WEBVTT - The History of Laptop Computers

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to text Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And when I first

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>started out in the work world, sit down, we're going

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a story time, it was a little bit

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>of a different landscape. Now. First of all, I was

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>not a podcaster. That was not my original profession. My

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>first steady job was working for a human resources consulting firm.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Have you guys seen the film Office Space. If you have,

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you might remember the Bob's in that movie. Those were

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>a pair of consultants who came into the company in

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the film in a tech in order to figure out

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>which employees could be downsized. In other words, who's gonna

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>get fired? Well, I used to say that I essentially

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>worked for the Bob's, but that's probably being a little unfair.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>But hey, that's that's neither here nor there, right So anyway,

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>more importantly for this episode, back then, I worked on designing, formatting, editing, proofing,

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and producing various documents. I had a pretty fancy title,

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but I was really more or less a copy editor.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Not that copy editors aren't fancy, they're incredibly important. But

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the title they that I was given at that you know,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>consulting firm made it sound like I was a manager

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>or something. But to do my work, I was assigned

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a big, old desktop computer. It was a decent machine

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for the time being, but it was also stationary. Right.

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>You weren't supposed to pick the thing up and take

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it with you at the end of the day, so

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I never had to bring work home with me. Now,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not that laptop computers were rare even back in

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the ancient days when I first started working, but the

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>average office tended to rely more on desktop computers than

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>laptops at that point, with only really important folks like

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>senior consultants at my company having laptops, and that was

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so that they could bring their work with them wherever

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>they went. Flash forward to a decade ago or so,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>I was working at how Stuff Works dot com, and boy,

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>howdy do I miss those guys. Not only is that

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>where this podcast got its start, it's also where I

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>got my first work laptop. Now that one I could

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>bring home with me. Right, I could bring the laptop

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with me if I needed to, made it much easier

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to work on any particularly tricky articles that I was

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>writing at the time. But on the flip side, you

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>could argue that I was suddenly able to put in

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>way more hours in a salaried job that I would

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>have if the computers were still metaphorically locked two desks

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in an office. But whether you view it as a

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>pause of or a negative, the laptop at that point

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>had become standard office gear, largely replacing the towers and

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>base units of desktops of the past, and that brings

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>us to today's topic. I wanted to talk about the

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>origin and evolution of laptop computers. Now, clearly we won't

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be talking about every variation. That would be insane. The

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>series would end up being one episodes long, and while

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed walking down the path of PlayStation for four episodes,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that was already pushing it. So this is more of

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>an overview of how laptops first came into being, when

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they first started getting popular, and then we're going to

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>talk in a second episode about some pretty dramatic shifts

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and form factor and use cases over the years. So

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>this episode is going to really be about how we

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of arrived at the standard form factor of what

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we consider a laptop to be and and how that

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was established. And in our next episode we'll look at

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>how various companies have innovated around that basic concept and

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the effort to kind of differentiate themselves and also add

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>new features and capabilities. So to talk about laptops, we

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also have to pull back a bit and talk about

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the shift towards personal computers, because the two are very

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>closely related. The first purely electronic computer for general purpose computing,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a machine that could really only do

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>one type of processing was the appropriately named Electronic Numerical

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Integrator and Computer or an EAC computer, so famous that

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael Simbello recorded a song about it for the movie

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Flash Dance. Hang on a second, I'm getting a note here.

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Um huh, Well, according to this note that I just

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>handed to myself, the whole song thing is a lie.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But for those of you out there who are as

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>old as I am, you get the joke right. Anyway.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>ENIAC was not the first computer, mind you, but it

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>was the first electronic one, or largely agreed to be

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the first electronic computer. There's even some disagreement on that matter,

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but there were older computers. Those were electro mechanical machines.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But Eniac was in itself a huge machine, pretty much

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>taking up all of the wall space of a basement

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that measured fifty ft by thirty feet or fifteen meters

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>by nine meters. Eniac had nearly twenty thousand vacuum tubes

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>as part of its wiring. Because this was a time

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>before the transistor, it was not, by any definition at all,

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>a portable machine. Now we got better at building computers,

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and components like the transistor would help immensely, and over

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>time we were able to miniaturize the various elements debate

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>computers work. We created circuit boards, and then we eventually

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>moved on to relatively tiny processors. Things that used to

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>take up several square feet of space or sometimes cubic

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>feet of space now could be fit on a few

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>chips on a circuit board, but even so that took

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a while. The Eniac project began during World War two.

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Three decades later, the computers were smaller, but still frequently

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the size of a desk or workstation, or sometimes a

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>couple of them. There was no such thing as a

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>personal computer. Yet the machines were too large and way

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>too expensive for that, and the applications were mostly restricted

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to scientific research and business applications like accounting analysis, that

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. In fact, there were two general classifications

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of computers by the nineteen seventies, though people weren't necessarily

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about them in these terms. At that time. You

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>had main frame computers. These were larger, centralized computers, typically

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>housed in their own rooms within a business or research facility,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and typically they were looked after by very highly trained technicians,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so there was a barrier between user and machine. They

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>were intended for multiple users, generally, and either those users

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>were accessing the main frame from dumb terminals meaning a

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>keyboard in some form of output that themselves had no

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>computing power. They just connected back to this central computer,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>or you were sharing time on the same physical device,

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>typically through using those highly paid technicians. These main frames

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>were really expensive. I mean, it wasn't unheard of for

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a mainframe computer to set a company back a million bucks,

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is a princely some The other category would

0:07:54.680 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>be mini computers. These were smaller, but not necessarily tiny. Uh.

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Defining the boundary between a main frame and a mini

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>computer is somewhat subjective. They also were typically multiple user computers.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>They weren't necessarily meant to be a single individuals computer,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but they were smaller than their main frame counterparts. They

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>were also less expensive. You could swoop up one of

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>these babies for a cool hundred grand or so. See

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>either they're practically giving them away. By the mid nineteen seventies,

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>miniaturization had reached a point where a computer could fit

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on a desktop rather than taking up the space of

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>an entire desk, or two desks or a dozen desks.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>This would start to get us into the era of

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>micro computers. Micro Computers is kind of another term for

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>personal computer in a sense the meaning is slightly different,

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>but effectively personal computers are micro computers. They're a subset,

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you could argue. So these were still machine beings found

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>largely in research centers and big corporations, not in the

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>home at this time, so computer manufacturers were building machines

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind. They weren't building for the home user,

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>but that would slowly change thanks to some computer enthusiasts

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>who saw an opportunity in vour. A company called micro

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems or MYTHS changed the game forever

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in computers. This company was founded by a group of

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>hobbyists in the late nineteen sixties. These were electronics enthusiasts

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and professionals, and their whole business was selling kits to

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>other hobbyists. And originally those kids were for stuff like

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>home radio transmitters and model rocket systems, thus the telemetry.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But in nineteen seventy four they put together a kit

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that would let hobbyists build their very own programmable computer.

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't think of it as a computer by modern standards,

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but it was the computer, and they named it the

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Altaire eight hundred. They sold these kits for just four

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty dollars, and they got a lot of publicity

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>from a cover page story in the magazine Popular Electronics.

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you were to adjust for inflation,

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that fourty kit would set you back about two thousand,

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dollars in today's money. And keep in mind

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a kit. You would still have to actually

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>build the thing yourself. Now, the l tear didn't exactly

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>become the must have gadget of nine, but it did

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>help usher in the personal computer era the micro computer era.

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>It allowed people like the Two Steve's those being jobs

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in Wozniak to get their own computer business going. In

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>case you aren't aware, that was a little company called Apple. Meanwhile,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>over at IBM, the focus was still primarily on corporate customers.

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a big part of IBM's business. In fact,

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that was IBM's business, was selling products to other big companies.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It would be a couple of years before IBM would

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>try its hand designing a personal computer for a more

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>mainstream customer base, like and an actual consumer level computer

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a commercial computer. But it is at

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>IBM where our story about laptops really gets its start.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>IBM had identified a market for computers that was underserved,

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and not again the average consumer. Instead, we're talking about

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>professionals who weren't necessarily connected to a big corporation or

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>research facility that has access to like a mainframe machine

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>or typical mini computer. So these were statisticians and engineers

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and analysts and other people who would routinely work with

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>big numbers and complicated calculations. They could really use something

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with the capabilities of a computer, a programmable machine, but

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>they weren't working at places where those sort of resources

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>were readily available. So IBM set out to make a

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>machine that the company could market to those professionals. To

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>do so, IBM created a portable computer called the IBM.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>This was an early example of an IBM mini computer. Now,

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't a laptop computer by today's standards, certainly, but

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it was a portable computer. In fact, it's pretty much

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>acknowledged as the world's first portable computer. However, when it

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to the word portable, your mileage may vary. See,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the IBM was no lightweight device. In fact, it tipped

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the scales at a hefty fifty five pounds. That's just

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>under twenty five and yeah, that's heavy. You would not

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>want this on your lap for very long at all,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>or you lose all feeling in your legs. But compared

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to an IBM computer of the same capabilities from just

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a few years earlier, it was positively smelt. An IBM

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>computer from the late sixties that would have the same

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>processing capabilities as the nineteen IBM would have been the

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>size of two full desks and it would have weighed

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>half a ton, So this was definitely an achievement. The

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>IBM was an all in one computer. It included a

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>display that was built into the body of the computer itself,

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>so the case had everything. The case had the display,

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it had the keyboard. Calling it a display, however, is

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty grand thing because it wasn't exactly large. In fact,

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the screen size was just five inches or twelve point

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>seven centimeters on the diagonal, so you wouldn't be playing

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Doo Maternal on one of these things. In fact, they

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>could not show graphics like that. The screen could display

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>standard characters, but it wasn't designed for more advanced graphics.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>The width of the display allowed for just sixty four

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>characters per line, with sixteen lines maximum on a screen,

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>so it had a height of sixteen characters and a

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>width of sixty four characters, so it was definitely limited.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>The body of the computer also had a keyboard complete

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with a number pad built into it, so this was

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>again a solid piece, one piece computer. And you if

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you imagine an old computer case, you know the kind

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that would sit horizontally on a desk, Just imagine poking

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>out the front is a keyboard and then you have, uh,

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rest of the cases behind where the

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>keyboard is, and it goes up a bit on the

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>upper left side above the keyboard that's where the little

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>display is. You can do a Google image search for

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the IBM to get a look at this thing. For storage,

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the IBM had a tape drive. This was one of

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>several forms of data storage in the computer era. With tapes,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>computers would store information onto reels of magnetic tape. The

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>specific version of the IBM fifty one hundred was the

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>d C three hundred cartridge drive. Those cartridges held three

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred feet or about nine of tape. Then the tape

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>itself measured a quarter inch wide or point six centimeters.

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It can hold up to two hundred four bytes of

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>data per cartridge. All right, let's do a quick refresher

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on bites too. A bit is a single unit of

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>machine information, and it can be either a zero or one.

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You can think of it like uh light switch. It's

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>either flipped off or on. A collection of eight bits

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is a bite. This is something IBM had a really

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>big hand in establishing. But that's a matter for another podcast.

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>A kilobyte is one thousand bytes, though in terms of memory,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly in this era, we're really talking about one thousand,

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty four bytes. To explain, why would have me go

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>off on yet another tangent. So we're just going to

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>ignore that for now, But just know that these cartridges

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>could hold up to two d four thousand bytes of data.

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's not that much. Even though two four thousand sounds

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like a lot, it's not much at all, especially when

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you consider that was on three hundred feet of tape.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>In addition to that cartridge port, the IBM also had

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a printer i O port io means input output, So

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you physically connect the printer to this beheamoth of a

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>portable computer with a cable. I'll have a little bit

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>more to say about the IBM in a second, and

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, I'm not gonna give every laptop the full

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>treatment like this. This is just to establish some baselines.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But before we get into that, let's take a quick break.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>What was powering the IBM under the hood, right, What

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>was actually acting as the processor? Well, back in those days,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we weren't necessarily talking about CPUs the way we do

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to day. In fact, it doesn't have a CPU the

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>way we would think of at all for modern computers.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>If you were to open up an old IBM, you'd

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>find a circuit board kind of mounted upside down. You'd

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>actually have to turn it over, and you would find

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen microchips mounted on that circuit board, and collectively those

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>chips acted as the computer's processor. So as such, it's

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.959
<v Speaker 1>a little tricky to talk about the IBMFE using modern

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>computing terms. It doesn't really fit. Plus, IBM offered up

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a few variations of this particular computer, but the least

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>expensive model of the IBM had a clock speed of

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>one point nine Mega hurts. And just in case that

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean anything to you if you didn't listen to

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the PlayStation episodes, I'm going to explain that really quickly.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>A processor's clock speed tells you how many steps of

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>instructions the processor can complete in a second. Uh These

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>steps are called cycles in processor speak, and a hurt

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is one cycle per second. A Mega hurts is a

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>million cycles per second. So essentially this means the IBM

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>could perform one point nine million steps of instructions per second.

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>And just a reminder, instructions can be really simple or

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>they can be really complicated, So a simple instruction might

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>have only a couple of steps, Complicated instructions could have

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of steps. And all these terms still

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>hold true. Today, if you have a machine with a

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>three point for giga hurts processor, that processor is capable

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of completing three point four billion steps of instructions every second.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>And don't worry, software developers have created programs that have

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>way more complicated steps to them. So while we've seen

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>processor speeds skyrocket over the years, the demands of software

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>have also increased. And that's part of why you might

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>get the feeling that a new computer isn't that much

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>faster than older computers. It's not the fault of the

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>machine necessarily, but rather that software that you're running is

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>more demanding than the software you were using on older computers.

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, several prominent people in tech have made observations

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that indicate software complexity pretty much negate the benefits of

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Moore's law. That's the general observation that computing processing capabilities

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>typically double every eighteen to twenty four months. Alright, So

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the IBM a one point nine megahertz processor or the

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>equivalent thereof the basic model also had sixteen kilobytes of memory,

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>and the cheapest model IBM offered was for the ap

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>L programming language. So what does a p L stand for?

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Get Ready, a p L stands for a programming language.

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So your standard sixteen kilobyte ap L version of the

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>IBM fifty one hundred would set you back a cool

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand, nine hundred seventy five bucks in nineteen. If

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we adjust for inflation, that would be right around forty

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>three thousand dollars today. Now that is a princely sum

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>for a portable computer. And keep in mind that's the

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>cheapest model. Let's say your your daddy Warbucks, right, you

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>got all the money in the world, you want the best.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So the most expensive version of the IBM had sixty

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>four kilobytes of memory, which is, by the way, is

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing compared to today's computers, and it could support both

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a p L and basic programming languages. That one would

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>cost nineteen thousand, nine hundred seventy five dollars back in

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>nine so in today's money that would be about nineties

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 1>six thousand bucks. So yeah, these things were major investments.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>But as I mentioned earlier, while the IBM was portable,

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't fit our definition of laptop. It was more

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of an all in one computer that you could set

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>up on a desk, then after you were done, you

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>could power it down and then you could take it

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else if you really needed to. UM I wouldn't

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>recommend it too much. Like I said, still pretty heavy.

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>While the IBM would not qualify as a laptop or

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as a personal computer, the concept of a portable computer

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was intriguing and in another big company, a guy named

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Alan Kay had been refining a concept he had been

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>pulling over for years. The other company in this case

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was Xerox, and Alan Kay would do a lot of

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>his thinking over at Xerox, and then later Xerox established

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a research center, the Park Research Center, which is redundant

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>if you know what Park stands for. But truth be known,

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>k had been thinking about this for several years. He

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>had really started thinking about in the late sixties, and

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to create a type of computer that could

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>be used by anyone. In fact, he really wanted to

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>develop a computer that kids could use. His dream was

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to make a computer that was portable, It was easy

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to use. It would have essentially eternal battery life, although

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that would require obviously recharging a battery over and over again.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>It would have a low requirements for processing. It would

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>have connectativity abilities, It would have a stylus where you

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>could have some sort of stylus input. He had a

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of ideas about what would make this ideal computer,

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>and he had a lot of different form factors that

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>he played around with in this concept, which I should

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>stress was strictly a concept. It was not a practical device.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>He he wasn't making a prototype because the actual ability

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to deliver upon his vision was not there. Like he

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about an ideal, but there was no way

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of making it happen. He thought about perhaps having a

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>slate like tablet form factor. You know, something that's a

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>solid piece where you would have a screen mounted above

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a keyboard. They're all on the same plane. So think

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>of it like if you had a tablet computer like

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>an iPad, but on the bottom half was a physical keyboard.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>That was kind of the form factor he was thinking about. Uh.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>He did think about other ones too, but that was

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one that was frequently cited, and it would have a

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>graphic user interface or g u I Gooey that's similar

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to Windows or Apple's OS today. In fact, Steve Jobs

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>got a look at Xerox Gooey a few years before

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple would go on to introduce the Mac computer, and

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it's graphic user interface. I'm just saying, you know, anyway,

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>researchers at Xerox would end up building a computer system

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>called the Alto, and the Alto was not a portable computer,

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but it did incorporate many of K's ideas into that design.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So while K was imagining this technology in the late

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties, like I said, it just wasn't realistic to

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>build at that time, his work did guide others Xerox

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to create a portable computer called the note Taker that

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was in nineteen eight. This, like the IBM, was a

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>pretty hefty machine. The case did have a keyboard that

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>could fold down from the case, but think of it

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like a briefcase, right, and it's not a briefcase that

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>opens all the way up. Or think of it like

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>a standard computer tower on its side, and the front

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>can fold down to reveal a keyboard. It's still not

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a clamshell design. We're not there yet. But we did

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>have the folding unit that had the keyboard in it.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Closing it would allow you to carry the note Taker

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>like it was a suitcase, which is really more what

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>appropriate than saying briefcase because this thing was pretty big. Again,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>not really a laptop. Xerox also did not produce this

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>as a consumer computer. The note Ta care was an

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>internal project. Reportedly, they only ever produced about ten prototypes

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of this. This, by the way, is a common thread

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>in xerox is computer history. Engineers at the company would

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>pioneer these incredible designs and they would find their way

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>into internal Xerox architecture, like Xerox machines, but Xerox wasn't

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>using those as products. They were using them internally at

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the company to develop other Xerox products. Then those same

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>design elements would later find their way into the products

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of other companies. So a lot of the stuff that

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we think of as being standard in personal computers comes

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to us thanks to Xerox, but not through direct Xerox products.

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty weird. So the company just didn't do very

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>much to capitalize on these developments in direct market products itself.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>One company that came out of all this and would

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>end up taking the note taker design and pulling it

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>forward was called Osbourne Computer Corporation, and it would make

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a consumer computer called the Osbourne One, and that was

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>heavily influenced by the Xerox NoteTaker design. In fact, if

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you compare them side by side, you can definitely see

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the the similarities. So the Osbourne one was a commercial

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>consumer computer, really more of still of a business computer,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but it was a commercial success. It cost nearly two

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars when it debuted in nine and some sites

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>referred to it as the first true laptop. Now I

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>take issue with that. Uh, this thing weighed nearly twenty

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>five pounds or around eleven kilograms, and while the keyboard

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>could fold down from the case, it still wasn't in

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that clamshell design that we tend to associate with the

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>word laptop. Now, our next stop on the timeline of

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>laptops takes us to a British industrial designer named Bill Mogridge.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And Madge got an invite from an x Xerox park

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>researcher named John Ellerby to join him and several others

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in forming a new computer company called Grid Big G,

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Big R, Little I, Big D. They formed the company

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy nine and they got to work. Margridge

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was asked specifically to contribute to a project that aimed

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.959
<v Speaker 1>to create a portable computer that could fit inside a suitcase.

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So Margridge gets to work and it was his design

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that would lead to the clamshell form factor that we

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>now associate with the word laptop computer. As far as

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm able to determine, his design was the first of

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>this style, and the computer, which was called the Grid

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Compass eleven oh one, would hit the market in nineteen

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty two, one year after the Osborne one. The Compass

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven oh one had a screen that could display twenty

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>four lines of text, each line eight characters long. It

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had an Intel eight eight six CPU running at eight

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>mega hurts. It featured two hundred fifty six kilobytes of RAM.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It did not have a hard drive. Uh, it did

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>have threes of bubble memory. And that gives me a

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>chance to explain what the heck that is, because back

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>in the seventies and eighties, engineers looked at bubble memory

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as a possible alternative to platter based hard drives. So

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you've got a strip of material and

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that material has the ability to be magnetized. Now imagine

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that you apply very precise magnetic fields and you create

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>just a little area of magnetization on that strip. So

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>teeny tiny magnetization area. Those are the bubbles, And now

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that we associate a bubble of magnetization

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>with the value of one in a binary system, and

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>if you have a section that doesn't have magnetization to it,

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a zero. So now you can just do a

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>series of magnetized and non magnetized sections of this material

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to create a record of binary information. So you could

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>do bubble, bubble, bubble, non bubble, non bubble, non bubble,

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that would be one zero zero zero, But really, I

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>guess I should add one more bubble, non bubble, one zero.

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>That way we have a full bite. Anyway, these areas

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>could then be moved or manipulated by an electromagnetic field.

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You could actually move this series of bubbles and non

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>bubbles to go past a magnetic reader, and the magnetic

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>reader would register whenever a bubble goes by. So the

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>magnetic reader registers the two states bubble and non bubble,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>thus recording whether it's a one or a zero. And

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the really cool thing about this is that while you're

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>using the electromagnetic field, while you're using these bubbles that

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are these little magnetized areas on a strip, there's not

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>actually any moving parts here. You're not moving the strip

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.959
<v Speaker 1>past the magnetic reader. That would be more like magnetic tape.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.959
<v Speaker 1>With magnetic tape, you do a very similar thing. You

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>use a magnetic field to create magnetized areas on the tape,

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and non magnetized areas can represent zeros. But you have

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to move the tape past a reader head, right, So

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why you have cassettes or reel to reel, you

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have motors that have to turn those elements and pull

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the tape across the reader head so that you can

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>read those zeros or ones. In this approach, you didn't

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have to do that. Use the electro magnetic field and

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>these little bubbles of magnetic spaces would move past a

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>stationary magnetic reader, So it's almost like it's virtual if

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you think of it that way. But again, no moving

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>parts makes it really simple and also makes it much

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>less likely to break down own mechanically because nothing's moving. However,

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>one downside to this is that you were storing information

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in a serialized format, meaning that let's say you you

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>filled up the bubble memory storage. You've completely filled up

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>those kill bytes of memory inside this machine, and you're

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>looking for a specific chunk of information that you've saved

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in that memory, the system would actually have to search

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the length of the information to find the chunk you're

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>interested in. You would have to start at the beginning,

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of like think of a board game that is

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a single pathway from beginning to end. Like you know,

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know candy Land, and you know you you're

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>information is three quarters the way down the board. Well,

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to go through the whole board before you

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 1>got there, and that's where things would slow down. And

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>so that slowed down was one of the reasons why

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>bubble memory didn't really take off. It was also really

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>expensive and difficult to manufacture. So those components together are

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>why we don't really talk about bubble memory anymore. But

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time people were hopeful that it could be

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a viable alternative to platter based hard drives. Now, in

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>addition to bubble memory, you could connect external floppy drives

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to the grid Compass eleven O one and you could

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>store data that way. You could just save it to

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a disk and then you'd have to insert the disc

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>whenever you want to pull them that information back out.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>The grid computer was not cheat when it launched, it

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>at a price tag of eight thousand one fifty dollars,

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so today that would be like twenty two thousand bucks.

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So Grid was really aiming at high level executives. We're

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>talking like CEOs of big companies, and also they were

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>hoping to get some military contracts. The US Space program

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>would end up using some grid Compass computers and sent

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>them up with astronauts to help with in orbit experiments.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can just put some of those up on

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>uh a spacecraft, fire that off into orbit, and then

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they were using those while orbiting the Earth. Rumor has

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it that the US Nuclear football a GA, the computer

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that holds the nuclear codes necessary to authorize a nuclear strike,

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>once made their home on a compass even one oh

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh and that name the eleven o one. It

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>makes you ask, what happened to the eleven hundred? Well,

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there never was one except in promotional material. There never

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was a physical eleven hundred products you could buy. Now,

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>if I were making an argument for the first laptop,

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the Grid Compass eleven oh one would be my candidate.

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the one I would argue is truly the first

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>laptop computer as we think of them today. It was

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>way too expensive for the vast majority of people to purchase,

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was still pretty hefty. It was at nearly

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven pounds or more than five kilograms, But that clamshell

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>form factor is the key component for me. Margaret's really

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>hit up on something truly useful, saving space by having

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the keyboard screen face one another when you close the computer.

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Other companies would later follow that lead. Now, another computer

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that vised for the title of first true laptop is

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the EPSOM h X twenty, which looks kind of like

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>an old word processor, which word processor is sort of

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a typewriter with a little bit more capability. The computer

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>has a flatform factor. It's a thick one, but it's flat,

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning that the keyboard in the screen are on the

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>same plane as one another. You've got a keyboard and

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>then the screen is mounted slightly above where the keyboard

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is on this flat piece of hardware. They are both

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>part of a solid case. The screen is small, it's

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>capable of showing just four lines of text that are

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>only twenty characters per a line, and it had built

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in data storage, rechargeable battery, and for a first for

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>all portable computers, it had a built in printer. That

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>printer could print out documents that had twenty four characters

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>per line, as speed of forty two lines in a minute,

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:07.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like you would use this to print

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>out your screenplay. I mean, do you remember back when

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Twitter would limit us to a hundred forty characters per tweet. Well,

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this printer could only print twenty four characters per line,

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's like printing on receipt paper. Then again, considering

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>how long some receipts are, you know, I'm looking at you, CVS,

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe you could print a whole screenplay that way.

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, like the Grid Compass, the EPs and h

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>X twenty would launch in late two, but unlike the Compass,

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it was much cheaper. It was seven dollars at the time.

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>That's around twenty one dollars in today's cash. Still expensive,

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but no longer in the astronomical range. And to be fair,

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this computer was not meant for the average home user either.

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh and the epsom also had an l c D display.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a liquid crystal display, y'all, And that means we're

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about how l c D s work.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But I have a feeling you might need to catch

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a breather before we do that, so we will jump

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on that after this quick break, I promise you guys

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a description about l c ds liquid crystal displays, and

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>here we go. But to understand how they work and

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>why it's important, one thing we need to talk about

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is polarization, specifically in terms of light. All right, So

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we know that light behaves both as a wave and

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>a particle, right, So for this explanation, we're really going

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to focus on the wave part. So imagine a wave

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably imagining a curved line that moves up

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and down right, creating hills and troughs like a sign wave,

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's totally fine. That's that's totally cool. But light

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>waves can be oriented in any number of directions. So

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you're standing perpendicular to a light wave

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can actually see that light wave like we're

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in this weird reality where you can do that from

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>your perspective. That wave might be moving up and down

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 1>with respect to your point of view, or it might

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>be moving side to side so that the wave peaks

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>point away from you and the wave troughs point towards you.

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So you've got parts of the wave that are further

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:29.280
<v Speaker 1>from you. In parts of the wave that are closer

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to you, or it could be any other orientation between

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>those two. Now, let's say that you've created a filter,

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and this filter has horizontal slits, and they're really really

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>narrow slits, so that light waves that aren't in the

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>same alignment as those horizontal slits can't pass through the filter.

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>They bounce off. So we're talking about the ability for

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>light that's vibrating a specific way to pass through a

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>specific type of hole. If the light is oriented a

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.760
<v Speaker 1>different way, if the waves are going up and down

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of left and right, it bounces off. So only

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>light waves that have the same orientation as the slits

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and the filter can pass through the filter. This is

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>how polarized lenses work. Now, let's say you've got two

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of these filters and they're both having these horizontal slits.

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You put one behind the other. Light with the horizontal

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>polarization would still be able to pass through both of

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>those filters. But let's say say we take that second

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.399
<v Speaker 1>filter and we turn it nine d degrees. So now

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>instead of having horizontal slits, we have vertical slits. Filter

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>one is horizontal filter to is vertical. Well, that means

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>that the light that gets through filter one will not

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to get through filter two because the polarization

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the angle is different. So if you have a couple

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of pairs of polarized sunglasses, you can actually see this

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for yourself. You can put one pair in front of

0:38:56.160 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the other, and then you can slowly rotate one set,

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and eventually you should see things get really dark until

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you reach a point where light just isn't passing through

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>at all. It just it turns black. I get this

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>same effect when I wear my polarized sunglasses and I'm

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at my computer display at work. The polarized filter

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on my display screen is actually at a ninety degree

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>angle from the polarized lenses that are in my sunglasses,

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 1>so it means I have to tilt my head if

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to read the display, or you know, I

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 1>would have to take my sunglasses off. But then I'm

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>not as cool, and I'm way more cool as a

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who's wearing sunglasses inside in an office who's tilting

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>his head way off to the side in order to

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 1>look at his computer monitor. There's been talk anyway back

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to l c DS liquid crystals, which refers to certain

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>materials that flow as a liquid would, but have a

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>molecular crystalline structure can twist light under certain conditions. So,

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>in other words, certain materials, certain liquid crystals, can reorient

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>light wavelength vibrations. Let's get back to our two polarization

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>filters that have that ninety degree offset. So we've got

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the horizontal and the vertical slits in these filters. If

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you have an appropriate liquid crystal solution between those two filters,

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you could use those liquid crystals to twist the light

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>coming from one side so it aligns with that second

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>filter passing through. So the light might be horizontally aligned

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as as it's going through filter number one, it hits

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the liquid crystals. The liquid crystals actually twist the polarization

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of that light, so now it's vertically aligned. It's not

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:41.439
<v Speaker 1>horizontally aligned anymore, which means it can actually pass through

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>filter number two and you get light coming through. So

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it just you know, like the force, it all depends

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>upon a certain point of view. So yeah, every pixel

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>on an l c D display has this arrangement of

0:40:55.840 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>filters and liquid crystals. Applying an electro magnetic field to

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the crystal sandwich between these two filters will untwist the

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:09.280
<v Speaker 1>liquid crystal. That means that the light coming from behind

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the screen will not realign as it passes through, and

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it will hit that second filter and it won't come

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>through the second filter. This is why we sometimes call

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.399
<v Speaker 1>l c D displays backlit displays, because there's a light

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that's always coming through from behind the display. It's just

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's being blocked by that second filter unless the liquid

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 1>crystals are twisting in such a way to allow light

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to come through. Now, on a related note, this is

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>why plasma television enthusiasts preferred plasma to l c D

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>t vs because the plasma displays didn't have this backlight.

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>L c D s did, and because they had that backlight,

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you were watching a scene in a

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>film that was really really dark, then it would be

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>affected by this. Instead of getting like a really dark black,

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you might get kind of a charcoal gray, so you

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>would have a worse contrast ratio between the brightest white

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>colors and the darkest black colors on screen. That's why

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:13.280
<v Speaker 1>plasma enthusiasts loved their approach because it didn't require a backlight. Anyway,

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to this, LCD screens would become way

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>more common in displays over the years, replacing stuff like

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>old cathode ray tube computer monitors and eventually becoming a

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>really important component in laptops. And I guess it's also

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a good good time to address the name laptop in general.

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So these days we tend to use the word laptop

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to refer to that clamshell design computer that you can

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>fold shut and carry around with you. But originally the

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>term laptop was more generally applied to any portable computer

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't too heavy to actually have sitting on your laps.

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So you had desktop computers, you had portable computers, and

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.760
<v Speaker 1>then you had a subset of portable computers that weren't

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>so heavy to cause you pain if you were to

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.439
<v Speaker 1>have them on your lap, and those were hptops. And yeah,

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>those definitions are really fuzzy, So in a way, it's

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the old puzzler, what's the difference between

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a boat and a ship, or what's the difference between

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a hill and a mountain. It wouldn't really be until

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the nineties that the term laptop would really not just

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>refer to weight and size, but a general form factor.

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 1>And it took a while for that clamshell design pioneered

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:26.399
<v Speaker 1>by the grid Compass one to become the standard. There

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>were several laptop computers there were more of a slate

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>or tablet style form factor in which the screen and

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the keyboard were on the same plane in a fixed case,

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>so there were no folding components. The Cryotronic eighty five

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>also known as the TRS eighty model one hundred, that

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>was it was offered by Texas Instruments here in the

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>United States. It was that kind of computer. It was

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>all in one solid case with the keyboard and the

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 1>screen mounted on the same plane so you're looking down

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>at both. Other computers were essentially cases that had a

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>display incorporated into the processor tower, sometimes with a detachable keyboard.

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.720
<v Speaker 1>The Commodore s X sixty four was one of those.

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It had a handle that you could carry around and

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the keyboard was separate. You would plug it into this machine,

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>and the handle could also act as sort of a

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>stand so that you could look at the display that

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 1>was on the end of this computer case. Again, look

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>these up in Google images if if it's not making

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sense to you, because these are old, clunky computers that

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>used to be the real cool stuff. One big reason

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>it took so long for a standard form to emerge

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is that the demand for laptop computers was really low,

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like personal computers in general were a rarity in most

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>households in the United States, in only eight point two

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of households in the US had a personal computer

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>at all, according to Statista dot com. In fact, it

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:57.399
<v Speaker 1>would take more than a decade before half of all

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>households in the US had at least one computer. That

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>would be two thousand when that happened here. So the

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>market for computers in general was still rather small, and

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that meant companies that were making computers were kind of

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>picking their battles. So for many computer companies, the margins

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't great, meaning the amount of money it costs to

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 1>build computers and the amount of money you would get

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>for selling computers wasn't a huge difference, So you weren't

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>making an enormous amount of profit per sale unless you

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 1>were a company like IBM or Apple. Both of those

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>could make more specialized hardware, and they could also command

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 1>much higher prices. Speaking of IBM, the company introduced the

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>IBM PC Convertible in nine six, which, as the name suggests,

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was a computer intended to serve both as a desktop

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and a portable device, thus convertible in desktop form. You

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>would slide the case of the PC convertible under a

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>stand had a computer monitor on it, and the monitor

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>would plug into a port on the case. But if

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you needed to, you could disconnect the case from this

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>monitor and you could grab a smaller flip up monitor

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to attach to this case and then flip it down

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>so that you could carry it off, and then on

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the road you could flip up this detachable l c

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 1>D screen and do some work. It was not as

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>tall as the standard monitor, so the flip up screen

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 1>had kind of a wide screen look to it. It

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>also wasn't as high resolution as the desktop monitor was,

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>but it did allow for portable computing. This debut in

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eight six for under two thousand dollars and it

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>weighed twelve pounds or five and a half kilograms. The

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>detachable screen is a neat idea, and it gave you

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 1>two different display options for the base computer, but it

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>still was a pretty bulky machine. It wasn't super convenient

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to carry around. In seven, the United States Air Force

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>put in a really big order for portable computers and

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they chose the company Zenith Data Systems for this contract.

0:46:56.719 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Zenith Data Systems had previously done a lot of big

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:05.359
<v Speaker 1>orders for various militaries and other big organizations, and this

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 1>one was another tall order. It was ninety thousand laptop

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 1>computers for one hundred four point five million dollars, and

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a project that was going to span three years.

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>The specific model the Air Force wanted was the Z

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>one eight, which followed the clamshell design that was established

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>by the grid Compass. This was also a really thick computer,

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:30.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely bulky by today's standards, but the fold down display

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>makes it instantly relatable to today's laptops, and that big

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>order really helped cement that form factor further, leading to

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:42.760
<v Speaker 1>more companies following that design approach. Some other early folding

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>laptops included the portable Vectra cs from Hewitt Packard, which

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was one of the first laptops to offer three and

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a half inch disk drives. Uh. There was also the

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>s l T two eight six, which was the first

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>battery powered laptop with v g A graphics. V g

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>A stands for Videographics Array. It's a set of standards

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for computer graphics. First introduced in the late eighties. It

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>was an improvement over older standards like c G A

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and e G A, but that would require its own episode.

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And then there was the Macintosh Portable, Apple's first attempt

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at creating a laptop mac That one was a pretty

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>much a flop in the marketplace. Of course, it cost

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>more than seven thousand dollars at the time, which was

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem. And this computer came out well

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:32.840
<v Speaker 1>after Apple management had exiled Steve Jobs from the company.

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I've done full episodes about that. I won't go into

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it here, but it would take some time for Apple

0:48:37.239 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to formulate a winning laptop strategy. Now I'm gonna end

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:43.359
<v Speaker 1>with the Macintosh Portable, but I will give a little

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>more detail about that one before we wrap this up,

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to just dog on that computer.

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>It was actually a really decent machine for the time.

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 1>That seven grand price tag wasn't just for prestige. The

0:48:56.480 --> 0:49:00.400
<v Speaker 1>processor ran at sixteen mega hurts. The standard amount memory

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for the computer was one megabyte, which was a respectable

0:49:03.560 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>amount at that time. You could actually upgrade it up

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to nine megabytes. The screen on the computer had a

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:12.839
<v Speaker 1>resolution of six forty by four pixels and it had

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 1>what was called an active matrix display. What that effectively

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 1>met was the display could update much faster than others

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>on the market, which reduced blur. That screen was also

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the components that significantly added to the cost

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of the computer. The first portable mac came in at

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a hefty sixteen pounds or about seven point three kilograms,

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and by that time that was definitely on the heavy

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>side for laptop computers. But why was it so heavy?

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>What was making it way so much? Well, a good

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>portion of that weight was due to the battery. Apple

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 1>chose a lead acid style battery to power the portable Macintosh.

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the same kind of battery that you find in cars,

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>car batteries or lead acid batteries, and you would get

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>between six and twelve hours of work one charge of

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that big battery. So the fact that it was bulky,

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 1>heavy and expensive meant that not a whole lot of

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>people opted for the Macintosh portable. Now, in our next episode,

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:14.439
<v Speaker 1>as I said before, we're gonna look at how things

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 1>really coalesced to create a laptop market. Then we'll explore

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the different subcategories that followed, like netbooks. Remember netbooks If

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 1>you guys have suggestions for future topics for me to

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>cover here on tech Stuff, whether it is a specific technology,

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a product, a company, maybe just a trend in tech,

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>let me know. Reach out to me on Facebook or Twitter.

0:50:38.120 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>The handle for both is tech stuff HSW and I'll

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:57.280
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. Eight