Speaker 1: Welcome back to the Sean Hennity Show. I'm Greg Jarrett
Speaker 1: filling in for Sean today. I'm a Fox News legal
Speaker 1: analyst and former trial attorney in San Francisco in a
Speaker 1: previous lifetime. We're going to be talking to Jason Chafitz
Speaker 1: in just a moment about the appalling number of anti
Speaker 1: Semitic attacks around the nation and the world. In the meantime,
Speaker 1: we do want to hear from you, So if you'll
Speaker 1: give us a call when I finish talking to Jason,
Speaker 1: I'll talk to you. And our number is one eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one seven three two six. Give
Speaker 1: us a call at one eight hundred nine four one.
Speaker 1: Sean love to hear from you. In the meantime here
Speaker 1: in the United States, I'm sad to report, but you
Speaker 1: already know this that violence against Jews is on the rise.
Speaker 1: According to the FBI, among all religiously motivated hate crimes,
Speaker 1: the data shows almost seventy percent target Jewish people. The
Speaker 1: Anti Defamation League the ADL reports that in the three
Speaker 1: months following the start of the war in Gaza, anti
Speaker 1: Semitic incidents in the US skyrocketed by three hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty one percent. It's abated somewhat, but we still see
Speaker 1: it happening over and over again, and not just in
Speaker 1: Bondai Beach, Australia at the outset of the Hanukkah celebrations,
Speaker 1: fifteen people gunned down, others terribly wounded. But we see
Speaker 1: it in the United States still, which prompted a New
Speaker 1: York Post editorial today by the Editorial Board recounting the
Speaker 1: alarming anti Semitic attacks in just the last few days.
Speaker 1: And I'll recite those in just a moment, but I
Speaker 1: want to bring into the conversation. Jason Chafitz, former congressman,
Speaker 1: is the author of the book They're Coming for You,
Speaker 1: and Jason, thanks for being here to talk to us
Speaker 1: about it, because I find it so insane. It is
Speaker 1: really hard to believe that in this day and age
Speaker 1: we see anti Semitic attacks, and so, you know, it
Speaker 1: invites the question where did this come from? Did the
Speaker 1: Free Palestine movement, the pro Hamas movement just serve as
Speaker 1: an excuse for open expressions of Jewish hatred so that
Speaker 1: now people think, well, we have permission to voice are
Speaker 1: religious biggest bigotry and hostility towards Jews is is that
Speaker 1: what has happened.
Speaker 2: I think that's part of it. Greg, again, thanks for
Speaker 2: having me on. I I that the numbers are stunningly high.
Speaker 2: It's absolutely disgusting. It's counter to the productive, to the
Speaker 2: foundation of our nation where we could practice religious freedom.
Speaker 2: That was the whole foundation of our of our nation
Speaker 2: and I and I but if you look at it
Speaker 2: on a global scale, there have been attacks on Christians
Speaker 2: and Jews. I mean for millennia they've been going on.
Speaker 2: But the uptake is what's so scary. I think if
Speaker 2: you take the global number, you'll see that Christians actually
Speaker 2: attacks on Christians. When you start to look at Nigeria
Speaker 2: and some of the mass slaughtering that's going on there
Speaker 2: is just unfathomable. But certainly, after the attacks on Israel
Speaker 2: in October seventh, the problem that I have here in
Speaker 2: the United States, and I think this is partly what
Speaker 2: happened in Australia, is the anti Semitic chants, rants, calls
Speaker 2: for death and destruction were not met with any sort
Speaker 2: of resistance. There were no consequences for it, and there
Speaker 2: continued to be an uptick of this type of violent
Speaker 2: type of rhetoric. And so when they have these people
Speaker 2: that go out and say, oh, you know, they're they're
Speaker 2: so evil and they're so bad, and we're gonna have
Speaker 2: the impetatas from you know, from C to C. You know,
Speaker 2: it looked no further than the mayor of the incoming
Speaker 2: mayor of New York and somehow he can't denounce that.
Speaker 2: He's tried a wordsmith a little bit, but still hasn't
Speaker 2: denounced some of the other type of of efforts. And
Speaker 2: I find that this should not be a partisan issue,
Speaker 2: but it has become one because I don't see in
Speaker 2: mass the Democrats taking a firm stance saying we will
Speaker 2: not tolerate this anymore. And the consequence has been violence
Speaker 2: and more violence and death. And it's scary.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I covered the Secondada in the Middle East as a
Speaker 1: correspondent there, so I know what it's all about. I've
Speaker 1: seen it with my own eyes, the bloodshed. And you know,
Speaker 1: this most recent malicious chant globalize the into Fada is
Speaker 1: a call for violence against Jews. Is no other way
Speaker 1: to explain it, to rationalize it. That's what it is.
Speaker 1: It is pure hatred, born of ignorance. It's frighteningly reminiscent
Speaker 1: of Nazi Germany. And what's so troubling is that the
Speaker 1: newly elected mayor of New York City refuses to condemn
Speaker 1: the phrase. He just refuses to condemn it, which is
Speaker 1: I don't know how to describe that. But he is
Speaker 1: encouraging the hatred, the verbal attacks and the physical attacks,
Speaker 1: isn't he.
Speaker 4: I think so.
Speaker 2: But the only thing I maybe would disagree, I would
Speaker 2: and maybe I would.
Speaker 1: Go ahead disagree with me what you.
Speaker 2: Said is that it's born of ignorance. I think it's
Speaker 2: on purpose. I don't think it's born of ignorance. I
Speaker 2: think there are too many people that believe that this
Speaker 2: is what has to happen.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you may be right, And I.
Speaker 2: Don't think it's ignorance. I think I think there's a
Speaker 2: lot of ignorance in religious It's funny to me because
Speaker 2: there's so many people who preach tolerance, and yet they're
Speaker 2: the least tolerance among us, right, So there are clearly
Speaker 2: a lot of people that are naive and and and
Speaker 2: and so focused and that they can't see the rest
Speaker 2: of you know, the world, but you know the foundation
Speaker 2: of our nation, it's well and and what we're taught
Speaker 2: in Christianity you know, I happen to believe in Jesus Christ,
Speaker 2: and I you know, I'm considered myself a Christian and
Speaker 2: and but you know, love thy neighbor and and but
Speaker 2: our foundation of our nation was based on religious tolerance.
Speaker 2: That's a large part with the First Amendment. It's all
Speaker 2: about And so you can't. I just think there's too
Speaker 2: many people calling for this type of violence and calling
Speaker 2: for this type of resistance. And and when you start
Speaker 2: calling people hitler, then you tell people, oh, then you
Speaker 2: have permission to to take them out. What would you
Speaker 2: do if you got a chance to meet Hiller? Would
Speaker 2: you do? Would you what would you do? Well, you'd
Speaker 2: kill them? Right. So, but that's so weird. I can't
Speaker 2: even say because then they attacked Jews, right like it
Speaker 2: just circularly doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mentioned a moment ago that you know, the
Speaker 1: New York Post editorial board was trying to make the point,
Speaker 1: I think in their editorial today, and it's a good
Speaker 1: one and people should read it online that it's not
Speaker 1: just Australia where this is happening still, No, it is
Speaker 1: right here in New York City. And they recite an
Speaker 1: alarming number of anti Semitic attacks in just the last
Speaker 1: few days. I'll give you a rundown on the West Village.
Speaker 1: A Jewish woman targeted with profane slurs, being taunted, We're
Speaker 1: going to get rid of you effing Zionists. Over in Brooklyn,
Speaker 1: Hanukkah celebrants denounced as effing Jews. One Jewish man grabbed
Speaker 1: by the throat and throat with death. In Crown Heights,
Speaker 1: an assailant shouted anti Semitic remarks it passers by and
Speaker 1: then stabbed one in the chest. And the post makes
Speaker 1: the point these were attacks that were caught on camera.
Speaker 1: How many others were not captured on videotape? And and
Speaker 1: and how many go unreported. It's pretty frightening, isn't it.
Speaker 2: It is in the incoming mayor can't seem to, you know,
Speaker 2: get his arms around the idea. You know, I worried
Speaker 2: that in party was elected because he was on the
Speaker 2: wrong side of this issue. And then you see what's
Speaker 2: playing out. You know, the mit professor, Yeah, he's Jewish.
Speaker 2: So I mean, is that just were we supposed to
Speaker 2: believe that's just a mere coincidence. There's too much of
Speaker 2: this going on. But you know what, happened on Austray
Speaker 2: was so that and deadly and terrorizing, and there are
Speaker 2: too many that want to call this terrorism, that want
Speaker 2: to create this type of tear, terror and fear. And
Speaker 2: look at what happened in New York with the college
Speaker 2: campuses and they The problem is you don't have leaders
Speaker 2: up and down both sides of the aisle denouncing this.
Speaker 2: You see it on one side but not the other,
Speaker 2: and that I think is a clear, clear pattern. Chuck
Speaker 2: Schumer should be leading the charge for the Democrats. He
Speaker 2: is the natural one to do this, and he's almost silent.
Speaker 2: He'll put out some statements, but he has not shown
Speaker 2: any leadership on this issue. And he just kind of
Speaker 2: scared with the tail between his legs, just not willing
Speaker 2: to really go to the mat and say this is it.
Speaker 2: You can you have stepped over the line. We are
Speaker 2: not going to talk. You don't see that from him.
Speaker 2: And yet being from New York, given his religious background,
Speaker 2: you'd think he'd lead out.
Speaker 3: But no, No.
Speaker 1: It speaks volumes of where Democrats are on this issue.
Speaker 1: And it's not just you know in New York with
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer And'mdani, you know, out in southern California, where
Speaker 1: I grew up. The FBI foiled what the Attorney General
Speaker 1: described as a massive and horrific terror plot by an
Speaker 1: extremist group planning a series of bombings in Orange County
Speaker 1: and Los Angeles. According to you know, Pambody, it was
Speaker 1: a plot by a far left pro Palestine, anti capitalist group.
Speaker 1: But what jumps out at you is the pro Palestine,
Speaker 1: which is likely pro Hamas poor people were arrested. But
Speaker 1: again the common denominator, Jason is the individuals appear to
Speaker 1: have been motivated in part at least by anti Semitism
Speaker 1: of the clause of Palestinians and using in fact the
Speaker 1: methods of a moss which is terror bombings, which I saw,
Speaker 1: you know, myself with blood on my boots in Israel
Speaker 1: during the second into Fauda.
Speaker 2: Can I just make you're right that plot that was
Speaker 2: spoiled in southern California, bombs that we're going to go
Speaker 2: off at distribution centers on New Year's Eve? Well done
Speaker 2: the law enforcement. I did a little side note here.
Speaker 2: This has really bothered me. I'm glad to have an
Speaker 2: opportunity to say this. Every single law enforcement from the
Speaker 2: city to the county to the state to the FBI.
Speaker 2: They all stood up and said it was all because
Speaker 2: of cooperation. We were able to foil this cooperation cooper
Speaker 2: every one of them said cooperation. Oh, it was great.
Speaker 2: They're patting each other on the back. But you know
Speaker 2: when they don't cooperate if ice is involved, somehow, the
Speaker 2: sheriff can stand up and say, we had great cooperation,
Speaker 2: but if somebody's here illegal and they have somebody who's
Speaker 2: wanted for, you know, some heinous crime, they won't cooperate
Speaker 2: with a fed to tell them they haven't atention. And yeah,
Speaker 2: cooperation works. See how good it works, But we just
Speaker 2: don't practice it here in California or any of these
Speaker 2: other sanctuary cities and states the counties. It just it
Speaker 2: really makes me mad because how many other crimes and
Speaker 2: accid terrorism could we have prevented if there was actually
Speaker 2: true cooperation. But there's not. It was just lip service
Speaker 2: and it made me mad.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I'm glad you told us so. Jason. Good
Speaker 1: talking to you. As always, Jason chaf hits everybody, and
Speaker 1: be sure to get his book. They're coming for you.
Speaker 1: It's a real eye opener. Jason. Take care, Happy holidays,
Speaker 1: Merry Christmas to you and your family.
Speaker 3: Very Christmas.
Speaker 2: Thanks Greg.
Speaker 1: All Right, we're gonna pause, take a quick break. We've
Speaker 1: got some callers on the other side. If you haven't
Speaker 1: called us yet, please do now. The number is one
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine four one seventy three twenty six. We
Speaker 1: have a full half hour of your phone calls coming up.
Speaker 1: One eight hundred and nine to four to one. Sean.
Speaker 1: I'm Greg Jarrett, filling in for Sean Hannity. Welcome back
Speaker 1: to the Sean Hannity Show. One of the topics we've
Speaker 1: been discussing today was potential indictments against those who waged
Speaker 1: lawfare against Donald Trump. And I'll give you one example,
Speaker 1: the rad on mar Lago. It was a shocking abuse
Speaker 1: of the law, and newly disclosed FBI documents prove it.
Speaker 1: There was no probable cause, as the law demands, because
Speaker 1: Trump had done nothing illegal. The Records Act is the
Speaker 1: controlling statute, and it gives a former president custody and
Speaker 1: possession of presidential records, and if the National Archives wants them,
Speaker 1: they go to court. The exclusive remedy is civil, it's
Speaker 1: not criminal. The government's only recourse is to file a
Speaker 1: to compel before a federal judge. What you cannot do
Speaker 1: is conjure up imaginary crimes and then shop it around
Speaker 1: to an anti Trump magistrate to sign off on a
Speaker 1: baseless search warrant. Now we know that Garland didn't care
Speaker 1: about the law. He and his confederates weaponized it to
Speaker 1: bring a meritless case against Trump to stop him from
Speaker 1: his reelection bid. In twenty twenty four, more of your
Speaker 1: phone calls on the other side. One eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four to one seven three two six, give us
Speaker 1: a call. Welcome back to the Sean Hennity Show. I'm
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, filling in for Sean and it's been a pleasure.
Speaker 1: I'll be back tomorrow, by the way, three o'clock to
Speaker 1: six p m. Eastern time. I hope you'll join us then,
Speaker 1: got a great lineup of guests. In the meantime, it's
Speaker 1: time for your calls and your questions, your comments, and
Speaker 1: give us a call if you haven't already. One eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one seven three two six. That's
Speaker 1: one eight hundred and nine four one Sean. All right,
Speaker 1: let's go to Will in Michigan, who's been standing by
Speaker 1: for a while. Will thanks for your patient. How are you?
Speaker 5: I'm driving my eighty thousand pounds and a half flight slaughter,
Speaker 5: My SEMMI it's eighty thousand pounds flight slaughter.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I have better you than me driving that thing.
Speaker 5: There easier than they look. But anyways, I have a
Speaker 5: question on the vetting process and the getting the cabinet
Speaker 5: set up for the president and why it's not done
Speaker 5: between the time the Electoral College does their voting and
Speaker 5: the time that he's sworn in. He got like two
Speaker 5: or three months there that they could be vetting the
Speaker 5: candidates that he wants as his cabinet and have them
Speaker 5: sworn in. And when Hea swears in, his cabinet's in
Speaker 5: his office and they're getting the ball rolled right away.
Speaker 3: Yeah, to wait what.
Speaker 5: Six eight ten months before he finally got his whole cabinet.
Speaker 5: I don't even know if he still has his whole Yeah, he's.
Speaker 1: Got his whole cabinet in there, and you know, some
Speaker 1: of them were approved quickly, some took a little extra time.
Speaker 1: There's really only a month between the Electoral College in
Speaker 1: December and January twentieth, when the president is they have
Speaker 1: sworn in on inauguration day, and you know the practice
Speaker 1: is because there are new senators who take office in
Speaker 1: January and you know, join various committees, including Judiciary, and
Speaker 1: you know it has to go through committee first with
Speaker 1: hearings and so, and you got to wait for the
Speaker 1: newcomers to arrive, if there are any. I think the
Speaker 1: real problem is not so much of the cabinet, but
Speaker 1: you know other positions that are incredibly important, and that
Speaker 1: comes down to blue slips. And I talked about it
Speaker 1: before a couple of hours ago, but you know, blue
Speaker 1: slips are totally crooked. It refers to a US Senate
Speaker 1: tradition that began in nineteen seventeen, believe it or not,
Speaker 1: where home state senators get to approve or disapprove of
Speaker 1: presidential nominees for federal judgeships, US attorneys and it effectively
Speaker 1: gives you know, those home state senators veto power over
Speaker 1: the president's choice, you know, and they can block and
Speaker 1: have blocked important appointments, leading inevitably to a conflict, particularly
Speaker 1: with President Trump, who wants ended and he's absolutely right
Speaker 1: about it. A withheld or negative blue slip blocks a
Speaker 1: nominee from moving forward, and it gives minority party senators
Speaker 1: leverage that they are not entitled to under the constitutions
Speaker 1: and the appointment power of the President of the United States.
Speaker 1: It's a tradition that was wrong when it started in
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy it's wrong today, and it's high time that
Speaker 1: the Senate vote out the blue slips. But Will thanks
Speaker 1: for your question. It was a good one. Aaron joins
Speaker 1: us from Arizona, and I imagine it's a lot warmer
Speaker 1: in Arizona right now than it is here in Chile.
Speaker 1: New York City. Aaron, how are you.
Speaker 6: Good? How are you doing great?
Speaker 2: Fine?
Speaker 6: Actually seventy three out here right now. I didn't wanted
Speaker 6: to say. I think the American people are ready.
Speaker 7: Some people need to be held accountable for all this
Speaker 7: corruption and everything's going on. You know, the FBI were
Speaker 7: supposed to be investigating, and I'm sorry that you know,
Speaker 7: Dan Bongngino is going to be leaving and everything.
Speaker 6: But it's it's sickening. It's hardening to keep seeing people
Speaker 6: they got, you got them dead to right, and they're
Speaker 6: not going to do anything for the crimes and the
Speaker 6: fleecing and the corruption against the American people. They're just
Speaker 6: let off Scott for you know, oops, it's over with,
Speaker 6: thank you, And then it just continues on and continues
Speaker 6: on and continues on. It's getting really old.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree with you. And it does not instill
Speaker 1: much faith in our criminal justice system because you know,
Speaker 1: it's abundantly clear that this long running, corrupt, last crusade
Speaker 1: against Trump and in fact anybody connected with him. You know,
Speaker 1: I think now finally it is the subject of a
Speaker 1: criminal investigation by the FBI, the Department of Justice, and
Speaker 1: the US Attorneys and maybe we will see some indictments.
Speaker 1: I hope, so there should be. And you know, it
Speaker 1: incorporates all the way back to twenty and sixteen in
Speaker 1: the Russia hoax, which was code named Crossfire Hurricane, and
Speaker 1: it's stretched on for years to the more recent targeting
Speaker 1: of Republicans by the Biden administration code named Arctic Frost.
Speaker 1: Then why don't they always have these stupid code nemes,
Speaker 1: like you know, I mean, it's just dumb, and you know,
Speaker 1: among other things, they you know, they seized surreptitiously the
Speaker 1: data of more than four hundred Republicans, including US senators,
Speaker 1: members of the House. They were all victimized by the
Speaker 1: FBI and the DOJ. Their phone records were seized without
Speaker 1: notice to the members of Congress, and the law requires
Speaker 1: they be put on notice. And Judge James Bosberg, a
Speaker 1: notorious federal district judge in Washington, DC, was behind a
Speaker 1: lot of the seizures and the gag orders associated you
Speaker 1: can't tell them even though the law says you must
Speaker 1: tell them that you're seizing their phone records. I mean,
Speaker 1: this was a shocking abuse of power. And as I
Speaker 1: said at the top of the first hour, it's a
Speaker 1: crime deprivation of constitutional rights under color of law. And
Speaker 1: thankfully this is now the focus of an intensive investigation
Speaker 1: in Florida. John Solomon joined me in the first hour
Speaker 1: and said, it's a grand jury convened beginning January second
Speaker 1: in Fort Pierce and they're going to be looking at
Speaker 1: an ongoing criminal conspiracy that deprived Trump and others of
Speaker 1: constitutional rights, which again is a crime punishable by up
Speaker 1: to ten years behind bars for each illegal act. And
Speaker 1: I hope charges are brought. They should be. Our next
Speaker 1: caller joins us from California. Diane, are you there, It's
Speaker 1: Greg Jared and where are you in California.
Speaker 3: I'm in Santa Cruz.
Speaker 1: Ah, beautiful Santa Cruz.
Speaker 3: I know it's endless summer here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well that's nice to hear if you're there. What's
Speaker 1: your question or.
Speaker 3: Comment, Diane, I have a comment about concerning the recent
Speaker 3: university shooting. I think that the gun free zone idea
Speaker 3: should be shelved, and I think that we should arm
Speaker 3: all teachers and staff with non lethal firearms and make
Speaker 3: it known that the staff carries non lethal firearms.
Speaker 1: Yeah, here's my question. And I'm not arguing with you
Speaker 1: because I actually agree. But opponents of that say that teachers.
Speaker 1: What happens if teachers who are armed make a miscalculation
Speaker 1: or misunderstand a situation, and god forbid, you know a student,
Speaker 1: a child is killed? How do you get around that argument?
Speaker 1: And if I like your argument, I'll steal it.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, there's always a worst case scenario. I mean,
Speaker 3: I don't know that you can rule out every possibility.
Speaker 3: And I think it's an American to take our weapons
Speaker 3: from us. I think it's unconstitutional. And I've always thought
Speaker 3: that the more people that were prepared to defend, the better.
Speaker 3: I even used to say I thought that when you
Speaker 3: got on an airplane that everyone should be required some
Speaker 3: sort of self defense, right, that would be a great deterrence.
Speaker 3: So I think the deterrent part outweighs this the worst
Speaker 3: case scenario in these situations, you know, at the.
Speaker 1: Height of airplane hijackings, and particularly after you know, nine
Speaker 1: to eleven in the plane flown into the World Trade Center,
Speaker 1: you know, the Pentagon and so forth, Federal marshals armed
Speaker 1: were on board a lot of flights across America. So
Speaker 1: if you can do that, then to your argument, Diane,
Speaker 1: why not schools as well?
Speaker 3: Well, I'm I might reveal my age, but when I
Speaker 3: was in grade school, we used to our class used
Speaker 3: to take regular trips to the gun range.
Speaker 1: Really, where did you grow up?
Speaker 3: I grew up in Portland, believe it or not.
Speaker 1: Wow, things have changed in Portland.
Speaker 3: Oh my god. Well it's always been a looney bin.
Speaker 3: But it's but for some reason, that was a thing,
Speaker 3: and it went away shortly after I got into high school.
Speaker 3: But I just think that the that we've gotten away from,
Speaker 3: you know, we need to take it. It's prophylactic, right,
Speaker 3: we can be prepared, you know. And wasn't it a
Speaker 3: deterrent in World War Two to the Japanese that that
Speaker 3: we were a nation of of militia. I mean, I
Speaker 3: think it's a deterrence and I think it's un American
Speaker 3: to not even consider that it's it's constitutional right. And
Speaker 3: so I don't know. I don't know what the legal
Speaker 3: ramifications are. So you probably know better than I do.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, the Supreme Court has weighed in on
Speaker 1: gun free zones and their justification around schools and and
Speaker 1: so forth. But it may be something that they really
Speaker 1: need to revisit in you know, our age of rage
Speaker 1: and violence. Diane, you're in Santa Cruz, which is largely pardon.
Speaker 3: Me, I'm a fish out of water here. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I was about to say, you probably have no friends.
Speaker 3: We call it the left coast. You do have to
Speaker 3: keep your mouth shut. You can't say much. I did
Speaker 3: offend somebody today when they said they went to an
Speaker 3: office meeting and they had to rebuild their pronouns, and
Speaker 3: I said, oh, well, I threw away my list of
Speaker 3: pronouns when Trump got into.
Speaker 1: I'm sure you got a rather nasty look in return.
Speaker 3: All the way around, I got the site.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, Diane, thank you very much for giving
Speaker 1: me a call. I appreciate it. Fun talking to you
Speaker 1: going to San Antonio. Now Bob is standing by. Hi, Bob,
Speaker 1: how are you doing good?
Speaker 4: Rick, Thanks for taking my call. Sure, I want to
Speaker 4: talk about Joe Biden. And now there's a double standard
Speaker 4: when he he was caught with all this classified information
Speaker 4: in three different locations, and the Democrats ran interference for
Speaker 4: him so he would not get prosecuted. And they are
Speaker 4: constantly lecturing America that nobody is above the law, unless,
Speaker 4: of course, you're a Democrat.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and he.
Speaker 1: Had no immunity or declassification authority, so he had no
Speaker 1: excuse because he was doing it when he was vice president.
Speaker 1: In fact, some of the documents that were classified came
Speaker 1: from when he was the United States Senator before he
Speaker 1: was vice president. So we talk about a violation of
Speaker 1: the Espionage Act, and yet they treated him with kid
Speaker 1: gloves and then in the end, you know, the Special Council.
Speaker 1: So we're not going to prosecute him basically because he's
Speaker 1: too old and senile, but he's perfectly okay to be
Speaker 1: president of the United States. You got to love that rationale.
Speaker 1: Good point, Bob of Sandy an Tonio. Thanks for giving
Speaker 1: us a call. We're gonna take a quick break. I'll
Speaker 1: be right back with more of The Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 1: I'm Greg Jarret. Welcome back to the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you about tomorrow. We're almost finished here.
Speaker 1: We've got a great lineup of guests. For example, Peter
Speaker 1: Schweitzer will be joining us. He wrote the book on
Speaker 1: Clinton corruption called Clinton Cash, and it comes on the
Speaker 1: heel of newly to classified documents that expose how the
Speaker 1: FBI's investigation of Hillary Clinton and her Clinton Foundation was
Speaker 1: shut down by Barack Obama's Department of Justice and those
Speaker 1: in the White House. Also joining us Mike Davis. We'll
Speaker 1: talk to him about whether criminal charges will be brought
Speaker 1: against those who waged a relentless lawfare campaign against Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Please join me tomorrow on The Sean Hennity Show. For now,
Speaker 1: I'm Greg Jared