WEBVTT - Friday Flight - Robots, Rent Control, & Taylor Swift #438

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How the Money. I'm Joel and I'm Matt,

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and today we're discussing robots, rent Control, and Taylor Swift. Yeah.

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So what do all three of those things haven't common? Well? Money,

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, that's what we're gonna talk about today. How

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the stories that we've come across this week how they

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>apply to your personal finances. We've got those three stories

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>plus several others that we're gonna get to today. That's right, Matt.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>But before we dig into those stories, before we get

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>into the Friday flight, I wanted to quickly mention that

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I filed my first homeowners claim in my adult life.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Is something you're excited about? Um, not really, it's it's

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>luckily this is bad news, But I guess it kind

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.639
<v Speaker 1>of depends on how things shape up for you, right,

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ultimately it's it's not the worst thing ever,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's also not fun, I would say. But basically,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>what happened that the house that we're doing some work

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to right now that used to be a duplex, we're

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>turning it back into a single family home for our family,

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>someone decided to get down on the cross space and

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>rip out the copper pipes with the sauce. Huge bummer dude. Actually,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So I was one that discovered it because Kate and

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I and the kids were just out for a walk

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and they had recently like busted out the back wall

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of your entire house and which is to me super fascinating,

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Like we're really interested in stuff like that. And so

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we went snoop and well, Emily she like sent us

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>to the lock box code and was like, hey, go

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>check it out, you know. So we poked our head

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in there. Y'all had just left town, I think, and

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>uh it was like, do you hear that? Is that

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>something like water running? And I was like, uh, yeah,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why the water is running. And sure enough,

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we kind of poked our head down through the floor

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and saw like a river underneath your house. It did

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>not look like something that was planned. It was it

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.559
<v Speaker 1>was not a good thing, and it was not And yeah,

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>so that water ended up ruining the h VAX them

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know a couple other things down there. And

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those things where I had my

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>deductible set as high as possible, and that's something we've

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>recommended on the show, and I had never had to

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>file an insurance claim before, and so I was like

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>looking pretty just saving money every year on the money

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I was paying to the insurance company, but came back

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to bite me in this instance. But I will say,

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I need to do the math at some

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>point and kind of see what's what's the difference how

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>much am I saving on an annual basis, because I'm

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sure I have more than made up for, uh this

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the additional deductible amount that I had to pay in

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>order to replace the HVAC system and fix you know,

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the other things that were ruined by this

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>act of vandalism. But I think that advice still holds

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>true because, Yeah, one of the other things that it

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>does is is having a higher deductible prevents you from

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>filing needless claims because if you have that really tiny deductible,

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you might start doing it willy nilly, and then your

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>rates start to go up over time. And so I

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>think this one claim hopefully shouldn't have too much of

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>an adverse impact on the premiums you'll find out next

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>year comes up, right, Well, so have you heard from

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>them at all? Because oftentimes your stories about how when

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you file a claim like this, something I mean, this

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't it's not a tiny claim, but it's also not

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>like a massive claim. It's not like a true felt

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in between, and so I'm curious if because sometimes individuals

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>will get booted from there insured because once you use it,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you lose it. Yes, I have heard that too, and

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>uh so obviously that hasn't happened to you, I think, yeah,

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the higher rates is definitely something that's worth

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>revisiting once you do get your your bill or your

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>premium for next year, because that's unfortunately not something that

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you can shop around. I mean, you can shop around

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>your home insurance, but when you take advantage of your insurance,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes onto your clue report, and that's something that

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>follows you from one insure to the next, and that's

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like the database where every insurance company can chant, does

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this person five claims or not? And yeah, hopefully one

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>claim isn't gonna mess me up. And it was the

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do, even though it was tough because

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those guys who's like, I'm gonna go

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>through all my life and never use this insurance. But

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what it's there forms that time when you do

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>want to use it and like you said, though, it

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is tough to know how much you're saving, and so

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you actually crunch the numbers. But that did cause me

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to go and check my homeowners insurance because we just

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hadn't touched our home policy in a while. Dude, my

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>deductible was said at one thousand dollars, I'm getting hosed.

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.559
<v Speaker 1>That's too low. Yes, I'm getting hosed every single year.

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And so immediately wrote an email to our insurance agent

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.679
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know how that happened, but at some point,

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know I didn't set it there intentionally,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but at some point I think it reset or they

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just automatically migrated it down to whatever the standard policy is.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sure that you're wishing that would have happened

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to you. If only we could trade places accidentally just

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks before the accident, would have been great. Yeah, because

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're back, and let us know what the difference is,

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like how much you're able to save, because if I mean,

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, my assumption is it's probably a couple hundred

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year. Oh yeah, I'm hoping by boosting that deductible,

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we should see a significant savings every single year. But yeah,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you know, okay, all right, Well, yeah, and

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and nobody needs to shed tears from me. Not a

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>big deal, but h and and ultimately means we're getting

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a new HVAC system, Like this whole house is gonna

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>be new at the end of the day. You really are.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, it's gonna it's cool. Bank accounts taking a

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>beating right now, but at least for a while. Yeah,

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that means that no repairs needed on this house

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, good buddy years. Yeah, well, let's

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>move on. Let's get to the Friday flight. Let's do

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>stories we found interesting this week in the realm of

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>personal finance. And first let's talk about budgeting for Christmas.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>There was a new service something you do budget Christmas,

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and well, I trying to keep that budget minimal, but

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously we we there is money they get spent every

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>year around the holidays when it comes to yeah, gifts

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>for our friends and loved ones, or experiences that we

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>share with other people, bringing something to a holiday party.

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Those those are all the kind of things that you've

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>got to plan ahead for. And there's a new survey

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>from ally Bank and it reveals that Americans are worried

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about going over budget this holiday season. That makes sense

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, especially with inflation, which we're gonna talk about

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in just a little bit. It's like everything costs more.

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Am I gonna be able to to stick to the

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>budget that I have? People don't want to overspend, and

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we're all about that. But the statistic that followed in

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that same survey revealed that two in five people they're

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>not doing any planning, they're not using a budget at all.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>And so, yeah, people who are like I'm really worried

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about going over budget the budget that I don't have,

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>I found that interesting. And it's gonna be hard not

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to go overboard if you don't have a plan, if

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any sort of budget when it comes

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to your holiday spending. And so, yeah, no, wonder you're

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>worried about it. Um, if you want to prevent what

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>we would say a January financial shock that can linger

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>into the summer months, well you need to get a

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>plan in motion now. You need to be prepared with

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a budget for holiday spending. That's right. And of course

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I was making fun of you because you too not

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to budget in the formal sense like you don't track

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>every sense that you spend like I do, but you

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>still have a more of a shoot from the hit

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>spending plan, and certainly when it comes to something like Christmas.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But the number one thing that we think folks should

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure to do, you know, in order to not

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>go overboard, is just to develop a list of people

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>that you plan to buy presents for and just you know,

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>don't don't overdo it just because maybe you have a

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>little more cash sitting around in your accounts, uh this year. Uh,

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to buy anything, you know, for your

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>your third cousin who's twice removed. Hey, we're very close, Matt.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>If that's the case, then make sure to buy them

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a nice gift. But just make sure that you have

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>communicated with folks with your family, who you're close to,

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>who you don't plan to exchange presence with. Because part

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of the reason we tend to go overboard is out

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of this sense of obligation and and this almost reciprocal

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>nonspoken agreement that we seem to have, especially with family members.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But right down the specific amounts that you aim to

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>spend on each person. We've talked about this somewhat recently,

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but even consider giving cash with just a thoughtful, uh

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>handwritten letter or a note, that can be a great

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>way for you to avoid finding your spending continuing to

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>increase throughout the holidays. Maybe even giving a fun experience

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of a of a high priced item. But just

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>don't overdo it because of the you know, you can't

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>blame it on the holiday spirit. You can't say that like, oh, well,

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I just this is something I feel like doing. We

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want you to approach you're spending that way. We

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>want you to have a plan. Getting in the Christmas

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>spirit or the holiday spirit is a great thing. But

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you know yourself and you know you're the kind

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of person because the jolly nous takes over your soul

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that you just start spending dollars like crazy, Like, yeah,

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a plan so that you don't

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. Yeah. Well, And one of the other things too,

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is just avoid spending on yourself because you see all

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the money that you're spending and you think, holy cal like,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I am spending so much money on other people. I

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>am being so generous. I deserve a little bit of that.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna treat myself Uh. And that's another way to

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>add a solid, i don't know, ten percent onto your

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>holiday spending budget where you to start buying some items

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for yourself. And so that's something we want you to avoid.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, we're gonna go into depth about

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>how to have more of a minimalist Christmas. We're gonna

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about that on Monday with guest Meg Nordman, so

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you can look forward to that, no doubt. All right,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>let's move on, Matt to talking about Tylor Swift for

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a second. You're a big fan, right, I am not

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a Swift tie, but I do like some of her music, Okay, yeah,

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and and me me too, Like I I like a

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>few of her songs, but I only really listened to

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Swift when my wife is listening to Taylor Swift.

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, she's talented, just not my jams. Yeah,

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean specifically, recently, her music has gotten like, you know,

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a little darker. Yeah, get a little more of an

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>indie vibe to some of the stuff she's like. Now, well, yeah,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, if our listeners remember we we just had

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>an episode about ownership recently. It was episode and there's

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this new story this week that to me reflected the

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>power of individual ownership and uh, and how it leads

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to building wealth and just like a real substantial like

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>pop cultural moments, and and this was really Taylor Swift right,

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Like she she's more than just a good musical artist,

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, adored by tens of millions of people,

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>she's an incredible businesswoman. And she actually just rereleased an

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>album that originally came out in two thousand and twelve.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Why did she do that well, because the rights to

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>her original songs were sold out from under her and

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they now belonged to like some hedge fund or something

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>like that, sold to the hedgephone buy some guy named

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like Scooter or something like that. Right, apparently Taylor and

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Scooter are not on good terms at odds they're not celebrating. Uh,

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to be the same holiday parties, is my guest.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But she rerecorded those songs and re release them, and

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that meant that she owns the music that her fans

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>are now listening to. No swifties are going back and

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>listening to that album. They're listening to the Swift version,

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the one that that Taylor is now profiting from because

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>she owns it directly, and it's also at the same

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>time it's devaluing those original recordings in a significant way.

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure which one she's happier about, probably considering

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>where she is with their finances, I'm sure the ladder

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a little more enjoyable at the moment. Uh.

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, she already did this with. The first

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>album that she did this with was Fearless, and that

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>album sold almost one million copies since April, and those

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>newly recorded songs have been streamed six hundred million times,

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and so this is just an awesome I don't know.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And even though she's a total celebrity, this is still

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a very fun success story when it comes to an

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>individual and their business acumen because Taylor, Yeah, she's got

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that ownership over everything that she's creating. That's incredibly powerful.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And again, it just goes to show how important it

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is to be an owner not just a consumer. Yeah,

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we see that clearly in Taylor Swift's example. It's just

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's fun to see someone not just be a great

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>entertainer but also great business person as well. Then, so, um, yeah,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>just kudos to t Swift on that front. And and yeah,

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt le's let's let's keep moving. Let's talk about inflation

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for a second. The costs of essentials in our lives

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 1>have been going through the roof, well, cost of everything, yeah,

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>has definitely been going up, but yeah and quickly, right,

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And gas prices in particular, or something that's on everyone's mind.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>The state of California actually is setting gas price records

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this week. Those are the kind of records you prefer

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to remain unbroken, especially records that they're not celebrating in

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>a positive way. And don't drive an electric vehicle in California.

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>If you have a gas powered vehicle there, you're probably

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>like not happy. And the national average of a gallon

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of gas is almost three dollars and fifty cents uh.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And when you run the numbers, Matt that this costs

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the average person sixty nine dollars more every single month

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>compared to where gas prices were last year. And that

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that's real money for for lots of folks like that,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole lot more money that's going straight into

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the gas tank just to get where you need to go.

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And of course, you know, we talked a little bit

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>about e bikes last week. It only makes more and

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>more sense to go in that direction when we see

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>those numbers. But also grocery store prices are rising sharply,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, you know, prices for meat, poultry, and

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>eggs were up more than ten percent in September. And

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so we're seeing shoppers having to make decisions at the

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>grocery store so that their grocery budget remains intact. They're

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>trading down for lower priced items because of how quickly

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>these prices are escalating, and and many are buying more

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>store brand items instead of the name brand counterparts. That's

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>something that you and I are are all about, you know,

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We're all about that. We're less about switching to store

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>brand beer. You've tried the Aldi beer before, yeah, and

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Kirkland signature beer too, But I'm not down

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with either. I am willing to drink some of the

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's called hopping nomad or whatever is the

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Aldi beer in the summertime, like after cutting the grass.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with an occasional six pack of that. But uh,

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, inflation, like basically we've just seen inflation stick around,

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>right it Like we thought it was just going to

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>be around for a few months, but it has been

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>much more sticky, and store brands and substitutions are two

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>great ways to curd costs as those rising prices continue

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>their climb. But what else can you do? You know, Joel,

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the high costs of gasoline. Well, on

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the gas front, not all of us can drive less.

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>There are just sometimes places that we have to be.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>We may not have the option to work from home,

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and so that morning and afternoon commute is still going on. Um.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of us who can change

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>our driving patterns and habits because a big chunk of

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the miles that we drive our discretionary myself to get

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to work. But can you combine more trips and go

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>to the grocery store once every two weeks twice a

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>week if you happen to work near a costco, that

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>needs to be something that you're doing. And the other

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>thing too. A lot of those miles are within just

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a smaller radius of our home, So we really could

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>hop on a bike a bit more for those shorter

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>trips in order to curb our gas usage. And if

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you are going to get in the car, look at

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna sound silly, but just accelerate a little

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>more slowly, like like coast. You notice this when you're

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>riding on your bike. But there's this one stretch where

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I always take a right onto a more main road. Uh.

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And whoever is behind me, well, after they make their right,

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they'll come zoom and past me. But there's always a

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>stoplight like one block up, and they're just like flooring it.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Just wasted gas fifty feet or something like that. And

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I always just gonna slam it on the brakes again. Yeah, yes,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And I always pull up right next to them. And

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I love it when I'm like even a car

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>too in front of them, and that you know, they

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>floored it. They wasted all that energy. Uh, they've lost

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>their whatever their patients, they've they've lost their cool. But

0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>just take it easy. Uh. And the other thing too,

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about insurance earlier on, while you're already driving

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>like a grandma. See if your insurance provider, if they

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>offer one of those monitors or the driving trackers, because

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, if you can combine gas savings with

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>some insurance savings as well, that is two birds with

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>one stone right there. Uh. And then yeah, on the

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>food front, where your shop is going to make the

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest difference. We've already mentioned Aldi and Costco randomly, but

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>those stores can make a massive difference in your food budget.

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Legal is also another affordable option. But we want you

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>just to constantly be challenging what it is that you've

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>all always done in order to see if you can

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>save a little bit here and there, because you might

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>find that these are patterns that stick. Uh, and even

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>when groceries are dropping in price, if you maintain those habits, well,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>then you're saving money every single month. You're not just

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>breaking even. And so just even simple things like buying

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>sale items, throwing them in the freezer, doing things that

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you haven't done before in order to curb your spending,

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and just stop eating steak right now probably. I mean,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a rare delicacy for for us saying

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like once a year, I feel like, seriously, but

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>when we do have it, it's it's a delight. But

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're having it on a weekly basis, you fancy

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and probably should trade down to chicken or meatless mondays

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>or you know, whatever you want to do. But we've

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>got more stories to get to on today's Friday flight,

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>including that robot story and a really interesting one about

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rent control. We'll get to those and more right after

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this break. Alright, we're back in. Before we get to

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that more heavy academic topic of rent control, put our

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>putting our economist hats on. We yeah, we actually are

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>going to do that. But before we get to that one,

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>let's get now to our ludicrous headline of the week.

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And this one is from Fast Company and it reads

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>science proves it most n f T s are worthless.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You know what? Trust science on this one. Well, here's

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing. It's less about the science, and it's just

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the simple numbers. It's like empirical evidence.

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just data. It's like, I love that they wrote science,

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And where does science actually come into play here? It's not.

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like, really like we've just looked at the actual

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>sales prices of n but science sounds a little more fun.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess like we've just discovered a new statistics. Yeah.

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But this article focused on the research from the University

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of London, which poured over the sales data from thousands

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of n f T s and oftentimes, you know the

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>n f T sales that make the headlines or for

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the different n f t s that might go for

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands or even tens of millions of dollars.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>In the case with that people n f T that

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that's sold for like seventy million dollars. But here is

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>an interesting little tidbit. Three quarters of n f t

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>s actually sell for fifteen dollars or less, and actually

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>only one percent sell for more than And so the

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto punk n f t s that were you know,

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>all the rage for a minute, Yeah, those are extreme outliers.

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But this doesn't mean that n f t s aren't

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>here to stay. But at the same time, we're not

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, the space is only about making

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>money or getting super rich, because you know, even if

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is a digital piece of art, it's okay to buy it,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>but only by it if you like it. If it's

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>something that you can somehow remove the knowledge that you

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>have of n f t s and what they have

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>sold for, and can if you can just evaluate it

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>from just a sense of appreciation. I don't know if

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that's something that anybody could actually do by actually removing

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the dollars and cents from it, But if that's something

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you can do, and it's something that you're drawn to,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this n f T, then if that's the case, go

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead and buy it. But it's just important to know

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that the latest, you know, the new n f T

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that you scoop up, is very unlikely to actually make

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you any money. Uh, it's I don't know. I see

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this almost as like a wake up call for for

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>those who are making n f T s to realize

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're probably not going to get rich that way.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But then also for those who are looking at investing

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>in the n f T s that that's also probably

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to pan out well for them either. Yeah.

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really good to see the actual statistics,

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of like a bucket of cold water

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>being tossed on your head, you know, they kind of

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>helps you wake you up, because, Yeah, the only real

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>facts and figures we typically see are just the rarest

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>of a rare n f T s that are selling

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for like bookoo's of dollars, and people just assume, all right,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that's base. That's where I say, I'm gonna go make

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>my money. But it turns out most people are making

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>next to nothing really on the creator and on the

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>investor side. And like you said, Matt, I think you're right. Like,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean you can't buy one if you want to.

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think you're gonna get rich. Just do

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it for funzies. And something that was really interesting in

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this piece as well. In this article is the guy

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the researcher pointed out that the majority of an n

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>f T s actually don't sell at all, and so

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>those are all data points that aren't taken into their calculations,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and so the figures are actually way way, way worse

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're not even counting the ones that don't actually sell. Yeah. Yeah,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a lot of people that post our our

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>work online and people are like, yeah, no, I don't

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>want I don't think so it's not even worth fifty cents.

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>That's weird, dude, Which is a lot of that stuff. Yeah. Well,

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and while we're talking about mostly worthless purchases, let's talk

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>about maybe you're worthless smartphone. And I mean, you like

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it and that's fine, but the question is is your

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>phone about to become worthless? And there was an article

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in The l A Times written by David Lazarus about

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>this this week, and he said, as five g is

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>spring up around the country. A lot of older phones

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>are set to become bricks as three G networks get

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>shut down all over the place. And so if it's

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>been like a really really long time since you upgraded

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>your phone and you're still running on like three G,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>your phone doesn't do four G. If you've done that

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>then managed to keep your phone working better than yeah, seriously,

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you're impressive. But it might be just a matter of

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>months until you can't look stuff up on the go anymore,

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Like you won't be able to use data or make

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a call, like you can't even make a nine one

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>one call once the network actually comes down. That phone

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is literally yeah, well I guess technically you could use

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it at home. Is like a Internet searching device. Maybe

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's something you can give to your kids. Yeah, it's

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>not completely worthless, but it's mostly worthless. But this is

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>probably a small segment of the population, probably not many

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>how to money listeners, And I just wanted to note

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>though I could see people seeing headlines, because there's probably

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be more headlines about this as the five G

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>network comes online and people are gonna assume that they're

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>four G phones are also going to be bricked or

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>become worthless. But that is not the case. Your four

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>gy phone is going to continue to work perfectly fine

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>for the time being, You're just yeah, but probably for

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>years to come. But the thing is it won't be

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as speedy as the new phones that are coming out.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>We would still say, don't feel the need to upgrade.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Five G. I'm sure will be nice, it will be faster,

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>but keep what you've got as long as you can.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>At the phone I bought last year, it doesn't have

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>five G capability and something along just fine, though, isn't it.

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not jealous. I'm gonna I'm gonna stick with the

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>four G as long as I can. I don't care,

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think most of us should take that mentality.

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Just kind of keep using our phone. If it works fine,

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Yeah, don't be like me who splurged and

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>went big time. So we talked about this a few

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>months ago, how I was planning to wait until the

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>new thirteens came out so that the price of the

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>twelves would drop and the nut could pounce on a

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>great deal. Right. I don't know if he ever did update,

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>but fact is, the twelve pros never came down in price.

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple cut them completely from their website, and so I

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was stuck in this position of Okay, am I gonna

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>spend a thousand dollars on a twelve pro? Or am

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I gonna go ahead and get the new one? I know,

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>splurging getting the new one. I kind of talked myself

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>into doing it after having you know, I sold like

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>over ten thousand dollars worth of photography equipment. So that

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>was my justification saying that, like, Okay, well there's a

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>net win here of nine thousand dollars. And so in reality,

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm you know, I'm kind of coming out ahead.

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>But in my case, I definitely splurged. But if you

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are not in a position where your phone is hanging

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on by a thread, like Joel said, we would recommend

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that you do your best to continue to make do uh.

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing too, is this not the most

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>egregious example of planned obsolescence. It's like the cell carriers

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and then like the phone manufacturers are in like serious

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>cahoots because they're like, hey, what kind of deals can

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>we work out if you just uh start not offering

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>three G anymore so that all of your subscribers have

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to purchase a new phone that we happen to make.

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It's unfortunately be because this is one of those areas

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>where I think a lot of folks would be happy

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to continue using their old, krusty phones, but in this case,

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>they don't have that option anymore. Yeah, Matt, And to

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I feel like, you know, I don't have

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>any problem with you spending money on the newest iPhone

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>because you waited like five years with your like I

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>earned it, I think so. I think so, I think

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like trying to get you more time out of your phone.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Just what we want to fight is that reactionary upgrade

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>cycle where it's like every year I get a new phone,

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>or every eighteen months I get a new phone. Um,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>and we just think that's unnecessary, especially when we're talking

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about the phone upgrades being pretty minimal these days. Each year.

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And I will say that I've gotten tremendous satisfaction out

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>of the new features on this new phone compared to

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the original se which is what I had. Good. I'm

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>glad to hear that. And I figured I figured you

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>would because it's a photographer, you know, having the multiple

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>camera approach, free lenses, Dude, it's awesome. I know you're

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna love it. Well, let's talk about robots for a second. Businesses,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously you're having a hard time finding the workers they need.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about that, and in fact, there are more

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs than people looking for those jobs right now. For

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>every one job opening, there's only point seven people looking

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for a job, and so yeah, that just leads to

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>uh A wage hikes of course, alongside just more leverage

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>for the everyday worker, and then with compensation going up,

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>though some companies are deciding to turn to robots for

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>certain specific tasks. Uh demand for robots is apparently also

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>at an all time high, and Matt I would say,

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be interesting to see what sort of an

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>impact this has on our economy and on the workforce,

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>because it makes sense the faster wages rise, the more

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>employers start to figure out how they can thin the herd,

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and robots are able to perform more tasks these days.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>So what did you think when you saw that statistic? Well,

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean and just the fact too that I mean,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>employers don't have the ability to continue to do business

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>because they just don't have the people around to do

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the jobs. And so sometimes I mean in this case,

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's a little bit less about the fact

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that the robots are here to take over take over

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>our jobs, and it's more, we've got to find a

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>way to continue doing business here, and in this way,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>robots are are the answer. But even for those who

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>are a little worried about robots showing up taking over

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>our jobs, you know, this is uh, I feel like

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a topic. This is a fear that's been circulating for

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>decades and they actually they never really seemed to come true.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>And so, for instance, it was thought that the brilliant

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>new technology of the automated teller machine a t M,

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that that would mean that most banks would no longer

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>need human tellers, right, people who you know, sit there

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and work at the desk. But that didn't happen, uh,

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>not even close. In fact, as more a t M

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>s came on the scene, we also saw a rise

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the number of human tellers working at banks as well.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Not not quite the apocalyptic scenario that someone yeah, exactly.

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And another instance, I'm thinking of the three D printed house. Uh,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>these are starting to become a reality as well, and

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>so a big question might be, you know, are they

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>going to take away jobs? From skill laborers and contractors.

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Because these houses are being made by like tubes of concrete.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>It's like giant toothpaste machine. It's like a soft service

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can live in. But we think that that's

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty unlikely as well. But it is likely going to

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>create more affordable housing, and those machines are going to

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>lower the cost of living for for many folks as

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>homes become more affordable. But you know, these robot headlines

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and predictions of rapidly advancing automation, at times it can

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>be scary, but you know, while it sometimes will negatively

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>impact a few specific communities or specific jobs, it's almost

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>always going to be part of a rising tide. You

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>know that helps the country overall more than it harms,

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, more than anything, it just makes me think

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of just the natural forces of supply and demand. Right now,

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.479
<v Speaker 1>there is just an incredibly low supply of workers, and

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so employers they're having to get creative when it comes

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to manufacturing literally more supply by creating more workers. This

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is something that I think sometimes can be scary, but

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>it's just the natural changing landscape of our economy, of

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>our labor markets, no doubt, so I don't think there's

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>any any need or reason to fear the robot Matt

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Like like you mentioned, I think you're right, and let

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>let's move on. Let's talk about rent control our our

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>last story for this Friday Flights. You know, we we've

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about rising rents on the show, and it's certainly

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>no fun to encounter. If you're a renter and you're

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>told that rent is a hundred fifty dollars more a

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>month for this next year long lease, that's that's frustrating,

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and that is it can be a budget buster. But

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>what are some cities trying to do to combat these

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>substantial increases that we're seeing? Rent control and uh ST Paul,

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota is the most recent example of this. They just

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>passed a ballot initiative capping rent price increases at three

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a year. And that sounds nice if you're a renter,

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>right saying that, hey, my rent is not going to

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>go up above this amount. I know that it can't increase.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But sadly, while rent control sounds good on its face,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the effects are almost all He's harmful in the end,

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>and landlords they tend to stop investing in the units

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>they own, leading to a more dilapidated housing supply overall,

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>they would ask themselves a question like why will I

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>spend extra to put in a nishier bathroom if they're

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to recoup those costs. And yeah,

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much at every turn when rent control is instituted,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>it ends up harming the vast majority of folks in

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that city where it's instituted exactly. Yeah. Yeah, we feel

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that the answer isn't capping the rent price that a

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>private landlord is able to charge. We feel that a

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>better answer is to focus on creating more supply, just

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like those inventive employers who are finding ways to put

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>robots to work and so uh and we're not alone too.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Economists have been in complete agreement on this for decades. Uh.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, Richard Taylor, the economist, he compared asking

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>whether rent control is good to asking whether the sun

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>revolves around the earth and this, No, that's just lunacy. Yeah,

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just like I mean, it was just outside the

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>realm of consideration for him. Uh. And so it's just

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see that there's a city that's gonna be

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>moving in the opposite direction. Uh. And for the folks

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>who currently live in a rent controlled unit. You know,

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it's great, it feels like it's like heaven. But for

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>other renters, the market rate is two thousand a month

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're paying seven hundred a month because of your

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>units rent controlled. You're like, I want the lottery exactly.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>But for the other renters looking for a place to live,

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it becomes more difficult. And instead, we think that more

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>relaxed zoning and creating incentives to build more units to

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>increase that supply is the best way to create more

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>affordable housing. Rising rents and the lack of access to

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>affordable housing are real issues in our country, uh, and

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, more prevalent in some specific cities. But

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>rent control legislation is just going to make things worse

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>over time. This is an example where we're gonna side

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>with the economists and we feel that the government, uh,

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>different governments should consider involving themselves less when it comes

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to interfering in an open market like this, where you know,

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the supply and demand can find their own equilibrium. And

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>when you start interfering and placing rent trolls at least

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to distortions within the market, the amount it just makes

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you think the city where we live, Atlanta, passed a

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>law a few years back that said that people could

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>build a small dwelling unit in their backyard, which creates

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>more density dwelling units. The more units that are available

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for people to rent, especially in some of these older neighborhoods,

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the better the better it's going to be when it

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to housing affordability. But then when you look at

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>actually the zoning laws, it's really it's harder than it

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>would appear at first glance to build one of those

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>ad U s, as I found out because I wanted

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to put one in my backyard, and because of the

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>setback laws, it was basically impossible to put that house

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in my backyard, even though the law made it somewhat

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>easier than it originally was. And so those are the

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of things that need to be looked at. If

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the law doesn't just say that you can build an

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a DU, but then the zoning laws make it not

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>too terribly difficult to do, so people will do it,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and that will increase density. That will lead to lower

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rent prices for people all across the spectrum. Not surprising

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Joel and I we live in the city. We're all

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>about density and and yes, in my backyard please. We're

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>all about it, and we think that that can alleviate

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the high costs of housing as well. But Joel,

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be it for this episode. Listeners can find

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>our show notes up on the website will link to

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>all the different stories that we mentioned and covered during

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this episode up at how to money dot com. That's right,

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be back on Monday within interview with our

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>friend Meg, who's going to talk about how to have

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that minimalist Christmas. We hope to see you then, but

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>have a great weekend, but buddy, until next time, Best

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Friends Out, Best Friends Out.