WEBVTT - Facts and Logic are Now Partisan, Gideon Says

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jelie.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. This

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Surveillance with Jonathan Faraoh and Tom McKeene. The

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred heading for a fourth straight week of gains,

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>but a little bit of weakness emerging in the past

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>few days, sparks some would say, by jitters around tax

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>cuts and whether the GOP has the votes to get

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this done next week. As far as futures are concerned,

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>this Friday morning, a little bit firmer at five points

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on the SMP five hundred, positive sixty two points on

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the doubt in the bondom market. It's as you were,

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>incredibly tight trading ranges through the year and over the

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>last month as well. Somewhere in the two thirties were

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>up another basis point at two thirty six on a

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>US ten year. At the front end of the curve

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on a US two year, we are trading at one

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>point eight two percent. Confidence that growth will improve and

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation will stay low, shared by most investors and central

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>bankers are like going into ten. And in the FX market,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 1>it's just a story of dollar witness through the year

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and on the session as well, with one exception some

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar strength against the pound. Even as European leaders vote

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to go to Phase two of Brexit negotiations, the cable

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>rate on the back fot south of one thirty four.

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>At one thirty three ninety two, we're down a third

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of one percent for the year so far. Tho, it

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>has been the pain trade of seventeen. All the ingredients

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>for a year of dollar strength, rate hikes, better growth,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>pushing through fiscal stimulus seemingly, and yet we grind towards

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst years for the green back in

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a decade. To discuss Bob sinch Amherst Pierpont global strategist,

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Bob a man that has followed the FX market four decades,

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen a year like this for quite

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a while for the US dollar. Yet we had the

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>recipe and the ingredients for a year that should have

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>been good. What happened? You know? I think the markets

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>discounted a lot of this. Remember the dollar had a

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>huge run up from the election to the end of

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the year, and in fact peaked right around the year end.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, when we do these annual comparisons, we

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>will be comparing the dollar move this year to just

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>about its peak at the end of December of of

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>last year. Uh And I think the market just got

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>two builed up um on US growth earlier in the year.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>They got two builed up on on higher US interest rates,

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and two bowled up on the dollar. And so the

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the year was really one of trying to digest those

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>long positions um and And I think also, you know,

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the big disappointments I think if you look

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>at the year as a whole, is that the US

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>trade balance and therefore current account balance hasn't really improved

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>all that much, even though we're almost at balance in

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the oil trade balance for the US. So you know,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the US trade balance and oil had gotten out to

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>his wide is about forty billion dollars during the peak,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and oil prices it's down down to less than five billion.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Yet the total trade balances is why as it's ever been,

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which means we have records record deficit in the non

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>oil trade balance. So I think that there were some

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>expectations that trade would improve because of the U S

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>improvement in the oil balance. There were expectations that, um,

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, that the markets would would embrace um, these reforms.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>In the US, it embraced growth, and I think a

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of it just got discounted in that big run

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>up in the dollar in November and December. We've been

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>digesting ever since. So if we think about excessive bullishness

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the dollar at the end of two thousand and

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and sixteen and the response that we saw in

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen of disappointment, you sort of look around

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, where's the greatest optimism right now in

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of market action in price action, it's bitcoin. So

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you're wonder where the bitcoin is going to be the

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>disappointment of two thousand and eight. Maybe we're gonna spend

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more time talking about the fundamentals in

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>this tax plan and where the GOP is at. I

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>want to talk tactically just ahead of and you mentioned

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the positioning going into this year. Everyone seemingly

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>on the one side of the boat for dollar strength,

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and you were wondering where the marginal bar was going

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to come through come from when net lungs was so big.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>What does the positioning look like coming into next year now, Bob,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>you know the market's a bit a bit underweighted on dollars,

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, a little bit overweighted on the euro, overweight

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Euro. But I don't think the positions are

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>as extreme as we've seen because we just haven't seen

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the results this year in currency trading. We haven't seen

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the results in trading in a lot of the commodity markets.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think going into the end of the

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>year we have big, big positioning. But if we do, um,

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the one that's been embraced is euro strength

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because of the strength of the economy and that filtering through.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You didn't mention that you had such great helpa. You're

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>into the year. Happened about October. Packed it and I'm

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>sure Bob sent you with this with AMers Uh Pure

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Surveillance. This morning. Good morning, brought you by Investco.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Investco dedicated to delivering an investment experience that can help

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you get more out of life. Learn more at investco

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash more out of life. What's the number

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>one mistake, Bob sinch that people make when they bet

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on the dollar. We say the dollar, but you got

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to do the dollar against something else to make any money.

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>What's the rookie mistake in a belief on dollars stronger

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>or for that matter, dollar weaker. You know. I think

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that that we've been in a in a in an

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>exchange rate market that's been dominated by capital flows for

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of decades now. And one thing that

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think did come through in two thousand and seventeen

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>UM is that current account balances still matter, and so

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>big current account surplus in Japan, big current accounts surplus

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Eurozone, those currencies held up pretty well during

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the year. And as I said, big current account deficit

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in the US that requires continuing capital inflows into the US.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>If that's going to happen in two thousand and eighteen,

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will, I think it's not going

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to be because US short term rates go up. I

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna it will be driven by long term

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>US rates going higher. So I think that the dollars

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>fortunes in two thousand and eighteen are similar to the

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>bond market's fortunes, obviously inversely related to the bond market

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>fortune fortunes and and I think one of the key

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>issues will be to see whether US bond yields rise

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as the FED gets out of the way UM in

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of beginning to to sell bonds. At the same time,

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the deficit projections get get moved higher. Uh. And the

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>question is, well, that creates some some congestion in the

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>bond market. So what we've got to think about and

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>then is structural forces reassertting themselves. That means stronger Euro, stronger,

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Swissy stronger, and weak compound and we could dollarways that

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>how we've got to think about get ten next year. Well,

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what drove this year. I think that

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the markets were all boiled up on the cyclical story

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of two thousand sixteen, and when the

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>cyclical story didn't continue to drive those capital flows, we

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>went back to um you know, the underlying current account balances.

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what helped the end and the

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Euro this year. The question will become do those capital

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>flows become bigger again in two thousand eighteen. And I

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think the driver of that is not short term rates

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and the FED. I think the driver of that is

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>bonn yields, and so it's really dependent upon bon yields.

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>We think bon yields are going higher in eighteen in

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the two thou eighteen in the US. To me, this

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely fascinating. As you say, there's almost a zeitgeist

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>rain which is the theme for next year? Do they

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>ever work out? Does the beliefs that John and I

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>read about and typically, Yeah, I was gonna say, I mean,

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is going to be stronger, Trump won US ascendant.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>That worked out. But right now, whatever you read across

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>all the literature, are you sitting there is a grizzled

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Bob since you're going are you guys kidding me? Yeah?

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that that there is some pressure

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on people who are deeply involved in the business to

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>come up with these ideas for the year. You know,

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the Trump trade, the higher US interest rates, fiscal stimulus,

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that all did drive the dollar. It drove it for

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks in November and December of two thousand and sixteen.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is by that time everybody was on

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the trade in the position, Bob, we don't care. Here's

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>what we care about. Pharaoh's so large, John, Pharaoh is

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>now so large at Bloomberg that his entire compensation package

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is hedged. The problem is John's going back to London

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>for the holidays to see mom, you know, and the

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>rest of it can what sterling level does he need

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to live large in the United Kingdom in the next

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>two weeks? You know, I think he's doing okay at

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>one thirty. I don't. He's an unhappy camper full disclosure

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>here funded in dollars and saying absolutely naked with no hedges. Okay,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So as I'm going back into the UK, we're going

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>pure on hedge dollars back into sterling. You know. The

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>other issue is when Jonathan goes home, does he actually

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>pay for anything? You know, I mean everybody's going to

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>be paying for hands price on the Bloomberg as I see,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's nice spot price at the terminal at JFK. Was

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>walking down thread Needle Street down towards our new office,

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and they like they bow, they do the head the

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>tap thing from medieval England. When he walks by, what's

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>your call on sterling for next year? Boring? You killed

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it this year? Full disclosure, Yeah, we had it was okay.

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's relatively boring. You know. One of the

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>things that I think may surprise us in in in

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the in two thousand and eighteen is the Brexit negotiations.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're going to be as difficult for

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the UK a on a relative basis as they were

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>in Phase one. Look in Phase one, the the EU

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>leadership had very little to give up, and this was

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>primarily about how much money the UK was going to

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>pay to get out of the deal. And so I

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>think that that the EU leaders didn't have a lot

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of disagreement. I come back to the fact that that

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the EU has is a major exporter to the u K.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And that creates a lot more strength for the UK

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and the trade negotiations than people generally perceive pay upon.

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>The global strategist Gideon Rose with us with a really

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting and emotional issue of foreign affairs. The Undead Passed

0:10:55.880 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>with two actual plaques from Auschwitz, was very, very very

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>emotional cover. John Ferro, you look through it and you

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>go to the challenges of the Middle East that are

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>spoken of within the Undead Past getting and I'm thinking

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about the United States State Department in the era of

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the reluctant hedge him on what that means for the

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Middle East. So basically there's a big picture and the details.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>The big picture is we're getting a preview of what

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a post American world would look like. Um the essentially

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States. It's almost like we're in the Iliad

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and where the Greeks and the United States is Achilles,

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and essentially we're sulking in our tent. We walked off

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the battlefield, and the enemy, the Trojans, are winning because

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we're basically not fighting. And the question now is you

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have in Saudi Arabia interesting developments where there's both internal

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>reform but also a regional uh a regional Hedgeman trying

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>to be born. You have Iran doing the same thing

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in reverse from the north and the Gulf. You have

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Syria in which we've not only defeated Isis on one hand,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but also the Russians have basically helped a sad win.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So you're entering a new phase in Syria. And all

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this is playing out with essentially the US completely distracted,

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>having no essential state department, no diplomatic apparatus, uh AT

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a half hearted attempt to do a piece deal, but

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with things like the move of the embassy to Jerusalem,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no possible way you're gonna get a piece deal.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So essentially the Middle East is working on its own

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>dynamics going forward in interesting ways with stuff happening. In

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States is sort of watching from the sidelines,

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and nobody is quite sure just how long the unraveling

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>will continue and if and when the US will ever

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>come back to the diplomatic game. Gidion. We have an

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>emerging alliance as this is happening, one that many years

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>ago people might not have expected. Emerging alliance between Saudi

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Arabia and Israel, with the bond, the glue keeping those

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>two together, a will and effort, the objective to to

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>isolate Iran. How is this going to evolve in the

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>coming year? Well, I mean essentially, Uh, you have guards,

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, guardians of the old order that are essentially

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>happy with the status quo, Israel and Saudi Arabia, which

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>actually are strong in their position and actually care about it,

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and Iran, which is trying to make inroads and essentially

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>counter them and with its own allies. So you're having

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of regional teams pick sides, uh. And what the

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Saudis and the uh Israelis are happy about. What this administration.

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Is they felt the Obama administration was almost moving to

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>be neutral between them and the Saudis, and now they're

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>happy that the Trump administration is backing them. But the

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>question in the long run is Israel and Saudi Arabia

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are not enough to make a Middle East policy with

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're actually uh gonna be. You need to have

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>some way of bringing Iran into the negotiations and stabilizing

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the situation in some way, and the question of what

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>happens with the future of the Iran nuclear deal is

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>actually crucial and interest So, Gideon, as you think about

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East right now, there are several hot spots Yemen,

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Lebanon emerging so in the last couple of months much

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>more so, and Syria as well. As you look at

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this evolving relationship between the saud East Israel, and there

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>are oppositions wereran, Which region, which area of the Middle

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>East You're most concerned about things bubbling over? Well, Syria

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is always has been in the last several years, the

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>potential for regional conflagration. Um now we're moving into an

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting area there because we're not quite sure what's going

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen with a post Isis. But strengthened Assad regime

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and what will the future of Syria look like. Uh,

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that has potential. Yemen's a terrible tragedy, but I don't

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>see it blowing up. The really interesting thing is the

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Iranian relationship. And also, frankly, it would be interesting

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to see if there are any repercussions between what happens

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in the American domestic political situation and the Middle Eastern situation, because, uh,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the the the Saudias are close allies of the Trump

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>administration as well as the Israelis, and if the Trump

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>administration finds itself in real troubles in that could be

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a problematic for Middle Eastern diplomacy. Were the Middle Eastern

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>plomacy and we all have, I mean literally, folks. The

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>evening of September eleven, I picked up eight hundred pages

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of Albert Harani and as one volume, the History of

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the Arab People. That's a true story. I picked it

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>up that evening and ran through it in about three months,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>two months. Maybe we all have our legacy knowledge of

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East. Gideon Rose, those books are old news.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>What's the new book being written? Now? What's what's the zeit?

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Guys that you would recommend we learn about about this

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>new Middle East. It's a fascinating question. Basically, when you're

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Middle East, you always have to remember

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the past because you want to understand the problems and

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the motivations of the different actors. But you have to

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>get past and transcend the past so that actually you

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>can focus in the future. I think the question of

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>whether we can actually create some kind of balance between

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Saudias and the Iranians in which their regional rivalry

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>can can be stabilized without destroying the region, where they

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>can compete in a structure that for regional influence that

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is not destructive to everything around it. That will be

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the key question. I've had the privilege of meeting three

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of Faisal's immediate and directs, and it's what I believe

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it was maybe a brother, I'll be honest, I can't remember.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's completely authentic tribal Aristocaracratic royal Middle East heritage.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And we all were weaned on Lawrence of Arabian all

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of our false mythologies. This new guy is trying to

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>get them away from that. How do you do that

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>within a tribal legacy? I I find it fascinating. So

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with the Mohammed bin Salman in Saudi Arabia?

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic reform UH moves, but where it's actually going? Is

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this just an increased play for personal power and control?

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And what does he want to do with the power

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>when he has it? Does he want to liberalize Saudi Arabia?

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Are we talking? Look at me? What's gonna happen with

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>energy markets? With happened with religious extremism and control there?

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And foreign policy? It's actually really interesting because he's trying

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>to It seems like he's trying to do interesting things domestically,

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 1>but he's also been a strapper US on foreign policy

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and the m in side of things has not worked

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>well at all. So the end, what will happen with

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed bin Salmans Saudi Arabia going forward is a really

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. Some people would argue Gideon that this is

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>a power graph under the veil of reform, and there

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are still significant doubts whether he can really contain Wahabism

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in Saudi Arabia? Can he really do that? When he

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>talks about a moderate Islam, I don't think of what

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>hobbyism is that Uh look, any of these religions has

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>variants that can be more militant or more pacific, and

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of room for political authorities in a place

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like Saudi Arabia to shade the coverage and interpretation into

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>various kinds of quiescence or not. Religious wise, So if

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to do some reform, he could, but we

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just don't know. And one of the things we'll all

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be watching is to see not just how the power

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>play works out internally, but what the fruits of it

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>are in terms of what does he do with the

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>power position that he has consolidated. So, given what does

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>success look like for MBS, success would look like maintaining

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>domestic power, having sent a clear message that he won't

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>tolerate opposition to his policies, and then some kind of

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>attempt to gradually reform to be able to take the

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>kingdom strengths, stabilize it, and move it forward into the

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one century with a different kind of model that's

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>more adapted to the future of the Middle East, energy wise, socially, religiously, etcetera.

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a big challenge, and uh, we don't know whether

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>he can pull it off, find a question. This has

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>been wonderful getting rose. What's your challenge with foreign affairs? Folks.

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make this simple, John, help me here, because

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have the pricing right. It's

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a price of two Manhattan's. Maybe it's a price of

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>to Gibson's. Our our challenge is pretty simple. Actually, we

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>are essentially shock troops of the Enlightenment. Our goal is

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>simply to apply reason to public policy for the public benefit,

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to provide a forum for serious discussion of real issues.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>And this whole question of fake news, the whole question

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>of trying to undermine standards of truth. That's the biggest

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>single challenge, because it doesn't matter about which political side

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you're on. There should be as as Dan pat Monehan

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>used to say, you can have the right to your

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>own opinions, but not your own facts. And that's the

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge we're in is that now facts and the

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>logic themselves are creating a part of the environment on

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>behalf of all the foreign affairs and counts on forign relations.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>What's the print subscription dynamic right now? To do this year?

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We're actually doing pretty well. We're up over a couple

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand and you could basically subscribe anyway you want.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Go to Foreign Affairs dot com and we're seeing a

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of journalism. Let me give you the real sales

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>job here, folks. The Prince subscription has adult larger font

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>you can actually read the damn thing. Two, you get

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a subscription for Foreign Affairs for the mouthy brat you

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have at home who's an undergraduate somewhere. You get on

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the subscription and you say, you don't get the Daily Pharaoh.

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>You get a daily or weekly. Do understand that that

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of magazine is going to make the mouthy brand

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in the family even mouth yet it is, that's true.

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But you get on the subscription and you say you

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>must read one article or you don't get the allowance

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to go to Florida for winter break. Hopefully it's not spinach,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully they're already reading an online and using it

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>for their debate teams and other kinds of preparation. But together,

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the digital and you're doing the producing Foreign

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Affairs magazine. You're end of my sales pitch. Joe Biden's

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in it some really interesting cross political analysis. The Undead

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Past John Farrell what's the one thing you see on

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the data screen here, I just say a week, a

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>dollar that's just struggling to get a bit, not just

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>today but throughout the whole of Tom and I know

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this a lot in the last couple

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>of days, but really, as we round out the year

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>and look at and with a prestigious guest next to

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>us as well, that's what I'm thinking about. What went

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the call for a stronger dollar this year?

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>To bring him in, bring him involved. I don't know

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with Tom Key this morning. I'm worried about Steelers,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Patriots data CEO and founder. Yes, it's always great to

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you. Tax cutter set to go through,

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Fiscal stimulus is set to happen, g d P is exalerating,

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>great hikes are going to continue through this year through

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>next year. What's the dollar doing down here? Well, so

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think when when you look at the dollar, it

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>tends to move in cycles, and we had a really

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>big dollar strengthening cycle from the summer of two thousand

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>fourteen too January this year, depending on how you counted,

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and once you had one of these really big movement

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>becomes hard to just to sustain the gains, and you

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>need to have like continuously good news. And this year

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>we've we've had a lot of good news, but a

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of us priced in and early in the year

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump arguably started to talk the currency down, So I

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 1>think that was a part of the turning point. Another

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>really important part of the turning point was that we

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>started to have much better global growth. Right, So it's

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>always very attempting to sort of be okay, we want

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to trade the dollars. Lets look, look, let's look at

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you as fundamentals, but effects is always a relative game,

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and we've had a lot better growth. Like just let

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>me emphasize one point from the ECB press conference last

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>year yesterday. The ESPN our projects essentially two and a

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>half percent growth for two thousand and eighteen. That's the

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>same as United States, and and they have no population growth.

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So in in in GDP per capital terms, it's it's

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>growing faster than United States, even though United States has

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to do fiscal stimulus our at tax cuts to get there.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of interesting. Yet we have a deposit rate

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in Europe negative forty basis. Noticed, I'm noticed, and at

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the front end in the United States, we continue to

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>grind higher. I'm trying to reconcile those two things. Yes,

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>can you help me? This is really good news for

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>me because I have to make a living predicting currencies,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and if it was easy, then I wouldn't have a job.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So this this year has been really interesting, right, because

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>we've had these huge divergence between the signal from interest

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>rates and what currencies have actually done. So I think

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there's been some really important flow effects that has pushed

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the US higher, and I think that can continue. But

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>since identified this an hour ago, let's go into this.

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>There's two drivers of effects flows money slashing around, and

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>am I right? Real interest rates inflation adjusted interest rates

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and their expectations that right versus president indust rates. Now

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you're really going into uh always religious debate. I'm on

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the edge of Michael. Help you here about the edge

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of Michael Rosenberg. One I want ends you'd be thinking

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>about great differentials at the front end. Yeah, that would

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>be effects one I want. And that's right. Um, if

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at emerging market country, I always look at

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>real interest rates for detail countries. I think normal is

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>more Chapter eight of your wonderful Important and I might

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>point out at the time courageous book pounding the European

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>society to get their act together. Chapter eight, where's the growth?

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>The cost of deflation? Can you say now your book

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is old and the Europe is on a new regime

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and you need to write a new book about a

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>European GDP that may be bigger than the U S

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>g d P. Yes, that that book came out in

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirty and I think a lot of things

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have changed as a fair few chapters I would like

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>to add as the refugee crisis that was not in

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the book, and now we actually seem to have come

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>through in a way where after ten years pretty much

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>but no growth. Okay, let me help you with the

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>title here, and I need a royalty on this. Are

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you going to write the Rise of the euro? Well,

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I have to do this, I have

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to get an approval from my wife to write another book,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because it takes a thought. You needed to get an

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>approval from Mrs Nordvig for me to get a royalty.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>He needs an approval for both. Is that what we

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>faced out a Ryan seeing euro a rising Europe? Is

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the excitement justified? Yents I do so I was. I

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was just speaking with the Lisa Brahmas and Alex Steel

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>this morning where we touched on this topic and the

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>one chart actually just tweeted out now is about the

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>public support for the euro So the whole thesis in

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the book that wrote back in two thousand and thirteen

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>was that the project was very, very shaky if public

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 1>support was going down, and now we're actually having a

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>turning point in the public support. So this is really

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>important because it means that the sort of forces in

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Europe that were ready to embrace a breakup potentially having

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a less less momentum, and that that could keep the

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>thing together. So when we think about political forces reasserting

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>themselves in I think most people think instantly they think

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Italy and what's going to happen with the Italian election

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and how that may kind of throw this whole, this

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>whole happy talk around Europe of course with it. So

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this this is why I watched these opinion polls very

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>very carefully, right, because if you look at the different

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>part aunties in Italy, there are right wing parties that

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are anti Europe and there are left wing parties that

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are anti Europe, but they also look at opinion polls.

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>If they can see it's actually not that popular to

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be anti Euro, they're gonna tone down the rhetoric. And

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we learn in France it's not in France in Italy. So,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and Italy has always been the big public problem country

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in that support for the Euro is kind of fifty fifty, right,

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So it makes a big difference where the ten percent

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to swing six against it or in favor

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. Just because the time I want to go

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>over to Asia, my recollection I could be wronging it

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is correctly, please is at the beginning of the year

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>there was almost a partition of euro U S trans

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic dynamics and then a whole another beast called Asia

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>d X Y or Asia Japan, whatever that dynamic is.

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Is dollar dynamics separate with Europe and then over here

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Asia or are they more of a converging set of dynamics. Well, so,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I think you're making a really good point because as

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>some flow dynamics that are very Asia specific. Yes, there's

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the capital flight that has been happening out of China

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>up until earlier this year but stopped for various reasons.

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>We go into then there's also a country like Korea,

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>another very important country in Asia. They have essentially stopped

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>intervening in the currency market this year. That allows the

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>currency to go to a different level than we've seen

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in the the ones that great. Yeah, well, I want

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>to rip the script up right now and if you

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to answer this, that's okay, without question. On

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>this Friday in December, the bitcoin focus is on the

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>frenzy in Korea. With your work at Golden Section, work

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>at the beautiful book you put out the Fall of

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the Euro, what do you see is the trading frenzy

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of China, Japan and Korea over this thing called bitcoin.

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You've lived that psychology, You've traveled there a million times.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you distill the bitcoin z that we see

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>within the Pacific rim was that they definitely have a

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>gambling culture that is different from what we know here

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can see that on the exchanges for for

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin in Asia. But I would add one more thing.

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's more and more people who are serious investors

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that have managed institutional money over the last couple of

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>decades that are telling me we're closing down our hedge fund,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe multiple and dollar hedge fund. Our focus going forward

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be cryptocurrencies. It's stunning. It's not just a

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>retail phenomenon. That's going to be an institutional chapter to this.

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>This is so too important. Are they going to Kogermon

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the Long Short Cryptocurrency Fund? Are they going there because

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to? Are they going there because they think

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the only alpha creating game in town to make

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>two and twenty. It's probably a mix. But I really

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>think there are there is people who are fundamental believers

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in this. You can maybe call them religious about it,

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but there are smart people who have conviction this space.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes when I sit down with these people who

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm known for years and hear what they say about it,

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm surprised how broad baseds and and how it's

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>mergings an institutional space. Now I'm not surprised the funds

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are closed and I'm surprised to go into cryptos. Global

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>macro just got killed by central banks. Todd one data point.

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Even people who have been successful, been successful in macro

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>are doing it. It's amazing. That's interesting. Now, that's interesting.

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>The Interview of the Week Howard Ward, gam Coo and

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Gabelly up this year and he's not making two and twenty.

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I speak to Mario Gabelly on television today around twelve noonishing, yes,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we will speak about the media Fox in Disney with

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Mr Gabelly as well. Yes, Nordvig, thank you so much, greatly,

0:29:53.720 --> 0:30:14.479
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate your wisdom. It is good to catch up

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>with Sony com or he's with Sony copor he's with Redefined.

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But far more than that, he takes a very broad,

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a holistic view of a europe Uh. That's really sort

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of in ascendency Sony, good morning. Did you did you

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.479
<v Speaker 1>ever think you would see forecast of European real g

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>d P larger than American Um. Yes, even at the

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:47.959
<v Speaker 1>depth of the European crisis, I never lost my faith

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US ability uh to get together and be resilient.

0:30:55.600 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Part of it, of course, is simply a question of

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back. The sad reality is that even with the

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>relatively optimistic forecast that we see today, many European countries,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>especially in the UA Zone, will still have g dps

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that are lower than they would than they were back

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seven and eight. Uh So, yes, it

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 1>looks good on a relative basis in a world that

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is otherwise confronted with slowing growth and rich economies. But

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we have had a lost decade in Europe. Certainly, we've

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>had a lost decade in Europe, arguably because there was

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a man called three around the e c B and

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>then we got a man called Drug that boiled everything out.

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Is this president dr recovery or is this Europe's recovery

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>driven by politicians that got their act together? Well, I

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think part of it is simply again the question of

0:31:56.240 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back. At some point, real economic activity had to

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>pick up. But yes, you are right that tre Set

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>built a bad blow at the start by raising interest

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>rate prematurely, by taking a divergent vie on monetary policy

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>compared to what the Fed and the Bank of England

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>were doing, and that probably cost Europe three or four

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>years of much lower growth in a deeper recession than

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we would have needed to have had. And yes, Drug

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:32.239
<v Speaker 1>has contributed to restoring confidence, particularly to taking away the

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a breakup of the Eurozone that haunted investment

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and economic activity in Europe for several years. But some

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of this is simply the result of the asset prise

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>inflation we have seen and may actually be temporary rather

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>than real seal hell, one of the things we can

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do with you, and this goes of course your advice

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:57.959
<v Speaker 1>to the Norwegian government, your work with O. E. C.

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>D and I m F. We got like eight ways

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to go here. But in the time that we've got left, Sony,

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>both John and I are to be kind surprised that

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Germany can't get its act together. I guess the election

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is old news, but have you been surprised by the

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>struggle to get to a two thousand eighteen coalition? Well

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>not really, because there has been a president of the

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>junior party in grand coalitions across Europe having to pay

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a significant electoral cost, and this time, after several such

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>years and coalition of being the junior partner, the SPT

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>decided that enough was enough and the mathematics simply didn't.

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>But but we have to remember, and this is very important,

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that Germany is a federal economy, with most key critical

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>economic decision making actually not lying with the federal government.

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense Germany can, as opposed to France

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and the UK, which are far more centralized, we afford

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>afford to be without a federal government without any serious

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>economic costs for far longer than these other centralized economies,

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and the example of Belgium, which set the record for

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>not having a government while the economy did quite well,

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is perhaps the best comparison. Like Germany, Belgium itself has

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple levels of government. The federal government in Belgium is

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>only responsible for some small decisions rather than being all important. Sonny,

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Nice to catch up, refels CDVO.

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Sony Kapor is managing director for Redefined with a Good

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Perspective and Europe jen if I just it is one

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of the great surprises of the year. I just thought

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a coalition would be doable in Germany. I think everyone

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>just saw. Everyone just thought smooth sailing for Chancellor Angela Merkel.

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>That probably was the political surprise this year. That was sunny,

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>called Cappolla points out Tom Ready, the lesson is that

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't really need a government sometimes in Europe for

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>things to be uncounty. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane Before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio