WEBVTT - Hollywood's Big Challenge: Resuming Production in a Pandemic

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Ye, welcome to another episode of Varieties Strictly Business podcast,

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>where we talked with some of the brightest minds working

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>in media today. I mean Andrew Wallenstein with Variety Intelligence Platform.

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Like everything else these days, the TV industry is in

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>a state of flux, to say the least. That's meant

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a recalibration of all kinds of practices and processes for

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>people like my next guest, Ken Basin, is not just

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the author of the book The Business of Television, he's

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the head of business Affairs at Paramount Television. Welcome back

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to Strictly Business. Ken. Thanks Andy, it's really fun to

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>be back. Yeah. I went back and checked and you

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>were on the podcast almost exactly two years ago, July one,

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's only been two years, but honestly it feels

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>like two hundred. Yeah, you know, I think it's it's

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>been an exciting decade since I last spoke to you.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we've all lived many lifetimes in journeys since then.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you know, no interesting updates, right, we can

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>make a quick short one of this. I'm sure it

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>should be pretty simple. Yeah. When we last talked, peak

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>TV was topic a and it seemed like the industry's

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>worst problem was there's too many TV shows. Fast forward

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to now and there's barely any shows in production due

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic. And I'd imagine that means deal making

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is going quite differently for you these days. Definitely, I mean,

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the simplest terms. The focus is on development

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>right now because that's what we're in a position to do.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, Paramount, like every company, has been

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking hard about how we can continue to do the

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>most business in the best way with the circumstances that

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>are in front of us. And so we know that,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of work to do to

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>manage the pandemic right now, but that there will be

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>another side of it, and so we're preparing ourselves with

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new project generation, still working extensively with

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>writers and producers, trying to be very thoughtful about how

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we put projects together and when we take them to

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>market to make sure that they get the best opportunity

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to succeed and don't get swallowed up. Uh, within the

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>moment that we're in. But business is absolutely moving forward.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>If you had asked me in March, what would I

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be doing if lockdown was still going in late July,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I would have answered, probably a lot of yoga and

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>building legos. But as it is, I'm as busy as

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I was on the first day of the lockdown, which

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is as busy as I was a week before it began. Well,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>let's put development aside for a second. Is there any

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>activity with regard to production resuming at some point for

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>shows that have obviously already made it through development and

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>are ready to go and all the things that go

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>into creating a safe environment for production. Should it happen

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>again anytime soon. Absolutely, And there's a couple of wings

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>in which that's taking place. One is just extensive dealmaking

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is is one of the right words, but really just

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>coordination and collaboration between you know, studios and networks in

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the environment, working together to come up with plans for

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>how we return and working to figure out what are

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the sort of economic consequences of the moment and how

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>those are going to be borne by the various parties

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>involved with the show. Um, you know, I think every

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>large company is undertaking its own process to come up

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>with return to work rules, the new procedures that we

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>want in place to assure the safety and security of

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>cast and crew, but our network partners have opinions about

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing as well, and so part of

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the process is, uh, you know, coming up with joint

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>plans that incorporate the priorities and needs and concerns of

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>both the networks and the studios. And in a sense, uh,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are only two of the voices of

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the room. We're also incorporating the opinions and requirements of government,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>where in extensive negotiations with the unions, all of them

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>over return to work rules, um, which involves you know,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commitments to them about how to keep

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>their members safe and all the while, you know, all

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of these things come with costs. So we are you know,

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in constant dialogue with the networks about what's the appropriate

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>allocation of those burdens in a way that is both

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>fair and also frankly allows these things to continue. I

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's anybody's desire or really that anybody would

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>be well served by completely disclaiming responsibility for for any

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>aspect of what's going on. One of the lessons certainly

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking, and I hope others are taking of this

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>pandemic moment is we live in a complex, interconnected ecosystem

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>where we all rely on each other. I mean, really,

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we should have all known this all along, and so

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to bring that attitude and perspective into coming

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>up with solutions for what we're dealing with right now,

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>because as there is economic pain to go around, and um,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we ultimately want this to be sustainable and

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>survivable for ourselves and the parties that we work with

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>every day. In addition, as we're now a few months in,

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to look ahead to deal making four

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>returns to production and that's a you know, tentative process

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's a very i think custom process on our

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>project by project basis, because the situation isn't different everywhere,

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, isn't identical everywhere in the world, and so

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are sort of preparedness and anticipated timetables for going back

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to production in Vancouver may be very different from those

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles, may be very different from those in Australia,

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.559
<v Speaker 1>depending on conditions on the ground. But we are also

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>starting the process of making deals with you know, line producers,

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>with casting directors and with other sort of key contributors

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to the production of a series in anticipation of coming back,

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but doing our best to prepare ourselves if those uh,

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, optimistic hopes are an't always born out and

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we have to push back even further. This all sounds

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>horrifically complex, and I know, even in the best of circumstances,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>UH can be quite contentious. So what is the culture

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of deal making right now? Because everyone's got to you know,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>row the yours in the same direction to make it work. Yeah,

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a recognition of that. And I uh,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly one thing that I've observed and marveled at with

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>others who do what I do is, for the most part,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the culture of deal making right now has been very

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>positive and collaborative. I think there's a sense both that

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>on a professional and industrial level it is incumbent upon

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>all of us to figure this out so all of

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>us can continue to you know, earn revenue, run our companies,

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>make projects. And at the same time, I think there's

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a recognition among everybody who's you know, bouncing a kid

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on their knee during their work zoom meetings or otherwise

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to reconcile uh, their their parental responsibilities of professional

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities and maybe just a tiny corner of personal sanity

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that everybody on the other side of the phone or

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the zoom is going through much

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. And so I think, um, it's really

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>been a healthy environment where people have kind of brought

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>their best selves to the negotiations, um, and and try

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to approach things in a way that's solution oriented rather

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>than adversarial in a negotiating climate that is sometimes you know,

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly adversarial among many industries, I think as Hollywood has

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a reputation for I'd say if in deal making, one

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>clause I've heard more about in the last four months

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>than possibly the last ten years is forced masure, which

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I can only imagine how different those clauses are in

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 1>terms of how they're structured going forward. Yeah, So, first

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of all, I mean the biggest difference is that as

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you say that, it's it's a pair of words on

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody's lips, because traditionally deal making, uh, you know, force masure, uh.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And just to kind of define terms for for those

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that it is you know, second nature to your force

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>masure is a concept under basic contract law about excusing

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>performance if there is a sort of major, unexpected third

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>party event that interferes with parties doing business under contract.

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the classic examples of force masu are war

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 1>um uh. Labor strikes can be considered force masures uh. Floods, fires,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>big sort of natural disasters, earthquakes, acts of God is

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a sort of synonym that sometimes used. And in traditional

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood deal making, you always knew that the force masure

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a background aspect of virtually any agreement

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that you entered into, but it was something you virtually

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>never talked about. It was routine. Um. It was something

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that never came up the deal making phase where people

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>are focused on substantive terms. It was something that you

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>worked out in the paperwork once you got past that

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>first step. Now, especially with an eye towards productions coming back, uh,

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, people are aware that the that force masure

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>plays an important role in what we're doing right now.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And really, for the first time in my career, force

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>masur is being introduced as a deal point in the

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>initial deal making phases. Uh. And one of the things

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting about it is there is no sort of

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>disparity of information out there. Everybody's negotiating these points kind

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, looking at the world and having the

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>same observations and experiences, and so Talent are looking for

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>protections that if there's a resurgence of COVID that you know,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>shuts production back down again after it resumes that they

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>will be protected in their compensation or at least, um

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you protected in their flexibility if they don't want to

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>wait around indefinitely. And studios are as finally attuned as

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>ever to the importance of these clauses in protecting ourselves

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because while we're not looking to s to manipulate any

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>situation with Talent, if we are forced to shut down production,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to be able to mitigate the expense of

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that and um, you know, protect our ability to keep

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>key cast and crew together. So uh, you know, something

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that became that spent many years as an afterthought has

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>become a central deal point, which you know, again brand

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>new to all of us in this game. Another aspect

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that I would imagine is changing much for you is

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>how you're dealing with the AMPTP these days, given that

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there's also the backdrop of all this pandemic issues playing out.

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>While tensions with the guilds are obviously front and center. Uh,

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what has that been like? Sure? So Uh, look, was

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big year for the AMPTP no

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>matter what, because is on the every three year cycle

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>where we're negotiating the d g A, w g A

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and SAG after agreements anyhow, uh and so uh, you know,

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>no surprise that there was a role for them this year.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the pandemic, maybe more than anything that

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I've encountered in my career, is a true hand industry issue, um,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>something that is affecting every producer more or less equally.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen a situation where all production everywhere in

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the world ground to halt all at once. And so

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're facing a challenge that truly touches on every

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the industry and affects everybody, there's an important

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>role for a trade group like the AMPTP so that

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we can make smart decisions because you know, ultimately, UM,

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Hollywood gets through this by recognizing our our

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:53.359
<v Speaker 1>shared uh interests and are shared fate, and the AMPTP

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>becomes a vehicle for that. So uh, just as the

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>AMPTP is the central body through we we organized art

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>collective margeting, as we're now dealing more extensively with the unions,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on return to work rules. The A m B t

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 1>P is the vehicle through which we're having those conversations,

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>so every company doesn't have to negotiate independently with the unions.

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>The AMPTP has also had an important role in kind

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of being the touch point for the industry with the

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>state and federal government officials. Again, we are submitting plans

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and white papers to the governor in California and in

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>New York articulating the industry's vision for when and how

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>production should resume. The AMPTP has allowed us to speak

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>more or less with one voice so that we can

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have that conversation most effectively, um ultimately, As I said,

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is an area where I'm sort of

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>when I look at the challenge in front of us,

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded of kind of other similarly structural challenges to

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>television or film or entertainment where maybe the industry wasn't

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>always as smart about looking at itself as a unitary whole.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes I think about the rise of home taping

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>in the early eighties, where the music industry and the

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>film and television industry viewed themselves as separate and competitive

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and did not work together. To come up with legislative

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>solutions or regulatory solutions to protect themselves from piracy, and

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as a result, I think suffered a lot more from

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>initially home taping piracy in the eighties leading to internet

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>piracy in the two thousands because they did not approach

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 1>things as a group, um and as an industry with

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>common goals. Uh. Here, I think that the industry has

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>been much more intelligent about saying that, you know what,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a division between producers and platforms, or studios

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and networks here, or talent and studios, um. Ultimately we

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>all get back to work together. And so I think

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the AMPTP again has been a very useful vehicle for

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>taking that collective approach, got it? Uh? And if as

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we talk here, I feel like we're adding layer upon

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>layer of complexity. So let me just throw yet another

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>thing on the stack here, which is the diversity issue,

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously a huge subject in the wake of

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the Black Lives Matter movement. And you know, I'm curious,

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>does that is that something that is already sort of

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>permeating deal making, permeating even the culture of companies like

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Paramount right now, given there's so much to reckon with

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>their Yeah, I mean, I think it's it's it operates

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>independently of the pandemic. I think it's it's an issue

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in a conversation that predates the pandemic. But as you know,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty isn't hurting for big news stories and big challenges

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to society, and we are all being forced to sort

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of reckon with racial engage us as an inequity on

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a social level in a really meaningful way and and

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and more forcefully than has been the case of the past.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think the industry has talked the talk about

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>taking diversity and inclusion seriously for some time, but uh,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the events of the Black Lives Matter protests,

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the murders of of George Floyd and mad

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Aarberry and others have, um, you know, encouraged everybody to

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>start walking the walk in a bigger way and to

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>really commit themselves to these these issues in in more

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>tangible ways. I think a lot of companies are looking

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>at their own numbers. I think Paramount has a good

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>track record organically over the last few years of seeking

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>out diverse storytellers and diverse stories. But yeah, I mean,

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the moment demands real action and not just platitudes.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And so every company is going through a period of

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>introspection about where it's truly at and how it gets

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to a better place. And I'm sure that's also working

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>itself into where we started the conversation in terms of

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>your your focus now on the development front. I understand

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of proceeds apace. But given you don't

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>really know when a lot of what you're talking about

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in development will actually be put in production, how does

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that impact the usual development deal making? Well, Um, for one,

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it requires a lot of communication between the studio and

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the talent and the representatives about what's the plan and

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the process. You know, deal making is all well

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and good, but deal making is really designed to the

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>way that I think about it as kind of getting

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>getting every uh documenting everybody being on the same page

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and what our understandings and what the rules will be

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>will be. But the sort of you know, root of that,

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like another step up, is just actually understanding each other

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and having a plan. So we're having transparent conversations with

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>our with the writers and producers that we work with

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>about what we think the timetable should be. UM Paramount

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>has always invested heavily in internal development. You know, there

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>are studios that focus more on ifcom arrangements, put together

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a quick package, take a pitch out, take it to market,

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>versus blinds, firm script deals, long internal development and packaging processes.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Paramount has always done a bit of both, and certainly

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we're extra focused on internal development right now because we

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>do not want to again take projects out into a

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>marketplace where our buyers are maybe feeling really financially stressed

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>or kind of you know, struggling with their budgets for

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the year, and so we're taking our time UM working

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>on second scripts, bibles and formats. UM. We are being

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we want to give our projects the

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>best opportunity to succeed, and sometimes that means waiting a

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>minute so that they kind of reach the most receptive audience.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And then part of you know, the next planning aspect

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of that is how you cannibalize yourself and you don't

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>rush to take everything to market all at once and

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to spread things out in a certain way. It's also

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a task of how you manage kind of pre existing

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>development and projects that were already well along the way

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>uh to production UM, where maybe the network and the

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>studio agree that creatively, this is where we want it.

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in a normal world this would be

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>ready to go, but we can't perceive right now. So

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>what do we do? And you know, we're talking to

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>network partners about conditional orders where you know, they're making

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a commitment to the series moving forward, subject to you know,

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>answering those last questions about what's the cost and what's

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the production plan in a COVID production environment, because we're

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>still in the process of quantifying that experience. UM. We're

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>also you know, uh, within our network development generating more

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>material and more scripts, uh, something that has I think

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>already been a trend of development where you're putting together

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>more written material before you get into production, so that

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.719
<v Speaker 1>when production does resume, there's the hope of actually smoother

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and easier production because there's more written material and the

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>traditional system of kind of rolling the writing and the

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>production process doesn't have to take place the same way.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>You can walk into the first day of production with

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>more scripts ready. You can have you know, your scripts

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>done at an earlier phase in the production process. UM,

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's a way to both kind of productively use

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the time we can doing the work we can and

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>putting ourselves in a position to have the best production

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>experience when that's back on the table. So you've got

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the development pipeline humming. Uh, I'm curious what this means

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of, you know, have you revised your expectations

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the peak TV trend? Is this? Is

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this still something that's gonna be a hockey stick curve

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>flying off to the top right of the chart, or

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing some disruption of that now? I think

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing some disruption and of that. Um. I

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, the peak TV curve, even if

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it was a hockey stick, it was never going to

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>be a perpetual hockey stick. There was always going to

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>be a plateau on the other end of it. And uh,

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do think that this moment may accelerate

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the arrival of that plateau. I mean the streaming wars

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>as as you know, people like that term. They're very competitive,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult wars. And I think there's broadly been a perception

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 1>that with the proliferation of all these new streaming services, uh,

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>not all will be able to survive forever. Uh. There's

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a assumption that you know, households will tolerate a certain

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>number of subscriptions. I believe the average household in the

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>research I most recently saw in the US has if

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a streaming household, has two point seven streaming subscriptions.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>How much higher can that go? Especially in a time

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>when you know, put aside the economic stress on the

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>industry and the companies in the industry, there's economic stress

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>on the public, on everybody. People are looking at their budgets. Um,

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're feeling economically insecure, even if their

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>jobs are still in place for now, and I'm probably

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 1>asking them tell their hard conunptions of do I need

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>four or five subscription services. One of the trope phrases

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that I've been using for a while is, you know,

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>this time a year and a half ago there were

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>three premious subscription services. This time next year there will

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be eight, and this time four years from now there

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>will be four. Maybe I need to revise that to

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this time three years from now there will be four, um,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately, you know, I think the business plan for

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these companies contemplated being able to tolerate a

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>certain period of time of pain, a certain period of

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>time of operating at a loss to acquire the subscriber

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>base that it needs to kind of advance to the

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>next stage of the industry. And right now, all of

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>these new entrants into the market are going to have

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a Harvard time to what have otherwise been the case

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>building up their original content offerings. So putting together that

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>really appealing package to the consumer to justify the initial

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>subscription is a little bit more challenging if you can't

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>load up your number of new shows, and uh, the

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of macro economic pressure that everybody is under may

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>make it harder for these companies to be willing to

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>operate these services at significant losses for two, three or

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>four years at a time to make it to that

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>phase of profitability. So I do think there's a risk that, um,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you know that the pandemic is going to accelerate the

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>contraction in the number of platforms that are active in

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace, which probably comes with a contraction in the

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>overall volume of production that's in the marketplace. Uh. So

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not the end of peak TV right now,

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>but I do wonder if you know peak TV as

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we understand it. I think when we last spoke, I

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>predicted a you know further five year runway to peak

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>TV before things we're going to start really tightening up.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a good chance that that five year

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>runway may look more like a three year runway. I

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>hear you. I follow the logic, but I would also

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>be remiss in not noting that your parent company, Viacom

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>CBS seems intent on entering this marketplace and a lot

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>later than many of the other players. So how does

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that bode for your company's effort on this front. Well, look,

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we have to be clear eyed

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>about the challenge in front of us. I think for

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Viacom CBS, the focus is on marshaling the combined resources

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>of the recently merged company and sort of um uh

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing to bear for the company, UH quality assets that

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we've kind of kept in our back pockets. Where we

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>at Paramount are extensive conversations with CBS all access about

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Paramount titles that are a good fit for for the service. UH.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Paramounts Library has always been sort of are big kind

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of entered market advantage as an independent studio of A

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>big reason why we've been able to establish ourselves as

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>quickly as we have is by accessing the resources of

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the great i P that we've got, and and sort

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of more that has been brought back into the fold

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>because of the combination CBS, and some of that i

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>P was sort of split up between the companies when

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they divided back in two thousand six. There's a lot

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that has been sort of held in reserve, UM that

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we can now deploy for CBS all access some kind

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>of crown jewel ideas. UM. I can't say a lot

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>more than that at this phase, other than to say

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's still fuel in the tank, UM, and and

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to strike that balance between remaining

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>active in the ecosystem and maintaining our relationships with outside

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>companies while supporting the big strategic endeavor of ICOM CBS

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. Yeah. I mean that to me would

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>be the big question. You know, you're gonna need a

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of fuel in that tank to you know, fuel

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>up other rival companies with your content, but at the

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>same time, uh, fueling your own effort. And I know

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's early days and it's not clear what what Viacom

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>CBS is exactly doing, UM, but you know that also

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>begs another question, which is last time we talked Vicom

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>CBS did not exist. Uh, you guys were off separately

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>with Viacom. So you know, sort of layer five in

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.239
<v Speaker 1>our you know, complicated stack of of what's making your

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>life tough these days. Does that change the nature of

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>deal making having a new parent company, Yeah, I mean

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly there are lines of of business that there's a

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>natural expectation that everybody's going to take advantage of. We

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>as as Paramount, already had had relationships with UM, you know,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>showtime and CPS all access prior to the merger, but

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>those have deepened tremendously. We still operate on an arms

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>length basis. We have obligations to participants. Uh, you know,

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to maintain our own business, but it's also

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a deal making context in which you know, everybody understands

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's got to get done. UM. Not figuring it out

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is not an acceptable result. But the good news is

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody is a real professional, and the experiences

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that we've had since the merger UM have actually been really,

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>really uniformly positive in terms of I think that one

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that I've encountered in large companies UM, and I've

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>worked in large companies over my career is when different

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>parts of companies are working, you know, into company, there's

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>often an expectation on both sides that each is owed

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a sweetheart deal. And it actually increases the friction rather

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>than decreases it, because everybody thinks they should be on

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the good end of the favor. Essentially, Um, it's counterproductive

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and UM and it you know, I think it leads

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to bad results. The attitude that I've found within the

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>vi Com CBS merger is nobody's expecting anybody to do

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>them tremendous favors. We're expecting each other to work with

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>each other reasonably, uh, to kind of cut the nonsense

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and find the real business solutions and to um, you know,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>operate fairly. And there are real professionals on all sides

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to understand the marketplace. And so those have been I

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>think really productive and for the most part, smooth conversations. Um,

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been I don't want to say a pleasant surprise

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to. I wasn't necessarily so dower

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on in advance. But I think it's gone really well.

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>That's good. And we've talked a lot about streaming. But

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, I remember last time we spoke about you

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>had particular takes on the future of broadcast and cable

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>television in this landscape. Have those changed at all? Do

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they still have seats at the table for who knows

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>how long? Yeah? I mean so, I think I think

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my production predictions from our last session

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>umor have have been borne out to an extent and

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe supported by recent events, and some uh, you know,

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>require some further thought. When we talked about broadcasters, my

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>going theory was that the best approach for broadcasters would

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>be to refocus on the content that was traditionally successful

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in their platforms that hadn't been as popular in streaming,

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so things like reality, multi camera comedies, excuse me, procedural dramas,

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>classic broadcast television. Um. I think that's still true, and

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's more true than ever. Uh. And I

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>also I think it's worth noting that as as companies

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about what kinds of productions can come back

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>into uh, what kinds of shows can go back into production,

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>as soon as those are the shows that are going

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to find the easiest time to come back. Reality shows

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>with controlled stage environment, especially if you reduce the presence

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of the audience, multi camera comedy, same logic versus some

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger, complex, location oriented, large numbers of extras,

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>massive crew shows that are characteristic of quote unquote premium

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>television or streaming style television that I think are going

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to take longer to really get back up to speed. UM.

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think that sort of prescription for broadcast hold.

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that as we look ahead to how

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going to actually program their two seasons, we're going

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of programming of that type. Uh.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Cable certainly is um it remains stressed. UM. I think

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that uh, you know, when we spoke last there was

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a contraction underway in the number of networks that we're

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>going to that we're investing in scripted programming UM, and

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>again particularly quoe unquote premium scripted programming. I think that

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>trend is continuing, and we are going to find that

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the networks that you know, we have gotten

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>used to seeing scripted programming on are going to be

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>turning away from that, uh that content. In part that's

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>related to the rise of streaming. The all of these

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>major news streaming players are associated with traditional legacy media companies,

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I think there's there's a little question that

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>HBO Max is really the focal point of the new

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>A T and T Warner brother environment. Peacock is really

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the focal point of the new the Comcast NBC universal environment,

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that by Coom CBS is streaming

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is likely to be a significant focal point of the

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Vicom CBS strategy going forward. And uh, as as you know,

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>companies are looking how to serve their digital offerings and

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>their cable offerings. You know, streaming is sucking up a

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of the con tent and it's going to affect

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the programming strategies for cable. Um. I think there will

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>always be a place for scripted on cable, but I

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think scripted is going to become progressively less common on

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>cable and there will be a focus on specials on

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>unscripted um with a lot of the kind of traditional

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>dramas that we've gotten used to seeing being pushed more

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>towards the streaming side of the business. For streaming, it's

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>really about how do you take maximum advantage of this moment? Uh.

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, Netflix's stock has been having quite the time

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last few months. Um. Uh, you know, as

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>people are home, it's very obvious that they are looking

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for ways to pass the time, and streaming is an

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>important part of that equation. So I think for every

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>streaming player it's about how do you sort of use

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity to build the relationship with your customer and

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure that it persists so that they remain interested

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in your brand and your service once they're allowed to

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>go back out side again. Well, in keeping with our

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>every two year podcast schedule, I'm gonna ask you to

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>set your calendar for July. It'll be interesting to see

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>how much has changed when we do this again. Thanks

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for coming on the podcast, Ken, Thank you Andy. Always

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure. This has been another episode of Strictly Business.

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Tune in next week for another helping of scintillating conversation

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>with media movers and shakers, and please make sure you

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the podcast to hear future episodes. Also, leave

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a review in Apple Podcast let us know how we're doing.