WEBVTT - S6 Part 1 | Plastic Pipelines | Ep 4: Keeping Oil Alive

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Last episode, we talked about the fossil fuel industry's plan

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to make up for any revenue it might lose as

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the world transitions away from its products in the residential

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and transport sectors.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Petrochemicals has become a kind of mantra for the oil

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>industry that thank goodness for petrochemicals, because you know, that's

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 2>where all the growth lies. And it's quite interesting if

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>you take the data now from VP and the IA,

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>probably the two leading forecasters of the entire system, then

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 2>from our calculations, about half the growth of oil demand

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>in the next twenty years in the IA numbers is

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>actually from plastics, and suppressingly enough, it's basically all of

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the growth in oil demand today.

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going to dig a bit further into the industry's

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>plan on this front, because just a couple of weeks

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>before that episode came out, a team of journalists from

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the UK revealed the fruits of an undercover investigation they've

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>been running for years, a video and a companying article

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in which two former high level lobbyists for Exon Mobile

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>walked through every step of how the company messages and

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>lobbies on climate policy and environmental regulations.

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm Lawrence Carsa.

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm an investative reporter for Unearthed, which is an investative

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 4>journalism project funded by Green based in the UK.

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 5>Awesome, And I'm going to play a little bit from

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 5>the video that you guys released so that anyone who

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 5>hasn't seen it yet will get a bit of a

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 5>believer for it.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Keith McCoy, one of exon Mobil's top Capitol

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Hill lobbyists.

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 6>Did we aggressively fight against uh some of the science?

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 6>Did we hide our science?

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely not?

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 6>Uh? Did we uh? Did we join some of these

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 6>shadow groups uh to work against uh some of the

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 6>early efforts. Yes, that's true, but there's nothing there's nothing

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 6>illegal about that. We were looking out for our investments.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 6>We were looking out for our shareholders. And you're not

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 6>going to be able to just switch to battery operated

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 6>vehicles or wind for your electricity. And just having that

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 6>conversation around why that's not possible in the next ten years,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 6>it's critically important to the work that we do. So

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 6>and and and that's an every phase, that's that's that's it.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 6>The Senate, that's in the House, that's with the administration.

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence Carter talked to me about how they set the

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>whole thing up and some of the things that he

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was surprised to learn. You can listen to that whole

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>interview as a bonus episode in the Feed next week.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>But today we're going to share something that wasn't in

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the unearthed video or story, but that was part of

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>what former excellent lobbyist Keith McCoy talked about the industry's

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>plastics playbook.

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 4>I then talked at length about how he basically said

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 4>that the vast majority of the American Chemistry Council's resources

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 4>is going into their plastics work. Yeah, keeping plastics on,

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 4>preventing bands, talking up the ability of recycling to deal

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 4>with the problem. Yeah, and that actually did you know,

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 4>like working on model legislation. In Keith Boy's words too,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 4>they would rather have legislation come from them, right, So

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 4>super aggressive politician.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Amy Westervelt, and this is Drilled season six, the

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Bridge to Nowhere today the continuation of Part one plastic

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>pipelines that's coming up right after this click break.

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 7>So they're talking about moving fracked gas as L and

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 7>g over to petrochemical facilities in other countries to.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Make Yeah, how important that was for their business. You know,

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 4>he said plastics of the future.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll quote McCoy directly here from the transcript of this conversation.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>He said, petrol chemicals are expanding in the United States

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>because of, you know, the cheap access to natural gas.

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Looking at how we can make these plastics more environmentally

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>friendly is going to be key, because that's the next

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>big frontier.

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Peter McCoy talks about how they want to take this

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of cheap feedstock. I think he refers to the Permian,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>but I guess it if applied to Pennsylvania and actually

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 4>rather than manufactured plastic in the US, to turn it

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 4>into liquified natural gas and ship it over to petrochemical

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 4>facilities that they have in Asia and in Australia so

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 4>that they can crank up plastic sales in those places.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we know this already. We know that cheap

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>natural gas is fueling a plastics boom, and that the

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>industry is banking on plastic to save it, and that

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>plastic recycling is basically greenwashing. But there's something different about

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>an oil lobbyist just come and write out and saying it.

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>That was journalist Lawrence Carter again that you heard there.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>He and his colleagues at Unearthed, an investigative outlet in

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the UK that's funded by Greenpeace, set up an undercover

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>operation to get Exxon to share its playbook. Ultimately, they

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>had a reporter pose as a corporate recruiter and interviewed

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>two high level Exon staffers who had recently left. That

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>reporter asked the men all kinds of questions about the

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:47.559
<v Speaker 1>company's strategy, and they answered in great detail. After we talked,

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Carter sent me a transcript of the part of the

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>conversation between his undercover reporter and former ex On lobbyist

0:06:54.320 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Keith McCoy that focused on plastic. It's fourteen pages long,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>just to give you an idea of how much time

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>he's spent talking about Exon's plastic strategy. In that conversation,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>McCoy said that all the Exon petrochemical facilities that are

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>being retooled or that are just now being built are

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>geared toward plastics. He says, quote, we see that as

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a big business, a growing business, but the issue is

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be disposal and recycling of plastics. And then

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>he explains that to deal with the pesky problem of

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>disposal and recycling of plastics. Exon is working with the

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>American Chemistry Council. Here's a snippet from one of the

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>many American Chemistry Council videos about how plastics aren't a

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>problem and recycling is working just fine.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 8>Plastics, our society demands their benefits and an environment free

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 8>of plastic waste. Recycling helps keep plastics out of our

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 8>oceans and environment, but traditional recycling technologies have some limitations.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 8>While mechanical recycling can handle most bottles and containers, today's

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 8>light weight packaging designs are a bit trickier. Fortunately, emerging

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 8>and innovative technologies can repurpose these plastics into new and

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 8>useful products.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And again keep in mind here that right now the

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>industry's plan is to shift whatever fossil fuels we manage

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.479
<v Speaker 1>to stop using in cars and homes over to plastic.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.719
<v Speaker 1>So what we're talking about here comes with both immediate

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and long term consequences. There's the immediate environmental scourge of

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>plastic waste. Less than ten percent of it is actually recycled,

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it never breaks down in the environment, and it is

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>filling up and poisoning our oceans. The birds and marine

0:08:55.880 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>life that survive off of them and many other waterways.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And there's the air and water pollution associated directly with

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the facilities that make plastic and with the fossil fuel

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure required to feed into those factories. And then there's

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the climate impact. Here's Carol Muffett, President and CEO of

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the Center for International Environmental Law.

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 9>Again, and if you look specifically at the refineries and

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 9>the crackers, even in the completely hypothetical, mythical world where

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 9>you were where you were fueling those refineries and crackers

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 9>with one hundred percent renewable energy, which is not possible

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 9>within the footprint of the plants, you'd still only cut

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 9>the emissions in half because the chemical processes themselves are

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 9>so greenhouse gas intensive. And this becomes particularly important when

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 9>you recognize that, because of the success of the growth

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 9>of renewable energy, within the next couple of years, the

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 9>industrial sector will surpass the power sector as the primary

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 9>source of greenhouse gas emissions in this country.

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And just like with climate change, the fossil fuel industry

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>has known about the various environmental impacts of plastic for decades,

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at least since the sixties.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 9>Just as we did with the oil and gas crisis.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 9>We've begun to look at what did the industry know

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 9>about what was happening to plastics in the environment. And

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 9>what we've found, and we've published some of this research

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 9>and there's more to come, was that it was very

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 9>clear from the very early stages that plastics were showing

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 9>up in the environment, showing up in the ocean, showing

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 9>up in water ways, from certainly the nineteen sixties onward.

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 9>In the late nineteen fifties and the sixties, research funded

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 9>by the oil industry to look at oil spills and

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 9>oil pollution in the Gulf of Mexico kept finding oil

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 9>related toxics adhering to plastic that was floating the water,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 9>trading and raising the first evidence that plastics actually tend

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 9>to accumulate and concentrate other environmental toxins and become vectors

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 9>for those toxics.

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So industry knew that plastic was bad news in waterways,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>and it also knew that plastic doesn't break down.

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 9>Ever, it becomes equally clear that the industry was aware

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 9>that plastics wouldn't break down in landfills, wouldn't break down

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 9>an environment. And there's this rather remarkable, rather remarkable o

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 9>ed from a plastic industry executive from the nineteen sixties,

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 9>where he argues, yes, we know it won't break down

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 9>in landfills. We consider that a feature.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 5>Not a bug.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 9>It'll provide stability to the landfill.

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Now, public awareness and concern around the plastic problem is growing,

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and according to lobbyist Keith McCoy, the fossil fuel industry

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>will use the same tax here that it used on

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 1>climate change. Here's how he laid it out. You want

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to get smart on it, right, because you know it's coming,

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so you want to get It's just like on climate change, right.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So when climate change came, well it's here. But well

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>when it started, you started to have conversations to say, well,

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't completely change the electric grid from coal and

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>gas into wind and here's why. It's the same conversation.

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>You can't ban plastics because here's why. Or you can't recycle,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, or legislate one hundred percent recycling because here's why.

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just not technologically feasible. So that's the public messaging.

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Congress, McCoy says, they look for solutions.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>They can talk about ways to maybe change the chemistry

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to make plastics slightly more recyclable, or laws that would

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>need to change to make one hundred percent recycling feasible,

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>ideally laws that would be too far reaching and too

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>complicated for Congress to actually change. He says, I would

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>love something like that to say, look, we're happy to

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do one hundred percent recycling, we think it's technologically feasible,

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but as an example, interstate commerce clause prevents us from

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it. I don't know if that's true, but you know,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>having that type of conversation, like you have to change

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the interstate commerce clause because that prevents us from carrying

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>plastic across state lines or something. Yeah, what a gift

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that would be, right. The scary thing here is that

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not just Exxon or the oil industry. It's also

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the chemical industry, which has been in the lobbying and

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>spin game just as long and just as successfully as

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel. It's like an industry voltron, which is why

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>this idea that the plastic problem is a distraction from

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the climate problem or just about making different consumer choices

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is so off base. Here's Muffett again.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 9>For a long time, the fight against plastics was presented

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 9>as something that was ultimately about suburban moms, you know,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 9>impressing each other with not using straws.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 7>It really was.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, But that argument breaks down when you go to

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 9>the Philippines and you look at how plastics there are

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 9>affecting human rights. It breaks down when you see mountains

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 9>of waste piled up in India. It breaks down when

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 9>you talk to fishermen from Louisiana and Texas who are

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 9>pulling plastic out of their bays and out of their fish. Yeah,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 9>and it really, really fun namentally breaks down when you

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 9>talk to the people who are living in the shadows

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 9>of the fracking wells and the and the crackers. Plastics

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 9>are one of the highest admitting of all industrial sectors,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 9>and they're also the most rapidly growing, and on their

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 9>present trajectory, you know, they could contribute fifty six gigatons

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 9>of carbon to the global atmosphere about twenty fifty. But

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 9>Exxon and Chevron and API and the American Chemistry Council

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 9>will go on asking you, well, are you turning off

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 9>your lights? Are you buying the electric cars that are

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 9>only just now becoming available and are still only barely affordable.

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this episode. Next time, we'll head back

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Gulf Coast to check in on Diane and Sharon,

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>who are still holding the line against the petrochemical boom.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>There come back for that. Drilled is an original production

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Critical Frequency Podcast Network. The show is reported, written,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and hosted by me Amy Westervelt. Our producer this season

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is Juliana Bradley. Our editor is Julia Ritchie. Our theme

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>song this season is Death Song by b Bemon. Additional

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>music for the season composed by Elliott Peltzman. Our artwork

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for the season is done by Matthew Fleming. Our First

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Amendment attorney is James Wheaton at the First Amendment Project.

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You can find additional reporting and photos for this season

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on our Twitter feed at We Are Drilled or online

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>at drillednews dot com. If you're a fan of the show,

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>please consider supporting us in two ways. One, if you

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>want to spend some money and get some extra bonus

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>content at early episodes, check out our Patreon at patreon

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Drilled. You can also support us.

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 3>By giving us a rating or review in Apple Podcasts.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>It really helps us by new listeners and combat the

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>army of climate gnera trolls that are constantly trying to

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 3>tank our ratings.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for doing that, and we'll see you next week.