Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom Hudge. Trump pulled Brennan's clearance,
Speaker 1: and now the media is completely freaked out. This is
Speaker 1: a tempest in a teapop, but it represents a lot
Speaker 1: of the Trump arrangement syndrome we've seen across the country.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about that, plus the three hundred newspapers across
Speaker 1: the country that are all reminding us that, yes, in fact,
Speaker 1: the main three media is run by libs and it's
Speaker 1: all about Libs. We'll get into that and so much
Speaker 1: more coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is
Speaker 1: to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no
Speaker 1: mistake America, You're a great American Again. The buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show begins now. Is this an effort to try to
Speaker 1: cow individuals, both inside and outside of the government to
Speaker 1: make sure that they don't say anything either is critical
Speaker 1: of Mr Trump or with which he disagrees. And I've
Speaker 1: seen this type of behavior and actions on the part
Speaker 1: of foreign tyrants and despots and autocrats for many, many
Speaker 1: years during my CIA and nascurity career. I never ever
Speaker 1: thought that I would see it here in the States.
Speaker 1: I haven't had any access to classified information since I
Speaker 1: left the government. The larger implication here is the jeopardy
Speaker 1: to our first our first Amendment rights and by extension, others.
Speaker 1: And by the way, uh, there's a very chilling message
Speaker 1: here to people in the intelligence community. If you te
Speaker 1: up intelligence that the president doesn't like, you may risk
Speaker 1: losing your clearance and and there by your job. This
Speaker 1: head and eerie memory of an enemy's list. These people
Speaker 1: were being singled out um to have either the occurrences
Speaker 1: revoked or in the process of being revoked. To me,
Speaker 1: smacks of Nixonian type practices of trying to silence anyone
Speaker 1: who's willing to criticize this president that puts us again
Speaker 1: in uncharted territory. Oh my, they are so upset about this.
Speaker 1: Welcome to the buck Sex and Show everybody. Here we
Speaker 1: are day two of the of the clearance freak out,
Speaker 1: and there's so much here that's wrong. I mean, first
Speaker 1: of all, you you have to understand, as I've discussed
Speaker 1: with you here on the show, that a security clearance
Speaker 1: is not a right. A security clearance is a privilege
Speaker 1: that you are given by the government to work for
Speaker 1: the government in government service. Um, I wouldn't even get
Speaker 1: into but I've had one or two people. Now, let's
Speaker 1: just say one person in particular was saying, you know, well,
Speaker 1: did you have a clearance when you left the government?
Speaker 1: Some media person, No, imbecile. I lost my clearance when inactive,
Speaker 1: which means no longer up and running, and therefore lost
Speaker 1: my access to classify when I resigned from the CIA,
Speaker 1: as it should be for everyone. They can always resurrect
Speaker 1: your clearance. This is not this is not rocket science.
Speaker 1: If you have to do rocket science and need a clearance,
Speaker 1: they can bring it back. Right. This is uh, this
Speaker 1: is all just more Trump't arrangement syndrome getting played out
Speaker 1: through another prison, this time through through the security clearance process.
Speaker 1: The next president can restore Brennan's clearance. It hasn't been
Speaker 1: adjudicated that he is unfit for a clearance. They're just
Speaker 1: pulling his clearance. It does give you a little bit
Speaker 1: of a window, though, into the mentality of Democrats in
Speaker 1: general when it comes to government service, which is one
Speaker 1: this notion of you know what can then can you
Speaker 1: not be fired? I would want to ask democrats this,
Speaker 1: what about somebody who works for the CIA? Now can
Speaker 1: they do TV interviews and talk about how well, then
Speaker 1: I'm at the CIA and I'm seeing everything every day
Speaker 1: and this president's a trader, And do you get to
Speaker 1: keep your job if you do that? You know, no,
Speaker 1: no disciplinary action. Do you do you get to stay
Speaker 1: in the government and undermine the executive branch from within
Speaker 1: the executive branches? Is that the new standard that we
Speaker 1: have the folks who are listening to your military, No,
Speaker 1: you don't get to wear your uniform and go on
Speaker 1: TV and say, yes, I'm I'm activity military. But you know,
Speaker 1: this general should be called General Bozo because he's a
Speaker 1: clown and an idiot. I mean, I've never been in
Speaker 1: the military, but those you're listening, A lot of you
Speaker 1: listening I know who have been or are now in
Speaker 1: the military, would say, uh yeah, buck you you would
Speaker 1: get in some trouble for that. You would not be
Speaker 1: It would be an issue if you went on TV
Speaker 1: in your military uniform, said your name and rank and
Speaker 1: then trash your commanding officer or trash your division or whatever.
Speaker 1: You look at the free speech, free speech. These people
Speaker 1: like Brennan and Clapper are working the government their whole lives.
Speaker 1: They apparently don't know what the First Amendment means. They
Speaker 1: have neither read nor understood the First Amendment. No one
Speaker 1: is silencing them. I mean, this is laughable. Brennan is
Speaker 1: being silenced, what as he's on national TV and being
Speaker 1: turned into some kind of an anti Trump martyr. He's
Speaker 1: he's being silenced because he hasn't gotten his seven figure
Speaker 1: book deal yet, because he hasn't set up a go
Speaker 1: fund Me account to give him hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: dollars of just free cash, because apparently the hashtag resistance
Speaker 1: got a lot of money to throw around. This is crazy,
Speaker 1: and people are saying, fuck you know, you should know better.
Speaker 1: You work in the agency. This should be non political.
Speaker 1: Oh hold up, hold up the people that have made
Speaker 1: the intelligence community so political that I don't know if
Speaker 1: it will ever recover from what has been done to it.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it will ever regain the sense
Speaker 1: of political neutrality and objective, fact based information and analysis
Speaker 1: that was not about partisanship. I don't know if it'll
Speaker 1: ever regain that. But it was lost not because Trump
Speaker 1: pulled some some you know, government stooges clearance, but because
Speaker 1: a bunch of former government stooges in government, used their
Speaker 1: position to try to throw an election, and then right
Speaker 1: after they left government service, or in some cases continue
Speaker 1: to just stay in government service, like comey, uh, you
Speaker 1: tried to leverage their previous position to undermine the current
Speaker 1: commander in chief. But this isn't silencing, he's just pulling
Speaker 1: their clearances. Doesn't think that they should have access to
Speaker 1: classified information. I would ask you this. You heard Clapper
Speaker 1: there say or I have an anxious classified shouldn't I
Speaker 1: came out? Okay, So what's the big deal? It would
Speaker 1: be very it would be very unethical and in fact illegal,
Speaker 1: depending on what happened to access classified and then use
Speaker 1: that for political attacks on TV. That would be reckless, right,
Speaker 1: So no one people have gosh, I've had so many
Speaker 1: idiot trolls. Well, you used to have a clearance, used
Speaker 1: to be in the CIA. Yeah, years and years and
Speaker 1: years ago. And I've never said, oh, i'm because of
Speaker 1: what I know in the CIA, the current commander in
Speaker 1: chief is a traitor. And oh, by the way, I
Speaker 1: want to keep my security clearance because I say so
Speaker 1: this this notion that that he's being silenced, How is
Speaker 1: he being silenced because he doesn't have a clearance. He
Speaker 1: doesn't need a clearance and he shouldn't have it anyway.
Speaker 1: So the president has taken this action, you know, if
Speaker 1: nothing else, it's a reminder to Brennan that, yeah, he is,
Speaker 1: in fact the commander chief. He is the President United States.
Speaker 1: Trump is the guy. And just because Brennan doesn't like him,
Speaker 1: let's go on TV and say this, This president is
Speaker 1: a traitor. He's traitorous to the American people. Uh, doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that it changes what's really going on, doesn't change
Speaker 1: the reality of who's running the show. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: this is just nonsense. You know. Jim Jordan, I gotta
Speaker 1: say I like Jim Jordans on this on on a
Speaker 1: whole bunch of things lately. How many how many newspapers
Speaker 1: and how many news outlets did you see that, uh,
Speaker 1: that that ran that there was a retraction one of
Speaker 1: those players who said that, remember Jim Jordan was never
Speaker 1: accused of wrongdoing himself, but that he didn't take action
Speaker 1: for wrongdoing, that there was a retraction. How many do you, Mike,
Speaker 1: did you see that that there were some one of
Speaker 1: one of the one of the people are there was
Speaker 1: some kind of walk back of the story with Jim
Speaker 1: Jordan that he actually didn't you know that it wasn't
Speaker 1: he didn't know or it wasn't clear did not get
Speaker 1: covered unless I'm unless I have my facts wrong, if
Speaker 1: I do all correct it. But I'm pretty sure that's
Speaker 1: what happened. But Jim Jordan's been very good lately, and
Speaker 1: and on Brennan, I think he sees this pretty clearly.
Speaker 1: Play Cliff nine, John Brennan lee the information to Harry Reid,
Speaker 1: lost his clearance. James Clapper lied under oath in the
Speaker 1: Intel Committee in the Senate. James Comey has been fired
Speaker 1: for leaking information on all kinds of other things. Andy
Speaker 1: McCabe lied three times under oath, has been fired. Sally
Speaker 1: Yates fired, Peter Struck demoted, then fired, Lisa Page demoted,
Speaker 1: then left the FBI. Jim Baker, Chief Council with the FBI,
Speaker 1: demoted and then left. I think all those people, frankly
Speaker 1: should lose their clearance, particularly when you have that kind
Speaker 1: of that kind of history where you've been fired, demoted,
Speaker 1: leaking information. Why should you have a clearance. So I
Speaker 1: agree with the President what he did. I think there's
Speaker 1: a lot more people who, frankly deserve the same treatment now.
Speaker 1: But the overwhelming media consensus is, of course they they
Speaker 1: are just in a frenzy over this thing. Oh my god,
Speaker 1: the silencing. The silencing mean we the same people that
Speaker 1: all back Brennan and the other intel people that have
Speaker 1: been named is possibly losing their clearances from Trump. Those
Speaker 1: same people are the ones who are are also claiming
Speaker 1: that the First Amendment is under great assault. On the
Speaker 1: same day that you've got and we'll get to this,
Speaker 1: three newspapers all reading from the same sheet of music. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but they're being silenced. There are political monoculture dedicated to
Speaker 1: destroying this presidency and opposing everything he does. But but sure,
Speaker 1: they're they're in danger of silencing. I don't know how
Speaker 1: they can take themselves seriously when they say such stupid things,
Speaker 1: but but they do. Somehow, they do seem to be
Speaker 1: of the belief that, you know, they should be treated
Speaker 1: with the utmost respect while they expand upon these preposterous
Speaker 1: ideas that they have. They're being silenced. You know that
Speaker 1: they don't know what it is to be sounds you know,
Speaker 1: you know what silence is people when there's a concerted
Speaker 1: effort to inflate the perception of or to make it
Speaker 1: seem like there's an inflated number of uh, those who
Speaker 1: want to boycott a product or a service, or a
Speaker 1: person or a company for political reasons and bring these
Speaker 1: concerted digital pressure campaigns to pull all sponsors from somebody
Speaker 1: at once and a d platform them and get them
Speaker 1: kicked off of platforms. That's silencing. Pulling somebody security clearance
Speaker 1: in no reasonable perspective could be considered a silencing, right,
Speaker 1: But this is what this is what they're saying. This
Speaker 1: is the storyline. And I think that Trump realizes that
Speaker 1: this is a This is a very it's a good
Speaker 1: thing to have this former CIA chief be a spokesperson
Speaker 1: for the anti Trump resistance because he's a loon and
Speaker 1: he's a hack, and he has been for a very
Speaker 1: long time. This was Obama's counter terrorism advisor. This was
Speaker 1: the guy that Obama trusted the most on counter terrorism
Speaker 1: in the White House. I know I wanted to be
Speaker 1: in charge, now do I want running the show? By
Speaker 1: the way, also, when he was CI director, SEWI was
Speaker 1: a debacle, an absolute debacle. But you know, no no
Speaker 1: one ever gets no one ever holds into account on
Speaker 1: it for that or anything. This is another another time
Speaker 1: when the outrage meter, you'd think maybe they'd run out
Speaker 1: of of juice for the outrage meter, right, they run
Speaker 1: out of of of stuff to put in it. And Nope, Nope,
Speaker 1: there's always more. They've always got another level. They can
Speaker 1: always take the dial to eleven on the outrage. And
Speaker 1: this time it's with Trump's clearances. There's like, oh, there
Speaker 1: might be more, more people might lose their clearances. And
Speaker 1: then he wrote this piece which I want to talk
Speaker 1: to you you about in a moment that you know, the
Speaker 1: same guy whos complaining about his clearance and being silenced
Speaker 1: is getting a featured editorial in the New York Times
Speaker 1: the same day. Oh wow, look at that. He's being
Speaker 1: silenced though he's in the biggest newspaper in the country.
Speaker 1: He's on TV every five minutes practically right now, but
Speaker 1: he's being silence. Don't know. His editorial, though, is a
Speaker 1: is a big, steamy pile of garbage. It is a
Speaker 1: dumpster fire of innuendo and craplousey analysis. And we will
Speaker 1: pour some gasoline on this dumpster fire and make it
Speaker 1: burn even hotter, I guess, because I'm going to tear
Speaker 1: this apart in a moment and the the the Brennan
Speaker 1: editorial in New York Times very very poor. Um eight
Speaker 1: four four nine two eight two five eight four buck
Speaker 1: if you want to chat, please do give me a ring.
Speaker 1: And uh, also, folks that if you're on Twitter. I
Speaker 1: talked about Twitter sometimes here you can always tweet at
Speaker 1: me at buck Sex and just be like, Hey, I
Speaker 1: listen to your show and I'm on Twitter. That's fun.
Speaker 1: Or you can say something pithy or witty, or you know,
Speaker 1: tell me to get a haircut, whatever you want, We'll
Speaker 1: be right back. Something that I think you should all
Speaker 1: member or I should tell you if you didn't know
Speaker 1: this before, is uh this courtesy is Steve Hayes over
Speaker 1: the Weekly Standard that when Brennan was CIA director, his
Speaker 1: agency presented unnecessary non disclosure agreements to Benghazi survivors and
Speaker 1: get this at the memorial service for their fallen comrades. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's how Brennan used to do things. It's the kind
Speaker 1: of shop Brennan used to run. Now he's Mr Hero though,
Speaker 1: now he's oh because he's saying terrible things about Trump.
Speaker 1: If you if you will say horrible things about Trump,
Speaker 1: the left will excuse anything about your past, and we'll
Speaker 1: also promise you great things in your future. That's probably
Speaker 1: why Brennan has this piece that is a piece of
Speaker 1: garbage in the New York Times today the same day
Speaker 1: he's claiming that he needs to be silenced, or he
Speaker 1: is being silenced. Rather, President Trump's claims of no collusion
Speaker 1: are hugwash, hugwash. He says, that's why the President revoked
Speaker 1: my security clearance to try to silence anyone who would
Speaker 1: shared challenge him. Um, how would that work exactly? Let's
Speaker 1: let's take Brennan the the hysterical pearl, collecting Brennan at
Speaker 1: his word here, how exactly would pulling the clearance? Uh
Speaker 1: terrify him? Brennan is going on national TV and calling
Speaker 1: the President of the United States a traitor, a traitor
Speaker 1: and has suffered no consequences of any kind. Now he
Speaker 1: has a First Amendment right to say that. But the
Speaker 1: notion that he has being silenced, I mean, this guy
Speaker 1: has has completely jumped the shark already many times. He
Speaker 1: keeps jumping that shark over and over again. And now
Speaker 1: he the clearance gets pulled. Now he's gonna stop. He's
Speaker 1: saying that the President United States is betraying the country,
Speaker 1: is a pawn of the Kremlin. But now that he's
Speaker 1: pulled my clearance, I don't think I can say the
Speaker 1: mean things anymore because I'm scared. That doesn't make very
Speaker 1: much sense, does it. That doesn't make very much sense
Speaker 1: at all. Um. I think it's uh. I think it's
Speaker 1: important for everybody to understand that Brennan is a is
Speaker 1: a hack and is dishonest, and the media is lionizing
Speaker 1: him right now, and that's troubling enough on its own.
Speaker 1: His piece, though, where he says that the Trump's claims
Speaker 1: of no collusion are hogwash, I go, I went through
Speaker 1: the whole piece. I read it multiple times in times,
Speaker 1: and he this will pretty much summarize the whole thing
Speaker 1: for you. Quote. The only questions that remain are whether
Speaker 1: the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether
Speaker 1: obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy,
Speaker 1: and how many members of Trump Incorporated attempted to defraw
Speaker 1: the government by laundring and concealing the movement of money
Speaker 1: into their pockets. A jury is about who deliberate banking
Speaker 1: tax fraud charges against one of those people Paul Manafort,
Speaker 1: Mr Trump's former campaign chairman, and the campaign's former deputy chairman,
Speaker 1: Rick Gates has pleaded guilty to financial fraud and line
Speaker 1: to investigators. Mr and Mr. Trump's claims of no collusion
Speaker 1: aren't a word hogwash. It's like we're dealing with crazy
Speaker 1: people here, folks. He says, Oh, there's definitely collusion. The
Speaker 1: claim there's no collusion as hogwash. And then I see
Speaker 1: it here and I say, Okay, where's the collusion. You
Speaker 1: know there's collusion. Where is it? You were the c
Speaker 1: I A director willing to play dirty Washington politics. We
Speaker 1: all know that, willing to leak, willing to talk to
Speaker 1: the press, willing to do whatever he had to do
Speaker 1: based on whatever code that former Commy lover Brennan has.
Speaker 1: And here is his moment to tell us, where is
Speaker 1: the evidence? Where is the smoking gun? If Mueller hasn't
Speaker 1: found it yet, you must know you were the CIA director. Oh,
Speaker 1: because they were willing to use a fights against freaking
Speaker 1: Carter Page. They've done everything that they can. Where is
Speaker 1: the collusion? Oh no, no, I can't tell you. I
Speaker 1: just know it's there. I just I just know it's there.
Speaker 1: And anybody who says otherwise is lying. All right, I
Speaker 1: don't want to be a liar. Brennan, tell me where
Speaker 1: the collusion is. Why Why are these questions that remain
Speaker 1: whether it constituted criminal conspiracy? Because because you're saying that,
Speaker 1: you know, you're not saying that there's a question. Right.
Speaker 1: If you're saying that, you can't say something is not
Speaker 1: if you cannot say for certain that it is. And
Speaker 1: he's saying that there's definitely collusion, but he can't tell
Speaker 1: us what that collusion is. This is just these are
Speaker 1: the rantings of a crazy person. He's holding the line
Speaker 1: for America, buck Sexton. His back editorials, in so many
Speaker 1: ways are anachronisms anyway. I think very few people read
Speaker 1: them other than for reinforcement of self. They're already known ideas,
Speaker 1: and it hurts the media and the bigger picture because
Speaker 1: it just reinforces that the media is packed journalism and
Speaker 1: they all think alike and move in the same direction.
Speaker 1: I think this is a meaningless exercise by the project.
Speaker 1: We have freedom of the press. It has not been
Speaker 1: infringed in the least by Donald Trump. In fact, if
Speaker 1: the press really want to they should have gone more
Speaker 1: after Barack Obama for all the use of the Justice
Speaker 1: Department to investigate the press way out of proportion anything
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has done. It's the group think. It's the
Speaker 1: liberal think. It's how they all go the same way.
Speaker 1: And if their editorials mattered that much anyway, Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: would have been president. Almost every one of those papers
Speaker 1: endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. And that's my point about
Speaker 1: editorial is really not being influential or moving readers anymore.
Speaker 1: What a joke this whole thing is. It's ridiculous, folks.
Speaker 1: You get three hundred papers are all like, we just
Speaker 1: want to stand up for the First Amendment together because
Speaker 1: we would in the air of Trump if he travels
Speaker 1: being mean? Nois are you kidding me? I at least
Speaker 1: have some respect for the papers that I look, we
Speaker 1: actually agree with what all these other papers were saying
Speaker 1: about Trump, but we're not going to join this because
Speaker 1: this is counter productive. It's idiotic. It is a slow
Speaker 1: pitch right down the middle. And Trump has just both
Speaker 1: hands on a Louisville slugger and he is about to
Speaker 1: grip it and rip it, folks, He's about to tear
Speaker 1: the cover off the ball. Threspapers are all aware scared
Speaker 1: the Trump in the First Commendment and the RGI Amendment.
Speaker 1: You gotta be kidding me. What has he done? I mean,
Speaker 1: you know already made that was already Fleischer before was
Speaker 1: there on the Bush administration. What has Trump done to
Speaker 1: hurt the First Amendment? Nothing? Nothing, words you don't like
Speaker 1: is not the same as silencing liberals. Just because you
Speaker 1: get owned by this president time and again in the press,
Speaker 1: it doesn't mean that he is shutting down the press
Speaker 1: when opinions don't mean and he's obinion scary. Really, the
Speaker 1: pearl clutching here's astonishing. And you know he eluded Ari
Speaker 1: Fleisher alluded this. I've been saying this for quite some
Speaker 1: time that yes, the press would write editorials. And we're concerned.
Speaker 1: We're concerned about what Obama has been doing when it
Speaker 1: comes to press freedom. This administration has not been good
Speaker 1: on press freedom. We have some we have some problems.
Speaker 1: They weren't writting three hundred three paper editorials, though all
Speaker 1: joining together in collusion, you could say, against the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: Obama was seizing the phone records of journalists to get
Speaker 1: their sources multiple times. Obama was doing all kinds of
Speaker 1: surveillance on journalists. Some of it is known about I
Speaker 1: can tell you some of it is not based on
Speaker 1: what journals here in d C that I know have
Speaker 1: told me from their personal experience. So Obama was willing
Speaker 1: to just do whatever it took to get whoever, whoever
Speaker 1: he wanted to get. And perhaps most chilling of all,
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice under Eric Holder, Obama's Attorney General,
Speaker 1: included James Rosen, a Fox News reporter, included his name
Speaker 1: as an unindicted co conspirator in an Espionage Act prosecution. Now,
Speaker 1: not only is that way beyond what anybody else has
Speaker 1: has done in recent memory when it comes to First Amendment,
Speaker 1: because that really is chilling. Right, Well, your name is
Speaker 1: appearing in a federal espionage indictment as a reporter probably
Speaker 1: worries you a little bit. You start to think him.
Speaker 1: I next, Also, it was Fox News, and I couldn't
Speaker 1: help I read today because you know, you'll you'll get
Speaker 1: these these blowhards from c and out of the places. Oh,
Speaker 1: we we didn't like when Obama did that. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: didn't like it. You didn't act like it was the
Speaker 1: you know, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which we get
Speaker 1: every day now with Trump. Everything Trump does is Pearl Harbor.
Speaker 1: He took up brands, friends clearance. He said something mean
Speaker 1: about almar Rosa. He he did, you know, just go
Speaker 1: down the list, Stormy Daniels. I mean, everything Trump does
Speaker 1: is the worst thing any human being has ever done.
Speaker 1: I don't know how these people can sleep at night.
Speaker 1: They must have so much anxiety. You know, they must
Speaker 1: have real issues because they seem to think that Trump
Speaker 1: is basically destroying the country in new ways every day.
Speaker 1: And it's almost amazing how creative Trump is in destroying
Speaker 1: the country when you take a look at all the
Speaker 1: things that they're saying. But this, you know, Boston Globe
Speaker 1: calling for three papers to all stand in support of
Speaker 1: the First Amendment. The First Amendment is not under assault.
Speaker 1: The fable, the falsehood, the lie of a neutral role
Speaker 1: press corps that is under assault, and it should be
Speaker 1: because it's a lie. These people who write for the
Speaker 1: editorial page of the Boston Globe, and I can't even
Speaker 1: think about, you know, the New York Times and all
Speaker 1: the different ones that were in this. There's something like,
Speaker 1: you know, the Cape cod Registered I think was in there.
Speaker 1: It's like, oh, the Cape of the cape Cod Register
Speaker 1: getting it on the action. It's like, oh, honey, did
Speaker 1: we see the editorial today. I'm going to the beach,
Speaker 1: going to drink a south side Uh. You know the
Speaker 1: cape Cod paper got in that action. I remembered a
Speaker 1: few of the names that I saw. Was a lot
Speaker 1: of little papers. You're like, what they still have a
Speaker 1: paper there. So they're all saying that they stand together
Speaker 1: in solidarity in the First Amendment, and I just say,
Speaker 1: the First Amendment is not under assault. In fact, what
Speaker 1: they seem to have a problem with is the usage
Speaker 1: of the First amenber that they don't like. The great
Speaker 1: irony here is that they are hoping to silence and
Speaker 1: deep platform people that they disagree with. That's what the
Speaker 1: left is doing now, right the left is the left
Speaker 1: is are you get all the kick him off Twitter,
Speaker 1: kick him off Facebook. So they're simultaneously assaulting free speech
Speaker 1: and claiming free speech is under assault for people that
Speaker 1: that they don't like. Again, they have no principles. They
Speaker 1: just have a blind and ferocious pursuit of power. That's it.
Speaker 1: That's what they want, and they understand the media is
Speaker 1: a very important tool in that. And you know there
Speaker 1: are other areas of life where we understand that the
Speaker 1: dominant and this is where you get people, Oh, not everybody.
Speaker 1: What about Fox News? It's like that isn't an intelligence
Speaker 1: test when somebody says the media is not liberal? What
Speaker 1: about Fox News? Like, can we okay, of the media's liberal.
Speaker 1: That's still a very big problem. Okay, No one's actually
Speaker 1: saying that every part of the meaning I'm technically in
Speaker 1: the media too. Oh you're in the media book. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know. I noticed that my liberal by a liberal
Speaker 1: counterpart here on the show. It's not come across sounding
Speaker 1: very intelligence. But there are parts of of American society
Speaker 1: we understand that it's overwhelm with liberals. Faculty lounges and
Speaker 1: colleges and universities overwhelm with liberals. Um unions generally speaking,
Speaker 1: especially public sector unions, overwhelm with liberals. Hollywood overrhulm with liberals.
Speaker 1: You know, you go down this list and you can
Speaker 1: think of all these, you know, community organizers overhelmed with liberals,
Speaker 1: environmental activists overhlm with liberals, all over hom with liberals.
Speaker 1: And I don't think any serious person argues that, right,
Speaker 1: you know, when when I look at my own college
Speaker 1: for example, and there are more self described self avowed
Speaker 1: Marxists and Republicans on the college faculty. That seems to
Speaker 1: be indicative of something. But we're we're oh, the federal
Speaker 1: bureaucracy liberal plus the donations went to Hillary Clinton, folks plus. Yeah.
Speaker 1: But with journalism, they think that either that's not they
Speaker 1: they either reject that factual statement, which is just there
Speaker 1: in denial journal journalists or liberal No, they are, and
Speaker 1: anyone who says otherwise really needs to either pay closer
Speaker 1: attention or start reading. Or they say, well, okay, just
Speaker 1: because journalists or liberals, just because three newspapers would all
Speaker 1: come together to say the same thing, to agree on
Speaker 1: the same thing on the same day, it doesn't mean
Speaker 1: that that affects the way they tell their stories, their
Speaker 1: editorial lines, the what they think is news and what
Speaker 1: they think is not news, the language they use in
Speaker 1: the coverage of their stories, none of that is affected.
Speaker 1: It's just a lie. It's a line. But you see,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of liberals, including liberal readers, and
Speaker 1: and you know, the liberal audience gets very enraged by
Speaker 1: this too. This is this is why when people it's
Speaker 1: you know, when some of the anchors that see Ann
Speaker 1: for example, get challenged now by those of us who
Speaker 1: understand this media game and what's really going on. You know,
Speaker 1: their audience will get very nasty. You know, you're just
Speaker 1: doing it's because they have been fooled, you see, and
Speaker 1: people don't like being fooled. But the CNN audience, the
Speaker 1: you know, ABC and This Week and NBC and all
Speaker 1: these different shows, they've been fooled into thinking that what
Speaker 1: they are getting is objective, fact based reality. But what
Speaker 1: they're really getting is a biased view of events that
Speaker 1: reinforces their preconceived notions, which they like, makes them feel
Speaker 1: safe and warm and smart. And that's the whole game.
Speaker 1: That is what the mainstream media offers its liberal audience,
Speaker 1: not that they're getting a democrat or liberal interpretation or
Speaker 1: spin on events, but that they are getting the factual,
Speaker 1: straight down the middle, reality based interpretation of events. And
Speaker 1: then they'll go use words like undocumented immigrant. But they'll
Speaker 1: still say this, oh no, we're just the factual, down
Speaker 1: the center, you know, balanced neutral. They will say this
Speaker 1: is this is a great fraud, and the audiences of
Speaker 1: that fraud don't want to hear it. You see. That's
Speaker 1: one of the That's one of the reasons they hate
Speaker 1: Trump so much. Trump isn't just calling out fake news.
Speaker 1: He's also by doing so, forcing the audiences who buy
Speaker 1: into the fake news to have to confront the reality
Speaker 1: of what it is that they've been watching or reading
Speaker 1: all these years and come to and they have to
Speaker 1: come to understand that, Wow, you mean that when I
Speaker 1: watch Wolf Blitzer, I'm not just getting an objective news
Speaker 1: source that has no agenda whatsoever. People don't want to
Speaker 1: hear that. They want to think they were one of
Speaker 1: the smart people watching a Wolf great journalists, you know,
Speaker 1: watching Brian Williams, the ten million dollar a year man
Speaker 1: to read off a prompter, has no background in journalism
Speaker 1: beyond just looking like a guy in journalism who can
Speaker 1: go on TV and sound like a guy that knows
Speaker 1: what he's talking about. They put him on TV, paid
Speaker 1: a millions and millions of dollars. What what was his
Speaker 1: great gift? What did he bring to the table. He's
Speaker 1: an actor, folks, A lot of them are actors. And
Speaker 1: now we're starting to see what who the wizard is
Speaker 1: behind the curtain with the whole mainstream media, and they
Speaker 1: don't like it. And that's what's really spurring on the
Speaker 1: three hundred different newspapers coming together. Oh my gosh, Trump,
Speaker 1: Trump is actually speaking the truth about this. It's catching
Speaker 1: on people see us for where we are. Our editorial
Speaker 1: pages are all liberal, by the way, they all they've
Speaker 1: already all come out. Every single newspaper that was a
Speaker 1: part of this today. I'd be willing to bet you
Speaker 1: on their unsigned editorials, you know, had already officially endorsed,
Speaker 1: if they endorsed candidates, which some of them don't I know,
Speaker 1: but I'm telling you they all endorsed Hillary. The only
Speaker 1: newspaper that I can think of that endorsed Trump during
Speaker 1: the election was Las Vegas, the Las Vegas something or other.
Speaker 1: I know, producer, Mike, I've pull out the I pull
Speaker 1: out the trivia like that off the top of my head,
Speaker 1: A smart guy. There we go, thank you, even even
Speaker 1: even the team. But the Freedom Hut squad sometimes gets
Speaker 1: a little impressed by that one. I think I'm right
Speaker 1: on that though. That was the That was the only one, uh,
Speaker 1: other than the Wall Street Journal. But I don't have
Speaker 1: the Wall Street Journal endorsed to candidate. I don't I
Speaker 1: don't think. I don't think that they do. So this
Speaker 1: is a waste of everybody's time, this whole three newspapers
Speaker 1: coming together, Except it reinforces everything that Trump says about
Speaker 1: the media. So that's what I meant. He's not He's
Speaker 1: gonna knock the cover off this ball. I cannot wait.
Speaker 1: I cannot wait for some Trump tweets tomorrow. I think
Speaker 1: they're gonna be They're gonna be fantastic on this one.
Speaker 1: And you know, just make sure that you push back
Speaker 1: when people say Trump is endangering the First Amendment? Say how,
Speaker 1: and don't say, oh, but it's rhetoric. Goodness, you know,
Speaker 1: always says the mean things about that. No, no no, no,
Speaker 1: how What action has he taken as commander in Cheither
Speaker 1: pulling Brennan's clearance. That's laughable, That's that's idiotic. It's not
Speaker 1: endangering anyone's first a minute, you don't have a right
Speaker 1: to a clearance. You certainly don't have a right to
Speaker 1: a clearance if you're gonna use it to undermine the
Speaker 1: existing executive branch. That's a big problem. But ask them,
Speaker 1: where do you get this idea that the first round
Speaker 1: is being under me Because the fake journalists created the
Speaker 1: term fake news, folks, it was all fun and games
Speaker 1: to them. They were saying that fake news was what
Speaker 1: was being spread on Facebook and the Internet by Russian
Speaker 1: trolls and others. And Trump's also, dumb voters is what
Speaker 1: the elite media thinks. We're falling for the fake news.
Speaker 1: And Trump turned that around on them and smacked them
Speaker 1: with their own weaponized term. And they don't like it.
Speaker 1: That's why it stinks so much. That's why they hate it.
Speaker 1: Fake news was supposed to be the elite way of
Speaker 1: sneering and condescending at you. And Trump said, oh no,
Speaker 1: you don't. You want to talk about fake news. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about fake news. You are the fakes. He's would
Speaker 1: the whole thing round. I mean, it was Trump jiu
Speaker 1: jitsu on this one, and it was incredible, or maybe
Speaker 1: even Trump I Q do well. I have to say,
Speaker 1: of all the fighting styles, I feel like that one
Speaker 1: is not particularly effective because you need to be able
Speaker 1: to grab somebody's sleep. What if they were wearing a
Speaker 1: T shirt. I'm gonna get somebody who's in an audience
Speaker 1: who's like a ninth degree in I kdo is gonna
Speaker 1: yell at me for this one. That's what always happens
Speaker 1: I talk a little smack about taekwondo, and now everybody
Speaker 1: with a with a red belt in taekwondo says they're
Speaker 1: gonna kick my butt. All right, We're gonna be back
Speaker 1: in just a moment. All right, team rack him and
Speaker 1: stack 'em. We got calls coming in from across the country.
Speaker 1: Nathan in Dallas, Hello, sir, Hey, she'll tie buck, she'll sigh. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to repeat too much. But if Brandon
Speaker 1: is going on the news insinuating the existence of Trump collusion,
Speaker 1: of proof of collusion, that is being sent cuation of
Speaker 1: a secret, how close to divulging a secret do you
Speaker 1: have to be before you get your clearance? Bull, Well, exactly,
Speaker 1: You're you're completely correct. And that's and this is, this
Speaker 1: is what's so egregious. He You know, you don't just
Speaker 1: have free reign to run around and and and say
Speaker 1: whatever you want, especially if you've been the CIA director
Speaker 1: and to be undermining the commander in chief through the
Speaker 1: suggestion that your secret knowledge that nobody else can have
Speaker 1: is why you know what you know is a huge problem.
Speaker 1: And if he, by the way, you know, if he
Speaker 1: really believes Trump is a traitor, and he has classified
Speaker 1: information to prove it. He should just he should throw
Speaker 1: himself on the mercy of his fellow citizens. Uh and
Speaker 1: and a jury and release that information and just tell everybody,
Speaker 1: you know, if he's a real patriot, that's what he
Speaker 1: would do. But no, he's playing that. I could tell you,
Speaker 1: but I can't because I'm I have a clear and
Speaker 1: it's just all garbage. He's a liar. A conservative enough
Speaker 1: judge could put him in jail for devulging a secret.
Speaker 1: He just didn't go into too much detail about the team. No,
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know. If I don't, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: of that far. But but what he's doing is it
Speaker 1: is a stretch, but it's on It is on ethical
Speaker 1: and he should have his clearance bold yep, I agree
Speaker 1: with that, Nathan. Thank you for calling it. Jeffrey and
Speaker 1: Mississippi we got or jeff in Mississippi. Pardon me, We've
Speaker 1: got to about a minute, yes, sir, well, thank you
Speaker 1: to take my top book. Thank you. I want to
Speaker 1: say I was active duty in the military four years.
Speaker 1: I had top secret clearance. When I got out to
Speaker 1: the military, I lost my type top sec clearance. I
Speaker 1: don't know what all the hubbubs about about losing top
Speaker 1: secret clearance and it's it's a privilege. And I had
Speaker 1: to go back to work at Stenness and I got
Speaker 1: my top secret clearance back. Yeah, they reinstated. That's what
Speaker 1: they do. It goes inactive, so you don't have it.
Speaker 1: We mean, you can't see secret stuff. But then if
Speaker 1: they need to bring you back into government service, you
Speaker 1: can reactive in it. This is very you know, it's
Speaker 1: really not that complicated. I know you know this exactly.
Speaker 1: I mean when you're taking their places like but there's
Speaker 1: the Maryland and you know it's a need in no
Speaker 1: basis and when you did jarved, Okay, I don't need
Speaker 1: a topic of larrence anymore. But if I need it again,
Speaker 1: I can get it again. So yeah, no, I know,
Speaker 1: Jeff or Jeff, it's uh, you know you got it man,
Speaker 1: You're right. Uh And thank you for your service, sir,
Speaker 1: Thank you very much for your call. Big our two
Speaker 1: coming up a refugee who infiltrated this country and as
Speaker 1: part of isis we'll talk about it. Buck Sexton Mission
Speaker 1: decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make
Speaker 1: no mistake, American, Frank, You're a great American Again, this
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton show at former CIA analysts, can
Speaker 1: you say something that despite the horrible immigration laws that
Speaker 1: we have to live with with catching real ease and
Speaker 1: all of the horror show it's a horror show, it
Speaker 1: to disgrace frankly, will get it changed, but uh, having
Speaker 1: a lot of problems with the other party because they
Speaker 1: don't want to change for I guess political reasons. It
Speaker 1: can't be common sense. Could you say how we're doing
Speaker 1: in terms of we're breaking records at the border, law
Speaker 1: enforcement records. Could you maybe just get a little update
Speaker 1: on that, despite the horrible laws, we're doing very well.
Speaker 1: Pleased Trump understands the immigration issue because he refuses to
Speaker 1: get boxed in by other people to use the language
Speaker 1: they want him to use to speak about this the
Speaker 1: way that they want him to speak about it, and
Speaker 1: and he just approaches us with common sense. The problem
Speaker 1: with our immigration policy and the conversation around it for
Speaker 1: a long time has been that there is no common
Speaker 1: sense applied to it, and there's also no consistency. That's
Speaker 1: a very important point. You know, we say that we're
Speaker 1: a nation immigrants, but we should be law by and
Speaker 1: then we say that illegal immigration is fine. Well, there's
Speaker 1: a lack of consistency. There isn't it. This is a problem.
Speaker 1: But Trump has shocked and horrified the establishment because of
Speaker 1: what he says an immigration. Although we did have remember this,
Speaker 1: remember Chuck Schuber on illegal Just to remind you, play
Speaker 1: a play clip one. When we use phrases like undocumented workers,
Speaker 1: we convey a message to the American people that their
Speaker 1: government is not serious about combating illegal immigration, which the
Speaker 1: American people overwhelmingly oppose. If you don't think it's illegal,
Speaker 1: you're not gonna say it. I think it is illegal
Speaker 1: and wrong, and we have to change it. Above all else,
Speaker 1: the American people want their government to be serious about
Speaker 1: protecting the public, enforcing the rule of law, and creating
Speaker 1: a rational system of legal immigration that will proactively fit
Speaker 1: our needs rather than reactively responding to future waves of
Speaker 1: illegal immigration. People who enter the United States without our
Speaker 1: permission are illegal aliens, and illegal aliens should not be
Speaker 1: treated the same as people who entered the US legally.
Speaker 1: What happened to that Chuck Schumer That Chuck Schumer was
Speaker 1: making sense? Oh, I guess that Chuck Schumer is a racist? Now?
Speaker 1: Is that right. I I just somebody that folks that
Speaker 1: that's the the Democrat minority leader Chuck Schumer is there?
Speaker 1: Am I? Why is he? Why is he not a racist?
Speaker 1: Somebody tell me this? Why you know Trump and his pologies?
Speaker 1: Oh it's no racist? Why isnt Chuck Schumer racist? I
Speaker 1: don't get it. I need somebody to explain this one
Speaker 1: to me, and to do it in a way where
Speaker 1: they actually use words that make sense. You're a smart guy. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you. It's the only explanation that's needed. Well, way, Mike,
Speaker 1: do we have my montage? I'm gonna We're gonna code
Speaker 1: red producer Mike. Right now, do we have a montage
Speaker 1: of people saying that refugees are all fine and good
Speaker 1: and everything else? That's right? You forgot, Yeah, you forgot that.
Speaker 1: It's all right, everybody. I'm calling Mike out on live
Speaker 1: radio because producer Mike is is squared away of the time,
Speaker 1: but the one percent when he misses something, I like
Speaker 1: to mess with them a little bit. And I wanted
Speaker 1: it very cool because his his audio and video skills
Speaker 1: are phenomenal. I wanted a cool montage. Today. We don't
Speaker 1: have it, but it was gonna be Basically all those
Speaker 1: mainstream bozos were like, oh my gosh, like refugees, there's
Speaker 1: no there's no threat from refugees. Like, refugees just come
Speaker 1: to this country cause they love it so much. And
Speaker 1: then they're perfect and they're amazing and they're better than
Speaker 1: Americans and they wonder why what you're giving me this? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's it's all right, you missed. It's all right, buddy,
Speaker 1: Do you nailed it? I don't. You don't need a clip. Okay,
Speaker 1: do it. You know, Mike knows how to keep the
Speaker 1: quote talent happy. That's all you can say. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: nail the buddy. It's like my agent, you're doing great.
Speaker 1: Keep it up, You're doing great. Just be patient, You're
Speaker 1: doing great. I'm like, wow, this is you could just
Speaker 1: record this. This is what my agent could just put
Speaker 1: this on a little tape player for me and whenever
Speaker 1: I'm like, hey, that deal come through. You're doing great,
Speaker 1: keep it up, you're doing great. Um, But I digress. So,
Speaker 1: so you're you heard a lot of stuff though about
Speaker 1: how refugees are. You know that they're like the best
Speaker 1: people on the planet always. I'm look, I know there
Speaker 1: are some of those amazing refugees. There's amazing people from
Speaker 1: all over the place, folks, amazing people in every country
Speaker 1: of every background and color and ethnicity, and their in
Speaker 1: the world. Six are closer to seven. I think now
Speaker 1: seven billion people in the world, right, how many people?
Speaker 1: I don't even think they can really count that number.
Speaker 1: I'll be honest with you, I don't think they really know.
Speaker 1: They're guessing. So we'll call it seven billions. Seven billion
Speaker 1: people in the world. And there's a lot of great
Speaker 1: people all over the place that all said refugee populations
Speaker 1: from war torn high terrorism countries. You would think, remember this,
Speaker 1: remember our whole premise here, folks. Trump approaches these things
Speaker 1: with common sense. Trump says, oh, what would a normal
Speaker 1: person think of this issue? When it's explained to them
Speaker 1: the media and the Democrats are like, well, what's the
Speaker 1: thing that makes us all like feel the best about
Speaker 1: our elves and feel like we're just doing the most,
Speaker 1: like make the world more amazing. Um, So, with a
Speaker 1: common sense approach, you would probably say, hold on. I
Speaker 1: think that if you were to take in large numbers
Speaker 1: of military aged males an acronym they used to use
Speaker 1: out in the military and in the intel community, right
Speaker 1: military age mail uh from countries that have a lot
Speaker 1: of jihadism, a lot of radicalization, and it's difficult to
Speaker 1: process them because what papers do they have, and you
Speaker 1: know they're coming from war torn country and they're also
Speaker 1: are active efforts to get through these screening processes we have.
Speaker 1: You would think that maybe there would be some risks.
Speaker 1: We were told folks, and this goes into the Muslim
Speaker 1: band and all that stuff. We were told that to
Speaker 1: have any concerns about refugees from say Syria or Iraq
Speaker 1: or Afghanistan, any concerns was rooted in nothing other than
Speaker 1: Islamophobia and racism. And there's never been anybody who's been
Speaker 1: a threat, even though not sure there's a guy arrested
Speaker 1: in Kentucky oh while ago who was actually ISIS or
Speaker 1: tied to al Qaeda in Iraq, but you know, they
Speaker 1: keep saying this, and and and then we have this
Speaker 1: little story that's getting very little play in the media
Speaker 1: right now about a a guy named Omar Amen who
Speaker 1: not to be confused with Omar Mateen, another Gee hottest terrorist,
Speaker 1: Omar Amine, who was arrested earlier this week in Sacramento,
Speaker 1: where he had been settled after being granted refugee status.
Speaker 1: So this guy was granted refugee status. But there and
Speaker 1: by the way, was in the process of getting a
Speaker 1: green card. Folks. Oh, but they say that he was
Speaker 1: wanted in Iraq on a murder charge. So it looks
Speaker 1: like that's a little bit of a problem to get
Speaker 1: him a green card and to make him a permanent
Speaker 1: resident of this country after we made him a refugee
Speaker 1: or brought him in as a refugee. But it gets worse.
Speaker 1: He wasn't just guilty of a murderer, let's say, because
Speaker 1: of some dispute with his neighbor. The allegation here is that,
Speaker 1: I mean, when the Islamic State rolled into Iraq, I
Speaker 1: mean went and was part of a torture and execution
Speaker 1: of an Iraqi police officer, I mean, was tied to
Speaker 1: the Islamic State. He was an Islamic State according to
Speaker 1: these court documents. According to the allegations here, he was
Speaker 1: an Islamic State executioner. So, you know, we we may
Speaker 1: have more to say here, We have more information going
Speaker 1: forward about this guy, um, but what we know so
Speaker 1: far is that there are eight witnesses that say he
Speaker 1: was involved with a Q U I and ISIS and
Speaker 1: was guilty of a murder and was rolling around with
Speaker 1: ISIS guy. So that's right, folks, that whole refugee program
Speaker 1: that there's so many, there's nobody would ever get through it.
Speaker 1: You're such an idiot for thinking that it's a security threat.
Speaker 1: You and the Trumpsters are such idiots. Oh that it
Speaker 1: hasn't been around that long? Has it? The Trump administration?
Speaker 1: What We've been here for eighteen months? And here we
Speaker 1: find out that this guy, um, this guy was an
Speaker 1: ISIS executioner and got through the process refugee process. So
Speaker 1: maybe extreme vetting is not such a crazy idea after all.
Speaker 1: Maybe there are cracks in the system because you basically
Speaker 1: have a jihadest terrorist living in Sacramento, California, who was
Speaker 1: already gotten, who had already gotten through one hurdle in
Speaker 1: the system, and was in the process of getting a
Speaker 1: full on green card. You know that that this is
Speaker 1: where I have to stop and say, do we get
Speaker 1: to go back to all those people who said that
Speaker 1: there was it was just a crazy idea that there
Speaker 1: could be anybody who is coming in the refugee pipeline.
Speaker 1: There's not that many refugees, but it's like fifty or
Speaker 1: something that we've taken in a year, and that that
Speaker 1: there might be somebody in in that football stadium size
Speaker 1: of individuals who's a problem. We were We were told
Speaker 1: that that's nuts and it's mean and his lomophobic and
Speaker 1: racist to say that. And now we find out no,
Speaker 1: there actually wasn't isis terrorist who slipped in. Do we
Speaker 1: get to talk to the people that said that Trump
Speaker 1: was crazy, that we were crazy? Now, of course not.
Speaker 1: They'll just move on to the next thing. But here's
Speaker 1: something we should remember. We were right. I was so
Speaker 1: happy and Donald Trump declared that he was going to run.
Speaker 1: You all know him as the president. I know him
Speaker 1: as a friend, I know his heart. But Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is a trump blazer on women's issues. And not only
Speaker 1: do I support him as a human being who has
Speaker 1: incredible character and a great vision, but his policies affect
Speaker 1: my community where I live in Los Angeles, and that's
Speaker 1: really why I stand by him, and I believe that
Speaker 1: you will see that this president is going to be
Speaker 1: incredible for this country. And I am excited about what's
Speaker 1: happening with this iministration. I'm very honored to be a
Speaker 1: part of that he was the right choice for America.
Speaker 1: When I say Trump trained, I want you to say,
Speaker 1: choo choo, you already Trump trying true, Trump tru Trump
Speaker 1: trap true true. That was amar Rosa. Then everybody that
Speaker 1: was amar Rossa Omer. I see, I keep going back
Speaker 1: omar Rossa, amar Rossa. Uh. Things have changed a little bit.
Speaker 1: Now she's making all these allegations about Trump, and I
Speaker 1: think this is our last omar Rossa update for the
Speaker 1: certainly for the week and hopefully ever because she released
Speaker 1: it tape today, another tape when he say what did
Speaker 1: I tell you folks? All along she was leading with
Speaker 1: the juiciest tape she had, which was with General Kelly,
Speaker 1: which wasn't juicy at all. Boring. It was General Kelly
Speaker 1: firing her butt because he should have fired her a
Speaker 1: long time ago. Nothing about that, uh, nothing about that
Speaker 1: tape or any of the exchange that went there was
Speaker 1: anything other than just the most mundane office you know,
Speaker 1: you fired, you fired, uh, And and she tried to
Speaker 1: make something of it beyond that. Well, now she's got
Speaker 1: a tape of of uh Lara Trump, who I've got
Speaker 1: to say, I don't know her. I did her Facebook
Speaker 1: show a little while ago she was a very very nice,
Speaker 1: very very nice lady. I don't really know her beyond that,
Speaker 1: I've heard that she's a very nice lady from friends
Speaker 1: of mine who know her. And you know, Omarossa has
Speaker 1: put this all over the place now where she secretly
Speaker 1: taped Oh wait, if I found out that somebody a
Speaker 1: friend of mine or or somebody that I worked with,
Speaker 1: secretly taped me and I wasn't engaged in some kind
Speaker 1: of egregious conduct, like if if they secretly taped me
Speaker 1: and I was saying, you know, I don't know. You know,
Speaker 1: I was saying, you know, you gotta do this for
Speaker 1: me or else I'm gonna fire you. I mean, if
Speaker 1: there was some justification for it, well then you know
Speaker 1: you're bagged, right, But just to tape you for the
Speaker 1: sake of taping you, it's such a breach of trust.
Speaker 1: It's such a sleazy, slimy thing to do. But we
Speaker 1: are talking about omar Rossa here, and she taped Lara
Speaker 1: Trump giving her job. I'm playing the audio for you,
Speaker 1: knowing that the audio is boring and not that important,
Speaker 1: but just because I want to put this whole thing
Speaker 1: to bed, uh please, so let's let's hear it. This
Speaker 1: is Omarossa get a job offer after she got fired.
Speaker 1: The only thing that we have to consider. We're talking
Speaker 1: salary as as part as the campaign is concerned that
Speaker 1: as you know, everything is public um and all the
Speaker 1: money that we raised and the pay salaries is directly
Speaker 1: propp donors, small dollar donors for the most part. Um.
Speaker 1: So I know you are making under sevent nine at
Speaker 1: the White House, and I think we could work something
Speaker 1: out where we keep you right along dose long um
Speaker 1: specifically only haven't even add up numbers, but we're talking
Speaker 1: about like k a month. Uh what that adds up to? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that sounds like a fair deal for you. It sounds
Speaker 1: like a great deal. By the way, that's at the
Speaker 1: very very top of what you would make in a
Speaker 1: in a government like a White House job. A lot
Speaker 1: of jobs, I forget how it works, but a lot
Speaker 1: of jobs. The federal service. You can't make more than
Speaker 1: a congressman, which tops out at around something like a eight.
Speaker 1: And you know that that that's getting up there. Beyond that,
Speaker 1: you really got to start getting a private sector. There's
Speaker 1: some special employee exceptions. This is how you get like
Speaker 1: football coaches at public universities that are like, you know,
Speaker 1: tex Williams making seven point two million dollars a year
Speaker 1: because tex is bringing home those w's. Baby, Uh yeah,
Speaker 1: you know. I like Friday Night Lights Lot? What could
Speaker 1: I show? I love that show. Buddy Garranty, La La
Speaker 1: told your mama I was gonna take care of you
Speaker 1: and you know, but Daddy like my college money, Like
Speaker 1: La La, I was making an investment for the family.
Speaker 1: I just I lost it all, baby, But give me
Speaker 1: a hug. I'm sorry, you know, no, Dad, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: You know the do you want fun of am? I
Speaker 1: Like it sounds like I'm having an episode here, but
Speaker 1: I really do. That is actually from an episode of
Speaker 1: Friday Night Lights. You know what I'm talking about. You
Speaker 1: ever seen the show? Did I ever see the show?
Speaker 1: I love? Yeah, Buddy Gartty. I thought was like after
Speaker 1: the after Kyle Chandler and Connie Britten, Buddy Garrity was
Speaker 1: like my favorite character on that was the best. But
Speaker 1: he's amazing, you know, he's uh, he's he's actually a Texan,
Speaker 1: unlike everybody else on that show. Who you do that?
Speaker 1: What's his name? You know, long hair abs guy? Whatever?
Speaker 1: That guy's name is Yeah, that guy that all the
Speaker 1: ladies like, Oh, he's sot him whatever. He's Canadian, all right,
Speaker 1: I know, Yeah, forget about at him like running around
Speaker 1: with a shotgun playing football and stuff. He's should be
Speaker 1: him and playing ice hockey. Yeah, I guess. Anyway, Um,
Speaker 1: what the heck was I talked about before? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I was talking about public employees and other compensation is cap.
Speaker 1: We've got a little bit of a diversion there, so
Speaker 1: you can't make that much money as a public sector employee.
Speaker 1: And they're look, they're trying to pay on borrows a
Speaker 1: lot of money obviously because you know, they probably realized
Speaker 1: that she's a loose cannon and they wanted to stay
Speaker 1: on the on her good side as much as possible.
Speaker 1: Obviously something of a fail there. But who records the
Speaker 1: their salary conversation and releases that. I mean, Mike, this
Speaker 1: would be like if I was, you know, sitting around
Speaker 1: talking to people here in the hill about my next
Speaker 1: story pitch, and they're like, yeah, that sounds good, buck right,
Speaker 1: And I'm like, oh, yeah, got you now having mundane,
Speaker 1: completely legitimate office conversations Like who would do that? She's
Speaker 1: a psycho. Dude, something's wrong with her, And I actually
Speaker 1: do have a question for you about this. Um, why
Speaker 1: is it that every recorded tape is automatically deemed the
Speaker 1: farious by the media, Like just because it's recorded, it's
Speaker 1: automatically bad, like they did with Devin Neoness last week. Dude.
Speaker 1: That is a fantastic point. Is the assumption is that
Speaker 1: if you if someone is surreptitiously taped, they must have
Speaker 1: done something like wrong to get taped. Meanwhile, Omrose is
Speaker 1: a crazy person who's taping people who are basically like,
Speaker 1: do you want me to get you a sandwich? I'm
Speaker 1: going out now for lunch, Like I'm gonna bring you
Speaker 1: back some Starbucks hopefully some black Rifle if you know
Speaker 1: what's good for you. But black Rifle coffee is the
Speaker 1: best coffee. Black Rifle coffee dot com slash buck Uh
Speaker 1: So yeah, I don't know, man, it's omeros thing. What
Speaker 1: what a was a physical of a story? Her? Her
Speaker 1: whole campaign around this is so desperate and so pathetic.
Speaker 1: I'm not even going to download the free Kindle sample
Speaker 1: of her book to read and then trash because it's
Speaker 1: not worth my time. I did do that. Well, actually,
Speaker 1: I read Fire and Fury, so I gave that guy
Speaker 1: some money, much to my much to my my shame. Um,
Speaker 1: but there was so much in that book that I
Speaker 1: read too. I'm like, this just isn't But let's just
Speaker 1: remember this, folks. The media was treating Omar Rossa like
Speaker 1: she was an elder statesman who had come forward to
Speaker 1: speak the truth about the Trump's because she was useful
Speaker 1: to them. Now that the whole thing is clearly a sham,
Speaker 1: a scam, that she's a scam artist. And yeah, she
Speaker 1: understands how to play Trump a little bit. Look, you
Speaker 1: know she did. She know, she knew how to get
Speaker 1: close to him, and she knew how to how to
Speaker 1: talk to talk and uh, getting the Trump land. But
Speaker 1: she's out now, and really, I don't think she was
Speaker 1: able to put much of a dent in in Maga
Speaker 1: at all. I don't think so. I think she's gonna
Speaker 1: be Yesterday's news already. I guess theories news today or something.
Speaker 1: So that's I guess all yesterday. That's what the phrase
Speaker 1: is about. So I don't think we have to talk
Speaker 1: about Iimrris anymore, which which makes me happy. We do
Speaker 1: have to talk about out Democrats being based and the
Speaker 1: economy and a lot of other very very important things though,
Speaker 1: and that specifically what the Democrats counter argument economy is
Speaker 1: that's coming up. He's back with you now, because when
Speaker 1: it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never
Speaker 1: stops the institutions because me is too super unpopular. I
Speaker 1: would like a poster test this question. How many people
Speaker 1: in the Republican Party think that it would be okay
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump to dissolve their own grandparents. I'm virtually
Speaker 1: certain that if it was a Donald Trump related question
Speaker 1: you get like ten percent. That would be like Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has the power to everyone's including kill my parents,
Speaker 1: you know, like that's the just strength to which I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't make looks. I was just working through. I'm
Speaker 1: trying to make the point. I think it's just a
Speaker 1: I think it's kind of a it's it's a test.
Speaker 1: There are certain things that that there is some number
Speaker 1: of people who they know his point that they just hear.
Speaker 1: The question is the media is trying to test my
Speaker 1: loyalty to Donald Trump, and if it's a question of
Speaker 1: whether Trump has the authority to do anything, they will
Speaker 1: say yes, no matter what that thing is. Well, look, Nicole.
Speaker 1: I think we're moving very quickly towards an hour where
Speaker 1: we're going to test the premise in this country whether
Speaker 1: the President of the United States is above the law
Speaker 1: or not. It's very clear that we're heading towards a
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis, that this will head towards the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: And we know that Rudy Giuliani, when he goes out
Speaker 1: and speaks, is not acting as the president's attorney, but
Speaker 1: as the president's mouthpiece, pursuing the only strategy that he
Speaker 1: can pursue, which is trying to incite his base. Now,
Speaker 1: as he incites that that base gets smaller and the
Speaker 1: majority grows in opposition to Trump. But the smaller base
Speaker 1: is a harder and more intense one. So if you
Speaker 1: go back to a naugy ration day, Trump has less
Speaker 1: support today than he did, then his base is smaller,
Speaker 1: the Republican Party is smaller. Of the country has surrendered
Speaker 1: their intellectual sovereignty to Donald Trump. Of the country has
Speaker 1: surrendered their sovereignty to Donald Trump. I mean, where do
Speaker 1: they get these buffoons and put them on TV to
Speaker 1: trash Trump? I mean, anybody can trash Trump like their trashy.
Speaker 1: It's just it's so childish and petty and easy. This
Speaker 1: is analysis for stupid people. You know. Yeah, ten percent
Speaker 1: would say it's okay to to kill their their parents.
Speaker 1: You know. That's that's right, that's really clever. That was
Speaker 1: Heilman a lot of MSNBC there, John, give me a
Speaker 1: bucks lap. I need to slap some people around buck slap.
Speaker 1: We need we need the bucks laugh to be a
Speaker 1: little more. Here's something that you know that sounds First
Speaker 1: of all, John, I got a bone pick here, because
Speaker 1: with the he uh, it gives people a moment maybe
Speaker 1: to flinch or to evade the slab. So I think
Speaker 1: we got to come up with it more of just
Speaker 1: like a whoop. You know that was but that's like
Speaker 1: a little you know what I mean that that didn't
Speaker 1: even leave a mark. I think we can have us
Speaker 1: more of a slot than that. Honestly, we got I
Speaker 1: gotta talk to somebody. I know some people get more
Speaker 1: of a slot. I want to, like, remember when you
Speaker 1: used to give your friend John, do you ever do this?
Speaker 1: We probably you're you're nice guys. You probably never did this,
Speaker 1: but a five finger, you know, where you go up
Speaker 1: to somebody's bare back and you just oh, man, you
Speaker 1: just five finger, they're back. It's it's kind of like, uh,
Speaker 1: the thing where people should grab your arm when you're
Speaker 1: and they would like take I can't even explain it,
Speaker 1: but yeah, yeah I can't. That's right, you know what
Speaker 1: I'm talking. I can't say it anymore. It's a burn
Speaker 1: of kinds. But you can't say what kind of burned
Speaker 1: because you also can't say what kind of give her
Speaker 1: somebody is when they take something back after they've offered
Speaker 1: it to you, because that's also not allowed anymore. You know,
Speaker 1: if they want to take away those phrases, fine, but
Speaker 1: we need to replace them with something. You know, you
Speaker 1: need to be like a j Leno giver because you
Speaker 1: let somebody else have the show and then you take
Speaker 1: it back, you know what I mean? Like you needed
Speaker 1: you did that? Did thank you? Did that reference work?
Speaker 1: I feel like that reference worked? Did you catch that one?
Speaker 1: But you know, Heilman and Schmidt, these guys, they just
Speaker 1: make a living going on in trash and Trump all
Speaker 1: the time. And and you'll notice how little focused there
Speaker 1: is on what Democrats would do. And this is a
Speaker 1: big problem, folks, for the laught and for the Democrats.
Speaker 1: There's so little focused on what they would do. And
Speaker 1: Schmid's supposed to be Republican, although I think he's ones
Speaker 1: with like, yeah, I'm now a Democrat. I was the Republican.
Speaker 1: I'm the one. What do you Harraldson plan in the
Speaker 1: h Barrel movie? Non the Democrat? Uh, I think that
Speaker 1: he's now a Democrat. He's openly said he's a Democrat.
Speaker 1: I think, so, I don't know. I don't know the guy.
Speaker 1: I just see mont It's just know his analysis and
Speaker 1: it's poor. And then there's Uh, then there's Heilman who's
Speaker 1: a journalist. So he's just a big lib. But what
Speaker 1: do they offer for making things better? Well, they want
Speaker 1: to put the you know that one of the big
Speaker 1: problems that I've always had with people who say, how
Speaker 1: could you like Trump? I'm like, oh, I'm sorry, why
Speaker 1: do you hate Trump? Said? Oh my god, she's so
Speaker 1: vulgar on ethical I'm like, you're right, Let's restore the
Speaker 1: Clinton crime family to the White House. That's a great idea.
Speaker 1: You know people, you know, people who Democrats would be
Speaker 1: begging to have Jared and Ivanka back if they had
Speaker 1: to listen to a couple of Chelsea speeches. Yes, I've
Speaker 1: never done anything of any interest, but everyone's supposed to
Speaker 1: think that I'm special because my mommy and daddy are
Speaker 1: famous politicians. Give me six hundred thousand dollars to do
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes of work on NBC and be terrible at
Speaker 1: it because I talk like this, that's it. They'd be
Speaker 1: like throwing the towel, bring bring back the Trumps. I
Speaker 1: can't take any more Chelsea Clinton because, by the way,
Speaker 1: if Hillary had won, they would be grooming Chelsea for
Speaker 1: her turn. I do not like this trend toward de nasty,
Speaker 1: dynastic families in in politics, and I do not like
Speaker 1: dynasties in politics. And I do not like that we
Speaker 1: are heading in this monarchical direction. I don't even know
Speaker 1: if monarchical is a word. I'd like to say it, though,
Speaker 1: you know, like cockamamie, it's fun to say, or you know,
Speaker 1: what are some of What are the other good words?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I can't. They're not coming to me
Speaker 1: right now with Hinky that's right from the fugitive so
Speaker 1: Heilman and Schmidt saying crap about her, but they don't
Speaker 1: ever give you. Okay, Democrats will be better because what
Speaker 1: they're gonna put Bernie Bernie Sanders hopes you don't do
Speaker 1: math or can't do math? Elizabeth Warren, Oh, you know what,
Speaker 1: let's let's let's actually let's hear from Elizabeth Warren. Um.
Speaker 1: Here's what she says should happen in America. Player play
Speaker 1: clip twelve. Please. My proposal says, let's get a live
Speaker 1: system and let's get these corporations to charter sederally, the
Speaker 1: ones that have more than a billion dollars of says
Speaker 1: every year. And let's have a couple of features. First one,
Speaker 1: let's put some employees on the board. Let the employees
Speaker 1: that like some people, so you've got multiple representations on
Speaker 1: the board itself. Second one, let's change the compensation structure
Speaker 1: for the CEOs to say that the CEOs will not
Speaker 1: be permitted to choose the price. And then once they
Speaker 1: choose the price, make a quick sale, make a bazillion dollars,
Speaker 1: and keep emphasizing the incentives. That's what we've got now
Speaker 1: for short termism. I want to get rid of it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I want to get rid of that. Want to be
Speaker 1: the ones who are making the decisions for the American corporation.
Speaker 1: You know, it's a little thing we'd like to call socialism.
Speaker 1: By the way, that's actual socialism. Now once you start
Speaker 1: having the government controlling the means of production, controlling corporate
Speaker 1: America and the power structure within it, and the and
Speaker 1: compensation structures, and now you are getting into like actual
Speaker 1: hardcore socialism. Elizabeth Warren needs a little refresher. She of
Speaker 1: Harvard Law School needs a little refresher on private property
Speaker 1: and capitalism. Obviously, by the way, the way she speaks
Speaker 1: her whole persona to mean this, Yeah, she reminds me
Speaker 1: of John of a a kind of a cookie woman
Speaker 1: who would wear like an oversized T shirt with like
Speaker 1: timberwolves and owls on it, who works in a store
Speaker 1: that sells essential oils and wind shimes. You know what
Speaker 1: I mean is that you am I paying the picture
Speaker 1: for you? Yeah, she's like an old hippie exactly. She's
Speaker 1: got kind of an old hippie vibe, but it put
Speaker 1: a self righteous old hippie, not the fun kind. She's
Speaker 1: the kind of old hippie where where you walk into
Speaker 1: a wind chime store, she's like, I'm sorry, are those
Speaker 1: leather shoes you're wearing? Yeah, leather comes from animals. Correct,
Speaker 1: but that that was she just threw that out there,
Speaker 1: like government should regulate board seats for companies and give
Speaker 1: it to workers. Folks. That is Harry marksis sounding, isn't it.
Speaker 1: What do you think about this? The guy the the
Speaker 1: company belongs to the shareholders, It does not belong to
Speaker 1: the workers. This is really straight out of the Carl
Speaker 1: Marks playbook. Now this is getting scary. This is a
Speaker 1: sitting US senator. And think about what she's saying too.
Speaker 1: We're just getting just gonna take it and give it
Speaker 1: to the boards. He took. Well, excuse me, this is
Speaker 1: these are private companies. What do you mean You're you're
Speaker 1: just gonna give board seats to workers. To give them
Speaker 1: would mean to take them, to take them, would mean
Speaker 1: to appropriate them, to seize them by force, which when
Speaker 1: the government does, is a scary thing. Starts to sound
Speaker 1: a bit almost like you're gonna nationalize things. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's that's the direction that she's really heading in here, folks,
Speaker 1: And and it is. It is troubling stuff. It is
Speaker 1: troubling stuff. I gotta say, Um, Democrats don't have any
Speaker 1: serious people to post Trump. That's one of the biggest
Speaker 1: problems they've got a lot of people who think they're
Speaker 1: really eloquent in bashing Trump, But no, people on the
Speaker 1: on the left were eloquent in making the case for
Speaker 1: why they would be better at running the country than
Speaker 1: the president is. Right now, they certainly can't point to
Speaker 1: any observable objective metrics that there's nothing that they can
Speaker 1: can bring up that that would make you think, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what, you're right, they'd be better at running
Speaker 1: the country because of fill in the blank, right, There's
Speaker 1: nothing that they're able to come up with and say
Speaker 1: on that issue that, in fact, I want to talk
Speaker 1: about that. Let's talk about the positive side of this equation.
Speaker 1: How how is the economy doing and what's the left
Speaker 1: saying about it? How how do they counter message? Look,
Speaker 1: we're going into a mid term election here, folks pretty soon.
Speaker 1: How does the left counter message on the economy at
Speaker 1: a time when the economy is booming? What are they
Speaker 1: saying about this? I will walk you through the talking
Speaker 1: points so that we can shred them together, and we
Speaker 1: will then also get into a whole lot more coming
Speaker 1: up in the third hours. Stay with me. We're creating
Speaker 1: manufacturing jobs at the fastest pace in memory, nobody has
Speaker 1: any numbers where it's anywhere close to what we're doing.
Speaker 1: And if you remember, during the campaign, everybody said that
Speaker 1: it was impossible to create manufacturing jobs. The past administration,
Speaker 1: I won't say who, but I think you know made
Speaker 1: the statement that we're not gonna have any manufacturing jobs,
Speaker 1: and we're doing them. By the hundreds of thousands. Companies
Speaker 1: are moving back into the United States. That means jobs,
Speaker 1: that means production, it means taxes, and really things are
Speaker 1: great by far, by far. The single biggest events, being
Speaker 1: political or otherwise, this year is an economic boom that
Speaker 1: most people thought would be impossible to generate. Not a rise,
Speaker 1: not a blip, a genuine economic boom. And everybody wrote
Speaker 1: us off going back to the campaign man as was
Speaker 1: put into place, uh last year, and now the followed
Speaker 1: through this year, and the numbers are coming in and
Speaker 1: they just keep coming in. That's right, folks, The numbers
Speaker 1: keep coming in, and they're telling everybody who will pay
Speaker 1: attention that the country is doing great. Wow, you mean
Speaker 1: that pulling back regulations giving people greater freedom to run
Speaker 1: their businesses, to do what they do, to let the
Speaker 1: business of the American people be business. You mean to
Speaker 1: tell me that that could have a really positive impact
Speaker 1: across the country on workers, on on unemployment, on growth,
Speaker 1: on investment. Oh my gosh, who could have known? Oh,
Speaker 1: that's right, Republicans did, and Trump certainly did. Big been
Speaker 1: a headline did on the Wall Street Journal, stock surge
Speaker 1: on upbeat earnings. Uh, dal Jones gets its biggest one
Speaker 1: day gain in four months, folks, big day today. And
Speaker 1: you know, we're we're we're keep seeing that. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: the tariffs, oh trade war, all this and then nope,
Speaker 1: you know what, Actually, the American businesses are very bullish
Speaker 1: about the future. The stock market obviously is bullish, and
Speaker 1: American businesses are bullish. And you know, I think that
Speaker 1: this is a huge problem for the left if this,
Speaker 1: I mean, this continues on. I don't know what they
Speaker 1: think they're gonna be telling people that they're gonna replace
Speaker 1: this with right, I mean, what are they gonna say,
Speaker 1: we want to make the country crappier and poorer. And
Speaker 1: could Low, who's a smart guy. Look, I know he's
Speaker 1: with the administration and he's going to take a positive
Speaker 1: view of these things in general. But Goodlow says that
Speaker 1: things are just getting started play eighteen. I'm saying this,
Speaker 1: we are just in the early stages. We're in the
Speaker 1: early innings here. We never had calf goods boom we're
Speaker 1: now starting, and we've never seen income numbers like this again,
Speaker 1: after tax, after inflation. Policies matter in America's free market economy.
Speaker 1: Ordinary people run our economy, entrepreneurs, that's the beauty of it.
Speaker 1: But policies matter. And when you change that switch, as
Speaker 1: President Trump has changed that switch, things are happening. That
Speaker 1: a handful of this thought might happen, but I would
Speaker 1: not say it was wide spread. So I'll just end, sir,
Speaker 1: and I appreciate the time very much. Um. The single
Speaker 1: biggest story this year is an economic boom that is
Speaker 1: durable and lasting and that most people thought was impossible
Speaker 1: and wrong. And you were not only and this is
Speaker 1: really important. Not only did they think that that economic
Speaker 1: boom was impossible, but there was also a very clear
Speaker 1: prediction that was echoed by all the major media outlets
Speaker 1: and all the different people out there. They're putting to
Speaker 1: the economists that Trump was gonna tank the economy. Right,
Speaker 1: So it's not just that things are okay, and they
Speaker 1: said they would be terrible. They the so called smart people,
Speaker 1: the people are supposed to be able to predict these things,
Speaker 1: you know what's going on. They said it was all
Speaker 1: going to be awful, and it's not just been not awful,
Speaker 1: it's been fantastic. You have more money now in your
Speaker 1: bank account, you have more money coming in with each paycheck,
Speaker 1: and your four oh one K is growing because of
Speaker 1: policies enacted by this president. That matters to me. I
Speaker 1: have a feeling it matters to you a lot more
Speaker 1: then whether every tweet that he puts out meets the
Speaker 1: standards of of presidential decorum that I would just note
Speaker 1: didn't apply to you know, Bill Clinton. I mean he
Speaker 1: didn't have Twitter, but my gosh, they're really gonn lecture
Speaker 1: us on decorum when that was there and they said
Speaker 1: he was a great president, folks, I was a great president.
Speaker 1: Like just you know, just get all close. I don't
Speaker 1: have Twitter, So if I wanted to like have a
Speaker 1: d M a direct message, I had to call ladies
Speaker 1: right in my office with no one else around. Just
Speaker 1: turn the lights down. Hey, you're in the oval. You know.
Speaker 1: That's always I want to always take the bill. The
Speaker 1: creepy Bill thing a little further. But you know, it's
Speaker 1: a family show, so I gotta like gotta censor myself
Speaker 1: a little bit. Oh but then then the the counter narrative,
Speaker 1: the counter narrative that you will hear from the Democrats,
Speaker 1: of course, is pathetic, but it's all they've got, which
Speaker 1: is it's the babacadamy, it's the Obama economy. Now, without
Speaker 1: getting into how you can point a very specific decisions
Speaker 1: that Trump made that were the reasons for this growth
Speaker 1: and this optimism and this prosperity for the American people,
Speaker 1: let me just say that, does anybody doubt for a second,
Speaker 1: then if the stock market attanked, you know, if unemployment
Speaker 1: was ticking up to you know, seven eight percent, if
Speaker 1: any of that stuff had happened, which was right in
Speaker 1: line with what the left, they'd be saying that it
Speaker 1: wasn't Trump's fault, that it was the Obama economy. Hangover. No,
Speaker 1: So we're not gonna take them seriously because they are
Speaker 1: a bunch of hacks When they say, oh, at the
Speaker 1: Obama economics, it's so great. The fact that they're calling
Speaker 1: at the Obama economy is just an admission of the
Speaker 1: fact that it's doing great and it's the Trump economy.
Speaker 1: You know what's really important for you, folks at home security? Right.
Speaker 1: A home security system is essential for protecting your your
Speaker 1: family and all of your stuff. And I'm all about
Speaker 1: saying please safe. You know, I've got a simply Safe
Speaker 1: system at home. I'm not that tech savvy, but I
Speaker 1: know when tech is good because one, it's easy to
Speaker 1: set up, even for somebody like me, and that's definitely
Speaker 1: true of the Simply Safe system. That's why I protects
Speaker 1: over two million people. It's totally comprehensive protection for your home,
Speaker 1: round the clock, professional monitoring and police dispatch. It's only
Speaker 1: four month by the way, for seven monitoring, and you
Speaker 1: get protection against intruders, fires, leaks, and burst pipes. I've
Speaker 1: known the Sympathific guys a long time and their company
Speaker 1: is fantastic. That's what's valued at a billion dollars, folks,
Speaker 1: So go check it out for yourself. Order your Simply
Speaker 1: Safe system now. Visit simply safe dot com slash buck
Speaker 1: that's simply safe dot com slash buck to protect your home.
Speaker 1: Simply safe dot com slash buck buck Sextons Decoding the
Speaker 1: news and disseminating information. W is actionable intelligence, make no
Speaker 1: mistakes American. You're a great American again. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Is Buck Sexton. No. That disappoint to
Speaker 1: me is the division and the fact that we're having
Speaker 1: to count people based on their skin color. I don't
Speaker 1: like that. And I think that you know, you look
Speaker 1: back at our history and we we have a pretty
Speaker 1: amazing history of overcoming slavery, of expanding civil rights, of
Speaker 1: women's rights, and a lot of those things happened under
Speaker 1: American presidents who didn't have any um minorities at all
Speaker 1: on their white houses. Thank god, we do. You know
Speaker 1: what's this? And that's great, but you just really missed
Speaker 1: the mark for you to have to say right that
Speaker 1: we don't necessarily need diversity in this white not what
Speaker 1: I said, but but let me do It's not what
Speaker 1: Let me just tell you what I heard, because I
Speaker 1: don't think you hardly understand because you're not going to
Speaker 1: keep doing is talking over me. Because my black life
Speaker 1: matters and so does my voice. So what you're gonna
Speaker 1: do right now is listening to what I'm saying you
Speaker 1: this white house not having diversity can be akin to
Speaker 1: presidents who didn't have any black people, their staff, but
Speaker 1: for slavery. I think I got stuck at Gina saying
Speaker 1: that American presidents have done a great deal for people
Speaker 1: of color, like ending slavery. Like I think I'm stuck
Speaker 1: in eighteen sixty five right now. So regardless of your
Speaker 1: points about slavery, which are nonsense, I hope that you are.
Speaker 1: I p those talking points tonight. They should never be resurrected.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you that it's a problem in this White
Speaker 1: House with the staff, and the reason why it is
Speaker 1: because it's slim pickings, you know why, Because nobody wants
Speaker 1: to go work for a racist. That's what you get
Speaker 1: over at CNN these days, folks. That is what I
Speaker 1: That's what I'm missing out on these days. Some of
Speaker 1: some of that that was Dr Gina Lowdon and Angela
Speaker 1: roy I Actually, I I know angel a little bit.
Speaker 1: Uh worked there a couple of times over there, did
Speaker 1: a few segments with her, and she's become more aggressive
Speaker 1: on air since I knew her. I mean, she used
Speaker 1: to be a little more. She came from Capitol Hill,
Speaker 1: you know, she had worked as a stafferd there, and
Speaker 1: now she's gone kind of full on, uh pundit ambush
Speaker 1: artists and and and it's disappointing, but I guess it's
Speaker 1: not surprising. And to go after Gina loudon this way.
Speaker 1: Look Dr Dr lowdon or Gina what's called her Gina.
Speaker 1: He's trying to have a civil discussion about the point
Speaker 1: that's that's now been raised. But how there's a lack
Speaker 1: of diversity in the White House right now. And what
Speaker 1: I would say to that is this is actually a
Speaker 1: much more complicated discussion then just there's a lack of diverse.
Speaker 1: Core's omar Rosa. They brought in as diversity outreach specifically
Speaker 1: to do that. But you will notice that the way
Speaker 1: that the Democrats have hit this you so hard. Even
Speaker 1: black conservatives, I think recognize there's a there would be
Speaker 1: a particularly difficult public reception for them outside of the
Speaker 1: White House where they go work for this president. I
Speaker 1: don't I don't have to get very creative to come
Speaker 1: up with what they would say, what the Democrats on
Speaker 1: the left would say about African Americans who go work
Speaker 1: for President Trump. Now there are I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: there's there's Dr Ben Carson, who I think I'm actually
Speaker 1: gonna be interviewing in the next few weeks. Uh, there are, Um,
Speaker 1: there's Katrina Pearson who is involved with a pack. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna forget what the specifics are, but no, there's no
Speaker 1: question right now, there's not a senior you know, African
Speaker 1: Americans not senior Black American. Uh you know, I know
Speaker 1: we can use the terms interchangeably black American who is
Speaker 1: in the White House at a senior level. And I'm
Speaker 1: just saying that part of this is because that person,
Speaker 1: whoever it would be. Then you know that the whoever
Speaker 1: the person is that that Trump would try to hire,
Speaker 1: now let's say to put them in the White House,
Speaker 1: but that person White House would be under incredible pressure
Speaker 1: not to take the job. So you know, they play
Speaker 1: this gotcha game of well, you don't have any senior
Speaker 1: black people in the White House right now, but we
Speaker 1: all know that those same Democrats would be saying, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, this black person is is betraying their race
Speaker 1: by going to work for Trump. That is what the
Speaker 1: left would say, because the media across the board, they
Speaker 1: You've got mainstream anchors on the biggest network saying Trump
Speaker 1: is a racist, that he you know, gives comfort to
Speaker 1: the KKK, that he's a all all right, and you know,
Speaker 1: white nationalists and all this stuff. So they make it
Speaker 1: virtually impossible for Trump to be able to recruit senior
Speaker 1: level black staff for the White House. And they make
Speaker 1: it very difficult not just for Trump to get anybody,
Speaker 1: but for anybody who would be offered the job to
Speaker 1: take it, which is a company but you know that
Speaker 1: never gets talked about. And then there's another piece here,
Speaker 1: which is that you know, Angela Ry is on a
Speaker 1: network right now, see and end that's putting all these
Speaker 1: pundits on air to bash the White House for its
Speaker 1: lack of diversity. And you can check for yourself. You
Speaker 1: can go to CNN dot com and look at the
Speaker 1: senior CNN leadership. Every single person there um is not black.
Speaker 1: There's not a single black senior member of CNN, one
Speaker 1: of the biggest you know, global news networks in existence.
Speaker 1: There's not a senior, a single senior executive who's black,
Speaker 1: not one. So is CNN racist Because if if CNN
Speaker 1: doesn't have a senior black executive, just because of the
Speaker 1: hiring that they've done, they didn't have a candidate at
Speaker 1: that time that was the best candidate. You know, I
Speaker 1: could be willing to accept that explanation, right, But wouldn't
Speaker 1: that also apply to the White House. Isn't it possible
Speaker 1: that they had a senior black executive Omar Rosa. She
Speaker 1: left and you know they haven't gotten anybody else yet,
Speaker 1: but it might be circumstantial and not prejudicial or based
Speaker 1: in prejudice. Isn't that possible? If if the White House
Speaker 1: is racist, then for not having anybody who's black and
Speaker 1: senior leadership. Isn't c an n racist for not having
Speaker 1: anybody who's black and senior leadership. I'm I'm just wondering,
Speaker 1: I would want to know about maybe I'm missing something,
Speaker 1: but that that that, to me is a question that
Speaker 1: I think should be asked. But but then by the
Speaker 1: way back to this CNN ambush theater, it gets even
Speaker 1: it gets even nastier because Gina Lowden has a a
Speaker 1: a minority of an African American adopted child who has
Speaker 1: learning disabilities. And then she tries to say she she
Speaker 1: this is this is a classic thing that you'll do
Speaker 1: that that I've dealt with at CNN two. This is
Speaker 1: what ends up happening. You just figure, you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm a good person. I'm gonna assume this other person
Speaker 1: on air is a good person. I'm going to extend
Speaker 1: some kind of olive branch to them and really try
Speaker 1: to treat them with respect and dignity in this conversation
Speaker 1: by saying, look, I get where you're kind, I understand
Speaker 1: your concerns. I disagree with you, but you know, ultimately
Speaker 1: we are all on the same team. And when you
Speaker 1: do that at CNN, I can tell you when you
Speaker 1: do that with liberals in general. Now, when you extend
Speaker 1: your hand to them in a basic human common courtesy,
Speaker 1: solidarity move, they slap your hand away. You get that
Speaker 1: racist hand out of my face, you get that Trump
Speaker 1: supporting hand out of you know. They don't want to
Speaker 1: shake your hand. They don't want to accept your effort
Speaker 1: to see them just on on basic human common ground terms.
Speaker 1: I don't want that, no matter who the anchor is,
Speaker 1: no matter who the pundit is or whatever. You know
Speaker 1: that that they don't really want that. They want to
Speaker 1: keep you in that position where you're the bad guy
Speaker 1: or bad gal. And this is a perfect example of
Speaker 1: that with Rye and Loud in place six. I understand
Speaker 1: your feelings on this, but here's my point. I have
Speaker 1: a I have an adopted minority son. Yes, I do.
Speaker 1: Who happens to have down to them. He experienced his
Speaker 1: bigot try every single day in a myriad of ways,
Speaker 1: not just because of his skin color, but also because
Speaker 1: of his disability. And I understand that you and I
Speaker 1: don't agree, but I would not support a president that
Speaker 1: I believed was going to be a right to his future.
Speaker 1: So what I'd like to have a constructive conversation. And
Speaker 1: I think, you know, I think points like yours that
Speaker 1: are that are focusing only on the negative and not
Speaker 1: even acknowledging seven hundred thousand new jobs for black people
Speaker 1: in this country, record low unemployment and the rest of it.
Speaker 1: It's tantamount to what Andrew Cuomo said today that upset
Speaker 1: me to that America has never been great and we've
Speaker 1: done well, and it's not focus on focus on into
Speaker 1: the United States and then and then and then bring
Speaker 1: out your son as an example, like you've got to
Speaker 1: focus on. Wow, you see what's happening there. First of all,
Speaker 1: she doubles down on quomoa America has never been great.
Speaker 1: You know, this is a this is a refrain that
Speaker 1: uh you hear in in a lot of Democrat minority
Speaker 1: communities these days, right, You'll hear people that will say this,
Speaker 1: and and it's it's troubling, you know, it's troubling. I mean,
Speaker 1: what is the name John of that? Um? Uh, well,
Speaker 1: I can't remember what it is the this is America
Speaker 1: music video, but I guess this is America. I can't
Speaker 1: remember the name of the the artist though, childish, childish, cambigo.
Speaker 1: That's right, you know that there it really is still
Speaker 1: this sense among the Democrat left, and I mean minority
Speaker 1: communities across the board, Hispanic African Americans, somewhat Asian communities
Speaker 1: to believe that America is really this oppressive, terrible system
Speaker 1: and it has to be dramatically reformed. And I just
Speaker 1: think that that's unfortunately. I wouldn't say it's delusional, but
Speaker 1: it is completely devoid of any sensible context. It fails
Speaker 1: to take into account where America is visa be the
Speaker 1: rest of the world, and what America has done for
Speaker 1: the rest of the world. And it's troubling to hear
Speaker 1: this out there. Um. But also just you'll notice that
Speaker 1: that was a real I could tell that that that
Speaker 1: gin a lout in there was trying to say, look,
Speaker 1: I I have a child. I don't know if the
Speaker 1: child's African American. Actually, and I said learning disabled, that
Speaker 1: meant to say down syndrome. I just forgot when we're
Speaker 1: doing our clip run through. UM. But you know, I
Speaker 1: have a child with Down syndrome who's a minority. And
Speaker 1: and I would not support this president if I really do.
Speaker 1: And and Angela right just slaps the hand right away,
Speaker 1: just as I said, just slaps it away. You should
Speaker 1: be ashamed of yourself. People like you or the reason
Speaker 1: this country has never been great. Wow, Yeah, that's right, Angela.
Speaker 1: People who adopt minority children whose parents I'm assuming abandoned them. Uh,
Speaker 1: and with Down syndrome. No, less, They're not the reason
Speaker 1: the country has never been great. They're actually the reason.
Speaker 1: People like Geena Loudon who do things like that, who
Speaker 1: show love and kindness to their fellow human beings irrespective
Speaker 1: of of race or creed, or or or ability or
Speaker 1: or disability. They're actually why country has been great for
Speaker 1: as long as it has, and why it continues to
Speaker 1: be the single most profound, most important source of progress
Speaker 1: and liberty and freedom and decency and prosperity on the
Speaker 1: planet in existence this country that you and I live
Speaker 1: in and that's why, you know, Cuomo had a missed up.
Speaker 1: But Croomos and he's just a it's really kind of
Speaker 1: a sad person because he's just an angry, imbecile who
Speaker 1: has ridden the coattails of his family name into into
Speaker 1: office in New York, but has no real vision for
Speaker 1: making other people's lives better. It's just all about Cuomo.
Speaker 1: It's all just self indulgence and and and pursuing what
Speaker 1: he viewsed as his family legacy, but then to have
Speaker 1: it doubled down on by Angela Ry And and there
Speaker 1: are others too who will say, yes, sure, America has
Speaker 1: never been great. This is a message that they should
Speaker 1: They should just keep getting this message a message going
Speaker 1: into the midterms. You know, they should just keep telling
Speaker 1: the American people as much as possible that they do
Speaker 1: not view America is great. And the Republicans and Trump
Speaker 1: can say, you know what, we actually think this place
Speaker 1: is great, has been great, and it's just gonna get
Speaker 1: even greater going forward. It really separates left from right
Speaker 1: these days. That single point of difference. Should plastic strawsby band?
Speaker 1: Should we ban plastic straws? Absolutely? Do you think we
Speaker 1: should ban plastic straws. Why do you think that because
Speaker 1: they're bad for the environment and they cause a lot
Speaker 1: of pollution, they kill the babycy turtles. What else should
Speaker 1: we ban to help save the environment, My goodness, come
Speaker 1: up with a better idea for like plastic lids on
Speaker 1: to go cups and paper lids. Paper lids would be great.
Speaker 1: What do you guys do to help eliminate your carbon footprint? Recycle? Wow? Heartwarming?
Speaker 1: What else could we do to help fix the environment?
Speaker 1: I think you know what I've been like seeing in
Speaker 1: different places, Like people have just been like planting fruit
Speaker 1: trees in public streets, and that's like dope in the ocean.
Speaker 1: If you cut open a fish. I saw like an
Speaker 1: article about this, and like all that's inside them are
Speaker 1: plastic straws. Should businesses be able to choose whether or
Speaker 1: not to use plastic or should the government just tell
Speaker 1: them they can't use it? I think the government should
Speaker 1: tell them we should stop using plastic. Think about it,
Speaker 1: Like people could eat fruit for free, like state, like
Speaker 1: planted by the state, trees fine by the state. They
Speaker 1: could eat fruit. Homeless people could eat fruit, and it's
Speaker 1: giving osten in to the air. So the government pays
Speaker 1: for the fruit trees? Sure? Why not? And what do
Speaker 1: you think is worse plastic straws here or people coming
Speaker 1: into this country illegally? Oh my god, plastic straws. Think
Speaker 1: this isn't all okay? What do you think is the
Speaker 1: best alter in it of two plastic straws? Um? Well,
Speaker 1: I the place that I work, we started using paper straws,
Speaker 1: and a lot of people have an issue with paper
Speaker 1: straws because they're what do you think is a bigger
Speaker 1: priority to to stop plastic straws or illegal immigration a
Speaker 1: bigger priority? I would say straws. But I think straws,
Speaker 1: I just like straws are like the much scarier than
Speaker 1: like illegal immigration, because like the straw like strangles the
Speaker 1: baby turtle, but like illegal immigrants just like do the
Speaker 1: jobs that like I won't do because like I don't
Speaker 1: want to break a Now, Oh boy, that was from Prager.
Speaker 1: You asking a much people about the straw band. This
Speaker 1: is one I know that this is one of the
Speaker 1: be in the bonnet subjects for me, right, I admit
Speaker 1: this that this whole stuff about and anything about environmentalist
Speaker 1: wacko stuff gets me just drives me up the wall.
Speaker 1: I hate that I have to separate out all of
Speaker 1: my different old There's this recyclable and now there's composts,
Speaker 1: and there's non compostable waste, and there's compostable waste, and
Speaker 1: there's recyclable glass, and there's no I mean, this is
Speaker 1: all crazy stuff. Okay, it doesn't make any difference. It
Speaker 1: is the tyranny of an environmentalist mindset that has replaced
Speaker 1: Gaya with or God with Gaya, like Mother Earth is
Speaker 1: now the deity and we are all supposed to worship
Speaker 1: at at her altar. Of course, Gaya, you know, female Mother,
Speaker 1: not not God, is just an eternal being of goodness,
Speaker 1: love and light and all that stuff. So they were
Speaker 1: more upset about the straws. I guess that's not surprising
Speaker 1: at all. The straw band in uh oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: there's more. It's spreading, folks. The straw band is spreading.
Speaker 1: You know. Starbucks is banning straws, as you know. But
Speaker 1: also now there are restaurants in Charlotte, restaurants in Atlanta.
Speaker 1: I didn't even know. I'm just seeing this now, all
Speaker 1: getting rid of straws. It is so dumb. It is
Speaker 1: so dumb. I swear this is not This is not
Speaker 1: the problem, folks. Week We are responsible. America is responsible
Speaker 1: for a very small percentage of the plastic waste that
Speaker 1: gets into the ocean. You know who's responsive for a
Speaker 1: lot more of it? Huge developing countries, China, India. Do
Speaker 1: you think they give a you know what about the turtles?
Speaker 1: I don't know. That was like my it sounds like
Speaker 1: a goat. I was trying to do a turtle noise,
Speaker 1: not just sound weird. Um. It would have been better
Speaker 1: if you could have seen my face. I do a
Speaker 1: good impression of a baby turtle, but you have to
Speaker 1: see me, and you guys can't see me. Right now,
Speaker 1: that's where we're gonna set up a livestream soon. That's
Speaker 1: gonna happen, by the way, Oh that's right, it's happening.
Speaker 1: I got big plans, folks, I got big plans for
Speaker 1: the Freedom Home. We've got all kinds of things that
Speaker 1: are gonna be happening. But the straw band is completely insane.
Speaker 1: It makes no it makes no sense. And they still
Speaker 1: have a California still has jail time for defying the
Speaker 1: straw Band. I mean, you know, you say you say
Speaker 1: they would never actually put somebody in jail for this,
Speaker 1: but then you also have to deal with Well then
Speaker 1: why is it on the books? Why say you could
Speaker 1: theoretically go to jail for something this stupid? And I
Speaker 1: think that that's there's no good answer for that, right
Speaker 1: A thousand dollars and a term not exceeding six months
Speaker 1: in prison. I think though, it's for each offense, and
Speaker 1: the offenses are uh, the offenses are based per straw,
Speaker 1: and this whole thing is just sheer idiocy. I I
Speaker 1: just hate and I had to separate some recyclables today.
Speaker 1: I hate recycling. It's not They've done studies. It's not
Speaker 1: good for the environment the way they say it is,
Speaker 1: it's a giant pain in the butt. I don't want
Speaker 1: to do it anymore. And the environmentalist left, they just
Speaker 1: get to be the ones. Look, I believe in clean
Speaker 1: air and a clean environment, and I don't want you
Speaker 1: know I'm I'm the one who tells you that the
Speaker 1: way you can tell how advanced the country is is
Speaker 1: by what it does with its garbage, meaning is it clean,
Speaker 1: are the streets clean, do they take care of waste?
Speaker 1: Do they remove waste from the streets. But to take
Speaker 1: it to this whole other level of act like we
Speaker 1: should be almost all our own specialty garbage men who
Speaker 1: are separating the stuff out all the time. It's it's
Speaker 1: just craziness. We're gonna do a double dose of roll
Speaker 1: call because I'm not gonna get to hang out with
Speaker 1: you tomorrow because the Godfather, Michael pel because in that
Speaker 1: is coming up. Yea team, Buck, it's time for roll call. Man.
Speaker 1: I gotta say, every time I go up in New York,
Speaker 1: I get a little, uh, a little savod I have
Speaker 1: to leave. I love that place. You know, home is home,
Speaker 1: and I know it's wherever you are across the country.
Speaker 1: I'm sure a lot of you are like Buck. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm just there's no place on earth that I
Speaker 1: love as munch as uh French lick Indiana. You know,
Speaker 1: I mean, I know there's somebody listen to that. That's
Speaker 1: how you feel. And home is home. Uh d C
Speaker 1: is I'm in political exile here in d C. But
Speaker 1: it's alright to be back. Let's see all my colleagues
Speaker 1: here at the hill. That's always fun, all right, Let's
Speaker 1: get into this uh Facebook dot com slash buck sex
Speaker 1: and by the way, guys, listen to the I got
Speaker 1: a long form interview with my buddy Dan Bongino. We
Speaker 1: have a great talk. I put them through a lightning round.
Speaker 1: We we really get into it, and uh, you know,
Speaker 1: I think you'll enjoy that in the Freedom Hut podcast.
Speaker 1: So even if you're listening live, if you're not somebody
Speaker 1: who does the podcast thing, it's a great chance to
Speaker 1: try it out. And it's not really new cycle base, right,
Speaker 1: so even if you don't get to it till this
Speaker 1: weekend or next week, and all the previous episodes of
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt are worth listening to as well because
Speaker 1: it's just interviews with people that you want to hear
Speaker 1: stuff from. It's not it's not overtaken by events. If
Speaker 1: you miss it the first day, so you can go
Speaker 1: back listen to all of them and we have a
Speaker 1: lot of fun. Mean, I don't know people that the
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly and Seawan Parnell on was great, although their
Speaker 1: audio there were some audio issues there which you know.
Speaker 1: Of course, the Army Ranger messing up the coms. I
Speaker 1: could count on the marine, that's all I can tell you.
Speaker 1: The marine came through, but the Army Ranger we were
Speaker 1: in a hot LZ and he was not getting it done. Uh.
Speaker 1: We had a great chat with Raheem Kasam and and
Speaker 1: Benny Johnson. Uh. Also so we've we've had a lot
Speaker 1: of fun here on those shows that I think you'll
Speaker 1: enjoy hearing Dan Bongino. All right, let's get to the
Speaker 1: next one. The first in Roll Call Facebook dot com
Speaker 1: slash Buck Sexton Matthew writes, missed you this morning on Rising.
Speaker 1: Almost fell out of my chair when Gorka accused Crystal
Speaker 1: of fake news. He did a good job. I can't
Speaker 1: believe she tried that false talking point. She can be
Speaker 1: hard to listen to at times. Hope everything is okay,
Speaker 1: Shields High. I heard that doctor Gorka told Crystal that
Speaker 1: her her talking point was fake news. Uh. Cork is
Speaker 1: great man. I'm gonna tell you guys about Gorka too.
Speaker 1: He's an academic, but uh, I gotta tell you gork
Speaker 1: is an academic, but he wouldn't want to catch that
Speaker 1: guy on the wrong side of a bar you know
Speaker 1: what I mean, or wrong side of a bar fight.
Speaker 1: He's a big dude, I I know, and he's I
Speaker 1: can always tell to He's a big dude. He can
Speaker 1: he can handle himself. You I'm just saying, you know,
Speaker 1: some of these guys you see and you're like, oh, yeah, whatever,
Speaker 1: not go Gorka. I'm telling you, Gorky, I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: Gorky could throw a punch. John, I'm telling you He's
Speaker 1: not a guy that you would you would easy, you
Speaker 1: would easily want to mess with. Yeah. We actually we
Speaker 1: talked to Bongino a little bit on the podcast about
Speaker 1: Brazilian jiu jitsu, which he's really into. But but Gorka
Speaker 1: is ready, He's ready to throw it out. Man, He's
Speaker 1: a warrior. I like that guy. I like Corka anyway,
Speaker 1: let's get into I like Crystal too. She's my friend.
Speaker 1: They had a little dispute and they selled it like adults,
Speaker 1: all right, Steve hey buck love the show. I'd like
Speaker 1: to take the kids over to the swamp to see
Speaker 1: some of the museums, but don't know if there's the
Speaker 1: crazy protests plan for the upcoming weekend. I'd really rather
Speaker 1: not stumble into a situation with an angry liberal mob
Speaker 1: with my daughters and tow do you know where I
Speaker 1: can look to find out if anything is planned? Since
Speaker 1: you are a swamp creature. Now, I figured you're the
Speaker 1: best resource, Steve Steve Um. Yeah, I'm pretty plugged in here.
Speaker 1: In fact, I have I have government local d C
Speaker 1: government contacts that I can always ask about what's going
Speaker 1: on with protests or anything else, and they can give
Speaker 1: me a really good heads up on it. I'm not
Speaker 1: aware of any protest right now, and if that changes,
Speaker 1: I will certainly I'll certainly right you back here on
Speaker 1: on roll call and get too as soon as I can.
Speaker 1: By the way, today on the in the Quiet Car,
Speaker 1: somebody was took a phone call. This is on the amtrack.
Speaker 1: You know, they have the Quiet Car, which is an
Speaker 1: outpost of civilization in the world gone mad, and someone
Speaker 1: pulled out not just started talking on the phone, but
Speaker 1: the phone was ringing, like with the old school phone ring,
Speaker 1: which nobody should have that old school phone ring. It's
Speaker 1: very jarring, it's very loud. So the old school phone
Speaker 1: ring to his cell phone and then he says, you know,
Speaker 1: he's like, hey, yeah, what's going on, buddy. You know,
Speaker 1: it starts talking really loudly, and I leaned over so
Speaker 1: I could make eye contact, and I gave him the
Speaker 1: whole uh you know, pointed point at the and point
Speaker 1: at the sign. To his credit, the guy backed off
Speaker 1: and he left the He left to make his phone
Speaker 1: call in the next car, which is what you should do.
Speaker 1: And somebody looked at me and nodded an approval in
Speaker 1: the car, of course. And I'm just saying, you know,
Speaker 1: not all heroes wear capes, folks, Not all heroes wear capes. Uh,
Speaker 1: Roger writes, buck omar Rossa took a personal device into
Speaker 1: a skiff NDAs and arbitration should be the last of
Speaker 1: her worries. Roger, I'm I'm pretty sure I'm correct on
Speaker 1: this one. It is not illegal to take an uh
Speaker 1: A personal device into it. It It is. It is against regulation,
Speaker 1: but that's different if you record class FIED on an
Speaker 1: unclassified device, that would be illegal. UH. It is a
Speaker 1: security violation to bring a cell phone into it a
Speaker 1: secure space. To my understanding, it is not for civilians.
Speaker 1: I can't speak the military side. You guys have you
Speaker 1: know under U C MJ. For example, you can't even
Speaker 1: like you can't cheat on your wife. I mean, there
Speaker 1: are things that civilians don't have to abide by as
Speaker 1: as a code. Although now you're gonna probably say buckets
Speaker 1: actually legal to cheat on your wife too, I know,
Speaker 1: but not enforced in civilian life. And U C MJ.
Speaker 1: My understanding as it isn't forced very serious. Uh so, yes, Roger,
Speaker 1: thank you for writing in we have Philip right Shields
Speaker 1: high Buck. I heard you mentioned yesterday that you like
Speaker 1: guest recommendations. I think you ought to consider a very
Speaker 1: good friend of mine and retired fellow retired Army officer
Speaker 1: Tony Dean Colonel you and the U. S. Army who
Speaker 1: has first hand insights into the Sunni Awakening and and
Speaker 1: Bar he wrote about it in his book Ramadi Declassified.
Speaker 1: Tony spearheaded the Sunni Awakening in two thousand and six
Speaker 1: as the lead task force came under in that effort. Um,
Speaker 1: keep up the great analysis you. You've been having excellent
Speaker 1: guests on the show. You've got a great lineup. Refently
Speaker 1: and encourage you to continue to mix to your own analysis.
Speaker 1: Uh continue it as a mixed your analysis, Shields Ye, Phil,
Speaker 1: thank you, Phil. Yeah. Look, I try to my my
Speaker 1: mandate every day on this show is to make this
Speaker 1: as worth your time as possible. That's my every single day,
Speaker 1: every goal of every segment bring you information and entertainment.
Speaker 1: And insight and and uh, you know the sense of
Speaker 1: the tribal belonging that we all have as patriots who
Speaker 1: come together here on this show. Uh, that's my goal
Speaker 1: every day. So if I'm getting good guests on and
Speaker 1: that's helping, fantastic. Adam, Right, it's good morning, Buck. Have
Speaker 1: a question for you today. With Washington d C's restrictive
Speaker 1: gun laws, could you carry a black powder revolver for
Speaker 1: personal protection? The Bureau of Alcohol's back on firearms doesn't
Speaker 1: consider it a firearm, So just wondering, Adam, you have
Speaker 1: stumped me on this one. I don't know. I would
Speaker 1: say this though. D C is so crazy when it
Speaker 1: comes to firearms that they have actually arrested people in
Speaker 1: the past. Uh. And I remember the case. I spent
Speaker 1: a lot of time covering it when I was at
Speaker 1: the Blaze. They have arrested people in the past for
Speaker 1: having shotgun shells, including a shotgun shell that was deformed
Speaker 1: and unusable, so it wasn't even really live ammunition ammunition.
Speaker 1: It was essentially a miss I can't remember if it
Speaker 1: was a misfired shell or but it was inert for
Speaker 1: all intents and purposes. I heard somebody go on TV
Speaker 1: recently and say for all intensive purposes, and I'm like,
Speaker 1: you know, that's just when you should that that it
Speaker 1: gets a lot of people intensive purposes And besides the
Speaker 1: point are two that people just we all get caught
Speaker 1: up sometimes, but those are two you gotta avoid total departure. Adam,
Speaker 1: for what you're saying, I don't know. It's a good question,
Speaker 1: but if I was going to defend myself with a
Speaker 1: black powder revolver, I do feel like I would um
Speaker 1: need to wear a try corner hat and breaches and
Speaker 1: maybe carry a saber with me as well, and then
Speaker 1: I would really complete the whole situation. So but thank you, Adam,
Speaker 1: thank you very much for writing in. Aaron, hey Buck,
Speaker 1: just wanted to check in on my previous message. UM.
Speaker 1: Pastor Michael Anthony is currently speaking on the breaking news
Speaker 1: of Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cake Shop suing the state
Speaker 1: of Colorado for the treatment he received from denying to
Speaker 1: bake a cake for a transgender birthday. Would you be
Speaker 1: interested in having him on your program? Uh, Aaron, I
Speaker 1: have passed this along to the team and uh, I'm
Speaker 1: sure we're in contact. I will follow up with them
Speaker 1: and we we'll see. I will tell you Aaron that
Speaker 1: just I rarely have guests on the show that I
Speaker 1: don't know or don't know their work, and that's kind
Speaker 1: of a quality control mechanism. It's not because I don't
Speaker 1: trust the suggestions from the audience. So when I asked
Speaker 1: for guest suggestions, I'm usually it's usually people that we've
Speaker 1: heard on the show in the past, that you want
Speaker 1: for a deep dive or that you want back on
Speaker 1: the show. Because bringing people from the outside world that
Speaker 1: I don't know. And when I say, I don't have
Speaker 1: to know the person, but if I don't know their work,
Speaker 1: if I've never heard of them before, I in my
Speaker 1: earlier radio career had that happened a few times and
Speaker 1: the results were the results were poor in terms of
Speaker 1: the segments that we got out of it. So I
Speaker 1: try to avoid any surprises like that, you know what,
Speaker 1: we're gonna do another real call, because I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: out tomorrow. The Godfather, Mike Opelca is gonna be in
Speaker 1: for me. That's right, Opelca is gonna be taking the
Speaker 1: wheel here, which also means that the Freedom Hunt podcast
Speaker 1: for this week is a little extra special important because
Speaker 1: It's almost like it's in place of me appearing on Friday,
Speaker 1: I guess. But Michael Pelkill be doing a great job tomorrow,
Speaker 1: and please do join him as you can and make
Speaker 1: sure you give the Godfather all the support that he needs.
Speaker 1: We are gonna come back into more roll call here
Speaker 1: in just a moment. The show ain't over yet, folks.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call. All right, let's get to it.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna waste any time here, Erica. Right. So
Speaker 1: I saw this on a friend's Facebook page. Had to
Speaker 1: pass it on to you. Jack Burton Truck and Company
Speaker 1: T shirt. I love it and I should get one
Speaker 1: for myself. H Thomas writes Buck. I was glad to
Speaker 1: see Sebastian Gorka on Rising this morning to set the
Speaker 1: record straight on the privileges and responsibilities of having security clearance.
Speaker 1: The arguments by the Progressives that John Brennan and other
Speaker 1: partisans from the Obama administration have a right to keep
Speaker 1: their clearances is a lie. I'm glad he emphasized that
Speaker 1: your point, your and in did a good job today.
Speaker 1: I'm guessing you're busy making the move from New York
Speaker 1: to d C. I'm starting to enjoy the discussions on rising,
Speaker 1: but Crystal has to lose that perky giggle. It's too
Speaker 1: frequent and gives the impression she's mocking the comments being
Speaker 1: given by guests and could be replaced with a canned
Speaker 1: laugh soundtrack. Keep up the good work, Thomas, Thomas, thank you.
Speaker 1: I've read that one do in Gorka voice. Um, Like
Speaker 1: I said, I love Gorka and you guys know here
Speaker 1: if I didn't know when something bad about him, because
Speaker 1: the guys like six four two forts a big dude. Uh.
Speaker 1: Next up here we have Ronnie trying to remember yesterday's show.
Speaker 1: There are Michelle Obama and Donald J. Trump or deal Ronnie.
Speaker 1: I don't know what you're saying, but thanks for writing. Stephen,
Speaker 1: Chill tie Buck. If you're heading to Austin, you have
Speaker 1: to try Franklin's b b Q. Best barbecue I've ever
Speaker 1: had in my life, and I have had a lot
Speaker 1: of barbecue, will Stephen. That makes two of us, and uh,
Speaker 1: I love barbecue. I'll tell you there's a little place.
Speaker 1: There's a little place on Route twenty two, which when
Speaker 1: you're heading north out of New York City, when you
Speaker 1: get on six eight four after the Hutchinson Parkway. You
Speaker 1: find yourself on Route twenty two. There is a little
Speaker 1: roadside restaurant known as Big W's b b Q in Poughkeepsie,
Speaker 1: New York. And you don't think of Pokeepsie, New York
Speaker 1: as Wait, no, not is it Poughkeepsie. I might be off.
Speaker 1: I think you know, I think it is Poughkeepsie. Well,
Speaker 1: you know what, I'll find out, because I do want
Speaker 1: to give you the wrong place for those of you
Speaker 1: who are listening, because I know that we actually are
Speaker 1: on in Poughkeepsie. We have a radio station there, Big
Speaker 1: W b b Q, New York. Where is it exactly?
Speaker 1: It is? In hold on, I'm getting there. I'm getting there. Wingdale, Wingdale,
Speaker 1: not Pockepsie, Wingdale, New York, which is about an hour
Speaker 1: and thirty minutes north of New York City. And the
Speaker 1: brisket there is world class. It is absolutely delicious. It
Speaker 1: is as good as any brisk get I had in
Speaker 1: all of my barbecue forays in Texas. And it's not
Speaker 1: a not a flashy place, you know. You know, if
Speaker 1: you looked at it from the outside, you like, do
Speaker 1: they serve burgers, they have grilled cheeses, You know. No,
Speaker 1: it's a barbecue place, Big Ws Barbecue in Wingdale. Best
Speaker 1: brisket you can get, you know, anywhere within an hour
Speaker 1: hour and a half driver there for sure. I mean
Speaker 1: you'd have to go into New York City to get
Speaker 1: brisket that's as good. And some of you are like, well,
Speaker 1: brisket of New York City, isn't that good? Folks? Folks?
Speaker 1: Folks's New York. The food is amazing, all right, if
Speaker 1: you can, you can hate New York as much as
Speaker 1: you want. And I know him a little a little
Speaker 1: touchy about New York right now because I miss it.
Speaker 1: You can hate New York as much as you want.
Speaker 1: The food is amazing. And you say, whoa we no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: we have that kind of food too, and it's amazing.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's as good as your Texas where
Speaker 1: your Carolina barbecue. I'm just saying it's very good. Um.
Speaker 1: And the only thing I well, no, I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: get a whole food discussion, and I'm supposed to be
Speaker 1: gett into a roll call. Uh, Josh, rites, stop referring
Speaker 1: to the Trump dossier is as opposition research that implies
Speaker 1: they conducted research and implies there is some truth to
Speaker 1: it unverified or demonstrably false. Verbiage is not oppo research.
Speaker 1: It is propaganda. Josh, I kind of know what you're
Speaker 1: going for with this, but I would just say that, um,
Speaker 1: you know, I would say that it is oppo research
Speaker 1: even if we don't like it and it's all false,
Speaker 1: because APPA research is often all false, So you gotta
Speaker 1: keep that in mind. Uh, Monica, Hey, Monica, hey buck.
Speaker 1: I used to work in a skiff. Leaving work, I
Speaker 1: picked up my phone, put in my pocket, turned to
Speaker 1: security guy and said, I left my keys on my desk.
Speaker 1: He said, just go, I'm not going to search you.
Speaker 1: Upon getting back from my desk, I realized I have
Speaker 1: my phone in my pocket inside the skiff for thirty
Speaker 1: seconds on camera, the whole time I told security. We
Speaker 1: both self reported security and got yelled at for ten
Speaker 1: minutes and it went into my file. I guess times
Speaker 1: have changed. Yeah, Monica, Uh, that's what happened. That was
Speaker 1: what would have happened to me too. I saw that
Speaker 1: happen to colleagues. You ever walked into a skiff with
Speaker 1: a phone, you had to self reported security and they
Speaker 1: came after you and you know dropped a hammer on
Speaker 1: you and the whole thing, and clearly not the case
Speaker 1: for Hillary Clinton, clearly not the case for some other folks. Um,
Speaker 1: I don't know what you're not the case for Roma Rossa.
Speaker 1: She'll never work in government again. I think unless you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know who knows. I shouldn't say that because
Speaker 1: you don't know. Brian, great shows always, Buck, how long
Speaker 1: do you think John Brennan goes before he opens a
Speaker 1: go fund Me page? Brian, because he's not in legal
Speaker 1: jeopardy right now, probably won't have a go fund Me,
Speaker 1: but I promise you if they do bring charges against him,
Speaker 1: he'll expect the hashtag resistance to fund his defense. Devon writes, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: do you think you can do a deep dive on
Speaker 1: when the d n C changed from being known as
Speaker 1: the Party of Slavery the KKK anti suffrage Jim Crow
Speaker 1: Laws to today? Because I always hear about how they're
Speaker 1: was a switch when suddenly all the worst kinds of
Speaker 1: people decided to jump to the Republican Party and almost
Speaker 1: like magic, the worst stuff in U s history is
Speaker 1: placed on our doorstep like they had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with it. Um, you know that's a very interesting question, Devin.
Speaker 1: I mean a deep dive on that really, that really
Speaker 1: requires a think a book more than a deep dive
Speaker 1: radio segment. Uh. And it is something that Denish to
Speaker 1: Susa tackles quite a bit in his his new movie
Speaker 1: and you know Death of a Nation and his writings
Speaker 1: in general. So you might want to start with the nish,
Speaker 1: but I will think about it for a deep dive
Speaker 1: to be sure that's gonna be it for me for
Speaker 1: today in the hut. The Godfather Michael Pelka is in tomorrow.
Speaker 1: I'll be back with you all from the swamp on Monday.
Speaker 1: Shields High