WEBVTT - Outlook for Rx Drug Pricing, 2020 Global Trends

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>news from the world's of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Bloomberg Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our hundred journalists and analysts more than

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You can

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show weekdays at two pm

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern only on Bloomberg Radio. Let's get into what is

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>happening overseas and obviously is among the most read stories

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>capturing a lot of attention moving markets, and it's those

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>air strikes against Iran, the response both political and military.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick Wadhams Joints, the State Department reporter for Bloomberg, joining

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Washington. He has been tracking

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this minute to minute. Nick, thanks so much for joining us,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having all right, so give us the latest here.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a pretty good sense of what's happened over

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours. What's happening now and where

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>do we go? Well, what you're seeing now is the

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>administration really now focusing on the messaging that follows what

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was an extremely bold and really unprecedented strike, an attack

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on a on a one of Iran's most prominent figures.

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>One one official told me it was equivalent to killing

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the guy who was a combination of CIA director and

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Defense secretary rolled into one so and then to top

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>it all off, it happened on Iraqi soil. Um. The

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 1>US is saying that this was a defensive action, and

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they're really trying to put the emphasis on the fact

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that they believed that by killing customs Summani, they were

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>saving American lives. Potentially hundreds of American lives were at risk.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>They're not telling us the details of that intelligence, but

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they are saying that there was an imminent threat to

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Americans in the region, um, and that that's why the

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>strike was taken. So really trying to get away from

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea that this was an escalatory act on on

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the part of the president. Nick, I've read at least

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>three articles today and um, you know, I'm in San

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and so we're all keeping our eyes on on technology.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But I do hear from at least multiple articles that

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the way that Iran now retaliates is via a cyber attack.

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you hearing as well that if they do a

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>measured response, would it be via cyber warfare. That's certainly

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the what's seen as being the most viable options.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>What's what's clear here is that if Iran chooses to respond,

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>which the general consensus is that they will have to, um,

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the question is how and and the word that keeps

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up is asymmetry. So they obviously don't have the

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>military might to take on the United States military head

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to head, but they can do other things. They can

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>um attack American forces and officials who are in the region.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>They can attack American allies, they can attack oil infrastructure

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in countries like Saudi Arabia, as they've done before. And

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they also have a very advanced cyber warfare program, so

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that could be another way to do it. Uh, It's

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>unlikely we would see the same sort of toe to

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>toe m military action that the United States wage because

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they just don't really have that refined a capability to

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>do that. So what we're looking for is in the

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>days or months ahead, some sort of asymmetrical response, And

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>indeed one of one of the ideas is that that

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>would likely take the shape of a cyber attack, because

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that's one way they could be most disruptive. And so

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Nick and you alluded to this a bit a few

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago, but you know, sort of the messaging around

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this some sharp words from the other side of the aisle,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the democratic side of the aisle, when it comes to Congress.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>What might we see upcoming in terms of the discussions

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in Washington about, you know, how the other branches of

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>government and specifically the legislative branch need to get involved

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>or should be involved going forward. Well, it really plays

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>into this broader discussion or debate that's been going on

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>for for years about you know, the quote unquote imperial presidency,

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the president himself just has an enormous

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of power to launch a military strike essentially at

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a time and place of his choosing, and regardless of

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it touches off a potential consulict or war, that

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to consult Congress, even though it is um

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Congress's right to to be the one that declares war.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think what you're going to see in the

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>next couple of days is a real effort by this

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>administration UH to present what it found or what it

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>concluded was the intelligence that led it to act, UM

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to persuade Congress that um, it did so in a

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>way that was justified and urgent and had to be

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>done now, and that there was no time to go

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>through other processes. Though of course, this administration, like others,

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>has has shown that it's not particularly wedded to doing

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>things UH in how in a way that we would

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>define as being sort of according to proper procedures. So um,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot of demands from from Democrats in Congress

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that uh they be keyed in on on what that

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>intelligence was. And then I think as that happens, we

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>should start to see better and have a better sense

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of what exactly it was that made the President feel

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this was such an need. And Nick, what are you

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>hearing about how else US officials the Trump administration is

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 1>preparing for any sort of retaliation That you said is

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the consensus from Iran. Well, the big thing is that

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the US is is bolstering its military presence in the

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Middle East now, and they plan to send about three

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand more troops from the eighty second Airborne UH into Kuwait. Um.

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>They had already deployed about seven troops to Quate earlier

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>this week. Um, after the after an attack on the U. S.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Embassy there. Um, So what what you're seeing here really

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is putting those forces in the region. Uh. The administration

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>says this is to protect Americans, that they will be

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>taking a defensive posture. Again, the insist this is not

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>meant to be an escalatory action. Um, but there is

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>really no one else who sees it that way. But UM,

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly there's a feeling even among American allies that this

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>was a vastly escalatory action. All Right, Nick Wadams, thank

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Part of a global team that is

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>keeping a close eye on this story, the implications, as

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we say, both military, politically, and financially and economically as

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this plays out in the coming days and weeks. We

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate your time, Nick, our State Department reporter joining

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>us from Washington, d C. All Right, So drug pricing

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>continues to be one of the hottest issues when it

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to consumers, when it comes to the markets, and

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to politics as well. Michael Ray joins us.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>He is founder and chief executive officer of r X

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Savings Solutions, joining us on the phone from Overland Park, Kansas. Michael,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you with us. Likewise, good to be here,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, So give us a sense of where we

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are when it comes to drug pricing. As the beginning

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year and the beginning of the year, I

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have to think, given that it's an election, your presidential

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>election here, we're gonna be hearing a lot about drug

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>pricing in that realm. It's also something that affects just

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>about all of us. So where are we? Ah? Yeah,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think you know, when we look back in

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the last decade, this has been a consistent theman issue

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>really highlighted when when Trump won back in the end

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of sixteen and in the seventeen where you know, you

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>had pharma companies coming in and taking social pledges to

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of do things a bit differently. In the subsequent

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>years since we haven't really seen too much different. There

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>have been some kind of tamped down percentage prices, but

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of increases is actually outpacing uh this year

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>when you look at first three days in versus by

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:09.559
<v Speaker 1>over Michael, more drug price increases. Yeah, tell us why

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I understand the need to raise drug prices to invest

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in R and D find new cures. These drug trials

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>are expensive. But why are we seeing what sounds like

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>more drug pricing. It's higher than inflation, higher than last year.

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>What's the balance? Yeah, it's a good question. I think

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's the you know, trillion dollar question that

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone's trying to answer. You know, there is um when

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>when drug prices are expected in the market for public markets.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Profitability certainly that's one driver. Um. You know, less profitability,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>uh doesn't mean less money for R and D or

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>does it mean maybe less profits in the short term,

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but more in the long term. And what's really good

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for um, the pharma the pharma company long term? That's

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a question. I think we're very shortsighted um with what's

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>going to up in next quarter, next year, and we're

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>not looking five to ten years out in a lot

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of cases with the with the pharma company operation. Right,

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And have you seen sort of behavior markedly change in

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of economic financial decisions being made on the front

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>lines by these companies in response to a lot more

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>public and political pressure. Well, I think what we've seen

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>from the large cap pharma companies is uh, you know,

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of consistently below ten price increases UM. There they're

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>still quite a bit higher than inflation. And when you

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>think about the compound effect of a nine nine increase

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>over three years, you know, compounded that's much bigger than

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>so you're still seeing um. You know, these high dollar

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>products come to market with compounded rates of increase in

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>pricing UM and and that ultimately just continues to strain

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy as a whole. Health plans, employers in and

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>consumers certainly, who are the one that are carrying that burden? Michael.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm based out here in San Francisco, and in about

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a week or two we will be heading over to

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the weston St. Francis where we're going to be at

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the JPMorgan Healthcare Conference. We have interviews with all of

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>these big tech companies, Fiser, you name it, some of

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>these big healthcare companies. What is the number one question,

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the number one theme we should be asking big drug

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>companies when we're at that JP Morgan Healthcare conference. Well,

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's you know, it's a drug pricing

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is very complex. I mean, there's obviously the pharma company

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>where things start, and there's a lot of intermediaries that

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>go between production of a pharmaceutical and the end consumer, Um,

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>who's who ends up taking it? So, you know, the

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>big question is what is driving drug price increases? Is it,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the need to try to appease the public

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>market from a profitability standpoint? Is it more money for

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>R and D? Is it for other people in supply chain? Um?

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Those are all the questions that really need to be

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>answered or didn't I think? UM? From a farmer perspective,

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll certainly have opinions on you know the at the

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, is it is it? Um? You know,

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>what is the driver? Why would they take these increases consistently? Um?

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>If they claim that there's no actual you know, net

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>profitability by doing so, Um, then what would be the

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>reason to to keep doing it? Where to leave it there?

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Ree is founder and chief executive officer of our

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ex Savings Solutions. He joined us on the phone from

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Overland Park, Kansas. Next, Well, it's more connected world. For sure,

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>We're more connected to our cars, but maybe less connected

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to each other by virtue of everything that's around us.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into that and much more with the chief

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>futurists over at Ford that Cheryl Connolly. She joins us

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from dearborn, Michigan. Cheryl, Happy New Year.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you with us. Thanks, Happy New Year

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to you too. All Right, First of all, Taylor and

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about this off air. You have a

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>really cool job. I mean, that's fair to say. I

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>do have a really really great job. I'm the chief

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>teutist before I've done future work for the company for

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sixteen years and I've been with Forward for twenty four years.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So it's a really really great uh gig. And it

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>always surprises people when I tell them that my job

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is to look outside of the auto industry anything pertains

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically to automotive. Al Right, so you have recently put

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>some thoughts out there. What was the thing that most

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>intrigues you as you look ahead, especially as we think

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>about twenty which feels like kind of a key year

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to our relationship with our cars. It is.

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>It is a really big year. I mean, we're starting

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a new decade, and it's interesting because it causes me

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>to reflect on the last decade. So I mentioned already,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I've done this work for sixteen years, and we used

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to never talk about it publicly. It was considered top secret,

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>prietory stuff. But eight years ago we decided to start

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>publishing some of our thoughts, and the more we shared,

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the richer our insights became. So it's really great to

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>have conversations like this with you and Taylor. But what

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I've seen over the last eight years is this constant

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>theme surrounding trust and mistrust and business government media has

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>never been higher. But what we see for is that

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the mistrust is starting to spill into our relationships. More specifically, loneliness.

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Loneliness is a global epidemic, and loneliness, you know, we'll

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>think about loneliness kind of as a temporary state, but

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>doctors actually say that loneliness doesn't just make you feel bad,

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's bad for you. One surgeon general said that it

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is the equivalent of being obese or smoking fifteen cigarettes today. Wow,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that is quite a statistic. You know. Another thing in

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>your report, Cheryl, that really stood out to me is

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that fifty eight percent of adults say they feel like

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to fight climate change, yet less than half

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>are actually taking action. We think green transportation methods like

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>electric cars or public transportation. Where are we in, you know,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>at least starting to get more on board with some

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of the EAVY driving methods. So what you're talking about

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is a trend that we call the green paradox. You know,

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone says that they're actively changing or fighting climate change

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in big ways and small but what we see is

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that most Americans are only willing to what I should

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>say both. It's of Americans that we survey are only

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>willing to embrace sustainable initiatives if the inconvenience is small

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or nonexistent. So how do we close the gap between

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>intention and action? And some of it is that people

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to make trade offs. They want things

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to be simplified and easy. And e VS is tricky

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>because well fifty six percent of the people we spoke

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to said more people should drive evs, only seventeen of

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the respondents actually they do, so that percentages remain really low.

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And we know that people don't fully understand the benefits.

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>All they think is about is this tradeoff or compromise.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's exciting because Board will introduce this year for

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the very first time in all electric new forward Mustang

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Mache Support utility vehicle. The most people recognize Mustang as

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a performance vehicle like a pony car um paddles to

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the metal wind at your hair convertible. So to think

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>about that brand legacy apply to a sport utility vehicle

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be an evy totally changed your notion

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of what you get. In other words, for our customers,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that means you can't have milogion ruscle. You don't have

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to compromise right. Well, and it's I'm so glad you

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>brought that up because I have this sense for me

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>reading your report, you sort of validate some things that

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we suspect, which is people sort of say

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing and do another, right, you know, they expect

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>so much of a brand, and yet if it's the

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>affordable choice, sir, it's the convenient choice, maybe they're going

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead and do that. Am I miss? Am?

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I missreading that In my two cynical about that, I'm

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>sad to say that I share in your cynicism. I mean,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of it is is that climate change

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in general is difficult because it doesn't evoke the fight

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>or flight instinct. It's abstract, it feels distant, so we

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>don't always take it as urgently as we should. But

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't experienced the summer where I traveled to South

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Africa and the public restrooms of a number of the

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and beating places I went to had shut off

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>their faucets and ask people to use hand sanitizer instead.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And it was just this reality. But like we talk

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>about climate change as this distant thing um irregular weather patterns,

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but in a place like South Africa, they see it

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>as a meaningful threat, in emminent threat to their food

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and water supply. Cheryl, I, I wanna get some of

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts because you mentioned, you know, Ford specifics push

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>into the electric vehicle market to help combat some of

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the climate issues that you just addressed, you know, the

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Mustang or even hearing the F one fifty trying to

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>revamp it's e V lineup as well. How do you

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>view forward in the midst of the e V push.

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, we got numbers out of Tesla this morning.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>They just continue to dominate the e V space. Where

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>do you see Ford sort of all in the EV

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>pictures as playing a role. We actually really excited about

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>our investment in this space. I mean Ford has um

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a long legacy of playing in the sustainability space, and

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that has everything to do with Bill Ford, who is

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the great grandson of Henry Ford and still actively involved

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>with the company as the executive chair of our board.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>And he has said, I have two passions in my

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>life their automobiles and their environment, and he has spent

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>his forty year career trying to reconcile the conflict between

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the two, and so he was pushing us to start.

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was actually pushed for the EV program

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>long before you could actually make a solid business case

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>for it. But what you said, you know, is that

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not everyone wants to pay for it. There are those

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>those people who see themselves as being like a deep

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>green consumer, and then there are those who are less

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>likely to jump on the bandwagon. But we have invested

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily into our um EV program. We plan to develop

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>develop new electric vehicles UM and we're working with partners

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>new partners on this like rivian um to create new

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>evs and Rivan is actually we've made a five million

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar investment with Rivan and rivian is bordered with Amazon

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to help deliver packages in the future. So we think

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's really big opportunity here right all right, Thank

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Haryl Connolly, Chief futurists over at Ford,

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>she joins on the phone from dearborn, Michigan. All right, well,

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>here in New York City, we care about a spit

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>relatively small number of things. Real estate is a very

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>important one of them, Let's be honest. Oh, Shrek Garmiel

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is real estate reporter for Bloomberg. She joins us on

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the phone from right here in New York City, O, Shrett,

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Happy new year. Great have you with us? Happy New year?

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, So what happened with Manhattan home sales? This

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>has been quite something to watch over the past few years,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>because after that sky is the limit mentality for so long,

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been quite that way, No, it hasn't. And

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess the top line number is Manhattan sales fell again.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know they've been falling for almost every quarter

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>for the last two years except for one. Um and

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so they felt but they fell by the smallest amount,

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, And so it feels like the new reality.

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>It takes usually eighteen months to take and it's just

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that finally sellers are kind of realizing that they can't

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just name any price and expect to have people outbid them. Um,

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that you may have to actually lower your price, and

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so it was just reflects that deals are getting done, um,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but the market is still flow Yeah. And what I

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>liked about that is that if you're a seller and

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you're willing to acknowledge you have to come down a

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit in price, you're actually making buyers a little

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>bit more encouraged and then they are coming to the table,

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>right they are. And I think the tale of the

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>tail for the last two years is that sales have

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>been falling. They were falling like ten, eleven, twelve, very

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>significant numbers, and that's because the buyers were just staying away.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>They weren't even bothering to bid. They just assumed that,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is overpriced. Sellers would just you know,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>laugh them off, and so they just didn't transact. And

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so the markets for the week seller buyers are still

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>very wary of overpaying. They're incredibly wary overpaying. But the

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that the sales drop is so low suggests that

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a meeting of the minds. It's not that wide anymore.

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>And so when you look at the numbers, sort of

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a level down, what is selling better? You know, give

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>us some price ranges for what seems to be moving

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>better than others. Well, I guess New York price ranges

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>are relative to the rest of the country. But in

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>New York it's the under three million market, which actually

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>New York is kind of work course housing, um. But

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>under three millions where most of the sales were about

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of the sales UM. Which sounds great, except

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for New York has a very very large glut of

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>luxury properties that was really where all the construction was

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>um in the last five years and and still happening.

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So there's a there's a real oversupply of of of

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>properties above five million UM. Not a majority of the

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>sales were not happening there um, but but yeah, under

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>three million is probably where things were more brisk UM. So,

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the headwinds that we have discussed

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of years are foreign buyer is

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>not showing up in the way that they did before,

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>or some of the tax changes that were predicted to

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have an impact and seemingly did. And then as you said,

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of this overbuilding that we saw on the luxury end,

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>especially on the first to the foreign buyers and the

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>tax changes, had those sort of ameliorated or have they

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>just worked their way through the system. Where do we

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>stand on those factors? Oh, those are still very much

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>weighing on on the market. So foreign buyers, um, they were,

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they were a very big source of virus for for

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>some of this, really this luxury product. People would come

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in pay cast I mean for a decade plus, right, yeah,

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and so and and some might still be there, but

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>there's really no urgency. There's so much to buy UM

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know some of some of it.

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have capital controls in some countries, so

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that making it harder to buy UM. So for the

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>most part, they they're gone. UM. And then people who

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>are left who might be buying this even as a pianetterror,

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, domestic buyers or pane terrors, or people who

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>might want to live there. You've got I mean, you've

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>got thousands and thousands of units to choose from. You

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>are in no rush, You're gonna be you know, you

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to you want to bargain and and obviously

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>making a bargain when you're dealing, we're making a deal

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about a property that's ten million, twelve million,

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>thirteen million dollars that that might take longer than maybe

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying a two million dollar property. Um so,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's a very slow moving market. That's a very

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>big factor. Tax law as a factor, um, both on

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the federal and on the state level. Um. On July one,

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>New York State raised the closing costs um so, Basically,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying and they made them the closing costs

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>more progressive. So essentially the starting at two million dollars,

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>you're paying a higher share of the closing costs in

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the mansion tax levies now a higher rate based on

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>how expensive your property is. Then there's a transfer tax

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that also is higher. So the more expensive your property is,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the higher your closing costs are. Um. And then there's

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>still talk right now in Albany when when the legislature

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>reconvenes of imposing a Pieta tear tax, which would be

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>an annual tax on second home properties five million and more.

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>So there's probably some fear of that happening. Um So,

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of a lot of impact on

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the market. Right all right, a great summary. Thank you

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>so much for your reporting. Keenly watch for sure. Oh

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Shrek Carmiel is real estate reporter for Blueberg join us

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New York City, talking Manhattan real

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>estate road a journal. Yeah but you let me drive?

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no no, no, please, I'll do the rod reveal.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive a ball. Just drive, baby, the question,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>drive the drive to the globe community. Things well dry up,

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Jadn on Bloomberg Radio, and it is time for the

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Drive to the close. One of our faiths back with us.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>David Dietz, President and chief investment Strategies for Point You

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Management, looking after about six point six billion dollars,

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Summit, New Jersey.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Happy New year, Mr Deeds, Same to you, Jason. All right, well,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>nice to catch up with you. You know, it's funny,

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if it's funny. It's interesting maybe

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have talked for so long, you and I

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and you and others and me and others about this

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>notion of well, there's some geopolitical risk out there. Looks

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like we've got some geopolitical risk at this point. How

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>does this play through the markets in your estimation? Well,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly it is a wake up call for our all

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>market participants to not be complacent. We've saw one of

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the best markets since two thousand thirteen. Last year, there

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>may have been a hint of complacency in the markets.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>But following the taking out of Iranian general last night,

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>UM and what the implications that would that could ultimately

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>have to the energy markets and peace in the world.

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>UM Marcus reacted strongly, and I think people realize that

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if they were too far out on their skis, if

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't taken in consideration, what could happen. UH, they

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>were under tremendous pressure today. And David is you take

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a look at the moves today, particularly the socks here

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>down one point six percent? Is this a buying opportunities

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>there's finally a little bit of a pullback. Given everyone

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>consensus is stocks post another decent year, So it could

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be a buying opportunity. It really depends where your portfolio is.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid that awful lot of people are coming into

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this year very overweight stocks and underweight safer haven's, and

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for them it's probably not a buying opportunity because to

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the extent that UM the risk that they're taking is

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent with the type of shocks that periodically market experience

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like today, UM is a chance to perhaps to rethink

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>where you are and take some chips off the table

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>from the risk assets. On the other hand, if you've

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>been sitting in cash or have been too conservative, this

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>is probably an opportunity to take advantage of pullbacks and

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>stocks because I think that this is not derailing some

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>very solid fundamentals as we come into two thousand twenty,

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and so talk to us about those fundamentals, because obviously

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 1>earnings is at the core of all of this, and

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you've you've mentioned that. But what do we expect, especially

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>as we're getting into earning season in just a few

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in a matter of weeks and maybe even days. Yeah,

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so. Uh. You know, the backdrop, of course is

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>a very dubbish fed and of course some positive what

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we believe to be resolutions to a number of trade

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>dispeech worldwide. Um. You know what we have though, with

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the higher valuations, which I guess can be justified because

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the lower interest rates. UM, what we need here is

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>strong corporate earnings to take the market to the next level. UM.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>This past year, earnings were close to However, analysts looking

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>forward to see earnings up corrupt ten percent, so evaluations

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>meeting multiple for those earning state constant earnings increase ten percent,

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the market go up ten percent. Having said that, we're

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>more conservative than that. We see earnings actually coming down

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>as the year progressive as people get more realistic. So

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>we're advising our investors, gee, maybe six to eight percent

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth, which might give you a market at the

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the year up about six eight percent. And so, David,

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>we love talking names with you, and I want to

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>bring in one name that Taylor and now we're talking

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.959
<v Speaker 1>about just a few minutes ago, which is Wells Fargo.

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I asked you about it every time and and the

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>context I want to ask it in today is you've

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>got a record number of are a a high number,

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the highest in quite some time of cell ratings for

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fargo. Maybe not the enthusiasm that Charlie Scharff is

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>looking for. What's your case for Wells Fargo at this moment? Well, um, so,

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we actually are Bollosh and Wells Fargo and it's one

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of our top ten stocks for two thousand twenty. I'll

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>put that out there. Now. Why are we bullish? First

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's one of the best franchises UH in

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the country coast to coast, which gets in the most

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>efficiencies for advertising and marketing and so forth. Um. Second,

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they have traditionally been conservative underwriters of debt and so

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>therefore to the extent that we're getting near the end

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of the economic cycle and you need to pay attention

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to credit quality there right there with you. Um. They

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>also have a low exposure to investment banking and bond

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>trading activities, which have often gotten other financial institutions cross

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>wise when things got volatile. Um. And so you know, uh,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you've also got a decent dividend of about four percent.

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>What is the key issue? The key issue now is

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they've got a new leader who from the Bank of

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.479
<v Speaker 1>New York, but not quite as proven as some of

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the legacy leaders. Um. And Second, of course, you still

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.479
<v Speaker 1>have the Federal Reserve which has ring fence the growth

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of Wells Fargo until they show some changing cultures. But

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately Jason could be one of the catalysts for

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a better Wells Fargo if the Federal Reserve lifts. At Finally,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I think interest rates could be moving higher. That means

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>net interest spreads expand. In this manna from heaven for financials.

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>David another stock they caught my eyes Fiser. I'm heading

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>over to the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference in a few

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>weeks right over here at the uh St Francis in

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. What do you like about FISER given they've

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>had what's been relatively anemic recent sales growth. Well, so, Taylor,

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's a number of problems for the whole

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>healthcare sector. You know. Right at the top, of course

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is the political scene where politicians and both sides that

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are are very concerned about the rapid rise in healthcare costs.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But nevertheless, when the time gets tough, go with the

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest player. And I think um Fiser has two key

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>advantages that UM puts them, has to put them in

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio. One, of course, is they spend more than

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone else on research and development, and is the type

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of business where the more shots on goal, the more

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you're doing, the more likely you're going to find that

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>blackbuster drug for cancer or whatever. Second, you know, they

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have the largest salesforce not just in this country, but worldwide.

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And of course a lot of the increase in spending

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to come from outside this country which want

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy some of the great health care that we

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>have in this country, I'll be not inexpensive. Um, so

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they are very well positioned. Of course, Why

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you're waiting for things to get better, for new discoveries

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to be out there. You have a different end that's

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>approaching four percent. It is a so called dog of

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the down this year, one of the top ten yielders.

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think you are well paid to wait and

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be patient here, all right, David did is always good

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to catch up with you, President and chief investment Strategies.

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>For a point, you Wealth Management looking after about six

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars there in Summit, New Jersey. That's

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>where he joined us. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. You can also listen to our radio

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>show every weekday at two pm Eastern only on Bloomberg

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Radio m