Speaker 1: We are not doing everything we can do with the
Speaker 1: things that are under our control.
Speaker 2: We didn't need the diaries to show us how corrupt
Speaker 2: that was. He was really between a rock and a
Speaker 2: hard place. If he answered truthfully would further destroy his reputation.
Speaker 2: If he answered falsely, it would leave him vulnerable to
Speaker 2: other legal jeopardy.
Speaker 3: You can look at the history of these midterm elections.
Speaker 4: When a president's in office, usually people just get, you know, itchy,
Speaker 4: and want some sort of change a couple of years in.
Speaker 4: So even when things are going great and everybody's really happy,
Speaker 4: it's hard to win a midterm election.
Speaker 1: So the jobs market, it's bad. Everybody who's looking for
Speaker 1: work or as a kid looking for work knows the
Speaker 1: job's market is tough right now, certainly for Americans, it
Speaker 1: just is. And this is not just high level, high
Speaker 1: paying jobs. Entry level jobs that were available when I
Speaker 1: was a young teenager, entry level jobs you don't work
Speaker 1: in at McDonald's or something like that. They were everywhere.
Speaker 1: They were plentiful. Even those jobs very very difficult to
Speaker 1: come by. So my oldest seventeen years old, obviously, once
Speaker 1: a job I love that wants to work ONTs to
Speaker 1: earn money. It's good. So at the start of this
Speaker 1: summer he decides he's going to go start trying to
Speaker 1: find a job. And he's aware that the jobs market's
Speaker 1: really tight, but he decides he's going to go start
Speaker 1: trying to find a job. And so we had a conversation,
Speaker 1: a very honest, frank conversation, and it went something like this, Hey,
Speaker 1: the job's market is bad. This is going to be difficult.
Speaker 1: But if you want to succeed, the only thing you
Speaker 1: can control is how many places you go and put
Speaker 1: an application in their head. That's the only thing you
Speaker 1: can control. You can't change the jobs market or anything else,
Speaker 1: but that at least is in your control. And if
Speaker 1: you do that, you go out there, you walk into
Speaker 1: enough places, shake hands, hand it an application, you do
Speaker 1: it enough times, you will probably find it will work
Speaker 1: out for you in the end because you took care
Speaker 1: of what you can control. You with me, this applies
Speaker 1: to so many different things in our lives, and it
Speaker 1: certainly applies to politics in American culture today, and it
Speaker 1: applies for people like you and me, anti communists who
Speaker 1: don't want the animals to take over the country. We
Speaker 1: don't want we're worried about Democrats and what they're saying
Speaker 1: and open borders and all those things are fair. I'm
Speaker 1: very worried too. I'm worried just like you are. But
Speaker 1: here's what sucks. We're about to talk about something kind
Speaker 1: of good. I can't do anything about Chuck Schumer. Nothing.
Speaker 1: I don't live in New York. Even if I did
Speaker 1: live in New York, maybe you live in New York.
Speaker 1: The numbers are what they are. I politically am completely
Speaker 1: unable to do anything about Chuck Schumer, AOC, Kevin new
Speaker 1: some whatever Koop gets elected in Oregon. I don't have power.
Speaker 1: I don't live in those places, and even if I did,
Speaker 1: I would be so outnumbered. I can't do anything there.
Speaker 1: But we're constantly looking and saying, how do we change that?
Speaker 1: I want to change? How do we stop that? But
Speaker 1: I would argue this we I'm putting myself in this too.
Speaker 1: We are not doing everything we can do with the
Speaker 1: things that are under our control. You see, we're worried
Speaker 1: about New York, California, La. What about Utah, Oklahoma, Texas,
Speaker 1: South Carolina, North? What about the blood red states? I
Speaker 1: get emails all the time, all the time to my
Speaker 1: show and the great emails by the way, that this
Speaker 1: is not an insult, but I get emails all the
Speaker 1: time of people saying, Hey, Jesse, I want to do more,
Speaker 1: but I live in a blood red area. What can
Speaker 1: I do? Jesse, live in a red area? What can
Speaker 1: I do? And my answer is always the same. Your
Speaker 1: red area has so many snakes and traders and fake
Speaker 1: Republicans who are elected in it, in your town and
Speaker 1: your state. There are so many snakes and traders in
Speaker 1: red areas that should be primaried and removed. And guests
Speaker 1: who has at least some control of that. You and
Speaker 1: me I live here in Texas. You understand that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump won Utah by twenty two percent. Twenty two percent.
Speaker 1: Utah is unbelievably read. Utah could elect me if the
Speaker 1: Utah GOP primary voter would get up and get involved. Instead,
Speaker 1: this guy represented Utah for years.
Speaker 5: Being able to take an amount which equals what about
Speaker 5: five percent of our military budget actually less than five
Speaker 5: percent of our military budget each year to help the
Speaker 5: Ukrainians is about the best national defense spending I think
Speaker 5: we've ever done.
Speaker 4: Have you seen any evidence that President Biden has committed
Speaker 4: high crimes and misdemeanors.
Speaker 5: No, I don't see any evidence of that at all.
Speaker 5: I'd be happy to vote for a number of the
Speaker 5: Democrats too. I mean it would be an upgrade from,
Speaker 5: in my opinion, from Donald Trump, and perhaps also from
Speaker 5: Joe Biden. Look I like President Biden, you know, I
Speaker 5: find a very charming, engaging person.
Speaker 6: Hy Senator, why is it important for you to be
Speaker 6: out here today?
Speaker 7: We need a voice against racism.
Speaker 5: We need many voices against racism and against brutality. We
Speaker 5: need to stand up and say the black lives matter.
Speaker 1: He's not from California, He's from Utah. We are so
Speaker 1: concerned about the blue areas in the country, but we're
Speaker 1: not doing all the things we need to do that
Speaker 1: are in our control. Oh and by the way, maybe
Speaker 1: you're thinking, well, okay, Utah screwed up. Guy had great name,
Speaker 1: Mighty ran for president. Hey, we screwed up one time.
Speaker 1: At least we're gonna make it right. Nope, this is
Speaker 1: the new senator from Utah.
Speaker 7: So listen. I've learned sadly, I can't control anybody but me, right,
Speaker 7: and the best thing I can do is set my example.
Speaker 7: And I think all of us need to wake up
Speaker 7: every morning, look in the mirror and say, what are
Speaker 7: we doing? What am I doing specifically today to make
Speaker 7: this country a better country? To make all of our
Speaker 7: immigrants feel more welcome. That's what we've always had.
Speaker 1: Lifelong Democrat, the United States senator now from Blood Red Utah.
Speaker 1: He wakes up every day and thinks you and I
Speaker 1: should be waking up thinking how can I make America
Speaker 1: better for immigrants. By the way, you just introduced the
Speaker 1: bill in the Senate. It's an amnesty bill. We can
Speaker 1: go into all the visa stuff in it, but it's
Speaker 1: just amnesty bill. The senator from the state Donald Trump
Speaker 1: won by twenty two percent. The Republican senator just introduced
Speaker 1: an amnesty bill in the United States Senate. Why are
Speaker 1: we worried about Chuck Schumer. I hope you don't think
Speaker 1: I'm picking on Utah. I adore Utah, so I do
Speaker 1: pick on Utah. Oklahoma. Look, Oklahoma, I mean Oklahoma. This guy,
Speaker 1: this guy was just your senator.
Speaker 8: And so what I'm saying is let me work with
Speaker 8: you on this stuff. I'm not handling things like maybe
Speaker 8: the past secretary had. I'm just saying, let's work to
Speaker 8: get the worst of the worst off the streets, and
Speaker 8: then you won't see me in your cities and states
Speaker 8: like you do as much because of my presence won't
Speaker 8: be as big. In fact, you probably want to see
Speaker 8: us at all.
Speaker 1: Worst of the worst. That's a Democrat line. That's that's
Speaker 1: a line that Barack Obama used. That's a Democrat line.
Speaker 1: That's a line that communists use to ensure we won't
Speaker 1: mass deport anybody that will just kind of nibble around
Speaker 1: the edges a little bit. Oh yeah, I grab this
Speaker 1: cereal rapist. Maybe this guy you go to a bunch
Speaker 1: of people in El salvad the war, But hey, we
Speaker 1: just want the worst of the worst. What and again
Speaker 1: he's not from California. And by the way, as long
Speaker 1: as I'm picking on Oklahoma, this Ginger Eunuch is your
Speaker 1: other Senator.
Speaker 4: Do you think that whatever you're working on will have
Speaker 4: to include a path to citizenship for Dreamers?
Speaker 6: I do.
Speaker 9: I've been pretty outspoken on that for even last September,
Speaker 9: Senator Tillis and I both put out a proposal to
Speaker 9: get citizenship for those individuals that are in the doctor
Speaker 9: program or were eligible for the doctor program. Because we've
Speaker 9: got a group that was in the doctor program. But
Speaker 9: we've got a group that never signed up, never went
Speaker 9: to the paperwork, for whatever reason they were eligible for it.
Speaker 9: We'd like to those individuals to be able to have
Speaker 9: access the citizenship as well.
Speaker 1: A Bloome I can't believe a Gavin Newsom did. What
Speaker 1: are we doing? Are we doing everything we can that's
Speaker 1: in our power. Are we putting in an app twenty
Speaker 1: applications a day or are we doing once a week
Speaker 1: and then saying the jobs market sucks? Doesn't work that
Speaker 1: way and the look, if I have to finish on
Speaker 1: a positive note, let me finish this way. Some of
Speaker 1: us are waking up and getting more involved, and we
Speaker 1: are punishing these people at the ballot box. People like
Speaker 1: this are gone.
Speaker 10: Docer recipients must have a permanent legislative solution. They deserve
Speaker 10: nothing less. We need to take action and pass legislation
Speaker 10: that will unequivocally allow these young men and women to
Speaker 10: stay in the only home in the only country they've known.
Speaker 1: He's gone. We can do this, and I realize there
Speaker 1: are special circumstances around that one, but we can do this.
Speaker 1: We need to clean up our own house before we
Speaker 1: look across the street and try to clean up Massachusetts, Connecticut,
Speaker 1: New York. We have a red state GOP problem, and
Speaker 1: only the red state GOP primary voter can fix that problem.
Speaker 1: We're not doing everything we can do. We're getting better,
Speaker 1: but we're not doing everything we can do. That's what
Speaker 1: we need to fix, and that's why you need to
Speaker 1: get some chalk in your body so you have the
Speaker 1: energy and focus needed to fix it. I'm not even
Speaker 1: close to kidding. This is about your energy levels, it's
Speaker 1: about your focus, It's about your mood. When you if
Speaker 1: you're a woman, start taking a female vitality stack, natural
Speaker 1: herbal supplements or a man male vitality stack, it's going
Speaker 1: to be pretty soon. I'm talking sixty days, ninety days,
Speaker 1: you're just gonna notice you just feel better, less down,
Speaker 1: and in the mood to move to do things. That's
Speaker 1: because you have what you need inside your body. It's
Speaker 1: about you being better, feeling better all the time. I've
Speaker 1: taken a male vitality stack for over four years. Every
Speaker 1: day Chalk dot Com, slash Jesse TV. We'll be back.
Speaker 2: So I would want to know, you know, to what
Speaker 2: extent were you involved in sabotaging hydroxylcorcin I've remected and
Speaker 2: and did you do that because you knew the only
Speaker 2: only way you get in emergency use authorization for these drugs,
Speaker 2: these experimental gene therapy was if there was no effect
Speaker 2: or treatment, get the emergency youth authorization. So is that
Speaker 2: why you help sabotage these cheap generic drugs in favor
Speaker 2: of ambesperary, which, by the way, nurses, are you where
Speaker 2: the fact that nurses called it run death is near.
Speaker 1: On the advisive Council?
Speaker 4: I respectfully declined to answer based upon my right.
Speaker 1: I totally enjoyed that last week. I still watch it.
Speaker 1: I watched it a bunch of times over the weekend.
Speaker 1: I bet Senator Ron Johnson enjoyed it a great deal,
Speaker 1: but he's probably too nice to admit that. Joining me
Speaker 1: now great senator for the state from the state of Wisconsin. Senator.
Speaker 1: So it was actually more malicious than I thought it
Speaker 1: was going to be. I'm talking about the revelations in
Speaker 1: the FAUCI you know, documents, the emails. It was not naivete,
Speaker 1: It wasn't mistakes. He just lied all the time about everything.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that hearing was devastating to doctor Fauci's reputation it lay,
Speaker 2: it should lay in shatters. Unfortunately, you've got probably about
Speaker 2: half of America who still thinks he's Saint Fauci and
Speaker 2: he is the science. If you listen to Democrats on
Speaker 2: that committee, they were all seeing his praises and saying,
Speaker 2: what a travesty that that hearing was. I mean, Chairman
Speaker 2: Paul did a great job in his opening statement, just
Speaker 2: laid out, you know, the extent to which Anthony Fauci
Speaker 2: covered up his complicity in the game function research to
Speaker 2: probably produced the coronavirus, then covering up for it, claiming
Speaker 2: it was a conspiracy theory, say it was a man
Speaker 2: made even though the people he originally consulted with that's
Speaker 2: certainly what they thought as well. You know, for my part,
Speaker 2: I just wanted to point out what, you know, the
Speaker 2: legacy me he continues to cover up. I mean, they
Speaker 2: covered up for Fauci, They're they're covering up for people
Speaker 2: like Peter Marx, for for people in these health agencies
Speaker 2: that covered up the safety signals, that covered up the
Speaker 2: fact that they diagnosed and treated the injection injured, so
Speaker 2: those people still can't get treatment to today. I thought
Speaker 2: Josh Holly did a fabulous job being a prosecutor and
Speaker 2: just laying out the case of how Anthony Fauci corruptly
Speaker 2: used government resources employees to detrol for these awards worth
Speaker 2: over a million dollars while while me and these people
Speaker 2: dying from the pandemic probably cost by his gain of function.
Speaker 2: I thought Bernie Marino did a fabulous job of again
Speaker 2: just laying out just devastating his character. So that was
Speaker 2: a very bad day for doctor Fauci.
Speaker 1: Senator, you mentioned the gain of function thing, and it's
Speaker 1: hard to look at the timeline of everything, the lies
Speaker 1: and what he lied about when and not come to
Speaker 1: at least some sort of a conclusion that that was
Speaker 1: really that was the big lie in the beginning, and
Speaker 1: every lie that came after that was a lie to
Speaker 1: cover up for the previous lie. It seems to be
Speaker 1: he was funding it, knew he was funding it, didn't
Speaker 1: want to get caught, so we just started lying about everything.
Speaker 1: Is that all line?
Speaker 2: It isn't. What really this shows is the complicity of
Speaker 2: the media in all this. We've known about the cover
Speaker 2: up of gain of function literally for years, as soon
Speaker 2: as we got access to and it's been a couple
Speaker 2: of years now of the email changed between Anthy Fauci
Speaker 2: Francis Collins. You know those biologists who originally thought, look, sure,
Speaker 2: it looks like it's man made to me. You know,
Speaker 2: because the fear and Cleavers site within a couple of
Speaker 2: days recognizing that they had been receiving grants from Faucci,
Speaker 2: that they would be receiving them in the future, and
Speaker 2: some of them got them. All of a sudden, they
Speaker 2: came up this proximate origin. They all started seeing out
Speaker 2: of the same hymndo that oh Man made his conspiracy theory. Again,
Speaker 2: we've known that for years. We didn't need the diaries
Speaker 2: to show us how corrupt that was, that cover up was.
Speaker 2: But again, it just took that additional piece of evidence
Speaker 2: and Chairman Paul holding that hearing and getting Anti Fauci
Speaker 2: to claim the fifth one hundred eleven times. By the way,
Speaker 2: it was a great quote I just saw today from
Speaker 2: Anthony Fauci being interviewed at sixty minutes saying, Oh, I'm
Speaker 2: goin testified before any O repsyched me. I've gotten nothing
Speaker 2: to hide. Well, he obviously had one hundred eleven things
Speaker 2: to hide, at.
Speaker 1: Least Senator on that subject the Fifth Amendment. Look, everybody,
Speaker 1: everybody's talked to a lawyer by this point time, and
Speaker 1: the same conclusion has been reached. He has immunity, so
Speaker 1: he can't take the fifth. He has immunity, so we
Speaker 1: can't take the fifth. But he did take the fifth.
Speaker 1: So what happens next? Where do we vote from here?
Speaker 2: Well, again, we'll hold a markup to vote him in
Speaker 2: contempt to Congress in the committee. I don't know whether
Speaker 2: we can refer directly to the Just Department or whether
Speaker 2: we need to get that is a vote on the
Speaker 2: full Senate, which couse Democrats won't vote contempt. I'm sure
Speaker 2: Just Apartment could potentially pick it up themselves. I mean,
Speaker 2: obviously he's lied to Congress repeatedly on funding gain and
Speaker 2: function and in not influencing the intelligence committees or in
Speaker 2: communities assessment on COVID knee deep into that assessment. Totally
Speaker 2: lied about that as well. So again he's couple in
Speaker 2: so many different ways in terms of taking the fifth.
Speaker 2: You know, he was really in between a rock and
Speaker 2: a hard place. If he answered truthfully, he would further
Speaker 2: destroy his reputation. If he answered falsely, it would leave him,
Speaker 2: you know, able to other legal jeopardy, but at the
Speaker 2: same time, if you answered truthfully, could also subject him
Speaker 2: to prosecution under state charges. So understood, I understand why
Speaker 2: he did what he did. From my standpoint, the first
Speaker 2: level of accountability and almost the most important with the
Speaker 2: you know, narcissistic megalomaniac like Anthony Fauci, is to expose
Speaker 2: him and destroy his reputation. And that's what happened in
Speaker 2: spades last Wednesday.
Speaker 1: Let's shift gears and talk about something possibly worse. I
Speaker 1: don't know. The Senate passes a bill to avoid a
Speaker 1: government shutdown. Should I be crying? Should I be celebrating?
Speaker 1: What is this?
Speaker 2: Listen? I think government shutdowns are bad. They increase cost
Speaker 2: the government.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: Certainly Democrats would blame Republicans even though they're the obstructionists.
Speaker 2: The media, the legacy met would basically take the Democrat side.
Speaker 2: We need to we need to prevent Democrats from taking
Speaker 2: over the House, from gaining more power there there their
Speaker 2: policy is destructive. In Wisconsin, they've got a radical socialist
Speaker 2: or radical left socialists or probably be the Democrat candidate
Speaker 2: for governor. They have the same thing in terms of
Speaker 2: a Senate candidate in Michigan. We already know what Mondanmi
Speaker 2: or Mondani is doing in New York. So it's a
Speaker 2: really very sad state of affairs in America. Where Democrats
Speaker 2: used to have to hide the fact that they were
Speaker 2: closet communist and socialists, now they're coming out of the clauset.
Speaker 2: Now they are absolutely they're not afraid to admit that
Speaker 2: that's an indictment on our education system in our news
Speaker 2: media that they haven't pointed out how disastrous communism and
Speaker 2: socialism is, socialism is anywhere it's put into effect.
Speaker 1: How much of that that they're embrace of socialism, how
Speaker 1: much of it comes down to the fact that they're
Speaker 1: afraid of these DSSA types. They keep running to the
Speaker 1: news and saying things, well, we're a big tent, We're
Speaker 1: a big tent. And every time I hear some Democrats
Speaker 1: say that to MS now, I think to myself, that's
Speaker 1: a Democrat who doesn't want to be primary.
Speaker 2: Well again, Democrats, all they care about is power, and
Speaker 2: so yeah, they're happy to have a big, big tenth.
Speaker 2: They'll welcome anybody into that tent that will deliver votes
Speaker 2: for them and give them power. And maintain their power.
Speaker 2: You have to understand that what the Democrats primary gain
Speaker 2: is to turn America into one party nation. It's why
Speaker 2: they open up our borders, why they vote against any
Speaker 2: election integrity lab You know, the Junior Center of Michigan
Speaker 2: kind of said the quiet part out law when she said, boy,
Speaker 2: if we pass Save America Act, I mean we're going
Speaker 2: to have a hard time winning any elections. Yeah, if
Speaker 2: you can't cheat, you can't win. That's why they refuse
Speaker 2: to restore confidence our elections and any kind of election
Speaker 2: and tegrity measures. So again, if we're not able to
Speaker 2: pass Save America Act, and it's going to be very
Speaker 2: difficult to through reconciliations, there's things we can do, and
Speaker 2: we're going to try and do those things. But blame
Speaker 2: the Democrats. They are the ones that refuse to vote
Speaker 2: for election integrity measures.
Speaker 1: Well, what are we going to get in reconciliation or
Speaker 1: what do you think we're going to get? I know
Speaker 1: we're not going to get to Save America Act. I
Speaker 1: get that.
Speaker 2: Well, again, I think there's some things that could be
Speaker 2: very helpful in terms of funding election tegrity measures. Now
Speaker 2: it will Democrat the jurisdictions embrace it. Probably not, but
Speaker 2: they're gonna elect Democrats anywhere. We really need to put
Speaker 2: pressure on the purple states, you know, like Wisconsin, clean
Speaker 2: up their voter roles, to you know, institute election integrity measures,
Speaker 2: use what funding is available to do exactly those things.
Speaker 2: But that'll be up to the voters in those states
Speaker 2: at some point in time. You have to realize it's
Speaker 2: up to the voters of this country to make sure
Speaker 2: that the Democrats and Democrats, Social Party, Socialist Party doesn't
Speaker 2: destroy it.
Speaker 1: Senator so good them. I appreciate you, sir, all right,
Speaker 1: talking more about this with Stu. He's always a good
Speaker 1: time in a moment before we do that. I'm America first.
Speaker 1: You're America first. But that has to be more than
Speaker 1: just saying America first. Right. We have to put those
Speaker 1: words into practice in various ways, including where we spend
Speaker 1: or don't spend our money. Now that big corporate America
Speaker 1: is certainly big Wireless has chosen to participate and not
Speaker 1: on our side, we have an obligation to find patriotic companies.
Speaker 1: That's that's what pure Talk is. Pure Talk is run
Speaker 1: by a guy who did two tours in Vietnam with
Speaker 1: Mac Vsog Pure Talk. They hire Americans while all these
Speaker 1: other companies are busy sending every American job overseas. Not
Speaker 1: Pure Talk Americans save a fortunate fraction of the cost
Speaker 1: of the big guys. All you have to do is
Speaker 1: go to Puretalk dot com, slash Jesse TV. We'll be back,
Speaker 1: all right. So poll numbers. Nobody likes poll numbers when
Speaker 1: they don't show good things. Everyone loves pull numbers when
Speaker 1: they show, you know, good things. That's human nature, it's
Speaker 1: how they react. And we understand Donald Trump's nature in
Speaker 1: general is going to be kind of the brag about everything.
Speaker 1: That's how he's always been. He was that way when
Speaker 1: he was a businessman. Everything's the best ever, the most
Speaker 1: beautiful ever. That's it's just Trump's way. You can love
Speaker 1: it or hate it, but that's Trump's way. So he
Speaker 1: came out today and he said this quote, My real
Speaker 1: polling numbers, not those made up ones by the fake
Speaker 1: news media, are the best they have ever been. And
Speaker 1: why wouldn't they be. Don't believe the radical lefts fake
Speaker 1: poll numbers. They are crooked and corrupt, just like the
Speaker 1: country destroying democrats are crooked and corrupt. Joining me now,
Speaker 1: my buddy Stubergear, host of Predictable, was stuberg Ear, Stu, Look,
Speaker 1: it's Donald Trump. We all get what it's going to be.
Speaker 1: Everything's golden age and stuff like that. How do the
Speaker 1: polls actually look.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, you know, you're right, it's Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: But it's every campaign, right, every campaign justifies pole numbers
Speaker 4: and denies the ones they don't like and celebrates the
Speaker 4: ones that they do like. It is a I wouldn't
Speaker 4: say it's a great moment for Donald Trump's poll numbers.
Speaker 4: They're about as low as they've been in either of
Speaker 4: his two terms.
Speaker 3: When it comes to his approval ratings.
Speaker 4: That being said, to put it in context, if you
Speaker 4: back up four years, there's still above where Joe Biden's
Speaker 4: poll numbers were. You know, again, it's a low hurdle
Speaker 4: to clear, but it is one that he is currently clearing.
Speaker 4: And it just sets up you know, when it comes
Speaker 4: to and you know history better than anybody, Jesse. It's
Speaker 4: like when you look at the history of these midterm elections.
Speaker 4: When a president's in office, usually people just get you know,
Speaker 4: itchy and want some sort of change. A couple of
Speaker 4: years in so even when things are going great and
Speaker 4: everybody's really happy, it's hard to win a midterm election.
Speaker 4: Add into the fact that Republicans have really small margins
Speaker 4: and things aren't going so great in some key areas,
Speaker 4: it's going to be a difficult November. That doesn't mean
Speaker 4: they can't turn it around, but it's it's a tough road.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's talk about that, a difficult November. Because there
Speaker 1: are varying degrees of that, right, there's bad, there's very bad.
Speaker 1: There's I'm starving and all we have to eat in
Speaker 1: the house is cottage cheese bad. How bad is it?
Speaker 3: I hope it's not cottage cheese bad, because that is.
Speaker 3: It's clumpy, it's runny, it's just awful. I just can't
Speaker 3: take it.
Speaker 4: So it's a great point because there are definitely variations
Speaker 4: of that. A normal bad situation would be something like,
Speaker 4: you know, Republicans losing the House. They have almost no majority. Anyway,
Speaker 4: it's very very likely. I mean, I do prediction markets
Speaker 4: for a living, and you know they're at about eighty
Speaker 4: six percent chance for Democrats to win.
Speaker 3: I think that's honestly probably appropriately priced at this point.
Speaker 4: So you know that them losing there is honestly expected
Speaker 4: when take everything out of the account where, however you
Speaker 4: feel about affordability or Iran or whatever issue you care about,
Speaker 4: you'd expect Republicans to lose the House in this situation.
Speaker 4: The next level of bad, I would say is Republicans
Speaker 4: losing the Senate, which is doable because but not super likely,
Speaker 4: because there's just the playing field is really in republicans favor.
Speaker 4: They'd have to lose seats, like you know, you're talking
Speaker 4: about seats like Ohio and Texas and things of that nature.
Speaker 4: Would have to be at risk and not picking up anything,
Speaker 4: even in a state like Michigan. So there's a chance
Speaker 4: that they lose that prediction. Markets now see it as
Speaker 4: a slight favorite for Republicans to hold the Senate. When
Speaker 4: I look at the structure of the Senate, I think
Speaker 4: you have to go almost to catastrophic levels for them
Speaker 4: to lose it. And you know you both you and
Speaker 4: I are both in Texas right now as we're talking
Speaker 4: about this. I keep coming back to the same thing,
Speaker 4: and I don't know if you feel the same way.
Speaker 4: I know Texans I can't imagine they're going to fall
Speaker 4: for a guy that is telling us that God is
Speaker 4: non binary and that we need reparations. And James Tarricos
Speaker 4: seems like the type of candidate that it would be
Speaker 4: nearly impossible for Texans to fall for. But it is
Speaker 4: possible that Paxson has some flaws on that side.
Speaker 3: I think that's your catastrophic cottage cheese situation.
Speaker 4: If you're looking at races like Texas that are going down,
Speaker 4: you're looking at a situation where Republicans not only are
Speaker 4: not going to be able to get any bills passed,
Speaker 4: but they're also not going to be able to get.
Speaker 3: Their Supreme Court justices through.
Speaker 4: They're not going to be able to change rules in
Speaker 4: a Senate, all these things that we talk about now
Speaker 4: as possibilities and advantages of having the Senate go away,
Speaker 4: and then you're really in a lane duck presidency and
Speaker 4: Donald Trump's not going to react well to that situation.
Speaker 1: Okay, So let's talk about this Texas race kind of
Speaker 1: in a more broad way. So you have Ken Paxon
Speaker 1: against Bottom. I got it. Bottom's a freak. Everyone understands
Speaker 1: all that. But are we simply dealing with a motivation
Speaker 1: problem where it's not necessarily the bottom is so wonderful
Speaker 1: or Ken Paxon is you know, the spawn of Satan.
Speaker 1: It's not that. But the truth is that if you're
Speaker 1: a communist, you are uniquely motivated to vote this no
Speaker 1: vent and the right kind of is the.
Speaker 4: Yes. I think that's where we are right now, and
Speaker 4: I think there's a distinction to me made from where
Speaker 4: we are right now to where we might be in November.
Speaker 4: I mean, if you think about the way this played
Speaker 4: out in Texas, you had this bruising sort of primary
Speaker 4: between corn and Talla Rico. And you know, I've been
Speaker 4: on the wrong side of a million primaries. My candidates
Speaker 4: always freaking lose, so I'm used to that happening in
Speaker 4: a lot of situations. I'm not a corn And fan
Speaker 4: at all in this situation, but I know the feeling.
Speaker 4: Right if you were a corn And fan and you
Speaker 4: wanted Corner to win, and you thought he was the
Speaker 4: only guy that could win this election, and they hate
Speaker 4: each other, they're trashing each other on the air every
Speaker 4: ad for months and months and months and months. Where
Speaker 4: one of these guys trash in the other, it's hard
Speaker 4: to bring yourself to that position where you say, in summer,
Speaker 4: when it's one hundred degrees out, your kids are at camp,
Speaker 4: you're thinking about vacation. Oh, well, I'm really gonna support
Speaker 4: James Telleric or I'm going to really support Paxton. When
Speaker 4: it comes to November, You're much more likely to say
Speaker 4: I might not show up a lot to spite him.
Speaker 4: I'm going to tell the Polster that I'm going for
Speaker 4: Talla Rica. Whatever that is. That anger kind of still
Speaker 4: lingers around for a while. It tends to evaporate as
Speaker 4: you get closer and closer and closer to November and
Speaker 4: you start thinking, wait a minute, I might we might
Speaker 4: lose a Supreme Court justice over this pick. You know,
Speaker 4: there are real significant consequences to who controls the Senate.
Speaker 4: So I think a lot of those Republicans, even corn Republicans,
Speaker 4: wind up.
Speaker 1: Coming back to the fold.
Speaker 3: That's why I'm a little more confident than the markets are.
Speaker 4: Prediction markets have that race at about fifty two percent
Speaker 4: for Paxston, just a slight favorite. I think he's more
Speaker 4: like a seventy seventy five percent chance to win that race.
Speaker 4: It is losable, though, and it shouldn't be. This is
Speaker 4: freaking Texas. This should not be one of those situations
Speaker 4: where we have to worry about this, especially with a
Speaker 4: guy like Taller Rico, who I would argue is even
Speaker 4: a worse candidate than Better o' rourke, who is terrible.
Speaker 3: He lost.
Speaker 4: I think tall Rico's even worse. So unless Paxson, if
Speaker 4: there's another scandal or something stupid like that happens, I
Speaker 4: do think that Republicans come back to the fold eventually.
Speaker 1: Stude tell me about these prediction markets, because I'm really
Speaker 1: old and bald and going gray, and I just don't
Speaker 1: understand this world at all. And I know it's enormous, right,
Speaker 1: It's absolutely massive. Now, what is all this?
Speaker 4: You know, it's funny you say that, just because I
Speaker 4: think you'd be great at them, because you have a
Speaker 4: really good sense as to what the motivation of individuals
Speaker 4: are like. You know, I read your book when you're
Speaker 4: talking about the Communist Manifesto. Basically you're talking about communist mindset.
Speaker 4: They will act in a way that is relatively predictable.
Speaker 4: You think about how you go back to certain scenarios
Speaker 4: where you have a year that's maybe leaning more red right,
Speaker 4: it's more of a Republican year. A lot of times
Speaker 4: you'd see Democrats wind up picking candidates that try to
Speaker 4: present themselves that way. They try to present themselves as moderate,
Speaker 4: try to present themselves as electable.
Speaker 3: And that's all there.
Speaker 4: When the Communists sees the opening though, when they know,
Speaker 4: wait a minute, we don't have to deal with a
Speaker 4: you know, you know, some Republican, you know, light candidate
Speaker 4: in the Democratic Party.
Speaker 11: We can go all the way.
Speaker 4: We can go after the socialists that this is the way,
Speaker 4: Mom Donnie was thinking, this is the environment where I
Speaker 4: can get a Chevalier elected, right, and when they see
Speaker 4: that opportunity, they don't stop.
Speaker 3: We do right.
Speaker 4: When we have an opportunity to put a real conservative in,
Speaker 4: we're still run the run of the mill establishment person
Speaker 4: half the time because we just don't have that killer
Speaker 4: instinct at times. I think the left has. The left
Speaker 4: takes those people. So you look at a race like
Speaker 4: New York. We did really, really well on that race.
Speaker 4: We picked all of those Mam Donnie people to win
Speaker 4: and made money on all of those races because think
Speaker 4: of the mindset of that voter, Think of who that
Speaker 4: person is, A person who'd even consider voting for someone
Speaker 4: who said nine to eleven was our fault. This is
Speaker 4: not a person who's going to settle for a moderate
Speaker 4: for an establishment person, and we saw those races come
Speaker 4: over the line over and over again. We've won those
Speaker 4: races where we picked the socialists over the establishment person
Speaker 4: multiple times, because it really is something that you can
Speaker 4: kind of see coming. Honestly, Jesse, I'd love to get
Speaker 4: your take on some of these races, because I think
Speaker 4: you'd be really really good at these.
Speaker 1: I think I would too. I'm really good at a
Speaker 1: lot of things. I think I'm gonna I think I'm
Speaker 1: gonna start getting involved, all right, Stu before I let
Speaker 1: you go AOC. I mean, she's fun to make fun
Speaker 1: of Ryan, She's fun to make fun of, but she
Speaker 1: has a fundraising juggernaut. It's hard to imagine her not
Speaker 1: making a lot of noise in the twenty twenty eight
Speaker 1: Democrat primary. If she jumps in and she's a total
Speaker 1: fame hog, you know there's a shot.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, there's definitely a shot. She has, you know,
Speaker 4: certainly a group of people who really like her. You know,
Speaker 4: she's around ten percent on prediction markets. I think to
Speaker 4: get that.
Speaker 1: To be picked.
Speaker 3: You know, it's weird with her, and you kind of
Speaker 3: see that this new brand of what she's been doing.
Speaker 4: She's sort of like a younger Bernie Sanders right where
Speaker 4: she believes all those socialist things.
Speaker 3: But it's a version of socialism.
Speaker 4: That is, you know, pound the fist, raise the fist,
Speaker 4: point the finger. It's that sort of yelling, screaming socialism.
Speaker 4: And Bernie took that about as far as think I
Speaker 4: think you can take it in America.
Speaker 3: What's you know, really concerning.
Speaker 4: About this new version of the socialist and communist leaning
Speaker 4: candidate is they're doing it with a smile. You know, Mom,
Speaker 4: Donnie's socialism with a smile. L Saiyah, socialism with a smile.
Speaker 4: These people kind of coming at it from a different angle.
Speaker 4: They're they're they're they're no longer. They never ever feel
Speaker 4: required to admit the things that are unpalatable to the
Speaker 4: average person. They will hide behind all these wonderful programs, Oh,
Speaker 4: we're going to lower your grocery prices, you know, we're
Speaker 4: going to we're going to embrace the combustion engine. It's
Speaker 4: part of America. They don't believe this at all, right,
Speaker 4: and the second they have the opportunity, they will turn around.
Speaker 4: We've seen it with Mom Donnie, he's immediately gone down
Speaker 4: roads he wasn't describing when he was running with a dumb,
Speaker 4: stupid grin in every one of his commercials. That I
Speaker 4: think is more risky because frankly, people aren't engaged. We're
Speaker 4: not doing what Ben Franklin wanted us to do and
Speaker 4: to be engaged and be able to protect a republic.
Speaker 4: We're the people that are, frankly not really paying attention.
Speaker 4: And when we see a guy who's smiling at us
Speaker 4: and promise us, promising.
Speaker 3: Great things, we fall forward a lot more often.
Speaker 4: So we're going down a road that is incredibly dangerous
Speaker 4: right now.
Speaker 3: And you know, if we don't wake up soon, it's
Speaker 3: going to be a very very dark future for us.
Speaker 1: My brother talk soon play. Travis sadly joins us.
Speaker 12: Next about yesterday, how we might have to pull together
Speaker 12: a right wing media all star basketball team. Jesse Kelly.
Speaker 12: He's so tall he can block. We know that he
Speaker 12: could block shots. I don't know if he can shoot.
Speaker 12: Turns out they weighed in on this one.
Speaker 1: What's up, Fellas, it's Jesse. I heard that you guys
Speaker 1: recruited me and we now have to play some NBA players.
Speaker 1: That's like the Women's Basketball League right Well, anyway, I
Speaker 1: was curious. I heard a lot of those chicks are lesbians.
Speaker 1: Have you guys ever heard that? Give me all?
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 11: Jesse versus Britney Griner. I think she may have a
Speaker 11: higher testosterone count than the Jesse Kelly, I'm not sure.
Speaker 2: I don't know that.
Speaker 1: I love that matchup.
Speaker 11: Inside.
Speaker 3: Do you think.
Speaker 12: Brittany would she uh manhandle if you will, our own
Speaker 12: Jesse Kelly down in the paint.
Speaker 11: I'm worried about it. She may dunk on him all
Speaker 11: balls in the face style.
Speaker 1: There's no way that chicken dunk. Let's talk to Clay
Speaker 1: about it. Joining me now, co host of The Wonderful
Speaker 1: Clay and Buck Show, author of several books, down on
Speaker 1: why he likes to write It's Really Weird Balls is
Speaker 1: his newest book. My friend Clay Travis Clay, all right,
Speaker 1: this Britney grinder chick. Look, I don't pretend to be
Speaker 1: really good at basketball or athletic or anything like that.
Speaker 1: But I can block shots, by the way, and I
Speaker 1: can shoot pretty well, or at least I could back
Speaker 1: in the day. There's no way some chick is going
Speaker 1: to post me up unless I take it easier on.
Speaker 1: It's just not going to happen.
Speaker 11: I think she may dunk on you and like knock
Speaker 11: you down Scottie Pippen Patrick Ewing style back in the day,
Speaker 11: like kind of give you a shove into the ramparts there.
Speaker 11: It immediately go viral. I see that's great footage of
Speaker 11: you that's going up right now on the screen. And
Speaker 11: I don't know. I think you got to watch out
Speaker 11: for you know, used to always say you don't want
Speaker 11: to take some guy rising up and hitting you, you know,
Speaker 11: balls in the face style while you're trying to take
Speaker 11: a charge. You strike me as a guy who might
Speaker 11: try to take a charge. And I don't know that
Speaker 11: she's going to stop. I think she might just go
Speaker 11: through you like a like a hot knife through butter.
Speaker 1: You know what, I'll take a charge for the team play.
Speaker 1: Some of us are team players and some of us
Speaker 1: are me players. And I think you all know which
Speaker 1: one you are going to be. Speaking of which, by
Speaker 1: the way, speaking of the WNBA, you have a lucrative
Speaker 1: offer out there to the WNBA. What is it and
Speaker 1: do you have any takers? Because that charity for lesbians
Speaker 1: could use some money.
Speaker 11: So one of the good benefits of actually having money
Speaker 11: now is occasionally I can put my money exactly where
Speaker 11: my mouth is. And I think most people would acknowledge
Speaker 11: that NBA players are better than WNBA players. So saying, hey,
Speaker 11: let's have an NBA team play against the WNBA team
Speaker 11: not a great idea, but a bunch of the WNBA
Speaker 11: coaches and even some of the players have come out
Speaker 11: and said that they would welcome men who identify as
Speaker 11: women into the w NBA. That's men who identify as women.
Speaker 11: That seems kind of counterproductive considering it's called the Women's
Speaker 11: National Basketball Association. So I have taken it a step
Speaker 11: further and accelerated it, as one does. I think sometimes
Speaker 11: you have to go you're pure ridiculous on top of
Speaker 11: ridiculous to sometimes cut through the noise. And so I
Speaker 11: put it out there, and this is an offer. I
Speaker 11: will give ten million dollars to the defending WNBA champion
Speaker 11: Las Vegas Aces if they can beat a boys high
Speaker 11: school basketball state champion team of my choice. We will
Speaker 11: put this on pay per view, Jesse. We will raise
Speaker 11: tens of millions of dollars. I really do believe this
Speaker 11: four tunnel to towers, great charitable organization, helping to pay
Speaker 11: off mortgages of people that lose a loved one in
Speaker 11: the armed services, any sort of first responders, police, all
Speaker 11: these different things, you will be happy to know. A
Speaker 11: bunch tons of state champion boys teams have reached out
Speaker 11: and said, Clay, we are in do you need to
Speaker 11: come scout us like, we will handle this, we will win.
Speaker 11: The WNBA Las Vegas Aces, despite claiming that they are
Speaker 11: drastically underpaid, has not spoken out at all about an
Speaker 11: opportunity to win ten million dollars if they could merely
Speaker 11: beat not a men's team, but just a boys team.
Speaker 11: I think that tells you a lot.
Speaker 1: Yeah, those of us who or even vaguely familiar with
Speaker 1: high level high school with men's basketball, though that that
Speaker 1: would that would probably be fifty point game, and it
Speaker 1: would be a massacre. E gaggerating it would be a massacre.
Speaker 1: I mean those guys all right, speaking of that sport,
Speaker 1: if we're going to call it that. The WNBA has
Speaker 1: decided to recently start waging or waiting into the whole
Speaker 1: tranny stuff. Here's as well, here's his coach. What's your stats?
Speaker 1: What is your stance?
Speaker 5: On men or athletes who tests as biological male participating
Speaker 5: in women's sports.
Speaker 1: What's your personal stance.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean, I'm I don't know that I would
Speaker 6: say that I'm educated enough.
Speaker 11: From a scientific standpoint.
Speaker 1: Sports is about belonging. It's about inclusivity.
Speaker 6: It's about allowing everyone to be their authentic self. You know,
Speaker 6: I'm big on that. Just because I have been criticized
Speaker 6: for my height, for my ethnicity. I've been in those
Speaker 6: you shouldn't belong here many times, and for me, I
Speaker 6: don't want that space, especially Golden State.
Speaker 1: To ever feel like that.
Speaker 6: So I'm all about women, little girls deserving to play.
Speaker 3: And that includes trans women.
Speaker 6: So I'm all about inclusivity.
Speaker 1: Play. I had somebody ask me this morning in response
Speaker 1: to all this stuff, why does this women's league hate women?
Speaker 1: And I explained, the WNBA is not a women's league.
Speaker 1: It exists inside the communist infrastructure of the country. It
Speaker 1: can only exist inside that infrastructure since it's not a
Speaker 1: profitable enterprise. And so these are all honestly, they're all
Speaker 1: political people and they have to take the left wing
Speaker 1: side of every issue. They have no choice.
Speaker 11: Yeah, I got a bunch of thoughts on this because
Speaker 11: I do think this is really an important issue, even
Speaker 11: though it may seem inconsequential to many people. So first,
Speaker 11: let's start with this. When you and I were growing up,
Speaker 11: it was there were some people who decided that they
Speaker 11: wanted to dress up as women even though they were men,
Speaker 11: and we called those people drag queen.
Speaker 10: Right.
Speaker 11: The understanding was, if they're adults and it makes them happier,
Speaker 11: they would dress up like women. They would pretend that
Speaker 11: they were women, but they didn't claim to be women.
Speaker 11: And so I think what's important here is the front
Speaker 11: lines of just basic truth and honesty. To me, comes
Speaker 11: down to when you demand that I tell a lie.
Speaker 11: Right when you demand that I say, oh, you are
Speaker 11: the same as a woman, or vice versa, that you
Speaker 11: are the same as a man. We had this big
Speaker 11: odyssey thing going on. Ellen Page changes her name to
Speaker 11: Elliott Page, and now we're supposed to say, oh, it's
Speaker 11: a man. It's not right. Again, If they want to
Speaker 11: dress up and it makes them more happy, it allows
Speaker 11: them to pursue happiness on some level as adults, I'm
Speaker 11: fine with that. To me, it's a next step to
Speaker 11: say and you are female or and you are male.
Speaker 11: That's a lie, right, It's not true the WNBA when
Speaker 11: we have men who identify as women. And remember it's
Speaker 11: never women who identify as men because they can't make
Speaker 11: the team. It's only men who identify as women that
Speaker 11: are taking away women sports spots on a roster. The
Speaker 11: point of sports is not actually, at a high level
Speaker 11: to be inclusive at all. It's to be exclusive. Everyone
Speaker 11: wanted to be a pro athlete at some point in time,
Speaker 11: just about listening and watching us, Jesse, you probably did.
Speaker 11: I certainly did. My boys do. Every single person who
Speaker 11: plays sports thinks to themselves, boy, I'd love to be
Speaker 11: a pro athlete. I'd love to be an Olympian. Most
Speaker 11: of us are nowhere near good enough. So at some
Speaker 11: point we get excluded because the meritocracy requires that only
Speaker 11: the absolute best are able to make a living. And
Speaker 11: in America we believe, I believe the meritocracy should actually exist.
Speaker 11: Sports at five and six year olds. Yes, every five
Speaker 11: and six year olds should be able to play. But
Speaker 11: by the time you're in the WNBA or any other
Speaker 11: apex level of competition, most people have no hope to
Speaker 11: be able to play, and so I think we just
Speaker 11: have to your point. Yes, this is largely a political
Speaker 11: organization that is masquerading as a league, which is why
Speaker 11: so many people outside of Sophie Cunningham are afraid they're cowards.
Speaker 11: They won't actually stand up for basic sports. I don't
Speaker 11: know if you coached your two boys, Jesse. I coached
Speaker 11: my two boys in basically every sport, twelve U baseball.
Speaker 11: If somebody had tried to play who was fourteen years old,
Speaker 11: that kid would have dominated. We don't allow transage. It's
Speaker 11: twelve U. You have to be twelve or under. Everybody
Speaker 11: understands that the fundamental division in all of sports is
Speaker 11: male and female, because if we had unisex sports, women
Speaker 11: would not be able to play sports at all. It's
Speaker 11: the WNBA. I think we have to push back. I
Speaker 11: think we have to go after this aggressively, because what
Speaker 11: happens is if you push back here, the entire foundation
Speaker 11: of identity politics begins to crumble, because it's predicated on
Speaker 11: the idea that we lie and accept that a woman
Speaker 11: who identifies as a man is actually a man, or
Speaker 11: that a man who identifies as a woman as actually
Speaker 11: a woman. I'll also point this out, Jesse. Men, by
Speaker 11: and large, we're over this because women who identify as
Speaker 11: men are so much less strong, less sizable. Men want
Speaker 11: to be bigger, stronger, and faster than we are when
Speaker 11: we're actually men. We all aspire to be superheroes or
Speaker 11: incredibly strong athletes. Right, men aspire to be bigger, stronger,
Speaker 11: faster than we are. All women pretending to be men
Speaker 11: are all super weak men. We just kind of ignore
Speaker 11: them and feel a little bit sorry for them. The
Speaker 11: people who have an impact here are the men who
Speaker 11: take women's sports positions, who take their roster spots, who
Speaker 11: steal their championships. These guys should be condemned and they
Speaker 11: should be banned completely from being able to compete in
Speaker 11: women's sports, But due to women's empathy, they are being
Speaker 11: taken advantage of. It's women who are actually the biggest
Speaker 11: obstacle keeping men out of women's sports, not men. It's
Speaker 11: a mess.
Speaker 1: I'll just say as I let you go that in general,
Speaker 1: I'm against men in women's sports, but when it comes
Speaker 1: to the WNBA, if men start playing it, we might
Speaker 1: actually get to watch some good basketball. Thank you, Klay,
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. We have light in the mood, all right,
Speaker 1: it's time to lighten the mood. And you know, they
Speaker 1: say history repeats itself. Obviously, that's a thing that exists.
Speaker 1: History repeats itself. Did you know you know about Napoleon's
Speaker 1: disastrous invasion of Russia? Right? He decided to raise the
Speaker 1: largest army of the world had ever seen and march
Speaker 1: it into Russia. And it ends up being disastrous. That
Speaker 1: the wolves are eating people and guys are freezing to
Speaker 1: death and eating each other, and it's a big, old,
Speaker 1: big old mess, horror story. And right before he crosses
Speaker 1: the river to venture into Russia, he's riding his horse.
Speaker 1: Fast rabbit jumps out in front of his horse. Horse
Speaker 1: spooks thea Poleon goes flying off his horse. He's fine physically,
Speaker 1: but the guys who were with told him that's a
Speaker 1: bad sign. That's a bad omen. You shouldn't invade. This
Speaker 1: is gonna end badly. That's a bad sign. The Poleon,
Speaker 1: of course ignored it, and the rest is history, if
Speaker 1: fuel pardon the pun. And like I said, history repeats itself.
Speaker 8: Here's a kick.
Speaker 11: He started it all off, perfect placement.
Speaker 1: He sees in big trouble. I hope he's not playing
Speaker 1: into invade Russia. I'll see them all