WEBVTT - Jan van Eck on Successful Thematic Investing

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>His name is Jan van Eck and he has really

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating background in history. His father built Vanek Associates

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>in n He never expected to go into the family business,

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of wandered about aimlessly. In the podcast portion we

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about the overlap between our backgrounds. It's kind of

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>amusing to me. But eventually comes into the business, which

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 1>was about a billion dollars in a u M and

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>here it is, uh some twenty eight years later and

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they're up to fifty six billion dollars. He's the CEO

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and basically runs the shop with a team. It is

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>an ensemble practice. They were very early into the world

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of e t f s and they do a lot

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of really interesting thematic funds. If you are all interested

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in international investments, or thematic investments or E s G investments,

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to find this conversation to be quite fascinating. So,

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, my sit down with my friend

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Jan van ef This is Masters in Business with Barry

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Jan

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>van Eck. He is the CEO and director of Van

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Eck Associates, where he has worked since. Van Eck manages

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>about fifty six billion dollars in assets, eight percent of

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>which is in E t F S, for which the

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>firm has won numerous awards. Jan van Eck, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Garry. So you and I know

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>each other um from a few different overlapping entities. Probably

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>inside E t F S is the one that the

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>entire sans Dashtan crew through Jim Wyant right through et

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>F folks. Let's talk a little bit about your background.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You work for a think tank, a newspaper, You go

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to law school, you get a degree from Stanford. What

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>were you doing wandering the fields for so long? Didn't

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you just think it was inevitable you're gonna end up

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in the business that coincidentally has your last name on it.

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh In my own mind, Barry Uh, No, I really

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>had no idea what I wanted to do. I graduated

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with a degree in economics and from what was your

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>undergraduate Williams College? Right? And so you come out with

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>an econ of degree And doesn't that suggest business and

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>or finance or not does. But I did the minimum

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to get my degree an ECON, and I really enjoyed

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>liberal arts. I took as many classes and I did

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>something that, um, I think a lot of people should

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>do and it's not done enough, which is audit classes.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's so much great stuff at at a

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>college like Williams. So you know art, history, history, photography, philosophy,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of things. You know, now people have a tendency

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>to do that later in life. You did that when

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you were nineteen and twenty. That's free. You know, you're

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>sitting for a course for an hour or two during college,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know you've already paid the tuition. So the

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>professors love to have more students there at least, you know,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in a smaller school. And today you can order classes

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>from Yale or m I T or n y U

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>or any one of a hundred schools online for free.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you still doing that? Uh? Well, I love to

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts and and get information. Yeah. Maybe, all right,

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, we'll see if they get together. Answer your question, right, Um,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what I wanted to do when I graduated,

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and you know that this great podcast I haven't read

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the book on the book range right, and and just

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>experiment as much as you can when you're young. So

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I divide an internship at the Washington Post metrodesk. While

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I was in law school, I worked for a prosecutor

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>one summer the UH in the Eastern District of New York.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I worked for a corporate law firm during M and

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>A deals, interned in Germany one summer at a bank.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just tried as many different things. But the

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the thing that triggered my love of business was actually

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>working in Silicon Valley and would you work for Silicon Valley?

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually after Brookings, Um, that was the thing Tank

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I realized I did not I want to get too

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>PhD in economics. Academia was not freean and so I

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>put my stuff in a car and drove across country

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and volunteered on the political campaign. Uh, we don't need

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to go into it. Um. It was a Senate campaign,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was a losing Senate campaign. So but I

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot um and most importantly, I met some

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley who I just loved the attitude

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of I try something, it doesn't work. I tried something

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>else that went public. I'm doing all these different things.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Just that that creativity I didn't perceive. Even though I

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>grew up in New York City area, you looking at

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the banks and going up the wrong of management, I

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>did not perceive that level of creativity. So that's when

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I fell in love with business UM. And then you know,

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I decided to go back to that region for law school.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It's lucky enough to get into Stanford UM. But that's

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's which is a fabulous, fabulous school. That's a little

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>more than luck. That's good undergraduate grades, good recommendations, and

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a good else at score. Yes, are you a good

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>standardized test taker? I must be, But we'll talk more

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>about that later. So even as a son of a financier,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>your dad opened and launched Vanac Associates in you never assumed, well,

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll end up in investing in the family business one day. Look,

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a psychological thing. I can't go through about. Tell

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you two things. The door was always open so my

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>father and my father always said, do what you want

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to do, because your happiness is more important than you

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know whether this business UM is there or not. So

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>how those things add up, I'll let for you know,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>third parties to decide. But you know, my my father

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was very no pressure to come into the business. So

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions that I like to ask people

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>who come from a family background in finance is what

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>are some of your earliest memories about money and investing.

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember the first stock you ever bought? Or

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>based on what you're saying now, you're not that guy

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>who was running Eliminate stand to buy UM shares in

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>ge when you were nine. You know, it's kind of interesting.

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I was never a portfolio manager, and I wasn't the

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>guy to buy shares. But you know, when I look

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>back in high school UM, I would buy Coca Cola

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>from distributors and resell them by the bottle. I worked,

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't have to work, so it's just a pure

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>arbitrary service. Like said, there was something about wanting to

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>do stuff to make money that was that was definitely

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>early early on for me. Quite interesting. So Vanek was

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the first asset managers to offer US investors

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>access to international markets. How did that affect the company

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and how how much overseas and investment does Vanek currently

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>do today? We're an American firm, based in New York,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but we always have had a very international orientation. Not

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>only was the first fund that my father launched in

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>an international equity fund. The idea was to take advantage

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of the rebound in Germany and Japan after World War Two.

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>That was the investment thesis at least nineteen fifties. That

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to be Martiall plan and a whole European

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and Asian rebound right um and uh and cheaper valuations

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. We've heard that before or still again. Um so,

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so that was really the story, and so our perspective

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>has always been international. Also, you know he later flipped

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that fund into a gold fund, and resources investing is

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>very international as well, whether at the time South for CO, Australia, Canada,

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>You're always a majority of our perspective and assets were

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>not not in the US. Quite interesting, you guys have

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>some really fascinating investment funds. The one you launched a

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, I I the Van Eck Vector's Video

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Gaming and E Sports et F, which I know is

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>won a number of e t F awards Best Thematic

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>ETF Best What was the thinking behind an E sports ETF? Well, uh,

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what we try to do is look from

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a longer term perspective, we don't want to just chase fads. Right,

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of ETFs on micro themes, and give

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>us an example on micro themes, and I mean that

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, like lots of things. Healthcare industry, for example,

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>has been sliced and diced into cancer drugs. And this

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>so really narrow or or even like five G like

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's it's an interesting thesis. But what

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>happens when six G comes out? Then they'll change the

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>name of the funds. Of course, there's always a solution

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>once the ao M is in the door. But um, yeah,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So so I try to take out like a five

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>or ten year view. And one of the things that's

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>happening now so we've had the smartphone for ten years,

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is the virtualization of life. Virtualization meaning we exist in

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a a virtual world of software as opposed to in

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in meat space and social media. Right before you and

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>I met in real life, I was listening to your podcast.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I was you know, you and I have media. Although

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty uh pretty constrained, you're pretty low key on

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on the on the Twitter right, so so so entertainment

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>world just going through that revolution. First of all, as

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we get wealth are as a society, more people enjoy

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>sports entertainment, betting that that's a growth industry. But it's

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>also transforming from the traditional you know, professional football, basketball,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>hockey into online gaming and the creation of teams competing

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>against each other, and and that's just that could us

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow and their dimensions now right, it's not

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>just the playing of the game, there's the watching of

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the game, and and there's the playing of those things

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.719
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and people watching games and now audience participation

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Barry is likely to happen right where you're watching a game,

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and as a spectator you can vote on the teams

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>or advise them. I don't. I don't do that, so

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so let me ask there's a there's a longer term

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>future as so, so that blows my mind. My frame

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of references decades ago, when I was on a trading desk,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite things to do each Tuesday night

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was once everybody was done with their blodder and their

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>P and L, which you had a save to a

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>disk and then walk to the head trader's office. That's

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>how long ago it was. The quote server would become

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a Quake server and all the traders would jack in

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and we would have this giant multiplayer game of Quake,

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>which was so immersive. I would look up and uh, oh,

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm in trouble. It's past ten o'clock. I've been doing

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>this since for already, and I found it fascinating. I

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot imagine watching other people play games. This is going

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a giant, burgeoning industry. It is already, and

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the only thing that we don't know the

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>story that hasn't been written as a monetization of all

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that traffic and crowds, so we we know that people

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>are doing it. You know, way more people watch these

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>E Sports World Championships than right. I mean some of

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the kids kids, sorry, expression are making five five million

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>bucks for for winning one of these things all the

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the owners of professional sports teams own

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>e sports teams as well, so you know, it's a

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It's life is a racket, right, so the next next

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>trend and having an et F just allows the rest

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>of us normal people to participate that trend. The other

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really worth noting is Asia is a It's

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge cultural thing in Asia, right, not just in China,

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but in South Korea and Japan end and it's just

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just big. Culturally, a lot of stuff is being

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>their life is being lived online. That's amazing. Let's talk

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about something that I'm fascinated with, the Van Eck Vector's

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>green bond e t F. The obvious question, what's a

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>green bond? Well, uh so, green bond is very simple.

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It is money raised by a company or a government

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that is supposed to go to improve operations that have

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a better effect on the environment. So bond by bond decision.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not a company decision. So the dirtiest commodity company

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world could issue a green bond if it

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>was improving it's processing to reduce the use of water

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for examp. So if you're a coal fired electrical plant

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and you want to raise money to transition to a

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>natural gas would you consider that a green bond. So

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not. Luckily, it's not us making this the determination.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a third party that certifies these green bonds, and

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it's and it's a big source of financing. It's it's

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it's grown. And these have become pretty popular, haven't they,

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Or they're starting to ramp up they're starting to. I mean,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>our funds not not huge. Um. I think what people

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes says, I want perfection in my alcohol it values

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>based or E s G injustment and perfection doesn't exist.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>There are tradeoffs in life. So the issue is okay,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I get it, the environments getting better, but I may

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>not like the issue, or it's a China government entity,

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>or it's a polluter that or has some other kind

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of practices I might not like. So I mean, in

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the US, we have several environmental funds, and I think

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to stack those values and so we say, okay,

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if you care about the environment more than the other factors,

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>then this is this is a good allocation for you,

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for for E s G investors. The old maxim don't

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Can

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>very much apply, can it? I think so? Right now

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to it's hard to figure out how to

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>optimize everything. So let's talk about something that's not so green.

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Two of your biggest funds are the gold miners and

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the junior miners. I've and that's what about twenty billion

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars all told. I noticed back in the day that

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>when there were signs of inflation or signs of deficits.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of fund managers wanted an instant hedge on inflation,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and so they would all pile into the junior miners.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>That behavior kind of changed when the g l D

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>E t F came out. Why does anyone need the

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>execution where managerial risk of a mine and its management

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>team and expenses when you could just buy g LD

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and and there's your hedge. Am I oversimplifying that, or

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>has has g l D as one of the biggest

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>dtfs out there change the dynamic around the gold miners

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and junior miners? Uh? Yes, But let me give you

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>some more historical context. Right, So we've had two big

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>commodity booms in my lifetime, in the nineteen seventies and

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>then in the odds, and they were very, very different

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for the operating companies because in the nineteen seventies commodities

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>gold went from thirty five dollars eight hundred dollars, oil

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>went up, all that stuff, but the cost of manufacturing

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>all those commodities did not change. So the companies were

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like options. I mean, all all the revenue would go

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>up and the costs really not go up. And so

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the stocks were fabulous. I mean, so when

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the price of gold fund that we had in that

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>decade would go up like a hundred hundred a year.

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about that gold fund later. But the

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>key is when the price of the commodities went up,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the company generated a whole lot more earnings. Right. But

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>now in this last cycle and the odds that was

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>not the case. The costs of manufacturing for a variety

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of different reasons, Um, the cost would go up as well,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing costs, So energy was growing, so that was

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>an input to mind that it was a bigger factor. Uh,

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to dig way more dirt per ounce of

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're pulling out, whether it's gold or copper or whatever.

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's just a lot of different factors. So the

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>last cycle there wasn't as much return leverage, which is

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>what you're asking about as in the nineties seventies. So

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>now where are we today. Gold is hitting all time

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>highs except in the US dollar. And I would agree

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with you, Uh, if you want a hedge against of

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the current monetary system and you're a little bit nervous

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about central bankers flying around in capes trying to fix

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>every problem including the coronavirus. Then you probably want you know,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>several different hedges. You want gold mining shares, you probably

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>want gold bullion, but you also want to look at

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and that Oh yeah, so that is the that's

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the alternative asset for the younger generation. I mean, coin

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:56.359
<v Speaker 1>base has between thirty and forty million US American American customers.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you deal with the fact that's something like

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a third of all bitcoins that have ever been mined

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>have either been lost in the terms of being misplaced

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>or literally hacked in stolen. How do you how does

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>an investor manage that? I or custody is a major

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>issue there. There are a couple of issues around bitcoin. Uh,

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Custody I think is being solved because you do have

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>major institutions like Fidelity, uh, the New York Stock Exchange

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>getting involved in offering bitcoin access having solved taken their

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>custody issue away from you as far as you know,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>some way at what they call whales or people owning

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bitcoin or it being lost or whatever.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And then the background of the mining community are point

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and we've got a lot of slides on our on

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>our website to show it is the diversification of ownership, trading,

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and mining is so much these days. I don't think

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a practical concern to say that this is one

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just manipulated market by one entity or something. I'm not

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>saying it's manipulated. I'm saying people seem to be You know,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>when one out of three dollars or even if it's

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>one out of four dollars in bitcoin seems to have vanished,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of raises a question for me. Maybe it's

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>still early days and a little bit of the wild West,

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and they'll eventually wrestle that into submission. But I think

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that's scared some people. All of these assets have their

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>pros and cons right, I just say buy a basket,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>because if there is a being scared to the system,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna go all we care about what goes up more.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. Bitcoin could go up way more than

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>gold chairs or bal bullion. So if you can solve

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the custody issue for yourself, then I then I think

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about your concern. Quite interesting, Let's talk

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the company that you joined in

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety two, and I want to focus on the era

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties seventies where your dad had an extremely

0:18:53.720 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>prescient call into gold in a very inflationary era. What

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more than just being a pundit who said gold's going up,

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he made a giant bet on that tell us about it.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So my father started the firm in fifty five. He

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>actually started it later in life, and so in the

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties, he had just gotten married. Um, he

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>was just over fifty years old and he was getting

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a degree at night at n y U in economics,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and one of his professors was an Austrian economist called

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Ludwig von Mises. And if you know anything, I mean

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>he's famous, right, but Austrians were never really accepted into

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>academia in the United States. Actually was not a full professor,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he was just sort of an adjunct. But anyway, my

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>father they are sort of hardcore monitorists and they really

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>focus on money, supply, money, you know, and it was basically, look,

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>guns and butter were happening in the nineteen sixties, my

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>supply was exploding and eventually that was going to break

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>into inflation, and the way to make money off of

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that was to invest in gold. Now, as you said,

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.479
<v Speaker 1>I really think it's amazing the risk he took at

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that point in time because gold had always been fixed

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>against the U. S. Dollar for the entirety of history

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>by the government. Yes, for almost two hundred years of

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>our history, gold had been fixed. He said, this paradigm

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.479
<v Speaker 1>is going to break. And that's really the philosophy of

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>our firm, which is you can't just look at the

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>four corners of the financial markets. You have to look

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at technology trends, political trends, and major economic trends. And

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and several years later, so he didn't have a lot

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of patients that that broke. By the way, for folks

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>who may not be familiar with Ludwig van Miss, he's

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous of the Austrians. A number

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of books and really well known. If you're more interested

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in more of that, just just go Google than Miss.

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm fascinated by the gold trade. Your father puts

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>how much money into gold at that? Well, he's so

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>he had an international equity fund and he went to

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Sharrel he said, I'm doing this, and he eight plus

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of the fund and buy gold mining shares. Now

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't buy gold, So that he was a little

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>bit to your point before he was forced into buying

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the share no g l D and if you want

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to buy actual gold, you're buying futures and its leverage

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in time future. Then that's right. You were talking seventies,

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>so there really different exactly, So three quarters of a

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars more or less into gold or this was

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this was way before that. Oh my god, the fund

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was teeny How big was teeny? Oh? I mean it

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was way less than a hundred millions. Okay. No one

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>wanted international investments in the nineteen sixties. Is kind of

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>like today, right, I mean, you don't want to even

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. So he piles into gold in this

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>small formerly international equity funds, it does nothing for two

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>or three years, to what our clients saying, What are

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>investors saying when you have us in gold and not

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>only is it doing nothing, but thanks to inflation, it's

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>actually worthless each year. Well, yeah, gold was less. I

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think the companies were, Okay, I haven't you know, looked

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>at the performance over that time period. But the industry

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was so small berry, right. The industry exploded in the

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>late seventies because of money market funds when the rate

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you could get on banks was regulated, So it was

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a cottage industry. And you know what ended up happening though,

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>because the performance was so tremendous that fund was the

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>best performing mutual fund in the industry in the seventies

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and that decade, that Decadecade. Yeah, Peter, Peter Lynch everything,

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Peter who Yeah, exactly cos he should have been gold

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and he you know, he went on MERV Griffin. I

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>mean it was action. It was such a big deal

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>back then. It was it was popular culture, right, I mean,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rates were going into the teens and uh, home

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>watching my dad, griff please going to embarrass us. And

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>so obviously that had to help the company. Is from

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the time gold explodes when we no longer on the

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gold standard is what seventy three, seventy four, early seventies,

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so almost twenty years later, you come into the company,

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Ino and the firm's up to a billion dollars in assets.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Well it got to two billion, yeah, and you know,

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>right at the peak, so right right, um in eight

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and then Paul Boker comes in, Uh, and the gold

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>went down to you know, two hundred dollars announce, So

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>here's only two thousands. Here's the really big question post gold.

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You're there in ninety two, the firm is now one

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>billion from two billion today, it's fifty times the size.

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>How did you manage to grow the firm over thirty

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>years fifty x? Well, first of all, it's not first person,

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, singular. There were a lot of people. It

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>was a team um, one of whom was my brother

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>who passed away ten years ago, but he was part

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. But there were a lot of other colleagues

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>as well, and it was building up other mutual funds.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>And then really before I was what I call e

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.239
<v Speaker 1>t F guy in two thousand and six, we for

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>ten years we had a hedge fund business and we

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>had to hedge funds. But that we rose about four

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars and so I had some good strategies there

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Quite fascinating. There's a quote of yours

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I really like, and I have to start the segment

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>on investing with this quote. The investment world has broken

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>up into two types of people. Historians and statisticians discuss, well,

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone that's not just doing a market cap exposure fund

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>tends to have some kind of bias, and they look

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to do asset allocation as well based on that kind

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>of bias. And I think there's been a lot of

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>quant work done and a lot of the investors. Let's

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>take value investing for example, right a study comes out

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>says value is the way to go. I've done, you know,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I look at the fundamentals of a company and those

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>with a cheaper price to book. That's gonna work, right,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's worked historic, Because it's worked historically, it's giving

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you some kind of added return over the market return.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>And then it doesn't work, and it doesn't work, and

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't worked for ten years. I like to point

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>out how little we know. Really. I feel like we're

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Caveman era of investing, Barry. I know there's

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of innovation, but there's so little we

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>know what is there? Is there an academic theory that

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>says growth versus value? No, no one can time growth

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.719
<v Speaker 1>versus value. It's an ongoing debate. Yet those trillions of

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars at very prestigious firms that have this value tilt

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that have now been underperforming. So anyway, so that's kind

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>of my, uh, you know, my perspective that you just

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>can't use these mathematical tests and and mathematicians that that's insulting.

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You really have to call them statisticians whatever that means

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>um but basically you can't just use mathematical ratios to

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>say their force. There is an investment opportunity, and the

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>current one that's floating around today is emerging markets. Value

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>stocks have underperform armed and there, and they're cheap and

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>therefore mean reversion. The statisticians say, oh, that's great value.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>My perspective on the world is that of historian. The

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>world is changing so much all the time, So let

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>me just take emerging markets. Emerging Market Index is so

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>different today. China dominates that. Asia is eight percent of

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that index. There's basically everything else you can ignore. Ten

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years ago and Emerging Markets Index had Thailand and Malaysia, Singapore, Korea, remember,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like Brazil, Mexico. It's it's just not even the same

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>thing to to take that statistic and say I'm going

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to do a study and give you an investment recommendation. Look,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a school of thought. I'm in the what I

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.479
<v Speaker 1>call historian school of thought, which is there's so much change.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Look at all the change that's happening. If only there

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>was an e t F that was emerging markets ex China.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That would be fantastic. It wouldn't be important in the world,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 1>right No, but it could would actually see some long

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>term growth, not dominated by one single company we filed

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for one go or um. That's why I brought that up.

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to toss that out. The other thing you

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and I briefly discussed a long time ago over wine,

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and I want to continue the conversation. We'll see if

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you remember this. There are many ways to measure value,

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>price to book being only one of them, and people

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of forget the days of having a book value

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with giant factories or thousands of miles of rail tracts

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>or fiber optic cables or whatever. May not really be

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so applicable to companies like Apple or Google or Facebook.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And you point out they have intellectual property, the algorithm

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>of Google search and how they monetize ads is not

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly the sort of book value that we saw in

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the days of steel manufacturers and railroads and automobile companies.

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Right Well, I think, as I was implying before, I

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>think there are these these things that people observe in

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets, and then they kind of go away after

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a while for whatever reason. Maybe they're arbitraged away or

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>for or whatever. And I do think that in the

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>new economy. I'm not saying growth will outperform value forever.

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you should tilt your portfolio that way,

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>but I definitely don't think you have to look at

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the measures um these days. The the one that we

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have as a firm that we like is the wide

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>mode philosophy, which is look at the earnings on a

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.479
<v Speaker 1>forward looking basis. Okay, so it's not just looking at

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>all the statistics on Yahoo, Finance, er Bloomberg, but and

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that's produced by morning Star Equity Research, and then so

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that will estimate the profitability. So even if a company

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook is not making money, which it wasn't at

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a point in time, we know the potential is there,

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>then we include it. And then the second step is

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that you're not overpaying for that, because

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think is a real value that doesn't exist

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in all e T s, which is that value suation

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>discipline of kicking out companies if they just become too expensive.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're really talking about GARB growth at a reasonable price.

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that that what you're implying? Yeah, I would say

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a proprietary version of GARB. They would not like that,

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's fair. So let's let's talk about

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the e t f s you've launched. You

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>guys are not known for plain vanilla beta. How do

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about developing a new strategy, How do you

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>put together the philosophy behind a new e t F,

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and then how do you decide here's how we're going

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to market this. Because you guys have been very successful

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>with this, I like to call it's like handcrafted beers.

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Every one of our e t F we really try

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to think about the underlying structure of the asset class

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and the market and how to construct an exchange traded

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>vehicle to take advantage of that. So for fixed income UM,

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>if I could talk about that. For we have several

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>high yield funds. You want to make sure there's enough

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>liquidity in that. So for our high yield Muni fund,

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we made sure a slug was in triple bees so

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.479
<v Speaker 1>that there would be enough liquidity in our view throughout

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a market cycle for that product. Also, sticking with fixed income, again,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the van deck philosophy, right, look at the

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>macro trends and market structure in the industry. So what's

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>happened over the last ten years has been the growth

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of triple bes as a percent of the overall investment

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>grade market. Right, so the lowest level of rating for

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>investment grade is now fifty percent of all investment grade

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and triple bes today are greater in issuance than all

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of investment grade debt ten years ago. So let me

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>let me wrap my head around this. The weakest investment

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>grade bonds are now half of of investment grade portfolios. Correct,

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, we've kind of worked a way

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>down the risk scale to get a little more return.

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that the companies are so it's it's natural companies

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>are optimizing. They're saying, let's and I can keep my

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>borrowing costs down if I just keep stay a little

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>bit above junk and then in a low interest rate environment,

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I've got all this money at two percent. You know

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>what's not to love. And and the spread between investment

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>grade and high yield or junk has really narrowed over

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the past because we're a wash and money. So that's

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a separate thing. But anyway, let's let's address that because

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a fascinating topic. Whether we're looking at venture capital

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or private equity or pretty much everything else. There is

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just an ungodly amount of capital coursing its way through

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the system. Absolutely, And what does that mean? Uh, Well,

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like I say, don't worry, be happy. I mean, you

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>can't fight central banks, don't fight. Don't well, and look

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at China. That's my thing that I think a lot

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of people don't look at. You have to look at

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in China. And the narrative in China

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is also right now mildly stimulative. So I can go

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>into that if you like. Well, well, let's talk out that,

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>because you had something I thought was pretty insightful leading

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>into the fourth quarter of when we saw temporary correction

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and you said, hey, China was looking at a hard landing.

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>They were slowing down, which is why we saw our weakness,

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and they figured it out and started stimulating again. How

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>do you offset that here in the first quarter of

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>against the coronavirus, which doesn't seem to be coming to

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a natural end yet. We we assume they'll eventually wrestle

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>this into submission like they have with other pandemics like

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a bola or zica or going out stars or swine flu.

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Or pick one, but this is still very much an

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>unknown and how much is this going to impact their

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>g d P and how much is this going to

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>impact the rest of the globes economic activity. Look, I

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think you can look through I think the markets have

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>looked through the coronavirus. So what I like to say

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is like I wouldn't say we live in China world,

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>but we are in the same life raft together. And

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to answer your question, if China's economy goes through a

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>super hard landing, every aspect of our financial markets will

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>get affected. I mean obviously commodities, but commodities flies through

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>effects high yield as well because energy bonds have a

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of issuance. It will affect US equities as well.

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'd say both Chinese equities and US equities

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>are saying this coronavirus will work itself out. Chinese equities

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are right where they were a month or two ago,

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>so so people buying China stocks don't think so. Again,

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I hate to oversimplify. What is the Central Bank in

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>China doing so two years ago they were slamming on

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the brakes because they were worried about debt, but they

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>have since taken their foot off the break. You know,

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not gassing it, but they are giving enough oxygen

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.239
<v Speaker 1>to the economy that I don't think we really need

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to worry about global growth. And that does assume that

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus doesn't go crazy, but that's what the markets

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>are assuming. So let's move from China but international. You

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>guys have offices in in Australia and in Frankfurt, Germany.

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Why expand internationally and why those countries. What we found

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>with our e t S is that buyers around the

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>world we're using it. I mean it was amazing, like

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>g DX, like literally people from a hundred different countries

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>were buying and trading U S e t S. It's

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a really great invention and we were lucky to be

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 1>part of it. And so one we saw that, of

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>course we wanted to chase our clients. Um Expanding internationally

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.439
<v Speaker 1>is not as easy as I thought it might be.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But uh, because we had clients in Europe and Australia,

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we thought, hey, let's provide local opportunities for them. And

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>because our industry is regulated and taxes are different, we

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>basically had to set up shop in those countries. We

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking to Jan van Eck vanek associates. You

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and I know each other for a couple of years.

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>We're not complete and total strangers, And as I was

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>researching you, I found a couple of interesting things. Our

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>backgrounds are shockingly similar in that we both came out

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>of college. We both didn't know what the hell we

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do. We both sort of wandered the earth

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>trying a bunch of things, some startups, some this, some that.

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>My joke has been, well, if you are a Jewish

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>boy from Long Island and you don't know what to

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>do with your life, you go to law school. You

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have a whole lot of choice in the matter.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the law. And it sounds like you had a

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>similarly non Long Island experience. Uh yeah, it took me

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a while to figure out what I wanted to do,

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but law school was the backup. So did did eventually

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>punch that ticket? And the other question, which I didn't

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>get to ask during the broadcast portion um, when I

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>was doing my research into Jan van Eck, how do

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you transition from being a fourteenth century Flemish painter into

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a career on Wall Street? And that's about as esoterica

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>question as I've ever asked that is that is really amazing.

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Well funny, my grandfather did the research and we're not

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>not related. I mean, that is not an unknown painter

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in the world. My wife taught design an illustration and

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>fine arts, and so I've been to every museum in

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the world just about it certainly feels like I've contract

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>every museum. But when when I first started researching, and

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, why is that name so familiar? Oh, that's right,

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Well you knew. I knew in college when people were

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>taking that class because they were like, yeahn did you

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>know that there was an artis called at granddad? Granddad

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's pretty hilarious. And it's funny because when and

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Google searches, he's got much better s

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 1>c oh than you do. So that's kind of uh,

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's kind of interesting. So there are a handful

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>of questions I did not get to that I have

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about prior to get into our favorite question,

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>ends of which I have a few bonus ones on

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't warn you about. I'm want to surprise

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you with. Um, let's let's talk a little bit about

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the E T F world and the question I really

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to during broadcast that I wanted to is

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six is pretty early days in the

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>world of ETFs. What motivated the move into e t fs.

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously been wildly successful, but tell us what that

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>ramp up was like and how did you make the decision? Hey,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>this ETF thing is going to be big one day,

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you know. My my background is more of

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a business person who works at an asset manager rather

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>than a portfolio manager. And like a lot of car

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>engineers run car companies, are used to uh that that

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>mindset really matters. So e t s were clearly there,

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were growing, and the question is do you

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>latch on as a person to those new and interesting

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and growing and maybe better things or do you not?

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And so we latched on and then also saw wow,

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>if since we were the gold mining fund leaders, if

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 1>someone does an e t F on gold mining were dead.

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 1>People love to trade gold, and this is a way

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>better vehicle. And we were thank god we we got

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there first. Why not put out g l D yourself?

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Or when you were looking around the world, how long

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>has g l D been around It's ten years, twelve

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.919
<v Speaker 1>years or did they, So you know it wasn't around

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in six it was not. It came afterwards. So god, yeah,

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the gold bullion very We've made so many mistakes, but

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, one one is not being more aggressive in

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 1>earlier in thinking that the SEC would approve a gold

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>bullion et fu kindsight biases always. I mean, you know

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>who who knew? Sometimes you gotta just roll the dice,

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>although one would imagine that's an expensive risk to take

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.839
<v Speaker 1>saying they'll never approve this, but let's spend two million

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars anyway on warriors, right, And that was we didn't

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>have that money back then. So that's that's that helps too,

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and explaining the past. But by the way,

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>if you there's a fantastic Wall Street Journal story about

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the history of g l D. It came out a

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, and the background was the World

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Gold Council created the e t F because they had

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>too much gold built up in warehouses. It was just

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a way of, hey, what are we doing with all

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 1>this yellow crap? We gotta get some of it out.

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And it was not very pressingent in philosophy. It just

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 1>worked out fantastic and even worse we knew those people,

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, because all the gold mining companies are members

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of the World Gold Council. Yeah, I don't go there.

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So so, um, let's talk a little bit about the

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>operations of of e t f s. How do the

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>flows in and out of index funds affect the underlying securities.

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>This is something that you have to plan and manage,

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>especially if some of the junior minors are a little

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>less liquid than the bigger gold miners. How do you

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>deal with that? Well? As as a lot of your

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>lessoners probably know, the function of an e t F

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is usually that you can take in kind delivery of

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the securities. So for the vast majority of US equities

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and other securities, actually we don't have to worry about it.

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the trading community that has to worry. Say, okay,

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I anticipate I'm going to get this price for the

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>e t F. I'm going to deliver this bundle of

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>stocks or bonds, and so we don't actually have to

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>trust it, and that's touch it. That's one of the

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>geniuses where we get involved is index rebalances, and uh,

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that is something where our portfolio managers pay

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention because especially if you have a

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>larger et F and the trading community knows Van Neck

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>has got to buy a hundred million or two hundred

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>million of the stock, it's very important that we game them.

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So we may buy it before the index adds it,

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>we might buy it afterwards, and there's an of folatility

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the market that that hopefully the trading community is

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.319
<v Speaker 1>not taking advantage of shareholders, because that's our number one job.

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Quite quite interesting, our mutual colleague Dave Noddig is a

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>big advocate of direct indexing. Um, what are your thoughts

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on this? Is this a challenge to thematic investing or

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>e t F SO or is this really just a

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>niche product? Although there were some companies with you know,

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Pinnacle has a couple of hundred billion dollars in direct

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>index right, which is another form of s m A. Right,

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an index form of s M A And

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh so there are slight advantages to that,

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>but one of the you know, I think one of

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the limitations is you can't really do that for fixed income.

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Everyone says, oh the spider, you know, sp y everything

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is transparent. This is not true. You know, of bonds

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.359
<v Speaker 1>do not trade on a given day, and so that's

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the I think that's one of the beauties that fixed

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>income ets they have disadvantages. That one of the advantages

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting way better liquidity. Like we have an

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a your market local currency bond ETF. You weigh rather

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>trade that et F at penny wide than you would

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the underlying bonds. There's so many more bonds than stocks.

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>People don't realize the vast number of bonds. The joke

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is the Wilshire five thousand is what something like that.

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the last time I looked at is something

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>like forty or sixty thousand bonds that trade at least

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>once a year, some crazy number like that. There are

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>tons and tons of bonds out there, every local municipality,

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>every corporate, in all sorts of different years and all

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>sorts of different chaunches. You would much rather trade the

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>funds than the specific bonds. Absolutely, and that's why that's

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the limitations to direct into thing. The

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>thing I like to point out as well, what's happened

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>over our careers right is fixed income is the last

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>holdout for voice broking. So all I couldn't say that

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>again voice being able to pick up the phone and

0:42:58.040 --> 0:42:59.800
<v Speaker 1>say buy me ten thousand, and the only way to

0:42:59.880 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>trade it is up the phone. There's no electronic version.

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Well there's text measaging the same thing, right, So all

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>equity trading has gone electronic. Not true. When we came out,

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all options trading is electronic. Basically all commodity of futures

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>trading is electronic. Fixed income it's still a minority of trades.

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, even most generous calculation is of investment grade

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>trades last year were electronic. So that just shows you

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that there the fixed income you can't just do things.

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think people look at direct indexing and other

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>things say, oh yeah, the whole world is electronic. Everything

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is simple because I can see I'm on Yahoo Finance.

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Not true. Isn't the US treasury bonds aren't there trading

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>electric elect They're electronic. I mean they're They're the deepest,

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>most liquid markets. And you have a very very specific

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>um run of dates. Everybody knows what what each vintages.

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>But beyond treasuries, things really start to get a little squirrel.

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't think absolutely. So one of the other questions

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I had to ask you that um is kind of

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of intriguing. Tell us about by the way, this

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 1>is the worst segue from electronic non electronic trading of

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:17.879
<v Speaker 1>bonds to this what is the then eck forest? Ah?

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>So uh not really related to me. Um, it was

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>my own or our firm, I should say. So. I

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to take any credit. But my uncle Fred

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>uh who never married, gave all his money to charity

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:35.360
<v Speaker 1>when he passed away, and he did something super creative.

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So he he loved trees, and what he did is

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 1>bought redwood forest in northern California after it had been

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>clear cut, so there was no commercial value. Way back

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>up a sec So you take a redwood forest. Are

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we using redwood for commercial uses? Yeah? You were doing that?

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. So or beautiful trees five plus percent

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of all old growth redwoods. I mean, these things are beautiful.

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 1>The old thousand year old trees were cut down nine

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's cut down to build San Francisco and

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 1>other things. And they just let no one said stop.

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean John Muir said stopped. But you know it

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:19.800
<v Speaker 1>took a while, but all the damage was done. We

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>were like, why don't you stop at fifty or sixty

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>or seven, like, it's just a complete disaster. So anyway

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that the but trees grow back. So he uh, he

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was a great value investor. He just bought all this

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>redwood forest for almost nothing, and guess what, twenty years later,

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the redwoods are growing. So what he did

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is basically create a sustainable redwood forest. This is fred

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Fred Vannack. He was he was a director of our

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 1>company but otherwise not involved, and he created a sustainable forest.

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So what he said is, I'm not going to I'm

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>going to give the income to charity. So it was

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the largest gift to Purdue University ever. But I'm not

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna know a lot of people just to

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>cut the trees down. I'm gonna do something called selective harvesting,

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>which is basically like weeding a forest. And what happens

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>if you wed a forest, it actually grows fast. So

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so that's managed by the Pacific Forest Trust. And then

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what they did as well is because California has carbon credits,

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they qualified the forest, the Vedic Forest, for carbon credits,

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 1>so it was the first property in the US to

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>qualify to get carbon credits, which they sold to Arnold

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Schwartz nigger and Nancy Pelosi. It's such an interesting story,

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but I take absolutely no credit for it. I mean

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we we helped it a little bit when I told

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you I we do a deep dive if I'm finding

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:47.280
<v Speaker 1>out about the uh. But actually it was mentioned somewhere

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on your corporate website if I remember, unless it was

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>just my uh shocking that we mentioned, you know. Yeah,

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So so that's pretty that's pretty intriguing. Um and finale,

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 1>before we get to our standard questions is what did

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you learn from your dad about leadership and running an

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:12.239
<v Speaker 1>investment business? You worked with him for how long? How

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>long was the overlap? Well, I mean, you know, we talked,

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>he talked about work at home, so almost so most

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of your so yeah, most of my life. Um so,

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, into my thirties. He luckily had

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a long life he passed away. Um My dad was

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>an economist, Okay, he was not a businessman, and he

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was not really a portfolio manager. So his he he

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>had this view of the world like look at what's

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 1>going on and then take advantage and then implement, right,

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 1>So just that perspective and that risk taking is really

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>what I learned from him, is question the structure the

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 1>world is changing, what's changing? And do you does that

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.399
<v Speaker 1>give you opportunity or risk in your portfolio? So that's

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>really what I what I learned from him. He was

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>very he was very much a gentleman. He was very

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>collaborative within the firm, and you know, he knew what

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know. Said the first thing. The first person

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he hired to run the Gold Fund was a geologist.

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of our histories is having real people

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>from industry as part of our portfolio management team. Quite

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:18.760
<v Speaker 1>quite fascinating. Any major topics I didn't get to before

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we get to my favorite questions, Well, we'll get this

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to some other time. But the fact that the explosion

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of passive means that ownership of corporate America is in

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:34.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, concentrated some very big firms. Let's talk about

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that because I'm astonished at some of the uh myths

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and discussions that have arisen around this. Do you look

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at passive as um a challenge to your core business

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>model or do you look at passive as a lazy

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>person's approach to investing? How how do you think of passive? Well,

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you know my bias. Yeah, she cheap market exposure.

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Passive has been fantastic for investors. Right, It's lowered costs,

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>uh thematically, dramatically and um, it's in a way not

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>our business. We tried to do value added or different exposures.

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:17.760
<v Speaker 1>What I would say is it's also been a perfect

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 1>environment for that. You know. You know, one of your

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>questions is what do you wish you had known thirty

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:25.759
<v Speaker 1>years ago? Well, I wish I will tell everybody. I

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.399
<v Speaker 1>wish I had known that interest rates we're gonna fall

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:32.280
<v Speaker 1>my entire career because financial assets have had this huge

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>tail wind really for for you know, since I'm gonna

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna stop you right there, and I have to

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>stop you because the person responsible for that is it

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>forty years eighty two to almost forty year bond bull

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>market and falling interest rates and to this day they're

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:57.240
<v Speaker 1>still falling. When was the thirty years one five five something? Crazy?

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Um was Paul volle car right, who on occasion am

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I remembering this correctly? Did your dad have lunch with

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul Vulcan on a regular basis, No, not regular basis?

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Once once and I was luckily to be invited. So

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 1>someone thought it was funny probably someone with your type

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of personality, say, hey, this guy got you know, solved

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the inflation problem in the US, and you know gold

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>got killed for twenty years afterwards. They should meet each other,

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>because is that my dad made I don't. I don't

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>know if that's my sense of humor to me. Any

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>opportunity I get to meet a fed chair, I'm going

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to take that. Yes, you'd like to put interesting. And

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>there was probably a little humor associated with this particular combination.

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.279
<v Speaker 1>In any case, so arranged that lunch. I don't I

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>don't remember. It was fitt of the vague associate if

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>my dad's I think it was someone who ran a

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 1>fixed income shop, like we didn't know. We didn't know

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that person well anyway, so I tagged along and it

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>was told you at the time, Wow, I uh, probably

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in my theories, okay, did you? Did you appreciate the gravity?

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he's a rock star, star, absolute superstar.

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he deserves much more of the credit for

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the so called Reagan Revolution than he's gotten because Reagan

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>did a bunch of things that I think were very helpful,

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 1>but none of which would have happened. And I don't

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think you know. In fact, he reminder when Volker's term

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was up, Reagan replaced him with some guy named Alan Greenspan.

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's another reason to be a little miffed at

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan. He fobbed that. Uh, I won't use any

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:45.320
<v Speaker 1>cursewords on the air, but I blame the crisis. The

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Crisis had a lot of inputs and a

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of factors that caused it. But towards the top

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of that list is Alan Greenspan. Both as a monetist

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and a regulator, he messed up. I'm trying to keep

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it g ridded. He messed up in two different ways.

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 1>But of what, let's avoid that digression. I got to

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 1>meet told Paul at I think it was an oh

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>eight at Chris Whalen's election party, and I found him

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to be absolutely charming. Um, he just passed away last year.

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:22.880
<v Speaker 1>What was your lunch with him? Like, what was your

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 1>experience like? And were you aware that you know, you

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>were having a brush with greatness? Oh yeah, I mean,

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, I mean he this this is sort of

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like like you said, he had a major effect on everything,

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>on everything, right, the structure of financials and and and everything.

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, it was. It was great meeting him.

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was more disengaged from the financial markets

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time than than my dad was, which I

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:53.359
<v Speaker 1>thought it was just odd, uh, disengaged with the day

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to day Okay, So again, my dad was like a

0:52:56.560 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>pencil sharp economist. He was upset with money supply growth.

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think they were talking about Japan at the time.

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>That was a hot topic. And you know, this was

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the beginnings of Japan. So it's just at the end

0:53:09.600 --> 0:53:11.279
<v Speaker 1>of the bubble, at the end of the bubble, how

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the bubble and you know, before this

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:16.759
<v Speaker 1>long period of disinflation or whatever you wanna call it,

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>deflation deflation in Japan. And my dad knew this. I

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't know statistics at the last month, you know, money

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>supply growth in Japan. And Booker was like, no, it's

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>just in this topic. So money supply is part of

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this huge list of economic and market indicators that people

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>used to track obsessively because they thought it would help

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>them figure out what's going on with the market, and

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 1>one by one, because if you think about it, hey,

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the money supply is expanding, all that will eventually work

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 1>its way into the stock market and stocks will go higher.

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Until that just completely stopped working. It was a coincidential

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 1>correlation for a long time, or maybe it was an

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>input factor. I don't know. We look at so much.

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:05.399
<v Speaker 1>We used to look at so much the odd lot

0:54:06.040 --> 0:54:08.279
<v Speaker 1>data point, and I know guys who used to do

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and was all guys who used to track that stuff

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 1>obsessively in the nineties and it just stopped working. Charles

0:54:18.080 --> 0:54:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Bitterman ran trim tabs that used to check money flow

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>in and out of mutual funds. This market has done

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:27.200
<v Speaker 1>more or less nothing but go up for over a decade,

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time money flows out of funds.

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Something like a half a trillion dollars have left mutual funds,

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not left mutual funds to go into et f s,

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>They've left the building, and the market continues to go. Well,

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a separate that's a separate podcast on I don't

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:48.520
<v Speaker 1>believe flows affect prices, but for a long time people

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:51.839
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was gospel. Here's my point. It used

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to be that all money would go through you know,

0:54:55.239 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the central bank, into commercial banks. Now there's so much money,

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>so much lending happening outside the banking system. Right, only

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 1>half of the lending is happening inside our banking system.

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>They've got hedge funds, lending companies probably, but but credit.

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about credit. So you've got a totally

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:13.200
<v Speaker 1>different world. That's why we don't care about that stuff

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:15.879
<v Speaker 1>is because the transmission mechanic is totally different. That's why

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the central bank has to go and buy bonds and

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, even stocks and ets in different countries to

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:24.400
<v Speaker 1>affect the markets because they're not being able to transmit

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>through reserve ratio requirements. Remember all that kind of stuff

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:33.400
<v Speaker 1>where are gone? And um, we used to call that

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the shadow banking sector, and it's not in the shadows

0:55:38.040 --> 0:55:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and more it's huge. It's now the banking sector. They're

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just non bank lenders, which is very different than when

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it seemed a little subversive and uh, you know, a

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:54.720
<v Speaker 1>little illicit. It's not. It's just a different form of credit. Alright.

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Quite fascinating, all right, So let's get to our favorite questions. Um,

0:55:59.840 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I I'm interested to hear about some of your answers,

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and I have to start out with, um, what was

0:56:06.640 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the first car you ever had? First car? Oh, my god,

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>my brother and I in college share the cheap I

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and I know you're a car guy, but

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it was like an old sumobile that had five hundred

0:56:17.800 --> 0:56:22.759
<v Speaker 1>thousand miles on it. And they're happy. We're happy to

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:26.880
<v Speaker 1>hit you up on you. What do you What are

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you streaming in terms of video on Netflix or Amazon Prime?

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>What are you downloading in terms of podcasts? And listening

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:38.759
<v Speaker 1>to tell us what you're entertaining yourself with. Well, I'm

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a junkie and podcasts, so I

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 1>don't really watch a lot of video. So I listened

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to about seven hours of podcasts. I love a week. Sorry,

0:56:49.840 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>different day, it would be hard to get happened. Um,

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I've learned a lot from I'll call it the stars

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in our industry. Give us some names, well, yours truly,

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Patrick K'shaughnessy, Ted Saide's you know Capital allocators, Um, and

0:57:06.200 --> 0:57:10.080
<v Speaker 1>uh a little bit off stream. I love Kara Swish her. Uh,

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:12.319
<v Speaker 1>she's so much fun. I had her. Not only did

0:57:12.360 --> 0:57:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I have her as a guest where she chewed the scenery,

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but if you listen to Pivot with her on Scott Galloway, Yeah,

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so much fun. Yeah. The So I learned a lot.

0:57:23.520 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I did my bitcoin learning in twenty seventeen. So I

0:57:26.120 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot from Patrick O'Shaughnessy a lot, learned a

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>lot from pomp and this Australian guy Stefan Lavera. But

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say the podcast episode you know of the

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>my podcasting career was when Scott Galloway predicted the takeover

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of Whole Foods by Amazon on Kara Swishers podcast. I'll

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>remember I was just coming finishing a run and I

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:52.760
<v Speaker 1>was like, wow, because everyone in business is always looking

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 1>at the fangs, going how is this going to impact

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:58.760
<v Speaker 1>my business? Right? Is Amazon going to come into finance

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all this kind of stuff? And he just he just

0:58:01.120 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 1>nailed it. And then literally it happened, and I'm like, wow,

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of smart people out there. I

0:58:05.080 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think I think he's been a guest four times on

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the show She He's just been a ton of fun

0:58:11.240 --> 0:58:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to interview, and um man, you gotta give him credit

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for being way out there now. His background in branding

0:58:20.200 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and marketing really helps him. Um but that was just

0:58:24.080 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 1>such a prescient call, so so sharp. Uh, what's the

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:32.440
<v Speaker 1>most important thing people don't know about Jan Vanak? It's important,

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:35.920
<v Speaker 1>but h my first language wasn't English, what was it?

0:58:36.040 --> 0:58:39.640
<v Speaker 1>It was German. Uh, my mom was German and she

0:58:39.960 --> 0:58:42.479
<v Speaker 1>just came over to the US shortly before they got married.

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They met in Germany and so she spoke German at

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:48.000
<v Speaker 1>home and that's what I learned. And what was funny

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:51.720
<v Speaker 1>about it is that the elementary school thought I was

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>not fast because I was learning English at the same time.

0:58:56.160 --> 0:58:59.439
<v Speaker 1>So they want me to repeat a great My parents said,

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we're out of here. We're going to the suburbs New

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 1>York City. Has to he isn't van Eck a Dutch name,

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or my dad's side was Dutch? Telling him mom's side

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:12.720
<v Speaker 1>was German. Quite interesting And speaking of your dad, who

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 1>are who were some of your early mentors? And I

0:59:15.960 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>assume your dad looms large in that. Yeah, you know

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I talked about my dad. I would say, uh, you know,

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the one person that we had mentioned is a Stanford

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Law School professor, Joe Grundfest him. He was an SEC

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 1>commissioner and he does he's involved in a lot of stuff.

0:59:34.080 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 1>He comments in government governance. Uh, work at Stanford as well. Uh.

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:42.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in a class I was taking with

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>him and I was his research assistant as well. He

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:48.480
<v Speaker 1>basically made fun of active managers. He's like that that

0:59:48.720 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is like a dinosaur, and I was. He was probably

0:59:50.920 --> 0:59:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the first person who said that to me. And I

0:59:53.840 --> 0:59:55.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's also when I saw the E t F

0:59:55.800 --> 0:59:59.240
<v Speaker 1>trend triggered that wow, this actually might be the future.

1:00:00.240 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So he he would I would put him in that category.

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Quite interesting. Um, what investors influence the way you approach investor?

1:00:11.440 --> 1:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>There I go back to my my father. I think,

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Barry have learned so much from so many

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>different people so that I just can't really do a

1:00:18.560 --> 1:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>shout out. But um, you know, I love the people

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that are talking about how the world is changing today,

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>who are forward looking because I think the market structure

1:00:28.440 --> 1:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is changing and so um you know that's that's there's

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>so many people that are good at that I think

1:00:36.240 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be unfair to pull one person out. Fair enough, UM,

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about books. What do you read?

1:00:42.120 --> 1:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>What sort of books? What? What are some of the

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>most recent books you've enjoyed? So I'm I don't have

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time. You know, in our industry, we

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>consume so much content and it's it's hard to get

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>through books. But I'll mention to um. One is, uh,

1:00:57.480 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the over story. And if you've heard about this won

1:01:00.600 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the Pulitzer Prize. Uh, it was written by Richard Powers,

1:01:05.200 --> 1:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's basically about trees, where it's it's a fiction

1:01:10.000 --> 1:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>book where trees play a major part in it. And um,

1:01:14.400 --> 1:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a long book. Uh, but I would

1:01:19.080 --> 1:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I really, I really enjoyed it, and um, it really

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>made me appreciate forests. If I had to give you

1:01:25.600 --> 1:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>one takeaway from a fiction book, which is weird that

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that forests are are really environments that you know, they

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>go beneath the ground, the trees interact with each other,

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's so much more complex than the way

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I look at a single tree singing in my front

1:01:42.440 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>yard all alone. That's not the way to look at trees.

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're interested in that, can I give

1:01:48.440 --> 1:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you my second one out of the blue. So, um,

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I have these enthusiasms, and I tried to reach a

1:01:54.480 --> 1:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>read a biography on every American president and I ran

1:01:57.400 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>out of ran out of energy, out of energy. Didn't

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>run that presidents. But uh, but one of my favorites

1:02:04.520 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is Jane Smith's Grant biography. So I gotta believe no

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one's talked to you about uh Ulysses s Grant on

1:02:12.680 --> 1:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts, and I wouldn't make that. All right, Well,

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the two here, right here, two takeaways. It's just Grants, um.

1:02:22.080 --> 1:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But but i'll tell you why. Number one, you know,

1:02:26.120 --> 1:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Grant helped win the war. I mean, we focus on Lincoln,

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>but if Lincoln, if we had lost the of the North,

1:02:31.360 --> 1:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>had lost the Civil War, the United States is a

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>completely different country. And he was so celebrated. He gets

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>such a bad rap when it comes to history that

1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he was, you know, an alcoholic and this, and that

1:02:45.520 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he was very magnanimous as he could be when he

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was president towards the South and towards um, you know,

1:02:52.680 --> 1:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>towards the blacks that you know, he really I think

1:02:55.440 --> 1:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>deserves a lot more credit for those two reasons. The

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>second element of the reason I love this book is,

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you go to college and you read

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>about these historians, you get kind of a view of history.

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And what you don't realize is that the schools of

1:03:09.680 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>thought right and and that and and this book was

1:03:13.120 --> 1:03:15.479
<v Speaker 1>a revision as school of thought. Like, you know, people

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>get trashed by historians and then their reputations come back.

1:03:19.600 --> 1:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't realize that dynamic went on so much

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in academia. You know every natural uh, you know natural biology,

1:03:28.720 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and we know that's changing all the time and it's

1:03:30.680 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>not the same as it was thirty years ago. But

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it's true for history too. Quite interesting. Um. When I

1:03:37.280 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>said don't don't assume so quickly, I was mostly wrong.

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Someone recommended a Grand book, but it was the churn

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>out Grand book, not the Smith Grand book. His books

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>are so long, I mean, can you really read that?

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I everything I've read of his has

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just been Spectacling's. I've been giving that book five times.

1:03:58.200 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, well because I talked about Grant, so I

1:04:00.960 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>should read it. So so if you read presidential biographies,

1:04:04.360 --> 1:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>did you read any of the churn at Washington or

1:04:06.960 --> 1:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson or any uh of the other churn out presidential

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>things or are they just too long? Yeah? Right, Hey, listen,

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to talk about how many books I

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>have at home. I'm a Hamilton's fan. I'll just put

1:04:20.400 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it out there so you know. But I don't know

1:04:23.200 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>if you know that we designed our own ties. So

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing a Hamilton. So that's my I'll defend Hamilton's

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>um before I saw the show again. Not recommended. I

1:04:38.160 --> 1:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>get the annotated Hamilton's lyrics. Um. Hamilton's Revolution is his

1:04:44.960 --> 1:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>annotated version of the lyrics to the show Lynn Manuel

1:04:51.360 --> 1:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Mirande's lyrics. And it's really quite fascinating how he explains everything,

1:04:56.960 --> 1:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>um and annotates how there's so many different interests references.

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>But given your predilection for biographies, do you UM read

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>anything like McCullough's book on the Right Brothers or anything

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>along those lines and gotten to that. Just so much stuff. Yeah,

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard he's a he's a great popularizer of American history.

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay Lehman, Yes, Leman Trilogy. Someone else recommends coming back

1:05:25.200 --> 1:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to Broadway, and uh, you know, if you like history

1:05:29.800 --> 1:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know finance, you have to see that play.

1:05:35.000 --> 1:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a that's a must. The Leman Trilogy. Yeah,

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it was here briefly started in London. You know, it's

1:05:41.680 --> 1:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>just theater. So maybe they make a movie. I guess,

1:05:44.320 --> 1:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I really recommend that. If you

1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'll put I'll put that on on our list. UM,

1:05:50.280 --> 1:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>tell us about a time you failed and what you

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>learned from the experience. So, uh, lots of failures, I

1:05:58.520 --> 1:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think of what The one that resonates the most with

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>me is when we were launching different mutual funds before

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>et S, we launched some international fixed income funds that

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>invested in high yielding European debt. It's not like it

1:06:13.520 --> 1:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was Russian debt, no, but it turned out to be

1:06:16.920 --> 1:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>like it. So basically, you know, as a money manager,

1:06:20.440 --> 1:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>whenever you can sell a yield, you can get flows.

1:06:22.840 --> 1:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And we were getting a ton of money into this fund.

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And this was the time where European exchange rates, it's

1:06:28.960 --> 1:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of the pre euro environment or exchange rates

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>were linked and as George Soros famously predicted and made

1:06:37.880 --> 1:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money on, that link was going to break.

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And that link broke, and so our funds, as did

1:06:43.920 --> 1:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of others. But our funds lost a lot

1:06:46.160 --> 1:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of ny V value. And one of the principles I

1:06:48.520 --> 1:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>take away from that learning experiences, it's so important to

1:06:51.600 --> 1:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>try to identify the risks of an investment along with

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the potential return. And you know, in a prospectus you

1:06:57.960 --> 1:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>can put down twenty risks, you get any points for

1:07:01.040 --> 1:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, identifying a risk in the prospectus, you've got

1:07:04.040 --> 1:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to pull it up in center and say hey, listen,

1:07:06.840 --> 1:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a major risk to this fund. And we've

1:07:09.880 --> 1:07:13.479
<v Speaker 1>really tried to get better at that. And whenever there's

1:07:13.520 --> 1:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>been funds UM that we could have launched, UM, that's

1:07:17.600 --> 1:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>been in my mind. And and there are a lot

1:07:19.000 --> 1:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of funds we haven't launched because of that experience. What

1:07:21.720 --> 1:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>do you do for fun? What do you do when

1:07:23.080 --> 1:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not in the office. I love to travel. I

1:07:26.720 --> 1:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>learned so much from traveling. UM and and thanks to

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>my wife it likes to travel as well. It was

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on our honeymoon and we went to Hong Kong and

1:07:35.760 --> 1:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I saw what was going on in China. It was

1:07:37.600 --> 1:07:39.919
<v Speaker 1>never in the paper. Then you can learn so much

1:07:40.080 --> 1:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>from contextualizing through travel. UM. So there's there's a lot

1:07:44.640 --> 1:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the Van Neck Forest. Frankly, my wife

1:07:47.320 --> 1:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>dragged me out there. It wasn't I was dying to

1:07:50.600 --> 1:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>go look at a bunch of trees. But you know,

1:07:52.640 --> 1:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>learned so much from that experience and gotten more involved tennis.

1:07:56.920 --> 1:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the last thing tennis for so uh. One

1:08:00.880 --> 1:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of my sons plays tennis for Brown. He starts on

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the varsity team and you know, you're sitting in these

1:08:06.680 --> 1:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>cold tennis courts in Long Island on the middle of

1:08:10.440 --> 1:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>February and I'm standing talking to the dads and all

1:08:13.320 --> 1:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of them had played college tennis, and I was like,

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:19.519
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever, I was such an hack athlete and everything.

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, okay, but I know he's genetically

1:08:22.160 --> 1:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>related to me. I can't be that bad. So I

1:08:24.840 --> 1:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>picked up tennis about ten years ago and enjoy playing that.

1:08:28.280 --> 1:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And then I like to host dinners. I mean, I

1:08:30.400 --> 1:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>know you do that too, Love to brainstorm with, you know,

1:08:33.840 --> 1:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>bring people together when I can. So I tried to

1:08:35.840 --> 1:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>do that, you know, three or four times. Ether there's

1:08:38.080 --> 1:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>so much intellectual capital here in New York. How do

1:08:40.760 --> 1:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you not take advantage of You can't swing a dead

1:08:44.040 --> 1:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>cat without hitting a Nobel Laurie at a billionaire. Someone

1:08:46.960 --> 1:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>was really insightful and they got to eat all And

1:08:50.040 --> 1:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the world is changing. That's what's cool, right, I mean,

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what you just can't go out and read a

1:08:54.720 --> 1:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>book because some of these changes haven't been you know, documented.

1:08:58.400 --> 1:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I found out a lot with China. That why I

1:09:00.280 --> 1:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>traveled there fifty times is like you couldn't read about

1:09:02.800 --> 1:09:04.479
<v Speaker 1>what was going on in China. You had to see it.

1:09:05.040 --> 1:09:08.759
<v Speaker 1>And and I know other people do these idea dinners

1:09:08.880 --> 1:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>where it's an attempt to sell something. We set hours

1:09:12.960 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>up and I know you do the same. Where there's

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>no agenda. It's just let's get eight really interesting people

1:09:18.960 --> 1:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in a room and have a conversation to see where

1:09:21.840 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it goes. There's no sales pitches. Nobody asked anybody to

1:09:25.320 --> 1:09:28.479
<v Speaker 1>do anything. It's just, hey, let's talk about what's going

1:09:28.520 --> 1:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on in the world. Absolutely, it's quite quite fascinating. So

1:09:32.320 --> 1:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>within our industry, what are you most optimistic about and

1:09:35.439 --> 1:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>what are you most pessimistic about? Uh? Optimistic. I have

1:09:41.520 --> 1:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to be optimistic. As I said before, there's so many

1:09:43.840 --> 1:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>unsolved problems. I think an understanding how financial markets work,

1:09:47.439 --> 1:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and I know you're you're doing research in that area.

1:09:50.280 --> 1:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm optimistic about all the innovations that are to come.

1:09:53.840 --> 1:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the pessimistic thing about our industry we what

1:09:57.320 --> 1:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>do you and I do We manage money? For people

1:09:59.600 --> 1:10:02.519
<v Speaker 1>who have money? Why they have money because they've saved

1:10:02.920 --> 1:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>or someone gave them money right or they started the

1:10:05.680 --> 1:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>business that ended up being very successful. Americans and we

1:10:10.000 --> 1:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about this in our industry, but half of Americans

1:10:12.479 --> 1:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>don't save, They don't they don't know how to save,

1:10:15.640 --> 1:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't know how to open a brokerage account. We

1:10:18.760 --> 1:10:21.479
<v Speaker 1>just led an investment in a company called financial Jim,

1:10:21.680 --> 1:10:24.479
<v Speaker 1>which is just oriented around that, like getting physically fit,

1:10:24.600 --> 1:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like the gym, like you don't want

1:10:26.920 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to go, You think you want to go, and your

1:10:28.880 --> 1:10:31.519
<v Speaker 1>needs resolution, then you don't go. And they are just

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>real life people who have found ways of engaging and

1:10:34.479 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they've got unlimited demand because a lot of people need

1:10:37.160 --> 1:10:40.519
<v Speaker 1>financial advice. I'm intrigued by the Robin Hood concept of

1:10:40.760 --> 1:10:43.479
<v Speaker 1>rounding up whatever you spend on a credit card and

1:10:43.680 --> 1:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>sending it to a savings or brokerage account. And you

1:10:47.760 --> 1:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't think that rounding up is a lot of money,

1:10:50.360 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but it can be. I have a jar of loose change.

1:10:53.120 --> 1:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It's probably nine hundred dollars and weighs a hundred pounds

1:10:56.520 --> 1:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that I just come home and throw the change on

1:10:58.640 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the mind. There are a lot of apps out there,

1:11:00.240 --> 1:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of tools, but a lot of people

1:11:02.040 --> 1:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>don't even they don't think about that need and and

1:11:06.280 --> 1:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the consequence is stress. If you don't have money, you

1:11:09.760 --> 1:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have stress in your life. And that's like we've all

1:11:13.439 --> 1:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>lived through periods of stress and and that. And that's

1:11:15.880 --> 1:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so when I think about our our industry collectively, I

1:11:19.120 --> 1:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>hope that business people can help solve you know, solve

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that problem a little bit quite intriguing. And our final

1:11:26.040 --> 1:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>two questions, what advice would you give to a recent

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>college graduate who was just beginning their career and interested

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in either finance or asset management. It's it's it's what

1:11:37.439 --> 1:11:40.479
<v Speaker 1>we talked about before. Try a lot of different things,

1:11:40.600 --> 1:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, David Rubinstein said, I saw him last week,

1:11:43.479 --> 1:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>said what you do before your thirty doesn't matter. Um,

1:11:47.760 --> 1:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, so many UM people I know who

1:11:51.400 --> 1:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>are younger in college are so concerned about their career track.

1:11:54.400 --> 1:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And I get that. But you really have to know

1:11:57.520 --> 1:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>what you like to do, uh and and can succeed in.

1:12:01.120 --> 1:12:04.479
<v Speaker 1>So that is that is the that's the big thing

1:12:04.760 --> 1:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is try and try different things, because I don't know

1:12:08.160 --> 1:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>how you can figure out whether you like something if

1:12:10.200 --> 1:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you haven't tried it. You're you're from the same camp

1:12:12.520 --> 1:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>as I, which is, I don't know what the hell

1:12:14.400 --> 1:12:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do when I was nineteen or twenty five,

1:12:17.840 --> 1:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>or by thirty, I started to having an inkling. I

1:12:20.720 --> 1:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>get the sense you traveled a similar path, and I'm

1:12:23.880 --> 1:12:26.479
<v Speaker 1>worried the kids don't do that enough these days. And

1:12:26.560 --> 1:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>our final question, what do you know about the world

1:12:29.400 --> 1:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of investing today that you wish you knew thirty years ago,

1:12:34.200 --> 1:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty years ago, let's call it, uh yeah, ninety two,

1:12:37.800 --> 1:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty years ago. Wow. Uh don't have a great answer

1:12:42.280 --> 1:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to that. I guess I wish I knew interest rates

1:12:44.040 --> 1:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>were gonna come down the whole time. I think there

1:12:48.640 --> 1:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is right. Was there was there any sign in ninety

1:12:51.240 --> 1:12:54.599
<v Speaker 1>two that this was a c change in the world

1:12:54.800 --> 1:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of inflation and yield? Or did it? Was it? Just

1:13:00.080 --> 1:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>remember the like eighty nine when when did when did Vulker?

1:13:04.560 --> 1:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh I'm sorry, sight was when he caused the double

1:13:08.960 --> 1:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>dip eight and eighty two, the double dip recession. He

1:13:11.760 --> 1:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>broke the back of inflation. So you were barely a

1:13:14.160 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>dozen years into that, right, Um? Yeah, So I wish

1:13:18.960 --> 1:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>i'd known that. You know, I really that that when

1:13:21.720 --> 1:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you have lower interest rates, that helps stock market valuations

1:13:25.200 --> 1:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and obviously helps fixed income. And I think we're now

1:13:28.160 --> 1:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in a spot where what is the next twenty year

1:13:29.800 --> 1:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to bring us? I want to know what

1:13:31.920 --> 1:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>was happening in the next ten years, Barry, that is

1:13:34.600 --> 1:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the trillion dollar question, and I'll tell you afterwards. We

1:13:38.800 --> 1:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking with Jan van Eck, CEO of Vent Associates.

1:13:44.479 --> 1:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation well, be sure to look

1:13:47.240 --> 1:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>up an Intra down an Inch on Apple iTunes, where

1:13:50.160 --> 1:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you could see any of our prior three plus conversations.

1:13:55.120 --> 1:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You'll find that on iTunes, Spotify, Google of a Cast,

1:13:59.040 --> 1:14:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Stitcher where your final podcasts are sold. We love your comments,

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions. Be sure and go to Apple iTunes

1:14:06.560 --> 1:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and give us a review. Send us an email at

1:14:09.439 --> 1:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>m ib podcast at Bloomberg dot net. You can check

1:14:12.479 --> 1:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>out my daily column on Bloomberg dot com. Sign up

1:14:15.720 --> 1:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>from my daily reads at Ridhalts dot com. I would

1:14:20.120 --> 1:14:22.479
<v Speaker 1>be remiss if I did not thank the cract staff

1:14:22.479 --> 1:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>who helps put these conversations together each week. Sam Schivrov

1:14:27.479 --> 1:14:32.439
<v Speaker 1>is our producer, slash booker, Mark Sineskalgee is our audio engineer.

1:14:32.840 --> 1:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Batnick is my head of research. I'm Barry Ridhalts.

1:14:37.040 --> 1:14:40.599
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters and Business on Bloomberg Radio.