WEBVTT - How DeepSeek Showed That Silicon Valley Is Washed

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Zone media.

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Chosen by God, perfected by science. I'm ed Zetron. This

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 2>is better offline. And as I've written about many, many,

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 2>many many times and argued on this very podcast, just

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>as often, the large language models run by companies like

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>open Ai, Athropic, Google, and Meta are unprofitable and unsustainable,

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and the transformer based architecture they run on as peaked.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>They're running out of training data, and the actual capabilities

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 2>of these models were peaking as far back as March

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four. Nevertheless, I'd assumed, incorrectly, by the way,

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>that there would be no way to make them more efficient,

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 2>because I had assumed, also incorrectly that the hyperscalers, along

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>with open Ai and Anthropic, would be constantly looking for

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 2>ways to bring down the ruinous cost of their services.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>After all, open Ai lost five billion dollars last year,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's after three point seven billion dollars in revenue too.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>An Anthropic lost just under three billion dollars in twenty

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. And in the last episode I told you

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about deep seek. By the way, in

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 2>this one we're going to get into well how fucked

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 2>things might actually be. But what I didn't wager was

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 2>that potentially nobody was actually trying to make these models

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>more efficient. My mistake was if you can believe this

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>being too generous to the AI companies, assuming that they

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't pursue efficiency because they couldn't and not because they

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>couldn't be bothered. But then, as I just hinted at,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 2>a little known Chinese company released a product that was

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>broadly equivalent to open AI's latest reasoning models, but cost

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>a fraction of the cost to train and run. And

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>now the conventional understanding of how generative AI should work

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>has been fundamentally upended. You see, the pre Deep Sea

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>status quo was one where several truths, and I'd say

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that in the loosest sense of the word, allowed the

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>party to keep going. So the first one is that

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>these models were incredibly expensive to train. GPT four morrow

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 2>cost one hundred million dollars in the middle of twenty

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, and future models, according Dario Ama Day of Anthropic,

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>might cost as much as one billion or more to train.

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>And training future models, by the way, as a result

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 2>of this, would necessitate spending billions of dollars on both

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 2>data centers and the GPUs necessary to keep training these

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>bigger huger models. Now, another thing was these models had

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 2>to be large because making them large, pumping them full

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 2>of training data, and throwing masses of compute at them

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 2>would unlock new features such as an AI that helps

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 2>us accomplish much more than we ever could without AI,

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>which is Sam Altman quote. And in the words of

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Sam again, you'd be able to get a personal AI

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>team full of virtual experts in different areas working together

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 2>to create almost anything we can imagine. I don't know, mate,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>you ever try creating a functional fucking business. Dipshit. Anyway,

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 2>here's another one. These models were incredibly expensive to run.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 2>There has to be this way, but it was all

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>worth it because making these models powerful was way more

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 2>important than making them efficient. Because once the price of

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 2>silicon comes down, and this is a refrain I've heard

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 2>from multiple different people as a defense of the costs

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>of generative AI, we would then have these powerful models

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 2>that were cheaper somehow because of silicon. Now you may think,

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 2>ed that sounds like a not a real argument. That

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>just sounds like something someone said once, and it is.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>It is something someone said once. Anyone who knows anything

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>about chips know how hard it is to make a

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>new chip. And remember one of the CES episodes when

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I asked Max Cherney about this, should go back and

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 2>listen to him. Anyway, another thing, another part of this

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 2>was that as a result of this need to make bigger, huger,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>even bigger models, the most powerful ones, these big beautiful

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 2>models that we love them. We look at the big

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>beautiful models, we would of course need to keep buying bigger,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>more powerful GPUs, which would continue the American excellence of

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>burning a bunch of money on nothing. And by following

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 2>this roadmap, everybody wins. The hyperscalers get the justification they

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>needed to create more sprawling data centers and spend massive

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 2>amounts of money and open AI and their alk get

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 2>to continue building powerful models, and also in video continues

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>to make money selling GPUs. Remember I've said in the

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>past that things were kind of a death cull. This

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 2>is what this is. It's a capitalist death cull. It

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 2>runs on plagiarism and hubris and the assumption that at

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 2>some point all of this would turn into something meaningful. Now,

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I've argued for a while that the latter part of

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the plan was insane, that there was no profitability for

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>these large language models. As I believe, there simply wasn't

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 2>a way to make these models more efficient in a

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 2>way I was raimed. The current models developed by both

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the hyperscalers, so Gemini from Google or Lama from Meta,

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>and so on and so forth, and the multi billion

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 2>dollar startups, if you can even fucking call them that,

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Open Ai and Anthropic, they're horribly inefficient. And I just

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>made the mistake of assuming that they tried to make

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>them more efficient, and they couldn't. Now, but what we're

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 2>witnessing right now isn't some sort of weird China situation.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 2>This isn't China being Chinese and doing scary Chinese things

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>to us. Now, what we're witnessing is the American tech

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 2>industry's greatest act of hubris. It's a monument to the

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>barely conscious stewards of so called innovation who are incapable

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>of breaking the k fab of the fake competition where

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>everybody makes the same products, charges about the same amount

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 2>of money, and mostly innovates in the same direction. Somehow, nobody,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>not Google, not Microsoft, not open Ai, not Meta, not Amazon,

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>no Oracle thought to try or was capable of creating

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 2>something like deep Seek, Which doesn't mean that deep Seek's

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 2>team is particularly remarkable or found anything super new, but

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>that for all the talent, trillions of dollars of market capitalization,

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and supposed expertise in Americans American tech hologarchs, not one

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 2>bright spark thought to try things that deep Seak had tried,

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>which appeared to be what if we didn't use as

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>much memory, and what if we tried synthetic data? And

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>because the cost of model development and inference was so

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 2>astronomical in the case of American models, they never assumed

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>that anyone would try to use their position. This is

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 2>especially bad considering that China's folks and AI as a

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>strategic part of its industrial priority was really no secret,

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 2>even if the ways it supported domestic companies kind of is.

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>In the same way that the automotive industry was blindsided

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 2>by China's EV manufacturers, the same is happening with AI. Fat,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 2>happy and lazy, and most of all oblivious. America's most

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>powerful tech companies sacked back and built bigger, messier models

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>powered by sprawling data centers of billions of dollars of

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 2>GPUs from Nvidia, A bacchanalia are spending that strains our

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>energy grid and depletes our fucking water reserves. Without it

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 2>appears much consideration of whether an alternative was possible. I

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 2>refuse to believe that none of these companies could have

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>done what Deep Seek has done, which means that they

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>either chose not to or they were so utterly myopic,

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 2>so excited to burn so much money on so many

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>parts of burning the earth, boiling lakes, and stealing from

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 2>people in pursuit of further growth, that they didn't think

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 2>to try. This isn't about China. It's so much fucking

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 2>easier if we let it be about China. No, no, no, no.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>It's about how the American tech industry is incurious, lazy, entitled, directionless,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 2>and irresponsible open an anthropic of the antithesis of Silicon Valley.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 2>They're incumbents, public companies wearing startup suits. I'm willing to

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>take on real challenges more focused on optics and marketing

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>than they are in solving actual fucking problems, even the

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>problems that they themselves created with their large language models.

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 2>By making this about China, we ignore the root of

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the problem that the American tech industry is no longer

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>interested in making good software that actually helps people. Deep

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 2>seaks shouldn't be scary to Silicon Valley because they that

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley should have come up with this first. It

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 2>uses less memory, fewer resources, and uses several kind of

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>quirky workarounds to adapt to the limited compute resources available.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>All things that you'd previously associate with Silicon Valley, except now.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley's only interest that the rest of the American

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>tech industry is the rot economy. It only cares about growing,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>growing at all costs, even if said costs were really

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>things you could mitigate, or if the costs themselves were

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>self defeating. To be clear, if the alternative is that

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>all of these companies simply did not come up with

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>this idea that in and of itself is a damning

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 2>indictment of the Valley. Was nobody thinking of this stuff?

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>If they were, why didn't Sam Altman or Dario Amadae

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>or sach In Adela or anyone else put serious resources

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 2>into efficiency? Was it because there was no reason to?

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Was it because there was, if we're honest, no real

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>competition between any of these companies? Did anybody try anything

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 2>other than throwing as much compute and training data at

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the model as possible. It's all just so cynical and

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>antithetical to innovation itself. Surely, if any of this shit mattered,

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 2>if generative AI truly was valid and viable in the

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>eyes of these companies, they would have actively worked to

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 2>do something like Deep Seeker has done. Don't get me wrong,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 2>it appears Deep Seak employed all sorts of weird tricks

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 2>to make this work, including taking advantage of distinct parts

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>of both CPUs and GPUs to create something called a

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 2>digital processing unit, essentially redefining how data is communicated within

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the servers running training and inference. And just this reminder,

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>inference is the thing where when you type something in

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 2>that's it infers the meaning. Just could have specified that earlier.

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Deepseak had to do things that a company with unrestrained

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>access to capital and equipment wouldn't have to do, and

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 2>it often used impractical and quirky methods to do so. Nevertheless,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Open AI and Anthropic both have enough money and hiring

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 2>power to have tried and succeeded in creating a model

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>this efficient and capable of running on older GPUs, except

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 2>what they wanted, what they actually wanted was more goddamn

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>growth and the chance to build even bigger data centers

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 2>with even more compute that they would own. Open ai

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>is as much a lazy, cumbersome incumbent as Google or Microsoft,

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>and it's about as innovative too. The launch of its

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Operator agent was a joke, a barely functional product that's

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>allegedly meant to control your computer and take distinct actions

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 2>like ordering stuff of instacark, you know, things you could

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>do with your hands, but just to be clear, it

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work. You'll never guess who was really into it.

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Though his name is Casey Newton. He writes a blog

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 2>called Platformer, and he's a man so gratingly credulous that

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>it makes me want to fucking scream. And of course

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 2>he wrote the Operator when he used it was a

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>compelling demonstration that represented an extraordinary technological achievement. Also, somehow

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 2>was significantly slower, more frustrating, and more expensive than simply

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>doing any of these tasks yourself. Casey, of course, not

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>to worry, had some extra thoughts about Deep Seek, that

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 2>there were reasons to be worried, but that American AI

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>lads were still in the lead, saying that deep seak

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>was only optimizing technology that open ai and others had

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 2>invented first, before saying that deep seek was only last

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 2>week that open ai made available to pro plan used

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>as a computer that can use itself. This statement is

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 2>bordering on factually incorrect. It is fucking insane that Casey

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 2>is still doing this. I do not want to I

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to do with this guy. This guy

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>just like that. That's a fucking lie. The computer can't

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 2>use itself, This shit can't just to explain what operator is,

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 2>You're meant to type in something like, hey, order me

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 2>some milk, Order me some milk off of vistacar. And

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 2>when Casey tried this, he tried to find milk and

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 2>de moine iowa. Just fucking insane. Just this is how

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>these companies have got big. It's people like cases people

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 2>are Casey, who are just like anything they show tore

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 2>like God, damn, that's the most impressive thing I've seen

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>in my life. It's a fucking fast. But let's be frank,

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>these companies aren't building shit. Open Air and Anthropic are

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 2>both limply throwing around the idea that agents are possible

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 2>in an attempt to raise more money to burn, and

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 2>after the launch of deep Seek, I have to wonder

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 2>what any investor thinks they're investing in other than certain

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 2>ones I'll get into in a bit. And to be clear,

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>an agent is meant to be this autonomous thing which

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.239
<v Speaker 2>you say, hey, go and do this action, go and

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>sell things for me, and go and email people for me.

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 2>They don't really work. There are some that kind of

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>do that are really expensive, but large Lane which model

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 2>is not built for this kind of thing. But let's

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 2>be honest, Deep Seek and as I said in the

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 2>last episode, they've built a more efficient reasoning model. So

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 2>like open aiy zo one And you'd think, well, okay,

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>couldn't open Ai simply add on deep Seek to its models.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Not really. First of all, with the way these models work,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>you can't just like plug it in. It's just not

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 2>how it works. They could train a new model using

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 2>deep Seek's techniques, but the optics of that aren't brilliant.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>It would be a concession. It'd be in the middle

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 2>that open aiyes slipped and needs to catch up, and

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 2>not to its main rival pretend rival, I mean anthropic

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 2>or to like another big tech firm, but to an

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 2>outgrowth of a hedge fund in China, a company that

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>few had heard of before December and the like. Really

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 2>not that many people had heard before January twenty fifth.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 2>It's very embarrassing, and this, in turn, I think will

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 2>make any serious investor think twice about writing the company

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 2>a blank chet. They're going to have to dip into

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 2>some very bothersome pockets, and as I've said ad nauseum,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.359
<v Speaker 2>this is potentially fatal as open ai needs to continually

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 2>raise money, more money than any startup has ever raised

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>in the history of anything, and it really doesn't have

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 2>a path to breaking even even if they copy what

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Deep Sea did, because we still right now, though deep

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Seek is thirty times cheaper than one, we don't know

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 2>if that's profit or we don't know. We haven't found out.

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 2>And if open ai wants to do its own, cheaper,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 2>more efficient model, it's likely to have to create it

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>from scratch, like I said, And while it could do

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>distillation to make it kind of more like open ai

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 2>using their own models. By the way, deep Sea taught

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 2>itself using open aies outputs. Like I mentioned in the

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 2>last episode, it's kind of what deep Seak already did.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 2>It already has been fed open ai bullshit. Even with

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 2>open AI's much larger team and more powerful hardware, it's

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 2>hard to see how creating a smaller, more efficient, and

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 2>almost as powerful version of OH one benefits them in

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 2>any way, because said version has well already been beaten

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 2>to market by deep Seek, and thanks to deep Seek,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 2>will almost certainly have a great deal of competition for

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 2>a product that to this day lacks any killer apps.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, It's just it's very frustrating to me. It's very

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>frustrating to me. It drives me a little insane. Reading

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff makes me feel crazy. I think you

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>hear it in my voice, you hear the sanity stripping away.

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'm here to podcast and don't worry. But seriously, though,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>anyone can build on top of what deep seek has

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>already built. Where is open Aiy's mote exactly? And where's anthropics?

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>What are the things that make these companies worth sixty

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>billion or one hundred and fifty billion, or oh my god,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>as we'll discuss in a bit, three hundred and forty

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars?

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>What is the technology they own or the talent they

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>have that justifies these valuations? Because it's kind of hard

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>to argue that their model particularly valuable anymore. Celebrity celebrity

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>them CULTI personality. Sam Orman, He's an artful bullshitter, and

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 2>he's built a career out of being in the right

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 2>places at the right times, have in the right connections,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>knowing exactly what to say, especially to credulous tech media

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>ponces without the spine or inclination to push back on

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 2>his more stupid claims. And already Aortman has tried to

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>shrug off Deep Seaks Rise, admitting that while Deep Seeks

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>are one model is impressive, particularly when it comes to

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 2>its efficiency, open Ai will obviously deliver much better models,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and also it's legit invigorating for open Ai to have

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 2>a new competitor. Yeah, mate, sure, I'll bet your love

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 2>in this. Aortmand ended his tweet where that came from

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 2>with look forward to bringing you all AGI and beyond,

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>something which I add has always been close on the

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>horizon in Altman's world, but it's never really materialized. Then

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the timeline keeps moving and there's no actual proof they

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>can do it. AGI is not fucking happening, And if

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>it's possible in any way, it's not coming out of

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>probabilistic models. I'm fucking sick of this and Opening I

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 2>can't even lean on its relationship with Microsoft, which on Wednesday,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>January twenty ninth started offering deep Seek's models through its

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>own cloud services. Opening I hasn't got shit. Deep Seek

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>has commoditized the large language model, publishing both the source

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>code and the guide to building your own. Whether or

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 2>not someone chooses to pay deep Seek is largely irrelevant.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Someone else will take what they have created and build

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 2>their own, or people will start running their own deep

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Seek instances, renting GPUs from one of the various cloud

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 2>computing firms. They don't give a shit. They'll take the

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 2>money and while in video, will always find other ways

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 2>to make money. Jensen Wong is amazing at this. It's

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be a hard sell for any hyperscala to

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 2>justify spending billions more on GPUs to markets that now

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>know that near identical models can be built for a

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 2>fraction of the cost with older hardware. Why do you

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>need Blackwell, which is the latest Nvidia GPU. The narrative

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>of this is the only way to build powerful models.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't really hold water anymore, and the only other

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 2>selling point is that what if China does something. Well,

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese did something, and they've now proven that they

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 2>cannot only compete with American AI companies, but doing so

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 2>is possible in an efficient way that can effectively crash

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the market while there's being a recovery. This is still

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>very worrying. I also want to address something real quick.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 2>A few people on Twitter have been suggesting that talking

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>about deep Seek positively in any way is some sort

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of Chinese op. If you believe this, you're a fucking moron.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I really must be clear, take your weirdsenophobia and go

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 2>eat your own shit. I don't fucking care anymore. Yes,

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 2>there are problems with China. Yes, China does something to America.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>This is an open source thing. This is an open

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>source thing, and you can remove China from the equation.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Because it's open source, someone else is going to use this.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 2>If your only defense is the sneaky Chinese are doing something,

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 2>go to therapy and talk to the therapist about you

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 2>being paranoid or racist, because it's one of them. I

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 2>should also be clear, concerns about China very realistic. The

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Chinese government has tried to interfere with America. It's happened

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>many times. Even if China is funding Deep Seeks models,

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they are open sourced means that anyone

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 2>can run them and anyone can build their own. They

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 2>can look under the hood. We don't have the training data,

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>but that is it. You cannot win on a senophobic

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 2>argument here. You can have realistic concerns about another foreign power.

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying not to, but what I am saying

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 2>is that you have to look at this realistically, and

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>you have to take this seriously. And dismissing this as

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Chinese magic is stupid. It's very goddamn stupid. But like

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I said earlier, it also isn't clear if these models

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 2>are actually going to be profitable. It's unclear who funds

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Deep seg like I just said, and whether it's current

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>pricing is actually sustainable. But they're likely going to be

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a damn site more profitable than anything open ai is

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>currently selling. After all, open ai loses money on every

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 2>single transaction, even their two hundred dollars a month Chat

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 2>GPT Pro subscription, And if open ai cuts its prices

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 2>to compete with deep sek, its losses are only going

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 2>to deepen. And as I've said again and again this

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 2>is also deeply cynical, because it's obvious that none of

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 2>this was ever about the proliferation of generative AI or

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 2>making sure that generative AI was accessible. Putting aside my

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 2>very obvious personal beliefs for a second, it's fairly obvious

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>why these companies, the big hyperscalers and open ai and

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Anthropic wouldn't want to create something like deep seek because

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 2>creating an open source model that uses less resources means

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 2>that open Ai, Anthropic and their associated hyperscalar findom clients

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>would lose their soft monopoly on large language models. Now

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>what does that mean, I'll explain before deep seek to

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 2>make a competitive large language model like GPT four zero,

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 2>as in one that you can actually commercialize, required exceedingly

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 2>large amounts of capital, and to make larger ones effectively

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>required you to kiss the ring or the ass of Microsoft,

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Google or Amazon. While it isn't clear what it cost

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.239
<v Speaker 2>to train open aizo one reasoning model, we know that

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 2>GPT four to ZH cost in excess of one hundred

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 2>million dollars, and oh one is a more complex model

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 2>would likely cost even more. We also know that open

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.719
<v Speaker 2>AI's training and inference costs in twenty twenty four were

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 2>around seven billion dollars, meaning that either refining current models

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 2>or building new ones is quite costly. The mythology of

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 2>both open AI and Anthropic is that these large amounts

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 2>of capital weren't just necessary, but the only way to

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>do this. While these companies ostensibly compete, neither of them

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 2>seemed concerned about doing so. As actual businesses that made

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>products that were say, cheaper and more efficient to run,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, they made more money than they cost because

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>in doing so, these companies would break the illusion that

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the only way to create powerful artificial intelligence was to

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 2>hand billions of dollars to one of two companies and

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 2>build giant data centers to build even larger language models.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 2>This is aisrot economy, two lumbering companies claiming that their

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>startups creating a narrative that the only way to build

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 2>the future to keep growing, to build more data centers,

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 2>to build larger language models, to consume more training data

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 2>with each infusion of capital, GPU purchase, and data center

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 2>build out, creating an infrastructural mote that always leads back

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 2>to one of a few tech hyperscalers. Open an anthropic

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 2>need the narrative to say, buy more GPUs and build

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 2>more data centers, because in doing so they create the

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 2>conditions of that infrastructural monopoly. Because the terms forget about

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 2>building software that does stuff for a second, were implicitly

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that smaller players cannot enter the market because the market

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 2>is defined as large language models that cost hundreds of

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 2>millions of dollars and require access to more compute than

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 2>any startup could ever reasonably access without the infrastructure that

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 2>a public tech company delivers. Remember, neither Anthropic nor open

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 2>AI has ever marketed themselves based on the products they

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>actually build. Large language models are in and of themselves,

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 2>fairly bland software products, which is why we've yet to

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 2>see any killer apps. This isn't a particularly exciting pick

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 2>to investors or the public markets because there's no product, innovation,

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 2>or business model to point to, and if they'd actually

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 2>tried to productize it and turn it into a business,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 2>it's quite obvious at this point that there really isn't

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a multi trillion dollar industry for generative AI. Look at

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft and their attempts to strong arm Copilot into Microsoft

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 2>three sixty five. Both personally and commercially, Nobody said Wow,

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 2>this is great. When they demanded use copilot in word,

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Lots of people, however, asked why am I being charged

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>significantly more for a product that I don't want or

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 2>care about. Open Ai only makes twenty seven percent of

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 2>its revenue from selling access to its models, so allowing

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>people to use their models to build products around a

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars of annual recurring revenue, by the way, with

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>the rest of their money coming in about two point

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 2>seven billion dollars last year coming from subscriptions to chat GPT.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 2>If you ignore the hype, open Air and Anthropic are

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 2>actually deeply boring software businesses with unprofitable, unreliable products prone

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to hallucinations, and then new products such as open Aisaura

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 2>cost way too much money to both run and trained

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 2>to get the results that well, they suck. They're not good.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Even open a Eyes pushing to the federal government with

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the release of chat GPT, GOV is unlikely to reverse

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>its dismal fortunes. Seriously, think about it. I'm sure some

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>of you are going to say, well, Trump will just

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 2>give them money. These motherfuckers need way more money than

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump is going to give them, and why would Trump

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 2>bet on a loser? Why would Trump be like, oh, yeah,

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to give more money to this company that

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 2>does the same thing. He doesn't understand it this shit,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and he probably just looks at Samut and goes, now,

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>that's a kind of new money I don't like. But

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>to make this more than a deeply boring software business,

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Open iron Anthropic needed larger models, and they needed them

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to get larger generally in perpetuity, and for the story

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>to always be that there was only one way to

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 2>build the future, and that the future cost hundreds of

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars, and that only the biggest geniuses, who

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 2>all happened to work in the same two or three places,

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>were capable of doing it. Post deep Seek, there really

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>isn't a compelling argument for investing hundreds of billions of

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 2>dollars of capex in data centers, or buying new GPUs,

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 2>or even pursuing large language models as they currently stand.

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>It's possible, and deep Seek, through its research papers, explained

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 2>in detail how to build models competitive with both of

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 2>open AI's leading models, and that's assuming you don't simply

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 2>build on top of the ones that deep Seek released.

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 2>It also seriously calls into question what it is you're

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 2>paying open Ai for in its various subscriptions, most of

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 2>which other than the two hundred dollars a month pro subscription,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 2>have hard limits on how much you can use their

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 2>most advanced reasoning models. One thing we do know, though,

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 2>is that open ai and Anthropic will now have to

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 2>either drop the price of accessing their models and potentially

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 2>even the cost of their subscriptions too. I'd argue that

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 2>despite the significant price difference between O one and deep

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Seek's are one reasoning model, the real danger to both

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 2>open ai and Anthropic is deep Seek V three, which

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 2>competes with GPT four h, which is their general purpose model.

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 2>By the way, and as on recording this episode, by

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the way, news broke the Alibaba, a bohemoth thie out

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 2>of China in its own right, has created its own

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 2>model that outsperforms Deep Seek and yet definitely dive into it.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 2>But if it's true, it's only going to pile on

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 2>the price pressure, though I kind of wonder what they

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 2>could possibly do. Is it going to be cheaper, because

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 2>if it's more powerful, that's just like it doesn't really

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 2>change shit anyway. Though Deep Seek's narrative shift isn't just

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 2>about commoditizing lllms at large, but commoditizing the most expensive

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>ones run by two monopolists backed by three other monopolists.

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the magic's died. There's no halo around Sam

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Moltman or Dario ama Day's head anymore, as their only

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>real argument was we're the only ones that can do this,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>something that nobody should have believed in the first place.

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Up until this point. People believe that the reason these

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 2>models were so expensive was because they had to be,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 2>and that we had to build more data centers and

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 2>buy more silicon because that's just how things worked. They

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 2>believe that reasoning models were the future, even if members

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 2>of the media didn't really seem to understand what reasoning

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 2>models did or why they mattered, and that as a result,

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 2>they had to be expensive because open Ai and their

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 2>elk were just so fucking smart, even if it wasn't

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 2>obvious what reasoning men or what it allowed you to do,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 2>or what the products were. It's just very annoying, and

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 2>now we're going to find out, by the way, because

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>reasoning is now commoditized along with large language models in general.

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Funnily enough, the way that deep seek may have been

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 2>trained using at least in part synthetic data. Also pushes

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 2>against the paradigm that these companies even need to use

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 2>other people's training data, though their argument, of course will

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 2>be that they need more training data always. We also

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know the environmental effects, by the way, with deep SEEK,

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 2>because even if it's cheaper, these models still require those

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 2>energy guzzling GPUs to run, and they're running at full tilt.

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 2>In any case, if I had to guess, the result

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 2>would be that the markets are going to be far

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 2>less tolerant of generative AI, and the idea that generative

0:26:50.160 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 2>AI is the future. Open AI and anthropic no longer

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 2>really have motes. Unless, well, there's another idea. What if

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 2>there was a huge fucking idiot with a lot of money.

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>How about billionaire dipshit Massioshi's son, the CEO of soft Bank,

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 2>a multinational investment firm that's rumored to be investing anywhere

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>from fifteen to twenty five billion dollars in Open AI

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 2>in a round that values the company and astonishing three

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty billion dollars as part of a round

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of up to forty billion dollars. Now you may think, damn,

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>this is a sign that open ai is going to

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 2>make it. But I must remind you how bad soft

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Bank is at investing. They put sixteen billion dollars into

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 2>famously awful real estate company we Work and managed to

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 2>lose I think eight hundred million dollars on the DoorDash

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Ipo and one point eight billion dollars on their investment

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 2>in Uber, and in both cases did so because they

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 2>were desperate to bandwagon on to supposedly your fire bets,

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 2>either just before they crashed away after an investment made sense.

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 2>According to the Wall Street Journal, SoftBank would lead this

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 2>insane forty billion dollar round in the company and would

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>and I quote help assemble investors for the rest of

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the round. In doing so, SoftBank would also become open

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>AI's largest investor, replacing Microsoft. And yes, SoftBank was the

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 2>largest investor in whe Work before it went tits up.

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 2>It's also important to remember the open ai is pledged

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 2>to put eighteen to nineteen billion dollars to fund the

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Stargate data center project. Along with you guessed SoftBank will

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 2>be committing the same amount. This is on some level,

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>soft Bank handing money to itself to invest in data

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 2>centers to prop up an industry that's dying. Now. This

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 2>is a developing story, but it's hard to imagine any

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>serious contribution from any respectable investor at this point. My

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.479
<v Speaker 2>money is on a few VC firms desperately scraping at

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the bottom and the barrel quarter of a billion here,

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 2>quarter of a billion there. Maybe in Vidia chucks in

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 2>some and on the subject of barrels of stuff, I

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>also expect money from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 2>its associated venture arms. You're going to see a few

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe Andrews and Horowitz gets involved. They don't think much.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just very fucking silly, and I don't know how

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>this works out. Open AI burns money, and even if

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 2>they somehow make more efficient models, the actual total addressable

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 2>market of generative AI is actually pretty small. Microsoft said

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 2>in their recent earnings they made twelve to thirteen billion

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 2>dollars of arr on AI. Just to be clear, that's

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 2>not profit and that's not a business unit. There's no

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 2>AI business unit, which means that that is just spread

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 2>across delivering cloud compute for AI copilot on Microsoft three

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 2>sixty five products, which by the way, no one likes.

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 2>They're having trouble selling and other associated copilot products they sell.

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think and like twelve to thirteen billion dollars

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 2>across four quarters. That's not actually good at all. It's

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 2>just very silly. All of this is so silly, and

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 2>when I think about it, too hard to feel a

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>little crazy. Open Ai makes three seven billion dollars in revenue,

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and they do so, as I mentioned, primarily from chad

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 2>GPT subscriptions. Even if that somehow and it won't by

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the way, turns into three point seven billion dollars of

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 2>profit or even ten billion dollars of profit a year,

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 2>that's less than the profits in a single quarter of

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 2>any given hyperscaler. It would be respectable, sure, But three

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty billion dollar valuation, I guess makes sense

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 2>if it was profit. It doesn't make sense if it's

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 2>not profitable. Though it also isn't obvious how open ai

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 2>would actually provide any liquidity to investors, by which I

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 2>mean allow them to sell their stock beyond selling shares

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 2>of people that work at open ai, like people who

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 2>work there who have been given stock runts selling that

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>to another investor, a really dumb guy maybe, And as

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>in the side, SoftBank bought one point five billion dollars

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 2>of stock from open ai employees and the tender at

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the end of November twenty twenty four. Just a note

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 2>for you. They could also take the company public, but

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 2>with the unit economics of this fucking company, which boil

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 2>down by the way to our products, lose billions of

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.479
<v Speaker 2>dollars and are extremely compoditized. I'm not really sure what

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the plan is here. The fundamental problems that open ai

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 2>has are not solved by throwing more money at the problem.

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 2>This hasn't worked before and it won't work this time.

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 2>They're burning cash and in soft banks case, it isn't

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 2>obvious what it is they're getting from open ai. Is

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 2>it the chance to continue an industry wide con the

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 2>chance to participate in a catalyst death cult. I don't know.

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's the chance to burn money at a faster

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 2>rate than we work ever could dream of. Will this

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 2>be the time that Microsoft, Amazon, and Google just drop

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 2>open ai and Anthropic and make their own models based

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 2>on deep Seek's work. What incentive is there for the

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 2>hyperscalers to keep funding open ai and Anthropic. They hold

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 2>all the cards. The GPU is the infrastructure, and in

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the case of Microsoft, non revocable licenses that permit them

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 2>unfettered use and access to open AI's tech, and there's

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 2>little stopping the hyperscalers from building their own models and

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 2>just dumping them entirely. In fact, Microsoft might actually be

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 2>a little glad to see soft bare become the biggest

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>investor and pick up the tab for open AI's expenses.

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I can imagine satching Adella texting Semilt and being like, no,

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 2>don't take that money. Hell, well, don't do oh I'd

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 2>hate that. I'd hate if this was someone else's problem.

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 2>And the stargate thing, by the way, is an attempt

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to that up to five hundred billion thing. It's just

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>bollocks whatever. It's an attempt to remove themselves from Microsoft.

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 2>And Microsoft actually allowed open ai to alter their deal

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 2>so that they could get cloud compute from others. Now

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 2>at the time, people were like, yeah, man, this is

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a good thing. This shows open ai will be independent. No,

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't. It just means that they're gonna be under

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Masayoshi's son, now the funniest dumbest man in investing. I

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 2>love Massa Yoshi's son. I think it's nice that we

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 2>have an insane guy who isn't instantly murderous in our

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 2>lives anyway. Anyway, though, as I've said before, I believe

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 2>we're at PKI and now that generative AI has been commoditized,

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the only thing that open AI and Anthropy have left

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 2>other than a pile of cash is their ability to innovate,

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think they're capable of doing so. And

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 2>because we sit in the ruins of Silicon Valley with

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>our biggest startups all doing the same thing in the

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>least efficient way possible, living at the beck and call

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 2>of public companies with multi trillion dollar market caps, everyone

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>is trying to do the same thing in the same way,

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 2>based on the fantastical marketing nonsense of a succession of

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 2>directionless rich guys that all want to create Americas next

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 2>top monopoly. It's time to wake up and accept that

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 2>there was never any kind of AI arms race, and

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 2>that the only reason that Hyperscale has built so many

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 2>data centers and bought so many GPUs is because they're

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 2>run by people that don't experience real problems and thus

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know what problems real people face. Generator AI does

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>not solve any trillion dollar problems, nor does it create

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 2>outcomes that are profitable for any particular business. Deep Seeks

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 2>models are cheaper to run. But the real magic trick

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 2>they pulled is that they showed how utterly replaceable a

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 2>company like open AI and buy extension any LLM company

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>really is. There Really isn't anything special about any of

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 2>these companies. They have no moat, their infrastructural advantages moot,

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 2>and their hordes of talent are relatively irrelevant. What Deep

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Seek is proven isn't just technological, it's philosophical. It shows

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 2>that the scrappy spirit of Silicon Valley builders is dead,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>replaced by a series of different management consultants that lead

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 2>teams of engineers to do things based on vibes. You

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 2>may ask if all of this means generative AI suddenly

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 2>gets more prevalent after all. Sech in Adella of Microsoft

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 2>quoted Yvonne's paradox, which posits that when resources are made

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 2>more efficient, their use increases. Sadly, I hypothesize that something

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 2>else happens right now. I do not believe that there

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 2>are companies that are stymied by the pricing the Open

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 2>AI and their ILK coffer, Nor do I think there

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.919
<v Speaker 2>are many companies or use cases that don't exist because

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 2>large language models are too expensive. AI companies took up

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 2>a third of all venture capital funding last year, and

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>on top of that, it's fairly try reasoning models like

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 2>O one and make a proof of concept without having

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.280
<v Speaker 2>to make an entire operational company. Sheer open ai barely

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 2>has one. I don't think anyone has been on the

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 2>sidelines of generative II due to costs, and remember, few

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 2>seem to be able to come up with great use

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 2>case for one or other reasoning models anyway, and deep

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Seek's models, while cheaper, don't have any new functionality. As

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 2>a result, I don't really see anything changing beyond the

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.399
<v Speaker 2>eventual collapse of the API market, which is the way

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 2>you plug these models into things. For companies like Anthropic

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 2>and open AI, large language models and reasoning models the niche.

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 2>The only reason that chat GPT became such a big

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 2>deal is because the tech industry is no other growth ideas,

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 2>and despite the entire industry and public markets screaming about it,

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I can't think of any mass market product that really matters.

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Even if deep Seek doesn't land the fatal blow, it

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>could set the foundations from another company to drag open

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 2>AI's carcass out behind the barn and hit it with

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a big stick. One way in which this entire fast

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 2>could fall as if nasty Mark Zuckerberg decides he wants

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 2>to splay destroy the entire market for llms. Meta has

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 2>already formed four separate war rooms to break down how

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Deep Seep did it and apparently to quote the information

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 2>in pursuing Lama, which is their large language model. CEO

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Mark Zuckerberg wants to commoditize AI models so that the

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 2>applications that use such models, including metas, generate more money

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 2>than the sales of the AI models themselves. That could

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 2>hurt metas AI rivals such as open ai and Anthropic,

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 2>which were on pace to generate billions of dollars in

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.840
<v Speaker 2>revenue from such sales and lose billions. Fucking hell. I

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 2>love the information, but can you add the most important bit?

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 2>But I could absolutely see Meta releasing its own version

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 2>of deep Seek's models. They've got the GPUs and Mark

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Zuckerberg can never be fired, meaning that if he simply

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 2>decided to throw billions of dollars into specifically creating his

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 2>own deep discounted alms to wipe out open ai he

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 2>absolutely could. After all, a few weeks back, Mark Zuckerberg

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 2>said that Meta would spend between sixty and sixty five

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in CAPITALGICS spenditures in twenty twenty five. And

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 2>this was before the deep Seek situation. And I imagine

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the markets would love a more modest proposal that involves

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Meta offering a chat GPT be to simply to fuck

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 2>over Sam Altman. And that's the thing. Chat GPT is

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 2>big because everybody's talking about AI, and chat GPT is

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the big brand in AI. It is not essential, and

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 2>it's only been treated as such because the media and

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the markets ran away with a narrative that they barely understood.

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Deep Seek pierced that narrative because believing said narrative also

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 2>required you to believe that Sam Moortman is a magician

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 2>versus an extremely shitty CEO that burned a bunch of money.

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 2>And I don't believe that, even before Deep Seek, that

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Altman's peers really bought into the hype. Sure you can

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 2>argue that deep Seek just built on top of software

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that already existed thanks to open Ai. Thank you Casey,

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 2>by the way, but this beg's a fairly obvious question

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 2>why didn't open ai build on top of software invented

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 2>by open ai? And here's another question, why is it

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 2>goddamn matter? In any case, the massive expense of running

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 2>generative models hasn't been the limiter on their deployment, of

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 2>their success. You can blame that on the fact that

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 2>they as a piece of technology and neither artificial intelligence

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 2>nor capable of providing the kind of meaningful outcomes that

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 2>would make them the next smartphone or cloud computing. Honestly,

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 2>it's all been a con It's been a painfully obvious

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 2>one one had been screaming about since February, since when

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I started this podcast, trying to explain that beneath the

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 2>hype was an industry that provided monister at best outcomes

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 2>rather than any kind of next big thing. Without reasoning

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 2>is its magical new creation. Open ai really doesn't have

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 2>anything left. Agents aren't coming, large language models aren't going

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 2>to build them. AGI isn't coming either. There's no proof

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 2>it's possible. All of this is fucking flim flamm to

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 2>cover up how mediocre and unreliable the fundament of the

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 2>supposed AI revolution really was. All of this money, all

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 2>of this energy, and all of this talent was wasted

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 2>thanks to markets that don't actually do anything, markets that

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 2>don't make for good companies, just growth hogs, and a

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 2>media industry that fails to hold the powerful to account.

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 2>And it looks like everything got broken by some random

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 2>outgrowth of a Chinese hedge fund. It's so ridiculous, it's

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 2>so sickening. I can't believe it. While I can totally

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 2>believe it, I'm actually surprised they didn't come up with

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 2>this idea myself, Just the idea that someone could do

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 2>this cheaper. It makes me go insane. And what's more

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 2>insane is that Open Eye is still going to be

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 2>able to raise that round. But I think we're approaching

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 2>the end of days. I'm not calling the end of

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 2>the bubble yet. I refuse to do that. I'm not

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 2>going to do that. What I am going to say

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 2>is it's deflating, and I am going to say I

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 2>have no idea how they reinflate it. A bunch more

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 2>money isn't going to change anything. These companies are washed.

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Sam Morton's washed. He's the Mark Sanchez of the tech industry,

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and he's so sickening. All of them are so sickening.

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if this money had gone anywhere else. Imagine if

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 2>it had gone into batteries. Imagine if it had gone

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 2>into climate stuff. Imagine if gone somewhere useful. Imagine if

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 2>instead of spending billions on this dog shit, they actually

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 2>fix their problems, they actually fix the products that they've

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 2>made worse. But the problem is that the rot economy

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 2>is in control. That the growth at all costs mindset

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 2>is all that you see in the tech industry, and

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley needs to repent. Silicon Valley needs to change

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 2>its ways because when the bubble bursts, and I really

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 2>think it will, the destruction that follows will be horrifying

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and it will hit workers. It will hit tens of

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 2>thousands of tech workers, and it will affect the markets.

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 2>And after that, the markets are going to realize something.

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 2>The tech industry doesn't have anything left, they don't have

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 2>another growth market. They're out. They're all out. And I

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 2>look forward to telling you how I look forward to

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about it when it happens. And I'm so grateful

0:40:49.840 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 2>for you listening. Thank you for listening to Better Offline.

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 3>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song,

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 3>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 3>and audio projects at Matasowski dot com, M A T

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 3>T O S O W s ki dot com. You

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 3>can email me at easy at better offline dot com

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 3>or visit better offline dot com to find more podcast

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 3>links and of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 3>you go to chat dot where's youreaed dot at to

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 3>visit the discord, and go to our slash Better Offline

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 3>to check out our reddit. Thank you so much for listening.

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 3>more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool Zonemedia

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 3>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.