WEBVTT - Bat Tat: Labubu, OBDC, Frank 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. I got a haircut.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 2>That was actually that's the first thing I said to you, though,

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>after I told you that, I didn't want you to

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>watch me yogurt.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>But in other news, you got a neck tattoo.

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I got a neck tattoo last Friday.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a Batman.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the bat signal, the bat signal. Yeah, it's

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>a bat tat on my neck. It's my first tattoo.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 2>A little intense to get it on the neck.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't realize this tattoo, like having only one tattoo

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and having apian neck tattoo is pretty good.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 2>The tattoo artist asked me that as well. The thing is,

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I got the tattoo for my late pony Batman. I'd

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>had him since I was eleven. He passed away in May,

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 2>the day before my birthday. Also intense. I knew I

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>was going to get this tattoo when he did leave us.

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>So my answer to that question is when my cat

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>does get another tattoo. I wasn't expecting my TV producers

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>to be as into it as they were. We have

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>this thing called the.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Tattoo is news, I know, but I thought.

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 2>That, you know, we are a buttoned up financial news network.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought that they wouldn't be thrilled about it, but

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 2>they really wanted to do an on air reveal, so

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>we did. We had a man with a steady cam,

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>which is just a handheld camera essentially, come in and

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>zoom in on it at one point during one day show. Thankfully,

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't scabbing yet, so it still looked kind of good.

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>It's in like a little yeah. Yeah, I think it's

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>healing nicely. It was really painful. Are you going to

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 2>get a tattoo?

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 3>No? No, no, I've missed.

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you've had.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Had a tattoott man.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 2>I was kind of thinking about that that my first

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 2>tattoo was at thirty two years old. It's still I

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I feel like age, I'm too old for tattoo.

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like if you want a tattoo, you

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 2>probably get it in your teens twenties.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I feel like a lot of people enter a

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>new phase of life from their thirties and become tattoo people.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe yes.

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I saw it on Instagram on Friday and I said

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>to my wife, Oh, Katie got a neck tattoo, and

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what, I'm like, Katy is not just

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a financial news anchor, She's also an emo girl. Yeah.

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 2>At heart, I'm just trying to get back to my roots.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast. You're a

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>weekly podcast where we talk about stuff related to money.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levine and I write the Money Stuff column

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:39.119
<v Speaker 2>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what a lu booo is?

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I do? Are there impossible to escape? Did you know

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 2>what a little boo boo was? Prior to this week?

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely aware of the booboos as an important cultural force.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, do I.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Know what they are? Even now? I couldn't pick them

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>out of a lineup.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I really hate them. Sure, there's a print out of

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 2>a little Boo Boo between us on the table right now.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>And I like free creatures that they're freaky.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>They're freaky little things. Now you can trade derivatives of them.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Kind of them?

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely, yeah, you can trade binary options on the

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>boo boos. It's so good.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, through enthusiasm.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 2>I really I don't get it. This is one of

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the first cultural phenomenons where I just I feel like

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't get into the headspace to pay sure.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is like the four hundredth for me.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Really, yeah, that's true. See I'm still getting neck tattoos.

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 2>This is my limit though, so Calshi and stock x

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 2>our partner, so that there's going to be event contracts

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 2>tied to many things.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Ye, here's the Boo Boo's a third category of h

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and also some trading cards. Trading cards.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I don't understand this because I have my mind

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>dropped around what stock x does. And you know, there's

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>other alternative asset market places where you know, you can

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>buy shares of collectible items. I don't know how you

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>turn that into an events contract, right, this.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Is what I've been writing about. It's a weird mechanism.

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>What you can do is you can buy a yes

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>no contract that pays off a dollar if, like, you know,

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the price of some box of the Boo Boos is

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred and twenty dollars and it pays off

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>zero dollars if the price of that box of the

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>booos is less than one hundred you know, like you

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can turn any continuous variable into a binary. Right. You

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can say, if the price of Tesla is above four

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars, then you get a dollar, and if it's

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>below four hundred dollars, you don't get a dollar.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's not the most natural no product.

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 2>It seems not fun, but that's.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>It's lot fun. But I don't know, it's like kind

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of interesting, right. I don't know the reason for this,

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but I speculated on some reasons, the simplest of which is, like,

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>CALSHI is an event contract marketplace, right. I think that's

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what it does. It lets your bet on whether or

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not some event will happen. And if that's your lens,

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>then like you could turn anything in the world into

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a yes no event, Right, And if you get money

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>for trading, then you want to turn everything in the

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>world into a yes no event. And so you sort

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of look around and say what products can we trade?

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, well sneakers, I was like, well sneakers

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>are not really yes no events, but if you have to,

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you can make them into yes no events and you

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>can trade them.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, convolute the question in such a way that it

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 2>becomes and it's not like.

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>A crazy convolution, but it's like a little crazy it is. Yeah,

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a little crazy. Like I was looking at their charts,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and like they have like prices some sneaker

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and like there's a chart and the chart is like

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>four different lines for the probabilities of different like price levels,

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because you want the chart to be just like the price. Right,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>there's an intuitive chart of a sneaker price, and they

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>don't show that into ay, so it's a strange mechanism.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is just like a publicity stunt, but I've

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed writing about it because like one thing that is

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>going on here is that there is a belief, possibly

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a money motivated belief among people like who are in

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>prediction markets and who work at like big exchanges and

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>who are partnering with prediction markets that this is like

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the path to be in everything exchange, which is like

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the term that coinbase has used, like this is the

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>way that you can sort of suck everything in the

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>world into financial markets. And one point I've been making

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this wee because it's like kind of a rickety way.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Why does it have to be a prediction market like this?

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But it is something that people are pretty enthusiastic about,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of the day, if you're running

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a financial market, like one big category of what you're

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>doing is offering people more opportunities to bet, let's say,

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on more things. And this is the most general purpose

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>way that people have found to let people bet on things.

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I get the betting argument. People like to bet, and.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why they would run a bet on

0:06:59.200 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like the yesterday.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing. It has to be fun, right, and

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't seem as fun versus like I'm going to

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 2>buy shares of a meme stock and hope it goes

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>to the moon versus I'm going to hope the price

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 2>of the box of the La Boo Boos goes above

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>this certain threshold.

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I do wonder if this is like a baby

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>step on the way to some more moonworthy financial market.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>One thing I've written is that the essential thing here

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is that these are contracts with someone on either side

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of them, right, Like you're betting against someone else, and

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if you have a contract that can go to a

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, then the person on the either side of

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that has to put up collateral and could have to

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>put up a million dollars of collateral. Right, so you

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have like a really complicated and risky margining system if

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you're having bets that can go continuously as far as

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you want in either direction. Yeah, Whereas like traditional prediction markets,

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the bets are like you get a dollar or you

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>don't get a dollar. So the collateral and the margining

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is a lot easier and the risk is a lot lower.

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So these are like not super risky exchanges. The exchange

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:02.239
<v Speaker 1>itself not a particular riskue proposition as compared to oh, say,

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>certain crypto exchanges we've talked about. And so going from

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that system to a system where the price can be

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever the price is is like a you know, risky

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and complicated set of decisions, but possibly something that is

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in the future if you want to be at everything exchange.

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I do wonder how this can be manipulated this, right,

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean events, contracts on.

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. The answer I think is very clearly that

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it can't be because go on, who is trading this.

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The way to the way to manipulate this is like

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a contract on like the average price of some sneaker,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and I go and buy a bunch of the sneaker

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to push out the average price, right, and then I

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>win on my prediction market contract. But I assume that

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>however big the market for the sneaker is, it's probably

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>not that big like treasury bounds. However the market for

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the sneaker is, presumably the prediction market is like orders

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude smaller, because like, some people buy sneakers because

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they want to wear the sneakers weird, But like, how

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>many people are going to want to buy the contract

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that's like, oh, for the sneaker, price will be about

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty dollars. So I think that it's

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be very hard to manipulate because it is,

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point, two days in or whatever, a very

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>small derivative on top of a yeah, moderately larger market.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But in the long run, sure, Like you know, you

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>have an event contract that is a binary, right, it

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>pays zero or one, and it's on some underlying thing.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And the event contract gets big enough and it's like

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>trading a penny below the threshold, You'll buy some of

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the underlying thing to push it up about the threshold,

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and you make a lot of money on the contract.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like very easy to manipulate in concept. It's probably

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>very hard to manipulate right now in reality, but like,

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, give it time, get more things.

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I get it sea legs first.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing is, you know, I think about

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. Like the CFTC, the US Commodity's

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Futures Trading Commission, regulates commodities futures. It doesn't like really

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>regulate the market for wheat, you know, but it does regulate, like,

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't manipulate the wheat market if it's going to

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>affect commodity futures. So the CFTC has some like anti

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>manipulation powers. And if you put everything onto prediction markets,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>then everything becomes a commodity. And like the CFTC has

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to think about like were you buying those sneakers to

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>push out the price of sneaker futures?

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 2>And then it's like, yeah, it's going to be interesting

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to see how just the prediction market space matures, because

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>this I think is firmly silly season and I think

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>we can put it in that bucket.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think there are two paths for it maturing.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>One is like what everyone says, which is like it's

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 1>somehow like becomes a market for everything, and it's like

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>becomes like the way that companies and like real people

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>think about having risk and like predicting the future and

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like understanding probabilities and potentialities to the future. And then

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the other way is it's like a giant legalized sports book, right, yeah,

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of where my money is. But who knows,

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>who knows?

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was speaking to the CEO of CBO sure

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 2>last week.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Probably not in the legal live sports book.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 2>No, no, So Cibo doesn't have their own prediction markets

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>outfit yet, but they're going to roll something twenty five minutes. Well,

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 2>they're going to roll it out in the next few months,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 2>which is interesting because there's kind of a land grab

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>going on right now. I have to imagine that the

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 2>exchanges think about this all the time. They should've been.

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>During commodity futures for years, and now it's like it

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>turns out they were running a sports book and they

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't know it.

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Right. No sports, Cibo specifically is not going into sports

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 2>at least, that's that's what the CEO said mid November

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. So we have the receipts and like that.

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense because like if you're like Calshier polymarket and

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you're like a little hobbyist prediction site. And then like

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>sports is it's like enormous gusher of money. And then you

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>go into sports right if you're seabow, like you know,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>if you have like treasury, Yeah, like you know, there's

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like more money in sports books than there is is

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in like traditional prediction markets. There's more money in real

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>financial markets than there's in sports books.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. So they're focusing on economic and financial prediction

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 2>markets for the next forty five minutes.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Synergies there with interest rates and whatnot.

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. Booze from La Boo boos to owls,

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>owls the blue cones. One interesting week.

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>We've said of this before, but like you yes, your

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>first love besides your horse is ETFs. You love an ETF.

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked about private credit. We've talked a lot

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about retel private credit and like ETFs for private credit,

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>which is like a category that kind of sort of.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Exists, trying to make it make trying to make it thing.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And whenever we talk about that, I always say, there

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is a retail exchange traded fund category for private credit,

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and it is called a BDC or business development company,

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>which is a terrible name because it makes it sound

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like it's a business development company, and that is not

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what it is. I don't know what a business development

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>company would be, but it sounds like a company that

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>develops businesses, right, But in fact, a BDC is just

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a private credit fund. It's just a pot into which

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a manager like Blue Owl puts private credit investments.

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>And it's publicly traded.

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It's totally traded, and so investors can buy shares a

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>traded BDC. Not all some are like private like not traded, yes,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but like a listed BDC is just a stock on

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. You can buy shares. Anyone can buy shares.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>You can sell shares in the market. It's a little

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>bit like you need tof with one really important distinction.

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Go on.

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't redeem like you can sell your shares in

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the market. And so what that means is that the

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>price of the shares is the price of the shares.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>There's no mechanism to make sure that the price of

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the shares is in line with NAV, whereas like an ETF,

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like you know, if like the shares are trading below NAV,

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>then like you buy some shares and you pop them

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>out of you know, pop the assets out of the fund,

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and you get stuff at a Navy.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>In authorized participant.

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Whatever.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>With BDC's that's not necessarily the case, and it's therefore

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>not actually the case for whatever reason.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like we got another lesson in that

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>this week with Blue Owl having to call off the

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 2>merger between one of its publicly listed BDCs and then

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>a private fund.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So it has a thing called OBDC, which is like

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Al Business Development Company, which is a publicly

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>traded PDC, and it has a thing called OBDC two,

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a private BDC. So private BDC is like

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they sell it to you know, investors. It doesn't trade

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on the market. And so if you're an investor in

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>OBDC two, the private one, you can't get your money

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>back by just selling on the stock market. And so

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the way it works is that they have a redemption

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>mechanism where like every quarter they'll buy up to a

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of the shares back if you want to, right,

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>so they'll offer to buy shares back and you can

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>tender or not. And in recent months there's been a

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>little tension. Yes, they have bought back anyone's shares who's

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sell. But there's like been a little bit

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>more redemptions than they'd like, and there's like, you know,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a widespread sense that if it continued at that pace,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they would eventually get redemptions speak, which they're allowed to do, right, Like,

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they can sort of buy back as much as they want.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And so to get out ahead of that, they announced

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to merge these two funds. So

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had shares of ABC two, the private company,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you'd get shares of OBDC, the public company, and then

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you could sell those whenever you wanted, no problem, you

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:55.359
<v Speaker 1>don't have to redeem anymore. And that caused some unhappiness

0:15:55.600 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>because OBDC won the publicly traded one happens to traded

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a about a twenty percent discount and net asset value,

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and so instead of being able to get back one

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred cents on the dollar, you can get back eighty

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>cents on the dollar if you sell your public shares.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>No one wanted that, Yeah, so they ultimately called off

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the merger.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Specifically, when it comes to redemptions. In the third quarter,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 2>they approved about sixty million dollars worth that was already

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>exceeding their pre set limit. Here the discount they've been

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to address that, they've been doing, you know, a

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>bunch of share repurchases. They have a two hundred million

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>dollar program. But I could see how that would cause

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>some indigestion. Yeah, yeah, right, yeah, So now they're evaluating

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 2>how to go forward.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's hard because like the publicly traded product seems

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a better product for the manager and

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>getting people out of the private product into the public product.

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>The public product, for the manager's perspective is permanent capital, right,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Like they never have to redeem any of it. Yeah,

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they can if they want to, and they have been right,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing buybacks, which you can think of a

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>buyback as like a way to address the discount and

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>make shareholders happy, or you can think of it as

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like just an opportunistic trade where like they can buy

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred cents worth of stuff at eighty cents on

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. Right. But with the private company, it's like

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>people complaining when they don't get liquidity. You have asking

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:21.479
<v Speaker 1>for liquidity, so you have to pay up money when

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't necessarily want to. It's a less good product,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>but it is hard. To get people out when the

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>public product trades at a discount. Yeah, The other question

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that one might ask is why does the public product

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>trade at a discount? And some of the answer for

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that is, like everything trades at a discount, like clothes

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on funds trading at a discount, and like the traditional

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is, like you capitalize future fees in

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the discount, and so like you know, yeah, you'd rather

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>own one hundred cents worth of loans than one hundred

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>cents of worth of loans plus like the fees you

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>have to pay Blue Howel for the rest of time,

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>but in November of twenty twenty five. The other reason

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.239
<v Speaker 1>that there might be a discount is that there are

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>some people who believe you may not believe this, for

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>some people who believe that some private credit loans aren't

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>worth as much as private credit managers think they're.

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that seems to be a more and more pervasive view.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a you you Jamie Diamond said some word about cockroaches, et.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Cetera, et cetera, and so Jeffrey Gunlock.

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Everyone not everyone. I shouldn't say that. Mark Lipschels, Yeah,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>this is not like necessarily correct, but it is a

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you that people have. And so one reason that a

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded pot of private credit loans might trade at

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>eighty cents on the dollar is that some of the

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>people trading it don't really believe that the pot of

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>loans is worth the dollar. Yeah, and so if that's

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the case, then, like one, this merger is awkward. But too,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the awkwardness around this merger calls awkward attention to people's

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>worries about valuation.

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you can also see this just in

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 2>shares of blue Owl Proper, which are down like forty

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 2>something percent this year. They're at their lowest since twenty

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty three. A lot of that decline happened before we

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 2>got into any drama with the fund merger.

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like a little you know, blue Owl as

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a management company, Right, you don't get a pure sense

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>of like the valuation of the portfolio, but.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 2>People viewed as approximy I understand.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Right, the price of blue Owl shares tells you something

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>about what people think about the future cash flows of

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the private credit business. The price of OBDC shares tells

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you what people think about what the current loans are

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>currently worth. Right, And like there's slightly different.

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Questions, slightly different. Right.

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>The price of the Blue Owl shares going down suggests

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that people think that the private credit party is over

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>coming to an end, not as good as it used

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to be. That right, Yeah, the price of the business

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>developed company is possibly suggests cockroaches.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Possibly.

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's going to be interesting to see what happens here.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 2>According to Bloomberg News, they have until April to find

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>a solution or will consider liquidating or dissolving the vehicle.

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 2>According to filings, typically there's you know, some wiggle room

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 2>around those deadlines.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I will say pudating is like not a terrible outcome

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>for the childers because it's like, then you get one

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred cents on the dollar.

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, assuming she's the loans one.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Hundred and something better than eighty for sure.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Probably there's an incredible brain controversy. Let's say about Charlie.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Javis another one.

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So, she was the founder and c of a company

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>called Frank that like helped students fill out financial informs basically,

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and she sold it to JP Morgan for one hundred

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>and seventy million dollars. And the allegations are that she

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>sold it to them on the basis of like having

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>millions of devoted customers. And then it turned out that

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the customer email addresses and her database were fake,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and they sent out, you know, like JP Morgan is

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not really in the business of providing financialate advice, Like

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan bought Frank to get like access to this

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like devoted young customer base, and then they sent out

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.959
<v Speaker 1>an email to all of Frank's customers being like, hey,

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>sign up for JP Morgan credit card or whatever, and

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like all the emails bounced in there like wait a minute,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and so they sued her for fraud and then ultimately

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>got referred to prosecutors and she was arrested in charged

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>with fraud and tried and convicted and sentenced to seven

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>years in person.

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And she's now I'm trying to find the title that

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan gave her because it was pretty good. But anyway,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 2>go on.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>She was like, yeah, they bought Frank and she was

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>like made a managing director and head of Frank or whatever,

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>and it was.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Like head of students something.

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then like they'd send out this email and

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>it all bounced and they're like wait a minute, and

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they put her on leave and fired her and so forth.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>But because she was a Japy Morgan employee and because

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>she had a merger agreement where she's old Frank, they

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>had agreed to indemnify her for legal expenses and pay

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>her defense costs and and legal cases including it turns

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>out and they litigated this but they lost. They were

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on the hook to pay for her criminal defense, which

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is like, seems a little weird that, like, she defrauded

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>them allegedly and now convictedly and they had to pay

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for her legal defense. But it's not that weird, Like

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that's actually like a thing that happens somewhat regularly is

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you agree to and then the fire

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>your employees, even against charges that they stole from you.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But what has also happened is that she has racked

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>up astonishing, amazing, incredible legal bills, to the point that

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>people keep saying the legal bills might approach the amount

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred and seventy million dollars that she defrauded

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>from David Morgan. The legal bills are now nine digits, according.

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 2>To The Wall Street Journal, between her and her co

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 2>executive's legal defense to already cost more than one hundred

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 2>and forty two million dollars, So they're pretty dang close incredible, Yeah, clean,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 2>just kidding.

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>If the government to send you to prison and someone

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>else will pay for your lawyers, you might as well

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>hire all of the best lawyers and leave no stone

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>unturned in your defense, which I think is what happened.

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Like she hired really fancy lawyers, and they put in

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hours and they reviewed a lot of documents,

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and like from where I set, that doesn't seem all

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that useful, Like, you know, they she had a lot

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of emails being like, let's do fraud, right, That's not true.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>There is there is more of a defense of her

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>actions that I'm whatever. I mean, like, it's pretty bad fraud,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but if it's not your money, you might as well

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>spend as much as you can to take any shot

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of kind of prism. But the other thing is that

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is like at the Times, Ron Lever wrote

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>about this last week, like JP Morgan is trying to

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>claw back some of this money and like stop paying

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>for it. And one thing they're accusing her is like

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, enormous wasteful, unconscionable spending on legal bulls. But

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is they're like, she spent money on

0:23:59.200 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>salulate butter.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd never heard of it. Okay, I'm interested.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't exactly know why JP Morgan, in paying

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>her legal bills, would have paid her salulated better bills.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But I have a guess which I read about, which

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is that law firms will serve you lunch. Like you know,

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I used to work at a law firm and like,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 1>so I once worked on a deal where like we

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>had a client and like their negotiating meurger with some

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>other client, and the other client had another law firm

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and we were meeting at that other law firm's offices,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and our client was like, let's go to Walktell's offices.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>They have better food. And so we went to our offices,

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and we had better food, and it's much nicer to

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>be at our offices, Like you have like a sort

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>of negotiating advantage when it's at your office, right, And

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I was like, yeah, that's so nice. We got a

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>real advantage by having better food. And we didn't cook

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the food, you know, we ordered in, but like we

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>ordered in nice food. Like, on the one hand, it's

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>nice that we're doing this nice thing for the client,

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but we're billing it to the client, like the client

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>pays for all of this eventually, And so there's a

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff like that, where like, if you're a

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>client and you're at the law firm and you're paying

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the law firm an enormous bill, and you ask the

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>law firm to do anything at all for you, like

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>buy you a change of clothes because you've been there overnight,

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>really anything, they'll just do it for you, but then

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll put it on your bill, right, Yeah, And so

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that one thing that might be happening here

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is that Jamie Wagen is not only paying the law

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>firms bills. They're paying the law firms expenses, and the

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>law firm's expenses could pay some stuff for Charlie Jovis.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, according to the Wall Street Journal, lawyers were

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 2>billing for twenty hours of work in a single day. Sure,

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 2>so maybe there were day shift and night shift lawyers

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 2>working around the clock.

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 3>No, that's that's no, that's individual. That's the same I've

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 3>worked at a law firm.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's awesome. Luxury hotel of grades, fine, the cellulite butter. Again,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm very interested in that. But we should probably say that.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>A spokesperson for Charlie Avis says that Charlie says she

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 2>has nothing to do with that, and it's a ridiculous allegation.

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not obvious that they could have bought the

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>cell that had better for themselves. That's like you're on

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a work trip.

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 2>You're like, yeah, it's very it.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You got it, Like you build enough hours, you work

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>enough hours. You're like, I'm going to expense everything on

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this work trip.

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>It is very heteronormative that we assumed it was for.

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Well, right, because like JP Morgan is sort of

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>accusing her of wasting their money.

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it could have been the law.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>The law lawyers, right, the lawyers brack up whatever experences

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they rack angels.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is amazing And I didn't fully appreciate that.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 2>I would have just thought she's very expensive lawyers. But

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad that so many different news outlets have tackled this.

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that JP Morgan is going to be

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 2>able to stop paying for her legal defense?

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe?

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 2>When does it start to impact their earnings? Like when

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 2>do we see analysts ask.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Questions about this million dollar appeal?

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Someone asked Jamie Diamond next earnings call.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's true, it's true, it's true. I think sometimes

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>about like the level of like mistake that you have

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to make it a bank to be like asked about

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>on the earning call, and like to be fair, the

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy five million dollar acquisition of Frank

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely got raised on some calls, right, Like Jamie Diamond

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>has addressed this, I think more than once. Yeah, with

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>like analysts and reporters, people be like, yeah, could you

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>do such bad due diligence and spent one hundred and

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>sef you have a million dollars in this company that

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know just have fay Gmail addresses. But now we're

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>getting to that level, getting to be a double dime.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Christ had Charlie Javis is exactly my age. She was

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 2>born in March of nineteen ninety three. She said, so much,

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 2>what have I done?

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 3>God?

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 2>What a whirlwind that must have been. Yeah, and by

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the time she gets out of prison, when she eventually goes,

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean she'll still be a relatively young woman. Yeah,

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 2>early forties, a lot to live for. She could still

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 2>get a tattoo.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Money Stuff podcast I'm Matt.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Levine and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to The Money

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Stuffnoletter on Bloomberg.

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Dot com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 2>every day on the close between three and five pm Eastern.

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>question and we might answer it on the air.

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamazerakis and Moses

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>ondem Our.

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Amy Keen is our executive producer.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 2>And Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>back next week with more stuff.