WEBVTT - Surveillance: Coronavirus With Eurasia Group's Sumpter

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg The

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like move from the State Department how confidence the State

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Department warning against Americans traveling to China, And we've said

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>again and again over the last week that for the economy,

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for markets, what will matter is the way states respond, nations, people, corporations,

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and right now things are throttling back even more. Yeah,

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's definitely clearly spreading, both economically as well

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>as otherwise. Almost ten cases to Our team has worked

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Haires Lison, with Steve Angel reporting from Hong Kong and

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>others to bring you the best we can clear to

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>discussion on this virus in China. UH. Jennifer Ron joined

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>us from UCL in London the other day and we're

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>now thrilled to bring you from Baylor University Peter Hotez.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>We've spoken to him many times before, of course, UH

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>with the UH the Tropical Medicine National School at Baylor

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Peter Hotels. I want to use a little bit of

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>your heritage here, and that is the moment decades ago

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:29.199
<v Speaker 1>at Rockefeller University where we really began to figure out virology,

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and you, of course we're part of that in the eighties.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we that much smarter now about all this than

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we were in Stars or back when you were at

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Rockefeller University thirty years ago. We certainly are. And it's

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thank you for having me back. It's

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>always good to talk to you. And I think we're

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in better shape now than we were back then because

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we have learned some lessons, although we're still not perfect.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>If we remember the Stars coronavirus that immerged out of

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the southern China, UH scared everybody shut down. This to

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>be a Toronto back in two thousand two, two thousand

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>three that wolf people up. And in response to the

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>World Health Organization created a new series of international health

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>regulations to beef up our security for health and border

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and virus detection, and the Global Health Security Agenda was

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>put in place by the US government and w h

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>O and and so things are better than they were. Um.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>The other good thing that's happened is that science has

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>has really stepped up. I mean, imagine we've gone from

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a brand new virus agent at the end of twenty nineteen,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>within a few weeks, isolating the virus, having a full

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>genetic code, knowing how it finds to and people. It's extraordinary.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So um, that's the good news. The bad news is

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you can only accelerate vaccine so much because despite what

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the anti vaccine lobby says, you still have to test

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>them for safety. And that's the one thing that you

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>only has diffic developed a common a protein STARS vaccine

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the head of manufactured in sixteen that we couldn't get

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the support, can proceed through clinical trials. And and now

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we've just learned that these two viruses are actually quite

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>similar Stars in the end coronavirus about to the same receptor,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>about eight percent similar. So we may be sitting out

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine for this end coronavirus UM. But we still

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have to go through all of the safety testing and

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>everything else. And that's the one piece that's company in

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the blur of knowledge, in pseudo knowledge that we have.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the compare here of this virus is it two stars?

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it to a different virus? I can't pronounce or

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is it to the Spanish influence of what kind of

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is this? This is it's very much closely resemble Stars.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>The difference is it's not quite as lethal. As far

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>as we can tell, it's about as easily transmissible where

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Stars was affecting healthy people. Uh. This one of the

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>serious cases the respiratory illness. Sear respiratory illness, mostly individuals

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>over the age of sixty, mostly mails, mostly those with

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>underlying diabetes hypertension, but a lot of people are getting

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>serious deal and requiring respiratory support. Look, this, this is

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen. Um. Uh, it's the tale of two

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>different countries in the United States. I'm actually not so worried.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got a good team in place. We've uh we

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>were thanks to the Chinese scientists who got a heads

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>up on this virus, so we knew it was coming. Um.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>We will see an increase in the number of cases

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but it won't nearly resemble anything like

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing in China or Central China. Such a

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>China and China will be in free fall. Um. Although

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we say ten thousand cases, summer estimating is already a

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousands people infective because there's probably a lot of

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>individuals with low grades UH symptoms. So this is gonna

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>sweep unless we can get a vaccine in there. This

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is gonna sweep across China. It's already upt on commerce

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>between Hong Kong and mainland. It's um it's it's calling

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a fallen Asian markets. I I imagine massive economic losses

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>in China, and that's SCI markets as well. Dr hote

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is what's China doing wrong in their response to the

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>virus that's leading to what you expect to be a rampant,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>widespread UH disease that is already perhaps hit it's a

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand people. I think the Chinese leadership, unlike in

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand to two thousand three when they were covering

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>up things slow, on this one. They're good, but you

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>know they're doing the best a person can with one

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>hand tied behind their back because there's no vaccine, and

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>when you have a contagious virus like this, ultimately in

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the end you need a vaccine. You can need a

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccine to stop it. So I actually think the Chinese

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>leadershild be doing everything they can all handed that they

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>recognize the hit not only the public health, but their

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>their economy and political stability. But the frustrating pieces that

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been slow to yet our vaccine and the other

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>four or five vaccine candidates out there, if you're just

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>joining US worldwide. Peter Hotels with us is dean of

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor Ecology, has

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>been with US many times on surveillance over the years.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Here on the Wuhan virus, Dr Hotez, is there any

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>sign that the virus is mutating into something that potentially

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is more lethal. We We don't have any evidence at

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this point, and I don't think we need to postulate

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that this is a virus that emerged out of the

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>wet markets in in Wuhan, because there's the virus that

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>jumps from bath to a second animal species and then

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>two people and now it's picked up human to human

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>transmissions going But in that sense is going by the

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>same playbook that are two other big coronavirus epidemics that

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the Stars in two thousand to two thousand three and

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>then the Mayor's coronavirus out of the Middle East in

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelves um So I don't think we have to.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, mutatition always possible. I don't think we have

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>to worry so much about that. But we've got to

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>figure out how we could do everything to help China.

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And remember there's also a million Chinese in Africa right

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>now through their belts and the ODA initiatives, So there's

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of commerce back and forces in China and Africa,

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>whereas the United States has got a great health system

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in place to prevent the spread from with Africa's country

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to country, So next to China the other place I'm

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>really worried about it such to here in Africa, and

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the major reason why Dr ted ros

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>w h O had declared the public health emergency. He's

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>probably stim early concerned. Peter, forgive me for getting a

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit ahead of things at the moment. But once

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got past this and hopefully move on from it,

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>what measures can we put into place in the country

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like China to make sure these kind of things don't happen,

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>or at least minimize the possibility of them actually happening. Well,

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, after the Stars coronavirus, the Chinese leadership committed

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to shutting down those wet markets these exotic animals that

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>are all if you've ever been to one of them,

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they're all piled together in cages. Some are dead, some

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>are That's just a recipe for disasters that needs to

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be shut down. The other two other things need to happen. One,

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we still need to be do a better job at

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>building up our vaccine infrastructure. This business of waiting for

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a catastrophe then to start. Um. You know, we could

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have had this vaccine potentially ready to go back in

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen after he came in trial. But you know we're

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>too reactive. We we uh. We're like a little kids

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>soccer game. If you are washing little kids play soccer,

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball goes in one direction. All everybody runs through

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and nobody stays behind to play defense. And

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to do better at that. I think the

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>third thing is we uh, we have to recognize this

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is our third major coronavirus epidemic pandemic in the twenty

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one century. We'd stars and mayors. Now this we have

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to start building an infrastructure specifically for the virus, just

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like we do for flu. Given not only public health impact,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's economic consequences. This is going to Peter Hotess,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much with the Baylor College of Venison

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in Houston. Now we go right over to the authentic

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on the ground knowledge of Meredith Sumter of Eurasia Group. Meredith,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna cut to the chase. Most of us don't

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>speak Mandarin. John, do you speak Man speak? I just

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to check that out, Meredith, what do you see

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Mandarin press? I mean, how is it different

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>from the wall to wall coverage of this Wuhuan virus

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in English has been morning Tom and John is great

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to be with you. Yeah, there's a market difference in

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that sort of statewide media press more important

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to a state organs of press are reporting on the

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the the the virus. Then the more local level media

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>outlets are even sit as an activist journalist who are

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get more information out to the Chinese people.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And what you see here is at the central level

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>there's really pressure. Uh, there's there's pressure there to try

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to to have more of a release of the public

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>discontent with how Beijing has handled this biver so far,

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and the media is doing this by going after local

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>officials who have withheld information. At the same time that

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>there are circling wagons around President Shi j and Ping

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>as a decisive and strong leader who is taking action

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and mobilizing all resources to get ahead of the crisis.

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's why, Meredith, the Major in China is just

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>considered state propaganda. It is always blame the local government

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and never the leader. This is from the ft Signing.

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>A critic said the local government in Wuhan did not

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have the power to act decisively because they were at

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the chain of command that started with

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Leader amou Era title recently bestowed on Mr.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>She is that a problem, Meredith, Regardless of what the

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Major is saying, let's talk about the structure of government.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>How a country this large responds to a crisis so

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>local so early. That's exactly right, John, And it really

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it shines the spotlight on the limitations of China's political system.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And really it's it's she's top down leadership style, the

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>one party system, top down leadership style that contributed to

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the problem by making local officials fearful to act without

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>authorization from Beijing. And what's notable here really is the

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Wuhan mayor Joe Hian Wam. He accepted responsibility, while subtly

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>placing blame on the need to wait for Beijing's approval

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>in publicizing the outbreak. Meredith, there was data overnight showing

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that Chinese factories were struggling even before the country shutdown

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>for the linear New York holidays as well as the

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>worsening coronavirus outbreak. And I'm wondering how much energy the

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>virus is spread takes away from Beijing to address some

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the economic issues that are still out there. Oh,

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 1>it takes a great deal of energy. But I think

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a social stability issue, j and Pain

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to mobilize everything that he's got to try

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to focus on getting the virus contained first. And and

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>then at the same time you see actions by UH

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>States banking officials UH to make sure that while there

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>are obvious economic stillover effects broadly impacting the Chinese economy,

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that because the way that they're mobilizing these resources, we

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>see fairly limited risk to economic stability UH at large.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>You have UM, you have Chinese banks that have been

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>instructed to extend loans to cushion the negative effects of

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the virus. UH and we believe that the central government

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>will intervene to maintain fiscal stability, with with the Central

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Bank providing likely to provide emergency liquidity provisions to limit

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the stress on China's bank system merative. Just a final

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>question on on the trade story, just quickly, where does

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this leave the agreement between the United States and China

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that was struck just a month or so ago. What

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is the whole issue with the coronavirus and relations with

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States and China leave things. That's a terrific question.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And really the combination of Beijing's focus on crisis fighting

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>and the economic disruption is likely to slow China's purchases

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of US goods under that Phase one trade deal. And

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest here, Jonathan, this was this was an

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>ambitious projection of what Beijing would be able to buy

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>even before the outbreak. So we think that the limited

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>domestic consumption, uh the the slowing industrial activity means that

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>China is going to be even slower to start to

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>make those market purchases. Now, this is not going to

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>derail Phase one, obviously, we understand and Washington would understand

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>why it would be harder for trying to make good

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>on those purchases right away. But the shortfall may put

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>more pressure on Trump to defend the deal later this

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>year of facing is slow to red regain momentum and

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>its purchases. Thank you so much. Madith Sumpter with Eraser Group,

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just riving in this morning with their knowledge of China

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the spread of the coronavirus. And there's

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a question especially to Goldman's access call as you're highlighting earlier, John,

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>which is that it will eat into second quarter GDP

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of US by zero point four percent to cut it

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>down Martel, Yeah, well this quarter. Excuse me, thank you

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>wells Capital Portfolio manage our marquis. As we look at

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a slight risk off feel in markets, do you think

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that this is actually going to eat into potential returns?

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this is going to persist or

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think that this is a by the dip,

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>very small dip moment. I would say more more body

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>if we don't actually know what the impact on GP

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>will be in the US, But it's really reflecting a

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>bigger trend, which is a move away from China outsourcing

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and also Chinese slower growth. So those trends are intact.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's more important. Looking out beyond one quarter market.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the commodity market move, We're down eleven and

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a half percent on copper on the London Medal Exchange

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in just two weeks. It's been a massive move in

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the commodity market. Are we pricing down inflation in the

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>bond market, Margie? Is that way you're doing or you're

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing back against that move? No. I think that low inflation,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>zero inflation is just going to be with us for

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future. So this makes a big call for

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the bond market. Then, markis, if we're gonna have low inflation,

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>how can you make a call for high yields on tens,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on thirties through twenty How difficult is it to do that?

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You really can't. You have to lower your expectation for

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>what fixed income can be across the board, which is

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>low to possibly mid single digits in the high yield market,

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>so much much less here the returns on equities. To

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>drag you with the headline eighteen months ago or so,

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>looking out to the end of two thousand twenty, Governor Kearney,

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was two days ago, Margie, looking out

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to the end of two thousand twenty, one is Margie

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Battell beginning to look at a low rate regime out

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.479
<v Speaker 1>farther than you thought even months ago. Have you extended

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>your ex access out well, I've been thinking we are

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in unthinkably low rates for many years. I spend my fear. Yes, well,

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's been very profitable. We were aware of your

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>excellence on that. But what now more? The same were

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the same? We've been in a one and a half

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>two and a half on the tenure. If we break out,

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it will be a low side. Margaret, do you think

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that the equation changes materially if we do get a sustained,

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>sustained inversion of the yield curve and increasing fear that

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we could be reaching stall speed. I'm not looking for

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>an inverted de Old curve. I think we're basically going

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at a somewhat flattish yield curve. But

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it as an irrelevance or reflecting the economy.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, we're talking about the gap between ten

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>year and two year yields, because if you take a

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the three month tenure yield, it's already inverted

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in the same with a two year to five year yield.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just wondering, isn't that sending a concerning signal. Well,

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been that way for quite a long time, and

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hasn't it any effect on the economy or on inflation

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>or on business lending. So I really don't look at it.

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think the curve will be so low, and

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it is somewhat administered by the government that is irrelevant

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>for economic activity. Margat Patel as well as capital management, Margie,

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you've had courage to say, look at if yields are

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>this troubled, look into equities, look at dividend growth and

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>share buy back with the elevated assets. Is there a

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>distinction between new cash flow or belief in cash flow

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>being applied to dividend or being applied to share buy back?

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Which makes more sense to you. I don't think it

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>really matters what a company does with its free cash flow. Uh,

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just a matter of a company choice. But I

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the Copper down Amazon up really tells you

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>what the trend of the market is going to be

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>over the next few years. Marky, thank you so much,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciated with Wells Capital management and that that's her magic.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I love what she said there Anthony Phillipson has not

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>only been the High Commissioner to Singapore but also John

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Ferrell directly involved in the exiting process and trade and

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>partnerships to Europe as well. And John, I go back

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on this historic day to the clear memories of the

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>morning after the Brexit vote walking down the corridor at

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>our London offices and there were there, you were doing

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a marathon on the desk. We had no idea where

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this would add on that morning after. I think the

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing people really didn't have a clue about is

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>how long it would take. Three and a half years,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and we finally stopped and make a move. Her Majesty's

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>tried Commissioner for North America, Anthony Phillipson joined us now. Anthony,

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>always great to catch up with you, walk us through it.

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Then eleven pm UK time, what actually happens, Well, good

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>morning to all of you, and thank you very much

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. As you say, it's a it's

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>a historic occasion, it's a significant momentum. At eleven pm

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>UK time this evening six pm New York, the UK

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>will leave the EU. We will end our almost forty

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>seven year membership, but it will become a new chapter

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in our relationship with our European and our EU partners.

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We have an ambition to a close economic and defense

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and security and indeed people to people relationship. In London itself,

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister will speak to the nation around about

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>ten pm understand or five pm New York. There will

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>be some visual displays around London, but I think it

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>will be a moment of significance and momentous in a

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>momentous occasion. But it's just the beginning in a new chapter,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in name only. The rules will still apply. The

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>UK will still pay into the EU's budget as well Antony,

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as you well know, through the rest of this year

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>eleven months, we have to secure a transition deal, I

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>guess secure secure the future relationship. So we're in this

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>transition period for the rest of What is the government

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>looking for and if we established what the red lines

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>are for the relationship between the UK and the EU

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>be on I think we have to some degree The

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>political declaration that was agreed between the government and the

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>European the other twenty seven member states in October last

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>year gives us a blueprint for what that future relationship looks.

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Like we will now be working out our own mandate

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and negotiating position, as will the European Commission on behalf

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of the member states, and we anticipate those negotiations beginning

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>early March. And then, as you say, we have the

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>rest of this year while we are in the implementation period.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>That gives this that period of transition and certainty to

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to work out the fine detail and that's what both

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>sides are committed to, Anthony. Earlier this week, UK Prime

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Minister Boris Johnson coming out and saying that they are

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>going to give Yahwei some of the contracts to help

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>build out their infrastructure. How much does that complicate your

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:22.880
<v Speaker 1>job right now? That process was incredibly detailed, thought through,

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>an incredible detail, with a very very high degree of

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>focus on the security and resilience of our telecom system.

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a process be running for a long long

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>period in terms of how we approach what we call

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>high risk vendors, and the decision that the government took

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>reflects the particular circumstances for the UK. It is a

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 1>decision that we have explained in detail to our American colleagues,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>including this week when Secretary Pompeio was in London, and

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we will keep explaining to them why we believe this

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>is the right decision for us, why it does not

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>endanger our own security and resilience of our telecom's network,

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and why it is it should not affect the bilateral

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>partnership between ourselves and off places security and Trade and

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Economic Council General. Thank you so much for joining us

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Anthony Phillipson with the United Kingdom on this

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>historic date. I lean Burbage joining us now, yeah, she

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is an arsenal. That's not what I was gonna talk.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>That's great. I would leave that. I'll leave that. I'll

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>leave that for you, Island Burbage. We're gonna talk Amazon partner,

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Passion Capital Investors, with years and years

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of experience covering this industry. I thank just how good

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>we're Amazon's earnings. I mean, does this give you a

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>sense that right now the guy is a limit and

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>basically Amazon has as a lot more road to run here.

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>It absolutely does, it really does. And by the way,

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got NFL matches now here in London, so I'm

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>all about following the NFL again as well as the

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>summer League too, But yeah, no, the thing about Amazon

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is they do such a great job of managing expectations

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that then when they blow it out of the water,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>they really do blow out of the water. Everyone was

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>expecting that revenues would go up like they did, but

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone was a little bit, you know, worried about maybe profitability,

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the costs that we're going to go into

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>fulfillment and to try and get everybody owns the day,

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>same day or next day shipping with time. And they

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>still blew it out of the water. So in terms

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of the question about how much more runway there is

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to go, they haven't finished all the youngers and the

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>conversions to next day to delivery for farm so there's

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>still a lot more to go there and they've shown

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they can do that while managing costs. Uh they're still

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>growth in Amazon Web services and cloud, even though that's slowing,

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still massive, and they added ten billion dollars worth

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of revenue from the year before on that, and then

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of course they're still add so they are kind of

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the night and shining owners industry at these from the

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>week gatter point of view, where they might be able

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to break up advertising uh D wappoly between Google and Facebook,

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>so the little learning there too. And then the one

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they still haven't really given us too much data about

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are the devices which echo or even the use of

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a Lexa for example. And how's your fiquitous We know

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that's becoming. We don't know how much value that's bringing

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>into the bottom line, but that's something else they can

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>still fought of the hat. So Amazon now on track

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to exceed a trillion dollars in market value yet again,

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>given the pop that we're seeing in their shares. When

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you talk about this growth, particularly when it comes to sales,

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>retail sales, who are they taking business from most of

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>all at this point, Well, this one, I think they're

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>consolidating a lot of online sales, and obviously we know

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the demise is forrick and mortar retails, that's happening anyway.

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of share, they're clearly getting more and

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>more share um from other online retailers and e commerce providers.

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I look at is that international growth

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>was only four for them, whereas in North America there's

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>still a lot more headway and a lot more for

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>them to gain abroad. When it's here in the UK

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>or another market outside of the home legion, and I

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>want to go to your expertise. So this goes back

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to you. You were fifteen, you were at Sun Microsystems

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, a long time ago, and then you

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>dashed over to England and did Skype and all of

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>this tech techy stuff is about network effect. And if

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at network effect, I mean Bezos has a

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>network effect with Amazon, including the bandwagon effect, which is

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>where everybody climbs on board. How are normal companies to

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>defend against the massive first movers status and network effects

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon has wrought. Well, I think you're gonna you

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>can't actually come out and try and beat Amazon or

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>compete with it on its owne churp. You're gonna have

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>to come at it from a different angle, come up

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with a niche satarian. We've seen more direct to consumer

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>brands and products come out um, and you gotta hope

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that you build up at each other. You build up

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a sort of leadership position in a category that Amazon

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't already dominate. So they're seen as a you know,

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a general it's kind of e commerce provider, um. But

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you see brands, whether it's Alberts for shoes, or even

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Night which continues to dominate another superfly shoes. There are

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be categories that Amazon can't compete with at

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the highest levels. Answer that brand value. They're just now

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>seen as a general fulfilment providers from a retail point

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of view. But I really think what's what striving corporate

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>values the enterprise side, cloud services and software that they use. So, Eileen,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>let's turn to politics now. Then, with that in mind,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you've done a fremendous job over the last few years

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of working with the British government and expanding investment in tech,

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>specifically in London over the last several years. Just looking

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>across the Atlantic into the United States. At the moment

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>here we have a massive company, Amazon with this huge

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>cloud business now basically providing all the capital for the

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>e commerce expansion, and a government a Washington, d C.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Scene at the moment where a lot of these names Amazon,

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and the likes aren't very popular and I'm just

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>wondering what the future looks like for them? What does

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it look like for them? Alene, Yeah, I think there's

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a reason you're seeing all these companies spend record levels

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>on lobbying, and I think Amazon's in a really interesting position.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>So I mentioned earlier, they could be the hedge against

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the duop lee in advertising between Google and facements. But

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, with the own ship of Washington

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Post and Bezo's personal interest and his lack of friendly

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>nature with Donald Trump, he could be really the subject

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of scrutiny. And this Department of Defense

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>deal for instance that Amazon lost for cloud services for

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a WS two Microsoft a year for example, is a

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>really really prime example of that. What would you expect

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>from Basils next? Does he just relentlessly stay with his

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>strategic plan or can I lean Bourbage Sea a twist

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>coming down the road? I mean, I think Bezos is

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty on top of his game, so I'm pretty sure

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>he's got lots of continuency plans, lots of things up

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to sleep. And I'm not worried about this business or

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.239
<v Speaker 1>its potential or its ability to send from anything like

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that um in the York to I mean, how concerned

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are you about anti trust cases against Amazon given how

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>much control they have not only over their own products

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and sort of their their clout there, but also with

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>independent independent shops that are operating on their website that

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily prioritized in source results. Yeah, I think

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that that is a concern, but it's probably I don't

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>think antitrust is as much concerning to Amazon as it

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>might be for Google and Facebook. Where I would be

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned if I was on the Amazon mobby inside or

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>public policy side, is what's going to come down the

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>pipe UM this year with respect to tax treatment and

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they might get hit with really severe

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>tax bills, especially outside of North America. How much more

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>upside is there left in Amazon shares? Do you think?

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't see UM an end insight. I really don't.

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that they have continued to demonstrate solid, consistent,

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>responsible growth. They continue to show that they can control

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>costs UM. They'll experiment when they need to, they'll acquire

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>when they have to, they make strategic investments UM you know,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>their acquisition or investment stars to stay in delivery here

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in UK is UM you know, being looked at by

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the competition of markets authority. But they are continuing to innovate,

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and yet they also don't forget what really matters to

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>retail customers in terms of fulfillment the same day or

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>next day delivery and even things like doing their own

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>titles for Amazon Prime to make that a more interesting

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>composition actual media content, so I don't see a lot

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of feeling to come. Eileen, Thank you so much. Eileen

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Bourberich with us today from London. Thanks for listening to

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You can

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio