WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Giant Opportunity?

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Clubs. Are you ready for

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>It is Friday, October ninth, twenty twenty, season sixteen, episode

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>number forty one. Welcome to the latest edition of The Break.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got so much to talk about today. We've got

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of news here heading into the show,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna spend quite a bit of time talking

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>about Tyren Smith and what that means for the rest

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of this team for the rest of this season. We'll

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>also get you guys ready for Cowboys versus Giants, will

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the offense versus Giants defense,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and also Cowboys defense versus the Giants offense, and then

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to predictions. See how these guys think the

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>game will play out this Sunday at three thirty at

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>at and T Stadium. We got to start though with

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Tyren Smith during his press conference this morning. Mike McCarthy

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>made it clear, I guess made the announcement that it

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is now official that Tyren Smith will have surgery on

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>his neck and that means he will be lost for

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the season. That now makes two offensive linemen Cowboys were

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>expecting to have two of their better offensive linement they

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>were expecting to have that are now out for the year.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>When you include Lyle Collins, if you want to go

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>back to last year, three starters that are now no

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>longer going to be on this team for the rest

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>or at least playing for this team for the rest

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of the year, when you throw in Travis Frederick. That

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.919
<v Speaker 1>all being said, I want to get reactions to this news.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with Unick. I hope he's okay. You know,

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope he's okay for not just not playing. But

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is he's at a point his career

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's a that's an injury that you don't want

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to mess around with. Of course, he's done everything that

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>one individual can do. They haven't been to the Super Bowl,

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, but he's done as great as you know,

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>He's had a phenomenal career. I'm not saying he's done.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I hope he's okay. I hope this is just a

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>setback for this year to get back and get ready

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to go. Yes, they're gonna miss him, and let them

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know how much he's gonna be missed.

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>But I just for his sake, man, I hope, I

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>hope he comebacks. Ope he can come back next year

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and this will be he'll be better for this surgery.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Amber Well, you know it's something serious when he gets

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to the point where they decide to get him to

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>get surgery, because a guy like Tyrn, I mean, he's

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the toughest players I've ever seen in the

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>time that I've been following football. I mean, it's amazing

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the things that he's been able to endure, endure and

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>then go through. So I know that it must be

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad that to the point that it's gonna end

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season for him being submitted to

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a surgery. But like Nick said, I do hope that

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that it's completely just career ending. I

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>know that this is something that Tyrant has been dealing with,

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>not just the next but just his back in general.

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>He's been dealing with for several years. So hopefully it's

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>he's able to make it through and come back next

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>year better Dave. In a weird way, I'm kind of relieved,

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I mean, obviously it sucks that Tyrn

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>can't play. It's going to be a challenge. You know,

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you got what two starts out of him, so you

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>got to make your way through fourteen games without one

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the best two or three left tackles in football.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's kind of a relief just that you know,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>hopefully he feels better, Hopefully he can get this taken

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>care of and play a few more years where he's

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>relatively healthy, because this guy has just been in pain

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>for like five years, and you know, we're in the

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>locker room, we're around the team like, I don't you know.

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It's Romo esque the way that this guy has just

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>dealt with nagging problems and it's been five years at

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>this point. So I'm relieved that he's gonna hopefully get

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it taken care of the lineup. But in a weird way,

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a relief on the Cowboys end that

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know you're not gonna wake up on Sunday and

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh crap, it's flaring up on Tyron again,

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to downgrade him, and I you know,

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to talk trash on Tyront. I know

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>he works as hard as he can to get in

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, but you just kind of have some certainty

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that he is down and not part of this season anymore,

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have that uncertainty. Let's talk about what

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this means for this offense. We've looked at the Cowboys

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>now through four games, and I think we all agree

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they are a high powered, very potent offense, and some

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of that they've had to do without Tyrant. The one

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>thing I look at, though, is I think they've only

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and you guys may have a different difference of opinion here,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think they face two premier pass rushers so

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>far this year. Aaron Donald Miles Garrett. Both of them

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>had their way with this offensive line. They had moments

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in those games when they created problems for this offensive line.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>As you get farther into this season, you're gonna face

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>some better defenses at times that pass rush. You can

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>think what you want to think about Washington's defense, but

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>their pass rush is outstanding. They got some real good

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>players up front that can rush the pass or you

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>look at a defense is like Baltimore, and I think

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna be some some challenges for this offense.

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>How much do you guys think this changes how potent

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this offense can be with now the loss of Tyren

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Smith for the year, not just for a couple of games,

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>not just for a half, but for the entire season.

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with you, Dave. I mean, they haven't

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>They've had Tyrn for half of these games, and in

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the ones that they didn't have them, they still looked

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>plenty of potent to me, And I mean, of course

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a problem. Of course, it's gonna suck.

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have played a couple of premier pass rushers,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>but they've also gotten a little bit lucky in the

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>sense that Seattle in Atlanta don't. They don't have that.

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>The Giants aren't going to have that on that level

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. But let's talk after that Washington game. They've

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>got about ninety five badass pass rushers, So yeah, there

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be There's gonna be some rough patches for sure,

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but um, Dave at least shown that they can still

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>put up yards and points without these guys in the lineup,

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's gonna be some moments that scare me and

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>should scare everybody, But I don't. I don't think it's

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be so bad that they're going to revert to

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>looking like, you know, like twenty eighteen prior to the

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Cooper trade. I think they can still you know, be efficient. Amber,

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I agree, We've seen it happened. I mean, we've seen

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a game where they had to play without tiring and

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they've made it work. My only concern would be, just

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>let the off clean up your game, clean it off

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, to start moving the offense from the

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the game, and not wait until something that

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Derek about a week ago. You know, the

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>question is like, Okay, are they playing better maybe because

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the defense is starting to get tired a little bit

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and kind of loosening it up during the game. So

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you cannot let that happen. You need to find a

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>way to figure it out from the beginning of the game,

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>first half of the game and get him moving because

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not always gonna work out. As we've seen, it

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter how much they try to come back. It

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean that you're gonna walk out of that

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>game winning. But to go back to your question, we've

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>seen it happen, so I do think that they're capable

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of making it work. Well. I think it's going to

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>be a problem in the run game. I mean just

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>because and then it has been a problem. You can

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to offset a pass rush and

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>by just throwing the ball quickly and get it out

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of your hands and maybe help Chip and all that stuff.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to actually trying to run the

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>ball people, you know, we forget that about Tyron Smith,

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not forget, but I think his his athletic ability for

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>his size is something that we always talk about. But

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he's got power too, of course, and he helps in

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that run game. And I think that they're just gonna

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>miss that, you know, they're just like they miss lyall

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Collins is power as well. So that's where and that

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>affects their balance. And we've talked about this before. And

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you get down in the red zone you have sometimes

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it's harder to run the ball in their short yardage.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just they're going to continue to miss it.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And she just says clean it up. That sounds good,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but you're talking about players that are now inexperience and

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>their game isn't clean, you know, because they're young, they're

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really they just got they just got here. Um, you know,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like they're gonna I don't know who's gonna

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>start it this week, but it sounds like it could

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that you know, it's bounced around on

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>practice squads that might be starting this week. Yeah, let's

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>before we get to that. I do want to talk

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 1>about where we think this this thing falls as far

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>as who's going to be playing at what position. But

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get opinions from Dave and Amber

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>regarding which you just talked about, how much does this

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>affect the running game? Which do you think is more

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>affected by the loss of Tyren Smith for the season,

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the past game or the run game? Amber, I think

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely the running game. I mean, we've seen them being

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>able to get the passing game going, but as far

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>as the running game, Ezekiel Elia hasn't been able to

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be as productive as he's been in previous years, and

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's something that they are lacking in himself too. Obviously,

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>these errors where he gets the ball loose and all

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think that's something that he can clean up himself.

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>And then as far as the running game goes once

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I truly believe that once they solidify the offensive line,

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>and I know that there are some inexperienced guys are

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>just not the amount of experience as your previous starter

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>tackles that you had before. But sorry, I'm rambling a

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit basically what I'm trying to say, once you

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>figure out and clean up the offensive line, solidify it,

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think that eventually it's gonna take a couple

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of weeks for Ezekiel Elio to be able to get

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>his running game back into place and be able to

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more productive than what we've seen

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>so far. Dave, No, it's actually it's a really good point.

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And I hadn't I hadn't considered it because I'm I

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>just want to ring wing it around all the time.

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's it's probably gonna not be great. You're

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss that, but just throw the ball. Zeke's a

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>great pass protector, so that should help you out in

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that regard. I mean, I have absolute faith that the

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>passing game can still can still be viable. I'll be

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>interested to see what the running game can get going

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>with so many moving parts, I would expect it to

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>not look amazing. You know, I just thought of this.

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You might actually might help your running game just from

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're going to help your tackle, whoever

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>it is. I mean, I think Blake Bell's gonna get

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>more snaps this week. You're gonna keep the tight ends

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in more. And by doing that, you might see more

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.719
<v Speaker 1>looks on your defensive front on the defense to run

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball, you know, and by doing that, because then

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have better blockers in place to help. But

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>then you know, Dak might look out and go, we

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>should just change this into a draw or run here,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And so therefore you might see that because of the

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.599
<v Speaker 1>first personnel they're forced to play to help. Yeah, that

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>could happen. The one part that I'm a little bit

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>concerned about when it comes to all of this is

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the best thing that the Cowboys passing game

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>does is go down feel. That's the part that they

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>can create these really big plays and they can quickly

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>get back into a ball game that they fall behind

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>him because they have that ability to go down feel.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 1>If teams look at this and say, hey, they don't

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have the time to be able to go downfield, or

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>if we got a good enough pass rush to what

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't give them the time to go down feel.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>What you do is neutralize what the Cowboys do best

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in their passing game, in my opinion, And if you

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>do that, that makes it tough on you on both sides,

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>because not only will you not be able to do

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>what you do best in the passing game, but teams

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about the deep ball as much.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>That means they can bring that safety down. That means

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they can stop the run. They got an extra guy

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to stop the run. So I think all the way around,

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'll be playing. I'll be looking at, is

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>can the Cowboys keep that part of their off that's

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>still flowing. Can they still go down feel and utilize

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Michael Gallop in those moments in games

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when they they're gonna go down feel? And if they

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>can't do that consistently, I think that's gonna be one

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of the lynch pins that could really really hurt this offensive.

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>This offense. Let's let's talk a little bit about the

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.599
<v Speaker 1>offensive line and how you think it will be constructed,

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and I want to look at this from a couple

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of different perspectives. Obviously, this morning on the radio and

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>one on five to out of three the fan here locally,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Jerry mentioned something kind of hinting around at the possibility

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of Zach Martin moving to tackle. Let's talk about, first

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, what do you think the Cowboys will do?

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily what we what you want to see, what

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think the Cowboys will do for this week

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on the five positions on the offensive line. Let's start.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with you, Nick, since you're having so

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>much consternation over there. I mean, it's really tough. The

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>only thing I think you can just hang your hat

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>on it is to say that Tyler Beyotest will be

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>its center. Yeah, I mean, everything else is really up

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in the air. I think we know, though, I mean

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I would guess I'll take a stab at it. I mean,

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be Brandon Knight left left tackle,

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Connor left guard, Beyodi at center, Zach at right guard,

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and then a right tackle. Let me get my coin

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>out and flip here Senat maybe because because Jerry mentioned

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>him on the radio, and I just think that they

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>do watch tape and they see Steele. I just can't

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>imagine Steel being the starter, but I think you will be.

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You think Still's gonna be the starter? Still Steel for now? Yeah,

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't love it. I mean, you know

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 1>what I heard about Snat was like, man, he's a

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>really good basketball player. And I'm like, well, you know,

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not playing the Mavericks this week. They're actually playing

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Giants. I don't know what that helps you,

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>but but athletic. I get a Partnell type athletic, you know,

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>good quick feet and all that kind of stuff. Amber,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the five this weekend? I mean

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with Nick and say the same thing

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't obviously want to put I don't want to

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>put Steal out there. But as far as the other guys,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you obviously the Cowboys are gonna know more than we do,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but me personally, I don't. I can't speak much about

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the other guys that they brought in because I haven't

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>seen any I haven't been able to see much from them,

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be tough. I mean, do you go

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with the guy that you haven't really played just yet,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>or do you go back to what you already know?

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like pick pick with your poison. Which one do

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you prefer? Do you take a risk and plug the

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>new guy in and just see how it works, or

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>do you go back to the chance of hoping that

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Steel just plays a little bit better than he's done

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in the previous games. But as of right now, and

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a tough question, I really don't know. I see

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>every possibility as a something that could happen, because we've

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>seen that McCarthy is not afraid to plug a guy in.

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't matter if like, oh, this was the

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>starter last week. He doesn't care. He's gonna suit it

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>up if he needs too. Dave, don't sell yourself short Amber.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You like to think that the Cowboys know better than you,

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>But everybody in America wanted Brandon Knight at right tackle

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>last week, and they went with Terren Steele, and they

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>admitted they were wrong after about fifteen snaps. I don't.

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's impossible to predict who plays right tackle

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>unless you're allowed at practice, which we are not. It'll

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>be I think, I do think they're going to try

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to stick with an actual tackle at tackle for as

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>long as possible. It might be Steel, it might be

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Mills, it might be Greg snot. I I don't

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling. I know for a fact that they've

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>tried all three, like all three of them are are

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>getting reps. I think they're gonna try one of them,

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and Zach is going to be your your break glass

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in case of emergency. And if that happens, you probably

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>plug Connor McGovern in at right guards since Joe Looney's hurt. So,

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know who will get the start,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but I would guess they're going to try to stick

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with the tackle. It's amazing that you're going into this

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>game and there's four legitimate options to play right tackle,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>three of them that day, you know, just mentioned and

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even throw Jordan Mills out there, who's played

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the most of anybody. He played for the Bills, and

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was actually here for like a few

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>hours back. I don't remember what year. Nobody remembered him

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>except for Rob Phillips, who remembers everything, and he did remember.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it was twenty fifteen, but yeah, yeah, which

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is the year that everyone tried to forget. But I

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just think that there's so many options there, and ye,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Dave said it best. These are the three and then

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>because it is a Rob Peter to pay Paul type situation,

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.239
<v Speaker 1>if you move Zach Martin out to tackle, and then

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you have the guard because now you're gonna put a

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>guard in there that's never played. So yeah, I mean

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at Georgian question. But yeah, I was gonna

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>ask whatever happened to Ron Leary. I know he came

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in and was looked at and all that, but I

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>never heard anything actually happening with that is them you

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>know where. I know you weren't necessarily looking for a guard,

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, if you think of moving

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>side Martin maybe to the tackle position, maybe Leary is

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>an option by guard. Yeah, I mean, I really don't

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>know why it broke down. I don't know if it

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was money, if it was not a good fit, if

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't in good shape. I might have just been

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>time and they were like, right now, we'll hole still

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and we know that that's in our back pocket, and

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe now they got to go to their back Well, okay,

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they are going to do this, and this isn't their

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>back pocket, this is a side pocket. I guess I

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but they're gonna bring Adam Redman, and I

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>wish I could see the look I get Derek here. No,

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>look yeah, side probably not. He's been here, he's easy,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>he's played, he's played different positions. I think he's actually

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>played some center. I think he's center guard. Yeah, so

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it's more of a backup. I mean,

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's here. But of course, now you know

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to you have to be on the radar

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for two months before you can get something. I mean, no,

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it's six days. But I think I think he's going

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in the COVID protocol for to to get

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, take the test, so he can be ready,

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>ready to play. I mean at this point, when I

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>look at this team, I'm I'm just like, Okay, you

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>got a guy like Jordan Mills who has played a lot, Yeah,

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and on an offensive line where that's a premium. Right now,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I would personally say throw Jordan Mills out there. If

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep if you want to keep Zach

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>where he is, and you don't want to create you

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>want to create as little extra movement as possible, I

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think you go with Brandon Knight at left tackle, and

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I think you put Jordan Mills in there at right

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle and see how that goes. If something should fall

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>apart and it doesn't work, then I would not have

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a slightest hesitation in moving Zach Martin. And then let's

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>see what this guy who you had a second round

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>grade in com McGovern what can he do a guard?

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see you. I know that they

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>may be seeing him every day in practice. I just

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>want to see what can he do? Also real quick?

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I know we go to break, but cam Irving is

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>also going to mix into this. Not this week, but

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like next week he could be there as well.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 1>But again, again cam Irving, the same cam Irving who

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys decided Terrence Steele should play out exactly right

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>over him. Yeah, all right, so we're gonna take our

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>first break. When we come back, let's talk about Cowboys

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>versus Giants. Will hit the offense, we'll hit the defense.

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>May even have a question on special teams. We'll talk

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>about that when we come right back this Dallas Cowboys

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Radio. We're back in a tasty treat that's

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new doctor Pepper and

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>cream soda. Let's take a listen Doctor Baba cream Soda?

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Is he a new combone? Let's music to my ears? Okay?

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Tis Music's mayars and mouths? New doctor pepper and cream soda?

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>What deliasis do bay want to use? What the pros use?

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>How about the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now you can get the Jack Black Starter,

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites plus a full sized intense therapy lip bomb.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys The Jack Black Starter ten bucks,

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>free shipping since eighteen sixty five. Stetson hats are American

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>maid with Pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Want

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to show your Texas and Team pride two You can

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>by purchasing your own stetson. You can look just like

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>how the flag guys do on field every home game.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys.

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And your favorite football team. Get yours today at shop

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com.

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It's funny as we travel places, often we find the

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>places we want to travel aren't really places at all.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>They're people, their grandparents, moms, old friends, and new nephews.

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why at American Airlines we've been using enhanced cleaning

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>measures so you can feel confident every step until you

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>get to them. So, as always, our people can't wait

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 1>to take you to yours American Airlines. You are why

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we fly back to the break. Help your fellow Cowboy

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Nation fans in their fight against cancer by purchasing Dallas

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys crucial catch gear. Support a great cause and look

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>good doing it. Visit your local Dallas Cowboys Pro shop

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>or shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com. Welcome back at

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>his the second segment of the show Life in the

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>s WBC Mortgage Studios at the Star, we've talked about

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Tyren Smith in the offensive line and what that will

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>mean for this offense. Now let's focus in a little

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>bit on this upcoming game. Cowboys take on the Giants

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday three thirty at at and T Stadium. Let's

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>first start by can I say something real quick about

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyren Smith. Sure never alluded to it, but I just

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>want to throw this point too. How great is he

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to be to need surgery? I mean, he needed if

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>he needed it now, he needed it last week too.

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>To need surgery on your neck would still play eighty

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>two snaps And I don't remember really a problem from

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>him in that game. And you know, Miles Garrett wasn't

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>even sniff in that side of the field. He didn't

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>have to, I mean, but still he didn't have any issues.

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>He played eighty two snaps. He didn't feel good after

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the game at all, Like you tell. I saw him

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>actually walking into the slower than usual because Tyren's got

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that slow glidewalk anyways, but slower than usual. But he like,

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>just to be able to play at that level and

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>need next urgury, it's amazing. I mean, he he is

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>by far. I mean, he could never play another snap

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and he'll be in the Ring of Honor and Hall

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of Fame. I think. I think hall of fame as

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a person who battled neck issues for a long time

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately had to have neck surgery. I can

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you it is the worst existence. Not possible, but

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it sucks because sleeping at night, which is the time

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>you really need to recharge, that's a luxury when you

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>got neck issues. And so if he's been dealing with

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>this for years, my hat's off to him. And by

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's on top of that going out and

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>getting into a car wreck every weekend. Basically that I

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>respect every respect. Yeah, just not just every weekend, every

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>minute I heard. I mean, I herniated a disc in

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>my back like three years ago, and anybody that knows

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>me knows that I'd still whine about it, like like

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>bending over to pick stuff up sucks. And he played

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>he played football with that for months, for for months,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>during a several years stretch. The man went out there

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with that and had people, you know, yeah, getting into

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a car wreck every week. I mean, he's the toughest

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>m effort I've ever spent time around in my life.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So the moral to this story is he is a

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>bad dude, and we all respect what he's done. And hope,

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>as you started this conversation with Nick, hope that this

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>means that he has, first of all, that he has

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a better quality of life than what he's been experienced.

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>These last few years. But on top of that, hopefully

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it means he can come back and he can continue

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>his career and he can play well for the remainder

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of his career because he is an outstanding player and

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a really tough seven straight Pro Bowls. Yep, it's gonna snap. Yep,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna you know, it's gonna end obviously. All right,

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>this game, let's jump into it. Let's talk Cowboys versus Giants.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's start first with the Giant offense versus a Dallas defense.

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>How concerned to you about Daniel Jones and his ability

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to scramble? Last year? He I mean last week he

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>was tied for most rushing yards on their team. I

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think with forty five he is Throughout his career, he's

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>been a guy that certainly he can get out of

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the pocket, and he can he can make you pay

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. How concerned to you that about that?

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>With this particular defense, Let's start first with you Amber. Look,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>last week, I was convinced. I was convinced that the

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys were gonna have a great game. I had my

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>hopes up. I believed. I thought, Man, this is gonna

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>be the games where the defense is able to kind

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of start turning things around and play a little bit better.

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>That obviously didn't happen. It was actually worse than what

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been seeing so this weekend, regardless of them playing

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the Giants and the Giants offense being absolutely terrible, I

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>am worried about every aspect of the game. Doesn't matter

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's the Giants. I do not trust the Cowboys defense,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>even though I still believe that they're gonna hopefully play

0:25:55.119 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>better this weekend. They should Otherwise I'm just gonna I'll

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>give up talking about the defense. But right now, any

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>little thing so he's scrambling, yes, that's gonna be a problem.

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys defense has had an issue with stopping the

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 1>running game and trying to attack the pocket getting there

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and attack the quarterback. So anything that they do, any

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>little thing like that, any little scramble, yes, the Cowboys

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have to string scramble behind him and go

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>after him. So yeah, it's gonna be a problem, all right, Dave,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You know it really bums me out about Daniel Jones.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, like he's gonna be able to extend

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>some plays and they're gonna have to account for that.

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Probably pick up a first down or two that you

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>would prefer he not. But what bums me out about

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones is early scouting report on him at this

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>point in his career is that he's good for a

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>handful of really dumb decisions per game. Like, you know,

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have a lot of talent around him. He's

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>athletic enough to extend plays and he's gonna try to

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>force some things because he needs to. And what bums

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>me out is that I just don't trust the Cowboys

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of that, Like, why should we have

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>faith that they will? Like they don't get takeaways. They

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't this season, they haven't in seasons past. You know,

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>we saw a lot out of Treyvon Diggs in training

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>camp in terms of ball skills that hasn't translated to

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the season to this point, at least not as well

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as you would prefer. You know, I think he's had

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to drop picks, So it just sucks to think that

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he's probably gonna give you those opportunities. And I just

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>don't trust the Cowboys to take advantage of them. Yeah,

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>nobody that's playing in the game has an interception for

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, right, I think she is the only one,

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course Trayvon Diggs did force that fumble. But yeah,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do think that that I think the

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys will get some turnovers in this game. I think

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that they will this will be their best defensive performance

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of the game, I mean, this season. But um, you know,

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I just really is concerned about this one at all.

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not. I just I don't think I heard,

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was told today on the radio one

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>or five three that the Giants their vegas is saying

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that their point total will be what twenty one and

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 1>over under. That shocks me that I getting twenty one

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>points on the Cowboys. They're not. So I just think

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna this is not gonna be in a

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>close game. I really don't. Why are you so sure

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>about that? I just think that Giants are terrible, terrible,

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I think, but I think I think

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're terrible. And I know what you're about to say.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but I don't. I don't don't do anything

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>really well, and they Cowboys do one thing really well.

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see that. I think it's just gonna

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>be a fight about who gets punched in the face first.

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Cowboys will well this game. They'll

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. And if you do that to the Giants

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with the way their offense is set up, I think

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>all I'm saying is the Cowboys are gonna strike first,

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>strike first strike hard, no mercy, sir, you have no idea,

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>just to make sure you were gonna oh really well

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>score right, score the score on offense? They yeah, I

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>mean they score, they throw the ball, they pass around,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and I know that both tackles are out, but I

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>think that they'll ste that. I think they'll strike on

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the on the Giants first, and then I think that'll

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>force Daniel Jones and them to kind of have to

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>force the back in the game, and I don't think

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they will. I think the Cowboys win this one, probably

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>by three touchdowns. All right, let me throw the set.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You did that right now? Um, you got Jack Garrett

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>coming back to town. Obviously, the advantage of a guy

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>like Jayson who's been here for so long is that, uh,

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't know the scheme necessarily, he's not a part

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of the coaching meetings and all. A lot of stuff changes.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But what he doesn't know really well is the personnel.

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>If you were Jason Garrett and you were coming back

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to play the Cowboys, what particular player or position do

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you think you would be looking at to say that's

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the guy we need to exploit. Oh well, yeah, who

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is the guy that you're looking at right now saying

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the gap we're gonna go and exploit this

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>week because we know that we can get him in

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>these situations and we know we can take advantage of him.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with you same answers last week, and it

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>will be the same answer. I'm looking at five four

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>every shot I get if I'm the opponent. He is

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the lynchpin of the defense. He in the run defense

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as in coverage. You got a super athletic

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>tight end. I don't think the Cowboys are crazy enough

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to try to cover Evan Ingram with Jalen Smith, but

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to take advantage of space in

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the field and try him in the

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>right game see if he's up to it. Nope, he

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>was last week and until otherwise, until proven otherwise. I

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think of Jaylen Smith as like nick um, I didn't

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>hear that last thing that Dave just said, but um, yeah,

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody somebody called me while I was in the middle

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of making my point, thank you State Farm Auto Insurance

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>means you need to change airplane mode the guy I'm

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at. Sorry, oh man. I you know last week

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it was Treyvon Diggs, and I don't really know if

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that if it matters. I mean, it's just whoever the

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Giant's best best matchup is, because there's not one guy

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that that does things exceptionally well right now. So I

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's just wherever the matchup goes, you know, I

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>thought on hanging with the boys this week. Nate Newton

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>had a great point. He said, Eric Polstra knows it

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>knows exactly what Lebron James is, and he can't stop him.

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, so sometimes just knowing personnel doesn't always mean

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that you can stop him. That makes sense when you're

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about Lebron James. They don't have any Lebron James

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on this defense. They don't. I don't know that there

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>are guys on this team you're like on this defense.

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And that it was wow that that have shown that

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>if you like, I know how to get that guy,

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take you out at this game that you

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>all said you can't do it because he's just too good.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen that play. I don't have any Lebron

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>James on their side of the ball either. Maybe not

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>not bad example. Sorry I was told this week sometimes

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>my analogies are bad. Maybe if you flip the coin

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and you talked about Cowboys offense versus the Giants defense,

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the that's a good analogy. Maybe I don't know, Amber,

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? I got nothing from from Nick's comment? Like,

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what you said. What was your point?

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Everybody is wall sound like me. Now you're supposed to

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>sound better than me when when you speak. Look, but no,

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I honestly I have not been watching the Giants play

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this this year. I've seen some little highlights here and there,

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but overall, I don't I would assume that Jason Garrett

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is still the same Jason Garrett we've known for the

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>past why ten years. So with the way that the

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys defense is playing, I think that there's nothing that

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>scares me if I'm the opponent. There's no area that

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>scares me from the Cowboys defense other than al Donna Smith.

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, nobody else. So I think you just

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>spake and choose your battle depending on the best player

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that you got on your offense and the area that

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you as an offense would rather try to exploit. Well,

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, the one thing that I think

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we learned from Jason Garrett during his time here is

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole concept of the nameless, faceless opponent. And if

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the case and they're not really looking for matchups

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to exploit, then that helps the Cowboys, I think. But

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Dave. If there were one player,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it was one player, and Jason was willing to have

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>his offense kind of geared towards taking advantage of one player,

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you would probably look at it and even say,

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I know what teams did to us, and we can

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>go back through a number of teams that tried and

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>created opportunities for themselves to be able to isolate Jalen

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in coverage and when they did that a lot of

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>times they were successful. And so I do look at

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that matchup and that actually matches up with the one area,

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like Dave said, that's the one area that the Giants

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>offense actually have A pretty good player like Evan Ingram

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is a good tight end and he's a very athletic

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>tight end. So if I'm the Giants and if I'm

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett, I'll go into this game thinking how can

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I create opportunities to isolate j Jalen where he's gonna

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have to cover him, and then try to take advantage

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of that matchup because I think that is their best matchup,

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the Giants offense versus the Cowboys defense. All right, we're

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna take our final break. When we come back, We're

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna flip and talk a little bit about the Giants

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>defense versus the Cowboys offense before we end the show

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and get predictions. We'll be right back. This is Dallas

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio since eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>are American maid with pride right here in Texas, and

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Stetson is proud to be on the field with America's team.

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Want to show your Texas and Team pride two You

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>can by purchasing your own stetson. You can look just

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 1>like how the flag guys do on field at every

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>home game. Stetson Hats the official crown of all self

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours today

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at Shop Dallas Cowboys dot Com or at Stetson dot com.

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jay Novachek, former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys.

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day. I was the guy who always

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>got the tough yards and that's why I run with

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>John Deer today. In fact, I have a John Deer

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>three zero twenty five E tractor that can handle any

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 1>yardwork I need to do, even the tough yards way

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>out back. So if you have one acre or a thousand,

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>John Deer has the equipment that's just right for you.

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Visit a John Deer dealer today and run with us.

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>We are the official tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys.

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Want to use what the pros use? How about the

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now you can get the Jack Black Starter are

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the collection of cowboys locker room favorites for just ten

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.919
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack Clack

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorites plus a full size and tense therapy whip bomb.

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys the Jack Black Starter ten bucks,

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>free shipping. We're backing the tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and taste buds. It's new Doctor pepper and cream Soda.

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen, Doctor bad cream Soda. Is he

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a Newcombonet's music to my ears? Okay, doctor back time

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>pass music to my ears and mouth new Doctor pepper

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and Cream Soda. Delas, just do bay back to the break.

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>We're launching a search for one extraordinary Cowboys fan who

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is a positive influence. You're out and inspires others through

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>their love of the game. This is for the NFL

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Fan of the Year contest. Visit NFL dot com slash

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Fan of the Year now to learn more and nominate today.

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Miss Price, Miss Price, that is a good one. That's

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a very good I actually miss seeing Miss Price. Like

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>every game, home game, I would walk down sideline, I'd

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 1>run into Miss Price because she was always there. Now,

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>what he wants to bring in the studio? Sure, why not?

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if Miss Price is available. Not. No, we

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>can't bring her in here. No I can't do that.

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But no, I can't get them in here. Hey maybe, Hey,

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I always like seeing her if the

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys won. If they didn't win, then it was kind

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of because she was sad and all that, she still

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>was Miss Price when to lose, she still was Miss Price.

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>She could be here without the microphone and you would

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 1>hear her. Yes, he's absolutely all right, let's get back

0:37:55.880 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>into it. Let's let's joined the virtual call. Oh, put

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 1>it on. Yeah, we could. We could always get well,

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, we got to see if somebody's at

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>our house, second helper get on. I'm not sure she'll

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to get that technology, but well we could

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>try it. Just stereotype in how do you know, I

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>just know, dealing with my mom like sometimes it's a

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a challenge, so can get it done?

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll see, we'll see. All right, Um, let's

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about this Giants defense versus the Cowboys offense. When

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you look at the and I asked Bucky a lot

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>about this earlier this week, you look at the teams

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys have played. Obviously they've been really good

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>offensively statistically, but the one game when they were not

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was against the Rams. That defense, I think is ranked

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like tenth or eight somewhere in there in past defense.

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the first time since then that the Cowboys

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>will be facing a past defense that is statistically ranked

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that high. How much do you guys think that the

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>value is the success that we've seen from the Cowboys

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>offense in a lot of ways is about the defenses

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that they've played and the defense that they did play

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that was much better. They only scored seventeen points. Now

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they're entering a game. How much do you where that's

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the same case. How much do you think that that

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>may be what plays out here? It'll start first with you.

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's a good point. I mean, the Rams obviously

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>have one or two really good players. You know, and

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I've made this point. You know that the Cowboys every

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>game they face, they face somebody on the other side

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of the ball that's that you arguably the best at

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>their position, and every game that they've faced, and the

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Rams defense had two of them in the Ramsey and

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald. The Cowboys don't really have that unless you

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.439
<v Speaker 1>say the best guard. But guards aren't game changing really.

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:37.879
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think you make it a good point,

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but I don't I don't think. I think it's still

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>early in the season. I think sample size is still

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>low for that for rankings. I don't see that the

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Giants are going to be a team that the Cowboys

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>can't move the ball, and I bet you the Cowboys

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 1>will will hurt the Giants ranking this week. You know

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the interesting part about that, before I get to David Amber,

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is if you look at that game last week the

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Giants and the Rams played, it was, in my my opinion,

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.399
<v Speaker 1>somewhat similar to what you saw Cowboys Rams, And that's

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>what started making me think maybe that's a little bit

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>more of what you can expect this weekend. Now. I

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys offense is superior than to the Giants offense,

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but I do think it's a similar kind of matchup

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>where you might see something a little bit different. Let's

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>go to you Amber, what do you think. I hope

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not right as far as I mean, I know

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the statistics are statics is, but like Nick said, I

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>hope that we're not just creating this vision of what

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys offense might be based on this first month

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of the game, because then that's basically you're basically telling

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:45.839
<v Speaker 1>me that this offense might be worse than what we thought.

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Because if they're they faced worst defenses passing defenses, why

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 1>has it taken them so long to get the ball

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>moving and start connecting. Why until the last quarter of

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the game base to start moving everything. So I would

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 1>hope that that's not fully the case, and that there's

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. And I know the game cannot purely

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:15.399
<v Speaker 1>be judged based on statistics, but if that's the case,

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>then crap. You made me more concerned. Now, you know,

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I will throw this out though, amber early in the games,

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>that's typically when the turnovers have been happening. So I

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 1>do think that's a part of it why this offense

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>has not gotten off some of those faster starts that

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you want them to get off too. But but again

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I still think that you know, you look at this

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>offense overall, they have not played great defenses except for

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>one or and that's not even a great defense. That's

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a good defense. We'll get to see this weekend. Dave,

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? I respect the question, but respectfully,

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't give a damn about this sample size. It's

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>four games game one. Game one was against Ben Roethlisberger,

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.800
<v Speaker 1>who was coming off a full year layoff when he

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>had surgery on his arm. Game two was I believe

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>True Bisky, which we know how that's going for him.

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>The week three was Nick Nick Mullins, who threw for

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>three fifty by the way, and then uh yeah, and

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>then last week, you know, Jared Goff, Yeah, he had

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a pedestrian day. So what, I don't care. I think

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Dak will be fine. If Dak's not fine, it's because

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they can't keep him clean. Like, if they can keep

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 1>him relatively clean three sacks or less, he'll be absolutely fine.

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried about it at all, to the tune of,

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>do you think it'll be closer to what we've seen

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the final three games to weeks two, three, and four? Oh,

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just a week hopefully hopefully not like you should You

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>should not be throwing for four hundred yards unless you're

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>trying to dig yourself out of a hole or it's

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just like an all time shootout like the Romo game. Um,

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, hopefully hopefully it's not like that. But I mean, yeah,

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>he'll somewhere between two seventy five and three three thirty

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>something like. That's funny how he's, you know, statistically the

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>best in the in the NFL right now and he

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a three hundred yard passing game after four games, yeah,

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the two, but he doesn't have a three, you know,

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>which has always been like the standard of that. But

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, I think the Cowboys offense, even though

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it's four games, I think they figured things out way

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>better than the Rams game. I mean, I think that

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they they've understood how this offense works. They understand what

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>CD's able to do. The understanding of the tight end

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 1>can help him. You know. You know, Jarwin got hurt

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in that game and Schultz was trying to figure his

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>way out. Schultz is showing, you know, to be a

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit better or a lot better since then. So

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think that the offense has has really developed,

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's had to because they've been on the field

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for so long. But I think that they're a different

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>offense than they were playing against the Rams. All right,

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>let's flip over and I want to talk a little

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>bit about special teams here. Earlier this week, John Fossil

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>had a comment about Tony Pollard. Last week, he had

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>another misqe um, if you want to call it, that

0:43:58.000 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 1>there was a ball he thought was going to come

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to the end zone. He was gonna, you know, basically

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just kind of fair catch it. But um, he let

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it go and it actually bounces in the field of

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>play and he got to run and go grab it

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and try to return it. And Fossil's comment was he

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>misread it. It's unfortunate because it was it was the

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ball that we were looking for with the return that

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we called. We were aware that can't happen. Um. He's

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>had some other miscues this season, particularly in kick return situations.

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's time for the Cowboys to look

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>at a different option for their kick returner Nick oh

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a different option for him Lasik? Seriously, he dropped that

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:37.919
<v Speaker 1>ball against Seattle. He dropped that ball in the game.

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>That was a big play. And that and that Um

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in the game last week. You know, he had wide

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>open space and dacked through the ball in the flat

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and then of course he missed. How do he misread

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that that ball like that? I mean, honestly, I'm not

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to Joe Crown, but it could be it could

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>be a situation for that, like maybe he needs to

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>get his eyes checked. And I'm not I think he's

0:44:58.080 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good young player. I think he's

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be good. But I mean these are three

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like elementary style plays that he hasn't made, and maybe

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that is an issue. I mean because if you if

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at the ball and the kickoff and you

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to go into the end zone and

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 1>it stops at like the eight, that's a pretty big

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>difference of not being able to judge the ball amber.

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to be ignorant here, but whatever, I'm

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>still gonna ask the question, why is it so hard

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>to find a kick returner that can actually do well?

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Like the Cowboys? This has been an area where the

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys have been struggling for several years. Why is it

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>so complicated to find someone that can freaking make it work?

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm being serious, I don't understand. It's especially frustrating

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>because kick returns are almost obsolete, Like they don't they're

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>not really a big factor in the modern NFL. So

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you can't figure out how to make

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:00.040
<v Speaker 1>it work better than they have, it's it's unbelievable. And

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know not to jump in on ag, but yes,

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I would give the job to Cedric Wilson. I love

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard, but I mean you're talking about like dozens

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and dozens of yards of field position that you've compromised.

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It gets lost because last week was such a dumpster fire.

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But Cedric made such a great play on that one

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>punt that bounced and he snatched it right off the bounce.

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 1>He got six yards and got out of bounds, Like

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the epitome of hidden yardage. As soon as he

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 1>made that play, I was like, give him the kick

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>returner job, like, I trust his hands, I trust him

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to make it work. Like Cedric Wilson would be a

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>okay with me. Yeah, that's a various dew point. I

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thought the same thing during the game, that that was

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a good that's understanding and having awareness on special teams

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:44.320
<v Speaker 1>as a return, which I don't know that they necessarily

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have with po He did the same thing later, but

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>then he kind of went backwards. Yeah, you know, Dave

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>makes a good point. Now we gotta make picks here,

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but they makes a good point about usually the kick

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>return is a part of the game that's been lost.

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>I wonder after the Patriots game of what happened last

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>year and seeing all the kickoffs and Tony Poler was

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a big part of that that maybe teams aren't deciding,

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, let's do that pooch kick that goes

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to the five yard line or whatever, and let's try

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to pen them down there. Hey, you can you know,

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe Poler doesn't make the right decision be they can

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have a block in the back. There's forty percent of

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>all kickoff returns have blocks in the back, and so

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you could be starting at the seven or eight yard line.

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think the teams are maybe going and purposely

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 1>doing that, not just giving Dak the ball to twenty five.

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's kick this thing up. We don't think Pauler will

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>go to the house. We think there's a better shot

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll start inside their ten. And that's happening. And this

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>will be the week when Tony Poler takes it to

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the house bad. It'll be how it goes. Hey, Rico Dowlind,

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I like Cedric Wilson, but what about Rico Dabble. It's

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a running back. He's a big you know, he's kind

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of a thick guy. I mean, i'd like to see him.

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see running backs in that because they

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have the vision for the holes and stuff like that.

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But somebody, I think it's time to make a change.

0:47:58.040 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 1>That I really do. All right, let's going to get

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a some picks here before we end the show. And

0:48:02.440 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start with you today. Tell us what's going

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to happen is game final score? Well, if the Cowboys

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>were playing another opponent, I would pick the other opponent

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>because the Cowboys don't deserve my trust right now and

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 1>in my faith, in my happiness. But because it is

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, I don't the Giants that even even worse.

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think the Cowboys do find a way to win.

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think that their numbers statistically, as far as

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the passing game is not gonna look as good as

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we've been seeing in the past few games. I think

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys, regardless of the old line issues, I

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:43.359
<v Speaker 1>think the running game is gonna be able to get

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>kick in this time and get going. So Zeke, I

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:49.320
<v Speaker 1>do see him having a better game in the Cowboys.

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:53.279
<v Speaker 1>It's just gonna come down to which team scores the

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>most points. It's gonna be a game between offense, which

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 1>offense can score the most and that's for sure in

0:48:59.840 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>my mind right now, can be the Cowboys. And final score.

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be like twenty fourteen, something like,

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:16.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, Dave, the Giants are terrible, but like we're

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 1>not talking about you know, they're not that I don't

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're like oh and sixteen terrible, Like they're not

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>like a wheel's off dumpster fire. I think there are

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 1>respect respectable kind of terrible. They've I mean they've been

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in every game that they've played. You know, the forty

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>nine ers blew them out on the scoreboard, but that

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>game was close until midway through the you know, early

0:49:36.360 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, midway through the third. So I just I

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>expect to hate this game. I expect this to be

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a very fresh I mean, the Cowboys are going to

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to be sloppy in my opinion, until they get

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>some of these injuries taken care of. Um. But the Giants,

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Giants offense can't keep up with them.

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's not realistic. But I see, you know,

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I see Dad getting sacked a couple times, installing some drives.

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they have to settle for some field goals that

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to. So I think it's gonna be frustrating.

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm thinking like a thirty and thirty to twenty

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>one win that just nobody feels happy about. All right, No,

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with that. With both those picks, I think

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys will will blow them out. I think my

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>prediction is that I'll get three text messages from people

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that say, why can't they just do this every game,

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 1>which their answer is that the Giants aren't on the

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:34.320
<v Speaker 1>schedule every week. I don't. I think the offense is

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>clicking to the point where they are going to be

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.360
<v Speaker 1>too strong for the Giants to keep up with. Defensively,

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, offense will be trying it'll make the Cowboys

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>defense look as good as it's been, which isn't really

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that hard to do, you know. I just think the

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys win this one handily. I think they win by

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. I'm gonna say thirty four thirteen, all right.

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually I'm a little torn on this game, just

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>because the more I think about it, the more i'm

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the more I think that this Giant's defense is a

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than everybody's given them credit for. I think,

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and I do think the way that the style of

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>play off way that they will try to play the

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys will make it to where the Cowboys don't have

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to just go all in. I don't think,

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Cowboys are in a closer game, they're

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>probably not putting up all the yards and the points

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that they've put up in these other weeks either, and

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's going to be a game that's

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>more similar to what we saw the Week one. I

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>do think the Cowboys win, though, and I think the

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are the better team, so I think they'll get

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:34.719
<v Speaker 1>some I think they'll get more point production than what

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:36.919
<v Speaker 1>they got against the Rams, but I still think it'll

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 1>be a relatively lower scoring game compared to the games

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that they've played in weeks two, three, and four. I

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys get the win, but I think it

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is a twenty four to sixteen win. That is that's

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty non eventful, if that's a good way to

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 1>put it. After you've been through all these other weeks

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of these big, high flying plays. I think it's gonna

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>feel more like that Week one game where it just

0:51:57.160 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of plots along. Cowboys will do some things well,

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll do some things not so well. The Giants will

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 1>play a little bit better offensively than they've played in

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the past because this Cowboys defense will give them opportunities

0:52:06.960 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And again, I think Cowboys went twenty

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>four sixteen. All right, we appreciate you join us. We're

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>back on Monday, we'll tell you what went right and

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>what went wrong to them for Nick Eatn, Dave Hellman,

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Amber Garcia. I am Derek Eagles and this has been

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. Hook Them.

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:52:26.960 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.