here, and you guys debate it constantly,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is what will the recession look like? You know, it's

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>not a question whether we get a recession, it's like

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>what kind of recession are we going to get? Paul

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>awesome as always going to catch up with this, Paul

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>sand Kick of Sanky Research. It is our great pleasure

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>now to introduce a former governor of the Bank of Israel,

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>but farm more than that, the Rockefeller Professor at the

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>University of Chicago just a few years ago, Jacob Frankel.

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>It has been far too long since we've seen you

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>working with Mr Diamond at JP Morgan. He comes to

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>us today from his tell of you, Professor Frankel let

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>me cut to the chase. Joe Stigletts talked about globalization

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's discontents. We have globalization and Mr Putin's discontent

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>or Mr Putin's grievances. What will come after? Well, remember,

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>since the collapse of the Soviet Union in the l nineties,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the entiled world was excited to embrace Russia, to embrace China,

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to bring them into the Group of Nations. The seven

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>G seven has become g A, the G twenty w

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>t O, the World Trade organizations all brought them in

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and both China and Russia have benefited immensely from being

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>intotegrated into the world. This has been a great period

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>which unfortunately, during the past few years, with the emotions

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Trade WARLD and now with the invasion of

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine, has inverted it all back. Russia will end

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>up being much poorer. They are suffering on a day

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in and day out. They are isolated, They are secluded financially, economically, politically,

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and the question now is how will the world look

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like thereafter? I think that, unfortunately, to my mind, the

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>globalization is will be part of the legacy of the past,

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and we will now move to a new world order

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in which democracies of the type of the US and

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Europe will be on one side, and and other countries,

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 1>autocratic countries like China and Russia will be on the

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>other hand. But take up how how do we get

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to that place? Considering the intertwining of the supply chains

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen that we still haven't moved away from

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>even with the pandemic. A lot of companies have kept

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>their factory footprints in China. Indeed, they have kept them

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in China because it was economically wanted, and I believe

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>that they will continue working with China. China sees what

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>happens with Russia. So while it does not take clear

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>sights and does not join the world in condemning what

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>is happening in in Russia, by the same token, it

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>takes the so called in their language, the middle ground.

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>So Russia China will continue to be a partner, but

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it will be of a different nature, not of camaraderie,

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.959
<v Speaker 1>but of self interest. Jack Franco, as a former governor

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Bank of Israel, a bit of a delicate question,

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but I will ask it of you, what is the

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>place of Israel to negotiate some form of better place

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>in this war in Ukraine. Well, I believe that the

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>place of Israel is to be wherever it is found

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to be useful. And in this regard, when both the

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>US and Russia and the Ukraine have approached the Prime

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Minister of Israel in a request to see if he

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>can bring some common sense, even though the chances are

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not very high, Like most cases of such negotiations, Mr

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Bennett decided to jump to the water and to see

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if he can bring a little bit of a cohession.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But I can tell you this is not an issue.

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a big, big issue. So even a progress of

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>one inch is a progress, Jacob. Right now we're getting

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a sense that the US is working and striking some

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of Iranian deal in order a nuclear deal, in

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>order to unleash some of the oil supplies there. I

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know this is a delicate issue for Israel. Are there

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is there more willingness in the nation to allow that

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>kinde of type of deal and actually support it given

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>where we are in the commodity space, Well, we are

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>so much now in the midst of everything. And to

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>get into the kitchen when there are important chefs in

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it is never a wise move to take. But what

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I can say is that given the situation that the

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>US is planning and effectively so, to ban imports of oil,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it will be extremely important to find other sources. And

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>other sources can come from Saudi Arabia, can come from

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>other places that have it, and so this is I

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>will put it in this context. What is important, however,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is not to forget that the A has been the

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>position of Israel on along that the Iranian deal. The

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>key world is not a deal, but the key world

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is sick, security and safety to all concerned, and if

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it compromises it, then it's not a good deal, and

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>if it does not compromise it, then it is a

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>good Jacob Frankel, thank you so much for joining us

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>some tele Aviv today, of course, former international chairman at JP,

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Chase, the former governor of the Bank of Israel.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and international relations and subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:27:52.320 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg w