WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: April 20th, 2026

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app our front and center.

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Is this one? This story at the moment crude climbing

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 2>on renewed uncertainty through the stred of for mers Am

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>world of the Atlantic Council writing, instead of trying to

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>jawbone markets with positive sentiment, the president should stick with

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 2>messaging from a position of strength and no vacillation. And

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 2>then joined us now for more Adan, Welcome to the program.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I was speaking to a market contact earlier who had

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>a basic question, is the worst of it behind us?

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Is this the post Liberation day picture of the market

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>right now? Is it a similar story or is it

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 2>different this time?

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure whether we're really whether the worst is passed.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 3>So I think that the US actually commandeering or blockading

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 3>these ships is pretty much an escalation of events. It

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 3>depends I guess, whether we see more active bombing and

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>whether we see Iran responding to that by hitting its neighbors.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that that's absolutely still in the cards, though

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the ceasefire is I guess technically still

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 3>in place, though I'm not sure you can say it's

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 3>still in place.

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 4>If we've had.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Iranian ships firing on ships trying to transit the Straight

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and the US firing on Iranian ships, I'm not sure

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 3>we can really call that a ceasefire. But it does

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>seem to still be in place, and so I wouldn't

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>be too hesitant to say that the worst is passed,

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>but it's could get worse very very quickly.

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you what you think was more likely

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>that in the next twenty four forty eight hours an

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 2>extension of the ceasefire or a resumption of hostilities.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I think an extension of the ceasefire is more likely,

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 3>but only maybe a little over fifty percent, I would

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>put it at.

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 5>So at this point, Ellen, how feasible do you see

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 5>the outcome that the market is pricing in. This is

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 5>sort of what we're trying to get our head around,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 5>because it seems like people come on the show who

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 5>are in the equity space or who even trade oil,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 5>and they say, well, you know, this actually roughly games

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 5>out what's probable, and an oil commodity strategist come on

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 5>and they say, absolutely not, that seems highly unlikely.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 4>What's your take.

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it's it's pretty unlikely right now. I think

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the market is over exuberant in terms of.

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 4>A fast fix to all of this.

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that despite what President trum tweeted on Friday,

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Iran and the United States are leagues and leagues and

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 3>worlds apart in terms terms of what they want, and

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Iran has absolutely no incentive to give in on anything

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 3>at this point, because, first of all, it doesn't see

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 3>anything wrong with higher oil prices, whereas Trump keeps going

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>back to these very positive statements to try to get

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>prices down and get the Dow drones up. And yet

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it's pretty clear at this point that once

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 3>everything actually is resolved, we're going to go back to

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 3>where we.

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Were in a hurry.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Prices will go to oil prices will go down, equities

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 3>will go up, and so it seems like it's kind

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 3>of confusing to me. So why he keeps trying to

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>make things seem better than they are, just to get

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 3>things looking better at the beginning of the week or

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>when market's open, when you know, let it be, you know,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>say say your position holds strong, because that's clearly what

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>he wants to do, and then let it all, you know,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 3>but let the cards fall where they will when it ends.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 5>Ellen, you wrote the book on Saudi Arabia Saudi Inc.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Talking about how the kingdom really came to fruition and

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 5>some of the monetary backing of the oil complex. Do

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 5>you have a sense of how much Saudi Arabia and

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 5>the other Golf countries are shifting alliances moving away from

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the US maybe amid this conflict.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>I do think that we're in a different paradigm than

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 3>we used to be. Really, you know, Asia is the

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>most important customer now for Saudi Arabia and the UAE

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 3>and other big oil exporters. It used to be that

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 3>the US was their most important customer. However, China and

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Asian countries are not big military suppliers. China's Navy is

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 3>never going to go into the Persian Gulf, whereas the

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 3>US Navy, they're the ones.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 4>That are there.

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.679
<v Speaker 3>So it's a slightly different dynamic in that the US

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 3>is still very important financially, very important as a military

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 3>supplier and as a naval force and an air force

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 3>in the region, but it's not that it doesn't play

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 3>that same role as buyer of oil. And so that

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 3>means that these countries have a bit less leverage over

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the US than they used to.

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, they're not going to want

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to create all this friction with their security blanket, are

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they exactly?

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 3>And so it is a bit of a careful line

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 3>that they're walking because they need the military protection, but

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 3>they can't necessarily say to the US, hey, we're we're

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 3>going to you know, we're going to control oil supplies now,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 3>and to make sure we get that. It's it's not

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 3>so much of a quid pro qo here, And I

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 3>think that they do need to tread carefully, and we're

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 3>seeing them tread carefully. You know, they haven't been all

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>that vocal about about what's going on, and I think

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>that that that's a sign that they know that their

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 3>position is perhaps a little more precarious than it used

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 3>to be.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, there are of courts of mahome Ben Salmon had

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a phone call with Shijingping earlier. Today. Are the Golf

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>arab partners you think pressing on China to put the

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>thumb on the scale on Iran?

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 3>I think they absolutely could, because China is one partner

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 3>of Iran. They that has that economic pull with Iran.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, I do think that you know,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>these calls could be all about just maintaining, you know,

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 3>maintaining the conversation about the fact that you know, China

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of investments in Saudi Arabia that are

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 3>not doing all that well right now because they can't

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 3>get oil out and you know, there are issues with

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the petrochemicals, and so I wouldn't be surprised to see

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 3>the Saudis and counterparts in the UA reaching out to

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 3>people in China to assure them that the relationship is

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 3>strong that once this is over, you know, things are

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 3>going to be repaired and go back to everyone making

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 3>money the way it used to be.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 2>And what happened on Friday, can we just finish on that.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Between eight and nine am Eastern time, On Friday, there

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>was a series of messages from one delegate coming out

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>of Iran and another in the US making the case

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of the stratiform merc that reopened and we were sitting

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>care thinking maybe it has let's say, let's wait and

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 2>find out. And then we found out pretty quickly it

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 2>has an And so what happened that? Was it something

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the US diad or was it just that the Iranians

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 2>committed to something that ultimately not all Iranians and all

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>interested parties had a great suit.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's I think it's both.

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 3>It's it's a bit of both here, because there's a

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 3>bit of over exuberance on the part of Trump to

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 3>say the street reforms is open, Iran has agreed to

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 3>everything we want, you know.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Let's let's move on now.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a huge amount of pressure, particularly from Trump,

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 3>to for that to be the message on Iran's part.

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, remember these are these are not

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>These parties are not talking to each other. They're talking

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>to intermediaries who are then talking to each other, who

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 3>are then going and talking to the other parties. So

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 3>so Iran and the US are not communicating with each other,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>and so there's a bit of a dance in the

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 3>wordplay that comes over comes around the US may say

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 3>we want X, Y and Z, and with that message

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>gets to the Iranians. It's not the same as exactly

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 3>what the US said. And so when Iran agrees to

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>something they're agreeing to, what would they think they're agreeing

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 3>to could fly with their people, which is not necessarily

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 3>what Trump thinks they're agreeing to. And this happens a

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 3>lot in diplomacy, particularly when the parties are not actually

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 3>sitting down at the same table as each other and

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 3>not speaking the same languages. And so I think this

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>means there's a lot more to bridge. Iran also needs

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>to message to its own people, and as you mentioned

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 3>on the program earlier, we're not entirely sure exactly who

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 3>we're speaking to with regards to Iran. There's the IRGC

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 3>and there's the elected government, and those are not necessarily

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>the same and don't have the same opinion and don't

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 3>even necessarily have the same elements under their control in

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the country.

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>President Donald Trump threatenings a quote knock out every single

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>power plant and every single bridge in Iran if adal

0:08:58.920 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>is not reached.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Wallways.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>On global infrastructure, Sodak Wabba of Ice Squad Capital is

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 2>remaining positive on the sector, writing the fundamental need for

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure in this part of the world doesn't disappear because

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the environment is difficult. If anything, it intensifies. Sodak joins

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 2>us now for more. Good morning, sir, it's good to

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 2>see you. Thank you, thank you very much for being

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 2>care so in your opinion, in your mind, the war

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 2>of the last two months or so doesn't upend infrastructure,

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it might accelerate it.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately in that sense. Yes, So two things. First, you're

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 6>going to get at least sixty billion dollars probably more

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 6>in terms of direct infrastructure damage. The problem is that's

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 6>the physical damage, but you have consequences in addition to that,

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 6>meaning it will take you a couple of years to

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 6>rebuild some of that infrastructure. You'll have to spend on defense.

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 6>So overall, the governments of the GCC have probably another

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 6>hundred billion dollars that they need to spend over the

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 6>coming years. What that will do, in my view, is

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 6>it will push these governments into investing in these projects

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 6>through direct government intervention and national oil companies, but then

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 6>let the private sector focus on the remaining infrastructure over

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 6>the course of the coming decade. If you look at

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 6>the share, for example, in Saudi of non government oil,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 6>that's about forty percent. What's that number in the US

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 6>about fifteen percent. So that share of government expenditure needs

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 6>to come down any way over the coming years, and

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 6>that I think will be accelerated because of what has happened.

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>What do you think the key priorities will be now?

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 6>I think there are two key priorities. One is redundancies

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 6>and the other one is accelerated growth. So redundancies because

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 6>we've seen that there's too much concentration in particular areas.

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 6>So for example, twenty percent of the oil goes through

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 6>the Strait of Homos. Twenty percent of the energy goes

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 6>through the Strait of Homos. So what the GCC countries

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 6>will need to do is to create redundancies, more pipelines,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 6>more storage facilities. And you're talking, by the way, they're

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 6>already talking about that, right, it's not something that is speculative.

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 6>What kind of pipeline do we need to build to

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 6>remove that reliance on the Strait of homost one kind

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 6>of storage facilities do we need to put in. So

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 6>you're going to get a huge boost and investment in

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 6>that kind of infrastructure to reduce that reliance. So that's

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 6>one aspect. The second aspect of it is if you

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 6>look at the non energy infrastructure, a lot of it

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 6>has been concentrated in particular geographic areas. So for example,

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 6>take data centers. One of the highest penetrations by the

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 6>way of mobile phones, fantastic, but the digital infrastructure is

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 6>highly concentrated in a few hubs, so a few hubs.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:52.599
<v Speaker 6>Global cloud dependency, a fiber optic comes in particular geographic

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 6>areas which we don't need to mention, so all concentrated

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 6>in those areas, So that will have to change over

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 6>the coming years. So one is data center. Another one

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 6>is water resources. Sixty seven of the population in the

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 6>GCC relies exclusively on diesel water and all the diesel

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 6>plants are along that coast which is in the Gulf

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 6>of Pressure, so you'll need to create a new infrastructure

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 6>for water. Water reserves that need to be put in.

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 5>This is a lot of money, and it's even more

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 5>money when you think about how much the commodity prices

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 5>are increasing as a result of all of this infrastructure

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 5>build Where is the money going to come from. Is

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 5>it going to be diverted from other initiatives that these

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Middle East countries are now investing in, whether it's golf

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 5>or whether it's the premier league in football, or is

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 5>it going to be coming from outside investors.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 6>I think it will come primarily from outside investors. So

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 6>take a private equity firm like Iceweat Capital. We're looking

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 6>to deploy easily over two billion dollars in the coming

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 6>years in the region in that kind of infrastructure. It

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 6>could be in water resources data centers, which already doing renewables.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 6>Renewables penetration in that area is five to seven percent,

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 6>US is twenty world overall globally it's about thirty percent.

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 6>Europe is sixty percent, So the weigh behind in terms

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 6>of integrating renewables power into their system. So I think

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 6>you're going to get a lot of investments. It should

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 6>come primarily from foreign direct investments, private capital, and that's

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 6>already happened in the last couple of years.

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Do you get the sense that there is an allegiance

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 5>in terms of where the money comes from to go

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 5>into some of these projects, the infrastructure projects. And I

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 5>say this at a time where it seems like the

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 5>world is kind of fracturing and there's a real question

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 5>about US money going into the region or is it

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 5>Asian money that's going into the region. At a time

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 5>when this used to be sort of the new financial capital,

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 5>that's kind of been called to a question. I mean,

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 5>do you have a sense of where the flows are

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 5>going to be coming from.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 6>I think, interestingly, the flows are going to continue to

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 6>come from the US because we are the largest, deepest

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 6>capital markets in the world. There's no doubt about that.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 6>We tend to be sometimes short term and forget about

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 6>the long term. Asia tend to be more longer term.

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 6>But you have a huge base of private equity investors

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 6>in the US that is looking to invest in the

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 6>region and will continue to invest in the region and

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 6>are willing to take a longer term view. I don't

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 6>think that was the case ten years ago, because you've

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 6>seen fundamental changes in the region notwithstanding the war. But sorry,

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 6>but Asia capital your point, I think, is going to

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 6>be very aggressive, like it has been in Latin America

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 6>likely it's been in Europe through Belton Road, through other

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 6>mechanism that China has developed.

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Sometimes there's a habit to talk about the region

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as a monolith, but it's not who's hit the hardest

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>right now? Is it Bahrain in Kuwait? Are they you

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>don't need the most money.

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 6>The truth is the people think of these as different countries,

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 6>which of course they are, but they all rely on

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 6>that energy infrastructure which has been hit that I think

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 6>will need to be rebuilt very quickly. Some of it

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 6>will take years. As I said, because I'll give you

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 6>an example today, I want to build in the US

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 6>a power plant. We have huge needs for power plants

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 6>right because of data centers. For me to order a

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 6>turbine from Siemens Mitsubishi ge five to seven years. So

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 6>think about that region where they have to rebuild. It's

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 6>not as much as the cost, as much as the

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 6>time that's going by, so they will have to wait

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 6>quite a bit to be able to rebuild that. So

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 6>it's honestly across all of the energy sector. What has

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 6>been most hit is of course anything that has to

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 6>do with the US, so US basis where US activities

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 6>occurred that was hit.

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>What about the trillions of dollars these countries have pledged

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to invest into the United States if the President made

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that huge foreign policy trip last year.

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I was actually part of that trip with President Trump.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 6>I think those investments will happen, but maybe will happen

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 6>over a longer period of time than expected. Let's put

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 6>it that way.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 4>That's what I heard.

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I heard all those investments are now getting kicked down

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the road, kick the can. But for the president, I say,

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this was a huge foreign policy win.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 6>Yes, you see, there's an irony to that. I think

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 6>those economies are willing to invest in the US. The

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 6>question is in what sector and are we able? Do

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 6>we have the mechanism to take on those investments. So

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 6>it's easy to invest in the stock market, it's much

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 6>more difficult to invest in a multi billion dollar pipeline

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 6>that needs to be built. So ironically, it's the availability

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 6>of projects in the US that is the challenge. The permitting,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 6>the regulatory frameworks, all that is effectively slowing down the

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 6>ability to observe that kind of capital.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>At least, try to ask the question, and do you

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>think the Sundias will stick with liftgolf? Have you got

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 2>an opinion on that, sir?

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 6>None?

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think they will stick. Yes, stay with us.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 2>More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this and the Savannahs

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 2>this morning. A change of course, we're going to focus

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 2>on a Federal Reserve confirming Kevin Walsh.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 7>It's time to move on from this. So the petitions

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 7>to the court have been rejected, and I think it's

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 7>time to move on from the case and put our

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 7>attention around getting Kevin Warsh confirmed by the United States Senate.

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 7>Let President Trump have a new partner at the Fed.

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 7>What Treasury Secretary of Bessett have a new partner in

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 7>bank supervision and monetary policy. It's time and I think

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 7>it's important to.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Move So here's the laces this morning, Kevin WASH's confirmation hearing.

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Facing headwinds. Senator Tom Tiller is still voving to block

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 2>the nomination until the DOJ ends its probe into the

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Central Bank joining us now as Claudia sum of New

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Century Advisors, Claudia, thanks for making some time for today

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 2>once again ahead of an important hearing. I have to say,

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 2>but you're anticipating more theater than signaled and insight in

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the next twenty four hours.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 8>Confirmation hearings always have an aspect of political theater to them.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 8>But this one, frankly, I think Kevin Worsh might almost

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 8>be a sideshow at his own confirmation hearing.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 4>President Trump is going to.

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 8>Loom very large in these hearings tomorrow and the pressure

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 8>campaign he's put on the FED, and we might learn

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 8>not so much about Kevin Warsh and his views on

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 8>monetary policy.

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 4>That's that, Claudia.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 5>It feels like people are on tenter hooks waiting for

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 5>him to give some signal of how high the bar

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 5>is for him to cut rates and exactly what he

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 5>plans to do with the balance sheet? Are you expecting

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 5>no signal from him with respect to cutting rates at

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 5>this moment, given the fact that Secretary Treasury Secretary Scott

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 5>Besson essentially gave him a green light to be a

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 5>little more hawkish than perhaps President Trump would like.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, first of all, somebody's got to ask him about it,

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 8>right again, That's where I mean him not being part

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 8>of the center of focus. If a lot of the

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 8>questions are about President Trump and FED independence and like, that.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Just wouldn't get to what's Kevin.

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 8>Worsh's reaction function, Like how does he think about what

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 8>the federal funds rate should be what is he balancing?

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 4>And it is difficult.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 8>Over his career, it's a bit of an enigma what

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 8>his reaction function is. So I think that's absolutely what

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 8>we should be learning about tomorrow. I hope we get

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 8>more guidance from him on this, but again senators have

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 8>got to ask him about and really push him on

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 8>how does he think about setting the federal funds rate.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 4>We might get some of that tomorrow, but I suspect

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 4>we're not.

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 8>Going to get as much as we really should be

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 8>getting to kind of think about him as a candidate, Claude,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 8>are you.

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 5>Surprised that the market's been relatively sanguine in the face

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 5>of some real drama and real questions around a who's

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 5>going to be atop the Federal Reserve and be what

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 5>would the composition look like given some of the drama

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 5>with current Fed share J Powell.

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 8>So there has been absolutely nothing normal about this transition

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 8>in leadership at the FED.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 4>And again that doesn't go back to Kevin Warre.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 8>Since President Trump has chosen to run the vetting process

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 8>in a certain way, being very clear that he's only

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 8>putting someone in place that wants low interest rates like

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 8>he does the fact that we have an open criminal

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 8>investigation against the current FED chair that's holding.

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 4>Up the confirmation vote.

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 8>We have another governor whose job is before the Supreme

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 8>Court because the president's.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 4>Trying to remove him. Like, nothing about this is normal.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think it will be good.

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 8>There's a potential for Kevin Wosh to come in and

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 8>kind of set the tone about how he's going to

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 8>smooth out this leadership transition, because right now it's really

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 8>it's quite chaotic.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>If Senators Jack read or Mark Warner Cythia Lumis are

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>watching this morning, what would you ask them to ask Kevin.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 8>Warsh Again, I think it's really important to help us

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 8>understand how does Kevin worsh think about rates policy. There's

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 8>been a lot of times where he's talked about the

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 8>balance sheet. We understand that he doesn't like the tool

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 8>of the balance sheet. He wants a smaller balance sheet.

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 8>One thing that I've been concerned about is often he said, well,

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 8>as we drink the balance sheet, that's going to give

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 8>us space to lower interest rates. Okay, his agenda to

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 8>shrink the Fed's balance sheet requires a real change to

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 8>the framework that is going to take a lot of time. Okay,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 8>say he doesn't get that, is that what rate policy

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 8>is tied to? Is him getting a smaller balance sheet?

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 8>If not, what is it that rate policy is tied to?

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 8>And how is he going to make these arguments because

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 8>again he's had very hawkish positions in the past and

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 8>now he has very dubvish positions, and he's just trying

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 8>to make sense of it, like what is his past?

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 8>And I think for the Republican senators as well, they

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.239
<v Speaker 8>need to understand who is this person that they are

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 8>elevating to fence here? How does he really process information

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 8>about the economy. And there's just there's a lot of

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 8>question marks. Confirmation hearing is where question marks should get

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 8>resolved totally.

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Just to find a question from us in your opinion,

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 2>your opinion, what is the most convincing argument right now

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>for lower interest rights?

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 8>Like right today, there isn't a convincing argument. There really

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 8>is too much uncertainty about what's happening with the conflict

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 8>and the Middle East. We still haven't had the tear

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 8>eff effects roll off. I think we can still build

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 8>a case for the next move is a rate cut.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 4>I think that is still appropriate.

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 8>I'd like to hear how Kevin worsh build that, because

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 8>I would build that with some weakness in the labor

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 8>market potential. That's not something we've ever heard from him

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 8>per se on this. But there's a case for the

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 8>next move is a rate cut. But it's really hard

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 8>to say that should be happening right now and these

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 8>should be big cuts. And that's where I think, you know,

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 8>if he wants to make that case, it would be

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 8>really interesting to hear him make it.

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survandons podcast, bringing you the best

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, an gio politics. You can watch the

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 2>show live on bloombog TV weekday mornings from six am

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.959
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple,

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always on

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bloombog terminal and the Bloomberg Business app