WEBVTT - Baby Judge School

0:00:15.276 --> 0:00:21.236
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. One of the cooler things that happened in the

0:00:21.276 --> 0:00:24.756
<v Speaker 1>last few decades is that scientists have decided that emotions

0:00:25.036 --> 0:00:30.116
<v Speaker 1>are worth studying, and they found new ways to study them,

0:00:30.156 --> 0:00:34.196
<v Speaker 1>not just in people, also in animals. The guy who's

0:00:34.196 --> 0:00:37.116
<v Speaker 1>taken the lead with the animals is a Dutch primatologist

0:00:37.716 --> 0:00:42.196
<v Speaker 1>named Franz Dawal. You know, emotions are sort of taboo topic.

0:00:42.276 --> 0:00:45.716
<v Speaker 1>They used to be, at least, and so most of

0:00:45.756 --> 0:00:49.436
<v Speaker 1>the time we don't explicitly discuss them. We discussed the

0:00:49.516 --> 0:00:53.836
<v Speaker 1>behavior that they produce, but not the emotions themselves. That's

0:00:53.916 --> 0:00:58.596
<v Speaker 1>Dwall himself. He's Dutch but works in Atlanta at Emory University.

0:00:59.236 --> 0:01:01.876
<v Speaker 1>When he started out, no one thought you could study

0:01:01.876 --> 0:01:05.196
<v Speaker 1>the emotions of animals. A lot of people just assumed

0:01:05.236 --> 0:01:08.476
<v Speaker 1>that animals didn't have emotions and scientists shouldn't care if

0:01:08.476 --> 0:01:11.356
<v Speaker 1>they did, but not supposed to talk about mental states

0:01:11.476 --> 0:01:16.236
<v Speaker 1>or feelings or planning or thoughts or whatever. And so

0:01:17.316 --> 0:01:20.036
<v Speaker 1>there was a taboo for one hundred years on talking

0:01:20.076 --> 0:01:23.956
<v Speaker 1>about that. And it's only in the last twenty years

0:01:24.036 --> 0:01:27.196
<v Speaker 1>or so that taboos being lifted, and that the more

0:01:27.196 --> 0:01:32.116
<v Speaker 1>and more scientists are open about internal states, meaning emotions.

0:01:32.636 --> 0:01:36.036
<v Speaker 1>They so clearly drive behavior in both animals and people,

0:01:36.956 --> 0:01:40.156
<v Speaker 1>which brings me to Professor the Wall's most famous experiment.

0:01:40.836 --> 0:01:43.516
<v Speaker 1>I worked with capuccin monkeys for a long time. We

0:01:43.636 --> 0:01:46.556
<v Speaker 1>noticed in our lap that the monkeys were always very

0:01:46.636 --> 0:01:50.196
<v Speaker 1>keenly watching what somebody else would get, not just what

0:01:50.316 --> 0:01:53.156
<v Speaker 1>they themselves get for a task, but also what somebody

0:01:53.156 --> 0:01:56.076
<v Speaker 1>else is getting. So the final experiment that I want

0:01:56.076 --> 0:01:59.436
<v Speaker 1>to mention to you is our fairness study. This is

0:01:59.476 --> 0:02:03.516
<v Speaker 1>the Wall's ted talk about that experiment. Two monkeys in

0:02:03.636 --> 0:02:08.796
<v Speaker 1>cages side by side. The cages are plexiglass, so the

0:02:08.836 --> 0:02:12.676
<v Speaker 1>monkey can see each other and the scientist. They're given

0:02:12.756 --> 0:02:16.716
<v Speaker 1>treats for performing a task. The task is to take

0:02:16.716 --> 0:02:19.156
<v Speaker 1>a rock from a researcher and hand it back to her.

0:02:19.876 --> 0:02:23.596
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't sound so hard, but then you're not a monkey.

0:02:23.756 --> 0:02:26.596
<v Speaker 1>The treat is a slice of cucumber. And if you

0:02:26.676 --> 0:02:29.916
<v Speaker 1>give both of them cucumber for the task, the two

0:02:29.956 --> 0:02:32.876
<v Speaker 1>monkeys side beside, they're perfectly willing to do this twenty

0:02:32.876 --> 0:02:35.356
<v Speaker 1>five times in a row. So cucumber, even though it's

0:02:35.396 --> 0:02:39.676
<v Speaker 1>really only water in my opinion, but cucumber is perfectly

0:02:39.716 --> 0:02:44.396
<v Speaker 1>fine for them, perfectly fine. But then a few rounds in.

0:02:44.916 --> 0:02:47.476
<v Speaker 1>One of the monkeys hands back the rock, and the

0:02:47.556 --> 0:02:52.476
<v Speaker 1>researcher gives that monkey a grape, not a cucumber. Monkeys

0:02:52.756 --> 0:02:56.116
<v Speaker 1>really like grapes, and the other one sees that The

0:02:56.196 --> 0:03:00.116
<v Speaker 1>other monkey stares. She waits her turn. She gets the

0:03:00.196 --> 0:03:04.396
<v Speaker 1>rock and hands it back, gets again cucumber. She looks

0:03:04.436 --> 0:03:09.196
<v Speaker 1>back and forth between the cucumber and the other monkey.

0:03:09.796 --> 0:03:13.116
<v Speaker 1>She just chucked the cucumber back at the researcher. Then

0:03:13.156 --> 0:03:19.316
<v Speaker 1>she goes ape shit. The researcher keeps giving grapes to

0:03:19.356 --> 0:03:23.716
<v Speaker 1>one monkey and cucumbers to the other. She tests a

0:03:23.836 --> 0:03:26.516
<v Speaker 1>rock now against the wall if she needs to give

0:03:26.556 --> 0:03:31.796
<v Speaker 1>it to us, and gets cucumber again. The monkey that

0:03:31.836 --> 0:03:35.876
<v Speaker 1>gets cucumber explodes in anger, climbing the walls of the cage,

0:03:36.316 --> 0:03:39.316
<v Speaker 1>throwing whatever she can get her paws on at the researcher.

0:03:39.796 --> 0:03:42.316
<v Speaker 1>So this is basically the Wall Street protest that you

0:03:42.356 --> 0:03:47.956
<v Speaker 1>see here. At some deep level, monkeys expect life to

0:03:48.036 --> 0:03:53.276
<v Speaker 1>be fair, and so do we. The human sense of

0:03:53.316 --> 0:03:56.876
<v Speaker 1>fairness is not just some sort of mental product some

0:03:56.956 --> 0:04:00.676
<v Speaker 1>sort of countient philosopher would say. Is that it's a

0:04:00.716 --> 0:04:04.956
<v Speaker 1>principle that we have arrived at by reasoning and logic

0:04:05.076 --> 0:04:07.396
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. No, no, there's there's a real

0:04:07.396 --> 0:04:11.196
<v Speaker 1>emotion behind it. And that's why the behind all these

0:04:11.236 --> 0:04:16.716
<v Speaker 1>moral principles that we have. This experiment isn't just about unfairness.

0:04:17.316 --> 0:04:20.316
<v Speaker 1>To have any effect at all, the unfairness has to

0:04:20.356 --> 0:04:24.676
<v Speaker 1>be out in the open. The monkey getting the cucumber

0:04:24.796 --> 0:04:28.316
<v Speaker 1>needs to see the monkey getting the grape. So it's

0:04:28.356 --> 0:04:35.276
<v Speaker 1>also about the relationship between transparency and unfairness. I sometimes

0:04:35.276 --> 0:04:37.596
<v Speaker 1>wonder what would happen if people ever got to see

0:04:37.716 --> 0:04:41.476
<v Speaker 1>all the unfairness in life, if say, some magical new

0:04:41.516 --> 0:04:46.316
<v Speaker 1>technology came along that generally increase the transparency in the world.

0:04:47.676 --> 0:04:54.916
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, it just did. My name is Michael Lewis,

0:04:55.116 --> 0:04:58.516
<v Speaker 1>and this is against the rules. I show about the

0:04:58.516 --> 0:05:01.596
<v Speaker 1>decline of the human referee in American life and what

0:05:01.716 --> 0:05:15.076
<v Speaker 1>that's doing to our idea of fairness. I was talking

0:05:15.116 --> 0:05:18.356
<v Speaker 1>the other day with a woman named Musa sever She'd

0:05:18.356 --> 0:05:21.996
<v Speaker 1>grown up in Slovenia when it was part of Yugoslavia,

0:05:22.036 --> 0:05:24.876
<v Speaker 1>and she was there in the nineteen nineties when Yugoslavia

0:05:24.916 --> 0:05:30.796
<v Speaker 1>fell apart. Hundreds of thousands were killed, millions more persecuted.

0:05:31.556 --> 0:05:35.356
<v Speaker 1>Musa escaped, but with the new conviction that nothing was

0:05:35.396 --> 0:05:40.236
<v Speaker 1>more important than the rule of law. Justice. She wanted

0:05:40.316 --> 0:05:44.116
<v Speaker 1>everyone everywhere to have it. In two thousand and three,

0:05:44.356 --> 0:05:48.796
<v Speaker 1>she moved to Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan was not an obvious upgrade

0:05:48.796 --> 0:05:54.436
<v Speaker 1>on Slovenia, even at its most terrifying. Well, they had

0:05:54.476 --> 0:05:59.036
<v Speaker 1>a pretty nice constitution, but that was mainly on the paper.

0:05:59.956 --> 0:06:06.036
<v Speaker 1>Security services were controlling everything. A group called Freedom House

0:06:06.076 --> 0:06:09.036
<v Speaker 1>had sent Musa to document what was happening in Uzbeka

0:06:09.196 --> 0:06:14.596
<v Speaker 1>stands prisons. The prisons had become the Uzbek government's torture chambers.

0:06:15.476 --> 0:06:18.436
<v Speaker 1>They had cattle prods and rooms where they hung you

0:06:18.516 --> 0:06:21.516
<v Speaker 1>from your wrists and ankles, other rooms where they beat

0:06:21.556 --> 0:06:24.516
<v Speaker 1>you with robber hoses and smothered you with plastic bags,

0:06:25.356 --> 0:06:28.796
<v Speaker 1>all done in total secrecy, just like the trials that

0:06:28.836 --> 0:06:31.196
<v Speaker 1>had sent people to prison in the first place. And

0:06:31.236 --> 0:06:33.596
<v Speaker 1>what about the judges in the courtroom, where the judges

0:06:33.676 --> 0:06:38.276
<v Speaker 1>were kind of independence? Did they have? No? No, no no.

0:06:38.436 --> 0:06:45.316
<v Speaker 1>That was the old legacy of the Soviet system made

0:06:45.596 --> 0:06:51.156
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors totally in charge of everything. The government. Prosecutors were

0:06:51.156 --> 0:06:55.836
<v Speaker 1>in charge. The judges had zero power. They just took

0:06:55.916 --> 0:07:00.476
<v Speaker 1>orders from the prosecutors. The orders were simple. Any person

0:07:00.516 --> 0:07:04.796
<v Speaker 1>who gets arrested is guilty. As soon as you did

0:07:04.876 --> 0:07:10.076
<v Speaker 1>something that got the police to arrest, that was it.

0:07:10.236 --> 0:07:13.276
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't get out. Can you just describe like you're

0:07:13.276 --> 0:07:15.556
<v Speaker 1>describing to a child, would it felt like to live

0:07:15.596 --> 0:07:22.476
<v Speaker 1>in that system? Well, one person didn't matter. You didn't

0:07:22.516 --> 0:07:27.436
<v Speaker 1>matter at all. So the only way how people tried

0:07:27.476 --> 0:07:31.996
<v Speaker 1>to preserve their safety was they didn't stick out in

0:07:32.076 --> 0:07:36.916
<v Speaker 1>any way. People had to stay hidden. Not because the

0:07:37.036 --> 0:07:41.276
<v Speaker 1>Uzbeks didn't have any laws. They had their nice little constitution.

0:07:42.276 --> 0:07:45.196
<v Speaker 1>What they lacked was an idea at the center of

0:07:45.236 --> 0:07:50.556
<v Speaker 1>any system of justice, the independent judge, the ref in robes,

0:07:51.276 --> 0:07:55.676
<v Speaker 1>the human being charged with ensuring fairness in the court

0:07:55.716 --> 0:07:59.476
<v Speaker 1>of law. When you live in a country that doesn't

0:07:59.476 --> 0:08:02.276
<v Speaker 1>have people like that, you wake up every day to

0:08:02.356 --> 0:08:06.076
<v Speaker 1>the same emotion. Fear that there was always fearing, Yeah,

0:08:06.276 --> 0:08:11.156
<v Speaker 1>fear that if you don't do what the state wants

0:08:11.156 --> 0:08:14.916
<v Speaker 1>you to do, they could eliminate you. The Uzbeks didn't

0:08:14.956 --> 0:08:18.596
<v Speaker 1>invent the police state. They were just more enthusiastic about

0:08:18.636 --> 0:08:22.796
<v Speaker 1>it than most. But in two thousand and sixteen something changed.

0:08:23.516 --> 0:08:34.356
<v Speaker 1>Muy the president died. That was his funeral. He was

0:08:34.396 --> 0:08:38.196
<v Speaker 1>the only president that Uzbekistan had ever had, And the

0:08:38.276 --> 0:08:43.276
<v Speaker 1>new president decided amazingly and without any great revolution, to

0:08:43.396 --> 0:08:47.836
<v Speaker 1>open things up, to create basically from scratch, a legal

0:08:47.876 --> 0:08:54.116
<v Speaker 1>system that included some concept of fairness in practice that

0:08:54.156 --> 0:08:57.316
<v Speaker 1>meant handing actual power to the people who'd never had

0:08:57.356 --> 0:09:03.236
<v Speaker 1>any The judges the refs, which sounds like it should

0:09:03.236 --> 0:09:05.676
<v Speaker 1>be easy for the judges, right, You don't really think

0:09:05.716 --> 0:09:08.476
<v Speaker 1>of them having to learn how to be independent. It's

0:09:08.516 --> 0:09:10.676
<v Speaker 1>like breathing. You do it so long as you're allowed to.

0:09:11.356 --> 0:09:16.436
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that's wrong. The younger ones are those

0:09:16.676 --> 0:09:21.116
<v Speaker 1>usually to make a decision on acquittals and try to

0:09:21.156 --> 0:09:26.316
<v Speaker 1>do things right. The older ones are still they find

0:09:26.356 --> 0:09:28.956
<v Speaker 1>it hard. So if you're a defendant and you walk

0:09:28.996 --> 0:09:31.756
<v Speaker 1>into a courtroom and you see a young judge, you're

0:09:31.796 --> 0:09:35.356
<v Speaker 1>happier than if you see an old judge. Yeah, definitely,

0:09:35.716 --> 0:09:39.196
<v Speaker 1>because only the new judges will acquit you. The old

0:09:39.276 --> 0:09:41.836
<v Speaker 1>guys will still assume you're supposed to be sent directly

0:09:41.876 --> 0:09:45.156
<v Speaker 1>to jail. It's as if they don't want their independence,

0:09:46.516 --> 0:09:49.436
<v Speaker 1>or as if the Uzbek system doesn't know how to

0:09:49.476 --> 0:09:53.116
<v Speaker 1>grant it to them. The Uzbeks have done all kinds

0:09:53.116 --> 0:09:56.636
<v Speaker 1>of things to get the changes to work. They've invited

0:09:56.676 --> 0:10:00.636
<v Speaker 1>American judges to visit to teach them about judicial independence.

0:10:01.196 --> 0:10:04.236
<v Speaker 1>They've opened their courtrooms so people can watch the trials.

0:10:05.396 --> 0:10:08.676
<v Speaker 1>Musa had this idea of staging mock trials so that

0:10:08.756 --> 0:10:11.756
<v Speaker 1>the old guys could see what fairness looked like. So

0:10:11.996 --> 0:10:16.556
<v Speaker 1>we had two trials. On both trials that defense won

0:10:16.756 --> 0:10:22.236
<v Speaker 1>the case. That was such a shock the team of prosecutors,

0:10:22.876 --> 0:10:26.156
<v Speaker 1>and they sent us the best. Didn't you even want

0:10:26.156 --> 0:10:29.356
<v Speaker 1>to shake the hands with the team of defense. They

0:10:29.396 --> 0:10:33.076
<v Speaker 1>were so pieced off, and they would be asking what

0:10:33.196 --> 0:10:38.436
<v Speaker 1>happens to American prosecutor when he loses a case? Does

0:10:38.516 --> 0:10:41.796
<v Speaker 1>he lose a job? Is he punished? They were an

0:10:41.836 --> 0:10:45.276
<v Speaker 1>undefeated team up to that point. Yes, they never lost.

0:10:45.476 --> 0:10:48.436
<v Speaker 1>They never lost because they were not supposed to lose.

0:10:48.876 --> 0:10:52.316
<v Speaker 1>They're not supposed to lose, right, Changing those attitudes must

0:10:52.356 --> 0:10:56.916
<v Speaker 1>not be easy. It's not easy, and you know that's

0:10:56.916 --> 0:11:00.756
<v Speaker 1>why I'm there fifteen years. All of which is to

0:11:00.836 --> 0:11:03.716
<v Speaker 1>say that a system of justice isn't just a bunch

0:11:03.756 --> 0:11:07.116
<v Speaker 1>of laws. A system of justice lives and dies on

0:11:07.156 --> 0:11:11.836
<v Speaker 1>the emotion it evokes, especially feelings about the judges, and

0:11:11.916 --> 0:11:16.756
<v Speaker 1>the judges feelings about their role. So here's what happens.

0:11:17.276 --> 0:11:20.836
<v Speaker 1>We're in front of a very hostile judge. The judge

0:11:20.956 --> 0:11:28.316
<v Speaker 1>was appointed by Barack Obama, federal judge. These feelings can change.

0:11:29.276 --> 0:11:33.236
<v Speaker 1>They're changing right here, right now, because he's given us

0:11:33.396 --> 0:11:37.836
<v Speaker 1>ruling after ruling after ruling, negative, negative, negative. The uzbeks

0:11:37.836 --> 0:11:40.356
<v Speaker 1>have picked a funny moment to emulate the American system

0:11:40.436 --> 0:11:45.556
<v Speaker 1>of justice. They want transparency, they want the people to

0:11:45.596 --> 0:11:49.196
<v Speaker 1>see the judges at work. At the same time, Americans

0:11:49.196 --> 0:11:52.236
<v Speaker 1>are being encouraged to watch their judges more closely than ever,

0:11:53.836 --> 0:12:05.516
<v Speaker 1>and what they see is causing some problems. So I

0:12:05.556 --> 0:12:07.676
<v Speaker 1>walked in, and I mean, I think, I think I

0:12:07.756 --> 0:12:09.756
<v Speaker 1>look younger than I am anyway, and so I think,

0:12:09.756 --> 0:12:11.756
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, you know, I thought a lot

0:12:11.796 --> 0:12:13.756
<v Speaker 1>of people just assumed guy was, you know, in my

0:12:13.916 --> 0:12:16.676
<v Speaker 1>early twenties or something. You know, this is Jeremy Fogel.

0:12:16.876 --> 0:12:20.196
<v Speaker 1>He was once a judge, but not just any judge.

0:12:20.756 --> 0:12:23.996
<v Speaker 1>A judge you had a gift for watching himself on

0:12:24.036 --> 0:12:26.756
<v Speaker 1>the job. Presiding judge gave me a file and say

0:12:26.796 --> 0:12:29.596
<v Speaker 1>here's your first case. The jury's coming in half an

0:12:29.636 --> 0:12:34.716
<v Speaker 1>hour or something like that. This podcast was bound to

0:12:34.796 --> 0:12:38.996
<v Speaker 1>lead to judges. They're too important to ignore, but they

0:12:39.076 --> 0:12:42.276
<v Speaker 1>usually don't have much to say for themselves. By law,

0:12:42.476 --> 0:12:46.236
<v Speaker 1>they're forbidden from discussing their cases. By custom, they don't

0:12:46.236 --> 0:12:49.036
<v Speaker 1>typically invite you to get to know them. That's why

0:12:49.036 --> 0:12:52.436
<v Speaker 1>I've come to Jeremy Fogel. He's decided that judges have

0:12:52.516 --> 0:12:55.516
<v Speaker 1>no choice but to break their silence because they're being

0:12:55.556 --> 0:12:58.596
<v Speaker 1>watched in new ways, and he's sort of taking the lead.

0:12:59.436 --> 0:13:02.076
<v Speaker 1>Fogel was always a little odd for a judge. He

0:13:02.116 --> 0:13:05.836
<v Speaker 1>went to college during the Vietnam War. He'd studied religion

0:13:05.956 --> 0:13:09.236
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to become a professor, but the war or

0:13:09.276 --> 0:13:12.236
<v Speaker 1>switched on something inside of him made him want to

0:13:12.276 --> 0:13:17.236
<v Speaker 1>do something practical out in the world. I just felt

0:13:17.236 --> 0:13:20.396
<v Speaker 1>like an academic life was going to be too cloistered,

0:13:21.116 --> 0:13:24.556
<v Speaker 1>so law school was kind of something I did, almost

0:13:25.076 --> 0:13:28.996
<v Speaker 1>as an afterthought. He became a public defender, taking the

0:13:29.036 --> 0:13:32.556
<v Speaker 1>cases of people who couldn't afford a lawyer. He saw

0:13:32.636 --> 0:13:37.396
<v Speaker 1>the unfairness of the system, the crazy inequality, the likelihood

0:13:37.396 --> 0:13:39.436
<v Speaker 1>that it would treat a poor person less fairly than

0:13:39.476 --> 0:13:43.036
<v Speaker 1>a rich person. Jeremy was doing what he could directify that,

0:13:43.556 --> 0:13:45.556
<v Speaker 1>but he sensed that he had this thing about him

0:13:45.916 --> 0:13:48.556
<v Speaker 1>that made him less than ideal for the job. You

0:13:48.636 --> 0:13:51.636
<v Speaker 1>can't be the one sided advocate where you you just

0:13:51.716 --> 0:13:53.636
<v Speaker 1>kind of go in and say, well, you know, my

0:13:54.156 --> 0:13:56.796
<v Speaker 1>client's entirely right and these people are entirely wrong. I

0:13:57.156 --> 0:14:00.596
<v Speaker 1>never felt comfortable doing that. He didn't like taking sides,

0:14:01.316 --> 0:14:03.956
<v Speaker 1>which is a problem if you're a lawyer. You know,

0:14:03.956 --> 0:14:08.436
<v Speaker 1>there's there's lawyers who actually believe their clients cases totally right.

0:14:08.476 --> 0:14:10.196
<v Speaker 1>Then there's people who know that it isn't but they

0:14:10.476 --> 0:14:14.396
<v Speaker 1>can play the role. And I wasn't ever really that

0:14:14.436 --> 0:14:17.276
<v Speaker 1>comfortable playing the role at the same time. I mean,

0:14:17.316 --> 0:14:20.676
<v Speaker 1>I was aware of my ethical obligations were and so

0:14:20.716 --> 0:14:22.236
<v Speaker 1>I started to think about, well if you what if

0:14:22.276 --> 0:14:25.636
<v Speaker 1>I were a neutral? A neutral we know now how

0:14:25.636 --> 0:14:29.196
<v Speaker 1>hard they are to find others who knew. Jeremy Fogel

0:14:29.276 --> 0:14:32.436
<v Speaker 1>had the same thought. In nineteen eighty six, Fogel was

0:14:32.476 --> 0:14:37.396
<v Speaker 1>appointed to be a California state judge. It nerve wracking. Well,

0:14:37.396 --> 0:14:39.956
<v Speaker 1>I was really nervous, you know, I didn't know what

0:14:40.036 --> 0:14:43.796
<v Speaker 1>to expect. And no, I don't think I don't I

0:14:43.836 --> 0:14:45.316
<v Speaker 1>know think I ever hit the gavel in my life.

0:14:45.356 --> 0:14:47.276
<v Speaker 1>But but but I just I was never in a

0:14:47.396 --> 0:14:49.156
<v Speaker 1>I was never in a mood where I felt like

0:14:49.196 --> 0:14:51.556
<v Speaker 1>I needed to do that. He wound up running a

0:14:51.596 --> 0:14:55.276
<v Speaker 1>family court without ever once using his gavel. He presided

0:14:55.276 --> 0:15:00.636
<v Speaker 1>over divorces and custody battles. It was emotional, angry, ugly.

0:15:01.756 --> 0:15:04.516
<v Speaker 1>If a judge had some perverse desire to be murdered

0:15:04.596 --> 0:15:07.236
<v Speaker 1>by the people in his courtroom, he'd ask for family

0:15:07.276 --> 0:15:11.516
<v Speaker 1>court duty. Most judges dislike family cord because it's the

0:15:11.556 --> 0:15:15.556
<v Speaker 1>hot zone. Jeremy Fogel didn't just like it. He loved it.

0:15:16.116 --> 0:15:18.316
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have people who are quote normal most

0:15:18.316 --> 0:15:20.956
<v Speaker 1>of the time, who when they're in the middle of

0:15:20.956 --> 0:15:24.956
<v Speaker 1>the divorce or not temporarily, they're temporarily insane. Right, So

0:15:25.036 --> 0:15:27.676
<v Speaker 1>the ability to kind of step in and bring a

0:15:27.716 --> 0:15:31.836
<v Speaker 1>little bit of order to the situation actually was something

0:15:31.876 --> 0:15:35.956
<v Speaker 1>I felt very positive about. And how did you do that?

0:15:36.556 --> 0:15:38.036
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think a lot of it was just

0:15:38.476 --> 0:15:41.476
<v Speaker 1>just listening and trying to figure out what's really going on.

0:15:41.556 --> 0:15:43.756
<v Speaker 1>And you know, they're fighting about who gets the dog.

0:15:43.756 --> 0:15:45.676
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're fighting about who gets the piano or

0:15:46.076 --> 0:15:48.476
<v Speaker 1>you knows, And I just said, it's not about the piano,

0:15:49.116 --> 0:15:51.476
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is this is a power struggle, you know.

0:15:51.836 --> 0:15:54.036
<v Speaker 1>So I would say parties, I would bring them in

0:15:54.076 --> 0:15:56.356
<v Speaker 1>for mediations. They would talk to me about this, you know,

0:15:56.956 --> 0:15:59.556
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, you would kind of dig down

0:15:59.596 --> 0:16:02.436
<v Speaker 1>and you could sort of see what the underlying problem was,

0:16:02.476 --> 0:16:04.156
<v Speaker 1>and then you could say, well, how are we gonna

0:16:04.836 --> 0:16:06.316
<v Speaker 1>how are we going to move forward here? You know,

0:16:06.316 --> 0:16:08.756
<v Speaker 1>how are we going to get you folks divorce? Because

0:16:08.756 --> 0:16:11.516
<v Speaker 1>that's really what needs to happen. Right, you're getting a

0:16:11.556 --> 0:16:15.276
<v Speaker 1>feel for him. A born neutral, some people just are.

0:16:16.276 --> 0:16:18.636
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Fogel thinks he caught the trait from growing up

0:16:18.676 --> 0:16:21.716
<v Speaker 1>with a volatile father, from wanting life at home to

0:16:21.756 --> 0:16:25.476
<v Speaker 1>just calm him down anyway. Judging suits him. In nineteen

0:16:25.636 --> 0:16:28.436
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven, Bill Clinton appoints him to the United States

0:16:28.476 --> 0:16:32.356
<v Speaker 1>Court for the District of Northern California. It's the big time.

0:16:33.156 --> 0:16:35.316
<v Speaker 1>He goes from being one of tens of thousands of

0:16:35.356 --> 0:16:38.716
<v Speaker 1>state judges to one of only two thousand federal judges.

0:16:39.516 --> 0:16:43.236
<v Speaker 1>He's got life tenure in this job that he totally loves.

0:16:44.556 --> 0:16:47.876
<v Speaker 1>But now he's noticing things and they're pulling him outside

0:16:47.876 --> 0:16:52.796
<v Speaker 1>of himself, causing him to watch himself meta judging. And

0:16:52.916 --> 0:16:55.916
<v Speaker 1>it's actually really hard to be humble when you're a

0:16:55.956 --> 0:17:00.996
<v Speaker 1>judge because the the everybody's countown to you. You're you're,

0:17:01.116 --> 0:17:02.556
<v Speaker 1>you're wearing the robe, and you're on the bench, and

0:17:02.596 --> 0:17:04.916
<v Speaker 1>everybody's you know, calling you your honor and they're you know,

0:17:04.996 --> 0:17:08.716
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a lot of false deference. I think a

0:17:08.836 --> 0:17:11.876
<v Speaker 1>judge you can make huge mistakes and still fool himself

0:17:11.916 --> 0:17:15.156
<v Speaker 1>into thinking that he was doing great. Jeremy Fogel tried

0:17:15.196 --> 0:17:18.436
<v Speaker 1>to fight this tendency by not allowing himself to forget

0:17:18.516 --> 0:17:21.356
<v Speaker 1>his most terrible mistakes. I mean, the one that always

0:17:21.396 --> 0:17:23.356
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind was when I was doing the Mantle

0:17:23.396 --> 0:17:27.036
<v Speaker 1>Health calendar and this young man was trying to get

0:17:27.196 --> 0:17:32.196
<v Speaker 1>off of conservativeship, and the doctors were saying, no, he's

0:17:33.036 --> 0:17:35.436
<v Speaker 1>managed depressive and he would be dangerous to himself, and

0:17:36.116 --> 0:17:39.916
<v Speaker 1>he persuaded me that he was okay, and he killed

0:17:39.956 --> 0:17:43.276
<v Speaker 1>himself the next day. Judging forces you to make these

0:17:43.316 --> 0:17:46.956
<v Speaker 1>horrible life and death decisions when you really don't know

0:17:47.036 --> 0:17:50.076
<v Speaker 1>the right answer. Jeremy Fogel knows that he's going to

0:17:50.156 --> 0:17:53.436
<v Speaker 1>be wrong sometimes, and so he thinks it's important for

0:17:53.516 --> 0:17:55.756
<v Speaker 1>the people on the receiving end of his judgments to

0:17:55.836 --> 0:17:59.996
<v Speaker 1>sense his humility, his humanity. He thinks judges need to

0:17:59.996 --> 0:18:02.716
<v Speaker 1>be not as book smart, but people smart, so that

0:18:02.756 --> 0:18:06.476
<v Speaker 1>people who leave their courtroom feel okay with what's just happened.

0:18:07.116 --> 0:18:11.516
<v Speaker 1>We need a curriculum. You need to be intentional about

0:18:11.596 --> 0:18:14.276
<v Speaker 1>what we're teaching judges. What kind of judges are we

0:18:14.276 --> 0:18:17.156
<v Speaker 1>trying to grow? You know, the longer Jeremy Foggle is

0:18:17.196 --> 0:18:21.276
<v Speaker 1>a judge, the more worried he becomes about the relationship

0:18:21.316 --> 0:18:26.116
<v Speaker 1>between Americans and their judges. He's right to be worried.

0:18:26.596 --> 0:18:31.156
<v Speaker 1>American judges are being threatened and challenged and exposed as

0:18:31.276 --> 0:18:35.756
<v Speaker 1>never before. You to say, Senator, I would like to

0:18:35.836 --> 0:18:42.556
<v Speaker 1>start by saying, unequivocally, uncategorically that I deny each and

0:18:42.836 --> 0:18:47.436
<v Speaker 1>every single allegation against me today that suggested in any

0:18:47.476 --> 0:18:52.756
<v Speaker 1>way that I had conversations of a sexual nature or

0:18:52.796 --> 0:18:59.996
<v Speaker 1>about pornographic material with Anita Hill. Supreme Court confirmation battles.

0:19:01.076 --> 0:19:04.316
<v Speaker 1>They're now just a ritual in American culture, but they

0:19:04.356 --> 0:19:08.316
<v Speaker 1>have echoes in the daily lives of ordinary judges. Political

0:19:08.356 --> 0:19:11.396
<v Speaker 1>attacks on jeg are on the rise, Physical attacks on

0:19:11.476 --> 0:19:14.196
<v Speaker 1>judges are on the rise, and there's this new demand

0:19:14.236 --> 0:19:16.916
<v Speaker 1>that judges reveal more and more of themselves in their

0:19:16.996 --> 0:19:20.516
<v Speaker 1>lives to us. When I was started writing the norm

0:19:20.636 --> 0:19:25.076
<v Speaker 1>was still for the justices not to grant many, if any,

0:19:25.156 --> 0:19:28.556
<v Speaker 1>on the record interviews, And in fact, the Supreme Court

0:19:28.556 --> 0:19:32.036
<v Speaker 1>at that time didn't even publish transcripts of the arguments

0:19:32.036 --> 0:19:33.836
<v Speaker 1>on the same day, and they would just refer to

0:19:33.916 --> 0:19:37.116
<v Speaker 1>the court rather than an individual justice. That's how impersonal

0:19:37.156 --> 0:19:39.116
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing was supposed to be. In the early nineties.

0:19:39.316 --> 0:19:43.556
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Rosen runs the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, but

0:19:43.596 --> 0:19:46.276
<v Speaker 1>he used to make his living writing these wonderful profiles

0:19:46.276 --> 0:19:50.356
<v Speaker 1>of Supreme Court justices. And he's watched even Supreme Court

0:19:50.436 --> 0:19:53.956
<v Speaker 1>judges bow to the social pressure to let everyone get

0:19:53.956 --> 0:19:56.356
<v Speaker 1>to know them. Now the transcripts are published on the

0:19:56.396 --> 0:19:58.436
<v Speaker 1>same day, the justices are identified by name, and the

0:19:58.516 --> 0:20:02.076
<v Speaker 1>justices are writing best selling books, and they're appearing not

0:20:02.156 --> 0:20:06.956
<v Speaker 1>only on c spand but on the networks, and they're

0:20:06.956 --> 0:20:09.436
<v Speaker 1>opening themselves up to being just as accessible is all

0:20:09.436 --> 0:20:14.436
<v Speaker 1>the other celebrified figures in our celebrified culture. Honorable the

0:20:14.556 --> 0:20:17.876
<v Speaker 1>Chief Justice and the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court

0:20:17.956 --> 0:20:21.956
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. Something different is going on here

0:20:22.076 --> 0:20:24.756
<v Speaker 1>than what goes on in the Capitol Building or in

0:20:24.796 --> 0:20:27.116
<v Speaker 1>the White House. And you need to appreciate how important

0:20:27.116 --> 0:20:30.356
<v Speaker 1>it is to our system of government. Jeff Rosen doesn't

0:20:30.356 --> 0:20:34.156
<v Speaker 1>approve of any of this. He really doesn't approve. He

0:20:34.236 --> 0:20:36.596
<v Speaker 1>thinks that would all be better off if judges retain

0:20:36.676 --> 0:20:41.076
<v Speaker 1>their old mystique, if they weren't so human. But you

0:20:41.156 --> 0:20:45.756
<v Speaker 1>know what, it's too late, and Jeremy Fogel thinks this

0:20:45.836 --> 0:20:49.476
<v Speaker 1>might be okay. One of the things that will help

0:20:50.436 --> 0:20:56.236
<v Speaker 1>strengthen traditional independence is if the public understands more about judges.

0:20:57.076 --> 0:21:00.836
<v Speaker 1>People don't understand what we do, and what you see

0:21:00.916 --> 0:21:03.956
<v Speaker 1>is that use caricatures, and I think the more you

0:21:03.996 --> 0:21:05.676
<v Speaker 1>can kind of really paint the picture and kind of

0:21:05.676 --> 0:21:07.676
<v Speaker 1>get out there's a job. You know, it's like being

0:21:07.676 --> 0:21:10.116
<v Speaker 1>a doctor, it's like being a teacher, being a fighter pilot.

0:21:10.116 --> 0:21:11.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a skill set that goes with it,

0:21:11.836 --> 0:21:14.156
<v Speaker 1>and there's a set of values that go with it,

0:21:14.196 --> 0:21:18.076
<v Speaker 1>and that it's inappropriate for people to be like making

0:21:18.116 --> 0:21:20.316
<v Speaker 1>death threats. Yeah. So that part of the problem with

0:21:20.396 --> 0:21:22.836
<v Speaker 1>the judge in American life is that he's so different

0:21:22.876 --> 0:21:25.836
<v Speaker 1>from so much else of American life. Americans go through

0:21:25.916 --> 0:21:28.556
<v Speaker 1>life doing what they feel like doing right, and it's

0:21:28.596 --> 0:21:31.596
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine themselves into a headspace where they're doing

0:21:31.636 --> 0:21:33.636
<v Speaker 1>things for some reason other than they want to do them.

0:21:33.716 --> 0:21:38.836
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Americans really don't understand refs. Jeremy Fogel felt

0:21:38.836 --> 0:21:42.876
<v Speaker 1>that they needed to, and so in twenty eleven, when

0:21:42.876 --> 0:21:45.476
<v Speaker 1>he was sixty one years old, he did something that

0:21:45.516 --> 0:21:49.156
<v Speaker 1>would have surprised his younger self. He left the bench

0:21:50.396 --> 0:21:54.356
<v Speaker 1>for this thing in Washington called the Federal Judicial Center,

0:21:54.916 --> 0:21:58.596
<v Speaker 1>created by Congress back in the nineteen sixties to improve

0:21:58.636 --> 0:22:04.196
<v Speaker 1>the nation's entire judiciary. Jeremy Fogel agrees to run it.

0:22:05.516 --> 0:22:07.836
<v Speaker 1>He thinks he can use the place to train judges

0:22:07.956 --> 0:22:12.276
<v Speaker 1>in better ways, so they can withstand the new transparency

0:22:12.636 --> 0:22:14.716
<v Speaker 1>and be better than the caricature as we see in

0:22:14.756 --> 0:22:19.756
<v Speaker 1>confirmation battles. Did you consume alcohol during your high school years? Yes,

0:22:19.836 --> 0:22:24.196
<v Speaker 1>we drank beer. My friends and I the boys and girls.

0:22:24.596 --> 0:22:29.396
<v Speaker 1>I liked beer. Still like beer, And I think, you know,

0:22:29.476 --> 0:22:32.396
<v Speaker 1>judges all over the country are really struggling with this.

0:22:32.476 --> 0:22:35.476
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, how how do we explain to people

0:22:35.516 --> 0:22:37.596
<v Speaker 1>that know? I mean, that's just not who we are,

0:22:37.636 --> 0:22:39.516
<v Speaker 1>it's not what we do, and it's really important that

0:22:39.556 --> 0:22:42.236
<v Speaker 1>you know that. Where do you hear that? I hear it.

0:22:42.276 --> 0:22:44.636
<v Speaker 1>I just hear it from other judges, and I hear

0:22:44.636 --> 0:22:47.196
<v Speaker 1>it from judges as state level and the federal level,

0:22:47.236 --> 0:22:48.716
<v Speaker 1>and you're hearing this in a way you wouldn't have

0:22:48.796 --> 0:22:50.956
<v Speaker 1>heard it when you started your career. That's right. So

0:22:50.996 --> 0:22:53.516
<v Speaker 1>this is changing. It is changing. It is changing. It

0:22:53.636 --> 0:22:55.796
<v Speaker 1>is something that's in the air. Actually, it must be

0:22:55.836 --> 0:22:58.236
<v Speaker 1>more than one thing, because it's new to your nose,

0:22:59.436 --> 0:23:06.276
<v Speaker 1>an entirely new smell. Has anyone told you about the

0:23:06.516 --> 0:23:09.116
<v Speaker 1>what judges you for breakfast study? Tell me about it.

0:23:09.476 --> 0:23:13.596
<v Speaker 1>That's Emily Basilon. She's written so much interesting journalism about

0:23:13.596 --> 0:23:16.916
<v Speaker 1>the American legal system that the Yale Law School has

0:23:16.956 --> 0:23:21.756
<v Speaker 1>made her a research scholar. Okay, so this is at

0:23:21.756 --> 0:23:25.196
<v Speaker 1>this point kind of a famous study in law nerd world.

0:23:26.836 --> 0:23:30.276
<v Speaker 1>Somebody looked at the sentencing decisions that judge is made

0:23:30.596 --> 0:23:34.996
<v Speaker 1>right before lunch and right after lunch, and they found

0:23:35.036 --> 0:23:40.396
<v Speaker 1>that after lunch judges are nicer, and before lunch, when

0:23:40.396 --> 0:23:44.956
<v Speaker 1>presumably they're getting a little peckish, they're meaner. They give

0:23:44.956 --> 0:23:49.316
<v Speaker 1>out longer sentences before lunch than after lunch. That's terrifying. Yeah,

0:23:49.356 --> 0:23:53.436
<v Speaker 1>it really is, because it feels so random, not just random, disturbing.

0:23:54.116 --> 0:23:56.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure anyone ever really believed that human beings

0:23:56.796 --> 0:23:59.636
<v Speaker 1>could be perfectly rational, but people who used to sort

0:23:59.676 --> 0:24:01.676
<v Speaker 1>of believe it, or at least pretend to believe it.

0:24:02.156 --> 0:24:04.356
<v Speaker 1>We created excuses for why we didn't need to pay

0:24:04.396 --> 0:24:06.716
<v Speaker 1>too much attention to what was going on inside of

0:24:06.796 --> 0:24:10.196
<v Speaker 1>judge's minds. I mean, they'd be hand picked to make

0:24:10.236 --> 0:24:13.396
<v Speaker 1>hard decisions. How could there be anything but good at it.

0:24:13.836 --> 0:24:17.596
<v Speaker 1>We had a group of judges trial court judges in Texas,

0:24:17.996 --> 0:24:21.236
<v Speaker 1>really municipal judges, the kind of folks who see traffic

0:24:21.236 --> 0:24:25.596
<v Speaker 1>tickets and fines for restaurants and the like. Jeffrey Klinsky

0:24:25.716 --> 0:24:29.316
<v Speaker 1>teaches at Cornell Law School. He's now almost famous for

0:24:29.396 --> 0:24:33.516
<v Speaker 1>these elaborate experiments involving judges, showing that when it comes

0:24:33.556 --> 0:24:37.436
<v Speaker 1>to making decisions, judges suck in exactly the same way

0:24:37.516 --> 0:24:40.636
<v Speaker 1>as other human beings. In one study, he wanted to

0:24:40.636 --> 0:24:42.916
<v Speaker 1>see if you could screw up judges minds by putting

0:24:42.916 --> 0:24:46.196
<v Speaker 1>some random number into their brains. So he gave them

0:24:46.196 --> 0:24:50.596
<v Speaker 1>a scenario involving a nightclub that violated noise ordinances. The

0:24:50.676 --> 0:24:53.796
<v Speaker 1>judges had to figure out a proper fine, and for

0:24:53.836 --> 0:24:56.236
<v Speaker 1>half of them, we called told them that the club

0:24:56.316 --> 0:24:59.476
<v Speaker 1>was named Club fifty eight, after its street address. For

0:24:59.556 --> 0:25:01.876
<v Speaker 1>the other half. We told them it was Club eleven thousand,

0:25:01.916 --> 0:25:04.996
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and sixty six after its street address, and

0:25:05.076 --> 0:25:08.396
<v Speaker 1>the fine was three times as high for Club eleven thousand,

0:25:08.556 --> 0:25:11.276
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred sixty six. Two of the judges even in

0:25:11.316 --> 0:25:14.556
<v Speaker 1>fact find the Club eleven thousand, eight hundred and sixty

0:25:14.556 --> 0:25:17.236
<v Speaker 1>six dollars. They thought that, well, that's a clever number.

0:25:17.316 --> 0:25:19.476
<v Speaker 1>Let's put that in and find them. You heard it

0:25:19.516 --> 0:25:24.276
<v Speaker 1>here first, Never ever call your establishment club eleven eight

0:25:24.356 --> 0:25:27.876
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty six, or mention any other random big

0:25:27.956 --> 0:25:30.236
<v Speaker 1>number to a judge in the process of finding you,

0:25:31.156 --> 0:25:33.716
<v Speaker 1>or for that matter, think that the judge is any

0:25:33.756 --> 0:25:36.876
<v Speaker 1>more capable than other human beings at checking himself before

0:25:36.916 --> 0:25:40.036
<v Speaker 1>he screws up. Eighty six percent of automobile drivers say

0:25:39.956 --> 0:25:42.476
<v Speaker 1>they're less likely than the median driver to get into

0:25:42.516 --> 0:25:46.716
<v Speaker 1>a car accident. People always think they're above average, especially

0:25:46.716 --> 0:25:49.476
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to something they care about. But most

0:25:49.516 --> 0:25:53.556
<v Speaker 1>trial judges care about is not having their rulings overturned.

0:25:53.996 --> 0:25:56.476
<v Speaker 1>So we asked them, how likely are you, relative to

0:25:56.516 --> 0:25:59.796
<v Speaker 1>the median judge in this room to be overturned on appeal?

0:26:00.796 --> 0:26:03.836
<v Speaker 1>And indeed, eighty seven percent of them said they were

0:26:03.916 --> 0:26:06.916
<v Speaker 1>less likely than the median judge to be overturned on appeal.

0:26:07.636 --> 0:26:10.596
<v Speaker 1>Later on, we asked a group of judges, is how

0:26:10.636 --> 0:26:13.436
<v Speaker 1>effective are you at avoiding race or gender bias in

0:26:13.436 --> 0:26:16.716
<v Speaker 1>your decisions? And nine of them are better than the

0:26:16.756 --> 0:26:20.316
<v Speaker 1>median judge at that. There's a long list of stuff

0:26:20.356 --> 0:26:24.436
<v Speaker 1>like this. It's the same stupid stuff that all people do.

0:26:25.636 --> 0:26:28.396
<v Speaker 1>The evidence has been piling up that judges are no

0:26:28.516 --> 0:26:31.716
<v Speaker 1>more than human at a time when being human is

0:26:31.756 --> 0:26:42.236
<v Speaker 1>maybe less flattering than it's ever been. It's funny how

0:26:42.356 --> 0:26:46.076
<v Speaker 1>neatly you can map what's happening to sports referees onto judges.

0:26:46.916 --> 0:26:50.556
<v Speaker 1>They've always had their biases, we're just getting better at

0:26:50.596 --> 0:26:53.796
<v Speaker 1>seeing them. We now know that sports refs, who are

0:26:53.836 --> 0:26:57.716
<v Speaker 1>made aware of their biases they make better calls. Same

0:26:57.756 --> 0:27:00.436
<v Speaker 1>should be true of judges, right, I mean, once you

0:27:00.596 --> 0:27:03.316
<v Speaker 1>know that you send people to jail longer right before

0:27:03.436 --> 0:27:06.556
<v Speaker 1>lunch than you do right after lunch, you can start

0:27:06.596 --> 0:27:10.836
<v Speaker 1>to watch your blood sugar. But as with sports refs,

0:27:11.436 --> 0:27:14.356
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people clearly believe that judges are getting worse.

0:27:15.196 --> 0:27:17.716
<v Speaker 1>It's as if we've demanded to know the truth without

0:27:17.756 --> 0:27:22.236
<v Speaker 1>realizing we can't handle the truth. Wait, it's such a

0:27:22.276 --> 0:27:26.036
<v Speaker 1>paradox that if we become more honest about the ways

0:27:26.116 --> 0:27:30.196
<v Speaker 1>in which someone's values and politics inform their judicial decisions,

0:27:30.196 --> 0:27:33.516
<v Speaker 1>that were somehow doing them a disservice. I'm talking to

0:27:33.556 --> 0:27:36.836
<v Speaker 1>Emily Basilon again. You know, it's funny. It's like the

0:27:36.956 --> 0:27:39.636
<v Speaker 1>system does much better if nobody's paying too much attention

0:27:39.636 --> 0:27:42.476
<v Speaker 1>to it. I think that's absolutely true. I mean, there's

0:27:42.516 --> 0:27:46.076
<v Speaker 1>something useful about the fiction that there is a totally

0:27:46.156 --> 0:27:49.356
<v Speaker 1>separate group of people called judges. They wear black robes,

0:27:49.396 --> 0:27:53.556
<v Speaker 1>they're Olympian, they're doing their own thing, and they're handing

0:27:53.556 --> 0:27:57.236
<v Speaker 1>down decisions from un high It's not true, right, I mean,

0:27:57.276 --> 0:28:01.316
<v Speaker 1>I really think it's like a kind of an idealized

0:28:01.356 --> 0:28:04.716
<v Speaker 1>notion of the law that is essentially false, because people's

0:28:04.756 --> 0:28:08.156
<v Speaker 1>prior beliefs and their values do shape the decisions they

0:28:08.156 --> 0:28:10.716
<v Speaker 1>make when they have real choice. Right. And Yet I'm

0:28:10.756 --> 0:28:13.636
<v Speaker 1>torn because when we had the fiction that judges were

0:28:13.636 --> 0:28:16.396
<v Speaker 1>doing some totally different thing, it was easier, I think,

0:28:16.476 --> 0:28:21.276
<v Speaker 1>for them to try to measure impartiality in that way,

0:28:21.316 --> 0:28:24.196
<v Speaker 1>to try to adhere to that standard. But it's hard

0:28:24.236 --> 0:28:27.476
<v Speaker 1>to imagine how the fiction would be restored. Oh yes,

0:28:27.556 --> 0:28:34.236
<v Speaker 1>it's gone. How long have baby judges been taught about

0:28:34.316 --> 0:28:38.956
<v Speaker 1>the importance of their emotions since twenty thirteen, so this

0:28:39.036 --> 0:28:41.516
<v Speaker 1>is a new thing. It's a new thing. Yeah. Her

0:28:41.596 --> 0:28:46.476
<v Speaker 1>name is Terry Moroney. She teaches LRD Vanderbilt. Jeremy Fogo

0:28:46.556 --> 0:28:48.876
<v Speaker 1>brought her in to teach judges in the new program

0:28:48.916 --> 0:28:53.156
<v Speaker 1>he created at the Federal Judicial Center Baby Judge School,

0:28:53.236 --> 0:28:56.556
<v Speaker 1>they call it new Judges now learn all about the

0:28:56.556 --> 0:28:58.956
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things they never used to have to think about,

0:28:59.796 --> 0:29:02.756
<v Speaker 1>like the mental errors to which all human beings are prone,

0:29:03.396 --> 0:29:07.236
<v Speaker 1>and their emotions. The law has maintained this very odd

0:29:07.276 --> 0:29:10.116
<v Speaker 1>fiction that emotion is a relevant to law and that

0:29:10.236 --> 0:29:14.476
<v Speaker 1>laws all about rationality, when pretty much every other discipline

0:29:14.556 --> 0:29:17.876
<v Speaker 1>in the world understands that emotion is central to all

0:29:17.916 --> 0:29:21.716
<v Speaker 1>aspects of human life. It's funny because I think historically,

0:29:22.076 --> 0:29:26.836
<v Speaker 1>if you'd ask people, they said, an emotional judge can't

0:29:26.836 --> 0:29:29.396
<v Speaker 1>be as fair as an unemotional judge. And what you're

0:29:29.436 --> 0:29:33.516
<v Speaker 1>saying is the emotions are always there, and it's the

0:29:33.596 --> 0:29:36.316
<v Speaker 1>judge doesn't recognize them, who can't who won't be fair?

0:29:36.596 --> 0:29:40.796
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. Yeah, The emotional lives of judges have been

0:29:40.836 --> 0:29:44.116
<v Speaker 1>discovered at roughly the same time as the emotional lives

0:29:44.116 --> 0:29:47.076
<v Speaker 1>of monkeys. It turns out they have a lot in common,

0:29:47.516 --> 0:29:50.956
<v Speaker 1>which is why Jeremy Fogel put emotional training at the

0:29:51.036 --> 0:29:54.076
<v Speaker 1>center of Baby Judge School. I wonder if you've going

0:29:54.156 --> 0:29:56.516
<v Speaker 1>back in history and tried to introduce this curriculum in

0:29:56.556 --> 0:29:59.876
<v Speaker 1>an earlier point in the history of the judiciary, if

0:29:59.876 --> 0:30:01.836
<v Speaker 1>people would have responded the same way. Said a really

0:30:01.876 --> 0:30:06.476
<v Speaker 1>interesting thought experiment, because when I was a California State judge,

0:30:06.476 --> 0:30:09.316
<v Speaker 1>I was involved in working with the California version of

0:30:09.356 --> 0:30:14.556
<v Speaker 1>the FJC and actually designed a class that looked at this,

0:30:15.396 --> 0:30:20.036
<v Speaker 1>and the general responds from judges at that time was,

0:30:20.156 --> 0:30:22.476
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just want to do my job, and

0:30:22.596 --> 0:30:24.676
<v Speaker 1>you know I don't. They didn't. They didn't say anything

0:30:24.676 --> 0:30:26.396
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't I don't have any feelings, but they

0:30:26.436 --> 0:30:28.396
<v Speaker 1>just said, I mean, I don't want to I don't

0:30:28.396 --> 0:30:30.076
<v Speaker 1>really want to go there. I don't need to go there.

0:30:30.556 --> 0:30:33.236
<v Speaker 1>And if it was somehow irrelevant to the job exactly,

0:30:37.596 --> 0:30:40.836
<v Speaker 1>the fiction is collapsing or has collapsed about who what

0:30:40.836 --> 0:30:42.876
<v Speaker 1>a judge is and what's inside a judge and how

0:30:42.876 --> 0:30:44.876
<v Speaker 1>it judge functions, and it's going to have to be

0:30:44.916 --> 0:30:48.516
<v Speaker 1>replaced by something else, right, and you're trying to you're

0:30:48.516 --> 0:30:51.396
<v Speaker 1>trying to work towards what it gets replaced by exactly.

0:30:51.556 --> 0:30:53.236
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's exactly what I'm trying to do. It.

0:30:53.396 --> 0:30:56.436
<v Speaker 1>The general idea of baby Judge School is to turn

0:30:56.516 --> 0:31:00.116
<v Speaker 1>judges into people who can judge themselves as well as others,

0:31:00.156 --> 0:31:03.916
<v Speaker 1>because the job's putting these new pressures on judges, and

0:31:03.996 --> 0:31:07.036
<v Speaker 1>if judges don't learn to cope, the pressures will crack

0:31:07.116 --> 0:31:10.396
<v Speaker 1>them and make the entire situation and even worse. And

0:31:10.436 --> 0:31:12.076
<v Speaker 1>when you start to baby like everybody else, you're gonna

0:31:12.076 --> 0:31:14.116
<v Speaker 1>get treated like that. That's exactly what the problem was.

0:31:14.356 --> 0:31:16.836
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what really upset me and ended

0:31:16.916 --> 0:31:19.716
<v Speaker 1>upset a lot of judges, I know, and your respective

0:31:19.716 --> 0:31:22.356
<v Speaker 1>of ideology, you know. But then so then what's the

0:31:22.596 --> 0:31:25.156
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's the remedy or is there a remedy

0:31:25.276 --> 0:31:28.636
<v Speaker 1>or you know, it's it just was we didn't nobody

0:31:28.676 --> 0:31:31.756
<v Speaker 1>likes seeing that this whole two week effort has been

0:31:31.796 --> 0:31:37.156
<v Speaker 1>a calculated and orchestrated political hit, almost by himself. Justice

0:31:37.236 --> 0:31:40.636
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh killed any doubts that emotions inside judges might be

0:31:40.636 --> 0:31:44.756
<v Speaker 1>a problem, fueled with apparent pent up anger about President

0:31:44.836 --> 0:31:48.836
<v Speaker 1>Trump and the twenty sixteen election fear that has been

0:31:48.916 --> 0:31:53.196
<v Speaker 1>unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of

0:31:53.196 --> 0:31:57.116
<v Speaker 1>the Clintons, and millions of dollars in money from outside

0:31:57.236 --> 0:32:00.756
<v Speaker 1>left wing opposition groups. The question I guess I have

0:32:00.956 --> 0:32:03.516
<v Speaker 1>is how much can be done about it? Even with

0:32:03.596 --> 0:32:06.636
<v Speaker 1>the best coaching I come in. I'm a baby judge.

0:32:06.796 --> 0:32:09.396
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't really care about other people's feeling.

0:32:09.596 --> 0:32:11.916
<v Speaker 1>I don't look you in the eye. But I'm very

0:32:11.916 --> 0:32:13.636
<v Speaker 1>reasonable and I got as, I got AIS and all

0:32:13.676 --> 0:32:15.396
<v Speaker 1>my classes in law school and eight under too, my

0:32:15.476 --> 0:32:19.396
<v Speaker 1>LSA t right, and I can write a really cool brief. However,

0:32:19.596 --> 0:32:22.436
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel your pain. What do you do to

0:32:22.516 --> 0:32:26.156
<v Speaker 1>school me? Well, you know there's a very long answer

0:32:26.196 --> 0:32:30.196
<v Speaker 1>to that, and that's a lifetime of work. Carry maroney again,

0:32:30.676 --> 0:32:33.676
<v Speaker 1>give me, give me an example, just one example of

0:32:33.756 --> 0:32:37.236
<v Speaker 1>a of a tool. I want a tool. Yes, So

0:32:37.676 --> 0:32:42.076
<v Speaker 1>one tool is situation modification. You can modify some aspects

0:32:42.116 --> 0:32:45.316
<v Speaker 1>of this situation to enable you to be in greater

0:32:45.516 --> 0:32:48.956
<v Speaker 1>control and give you time and space to self reflect

0:32:48.996 --> 0:32:51.796
<v Speaker 1>into act. So sometimes it's as simple as taking a break.

0:32:52.476 --> 0:32:55.236
<v Speaker 1>Let me stop here. Like all of these feelings and

0:32:55.316 --> 0:32:57.156
<v Speaker 1>the tools that you might give them to deal with

0:32:57.196 --> 0:32:59.756
<v Speaker 1>these feelings. This will make I can see why this

0:32:59.756 --> 0:33:03.116
<v Speaker 1>would help make the judge feel better about about himself

0:33:03.116 --> 0:33:06.036
<v Speaker 1>and about his job and able to sleep at night. Yeah, which,

0:33:06.396 --> 0:33:09.516
<v Speaker 1>actually it's not going to actually affect the sentencing, is it. Well,

0:33:09.556 --> 0:33:13.436
<v Speaker 1>it could actually because again, think about a judge who says,

0:33:13.476 --> 0:33:16.436
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I didn't want to send it in anger.

0:33:17.716 --> 0:33:21.196
<v Speaker 1>Anger makes you very punitive. That's part of what it's for.

0:33:21.636 --> 0:33:24.436
<v Speaker 1>That's the tendency that it evokes in humans as to

0:33:24.476 --> 0:33:34.276
<v Speaker 1>attach responsibility and to take punitive action in response to it.

0:33:34.316 --> 0:33:36.836
<v Speaker 1>In a funny way, American judges are in the same

0:33:36.876 --> 0:33:41.716
<v Speaker 1>situation as the judges in Uzbekistan. They're being forced to

0:33:41.796 --> 0:33:45.516
<v Speaker 1>adapt to a new environment. Mister Trump tweeted last week

0:33:45.756 --> 0:33:48.836
<v Speaker 1>about the Seattle judge for ruling against his executive order

0:33:48.876 --> 0:33:52.876
<v Speaker 1>on immigration, only the American environment is increasingly driven by emotion,

0:33:53.196 --> 0:33:55.956
<v Speaker 1>saying so the opinion of this so called judge, which

0:33:56.036 --> 0:33:59.516
<v Speaker 1>essentially takes law enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous

0:33:59.516 --> 0:34:03.676
<v Speaker 1>and will be overturned. That judge, James Robart, immediately became

0:34:03.676 --> 0:34:06.596
<v Speaker 1>a target on social media, with one person even calling

0:34:06.676 --> 0:34:10.996
<v Speaker 1>him a dead man walking. This is Jeremy Fogel's worst nightmare.

0:34:11.276 --> 0:34:13.516
<v Speaker 1>So Judge Robart, who was the judge in Seattle who

0:34:13.556 --> 0:34:19.756
<v Speaker 1>did the travel band case, got over a million emails.

0:34:20.596 --> 0:34:22.756
<v Speaker 1>He got death threats, and the death threats the Marshal

0:34:22.836 --> 0:34:25.716
<v Speaker 1>Service determined were credible enough that they had to give

0:34:25.756 --> 0:34:29.396
<v Speaker 1>him twenty four hour protection. And what facilitated all of

0:34:29.436 --> 0:34:34.836
<v Speaker 1>that was was social media. Are there other judges like Robot?

0:34:34.596 --> 0:34:39.556
<v Speaker 1>Sure the Ninth Circuit judges who reviewed Robart's decision that

0:34:40.076 --> 0:34:43.796
<v Speaker 1>got the same as a judge Jeremy Fogel had upset

0:34:43.836 --> 0:34:46.516
<v Speaker 1>people with his rulings back in two thousand and six.

0:34:46.596 --> 0:34:48.956
<v Speaker 1>He had blocked the execution of a man who had

0:34:49.036 --> 0:34:52.996
<v Speaker 1>raped and strangled the seventeen year old girl. After Fogel's ruling,

0:34:53.196 --> 0:34:56.476
<v Speaker 1>people went crazy. But crazy in two thousand and six

0:34:56.716 --> 0:35:00.996
<v Speaker 1>is different from crazy now. The point is that everything

0:35:01.076 --> 0:35:05.276
<v Speaker 1>is amplified and sped up, and there's just no way

0:35:05.276 --> 0:35:08.276
<v Speaker 1>you can respond to that. Judges are precluded by the

0:35:08.676 --> 0:35:11.916
<v Speaker 1>Code of Conduct from commenting on pending cases. These forces

0:35:11.956 --> 0:35:16.636
<v Speaker 1>of it that are antagonistic to judicial authority. I've gained

0:35:16.756 --> 0:35:21.276
<v Speaker 1>enormous strength, and there's not a corresponding gain in in

0:35:21.316 --> 0:35:24.036
<v Speaker 1>the forces. In the strength of the forces that might

0:35:24.036 --> 0:35:28.516
<v Speaker 1>defend authority. That's right. I think there are steps along

0:35:28.556 --> 0:35:32.196
<v Speaker 1>the way, and that one of the most important qualities

0:35:32.476 --> 0:35:34.956
<v Speaker 1>judges in America have right now is that people believe

0:35:34.996 --> 0:35:39.036
<v Speaker 1>in their independence. Emily Basilon with one final thought, if

0:35:39.036 --> 0:35:42.036
<v Speaker 1>that starts to break down in a really serious way,

0:35:42.396 --> 0:35:48.436
<v Speaker 1>then even if they technically remain independent, wouldn't they start

0:35:48.436 --> 0:35:51.116
<v Speaker 1>to feel tempted more and more to do whatever is

0:35:51.156 --> 0:35:55.356
<v Speaker 1>politically expedient. But if they stop behaving in any plausible

0:35:55.396 --> 0:35:58.036
<v Speaker 1>way as if they're independent, then aren't we on our

0:35:58.076 --> 0:36:05.596
<v Speaker 1>way to Uzbekistan? America Obviously isn't Uzbekistan. The Uzbek judges

0:36:05.636 --> 0:36:08.596
<v Speaker 1>lived in a black box. The American judge lives in

0:36:08.636 --> 0:36:12.956
<v Speaker 1>a plex a glass cage. The Uzbeks had no ability

0:36:12.996 --> 0:36:16.116
<v Speaker 1>to criticize their system of justice or even to see

0:36:16.116 --> 0:36:19.716
<v Speaker 1>how it really worked. We watch our judges as they've

0:36:19.756 --> 0:36:23.796
<v Speaker 1>never been watched before. It's not that all eyes are

0:36:23.876 --> 0:36:27.596
<v Speaker 1>upon judges when they do their jobs. It's that all

0:36:27.636 --> 0:36:29.796
<v Speaker 1>eyes are upon them when they do their jobs in

0:36:29.876 --> 0:36:33.676
<v Speaker 1>unpopular ways. When some subset of the population feels that

0:36:33.676 --> 0:36:37.716
<v Speaker 1>it's being handed a cucumber when it deserves a grape.

0:36:38.396 --> 0:36:41.756
<v Speaker 1>People from the Supreme Court of Ukraine came to visit

0:36:42.356 --> 0:36:45.476
<v Speaker 1>and so in this meeting with them, and they say, well,

0:36:45.476 --> 0:36:47.236
<v Speaker 1>you know what happens when you rule against the government,

0:36:47.436 --> 0:36:49.956
<v Speaker 1>and so nothing, you know, if the government doesn't like

0:36:49.996 --> 0:36:52.356
<v Speaker 1>the ruling, they appeal, you know, but nothing happens to me,

0:36:52.876 --> 0:36:56.236
<v Speaker 1>you know. And they thought I was being disrespectful, that

0:36:56.276 --> 0:36:58.956
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't being truthful with them. He was being truthful.

0:36:59.716 --> 0:37:02.276
<v Speaker 1>But there's more than one way to attack the independence

0:37:02.316 --> 0:37:06.556
<v Speaker 1>of judges. You don't need to completely eliminate it. All

0:37:06.596 --> 0:37:09.396
<v Speaker 1>you need to do is to generate sufficient mistry trust

0:37:09.436 --> 0:37:12.996
<v Speaker 1>of their judgments, and then it isn't long before every

0:37:13.116 --> 0:37:16.276
<v Speaker 1>judge is just a little bit frightened to do her job.

0:37:16.956 --> 0:37:19.516
<v Speaker 1>The Ninth Circuit we're gonna have to look at that,

0:37:19.956 --> 0:37:22.636
<v Speaker 1>because every case, no matter where it is, they file it.

0:37:22.676 --> 0:37:26.716
<v Speaker 1>And what's called the Ninth Circuit. This was an Obama judge.

0:37:27.156 --> 0:37:30.876
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you what, It's not gonna happen like

0:37:30.996 --> 0:37:36.796
<v Speaker 1>this anymore. She tests her rock now against the wall.

0:37:36.956 --> 0:37:39.596
<v Speaker 1>She needs to give it to us and cumber again.

0:37:42.956 --> 0:37:47.316
<v Speaker 1>There's one big practical difference between experimental monkeys and human beings.

0:37:48.556 --> 0:37:51.516
<v Speaker 1>The monkeys at least pretend to respect their referees, the

0:37:51.516 --> 0:37:55.156
<v Speaker 1>people who work with them, and the scientists really do

0:37:55.236 --> 0:37:58.236
<v Speaker 1>want the best for the monkeys. The researchers piss them

0:37:58.236 --> 0:38:01.036
<v Speaker 1>off by giving one a cucumber and another a grape,

0:38:01.876 --> 0:38:04.836
<v Speaker 1>but they don't allow them to stay pissed off. And

0:38:04.956 --> 0:38:08.116
<v Speaker 1>how long do the feelings linger? Oh, then I don't know.

0:38:08.196 --> 0:38:10.996
<v Speaker 1>We usually by the end of the experiment, because these

0:38:11.036 --> 0:38:12.876
<v Speaker 1>monkeys live in the group, they don't live in these

0:38:13.356 --> 0:38:16.076
<v Speaker 1>test chambers. By the end of the experiment, we give

0:38:16.116 --> 0:38:18.876
<v Speaker 1>them a lot of food and all very happy, and

0:38:18.916 --> 0:38:21.236
<v Speaker 1>then they are sent back to the group. So we

0:38:21.316 --> 0:38:23.876
<v Speaker 1>never know how long how long they're mad, because we

0:38:24.476 --> 0:38:28.516
<v Speaker 1>don't want them to be frustrated by the experiment. People

0:38:28.516 --> 0:38:32.756
<v Speaker 1>aren't given that chance. Our experiment is called life, and

0:38:32.836 --> 0:38:36.916
<v Speaker 1>it's frustrating when we see unfairness. We aren't sent to

0:38:36.996 --> 0:38:40.436
<v Speaker 1>some decompression chamber to calm down before rejoining our fellow

0:38:40.516 --> 0:38:45.636
<v Speaker 1>human beings. We look around for something or someone to attack,

0:38:46.436 --> 0:39:05.076
<v Speaker 1>and at some point we see the judge. I'm Michael Lewis,

0:39:05.476 --> 0:39:09.236
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening to Against the Rules. Against the Rule

0:39:09.396 --> 0:39:14.276
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. The show is

0:39:14.316 --> 0:39:18.076
<v Speaker 1>produced by Audrey Dilling and Katherine Giredo, with research assistance

0:39:18.196 --> 0:39:22.356
<v Speaker 1>from Zoe, Oliver Gray and Beth Johnson. Our editor is

0:39:22.436 --> 0:39:28.156
<v Speaker 1>Julia Barton. Mia Lobell is our executive producer. Our theme

0:39:28.276 --> 0:39:31.876
<v Speaker 1>was composed by Nick Brittel, with additional scoring by Seth Samuel,

0:39:32.556 --> 0:39:36.756
<v Speaker 1>mastering by Jason Gambrel. Our show was recorded by Tofa

0:39:36.836 --> 0:39:42.116
<v Speaker 1>Ruth at Northgate Studios in Berkeley. Special thanks to our founders,

0:39:42.596 --> 0:39:45.076
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Weisberg and Malcolm Gladwell.