WEBVTT - How Does Critical Race Theory Work?

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio, Hey Brainstuff

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vogelbaum here. The term critical race theory or CRT

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>became a hot button issue in late twenty twenty. Since then,

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of US state and local legislators and other officials

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have introduced policies attempting to ban critical race theory from

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>being taught in public schools. As of October of twenty

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, twenty nine states had actually adopted such policies

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in one way or another. Many measures have failed to

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be adopted, or have been withdrawn or expired before they

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>went to vote. Only seven states have had no such bans.

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>Put forth, the term seemed to appear out of nowhere.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So why is critical race theory suddenly part of the

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>conversation and what is it? Anyway? For the article, this

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>episode is based on how Stuff Work. Spoke with David

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Miguel Gray, an assistant professor of philosophy at the Institute

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>for Intelligence Systems at the University of Memphis. He explained,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>critical race theory is a movement in legal thought. Let's

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>unpack that our Critical race theory is an academic framework

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that legal scholars specifically used to critically examine the legal

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>history of the United States through a lens of racism,

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>including everything from the US Constitution to the Mayflower Compact,

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as well as legislation from the Supreme Court or lower courts.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>A CRT was developed during the mid nineteen seventies by

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a handful of legal scholars after they determined that despite

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the gains of the US civil rights movement, a progress

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>toward racial equality had been slow or in some cases

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>rolled back. These scholars, in particular Derek Bell and Alan Freeman,

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>realized that a new conceptual framework was needed to better

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>understand the complex relationship between race, racism, and the US

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>legal system. In nineteen eighty nine, more than twenty scholars

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>created the first CRT workshop in Madison, Wisconsin. One of

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the organizers one Kimberly Crenshaw, so that they quote were

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>interested in defining and elaborating on the lived reality of

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>race and were open to the aspiration of developing theory.

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So the original purpose of CRT was to think about

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>how the law contributed to racial inequality in the United States,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>both in the past and present. The theory they developed,

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>which is that racism is systemic in the institutions of

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and that these institutions function to preserve

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the dominance of white people in society, regardless of people's intentions.

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Has continued an academic inquiry through today. For example, a

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>member of the American Bar Association wrote in twenty twenty

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>one that in the legal field, critical race theorists quote

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>address the role of racism in the law and the

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>work to eliminate it and other configuration of subordination, meaning

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that as a theory, CRT provides scholars with a framework

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>from which to review past and existing legal decisions. Before

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>diving deeper into the principles of CRT, it's important to

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>understand the purpose of academic theories like this one. Theories

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are used in both scientific and non scientific research, and

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they're used to explain complex things in ways that others

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>can apply the same ideas to another situation. Various academic

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>disciplines engage with different theories, although many theories cross over

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>into multiple disciplines. Anthropologists might use theories like structuralism and postmodernism.

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Educators might use theories like behaviorism or connectivism. Not all

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>scholars with a discipline utilize the same theories, or even

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>use them in the same way. Which allows many viewpoints

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to discuss each discipline, which this really cool. It acknowledges

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that there are different ways of viewing the world and

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of trying to figure out how it works. Critical race

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>theory is one such academic theory. It was initially developed

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>within legal studies, but now discussed within many other academic disciplines. Again,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to quote the American Bar Association, a CRT is not

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a diversity and inclusion training, but a practice of interrogating

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the role of race and racism in society that emerged

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in the legal academy and spread to other fields of scholarship.

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>The aforementioned Kimberly Crenshaw explained in an MSNBC interview in

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, quote, a critical race theory is not

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>so much a thing, it's a way of looking at

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a thing. She elaborated that basically, CRT is a way

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of looking at race to understand why after centuries since emancipation,

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>patterns of inequality have endured for people of color and

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>indigenous people. Goal of CRT is to get everyone closer

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to the promises that are embedded in the Constitution. Gray

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>explained that many people have conflicting views about critical race

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>theory and what ideas should be included with it. However,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 1>it does include some fundamental views. These basic views include

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea that racism is a part of American society,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>not just a simple flaw that can be easily fixed

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with laws. So, for example, the concept is that in

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>United States legal and governmental institutions, racism isn't an anomaly

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or some aberrant feature, It's just normal. And while racism

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>may be more present in some areas than others, it

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>has existed throughout US history and it continues today. CRT

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>focuses only on legal and other institutions in general, and

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not on individual people. Through it, scholars work to learn

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>how racism exists in society and where improvements can be made,

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>as well as to provide an analysis of what perpetuates

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>racism in American systems. The theory also maintains the idea

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that the foundation of the United States was based on

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>doctrines that could be considered racist, for example, the Virginia

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>laws about slavery and servitude. In other cases, race might

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>not have been explicitly included, but was nevertheless implied, like

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Three Fifths Compromise that was the agreement made

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>during the seventeen eighty seven Constitutional Convention, which determined that

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>enslaved individuals counted as three fifths of a person for

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>both representation and taxation. Gray explained that later and even

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>modern laws and policies about housing, voting rights, education, and

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>segregation can also fall into this category. He said, the

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>critical race theorists have argued that our country is largely

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>founded upon doctrines that are in direct opposition with what

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we normally hear our country is all about. In addition

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to just studying these discrepancies about liberty and equality, critical

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>race theorists also aim to change them. Some researchers who

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>study education have taken up critical race theory by arguing

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that racism is entrenched in American education practices and policies.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>They've questioned how the educational system might be unjust with

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>respect to race. Again, regardless of anybody's intentions, certain practices

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>might have different impacts on different communities. For example, the

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>aforementioned Derek Bell explored the Brown Versus Board of Education's

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Preme Court ruling of nineteen fifty four, which legally determined

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that the racial segregation of children in public schools is unconstitutional.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Bell asserted that the court's decision was based on improving

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the international image of the United States during the Cold War.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>He also argued that the ruling was effectually limited because

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the court didn't actually offer a fix, and that furthermore,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there is still racial inequality and education

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>means the law is helping maintain that, whether anyone meant

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it to or not. This is an example of the

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>relationship between CRT and education. The theory is used to

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>critically analyze the history and present state of education in

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States. However, there is no evidence that critical

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>race theory itself is being added to the curriculum in

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>American K through twelve schools. One reason for that is

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that K through twelve children are unlikely to comprehend advanced

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>academic theories. That's why structuralism and behaviorism aren't on the

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>K through twelve curriculum either, with the possible exception of

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>some advanced high school classes. A critical race theory is

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a law school course, and the theory is used in

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>university courses of other disciplines like philosophy and literary criticism,

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>often at the graduate level. But I know that's being

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a little pedantic. Certainly some of the documents and court

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>decisions that CRT has been used to critique are taught

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>at various levels during K through twelve education, such as

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the Three Fifths Compromise and the Enduring Effects of Slavery.

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>That is why CRT has received a lot of attention recently,

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>with people and politicians expressing concern that's being taught in schools,

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>including elementary schools. AGray wrote in an article for The

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Conversation that it's quote become a catch all phrase among

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>legislators attempting to ban a wide variety of teaching practices

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>concerning race. However, the concepts being banned by proposed legislation

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>under the guise of prohibiting the teaching of CRT aren't

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>often part of CRT principles. For example, in Tennessee, and

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>anti CRT bill that was signed into law in twenty

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty one states that public and charter schools may not

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>teach or use materials that assert one race or sex

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is inherently superior to another race or sex, or that

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>because of the individual's race or sex. Critical race theory

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have anything to do with that what seems

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to have happened is those opposing CRT have taken the

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that the theory isn't colorblind because it recognizes the

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>effects of race and racism and asserts that the only

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>way to improve our society is to address racism through

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>legal and institutional changes, and they've therefore ascribed a racist

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>characteristics to the theory. In other words, many people are

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>saying that critical race Theory is trying to rewrite American

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>history to convince white people that they are inherently racist,

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>which again is not the point of CRT. It's merely

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a lens through which to see how our world works,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and it focuses specifically on laws and systems, regardless of

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>any person's intent. Gray the situation up by saying it's

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a hot mess to use a really good Southern phrase.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is based on the article what is critical

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Race Theory Anyway? On how Stuffworks dot com written by

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Kerry Whitney. Rains Stuff is production of iHeartRadio in partnership

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with how Stuffworks dot Com, and it's produced by Tyler Klain.

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Four more podcasts from iHeartRadio visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows