WEBVTT - Metal Mania

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, a chillions.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Balcunas.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Eric, there's a lot of stuff happening in the world

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 3>right now, but one theme that has been just kind

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 3>of like on a tear for more than a year

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 3>or two years even is metals. We're gonna have a

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 3>gentlemen join us, John Champalia, who's the CEO of sprot

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Asset Management. Eric, what's interesting about metals and spots approach

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 3>in ETF investing.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Let me give you a statue. About two weeks ago,

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 2>the silver ETF SLV traded more in a week than

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.959
<v Speaker 2>any stock on planet Earth, more than Navidia, more than Tesla.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 2>A year ago, this ETF was ranked one hundred and

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 2>sixty eighth. This is crazy what happened with silver and gold?

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Silver in particular felt like GameStop. It felt like, what

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 2>in the hell's going on? How does something that's mid

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>size takeover in terms of volume. So silver had this

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>just parabolic move up. Gold has been going up for

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>a year and a half. But between the two of them,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 2>I think they combined for I want to say something

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 2>like sixty seventy billion in volume. That I mean, these

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>are ridiculous numbers, it's going to die down. It has

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 2>died down a little bit, there's been a sell off,

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>but for the most part, these two medals really just

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 2>went wild, particularly over the past couple months, and some

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>people are calling it part of the debasement trade. It

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 2>feels a little like fomo to me. People general investors

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 2>have for a while now been buying equities like normal,

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 2>but they've been buying gold. So gold has been a

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>story for about a year and a half. But silver

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>came out of nowhere and just went absolutely wild, and

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 2>that's just caught everybody's by surprise a little bit. But

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 2>the ETFs again, those volume numbers were absolutely ridiculous, and

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>then there's some of the things to unpack there. But

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just one of those things where you

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>never know, Joel. Just when you know things are like

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of going one direction, out thing comes from the

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 2>side door and just goes wild. And silver was that thing,

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>And where do we go from here? Both of these

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>metals are like really at extreme positions. So what happens

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 2>now also worth mentioning.

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>John's been on the podcast once.

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Before a couple of years ago when we did a

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 3>uranium episode. So if you want to hear more, you

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 3>can listen back to that one this time I'm Tryin's

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Metal Mania.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>John.

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to trillions, Thanks for having me back.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So we mentioned this, this precious metals just having

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 3>this incredible run. There's also like no shortage of ETFs

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 3>that are offering exposure. So so curious what does SPRAT

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 3>do differently and why does that matter?

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Right? Well, Sprout has a long history in metals of mining.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of our DNA, it's our culture and it's

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 4>all we do, so we know it really well. And

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 4>we do everything from investing in physical commodities and that

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 4>covers gold, silver, palladium, platinum, copper, and uranium all in

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 4>physical form, and we do most of the related equity

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 4>oriented categories and we also do active management as well

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 4>as some private investments. So we do everything in the

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 4>capital structure, both physical commodities, passive equities, and active equities

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 4>in metals of mining. So, you know, we saw a

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of these trends starting to form three four, five

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 4>years ago, and we built a large suite of ETFs,

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 4>not just in the United States, but we also have

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 4>funds in Europe and Canada and they're really designed to

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 4>give investors opportunities to play a lot of these thematics,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 4>which we think are still in the early stages of

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 4>their development.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>So Eric mentioned the debasement trade, and I'm curious that

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 3>really became a theme, especially last year. It seems like

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>it's really gone mainstream. When did that thesis first resonate

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 3>with you? And what's changed even since then?

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, at Sprott, I can tell you the deplacement trade

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 4>that that term we've been using since the Great Financial Crisis,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 4>and it's only been in the last year, so it's

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of entered the mainstream lexicon. And for your audience,

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 4>I think we should define what it means because it's

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 4>not a typical term we use in everyday language. But

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 4>the basement is a term to describe a situation where

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 4>very excessive levels of debt, very high levels of inflation

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 4>are basically eroding your real real after inflation returns, whether

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 4>you're investing in treasuries or currencies. And it's also a

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 4>part of currency devaluation. Currency evaluation is very common when

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.799
<v Speaker 4>countries are in trade wars, which we're in right now,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 4>and all of these things kind of point investors to say,

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 4>maybe I need to hedge myself against those risks. How

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 4>do I do that? Well. Precious metals, for not one

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 4>or two years, but for the last five thousand years,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 4>have been an alternative form of storing your wealth. And

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 4>this is one of the reasons why gold and silver

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 4>and platinum have all been really well bid over the

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 4>last couple of years, because investors are rotating from let's

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 4>call it paper assets, whether those are treasuries or stocks

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 4>in some cases, two more real things that historically have

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 4>performed well in these par periods of debasement.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about this so right now. I mean, inflation

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>isn't that bad, Debasement isn't that bad. I mean, it's

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 2>not like we just had a bunch of qi. It

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 2>feels a little more like fomo as well. It just

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>seems like gold started going up because people were buying

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>it for that reason. But then I think as it

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 2>goes up, it gets more fomo money. It just seems

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>like more of a craze than it does seem like

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>a general allocation to it for this long term inflation hedge.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 2>What's your take on that.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.679
<v Speaker 4>We would describe it as a pivot, and the pivot

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 4>is really twofold. It's one. I'm going to bring this

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 4>more on a local basis. It's about running an economy

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 4>very hot in the United States. That means allowing inflation

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 4>to be higher than historic targets of two percent. That

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 4>means running very high physical death sits, which is what's happening.

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 4>It is also around very commoday to monetary policy, which

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 4>obviously the Trump administration is trying to engineer with new

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 4>FED chairman. So if you're running the economy hotter from

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 4>a fiscal and monetary perspective, I think that introduces a

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 4>different dynamic. But take a step back and look at

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 4>the big picture globally, this really started four years ago

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 4>when Russian invaded the Ukraine, and so what does this

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 4>have to do with gold? While six hundred billion dollars

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 4>of Russian assets were frozen with a few keystrokes on

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 4>the computer. And this was a real eye opener for

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 4>a lot of emergent markets and countries that aren't so

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 4>friendly with the United States and other Western countries that

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 4>their assets could be seized or frozen very easily. And

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 4>this is what really kick started and accelerated a shift

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 4>we call it dedollarization, basically where central banks around the

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 4>world and governments were basically selling treasuries or reducing their

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>dollar holdings, and what were they doing with the money.

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 4>They were basically recycling it into gold. The Chinese Central

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Bank was really the primary proponent of this strategy. We

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 4>know they have hundreds of billions of dollars of treasures

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 4>that they are selling into the market and recycling in

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 4>hard assets. It's not just gold, it's infrastructure, it's energy, etc.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 4>But there are a lot of central banks doing this India,

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Poland Singapore. They are moving away from dollars and treasuries

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 4>as part of their foreign exchange reserves, and they're recycling

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 4>the money into physical gold. And you're starting to see

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:37.239
<v Speaker 4>institutional investors mimic this behavior, which is why last year

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 4>we saw very good flows into gold based exchange listed offerings,

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 4>including the sprot Physical Gold Trust. And this trend, I

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 4>think is starting to trickle down into more of the

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 4>advisor channel and down to individual investors. They're kind of

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 4>minicking the behavior of these central banks. And so you

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 4>might say, well, is this a short term trend or

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 4>is this part of a longer term kind of fracture

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 4>of the global world order? And right now it feels

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 4>like the ladder to us, which is why you have

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 4>such a constant bid under the price of gold, why

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 4>it's been so resilient, and obviously in the last few

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 4>weeks it's hit an all time high.

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>So god, there was a lot there. I want to

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 3>ask about. You went from the institutional kind of to

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the retail. So let's pivot, if we may, from the

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 3>institutional into the retail. And I'm curious, like, what role

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 3>should metals play in a retail investor's portfolio? Now, I

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 3>mean there was this sort of like old way and

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 3>if you're describing sort of a new world, like what

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 3>is the way that asset managers are financial advisors are

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 3>starting to talk to one another about this.

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean historically goal has always played a safe

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 4>haven role in a portfolio. It's always done very well,

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 4>particularly in financial dislocations or calamities. And the other assets

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 4>that always historically did well are things like US treasuries

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 4>and the US dollar. But last year the US dollar

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 4>went down ten percent against a basket of currency, so

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 4>didn't really provide the shock absorber against things going on

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 4>with trade wars and tariffs and the lake. So what

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 4>we see is some rotation of assets away from traditional

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 4>treasuries to gold, and we think it's displaying a more

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 4>effective hedge against some of the risks, whether it's currency, credit,

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 4>equity risk. And we've always told our investors, and this

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 4>is going back decades, that gold should always be kind

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 4>of the ballast in your portfolio. You should always have

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 4>some weight to it depending on what you know, what

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 4>you're trying to hedge against. But it obviously goes up

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 4>around eight to ten percent over long periods of time,

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 4>and then it obviously can can perform well against other

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 4>asset classes and a dislocation. But we've always said to

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 4>people you should have somewhere between five to ten percent

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 4>of your portfolio in physical gold help you stay invested

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 4>in other asset classes that historically have been more volatile.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Gold, but maybe maybe not silver. Right, So what's driving

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the interest in in silver? Is it just price momentum

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>or is there something else going on?

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean silver obviously and gold are very tied together,

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 4>but there are some key differences between the two. Silver

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 4>is what we call a hybrid metal. That means it

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 4>has monetary elements to it and it has industrial elements

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 4>to it. And I think it's important to take a

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 4>step back and look at the price history of silver.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, silver was fifty dollars an ounce in twenty eleven.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 4>It meandered around for over ten years, and in the

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 4>last I guess three or four months, it was like

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 4>a coiled sprint. It had a huge catchup trade because

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 4>gold was rallying first. But there's also kind of a

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 4>geopolitical angle to silver as well, because silver is a

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 4>very important metal for anything that conducts electricity. So think

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 4>about defence industries, evs, things where you need very high

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 4>levels of electrical connectivity. Silver's your go to metal. China

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 4>has recently put export restrictions on silver, so there's some

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 4>challenges there. The other element that's got silver kind of

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 4>really going is substitution effects. So what does that mean. Well,

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 4>what it means is if you're an investor in a

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 4>place like India or another emerging market where you don't

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 4>trust your currency because of hyper inflation or whatever, gold

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 4>has become very expensive for those for those people. And

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 4>so what we see is that as the price of

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 4>gold becomes unaffordable for some groups in the world, they

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 4>switched to silver. So a really good example would be India,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, huge owners of physical gold. When the price

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 4>of gold kind of broke five thousand, we saw eighty

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 4>five million ounces of silver in the just a two

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 4>month period get imported into India, So they're basically hoarding

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 4>silver now as y're touched at the beginning. Was there

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a fomo you know, memification going on

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.599
<v Speaker 4>with silver in the last couple of weeks. Yeah, absolutely,

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 4>there was a absolute wild trading looking at some of

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 4>the ETFs you look at, we were watching the options

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 4>trading on some of the ETFs. It got very excessive,

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 4>and we've had kind of a correction here, which I

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 4>think is quite healthy. But we're holding at eighty dollars,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 4>so you know, we were fifty dollars an ounce in

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 4>November and we obviously broke through one hundred and corrected

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 4>back down to eighty. But there's also a shortage of silver.

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 4>We've had a supply deficit for five years and that

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 4>is obviously starting to catch up to the marketplace.

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>So SLV alone traded one hundred and forty six billion

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>in the last week of January, and that's an enormous number.

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 2>And even leading up to that, we're talking like eight

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>ten times its average. Now, all that volume, all that return,

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 2>and yet no flows. This was interesting to me. I

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 2>want to get your take on this, so Joel. Normally,

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>like when gold started to go up, the flows came in,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>like people were like, oh cool silver. No flows in

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>fact outflows, and I heard a theory and it feels

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 2>but I want to get your take on it. That

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>silver for a minute there and I'm not sure if

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 2>it still exists was so hot and demand physically, especially

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 2>in Asia and China. One guy tried to smuggle silver

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 2>in through Hong Kong, got busted and they put up

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the picture all the silver he was trying to snuggle

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>it in these Danish cookie boxes. Anyway, I wouldn't mess

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 2>with the Chinese government, but that's just me. Anyway, he's

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to get this in. And the thesis I heard

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 2>was that the traders out there were using SLV for

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 2>its silver stash. They were actually handing in chairs of

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 2>SLV to get physical silver back and then sell it

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 2>in arbitrage it in the open market, especially in Asia.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>So it was almost like the ETF was getting raided

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 2>for its valuable thing that it held. And that's why

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.599
<v Speaker 2>there could be outflows that overwhelmed the inflows from the

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>FOMO people. Thoughts.

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think you have to look at

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 4>it fun by fund. So Sprott has a physical silver

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 4>trust that's actually been in net inflow, so we've been

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 4>accumulating new new dollars into the fund, and buying silver

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 4>with SLV is more of a trading instrument versus a

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 4>buy and hold, And obviously I think the options market

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 4>for that is more the tail wagging the dog on

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 4>that thing, just the way it trades. But yes, you're right,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 4>there are some arbitrage opportunities by location. So for example,

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 4>there's too much metal sitting in North America right now

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 4>versus places like London, India or China, the other big

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of metal markets. And we know that because there's

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 4>a price differential as to what the price of silver

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 4>trades for in Shanghai versus New York, and there is

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 4>a big spread, and traders are very opportunistic. If that

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 4>spread provides an arbitrage opportunity, they will physically move the silver,

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 4>put it on a ship, sail it around the world,

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 4>and deliver it and the vaults into whatever market. We

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 4>haven't quite seen that yet because there's not enough arbitrage there.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 4>There is some vat taxes in China that makes that

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 4>arbitrage why than you would think, But we see that

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 4>all the time when markets dislocate. I think the great

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 4>example right now is copper. We obviously saw the price

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 4>of copper at one point trading over ten percent over

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 4>the price of copper in London and traders were basically

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 4>loading up ships and rushing it to the United States.

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 4>So these physical movements of metal actually happen.

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>We do it.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 4>That's brought all the time. We have to buy metal

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 4>and move it around the world. But yeah, there's definitely

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 4>I think the volatility has been exacerbated by some of

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 4>the inventory mismatches right now going on.

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Who's calls when you have to move metal like that?

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we we obviously work with different banks and

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 4>shippers and believe it or not, silver, It just gives

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 4>you a quick background silver. So how do you move

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 4>around these one thousand ounce bars. Well, we put six

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 4>hundred of them on a semi flatbed tractor trailer, which

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 4>is a reinforced trailer, and we moved six hundred bars

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 4>at a time, and sometimes it'll take us six months

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 4>to move large quantities around to our vaults, but we

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 4>do it. It's a lot of work, but we have

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 4>a whole team of logistics people that organize this. And

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 4>gold is a little different. It's obviously it's obviously in

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 4>armored cars because of the volume to value, but silver

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 4>is so bulky you need to put it on flatbed trailers.

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Interesting about all this, like moving this merchandise around and ships.

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 2>And I just finished a book project on bitcoin and

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the chapters is called the Store of Value SmackDown,

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's basically gold versus bitcoin. One of the big

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>arguments that the bitcoiners have is, hey, if you want

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 2>to move bitcoin, you just like basically click a button.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>You can move it anywhere in the world. You don't

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 2>have to get it through a border, there's nobody who's

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 2>going to confiscate it. You don't have to call like

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>a big ship up, you don't have to ensure it.

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just easy. So it's like better version of gold.

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 2>And obviously it has made that case pretty well. Even

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>seventy thousand dollars after this huge pullback, that's still a

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of money per bitcoin, and it's been around seventeen years. Obviously,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>gold has really crushed in the short term, and bitcoin

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 2>crushed maybe we'll call it twenty twenty twenty three and

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four was up four hundred and fifty percent,

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 2>gold up way less. So they go back and forth.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 2>But what's your take on bitcoin? Could it be used

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 2>as the same store of value in it as they

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 2>say a digital gold, and is it even better because

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to worry about calling up a ship.

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a good question. I obviously get that all

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 4>the time. I'm going to use your seventeen year term

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 4>and say that gold's been a store of value for

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 4>five thousand plus years. So we have a long history

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 4>as humans in terms of our value and accumulation of gold.

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 4>So it stood the test of time over millennia. You know,

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 4>seventeen years. It sounds like a long time, but it's

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 4>still in its infancy in terms of a new asset class. So,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 4>but yes, they have pros and they're very different there.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 4>It's not a digital gold. We don't like to think

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 4>of it that way. It's a very different asset. Last obviously,

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 4>if it was digital gold, there wouldn't be a forty

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 4>percent difference in performance just over the last few months.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 4>So they have very different audiences. They have some similarities. Yes,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 4>you can zip it around digitally, but there's obviously trade

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 4>offs with security, whereas trying to steal gold is pretty

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 4>challenging given how heavy it is and how highly secure

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 4>it is. So they can compliment each other, but we

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 4>just we don't like to think of them as substitute.

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 4>That's brought.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, Joel. I have a trivia question for you.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>How old is gold?

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like from the beginning.

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, here's how old it is. It was mentioned in

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the Old Testament three hundred fifty times. That's old, man.

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 2>If you get if you're like getting shout outs in

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the Old Testament, I mean that is really old. And

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 2>that's why gold I do think it's it should get

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>respected more from the bitcoinners. It's like you're seventeen years old.

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 2>This thing is like has been through it, and every

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 2>human generation has come along has come on and say

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>gold is valuable. So that is definitely worth something. I

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>think they both can exist.

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 3>But you know, John, actually I'm curious do you think

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 3>that the kind of the rise and popularity of bitcoin

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 3>has that actually sparked an interest and expanded the interest

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>in more hard assets that are physically backed.

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think there's similarities in terms of what people

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 4>are trying to do with each asset class. Right, people

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 4>are trying to diverse away at the fundamental base of

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 4>from FIA currencies, which are basically paper money which can

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 4>be printed as free will and debased. There's that term

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 4>again over time from excessive money printing, inflation, excessive debt levels,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 4>et cetera. So there are some commonalities in terms of

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 4>what people are trying to avoid. So those are the

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 4>common I think the commonalities between the two. Obviously one

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 4>is a lot more volatile than the other. We don't

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 4>see central banks accumulating bitcoin yet. Maybe there are one

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 4>or two that I am not worre about of. But

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 4>we obviously have lots of central banks that a store

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 4>as in there as part of their foreign exchange reserves

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 4>as a liquid, tangible acid they can easily exchange for

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 4>whatever it wants to when it wants to. So we

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 4>haven't quite got central banks buying bitcoin. Maybe I'll Salvador,

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 4>but time will tell to see how they play out.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 2>One more question on this, because one of the other

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 2>things that we bring up between bitcoiners as well, Okay,

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 2>gold is definitely scarce because one of the big you know,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 2>reasons to buy bitcoin is there's only going to be

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty one million, and twenty million are already done, so

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 2>you're almost at the capacity and it's locked in. That's

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 2>hard coded. Now gold two three percent is dug up

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 2>from the ground a year, right, so there's a little

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 2>bit of inflation. And then now they're talking about digging

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>up the ocean floor or even beyond that mining asteroids. Joel,

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.479
<v Speaker 2>there's an asteroid called sixteen psych and did you know

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>it has seven hundred quintillion I think, not gold on it.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 2>That's enough for ninety billion dollars per person on Earth.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that could really decrease the price of gold.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 4>No, I think that's a pretty far fetch, well a theory.

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>But it also I will pivot that again, pivot into

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 3>a question about miners. There's the physical and the physical backstaff.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, but I want to get to miners.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But well, he would have exposure via miners.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, why don't they send the gold miners into

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 2>the ocean or to space space?

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, how about when was the last time somebody landed

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 4>on the moon, let alone an asteroid? So I'm not

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 4>holding my wreath on that one. But you do raise

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 4>another question which is obviously being thirsty debated right now,

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 4>which is basically mining on the ocean floor. You know,

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 4>there are these polymetallic nodules that sit way down in

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 4>the bottom of the ocean, and there's a lot of

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 4>debate going on right now across government agencies and countries

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 4>around whether that is is fair game or is that

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 4>basically something we should not attempt to do. And it's

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 4>still not clear cut, but yeah, there's minerals all over

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 4>the place, whether they're at surface blow surface, at the

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 4>bottom of the ocean, so that I think we don't

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 4>have enough clarity on. But finding these minerals is not

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 4>easy to do. It takes a long time to find

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 4>a large scale deposit that has economically viable permitting, building minds, etc.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 4>There's a long lead time with commodities, and I think

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 4>that's one of the interesting aspects of it. You might say, Okay,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 4>all these commodity prices despike, so we're going to have

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 4>a huge supply response, right The answer is no, because

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 4>it takes so long to find these deposits bring them

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 4>to market. And yes, the incentives are very high right now,

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 4>but you know, it will take several years for new

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 4>deposits to come into production, which naturally, I think keeps

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 4>these bull markets running much longer than normal business cycles.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, related to that, we hear a lot about rare earth.

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 3>The Trump administration obviously views this is a strategic competitive

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 3>competition with China. Obviously, there's nothing that looks like a

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 3>rare earth ETF maybe ever or yet at least, But

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 3>what would it actually take like, not only for markets,

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 3>but supply chains and regulation. What would a rare earth

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 3>vehicle look like?

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean we're investing a rare earth's it's brought

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 4>both passively inactive. We have a fun called the Sprought

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Critical Materials ETF, and that does have exposure to rare earths.

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 4>And maybe we should take a step back and say,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 4>what the heck are rare earths. Well, it's a group

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 4>of minerals. Most of them I can't even pronounce, so

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 4>they're so obscure. But they're very strategically important because they're

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 4>used in very small quantities for very important technologies defense industries.

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Other technologies from the magnets are used in electric vehicles,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 4>things like that. Now, so, yes, they're rare. They're usually

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 4>found in very small traces in other deposits, so they

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 4>come as a byproduct. They sometimes are produced smelting other materials. Okay,

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 4>why does all that matter? Well, why it matters is

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 4>that China controls between eighty of the processing of these

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 4>rare earths. So it's not so much that they control

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 4>of the mining, but it's the processing that they have

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 4>a stranglehold on. And we know that this is being weaponized. So,

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 4>for example, in the last few years, China gets into

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 4>a spat with Japan, China says that Japan, we're not

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 4>saying you anymore rare earths. And this is this has

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 4>not gone lost by many administrations around the world saying, look,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 4>if we got cut off from these supply chains by China,

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 4>our industries could be crippled. And this is why the

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration and even prior to the Bide administration, has

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 4>been taking steps to basically build the jargon is resilient

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 4>supply chains, which is code for diversify away from China.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 4>And so what's happening is a lot of energy policy

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 4>and national security driven policy is driving the incentives to

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 4>produce rare earths. In the United States and other Western

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 4>countries to build processing facilities because it's not just the minerals.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 4>You need the processing, which is very complex to ensure

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 4>that we have adequate supply. Now, just in the last week,

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administrations announced something called Project Vault, and Project

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Vault is twelve billion dollars of funding to stockpile critical

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 4>materials like rare earths. So this is basically going back.

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 4>We're going back to the Cold War where governments basically

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 4>stockpiled a lot of different minerals to ensure it was

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 4>not disrupted. And you know, the genesis of all this

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 4>is obviously in the nineteen seventies when Opek squeezed the

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 4>oil price. It was really the wake up call for

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 4>government saying, you know what, we're vulnerable here. If somebody

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 4>shuts off our oil or rare earth, you know, we

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 4>could be really screwed here. So government is basically taking

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 4>a very holistic approach to incentivize mining of rare earths

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 4>and minerals. In the United States, they're talking about public

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 4>private partnership, so that's things like loans to get these

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 4>projects off the ground. That Trump administration is even gone

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 4>as far as taking equity stakes in some of these

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 4>mining companies wear erth lithium, et cetera, and they're taking

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 4>in exchange for the equity off take agreements. So off

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 4>take is basically a promise to deliver me future production.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 4>They're even contemplating in some cases price floors, which says

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 4>we will guarantee a price of X for all that

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 4>future delivery. That price of X may be above the

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 4>current spot price, So they're basically putting a floor under

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 4>the price so that it incentivizes and allows the project

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 4>to get to completion. And one of the big complaints

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 4>about China is over capacity, and they basically flood the

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 4>market with heavily subsidized production, which destroys the price and

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 4>doesn't allow mines around the world form me ever getting

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 4>off the ground. You know, in the last couple of years,

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 4>we've heard he's a here's a cobalt mine in Idaho

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 4>shut because the price collapse, you know, because China controls

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 4>the cobalt supply out of the Congo. So this is

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 4>the game, the chess game is playing right now geopolitically

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 4>around trying to wrestle control away from China of these

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 4>critical supply chains. It's happening right now in our earth.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 4>It's happening in things like cut, excuse me, copper. These

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 4>are all metals that are very strategically important to the West.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>How's that chess match going from your vantage so far?

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, China has the benefit of playing a long game,

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 4>and we seem in the West to go administration by

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 4>administration in terms of new administration comes in and they

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 4>flip flop and unwind everything that the prior one did,

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 4>so we don't have the benefit of having a government

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 4>that can play out the next ten to twenty thirty years.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's basically a woke in the giant,

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 4>just like in in the midst nineteen seventies when the

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Strategic Oil Reserve and the International Energy Agency was formed.

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 4>So it's not a fight over oil like it was

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen seventies, a fight over metals. This is a

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 4>very different I think geopolitical struggle right now, and metals

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 4>are at the forefront of it. And the reason is

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 4>is because metals are a very vulnerable supply chain, and

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 4>metals are so ubiquitous in everything we do in our lives.

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Just about every industry, technology, defense, AI, all these things

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 4>are very mineral intensive, so why are people fighting. It's

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 4>not about rocks. It's about controlling chips and missiles, it's

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 4>about controlling AI data centers. All of these things are

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.239
<v Speaker 4>the new front line, and governments around the world are

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 4>really responding to this challenge.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 2>We're going to wrap up here, but I wanted to

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 2>pivot to uranium since you are the issue of view.

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 2>RNM jewel Uranium miners are up twenty two percent this

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.479
<v Speaker 2>year and I can't not do it. How much are

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 2>they up? Since yours truly pitched this ETF in the

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.479
<v Speaker 2>Best New ETF Launch competition in early twenty twenty at

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Inside ETFs and came in third place, even though I

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 2>should have won. Go ahead and tell you tie hundred

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>and fifty percent. I remember standing up there. I was

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 2>in front of a whole room, and I said, look

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 2>at this back test. It came started way up up

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 2>or left, down to the bottom right, and I said,

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I trust a crappy back test. This thing has been

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 2>beaten up for ten years, so it had room to run.

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 2>And then I said to everybody, look, everybody here wants

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to be like mister environmental, But how'd you get here?

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, walk if we want to go from A

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to Z in terms of like helping the environment, you

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 2>just can't do wind and solar. It's just not enough.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 2>That was my pitch. I should have won, you know what,

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 2>it was jobs ahead of.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Rode wasn't in the audiences, I know, And.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Also they had employees from the conference in the competition.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 2>It's just kind of suspect.

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I gotta say, I don't know if you're bitterer still,

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 3>I can't tell.

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, I was too ahead of my time. I think

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 2>if I had pitched this three years later, I would

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 2>have won, But I was super early. Anyway, you obviously

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 2>were all over this. How big is this going to be?

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 2>We actually reinvented this theme last year's roal. We said,

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 2>this is a backdoor way to play the AI revolution

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 2>because all these big mag seven companies seem to be

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 2>either renting or building nuclear facilities or buying to and

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 2>they're using uranium obviously to fund the AI. Huge energy suck.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>What is the bull case here? Is it just the

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 2>AI or what else is going on?

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Well I think you've I think you've been winning

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 4>continuously for five years with your call. So congratulations. It's

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 4>been an incredible run for uranium and you're right, Okay,

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 4>basically was left for dead. It had a horrific ten

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 4>year bear market that basically wiped out most of the industry,

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 4>and in the last five years the industry has come

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 4>back to life. It's really being driven by a number

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 4>of really big pivots. One is around decarbonization. Governments are

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 4>focused on lower carbon forms of energy, but more recently

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 4>obviously energy security because uranium produces just abundant amount of

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 4>energy and affordable energy. And you're right, it is base

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 4>load power, which means it runs twenty four to seven

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 4>three sixty five, unlike wind and solar that run twenty

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 4>five to thirty five percent of the time. You obviously

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 4>cannot run very energy hungry data centers on intermittent or

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 4>variable energy. So this is part of this big shift

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 4>going on around energy security and national security. Just the

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Quick Factory, About nineteen percent of the electricity United States

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 4>today is generated from NUKO, so it's a huge part

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 4>of the mix. It was forgotten and it's now going

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 4>through a new renaissance where governments are starting to take

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, nuclear out of the penalty box and actually

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 4>provide incentives. The Trump administration has been very pro nuclear,

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 4>lots of executive orders, lots of funding available to build

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 4>new reactors, so it's coming. But the real story is China.

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 4>China is building like six to eight new reactors a year.

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 4>And so if you look at the West pivoting back

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 4>on top of places like India and China building tons

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 4>of new nuclear capacity to increase energy production, you're looking

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 4>at a uranium sector that between now and twenty forty

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 4>is forecast to double. So again, the cure for low

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 4>prices is low prices, and right now the uranium price

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 4>has gone from the twenty dollars per pound up to

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 4>the mid eighties, so it's doing its thing. The supply

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 4>response has still been kind of lukewarm because the industry

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 4>was so shut in for such a long time, and

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 4>so capital is finally coming back into the sector. It's

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 4>no this legacy stigma around the technology is largely gone,

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.719
<v Speaker 4>and we've seen tremendous success in our suite of uranium ets.

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 4>We have the largest physical uranium fund in the world,

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 4>which is about seven billion dollars, and so it's been

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 4>a huge win for our clients the last few years

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 4>investing in the CUD.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, real quick on that this physical uranium etf Joel,

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 2>You guys get inflows. You have to go buy yellow cake,

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess, and store it. How does that work? And

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 2>you ever been there? I mean it seems like unlike

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 2>gold or silver. You know, there's obviously some danger right

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 2>with storing you know, uranium?

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 4>No, no danger, I mean, I mean basically what we

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 4>store is something called U three awaight uranium oxide, and

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 4>it basically looks like a yellow powder and it's it's

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 4>stored and steeled drum just outside on a concrete pad

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:52.239
<v Speaker 4>and to stock the barrels up.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Joel. No smoking, you can't let a cigarette in there, right,

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 2>is that a rule?

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I hope there's no smoking anyway, Okay, but.

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 4>It's a fairly inert substance. And yeah, we have over

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 4>seventy five million pounds of the stuff that we stored

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 4>in the United States, Canada and France. And it's it's

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 4>obviously a very early stage product. It has to get

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 4>refined into enriched training, which obviously then goes into a

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 4>reactor core. But yeah, our investors have been huge supporters

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 4>of the vehicle and it has grown enormously since we

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 4>launched it almost five years ago.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Actually, I'll bring this back as a way of asking

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 3>you to answer a question that I teased but we

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 3>didn't ask. You have the physical back stuff, and we've

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 3>spent some time talking about that. You also, the portfolio

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 3>also includes a lot of miners. When do you, like,

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 3>what's the purpose of the miners and like when does

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 3>that take trade takeoff versus the physical back stuff? And

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 3>this goes for a portfolio, right, you've copper miners, uranium miners,

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 3>gold and silver miners. Like what's the relationship between the

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 3>physical back stuff and the and the miners?

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, great question. I mean we try to offer our

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 4>clients both where we can options in physical metals, and

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 4>we do that in about six different metals and then

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 4>obviously the related mining companies, and they both have different

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 4>attributes the physicle commodities. You're playing the spot market, you're

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 4>playing a bullish view that the price of copper is

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 4>going to continue to go up, and copper recently had

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 4>an all time high like it has for silver, gold,

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 4>and platinum. The miners are obviously tied heavily to the

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 4>commodity price, but they obviously have enormous operating leverage, and

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 4>they also have a lot of optionality with the discoveries

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 4>and bringing new discoveries into production, so they are more volatile,

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 4>but they can obviously create tremendous value for investors when

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 4>they are benefiting from higher commodity prices, but also when

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 4>they're bringing new production to market. And right now, a

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 4>lot of these mining companies are minting profits because the

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 4>body prices are high and they are finally getting capital

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 4>to move their projects forward. You know, there was a

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 4>long period of time where nobody wanted to invest in

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 4>this segment. Everybody was invested in having a good time

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 4>in tech stocks, and we're seeing a rotation going on

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 4>right now where capitals finally in the last i would say,

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 4>twelve to eighteen months coming back into these sectors, which

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 4>is allowing many of these companies to move their projects forward,

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 4>which is how they ultimately create value for investors. So

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 4>we find most investors will invest in some ratio between

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 4>the two. Sometimes it's driven by relative value, sometimes it's

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 4>risk tolerance. So a lot of our institutional investors they

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 4>like to own, you know, the physical commodities sprinkled with

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 4>some of the hot sauces. Eric likes to call it.

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 4>So we don't have a prescribed formula, but we find

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 4>most of our investors hold these things in tandem.

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 2>And is there any commodity just you know, last question

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 2>that people are forgetting about, Like we just went over

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 2>some of the big ones, like how do you have

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 2>a nickel etf like? Is there anything? Like?

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But everything's up right, is it? But Eric Tright, is

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>there anything that we haven't?

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought? Or what else? What do you think?

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Dark horse commodity right now?

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Ooh, the dark horse commodity. That's a good question. They've

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 4>all they have all been moving together, which is very odd.

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 4>Commodities typically all have their own little cycles. Dark Horse commodity.

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 4>Maybe lithium. Lithium kind of came back to life last

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 4>year after getting really washed out after a period of

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.919
<v Speaker 4>excessive pricing. That lithium has kind of come back to life.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 4>Nickel is is stabilized. There was a period there where

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Indonesia was kind of flooding the market with nickel. That

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 4>seems to be being put in check a little bit

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 4>as they've realized that they've disturbed the market. But the

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 4>other one that we're excited about is copper coppers finally

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 4>starting to hit new highs and what you find when

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 4>these metals finally break new highs. It provides kind of

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 4>a logical signal to investors. And the copper miners have

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 4>done incredibly well the last couple of years. They're really

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 4>printing money right now. And copper is so important for

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 4>so many different industries that and so much of it

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 4>is around electrification right now. So copper is another one.

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 4>We're pretty excited about it. John.

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Final question, it's a personal one. I'm curious, is your

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 3>personal portfolio does it have anything other than medals in it?

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 3>Or like, do you own stocks and bonds or is

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 3>it just metals?

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh, but goal miners don't count. I'm talking like regular stocks.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh absolutely, I invest in all kinds of tech stocks

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 4>and yeah, absolutely, I mean I get I have a

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of economic exposure to these metals through my work income,

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 4>so I have a great hedge there. But yeah, absolutely,

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean I am a proponent of having a diversified portfolio.

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to ask a follow up question that's also

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 3>one that we ask a lot of in trillions. I

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 3>gotta say goldbug g Bug, great ticker. Yeah, that's a

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 3>world class ticker. Is there any ticker that you think

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:07.919
<v Speaker 3>is better than that one.

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 4>That's a really great ticker, and when I found out

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:12.839
<v Speaker 4>it was available, I said, let's grab it right away.

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like.

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he made like glitter g ltr. That's the

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Aberdeen Physical Precious Metals Basket, which is a gold, silver, platinum, pladium.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:25.720
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty good, right.

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Any other ticker envy? John?

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Uh, you know, I was a little disappointed, to be

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 4>honest with you, when the ticker gold just got reassigned

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 4>to somebody after Barrick Mining dropped it, which was.

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Who got it?

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 4>A puzzling thing. A company involved, I can't remember the

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 4>name of it, but a company involved probably met total

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of cold you know, kind of precious metals and

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 4>coins and stuff. Okay, but that that's a killer ticker too.

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, John, thanks so much for joining us

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 3>on trillions again.

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much. It was great to be back.

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to Trillions until next time. You can

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 3>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 3>or wherever else you'd like to listen. We'd love to

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 3>hear from you. Hit us up on social I'm at

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Joel Weber Show. He's at Eric Balchina's Trillions is produced

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 3>by Magnus Hendrickson